21.01.2013 Views

FOCUS ON THE AUSTRIAN W UND ASSOCIATION - EWMA

FOCUS ON THE AUSTRIAN W UND ASSOCIATION - EWMA

FOCUS ON THE AUSTRIAN W UND ASSOCIATION - EWMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Science, Practice and Education<br />

Figure 1: The first degree of tissue damage<br />

(straight edge without any cracks)<br />

Figure 3: The third wound trauma degree (deep crack) Figure 4: The third wound trauma degree (disrupted tissue)<br />

First, we analysed the distribution of TDD in the whole<br />

observation. We found a statistically significant difference<br />

between the TDD I, II and III (p = 0.0000) and also between<br />

the group with minimal tissue damage (TDD I) and<br />

the rest of the cohort (p = 0,00023) and between the maximum<br />

damage grade (TDD III) and the rest (0,00001), see<br />

table and graph 3a, 3b. Each group is unique and can be<br />

used to describe the properties of the whole group.<br />

The best results (the lowest occurrence of trauma<br />

markers), are achieved with the water-jet hydrosurgery<br />

technique (69%) and scalpel debridement (47%). In contrast,<br />

the greatest incidence of grade III trauma (the most<br />

severe signs of tissue trauma) were found in the group of<br />

tissue samples treated with scissors, method N (47%). A<br />

statistically significant difference in results was confirmed<br />

between the groups “V” and “N” (p=0.00005), “V” and<br />

“E” (P=0.00112), “N” and “S” (p=0.00049) and “N” and<br />

“E” (p=0.00035). Statistical analysis didn’t prove the statistically<br />

significant difference in wound trauma between<br />

the group “E” versus “S” (p=0.17404) and “V” versus “S”<br />

(p=0.17404).<br />

10<br />

Figure 2: The second wound trauma degree (small fissure)<br />

To establish a ranking of all the tested techniques we<br />

can calculate the average TDD (ATDD ) score, which<br />

takes into account not only the layout in each of the<br />

stages I-III, but also the significance of histopathological<br />

changes when assessing the impact of the relevant debridement<br />

technology on wound healing. According to this<br />

ATDD score, the best results (the least severe trauma) were<br />

achieved by group “V”, followed by groups “S” and “E”.<br />

The worst results (the heaviest histopathological changes<br />

on the surface due to wound trauma) were observed in<br />

group “N” (see table and graph No. 4).<br />

DISCUSSI<strong>ON</strong><br />

We observed 64 soft tissue specimens debrided with 4<br />

different surgical techniques in our experimental study.<br />

When planning the study we decided to make 2 independent<br />

histological sections from each tissue block to utilize<br />

the clinical material effectively. Thanks to this, we were<br />

able to increase the number of histological findings in<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> Journal 2012 vol 12 no 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!