19.01.2013 Views

Title: The use of Multimedia technology as an educational aid for ...

Title: The use of Multimedia technology as an educational aid for ...

Title: The use of Multimedia technology as an educational aid for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Title</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Multimedia</strong> <strong>technology</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>educational</strong> <strong>aid</strong> <strong>for</strong> primary-school age children with cognitive<br />

disabilities.<br />

Aims: <strong>The</strong>re h<strong>as</strong> been <strong>an</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>ed interest in the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Multimedia</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Assistive Technologies in educating people<br />

with disabilities over the l<strong>as</strong>t number <strong>of</strong> years (Dept. <strong>of</strong> Education <strong>an</strong>d Science, 2008). This incre<strong>as</strong>e is due to<br />

adv<strong>an</strong>ces in <strong>an</strong>d improved access to this <strong>technology</strong>, foc<strong>use</strong>d training initiatives <strong>for</strong> educators, incre<strong>as</strong>ed funding <strong>for</strong><br />

ICT in schools <strong>an</strong>d the generally lower cost <strong>of</strong> integrating these technologies. (Shiels & O’Flaherty, 2006). Computers<br />

c<strong>an</strong> be <strong>use</strong>d in a structured <strong>an</strong>d creative way in the cl<strong>as</strong>sroom but the benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>technology</strong> are not limited to<br />

conventional computer systems. Teachers need to be in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>of</strong> the multi faceted technologies available today that<br />

c<strong>an</strong> be quite e<strong>as</strong>ily integrated in the teaching curriculum. With the current drive <strong>for</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> most children with<br />

cognitive disabilities into mainstream schools, equipment <strong>an</strong>d expertise will be <strong>of</strong> enormous help to both children <strong>an</strong>d<br />

teachers. While <strong>technology</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be a complementary approach to traditional teaching methods, it is not a replacement<br />

<strong>for</strong> these methods. <strong>The</strong> <strong>technology</strong> must suit the needs <strong>of</strong> the individual <strong>an</strong>d the t<strong>as</strong>k or activity at h<strong>an</strong>d (Zabala, 1995),<br />

particularly with regard to differentiation <strong>of</strong> the curriculum (adapting the curriculum to suit individual needs) <strong>an</strong>d<br />

inclusiveness (Smeets & Mooij, 2002). In light <strong>of</strong> the recent global economic downturn, funding restrictions have been<br />

implemented in Irel<strong>an</strong>d’s 2009 Budget. (Dept. <strong>of</strong> Fin<strong>an</strong>ce, 2008). <strong>The</strong>se cutbacks were preceded by a June 2008<br />

decision by the Department <strong>of</strong> Education <strong>an</strong>d Science to remove funding <strong>for</strong> ICT Advisors working from Education<br />

Centres (TUI, 2008). This, <strong>an</strong>d other cost cutting exercises, is a worrying sign <strong>of</strong> Irel<strong>an</strong>d’s ICT practices failing to meet<br />

EU st<strong>an</strong>dards. (Korte & Husing, 2007).<br />

<strong>The</strong> main aims <strong>of</strong> this thesis are:<br />

• To establish how best to facilitate the learning <strong>of</strong> children with cognitive disabilities through the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

multimedia <strong>technology</strong>.<br />

• To provide guidelines <strong>for</strong> teachers on the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> multimedia <strong>technology</strong> <strong>as</strong> a pedagogical tool <strong>for</strong> children with<br />

cognitive disabilities.<br />

Objectives will be to research:<br />

• <strong>The</strong> criteria <strong>an</strong>d guidelines currently available <strong>for</strong> the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>technology</strong> in schools <strong>an</strong>d the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> children with cognitive disabilities, e.g. cost, learning curve, etc<br />

• <strong>The</strong> Government <strong>an</strong>d Educational Institutes policies <strong>an</strong>d practices with regard to implementing <strong>technology</strong> in<br />

schools in Irel<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d Worldwide, e.g. UK, New Zeal<strong>an</strong>d, US, (Austria/ Finl<strong>an</strong>d/ Fr<strong>an</strong>ce/ Pol<strong>an</strong>d).<br />

