22.01.2013 Views

ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events

ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events

ICEM11 Final Program 9.7.11pm_ICEM07 Final Program ... - Events

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINAL PROGRAM<br />

ICEM’11<br />

ICEM’11<br />

The 14th International Conference<br />

on Environmental Remediation and<br />

Radioactive Waste Management<br />

(ICEM)<br />

Date: September 25-29, 2011<br />

Location: Reims, France<br />

Reims Champagne Congrès (RCC) Centre<br />

ORGANIZED AND SPONSORED BY<br />

ASME Web site: www.asmeconferences.org/icem2011<br />

SFEN Web site: www.sfen.fr/icem-11<br />

Andra Disposal Facility<br />

Chooz Nuclear Power Plant


WELCOME TO ICEM’11<br />

The Fourteenth International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste<br />

Management (ICEM’11) is a global information exchange, featuring engineering and scientific solutions to<br />

environmental problems. More than 600 scientists, engineers, managers, project directors, business<br />

representatives, equipment vendors and government officials from more than 30 countries are expected to attend<br />

the conference, held this year in Reims, France at the Reims Champagne Congrès (RCC) Centre.<br />

The Environmental Engineering (EED) and Nuclear Engineering Divisions (NED) of the American Society<br />

of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) have joined forces with the Société Française d’Energie Nucléaire (SFEN) for<br />

ICEM’11. The conference and exhibition will offer a unique opportunity to foster cooperation and establish<br />

contacts with participants from many countries. Conference participants will be able to speak directly with peers<br />

who are reporting new research, initiating and managing environmental projects, establishing national and<br />

international regulations and applying new methods and equipment. ICEM’11 is expected to feature 300<br />

technical papers, research presentations and discussions of field applications. A diverse group of international<br />

organizations will be exhibiting related technologies and services.<br />

We have organized this <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Program</strong> so you can easily find additional details on the technical program and<br />

ways to participate. Also included is a listing of Exhibitors, Sponsors and their services, and the technical<br />

abstracts. Please take a look inside for more details. We are sure you will find something of interest. We hope<br />

that you have a successful meeting and welcome to Reims!<br />

Conference General Co-Chairs<br />

Anibal Taboas, for ASME (USA)<br />

Dominique Greneche, for SFEN (FRANCE)<br />

Honorary Co-Chairs<br />

Mr. Christophe Behar, Nuclear Energy Director, CEA (FRANCE)<br />

Ms. Tracy Mustin, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for EM, DOE (USA)<br />

Mr. Francois-Michel Gonnot, Chairman of the Board, ANDRA (FRANCE)<br />

Dr. Tero Varjoranta, Director, Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, IAEA (AUSTRIA)<br />

Mr. Arnaud Gay, Executive Vice President of the Nuclear Sites Value Development Business Unit,<br />

AREVA (FRANCE)<br />

Conference Managers<br />

Gary Benda, for ASME/ICEM (USA) and Bernard Jolly, SFEN (FRANCE)<br />

— EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION —<br />

During the conference, in case of emergency, contact Tel : +33 (0)3 26 77 44 88.<br />

There will also be a guest message and program errata board located at the Registration Area, 1st Floor.<br />

We would like to thank the following companies for sponsoring<br />

the following events at the ICEM’11 Conference.<br />

~ Our Platinum Sponsors ~<br />

ANDRA — Tuesday Reception<br />

URS CORPORATION — Sunday Reception<br />

~ Our Gold Sponsor ~<br />

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

~ Our Silver Sponsor ~<br />

FLUOR CORPORATION<br />

~ Our Bronze Sponsors ~<br />

ATOMEXPO<br />

KRAFTANLAGEN HEIDELBERG GmbH<br />

ONET TECHNOLOGIES


Table of Contents<br />

ICEM’11 Corporate Sponsors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inside Front Cover<br />

ICEM’11 Perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2<br />

Background, Location and Contact Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Objectives and Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Format and Venue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

City of Reims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Hotel - Accommodations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Restaurants - Eating out in the City of Reims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Foreign Exchange and Traveler’s Cheques. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Insurance and Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Disclaimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

ICEM’11 Organizing Societies and Cooperating Int'l Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

US Societies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

European Societies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

Cooperating International Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

Social <strong>Events</strong> and Guest <strong>Program</strong>s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

Sunday Golf Outing at Le Golf de Reims Champagne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

Sunday Welcome Reception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

Tuesday Reception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

Wednesday Conference Banquet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

Guest <strong>Program</strong>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

Associated Technical <strong>Events</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

Technical Training Course . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

Technical Tours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

Major Topics and Panel Sessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

Major Topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

Participating Attendees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

Monday Morning Opening Session . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />

Poster Sessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />

Special Panel Sessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />

Conference Scheduling and Additional Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

Registration Hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

Exhibition Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

Coffee/Tea Breaks Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

Lunch Periods in Exhibit Halls Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

Daily Speaker/Session Co-Chair Briefing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

Presentation Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

Conference Proceedings on CD-ROM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

Audio Visual Office / Speaker Ready Area, Date and Time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

Poster Sessions Setup Date and Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

Acronym List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11<br />

Reims City Site Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

Reims Train Station to Reims Champagne Congres (RCC) Centre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

Reims Road Map and Hotel Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13<br />

Reims Champagne Congres (RCC) Centre Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-15<br />

Technical <strong>Program</strong> at a Glance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-17<br />

Technical <strong>Program</strong> Descriptions - Sessions 1 - 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-34<br />

Exhibit Hall Layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38-39<br />

Exhibitor Descriptions and Sponsorship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40-55<br />

Technical Abstracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-133<br />

Attendee Pre-registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133-142<br />

Technical <strong>Program</strong> Organizers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143<br />

Session Organizers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143<br />

Conference Steering Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144<br />

Schedule of <strong>Events</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inside Back Cover<br />

1


2<br />

ICEM’11 PERSPECTIVES<br />

Thank you for being involved in the latest of the premier series of International Conferences on Environmental<br />

and Radioactive Waste Management sponsored by ASME International (ASME). The final<br />

ICEM’11 Conference <strong>Program</strong> should facilitate exchange of ideas to reduce risk, and avert the overwhelming<br />

costs of delay in resolving environmental and radioactive waste management issues.<br />

Meeting the high quality expectations of the event sponsors, the Societe Française d’Energie<br />

Nucléaire (SFEN) and ASME, requires enabling contribution of: sponsors and exhibitors; dedicated volunteer<br />

track and session chairs; and many others, from organizers to independent peer reviewers, and presen- Aníbal L. Taboas<br />

ters. As Conference General Co-Chairs we recognize the exceptional leadership of Gary Benda (Conference<br />

Manager) and Bernard Jolly (European Event Manager), whose intensive cooperation resulted in exceptional<br />

planning and execution.<br />

Our goal is to promote the necessary art, science & practice leading to sustainable global environmental<br />

management. This includes overarching discussion to complement the plenary session key-note presentations.<br />

Reims is specially fitting for its history as witness in evolution of the established world order.<br />

Challenges to contemporary global order include interdependent economic imbalance, regime change,<br />

zeal among newly-leading divergent populations, and reliance on electronic media as the primary source of Dominique Greneche<br />

information. Volatility diverts focus from topic concepts like concerted environmental action, to insular needs (such as the nearterm<br />

supply of food, water, and power, and security).<br />

Industrialized nations remain as unprepared to relocate populations in response to predicted sea level changes, as they are for<br />

the unprecedented strategic opportunity to transform the related supply and distribution of energy, food, commerce, and emerging<br />

populations. Similarly, while the risk of sovereign debt is recognized, there is scant movement to recognize the equally obligatory<br />

and non-discretionary nature of funding responsible environmental management. Ideological governance, however, continues<br />

unabated, and without apparent realization that maintaining the health of wealth generating engines, particularly manufacturing<br />

capability, is essential to sustainability.<br />

Transitory ideologies and obstructionists successfully inflate uncertainty and perceived technical risk with tricks such as<br />

reliance on non-rigorous or un-reproducible data, and extrapolation of performance expectations to absurd times. Projections that<br />

significantly deviate from defensible models, theory, and observation, necessarily decrease confidence on projected results. The<br />

misapplication of statistical methods, use of sloppy science, and the masterful use of mass communication tools, imparts plausibility<br />

to ideological biases, and masks competence and applicability limitations.<br />

Education imparts individual responsibility to ensure safety, advancement of technology, and to contribute to societal well-being.<br />

Scientists, engineers, technologists, and learned societies have a unique duty to engage in discourse of public policy. Effective communication<br />

is facilitated by simple and clear themes, such as: “Education, Energy, Environment, Economy, and National Security are<br />

inextricably intertwined”; “Society demands to be actively aware of details that influence their reasonable expectation of an adequate<br />

return on their investment in Governance”; and “Global partnerships are effective tools to demonstrate best-in-class performance.”<br />

Individuals frequently feel powerless to influence global outcomes, however, success continues to favor those who properly<br />

prepare to assess and manage risk. It is time for the technically educated to fulfill a responsibility for engagement at all levels of<br />

government on science and technology policies affecting the public interest.<br />

It is time to demand a return to basic principles, such as reliance on best available science, independent peer review; and<br />

increased intellectual honesty in regulatory engineering. It is time, for example, to get past regulation of waste disposal mechanisms<br />

according to the activity level and generating source, and to promulgate international guidelines to manage and dispose such waste<br />

exclusively on the basis of sound multi-media risk management. It’s time to initiate transition of international efforts away from<br />

insular engagement, and into supporting systematic approaches to inextricable factors.<br />

Our challenge is for you to find ICEM’11 as stimulating, cost effective, and constructive, as we intend it to be, and that you<br />

find it essential to join us for ICEM’13.<br />

Aníbal L. Taboas<br />

Dominique Greneche<br />

ICEM’11 Conference General Co-Chairs


Background, Location and<br />

Contact Information<br />

Objectives and Background<br />

The fourteenth International Conference on<br />

Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste<br />

Management (ICEM) promotes a broad global<br />

exchange of information on technologies, operations,<br />

management approaches, economics, and public<br />

policies in the critical areas of environmental<br />

remediation and radioactive waste management. The<br />

conference provides a unique opportunity to foster<br />

cooperation among specialists from countries with<br />

mature environmental management programs and those<br />

from countries with emerging programs. Attendees will<br />

include scientists, engineers, technology developers,<br />

equipment suppliers, government officials, utility<br />

representatives and owners of environmental problems.<br />

Format and Venue<br />

The ICEM’11 technical program includes concurrent<br />

technical sessions in five subject tracks:<br />

1. Low/Intermediate-Level Waste Management<br />

2. Spent Fuel, Fissile, Transuranic, High-Level Waste<br />

Management<br />

3. Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning<br />

4. Environmental Remediation<br />

5. Environmental Management / Public Involvement<br />

The technical program consists of an opening plenary<br />

session and several parallel program tracks with up to<br />

eight concurrent sessions. The sessions include 25<br />

minute oral presentations, panels, and poster displays<br />

which are designed to enhance dialogue between<br />

presenters and participants.<br />

The ICEM’11<strong>Program</strong> is divided into 60 technical<br />

sessions conducted over three and a half days.<br />

A listing of the specific sessions within each of the five<br />

technical program tracks can be found in the “Technical<br />

<strong>Program</strong> at a Glance” section. The full registration fee<br />

includes entrance to all technical presentations, the<br />

exhibit hall, the Sunday evening Welcome Reception,<br />

the Tuesday evening Exhibitor Reception, all<br />

refreshments during the conference breaks and lunch<br />

for three days. The meeting material provided includes<br />

the final program which includes the technical session<br />

abstract book, and a complete CD-ROM containing all<br />

approved papers that were presented, which will be<br />

mailed six months after the conference.<br />

City of Reims<br />

The city of Reims is fairly small and easily walkable,<br />

with many streets for pedestrians only. Reims, the home<br />

of champagne (the most celebrated and celebrating<br />

wine in the world), is the main city of the champagne<br />

area. It is a charming city, and one that the French hold<br />

dear to their hearts.<br />

In Reims stands one of the most beautiful buildings of<br />

the Middle Ages in Europe, one that is filled with<br />

history:<br />

Notre-Dame de Reims. The baptism of Clovis, around<br />

the year 498, gave birth to the Kingdom of the Franks,<br />

where the cathedral now stands. In 816 at the cathedral<br />

took place the first royal coronation in Reims, the one<br />

of Louis le Pious. This exceptional event explains the<br />

choice of Reims as the coronation city. Almost all<br />

French kings were crowned there for about 1,000 years.<br />

Reims, and surrounding Epernay and Ay are the main<br />

places of champagne production. Many of the largest<br />

champagne producing houses, referred to as les grandes<br />

marques, have their head office in Reims. Most are<br />

open for champagne tasting and tours by appointment<br />

only. The champagne is aged in the many chalk caves<br />

and tunnels, some originating in the Roman period,<br />

located deep inside the ground.<br />

Hotel - Accommodations<br />

ICEM has teamed with the Reims Tourism Board to<br />

assist in room accommodations. Participants that made<br />

arrangement through them, can reach them for any<br />

reason. Contact: Reims Tourism Board, 12 bd du<br />

Général Leclerc - 51722 REIMS cedex, Telephone:<br />

03 26 77 44 74, Website: www.reims-evenements.fr.<br />

The ICEM’11 Committee is not responsible for any<br />

violations of any ordinances, and all other claims of<br />

losses, costs, and damages arising from the attendee’s<br />

occupancy at any of the local hotels.<br />

Restaurants - Eating out in Reims City Region<br />

During the day, delegates can enjoy the numerous bars<br />

and restaurants down the avenue from the conference<br />

centre. During the night, come celebrate with us and<br />

indulge in Reim’s best restaurants, cafes and bars. The<br />

area continues to astound with new and ever evolving<br />

imaginative food offerings which highlight the fantastic<br />

diversity this city has to offer. If you cannot decide<br />

where to eat check out http://www.reims-tourism.com/<br />

which can guide you to some of the best places in the<br />

area.<br />

Foreign Exchange and Traveler’s Cheques<br />

The conference secretary on-site will accept only<br />

EUROs (no US$ or Traveler's Cheques) for payment of<br />

any registration or optional ticket fees. Visa, American<br />

Express, and MasterCard are also accepted.<br />

Transportation<br />

Transportation by Air to Reims, France<br />

The Paris Charles De Gaulle (CDG) International<br />

Airport provides direct access to and from major<br />

European and North American cities and is a 50 minute<br />

drive from Reims. Reims is also located 30 mins. from<br />

the Paris Roissy international airport. Several<br />

companies also offer connections to these airports.<br />

Reims-Prunay aerodrome: Light business and tourist<br />

aircraft or Phone: +33 (0)3 26 49 10 92<br />

Transportation by Rail to Reims<br />

The easiest way to get to Reims from the CDG airport<br />

is by train. Reims is located at the junction of the Lille -<br />

Dijon - Mediterranean and Paris - Charleville – Sedan<br />

lines with 12 daily links between Reims-Paris. A TGV<br />

high-speed train links Reims to Paris in 45 mins.<br />

Travelers coming from Lille or Paris CDG airport<br />

arrive at Champagne Ardenne TGV station, around 3<br />

miles (5km) outside Reims. Regular local train services<br />

connect this station to Reims city station. To consult the<br />

times and reserve your ticket:<br />

http://www.sncf.com/en_EN/html/ or<br />

www.tgvesteuropeen.com.<br />

3


4<br />

Transportation by Car to Reims<br />

Reims is located at the crossroads of the A4-E50 (Paris<br />

- Strasbourg) and A26-E17 (Calais - Troyes - Dijon)<br />

motorways. The city has 6 motorway exits. To<br />

determine a specific route visit: www.viamichelin.com<br />

Insurance and Liability<br />

All participants are encouraged to make their own<br />

arrangements for health and travel insurance. Neither<br />

ASME, Société Française d’Energie Nucléaire (SFEN)<br />

nor their agents, can be held responsible for any<br />

personal injury, loss, damage, accident to private<br />

property or additional expenses incurred because of<br />

delays or changes in air, rail, sea, road or other services,<br />

strikes, sickness, weather or any other cause.<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Neither ASME or Société Française d’Energie Nucléaire<br />

(SFEN) can accept any liability for death, injury, or any<br />

loss, cost or expense suffered or incurred by any person<br />

if such loss is caused or results from the act, default or<br />

omission of any person other than an employee or agent<br />

of ASME or Société Française d’Energie Nucléaire<br />

(SFEN). In particular, neither ASME nor Société<br />

Française d’Energie Nucléaire (SFEN) can accept any<br />

liability for losses arising from the provision or nonprovision<br />

of services provided by hotel companies or<br />

transport operators. Nor can ASME or Société Française<br />

d’Energie Nucléaire (SFEN) accept liability for losses<br />

suffered by reason of war including threat of war, riot<br />

and civil strife, terrorist activity, natural disaster,<br />

weather, flood, drought, technical, mechanical or<br />

electrical breakdown within any premises visited by<br />

delegates and/or partners in connection with the<br />

conference, industrial disputes, governmental action,<br />

regulations or technical problems which may affect the<br />

services provided in connection with the conference.<br />

Neither ASME nor Société Française d’Energie<br />

Nucléaire (SFEN) is able to give any warranty that a<br />

particular person will appear as a speaker or panelist.<br />

ICEM’11 Organizing Societies and<br />

Cooperating International Agencies<br />

U.S. Societies<br />

The Environmental Engineering Division (EED) and<br />

the Nuclear Engineering Division (NED) of ASME are<br />

the primary organizing societies of the ICEM<br />

conference. Since its inception in 1987, the objective<br />

has been to conduct international conferences on key<br />

environmental management topics in locations<br />

convenient to large numbers of technical experts from<br />

emerging environmental programs. ASME is committed<br />

to continue to provide this global conference wherever<br />

the greatest need and interest are shown.<br />

ICEM’11 is also organized to support the US<br />

Department of Energy (US DOE), the US Nuclear<br />

Regulatory Commission (US NRC) and the US<br />

Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) along with<br />

several other major international technical societies and<br />

governmental organizations. Each agency has had<br />

significant involvement with the ICEM series. The US<br />

DOE is responsible for managing the wastes and<br />

cleaning the sites from the past US government nuclear<br />

operations, thus the US DOE staff has viewed this<br />

conference series as an opportunity to identify new<br />

technical solutions and to provide information on the<br />

results of their programs to the international<br />

community. Federal regulatory participants from both<br />

the US EPA and US NRC have also been active in<br />

program development and participation.<br />

European Societies<br />

The ICEM conferences have always been conducted<br />

jointly with a major local technical society and other<br />

co-societies in the host country. For ICEM’11, the<br />

Société Française d’Energie Nucléaire (SFEN) will help<br />

partner in the organization of this conference along with<br />

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and<br />

Development) and the Nuclear Energy Agency.<br />

Cooperating International Agencies<br />

Since the beginning, the ICEM meetings have been<br />

held in cooperation with major international<br />

organizations responsible for programs and research in<br />

radioactive waste management and environmental<br />

remediation fields. The International Atomic Energy<br />

Agency (IAEA) has been assisting this conferencein<br />

several ways. Their support has included assistance in<br />

the technical program preparation, presentation of<br />

technical papers and other agency information,<br />

promotion of the conference to their member states, and<br />

providing financial and technical assistance.<br />

Social <strong>Events</strong> and Guest <strong>Program</strong><br />

The conference registration fee includes lunch for three<br />

days (Monday to Wednesday), the Sunday Welcome<br />

Reception sponsored by URS and the Tuesday<br />

Reception sponsored by Andra. Tickets for the<br />

Conference Banquet on Wednesday are optional and are<br />

charged at a nominal price. Please note space is limited<br />

and tickets will be issued on a first-come first-served<br />

basis in EURO currency only.<br />

Sunday Golf Outing at Le Golf de Reims Champagne<br />

Golf de Reims Champagne is an international golf<br />

course to the extent of professional and amateur<br />

champions, open every day of the year. The course is<br />

located in a sleepy village just under 10 minutes from<br />

Reims. A group of attendees will meet and golf together<br />

before the conference starts. Additional information can<br />

be found at http://www.golf-dereims.com/diaporama.html<br />

or by contacting Virgene<br />

Mulligan, vmulligan@amrad.com.<br />

Sunday Welcome Reception – Sponsored by URS,<br />

Platinum Sponsor<br />

All conference participants are invited to attend the<br />

Welcome Reception on Sunday from 6:00pm to 8:00pm<br />

at the RCC located by the registration area on the<br />

second floor (“Le Bouchon” Space). Attendance is<br />

included in the conference registration fee. Delegate<br />

badges are required to gain entry and will be available<br />

at the registration desk between 4:00pm - 7:00pm.<br />

Guests are welcome but will be required to purchase a<br />

ticket for EURO €27 plus VAT.<br />

Tuesday Reception – Sponsored by Andra, Platinum<br />

Sponsor<br />

In order to celebrate Andra's 20th Anniversary, Ms.<br />

Marie-Claude Dupuis, Chief Executive Officer is pleased<br />

to invite all of the participants of ICEM 2011 to a buffet<br />

on Tuesday evening, 27 September 2011. This reception<br />

is sponsored by Andra for all registrants and will be held<br />

from 6:00pm to 8:00pm in the Exhibit Hall. Delegate


adges are required to gain entry and guests are welcome<br />

but will be required to purchase a ticket for EURO €27<br />

plus VAT at the registration desk prior to this event.<br />

Please take this opportunity to review, evaluate and test<br />

the current products and services of the exhibiting<br />

companies. They look forward to seeing everyone there<br />

to celebrate this anniversary.<br />

Wednesday Conference Banquet<br />

The entertainment hallmark of the ICEM conference is<br />

the traditional and culturally festive banquet, reflective<br />

of the host country. This year’s ICEM 2011 Banquet<br />

will be held at the Champagne De Castelnau Caveau<br />

from 7:30pm to 11:30pm. A four course meal with four<br />

different champagnes will be served. The ICEM<br />

Conference Banquet is an optional extra, but truly<br />

memorable. Tickets and badges will be required to gain<br />

entrance. Please note: This event is not included in the<br />

purchase price of your registration fee, there is an<br />

additional nominal cost to attend this event. Guests are<br />

also welcome to attend this event. For our fully paid<br />

conference registrants: EURO €54 plus VAT and for our<br />

Guests: €67 plus VAT.<br />

Guest <strong>Program</strong><br />

ICEM will sponsor a Guest Welcome Reception, hosted<br />

by Ms. Dianne Benda on Monday morning at 8:00am in<br />

Room 1 on Level 2. This “Guest Welcome Reception”<br />

will review all of our scheduled tour options available.<br />

While there will be tourism information available<br />

throughout the event, we encourage you to attend to<br />

answer questions and assist you in planning your week<br />

in Reims and its surrounding areas to make the most of<br />

your visit.<br />

You must arrive at least a half hour prior to the<br />

scheduled departure time of that scheduled tour. All<br />

Tours unless otherwise noted are accompanied by an<br />

English Speaking guide and will depart from and return<br />

to the RCC, registration area on the 1st floor. Upon<br />

availability, last minute tickets can be purchased. Only<br />

EURO currency will be accepted.<br />

Day Tour to Paris (Guided Tour #1)<br />

Sunday, 25th September, 9:00am-5:-00pm,<br />

135 € + VAT<br />

On Sunday, we are organizing a group to travel by train<br />

from Reims to Paris and enjoy a brief time in the local<br />

area. At the Paris East train station, we will board a Hop<br />

On – Hop Off bus for a 4 hour quick city tour. We will<br />

hop off at Notre Dame, The Eiffel Tower and at the<br />

Place d’Concorde and you will be able to have lunch on<br />

one of the stops on your own. After our tour of the<br />

highlights of Paris we will re-board the train at 4:00pm<br />

in time to return to the RCC for the Sunday reception.<br />

Cost includes roundtrip train, escort and tour bus. The<br />

group will meet on Sunday at the Best Western Hotel at<br />

8:15am and later at the Reims Train Station at 8:45am.<br />

Walking Tour of Reims (Guided Tour #2A)<br />

Monday, 26th September, 9:00am – 12:00pm,<br />

25 € + VAT<br />

(Note: This tour is also available on Thursday, 2:15 –<br />

6:00 as Guided Tour #5)<br />

Circus School, Paris and Mars Gates, Forum and<br />

Royal Square, Notre Dame with Guide. Sights<br />

include;<br />

• Hard Built Circus and Riding School - 19th<br />

century, now renovated and used for shows<br />

• The Paris Gate - built for the coronation of Louis<br />

XVI in 1775<br />

• The Gate of Mars - one of the four arches built ca.<br />

200 AD to mark the four main thoroughfares of<br />

Durocortorum, capital of the Roman province of<br />

Belgica.<br />

• The City Hall - typical of 17th century<br />

architecture. The facade bears an equestrian statue<br />

of King Louis XIII in its centre<br />

• The Forum Square - located on the site of the<br />

antique forum, this square was the market place,<br />

Gallo-roman Cryptoporticus (semi-subterranean<br />

gallery) and the Le Vergeur House Museum,<br />

• The Royale Square - ca. 1760, the square was<br />

built by the population as a tribute to Louis XV. In<br />

its centre, stands a statue of the king surrounded by<br />

a series of symbolic decorative figures by Pigalle.<br />

• The Notre-Dame Cathedral - a master-piece of<br />

gothic art, the Cathedral of Our Lady was started in<br />

1211. It was the Cathedral of the Coronations for<br />

French Kings in memory of the baptism of Clovis<br />

by Saint Remi on Christmas Day 498.<br />

Walking Tour of Reims / Champagne Cellars Tour<br />

(Guided Tour #2B)<br />

Monday, 26th September, 2:15pm – 6:00 pm,<br />

43 € + VAT<br />

The Basilica St-Remi and Champagne Cellars Taittinger,<br />

with Guide. Sights include;<br />

• Basilica Saint-Remi - The largest Romanesque<br />

pilgrimage church in northern France. It was built<br />

as a shrine to Saint Remi. The nave was<br />

consecrated in 1049 whereas the apse was built in<br />

the late 12th century.<br />

• Visit of Champagne Cellars – Taittinger -<br />

Located in the heart of Reims, between City Hall<br />

and the Cathedral, the Demeure des Comtes de<br />

Champagne makes the historical heritage of the<br />

city. Built in the 13th century, and partially<br />

destroyed during the First World War, it was<br />

restored under the direction of the Fine Arts<br />

Ministry. The tour will be concluded by a<br />

Champagne tasting. Price includes entrance fee to<br />

the champagne house.<br />

Visit of the Champagne Vineyard by Coach with<br />

Lunch (Guided Tour #3)<br />

Tuesday, 27th September, 9:30am – 5:00pm,<br />

97 € + VAT<br />

Cruise near Epernay on the Marne River.<br />

• Travel through the Champagne Vineyards - For<br />

the past three centuries, the passion of the men of<br />

Champagne and their respect for local traditions<br />

have resulted in the exceptional wines that are<br />

famous around the world for their subtle and<br />

delicate bouquet.<br />

• Meeting at Cumieres for Lunch Cruise - The<br />

jetty is located in the small village of Cumieres,<br />

near Epernay. You will sail on a sternwheeler<br />

between the vineyard covered slopes and the viticol<br />

villages nested on hillsides. After the lock, different<br />

species of birds will escort you to the doors of the<br />

Valley of the River Marne. All the history of the<br />

region seems to spring at each turn of the river: the<br />

castle of the famous Veuve Clicquot, Dom<br />

Perignon, the revolt of the wine-growers in 1911,<br />

the Duchess of Uzes, and so on.<br />

5


6<br />

• End Of The Cruise And Travel To Hautvillers<br />

Village - On the outskirts of Epernay, a small<br />

village known around the world thanks to a<br />

Benedictine monk named Dom Perignon, is<br />

perched on sunny vine planted hillsides. The<br />

legend of Dom Perignon adds an intangible but no<br />

less genuine aura to Hautvillers. He is said to have<br />

been able to make a “grey” or red still Champagne<br />

wine into a sparkling wine of perfect clarity. Dom<br />

Perignon is buried in the village church. The tour<br />

will include a champagne toasting.<br />

The Old City of Troyes and Shopping Outlet by<br />

Coach (Guided Tour #4)<br />

Wednesday, 28th September, 9:00am -5:30pm,<br />

85 € + VAT<br />

• Troyes - Travel by bus to see the Champagne Fairs<br />

and the Saint-Jean-au- Marche quarter. It is mainly<br />

in the urban fabric that the memory of the great<br />

Champagne Fairs can be found, fairs that were held<br />

in the city of Troyes during the festival of Saint<br />

Vincent and Saint Remi. The confusion of streets<br />

and small squares with closed courtyards give an<br />

idea of the city at this period.<br />

• Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paul - This<br />

cathedral was built between the 13th and 15th<br />

centuries and is characteristic of the Gothic style.<br />

Only the Saint Peter tower was completed - the<br />

Saint Paul tower has remained unfinished since<br />

1545.<br />

• The Saint-Pantaleon Church, the Parish of the<br />

Polish Community of Troyes - Built on the site of<br />

a synagogue (according to tradition), a genuine<br />

museum of 16th century Troyes statuary, since it<br />

was the hiding place for statues saved during the<br />

French Revolution. Some were created by<br />

Dominique le Florentin, an artist from Troyes and<br />

decorator for Francois 1st.<br />

• Shopping - Factory and Trade Outlets - Troyes<br />

Designer Outlet - The first of McArthurGlen’s<br />

discount outlet malls in France, having opened in<br />

1995. It’s not surprising that McArthurGlen chose<br />

this city as the location for their designer outlet as<br />

Troyes’ association with textile manufacture and<br />

knitting go back to the 12th century. The Marque<br />

Avenue and Marques City outlets will also be<br />

visited. Here you’ll find 210 top fashion names.<br />

Walking Tour of Reims / Champagne Cellars Tour<br />

(Guided Tour #5)<br />

Thursday, 29th September, 2:15pm – 6:00pm,<br />

43 € + VAT<br />

The Basilica St-Remi and Champagne Cellars Taittinger<br />

with Guide. This is the same tour as Monday afternoon<br />

Tour #2B, but provides the attendee in sessions all week<br />

a second opportunity to see and taste at little of Reims<br />

and the Champagne region.<br />

Associated Technical <strong>Events</strong><br />

Technical Training Course<br />

RISK REDUCTION IN REMEDIATION, WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING<br />

Sunday: 9:00am-4:00pm Room: 5<br />

The workshop is being held as a service to the ICEM<br />

community and is relevant to all technical program<br />

attendees as well as other professionals in the nuclear<br />

field. This workshop is intended as a condensed but<br />

intense training in the subject area of risk reduction for<br />

nuclear remediation, radioactive waste management and<br />

decommissioning of nuclear reactors and facilities.<br />

Participants will receive a certificate of training<br />

completion. Professional education credits may be<br />

available from ASME, IHMM or other organizations.<br />

Topics covered will include risk assessment, risk<br />

reduction methodologies, risk vs. cost, and practical<br />

lessons from various projects. Technical experts from<br />

the industry and senior leaders from international<br />

organizations will be invited as lecturers. The workshop<br />

will be directed by Dr. Jas Devgun.<br />

The agenda consists of six hours of intense instruction<br />

with a one hour lunch break. Refreshments for coffee<br />

breaks will be provided.<br />

Technical Tours<br />

Three technical tours are planned to see Andra and<br />

Chooz D&D project radioactive waste management<br />

programs first hand. The tours will take place<br />

immediately after the conference on Friday. Please<br />

Note: Tours will depart on Friday at 7:00 am at the<br />

RCC centre.<br />

1. Reims to Andra, LLW Site Tour (Tour 1A)<br />

• The Disposal Facilty for Low-Level and<br />

Intermediate-Level (LIL) Waste<br />

• The Disposal Facility for Very-Low-Level (VLL)<br />

Waste<br />

2. Reims to Andra, HLW Site Tour (Tour 1B)<br />

• The Underground Laboratory<br />

• Saudron' s Technological Centre<br />

3. Reims to Chooz, D&D Technical Tour (Tour B)<br />

Major Topics and Panel Session<br />

Major Topics<br />

The <strong>ICEM11</strong> Technical <strong>Program</strong> is divided into 60<br />

technical sessions conducted over three and one-half<br />

days. A listing of the specific sessions within each of<br />

the five technical programs can be found in the<br />

“<strong>Program</strong> at a Glance” Section.<br />

Participating Attendees<br />

Over 400 abstracts have been accepted from more than<br />

30 countries, including submittals from Western<br />

Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, the Far and<br />

Middle East, North and South America and Australia.<br />

This strong technical program is expected to draw more<br />

than 600 scientists, engineers, managers, project<br />

directors, utility and other business representatives,<br />

equipment vendors and government officials from<br />

around the world.<br />

The traditionally strong participation from countries<br />

with mature environmental programs will be<br />

supplemented by a contingent of attendees from Central<br />

and Eastern Europe, as well as key representatives from<br />

other countries from around the world with emerging<br />

programs. In the past, the ICEM meetings have allowed<br />

participants to exchange technical information, discover<br />

solutions to problems and make valuable business<br />

contacts or even arrange business agreements.


Monday Morning Opening Session<br />

SESSION 1 - PLENARY - OPENING SESSION<br />

Monday: 9:00am -12:30pm Room: Salle Royale<br />

The Opening Session will begin Monday morning with<br />

the keynote presentations setting the theme for this<br />

year’s conference. Coffee will be served on the 2nd<br />

floor Foyer from 08:00 until the program begins at<br />

9:00am.<br />

A break is scheduled after the third speaker.<br />

The Welcome speakers and Keynote speakers are:<br />

• Mr. Christophe Behar, Nuclear Energy Director,<br />

CEA (France)<br />

• Ms. Tracy Mustin, Principal Deputy Assistant<br />

Secretary for EM, DOE (USA)<br />

• Mr. Francois-Michel Gonnot, Chairman of the<br />

Board, Andra (France)<br />

• Dr. Tero Varjoranta, Director, Division of<br />

Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, IAEA<br />

(Austria)<br />

• Mr. Arnaud Gay, Executive Vice President of the<br />

Nuclear Sites Value Development Business Unit,<br />

AREVA (France)<br />

Special Panel Sessions<br />

Listed below is a brief summary on the ICEM2011<br />

panels. A more comprehensive and detailed description<br />

and the panelists are listed in the Technical <strong>Program</strong><br />

section with each Session.<br />

Poster Sessions<br />

The conference technical program will contain three<br />

major Poster Sessions on Monday - Wednesday<br />

arranged from the five Technical Tracks. The leading<br />

objective for the poster sessions is to provide a forum<br />

for experts in the field and interested attendees to gather<br />

in the RCC where they can move around freely and<br />

engage in discussions, which would normally not be<br />

possible during the oral sessions. The three best Posters<br />

from each Track will be displayed on Thursday<br />

morning.<br />

SESSION 2: APPROACHES FOR<br />

INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION (5.18)<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 1<br />

An important element to reducing the cost and schedule<br />

of a country’s and/or organization’s environmental<br />

remediation mission is forming key international<br />

collaborative partnerships that focus on identifying and<br />

leveraging international expertise, infrastructure, and<br />

collaboration opportunities. This panel will provide an<br />

overview of the different approaches and initiatives<br />

used to promote international collaboration in<br />

environmental remediation and/or radioactive waste<br />

management, with a focus on the challenges and<br />

opportunities unique to each country and/or<br />

organization.<br />

Panelists Include: Mark Butez, Andra (France);<br />

John Mathieson, NDA (UK); Ian Bainbridge, AECL<br />

(Canada); Jong-Kil Park, KHNP (Korea);<br />

Malgorzata K. Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection<br />

Authority (Norway)<br />

SESSION 3: LESSONS LEARNED: FUKUSHIMA,<br />

CHERNOBYL-25 YEARS LATER, TMI-2 &<br />

OTHER EXPERIENCES (3.11)<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: Salle Royale<br />

This panel was initially planned to discuss confinement<br />

activities and lessons learned from Chernobyl at a time<br />

of 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident (April<br />

26, 1986), lessons from TMI-2 accident (March 28,<br />

1979) and other industry experience with smaller<br />

events. However, the natural events of March 11, 2011<br />

(large earthquake and tsunami) led to the accident at the<br />

Fukushima- Dai-ichi complex which has been given the<br />

highest rating of seven on the international scale,<br />

equivalent to that of the 1986 Chernobyl crisis. The<br />

recovery efforts at Fukushima are still ongoing. This<br />

panel will discuss lessons learned from Fukushima,<br />

Chernobyl, and TMI-2 related to recovery, confinement,<br />

decommissioning, and future design lessons.<br />

Panelists Include: Dr. Tero Varjoranta, IAEA<br />

(Austria); Sergii Mitichkin, Chernobyl NPP (Ukraine);<br />

Thomas Chauveau, Bouygues-Construction (France);<br />

Didier Dall’ava, CEA/DEN/DADN (France);<br />

Svetlana Bratskaya, Institute of Chemistry of Russian<br />

Academy of Science (Russia); Dominique Greneche,<br />

SFEN (France); and Claudio Pescatore, OECD/NEA<br />

(France)<br />

SESSION 10: EMERGING ISSUES IN THE<br />

MANAGEMENT OF I/ILW (1.16)<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 1<br />

This panel will focus on strategies for the management<br />

of all low and intermediate level waste (L/ILW). Based<br />

on experience in different national programs, it will<br />

discuss various options and their merits for managing<br />

L/ILW. It will consider the definition of different<br />

categories of L/ILW and their potential routes for<br />

disposal including waste of very low activity, often<br />

arising in high volumes as contaminated land, or from<br />

decommissioning. There will be discussion on large,<br />

disused components that are part of the<br />

decommissioning L/ILW waste stream. The<br />

engineering of facilities for the disposal of all such<br />

wastes should be proportionate to the long-term<br />

environmental impact that might arise.<br />

Panelists Include: Irena Mele, Section Head of Waste<br />

Technology, IAEA (Austria); Keith McConnell,<br />

Deputy Director, US NRC (USA); Bruno Cahen,<br />

Director, Andra (France); Geraldine Dandrieux, Head<br />

of Waste, Research Facilities and Fuel Cycle Facilities<br />

Department (France); Kazuyuki Kato, Federation of<br />

Electric Power Companies (Japan); Paul Dixon, Los<br />

Alamos National Lab (USA); and Dick Raaz, Chairman<br />

and Director, UK LLWR (UK)<br />

SESSION 11: HOW CAN NETWORKS IMPROVE<br />

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ER PROJECTS?<br />

THE IAEA NETWORK ON ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIATION-<br />

ENVIRONET (4.15)<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am-12:30pm Room: 4<br />

Environmental remediation projects tend to be<br />

constrained by several aspects being the lack of<br />

financial resources one of the most prominent factors.<br />

However, even when financial resources are available<br />

lack of institutional framework (e.g. lack of<br />

regulations), lack of human resources, and absence of a<br />

solid technical basis at the national level will contribute<br />

to slow the pace of implementation. Networking intends<br />

to bring problem holders and solution donors together<br />

7


8<br />

and enhance the exchange of experience while fostering<br />

the construction of partnerships. The ENVIRONET was<br />

initially presented to the international community at<br />

WM 2010. The ICEM 2011 will be an opportunity to<br />

present its achievement, broaden its affiliation and build<br />

an agenda of activities for the next years.<br />

Panelists Include: Leo van Velzen, NRD<br />

(Netherlands); Peter Booth, WSP Group (UK); and<br />

joining after the break - Irena Mele, Section Head of<br />

Waste Technology, IAEA (Austria)<br />

SESSION 20: CHALLENGES WHEN SELECTING<br />

DISPOSAL OPTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF THE<br />

NEW IAEA CLASSIFICATION SCHEME (1.17)<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 1<br />

The new IAEA classification scheme is based on long<br />

term safety – primarily disposal. The potential options<br />

for disposal include: above surface engineered landfill,<br />

near surface disposal (trenches, vaults or shallow<br />

boreholes), engineered facilities at intermediate depth<br />

(10s to 100s of meters) and geological disposal (> few<br />

hundred metres). Specific waste types will need specific<br />

consideration (e.g. disused sealed sources, graphite<br />

waste, and radium bearing waste). National schemes<br />

will be circumstance dependent.<br />

The following will be discussed:<br />

• Near surface or geological disposal for SL-LILW<br />

• Separate disposal for SL-LILW and VLLW<br />

• Advantages and disadvantages of opting for codisposal<br />

• Borehole disposal as potential solution for the<br />

countries having limited waste inventories<br />

• Feasible approaches for disposal of low level longlived<br />

waste<br />

This panel will provide a forum for the exchange of<br />

scientific and technical information on disposal of<br />

different categories of radioactive waste with focus on<br />

current approaches.<br />

Panelists Include: Linde Nel, Director of Operations<br />

and Maintenance Services (South Africa); Vaclav<br />

Hanusik, Senior Researcher, VUJE (Slovak Republic);<br />

Dr. Irina Gaus, Senior Expert (Switzerland); Thibaud<br />

Labalette, <strong>Program</strong> Director at Andra (France); Balint<br />

Nos, Head of Strategy Development and Engineering<br />

Office of PURAM (Hungary); Dr. Peter Brennecke,<br />

Bundestamt fur Strahlenschutz (BFS), Retired<br />

(Germany); Dr. Kazumi Kitayama, Senior Technical<br />

Advisor, Nuclear Waste Management Organization of<br />

Japan (NUMO) (Japan); and Keith McConnell,<br />

Deputy Director, US NRC (USA)<br />

SESSION 21 & 22: CONTRIBUTION AND<br />

COMPLEMENTARITIES OF INTERIM<br />

STORAGE, GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL,<br />

PARTITIONING & TRANSMUTATION<br />

REVERSIBILITY REGARDING GLOBAL<br />

OPTIMIZATION OF RADWASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (2.15)<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm-3:30pm Room: 4<br />

Tuesday: 4:15pm-6:00pm Room: 4<br />

Session 21 is a two part panel in conjunction with<br />

Session 22. The first part will consist of a introductory<br />

paper and then a panel will address the status of HLW<br />

and Spent Fuel interim storage, processing and national<br />

programs. Partitioning and transmutation are also<br />

investigated in several countries. Interim storage is<br />

required to accommodate waste as long as sustainable<br />

management solutions are not available and interim<br />

storage duration up to 100 years has been often<br />

considered.<br />

Speakers Include: Bernard Boullis, CEA (France);<br />

Wilhelm Bollingerfehr, DBE (Germany); Philippe<br />

Lallieux ONDRAF (Belgium); Claudio Pescatore,<br />

NEA, (France); Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, Andra<br />

(France); Farok Sharif, URS (USA); Jürg Schneider,<br />

NAGRA (Switzerland); and Neil Smart, NDA (UK)<br />

SESSION 29: INTERNATIONAL<br />

COOPERATION: NEA ROAD MAP, HOW TO<br />

INCREASE SYNERGY (3.12)<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am-12:30pm Room: 1<br />

This session will start with short presentations and<br />

conclude with a panel session.<br />

The session will end with a panel discussions<br />

moderated by Ivo Tripputi (Sogin).<br />

Panelists include: Juan Luis Santiago (Enresa), Jim<br />

Marra (US DOE), and Gerard Laurent<br />

(EDF/CIDEN)<br />

SESSION 38: YOUNG GENERATION NETWORK<br />

(YGN) AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

PROGRAMS (5.17)<br />

Wednesday: 10:45am - 12:30pm Room: 5<br />

A general YGN Meeting will be conducted to canvass<br />

views of the younger members of the industry,<br />

exchange knowledge across companies, and grow the<br />

YGN network through the conference attendees. This<br />

meeting will be used to share best practices, and<br />

develop new ideas to progress the aims and objectives<br />

of the YGN in the future. Agenda: 1) Introductions; 2)<br />

Explanation of YGN Aims and Objectives; 3)<br />

Discussion on Output of YGN Questionnaire; 4)Sharing<br />

of International YGN Activities and <strong>Events</strong>; 5) Personal<br />

Development and Career Progression; 6) Education and<br />

Training Initiatives; 7) Communications across the<br />

YGN Network; 8) External Communications to wider<br />

industry and 9) Future Plans and New Initiatives.<br />

For the session we conduct ‘An audience with…….’<br />

where two leaders of industry provide candid views of<br />

their career paths and offer advice to young<br />

professionals answering any questions and providing<br />

advice on career development.<br />

Panelists Include: Sarah Greenwood, AREVA (UK);<br />

and Jim Blankenhorn, Permafix Environmental<br />

Services Inc.; and Claudio Pescatore, OECD/NEA<br />

(France)<br />

SESSION 48: RADIUM REMEDIATION -<br />

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES AND CURRENT<br />

CIRCUMSTANCES - PART 3 OF 3 (4.13)<br />

Wednesday: 4:15pm - 6:00pm Room: 1<br />

An international panel will discuss and compare<br />

progress and history of national radium remediation<br />

programs. Lessons learned will be featured and shared.<br />

The outlook for the final closure on this issue<br />

worldwide will also be addressed. The perspectives and<br />

panelists invited include those from practitioners in<br />

government policy leadership, regulatory oversight and<br />

licensing, health and safety impacts and protection,<br />

environmental remediation practice and affected<br />

community stakeholders.<br />

Panelists Include: Stéphane Pepin, FANC (Belgium);<br />

Keith McConnell, USNRC (USA); Jean-Luc<br />

Lachaume, ASN (France); and Steve Brown, SENES<br />

Consultants Ltd. (USA)


SESSION 49 AND 50: COMMUNICATIONS AND<br />

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT - PART 1 OF 2<br />

(5-21)<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 3:30pm Room: 4<br />

Wednesday: 4:15pm - 6:00pm Room: 4<br />

This is a two part series of paper presentations and a<br />

following panel session discussion on communications<br />

and knowledge management. Current efforts and views<br />

will be presented during this first session. This session<br />

is directly followed by the second part, Panel Session<br />

#50. Presenters will each provide a 10-15 minute<br />

overview to the audience before the break, and will then<br />

resume on this topic.<br />

Panelists Include: Laurie Judd, NuVision<br />

Engineering (USA); Leonel Lagos, Florida<br />

International University (USA); Yanko Yanev, IAEA<br />

(Austria); Hitoshi Makino, JAEA (Japan); Bill<br />

Shingler, Fluor Government Group (USA) and Herve<br />

Bienvenu, Andra (France)<br />

Conference Scheduling and<br />

Additional Information<br />

Registration Hours<br />

DAY / DATE TIME<br />

Sunday, September 25, 2011 4:00pm to 7:00pm<br />

Monday, September 26, 2011 7:15am to 6:00pm<br />

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:15am to 6:00pm<br />

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 7:15am to 6:00pm<br />

Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:15am to 12:30pm<br />

Exhibition Hours<br />

DAY / DATE TIME<br />

Monday, September 26, 2011 12:00pm to 6:00pm<br />

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:30am to 8:00pm<br />

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 8:30am to 5:00pm<br />

Thursday, September 29, 2011 8:30am to 11:00am<br />

Coffee/Tea Breaks<br />

Complimentary coffee and tea will be served for all<br />

meeting participants at 8:00 am, during the morning<br />

breaks and the afternoon breaks each day of the<br />

conference.<br />

Coffee/Tea Break Schedule<br />

DAY / DATE / TIME LOCATION<br />

Monday, September 26, 2011 RCC - 2nd Floor<br />

8:00am - 9:00am “Le Bouchon” Space<br />

Monday, September 26, 2011 RCC - 2nd Floor<br />

After Third Speaker “Le Bouchon” Space<br />

Monday, September 26, 2011 RCC - Exhibition Hall<br />

3:30pm - 4:10pm 1st Floor<br />

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 RCC - Exhibition Hall<br />

10:15am - 10:40am &<br />

3:30pm - 4:10pm<br />

1st Floor<br />

Wednesday, September 28, 2011 RCC - Exhibition Hall<br />

10:15am - 10:40am &<br />

3:30pm - 4:10pm<br />

1st Floor<br />

Thursday, September 29, 2011 RCC - Exhibition Hall<br />

10:15am - 10:40am 1st Floor<br />

Lunch Periods<br />

Lunch will be served in the Exhibit Hall on Monday,<br />

Tuesday and Wednesday. Lunch serving hours are from<br />

12:30-1:15 pm. Paid full week registration includes the<br />

luncheon price for all three days. If you prefer, there are<br />

also several local restaurants near the conference center.<br />

A listing of local restaurants can be found at<br />

http://www.reims-tourisme.com/a copy of which will be<br />

given to delegates upon arrival.<br />

Lunch Periods<br />

DAY / DATE / TIME LOCATION<br />

Monday thru Wednesday RCC - Exhibition Hall<br />

12:30pm - 1:30pm 1st Floor<br />

Thursday<br />

On your own<br />

N/A<br />

Daily Speaker/Session Co-Chair Briefing<br />

Monday thru Thursday Mornings: 7:30am - 8:00am<br />

RCC, Room: “Le Millesime” Space, 1st Floor<br />

A morning briefing will be provided to all Speakers,<br />

Panelists, Poster Presenters, and Session Co-Chairs on<br />

the day of their session. The briefing will include<br />

coffee/tea and will be served at the conference center.<br />

Most hotels have breakfast included in the cost of the<br />

room, but the speaker’s briefing will give you the time<br />

for final arrangements before your session. The<br />

attendance at the briefing will provide an opportunity<br />

for the Session Co-Chairs to meet with the speakers,<br />

and for all to discuss the topics they will be addressing.<br />

9


10<br />

Presentation Times<br />

The below approximate presentation times are provided<br />

so you can tentatively arrange your schedule. We rely<br />

on the Session Co-Chairs to manage the presentations<br />

to this schedule so that you can move between sessions<br />

and attend the presentations you desire. We recognize<br />

however that due to cancellations or other unplanned<br />

events, the order time may be changed at the<br />

conference. The session posters outside each speaking<br />

room are intended to show the cancelled papers and any<br />

changed times. We also encourage the Session Co-<br />

Chairs to manage the session time in the best interest<br />

for the majority of the attendees and request that they<br />

mark any changes on the posters before the session<br />

starts. We offer our regrets if you missed a presentation<br />

due to these changes.<br />

Approximate Presentation Times<br />

AM START TIME PM START TIME<br />

Session Start 8:30 Session Start 1:45<br />

Paper 1 8:35 Paper 1 1:50<br />

Paper 2 9:00 Paper 2 2:15<br />

Paper 3 9:25 Paper 3 2:40<br />

Paper 4 9:50 Paper 4 3:05<br />

Break 10:15-10:40 Break 3:30-4:10<br />

Session Start 10:45 Session Start 4:15<br />

Paper 5 10:50 Paper 5 4:20<br />

Paper 6 11:15 Paper 6 4:15<br />

Paper 7 11:40 Paper 7 5:10<br />

Paper 8 12:05 Paper 8 5:35<br />

Session Ends 12:30 Session Ends 6:00<br />

Lunch Break 12:30-1:40<br />

Conference Proceedings on CD-ROM<br />

Each conference registrant will receive the conference<br />

proceedings on a CD-ROM mailed approximately six<br />

months after the conference. Additional proceedings<br />

may be ordered at an additional charge, by writing to<br />

the ASME Order Department, 22 Law Drive, P.O. Box<br />

2300, Fairfield, NJ 07007-2300, U.S.A., Telephone 1-<br />

800-THE-ASME.<br />

AV Office / Speaker Ready Area<br />

The AV Office / Speaker Ready area will be available<br />

for speakers to load and review their PowerPoint slides.<br />

This area will be open Sunday from 4:00pm - 7:00pm,<br />

Monday thru Wednesday from 7:15am - 5:00pm, and<br />

Thursday from 7:15am - 12:30pm at the RCC Centre in<br />

the Salle De Presse on the 2nd Floor. The on-site<br />

loading schedule of PowerPoint presentations are listed<br />

below.<br />

Coffee/Tea DAY / DATE Break / TIMESchedule LOCATION<br />

Sunday — 3:00pm-7:00pm<br />

Loading All Power Points All Sessions 1-60<br />

Monday — 9:00am-12:30pm<br />

Reserved for Loading<br />

Monday Afternoon Sessions Sessions 2-9<br />

Monday — 2:00pm-5:00pm<br />

Loading All Power Points Sessions 10-60<br />

Tuesday — 9:00am-12:30pm<br />

Reserved for Loading<br />

Tuesday Afternoon Sessions Sessions 20-28<br />

Tuesday — 2:00pm-5:00pm<br />

Loading All Power Points Sessions 29-60<br />

Wednesday — 9:00am-12:30pm<br />

Reserved for Loading<br />

Wednesday Afternoon Sessions Sessions 40-49<br />

Wednesday — 2:00pm-5:00pm<br />

Loading All Remaining Power Points Sessions 50-60<br />

Poster Session Setup Date and Time<br />

Poster Presentations will be located in the Exhibit Hall<br />

on Level 1 of the Conference Center. Each day of the<br />

conference a Q&A time is set up to meet with the<br />

Poster Presenters. At the end of each session there will<br />

be three Poster Presentations selected as “Best of<br />

Show”. These winning selections will remain until the<br />

end of the conference. We ask that you check back each<br />

day for these selections and on Thursday to view all of<br />

the awardees.<br />

Day Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday<br />

Session # 9 19 39 A/B/C 60<br />

Poster 8:00 - 8:00 - 8:00 - Best of<br />

Setup 12:00 8:30 8:30 Show<br />

Poster 12:00 - 8:30 - 8:30 - 8:30 -<br />

Period 5:45 5:45 5:45 11:00<br />

Q&A 12:30 - 10:15 - 10:15 - x<br />

Period 1:30 10:40 10:40<br />

Q&A 3:30 - 3:30 - 3:30 - x<br />

Period 4:10 4:10 4:10<br />

Poster 5:45 - 5:45 - 5:45 - 11:00 -<br />

Removal 6:00 6:00 6:00 12:30


Acronym List<br />

AEA Atomic Energy Agency<br />

ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable<br />

ANDRA Agence nationale pour la gestion des<br />

déchets radioactifs<br />

ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers<br />

BWR Boiling Water Reactor<br />

CEA Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux<br />

Energies Alternatives<br />

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response,<br />

Compensation and Liability Act<br />

CH-TRU Contact Handled Transuranic Waste<br />

DAW Dry Activated Waste<br />

DNFSB Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board<br />

DOE Department of Energy<br />

EIS Environmental Impact Statement<br />

EM Environmental Management<br />

EPA Environmental Protection Agency<br />

EPRI Electric Power Research Institute<br />

ER Environmental Remediation<br />

FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action<br />

<strong>Program</strong><br />

HEPA High Efficiency Particulate Air<br />

HEU Highly Enriched Uranium<br />

HLW High Level Waste<br />

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency<br />

IDN International Decommissioning Network<br />

ILW Intermediate Level Waste<br />

IPSN Institut de Protection et de SureteNucleaire<br />

ISM Integrated Safety Management<br />

JAERI Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute<br />

KAERI Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute<br />

LEU Low Enriched Uranium<br />

LILW Low-Intermediate Level Waste<br />

LLW Low Level Waste<br />

LSA Low Specific Activity<br />

M&I Management & Integration<br />

M&O Management & Operation<br />

MOX Mixed Uranium-Plutonium Oxide<br />

MW Mixed Waste<br />

Notes<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

N-DA Non-Detectable Activity<br />

NDA Nuclear Decommissioning Authority<br />

NEA Nuclear Energy Agency<br />

NED Nuclear Engineering Division<br />

NEI Nuclear Energy Institute<br />

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act<br />

NI Nuclear Institute<br />

NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration<br />

NORM Natural Occurring Radioactive Material<br />

NPO Nuclear Power Operations<br />

NPP Nuclear Power Plant<br />

NWPA Nuclear Waste Policy Act<br />

OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation &<br />

Development<br />

PRA Probabilistic Risk Analysis<br />

PWR Pressurized Water Reactor<br />

R&D Research & Development<br />

RCC Reims Champagne Congrès Centre<br />

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act<br />

RH-TR Remote Handled Transuranic Waste<br />

ROC Republic of China<br />

RPV Reactor Pressure Vessel<br />

RW Rad Waste<br />

SFEN Société Française d’Energie Nucléaire<br />

SNF Spent Nuclear Fuel<br />

SRW Solid Radioactive Waste<br />

TENORM Technologically Enhanced Naturally<br />

Occurring Radioactive Material<br />

TRU Transuranic<br />

TRUPACT Transuranic Package Transporter<br />

USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers<br />

USDOD US Department of Defense<br />

USDOE US Department of Energy<br />

USNRC US Nuclear Regulatory Commission<br />

WAC Waste Acceptance Criteria<br />

WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot Plant<br />

WM Waste Management Symposium<br />

WNA World Nuclear Association<br />

Notes<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________<br />

11


12<br />

Reims City Site Map<br />

RCC<br />

Wednesday Banquet<br />

Champagne de Castelnau Caveau<br />

5 rue Gosset<br />

Reims Train Station to Reims<br />

Champagne Congrès (RCC) Centre (15 minute walk)


Reims Road Map and Hotel Locations<br />

Wednesday Banquet<br />

Champagne de Castelnau Caveau<br />

5 rue Gosset<br />

# HOTEL NAME / ADDRESS<br />

3 Grand Hotel des Templiers / 22 rue des Templiers, 51100 Reims<br />

4 Kyriad Reims Center / 7‐9 rue du Général Sarrail, 51100 Reims<br />

5 Grand Hotel Continental / 93 Place Drouet Erlon, 51100 Reims<br />

6 Holiday Inn Garden Court / 46 Rue Buitrette, 51100 Reims<br />

7 Mercure Cathedrale Hotel / 31 Boulevard Paul Doumer, 51100 Reims<br />

11 Best Western – Hotel de la Paix / 9 rue Buirette, 51100 Reims<br />

12 Hotel Porte Mars / 2 place de la République, 51100 Reims<br />

13 Quality Hotel / 37 Boulevard Paul Doumer, 51100 Reims<br />

14 Grand Hotel de l’Univers / 41 Boulevard Foch, 51100 Reims<br />

16 Bristol Hotel / 76 place Drouet d’Erlon, 51100 Reims<br />

20 Hotel Crystal / 86, place Drouet d’Erlon, 51100 Reims<br />

21 Hotel du Grand Nord / 75 Place Drouet, 51100 Reims<br />

22 Express by Holiday Inn / Boulevard Paul Doumer 21, 51100 Reims<br />

23 Ibis Centre Reims / 28 boulevard Joffre, 51100 Reims<br />

28 Suite Hotel / 1 rue Edouart Mignot, 51100 Reims<br />

29 Résidence Clairmarais / 25 Rue Edouard Mignot, 51100 Reims<br />

13


14<br />

Convention Center — Level 0 (Entrance Access)


Convention Center — Level 1 & Level 2<br />

Level 1 — Registration, Exhibits, Poster, and Speaker’s Briefings<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Lounge Area<br />

C<br />

A – Registration/Speaker & Co-Chair Check-In,<br />

B – Poster Area, C – Speaker's Briefing<br />

Level 2 — Opening Sessions and All Technical Sessions<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

10<br />

D<br />

E<br />

D – Opening Session<br />

1-10 – Technical Session Rooms<br />

E – Sunday Welcome Reception/ Monday Morning Break Area<br />

15


SESSION #<br />

16<br />

Technical <strong>Program</strong> at a Glance<br />

SESSION TITLES<br />

MONDAY AM - SEPTEMBER 26, 2011<br />

1 Opening Session • • • • • Salle Royale 9:00<br />

MONDAY PM - SEPTEMBER 26, 2011<br />

2 PANEL: Approaches for International Collaboration • Room 1 1:45<br />

3 PANEL: Lessons Learned: Chernobyl 25 Years Later, TMI & Other Experiences • Salle Royale 1:45<br />

4 National and International <strong>Program</strong>s for L/ILW Management • Room 2 1:45<br />

5 L/ILW Treatment Technology Development and Implementation • Room 3 1:45<br />

6 Issues and Solutions Related to Spent Fuel, TRU, and HLW Transportation and Disposal • Room 4 1:45<br />

7 National and International ER <strong>Program</strong>s • Room 5 1:45<br />

8 Experiences in ER Clean-Up Methods and Actions • Room 10 1:45<br />

9 POSTER SESSION: Low/Intermediate Level Waste Management Posters • Exhibit Hall 12:00<br />

TUESDAY AM - SEPTEMBER 27, 2011<br />

10 PANEL: Emerging Issues in the Management of I/ILW • Room 1 8:30<br />

11 PANEL: IAEA: How can Networks Improve the Implementation of ER Projects? • Room 4 8:30<br />

12 Waste Minimization, Avoidance, and Recycling • Room 2 8:30<br />

13 HLW, Fissile, TRU and Spent Fuel Short and Long-Term Storage Issues • Room 3 8:30<br />

14 D&D of Power Reactors and Research Reactors • Room 5 8:30<br />

15 The French D&D Activities - Organization, Strategy, Objectives and Experience • Room 10 8:30<br />

16 National and International D&D <strong>Program</strong>s • Room 10 10:45<br />

17 Applying Strategic Planning, Decision-Making and Risk Reduction Methodologies in EM • Room 6 8:30<br />

18 Economic Analyses, Monitoring Strategies and Project Management in EM • Room 6 10:45<br />

19 POSTER SESSION: Spent Fuel, Fissile, Transuranic and HLW Management Posters • Exhibit Hall 8:30<br />

TUESDAY PM - SEPTEMBER 27, 2011<br />

20 Challenges When Selecting Disposal Options in the Light of the New IAEA Classification Scheme • Room 1 1:45<br />

21 PANEL: Interim Storage, Geological Disposal, Partitioning & Transmutation • Room 4 1:45<br />

22 PANEL: Interim Storage, Geological Disposal, Partitioning & Transmutation Issues • Room 4 4:15<br />

23 Advanced L/ILW Conditioning Technologies - Part 1 of 2 • Room 2 1:45<br />

24 L/ILW Waste Characterization, Assay, and Tracking Systems - Part 1 of 2 • Room 2 4:15<br />

25 D&D of Non-Reactor Nuclear Facilities • Room 3 1:45<br />

26 D&D Technologies - Part 1 of 2 • Room 5 1:45<br />

27 ER Site Characterization and Monitoring - Part 1 of 2 • Room 10 1:45<br />

28 Public Perception Issues and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies in Radioactive EM • Room 6 1:45<br />

WEDNESDAY AM - SEPTEMBER 28, 2011<br />

29 PANEL: International Cooperation: NEA Road Map, How to Increase Synergy • Room 1 8:30<br />

30 Siting, Design, Construction, and Operation of L/ILW Disposal Facilities - Part 1 of 2 • Room 2 8:30<br />

31 L/ILW Waste Characterization, Assay, and Tracking Systems - Part 2 of 2 • Room 3 8:30<br />

LLW<br />

HLW<br />

D&D<br />

ER<br />

EM<br />

ROOM #<br />

TIME


SESSION #<br />

Technical <strong>Program</strong> at a Glance<br />

WEDNESDAY AM - SEPTEMBER 28, 2011<br />

32 Repository <strong>Program</strong>s: - Part 1 of 2 • Room 4 8:30<br />

33 Recent Advances in Processing and Immobilization of HLW, Fissile Material and<br />

Transuanic (TRU) - Part 1 of 2 • Room 6 8:30<br />

34 Uranium Sites, ER Issues, Site Characterization and Monitoring - Part 2 of 2 • Room 10 8:30<br />

35 Merged with Session 34<br />

SESSION TITLES<br />

36 Radium Remediatio:- Historical Perspectives and Current Circumstances - Part 1 of 3 • Room 10 10:45<br />

37 Young Generation Network (YGN) and Professional Development <strong>Program</strong>s - Presentations • Room 5 8:30<br />

38 Young Generation Network (YGN) and Professional Development <strong>Program</strong>s - Meeting • Room 5 10:45<br />

39A POSTER SESSION: D&D • Exhibit Hall 8:30<br />

39B POSTER SESSION: ER • Exhibit Hall 8:30<br />

39C POSTER SESSION: EM & Crosscutting • Exhibit Hall 8:30<br />

WEDNESDAY PM - SEPTEMBER 28, 2011<br />

40 D&D Management Approaches and Planning Tools • Room 2 1:45<br />

41 D&D Technologies - Part 2 of 2 • Room 3 1:45<br />

42 Liquid Waste Treatment Process and Experience • Room 5 1:45<br />

43 Siting, Design, Construction, and Operation of L/ILW Disposal Facilities - Part 2 of 2 • Room 6 1:45<br />

44 Disposal Site and Waste Form Characterization and Performance Assessment - Part 1 of 2 • Room 6 4:15<br />

45 Repository <strong>Program</strong>s: - Part 2 of 2 • Room 10 1:45<br />

46 National and International <strong>Program</strong>s for Spent Fuel, Fissile, TRU, and HLW Management • Room 10 4:15<br />

47 Radium Remediation - Historical Perspectives and Current Circumstances - Part 2 of 3 • Room 1 1:45<br />

48 PANEL: Radium Remediation Historical Perspectives and Current Circumstances - Part 3 of 3 • Room 1 4:15<br />

49 PANEL: Communications and Knowledge Management - Part 1 of 2 • Room 4 1:45<br />

50 PANEL: Communications and Knowledge Management - Part 2 of 2 • Room 4 4:15<br />

THURSDAY AM - SEPTEMBER 29, 2011<br />

51 Safety Considerations Associated with L/ILW Management • Room 2 8:30<br />

52 Disposal Site and Waste Form Characterization and Performance Assessment - Part 2 of 2 • Room 3 8:30<br />

53 Global Partnership in Environmental Management - Part 1 of 2 • Room 1 8:30<br />

54 Global Partnership in Environmental Management - Part 2 of 2 • Room 1 10:45<br />

55 Safety and Security Related to Environmental and Nuclear Materials Management • Room 4 8:30<br />

56 Advanced L/ILW Technologies - Part 2 of 2 • Room 4 10:45<br />

57 Recent Advances in Processing and Immobilization of HLW, Fissile and TRU - Part 2 of 2 • Room 5 8:30<br />

58 D&D Radiological Characterization and Monitoring • Room 10 8:30<br />

59 Risk/Performance Assessments and Contaminant Migration • Room 6 8:30<br />

60 POSTER SESSION: Best Posters of ICEM2011 • • • • • Exhibit Hall 8:30<br />

LLW<br />

HLW<br />

D&D<br />

ER<br />

EM<br />

ROOM #<br />

TIME<br />

17


Monday AM Technical Sessions<br />

Presentations with a paper prepared for the post conference CD are<br />

noted as “wP”. Presentations without papers are noted as “w/oP”.<br />

Authors and Panelists speaking are shown in Bold. Coffee will be<br />

served at 8:00am, Tuesday - Thursday in Lounge A in the Exhibit Hall.<br />

SESSION 1<br />

Monday: 9:00am -12:30pm Room: Salle Royale<br />

PLENARY SESSION<br />

Co-Chairs: Yvette Collazo, US DOE (USA)<br />

Dominique Grenêche, SFEN (France)<br />

The Opening Session will begin Monday morning with the keynote<br />

presentations setting the theme for this year’s conference. Coffee will<br />

be served on the 2nd floor Foyer from 08:00 until the program begins<br />

at 9:00am.<br />

• Welcome to the ICEM’11 Conference —<br />

Yvette Collazo, for ASME (USA)<br />

• Welcome to Reims —<br />

Dominique Grenêche for SFEN (France)<br />

Plenary Speakers:<br />

• Mr. Christophe Behar, Nuclear Energy Director, CEA (France)<br />

• Ms. Tracy Mustin, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for EM,<br />

DOE (USA)<br />

• Mr. Francois-Michel Gonnot, Chairman of the Board, Andra<br />

(France)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

• Dr. Tero Varjoranta, Director, Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and<br />

Waste Technology, IAEA (Austria)<br />

• Mr. Arnaud Gay, Executive Vice President of the Nuclear Sites<br />

Value Development Business Unit, AREVA (France)<br />

• Conference Organization and Administration: Gary Benda,<br />

ICEM Conference Manager (USA)<br />

SESSION 2<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 1<br />

PANEL: APPROACHES FOR INTERNATIONAL<br />

COLLABORATION (5.18)<br />

Co-Chairs: Rosa Ramirez, US DOE (USA)<br />

John Mathieson, UK Nuclear Decommissioning<br />

Authority (UK)<br />

Organizers: Ana Han, US DOE<br />

An important element to reducing the cost and schedule of a country’s<br />

and/or organization’s environmental remediation mission is<br />

forming key international collaborative partnerships that focus on<br />

identifying and leveraging international expertise, infrastructure, and<br />

collaboration opportunities. This panel will provide an overview of<br />

the different approaches and initiatives used to promote international<br />

collaboration in environmental remediation and/or radioactive waste<br />

management, with a focus on the challenges and opportunities unique<br />

to each country and/or organization.<br />

Panelists include: Mark Butez, Andra (France); John Mathieson,<br />

NDA (UK); Ian Bainbridge, AECL (Canada); Jong-Kil Park,<br />

KHNP (Korea); Malgorzata K. Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection<br />

Authority (Norway)<br />

SESSION 3<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: Salle Royale<br />

PANEL: LESSONS LEARNED: FUKUSHIMA, CHERNOBYL-<br />

25 YEARS LATER, TMI-2 & OTHER EXPERIENCES (3.11)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jas S. Devgun, Sargent & Lundy (USA)<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN<br />

(France)<br />

Organizers: Jas S. Devgun and Jean-Guy Nokhamzon<br />

This panel was initially planned to discuss confinement activities and<br />

lessons learned from Chernobyl at a time of 25th anniversary of the<br />

Chernobyl accident (April 26, 1986), lessons from TMI-2 accident<br />

(March 28, 1979) and other industry experience with smaller events.<br />

However, the natural events of March 11, 2011 (large earthquake and<br />

18<br />

tsunami) led to the accident at the Fukushima- Dai-ichi complex<br />

which has been given the highest rating of seven on the international<br />

scale, equivalent to that of the 1986 Chernobyl crisis. The recovery<br />

efforts at Fukushima are still ongoing. This panel will discuss lessons<br />

learned from Fukushima, Chernobyl, and TMI-2 related to recovery,<br />

confinement, decommissioning, and future design lessons.<br />

Panelists include: Dr. Tero Varjoranta, IAEA (Austria); Sergii<br />

Mitichkin, Chernobyl NPP (Ukraine); Thomas Chauveau,<br />

Bouygues-Construction (France); Didier Dall’ava,<br />

CEA/DEN/DADN (France); Svetlana Bratskaya, Institute of Chemistry<br />

of Russian Academy of Science (Russia); and Dominique<br />

Greneche, SFEN (France)<br />

SESSION 4<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 2<br />

NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR L/ILW<br />

MANAGEMENT (1.2)<br />

Co-Chairs: Andrew Baker, Eden Nuclear and Environment<br />

Ltd. (UK)<br />

Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Keith Anderson and David Wallace<br />

1. Low Level Waste Disposal Regulatory Issues in the US<br />

(w/oP-59311)<br />

David James, Thomas Kalinowski, DW James Consulting LLC;<br />

Lisa Edwards, Electric Power Research Inst. (USA)<br />

2. Taking the UK’s National LLW Progamme from Strategy<br />

Development to Implementation (w/oP-59059)<br />

David Rossiter, Rachel O’Donnell, LLW Repository Ltd. (UK)<br />

3. CEA’s Waste Management Policy and Strategy. Lessons<br />

Learned (w/oP-ICEM2011-59201)<br />

Didier Dall’ava, CEA (France)<br />

4. Regulations for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste in the<br />

Konrad Repository (w/oP-ICEM2011-59105)<br />

Hagen Gunther Jung, Lower Saxony Water Management,<br />

Coastal Protection and Nature Conservation Agency (NLWKN);<br />

Gabriele Bandt, TÜV Nord EnSys Hannover GmbH & Co. KG<br />

(Germany)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. The Hydrogeologic Environment for a Proposed Deep<br />

Geologic Repository in Canada for Low and Intermediate<br />

Level Radioactive Waste (w/oP-59285)<br />

Jonathan Sykes, Stefano Normani, Yong Yin, University of<br />

Waterloo; Mark Jensen, Nuclear Waste Management<br />

Organization (Canada)<br />

6. Radioactive Waste Management Challenges and Progress in<br />

Iraq (wP-59164)<br />

Fouad Al-Musawi, Emad Shamsaldin, Ministry of Science &<br />

Technology (Iraq); John Cochran, Sandia National Laboratories<br />

(USA)<br />

SESSON 5<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 3<br />

L/ILW TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND<br />

IMPLEMENTATION (1.15)<br />

Co-Chairs: Hans Codee, COVRA N.V. (Netherlands)<br />

Keith Anderson, ECC (USA)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Hans Codee and Keith Anderson<br />

1. Research and Technology Delivery at Sellafield, UK (w/oP-<br />

59372)<br />

Mike James, Sellafield Ltd (UK)<br />

2. Waste Loading Enhancements for Hanford LAW Glasses<br />

(wP-59018)<br />

Albert Kruger, US Department of Energy WTP Engineering<br />

Division (USA)<br />

3. THOR(R) Steam Reforming Technology for the Treatment<br />

of Complex and Problematic Wastes (wP-59084)<br />

J. Brad Mason, Adam L. Foster, Studsvik, Inc.(USA)


Technical Sessions Monday PM<br />

4. A Room Temperature Stabilization and Waste Volume<br />

Reduction Method Tested on Belgian Intermediate-Level<br />

Homogeneous Bituminized Waste (Eurobitum) (wP-59103)<br />

Nathalie R.E.N. Impens, SCK-CEN; Jan Deckers,<br />

BelgoProcess; Lesley Adriaensen, Pierre Van Iseghem,<br />

Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie-Centre d’Etude de l’Energie<br />

Nucléaire (Belgium) — BREAK —<br />

5. Standardizing of LLW/ILW Treatment for Russian Type<br />

Pressure Water Reactors (w/oP-59233)<br />

Klaus Buettner, Rainer Slametschka, NUKEM Technologies<br />

GmbH (Germany)<br />

6. 35 Years of Incineration in Studsvik, Lessons Learned and<br />

Recent Modifications and Improvements (wP-59264)<br />

Maria Lindberg, Karin von Kronhelm, Joakim Lövstrand,<br />

Studsvik Nuclear AB (Sweden)<br />

7. Sodium-Rich Wastes: Challenges, Analysis and Performance<br />

(w/oP-59316)<br />

Daniel Brew, Melody L Carter, Lou Vance, Martin W Stewart,<br />

ANSTO (Australia)<br />

8. Preliminary Demonstration of GeoMelt Treatment of<br />

Hanford’s K-Basin Sludge (wP-59004)<br />

Keith Witwer, IMPACT Services, Inc. (USA)<br />

SESSION 6<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 4<br />

ISSUES AND SOLUTIONS RELATED TO SPENT FUEL, TRU,<br />

AND HLW TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL (2-5)<br />

Co-Chairs: Mike Garamszeghy, Nuclear Waste Management<br />

Organization (Canada)<br />

Jean Paul Chiles, Ecole Mines (France)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Jeffrey Griffin and Jean Paul Chiles<br />

1. Initial Assessment of Radon in a Deep Geological Repository<br />

for Used Nuclear Fuel (wP-59145)<br />

Kelly Sedor, Frank Garisto, Helen Leung, Nuclear Waste<br />

Management Organization (Canada)<br />

2. Groundwater Flow Modeling of Periods with Temperate<br />

Climate Conditions for use in a Safety Assessment of a<br />

Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel (w/oP-59154)<br />

Steven Joyce, Lee Hartley, Serco; Trevor Simpson, Serco (UK)<br />

3. Conception of a New Conditioning Process, of Strongly<br />

Plutonium Contaminated Waste Canisters (w/oP-59205)<br />

Maxime Michel-Noel, ONET Technologies-ONECTRA (France)<br />

4. Methodological Guide on Development of Work Plan for<br />

Mitigation of Accident Consequences during Transportation<br />

of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators and<br />

Radioisotope Heat Sources (w/oP-59162)<br />

Valeriy Shempelev, Scientific and Engineering Centre for<br />

Nuclear and Radiation Safety; Vladimir Reka, Rostechnadzor;<br />

Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority;<br />

Alexander Smetnik, Evgenij Kapralov, FSUE VO “Safety”;<br />

Galina Zubareva, Tver State Medical Academy (Russia/Norway)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Physical and Chemical Processes during Vacuum Drying of<br />

Metallic Spent Nuclear Fuel (wP-59114)<br />

Martin Plys, Michael Epstein, Sung Jin Lee, Robert Apthorpe,<br />

Fauske & Associates LLC (USA)<br />

6. Security Issues for Long-Term Storage of Used Fuel<br />

(w/oP-59380)<br />

Felicia A Durán, Gregory Wyss, Calvin Jaeger, Sandia National<br />

Laboratories (USA)<br />

SESSION 7<br />

Monday: 1:45pm-6:00pm Room: 5<br />

NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ER PROGRAMS (4.2)<br />

Co-Chairs: Leo P.M. Velzen, Nuclear Research and<br />

Consultancy Group (Netherlands)<br />

Nick DiMascio, Bartlett Services Inc. (USA)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Steve Brown and Leo Van Velzen<br />

1. Objectives for Remediation of Areas Polluted by Radioactive<br />

Substances in France (w/oP-59300)<br />

Charlotte Cazala, Didier Gay, Olivier Chabanis, Jerome<br />

Guillevic, IRSN; Odile Palut Laurent, Geraldine Dandrieux,<br />

ASN; Alain Thomassin, IRSN/DRPH/SER/UETP; Chapalain<br />

Estelle, Laurence Roy, Ministère de lEcologie, du<br />

Développement Durable, des Transports et du Logement<br />

(France)<br />

2. Remediation of AREVA Miramas Site (w/oP-59312)<br />

Gilles Potier, AREVA (France)<br />

3. The Value of a Mature, Stable, and Transparent Regulatory<br />

Framework in Facilitating ER <strong>Program</strong>s Lessons Learned in<br />

Decommissioning of Uranium Recovery and Other Facilities<br />

in the USA (w/oP-59411)<br />

Keith I. McConnell, Larry Camper, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory<br />

Commission (USA)<br />

4. The First New Conventional Uranium Mill in the U.S. in 30<br />

Years Licensing of the Pinon Ridge Project, Colorado, USA<br />

(w/oP-59330)<br />

Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd; Frank Filas, Energy<br />

Fuels Resources, Lakewood, (USA)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Integrated <strong>Program</strong> Management for Major Nuclear<br />

Decommissioning and Environmental Remediation Projects<br />

(w/oP-59068)<br />

John Lehew, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (USA)<br />

6. EPRI Nuclear Power Plant Groundwater Protection<br />

<strong>Program</strong> (w/oP-59341)<br />

Karen Kim, Electric Power Research Institute (USA) -<br />

Presentation by Sean Bushart, EPRI (USA)<br />

7. Clean Up Strategies and Results in USIN Site in São Paulo<br />

City, Brazil (w/oP-59243)<br />

Rodrigo Raposo de Almeida, Federal Fluminense University;<br />

Valter J.G. Mortágua, Industrias Nucleares do Brasil (Brazil)<br />

8. Application of an Environmental Remediation Methodology:<br />

Theory vs. Practice. Reflections and Two Belgian Case<br />

Studies (wP-59184)<br />

Koen Mannaerts, Stephane Pepin, Boris Dehandschutter, Walter<br />

Blommaert, Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC)<br />

(Belgium)<br />

SESSION 8<br />

Monday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 10<br />

EXPERIENCES IN ER CLEAN-UP METHODS AND ACTIONS<br />

(4.4)<br />

Co-Chairs: Dawn Kaback, AMEC (USA)<br />

Virgene Mulligan, ARS International, Inc. (USA)<br />

Organizers: Didier Dubot and Steve Brown<br />

Reviewers: Susan Walter and Walter Van Hecke<br />

1. Groundwater Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium along<br />

the Columbia River at the Hanford Site in Washington State,<br />

USA (wP-59030)<br />

Dyan Foss, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company; Briant<br />

Charboneau, DOE RL (USA)<br />

2. Environmental Remediation of an Alstom Grid Industrial<br />

Site (France) (wP-59270)<br />

Stéphanie Romero, ALSTOM GRID (France)<br />

3. Design and Installation of a Permeable Treatment Wall to<br />

Passively Remove Strontium-90 from Groundwater at a<br />

Former Commercial Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facility in<br />

New York (wP-59292)<br />

Douglas Bablitch, Rupeet Malhotra, Richard Frappa, Scott<br />

Warner, AMEC Geomatrix (USA)<br />

19


Monday PM Technical Sessions<br />

4. Decommissioning of the Active Storage Facility for Residuals<br />

in Rheinsberg (Brandenburg/Germany) and Results of<br />

Groundwater Monitoring (wP-59134)<br />

Mathias Steinhoff, Öko-Institut e.V. (Germany)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Environmental Surveillance System for the Shchuchye Site<br />

(wP-59042)<br />

Stephane Belbeze, Matthieu Hallouin, Antea (France)<br />

6. 25 Years After Chernobyl NPP Accident: Experience and<br />

Trends of Radioactive Contaminated Soils Rehabilitation in<br />

Belarus (wP-59242)<br />

Leanid Maskalchuk, JIPNR-Sosny NAS of Belarus (Belarus)<br />

SESSION 9<br />

Monday: 12:30pm - 6:00pm Room: Exhibit Hall<br />

POSTER SESSION: LOW/INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (1.1)<br />

Co-Chairs: Steve Rima, AMEC (USA)<br />

Cathy Hickey, CH2M Hill (USA)<br />

Reviewers: Donald Goebel, Vickie Maranville, and David Wallace<br />

1. Numerical Modeling for Colloid-Facilitated Migration of N-<br />

Number Radionuclides Chains in the Fractured Rock (w/oP-<br />

59257)<br />

Chun-Ping Jen, National Chung Cheng University (Taiwan)<br />

2. Laboratory Experiments on the Alteration of Highly-<br />

Compacted Bentonite by Alkaline Solution and the Effects<br />

on Physical Properties (wP-59318)<br />

Satoru Miyoshi, Shinya Morikami, Yukinobu Kimura, Tomoko<br />

Jinno, Shuichi Yamamoto, Obayashi Corporation (Japan)<br />

3. Gas Transport Properties of Pumice Tuff for Performance<br />

Assessment of LLW Disposal Facility (wP-59074)<br />

Shuichi Yamamoto, Kenichiro Suzuki, Obayashi Corporation;<br />

Mamoru Kumagai, Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited; Yasuhiro<br />

Tawara, Koji Mori, Geosphere Environmental Technology<br />

Corporation (Japan)<br />

4. Extraction and Confinement of Caesium Using<br />

Functionalized Porous Materials (w/oP-59106)<br />

Carole Delchet, Guillaume Toquer, Agnès Grandjean, Institut de<br />

Chimie Séparative de Marcoule; Joulia Larionova, Yannick<br />

GUARI (France)<br />

5. Photocatalytic and Photochemistry Degradation of Liquid<br />

Waste Containing EDTA (wP-59144)<br />

Célia Lepeytre, Cyril Lavaud, Guillaume Serve, CEA Marcoule<br />

(France)<br />

6. Historical Waste – Biological Shield & Documentation<br />

during Decommissioning (w/oP-59056)<br />

Thomas Nellemann, Anne Sørensen, Danish Decommissioning<br />

(Denmark)<br />

7. A Numerical Interpretation of Density Homogenization of<br />

Bentonite Material in Wetting Process (wP-59153)<br />

Atsushi Iizuka, Yusuke Takayama, Katsuyuki Kawai, Kobe<br />

University; Shinya Tachibana, Saitama University; Shintaro<br />

Ohno, Ichizo Kobayashi, Kajima Corporation (Japan)<br />

8. Comparison of Organic and Inorganic Ion Exchangers for<br />

the Treatment of Radioactive Liquid Wastes by Ion<br />

Exchange Processes (w/oP-59107)<br />

Yves Barre, CEA (France)<br />

9. Detritiation of JET Plasma Facing Components (w/oP-<br />

59345)<br />

Pierre Trabuc, Karine Liger, Nicolas Ghirelli, Christophe<br />

Perrais, CEA (France)<br />

10. Experimental Drop Testing of Waste Containers for the<br />

KONRAD Repository (w/oP-59269)<br />

Tino Neumeyer, Karsten Müller, Holger Voelzke, Federal<br />

Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) (Germany)<br />

11. Instrumented Measurements on Radioactive Waste Disposal<br />

Containers during Experimental Drop Testing (wP-59142)<br />

Thomas Quercetti, Andre Musolff, Karsten Müller, BAM -<br />

Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (Germany)<br />

20<br />

12. Regulatory Clearance of Spent Steel Drums (wP-59405)<br />

Dae-Seok Hong, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute;<br />

Young-Yong Ji, Il-Sik Kang, Kyoung-Kil Kwak, Woo-Seog Ryu,<br />

KAERI (Korea)<br />

13. Liquid Waste Treatment Process (w/oP-59061)<br />

Bouchta Moussaif, Touria Lambarki el Allioui, CNESTEN<br />

(Morocco)<br />

14. Cast Iron Transport, Storage and Disposal Containers for<br />

use in UK Nuclear Licensed Sites (w/oP-59412)<br />

Joerg Viermann, Matthias P Messer, GNS Gesellschaft fuer<br />

Nuklear-Service mbH (UK)<br />

15. Optimization of Radioactive Waste Cementation for<br />

Decommissioning of Salaspils Research Reactor (wP-59066)<br />

Gunta Abramenkova, Maris Klavins, University of Latvia;<br />

Andris Abramenkovs, Latvian Environment, Geology and<br />

Meteorology Centre (Latvia)<br />

16. Bayesian Statistics Applied to the Activities of Waste Drums<br />

(wP-59081)<br />

Richard Bull, Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

17. Physical Modelling of Turbulent Jets for Nuclear Sludge<br />

Mobilisation (wP-59147)<br />

Donna McKendrick, Institute of Particle Science and<br />

Engineering; Simon Biggs, Michael Fairweather, James Young,<br />

University of Leeds (UK)<br />

18. Environmentally-Friendly Recovery of Uranium from<br />

Nuclear Fuel Scraps Generated at Nuclear Fuel Fabrication<br />

Process (wP-59383)<br />

Kwang-Wook Kim, Dong-Yong Chung, Eil-Hee Lee, Keun-<br />

Young Lee, Kune Woo Lee, Jei-Kwon Moon, Korea Atomic<br />

Energy Research Insititute (Korea)<br />

19. Self Cleaning HEPA Filtration Without Interrupting Process<br />

Flow (wP-59347)<br />

Chris Chadwick, Porvair Filtration Group (UK)<br />

20. Steam and Condensate Tolerant HEPA Filter - Substitute for<br />

ESP (wP-59346)<br />

Chris Chadwick, Porvair Filtration Group (UK)<br />

21. Status of Site Investigation for L/ILW Facilities in the<br />

Philippines (wP-59262)<br />

Maria V. Palattao, Carl Nohay, Rolando Reyes, Alfonso<br />

Singayan, Philippine Nuclear Research Institute (Philippines);<br />

Dirk Mallants, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK-CEN<br />

(Belgium)<br />

22. Management of Smoke Detectors Containing Radioactive<br />

Sources (wP-59049)<br />

Mercedes Salgado Mojena, Juan Carlos Benitez Navarro, Juan<br />

Miguel Hernandez García, Rafael Castillo Gomez, Ania<br />

Berdellans Escobar, CPHR (Cuba); Carlos Jose Pirez, Pedro<br />

Graciano Soto, Atomic Centre Ezeiza, National Commission of<br />

Atomic Energy (Argentina)<br />

23. Curing Time effect on the Fraction of 137 CS from<br />

Immobilized Radioactive Evaporator Sludge by Cement<br />

(wP-59006)<br />

Ilija Plecas, Slavko Dimovic, Vinca Institute of Nuclear<br />

Sciences; Radojica Pesic, Nuclear Facilities of Serbia (Serbia)<br />

24. An Approach for the Development of a Comprehensive Data<br />

Base of Time-Dependent Hydraulic and Transport<br />

Parameters for Concrete Engineered Barriers (wP-59299)<br />

Suresh Seetharam, Dirk Mallants, Janez Perko, Diederik<br />

Jacques, SCK.CEN (Belgium)<br />

25. Radiation Protection Experiences in Retrieval of Radioactive<br />

Waste at Püspökszilágy Repository (wP-59054)<br />

László Juhász, National Research Institute for Radiobiology<br />

and Radiohygiene; Sándor Kapitány, István Barnabás, Public<br />

Limited Company for Radioactive Waste Management; Anna<br />

Mária Motoc, National Research Institute for Radiobiology and<br />

Radiohygiene (Hungary)


Technical Sessions Tuesday AM<br />

SESSION 10<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 1<br />

PANEL: EMERGING ISSUES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF<br />

I/ILW (1.16)<br />

Co-Chairs: Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

Angie Jones, AMEC (USA)<br />

Organizer: Michel Dutzer<br />

This panel will focus on strategies for the management of all low and<br />

intermediate level waste (L/ILW). Based on experience in different<br />

national programs, it will discuss various options and their merits for<br />

managing L/ILW. It will consider the definition of different categories<br />

of L/ILW and their potential routes for disposal including waste of<br />

very low activity, often arising in high volumes as contaminated land,<br />

or from decommissioning. There will be discussion on large, disused<br />

components that are part of the decommissioning L/ILW waste<br />

stream. The engineering of facilities for the disposal of all such wastes<br />

should be proportionate to the long-term environmental impact that<br />

might arise.<br />

Panelists include: Irena Mele, Section Head of Waste Technology,<br />

IAEA (Austria); Keith McConnell, Deputy Director, US NRC (USA);<br />

Bruno Cahen, Director, Andra (France); Geraldine Dandrieux,<br />

Head of Waste, Research Facilities and Fuel Cycle Facilities<br />

Department (France); Kazuyuki Kato, Federation of Electric Power<br />

Companies (Japan); Paul Dixon, Los Alamos National Lab (USA);<br />

and Dick Raaz, Chairman and Director, UK LLWR (UK)<br />

SESSION 11<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am-12:30pm Room: 4<br />

PANEL: HOW CAN NETWORKS IMPROVE THE<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF ER PROJECTS? THE IAEA<br />

NETWORK ON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND<br />

REMEDIATION-ENVIRONET (4.15)<br />

Co-Chairs: Leo Van Velzen, EURSSEM, NRG (Netherlands)<br />

Rosa Ramirez, US DOE (USA)<br />

Organizer: Horst Monken Fernandes<br />

Environmental remediation projects tend to be constrained by several<br />

aspects being the lack of financial resources one of the most<br />

prominent factors. However, even when financial resources are<br />

available lack of institutional framework (e.g. lack of regulations),<br />

lack of human resources, and absence of a solid technical basis at the<br />

national level will contribute to slow the pace of implementation.<br />

Networking intends to bring problem holders and solution donors<br />

together and enhance the exchange of experience while fostering the<br />

construction of partnerships. The ENVIRONET was initially<br />

presented to the international community at WM 2010. The ICEM<br />

2011 will be an opportunity to present its achievement, broaden its<br />

affiliation and build an agenda of activities for the next years.<br />

Panelists include: Leo van Velzen, NRD (Netherlands); Peter<br />

Booth, WSP Group (UK); and joining after the break - Irena Mele,<br />

Section Head of Waste Technology, IAEA (Austria)<br />

SESSION 12<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 2<br />

WASTE MINIMIZATION, AVOIDANCE, AND RECYCLING<br />

(1.3)<br />

Co-Chairs: Ian Beadle, AMEC (UK)<br />

Kapila Fernando, ANSTO (Australia)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Ian Beadle and Kapila Fernando<br />

1. Waste Minimization by Melting - Recycling of Radioactive<br />

Metals (wP-59040)<br />

Thomas Kluth, Ulrich Quade, Siempelkamp Nukleartechnik<br />

GmbH (Germany)<br />

2. Waste Minimization Benefits of Dissolvable Protective<br />

Clothing (wP-59003)<br />

Michael Cournoyer, David Wannigman, Robert Dodge, Los<br />

Alamos National Laboratory (USA)<br />

3. Evaluation of External Exposure during Building and<br />

Operation of Concrete Bridges Constructions that Reuse the<br />

Conditionally Released Steels (wP-59120)<br />

Michal Panik, Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology<br />

(Slovakia)<br />

4. Treatment of Spent Acidic Decontaminants with a High-<br />

Efficiency Cementation Method (wP-59063)<br />

Kou-Ming Lin, Ching-Tu Chang, Ming-Shin Wu, Wen-Chen<br />

Lee, Jen-Chieh Chung, Tsong-Yang Wei, Institute of Nuclear<br />

Energy Research (Taiwan)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Methodology for Identification of Conditionally Released<br />

Materials from Decommissioning using the OMEGA Code<br />

(wP-59175)<br />

Matej Zachar, Vladimír Daniaka, DECOM, a.s.; Vladimir<br />

Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

6. Impact of Nuclide Vector Composition Contained in<br />

Conditionally Released Steel Reused In Motorway Tunnels<br />

Scenario on Calculated Individual Effective Doses (wP-<br />

59128)<br />

Tomas Hrncir, Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology<br />

(Slovakia)<br />

7. Evaluation of Technical, Economic and Financial Feasibility<br />

for Recycling and Reprocessing of Radioactive Waste from a<br />

Remediation Work of Low and Medium Activity for the<br />

Extraction of Heavy Minerals (w/oP-59231)<br />

Rodrigo Raposo de Almeida, Federal Fluminense University;<br />

Valter J.G. Mortágua, Industrias Nucleares do Brasil (Brazil)<br />

8. WNA Statement - Towards Greater Efficiency in the<br />

Management of Low-Level Radioactive Material that<br />

Concurrently Supports Reuse, Recycling and Disposal (w/p -<br />

59414)<br />

Sylvain Saint-Pierre, World Nuclear Association (WNA) (UK)<br />

SESSION 13<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 3<br />

HLW, FISSILE, TRU AND SPENT FUEL SHORT AND LONG-<br />

TERM STORAGE ISSUES (2.4)<br />

Co-Chairs: Vince Dilworth, ASME (USA)<br />

Organizer: James Blankenhorn, Permafix Environmental<br />

Services Inc. (USA)<br />

Reviewer: Bill Wilmarth<br />

1. West Valley Demonstration Project High Level, Transuranic,<br />

and Greater than Class C Wastes (wP-59048)<br />

James Blankenhorn, West Valley Environmental Services (USA)<br />

2. Managing Aging Effects on Used Fuel Dry Cask for Very<br />

Long-Term Storage (wP-59067)<br />

Omesh Chopra, Dwight Diercks, David Ma, Vik Shah, Shiu-<br />

Wing Tam, Ralph Fabian, Yung Liu, Mark Nutt, Argonne<br />

National Laboratory (ANL)(USA)<br />

3. Application of Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-<br />

Chemical (THMC) Process In Hydrothermal Systems To<br />

Process Near A High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository (wP-<br />

59246)<br />

Geoffrey Peter, Oregon Institute of Technology Portland Center<br />

(USA)<br />

4. Generic Design Assessment of Long-Term Spent Fuel<br />

Storage for New Reactors in the UK (wP-59174)<br />

Christopher Fisher, Nuclear Directorate, Health and Safety<br />

Executive; Dave Watson, Office of Nuclear Regulation; Ian<br />

Streatfield, Colette Grundy, Saffron Price-Walter, Environment<br />

Agency, Dave Glazbrook, Office of Nuclear Regulation (UK)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

6. Industrial Complementarities between Interim Storage and<br />

Reversible Geological Repository (wP-59237)<br />

Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, Andra (France)<br />

7. Recent Developments in Spent Fuel Management in Norway<br />

(wP-59260)<br />

Peter Bennett, Barbara Oberlander, Erlend Larsen, Institutt for<br />

Energiteknikk (Norway<br />

21


Tuesday AM Technical Sessions<br />

8. Advanced Surveillance Technologies for Used Fuel Long-<br />

Term Storage and Transportation (wP-59032)<br />

Hanchung Tsai, Yung Liu, Mark Nutt, Argonne National<br />

Laboratory; James Shuler, US Department of Energy (USA)<br />

SESSION 14<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am - 12:30am Room: 5<br />

D&D OF POWER REACTORS AND RESEARCH REACTORS<br />

(3.9)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jean-Marie Cuchet, BELGONUCLEAIRE (Belgium)<br />

Kenneth Kok, ASME (USA)<br />

Organizers: Jean-Marie Cuchet and Jas S. Devgun<br />

1. DfD an Approach to New Reactor Designs (wP-59197)<br />

Jas S. Devgun, Sargent & Lundy (USA)<br />

2. Feedback from Westinghouse Experience on Segmentation<br />

of Reactor Vessel Internals (wP-59013)<br />

Joseph Boucau, Westinghouse Electric Company; Stefan<br />

Fallström, Westinghouse; Per Segerud, Westinghouse Electric<br />

Sweden; Paul Kreitman, Westinghouse Electric Company<br />

(Belgium/Sweden/USA)<br />

3. Update on Jose Cabrera NPP Decommissioning (wP-59322)<br />

Juan Santiago, Nieves Martin, Manuel Rodriguez, ENRESA<br />

(Spain)<br />

4. The Decommissioning of the CIEMAT Nuclear Research<br />

Centre (w/oP-59321)<br />

Juan Santiago, Sergio Vidaechea, Manuel Ondaro, ENRESA<br />

(Spain)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. The Removal, Transportation and <strong>Final</strong> Treatment and<br />

Conditioning of the Thetis Research Reactor Spent Fuel of<br />

the University of Ghent (Belgium) Achieved in 2010 Authors<br />

(wP-59261)<br />

Hubert Thierens, Myriam Monsieurs, Ghent University; Vincent<br />

De pooter, Marnix Braeckeveldt, NIRAS/ONDRAF; Luc<br />

Noynaert, SCK●CEN; Patrick Lewandowski, Belgoprocess;<br />

Patrick Maris, Luc Ooms, SCK●CEN; Karel Strijckmans, Ghent<br />

University (Belgium)<br />

6. Decommissioning and Dismantling of the French Brennilis<br />

NPP (w/oP-59366)<br />

Thierry Andre, ONET Technologies; Werner Botzem, Nukem<br />

Technologies (France/Germany)<br />

7. The Chooz a Reactor Dismantling Project (wP-59363)<br />

Estelle Grevin, EDF; Joseph Boucau, Westinghouse Electric<br />

Company (France/Belgium)<br />

8. Full System Decontamination (FSD) Prior to Decommissioning<br />

(wP-59189)<br />

Christoph Stiepani, AREVA NP GmbH (Germany)<br />

SESSION 15<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am - 10:15am Room: 10<br />

THE FRENCH D&D ACTIVITIES - ORGANIZATION,<br />

STRATEGY, OBJECTIVES AND EXPERIENCE (3.2)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN (France)<br />

Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

Organizer: Jean-Guy Nokhamzon<br />

Reviewers: Jean-Guy Nokhamzon and Andy Szilagyi<br />

1. CEA’s Decommissioning Policy and Strategies. Lessons<br />

Learned (w/oP-59203)<br />

Philippe Guiberteau, Didier Dall’ava, CEA; Jean-Guy<br />

Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN (France)<br />

2. Cleansing and Dismantling of CEA-Saclay Nuclear Licensed<br />

Facilities (w/oP -59227)<br />

Michel K. Jeanjacques, Rebecca Glévarec, Isabelle Delaire,<br />

Jean Louis Martin, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux<br />

Energies Alternatives (France)<br />

3. Decontamination and Dismantling of CENDRILLON<br />

Transfer Systems for Radioactive Liquid Solutions (w/oP -<br />

59336)<br />

Michel K. Jeanjacques, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et<br />

aux Energies Alternatives; Frédéric Masure, Alternative<br />

Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (France)<br />

22<br />

4. AREVA Return on Experience from D&D <strong>Program</strong>me<br />

Management - What we have Learned so Far? (w/oP -59324)<br />

Jean-Michel Chabeuf, Thierry Varet, Grégoire de Laval, Guy<br />

Decobert, Frédéric Chambon, AREVA Nuclear Site Value<br />

Development BU (France)<br />

SESSION 16<br />

Tuesday: 10:45am - 12:30pm Room: 10<br />

NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL D&D PROGRAMS (3.3)<br />

Co-Chairs: Sean Bushart, Electric Power Research Institute (USA)<br />

Thibaud Labalette, Andra (France)<br />

Organizers: Jas Devgun and Thierry Varet<br />

Reviewers: Sean Bushart and Dominique Greneche<br />

1. Particularities of CHNPP Site Remediation During its<br />

Decommissioning (wP-59193)<br />

Sergii Mitichkin, Valeriy Seyda, Chernobyl NPP (Ukraine)<br />

2. Division of Nuclear Liabilities between different License<br />

Holders and Owners (wP-59214)<br />

Staffan Lindskog, Swedísh Radiation Safety Authority; Rolf<br />

Sjöblom, Tekedo AB (Sweden)<br />

3. Spanish Approach to Large Decommissioning Projects (wP-<br />

59320)<br />

Juan Santiago, Alejandro Rodríguez, ENRESA (Spain)<br />

4. Decommissioning of Obsolete Nuclear Facilities in the<br />

Nuclear Research Institute Rez (wP-59309)<br />

Josef Podlaha, Karel Svoboda, Nuclear Research Institute Rez;<br />

Eduard Hanslik, T.G.M. Water Research Institute (Czech<br />

Republic)<br />

SESSION 17<br />

Tuesday: 8:30am - 10:15am Room: 6<br />

APPLYING STRATEGIC PLANNING, DECISION-MAKING<br />

AND RISK REDUCTION METHODOLOGIES IN EM (5.7)<br />

Co-Chairs: Mark Nutt, ANL (USA)<br />

Dominique Francois-Bongarcon,<br />

AGORATEK International Consultants (Canada)<br />

Organizer: Roger Seitz<br />

Reviewers: Roger Seitz and Dominique Francois-Bongarcon<br />

1. Can Sustainability be Applied to our Environmental<br />

Remediation Challenges? (w/oP-59148)<br />

Peter Booth, Vicky Gaskin, WSP Environment and Energy (UK)<br />

2. Evolution of Performance Assessment Modeling in the US<br />

(w/oP- 59334)<br />

Paul Black, John Tauxe, Neptune and Company, Inc. (USA)<br />

SESSION 18<br />

Tuesday: 10:45am - 12:30pm Room: 6<br />

ECONOMIC ANALYSES, MONITORING STRATEGIES AND<br />

PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

MANAGEMENT (5.6)<br />

Co-Chairs: Yvette Collazo, US DOE (USA)<br />

Paul Black, Neptune and Company, Inc. (USA)<br />

Organizers: Judy Connell and Yvette Collazo<br />

Reviewers: Yvette Collazo and Paul Black<br />

1. Delivering Value for Money - Trust and Verify? (wP-59253)<br />

Alastair Laird, Project Time & Cost Inc. (USA)<br />

2. The Technical and Economical Optimization of the French<br />

Geological Repository Project (w/oP-59275)<br />

Rodolphe Raffard, Thibaud Labalette, Andra (France)<br />

3. The Environmental Monitoring System Developed within<br />

the Framework of the French Radioactive Waste Deep<br />

Repository Project (w/oP-59296)<br />

Elisabeth Leclerc; Patrick Landais, Andra (France)


Technical Sessions Tuesday PM<br />

SESSION 19<br />

Tuesday: 12:00pm-6:00pm Room: Exhibit Hall<br />

POSTER SESSION: SPENT FUEL, FISSILE, TRANSURANIC<br />

AND HIGH LEVEL WASTE MANAGEMENT (2.1)<br />

Co-Chairs: Ed Bentz, E.J. Bentz & Associates (USA)<br />

Heather Klebba, NFT (USA)<br />

Reviewers: Heather Klebba, Gerald Ouzounian, and Ed Bentz<br />

1. ADONIS, High Count Rate Hp-Ge ƴ Spectrometry<br />

Algorithm: Irradiated Fuel Assembly Measurement<br />

(wP-59234)<br />

Patrick Pin, AREVA NC; Eric Barat, Thomas Dautremer,<br />

Thierry Montagu, Stéphane Normand, CEA - Saclay (France)<br />

2. Technical Know-How for the Investigation and Modelling of<br />

Topographic Evolution for Site Characterisation<br />

(wP-59171)<br />

Ryosuke Doke, Ken-ichi Yasue, Tadafumi Niizato, Akio<br />

Nakayasu, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

3. Validation of Correlations between ND Isotopes and<br />

Difficult-To-Measure Nuclides Predicted with Burn-Up<br />

Calculation Code By Post Irradiation Examination<br />

(wP-59086)<br />

Shiho Asai, Keisuke Okumura, Yukiko Hanzawa, Hideya Suzuki,<br />

Masaaki Toshimitsu, Jun Inagawa, Takaumi Kimura, Japan<br />

Atomic Energy Agency; Satoru Kaneko, Kensuke Suzuki, Tokyo<br />

Electric Power Company (Japan)<br />

4. Computational Study for Inventory Estimation of Se-79, Tc-<br />

99, Sn-126, and Cs-135 in High-Level Radioactive Wastes<br />

from Spent Nuclear Fuels of Light Water Reactors<br />

(wP-59087)<br />

Keisuke Okumura, Shiho Asai, Yukiko Hanzawa, Tsutomu<br />

Okamoto, Hideya Suzuki, Masaaki Toshimitsu, Jun Inagawa,<br />

Takaumi Kimura, Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Satoru Kaneko,<br />

Kensuke Suzuki, Tokyo Electric Power Company (Japan)<br />

5. Industrial Scale HL-LL Waste Canister Transfer<br />

Demonstrator (wP-59305)<br />

Pascal Champ, Jacques Bardet, Benjamin Attias, Cegelec<br />

(France)<br />

6. CESAR5.3: An Industrial Tool for Irradiated Nuclear Fuel<br />

and Waste Characterisation, with an Associated<br />

Qualification (w/oP-59080)<br />

Jean-Marc Vidal, Romain Eschbach, Commissariat à lÉnergie<br />

Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives; Agnes Launay,<br />

Christophe Binet, AREVA_NC (France)<br />

7. Test Procedure with a 15,000 kg half-scale Prototype of<br />

Transport and Storage Cask (w/oP-59141)<br />

Andre Musolff, Thomas Quercetti, Karsten Müller, BAM -<br />

Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (Germany)<br />

8. Capillary Electrophoresis with Laser-Induced Fluorescent<br />

Detection Method Using Highly Emissive Probes for Analysis<br />

of Actinides in Radioactive Wastes (wP-59092)<br />

Tomoko Haraga, Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Yuta Nakano,<br />

Masami Shibukawa, Saitama University; Yutaka Kameo,<br />

Kuniaki Takahashi, Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Shingo Saito,<br />

Saitama University (Japan)<br />

9. A New Way of Eliminating Tributylphosphate and Dodecane<br />

Mixtures Using Advanced Oxidation Techniques<br />

(w/oP-59104)<br />

Geraldine Dupuy, DEWDROPS (France)<br />

10. The FP7 Collaborative Project ReCosy (w/oP-59397)<br />

Gunnar Buckau, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Joint<br />

Research Center, European Union; Anne Delos, Vanessa<br />

Montoya, Amphos 21 (Germany/France/Spain)<br />

11. Technical Know-How of Site Descriptive Modeling for Site<br />

Characterization (wP-59089)<br />

Hiromitsu Saegusa, Tadafumi Niizato, Ken-ichi Yasue, Hironori<br />

Onoe, Ryosuke Doke, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

12. A Comprehensive Information Management System for<br />

European Disposal R&D (INMAN): A Proposal for the Next<br />

European Framework <strong>Program</strong> (w/oP-59397)<br />

Gunnar Buckau, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Joint<br />

Research Center, European Union; Anne Delos,Vanessa<br />

Montoya, Amphos 21 (Germany/France/Spain)<br />

13. Development of Comprehensive Techniques for Coastal Site<br />

Characterization: Integrated Palaeohydrogeological<br />

Approach for Development of Site Evolution Models<br />

(wP-59259)<br />

Kenji Amano, Tadafumi Niizato, Kunio Ota, Japan Atomic<br />

Energy Agency; Bill Lanyon, Nagra; W Russell Alexander,<br />

Bedrock Geosciences (Japan/Switzerland)<br />

SESSION 20<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 1<br />

PANEL: CHALLENGES WHEN SELECTING DISPOSAL<br />

OPTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF THE NEW IAEA<br />

CLASSIFICATION SCHEME (1.17)<br />

Co-Chairs: Angie Jones, AMEC (USA)<br />

Peter Ormai, IAEA (Austria)<br />

Organizer: Peter Ormai<br />

The new IAEA classification scheme is based on long term safety –<br />

primarily disposal. The potential options for disposal include: above<br />

surface engineered landfill, near surface disposal (trenches, vaults or<br />

shallow boreholes), engineered facilities at intermediate depth (10s to<br />

100s of meters) and geological disposal (> few hundred metres).<br />

Specific waste types will need specific consideration (e.g. disused<br />

sealed sources, graphite waste, and radium bearing waste). National<br />

schemes will be circumstance dependent.<br />

The following will be discussed:<br />

• Near surface or geological disposal for SL-LILW<br />

• Separate disposal for SL-LILW and VLLW<br />

• Advantages and disadvantages of opting for co-disposal<br />

• Borehole disposal as potential solution for the countries having<br />

limited waste inventories<br />

• Feasible approaches for disposal of low level long-lived waste<br />

This panel will provide a forum for the exchange of scientific and<br />

technical information on disposal of different categories of radioactive<br />

waste with focus on current approaches.<br />

Panelists include: Linde Nel, Director of Operations and<br />

Maintenance Services (South Africa); Vaclav Hanusik, Senior<br />

Researcher, VUJE (Slovak Republic); Dr. Irina Gaus, Senior Expert<br />

(Switzerland); Thibaud Labalette, <strong>Program</strong> Director at Andra<br />

(France); Balint Nos, Head of Strategy Development and<br />

Engineering Office of PURAM (Hungary); Dr. Peter Brennecke,<br />

Bundestamt fur Strahlenschutz (BFS), Retired (Germany); Dr.<br />

Kazumi Kitayama, Senior Technical Advisor, Nuclear Waste<br />

Management Organization of Japan (NUMO) (Japan); and Keith<br />

McConnell, Deputy Director, US NRC (USA)<br />

SESSION 21<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm-3:30pm Room: 4<br />

PANEL: CONTRIBUTION AND COMPLEMENTARITIES OF<br />

INTERIM STORAGE, GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL,<br />

PARTITIONING & TRANSMUTATION REVERSIBILITY<br />

REGARDING GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF RADWASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (2.15)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, Andra (France)<br />

Heather Klebba, NFT (USA)<br />

Organizer: Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke<br />

Session 21 is a two part panel in conjunction with Session 22. The<br />

first part will consist of a introductory paper and then a panel will<br />

address the status of HLW and Spent Fuel interim storage, processing<br />

and national programs. Partitioning and transmutation are also<br />

investigated in several countries. Interim storage is required to<br />

accommodate waste as long as sustainable management solutions are<br />

not available and interim storage duration up to 100 years has been<br />

often considered.<br />

Panelists include: Bernard Boullis, CEA (France); Wilhelm<br />

Bollingerfehr, DBE (Germany); Philippe Lallieux ONDRAF<br />

(Belgium); Claudio Pescatore, NEA, (France); Jean-Michel<br />

Hoorelbeke, Andra (France); Farok Sharif, URS (USA); Jürg<br />

Schneider, NAGRA (Switzerland); and Neil Smart, NDA (UK)<br />

23


Tuesday PM Technical Sessions<br />

1. New Nuclear <strong>Program</strong>mes Must Not Neglect Waste<br />

Management (wP-59077)<br />

Charles McCombie, Arius Association (Switzerland)<br />

SESSION 22<br />

Tuesday: 4:15pm-6:00pm Room: 4<br />

PANEL: CONTRIBUTION AND COMPLEMENTARITIES OF<br />

INTERIM STORAGE, GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL,<br />

PARTITIONING & TRANSMUTATION REVERSIBILITY<br />

REGARDING GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF RADWASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (2.15)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, Andra (France)<br />

Heather Klebba, NFT (USA)<br />

Organizer: Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke<br />

Session 22, the second part of this two part panel will discuss final<br />

disposition and geological disposal issues since it is internationally<br />

recognized as the reference option for long term management of high<br />

level and TRU waste, or non reprocessed spent fuel. Nevertheless the<br />

progress of geological repositories varies significantly from one<br />

country to another. In many cases some reversibility or irretrievability<br />

is expected by stakeholders.<br />

Specialists know that geological repository will not suppress the need<br />

for interim storage, and that partitioning and transmutation cannot<br />

suppress the need for geological disposal. The panel will discuss the<br />

potential complementarities of these various waste management tools,<br />

or their incompatibilities if any, with regard to possible optimization<br />

of the whole system. Different time scales and types of waste will be<br />

considered as necessary.<br />

Panelists include: Bernard Boullis, CEA (France); Wilhelm<br />

Bollingerfehr, DBE (Germany); Philippe Lallieux ONDRAF<br />

(Belgium); Claudio Pescatore, NEA, France; Jean-Michel<br />

Hoorelbeke, Andra (France); Farok Sharif, URS (USA); Jürg<br />

Schneider, NAGRA (Switzerland); and Neil Smart, NDA (UK)<br />

SESSION 23<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm-3:30pm Room: 2<br />

ADVANCED L/ILW CONDITIONING TECHNOLOGIES -<br />

PART 1 OF 2 (1.11)<br />

Co-Chairs: Mike Garamszeghy, Nuclear Waste Management<br />

Organization (Canada)<br />

Andrew Baker, Eden Nuclear and Environment<br />

Ltd. (UK)<br />

Organizer: Angie Jones<br />

Reviewers: Mike Garamszeghy and Andrew Baker<br />

1. Cementitious Materials for Radioactive Waste Management<br />

Within IAEA Coordinated Research Project (wP-59021)<br />

Zoran Drace, IAEA; Michael Ojovan, University of Sheffield<br />

(Austria/UK)<br />

2. Elution Behavior of Heavy Metals from Cement Solidified<br />

Products of Incinerated Ash Waste (wP-59102)<br />

Yoshihiro Meguro, Yoshimi Kawato, Takuya Nakayama,Osamu<br />

Tomioka, Motoyuki Mitsuda, Japan Atomic Energy Agency<br />

(Japan)<br />

3. Immobilisation of Radwaste in Synthetic Rock: An<br />

Alternative to Cementation (W/P-59008)<br />

Bernard Rottner, Onet Technologies (France)<br />

24<br />

SESSION 24<br />

Tuesday: 4:15-6:00pm Room: 2<br />

L/ILW WASTE CHARACTERIZATION, ASSAY, AND<br />

TRACKING SYSTEMS - PART 1 OF 2 (1.7)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jeffrey Lively, AMEC (USA)<br />

Jerome Brueziere, AREVA (France)<br />

Organizers: Ronald Keyser and Karan North<br />

Reviewers: Karan North and Jerome Brueziere<br />

1. A Proposed Figure of Merit for Evaluating the Performance<br />

of Radiation Identification and Detection Systems<br />

(wP-59159)<br />

Ronald Keyser, Timothy Twomey, ORTEC - AMETEK; Michael<br />

D. Belbot, Thermo Fisher Scientific; Neil Andrew Webster,<br />

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Radiation Measurement & Security<br />

Instruments (USA)<br />

2. Characterization of Legacy Low Level Waste at the SVAFO<br />

Facility Using Gamma Non-Destructive Assay and X-Ray<br />

Non-Destructive Examination Techniques (wP-59289)<br />

Stephen Halliwell, VJ Technologies Inc; Gary Mottershead, VJ<br />

Technologies Inc; Fredrik Ekenborg (USA/France/Sweden)<br />

3. Calibration and Validation of a Wide Range Segmented<br />

Gamma Ray Scanning Instruments for the Measurement of<br />

Low and Intermediate Level Waste (wP-59304)<br />

John Mason, A. N. Technology Ltd.; Kapila Fernando, ANSTO,<br />

Australia Nuclear Science and Technology Organization<br />

(UK/Australia)<br />

4. Performance of a DrumScan® HRGS Solo Scanner for the<br />

Assay of Legacy Waste at the Belgoprocess Site (wP-59122)<br />

Daniel Parvin, Babcock International Group; Thomas Huys,<br />

Belgoprocess, Dessel, (UK/Belgium)<br />

SESSION 25<br />

Tuesday: 1:45-6:00pm Room: 3<br />

D&D OF NON-REACTOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES (3.10)<br />

Co-Chairs: Kenneth Kok, ASME (USA)<br />

Lucien Pillette-Cousin, Areva (France)<br />

Organizers: Jas Devgun and Jean-Guy Nokhamcon<br />

Reviewers: Ken Kok and Lucien Pillette-Cousin<br />

1. Decommissioning The Belgonucleaire Dessel Mox Plant:<br />

Presentation of The Project And Situation on 30/06/2011<br />

(wP-59027)<br />

Jean-Marie Cuchet, Carlo Verheyen, Henri Libon,<br />

Belgonucleaire; Jos Custers, Tecnubel; Robert Walthery,<br />

Belgoprocess; Jozef Bily, Studsvik (Germany)<br />

2. Uranium Workshops Dismantling and Criticality Control<br />

(wP-59060)<br />

Pierre Lisbonne, Julie Rosello, CEA (France)<br />

3. The Complex Challenge of Refurbishing the Pond Gantry<br />

Steelwork which Supports the Pond Skip Handler above the<br />

First Generation Magnox Storage Pond at Sellafield (wP-<br />

59133)<br />

Ian Richardson, Sellafield (UK)<br />

4. Systematic Chemical Decontamination Using IF7 Gas<br />

(wP-59036)<br />

Haruhi Hata, Kaoru Yokoyama, Noritake Sugitsue, Japan<br />

Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Decommissioning & Demolition of Facilities used for the<br />

Storage & Stabilisation of Water Reactor Sludge (wP-59097)<br />

Nicholas J. Brown, Rowland Cornell, Nuvia Limited; Andy<br />

Staples, RSRL (UK)<br />

6. Decommissioning of the Radio Chemical Hot Laboratory of<br />

the European Commission Joint Research Centre of ISPRA<br />

(wP-59207)<br />

Daniele Ugolini, Francesco Rossi, Francesco Basile, European<br />

Commission Joint Research Centre (Italy)<br />

7. A Successful Transition from Operating to Dismantling a<br />

UO2-PuO2 Fuel Fabrication Facility (w/oP-59326)<br />

Thierry Flament, AREVA NC (France)


Technical Sessions Tuesday PM<br />

SESSION 26<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm-6:00pm Room: 5<br />

D&D TECHNOLOGIES - PART 1 OF 2 (3.4)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jas Devgun, Sargent & Lundy (USA)<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN<br />

(France)<br />

Organizer/Reviewer: Jas Devgun<br />

1. Dismantling/Remediation of a Highly Contaminated Sump<br />

in Running Plant Conditions (w/oP-59053)<br />

Jos Boussu, Koen Lenie, Tecnubel (Belgium)<br />

2. New Degreasing Formulations for the Decontamination of<br />

Solid Substrates, Consistent with Vitrification Process of the<br />

<strong>Final</strong> Wastes (w/oP-59166)<br />

Jeremy Causse, Cyril Roussignol, French Atomic Enrgy<br />

Commission; Jean-François Valery, Jean Charles Hamel, Areva<br />

NC (France)<br />

3. The Orion ScanSort Soil Sorting System (w/oP-59385)<br />

Jeffrey Lively, MACTEC (USA)<br />

4. Liquids, Gels, Foams and Supercritical Fluids: Four States<br />

of Matter for Radioactive Decontamination of Solids<br />

(w/oP-59158)<br />

Sylvain Faure, Jérémy Causse, Bruno Fournel, CEA (France)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Decommissioning of the A-1 NPP Heavy Water Evaporator<br />

Facility (wP-59225)<br />

Jan Medved, VUJE Inc.; Ladislav Vargovcik, ZTS VVU Kosice<br />

a.s. (Slovakia)<br />

6. Remote Decommissioning of Blind Cells - APM 214 Facility<br />

CEA Marcoule (w/oP-59206)<br />

Olivier Calixte, ONET Technologies - ONECTRA (France)<br />

7. Transport of Nuclear Waste Flows - A Modeling and<br />

Simulation Approach (wP-59136)<br />

Jonathan Adams, Michael Fairweather, James Young, Simon<br />

Biggs, Jun Yao, University of Leeds, Leeds (UK)<br />

8. Fuel Racks Dismantling Workshop at CENTRACO Facility<br />

(wP-59365)<br />

Jean-François Rives, Christophe Maufrais, SOCODEI (France)<br />

SESSION 27<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm-6:00pm Room: 10<br />

ER SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND MONITORING - PART<br />

1 OF 2 (4.5)<br />

Co-Chairs: Nicolas Jeannée, GEOVARIANCES (France)<br />

Virgene Mulligan, ARS International, Inc. (USA)<br />

Organizers: Steve Brown and Didier Dubot<br />

Reviewers: Nicolas Jeannée and Virgene Mulligan<br />

1. Soils Radiological Characterization Under a Nuclear Facility<br />

(wP-59046)<br />

Emilie Aubonnet, Geovariances / CEA FAR, Fontenay aux<br />

Roses, France, Didier Dubot, CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS,<br />

Fontenay aux Roses (France)<br />

2. Radiological Evaluation of Contaminated Sites and Soils<br />

VEGAS: An Expertise and Investigating Vehicle (wP-59057)<br />

Julien Attiogbe, GEOVARIANCES; Marie Lavielle, Patrick De<br />

Moura, CEA (France)<br />

3. Determination of the Radionuclide Contamination on the<br />

Absheron Peninsula in Azerbaijan (wP-59177)<br />

Tjalle Vandergraaf, Providence University College; Gudrat G<br />

Mamedov, Mahammadali A. Ramazanov, Baku State University;<br />

Jalal A. Naghiyev, Institute of Radiation Problems; Afat A.<br />

Mehdiyeva, National Aerospace Agency of Azerbaijan; Nazim A.<br />

Huseynov, Institute of Radiation Problems (Canada/Azerbaijan)<br />

4. High-density Gamma Radiation Spectrometry Surveys of<br />

Contaminated Land (wP-59076)<br />

Mike Davies, Robert Clark, Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Remediation and Assessment of the National Radioactive<br />

Waste Storage and Disposal Site in Tajikistan (wP-59110)<br />

Nazirzhon Buriev, Dzhamshed Abdushukurov, Physical-<br />

Technical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of<br />

Tajikistan; Tjalle Vandergraaf, Providence University College<br />

(Tajikistan/Canada)<br />

6. Integrating History and Measurement into a Case for Site<br />

Release (wP-59131)<br />

Angela Bartlett, Research Sites Restoration Limited; Mike<br />

Davies, Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd; Gavin Coppins, Babcock<br />

International Group (UK)<br />

7. Characterization of a Deep Radiological Contamination:<br />

Integration of Geostatistical Processing and Historical Data<br />

(wP-59062)<br />

Yvon Desnoyers, GEOVARIANCES; Patrick De Moura, CEA<br />

(France)<br />

8. Industrial Experience Feedback of a Geostatistical<br />

Estimation of Contaminated Soil Volumes (wP-59181)<br />

Claire Faucheux, Nicolas Jeannée, GEOVARIANCES(France)<br />

SESSION 28<br />

Tuesday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 6<br />

PUBLIC PERCEPTION ISSUES AND STAKEHOLDER<br />

ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN RADIOACTIVE<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (5.5)<br />

Co-Chairs: Judy Connell, Fluor Government Group (USA)<br />

Sebastien Farin, Andra (France)<br />

Organizer: Judy Connell<br />

Reviewers: Judy Connell and Sebastien Farin<br />

1. Perspectives on Reversibility and Retrievability of a<br />

Geological Repository in France (wP - 59263)<br />

Jean-Noel Dumont, Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, Andra (France)<br />

2. A Dialogue-Centric Approach to Environmental<br />

Remediation Decision-Making (wP -59115)<br />

Laurel Boucher, The Laurel Co.; James Clark, CRX Group, Inc.<br />

(USA)<br />

3. Outreach and Education - Ensuring a Clean Energy Future<br />

for All (wP - 59339)<br />

Susan Hess, Areva Inc USA)<br />

4. Challenge in the Public Acceptance and Cooperation in the<br />

Verge of Building the First Nuclear Power Plant in Indonesia<br />

(wP - 59119)<br />

Putero Susetyo Hario, Santosa Haryono Budi, Gadjah Mada<br />

University (Indonesia)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Andra Long Term Memory Project (wP - 59277)<br />

Patrick Charton, Fabrice Boissier, Guillaume Martin, Andra<br />

(France)<br />

6. Engaging Local Stakeholders on Technical Issues: Test Case<br />

at the La Hague Reprocessing Plant (wP - 59211)<br />

Ludivine Gilli, Institut de radioprotection et de sûreténucléaire<br />

(IRSN) (France)<br />

7. Creating and Managing Radioactive Waste Disposal<br />

Facilities with the Involvement of the Local Populations<br />

(w/oP - 59286)<br />

Sébastien Farin, Andra (France)<br />

SESSION 29<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am-12:30pm Room: 1<br />

PANEL: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION: NEA ROAD<br />

MAP, HOW TO INCREASE SYNERGY (3.12)<br />

Co-Chairs: Hans Riotte, OECD/NEA (France)<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN<br />

(France)<br />

Organizers: Hans Riotte and Jean-Guy Nokhamzon<br />

This session will start with short presentations and conclude with a<br />

panel session. The presentations will include;<br />

1. Recent Work And Achievements At The Nuclear Energy<br />

Agency InDecommissioning: Claudio Pescatore (OECD/NEA)<br />

25


Wednesday AM Technical Sessions<br />

2. Cooperative <strong>Program</strong> on Dismantling and Decommissioning<br />

(CPD) -Overview, Jan Carlson & Jean-Guy Nokhamzon<br />

3. CPD - Decontamination and Dismantling of Concrete<br />

Structures, Eric Cantrel (CEN/SCK/Mol)<br />

4. CPD -Experience with Remote Handling Techniques, Pierre<br />

Valentin (CEA/DEN/DPAD)<br />

5. Working Party on Dismantling and Decommissioning<br />

(WPDD) - Overview, Ivo Tripputi (Sogin)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

6. WPDD -Integration of Waste Management and<br />

Decommissioning: The Management of Large Components,<br />

Michel Dutzer (Andra)<br />

7. WPDD -Decommissioning Techniques: Prospects for R &D,<br />

Gerard Laurent (EDF/CIDEN)<br />

8. WPDD -Decommissioning Costs: Yellow book and Cost<br />

Control, Patrick Devaux (CEA/DEN/DPAD)<br />

9. WPDD -Decommissioning Feedback for New Nuclear Power<br />

Plants, Rateb Abu-Eid (US/NRC)<br />

The session will end with a panel discussions moderated by Ivo<br />

Tripputi (Sogin).<br />

Panelists include: Juan Luis Santiago (Enresa), Jim Marra (US<br />

DOE), and Gerard Laurent (EDF/CIDEN)<br />

SESSION 30<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 2<br />

SITING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OF<br />

L/ILW DISPOSAL FACILITIES - PART 1 OF 2 (1.12)<br />

Co-Chairs: Philip Rendell, NDA (UK)<br />

Patrice Torres, Andra (France)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Cathy Hickey and Philip Rendell<br />

1. An Innovative Design for Low and Intermediate Radwaste<br />

Near Surface Repository in Lithuania (w/oP-59382)<br />

Boniface Jean-Michel, AREVA TA (France)<br />

2. Product Quality Control of Radioactive Waste with a Special<br />

Regard to Federal States Collecting Facilities (w/oP-59176)<br />

Markus Havertz, Research Centre Jülich GmbH (Germany)<br />

3. Centre de la Manche: A Disposal Facility in Institutional<br />

Control (wP-59236)<br />

Michel Dutzer, Jean Pierre Vervialle, Alain André, Albert<br />

Marchiol, Andra (France)<br />

4. Radiological Impact of Co-Location of the VLLW and LILW<br />

Repository at Mochovce site (wP-59152)<br />

Václav Hanusík, Zdena Kusovská, Jozef Morávek, VUJE, Inc.;<br />

J. Balaz, O. Chren, Nuclear and Decommissioning Company<br />

plc. (Slovakia)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Development of an Engineering Design Process and<br />

Associated Systems and Procedures for a UK Geological<br />

Disposal Facility (wP-59160)<br />

Philip Rendell, NDA; Henry O’Grady, Parsons Brinckerhoff:<br />

Brendan Breen, Alastair Clark, Steve Reece, NDA (UK)<br />

6. State of the Art for Fabricating and Emplacing Concrete<br />

Containers into Large Horizontal Disposal Caverns in the<br />

French Geological Repository (wP-59267)<br />

Jean-Michel Bosgiraud, Maurice Guariso, François Pineau,<br />

Andra (France)<br />

7. On-Site, Near Surface Disposal of Graphite Wastes in the<br />

UK (wP-59078)<br />

Adam Meehan, Peter Sibley, EnergySolutions; Jeremy<br />

Lightfoot, Golder Associates (UK) Ltd.; Duncan Jackson, Eden<br />

Nuclear & Environment Ltd., (UK)<br />

26<br />

SESSION 31<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 3<br />

L/ILW WASTE CHARACTERIZATION, ASSAY, AND<br />

TRACKING SYSTEMS - PART 2 OF 2 (1.18)<br />

Co-Chairs: Ronald Keyser, ORTEC - AMETEK (USA)<br />

Jerome Brueziere, AREVA (France)<br />

Organizers: Ronald Keyser and Karan North<br />

Reviewers: Ronald Keyser and Jerome Brueziere<br />

1. Non-Destructive Examination of TRU Waste in Low and<br />

High Density Boxes and Drums, using High Energy Real<br />

Time Radioscopy (HE-RTR) and Wide Dynamic Range<br />

Imaging (wP-59302)<br />

Stephen Halliwell, VJ Technologies Inc. (USA)<br />

2. Measurement Methodology for Fulfilling of Waste<br />

Acceptance Criteria for Low and Intermediate Level<br />

Radioactive Waste in Storages (wP-59016)<br />

Marina Sokcic-Kostic, Felix Langer, Roland Schultheis,<br />

NUKEM Technologies GmbH (Germany)<br />

3. Disposition of Transuranic Residues from Plutonium<br />

Isentropic Compression Experiment (Pu-ICE) conducted at<br />

Z Machine (LA-UR-10-05649) (wP-59186)<br />

Kapil K. Goyal, Los Alamos National Laboratory; Betty J.<br />

Humphrey, Weston Solutions Inc.; Jeffry Gluth, Ktech<br />

Corporation/Sandia National Laboratory; David M. French,<br />

Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)<br />

4. Detection of Shielded Sealed Radioactive Sources in<br />

Radioactive Waste by Non-Destructive Assay Techniques<br />

(wP-59252)<br />

Leo P.M. Velzen, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group;<br />

Steven van der Marck, Nuclear Research Group (Netherlands)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Use of Lanthanum Bromide Detectors to Augment Site<br />

Surveys for Depleted Uranium (w/P-59169)<br />

Charles Waggoner, Mississippi State University; Ronald Unz,<br />

Institute for Clean Energy Technology; Donna Rogers,<br />

Mississippi State University; Charles R. Jones, Jay P. McCown,<br />

Institute for Clean Energy Technology/Mississippi State<br />

University (USA)<br />

6. Ultrasonic Techniques for the In Situ Characterisation of<br />

‘Legacy’ Waste Sludges & Dispersions (wP-59111)<br />

Timothy Hunter, Jeff Peakall, Simon Biggs, Michael<br />

Fairweather, James Young, University of Leeds, Leeds (UK)<br />

7. Free-Release and Sorting Monitors Developed for NPP A-1<br />

Decommissioning, Slovakia (wP-59071)<br />

Ondrej Slávik, VUJE; Alojz Slaninka, VUJE, a.s./ Slovak<br />

University of Technology in Bratislava; Martin Liatjak, Kamil<br />

Kravárik, VUJE, a.s.; Igor Pély, JAVYS, a.s. (Slovakia)<br />

8. Design and Operation of the Combined Technology<br />

Automated Waste Characterisation System (wP- 59308)<br />

John Mason, Marc R Looman, Robert A. Price, A. N.<br />

Technology Ltd. (UK)<br />

SESSION 32<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 4<br />

REPOSITORY PROGRAMS: SITE SELECTION &<br />

CHARACTERIZATION, UNDERGROUND RESEARCH LABS,<br />

ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL BARRIERS - PART 1 OF 2<br />

(2.3)<br />

Co-Chairs: Irina Gaus, Nagra (Switzerland)<br />

Jean Paul Chiles, Ecole Mines (France)<br />

Organizers: Irina Gaus and Johan Andersson<br />

Reviewers: Irina Guas and Jean-Paul Chiles<br />

1. Safety Assessment Input to Site Selection - The Swedish<br />

Example (wP-59031)<br />

Johan Andersson, JA Streamflow AB (Sweden)<br />

2. Technical Know-How of Selection Process for the Horonobe<br />

Underground Research Laboratory Area and Site<br />

(wP-59088)<br />

Takanori Kunimaru, Ryuji Takeuchi, Tatsuji Matsuzaki, Japan<br />

Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)


Technical Sessions Wednesday AM<br />

3. Characterisation of Bedrock Hydrogeology at the Olkiluoto<br />

Site Using Surface Based and Underground Data<br />

(w/oP-59095)<br />

Lee Hartley, Dave Swan, Steven Baxter, SERCO (UK)<br />

4. Self-Disposal Option for Heat-Generating Waste (wP-59182)<br />

Michael Ojovan, University of Sheffield; Pavel Poluektov,<br />

Vladimir Kascheev, A.A. Bochvar’s VNIINM (UK/Russia)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. NUMOs Approach for Long-term Safety Assessment<br />

(wP-59404)<br />

Takeshi Ebashi, Kenichi Kaku, Katsuhiko Ishiguro, Nuclear<br />

Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO) (Japan)<br />

6. Modeling Approaches for Evaluating the Effect of<br />

Heterogeneity on Two-Phase Flow Associated with the<br />

Migration of Waste-Generated Gas from SF/HLW- and<br />

L/ILW Repositories in Low-Permeability Formations (wP-<br />

59196)<br />

Alexandros Papafotiou, Rainer Senger, Intera Inc. Swiss<br />

Branch; Andrés Alcolea, TK Consult AG; William Lanyon,<br />

Fracture-Systems Ltd; John Ewing, Intera Inc. Swiss Branch<br />

(Switzerland/UK)<br />

7. A New Safety Concept for Geological Disposal in Japan (II)<br />

(wP-59357)<br />

Kazumi Kitayama, Nuclear Waste Management Organization of<br />

Japan (NUMO) (Japan)<br />

8. Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Simulation of a Heating and<br />

Hydration Experimental Study (China-Mock-Up) in<br />

Unsaturated GMZ Bentonite (wP-59212)<br />

Liang Chen, Ju Wang, Yuemiao Liu, Beijing Research Institute<br />

Of Uranium Geology; Federic Collin, University Of Liège;<br />

Jingli Xie, Beijing Research Institute Of Uranium Geology<br />

(China/Belgium)<br />

SESSION 33<br />

Wednesday: 8:30 - 10:15 Room: 6<br />

RECENT ADVANCES IN PROCESSING AND<br />

IMMBOLIZATION OF HLW, FISSLE MATERIAL AND<br />

TRANSUANIC (TRU) - PART 1 OF 2 (2.14)<br />

Co-Chairs: Mark Denton, Kurion Inc. (USA)<br />

Bernard Vigreux, SFEN (France)<br />

Organizers: Mark Denton and Bill Wilmarth<br />

Reviewers: Mark Denton and Bernard Vigreux<br />

1. Uranium Metal Oxidation, Grinding and Encapsulation in<br />

BoroBond: TRU Waste Management (w/oP-59279)<br />

Kevin Cook, Larry Addington, Beth Utley, Boron Products<br />

(USA)<br />

2. Results of Investigation of High Level Solid Radioactive<br />

Waste from Pits No1 and No2 at the Gremikha Site<br />

(w/oP-59390)<br />

B.S. Stepennov, V.M. Afanasyev, A.Yu. Kazennov, N.V. Kartashev,<br />

A.V. Korolev, O.E. Kiknadze, D.V. Pavlov, Kurchatov Institute;<br />

V.V. Eremenko, FGUP SevRAO; G. Fady, CEA; Lucien Pillette-<br />

Cousin, Areva TA (Russia/France)<br />

3. Pilot Test of Precipitation Setup for Dust Supressor and<br />

Transuranic Elements Removal from Wastewaters of<br />

Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (w/oP-59256)<br />

Valentin Avramenko, Svetlana Bratskaya, Dmitry Marinin,<br />

Institute of Chemistry FEBRAS; Anatoliy Terzi, Mariya<br />

Yarmolyuk, Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (Russia/Ukraine)<br />

4. Separation Processes for the Pretreatment of High-Level<br />

Nuclear Wastes at the Savannah River Site (w/oP-59291)<br />

David Hobbs, Aiken, Thomas Peters, Kathryn Taylor-Pashow,<br />

Fernando Fondeur, Charles Nash, Samuel Fink, David Herman,<br />

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) (USA)<br />

Presentation by: Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

SESSION 34<br />

(MERGED WITH SESSION 35)<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am - 10:15am Room: 10<br />

URANIUM SITES, ER ISSUES, SITE CHARACTERIZATION<br />

AND MONITORING - PART 2 OF 2 (4.12) (4-6)<br />

Co-Chairs: Stephane Belbeze, Antea Group (France)<br />

Jeroen Welbergen, COVRA (Netherlands)<br />

Organizer: Didier Dubot<br />

Reviewers: Stephane Belbeze and Jeroen Welbergen<br />

1. Sampling in Decommissioning: CETAMA Seminar and<br />

International Overview (w/oP-59209)<br />

Guy Granier, Daniele Roudil, CEA MARCOULE; Didier Dubot,<br />

CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS (France)<br />

2. Foam Novel Delivery Technology for Remediation of Vadose<br />

Zone Environments (wP-59019)<br />

Dawn Wellman, Danielle P Jansik, Shas Mattigod, Lirong<br />

Zhong, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Yuxin Wu,<br />

Lawrence Berkeley National Lab; Martin Foote, MSE<br />

Technology Applications; Z. F. (Fred) Zhang, Pacific Northwest<br />

National Laboratory; Susan Hubbard, Lawrence Berkeley<br />

National Lab (USA)<br />

3. Mobility of Radium from Pyritic Uranium Mine Tailings<br />

under Sub-aqueous Disposal Conditions (wP-59283)<br />

Nand Dave, Mining and Mineral Sciences Laboratories Canada<br />

(Canada)<br />

4. Remediation Project Planning at the Uranium Production<br />

Legacy Sites. Lesson Learned from the Best International<br />

Practice and Challenges for Developing Countries<br />

(wP-59043)<br />

Oleg Voitsekhovych, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute<br />

(Ukraine)<br />

5. Close-Out of Open Pit and Waste Rock Piles of Daxin<br />

Uranium Mine of China (wP-59073)<br />

Lechang Xu, Changshun Ren, Min Shi, Liaoning Xueli Zhang,<br />

Jie Gao, Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering<br />

and Metallurgy, CNNC (China)<br />

(MERGED WITH SESSION 34)<br />

SESSION 35<br />

SESSION 36<br />

Wednesday: 10:45am - 12:30pm Room: 10<br />

RADIUM REMEDIATION: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES<br />

AND CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES - PART 1 OF 3 (4.11)<br />

Co-Chairs: Robert Zelmer, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited<br />

(Canada)<br />

Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd. (USA)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Robert Zelmer & Steve Brown<br />

1. Radium Diagnosis Campaign (wP-59327)<br />

Florence Gabillaud-Poillion, Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire<br />

(France)<br />

2. Andra’s Remediation Missions (w/oP-59210)<br />

Patrick Poiret, Eric Lanes, Andra (France)<br />

3. Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation in the USA. A History<br />

and Lessons Learned (w/oP-59407)<br />

Steve Rima, AMEC (USA)<br />

4. Remediation of Canada’s Historic Haul Route for Radium<br />

and Uranium Ores: The Northern Transportation Route<br />

(wP-59303)<br />

Robert Brian Geddes, Chris Wenzel, AMEC; Michael Owen,<br />

Mark J. Gardiner, AECL; Julie Brown, Natural Resources<br />

Canada’s (Canada)<br />

27


Wednesday AM Technical Sessions<br />

SESSION 37<br />

Wednesday: 8:30 - 10:15 Room: 5<br />

YOUNG GENERATION NETWORK (YGN) AND<br />

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS (5.16)<br />

Co-Chairs: Corhyn Parr, Nuclear Enterprise Ltd (UK)<br />

Connor Deehan, Nukem (UK)<br />

Organizer/Reviewer: Corhyn Parr<br />

1. The Reestablishment of Radiochemistry Academic <strong>Program</strong>s<br />

in the United States (w/oP-59025)<br />

Craig Williamson, South Carolina Universities Research and<br />

Education Foundation (USA)<br />

2. Planning for Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities - the<br />

Views of Younger Stakeholders (wP-59222)<br />

Staffan Lindskog, Swedísh Radiation Safety Authority; Bea<br />

Labor, Badania Dydaktycne Project 2010 (Sweden/Poland)<br />

(<strong>Final</strong> paper received and Copyrights pending)<br />

3. Graduate or Apprentice? How Nuclear Training Provision<br />

has Changed the Shape of the Nuclear Employment Market<br />

(w/oP- 59415)<br />

Corhyn Parr, Nuclear Enterprise (UK)<br />

4. Nuclear Knowledge Development - Overview of the<br />

Activities Proposed by SFEN Young Generation (SFEN-JG)<br />

Guillaume Vaast, SGN–Pierrelatte (France)<br />

SESSION 38<br />

Wednesday: 10:45am - 12:30pm Room: 5<br />

MEETING: YOUNG GENERATION NETWORK (YGN) AND<br />

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS (5.17)<br />

Co-Chairs: Corhyn Parr, Nuclear Enterprise Ltd. (UK)<br />

Connor Deehan, Nukem (UK)<br />

Organizers: Corhyn Parr<br />

A general YGN Meeting will be conducted to canvass views of the<br />

younger members of the industry, exchange knowledge across<br />

companies, and grow the YGN network through the conference<br />

attendees. This meeting will be used to share best practices, and<br />

develop new ideas to progress the aims and objectives of the YGN in<br />

the future. Agenda: 1) Introductions; 2) Explanation of YGN Aims and<br />

Objectives; 3) Discussion on Output of YGN Questionnaire;<br />

4)Sharing of International YGN Activities and <strong>Events</strong>; 5) Personal<br />

Development and Career Progression; 6) Education and Training<br />

Initiatives; 7) Communications across the YGN Network; 8) External<br />

Communications to wider industry and 9) Future Plans and New<br />

Initiatives.<br />

For the session we conduct ‘An audience with…….’ where two<br />

leaders of industry provide candid views of their career paths and offer<br />

advice to young professionals answering any questions and providing<br />

advice on career development.<br />

Presenters Include: Sarah Greenwood, AREVA (UK); and Jim<br />

Blankenhorn, Permafix Environmental Services Inc.<br />

SESSION 39A<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am - 5:45pm Room: Exhibit Hall<br />

POSTER SESSION: FACILITY DECONTAMINATION AND<br />

DECOMMISSIONING<br />

Co-Chairs: Keith Anderson, ECC (USA)<br />

Didier Delmont, CEA (France)<br />

Reviewers: Keith Anderson and Didier Delmont<br />

A-1. Use of Highly Presurized Liquid Nitrogen Technology for<br />

Concrete Scabbling Application at SICN Nuclear Facilitiy<br />

(wP-59282)<br />

Fabrice Moggia, Claire-Emilie Vaudey, Thierry Varet, Valérie<br />

Toulemonde, AREVA; Frédéric Richard, Air Liquide CTAS;<br />

Gary Anderson, Nitrocision; Frédérique Damerval, AREVA<br />

(France/USA)<br />

28<br />

A-2. Methodology of External Exposure Calculation for Reuse<br />

of Conditional Released Materials from Decommissioning<br />

(wP-59138)<br />

Frantisek Ondra, Marek Vaako, DECOM, a.s.; Vladimir<br />

Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

A-3. Uncertainty Analysis of Activity Measurement of New<br />

Monitoring System for Free-Release for NPP A-1<br />

Decommissioning, Slovakia (wP-59244)<br />

Alojz Slaninka, VUJE, a.s./ Slovak University of Technology<br />

in Bratislava; Ondrej Slávik, VUJE, a.s.; Vladimir Necas,<br />

Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

A-4. Laser Removal of Contaminants on the Metal Surface (wP-<br />

59343)<br />

Hui Jun Won, Jei Kwon Moon, Sun Hee Jung, Chong Hun<br />

Jung, Kune Woo Lee, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute;<br />

Byung -Sun Choi, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute<br />

(Korea)<br />

A-5. Influence of the Conditional Release of the Materials with<br />

Very Low Level of Radioactivity on the Environment<br />

(wP -59132)<br />

Slavka Prvakova, University of Economics in Bratislava;<br />

Adela Mrskova, DECOM, A. S.; Jozef Pritrsky, DECOM<br />

(Slovakia)<br />

A-6. Conditional Release of Steel from Decommissioning in a<br />

Form of Reinforced Concrete (wP -59058)<br />

Jozef Pritrsky, DECOM; Miroslav Brodnan, University of<br />

Zilina; Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology<br />

(Slovakia)<br />

A-7. Decommissioning of the UF6 Sphere (w/oP -59200)<br />

Sylvain Chevassu, ONET Technologies - ONECTRA (France)<br />

A-8. Development of Nuclear Facilities Piping Cleaning System<br />

using Microbubble (w/oP-59070)<br />

Jongseon Jeon, SangChul Lee, Byoungsub Han, Enesys Co.,<br />

LTD.; HakSoo Kim, Nuclear Engineering & Technology<br />

Institute; Wisoo Kim, Enesys Co., Ltd. (Korea)<br />

A-9. A Matrix Inversion Method For Gamma-Source Mapping<br />

From Gamma Count Data (wP -59082)<br />

Richard Bull, Claire Burgess, Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

A-10. Decommissioning Activities for Salaspils Research Reactor<br />

(wP -59055)<br />

Andris Abramenkovs, Latvian Environment, Geology and<br />

Meteorology Centre; Jazeps Malnacs, State Environmental<br />

Service (Latvia)<br />

A-11. Technical Justification & Choice for Remediation Methods<br />

(wP -59398)<br />

Mark Morton, Janaka Jayamaha, WorleyParsons (USA)<br />

A-12. New Generation of Diamond Toolings for Facilitating<br />

Decommissioning Operations (wP-59396)<br />

Claude Besson, Erico Mariotti, Alexandre Mouysset, Lorenz<br />

Zur Nedden, Bernard Delannay, Carbodiam (France/Belgium)<br />

A-13. Pompe Secondaire (w/oP -59413)<br />

Anne Durand, CEA (France)<br />

A-14. Tritium Analysis : An Actual Problem for Large Building<br />

Decommissioning (w/oP-59406)<br />

Pascal Fichet, Florence Goutelard, Sylvie Guegan, Aurelie<br />

Robert-Ortis, Nadine Evenat-Robic, Commissariat à l’Energie<br />

Atomique (France)<br />

A-15. Reuse of Conditionally Released Steels; Proposal and<br />

Evaluation of Processes for Manufacturing of Steel<br />

Elements and for Construction of Selected Scenarios (wP-<br />

59130)<br />

Peter Bezák, Eva Hajková, Frantisek Ondra, Vladimír<br />

Daniska, DECOM, a.s.; Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of<br />

Technology (Slovakia)<br />

A-16. The Assessment of the Waste Management Plan to<br />

Decommissioning of Cernavoda NPP for Environmental<br />

Impact Reduction (wP -59358)<br />

Gheorghe Barariu, National Authority for Nuclear Activity -<br />

Subsidiary of Technology and Engineering for Nuclear Project<br />

(Romania)<br />

A-17. Application of the Data Quality Objective Process to the<br />

Partial De-Licensing at Oldbury Nuclear Power Station<br />

(wP -59376)<br />

Denis Buckley, Magnox Ltd, Berkeley (UK)


Technical Sessions Wednesday AM<br />

A-18. Multi-Site Risk-Based Project Planning, Optimization,<br />

Sequencing & Budgeting Process and Tool for the<br />

Integrated Facility Disposition Project (wP -59394)<br />

Jerel Nelson, Carlos Castillo, Julie Huntsman, Heather Lucek,<br />

WorleyParsons; Tim Marks, Omega Consultants (USA)<br />

SESSION 39B<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am - 5:45pm Room: Exhibit Hall<br />

POSTER SESSION: ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION<br />

POSTERS (4.1)<br />

Co-Chairs: Lucien Pillette-Cousin, Areva TA (France)<br />

Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

Reviewers: Lucien Pillette-Cousin and Michel Dutzer<br />

B-1. Radium Remediation in Canada - History and Present Day<br />

(w/oP-59157)<br />

Mark Gardiner, Michael Owen, Robert Zelmer, AECL<br />

(Canada)<br />

B-2. Mathematical Modeling of Reactive Transport in<br />

Groundwater with Metals and Dissolved Isotopes 226Ra<br />

and 228Ra, USIN, São Paulo, Brazil (w/oP-59245)<br />

Rodrigo Raposo de Almeida, Federal Fluminense University;<br />

Valter Mortágua, Industrias Nucleares do Brasil; Felipe Rosa,<br />

Luciano Magalhaes, Universidade Federal Fluminense<br />

(Brazil)<br />

B-3. Quantifying the Retention of Foam Formulation<br />

Components to Sedimentary Phases to Enable Predictions<br />

of Mobility and Treatment Efficacy (w/oP-59369)<br />

Rosa Ramirez, DOE EM; Danielle Jansik, Dawn Wellman,<br />

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (USA)<br />

B-4. Techniques of Radioactive Soil Processing at Rehabilitation<br />

of Contamination Territories. (wP-59199)<br />

Victor Volkov, Alexander Chesnokov, Alexey Danilovich, Yury<br />

Zverkov, Sergey Koltyshev, Sergey Semenov, Anatoly Shisha,<br />

RRC Kurchatov Institute (Russia)<br />

B-5. Optimisation (Sampling Strategies and Analytical<br />

Procedures) for Site Specific Environment Monitoring at<br />

the Areas of Uranium Legacy Sites Contamination<br />

Concern in Ukraine (wP-59045)<br />

Oleg Voitsekhovych, Tatiyana Lavrova, Alexander Kostezh,<br />

Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute (Ukraine)<br />

SESSION 39C<br />

Wednesday: 8:30am - 5:45pm Room: Exhibit Hall<br />

POSTER SESSION: MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT / PUBLIC<br />