• <strong>The</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> the multimedia <strong>technology</strong> that is available <strong>for</strong> education in general b<strong>as</strong>ed on the above<br />

criteria that would help achieve the researcher’s aim <strong>of</strong> determining how this <strong>technology</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be <strong>use</strong>d to<br />

support <strong>educational</strong> development.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> current versus the potential <strong>use</strong> <strong>for</strong> multimedia <strong>technology</strong> in Irish primary education.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> <strong>educational</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> children with cognitive disabilities <strong>an</strong>d the suitability <strong>of</strong> the curriculum <strong>for</strong><br />

differentiation with multimedia <strong>technology</strong> to benefit these children.<br />

• Whether multimedia technologies <strong>an</strong>d computer <strong>aid</strong>ed learning benefit children with cognitive disabilities.<br />

• And develop <strong>an</strong> interactive learning tool using media design <strong>an</strong>d development s<strong>of</strong>tware <strong>an</strong>d published <strong>as</strong> a<br />

st<strong>an</strong>dalone application<br />

• And to trial the <strong>technology</strong> with primary school aged children with cognitive disabilities using talk aloud protocol<br />

sessions, <strong>an</strong>d with teachers during in<strong>for</strong>mal focus groups.<br />

• To evaluate the success <strong>of</strong> the trials <strong>an</strong>d extract guidelines from these results.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> attitudes <strong>of</strong> teachers towards <strong>technology</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the skills required to implement a multimedia approach to<br />

education.<br />

• B<strong>as</strong>ed on this, how practicable it is that multimedia <strong>technology</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> learners with cognitive<br />

disabilities <strong>an</strong>d be integrated in cl<strong>as</strong>srooms.<br />

Research Methodologies will involve<br />

• A survey <strong>of</strong> the guidelines, criteria <strong>an</strong>d policies identified above using a combination <strong>of</strong> traditional <strong>an</strong>d ICT<br />

b<strong>as</strong>ed in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

• Review <strong>of</strong> the various multimedia technologies available <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong> <strong>as</strong>sessment <strong>of</strong> its potential to address the<br />

specific objectives <strong>of</strong> the research.<br />

• Survey <strong>of</strong> the current <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>technology</strong> in schools, including field research <strong>an</strong>d questionnaires.<br />

• Continued investigation <strong>of</strong> design principles <strong>an</strong>d development methods <strong>for</strong> creating the pilot through desk<br />

research <strong>an</strong>d testing.<br />

• Qualitative research <strong>of</strong> the suitability <strong>an</strong>d <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> computers in education through focus groups with teachers.<br />

• Qualitative research <strong>of</strong> the multimedia <strong>technology</strong> developed by the researcher by incorporating talk out loud<br />

protocol during trial sessions with students <strong>an</strong>d involving a reflection on the af<strong>for</strong>d<strong>an</strong>ces <strong>of</strong> the <strong>technology</strong> <strong>as</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong> alternative to the face to face learning environment.<br />

• Semi <strong>for</strong>mal interviews <strong>an</strong>d communication with teachers <strong>an</strong>d <strong>educational</strong> <strong>technology</strong> providers.


Schedule <strong>of</strong> Work -<br />

Time Period Activity Outcome<br />

Month 1-4 • Initial research <strong>an</strong>d development <strong>of</strong><br />

multimedia <strong>technology</strong> to be <strong>use</strong>d by<br />

the researcher.<br />

• Establish communication with key<br />

individuals <strong>an</strong>d org<strong>an</strong>isations in the<br />

field <strong>an</strong>d extend list <strong>of</strong> contacts.<br />

• Identification <strong>of</strong> resources needed to<br />

undertake the research<br />

Month 4-8 • Survey <strong>of</strong> the guidelines <strong>an</strong>d policies<br />

identified in the stated objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the research.<br />

• Continued research <strong>an</strong>d<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the multimedia<br />

<strong>technology</strong> outlined in the objectives.<br />

Month 8-10 • Review <strong>of</strong> the various multimedia<br />

technologies available <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong><br />

<strong>as</strong>sessment <strong>of</strong> its potential to<br />

address the specific objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

research.<br />

• Continued development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

multimedia <strong>technology</strong> outlined<br />

above.<br />

Month 10-12 • Continued research including a<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> the current <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>technology</strong> in schools through field<br />

research <strong>an</strong>d questionnaires.<br />

Month 12-14 • Continued research including<br />

conducting semi <strong>for</strong>mal interviews<br />

<strong>an</strong>d communicating with teachers<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>educational</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

providers.<br />

Month 14-18 • Testing <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

developed <strong>technology</strong> stated above<br />

with a <strong>use</strong>r group including a<br />

reflection on the af<strong>for</strong>d<strong>an</strong>ces <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>technology</strong> <strong>as</strong> stated in the<br />