INVOLVEMENT (5.1)<br />

Co-Chairs: Judith Connell, Fluor Government Group (USA)<br />

Gerald Ouzounian, Andra (France)<br />

Reviewers: Judith Connell and Gerald Ouzounian<br />

C-1. Virtual Reality Technology for Radiation Visualisation<br />

during the Remediation at Andreeva Bay in Russia as<br />

Support to Operational and Regulatory Supervision<br />

(wP-59400)<br />

Niels-Kristian Mark, Institute for Energy Technology,<br />

Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority<br />

(Norway)<br />

C-2. Taking Risk Asessment and Management to the Next Level<br />

(wP-59395)<br />

Jerel Nelson, Russel Lee Morton, WorleyParsons Polestar;<br />

Carlos Castillo, WorleyParsons; James T. McSwain,<br />

Terragraphics; George Dyer, Natalie Johnson, WorleyParsons;<br />

Gary Nick Kruskall, Link Technologies (USA)<br />

C-3. Radioactive Waste, from Myth to Reality: The Stakes for<br />

Andra’s Educational Communication Efforts (w/oP-59287)<br />

Annabelle Comte, Andra (France)<br />

SESSION 40<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 2<br />

D&D MANAGEMENT APPROACHES AND PLANNING<br />

TOOLS (3.6)<br />

Co-Chairs: Thierry Varet, AREVA (France)<br />

Sean Bushart, EPRI (USA)<br />

Organizers: Jas S. Devgun and Jean-Guy Nokhamzon<br />

Reviewer: Thierry Varet<br />

1. Implementation of the Standardised Listing into<br />

Decommissioning Costing; Examples and Related IAEA<br />

Projects (wP-59313)<br />

Vladimír Daniska, DECOM, a.s.; Michele Laraia, Paul Dinner,<br />

Patrick O’Sullivan, IAEA (Slovikia/Austria)<br />

2. Use of Source Term and Air Dispersion Modeling in<br />

Planning Demolition of Highly Alpha-Contaminated<br />

Buildings (wP-59254)<br />

James G Droppo, Bruce A. Napier, Jeremy P. Rishel, Pacific<br />

Northwest National Laboratory; Richard W. Bloom, CH2M Hill<br />

Plateau Remediation Company (USA)<br />

3. How and Integrated Change <strong>Program</strong>me has Accelerated<br />

the Reduction in High Risk and High Hazard Nuclear<br />

Facilities at Sellafield (wP-59014)<br />

Angela Mackintosh, Sellafield Ltd. (UK)<br />

4. Use of In-Situ Gamma Spectroscopy During Nuclear Power<br />

Plant Decommissioning (w/oP-59340)<br />

Richard McGrath, Karen Kim, Electric Power Research Institute<br />

(USA) - Presentation by Sean Bushart, EPRI (USA)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Legacy Radioactive Waste Storage - Magnox Swarf Storage<br />

Silo Liquor Effluent Management (wP-59271)<br />

Stephen Le Clere, Sellafield Ltd (UK)<br />

6. Experience of Application of New Remote Controlled<br />

Instruments for Scanning of Distribution of Radioactive<br />

Contamination in Rooms with High Dose Rate (wP-59354)<br />

Vyacheslav Stepanov, Alexey Danilovich, Oleg Ivanov, Victor<br />

Potapov, Sergey Smirnov, Anatoly Volkovich, NRC Kurchatov<br />

Institute (Russia)<br />

7. Human and Organisational Factors as Key Levers of<br />

Performance in D&D Project Management (w/oP-59323)<br />

Thierry Flament, Bertrand Willmann, Grégoire de Laval, Jean-<br />

Louis Lemarch, Alain Cordoba, AREVA (France)<br />

8. Development of Computer <strong>Program</strong> for Estimating<br />

Decommissioning Cost (wP-59037)<br />

HakSoo Kim, JongKil Park, Nuclear Engineering & Technology<br />

Institute (Korea)<br />

SESSION 41<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 3<br />

D&D TECHNOLOGIES - PART 2 OF 2 (3.13)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jas S. Devgun, Sargent & Lundy (USA)<br />

Bernard Vignau, CEA (France)<br />

Organizer: Jas Devgun<br />

Reviewers: Jas Devgun and Bernard Vignau<br />

1. An Innovative Process for Segmenting of Guide Tubes (wP-<br />

59029)<br />

Patrick (PJ) Gobert, Pierre-Henri Ponchon, Stefan Fallström,<br />

Joseph Boucau, Westinghouse Electric Company<br />

(Belgium/France/Sweden)<br />

2. Assay of Plutonium Contaminated Waste by Gamma<br />

Spectrometry (wP-59039)<br />

Ian Adsley, Michael Green, Ian Pearman, Mike Davies, Nuvia<br />

Limited (UK)<br />

3. Reuse of Conditional Released Materials from<br />

Decommissioning; A Review of Approaches and Scenarios<br />

with Long-Term Constructions (w/oP-59149)<br />

Vladimír Daniska, Jozef Pritrsky, Frantisek Ondra, Ivan Rehák,<br />

Matej Zachar, DECOM, a.s,; Vladimir Necas, Slovak University<br />

of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

29


Wednesday PM Technical Sessions<br />

4. Remediation of a Ventilation Duct Contaminated by Pa-231<br />

(wP-59248)<br />

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd; Clare Irving, Forest Environmental;<br />

Keith Stevens, Nuvia Ltd, (UK)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Measurement of Plutonium Contamination through Paint<br />

Using a Fidler Probe (wP-59250)<br />

Robert Clark, Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd; Ian Croudace, GAU-<br />

Radioanalytical Laboratories (UK)<br />

6. The Use of Standard Alpha and Beta Surface Scintillation<br />

Contamination Monitors to Confirm the Contamination<br />

Fingerprint and to Check on Source Quality (wP-59249)<br />

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd (UK)<br />

7. Clearance of Buildings of NPP Würgassen (Germany) Using<br />

an Innovative Clearance Concept (wP-59280)<br />

Stefan Woerlen, Marco Steinbusch, Alexander Kummer, Stefan<br />

Thierfeldt, Frank Schartmann, Brenk Systemplanung (Germany)<br />

8. Characterization of Iraq’s Remote Nuclear Facilities for<br />

Decommissioning and Waste Management (wP-59167)<br />

Fouad Al-Musawi, Adnan S. Jarjies, Ministry of Science and<br />

Technlogy; Ross Miller, Sandia National Laboratories<br />

(Iraq/USA)<br />

SESSION 42<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 6:00pm Room: 5<br />

LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT PROCESS AND EXPERIENCE<br />

(1.8)<br />

Co-Chairs: Michael Ojovan, University of Sheffield (UK)<br />

Andrew Drom, EnergySolutions EU Ltd. (UK)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Michael Ojovan and Paul Haigh<br />

1. Nuclide Separation by Hydrothermal Treatment and Ion<br />

Exchange (wP-59217)<br />

Georg Braehler, Ronald Rieck, NUKEM Technologies GmbH;<br />

Valentin Avramenko, Valentin Sergienko, Sergej Shmatko,<br />

Valentin Dobrzhanskyi, Institute of Chemistry FEBRAS; Elmar<br />

Antonov, NTP (Germany/Russia)<br />

2. Decontamination of Strontium from Liquid Radioactive<br />

Wastes by Sodium Nonatitanate (wP-59083)<br />

Merceille Aurélie, CEA Marcoule; Agnès Grandjean, Institut de<br />

Chimie Séparative de Marcoule; Yves Barre, CEA Marcoule<br />

(France)<br />

3. Russia: Results and Prospects of Liquid Solidification<br />

Experiments at ROSATOM Sites (w/oP-59112)<br />

Dennis Kelley, Pacific Nuclear Solutions (USA)<br />

4. Pre-Treatment of Organic Liquid Waste Stream at<br />

Cernavoda NPP (w/oP-59079)<br />

Gabriela Teodorov, Laszlo Toro, Adina Sandru, MATEFIN;<br />

Dennis Kelley, Pacific Nuclear Solutions; Dorin Dumitrescu,<br />

NPP Cernavoda (Romania/ USA)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Transport and Deposition Properties of Model Slurries of<br />

One and Two Particle Species (wP-59140)<br />

Hugh Rice, Simon Biggs, Michael Fairweather, James Young,<br />

University of Leeds, Leeds, (UK)<br />

6. Application of a New Technology For Reprocessing of<br />

Wastes Within the Framework of Rehabilitation of Uranium<br />

Mines Operated by In Situ Leaching (wP-59403)<br />

Gagik Martoyan, Garik Nalbandyan, Lavrenti Gagiyan,<br />

AREV SI CJS Company; Gagik Karamyan, Artak Barseghyan,<br />

Gagik Brutyan, Ecoatom LLC (Armenia)<br />

7. A Fully Operational Pilot Plant for Eliminating Radioactive<br />

Oils Mixed with Chlorinated Solvents (wP-59044)<br />

Albert Jacobs, William Everett, Dewdrops Company (France)<br />

8. Adsorption of Cesium Radionuclides by the Composite<br />

Sorbents Carbon Fiber/Transition Metals Ferrocyanides<br />

(wP-59255)<br />

Irina Sheveleva, Veniamin Zheleznov, Svetlana Bratskaya,<br />

Valeriy Kuryavyi, Valentin Avramenko, Institute of Chemistry<br />

FEBRAS (Russia)<br />

30<br />

SESSION 43<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 3:30pm Room: 6<br />

SITING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OF<br />

L/ILW DISPOSAL FACILITIES - PART 2 OF 2 (1.19)<br />

Co-Chairs: Cathy Hickey, CH2M Hill (USA)<br />

Patrice Torres, Andra (France)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Cathy Hickey and Philip Rendell<br />

1. 20 Years of Operation for Centre de l’Aube Disposal<br />

Facility: Lessons Learned (w/oP-59235)<br />

Patrice Torres, Laurent Schacherer, Franck Duret, Pascal<br />

Lecoq, Alain Delaplanche, Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

2. Demonstration Test of Underground Cavern-Type Disposal<br />

Facilities Fiscal 2010 Status (w/oP-59180)<br />

Yoshihiro Akiyama, Kenji Terada, Nobuaki Oda, Tsutomu Yada,<br />

Takahiro Nakajima, Radioactive Waste Management Funding<br />

And Research Center (Japan)<br />

3. Demonstration of Gas Permeable Seals for Radioactive<br />

Waste Repositories Laboratory and In-Situ Experiments<br />

(wP-59224)<br />

Joerg Rueedi, Paul Marschall, Nagra (Switzerland)<br />

4. Post-Iodine Production Norm Repository Technical Design<br />

and Reconstruction Experience in Turkmenistan<br />

(wP-59183)<br />

Alexander Gelbutovsky, Peter Cheremisin, Alexander Troshev,<br />

Alexander Egorov, Mikhail M. Boriskin, Mikhail Bogod,<br />

ECOMET-S (Russia)<br />

SESSION 44<br />

Wednesday: 4:15pm - 6:00pm Room: 6<br />

DISPOSAL SITE AND WASTE FORM CHARACTERIZATION<br />

AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - PART 1 OF 2 (1.13)<br />

Co-Chairs: Ed Bentz, E.J. Bentz & Associates (USA)<br />

Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

Organizer: Donald Goebel<br />

Reviewers: Ed Bentz and Michel Dutzer<br />

1. Radiological Characterization of the Dutch Interim Waste<br />

Storage Facility Site (w/oP-59023)<br />

Jeroen Welbergen, COVRA; Leo P.M. Velzen, Nuclear Research<br />

and Consultancy Group (Netherlands)<br />

2. Climate Change Impacts on the Disposal Environment: A<br />

Climate Analogue Approach (wP-59274)<br />

Bertrand Leterme, Dirk Mallants, SCK●CEN (Belgium)<br />

3. Mineralogical Analyses of Old (78 and 98 years) Concrete<br />

(wP-59093)<br />

Tomoko Ishii, Hitoshi Owada, Radioactive Waste Management<br />

Funding and Research Center; Hiroyuki Sakamoto, Masahito<br />

Shibata, Kumi Negishi, Taiheyo Consultant Co.,Ltd. (Japan)<br />

4. Modeling of Alteration Behavior on Blended Cementitious<br />

Materials (wP-59096)<br />

Hitoshi Owada, Tomoko ISHII, Radioactive Waste Management<br />

Funding and Research Center; Mayumi Takazawa, Hiroyasu<br />

Kato, Mitsubishi Materials Corporation; Hiroyuki Sakamoto,<br />

Taiheyo Consultant Co.,Ltd.; Masahito Shibata, Taiheyo<br />

Consultant Co., Ltd. (Japan)


Technical Sessions Wednesday PM<br />

SESSION 45<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 3:30pm Room: 10<br />

REPOSITORY PROGRAMS: SITE SELECTION &<br />

CHARACTERIZATION, UNDERGROUND RESEARCH LABS,<br />

ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL BARRIERS - PART 2 OF 2<br />

(2.7)<br />

Co-Chairs: Bill Miller, AMEC (UK)<br />

Johan Andersson, JA Streamflow AB (Sweden)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Bill Miller and Johan Andersson<br />

1. EBS Behavior Immediately After Repository Closure in a<br />

Clay Host Rock: The HE-E Experiment (Mont Terri URL)<br />

(wP-59288)<br />

Irina Gaus, Nagra; Klaus Wieczorek, GRS; Juan Carlos Mayor,<br />

ENRESA; Kristof Schuster, BGR; Thomas Trick, Solexperts;<br />

José-Luis Garcia-Siñeriz, Aitemin; Benoit Garitte, CIMNE; Uli<br />

Kuhlman, TK Consult (Switzerland/Germany/Spain)<br />

2. Performance Assessment Modeling for the Geological Siting<br />

Regions for the L/ILW and HLW Repositories in the Context<br />

of the Swiss Site Selection Plan (wP-59306)<br />

Andreas Poller, Juerg Schneider, Piet Zuidema, Nagra;<br />

Johannes Holocher, Gerhard Mayer, AF-Consult Switzerland<br />

Ltd. (Switzerland)<br />

3. Investigations of the Possible Separation Distance between<br />

Spent Fuel/High-Level Waste and a Low/Intermediate-Level<br />

Waste Repositories Due to Gas and Heat Generation<br />

(wP-59220)<br />

Rainer Senger, John Ewing, Intera Inc. Swiss Branch;<br />

(Switzerland)<br />

4. Hydraulic/Mechanical Modeling of Smectitic Materials for<br />

HMC Analytical Evaluation of the Long Term Performance<br />

of TRU Geological Repository (wP-59090)<br />

Ichizo Kobayashi, Kajima Corporation; Hitoshi Owada,<br />

Tomoko Ishill, Radioactive Waste Management Funding and<br />

Research Center (Japan)<br />

SESSION 46<br />

Wednesday: 4:15pm-6:00pm Room: 10<br />

NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR SPENT<br />

FUEL, FISSILE, TRU, AND HLW MANAGEMENT (2.2)<br />

Co-Chairs: Paul Dixon, LANL (USA)<br />

Bernard Vigreux, SFEN (France)<br />

Organizer: Hans Codee<br />

Reviewers: Bernard Vigreux and Hans Codee<br />

1. Implications of Co-existing National and Multinational<br />

Geological Repository Development <strong>Program</strong>mes in Europe<br />

(wP-59118)<br />

Neil A. Chapman, Charles McCombie, Arius Association;<br />

Ewoud Verhoef, Covra (Switzerland/Netherlands)<br />

2. Regulation of Ageing Facilities - The UK Regulators<br />

Perspective (wP-59353)<br />

Ryan Maitland, Unit 2G Nuclear Installations Inspectorate<br />

(UK)<br />

3. Establishment of Research and Development Priorities<br />

Regarding the Geologic Disposal of Nuclear Waste in the<br />

United States and Strategies for International Collaboration<br />

(wP-59168)<br />

Mark Nutt, Argonne National Laboratory; Michael Voegele,<br />

Complex Systems LLC; Jens Birkholzer, Lawrence Berkeley<br />

National Laboratory; Peter Swift, Sandia National<br />

Laboratories; Jeff Williams, U.S. Department of Energy; Kevin<br />

McMahon, Sandia National Laboratories; Mark Peters,<br />

Argonne National Laboratory (USA)<br />

4. The Cigéo Geological Repository Project (wP-59265)<br />

Thibaud Labalette, Alain Harman, Marie-Claude Dupuis,<br />

Andra (France)<br />

SESSION 47<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 3:30pm Room: 1<br />

RADIUM REMEDIATION HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES<br />

AND CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES - PART 2 OF 3 (4.47)<br />

Co-Chairs: Robert Zelmer, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited<br />

(Canada)<br />

Gerald Ouzounian, Andra (France)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Robert Zelmer and Gerald Ouzounian<br />

1. Port Radium Start to Finish Life Cycle: A Case Study on<br />

Canada’s Historic Radium/Uranium Mine, Initial Operation<br />

and Closure, Concerns of the Aboriginal Dene People,<br />

Subsequent Assessments, Remediation (wP-59332)<br />

Gerd Wiatzka, SENES Consultants Ltd. (Canada)<br />

Presentation by Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd (USA)<br />

2. Challenges in Developing a Remediation Plan, Procurement<br />

Plan and Long Term Monitoring <strong>Program</strong> for the Former<br />

Port Radium Uranium Mine that Meets the Needs of the<br />

Community of Deline (w/oP-59333)<br />

Julie Ward, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (Canada)<br />

3. Overview of Radium Legacies in Belgium (wP-59367)<br />

Stephane Pepin, Koen Mannaerts, Boris Dehandschutter, André<br />

Poffijn, Ludo Jadoul, Walter Blommaert, Michel Sonck, FANC<br />

(Belgium)<br />

4. Preparing for the Construction Phase of The Port Hope Area<br />

Initiative: Canada’s Largest Low-Level Radioactive Waste<br />

Clean-up Project (wP-59307)<br />

Christine Fahey, Andrea Denby, Glenn Case, Atomic Energy of<br />

Canada Ltd.; Tim Palmeter, Public Works Government Services<br />

Canada (Canada)<br />

SESSION 48<br />

Wednesday: 4:15pm - 6:00pm Room: 1<br />

RADIUM REMEDIATION - HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES<br />

AND CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES - PART 3 OF 3 (4.13)<br />

Co-Chairs: Robert Zelmer, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited<br />

(Canada)<br />

Gerald Ouzounian, Andra (France)<br />

Organizers: Robert Zelmer and Gerald Ouzounian<br />

An international panel will discuss and compare progress and history<br />

of national radium remediation programs. Lessons learned will be<br />

featured and shared. The outlook for the final closure on this issue<br />

worldwide will also be addressed. The perspectives and panelists<br />

invited include those from practitioners in government policy<br />

leadership, regulatory oversight and licensing, health and safety<br />

impacts and protection, environmental remediation practice and<br />

affected community stakeholders.<br />

Panelists include: Stéphane Pepin, FANC (Belgium); Keith<br />

McConnell, USNRC (USA); Jean-Luc Lachaume, ASN (France); and<br />

Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd. (USA)<br />

SESSION 49<br />

Wednesday: 1:45pm - 3:30pm Room: 4<br />

PANEL: COMMUNICATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE<br />

MANAGEMENT - PART 1 OF 2 (5-21)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

Ian Seed, Cogentus Consulting Limited (UK)<br />

Organizer: Jim Marra<br />

This is a two part series of paper presentations and a following panel<br />

session discussion on communications and knowledge management.<br />

Current efforts and views will be presented during this first session.<br />

This session is directly followed by the second part, Panel Session<br />

#50. Presenters will each provide a 10-15 minute overview to the<br />

audience before the break, and will then resume on this topic.<br />

Panelists include: Laurie Judd, NuVision Engineering (USA);<br />

Leonel Lagos, Florida International University (USA); Yanko Yanev,<br />

IAEA (Austria); Hitoshi Makino, JAEA (Japan); Bill Shingler, Fluor<br />

Government Group (USA) and Herve Bienvenu, Andra (France)<br />

31


Wednesday PM Technical Sessions<br />

SESSION 50<br />

Wednesday: 4:15pm - 6:00pm Room: 4<br />

PANEL: COMMUNICATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE<br />

MANAGEMENT - PART 2 OF 2 (5-21)<br />

Co-Chairs: Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

Ian Seed, Cogentus Consulting Limited (UK)<br />

Organizer: Jim Marra<br />

This panel will provide strategies and lessons learned regarding<br />

general communications and knowledge management to a wide<br />

variety of target audiences, and discuss the earlier presentations.<br />

Communication and management of technical information is a<br />

challenging endeavor. Target groups for technical communications<br />

range from the general public with a cursory knowledge of the subject<br />

matter to highly technical personnel heavily engaged in the work<br />

scope. Communications to the general republic requires deft wording<br />

of technical content and use of attention-grabbing graphics and<br />

illustrations. Managing technical content for highly technical<br />

personnel requires thorough cataloging of subject matter and<br />

providing easy recall and use.<br />

Panelists include: Laurie Judd, NuVision Engineering (USA);<br />

Leonel Lagos, Florida International University (USA); Yanko Yanev,<br />

IAEA (Austria); Hitoshi Makino, JAEA (Japan); Bill Shingler, Fluor<br />

Government Group (USA) and Herve Bienvenu, Andra (France)<br />

SESSION 51<br />

Thursday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 2<br />

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH L/ILW<br />

MANAGEMENT (1.14)<br />

Co-Chairs: Stephen Wickham, Galson Sciences Limited (UK)<br />

Adam Meehan, EnergySolutions/Magnox Ltd. (UK)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Stephen Wickham and Ian Crossland<br />

1. UK LLWR Environmental Safety Case Submission 2011<br />

(wP-59135)<br />

Richard Cummings, LLWR Ltd; Andrew Baker, LLWR; Trevor<br />

Sumerling, LLWR; John Shevelan, Amy Huntington, LLWR Ltd.<br />

(UK)<br />

2. An Assessment of the Radiological Impact of Coastal<br />

Erosion of the UK Low-Level Waste Repository (wP-59137)<br />

Trevor Sumerling, LLWR; Paul Fish, Halcrow Ltd.; George<br />

Towler, James Penfold, Quintessa Ltd; John Shevelan, Richard<br />

Cummings, LLWR Ltd. (UK)<br />

3. Development of a Methodology for Determining ILW<br />

Package Monitoring and Inspection Requirements (wP-<br />

59156)<br />

Jenny E. Morris, Timothy W. Hicks, Stephen M. Wickham,<br />

Galson Sciences Limited; Antonio Guida, Babcock International<br />

Group; Melanie Brownridge, James McKinney Darrell Morris,<br />

Nuclear Decommissioning Authority; Mark Tearle, Magnox<br />

Limited (UK)<br />

4. An Assessment of the Radiological Impact of Human<br />

Intrusion at the UK Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR)<br />

(wP-59356)<br />

Timothy Hicks, Tamara Baldwin, Galson Sciences Ltd; Richard<br />

Cummings, LLWR Ltd.; Trevor Sumerling, LLWR (UK)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Factors Affecting the Longevity of Interim ILW Stores,<br />

Monitoring Methods and Techniques Supporting Store Life<br />

Extension (wP-59151)<br />

Jenny E. Morris, Stephen Wickham, Timothy Hicks, Phil J.<br />

Richardson, Galson Sciences Limited; Melanie Brownridge,<br />

Darrell Morris, James McKinney, Nuclear Decommissioning<br />

Authority; Mark Tearle, Magnox Limited (UK)<br />

6. Different Types of Radioactive Waste Repositories, each<br />

Suited for a Given Type of Radioactive Waste (wP-59293)<br />

Sylvie Voinis, Fabrice Boissier, Lise Griffault, Jean Louis<br />

Maillard, Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

32<br />

SESSION 52<br />

Thursday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 3<br />

DISPOSAL SITE AND WASTE FORM CHARACTERIZATION<br />

AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - PART 2 OF 2 (1.20)<br />

Co-Chairs: Bill Miller, AMEC (UK)<br />

Patrice Torres, Andra (France)<br />

Organizer/Reviewer: Donald Goebel<br />

1. Characterisation of the Geology of the UK Low Level Waste<br />

Repository (wP-59146)<br />

John Shevelan, LLWR Ltd; Nicholas Smith, National Nuclear<br />

Laboratory (UK)<br />

2. In-Situ Interferometric Measurements of Compacted<br />

Smectite under Hyperalkaline Condition (w/oP-59124)<br />

Hisao Satoh, Susumu Kurosawa, Mitsubishi Materials<br />

Corporation; Tomoko Ishii, Hitoshi Owada, Radioactive Waste<br />

Management Funding and Research Center (Japan)<br />

3. Evolution of Sorption Properties in Large-Scale Concrete<br />

Structures Accounting for Long-Term Physical-Chemical<br />

Concrete Degradation (wP-59297)<br />

Janez Perko, Dirk Mallants, Diederik Jacques, Suresh<br />

Seetharam, SCK●CEN, (Belgium)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

4. Biogeochemical Modelling of the Chemical Evolution of the<br />

Near Field of the UK LLW Repository and effects on<br />

Carbon-14 Release (w/oP-59150)<br />

Joe Small, Christopher Lennon, Liam Abrahamsen, UK<br />

National Nuclear Laboratory; Andrew J. Baker, LLWR (UK)<br />

5. Characterisation and Assessment of the Groundwater<br />

Pathway for the Low Level Waste Repository, UK (wP-<br />

59098)<br />

Lee Hartley, Martin James, Peter Jackson, Matt Couch,<br />

SERCO; John Shevelan, LLWR Ltd (UK)<br />

SESSION 53<br />

Thursday: 8:30am - 10:15am Room: 1<br />

GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS AND NATIONAL INITIATIVES IN<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - PART 1 OF 2 (5.13)<br />

Co-Chairs: Michael Cull, Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.<br />

(USA)<br />

Mark Gerchikov, AMEC NSS (Canada)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Michel Cull and Mark Gerchikov<br />

1. Russian Nuclear Submarine Elimination 2001 - 2011 by The<br />

International Community (w/oP-59041)<br />

Michael Washer, Foreign Affairs and International Trade<br />

Canada; Alan Heyes, King’s College (Canada/UK)<br />

2. The Global Partnership: Its Achievements, Missed<br />

Opportunities and Potential to Address Future Threats from<br />

the Spread of CBRN Materials and Expertise (w/oP-59335)<br />

Alan Heyes, Wyn Bowen, Hugh Chalmers, King’s College (UK)<br />

3. The Global Threat Reduction Initiatives Radiological<br />

Security Cooperation with Russia (wP-59361)<br />

Tiffany Blanchard, U.S. Department of Energy/National<br />

Nuclear Security Administration; William Abramson, Lawrence<br />

Livermore National Laboratory; James W. (J.R.) Russell,<br />

National Security Technologies; Catherine Roberts, Pacific<br />

Northwest National Laboratory (USA)<br />

4. Kola Peninsula Radwaste Management in the Framework of<br />

the Italian-Russian Cooperation Agreement for Global<br />

Partnership (wP-59392)<br />

Massimiliano Nobile, SOGIN (Russia)<br />

5. Securing of the Spent Nuclear Fuel Stored on Gremikha Site<br />

- The Former Soviet Submarine Base in North-West of<br />

Russia (w/oP-59371)<br />

Alexandre Gorbatchev, CEA; Lucien Pillette-Cousin, AREVA<br />

TA: Boris Stepennov, NRC KI; Valery Eremenko, SevRAO;<br />

Anatoly Zakharchev, ROSATOM (France/Russia)


Technical Sessions Thursday AM<br />

SESSION 54<br />

Thursday: 10:45am - 12:30pm Room: 1<br />

GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP IN ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

MANAGEMENT - PART 2 OF 2 (5.20)<br />

Co-Chairs: Michael Cull, Teledyne (USA)<br />

Mark Gerchikov, AMEC (Canada)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Michael Cull and Mark Gerchikov<br />

1. Environmental and Radiological Remediation Under<br />

Canada’s Global Partnership <strong>Program</strong> 2004-11 (wP - 59185)<br />

Michael J. Washer, Foreign Affairs and International Trade<br />

Canada (Canada)<br />

2. UK Contributions to the Decommissioning of the BN-350<br />

Reactor in Kazakhstan: 2002 – 2011 (wP-59099)<br />

Steven Laws, Department of Energy and Climate Change (UK),<br />

David Wells and Andrew Herrick, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

3. Dismantling of Civilian Nuclear Powered Fleet Technical<br />

Support Vessels. Engineering Solutions. (wP-59386)<br />

Konstantin Kulikov, Rinat Nizamutdinov, NIPTB Onega OAO<br />

(Russia)<br />

4. Progress in International Cooperation on Regulatory of<br />

Legacy Management: Experience in Norwegian Cooperation<br />

<strong>Program</strong>mes (wP-59399)<br />

Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority<br />

(Norway)<br />

5. Methodological and Practical Bases of Providing<br />

Information Support to Activities on Environmental<br />

Remediation of the Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive<br />

Waste Temporary Storage Facility in Gremikha (wP-59375)<br />

Dmitry Stepennov, Anatoly P. Varnavin, NRC Kurchatov<br />

Institute; Anatoly A. Zakharchev, Rosatom; Lucien Pillette-<br />

Cousin, AREVA TA (Russia/France)<br />

SESSION 55<br />

Thursday: 8:30am - 10:15am Room: 4<br />

SAFETY AND SECURITY RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

AND NUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT (5.11)<br />

Co-Chairs: Ken Kok, Consultant (USA)<br />

Bernard Vigreux, SFEN (France)<br />

Organizer: Adrian Mendez-Torres<br />

Reviewers: Adrian Mendez-Torres and Philippe Crochon<br />

1. Remote Radiation And Visual Surveys of the Hot Cell Waste<br />

Vault and Spent Fuel Transfer Route at Kazakhstans BN-<br />

350 Reactor (wP-59101)<br />

David Wells, Nuvia Limited, Dorchester,United Kingdom, Collin<br />

Knight, Idaho National Laboratory; Alexander Klepikov,<br />

Nuclear Technology Safety Center; Igor Yakovlev, CRT&TD<br />

MAEC-Kazatomprom LLP; Evgeniy Tur, National Nuclear<br />

Center of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Andrew Herrick, Nuvia<br />

Limited (USA/Kazakhatan/UK)<br />

2. Human Reliability-Based MC&A Modeling for Evaluating<br />

the Effectiveness of Protecting Nuclear Material (wP-59379)<br />

Felicia A Durán, Gregory D. Wyss, Sandia National<br />

Laboratories (USA)<br />

3. Risk-Based Security Cost-Benefit Analysis: Method and<br />

Example Applications (w/oP-59381)<br />

Gregory Wyss, John Hinton, John Clem, Consuelo Silva, Felicia<br />

A Durán, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)<br />

SESSION 56<br />

Thursday: 10:45am - 12:30pm Room: 4<br />

ADVANCED L/ILW TECHNOLOGIES - PART 2 OF 2 (1.21)<br />

Co-Chairs: Ian Beadle, AMEC (UK)<br />

Dominique Greneche, Consultant (France)<br />

Organizer: Angie Jones<br />

Reviewers: Pierre Van Iseghem and Dominique Greneche<br />

1. Applying Fluid Dynamics Simulations to Improve<br />

Processing and Remediation of Nuclear Waste (wP-59172)<br />

Kelly J Knight, Jon M. Berkoe, Brigette M. Rosendall, L. Joel<br />

Peltier, Chris A Kennedy, Bechtel National (USA)<br />

2. Lifetime Performance of ASME AG-1 Section FK Radial<br />

Flow Filters (wP-59170)<br />

Charles Waggoner, Michael Parsons, Paxton Giffen,<br />

Mississippi State University; Jaime Rickert, Institute for Clean<br />

Energy Technology (USA)<br />

3. Alternative Strategies to Reduce Cost and Waste Volume in<br />

HEPA Filtration using Metallic Filter Media (wP-59348)<br />

Chris Chadwick, Porvair Filtration Group (UK)<br />

4. Advanced Drying System to Meet Radiolysis Criteria of<br />

Metallic Waste (wP-59116)<br />

Masamichi Obata, Yasushi Ooishi, Toshiba Corporation<br />

(Japan)<br />

SESSION 57<br />

Thursday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 5<br />

RECENT ADVANCES IN PROCESSING AND<br />

IMMOBILIZATION OF HLW, FISSILE AND TRU -<br />

PART 2 OF 2 (2.6)<br />

Co-Chairs: James Blankenhorn, Permafix Environmental<br />

Services Inc. (USA)<br />

Gerald Ouzounian, Andra (France)<br />

Organizers: Mark Denton and Bill Wilmarth<br />

Reviewers: James Blankenhorn and Gerald Ouzounian<br />

1. Mitigation of Sliding Motion of a Cask-Canister by Fluidstructure<br />

Interaction in an Annular Region (wP-59208)<br />

Tomohiro Ito, Atsuhiko Shintani, Chihiro Nakagawa, Osaka<br />

Prefecture University; Kazuhisa Furuta, Osaka Prefcture<br />

University (Japan)<br />

2. Iodine Conditioning as Iodate Ion in an Apatite-Like<br />

Ceramic (w/oP-59015)<br />

Lionel Campayo, CEA; Danielle Laurencin, Institut Charles<br />

Gerhardt De Montpellier; Agnès Grandjean, Institut De Chimie<br />

Séparative De Marcoule; Remy Delorme, CEA (France)<br />

3. Status of the Development of In-Tank/At-Tank Separations<br />

Technologies for High-Level Waste Processing for the U.S.<br />

Department of Energy (wP-59109)<br />

Bill Wilmarth, SRNL; Nicholas P. Machara, US DOE Office of<br />

Technology Innovation and Deployment; Steve P. Schneider, US<br />

DOE Office of Waste Processing; Reid A. Peterson, PNNL;<br />

Sheryl R. Bush, SRNL (USA)<br />

Presentation by Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

4. The Development, Testing and Demonstration of a New<br />

Class of Inorganic Ion Specific Media Emphasizing the<br />

Optimization, Stabilization and Volume Reduction of the<br />

<strong>Final</strong> Nuclear Waste Form (w/oP-59126)<br />

Mark Denton, Kurion Inc.; William D. Bostick, MCL, Inc.<br />

(USA)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. High Waste Loading Glass Formulations for Hanford High-<br />

Aluminum HLW Streams (wP-59388)<br />

Albert Kruger, US DOE (USA)<br />

6. The Design, Development and Demonstration of a New<br />

Modular Vitrification System (MVS®) for the Treatment of<br />

Nuclear Waste (w/oP-59127)<br />

Mark Denton, Gaetan Bonhomme, Kurion Inc. (USA)<br />

33


Thursday AM Technical Sessions<br />

SESSION 58<br />

Thursday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 10<br />

D&D RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND<br />

MONITORING (3.5)<br />

Co-Chairs: Maria Lindberg, Studsvik Nuclear AB (Sweden)<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN<br />

(France)<br />

Organizers/Reviewers: Jas S. Devgun and Jean-Guy Nokhamzon<br />

1. Quantifying Tc-99 Contamination in a Fuel Fabrication<br />

Plant (wP-59024)<br />

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd; Carol Darbyshire, Springfield Fuels<br />

Ltd (UK)<br />

2. The Science, Assaying and Waste Sentencing of Activated<br />

Bioshields (wP-59038)<br />

Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

3. Gamma-Ray Imaging for Generating 3D Dose Rate Maps<br />

(wP-59123)<br />

Karl Hughes, Edmund Cracknell, Babcock International Group<br />

(UK)<br />

4. Sampling vs. Taking Some (wP-59349)<br />

Dominique Francois-Bongarcon, AGORATEK International<br />

Consultants (Canada)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Waste Assessment: A Practical Approach to Proving Waste<br />

Metals Suitable for Consignment as Radiologically Exempt<br />

Materials (wP-59266)<br />

Iain Carvel, RSRL; Richard D Gunn, Robin Strange,<br />

Christopher Orr, Babcock International Group (UK)<br />

6. Development of a Computer System for Support and<br />

Documentation of Clearance of Buildings of Nuclear<br />

Installations (wP-59278)<br />

Christoph Winkler, Stefan Woerlen, Stefan Thierfeldt, Frank<br />

Schartmann, Brenk Systemplanung (Germany)<br />

7. Geostatistical Methodology for Waste Optimization of<br />

Contaminated Premises (wP-59344)<br />

Yvon Desnoyers, GEOVARIANCES; Didier Dubot,<br />

CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS (France)<br />

8. Discrimination Monitors for Various Kinds of Waste to be<br />

Down Graded (wP-59117)<br />

Susumu Naito, Syuji Yamamoto, Mikio Izumi, Masamichi<br />

Obata, Yukio Yoshimura, Jiro Sakurai, Hitoshi Sakai, Toshiba<br />

Corporation (Japan)<br />

SESSION 59<br />

Thursday: 8:30am - 12:30pm Room: 6<br />

RISK/PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS AND CONTAMINANT<br />

MIGRATION (4.7)<br />

Co-Chairs: Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

Didier Dubot, CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS<br />

(France)<br />

Organizers: Steve Brown and Didier Dubot<br />

Reviewers: Gerd Wiatzka and Didier Dubot<br />

1. Uncertainties on the Extension of a Polluted Zone (wP-<br />

59198)<br />

Chantal de Fouquet, Mines ParisTech - Ecole des mines de<br />

Paris (France)<br />

2. Identification and Implementation of End-User Needs<br />

During Development of a State-of-the-Art Modeling Toolset<br />

(wP-59069)<br />

Roger Seitz, SRNL; Mark Freshley, PNNL; Susan Hubbard,<br />

Lawrence Berkeley National Lab; Mark Williamson, US DOE;<br />

Paul Dixon, LANL; Kurt Gerdes, DOE EM; Yvette Collazo , US<br />

DOE (USA)<br />

3. Uranium Investigation in an Alluvial Aquifer with Direct<br />

Push Methods (w/oP-59281)<br />

Fabian De Weirdt, Geoprobe Environmental Technologies s.a.<br />

(Belgium)<br />

34<br />

4. Independent Technical Reviews for Groundwater and Soil<br />

Remediation Projects at US Department of Energy Sites<br />

(w/oP-59188)<br />

Dawn Kaback, AMEC; Grover Chamberlain, DOE EM; John G.<br />

Morse, US DOE; Scott W. Petersen, CH2M Hill (USA)<br />

— BREAK —<br />

5. Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental<br />

Management (ASCEM) (wP-59065)<br />

Paul Dixon, LANL; Mark Williamson, US DOE; Mark Freshley,<br />

Pacific Northwest National Lab; David Moulton, LANL; Ian<br />

Gorton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Elizabeth H.<br />

Keating, LANL; Yvette Collazo , US DOE; Kurt Gerdes, DOE<br />

EM; Juan Meza, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (USA)<br />

6. A Physiochemical Analysis of the Mechanisms for Transport<br />

and Retention of Technetium (Tc-99) in Unsaturated Soils<br />

(w/oP-59050)<br />

Danielle P Jansik, Dawn Wellman, Elsa Cordova, DeNomy<br />

Dage, PNNL; Dorthe Wildenschild, Oregon State University<br />

(USA)<br />

7. Intermediate and Long-Term Radiological Consequences of<br />

Uncontrolled Saline Solution Access into Asse Mine<br />

(wP-59163)<br />

Veronika Ustohalova, Christian Küppers, Öko-Institut e.V.<br />

(Germany)<br />

8. Cost Benefit Assessment According to French Methodology<br />

(w/oP-59310)<br />

Philippe Pouget-Abadie, Pricop-Bass Tudor, URS (France)<br />

SESSION 60<br />

Thursday: 8:30 - 11:00pm Room: Exhibit Hall<br />

BEST POSTERS OF ICEM 2011<br />

Co-Chairs: Gary Benda, Bartlett Services (USA)<br />

Dominique Greneche, Consultant (France)<br />

Organizer: Gary Benda<br />

This poster session highlights the top posters selected from each of the<br />

five Tracks of ICEM 2011.


Notes<br />

35


36<br />

Notes


Notes<br />

37


38<br />

Exhibition Hours and Exhibitor Floorplan<br />

Exhibitors Listings in Alphabetical Order<br />

BOOTH COMPANY<br />

217 ANDRA<br />

ASME<br />

320 ARS INTERNATIONAL, INC.<br />

Sponsor Only ATOMEXPO<br />

218 BELGOPROCESS<br />

412 CANBERRA - AREVA<br />

214 CEA<br />

426 CONTAINER PRODUCTS CORPORATION<br />

130 DEWDROPS<br />

226 ENERGYSOLUTIONS<br />

131 FAYAT NUCLEAR<br />

Sponsor Only FLUOR GOVERNMENT GROUP<br />

118 GEOVARIANCES<br />

221 GNS GESELLSCHAFT FÜR NUKLEAR-SERVICE GmbH<br />

112 INTERA INCORPORATED<br />

119 ITECH-INSTRUMENTS<br />

413 JMCS SARL<br />

Sponsor Only KRAFTANLAGEN HEIDELBERG GmbH<br />

125 NUCLEAR RESEARCH & CONSULTING GROUP<br />

422 NUKEM TECHNOLOGIES GnbH<br />

230 NUVIA GROUP<br />

219 OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY (NEA)<br />

424 ONET TECHNOLOGIES<br />

227 ORTEC (AMETEK SAS)<br />

126 PACTEC EPS LTD<br />

327 PORVAIR FILTRATION GROUP<br />

127 STUDSVIK SAS<br />

220 ROBATEL INDUSTRIES<br />

421 RÖHR + STOLBERG GmbH<br />

FRENCH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY (SFEN)<br />

133 SOCODEI<br />

117 TIB<br />

114 URS<br />

116 UTILIS SAS<br />

414 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

124 WSP ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY


Exhibition Hours and Exhibitor Floorplan<br />

Exhibitors Listings in Numerical Order<br />

BOOTH COMPANY<br />

112 INTERA INCORPORATED<br />

114 URS<br />

116 UTILIS SAS<br />

117 TIB<br />

118 GEOVARIANCES<br />

119 ITECH-INSTRUMENTS<br />

124 WSP ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY<br />

125 NUCLEAR RESEARCH & CONSULTING GROUP<br />

126 PACTEC EPS LTD<br />

127 STUDSVIK SAS<br />

130 DEWDROPS<br />

131 FAYAT NUCLEAR<br />

133 SOCODEI<br />

214 CEA<br />

217 ANDRA<br />

218 BELGOPROCESS<br />

219 OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY (NEA)<br />

220 ROBATEL INDUSTRIES<br />

221 GNS GESELLSCHAFT FÜR NUKLEAR-SERVICE GmbH<br />

226 ENERGYSOLUTIONS<br />

227 ORTEC (AMETEK SAS)<br />

230 NUVIA GROUP<br />

320 ARS INTERNATIONAL, INC.<br />

327 PORVAIR FILTRATION GROUP<br />

412 CANBERRA - AREVA<br />

413 JMCS SARL<br />

414 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

421 RÖHR + STOLBERG GmbH<br />

422 NUKEM TECHNOLOGIES GnbH<br />

424 ONET TECHNOLOGIES<br />

426 CONTAINER PRODUCTS CORPORATION<br />

Sponsor Only ATOMEXPO<br />

Sponsor Only KRAFTANLAGEN HEIDELBERG GmbH<br />

Sponsor Only FLUOR GOVERNMENT GROUP<br />

ASME<br />

FRENCH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY (SFEN)<br />

39


ANDRA Booth: 217<br />

— SPONSOR —<br />

Contact: Gérald Ouzounian<br />

1/7, rue Jean-Monnet<br />

92298 Chatenay Malabry, Cedex<br />

France<br />

Email: International@andra.fr<br />

www.andra.fr<br />

Andra has developed a very significant experience in the field<br />

of management of radioactive waste, from initial design of<br />

repositories to their closure, including siting, designing and<br />

building of repositories, safety cases, waste acceptance and<br />

control, monitoring during operational and postclosure phases,<br />

and memory keeping. The agency has experience for managing<br />

for all types of radioactive waste, from sources to high level<br />

waste. The methods developed for managing waste include :<br />

establishing detailed inventories, with a prospective<br />

assessment, technical specifications for bids and contractors<br />

selection, disposal concepts development, specifications of the<br />

waste and their packaging (Waste Acceptance Criteria), design<br />

and construction of repositories, safety assessment and safety<br />

case, expertise and consultancy, including economic aspects<br />

and review of projects and of existing facilities.<br />

40<br />

ASME<br />

Contact: Vince Dilworth<br />

Phone: U.S./Canada: +1-800-843-2763<br />

Mexico: +001-800-843-2763<br />

Outside North America: +1-973-882-1170<br />

Fax: +1-973-882-1717<br />

Email: infocentral@asme.org<br />

www.asme.org<br />

ASME is a not-for-profit membership organization that enables<br />

collaboration, knowledge sharing, career enrichment, and skills<br />

development across all engineering disciplines, toward a goal<br />

of helping the global engineering community develop solutions<br />

to benefit lives and livelihoods. Founded in 1880 by a small<br />

group of leading industrialists, ASME has grown through the<br />

decades to include more than 120,000 members in over 150<br />

countries worldwide.<br />

From college students and early-career engineers to project<br />

managers, corporate executives, researchers and academic<br />

leaders, ASME's members are as diverse as the engineering<br />

community itself. ASME serves this wide-ranging technical<br />

community through quality programs in continuing education,<br />

training and professional development, codes and standards,<br />

research, conferences and publications, government relations<br />

and other forms of outreach.<br />

ARS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Booth: 320<br />

Contact: Virgene Mulligan,<br />

Vice President, Laboratory Services<br />

2609 North River Road<br />

Port Allen, LA, 70767 USA<br />

Phone: +1-800-401-4277<br />

Fax: +1-225-381-2996<br />

Email: marketing@amrad.com<br />

www.amrad.com<br />

ARS International, Inc. is a U.S. based, 8(a) Small Business<br />

specializing in the following services: Environmental<br />

Remediation Services; Analytical Services; Decontamination,<br />

Deactivation Demolition Services; Field Sampling Services;<br />

Disaster Response Services.<br />

ATOMEXPO<br />

— SPONSOR ONLY —<br />

Contact: Catherine Bulgachenko<br />

Phone: +7-495-663-38-21 (ext.152)<br />

Fax: +7-495-663-38-20<br />

Email: ESBulgachenko@atomexpo.com<br />

www.atomexpo.com


BELGOPROCESS Booth: 218<br />

Contact: Emmy Roos, Marketing and External Affairs<br />

Gravenstraat 73<br />

2480 DESSEL<br />

Belgium<br />

Phone: +32-14-33-40-08<br />

Fax: +32-14-33-40-99<br />

Email: emmy.roos@belgoprocess.be<br />

www.belgoprocess.be<br />

Founded in 1984, Belgoprocess is a limited liability company<br />

located in the Belgium nuclear area Mol-Dessel. Belgium has<br />

opted for a centralised processing and management of its<br />

radioactive waste, in which Belgoprocess plays a key role. The<br />

operational experience of Belgoprocess covers the<br />

decommissioning of nuclear facilities, including heavily alpha<br />

and/or beta/gamma-contaminated cells. Furthermore our<br />

competences cover the processing of radioactive waste by<br />

means of (super)compaction, incineration and waste water<br />

treatment, as well as specific processes and infrastructure<br />

developed for specific waste streams. In that perspective the<br />

general goal is to minimize the amount of radioactive waste<br />

produced, to maximise clearance of decontaminated material<br />

while optimising operational costs. Belgoprocess set-up a<br />

nuclear inventory management system supported by state of the<br />

art non-destructive radiological waste characterisation<br />

techniques. Currently over 50 000 drums of radioactive waste<br />

are stored at the Belgoprocess site, from low level waste up to<br />

high level vitrified waste. Belgoprocess offers cost effective<br />

solutions related to radioactive waste management and<br />

decommissioning projects.<br />

CANBERRA - AREVA Booth: 412<br />

Contact: Gerard Darmon, Regional Development Manager<br />

St-Quentin-en-Yvelines<br />

78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux<br />

St-Quentin-en-Yvelines<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-0-1-39-48-57-76<br />

www.canberra.com<br />

www.areva.com<br />

AREVA's CANBERRA brand incorporates a dozen<br />

manufacturing and sales operations worldwide. CANBERRA<br />

offers a wide range of measuring solutions for site safety and<br />

occupational safety. For 40 years, CANBERRA’s operations<br />

have been offering their expert services to the nuclear industry,<br />

to test laboratories and to scientific research operations. The<br />

AREVA Nuclear Measurement business unit designs and<br />

manufactures solutions meeting the various requirements of<br />

nuclear plant operators, including: • dosimetry and radiation<br />

protection, • servicing of reactor components, • monitoring of<br />

environmental impact, • materials inspection and access<br />

control, • waste management, • decontamination and<br />

dismantling operations. CANBERRA also provides fuel cycle<br />

laboratories and industries a comprehensive range of solutions,<br />

measuring devices and spectrometric analysis services.<br />

CEA Booth: 214<br />

Contact: Didier Dubot<br />

18, route du Panorama - BP N°6<br />

Fontenay-aux-Roses cedex 92265<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-1-46-54-82-94<br />