• Datab<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> relev<strong>an</strong>t sources,<br />

references <strong>an</strong>d key data in the<br />

field<br />

• Detailed structure <strong>an</strong>d timetable<br />

<strong>for</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> the thesis<br />

b<strong>as</strong>ed on the above to include:<br />

• Arr<strong>an</strong>gements <strong>for</strong> contact <strong>an</strong>d<br />

feedback from supervisor<br />

Detailed catalogue <strong>of</strong><br />

• Current criteria <strong>an</strong>d guidelines<br />

<strong>for</strong> the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>technology</strong> in<br />

schools <strong>an</strong>d <strong>for</strong> children with<br />

cognitive disabilities.<br />

• Government <strong>an</strong>d Educational<br />

institutes policies <strong>an</strong>d practices<br />

regarding the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>technology</strong> in schools<br />

worldwide.<br />

Comprehensive evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

• <strong>Multimedia</strong> <strong>technology</strong> that is<br />

available <strong>for</strong> education in<br />

general<br />

• Developments in multimedia<br />

<strong>technology</strong> that would help to<br />

determine how this <strong>technology</strong><br />

c<strong>an</strong> be <strong>use</strong>d to support<br />

<strong>educational</strong> development.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

• Current versus the potential <strong>use</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> multimedia <strong>technology</strong> in<br />

Irish primary schools.<br />

• Educational needs <strong>of</strong> children<br />

with cognitive disabilities <strong>an</strong>d<br />

the suitability <strong>of</strong> the curriculum<br />

<strong>for</strong> differentiation with<br />

multimedia <strong>technology</strong> to<br />

benefit these children.<br />

Analysis <strong>an</strong>d reflection <strong>of</strong><br />

• Whether computer <strong>aid</strong>ed<br />

learning <strong>an</strong>d multimedia<br />

technologies benefit people with<br />

cognitive disabilities.<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the success <strong>of</strong> the<br />

multimedia <strong>technology</strong><br />

developed by the researcher<br />

• Creation <strong>of</strong> guidelines <strong>for</strong><br />

teachers on the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

multimedia <strong>technology</strong> in


objectives. primary schools.<br />

Month 18-20 • Analysis <strong>of</strong> the suitability <strong>an</strong>d <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>technology</strong> in education through <strong>use</strong>r<br />

testing sessions incorporating talk<br />

out loud protocol.<br />

Month 20-22 • Revisions <strong>an</strong>d editing <strong>of</strong> thesis <strong>as</strong> a<br />

whole<br />

• Potential modification b<strong>as</strong>ed on<br />

feedback<br />

• Writing introduction <strong>an</strong>d conclusion<br />

sections; <strong>an</strong>d reference check<br />

• Design <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>y graphic elements<br />

Month 22-24 • Final meeting <strong>an</strong>d consultation with<br />

thesis supervisor<br />

• Final revisions <strong>an</strong>d modifications <strong>of</strong><br />

thesis<br />

• Binding <strong>an</strong>d submission<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

• Skills required <strong>for</strong> the<br />

implementation a multimedia<br />

approach to education.<br />

• Practicability that multimedia<br />

<strong>technology</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be integrated in<br />

cl<strong>as</strong>srooms <strong>for</strong> learners with<br />

cognitive disabilities.<br />

• Draft <strong>of</strong> complete thesis<br />

• Final bound version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

complete thesis


References:<br />

Abbey, Beverly (Ed.) Instructional <strong>an</strong>d Cognitive Impacts <strong>of</strong> Web B<strong>as</strong>ed Education. Idea Group Publishing,<br />

2000 http://www.ou.nl/Docs/Expertise/OTEC/Publicaties/theo%20b<strong>as</strong>tiaens/tba.pdf.<br />

Carey, David J. <strong>The</strong> Essential Guide to Special Education in Irel<strong>an</strong>d. Dublin: Primary ABC, 2005.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education <strong>an</strong>d Science. Blueprint <strong>for</strong> the Future <strong>of</strong> ICT in Irish Education. Three Year<br />

Strategic Action Pl<strong>an</strong> 2000–2003, from http://www.ncte.ie/cao/documents/d247.pdf<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education <strong>an</strong>d Science (2008). Investing Effectively in In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>an</strong>d Communications<br />