Email: didier.dubot@cea.fr<br />

www.cea.fr<br />

The CEA is a key player in technological research and<br />

innovation in Europe and is active on the one hand in four<br />

major fields: energy, defence and global security, information<br />

technologies and health technologies, associated with<br />

fundamental research of excellence, and on the research<br />

infrastructures. The Clean-up Section (SAS) is a service of the<br />

CEA of Fontenay-aux-Roses made up of project managers<br />

which are specialized in one or several of its domains of<br />

expertise. Their goal is to manage and proceed to the<br />

remediation of nuclear sites, establish the radiological<br />

characterization of contaminated sites and manage and<br />

evacuate the nuclear waste due to the removal of the<br />

contaminated soils. The section may intervene at a national and<br />

an international level. Besides many publications, the Clean-up<br />

Site Section has developed a decontamination methodology to<br />

respond to the CEA centre’s need of dismantling all the nuclear<br />

facilities in order to set up buildings for new research activities.<br />

The goal of this methodology relies on various tools such as<br />

expertise vehicles with efficient detection performances<br />

(VEgAS), a recently developed software platform called<br />

Kartotrak and several modules aiming at sampling<br />

optimization, data analysis and geostatistical modeling, realtime<br />

monitoring and validation of clean up efficiency. These<br />

tools, used on the CEA centers, are a fitted and efficient answer<br />

to the various needs in radiological evaluation of contaminated<br />

sites and soils, concerning the optimization of the costs of<br />

measurements and clean-up process on one hand, and the waste<br />

volumes on the other hand.<br />

CONTAINER PRODUCTS Booth: 426<br />

CORPORATION<br />

Contact: John Hollinden, Consulting and Sales<br />

112 N. College Road<br />

Wilmington, NC 28495<br />

USA<br />

Phone: +1-910-382-6100<br />

Fax: +1-910-392-6778<br />

Email: john@c-p-c.com<br />

www.c-p-c.com<br />

Container Products Corporation has been in the business of<br />

supplying equipment and waste containers to the nuclear<br />

industry since 1981. We supply containers/packaging to the<br />

commercial nuclear world, Department of Energy Facilities,<br />

Department of Defense facilities, and Universities. We also<br />

have experience in design and manufacturing of hydraulic<br />

systems such as the box and drum compaction and<br />

decontamination units.<br />

Our products are also sold to Canadian nuclear power<br />

generation facilities and laboratories, and a number of foreign<br />

countries including Europe, the Far East (Korea, Japan), South<br />

America, (Argentina), Mexico, and Russia to name a few.<br />

Our container product line includes IP-1, IP-2, IP-3, Type A,<br />

(IAEA) and IATA containers in all shapes and sizes, with a<br />

wide range of payload, lift lug, fork pocket, safety arm, hinged<br />

lid and door options to meet most any customer needs.<br />

We feature a full Engineering Department with a PE on staff,<br />

and a QA Department with a NQA-1 program. We are also<br />

qualified to Canadian QA standards, ANSI/ASME standards<br />

and ISO 9001:2000.<br />

41


44<br />

F r om Nuclear P Proc<br />

essing t o Na tur e P<br />

reserve:<br />

Doing the R<br />

ight<br />

T hings R Right<br />

One of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering and construction<br />

companies, Fluor is recognized for completing complex projects on schedule and<br />

within budget.<br />

Fluor’s reputation as a leader in environmental management and radioactive<br />

waste management is well-established throughout the United States. Capitalizing<br />

on our global presence and environmental expertise, Fluor is positioned to<br />

deliver the same unparalleled level of service to our International clients, ensuring<br />

a sustainable future.<br />

We have the experience in project management, operations, and proven and<br />

emerging technologies to help our customers solve complex environmental<br />

management challenges.<br />

Safety, Performance, and Integrity<br />

Fluor Government Group<br />

2300 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1110<br />

Arlington, Virginia 22201<br />

703.351.1204<br />

www.fluor.com<br />

© 2011 Fluor Corporation. All Rights Reserved. ADGV073011


DEWDROPS Booth: 130<br />

Contact: William Everett, President<br />

219, ave du Maréchal Leclerc<br />

Sin le Noble, 59450<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-327-904-334<br />

Email: dewdrops@dewdrops.fr<br />

www.dewdrops.fr<br />

Dewdrops provides a flexible comprehensive on-site service to<br />

owners of wastes containing oils, solvents, organic cleaning<br />

fluids or foams. Our patented process and mobile treatment<br />

plants have been tailored to meet the exacting requirements of<br />

the nuclear industry. Dewdrops aims to play a key role in<br />

nuclear site value development by dealing economically and<br />

safely with sensitive organic liquide waste streams or arisings.<br />

ENERGYSOLUTIONS Booth: 226<br />

Contact: Pippa Waterman VP, Marketing & Communications<br />

Stella Building, Windmill Hill Business Park<br />

Swindon SN5 6NX<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Phone: +44-0-1793-733100<br />

Fax: +44-0-1793-733179<br />

Email: international@energysolutions.com<br />

www.energysolutions.com<br />

EnergySolutions, headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, is an<br />

international nuclear services company with operations<br />

throughout the United States, UK, mainland Europe, Canada<br />

and the Far East. In the UK we hold contracts with the Nuclear<br />

Decommissioning Authority to manage the UK’s Magnox<br />

reactor sites. We are a world leader focused on servicing the<br />

nuclear industry with the development and implementation of<br />

new technologies and approaches for resolving radioactive<br />

waste challenges faced by our clients.<br />

FAYAT NUCLEAR Booth: 131<br />

Contact: Henri Mydlarz<br />

3 rue René Razel<br />

Orsay Cedex 91892<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-0-1-698-56915<br />

Email: hmydlarz@razel.fr<br />

www.fayat.com<br />

Founded in 1957, FAYAT is France’s leading family-owned<br />

Group in the sector of building and industry: 2.7 billion -<br />

turnover and more than 17 000 employees. With major<br />

industrial facilities in Europe, Asia and America, FAYAT<br />

regroups 118 autonomous subsidiaries in all the core<br />

businesses of building and public works, structural steel works,<br />

electricity, road building equipment, handling and hoisting<br />

equipment, and pressure vessels. Several FAYAT’s Group<br />

Companies have developed their activities in nuclear industry<br />

with two major projects currently in progress for CEA and<br />

EDF. RAZEL is a strong actor for civil works and turnkeys<br />

projects, BEC brings its specialties -core sampling and wire<br />

cutting- for dismantling in active zones, and COMETE<br />

supplies cranes and specialized equipment for nuclear plants<br />

and laboratories like EPR in France and China, or RJH test<br />

reactor. All these companies have their own design capacities<br />

and references. They can handle complex projects in<br />

partnership with any of the other Nuclear Industry actor.<br />

FLUOR GOVERNMENT GROUP<br />

— SPONSOR ONLY —<br />

Contact: Greg Meyer<br />

2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite 1110<br />

Arlington, VA 22201<br />

Phone: +1-703-647-4340<br />

Fax: +1-703-469-1593<br />

Email: Greg.meyer@fluor.com<br />

Fluor is a global leader in engineering, procurement,<br />

construction, maintenance, and project management. Active<br />

across six continents, Fluor works with governments and multinational<br />

companies to design, build, and maintain many of the<br />

world's most complex and challenging capital projects. We are<br />

a solutions-based company with the technical expertise and<br />

financial strength to successfully complete the most difficult<br />

assignments. Fluor is recognized around the world as a firm<br />

that is reliable, delivers projects on time and within budget, has<br />

an outstanding safety record, and adheres to the highest ethical<br />

standards. Whether it's managing nuclear operations, cleaning<br />

out and tearing down nuclear facilities, or remediating a<br />

contaminated site, we bring leadership, experience, expertise,<br />

respect, and pride to every effort. Headquartered in Irving,<br />

Texas, Fluor is a FORTUNE 200 company and had revenues of<br />

$20.8 billion in 2010.<br />

FRENCH NUCLEAR ENERGY<br />

SOCIETY (SFEN)<br />

Contact: Bernard Jolly<br />

Phone: +33-0-1-53-58-32-10<br />

Fax: +33-0-1-53-58-32-11<br />

Email: sfen@sfen.fr<br />

www.sfen.org<br />

A forward-looking learned society with high-level exchanges<br />

on scientific and technical issues, organizing and sponsoring<br />

large national and international events. The SFEN provides a<br />

proactive and well-defined information policy thanks to its<br />

widespread international presence and cooperation agreements<br />

with learned nuclear societies.<br />

Founding member and one of the main promoters of the<br />

European Nuclear Society (ENS). Sustained contacts with<br />

institutions of the European Commission and with IAEA,<br />

working together with the French Atomic Forum and<br />

FORATOM. SFEN makes way for the young generation and<br />

transversal meeting groups open worldwide.<br />

45


GEOVARIANCES Booth: 118<br />

Contact: Jean-Jacques Peraudin, Sales Manager Environment<br />

49bis avenue Franklin Roosevelt<br />

AVON 77210<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-1-6074-9090<br />

Fax: +33-1-6422-8728<br />

Email: bleines@geovariances.com<br />

www.geovariances.com<br />

GEOVARIANCES is a French independent software vendor<br />

which provides the most complete solution in Geostatistics:<br />

innovative methodologies, experts and software packages to<br />

answer challenges in mapping, volumes estimation, risk<br />

analysis. GEOVARIANCES develops and sells KARTOTRAK,<br />

the first all-in-one software solution designed for the<br />

radiological characterization of contaminated sites and<br />

facilities. KARTOTRAK provides an integrated workflow from<br />

in-situ characterization to final control after remediation.<br />

GEOVARIANCES also offers consulting and training services.<br />

GNS GESELLSCHAFT FÜR Booth: 221<br />

NUKLEAR-SERVICE GmbH<br />

Contact: Joerg Viermann<br />

Frohnhauser Str. 67<br />

45130 Essen<br />

Germany<br />

Phone: +49-201-109-0<br />

Email: info@gns.de<br />

www.gns.de<br />

Competence for Nuclear Services: GNS Gesellschaft für<br />

Nuklear-Service mbH, world leading supplier of casks for spent<br />

fuel, HLW and ILW, also offers services for management and<br />

disposal of spent fuel and all types of radioactive waste.<br />

More than one thousand spent fuel casks of the CASTOR® and<br />

CONSTOR® type and more than 5500 MOSAIK® casks for<br />

intermediate level waste make GNS mbH the supplier of the<br />

world’s top selling shielded transport and storage casks, which<br />

are today used in a number of countries on four continents.<br />

Design and supply of treatment facilities, decommissioning<br />

services and all kinds of engineering support round off our<br />

portfolio.<br />

INTERA INCORPORATED Booth: 112<br />

Contact: Mr. Benoît Paris<br />

90 Av. Lanessan<br />

69410 Champagne au Mont d'Or, France<br />

Phone: +33-0-4-37-49-13-30<br />

Email: bparis@intera.com<br />

Contact: Mr. Michael Apted<br />

3900 S. Wadsworth Blvd.<br />

Suite 555<br />

Denver, CO 80235, USA<br />

Phone: +1-303-985-0005<br />

Email: mapted@intera.com<br />

www.intera.com<br />

Established in 1974, INTERA has developed a solid track<br />

record of technical excellence and client satisfaction by<br />

providing innovative solutions to the environmental, waste<br />

isolation and natural resource management challenges facing<br />

industry and government.<br />

In each of these areas, INTERA brings unique and specialized<br />

experience that adds value to client projects. From restoring<br />

contaminated sites like former uranium mining and processing<br />

facilities, to developing innovative technologies to address<br />

complex environmental issues, such as the removal of<br />

chlorinated solvents from the subsurface, to using sophisticated<br />

numerical models to guide site investigation and remediation<br />

activities, INTERA is a leader in providing quantitative<br />

geosciences and engineering services to meet environmental<br />

challenges.<br />

Over the past 30 years, INTERA has served as a key<br />

contributor to high-profile underground storage projects. We<br />

have provided long-term support for nearly all of the high-level<br />

radioactive waste disposal programs in the U.S. and Canada,<br />

many programs in Europe, and several in Japan.<br />

Through this experience, our experts in hydrology,<br />

hydrogeology, geochemistry, civil and environmental<br />

engineering, reservoir engineering, applied statistics, and risk<br />

and decision analysis add value to all aspects of waste isolation<br />

and underground storage projects—from site characterization<br />

and process modeling to risk assessment and performance<br />

verification.<br />

Kraftanlagen Heidelberg:<br />

More than 40 years experience<br />

in nuclear engineering and construction<br />

Our services comprise of:<br />

• Radiation protection and dismantling of nuclear facilities<br />

• Radioactive waste management<br />

• Nuclear power plant technology<br />

• Plant design and process technology<br />

• Structural analysis and system engineering<br />

• Training and performance of high-quality welding<br />

For Kraftanlagen Heidelberg, customer focus means maintaining<br />

a permanent presence close to our clients, often directly,<br />

in nuclear power stations and research centers.<br />

Contacts:<br />

Heidelberg headquarters<br />

phone: +49 6221 94-07<br />

email: info@ka-heidelberg.de<br />

France offi ces in Manosque (ITER activities)<br />

and St. Genis-Pouilly (CERN activities)<br />

phone: +33 685986007<br />

email: Breton@ka-heidelberg.de<br />

www.ka-heidelberg.de<br />

47


48<br />

ITECH-INSTRUMENTS Booth: 119<br />

Contact: Marius Casile, General Manager<br />

ZI La Valampe - 3 av. de la Maranne<br />

Châteauneuf Les Martigues 13220<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-4-42-07-4192<br />

Fax: +33-4-88-71-4200<br />

Email: info@itech-instruments.com<br />

www.itech-instruments.com<br />

ITECH-INSTRUMENTS is a French Company specialized in<br />

Nuclear Instrumentation. We develop our own Multi-channelanalyzers<br />

for NaI, LaBr3,CSI scintillators, Germanium or CZT<br />

semi-conductors. Our most famous analyzers are VENUS and<br />

ORION. All our electronics works with the most popular<br />

spectroscopic software INTERWINNER. ITECH-<br />

INSTRUMENTS can design and study your systems for wastedrums<br />

measurements, for in-situ measurements, for gloveboxes,...<br />

ITECH-INSTRUMENTS will supply, install and test<br />

the systems at your site or in our facility. We have Maintenance<br />

Service and Training Team. Keep free to contact us.<br />

JMCS SARL Booth: 413<br />

Contact: Jacques Minassian, General Manager<br />

8, Avenue Hoche<br />

Saint-Remy-Les-Chevreuse 78470<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-0-13047-1552<br />

Email: jacquesminassian@orange.fr<br />

JMCS is a distributor selling a wide range of products for the<br />

nuclear industry, Alpha / Beta / Gamma equipments, Reactor<br />

Outage Service Cameras, Hardened Radiation Cameras, HPGe<br />

Spectrometer, Environmental Radiation Gamma Monitoring<br />

station, Phantom for Whole Body Counting system Companies<br />

represented: AHLBERG ELECTRONICS - ENVINET - LAB<br />

IMPEX - BSI - RSD.<br />

KRAFTANLAGEN HEIDELBERG GmbH<br />

— SPONSOR ONLY —<br />

Contact: Bernd Heinen<br />

Sales and Marketing<br />

Im Breitspiel 7<br />

69126 Heidelberg<br />

Phonee: +49-6221-94-1303<br />

Fax: +49-6221-94-41303<br />

Email: heinen@ka-heidelberg.de<br />

www.ka-heidelberg.de<br />

NUCLEAR RESEARCH & Booth: 125<br />

CONSULTING GROUP (NRG)<br />

Contact: Ronald Dekker & André Wakker<br />

NRG, P.O. Box 25<br />

1755 ZG, Petten<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Phone: +31-224-56-4234<br />

Email: radwaste@nrg.eu<br />

www.nrg.eu<br />

NRG Radiation & Environment is the innovative centre of<br />

excellence on radiological safety in the Netherlands. We can<br />

help you use nuclear technology safely and responsibly. NRG<br />

provides services internationally, supplying expertise and<br />

products to protect humans and the environment from the<br />

effects of radioactivity and radiation.<br />

During ICEM, NRG will present new methods for treatment of<br />

organic materials containing radioactive waste water, our waste<br />

management database REWIND to register waste in<br />

decommissioning projects, HIRARCHI a station to sort<br />

different waste levels, and our services regarding natural<br />

occurring radioactivity (NORM). We give you the full<br />

overview of services we offer in environmental remediation<br />

and radioactive waste management.<br />

Our radiological protection experts provide services for:<br />

• National and international public authorities<br />

• Utilities<br />

• Pharmaceutical and medical sector<br />

• Oil and gas producers<br />

• Scrap, ore and metal processing companies<br />

• Airlines<br />

Our expertise and services cover the entire spectrum of<br />

radiological protection:<br />

• Laboratory analysis and monitoring equipment/networks<br />

• Dosimetry and calibration services, personal dosimetry<br />

• Advisory services and license application support<br />

• Risk assessment, environmental impact reports and policy<br />

support<br />

• Support, auditing and optimization of operations<br />

• Training<br />

• Ageing management and/or dismantling of radiological<br />

facilities<br />

• Clean-up, decontamination and recycling, waste disposal<br />

and site declassification.


NUKEM TECHNOLOGIES Booth: 422<br />

GmbH<br />

Contact: Beate Scheffler,<br />

Director Communications & Support Services<br />

Industriestr. 13<br />

Alzenau 63755<br />

Germany<br />

Phone: +49-623-9104<br />

Fax: +49-6023-911188<br />

Email: info@nukemtechnologies.de<br />

www.nukemtechnologies.de<br />

NUKEM Technologies GmbH world-wide offers nuclear<br />

engineering solutions: • Management of radioactive waste<br />

(from concept development to turn-key delivery of complete<br />

waste treatment centers, techniques for all types of radioactive<br />

waste) • Spent Fuel Management (storage technologies,<br />

handling facilities, technologies for characterization of spent<br />

fuel elements) • Decommissioning of nuclear facilities (from<br />

concept development to complete project management, broad<br />

spectrum of techniques for dismantling and decontamination) •<br />

Comprehensive spectrum of engineering and consulting<br />

services.<br />

������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������<br />

���������������������<br />

�����������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������<br />

����������������<br />

���������������<br />

��������������������<br />

������������������������<br />

�������������������������<br />

����������������������������������<br />

����������������������������<br />

������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������<br />

����������������������<br />

������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������<br />

NUVIA GROUP Booth: 230<br />

Contact: Ron Smith, International Sales Manager<br />

Kelburn Court, Daten Park, Risley<br />

Warringdon, Cheshire, WA3 6TW<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Phone: +44-0-1925-858200<br />

Fax: +44-0-1925-811867<br />

Email: info@nuvia-group.com<br />

www.nuvia-group.com<br />

The Nuvia Group delivers to its clients a unique range of<br />

vertically integrated solutions covering nuclear new build,<br />

plant life extension, operations, radiation safety,<br />

decommissioning and waste management. With a total staff of<br />

over 1,000 it brings together the nuclear experience and<br />

expertise of Nuvia Limited in the UK and Nuvia France with<br />

its subsidiaries NTS, Salvarem, Mecatiss, Millennium, Essor<br />

and Vraco as well as its international operations Nuvia India,<br />

Nuvia Italy and Nuvia Nordic.<br />

OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY Booth: 219<br />

AGENCY (NEA)<br />

Contact: OECD Nuclear Eneregy Agency (NEA)<br />

12 boulevard des îles<br />

Issy-les-Moulineaux 92130<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-01-45-24-1015<br />

Email: nea@oecd-nea.org<br />

www.oecd-nea.org<br />

The Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) is a specialised agency of<br />

the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development<br />

(OECD). Its 30 member countries account for approximately<br />

85% of global installed nuclear energy capacity and represent<br />

the world?s best nuclear expertise. NEA studies are carried out<br />

in the areas of nuclear safety and regulation, radioactive waste<br />

management, radiological protection and public health, nuclear<br />

science and data, nuclear development and the fuel cycle, and<br />

legal affairs. For more information see: www.oecd-nea.org.<br />

ONET TECHNOLOGIES Booth: 424<br />

— SPONSOR —<br />

Contact: Philippe Gros Gean,<br />

Business Development Director,<br />

Gwenaëlle Gozé, communication officer<br />

Phone: +33-4-91-29-18-44 or +33-4-91-29-18-74<br />

Email: pgrosgean@onet.fr or ggoze@onet.fr<br />

www.onet-technologies.com<br />

In a nut shell:<br />

• Turnover: € 225 Million<br />

• 2 300 employees<br />

• 600 engineers & experts, 1 700 operators, technicians and<br />

specialized site workers<br />

• 438 employees recruited in 2010<br />

• 3% of the turnover for R&D<br />

Our core Business:<br />

• Engineering & site services for nuclear power plants and<br />

nuclear installations<br />

• Decommissioning, decontamination & waste management<br />

• New build<br />

• Training<br />

Our international network includes:<br />

Subsidiaries in Bulgaria, India, Italy, Romania, United<br />

Kingdom… and partners all over the world.<br />

49


ONET TECHNOLOGIES is part of the ONET group, a<br />

service provider with a turnover of €1.4 Billion<br />

• 57 000 employees<br />

• Service provider through 4 trademarks:<br />

- ONET TECHNOLOGIES: nuclear engineering and<br />

services<br />

- ONET PROPRETE MULTISERVICES: cleaning<br />

and associated services<br />

- ONET SECURITE: guarding, electronic security<br />

- AXXIS RESSOURCES: recruitment, temporary labour<br />

ORTEC (AMETEK SAS) Booth: 227<br />

Contact: Reginald Recco, Sales Manager<br />

Elancourt 78990<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-0-1-3068-89-10<br />

Fax: +33-0-1-30-68-89-99<br />

Email: reginald.recco@ametek.com<br />

www.ortec-online.com<br />

ORTEC is a leading global manufacturer of radiation detection<br />

instrumentation offering solutions for NDA, and Waste Assay<br />

applications including instrumentation for mobile gamma ray<br />

assays of sites, surfaces and objects. Visit our booth to demo<br />

the micro-trans-spec portable HPGe gamma spectrometer.<br />

PACTECH EPS LTD. Booth: 126<br />

Contact: Mike Nichols, Managing Director<br />

Buttermere Pavilion, Ingwell Drive<br />

Westlakes Science & Technology Park<br />

Cumbria CA24 3JZ<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Phone: +44-0-1946-695005<br />

Email: mikenichols@pactecinc.com<br />

www.pacteceps.co.uk<br />

PacTec, Inc. has over 20 years experience in manufacturing a<br />

complete line of custom engineered packaging products for the<br />

nuclear waste, hazardous waste, and transportation industries.<br />

We manufacture soft sided packaging such as IP-1 and IP-2 lift<br />

bags which meet IAEA requirements, LSA and SCO wraps,<br />

and rail car liners and tarps. PacTec has been awarded 9<br />

patents, and is ISO 9001-2008 certified. We also provide<br />

product testing and development, working with our UK clients<br />

such as LLWR, RSRL, Magnox, Dounreay, and Sellafield.<br />

PORVAIR FILTRATION GROUP Booth: 327<br />

Contact: Chris Chadwick<br />

1 Concorde Close<br />

Fareham, Hampshire PO15 5RT<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Phone: +44-0-1489-864330<br />

Fax: +44-0-1489-864399<br />

Email: info@porvairfiltration.com<br />

www.porvairfiltration.com<br />

Porvair Filtration Group is an international leader in the design<br />

and supply of high quality filtration and separation materials<br />

and products. As an engineering company we offer fully<br />

optimised solutions to the nuclear industry including the power<br />

generation, fuel production, reprocessing, decontamination and<br />

waste packaging sectors. We provide everything from a single,<br />

specialised, retrofit element to a complete packaged system<br />

meeting the precise needs of complex applications, together<br />

with on-site support and a complete after sales service.<br />

50<br />

ROBATEL INDUSTRIES Booth: 220<br />

Contact: Christophe Bruneel, Business Manager<br />

Rue de Genève - B.P. 203<br />

GENAS Cedex 69741<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-0-4-72-22-10-10<br />

Fax: + 33-0-4-78-90-23-79<br />

Email: commercial@robatel.fr<br />

www.robatel.fr<br />

ACTIVITIES - Turnkey contractor for major nuclear projects :<br />

design, manufacture, and assembly of shielded laboratories for<br />

research or production, decontamination facilities, waste<br />

packaging facilities, nuclear fuel production, and testing<br />

installations using glove-box technology - Design, certification<br />

and manufacture of type B casks for transportation and storage<br />

of radioactive materials (fuel, waste, sources): 73 type B casks<br />

- Process equipment for reprocessing facilities -<br />

Decommissioning projects - Development and production of -<br />

special equipment - for the nuclear industry.


RÖHR + STOLBERG GmbH Booth: 421<br />

Contact: Frank Köhler<br />

Bruchfeld 52<br />

Krefeld<br />

Germany<br />

Phone: +49-2151-5892-50 or<br />

+49-170797-8939 (Mobile)<br />

Email: frank.koehler@roehr-stolberg.de<br />

www.roehr-stolberg.de<br />

Calder Group is a pan-European engineering group, active in<br />

lead engineering and the manufacture and distribution of lead<br />

sheet. Calder is leading manufacturer of radiation shielding.<br />

Calder Companies provide radiation shielding products,<br />

services and solutions meeting customer demands for<br />

applications in the nuclear power and nuclear healthcare<br />

industry.<br />

SOCODEI Booth: 133<br />

Contact: Christophe Maufrais<br />

Phone: +33-0-4-66-50-5987<br />

Email: christophe.maufrais@socodei.fr<br />

www.socodei.fr<br />

SOCODEI is the French leader for short half life radioactive<br />

waste treatment by incineration and melting.<br />

STUDSVIK SAS Booth: 127<br />

Contact: Thierry Hoffmann<br />

Centre d’Affaires Euripole<br />

ZA des Vauguillettes III – 89100 SENS<br />

France<br />

Phone: +3-86-66-60-75<br />

Email: info@studsvik.fr<br />

www.studsvik.com<br />

MAIN ACTIVITIES - Services on the Nuclear Field :<br />

• Processing of radioactive waste<br />

• On-site waste services<br />

• Engineering and consultancy<br />

• Health physics services (manufacture and montage)<br />

• Transport logistics<br />

• Decommissioning services (engineering and operating)<br />

• Operational and outage support (decontamination, nuclear<br />

logistic)<br />

• Fuel and materials performance<br />

• Materials integrity and water chemistry<br />

• Nuclear fuel analysis software<br />

• Design and built<br />

TIB Booth: 117<br />

Contact: Patrick Poitevin<br />

32 rue de Saint-Rémy<br />

Brezolles 28270<br />

France<br />

Email: p.poitevin@tib.fr<br />

Please visit our booth for more information about our services<br />

and products.<br />

URS Booth: 114<br />

— SPONSOR —<br />

Contact: Daniel Curry<br />

Email: Daniel.Curry@wsms.comwww.urscorp.com<br />

URS Corporation is a leading provider of engineering,<br />

construction and technical services around the world.<br />

Headquartered in San Francisco, the company operates in 45<br />

countries with approximately 55,000 employees providing<br />

services to federal, state and local governmental agencies as<br />

well as private clients in the Energy, Industrial and<br />

Infrastructure sectors.<br />

URS Corp has particular expertise in environmental<br />

management and operation of nuclear facilities on behalf of the<br />

United States government and is the market leader in nuclear<br />

waste management, disposal and clean-up. It has one of the<br />

best overall safety records in the US nuclear industry and since<br />

1999 has brought this track record and capability to nuclear<br />

waste programmes in the UK.<br />

URS leads the two consortia: UK Nuclear Waste Management<br />

Ltd, and Nuclear Management Partners Ltd which were<br />

successful in winning the management and operations contracts<br />

with the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority for the Low<br />

Level Waste Repository and Sellafield Sites respectively.<br />

UTILIS SAS Booth: 116<br />

Contact: Pascal Maloni, Sales Manager<br />

ZAC Eurotransit - rue Mariotte<br />

Ennery 57365<br />

France<br />

Phone: +33-0-87-74-60 74<br />

Fax: +33-0-3-87-71-07-60<br />

Email: contact@utilis.fr<br />

www.utilis.fr<br />

For more than 10 years UTILIS SAS has been manufacturing<br />

rapid-deploy shelters and designing expeditionary systems for<br />

protection of people and operational equipment. Thanks to a<br />

large range of soft-wall and hard-wall shelters UTILIS SAS<br />

meets requirements of both military, civil and homeland<br />

security markets and has a history of complete equipment<br />

solutions for various applications:<br />

• Camps / Command Posts / Head Quarters<br />

• CBRN decontamination of people<br />

• CBRN collective protection<br />

• CBRN protection for vehicles / trucks / helicopters / tanks<br />

• Rapid deploy hangars for maintenance of aircrafts or<br />

vehicles<br />

• Field hospitals / First-aid Medical Posts<br />

We offer field-proven and reliable products that meet NATO<br />

and MIL-standard specifications and occupy a unique position<br />

in the market place. Our shelter systems have successfully<br />

passed snow load, solar resistance, blackout, wind, wind driven<br />

rain resistance and durability tests at the Aberdeen Proving<br />

Grounds (U.S. Army). To enhance your mission capabilities, a<br />

quick and efficient service support is provided via our<br />

international presence with head offices in Europe, US, Latin<br />

America, Middle East and Asia.<br />

51


URS has developed proven Integrated Management Systems that create safety conscious cultures for the highest hazard,<br />

most complex and regulated facilities in the world. With our extensive resources, customers receive the most<br />

comprehensive inventory of engineering, construction and management available.<br />

The Global Management & Operations Services Group of URS provides safe, innovative management of high risk,<br />

technically complex projects, programs and facilities for the U.S. Department of Energy and other global organisations.<br />

Nuclear Processing/High Hazard Facilities<br />

URS is a leader in the safe operation of high-hazard/high-consequence facilities. We have safely operated plutonium and<br />

other complex nuclear chemical processing facilities at DOE sites across the US.<br />

URS is part of each of the consortiums that have been awarded contracts to manage and operate the UK’s Low Level<br />

Waste Repository and Sellafield sites by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.<br />

Nuclear/Hazardous Waste<br />

As the only company to vitrify high-level radioactive nuclear waste in the United States, URS is a world leader in safely<br />

managing nuclear and other hazardous wastes for a wide range of federal and state agencies.<br />

URS is the only DOE contractor successfully to licence a deep geological nuclear waste repository in the U.S. The company<br />

oversaw the building, licensing and start up of the DOE’s Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, a transuranic waste repository near<br />

Carlsbad, New Mexico.<br />

Additionally, URS was the lead managemnt contractor for the licensing of Yucca Mountain.<br />

Environmental/Facility Closure<br />

URS is a leader in the safe and regulatory compliant closure of facilities formerly used to process and store nuclear and<br />

other hazardous materials. URS capitalises on state-of-the-art technical knowledge backed by six decades of experience<br />

working at nuclear facilities for commercial and government clients.<br />

URS’s closure efforts are backed by experienced teams of professional engineers, scientists, regulatory analysts and<br />

project managers specialising in hazardous and radiological waste engineering; soil, groundwater and mixed waste<br />

remediation; facility decontamination and decommissioning; and environmental compliance.<br />

Global Environmental Technology<br />

URS has a proud history of providing advanced technological solutions. URS is a leader in the development of innovative<br />

technologies to provide solutions to problems ranging from environmental remediation to homeland security. These<br />

technologies range from solvent cleanup methods to waste site capping and sealing approaches.<br />

URS also pioneered a variety of natural remedies such as phytoremediation (using natural vegetative processes),<br />

bioremediation (using naturally occurring microbes), and monitored natural remediation (establishing a groundwater<br />

mixing zone), to passively remove contaminants and improve the cost and effectiveness of its cleanup efforts.<br />

53


54<br />

FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT,<br />

Westinghouse is<br />

focused on<br />

nuclear technology.<br />

Westinghouse Electric Company is contributing to a healthy environment<br />

as it builds new nuclear power plants that emit zero greenhouse gases when<br />

generating electricity. Our dedication to a cleaner environment extends to<br />

servicing existing nuclear power plants and managing by-products in an<br />

environmentally responsible manner.<br />

Westinghouse provides comprehensive integrated services and solutions<br />

to the Decommissioning and Dismantling (D&D) and Waste Management<br />

industries. We have acquired extensive experience in the dismantling of<br />

nuclear installations from uranium mills to nuclear power plants.<br />

We provide state-of-the-art solutions for the treatment and handling<br />

of radioactive waste. And we offer proven solutions for the storage of<br />

low-, intermediate- and high-level waste.<br />

Westinghouse technology will help provide future generations with safe,<br />

clean and reliable electricity.<br />

Check us out at www.westinghousenuclear.com.


WESTINGHOUSE Booth: 414<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

— SPONSOR —<br />

Contact: Joseph Boucau, Director,<br />

Global D&D and Waste Management<br />

43, rue de l’Industrie<br />

Nivelles 1400<br />

Belgium<br />

Phone: +32-67-28-84-34<br />

Fax: +32-67-28-8534<br />

Email: boucauj@westinghouse.com<br />

www.westinghouse.com<br />

Westinghouse Electric Company is a leading provider of fuel,<br />

services, technology, plant design and equipment to utility and<br />

industrial customers globally in the commercial nuclear electric<br />

power industry. Nearly 50% of all commercial nuclear power<br />

plants in operation worldwide, and approximately 60% in the<br />

U.S., are based on Westinghouse technology. Westinghouse<br />

supplied the original equipment design for 62 out of the 104<br />

licensed commercial nuclear reactors in the U.S. and 113 out of<br />

the 443 licensed commercial nuclear reactors worldwide.<br />

Westinghouse provides global, operationally excellent nuclear<br />

services that keep operating plants operating safely and<br />

efficiently, as well as comprehensive, integrated services and<br />

solutions in support of decommissioning and dismantling<br />

(D&D) and waste management.<br />

WSP ENVIRONMENT Booth: 124<br />

AND ENERGY<br />

Contact: Peter Booth<br />

The Victoria 150-182<br />

Salford Quays<br />

M50 3SP Manchester<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Phone: +44-16-1886-2401<br />

Email: peter.booth@wspgroup.com<br />

www.wspenvironmental.com<br />

WSP Environment and Energy is a global business and part of<br />

the WSP Group building on a sound platform supporting the<br />

nuclear and radiological sectors. We are supporting our clients<br />

in the areas of radioactive waste management, environmental<br />

remediation, dose and risk assessment, stakeholder<br />

engagements, EIA and decision making processes. Drawing on<br />

the expertise held within WSP and our delivery partners we can<br />

provide these services across the entire nuclear fuel cycle and<br />

NORM related industries.<br />

Notes<br />

55


Session 1 Abstracts<br />

ICEM'11 Abstracts - Per instructions, only the first 200 words of each abstract is shown.<br />

SESSION 1 — PLENARY SESSION<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 2 — PANEL: APPROACHES FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION (5.18)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 3 — PANEL: LESSONS LEARNED: FUKUSHIMA, CHERNOBYL-<br />

25 YEARS LATER, TMI-2 & OTHER EXPERIENCES (3.11)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 4 — NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR L/ILW MANAGEMENT (1.2)<br />

1) LOW LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN THE US (w/oP-59311)<br />

David James, Thomas Kalinowski, DW James Consulting LLC; Lisa Edwards, Electric Power Research Inst. (USA)<br />

The United States led the international efforts to define disposal requirements for low level radioactive wastes with the publication<br />

of US Regulations governing the disposal of such wastes. The requirements were based on a system of waste classification<br />

based on the concentrations of certain radionuclides considered problematic for the protection of future generations from radiation<br />

exposure. The regulation, itself, was based on a process for the development of new disposal sites defined by the US congress to<br />

provide an equitable distribution of burden to various regions of the US. This process has met with little success in the almost 30<br />

years since its initiation leaving only an incomplete patchwork of disposal options which are primarily dependant on the same<br />

options that existed before the act and regulations were initiated. There is currently a new focus on the basis for some of the regulatory<br />

requirements derived from advances in the understanding of dose impacts from certain radionuclides, improvements in performance<br />

assessment methodologies, the increased use of engineered barriers, the reality of current disposal economies, along with<br />

the failure of the act to conform to expectations. This paper will provide an update on the discussion taking place with a focus on<br />

the technical considerations.<br />

2) TAKING THE UK’S NATIONAL LLW PROGAMME FROM STRATEGY<br />

DEVELOPMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION (w/oP-59059)<br />

David Rossiter, Rachel O’Donnell, LLW Repository Ltd. (UK)<br />

In 2008 UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd (UKNWM) became the Parent Body Organisation (PBO) at the Low Level Waste<br />

Repository (LLWR) in the UK. LLWR is the primary disposal facility for the UKs LLW, supporting a wide range of industries<br />

across the nuclear power generation, reprocessing, defence, healthcare, education, and oil and gas sectors. One of the key tasks following<br />

the appointment of the new PBO was to work with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) to develop a national<br />

strategy for LLW generated in the UK, predominantly in the NDA estate. The new National Strategy for LLW was required to<br />

address the gap between the forecast waste arisings and predicted capacity at LLWR.<br />

The National Strategy for LLW Management was published in August 2010 following an 18 month development period. The<br />

main focus of the strategy is on three areas:<br />

• Application of the waste management hierarchy to extend the life of LLWR and ensure waste is managed in a risk-based,<br />

fit-for-purpose manner<br />

• Making best use of existing assets such as transport, packaging, treatment and disposal facilities<br />

• Opening up new fit-for-purpose waste management routes to divert waste away from LLWR<br />

Developing a robust strategy is vital to provide…<br />

3) CEA’S WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY AND STRATEGY. LESSONS LEARNED (w/oP-ICEM2011-59201)<br />

Didier Dall’ava, CEA (France)<br />

Radioactive wastes are generated during operation as well as during the decontamination and dismantling of CEAs nuclear<br />

facility/installation. The safe and responsible management of radioactive wastes at all stages is an essential requirement of the regulatory<br />

system. The management covers the whole sequence of operations starting with the generation of waste and ending with its<br />

disposal. The disposal here means discarding of waste with no intention for retrieval.<br />

It is important to note here that the safety principles and practices that are applicable during the operational phase are also applicable<br />

during the decommissioning phase. As the radioactive waste arising is an inevitable outcome of decommissioning work, all<br />

the regulatory requirements associated with decommissioning remain in force in waste management. This presentation deals initially<br />

with the regulatory standards related to the management of wastes. As the management of radioactive wastes inevitably<br />

includes treatment and conditioning of wastes, following treatment and conditioning of wastes, storage, transportation and eventual<br />

disposal are the logical outcome of the radioactive wastes, processes are at any time improved based on the feedback experience<br />

and the lessons learned.<br />

4) REGULATIONS FOR THE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN<br />

THE KONRAD REPOSITORY(w/oP-ICEM2011-59105)<br />

Hagen Gunther Jung, Lower Saxony Water Management, Coastal Protection and Nature Conservation Agency<br />

(NLWKN); Gabriele Bandt, TÜV Nord EnSys Hannover GmbH & Co. KG (Germany)<br />

The German Atomic Act required a plan approval process to grant the license for the construction and operation of the Konrad<br />

repository for radioactive waste with negligible heat generation (nearly analog to low/intermediate level waste).<br />

56


Abstracts Session 4<br />

In 2002 the Ministry for Environment of the federal State of Lower Saxony licensed the construction and operation of the Konrad<br />

repository. In addition to the Plan Approval License a Water Law Permit is required for the operation of the repository. It considers<br />

the impact of radioactive as well as non-radioactive harmful substances on the near-surface groundwater. The Water Law Permit<br />

limits the total maximum masses, which are allowed for the Konrad repository.<br />

According to the Water Law Permit the operator of the repository has to register the radioactive and non-radioactive harmful<br />

substances and to balance them. Thus, the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) as the permit holder had to develop a concept<br />

accordingly. BfS defined threshold values for registering and balancing the harmful substances, which led to a site specific<br />

solution for the Konrad repository.<br />

The Lower Saxony Water Management, Coastal Protection and Nature Conservation Agency (NLWKN) as the responsible<br />

water law regulatory authority examined this concept in order to exclude an adverse…<br />

5) THE HYDROGEOLOGIC ENVIRONMENT FOR A PROPOSED DEEP GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY<br />

IN CANADA FOR LOW AND INTERMEDIATE LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE (w/oP-59285)<br />

Jonathan Sykes, Stefano Normani, Yong Yin, University of Waterloo;<br />

Mark Jensen, Nuclear Waste Management Organization (Canada)<br />

A Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) for low and intermediate level radioactive waste has been proposed by Ontario Power<br />

Generation for the Bruce nuclear site in Ontario, Canada. The DGR is to be constructed at a depth of about 680 m below ground<br />

surface within the argillaceous Ordovician limestone of the Cobourg Formation. This paper describes the hydrogeology of the DGR<br />

site developed through both site characterization studies and regional-scale numerical modelling analysis. The analysis provides a<br />

framework for the assembly and integration of the site-specific geoscientific data and explains the factors that influence the predicted<br />

long-term performance of the geosphere barrier. Flow system evolution was accomplished using both the density-dependent<br />

FRAC3DVS-OPG flow and transport model and the two-phase gas and water flow computational model TOUGH2-MP. In the geologic<br />

framework of the Province of Ontario, the DGR is located at the eastern flank of the Michigan Basin. Borehole logs covering<br />

Southern Ontario combined with site specific data from 6 deep boreholes have been used to define the structural contours and<br />

hydrogeologic properties at the regional-scale of the modelled 31 sedimentary strata that may be present above the Precambrian<br />

crystalline basement rock. The regional-scale domain encompasses an 18,500 km2 region extending from…<br />

6) RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES AND PROGRESS IN IRAQ (wP-59164)<br />

Fouad Al-Musawi, Emad Shamsaldin, Ministry of Science & Technology (Iraq);<br />

John Cochran, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)<br />

The government of Iraq, through the Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) is decommissioning Iraqs former nuclear<br />

facilities. The 18 former facilities at the Al Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center near Baghdad include partially destroyed research<br />

reactors, a fuel fabrication facility and radioisotope production facilities. These 18 former facilities contain large numbers of silos<br />

and drums of uncharacterized radioactive waste and approximately 30 tanks that contain or did contain uncharacterized liquid<br />

radioactive wastes. Other key sites outside of Al Tuwaitha include facilities at Jesira (uranium processing and waste storage facility),<br />

Rashdiya (centrifuge facility) and Tarmiya (enrichment plant).<br />

The newly created Radioactive Waste Treatment Management Directorate (RWTMD) within MoST is responsible for Iraqs<br />

centralized management of radioactive waste, including safe and secure disposal. In addition to being responsible for the uncharacterized<br />

wastes at Al Tuwaitha, the RWTMD will be responsible for future decommissioning wastes, approximately 900 disused<br />

sealed radioactive sources, contaminated debris from the first Gulf War in 1991 and unknown quantities of NORM wastes from oil<br />

production in Iraq.<br />

This paper presents the challenges and progress that the RWTMD has made in setting-up a radioactive waste management program.<br />

The progress includes the establishment of a staffing structure, staff, participation in international…<br />

SESSON 5 — L/ILW TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION (1.15)<br />

1) RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DELIVERY AT SELLAFIELD, UK (w/oP-59372)<br />

Mike James, Sellafield Ltd (UK)<br />

This paper provides an overview of research and development which is critical to the successful delivery of our operational<br />

and clean up activities. Today we operate a number of plants supporting the nuclear fuel cycle including two reprocessing plants,<br />

fuel fabrication and associated waste management plants for low, intermediate and high level wastes. Our decommissioning programme<br />

is extensive with challenging and complex programmes of work along side the operational facilities. This involves a prioritised<br />

programme to reduce risk and hazard in former reprocessing and fuel fabrication plants, fuel storage ponds and waste silos<br />

and other related facilities.<br />

Our work covers the span of research, development and technology transfer from investigations into low maturity applications<br />

through to deployment of mature technologies across a range of operational and decommissioning areas. An over view of this will<br />

be provided through examples. Characterisation is one of the key areas for successful operations in the nuclear industry today. Our<br />

work has included commissioning work through others such as the National Nuclear Laboratory to investigate novel technologies<br />

such as the use of muon tomography and implementing HiRad a high radiation field detector. Our work does not just include investment<br />

in novel applications a number of significant…<br />

57


Session 5 Abstracts<br />

2) WASTE LOADING ENHANCEMENTS FOR HANFORD LAW GLASSES (wP-59018)<br />

Albert Kruger, US Department of Energy WTP Engineering Division (USA)<br />

About 50 million gallons of mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at The United States Department of Energys<br />

(DOE) Hanford site in Washington state. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOEs<br />

Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will<br />

be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity<br />

Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product is destined for disposal in an engineered<br />

facility at Hanford site while the IHLW product will be disposed in a national geological repository. Both waste forms must meet<br />

a variety of requirements to ensure the protection of the environment before they can be accepted for disposal.<br />

DOE-WTP is examining options to optimize the LAW Facility and LAW glass waste form. One option under evaluation is to<br />

enhance the waste processing rate of the vitrification plant currently under construction. It is likely that the capacity of the LAW<br />

vitrification plant can be increased incrementally by implementation of a variety of low-risk, high-probability changes, either separately<br />

or in combination. These changes include:…<br />

3) THOR(R) STEAM REFORMING TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT<br />

OF COMPLEX AND PROBLEMATIC WASTES (wP-59084)<br />

J. Brad Mason, Adam L. Foster, Studsvik, Inc.(USA)<br />

Many types of complex radioactive wastes exist that, due to their chemical and radiological characteristics, are problematic to<br />

treat using traditional methods. Studsvik has developed the THOR® process that has the capability to successfully treat a wide variety<br />

of radioactive wastes including those with high organic content, high nitrate and nitrite content, high solids content, and heavy<br />

metal bearing. The process produces a dry stable waste form with no liquid effluents and environmentally compliant off-gas emissions,<br />

while reducing the overall waste volume.<br />

The more than 10 years of successful operations at Studsviks Processing facility in Erwin, TN USA provides the foundation<br />

for the deployment of the THOR® steam reforming process for the treatment of many complex wastes. The THOR® process has<br />

been shown to effectively convert numerous types of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) liquid radioactive wastes into solid products<br />

while providing a final waste form with properties comparable to vitrified glass waste forms. In addition to testing and ongoing<br />

project work in the U.S., multiple test programs including lab-scale and engineering-scale demonstrations have been successfully<br />

completed for several international organizations. This international work has included testing and development work with<br />

solid and liquid organic wastes, as well as high…<br />

4) A ROOM TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION AND WASTE VOLUME REDUCTION METHOD<br />

TESTED ON BELGIAN INTERMEDIATE-LEVEL HOMOGENEOUS<br />

BITUMINIZED WASTE (EUROBITUM) (wP-59103)<br />

Nathalie R.E.N. Impens, SCK-CEN; Jan Deckers, BelgoProcess; Lesley Adriaensen,<br />

Pierre Van Iseghem, Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie-Centre d’Etude de l’Energie Nucléaire (Belgium)<br />

We developed a room temperature method to recondition intermediate-level homogeneous bituminized waste, called Eurobitum.<br />

Using this method, Eurobitum could be separated in an aqueous and an organic effluent, and a solid asphaltene-salt mix. In<br />

this paper, we present the results of the room temperature reconditioning method using real radioactive Eurobitum samples. The<br />

dissolution and separation processes were optimized. The residual waste could then be pressed towards a material, that might be<br />

suitable for geological disposal. The concentration of radionuclides in the two secondary waste effluents was thereafter determined.<br />

The aqueous effluent contained radionuclide concentrations below the treatment levels for common radioactive waste water treatment<br />

processes, whereas the alpha radioactivity of the organic phase was low enough to consider the possibility to inject it into the<br />

CILVA radwaste incinerator where it would undergo a thermal treatment process together with other solid radwaste. Our proposed<br />

process could reduce the Eurobitum volume considerably. The most flammable and the least radiation resistant molecules and the<br />

nitrates were removed from the original Eurobitum waste. <strong>Final</strong>ly, the residual waste is expected to be more stable in geological<br />

disposal conditions.<br />

5) STANDARDIZING OF LLW/ILW TREATMENT FOR RUSSIAN<br />

TYPE PRESSURE WATER REACTORS (w/oP-59233)<br />

Klaus Buettner, Rainer Slametschka, NUKEM Technologies GmbH (Germany)<br />

According to the framework program of the Russian Federation released in 2010 it is planned to build up additional nuclear<br />

capacity of approximately 20 GWe. In addition, contracts were signed for several new-builds throughout the world. The related<br />

design efforts together with the restricted design capacities in Russia led Rosenergoatom (Client) and Atomstroyexport (Co-Client)<br />

to the set up of a so-called unified project TOI. TOImeans translated Technically Optimized reactor designed with Integrated databases.<br />

NUKEM Technologies owned by Atomstroyexport was selected to develop the standardized Technically optimized design for<br />

the treatment of the generated LLW and ILW. Special emphasis was made to reduce the waste volume for storage after treatment<br />

to below 50 m³ per year and unit. The selected treatment technologies compromise sorting, fragmentation, thermal treatment, compaction,<br />

evaporation, cementation etc.<br />

In 2010 NUKEM Technologies together with Atomenergoprojekt (Main Contractor) developed the technical concept for the<br />

treatment of liquid and solid LLW and ILW generated within the reactor as well as in the auxiliary buildings. In an iterative process<br />

the waste amounts generated and the respective treatment methods were discussed and agreed. The next step will be to further<br />

develop the design. The basic design (technical project) should be finalized until end of 2012.<br />

58


Abstracts Session 6<br />

6) 35 YEARS OF INCINERATION IN STUDSVIK, LESSONS LEARNED<br />

AND RECENT MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS (wP-59264)<br />

Maria Lindberg, Karin von Kronhelm, Joakim Lövstrand, Studsvik Nuclear AB (Sweden)<br />

In 1976 Studsvik, Sweden, started operation of its incinerator and has since been in operation. The incinerator facility is<br />

licensed for 600 tonnes per year and during 2010 around 500 tonnes were treated.<br />

The waste incinerated arises both in the nuclear industry, including the Studsvik site, as well as other industries where radioactivity<br />

is used such as hospitals, universities and other research activities. Waste from customers in different countries has been treated<br />

over the years, for example Swedish and German nuclear power plants, fuel vendors in Sweden, Germany and the UK as well<br />

as the Studsvik site it self.<br />

The last few years the facility waste acceptance criteria has been upgraded to also accept flame retardant plastics as well as<br />

oils, solvents and oil soaks. In order to do this the facility it self has also been upgraded.<br />

The latest new waste stream that can be accepted is activated carbon from off-gas treatment systems. This waste stream is treated<br />

by grinding the pellets before incineration. A recent test has shown that this approach works really well and that the amount of<br />

ash and dust is very small. Studsvik is currently awaiting the final authority approval for this waste stream and…<br />

7) SODIUM-RICH WASTES: CHALLENGES, ANALYSIS AND PERFORMANCE (w/oP-59316)<br />

Daniel Brew, Melody L Carter, Lou Vance, Martin W Stewart, ANSTO (Australia)<br />

The immobilisation of radioactive waste is of fundamental importance to its safe management. By changing the form of the<br />

waste, chemically and/or physically, it is possible to minimise the escape of radionuclides to the biosphere. Sodium-rich wastes can<br />

be particularly problematic to immobilise. The high solubility of sodium in both acidic and alkaline water makes it particularly challenging<br />

to maintain as a structural component within the wasteform matrix. Glass and glass-ceramic wasteforms have been developed<br />

at the Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organisation (ANSTO) that immobilise sodium-rich wastes (up to 7 M<br />

NaOH) in accordance with US Department of Environment regulations. While traditional chemical and structural analyses such as<br />

powder infra-red spectroscopy, thermal gravimetry and x-ray diffraction have been employed in this development, additional data<br />

from neutron- and X-ray micro-focus tomography are also presented. These techniques were used to quantify phase volume percentage<br />

and size distribution data to further elucidate structural information and matrix uniformity. This work presents the ANSTO<br />

experience of sodium-rich wastes: the process involved from laboratory design with key results, to upscale considerations and challenges.<br />

8) PRELIMINARY DEMONSTRATION OF GEOMELT TREATMENT OF<br />

HANFORD’S K-BASIN SLUDGE (wP-59004)<br />

Keith Witwer, IMPACT Services, Inc. (USA)<br />

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are seeking a waste treatment<br />

solution for sludge stored in the K-Basin spent fuel pond at the Hanford Nuclear Site, in Washington State, USA. This sludge<br />

is a Remote Handled Transuranic (RHTRU) waste destined for final disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Pant (WIPP) in New Mexico.<br />

Removal of the sludge from the K-Basin and transport for interim storage at the Hanford Site is referred to as Phase 1 in this<br />

process. Phase 2 is defined as the treatment and packaging of the sludge such that it can be transported and disposed at the WIPP.<br />

This paper discusses work in support of Phase 2.<br />

ISIs GeoMelt ICV process is ideally suited to treating a heterogeneous sludge that is rich in uranium metal and which contains<br />

a mixture of other fuel derived products, earthen materials, and miscellaneous items (operational debris, resin, etc). GeoMelt can<br />

quickly and efficiently treat small drum load batches and will fully destroy organics, oxidize reactive metals, and permanently<br />

immobilize radioactive constituents within a high-integrity vitrified product that will meet or exceed all WIPP acceptance criteria.<br />

The GeoMelt Technology has an extensive experience base, having…<br />

SESSION 6 — ISSUES AND SOLUTIONS RELATED TO SPENT FUEL, TRU, AND<br />

HLW TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL (2-5)<br />

1) INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF RADON IN A DEEP GEOLOGICAL<br />

REPOSITORY FOR USED NUCLEAR FUEL (wP-59145)<br />

Kelly Sedor, Frank Garisto, Helen Leung, Nuclear Waste Management Organization (Canada)<br />

The Nuclear Waste Management Organization is implementing Adaptive Phased Management (APM) for the long-term management<br />

of Canadas used nuclear fuel. The APM approach encompasses centralized containment and isolation of the used fuel in<br />

a Deep Geological Repository (DGR) in a suitable rock formation, such as crystalline rock or sedimentary rock.<br />

During the construction and operation of a DGR, workers will be exposed to radon in air emanating from the repository host<br />

rock. In open air, the concentration of radon gas is very small. In confined spaces, such as the DGR, radon gas has the potential to<br />

accumulate and reach relatively high concentration levels, and may become a health hazard to workers.<br />

An initial assessment of the radon hazard of the DGR concept was performed to determine whether there is a health hazard to<br />

workers, and any need for radon monitoring during construction and operation.<br />

The radon concentration in various locations was estimated based on properties of the host rock (including uranium content,<br />

porosity and saturation), radon emanation rate, ventilation rate, and dimensions of the repository. Specifically, the analysis considered:<br />

the radon concentration in the DGR during construction and operations; the radon concentration at the repository site,<br />

including that adjacent to…<br />

59


Session 6 Abstracts<br />

2) GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELING OF PERIODS WITH TEMPERATE CLIMATE CONDITIONS FOR USE IN<br />

A SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF A REPOSITORY FOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL (w/oP-59154)<br />

Steven Joyce, Lee Hartley, Serco; Trevor Simpson, Serco (UK)<br />

As a part of the license application for a final repository for spent nuclear fuel, the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management<br />

Company (SKB) has prepared a safety report (SR-Site) that assesses the long-term radiological safety after closure of a repository<br />

located at 500 m depth in the Forsmark area, c. 120 km north of Stockholm. The movement and composition of groundwater<br />

affect both the key pathways for radionuclide migration and the performance of engineered barriers, and hence are important issues<br />

that have to be considered and modelled as part of quantitative assessment calculations. This presentation describes the groundwater<br />

flow modelling studies that have been performed to represent the post-closure hydrogeological and hydrochemical situations<br />

during temperate climate conditions, and how these are used to support safety assessment calculations and arguments.<br />

The collation and implementation of onsite hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical data from the surface based site investigations<br />

at Forsmark are used as the basis for defining a reference case for the natural hydrogeological situation at the site (hydrogeological<br />

base case). Areas of uncertainty within the current site understanding and the engineered system are examined by a<br />

series of flow model variants. The flow modelling needs to consider a wide range of…<br />

3) CONCEPTION OF A NEW CONDITIONING PROCESS, OF STRONGLY PLUTONIUM<br />

CONTAMINATED WASTE CANISTERS (w/oP-59205)<br />

Maxime Michel-Noel, ONET Technologies-ONECTRA (France)<br />

Intermediate storage in the Pegase nuclear facilities, of wastes strongly contaminated with plutonium and conditioned in 100<br />

litres canisters, was no longer possible due to the new safety evaluation of this installation. A new process have been then imagined<br />

to transform all these canisters in new confined packages inside the building itself. The conception, which is described, is based<br />

on safety risk analysis which has been conducted before the construction.The operation itself is now terminated.<br />

4) METHODOLOGICAL GUIDE ON DEVELOPMENT OF WORK PLAN FOR MITIGATION OF ACCIDENT<br />

CONSEQUENCES DURING TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOISOTOPE THERMOELECTRIC GENERATORS AND<br />

RADIOISOTOPE HEAT SOURCES (w/oP-59162)<br />

Valeriy Shempelev, Scientific and Engineering Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Safety; Vladimir Reka, Rostechnadzor;<br />

Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority; Alexander Smetnik, Evgenij Kapralov,<br />

FSUE VO “Safety”; Galina Zubareva, Tver State Medical Academy (Russia/Norway)<br />

This methodological Guide has been built on the requirements of the regulatory acts of the Russian Federation, federal codes<br />

and standards in the field of atomic energy, and also recommendations of the IAEA regulating the issues of safety during transportation<br />

of radioactive material, and is intended to provide methodological aid to the operation organizations (operators), consignors<br />

and consignees, when planning and organization of work on mitigation of accident consequences during transportation of<br />

Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTG) and Radioisotope Heat Sources (RHS) by transport of all types, by land, air and<br />

water all over the territory of the Russian Federation.<br />

The methodological Guide contains recommendation on the procedure of preparation and execution of the Work Plan for mitigation<br />

of accident consequences and its sections, as well as a standard model of the Plan and agreement with emergency and rescue<br />

units for implementation of work to prevent transport incidents and accidents when transporting RTG and RHS drafted on the<br />

basis of results of generalizing the real plans developed by the operating organizations. RTG utilize heat energy from radioactive<br />

isotopes, in this case 90Sr and its daughter nuclide 90Y, to generate electricity as a power source.<br />

5) PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROCESSES DURING VACUUM DRYING<br />

OF METALLIC SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL (wP-59114)<br />

Martin Plys, Michael Epstein, Sung Jin Lee, Robert Apthorpe, Fauske & Associates LLC (USA)<br />

A key process step in remediation of metallic spent nuclear fuel is vacuum drying, in order to move such fuel from pool storage<br />

to dry storage. The drying process for metallic spent nuclear fuel is complicated by the fact that it must accommodate failed<br />

fuel elements, scrap pieces of fuel elements, and scrap particulate. A number of physical and chemical processes that must be considered<br />

in order to effectively and safely vacuum dry these materials are discussed in this paper including: (1) Exothermic oxidation<br />

of exposed metallic surfaces, (2) The impact of uranium hydrides that may be present, (3) The potential for thermal instability,<br />

(4) Degradation of thermal conductivity at low pressures, (5) Multi-component diffusion in scrap and particulate, and (6) Behavior<br />

of uranium oxide hydrates.<br />

We have addressed these issues by creating models for the individual phenomena that are based upon experimental data, integrating<br />

these models into the process simulation code, FATE, and validating process simulations against closed-form solutions. The<br />

integrated model has been employed during the conceptual and preliminary design phases for vacuum drying of scrap particulate<br />

at Hanford in order to converge upon design and operational features that are demonstrably robust and therefore minimize safetyrelated<br />

technical specifications<br />

6) SECURITY ISSUES FOR LONG-TERM STORAGE OF USED FUEL (w/oP-59380)<br />

Felicia A Durán, Gregory Wyss, Calvin Jaeger, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)<br />

With the uncertain future of the proposed Yucca Mountain Repository for final disposal of used light water reactor fuel, the<br />

need to store these fuels past their current regulatory certification periods has become clear. This situation presents possible regulatory<br />

and technical issues with regard to both storage safety and security. The U.S Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear<br />

Energy (NE) is engaged in a program to develop the technical bases for extending dry storage and subsequent transportation of used<br />

nuclear fuel (UNF). The DOE/NE program addressing this issue is divided into four main topical areas: Research and Development<br />

(R&D) Opportunities, Security, Transportation, and Concept Evaluations. This paper will discuss work to address security<br />

issues for long-term storage of UNF. The timeframe for long-term management of UNF is currently defined to be on the order of<br />

60


Abstracts Session 7<br />

300 years. This longer timeframe presents possible regulatory and technical issues with regard to both storage safety and security.<br />

Issues associated with maintaining security for very long-term storage are being identified and addressed. An assessment has been<br />

performed of security regulations, including those from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the DOE, for impacts over<br />

the longer timeframe. The characterization of UNF as self-protecting...<br />

SESSION 7 — NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ER PROGRAMS (4.2)<br />

1) OBJECTIVES FOR REMEDIATION OF AREAS POLLUTED BY<br />

RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES IN FRANCE (w/oP-59300)<br />

Charlotte Cazala, Didier Gay, Olivier Chabanis, Jerome Guillevic, IRSN; Odile Palut Laurent,<br />

Geraldine Dandrieux, ASN; Alain Thomassin, IRSN/DRPH/SER/UETP; Chapalain Estelle,<br />

Laurence Roy, Ministère de lEcologie, du Développement Durable, des Transports et du Logement (France)<br />

In the 90s, the French administration has developed several tools in order to inventory potentially polluted sites and to identify<br />

those requiring an immediate action. Concerns and needs have gradually moved on and a methodology for the management of<br />

selected areas was established. A general framework was then published by the Ministry of Ecology in 2007.<br />

The Ministry of Ecology jointly with the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) asked the Institute for Radiological Protection and<br />

Nuclear Safety (IRSN) to establish guidelines for the management of radioactive polluted areas . Requirements were: i) to fit with<br />

the published general framework while highlighting specificities of radioactive pollutants management; ii) to take benefit of<br />

radioactive polluted areas remediation; iii) to precise remediation objectives and iv) to develop stakeholders involvement issues.<br />

Within this general framework, two situations were identified: i) the polluted area is already used for domestic, public or industrial<br />

purposes; ii) the polluted area is an industrial site under dismantling or a polluted wasteland where a redevelopment project is<br />

under consideration.<br />

Management of a polluted site with ongoing use is based on the pollution level determination. This level can be compared to<br />

threshold values defined in applicable regulations when such threshold values do…<br />

2) REMEDIATION OF AREVA MIRAMAS SITE (w/oP-59312)<br />

Gilles Potier, AREVA (France)<br />

Remediation of AREVA Miramas site<br />

Objectives : The objectives of this project is to remediate the former facility by performing all operations useful and necessary<br />

enabling a final withdrawal of CEA and AREVA NC companies. The desired end state is a remediated site for a new industrial use<br />

Environmental Context : The various studies have demonstrated and confirmed the presence of soil contaminations. The types<br />

and ranges of pollution could clearly be attributed to different historical activities : metals; mercury and organic compounds. However,<br />

due to the different constraints (Mercury regulation, urban proximity, slick ...) and to a particular sensitivity (AREVA operator,<br />

site located in a urban area), the project cannot be limited to the strict regulatory requirements<br />

Description of operations : The operations concerns the remediation of approximately 100 000 m3 of soil and the decommissioning<br />

of facilities. Soil remediation focuses on two major pollutants: mercury and organo-nitro compounds, located in areas well<br />

identified. The techniques applied will be...<br />

3) THE VALUE OF A MATURE, STABLE, AND TRANSPARENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK<br />

IN FACILITATING ER PROGRAMS LESSONS LEARNED IN DECOMMISSIONING OF<br />

URANIUM RECOVERY AND OTHER FACILITIES IN THE USA (w/oP-59411)<br />

Keith I. McConnell, Larry Camper, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USA)<br />

The history of decommissioning activities in the United States has demonstrated the value of a mature, stable and transparent<br />

regulatory framework in facilitating the timely completion of environmental remediation. Two examples are given as case studies.<br />

The first example relates to the history of uranium concentrate (yellowcake) production in the U.S. to support the initial development<br />

of civilian nuclear power in the U.S. in the 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s. This yellowcake production, which took place mostly in<br />

the western U.S., was undertaken before laws and regulations to prevent contamination and protect public health and safety were<br />

fully developed. Significant contamination occurred in terms of both surface and ground water contamination. Although most conventional<br />

mills producing uranium during these early years entered decommissioning in the 70s and 80s, the vast majority are still<br />

remediating their sites because of persistent contamination in ground water. Had an effective regulatory framework been in place,<br />

much of this contamination would have been prevented and remediation accomplished more effectively. In contrast to this experience,<br />

a second example is provided related to development of the regulatory framework for decommissioning of non-uranium<br />

recovery facilities in the U.S. in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Prior to this...<br />

4) THE FIRST NEW CONVENTIONAL URANIUM MILL IN THE U.S. IN 30 YEARS LICENSING<br />

OF THE PINON RIDGE PROJECT, COLORADO, USA (w/oP-59330)<br />

Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd; Frank Filas, Energy Fuels Resources, Lakewood, (USA)<br />

Energy Fuels Resources Corporation (EFR) has recently received a radioactive material license from the US State of Colorado<br />

and intends to construct and operate a conventional acid leach uranium and vanadium mill at the Piñon Ridge Mill site in western<br />

Montrose County, Colorado. Site facilities will include an administration building, a 17- acre mill; three tailing cells totaling 90<br />

acres, a 40-acre evaporation pond (expandable capacity to 80 acres), a 6-acre ore storage pad, and an access road. The mill will<br />

process ore produced from mines within a reasonable truck-hauling distance, mostly from the historical Uravan mineral belt of the<br />

Colorado Plateau (Four Corners region of the States of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico) and will have a capacity of 500<br />

tons per day, but is designed to accommodate subsequent expanded production capacity of up to 1,000 tons per day. The expected<br />

operating life of the mill is 20 to 40 years, depending on the production rate.<br />

The Piñon Ridge mill is subject to regulation by the state of Colorado as a Agreement State with the U.S. Nuclear regulatory<br />

Commision under the U.S. Atomic Energy Act. Accordingly, the mill license (radioactive source material license) that was issued<br />

in January…<br />

61


Session 7 Abstracts<br />

5) INTEGRATED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FOR MAJOR NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING<br />

AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION PROJECTS (w/oP-59068)<br />

John Lehew, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (USA)<br />

CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) is the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) contractor responsible<br />

for the safe, environmental cleanup of the Hanford Sites Central Plateau, sections of the Columbia River Corridor and the Hanford<br />

Reach National Monument.<br />

The 586-square-mile Hanford Site is located along the Columbia River in southeastern Washington, U.S.A. A plutonium production<br />

complex, housing the largest volume of radioactive and contaminated waste in the nation, with nine nuclear reactors and<br />

associated processing facilities, Hanford played a pivotal role in the nation’s defense for more than 40 years, beginning in the 1940s<br />

with the Manhattan Project. Today, under the direction of the DOE, Hanford is engaged in one of the world’s largest environmental<br />

cleanup project.<br />

The Plateau Remediation Contract is a 10-year project paving the way for closure of the Hanford Site. The site through its location,<br />

climate, geology and proximity to the Columbia River in combination with the results of past nuclear operations presents a<br />

highly complex environmental remediation challenge. The complexity is not only due to the technical issues associated with<br />

decommissioning nuclear facilities, remediating soil contamination sites, dispositioning legacy waste and fuel materials and integrating<br />

these with the deep vadose zone and groundwater remediation,…<br />

6) EPRI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM (w/oP-59341)<br />

Karen Kim, Electric Power Research Institute (USA) - Presentation by Sean Bushart, EPRI (USA)<br />

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is a non-profit research organization that supports the energy industry. The<br />

Nuclear Power Plant Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> conducts research related to the management of groundwater at nuclear<br />

power plant sites.<br />

Experiences at decommissioned and operating nuclear power plants show that leaks and spills from plant systems, structures,<br />

and components and work practices can lead to contamination on on-site soils and groundwater. While the levels of radioactivity<br />

resulting from such contamination events do not pose health and safety threats to the public, they have raised stakeholder concerns<br />

and, in some cases, have required remediation during decommissioning to meet site-release criteria. The EPRI Nuclear Power Plant<br />

Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> provides technical support and guidance to the industry for prevention of leaks and spills, early<br />

detection of leaks and spills, monitoring of groundwater contamination, prevention of off-site migration of groundwater contamination,<br />

and remediation of groundwater and soil contamination. The EPRI Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> is composed of two<br />

main objectives: 1) provide technical guidance and 2) develop advanced technologies.<br />

The cornerstones of the EPRI Groundwater Protection <strong>Program</strong> are the EPRI Groundwater Protection Guidelines for Nuclear<br />

Power Plants and the EPRI Groundwater and Soil Remediation Guidelines. These Guidelines documents<br />

7) CLEAN UP STRATEGIES AND RESULTS IN USIN SITE IN SÃO PAULO CITY, BRAZIL (w/oP-59243)<br />

Rodrigo Raposo de Almeida, Federal Fluminense University;<br />

Valter J.G. Mortágua, Industrias Nucleares do Brasil (Brazil)<br />

This paper presents the experience of the team of technicians and consultants from INB (Industrias Nucleares do Brazil SA)<br />

in activities related to environmental remediation of soils contaminated by radionuclides of natural series of uranium and thorium<br />

in the USIN unit (old mill Interlagos).<br />

In 2007 was elaborated a master plan for remediation the USIN site, after 6 months the plan was approved by CNEN, the<br />

nuclear regulatory agency in Brazil. Given the lack of a final deposit of radioactive residues in Brazil, the elaborate plan aimed to<br />

minimize the volume of radioactive waste final. A criterion was developed to fractionate the tailings at three levels. The waste level<br />

1, with activity of 226Ra and 228Ra below 0.5 Bq/g and the effective dose of less than 1.0 mSv/yr, may remain in the area. The<br />

waste level 2, with activity of 226Ra and 228Ra than 0.5 Bq/g and individual effective dose exceeding 1,0 mSv/yr, but with total<br />

activity below 30 Bq/g may be disposed in municipal landfills. The waste level 3, with total activity above 30 Bq/g should be stored<br />

in steel drums of 200 liters and stored in a radioactive residues warehouse.<br />

Considering that the time for radiometric analysis is…<br />

8) APPLICATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION METHODOLOGY:<br />

THEORY VS. PRACTICE. REFLECTIONS AND TWO BELGIAN CASE STUDIES (wP-59184)<br />

Koen Mannaerts, Stephane Pepin, Boris Dehandschutter,<br />

Walter Blommaert, Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) (Belgium)<br />

Like in many countries, polluted industrial sites also exist in Belgium. Although the contamination is purely chemical in most<br />

cases, they may also contain a radioactive component. For chemically contaminated sites, extensive regulations and methodologies<br />

were already developed and applied by the different regional authorities. However and essentially because radioactivity is a federal<br />

competence, there was also a necessity for developing a legal federal framework (including an ER-methodology) for remediation<br />

of radioactive contaminated sites. Most of the so-called radioactive contaminated sites are exhibiting a mixed contamination<br />

(chemical and radiological), and hence the development of such methodology had to be in line with the existing (regional) ones<br />

concerning chemical contamination. Each authority having their own responsibilities with regard to the type of contamination, this<br />

makes it more complicated and time-consuming finding the best solution satisfying all involved parties. To overcome these difficulties<br />

the legal framework and methodology - including the necessary involvement of the stakeholders and delineation of each partys<br />

responsibilities - has to be transparent, clear and unambiguous.<br />

Once the methodology is developed as such and approved, the application of it is expected to be more or less easy, logic and<br />

straightforward. But is this really true? The aim this…<br />

62


Abstracts Session 8<br />

SESSION 8 — EXPERIENCES IN ER CLEAN-UP METHODS AND ACTIONS (4.4)<br />

1) GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM ALONG THE<br />

COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE HANFORD SITE IN WASHINGTON STATE, USA (wP-59030)<br />

Dyan Foss, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company; Briant Charboneau, DOE RL (USA)<br />

The U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site, formerly used for nuclear weapons production, encompasses 1500 square kilometers<br />

in southeast Washington State along the Columbia River. A principle threat to the river are the groundwater plumes of hexavalent<br />

chromium (Cr(VI)), which affect approximately 9.8 square kilometers, and 4.1 kilometers of shoreline.<br />

Cleanup goals are to stop Cr(VI) from entering the river by the end of 2012 and remediate the groundwater plumes to the drinking<br />

water standards by the end of 2020. Five groundwater pump-and-treat systems are currently in operation for the remediation of<br />

Cr(VI).<br />

Since the 1990s, over 13.6 billion liters of groundwater have been treated; over 1,435 kg of Cr(VI) have been removed. This<br />

paper describes the unique aspects of the site, its environmental setting, hydrogeology, groundwater-river interface, riverine<br />

hydraulic effects, remediation activities completed to date, a summary of the current and proposed pump-and-treat operations, the<br />

in situ redox manipulation barrier, and the effectiveness of passive barriers, resins, and treatability testing results of calcium polysulfide,<br />

biostimulation, and electrocoagulation, currently under evaluation.<br />

2) ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION OF AN ALSTOM GRID INDUSTRIAL SITE (FRANCE) (wP-59270)<br />

Stéphanie Romero, ALSTOM GRID (France)<br />

ALSTOM Grid is the project owner of the remediation of a former industrial site, located in Saint-Ouen, north of Paris. The<br />

industrial activity (power transformer production) started in 1921 and stopped in 2006. The type of pollution is linked with the former<br />

activity. It’s an organic pollution: hydrocarbon, PCB and chlorinated volatile organic compounds. The clean-up concerns soil<br />

and groundwater.<br />

The main specificity of the project is that the remediation is operated inside the existing industrial buildings which must be<br />

kept in place and restituted to the owner after the works. The treatment of soil requires excavating soil up to 9 m deep (1 m under<br />

the level of the groundwater) inside the buildings. As a consequence, some impressive devices were set up to ensure the stability<br />

of the buildings during the clean-up, like support structures of the foundations and strengthening of the building fronts.<br />

In the same time, it has to be pointed out that great diversity of clean-up actions is performed on the site: the soil is excavated<br />

to be treated on site (bioremediation or chemical treatment) or off site. The treatment of groundwater consists of pumping the oil<br />

staying on the surface and oxidizing the dissolved pollution.<br />

This project is probably the first experience of this scale in France with multi-contaminated soil and groundwater decontamination<br />

in keeping and reinforcing the existing buildings.<br />

3) DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF A PERMEABLE TREATMENT WALL TO PASSIVELY<br />

REMOVE STRONTIUM-90 FROM GROUNDWATER AT A FORMER COMMERCIAL<br />

NUCLEAR FUEL REPROCESSING FACILITY IN NEW YORK (wP-59292)<br />

Douglas Bablitch, Rupeet Malhotra, Richard Frappa, Scott Warner, AMEC Geomatrix (USA)<br />

A permeable treatment wall (PTW) was designed and installed at the West Valley Development Project (WVDP), a former<br />

commercial nuclear fuel reprocessing facility in New York, to passively remove and contain the expansion of strontium-90 (Sr-90)<br />

in the site groundwater. AMEC engineers and geologists have collaborated with researchers at the State University of New York at<br />

Buffalo (UB) and West Valley Environmental Services LLC to design and install an approximately 260 meter (860-foot) long by<br />

0.9 meter (3-foot) thick zone of granular zeolite (a natural aggregate composed of approximately 85 percent of the mineral clinoptilolite)<br />

that will remove Sr-90 in situ from groundwater through ion-exchange reactions. The PTW was designed to meet the functional<br />

objectives for up to 20 years; performance monitoring will be conducted regularly and will be used to assess the lifetime efficacy<br />

of the PTW. The zeolite-filled PTW was the selected remedial alternative due to its hydraulically passive operations and lower<br />

life-cycle cost over other more traditional active treatment alternatives such as pump and treat.<br />

The design relied heavily on detailed site characterization of site soils and groundwater conditions and bench and pilot scale<br />

evaluations of various zeolite materials. The design specified the use of a one-pass…<br />

4) DECOMMISSIONING OF THE ACTIVE STORAGE FACILITY FOR RESIDUALS IN RHEINSBERG<br />

(BRANDENBURG/GERMANY) AND RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER MONITORING (wP-59134)<br />

Mathias Steinhoff, Öko-Institut e.V. (Germany)<br />

The Active Storage Facility for Residuals (Aktives Lager für Rückstände ALfR) an open air controlled area has been used<br />

for storage of radioactive waste (liquid and solide waste) at the site of the NPP Rheinsberg in the former GDR. Liquid waste has<br />

been cemented and dumped for near surface final disposal.<br />

During period of operation of ALfR some incidents happened. Residues of evapo-rated cooling water of unknown amount (ca.<br />

1-10 m³), the drop out from small leak-ages and wash off from contaminated open air storage barrels contaminated the soil.<br />

Since 1997 the buildings of the ALfR are decommissioned and the site will be reme-diated. From the beginning of decommissioning<br />

up to now the groundwater has been monitored.<br />

This paper shows different steps of decommissioning and explains the experience of groundwater monitoring. Currently 33<br />

sampling points are used for sampling groundwater of different layers. The radiological parameters under examination are Cobalt-<br />

60, Cesium-137, Strontium-90 and Tritium. Non radiological Parameters like Bore, Potassium, Sodium, Nitrate, pH value and TOC<br />

(total organic carbon) are also investigated.<br />

Since 1997 activity concentration of Cobalt-60 and Tritium in groundwater has de-creased. The activity concentration of Strontium-90<br />

had increased from 1997 to 2007. Since 2007<br />

63


Session 9 Abstracts<br />

5) ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM FOR THE SHCHUCHYE SITE (wP-59042)<br />

Stephane Belbeze, Matthieu Hallouin, Antea (France)<br />

An intergovernmental agreement on cooperation about chemical weapon destruction was signed between France and the Russian<br />

federation on 14th February 2006 in the context of a Global Partnership dedicated to preventing catastrophic terrorism and the<br />

proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It came into effect on 25th April 2007 after ratification by both countries. The present<br />

demonstrated project was launched as part of this collaboration on the Shchuchye site (Russia – Kurgan Oblast). The project<br />

concerned the environmental surveillance system for the Shchuchye site required for the safe operation of the installation used to<br />

destroy chemical weapons.<br />

The aim was to implement equipments and methods of analysis for very low concentrations of pollutants in the three environmental<br />

compartments: air, water and soil. This has been achieved with the help of industry and other organizations in France (Environment/SA<br />

for supplies, INERIS and Antea Group) and Russia (ROST Association and EKROS Engineering). This system takes<br />

account of the normal operation of the installation as well as incident management. It includes 11 stationary atmospheric measuring<br />

stations constructed by Environment/SA and EKROS Engineering including ASTEK dedicated toxic gas detector : “Terminator<br />

FOV-1”, 3 mobile atmospheric measuring stations, 2 mobile soil & water measuring stations, 4 sampling cars constructed by<br />

Environment/SA and EKROS Engineering, a complete Chemical analysis laboratory which can handle ppb analysis of toxic gases,<br />

organics and minerals pollutants, an information collection center and a meteo station which can retrieve, display and archive all<br />

the datas or alarm from the stationary and mobile stations. Antea Group has provided a technical expertise and various negotiations<br />

during the negotiation phase, the project initiation files & contracts redaction, the project Monitoring and reporting to stakeholders,<br />

the REX. Up to 2009, No other site of the world uses such an innovative system. Antea Group worked on this project for 4<br />

years. It successfully began operating in March 2009, before the start of destruction operations, after 15 months of work on the site.<br />

6) 25 YEARS AFTER CHERNOBYL NPP ACCIDENT: EXPERIENCE AND TRENDS OF RADIOACTIVE<br />

CONTAMINATED SOILS REHABILITATION IN BELARUS (wP-59242)<br />

Leanid Maskalchuk, JIPNR-Sosny NAS of Belarus (Belarus)<br />

The paper describes the developed and applied soil decontamination measures and methods in Belarus after the Chernobyl<br />

NPP accident. It is considered the possibility of using of organomineral amendments based on natural raw materials (sapropel)<br />

and industrial wastes (hydrolyzed lignin, clay-salt slimes) for rehabilitation of radioactive contaminated soils.<br />

SESSION 9 — POSTER SESSION: LOW/INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE MANAGEMENT (1.1)<br />

1) NUMERICAL MODELING FOR COLLOID-FACILITATED MIGRATION OF N-NUMBER<br />

RADIONUCLIDES CHAINS IN THE FRACTURED ROCK (w/oP-59257)<br />

Chun-Ping Jen, National Chung Cheng University (Taiwan)<br />

A previous numerical model for N-member radionuclide decay chains has been extended to include the effect of radionuclide<br />

sorption with groundwater colloids. Published distribution coefficients were employed in the nuclide decay chain to illustration the<br />

present model. The colloid concentration was assumed constant in time and space owing to equilibrium between colloid generation<br />

and sedimentation by chemical and/or physical perturbations. Furthermore, the diffusion of colloids into the rock matrix was<br />

ignored because the diameter of colloid is relatively large and colloids and fracture surfaces are like-charged. The results indicated<br />

that colloids could facilitate the transport of radionuclides and the large adsorbability of nuclides with colloids enlarged the effect<br />

of acceleration by colloids. The influence of colloids on the radionuclide transport was expected to be crucial to the actinides with<br />

large adsorbability; however, the present results revealed that the low-adsorbing nuclides whose parent nuclides have large capability<br />

of sorption could be also facilitated significantly by colloids indirectly. Therefore, the role of colloids played in the transport<br />

of the radionuclides decay chain should be assessed carefully in the radioactive waste disposal. The numerical method presented<br />

herein is helpful to verify/validate further complex far-field models.<br />

2) LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON THE ALTERATION OF HIGHLY-COMPACTED BENTONITE BY<br />

ALKALINE SOLUTION AND THE EFFECTS ON PHYSICAL PROPERTIES (wP-59318)<br />

Satoru Miyoshi, Shinya Morikami, Yukinobu Kimura, Tomoko Jinno, Shuichi Yamamoto, Obayashi Corporation (Japan)<br />

The issue has to be considered for the evaluation of performance of multiple burrier systems in geological repository of<br />

radioactive waste wheather alkaline leachate from cement matterials may alterate clay materials so that they can not show the<br />

required performance. In order to study on the alkali alteration of compacted bentonite and the effect on the physical properties,<br />

using modified consolidation apparatus, we have done a series of experiments for a long term such that alkali solution is injected<br />

into compacted bentonite to measure the temporal change of swelling pressure, flow rate, and the compositions of outflow solution.<br />

We settled two cases for the experiment: one is the case where 1.0 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution is injected (case 1) and<br />

the other saturated calcium hydroxide solution (case 2). The dry density of specimen for both cases are 1.6 g/cm3. The dissolution<br />

of the minerals in the high-pH environment is mainly considered in case 1 and the effect of the secondary minerals to be generated<br />

in calcium rich environment is mainly considered in case 2. The experiment is done in the bath with constant temperature 70<br />

celcius degree to reasonably accelerate the reaction of alkali alteration. In addition to the above measurements, a series of analysis<br />

of solid phase is done after one and half year injection of alkaline solution. Through the experiment, we found that the dissolution<br />

rate of montmorillonite is much lower than those of accompanying minerals and that the physical properties are reasonably kept<br />

even though some part of the minerals are dissolved.<br />

64


Abstracts Session 9<br />

3) GAS TRANSPORT PROPERTIES OF PUMICE TUFF FOR PERFORMANCE<br />

ASSESSMENT OF LLW DISPOSAL FACILITY (wP-59074)<br />

Shuichi Yamamoto, Kenichiro Suzuki, Obayashi Corporation; Mamoru Kumagai, Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited;<br />

Yasuhiro Tawara, Koji Mori, Geosphere Environmental Technology Corporation (Japan)<br />

In Japan, some of the radioactive waste with a relatively higher radioactivity concentration from nuclear facilities is to be packaged<br />

in rectangle steel containers and disposed of in sub-surface disposal facilities, where normal human intrusion is unlikely to<br />

occur. If dissolved oxygen in pore water is consumed by steel corrosion after the closure of the facility, hydrogen gas will be generated<br />

from the metallic waste, steel containers and concrete reinforcing bars largely by anaerobic corrosion. If the generated gas<br />

accumulates and the gas pressure increases excessively in the facility, the facilitys barrier performance might be degraded by<br />

mechanical influences such as fracturing of surrounding rock and cementitious materials or plastic deformation of the bentonite<br />

buffer.<br />

In this study laboratory experiments for gas and water transport properties of the rock were performed to evaluate gas flow<br />

through the rock mass (pumice tuff) around a facility for low level waste disposal. Based on the experimental results two-phase<br />

flow properties were evaluated by means of an inverse analysis method.<br />

The pumice tuff was subjected to hydraulic conductivity tests, water retention (moisture characteristic) tests, and gas injection<br />

tests. Non-linear properties such as relative permeability and water retention curve and hydraulic conductivity as a function…<br />

4) EXTRACTION AND CONFINEMENT OF CAESIUM USING FUNCTIONALIZED<br />

POROUS MATERIALS (w/oP-59106)<br />

Carole Delchet, Guillaume Toquer, Agnès Grandjean, Institut de Chimie Séparative de Marcoule;<br />

Joulia Larionova, Yannick GUARI (France)<br />

An original approach to immobilize caesium species that uses hybrid functionalized porous media is presented. This study is<br />

part of radioactive waste water treatment Indeed, one of the most abundant fission product to be extracted from radioactive effluents<br />

are the caesium isotopes : 137Cs (T1/2 ~30y) and 135Cs (T1/2~2.106y). Transition metal hexacyanoferrates HFC (II) or (III)<br />

exhibit better sorption properties compared to organic resins or zeolites. There are then widely studied for this application over a<br />

wide pH range and wide range of ionic strength. Moreover, they show a good resistance to ionising radiation. First we present kinetic<br />

and thermodynamic data of Cs sorption properties in batch experiment for pure K2Ni(FeCN) 6 , Co3 (Fe(CN) 6 ) 2 and<br />

Ni3 (Fe(CN) 6 ) 2 . A comparison of the kinetics parameters and adsorption capacity between these HFC is then done. Furthermore,<br />

first tests of grafting Ni3 (Fe(CN) 6 ) 2 on porous glass and ordered porous silica have allowed the extraction of Cs from an aqueous<br />

solution. Then we show that an ammoniac atmosphere during two days at ambient temperature allows closing the porosity of<br />

ordered porous silica. So this soft treatment will be tested with silica solids containing HFC and extracted caesium in order to immobilized<br />

caesium species without high temperature steps, avoiding then any volatilisation.<br />

5) PHOTOCATALYTIC AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY DEGRADATION OF LIQUID<br />

WASTE CONTAINING EDTA (wP-59144)<br />

Célia Lepeytre, Cyril Lavaud, Guillaume Serve, CEA Marcoule (France)<br />

The decontamination factor of liquid waste containing 60Co is generally weak. This is due to the presence of complexant molecules.<br />

For instance, complexation of EDTA with 60Co decreases efficiency of radioactive waste treatment. The aim of this study<br />

was to degrade EDTA in H2O and CO2 and to concentrate free 60Co in order to increase decontamination factor. A first test of<br />

radioactive waste treatment by photocatalysis was allowed to increase decontamination factor ( 60Co) from 16 to 196 with a device<br />

requiring to be improved. The present work concerns the first step of the degradation process development with a more powerful<br />

device. These first experiments were leaded to follow the only EDTA oxidation. EDTA degradation was carried out by the following<br />

Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOP): UV/H2O2 (photochemistry); UV/TiO2 (photocatalysis); UV/TiO2 /H2O2 . A specific reactor<br />

was achieved for this study. The wavelength used was 254 nm (UV-C). The photocatalytic degradation of EDTA was carried<br />

out with Degussa P-25 titanium dioxide (TiO2 ), which is a semiconductor photocatalyst. The degradation degree of EDTA and the<br />

intermediate products were monitored by TOC and ionic chromatography methods. The effects of various parameters such as pH<br />

and the quantity of H2O2 were studied. This allows us to conclude…<br />

6) HISTORICAL WASTE – BIOLOGICAL SHIELD & DOCUMENTATION DURING<br />

DECOMMISSIONING (w/oP-59056)<br />

Thomas Nellemann, Anne Sørensen, Danish Decommissioning (Denmark)<br />

Inventory records of isotopes in radioactive waste are important as documentation with respect to governmental control, final<br />

disposal and public transparency. We present a simple, practical and cost-effective method for characterization of a part of the<br />

radioactive waste from decommissioning of a research reactor: The biological shielding. The method uses documentation from the<br />

decommissioning and from the construction drawings and blueprints of the reactor as well as measurements based on samples from<br />

the facility.<br />

The data presented is from a 5MW experimental light water nuclear reactor (DR-2) shutdown in 1975 and decommissioned in<br />

2008. The method incorporates an activity distribution in the biological shield. The distribution is based on measurements of samples<br />

from across the shielding and coupled with the distance to the center of the reactor core. The exact origin of each waste item<br />

is determined from pictures from the decommissioning and from old blueprints and construction drawings of the reactor.<br />

The uncertainty and usefulness of the method is related directly to different factors such as: The amount of samples obtained<br />

and the position of these with respect to the origin of the waste, the accuracy of the documentation of the decommissioning, the<br />

size of the waste items in…<br />

65


Session 9 Abstracts<br />

7) A NUMERICAL INTERPRETATION OF DENSITY HOMOGENIZATION<br />

OF BENTONITE MATERIAL IN WETTING PROCESS (wP-59153)<br />

Atsushi Iizuka, Yusuke Takayama, Katsuyuki Kawai, Kobe University; Shinya Tachibana, Saitama University;<br />

Shintaro Ohno, Ichizo Kobayashi, Kajima Corporation (Japan)<br />

The bentonite material is expected to be a buffer in the nuclear waste disposal, since it has low permeability and excellent<br />

expansion characteristics. Its expansion characteristics through wetting process can be interpreted based on the full saturation line<br />

that is depicted as a unique line on the density and the confining pressure relationship (Kobayashi et. al., 2007). And its elasto-plastic<br />

constitutive relation can be formulated by introducing additional irreversible strain component describing the expansion of<br />

montmorillonite contained in the bentonite material. Its constitutive model can express the mechanical behavior of compacted bentonite<br />

material consistently in the unsaturated sate up to fully saturated state. Then, this paper describes the density homogenization<br />

process through a series of soil-water coupled elasto-plastic finite element simulations. Namely, we consider the cases that the<br />

bentonite composed of two specimens having different initial densities is permeated with the constant water head. Stresses and<br />

strains developing in the bentonite, particularly the density change of bentonite, are examined. According to a series of numerical<br />

simulations, the density of bentonite composed of two specimens having different initial densities is not homogenized into a certain<br />

unique value of density when the bentonite reaches fully saturated state. To confirm the simulation results, we carried out a<br />

series of experiments. The experiment results also support our simulation results.<br />

8) COMPARISON OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC ION EXCHANGERS FOR THE TREATMENT OF<br />

RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTES BY ION EXCHANGE PROCESSES (w/oP-59107)<br />

Yves Barre, CEA (France)<br />

There are number of liquid processes and wastes streams at nuclear facilities that require treatment for process chemistry control<br />

reasons and/or the removal of radioactive contaminants. One of the most common treatment methods for such aqueous streams<br />

is the use of ion exchange, which is a well developed technique that has been employed for many years in the nuclear industries.<br />

Nuclear power plant process water systems have typically used organic ion exchange resins to control system chemistry to minimize<br />

corrosion and to remove radioactive contaminant. In the past decade, inorganic ion exchange materials have emerged as an<br />

increasingly important replacement or complement for conventional organic ion exchange resins, particularly in liquid radioactive<br />

waste treatment and spent fuel reprocessing applications. Inorganic ion exchangers often have the advantage of a much greater<br />

selectivity than organic resins for certain important radionuclides such as 137Cs and 90Sr. These inorganic materials have also<br />

advantages with respect to immobilization and final disposal when compared with organic ion exchangers.<br />

Fixed bed column experiments were carried out with porous titanium dioxide beads and with standard polystyrene divinylbenzene<br />

resin in order to estimate the dynamics of 90Sr decontamination from a simulated liquid wastes. We present a comparison of<br />

the kinetic and thermodynamics sorption properties between organic and inorganic ion exchangers.<br />

9) DETRITIATION OF JET PLASMA FACING COMPONENTS (w/oP-59345)<br />

Pierre Trabuc, Karine Liger, Nicolas Ghirelli, Christophe Perrais, CEA (France)<br />

Beryllium tiles are proposed for ITER and the ITER-like JET wall project. The development of detritiation / recycling methods<br />

for bulk Be and the definition of a strategy, is necessary to reduce the final waste and the constraints linked to the management<br />

of mixed Be waste.<br />

The tritium content in Be is the results of contribution of different mechanisms (activation, trapping in defects due to neutron<br />

flux, and diffusion in the bulk). In fusion machines, it is foreseen to remove a part of this tritium first with in-situ detritiation techniques,<br />

but also with ex-vessel detritiation methods. Among these methods, thermal desorption is a good candidate.<br />

In this paper, the efficiency of thermal desorption of trapped tritium using different carrier gases is assessed. Effect of oxidant<br />

and reductive gases on detritation of flakes (~20 GBq/g), limiter (~103Bq/g) and divertor (~104Bq/g) tiles, at relatively high temperature<br />

(800°C), is experimentally analysed. Best results were obtained under N2 +20%O2 , after 10 h at 800°C (during 2 days) and<br />

5 hours at 1050°C (during one day). With this treatment, it is possible to conclude that flakes, limiter and divertor tiles are allowed<br />

as Low Level Waste (between 0.4 Bq/g and 12 kBq/g).<br />

10) EXPERIMENTAL DROP TESTING OF WASTE CONTAINERS FOR THE KONRAD REPOSITORY (w/oP-59269)<br />

Tino Neumeyer, Karsten Müller, Holger Voelzke, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) (Germany)<br />

The Konrad repository for not heat generating radioactive wastes was licensed in 2002 primarily. Due to legal actions the final<br />

confirmation of this license took place not until 2007. Subsequently, the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) began scheduling<br />

backfitting of the former iron ore mine into a repository. The licensed repository volume is 303,000 m3 considering estimations<br />

of expected waste volumes to be disposed off. The mine itself would offer a much larger volume. Waste packages can be disposed<br />

off as recently as the repository is ready for operation what is expected not before the end of this decade. Nevertheless, there<br />

is high interest of qualified and certified waste conditioning and packaging for disposal today, what for from BAM and BfS tested,<br />

evaluated and certified containers are needed.<br />

In recent years numerous container prototypes made of steel, concrete and ductile cast iron have been tested by BAM, the Federal<br />

Institute for Materials Research and Testing in Germany. To cover the Konrad test requirements in a conservative manner container<br />

drop tests are performed mostly onto the unyielding IAEA target of BAMs large drop test facility instead of a representative<br />

foundation of the repository.<br />

This conference contribution focuses on experimental drop…<br />

66


Abstracts Session 9<br />

11) INSTRUMENTED MEASUREMENTS ON RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL<br />

CONTAINERS DURING EXPERIMENTAL DROP TESTING (wP-59142)<br />

Thomas Quercetti, Andre Musolff, Karsten Müller,<br />

BAM - Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (Germany)<br />

In context with disposal container safety assessment of containers for radioactive waste the German Federal Institute for Materials<br />

Research and Testing (BAM) performed numerous drop tests in the last years. The tests were accompanied by extensive and<br />

various measurement techniques especially by instrumented measurements with strain gages and accelerometers.<br />

The instrumentation of a specimen is an important tool to evaluate its mechanical behavior during impact. Test results as deceleration-time<br />

and strain-time functions constitute a main basis for the validation of assumptions in the safety analysis and for the<br />

evaluation of calculations based on finite-element methods. Strain gauges are useful to determine the time dependent magnitude of<br />

any deformation and the associated stresses. Accelerometers are widely used for the measuring of motion i.e. speed or the displacement<br />

of the rigid cask body, vibration and shock events. In addition high-speed video technique can be used to visualize and analyze<br />

the kinematical impact scenario by motion analysis.<br />

The paper describes some selected aspects on instrumented measurements and motion analysis in context with low level<br />

radioactive waste (LLW) container drop testing.<br />

12) REGULATORY CLEARANCE OF SPENT STEEL DRUMS (wP-59405)<br />

Dae-Seok Hong, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute; Young-Yong Ji, Il-Sik Kang,<br />

Kyoung-Kil Kwak, Woo-Seog Ryu, KAERI (Korea)<br />

At KAERI(Korea Atomic Energy Institute), radioactive soil and concrete wastes with extremely low level of activity were regulatory<br />

cleared in 2008 and large amount of spent drums were remained. After generation, drums having good physical integrity<br />

were reused for packaging radioactive wastes and about 50 tons of drums unsuitable for reuse were stored as radioactive wastes.<br />

Once having been used for packaging regulatory cleared radioactive wastes, these spent drums were determined to be cleared.<br />

Before clearance, steel drums were radiation monitored, washed with pressurized water two times, compacted and stored at a designated<br />

area. Based on radiological dose assessment result using a clearance scenario, the clearance of steel drums was permitted<br />

by the regulatory body. And then, treatment of the cleared drums was committed to a scrap-metal dealer for recycling. In this study,<br />

a process of the regulatory clearance for spent steel drums and a modified radiological dose assessment model for the scrap-metal<br />

dealer will be discussed.<br />

13) LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT PROCESS (w/oP-59061)<br />

Bouchta Moussaif, Touria Lambarki el Allioui, CNESTEN (Morocco)<br />

The law defined the responsibilities of the national center of nuclear energy in Morocco CNESTEN as the sole radioactive<br />

waste operating organization and designated CNESTEN as responsible for the management of radioactive waste at the national<br />

level in several social and economic sectors.<br />

The goals of the unit of radioactive waste management are: -reduce the volume of the radioactive waste product; -convert the<br />

radioactive waste into an appropriate waste for monitoring, storage and evacuation; -Recover if it’s possible an element of value.<br />

The Moroccan products of radioactive liquid waste per year are 0.1m3 of organic liquid and 35 m3 of liquid aqueous. The<br />

method adopted by CNESTEN was the evaporator for liquid aqueous and the solidification with the activated carbon for the organic<br />

liquid. An evaporation installation to treat 5 m3 of aqueous liquid in each campaign, the volume of the sludge obtained is 200<br />

liters and 4800 liters of distillate water. Concerning the management system is plan to collect the liquid aqueous in tanks in the bottom<br />

of each nuclear installation. After characterization according to the technical specification of radioactive waste management<br />

nuclear installation, the waste is transported in an appropriate tank to the treatment building to be evaporated. After treatment the<br />

clean water is collect in a separate tank waiting its discharge if it complies with the requirements of release. The volume of sludge<br />

issued from evaporator is conditioning with mortar (40 liters) in 120liters drum, the mixing operation is ensured by shingles introduced<br />

in the drum and the rotation of the drum is ensured by a mixer named “turn drums”. The drum must respect the acceptance<br />

criteria before transferred to storage building. About the liquid organic waste was collected in the polyethylene move tank; this kind<br />

of waste is mixed to an absorbent product and conditioned like the sludge.<br />

14) CAST IRON TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL CONTAINERS FOR<br />

USE IN UK NUCLEAR LICENSED SITES (w/oP-59412)<br />

Joerg Viermann, Matthias P Messer, GNS Gesellschaft fuer Nuklear-Service mbH (UK)<br />

Ductile Cast Iron Containers of the types GCVI (UK trademark -GNS YELLOW BOX®) and MOSAIK® have been in use in<br />

Germany for transport, storage and disposal of intermediate level radioactive waste (ILW) for more than two decades. In 2009 a<br />

number of containers of these types were delivered to various Magnox sites as so called pathfinders to test their suitability for Magnox<br />

waste streams. The results were encouraging. Therefore the Letter of Compliance (LoC) procedure was started to prove the<br />

suitability of packages using these types of containers for the future UK Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) and a conceptual Letter<br />

of Compliance (cLoC) was obtained from RWMD in 2010. Waste stream specific applications for Interim Stage Letters of Compliance<br />

(ILoC) for a number of waste streams from different Magnox sites and from the UKs only pressurised water reactor,<br />

Sizewell B are currently being prepared and discussed with RWMD.<br />

In order to achieve a package suitable for interim storage and disposal the contents of a Ductile Cast Iron Container only has<br />

to be dried. Mobile drying facilities are readily available. Containers and drying facilities form a concerted system.<br />

During treatment, interim storage and transport the containers provide shielding and structural integrity….<br />

15) OPTIMIZATION OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE CEMENTATION FOR<br />

DECOMMISSIONING OF SALASPILS RESEARCH REACTOR (wP-59066)<br />

Gunta Abramenkova, Maris Klavins, University of Latvia; Andris Abramenkovs,<br />

Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre (Latvia)<br />

This paper deals with information on the radioactive waste cementation technology for decommissioning of Salaspils Research<br />