Technology in Schools, 2008-2013. <strong>The</strong> Report <strong>of</strong> the Minister’s Strategy Group. Dublin, 2008<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Fin<strong>an</strong>ce (2008). Budget Documents – Education <strong>an</strong>d Science. From<br />

http://www.budget.gov.ie/2009/budgetsummary09.html#_Toc211585098<br />

Evaluation Support <strong>an</strong>d Research Unit Inspectorate (2008) ICT in Schools, Inspectorate Evaluation Studies<br />

Dublin: Department <strong>of</strong> Education <strong>an</strong>d Science, 2008.<br />

Kilbourn, Brent <strong>an</strong>d Ivarez, Isabel A. “Root-metaphors <strong>for</strong> underst<strong>an</strong>ding: A framework <strong>for</strong> teachers <strong>an</strong>d<br />

teacher educators <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>an</strong>d communication technologies.” Computers <strong>an</strong>d Education. v50 n4,<br />

2008. 1354-1369<br />

King, Fiona. Special Education in Irish Cl<strong>as</strong>srooms: a Practical Guide. Dublin: Primary ABC, 2006.<br />

Korte, W.B. & Husing, T. "Benchmarking Access <strong>an</strong>d Use <strong>of</strong> ICT in Europe<strong>an</strong> Schools 2006: Results from<br />

Head Teacher <strong>an</strong>d A Cl<strong>as</strong>sroom Teacher Surveys in 27 Europe<strong>an</strong> Countries" ELearning Papers.<br />

from http://www.elearningpapers.eu/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=8558&doclng=6.<br />

Lewis, Rena B. “Assistive Technologies <strong>an</strong>d Learning Disabilities: Today’s Realities <strong>an</strong>d Tomorrow’s<br />

Promises”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Learning Disabilities. 1998.<br />

Mulkeen, D. A. Schools <strong>for</strong> the Digital Age - Progress Report 1998-2002. Dublin: <strong>The</strong> National Centre <strong>for</strong><br />

Technology in Education, 2004.<br />

National Policy Advisory <strong>an</strong>d Development Committee. <strong>The</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> Schools IT2000. Dublin: <strong>The</strong> National<br />

Centre <strong>for</strong> Technology in Education, 2001.<br />

Rezaiy<strong>an</strong>, Akram et al. “Effect <strong>of</strong> computer game intervention on the attention capacity <strong>of</strong> mentally retarded<br />

children”. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Nursing Practice. v13 n5, 2007.<br />

Shiels, G., & O'Flaherty, A. (2006) NCTE 2005 Census on ICT Infr<strong>as</strong>tructure in Schools, from<br />

http://www.ncte.ie/documents/NCTE_2005_Census_on_ICT_Infr<strong>as</strong>tructure_in_Schools.pdf.<br />

Smeets, Ed <strong>an</strong>d Mooij, Ton. “Pupil-centred learning, ICT, <strong>an</strong>d teacher behaviour: observations in <strong>educational</strong><br />

practice” British Journal <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology. v32 n4, 2002. 403-407.<br />

Sw<strong>an</strong>son, H. Lee et al. (Eds.) H<strong>an</strong>dbook <strong>of</strong> Learning Disabilities. New York: Guil<strong>for</strong>d Press, 2003.<br />

Technology | Sentech: Special Educational Needs Technology, from http://sentech.ie/<strong>technology</strong>.htm.<br />

Teachers' Union <strong>of</strong> Irel<strong>an</strong>d (2008). "New Strategy <strong>for</strong> ICT in Schools: Withdrawal <strong>of</strong> ICT Advisors - Dismay <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Disbelief" TUI Newsletter, September/October 08. v31 n1, 2008. 10-11.<br />

Tondeur, Jo et al. “<strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> primary school teachers’ <strong>educational</strong> beliefs on the cl<strong>as</strong>sroom <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

computers.” Computers <strong>an</strong>d Education. v51 n4, 2008. 1499-1509.<br />

Tondeur, Jo et al. “ICT integration in the cl<strong>as</strong>sroom: Challenging the potential <strong>of</strong> a school policy” Computers<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Education. v51 n1, 2008. 212-223<br />

Zabala, Joy (1995) Introduction to the SETT Framework, from http://sweb.uky.edu/~jszaba0/SETTintro.html.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!