67


Session 9 Abstracts<br />

Reactor (SRR). Dismantled and segmented radioactive materials were cemented in concrete containers using tritiated water-cement<br />

mixture. The viscosity of water-cement mortar, mechanical tests of solidified mortar’s samples, change of temperature of the samples<br />

during solidification time and long time leakage of 137Cs, 14C, 60Co and 3T radionuclides was studied for different watercement<br />

compositions with additives. The pH and electro conductivity of the solutions during leakage tests were controlled.<br />

It was shown, that water/cement ratio significantly influences on water-cement mortar’s viscosity and solidified samples<br />

mechanical stability. The role of additives – fly ash and Penetron admix in reduction of solidification temperature is discussed. It<br />

was found, that addition of fly ash to the cement-water mortar can reduce the solidification temperature from 81oC up to 62oC. The<br />

optimal interval of water ratio in cement mortar is discussed.<br />

Radionuclides leakage tests show that the release curves has a complicate structure. The possible radionuclides release mechanisms<br />

are discussed. Experimental results indicated that additives can significantly influence on the radionuclides release processes<br />

from cemented samples.<br />

The optimization of cementation of radioactive wastes in concrete containers was performed using mechanical stability, solidification<br />

temperature, radionuclide releases and viscosity of mortar.<br />

16) BAYESIAN STATISTICS APPLIED TO THE ACTIVITIES OF WASTE DRUMS (wP-59081)<br />

Richard Bull, Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

Gamma spectrometry is widely used to determine the radioactive content of waste drums. However, the results of such surveys<br />

often result in large numbers of limit-of-detection (LOD) results. In a previous paper it was shown how simple statistical methods<br />

could be used to make estimates of the mean activity of a set of waste drums even when the individual measurements were dominated<br />

by limit-of-detection results. In that approach it was necessary to make assumptions about the statistical distribution (taken<br />

to be lognormal) of the activities and the geometric standard deviations of the distributions.<br />

In this paper a development of the method is presented which uses two statistical methods- Bayes’ Theorem and marginalization.<br />

These allow the probability distribution of the mean activity of the waste drums to be calculated, whilst the number of assumptions<br />

is reduced to just one, namely the form of the statistical distribution.<br />

The mathematical details are described in the paper and the application to a set of U235-in-drum measurements is presented.<br />

17) PHYSICAL MODELLING OF TURBULENT JETS FOR NUCLEAR SLUDGE MOBILISATION (wP-59147)<br />

Donna McKendrick, Institute of Particle Science and Engineering; Simon Biggs,<br />

Michael Fairweather, James Young, University of Leeds (UK)<br />

In the UK the Office for Nuclear Regulation and the Environment Agency developed the Generic Design Assessment process<br />

in response to a request from the UK Government. The process allows the regulators to jointly assess new nuclear reactor designs,<br />

in advance of any site-specific proposals to build a nuclear power station.<br />

Two reactor types are currently being assessed within Generic Design Assessment:<br />

• AREVA and Electricité de France's UK EPR®<br />

• Westinghouse Electric Company's AP1000®<br />

This paper will present the outcome of the assessment of radioactive waste management within the Generic Design Assessment<br />

process. One aspect of particular interest is the management of spent fuel from proposed new reactors as the assessment is<br />

based on an assumption that it will be sent for disposal. Therefore the paper will specifically consider the management of spent fuel<br />

and how this affects the regulatory decisions. The paper will look at four aspects. The first of these is to give a short overview of<br />

the Generic Design Assessment process. This will be followed by a summary of the Generic Design Assessment Radioactive Waste<br />

Management assessment on the acceptability of:<br />

• The types of waste and spent fuel<br />

• The plans for conditioning of the wastes<br />

• The safety issues associated with short-term storage.<br />

• The safety issues associated with long-term storage.<br />

• The issues associated with the disposal of the wastes.<br />

• The safety issues associated with decommissioning the reactors.<br />

The third aspect will be to look at the work commissioned by...<br />

18) ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY RECOVERY OF URANIUM FROM NUCLEAR FUEL<br />

SCRAPS GENERATED AT NUCLEAR FUEL FABRICATION PROCESS (wP-59383)<br />

Kwang-Wook Kim, Dong-Yong Chung, Eil-Hee Lee, Keun-Young Lee, Kune Woo Lee,<br />

Jei-Kwon Moon, Korea Atomic Energy Research Insititute (Korea)<br />

A way to recover pure uranium as UO4 from UO2 and (U,Gd)O2 nuclear fuel scraps by using carbonate solution with hydrogen<br />

peroxide was studied and the nuclear fuel fabrication characteristics of the UO2 powder prepared from the UO4 was evaluated.<br />

19) SELF CLEANING HEPA FILTRATION WITHOUT INTERRUPTING PROCESS FLOW (wP-59347)<br />

Chris Chadwick, Porvair Filtration Group (UK)<br />

The strategy of protecting the traditional glass fibre HEPA filtration train from its blinding contamination and the recovery of<br />

dust by the means of self cleaning, pre-filtration is a proven means in the reduction of ultimate disposal volumes and has been used<br />

within the Fuel Production Industry.<br />

However, there is an increasing demand in nuclear applications requiring elevated operating temperatures, fire resistance,<br />

moisture resistance and chemical composition that the existing glass fibre HEPA filtration cannot accommodate, which can be<br />

remedied by the use of a metallic HEPA filter media.<br />

Previous research (Bergman et al 1997, Moore et al 1992) suggests that the then costs to the DOE, based on a five year life<br />

cycle, was $29.5 million for the installation, testing, removal and disposal of glass fibre HEPA filtration trains. Within these costs,<br />

$300 was the value given to the filter and $4,450 was given to the peripheral activity.<br />

68


Abstracts Session 9<br />

Development of a low cost, cleanable, metallic, direct replacement of the traditional filter train will the clear solution. The<br />

Bergman et al work has suggested that a 1000 ft^3/min, cleanable, stainless HEPA could be commercially available for $5,000 each,<br />

whereas the industry has determined that the truer cost of such an…<br />

20) STEAM AND CONDENSATE TOLERANT HEPA FILTER - SUBSTITUTE FOR ESP (wP-59346)<br />

Chris Chadwick, Porvair Filtration Group (UK)<br />

A major component has failed in an active vessel ventilation system, which has been running successfully for the last 25 years<br />

or so. The failed component is one of two Electrostatic Precipitators housed in a sealed concrete cell. The remaining running ESP<br />

could fail at any time. The systems overall clean-up capability has to be restored. A solution has been determined by the use of a<br />

bespoke metal filter unit. The discussion presents the issues and challenges associated with the solution.<br />

21) STATUS OF SITE INVESTIGATION FOR L/ILW FACILITIES IN THE PHILIPPINES (wP-59262)<br />

Maria V. Palattao, Carl Nohay, Rolando Reyes, Alfonso Singayan, Philippine Nuclear Research Institute (Philippines);<br />

Dirk Mallants, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK-CEN (Belgium)<br />

Radioactive waste in the Philippines is generated from the various applications of radioactive materials in medicine, industries<br />

and research. The Philippine Nuclear Research Institute (PNRI) currently manages these wastes through its centralized treatment<br />

and storage facilities on site. Radioactive wastes that are received at the Institute are of different types ranging from contaminated<br />

solid and liquid materials to spent sealed sources, including radium. Treated and conditioned wastes are temporarily stored in simple<br />

roofed above ground concrete bunkers. The Philippine government through the Inter-agency Subcommittee on Radioactive<br />

Waste Management is committed to the development of a national repository for the countrys radioactive waste. This policy has<br />

been recognized in spite of the relatively small volume of radioactive waste compared with countries that have a nuclear power program.<br />

To date, a potential site has been identified for detailed investigation with the assistance of the International Atomic Energy<br />

Agency (IAEA). The site is located in the northern part of the Philippine archipelago and has about 34 hectares for potential development.<br />

A drilling program that aimed to investigate the geologic, hydrogeologic and hydrologic properties of the site has been<br />

implemented. All boreholes have been equipped with piezometer wells to continuously monitor the seasonal variation…<br />

22) MANAGEMENT OF SMOKE DETECTORS CONTAINING RADIOACTIVE SOURCES (wP-59049)<br />

Mercedes Salgado Mojena, Juan Carlos Benitez Navarro, Juan Miguel Hernandez García, Rafael Castillo Gomez,<br />

Ania Berdellans Escobar, CPHR (Cuba); Carlos Jose Pirez, Pedro Graciano Soto, Atomic Centre Ezeiza,<br />

National Commission of Atomic Energy (Argentina)<br />

Ionic smoke detectors contain radioactive sources that could be of Am-241, Pu-238, Pu-239, Kr-85, or other radionuclides.<br />

Although the activity of these devices is very low, their distribution and use is under regulatory control, and when become disused,<br />

should be managed as radioactive waste. More than 25 000 smoke detectors have been collected and stored at the Centralized Waste<br />

Management Facility in Cuba.<br />

The safe management of ionic smoke detectors consists in dismantling the devices, recovering the radioactive sources and conditioning<br />

them for long term storage and future disposal. Most of smoke detectors contain long lived radioactive sources (Am-241,<br />

Pu-238 and Pu-239), therefore especial attention is given to the management of these sources. The rest of nonradioactive materials<br />

are segregated (plastic, metal and electronic components) for recycling. A technical manual with specific instructions for all operations,<br />

including dismantling of detectors, segregation and management of non-active parts, recovering and conditioning of radioactive<br />

sources, has been developed.<br />

23) CURING TIME EFFECT ON THE FRACTION OF 137CS FROM IMMOBILIZED<br />

RADIOACTIVE EVAPORATOR SLUDGE BY CEMENT (wP-59006)<br />

Ilija Plecas, Slavko Dimovic, Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences; Radojica Pesic, Nuclear Facilities of Serbia (Serbia)<br />

Traditional methods of processing evaporator concentrates from NPP are evaporation and cementation.These methods allow to<br />

transform a liquid radioactive waste into the rather inert form, suitable for a final disposal. To assess the safety for disposal of<br />

radioactive mortar-waste composition, the leaching of 137Cs from immobilized radioactive evaporator concentrate into a surrounding<br />

fluid has been studied. Leaching tests were carried out in accordance with a method recommended by IAEA. Curing conditions<br />

and curing time prior to commencing the leaching test are critically important in leach studies since the extent of hydration of the<br />

cement materials determines how much hydration product develops and whether it is available to block the pore network, thereby<br />

reducing leaching. Incremental leaching rates Rn(cm/d) of 137Cs from evaporator concentrates after 180 days were measured. The<br />

results presented in this paper are examples of results obtained in a 20-year concrete testing project which will influence the design<br />

of the engineer trenches system for future central Serbian radioactive waste storing center.<br />

Key words : Cement, Radioactive Waste, Radionuclide, Leaching, concrete<br />

24) AN APPROACH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE DATA BASE OF TIME-DEPENDENT<br />

HYDRAULIC AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS FOR CONCRETE ENGINEERED BARRIERS (wP-59299)<br />

Suresh Seetharam, Dirk Mallants, Janez Perko, Diederik Jacques, SCK.CEN (Belgium)<br />

This paper presents an approach for the development of a comprehensive data base of time-dependent hydraulic and transport<br />

parameters for concrete engineered barriers and multi-layer cover of the future Dessel near surface repository. The parameter derivation<br />

is based on an extensive literature review, experimental data from studies on cementitious materials specific for the Dessel<br />

repository and numerical modelling studies. Best estimate parameter values for assessments are derived; source range and expert<br />

range are also determined, together with probability density functions. Emphasis is also given to the upscaling of laboratory derived<br />

parameter values to the repository component scale resulting in large-scale effective parameters. To accommodate different levels<br />

of conservatism in the various assessment calculations defined by ONDRAF/NIRAS, several sets of parameter values have been<br />

derived based on assumptions that introduce different degrees of conservatism. For pertinent parameters, the time evolution of such<br />

properties due to the long-term concrete degradation is also addressed. The implementation of the approach is demonstrated by considering<br />

diffusion coefficient as an example.<br />

69


Session 10 Abstracts<br />

25) RADIATION PROTECTION EXPERIENCES IN RETRIEVAL OF RADIOACTIVE<br />

WASTE AT PÜSPÖKSZILÁGY REPOSITORY (wP-59054)<br />

László Juhász, National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene; Sándor Kapitány,<br />

István Barnabás, Public Limited Company for Radioactive Waste Management;<br />

Anna Mária Motoc, National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene (Hungary)<br />

The radioactive waste disposal facility at Püspökszilágy is declared for disposal of institutional radioactive waste from smallscale<br />

producers in Hungary run by the Public Limited Company for Radioactive Waste Management (PURAM). The repository was<br />

sited in 1971 and commissioned in 1976. The repository is a typical near-surface facility, composed of concrete vaults and special<br />

disposal units.<br />

Because the original licence did not deal with waste acceptance criteria high activity sources and spent sealed radioactive<br />

sources (SSRS) consisting of long-half life and alpha emitting radionuclides were also disposed of. The results of the safety assessments<br />

clearly indicate that the SSRS could result in high doses to individuals who intrude into the facility after the closure and they<br />

could also lead to high doses following any future disruption of the facility by natural processes. Therefore the PURAM launched<br />

a demonstration program for retrieval and removal these radiation sources.<br />

The main aim of the achievement of the demonstration program was that each step of the recovery technologies could be appropriately<br />

tested before starting the full scale retrieval program. Concerning the high level activities of radiation sources and much<br />

elevated radiation fields the demonstration program had to be concerned from the radiation protection…<br />

SESSION 10 — PANEL: EMERGING ISSUES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF I/ILW (1.16)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 11 — PANEL: HOW CAN NETWORKS IMPROVE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ER PROJECTS?<br />

THE IAEA NETWORK ON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIATION-ENVIRONET (4.15)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 12 — WASTE MINIMIZATION, AVOIDANCE, AND RECYCLING (1.3)<br />

1) WASTE MINIMIZATION BY MELTING - RECYCLING OF RADIOACTIVE METALS (wP-59040)<br />

Thomas Kluth, Ulrich Quade, Siempelkamp Nukleartechnik GmbH (Germany)<br />

Preserving resources is the fundamental principle for recycling of waste metals, using it as raw material for new products.<br />

Recycling radioactive metal waste from operational and decommissioned nuclear facilities meets this principle and minimizes the<br />

volume of radioactive waste and consequently saves costs.<br />

For 20 years now, the operation of the melting plant CARLA (Centrale Anlage zum Recyclieren Leichtaktiver Abfälle / central<br />

plant for recycling slightly radioactive waste) alongside the production facilities of the Siempelkamp foundry have delivered<br />

this service with plant licensed for handling radioactive material according to § 7 StrlSchV (the German radiation protection ordinance).<br />

The flexible nature of the facilities and products even allow metals that cannot be released after the primary melt, to be<br />

recycled into components used in nuclear industry, e. g. waste containers made of cast iron or heavy concrete. These recycling<br />

routes are unique in the world and were developed by Siempelkamp in the 1980ies and have been expanded continuously since<br />

then.<br />

More than 5,500 waste containers manufactured from Ductile Cast Iron (DCI) in cylindrical or cubic form licensed for the German<br />

ILW waste repository KONRAD have been manufactured with a recycled metal content of between 15 % and 25 %. Waste<br />

metals…<br />

2) WASTE MINIMIZATION BENEFITS OF DISSOLVABLE PROTECTIVE CLOTHING (wP-59003)<br />

Michael Cournoyer, David Wannigman, Robert Dodge, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)<br />

<strong>Program</strong>matic operations at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility (TA-55) involve working with various<br />

amounts of plutonium and other highly toxic, alpha-emitting materials. The spread of radiological contamination on surfaces, airborne<br />

contamination, and excursions of contaminants into the operators breathing zone are controlled through the radiological protection<br />

program. A key element of this program is the proper selection of protective clothing. Re-useable, launderable protective<br />

clothing has been the standard for several decades. Over the years, radioactive waste disposal costs have increased and disposal<br />

options have become more limited. This has prompted the development of single-use, dissolvable protective clothing. Single-use,<br />

dissolvable protective clothing is under evaluation as a replacement for launderable woven textile garments at TA-55. We examined<br />

re-useable, launderable and single-use, dissolvable protective clothing, addressed management issues (residual contamination,<br />

cost, environmental footprint, quality assurance), and waste minimization benefits. Replacement of launderable garments with single-use,<br />

dissolvable protective clothing improves the safety configuration of TA-55 by reducing LLW waste generation. Process<br />

improvements of this type contribute to LANLs scientific and technological excellence by increasing the Laboratorys operational<br />

safety.<br />

3) EVALUATION OF EXTERNAL EXPOSURE DURING BUILDING AND OPERATION OF CONCRETE BRIDGES<br />

CONSTRUCTIONS THAT REUSE THE CONDITIONALLY RELEASED STEELS (wP-59120)<br />

Michal Panik, Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

This paper presents ongoing results of the project presented at ICEM`10 related to the topics of reusing the conditionally<br />

released materials from decommissioning. The subject of the reuse of conditionally released materials in this case is modeling of<br />

bridge constructions which reuse the conditionally released steel in the form of reinforcement bars for the concrete bridges. A general<br />

approach for the project was presented at ICEM`10. The activities of the project continue in evaluating the individual effective<br />

doses from the external exposure based on reused conditionally released steels separately for public and for professionals (the inter-<br />

70


Abstracts Session 12<br />

nal exposure will be evaluated in next stages of the project). Evaluated scenarios are related to critical groups of professionals constructing<br />

the bridges (workers scenarios). The computer code VISIPLAN 3D ALARA 4.0 planning tool was used for the calculation<br />

of the individual effective dose for professionals. Various limits of the annual individual effective dose are used for the evaluation<br />

of calculation results. The aim of the ongoing modeling is to develop a set of data of maximal radioactivity concentration for<br />

individual radionuclides in the conditionally released steel used in the bridges model constructions in order not to exceed the limits<br />

for the individual effective dose.<br />

4) TREATMENT OF SPENT ACIDIC DECONTAMINANTS WITH A HIGH-EFFICIENCY<br />

CEMENTATION METHOD (wP-59063)<br />

Kou-Ming Lin, Ching-Tu Chang, Ming-Shin Wu, Wen-Chen Lee,<br />

Jen-Chieh Chung, Tsong-Yang Wei, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (Taiwan)<br />

Metal scrap is a major waste generated from the decommissioning of nuclear facilities. Through a decontamination process,<br />

most of the metal scraps can be cleaned to meet the clearance level, which can then be reused or released according to the regulatory<br />

procedure. Usually, chemical processes will be used in the cleaning step. Phosphoric acid and fluoroboric acid are the typically<br />

used chemicals or decontaminants. Although the regeneration method could be applied to increase the lifetime of the decontaminant,<br />

its decontamination efficiency would decrease after 3 to 5 cycles. In addition, the contaminated nuclide such as Cs-137 is not<br />

easily removed during the regeneration process; it tends to accumulate slowly in the decontaminant. According to the ALARA principle,<br />

decontaminant must be replaced if its activity exceeds the regulatory level. As a result, significant amount of spent strong<br />

acid solution would be generated. The traditional way of treatment is to neutralize the acid solution with an alkaline solution. However,<br />

such method will produce large amount of sludge that requires further stabilization, which offsets the advantages of metal<br />

decontamination.<br />

A high-efficiency solidification method is developed and used to treat the spent phosphoric acid and fluoroboric acid solution<br />

in INER. The self-polymerization nature of<br />

5) METHODOLOGY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITIONALLY RELEASED MATERIALS FROM<br />

DECOMMISSIONING USING THE OMEGA CODE (wP-59175)<br />

Matej Zachar, Vladimír Daniaka, DECOM, a.s.; Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

The nuclear facility decommissioning process is characterized by production of large volume of radioactive materials to be<br />

managed. The materials with radioactivity slightly above the defined unconditional clearance levels could be released conditionally<br />

for a specified industrial application in accordance with beforehand developed scenario ensuring that the limits for radiation<br />

exposure of workers and public will not be exceeded.<br />

The paper presents the methodology for identifying and assessment of the physical and radiological parameters of material<br />

items suitable for using in defined scenarios of conditional reuse of materials resulting from the decommissioning process. The calculation<br />

of mentioned parameters is done by using the analytical code OMEGA with implemented calculation stream for evaluation<br />

the conditional release process.<br />

The necessary input parameters for the OMEGA code are maximum concentrations of each radionuclide in the conditionally<br />

released materials which do not cause the doses above the limit values for the possible scenarios of further use of materials outside<br />

the nuclear site. The examples of such scenarios are assessed and presented in other related papers proposed for the ICEM conference.<br />

Based on the inventory database of physical and radiological characteristics of decommissioned facility, the calculation algorithm<br />

separates the relevant material items with activity concentrations…<br />

6) IMPACT OF NUCLIDE VECTOR COMPOSITION CONTAINED IN CONDITIONALLY<br />

RELEASED STEEL REUSED IN MOTORWAY TUNNELS SCENARIO ON<br />

CALCULATED INDIVIDUAL EFFECTIVE DOSES (wP-59128)<br />

Tomas Hrncir, Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

This paper presents ongoing results of the project presented at ICEM 10 [paper 40071] related to the topics of the reuse of conditionally<br />

released materials arising from decommissioning of nuclear installations.<br />

The subject of the presented paper is modelling of motorway tunnels, which reuse the conditionally released steel in form of<br />

reinforcing nets and bars for the concrete construction of tunnels. The general approach for the project was presented at ICEM 10.<br />

The activities of the project continued in evaluating the impact of the nuclide composition contained in the conditionally released<br />

steel on calculated individual effective doses from the external exposure (the internal exposure will be evaluated in next stages of<br />

the project). Mentioned radioactive steel arises during decommissioning and would be reused in motorway tunnels. Evaluated scenarios<br />

are related to critical groups of public (drivers scenarios) and for professionals constructing the tunnels and performing the<br />

maintenance of tunnels (workers scenarios).<br />

The computer code VISIPLAN 4.0 3D ALARA planning tool was used for the calculation of individual effective doses for<br />

worker and for public groups. Various limits of the individual effective dose are used for public and for professionals. The aim of<br />

the ongoing modelling is to develop a set…<br />

7) EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL, ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY FOR RECYCLING<br />

AND REPROCESSING OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE FROM A REMEDIATION WORK OF LOW<br />

AND MEDIUM ACTIVITY FOR THE EXTRACTION OF HEAVY MINERALS (w/oP-59231)<br />

Rodrigo Raposo de Almeida, Federal Fluminense University;<br />

Valter J.G. Mortágua, Industrias Nucleares do Brasil (Brazil)<br />

This paper aims to present the methodology and criteria used for the destination, discard and reuse of waste from the remediation<br />

activities of soil contaminated by radioactive waste of low activity in the USIN Plant. The site is located in São Paulo city,<br />

the city with the largest population of Brazil, with approximately 11 million inhabitants. As the environmental agency in São Paulo<br />

state, in this neighborhood there are several cases of severe contamination of soil and groundwater. The situation of contamination<br />

is so severe that it is forbidden the use of groundwater in the region for an indefinite period. Site of the plant running in a monazite<br />

71


Session 13 Abstracts<br />

processing plant for extraction of rare earths, have been filed across the land several fractions of soil containing monazite sand. In<br />

order to guide the remediation of the area for unrestricted use, was a plan for remediation of radioactive waste characterization<br />

based on geological, hydrogeological and environmental extensive in the area. From the calculation of the dose was established that<br />

the fractions of soil with concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra below 0.5 Bq/g result in additional effective dose less than 1.0 mSv/yr<br />

and therefore can be kept on the ground. The fractions…<br />

8) WNA STATEMENT - TOWARDS GREATER EFFICIENCY IN THE MANAGEMENT<br />

OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL THAT CONCURRENTLY SUPPORTS REUSE,<br />

RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL (wP - 59414)<br />

Sylvain Saint-Pierre, World Nuclear Association (WNA) (UK)<br />

This paper presents the subject WNA statement which resulted from a conserted effort between a wide range of nuclear industry<br />

players such as nuclear power utilities, nuclear fuel cycle companies – and experienced recyling and waste disposal companies<br />

which routinely received material from nuclear sites.<br />

SESSION 13 — HLW, FISSILE, TRU AND SPENT FUEL SHORT AND LONG-TERM STORAGE ISSUES (2.4)<br />

1) WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT HIGH LEVEL, TRANSURANIC,<br />

AND GREATER THAN CLASS C WASTES (wP-59048)<br />

James Blankenhorn, West Valley Environmental Services (USA)<br />

Located in the scenic hills of Western New York, just about 35 miles south of Buffalo, the 68 acre West Valley Demonstration<br />

Project (WVDP) is a unique and challenging environmental cleanup project that currently manages High Level, Transuranic, and<br />

Greater than Class C wastes<br />

Before the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) took on the challenge of cleaning up the site, the site was the location of the only<br />

commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) reprocessing facility to operate in the United States. Operated by Nuclear Fuels Services from<br />

1966-72, the site was owned by the State of New York and licensed by the Atomic Energy Commission. During operations, the<br />

plant reprocessed approximately 640 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel. When commercial operations were discontinued and the<br />

facilities were returned to New York State, there were nearly 2,271,247 liters (nearly 600,000 gallons) of liquid high-level radioactive<br />

waste (HLW) in an underground storage tank and the facility that was used to reprocess the SNF, the Main Plant Process Building<br />

(MPPB), was highly contaminated.<br />

The West Valley Demonstration Project Act of 1980 (the Act) authorized DOE to conduct a cleanup of the site, in cooperation<br />

with the New York State Energy Research and Development…<br />

2) MANAGING AGING EFFECTS ON USED FUEL DRY CASK FOR VERY LONG-TERM STORAGE (wP-59067)<br />

Omesh Chopra, Dwight Diercks, David Ma, Vik Shah, Shiu-Wing Tam, Ralph Fabian,<br />

Yung Liu, Mark Nutt, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)(USA)<br />

The cancellation of the Yucca Mountain repository program in the Unites States raises the prospect of very long-term storage<br />

(i.e., >120 years) of used fuel and deferred transportation. While long-term storage of used nuclear fuel in dry cask storage systems<br />

(DCSSs) at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) is already a standard practice among U.S. utilities, recent rulemaking<br />

activities of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) indicated additional flexibility for the NRC licensees of ISF-<br />

SIs and certificate holders of the DCSSs to request initial and renewal terms for up to 40 years. The proposed rule also adds a<br />

requirement that renewal applicants must provide time-limited aging analyses (TLAAs) and descriptions of aging management programs<br />

(AMPs) to ensure that the systems, structures, and components (SSCs) in the DCSSs will perform as designed under the<br />

extended license terms. Details of the license renewal process can be found in the NRC draft Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1927)<br />

for renewal of ISFSI Licenses and DCSS Certificates of Compliance (CoCs). The final Standard Review Plan will provide NRC<br />

staff with guidance on the renewal of site-specific licenses and CoCs.<br />

Over the last three decades, Argonne National Laboratory has conducted research programs funded by NRC to address…<br />

3) APPLICATION OF COUPLED THERMO-HYDRO-MECHANICAL-CHEMICAL (THMC) PROCESS IN<br />

HYDROTHERMAL SYSTEMS TO PROCESS NEAR A HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY (wP-59246)<br />

Geoffrey Peter, Oregon Institute of Technology Portland Center (USA)<br />

Modeling of coupled processes in the geology near a high-level nuclear waste repository is similar to the modeling of coupled<br />

Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC) processes that occur in magma-hydrothermal systems. Magma-hydrothermal systems<br />

were extensively studied by former Professor Denis Norton and his colleagues at the Geoscience Department at University of<br />

Arizona. These hydro-thermal codes were verified by obtaining excellent matches between calculated oxgyen 18 isotope - values<br />

and measured oxygen 18 isotope values in three principal rock units: basalt, gabbro, and gneiss.<br />

This paper reviews the concept of transport theory used in the formulation of the conservation principle that is used to model<br />

the hydrothermal systems. In addition, it reviews conservation of mass, momentum, energy, and chemical components equations as<br />

applied to the multicomponent-multiphase systems related to hydrothermal systems and obtains parallels to reaction rates and<br />

radionuclide transport in the geology of a high level nuclear water repository. The paper discusses the numerical methods used to<br />

solve the coupled equations.<br />

Further, this paper compares published results obtained by other researchers modeling coupled THM process in the geology of<br />

high-level nuclear waste repositories.<br />

72


Abstracts Session 13<br />

4) GENERIC DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM SPENT FUEL STORAGE<br />

FOR NEW REACTORS IN THE UK (wP-59174)<br />

Christopher Fisher, Nuclear Directorate, Health and Safety Executive;<br />

Dave Watson, Office of Nuclear Regulation; Ian Streatfield, Colette Grundy,<br />

Saffron Price-Walter, Environment Agency, Dave Glazbrook, Office of Nuclear Regulation (UK)<br />

In the UK the HSE and the Environment Agency developed the Generic Design Assessment or GDA process in response to a<br />

request from the UK Government. The process allowed the regulators to jointly assess new nuclear reactor designs, in advance of<br />

any site-specific proposals to build a nuclear power station. The first GDA process will be complete in June 2011.<br />

Two reactor types are being assessed within GDA:<br />

• AREVA and Electricité de France’s (EDF) UK EPR®<br />

• Westinghouse Electric Company’s AP1000®<br />

This paper will present the outcome of the assessment of radioactive waste management and decommissioning (RW&D)<br />

within the GDA process. One of the most interesting aspects is the management of spent fuel as it is assumed that this will be<br />

sent for disposal. Therefore the presentation will specifically consider the management of spent fuel and how this affects the<br />

reulatory decisions.<br />

The presentation and paper will look at four aspects. The first of these is to give a short overview of the GDA process.<br />

This will be followed by a summary of the regulators conclusions at the end of GDA on the acceptability of:<br />

• The types of waste and spent fuel<br />

• The plans for conditioning of…<br />

6) INDUSTRIAL COMPLEMENTARITIES BETWEEN INTERIM STORAGE AND<br />

REVERSIBLE GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY (wP-59237)<br />

Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, Andra (France)<br />

The French Act voted in 2006 made the choice of deep geological disposal as the reference option for ILW and HLW long term<br />

management. The CIGEO repository project aims at avoiding or limiting burden to future generations, which could not be achieved<br />

by the extension in time of interim storage. The reversibility as provided by the Act will maintain a liberty of choice for waste management<br />

on a duration which is comparable to new storage facility.<br />

Interim storage is required to accommodate waste as long as the repository is not available. The commissioning of the repository<br />

in 2025 will not suppress needs for interim storage. The paper describes the complementarities between existing and future<br />

interim storage facilities and the repository project: repository operational issues and planning, HLW thermal decay, support for the<br />

reversibility, etc. It shows opportunities to prepare a global optimization of waste management including the utilization at best of<br />

storage capacities and the planning of waste emplacement in the repository in such a way to facilitate operational conditions and<br />

to limit cost. Preliminary simulations of storage-disposal scenarios are presented.<br />

Thanks to an optimal use of the waste management system, provision can be made for a progressive increase of…<br />

7) RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT IN NORWAY (wP-59260)<br />

Peter Bennett, Barbara Oberlander, Erlend Larsen, Institutt for Energiteknikk (Norway<br />

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) in Norway has arisen from irradiation of fuel in the NORA, Jeep I and Jeep II reactors at Kjeller,<br />

and in the Heavy Boiling Water Reactor (HBWR) in Halden. In total there is some 16 tonnes of SNF, with 12 tonnes of aluminium-clad<br />

fuel, of which 10 tonnes is metallic uranium fuel and the remainder oxide (UO2). The portion of this fuel that is similar to<br />

commercial fuel (UO2 clad in Zircaloy) may be suitable for direct disposal on the Swedish model or in other repository designs.<br />

However, metallic uranium and/or fuels clad in aluminium are chemically reactive and there would be risks associated with direct<br />

disposal.<br />

Two committees were established by the Government of Norway in January 2009 to make recommendations for the interim<br />

storage and final disposal of spent fuel in Norway. The Technical Committee on Storage and Disposal of Metallic Uranium Fuel<br />

and Al-clad Fuels was formed with the mandate to recommend treatment (i.e. conditioning) options for metallic uranium fuel and<br />

aluminium-clad fuel to render them stable for long term storage and disposal. This committee, whose members were drawn from<br />

the nuclear industry, reported in January 2010, and recommended commercial reprocessing as the<br />

8) ADVANCED SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES FOR USED FUEL<br />

LONG-TERM STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION (wP-59032)<br />

Hanchung Tsai, Yung Liu, Mark Nutt, Argonne National Laboratory; James Shuler, US Department of Energy (USA)<br />

Dry cask storage systems are being used by utilities in the United States to handle the ever-increasing number of discharged<br />

fuel assemblies from nuclear power plants. Most of the newer systems incorporate multiple-purpose (storage, transport, and disposal)<br />

or dual-purpose (storage and transport) canister technologies. With the prospect of very long-term storage (>120 years) and<br />

deferred transport looming, condition- and performance-based aging management of structures and components in the dry cask<br />

storage systems becomes an even more challenging task. From the standpoint of used fuels, one of the greatest concerns is embrittlement-related<br />

cladding rupture of a large number of used fuel rods during long-term storage and transportation.<br />

Radio frequency identification (RFID) is an automated and remote-sensing technology ideally suited to monitor sensitive assets<br />

on a continuous, long-term basis. One such system, called ARG-US, has been developed by Argonne National Laboratory for the<br />

U.S. Department of Energy Packaging Certification <strong>Program</strong>, Office of Packaging and Transportation, and deployed at several DOE<br />

sites to track and monitor drums containing nuclear and radioactive materials. While the sensor suite currently in the ARG-US RFID<br />

tags (seal, temperature, humidity, shock and radiation) is adequate in monitoring the exterior conditions of the used fuel casks,<br />

advanced surveillance technology<br />

73


Session 14 Abstracts<br />

SESSION 14 — D&D OF POWER REACTORS AND RESEARCH REACTORS (3.9)<br />

1) DFD AN APPROACH TO NEW REACTOR DESIGNS (wP-59197)<br />

Jas S. Devgun, Sargent & Lundy (USA)<br />

Design for Decommissioning (DfD) is now becoming a part of the design optimization process for the new reactor designs.<br />

This is a significant contrast to when the currently operating reactors were designed several decades ago and when decommissioning<br />

was not given much thought during the design process. At a time when nuclear renaissance has taken hold worldwide and many<br />

reactors are in the planning or early construction stages, design considerations for decommissioning will have a significant impact<br />

not only during the construction but also during the eventual decommissioning phase albeit long after the design stage as most reactors<br />

are now designed for 60 year operating life.<br />

Industry has taken a lead in this area and all current designs incorporate decommissioning considerations into the designs of<br />

the new reactors to some degree. Some, such as, AP1000 are highly optimized in this regard. The goals are to have fewer components,<br />

provide for modular designs for construction and eventual deconstruction, address major component removal issues, minimize<br />

the generation of radioactive waste, and provide for better radiological safety.<br />

International interest in the area has culminated in new or updated guidance on the subject at the IAEA and NEA. The IAEA<br />

has drafted a technical…<br />

2) FEEDBACK FROM WESTINGHOUSE EXPERIENCE ON SEGMENTATION<br />

OF REACTOR VESSEL INTERNALS (wP-59013)<br />

Joseph Boucau, Westinghouse Electric Company; Stefan Fallström, Westinghouse;<br />

Per Segerud, Westinghouse Electric Sweden; Paul Kreitman, Westinghouse Electric Company (Belgium/Sweden/USA)<br />

With more than 20 years of experience in the development of reactor vessel internals segmentation and packaging technology,<br />

Westinghouse has accumulated significant know-how in the reactor dismantling market.<br />

Building on tooling concepts and cutting methodologies developed decades ago for the successful removal of nuclear fuel from<br />

the damaged Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor (TMI-2), Westinghouse has continuously improved its approach to internals segmentation<br />

and packaging by incorporating lessons learned and best practices into each successive project.<br />

Westinghouse has developed several concepts to dismantle reactor internals based on safe and reliable techniques, including<br />

plasma arc cutting (PAC), abrasive waterjet cutting (AWJC), metal disintegration machining (MDM), or mechanical cutting. Westinghouse<br />

has applied its technology to all types of reactors covering Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs), Boiling Water Reactors<br />

(BWRs), Gas Cooled Reactors (GCRs) and sodium reactors.<br />

The primary challenges of a segmentation and packaging project are to separate the highly activated materials from the lessactivated<br />

materials and package them into appropriate containers for disposal. Since space is almost always a limiting factor it is<br />

therefore important to plan and optimize the available room in the segmentation areas.<br />

The choice of the optimum cutting technology is important for a successful project implementation and…<br />

3) UPDATE ON JOSE CABRERA NPP DECOMMISSIONING (wP-59322)<br />

Juan Santiago, Nieves Martin, Manuel Rodriguez, ENRESA (Spain)<br />

Construction of José Cabrera Nuclear Power Plant, owned by Gas Natural, began in 1964 and the plant went into commercial<br />

operation in 1969. The nuclear steam supply system was designed and supplied by Westinghouse and is made up of a light PWR<br />

reactor with an authorized thermal output of 510 MW and an electrical power of 160 MW and all the auxiliary and safety systems<br />

required for the efficient operation of the facility under safe conditions.<br />

In 2002, the Ministry of Economy authorized the operation of the plant until April 30th 2006. Subsequently, the Directorate<br />

General for Energy Policy and Mines, through of Order of April 20th 2006, confirmed the definitive shutdown of the plant on the<br />

schedule date and established the requirements to be met in performing activities at the facility prior to awarding of the dismantling<br />

permit, along with the basic framework for the granting of this authorization.<br />

On April 30th 2008, ENRESA requested the transfer of the ownership of the José Cabrera NPP from the Ministry of Industry,<br />

Tourism and Trade, along with the corresponding authorization for performance of the Dismantling and decommissioning Plan,<br />

submitting the documentation required by article 30 of the Regulation on Nuclear and…<br />

4) THE DECOMMISSIONING OF THE CIEMAT NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE (w/oP-59321)<br />

Juan Santiago, Sergio Vidaechea, Manuel Ondaro, ENRESA (Spain)<br />

CIEMAT, formerly the Nuclear Energy Board (JEN), is the Spanish Centre for Energy-Related, Environmental and Technological<br />

Research. Located in Madrid, it used to have more than 60 facilities in operation that allowed a wide range of activities in the<br />

nuclear field and in the application of ionising radiations. Particularly significant among these facilities were the research reactors,<br />

particle accelerators, hot cells and nuclear fuel manufacturing and processing plants.<br />

At present the centre, which is authorised as a single nuclear facility, includes various installations, some of them are now obsolete,<br />

shut down and in dismantling phases. In 2000 CIEMAT started the Integrated plan for the improvement of CIEMAT installations<br />

(PIMIC), which includes activities for the decontamination, dismantling and rehabilitation of obsolete facilities.<br />

The PIMIC-Decommissioning Project, carried out by ENRESA as main contractor, includes the dismantling of 4 installations:<br />

JEN-1 Research Reactor, Reprocessing plant (Hot Cell M-1), Radioactive Liquid Treatment Plant and Radioactive Liquid Storage<br />

Plant. Besides, a small contaminated area has to be remediated and restored, because of an incidental leakage of radioactive liquid<br />

in the 70´s.<br />

Currently, decommissioning activities in buildings have been completed, and soil remediation is under way together with the<br />

final radiological characterisation of the soil, including…<br />

74


Abstracts Session 14<br />

5) THE REMOVAL, TRANSPORTATION AND FINAL TREATMENT AND CONDITIONING<br />

OF THE THETIS RESEARCH REACTOR SPENT FUEL OF THE UNIVERSITY<br />

OF GHENT (BELGIUM) ACHIEVED IN 2010 AUTHORS (wP-59261)<br />

Hubert Thierens, Myriam Monsieurs, Ghent University; Vincent De pooter, Marnix Braeckeveldt, NIRAS/ONDRAF;<br />

Luc Noynaert, SCK●CEN; Patrick Lewandowski, Belgoprocess; Patrick Maris, Luc Ooms, SCK●CEN; Karel Strijckmans, Ghent University (Belgium)<br />

The THETIS research reactor on the site of the Nuclear Sciences Institute of the Ghent University has been in operation from<br />

1967 until December 2003. This light-water moderated graphite-reflected low-enriched uranium pool-type reactor has been used<br />

for various purposes e.g. the production of radio-isotopes and activation analyses. During the first years its core power was 15 kW.<br />

In the early 70, a core enlargement allowed for operation at typically 150 kW, while the maximum was allowed to be 250 kW. The<br />

fuel was 5% enriched uranium cladded with AISI304L stainless steel, with graphite plugs at both end of the tubes.<br />

In order to decommission the reactor, the spent fuel and other nuclear materials present had to be removed from the reactor<br />

site.<br />

Ghent University entrusted to SCK”CEN, the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre , the study of the further management of the<br />

spent fuel. Various options such as reprocessing, intermediate storage awaiting final disposal were investigated. However the characteristics<br />

and the small amount of spent fuel made these solutions very expensive. In the meantime NIRAS/ONDRAF, the Belgian<br />

radioactive waste management agency, was developing together with Belgoprocess, a solution for final conditioning in 400<br />

liter drums and further intermediate storage of the…<br />

6) DECOMMISSIONING AND DISMANTLING OF THE FRENCH BRENNILIS NPP (w/oP-59366)<br />

Thierry Andre, ONET Technologies; Werner Botzem, Nukem Technologies (France/Germany)<br />

This paper deals with the dismantling of the Brennilis NPP plant located in the west of France (Finistère). This prototype NPP<br />

of Brennilis was the unique reactor of the heavy water developed in France during the 50 and the 60. The reactor diverged in<br />

December 1966 and the NPP was operated during 9 years from 1972 to 1981, then the permanent shutdown occurred in July 1985.<br />

In 2008, the operator and owner of the plant Electricité de France (EDF) commissioned consortium Onet Technologies (France)<br />

and Nukem Technologies (Germany) with the dismantling of the reactor block of the NPP.<br />

The reactor block essentially contains the reactor vessel including built-in units and biological shields, the peripheral piping as<br />

well as systems for controlling the nuclear-related process. In addition to the complete dismantling, the scope of the contractual<br />

services also includes their proper handling in accordance with the applicable regulation : safety requirements, waste management,<br />

radioprotection optimization and management.<br />

The central element of the plant is the reactor pressure vessel filled with heavy water. Each of the 216 horizontal fuel element<br />

channels made of zircaloy is at each side connected to a pipe which directs the heat transfer gas to a header mounted…<br />

7) THE CHOOZ A REACTOR DISMANTLING PROJECT (wP-59363)<br />

Estelle Grevin, EDF; Joseph Boucau, Westinghouse Electric Company (France/Belgium)<br />

Located in the Ardennes next to the Meuse River, Chooz A nuclear power plant was the first Pressurised Water Reactor (PWR)<br />

built in France (1963). Its a 305 MW NPP and it produced electricity from 1967 until 1991 (38TWh). Chooz A NPP was permanently<br />

shut down in 1993 and the fuel was removed.<br />

The complete dismantling decree was published in September 2007. According to this decree, the dismantling is spilt into 3<br />

main steps :<br />

1st step: dismantling of all the nuclear equipment (2008 to 2015)<br />

2nd step: tritium ratio decrease monitoring.(2015-2017)<br />

3rd step: dismantling of the equipment needed for gathering. Filling of the underground buildings with concrete.<br />

In 2010 the dismantling of the circuits connected to the vessel commenced. On Monday, the 1st of February, the first steam<br />

generator was extracted and prepared to be decontaminated. Steam generators and the primary circuit will be decontaminated before<br />

being transported in one piece to the French nuclear waste storage facility.<br />

Once the decontamination is complete, the vessel dismantling will begin: this will be another important step for the project.<br />

8) FULL SYSTEM DECONTAMINATION (FSD) PRIOR TO DECOMMISSIONING (wP-59189)<br />

Christoph Stiepani, AREVA NP GmbH (Germany)<br />

Decontamination prior to decommissioning and dismantling is imperative. Not only does it provide for minimization of personnel<br />

dose exposure but also maximization of the material volume available for free release. Since easier dismantling techniques<br />

in lower dose areas can be applied, the licensing process is facilitated and the scheduling and budgeting effort is more reliable.<br />

The most internationally accepted approach for decontamination prior to decommissioning projects is the Full System Decontamination<br />

(FSD). FSD is defined as the chemical decontamination of the primary cooling circuit, in conjunction with the main auxiliary<br />

systems.<br />

AREVA has long-term experience with Full System Decontamination for return to service of operating nuclear power plants<br />

as well as for decommissioning after shutdown. Since 1976, AREVA has performed over 500 decontamination applications and<br />

from 1986 on, decontaminations prior to decommissioning projects which comprise virtually all nuclear power plant (NPP) designs<br />

and plant conditions:<br />

• NPP designs: HPWR, PWR, and BWR by AREVA, Westinghouse, ABB and GE<br />

• Decontaminations performed shortly after final shutdown or several years later, and even after re-opening safe enclosure<br />

• High alpha inventory and or low gamma/alpha ratio<br />

• Main coolant chemistry (e.g. with and without Zn injection during operation)<br />

Fifteen decontaminations prior to…<br />

75


Session 15 Abstracts<br />

SESSION 15— THE FRENCH D&D ACTIVITIES - ORGANIZATION, STRATEGY,<br />

OBJECTIVES AND EXPERIENCE (3.2)<br />

1) CEA’S DECOMMISSIONING POLICY AND STRATEGIES. LESSONS LEARNED (w/oP-59203)<br />

Philippe Guiberteau, Didier Dall’ava, CEA; Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN (France)<br />

Since the beginning of the 20th century, France has carried out research programmes on civil use of nuclear, and its application,<br />

France has set up and run various types of installations: research or prototypes reactors, process study or examination laboratories,<br />

pilot installations, accelerators, nuclear power plants and processing facilities. There are currently more than several tens of<br />

facilities which are presently closed down pending dismantling or in the process of being dismantled by CEA , the governmental<br />

body for research and development in nuclear and renewable energies..<br />

When operating, all these installations work with nuclear materials and generate radioactive waste. When they are shutdown,<br />

either as a result of the programmes for which they were set up, or due to equipment wearing out or being obsolete, these installations<br />

must be cleaned and dismantled, taking into account their nuclear nature and requirements related to safety and environment.<br />

During the decommissioning process, the implementer has to deal with safety and site rehabilitation issues.<br />

Dealing with these installations is a long-term programme which must be carefully planned and financed in order to optimise<br />

its management.<br />

The paper will describe the French decommissioning policy and strategies adopted, showing that :<br />

• Safety is guaranteed…<br />

2) CLEANSING AND DISMANTLING OF CEA-SACLAY NUCLEAR LICENSED FACILITIES (W/OP -59227)<br />

Michel K. Jeanjacques, Rebecca Glévarec, Isabelle Delaire,<br />

Jean Louis Martin, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (France)<br />

This summary presents the cleansing and dismantling operations currently realized on the CEA center of Saclay (CEA-Saclay).<br />

This CEA center was created at the beginning of the Fifties on the plateau of Saclay located at approximately 25 km at the south<br />

of Paris. The CEA-Saclay as of its creation was dedicated to fundamental research, the studies for the development of the nuclear<br />

dies, the uranium enrichment and the radioelement study and production.<br />

The Saclay-center nuclear facilities were already dismantled in function of the end of R&D and fundamental research (research<br />

reactor: EL2-EL3, critical mock-up, uranium enrichment pilot plants, radioelement production cells, and accelerators SATURNE-<br />

ALS [Saclay Linear Accelerator]). It was initiated at the beginning of the 2000 years a cleansing and dismantling program of the<br />

old Nuclear Licensed Facilities (LNF). Currently this program relates to the Hot Laboratories (Laboratoires de Haute Activité :<br />

LHA) and the old workshops of the Liquid Waste Treatment Plant (Station des Effluents Liquides : STEL).<br />

The LHA are a multipurpose laboratory for R&D studies of various units of the CEA-Saclay. They were built at the end of the<br />

Fifties. The reference safety frame allowed disassembling the equipment at the end of R&D program. Since the beginning…<br />

3) DECONTAMINATION AND DISMANTLING OF CENDRILLON TRANSFER<br />

SYSTEMS FOR RADIOACTIVE LIQUID SOLUTIONS (w/oP -59336)<br />

Michel K. Jeanjacques, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives;<br />

Frédéric Masure, Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (France)<br />

The CENDRILLON system was studied and developed by the CEA at the end of the 1950s and early of the 1960s to transfer<br />

and transport the radioactive liquid solutions to waste treatment facilities. This system has been manufactured in several versions<br />

in three different sizes and for each different volumes of capacity. For each size, the biological shielding thickness is based on the<br />

volume capacity. Whatever the size and volume, the CENDRILLON connection system remains identical. All liquid transfers, filling<br />

and sucking out, of the CENDRILLON are carried under vacuum.<br />

The CENDRILLON D&D works are carried out during the facilities POCO (post clean out operations) and decommissioning<br />

or into a dedicated waste treatment plant.<br />

The parer will show CEAs procedure to carry out these CENDRILLON D&D works. It consists of tasks sequences: CEN-<br />

DRILLON emptiness assessment, capacity flushing and decontamination, pumping out, drying and finally CENDRILLON dismantling<br />

by mechanical disassembly (taking apart) and the capacity cutting. Control of nuclear risk is essential for all these tasks: radiolysis,<br />

contamination and irradiation.<br />

4) AREVA RETURN ON EXPERIENCE FROM D&D PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT -<br />

WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED SO FAR? (w/oP -59324)<br />

Jean-Michel Chabeuf, Thierry Varet, Grégoire de Laval, Guy Decobert,<br />

Frédéric Chambon, AREVA Nuclear Site Value Development BU (France)<br />

In November 1997, UP1, France first large scale reprocessing plant, ceased operations after 40 years of activities. A comprehensive<br />

D&D program was immediately initiated, scheduled to last for a period of approximately 30 years. In 2002, AREVA<br />

launched the decommissioning and dismantling of SICN sites, two GCR fuel fabrication located near Grenoble and Annecy. Shortly<br />

after, in 2003, the second reprocessing plant, UP2 400, commissioned in the sixties in La Hague (Normandy) followed. Less than<br />

a decade later, UP1 decommissioning program is well advanced, with the de-cladding facilities nearing completion, and the chemical<br />

plant showing a work progress of about 50%. The decommissioning of SICN sites is reaching its final stage, with concrete<br />

scrabbling operations launched in order to release the site for non nuclear industrial activities. A part of UP2 400 de-cladding facilities<br />

have been dismantled, and a vast D&D program is now on track for the bulk of the plant.<br />

AREVA is managing those operations, either as owner in La Hague and SICN, or as prime contractor for the French Atomic<br />

Energy commission in Marcoule.<br />

More than 10 years of continuous, large scale D&D operations have provided a unique feed back for such operations.<br />

RETURN ON EXPERIENCE OF…<br />

76


Abstracts Session 16<br />

SESSION 16 — NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL D&D PROGRAMS (3.3)<br />

1) PARTICULARITIES OF CHNPP SITE REMEDIATION DURING ITS DECOMMISSIONING (wP-59193)<br />

Sergii Mitichkin, Valeriy Seyda, Chernobyl NPP (Ukraine)<br />

On April 26, 1986 beyond designed accident occurred at Chernobyl NPPs Unit 4 as a result of which the reactor core and protective<br />

safety barriers have been destroyed. Releases of fission products are evaluated approximately in 50 MKu (without considering<br />

inert radioactive gases) that makes approximately 3,5 % of total quantity of the radio nuclides accumulated in the reactor as<br />

of the moment of accident.<br />

To liquidate the accident consequences it has been constructed the Shelter object. The major part of fission nuclear materials<br />

is localized within the Shelter object in the form of separate elements of fuel assemblies and congestions of Fuel Containing Materials.<br />

The de?ontamination works carried out in 1986, have allowed to clean up ChNPP site from a main part of radioactive substances.<br />

That has provided a possibility to operate ChNPP site equipment without the excess of a dose limit established in normative<br />

documents. But a significant amount of reactor core fragments (according to some estimations - from 500 kg up to 1000 kg)<br />

remains at ChNPP territory under a concrete and ground layer, laid in 1986 with the purpose to reduce radiation conditions parameters<br />

at the site up to the normative documents requirements. The given circumstance<br />

2) DIVISION OF NUCLEAR LIABILITIES BETWEEN DIFFERENT LICENSE HOLDERS AND OWNERS (wP-59214)<br />

Staffan Lindskog, Swedísh Radiation Safety Authority; Rolf Sjöblom, Tekedo AB (Sweden)<br />

Operation of nuclear facilities typically implies that substantial liabilities for decommissioning and waste management are<br />

incurred. In the case of Sweden, and in accordance with the polluter pays principle, money is collected into segregated funds and<br />

securities are provided to ensure that adequate funding will be available at the time when it is needed. For nuclear power plants,<br />

the safeguarding of funds includes the estimated costs as well as an amount related to the risk that the Government takes as the ultimate<br />

guardian of the system.<br />

For other license holders, the fees and securities must include only the estimated cost. For old facilities, special problems may<br />

arise since they might no longer generate any revenue. Another problem with old facilities is that it has been proven difficult, in<br />

many cases, to obtain sufficiently precise cost calculations. There issues have been dealt with in previous presentations to the ICEM<br />

by the present authors.<br />

However, equally important - but so far largely neglected - is the issue of who is actually responsible for what. Of course, our<br />

Environmental Code - as does the corresponding legislation in many other countries - states that the responsibility is a collective<br />

one, and anyone involved can…<br />

3) SPANISH APPROACH TO LARGE DECOMMISSIONING PROJECTS (wP-59320)<br />

Juan Santiago, Alejandro Rodríguez, ENRESA (Spain)<br />

Spain has accumulated significant experience in the field of decommissioning of nuclear and radioactive facilities. Relevant<br />

projects include the decommissioning of research reactors and nuclear research facilities and the decommissioning of gas-graphite<br />

and light water nuclear power plants. The decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Spain is undertaken by ENRESA, who is also<br />

responsible for the management of radioactive wastes. The three most notable projects are the decommissioning of the Vandellós I<br />

nuclear power plant, the decommissioning of the CIEMAT Nuclear Research Centre and the decommissioning of the José Cabrera<br />

nuclear power plant.<br />

The Vandellós I gas-graphite reactor was decommissioned in about five years (from 1998 to 2003) to what it is known as level<br />

2. During this period, most plant systems and components were dismantled, the reactor vessel was confined and the facility was<br />

prepared for latency. In 2005 the facility entered into a dormancy phase, with minimum operating requirements.<br />

The decommissioning of the CIEMAT Research Center includes the dismantling of obsolete facilities, such as the research<br />

reactor JEN-1, a pilot reprocessing plant, and a conditioning and storage liquid waste facility and the remediation of contaminated<br />

soils. Dismantling works started in 2006 and have been completed by 2010.<br />

In March…<br />

4) DECOMMISSIONING OF OBSOLETE NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN THE<br />

NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE REZ (wP-59309)<br />

Josef Podlaha, Karel Svoboda, Nuclear Research Institute Rez; Eduard Hanslik,<br />

T.G.M. Water Research Institute (Czech Republic)<br />

After more than 55 years of activities of the Nuclear Research Institute Rez (NRI) in the nuclear field, there are some obsolete<br />

nuclear facilities that shall be decommissioned.<br />

NRI is a leading institution in all areas of nuclear R&D in the Czech Republic. NRI has had a dominant position in the nuclear<br />

programme since it was established in 1955 as a state-owned research organization and it has developed to its current status. In<br />

December 1992, NRI has been transformed into a joint-stock company.<br />

The Institute’s activity encompasses nuclear physics, chemistry, nuclear power, experiments at the research reactor and many<br />

other topics. Main issues addressed in NRI in the past decades were concentrated on research, development and services provided<br />

to the nuclear power plants operating VVER reactors, development of chemical technologies for fuel cycle and irradiation services<br />

to research and development in the industrial sector, agriculture, food processing and medicine.<br />

The NRI operates two research nuclear reactors, many facilities as a hot cell facility, research laboratories, technology for<br />

radioactive waste (RAW) management, radionuclide irradiators, an electron accelerator, etc.<br />

The obsolete facilities to be decommissioned comprise:<br />

(1) Various research facilities<br />

Hot cells used for research in the field of reprocessing of…<br />

77


Session 17 Abstracts<br />

SESSION 17 — APPLYING STRATEGIC PLANNING, DECISION-MAKING AND<br />

RISK REDUCTION METHODOLOGIES IN EM (5.7)<br />

1) CAN SUSTAINABILITY BE APPLIED TO OUR ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

REMEDIATION CHALLENGES? (w/oP-59148)<br />

Peter Booth, Vicky Gaskin, WSP Environment and Energy (UK)<br />

There are many environmental remediation challenges around the world today with a radiological connotation. These in turn<br />

relate to all aspects of the nuclear industry life cycle as well as the NORM industries and consequences of accidents /incidents.<br />

In reality, apart from one or two major exceptions in a few counties who have extensive budgets allocated to environmental<br />

remediation, we do not generally see a lot of real progress in the protection of human health and the environment from legacy issues.<br />

It is important therefore to determine why this is the case and if there is anything that can be undertaken to improve the situation.<br />

There are a number of reasons potentially leading to this lack of progress, namely;<br />

• A lack of available funding;<br />

• The diversion of funds to other issues deemed to be a greater priority;<br />

• No practical experience in resolving such problems;<br />

• Lack of established regulatory and/or procedural infrastructure.<br />

More often than not when environmental remediation challenges exist, the decision makers only tend to look for final solutions.<br />

If such final solutions cant be achieved, often because of funding restrictions, then little or no progress is generally made.<br />

However, there is the potential through…<br />

2) EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT MODELING IN THE US (w/oP- 59334)<br />

Paul Black, John Tauxe, Neptune and Company, Inc. (USA)<br />

Performance Assessment under DOE Orders and NRC regulations are evolving from the deterministic modeling that was performed<br />

in the 1990s, to the probabilistic modeling that is being performed in current PA efforts. This evolution has also seen a change<br />

from bottom-up process modeling to top-down system modeling, which is better suited for probabilistic modeling performed with<br />

the goal of supporting decision analysis. This evolution is presented, with a description of how process modeling can be used effectively<br />

to support system modeling, and how system modeling can be used effectively in a probabilistic environment to support PA<br />

decisions such as disposal optimization, closure, and long-term management and maintenance. The decision analysis process implied<br />

by this approach follows the basic tenets of Bayesian methods, the scientific method, and DOE’s as low as reasonably achievable<br />

process, and allows DOE’s performance assessment maintenance program to become operational and measurable. Technical nuances<br />

in this type of PA modeling such as uncertainty and sensitivity analysis methods that can be applied to such complex, dynamic, nonlinear,<br />

non-monotonic models, and issues associated with proper model scaling are also presented. Specific examples are presented<br />

from performance assessment modeling conducted at several radioactive waste disposal facilities in the US.<br />

SESSION 18 — ECONOMIC ANALYSES, MONITORING STRATEGIES AND PROJECT<br />

MANAGEMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (5.6)<br />

1) DELIVERING VALUE FOR MONEY - TRUST AND VERIFY? (wP-59253)<br />

Alastair Laird, Project Time & Cost Inc. (USA)<br />

Accurate estimates for national Environmental Management remediation work programmes are an essential ingredient of<br />

ensuring that plans can be adequately funded. They also form the basis of value measurement as the work is executed on an annual<br />

or programme basis. However, the inherent uncertainties of many of the EM and decommissioning tasks, both in terms of the<br />

technical challenges faced, options available, end states to be achieved; and the general risks and uncertainties associated with the<br />

hazard and its characterisation means that many estimates were always going to be subject of very high levels of uncertainty.<br />

In 2002 the United Kingdom Nuclear Liabilities Estimate was quoted as £48Bn when the government restructured the UK civil<br />

nuclear industry and set out the basis for forming what was to become the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). By 2005<br />

the NDA had assessed the costs as £56Bn but by 2008 the costs had significantly increased to £73Bn and continue to rise. How<br />

does this relate to the more immediate challenges of working off the plan and demonstrating Value for Money can be achieved in<br />

the near term? In parallel the US Department of Energy EM Office introduced its best-in-class initiative in 2007 – the…<br />

2) THE TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL OPTIMIZATION OF THE<br />

FRENCH GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY PROJECT (w/oP-59275)<br />

Rodolphe Raffard, Thibaud Labalette, Andra (France)<br />

The French Act of 28 June 2006 made the choice of reversible geological repository for long term management of high level<br />

and long-lived intermediate level waste. Andra is in charge of designing, building and operating the future industrial repository<br />

Cigéo. Current major issues consist in preparing the application to be examined in 2015, planning the construction so that operation<br />

would start in 2025 and optimizing the design on both technical and economical points of view.<br />

The Dossier 2005 -provided by Andra prior to the 2006 Act- established the feasibility of the project, especially towards compliance<br />

with safety and reversibility. Design options were presented at that time with the objective of demonstrating feasibility without<br />

ruling out possibilities of further optimization.<br />

Along with the scientific and technical review of Dossier 2005, a number of design optimization topics were identified in 2006.<br />

Working groups involved Andras specialists as well as external experts. A particular attention was given to (i) the industrial experience<br />

of waste producers and (ii) the characteristics of the clay layer investigated in the Meuse/Haute-Marne Underground<br />

Research Laboratory.<br />

The 2006 optimization topics were prioritized taking into account their economical impact and the development plan of the<br />

project. They have been implemented…<br />

78


Abstracts Session 19<br />

3) THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEM DEVELOPED WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK<br />

OF THE FRENCH RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEEP REPOSITORY PROJECT (w/oP-59296)<br />

Elisabeth Leclerc; Patrick Landais, Andra (France)<br />

In 2007, an environmental monitoring system, called the Observatoire Pérenne de lEnvironnement (OPE) was launched by<br />

Andra in order to establish the environmental initial state and to monitor ecosystems around the Meuse/Haute-Marne region (East<br />

of France), before the potential installation of a national deep repository of radioactive waste. The OPE aims to characterize an area<br />

covering 900 hundreds of kilometres and to follow environmental evolutions during exploitation, i.e. over 100 years.<br />

The OPE is associated to a comprehensive research and development program involving the deployment of important scientific<br />

tools covering all environmental compartments since several years. The objectives are:<br />

• to gather and analyse physical, chemical, biological and radiological data on the initial state of the environment including<br />

samples preservation from different areas (air, water, forest wildlife and flora, soils, agricultural food chain, etc.)<br />

• to assess the very long term evolution of the environmental quality;<br />

• to model elements biogeochemical cycles, mass and energy fluxes and to study interactions of processes between environmental<br />

areas;<br />

• to anticipate impacts from anthropogenic pressures (industrial, agricultural, climatic, on a local or global scale);<br />

• to study links between environment and human health.<br />

The OPE is currently developing large-scale scientific tools and collecting…<br />

SESSION 19 — POSTER SESSION: SPENT FUEL, FISSILE, TRANSURANIC<br />

AND HIGH LEVEL WASTE MANAGEMENT (2.1)<br />

1) ADONIS, HIGH COUNT RATE HP-GE Ƴ SPECTROMETRY ALGORITHM:<br />

IRRADIATED FUEL ASSEMBLY MEASUREMENT (wP-59234)<br />

Patrick Pin, AREVA NC; Eric Barat, Thomas Dautremer, Thierry Montagu, Stéphane Normand, CEA - Saclay (France)<br />

ADONIS is a digital system for gamma-ray spectrometry, developed by CEA. This system achieves high count-rate gammaray<br />

spectrometry with correct dynamic dead-time correction, up to, at least, more than an incoming count rate of 3:106 events per second.<br />

An application of such a system at AREVA NC’s La Hague plant is the irradiated fuel scanning facility before reprocessing.<br />

The ADONIS system is presented, then the measurement set-up and, last, the measurement results with reference measurements.<br />

2) TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND MODELLING OF<br />

TOPOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION FOR SITE CHARACTERISATION (wP-59171)<br />

Ryosuke Doke, Ken-ichi Yasue, Tadafumi Niizato, Akio Nakayasu, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

Geological hazard assessments are being used to make important decisions relevant to the constructing nuclear facilities such<br />

as repositories for deep geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste. With respect to such repositories, topographic evolution<br />

is a key issue for description of the long-term evolution of a groundwater flow characteristics in time spans of tens to hundreds<br />

of thousands of years. The construction of topographic evolution model is complex, involving tacit knowledge and working<br />

processes. Therefore, it is important to externalise, that is to explicitly present the tacit knowledge and decision-making processes<br />

used by experts in the model building unambiguously, with thorough documentation and to provide key knowledge to support planning<br />

and implementation of investigations.<br />

In this study, documentation of the technical know-how used for the construction of a topographic evolution model is demonstrated.<br />

The process followed in the construction of the model is illustrated using task-flow logic diagrams; the process involves<br />

four main tasks with several subtasks. The task-flow for an investigation to estimate uplift rates is also illustrated linked to the taskflow<br />

for the modelling of topographic evolution. In addition, the decision-making processes in the investigation are expressed in<br />

logical IF-THEN format for each task. Based on the documented…<br />

3) VALIDATION OF CORRELATIONS BETWEEN ND ISOTOPES AND DIFFICULT-TO-MEASURE NUCLIDES<br />

PREDICTED WITH BURN-UP CALCULATION CODE BY POST IRRADIATION EXAMINATION (wP-59086)<br />

Shiho Asai, Keisuke Okumura, Yukiko Hanzawa, Hideya Suzuki, Masaaki Toshimitsu, Jun Inagawa, Takaumi Kimura,<br />

Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Satoru Kaneko, Kensuke Suzuki, Tokyo Electric Power Company (Japan)<br />

Correlations between Nd isotopes and difficult-to-measure (DTM) nuclides, such as Se-79, Tc-99, Sn-126, and Cs-135, predicted<br />

using a calculation code have been validated by postirradiation examination (PIE). The calculation was performed with a<br />

burnup calculation code, MVP-BURN, using the updated nuclear data library JENDL-4.0. An irradiated PWR fuel with a burnup<br />

of 44.9 GWd/t and a cooling time of 7458 days was used as a standard sample. The concentrations of Nd isotopes in the sample<br />

solutions were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after purification by two consecutive anionexchange<br />

separations. The ratios of Se-79 and Cs-135 to Nd isotopes (Nd-145, Nd-146, and Nd-145+Nd-146) calculated using<br />

MVP-BURN were in good agreement with PIE values within the deviations of 8% and 6%, respectively. This indicates that these<br />

calculated ratios are applicable to the scaling factors of Se-79 and Cs-135. For Tc-99 and Sn-126, the calculated values were respectively<br />

about 50% and 20% higher than the PIE values. These overestimations were mainly caused by the lack of the contribution<br />

of an insoluble residue to the measured concentrations.<br />

79


Session 19 Abstracts<br />

4) COMPUTATIONAL STUDY FOR INVENTORY ESTIMATION OF SE-79, TC-99, SN-126, AND CS-135 IN HIGH-<br />

LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM SPENT NUCLEAR FUELS OF LIGHT WATER REACTORS (wP-59087)<br />

Keisuke Okumura, Shiho Asai, Yukiko Hanzawa, Tsutomu Okamoto, Hideya Suzuki, Masaaki Toshimitsu,<br />

Jun Inagawa, Takaumi Kimura, Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Satoru Kaneko,<br />

Kensuke Suzuki, Tokyo Electric Power Company (Japan)<br />

Inventory estimation of long-lived fission products (LLFPs) in high-level radioactive wastes (HLW) from spent nuclear fuels<br />

of light water reactors is important for a safety assessment of their disposal. In order to develop an inventory estimation method of<br />

difficult-to-measure LLFPs (Se-79, Tc-99, Sn-126, and Cs-135), a parametric study was carried out by using a sophisticated burnup<br />

calculation code and data. In the parametric study, fuel specifications and irradiation conditions are changed in the conceivable<br />

range. The considered parameters are fuel assembly types (PWR / BWR), U-235 enrichment, moderator temperature, void fraction,<br />

power density, and so on. From the calculated results, we clarify the burnup characteristics of the target LLFPs and their possible<br />

ranges of generations. <strong>Final</strong>ly, candidates of the key nuclide are proposed for the scaling factor method of HLW.<br />

5) INDUSTRIAL SCALE HL-LL WASTE CANISTER TRANSFER DEMONSTRATOR (wP-59305)<br />

Pascal Champ, Jacques Bardet, Benjamin Attias, Cegelec (France)<br />

In 2007, Cegelec has been attributed a contract by ANDRA under the ESDRED program (Engineering Studies and Demonstrations<br />

of Repository Designs) financed by 13 organisations across Europe, for the design, manufacturing and trial test of a full scale<br />

industrial demonstrator of HL-LL waste canister transfer system.<br />

Completed in 2009, this project gives a good synthesis of solutions the industry can offer in order to manage HLW transportation<br />

with regard to deep geological disposal.<br />

This paper highlights solutions developed and results achieved with numerous pictures of the actual system.<br />

6) CESAR5.3: AN INDUSTRIAL TOOL FOR IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL<br />

AND WASTE CHARACTERISATION, WITH AN ASSOCIATED QUALIFICATION (w/oP-59080)<br />

Jean-Marc Vidal, Romain Eschbach, Commissariat à lÉnergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives;<br />

Agnes Launay, Christophe Binet, AREVA_NC (France)<br />

CESAR (Simplified Evolution Code Applied to Reprocessing) is a depletion code developed between CEA and AREVA. This<br />

code was first used in the La Hague reprocessing plant Laboratories in 1980, to confirm the nuclear data experimental measurements.<br />

The use of the CESAR code was then extended to the characterizations of various type of irradiated nuclear fuel (PWR/UOx<br />

URE and MOx ; BWR/UOx and MOx ; MTR and Fast Reactors) and the associated produced waste. The code can distinguish more<br />

than 100 heavy nuclides, 200 fission products and 150 activation products (in particular Tritium and Helium generation are included).<br />

Both the fuel and its structural materials can be characterized. The CESAR code can also perform depletion calculations from<br />

3 months to 1 million years of cooling time.<br />

The updated version of the code is related to the harmonization between nuclear data and calculation schemes (APOLLO2)<br />

based on the JEFF3.1.1 nuclear data library. The current features allow fast characterizations for both irradiated fuel and waste, calculating:<br />

material balance, activity, decay heat, neutron source and spectrum, radiotoxicity source, gamma and alpha source and<br />

their respective spectrum. The CESAR code can also calculate the coefficients used in nuclear material transport and in classification<br />

of…<br />

7) TEST PROCEDURE WITH A 15,000 KG HALF-SCALE PROTOTYPE<br />

OF TRANSPORT AND STORAGE CASK (w/oP-59141)<br />

Andre Musolff, Thomas Quercetti,<br />

Karsten Müller, BAM - Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (Germany)<br />

BAM is the competent authority for mechanical and thermal safety assessment of transport packages for spent fuel and high<br />

level waste in Germany. In context with the package design approval procedure for transport and storage of new German cask several<br />

drop test series were performed by BAM with a half-scale prototype.<br />

The test program comprised a sequence of a total of 18 drop tests with different drop orientations, drop heights and temperatures.<br />

The sequence of testing in the program consisted of a number of nine-meter free drop onto an unyielding target and several<br />

drops from one meter onto a steel puncture bar. In order to cause maximum damage on the package various drop orientations were<br />

performed according to the most severe drop position as well as most sensitive parts of the container.<br />

The subsequent release of radioactive substances must not exceed a value specified in the dangerous goods transport regulations.<br />

Radiation shielding and nuclear safety has to be guaranteed. The prototype was tested under normal and accident conditions<br />

of transport in the 200 tons BAM drop test facility at BAM Test Site Technical Safety.<br />

Extensive test methods as well as comprehensive measurement data are presented within the complexity of performed drop test<br />

procedures.<br />

8) CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS WITH LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENT DETECTION METHOD USING<br />

HIGHLY EMISSIVE PROBES FOR ANALYSIS OF ACTINIDES IN RADIOACTIVE WASTES (wP-59092)<br />

Tomoko Haraga, Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Yuta Nakano, Masami Shibukawa, Saitama University; Yutaka Kameo,<br />

Kuniaki Takahashi, Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Shingo Saito, Saitama University (Japan)<br />

For the safe disposal of radioactive wastes, it is indispensable to evaluate radioactivity concentration in each waste package.<br />

Actinides are important nuclides for the safety analysis of radioactive wastes from nuclear fuel cycle facilities. In order to analyze<br />

many kinds of waste samples, a simple, fast and highly sensitive analytical method for actinides is required. While capillary electrophoresis<br />

(CE) has been employed for the analysis of ionic species including actinide ions with advantage of the high separation<br />

efficiency and simpleness so far, there is no report for CE method providing high sensitivity amenable to practical use, to our<br />

knowledge. In this study, an approach to develop new emissive probes for actinide ions using CE-laser-induced fluorescent detection<br />

(LIF) was made for the first time. The separation and detection of neptunium (Np-237) and americium (Am-243) was exam-<br />

80


Abstracts Session 19<br />

ined as a model nuclide using several new emissive complexing probes, each of which possesses a fluorophore (fluorescein) and a<br />

different chelating moiety (hexa-octadentate, and acyclic or macrocyclic polyaminocarboxylate). Applying the actinide-probe complexes<br />

to a pre-capillary complexation technique, in which an emissive probe was mixed to a sample solution before electrophoresis<br />

without addition of the emissive probe to the carrier electrolyte, the highly sensitive fluorescent detection…<br />

9) A NEW WAY OF ELIMINATING TRIBUTYLPHOSPHATE AND DODECANE MIXTURES<br />

USING ADVANCED OXIDATION TECHNIQUES (w/oP-59104)<br />

Geraldine Dupuy, DEWDROPS (France)<br />

Tributylphosphate (TBP)/dodecane mixtures are widely used as extraction solvents in the PUREX process. The process is well<br />

known as an efficient method for Uranium and Plutonium recovery from spent nuclear fuel. After undergoing several cycles, the<br />

performance of the PUREX process is impaired by chemical and radiolytic damage to the TBP and dodecane molecules. The used<br />

extraction solvent becomes an organic nuclear waste for which disposal options are scarce. Currently, the dodecane can be recycled<br />

or incinerated after TBP removal to limit corrosion problems. However, the separation of the two solvents still leaves untreated<br />

extraction products that accumulate awaiting a satisfactory disposal solution.<br />

Dewdrops has developed and optimized a treatment based on advanced oxidation techniques that provides an elegant and costeffective<br />

solution particularly well adapted to small arisings of complex mixtures originating from the PUREX process. The organic<br />

waste is completely mineralized yielding only effluents for which disposal routes are already available. The patented oxidation<br />

process uses the combination of hydrogen peroxide and UV-C radiation with or without a catalyst to produce hydroxyl radicals<br />

capable of mineralizing organic matter to carbon dioxide and water. The performance of the process has been proven in an experimental<br />

set up comprising a 14…<br />

10) THE FP7 COLLABORATIVE PROJECT RECOSY (w/oP-59397)<br />

Gunnar Buckau, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Joint Research Center, European Union;<br />

Anne Delos, Vanessa Montoya, Amphos 21 (Germany/France/Spain)<br />

The Collaborative Project REdox phenomena Controlling SYstems (RECOSY) started in 2008 falls within the EURATOM<br />

program and is implemented within the 7th Framework <strong>Program</strong>.<br />

The main objective of ReCosy is the sound understanding of redox phenomena controlling the long-term release/retention of<br />

radionuclides in nuclear waste disposal providing tools to apply the results to Performance Assessment/Safety Case.<br />

Although redox is not a new issue, different questions are still not resolved, such as, redox processes in the long-term dissolution/chemical<br />

transformation of the radioactive waste, waste packages and engineered barriers, and migration in the far-field,<br />

including which species are formed and their respective various retention mechanisms. In order to solve this questions, the project<br />

includes i) development of advanced analytical tools, ii) investigations of processes responsible for redox control (thermodynamically<br />

and kinetically controlled processes, surface reactions and microbial processes), iii) provision of required data on redox controlling<br />

processes, and iv) response to internal/external disturbances in disposal systems to internal/external disturbances.<br />

The work program of the project is structured along six Research and Technological Development workpackages. Specific<br />

workpackages on knowledge management, education and training (WP7) and administrative management issues (WP8) are also<br />

included in the project. In WP1, the scientific state-of-the-art and its application to Performance Assessment/Safety Case is documented<br />

and regularly up-dated, based on the safety case of the ANDRA B2 cell. WP2 deals with the development and testing of<br />

redox determination methods using different type of electrodes as well…<br />

11) TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW OF SITE DESCRIPTIVE MODELING FOR SITE CHARACTERIZATION (wP-59089)<br />

Hiromitsu Saegusa, Tadafumi Niizato, Ken-ichi Yasue, Hironori Onoe,<br />

Ryosuke Doke, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

The site descriptive model covering the current status of characteristics of geological environment and the site evolution model<br />

for estimation of the long-term evolution of site conditions are used to integrate multi-disciplinary investigation results. It is important<br />

to evaluate uncertainties in the models, to specify issues regarding the uncertainties and to prioritize the resolution of specified<br />

issues, for the planning of site characterization.<br />

There is a large quantity of technical know-how in the modeling process. It is important to record the technical know-how with<br />

transparency and traceability, since site characterization projects generally need long duration. The transfer of the technical knowhow<br />

accumulated in the research and development (R&D) phase to the implementation phase is equally important.<br />

The aim of this study is to support the planning of initial surface-based site characterizations based on the technical know-how<br />

accumulated from the underground research laboratory projects. These projects are broad scientific studies of the deep geological<br />

environment and provide a technical basis for the geological disposal of high-level radioactive wastes. In this study, a comprehensive<br />

task flow from acquisition of existing data to planning of field investigations through the modeling has been specified. Specific<br />

task flow and decision-making process to perform the tasks have been specified.<br />

81


Session 20 Abstracts<br />

12) A COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR EUROPEAN DISPOSAL R&D<br />

(INMAN): A PROPOSAL FOR THE NEXT EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK PROGRAM (w/oP-59397)<br />

Gunnar Buckau, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Joint Research Center, European Union;<br />

Anne Delos, Vanessa Montoya, Amphos 21 (Germany/France/Spain)<br />

ABSTRACT NOT AVAILABLE<br />

13) DEVELOPMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE TECHNIQUES FOR COASTAL SITE<br />

CHARACTERIZATION: INTEGRATED PALAEOHYDROGEOLOGICAL APPROACH<br />

FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SITE EVOLUTION MODELS (wP-59259)<br />

Kenji Amano, Tadafumi Niizato, Kunio Ota, Japan Atomic Energy Agency; Bill Lanyon, Nagra;<br />

W Russell Alexander, Bedrock Geosciences (Japan/Switzerland)<br />

Radioactive waste repository designs consist of multiple safety barriers which include the waste form, the canister, the engineered<br />

barriers and the geosphere. In many waste programmes, it is considered that the three most important safety features provided<br />

by the geosphere are mechanical stability, favourable geochemical conditions and low groundwater flux. To guarantee that a<br />

repository site will provide such conditions for timescales of relevance to the safety assessment, any repository site characterisation<br />

has to not only define whether these features will function appropriately today, but also to assess if they will remain adequate<br />

up to several thousand to hundreds of thousand years into the future, depending on the repository type.<br />

In general, this is done by studying the palaeohydrogeological evolution of a site, defining the temporal and spatial changes of<br />

various properties and processes. These may include geology, hydrogeology, hydrochemistry and site tectonics, including uplift and<br />

erosion processes. These key aspects are studied to build up a conceptual model for the overall site evolution over geological time,<br />

up to the present and this is used to define the likely future evolution of the site and to assess if the main safety features will continue<br />

to function adequately.<br />

The collaborative programme…<br />

SESSION 20 — PANEL: CHALLENGES WHEN SELECTING DISPOSAL OPTIONS IN THE LIGHT<br />

OF THE NEW IAEA CLASSIFICATION SCHEME (1.17)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 21 — PANEL: CONTRIBUTION AND COMPLEMENTARITIES OF INTERIM STORAGE,<br />

GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, PARTITIONING & TRANSMUTATION REVERSIBILITY REGARDING<br />

GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF RADWASTE MANAGEMENT (2.15)<br />

NEW NUCLEAR PROGRAMMES MUST NOT NEGLECT WASTE MANAGEMENT (wP-59077)<br />

Charles McCombie, Arius Association (Switzerland)<br />

Many established nuclear power programmes have learned to their dismay that waste management and disposal are not tasks<br />

that can be postponed at will if public and political acceptance is a prerequisite for progress. In fact, some programmes that recognised<br />

this back in the 1970s and 1980s moved into leading positions in repository development. This happened, for example, in<br />

Sweden and Switzerland where already in the 1970s Laws were passed specifying that safe disposal must be demonstarted before<br />

new nuclear plants could opersate. In recent years, it has become recognised that, in order to ensure that the radioactive wastes in<br />

any country are managed safely, it is necessary to have an established legislative and regulatory framework and also to create the<br />

necessary organizations for implementation and for oversight of waste management operations and facility development. Guidance<br />

on these issues is given in the Joint Convention and a number of other IAEA documents. The IAEA, and also the EC, have in addition<br />

published key overarching advisory documents for new nuclear programmes. These are useful for strategic planning but, when<br />

it comes to actual implementation projects, the advice tends to imply that all nuclear programmes, however large or small, should<br />

be pressing…<br />

SESSION 22 — PANEL: CONTRIBUTION AND COMPLEMENTARITIES OF INTERIM STORAGE,<br />

GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, PARTITIONING & TRANSMUTATION REVERSIBILITY REGARDING<br />

GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF RADWASTE MANAGEMENT (2.15)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 23 — ADVANCED L/ILW CONDITIONING TECHNOLOGIES - PART 1 OF 2 (1.11)<br />

1) CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />

WITHIN IAEA COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT (wP-59021)<br />

Zoran Drace, IAEA; Michael Ojovan, University of Sheffield (Austria/UK)<br />

The IAEA Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on cementitious materials for radioactive waste management was launched in<br />

2007. The objective of CRP was to investigate the behaviour and performance of cementitious materials used in radioactive waste<br />

management system with various purposes and included waste packages, wasteforms and backfills as well as investigation of interactions<br />

and interdependencies of these individual elements during long term storage and disposal. The specific research topics considered<br />

were: (i) cementitious materials for radioactive waste packaging: including radioactive waste immobilization into a solid<br />

waste form, (ii) waste backfilling and containers; (iii) emerging and alternative cementitious systems; (iv) physical-chemical<br />

processes occurring during the hydration and ageing of cement matrices and their influence on the cement matrix quality; (v) methods<br />

of production of cementitious materials for: immobilization into wasteform, backfills and containers; (vi) conditions envisaged<br />

82


Abstracts Session 24<br />

in the disposal environment for packages (physical and chemical conditions, temperature variations, groundwater, radiation fields);<br />

(vii) testing and non-destructive monitoring techniques for quality assurance of cementitious materials; (viii) waste acceptance criteria<br />

for waste packages, waste forms and backfills; transport, long term storage and disposal requirements; and finally (ix) modelling<br />

or simulation of long term behaviours of cementations materials used for packaging, waste immobilization and backfilling,…<br />

2) ELUTION BEHAVIOR OF HEAVY METALS FROM CEMENT SOLIDIFIED PRODUCTS<br />

OF INCINERATED ASH WASTE (wP-59102)<br />

Yoshihiro Meguro, Yoshimi Kawato, Takuya Nakayama,Osamu Tomioka,<br />

Motoyuki Mitsuda, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

Combustible radioactive wastes generated from the operation of nuclear facilities are incinerated for volume reduction in<br />

Japan. In Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) the incinerated ash is planned to be solidified using cement and to be buried in the<br />

ground. Incinerated ashes with various compositions and properties are generated because there are facilities of several kinds of<br />

types such as reactors, nuclear fuel cycle facilities, and hot laboratories in JAEA. And also a small amount of heavy metal, which<br />

is hazardous chemical substance for environment, is also included in the incinerated ash.<br />

The authors push forward a study to determine conditions to produce solidified products of the incinerated ash with cement.<br />

Here relationships between solidification conditions and solidification characteristics have been investigated. The solidification<br />

conditions are the ash composition, cement materials, ash filling rate and water/cement ratio, and the solidification characteristics<br />

are including curing rate and expansion behavior. And also characteristics of the solidified product have been studied, these are<br />

compressive strength, elution behavior of radionuclides and the heavy metals from the solidified products, gas generation by radiolysis,<br />

and so on.<br />

In the present paper, our recent results about the elution behavior of the hazardous heavy metals from synthetic solidified…<br />

3)IMMOBILISATION OF RADWASTE IN SYNTHETIC ROCK: AN ALTERNATIVE TO CEMENTATION (w/P-59008)<br />

Bernard Rottner, Onet Technologies (France)<br />

SOGETER is a waste conditioning process for Low Level radwaste (LLW) or Intermediate Level radwaste (ILW) like sludge,<br />

soil, ashes, evaporator concentrate, concrete rubble, asbestos, sand, & Usually such radioactive waste is solidified into a cement<br />

matrix, resulting in a factor 2 to 5 volume increase: 1 m3 of initial raw waste generates 2 to 5 m3 of solidified waste.<br />

Sogeter consists in melting the waste at high temperature, up to 2000 K, and producing a synthetic rock. The main component<br />

of the matrix is the waste itself; therefore 1 m3 of initial raw waste generates only 0.2 to 0.5 m3 of solidified waste.<br />

Compared to cementation, synthetic rock decreases the volume to be disposed of by a factor of 4 to 25.<br />

By mixing different types of waste, or using additives, the composition of the waste is adjusted, so that a fluid melt is obtained<br />

at temperatures less than 2000 K, and so that the final 200 L ingot may be cooled down within 2 days, without shattering or disaggregating.<br />

We tested a wide range of compositions, demonstrating that almost every type of waste may be conditioned with Sogeter.<br />

We designed the industrial facility, based on a very robust and…<br />

SESSION 24 — L/ILW WASTE CHARACTERIZATION, ASSAY, AND TRACKING SYSTEMS - PART 1 OF 2 (1.7)<br />

1) A PROPOSED FIGURE OF MERIT FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE<br />

OF RADIATION IDENTIFICATION AND DETECTION SYSTEMS (wP-59159)<br />

Ronald Keyser, Timothy Twomey, ORTEC - AMETEK; Michael D. Belbot, Thermo Fisher Scientific;<br />

Neil Andrew Webster, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Radiation Measurement & Security Instruments (USA)<br />

The instruments used to monitor the radioactive content of waste materials, either in container monitors, hand held radiation<br />

detectors, or mobile analysis systems, are constructed of widely different ways with widely varying detector materials and analysis<br />

software. However, within the various groupings (e.g., automatic waste monitors), all instruments are expected to solve the same<br />

problem, that is, to detect and identify any radioactive material present according to the prescribed investigation methods. The best<br />

way to compare the performance of different instruments is with a numerical score or Figure of Merit (FOM). The FOM must quantity<br />

the performance of the instrument with respect to false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN). The minimization of FN for<br />

certain radionuclides (e.g., uranium and plutonium or SNM) is more important than the minimization of FN for non-threat nuclides<br />

(e.g., low NORM). Likewise, the minimization of FP for SNM is also more important than falsely reporting the common NORM<br />

nuclides. The performance depends on the details of the testing, so the analysis conditions must also be included in the statement<br />

of the FOM. A FOM has been developed based on the number of true positives (TP), the number of false important positives (FIP),<br />

the number…<br />

2) CHARACTERIZATION OF LEGACY LOW LEVEL WASTE AT THE SVAFO<br />

FACILITY USING GAMMA NON-DESTRUCTIVE ASSAY AND X-RAY<br />

NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES (wP-59289)<br />

Stephen Halliwell, VJ Technologies Inc;<br />

Gary Mottershead, VJ Technologies Inc; Fredrik Ekenborg (USA/France/Sweden)<br />

Over 7000 drums containing legacy, low level radioactive waste are stored at four SVAFO facilities on the Studsvik site which<br />

is located near Nyköping, Sweden. The vast majority of the waste drums (>6000) were produced between 1969 and 1979. The<br />

remainder were produced from 1980 onwards.<br />

Characterization of the waste was achieved using a combination of non-destructive techniques via mobile equipment located<br />

in the AU building at the Studsvik site. Each drum was weighed and a dose rate measurement was recorded. Gamma spectroscopy<br />

was used to measure and estimate radionuclide content. Real time xray examination was performed to identify such prohibited<br />

items as free liquids.<br />

83


Session 24 Abstracts<br />

3) CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF A WIDE RANGE SEGMENTED GAMMA RAY SCANNING<br />

INSTRUMENTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF LOW AND INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE (wP-59304)<br />

John Mason, A. N. Technology Ltd.;<br />

Kapila Fernando, ANSTO, Australia Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (UK/Australia)<br />

This paper describes the design and operation of a Wide Range Segmented Gamma ray Scanning (WR-SGS) assay instrument<br />

for the measurement of both Low and Intermediate Level Waste (LLW and ILW) in 200 liter drums. The instrument employs a single<br />

shielded and collimated high purity germanium (HPGe) detector to quantify the radionuclide content of the waste. A novel feature<br />

of the instrument is the use of an automated variable aperture collimator, which allows the vertical segment height to be adjusted.<br />

Conventional SGS measurements may be performed where the drum is rotated and measured in vertical segments. Alternatively,<br />

faster measurement can be made using continuous helical scanning of the drum as it rotates. Intermediate level waste drums,<br />

with significant surface dose rates, can be measured through the use of the variable aperture collimator. A gamma ray emitting transmission<br />

source is used to correct for waste density. In place of a conventional shutter, the shielded transmission source is moved to<br />

a shielded storage position to eliminate background radiation arising from the transmission source. Using this approach, higher<br />

activity transmission sources may be used in order to achieve adequate density corrections for higher density drums.<br />

These new features makes the WR-SGS suitable for…<br />

4) PERFORMANCE OF A DRUMSCAN® HRGS SOLO SCANNER FOR THE ASSAY<br />

OF LEGACY WASTE AT THE BELGOPROCESS SITE (wP-59122)<br />

Daniel Parvin, Babcock International Group; Thomas Huys, Belgoprocess, Dessel, (UK/Belgium)<br />

On the sites of Belgoprocess several thousands of drums containing conditioned legacy waste are stored. A significant number<br />

of these waste packages are 220 litre drums containing radioactive waste embedded into inactive bitumen. Most of the radioactive<br />

waste in these drums was generated during the development and production of MOX-fuels and the operation of the Eurochemic<br />

reprocessing plant. The current state of a number of these packages is no longer acceptable for long term interim storage. In order<br />

to make the waste packages acceptable for interim storage a repackaging process was developed. The process involves the re-packaging<br />

of the waste items into 400 or 700 litre waste drums and a non-destructive gamma-ray assay (NDA) measurement performed<br />

on the new package. The aim of the NDA measurement is to detect significant quantities of fissile material in order to demonstrate<br />

compliance with the operational limits of the storage building. Since the waste items are destined for geological disposal, there is<br />

no specific need for a detection limit in the order of milligrams of plutonium as required for surface disposal.<br />

To meet this NDA requirement Babcock International Group supplied, calibrated and commissioned an open geometry version<br />

from its HRGS product range. The DrumScan®…<br />

SESSION 25 — D&D OF NON-REACTOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES (3.10)<br />

1) DECOMMISSIONING THE BELGONUCLEAIRE DESSEL MOX PLANT: PRESENTATION<br />

OF THE PROJECT AND SITUATION ON 30/06/2011 (wP-59027)<br />

Jean-Marie Cuchet, Carlo Verheyen, Henri Libon, Belgonucleaire; Jos Custers, Tecnubel; Robert Walthery,<br />

Belgoprocess; Jozef Bily, Studsvik (Germany)<br />

BELGONUCLEAIRE has been operating the Dessel MOX plant at industrial scale between 1986 and 2006. In this period, 40<br />

metric tons of plutonium (HM) have been processed into 90 reloads of MOX fuel for commercial light water reactors. The decision<br />

to stop the production in 2006 and to decommission the MOX plant was the result of the shrinkage of the MOX fuel market<br />

owing to political and customers factors.<br />

As a significant part of the decommissioning project of the Dessel MOX plant, about 170 medium-sized glove boxes and about<br />

1.300 metric tons of structure and equipment outside the glove boxes are planned for dismantling.<br />

The license for the dismantling of the MOX plant was granted by Royal Decree in 2008 and the dismantling started in March<br />

2009; the dismantling works are executed by an integrated organization under leadership and responsibility of BELGONUCLE-<br />

AIRE with 3 main contractors, namely Tecnubel N.V., the THV Belgoprocess / SCK•CEN and Studsvik GmbH<br />

In this paper, after having described the main characteristics of the project, the authors introduce the different organisational<br />

and technical options considered for the decommissioning of the glove boxes, and the main decision criteria (qualification of personnel<br />

and of processes, confinement, cutting techniques…<br />

2) URANIUM WORKSHOPS DISMANTLING AND CRITICALITY CONTROL (wP-59060)<br />

Pierre Lisbonne, Julie Rosello, CEA (France)<br />

Within the CEA at Cadarache Research Center located in southern France, the ATUE, standing for Ateliers de Traitement de<br />

lUranium Enrichi (Enriched Uranium Treatment Workshops), is a nuclear facility started in 1965, and shut down in 1995.<br />

Various chemical processes were in operation in the ATUE in order to product enriched uranium oxide intended for fast breeders<br />

and naval propulsion reactors.<br />

According to the mass of fissile material, the most contaminated process equipment has already been dismantled under criticality<br />

risk management procedures. Cleanup of the building and dismantling of the remaining equipment, such as ventilation and<br />

electricity network, are now in progress without any constraint regarding criticality, thanks to in site measurement and calculations.<br />

Criticality management and how we finally proved the risk was over, as well as the strategy under French rules for final decommissioning<br />

of the facility leading to brown field will be presented.<br />

84


Abstracts Session 25<br />

3) THE COMPLEX CHALLENGE OF REFURBISHING THE POND GANTRY STEELWORK<br />

WHICH SUPPORTS THE POND SKIP HANDLER ABOVE THE FIRST GENERATION<br />

MAGNOX STORAGE POND AT SELLAFIELD (wP-59133)<br />

Ian Richardson, Sellafield (UK)<br />

The First Generation Magnox Fuel Storage Pond (FGMSP) provided fuel storage and decanning capability from the early<br />

1960s until 1986.<br />

A significant programme of work has been underway since the completion of operational activities to support the programmes<br />

strategic intent of retrieving and storing all legacy wastes, and remediating the structure of the plant to support decommissioning<br />

activities.<br />

A key enabler to the retrievals programme is the Pond Skip Handler Machine (SHM), removed from service in 2002 following<br />

the discovery of significant signs of corrosion, an inevitable consequence of being located in a coastal, salt laden environment.<br />

The SHM provides sole capability to access and retrieve the inventory of the fuel skips in the pond. It is also fundamental to<br />

future operations and the deployment of desludging equipment to recover bulk sludges from the pond floor.<br />

This paper will examine the challenges faced by the team as they successfully defined, planned and executed remedial work<br />

to a specific aspect of the civil structure, the SHM gantry rail system, using a purpose built refurbishment platform; the Gantry<br />

Refurbishment System.<br />

The paper will examine how an innovative approach was adopted to resolve the related issues of:<br />

• Refurbishing an aged structure to….<br />

4) SYSTEMATIC CHEMICAL DECONTAMINATION USING IF7 GAS (wP-59036)<br />

Haruhi Hata, Kaoru Yokoyama, Noritake Sugitsue, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

Since 1979, Uranium enrichment technology has been researched through the gas centrifuge method, at Ningyo-toge Environmental<br />

Engineering Center of Japan Atomic Energy Agency(JAEA). In addition, the Demonstration Plant, that is final stage test<br />

facilities, was operating continuously from 1988 to 2001.<br />

As a result, a lot of residues accumulated in the plant. Most of this accumulation was found be uranium intermediate fluoride.<br />

The basic decommission policy of JAEA is that equipments of gas centrifuge will be decontaminated by sulfuric acid immersion<br />

method for clearance and reuse.<br />

In our plan, approximately 90% of metals will be cleared and reused, and then the remaining 10% will be disposed of radioactive<br />

waste.<br />

We propose a combination of sulfuric acid immersion method and the systematic chemical decontamination as an efficient<br />

method for decontamination of uranium enrichment facilities. This paper focuses on the method and performance of systematic<br />

chemical decontamination using IF7gas. The following (Figure 1)shows our decommission policy and position of systematic chemical<br />

decontamination by IF7gas for uranium enrichment plant...<br />

5) DECOMMISSIONING & DEMOLITION OF FACILITIES USED FOR THE STORAGE<br />

& STABILISATION OF WATER REACTOR SLUDGE (wP-59097)<br />

Nicholas J. Brown, Rowland Cornell, Nuvia Limited; Andy Staples, RSRL (UK)<br />

Nuvia Limited was contracted to design, build and operate a waste treatment plant to stabilise a quantity of about 300m3 of<br />

active sludge stored in the External Active Storage Tanks (EAST) at the former United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority<br />

(UKAEA) research site at Winfrith, UK. At the end of this process both the old and new plants are to be decommissioned and<br />

demolished with the minimisation of waste material volumes. The sludge was produced in the Steam Generating Heavy Water<br />

Reactor (SGHWR) during 30 years of operation, which is now in the early stages of decommissioning. As part of the reorganisation<br />

of UKAEA responsibility for the site now lies with RSRL (Research Sites Restoration Limited) with funding provided by the<br />

Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA).<br />

The process of stabilisation of the SGHWR sludge from the EAST tanks within 500 litre stainless steel drums in the newly<br />

constructed Winfrith EAST Treatment Plant (WETP) was completed in March 2010. Now that these operations have been completed,<br />

the plant has entered a full decommissioning phase since no further work on any other waste materials have been identified by<br />

the client.<br />

This paper describes the development of a decommissioning plan for the mixture of old…<br />

6) DECOMMISSIONING OF THE RADIO CHEMICAL HOT LABORATORY OF THE<br />

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE OF ISPRA (wP-59207)<br />

Daniele Ugolini, Francesco Rossi, Francesco Basile, European Commission Joint Research Centre (Italy)<br />

The construction of the Radio Chemical Hot Laboratory (RCHL) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of Ispra began in the early<br />

1960s while the laboratory activities started in 1964. In 1976 an annex to the main building was built. At this time the RCHL main<br />

research activities were in environment and biochemistry by means of radioactive tracers; neutron activation analyses; extraction<br />

of actinides from radioactive liquid waste coming from the nuclear fuel reprocessing plants; and analyses of U, Pu, and Th in samples<br />

from the nuclear fuel cycle in order to determine the isotopic ratio and the burn-up. In 1978, a new area of laboratories named<br />

Stabularium was built to study the metabolism of heavy metal on laboratory animals. Complementary to the laboratory three pneumatic<br />

transfer systems for irradiated sources connected the RCHL to two research reactors.<br />

The decommissioning activities of the 2650 m2 facility started in January 2008 and they were completed at the end of 2010<br />

with the release for unrestricted use of all the buildings of the facility. They consisted in five main tasks: pre-decommissioning,<br />

licensing, dismantling, waste management, and final survey. The main pre-decommissioning activities were the physical and radiological<br />

characterization of the facility. The principal…<br />

85


Session 26 Abstracts<br />

7) A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION FROM OPERATING TO DISMANTLING<br />

A UO2-PUO2 FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY (w/oP-59326)<br />

Thierry Flament, AREVA NC (France)<br />

After fabricating plutonium fuels for 40 years (Fast bredder reactor, Mox), commercial operations at the AREVA Cadarache<br />

plant ended in 2003 and post operation clean out of its production building and laboratory started. AREVAs objective is to achieve<br />

the clean-up of the process facilities and to transfer them to their owner, the French Atomic Energy Commission. The completion<br />

of this operation demonstrates the possibility to dismantle plutonium fuel fabrication facility and the possibility to reuse the facilities.<br />

The facilities to be dismantled by AREVA at Cadarache include:<br />

About 420 glove boxes containing various types of equipment (process equipment for nuclear fuel fabrication, analytical equipment<br />

to characterize fabricated fuel, process equipment to recover valuable materials (Uranium and plutonium) and calcine liquid<br />

effluent),<br />

• About 40 storage tanks<br />

• 3 major steps in this large D&D programme<br />

• Recovery of fissile materials left in the facility led by a project team:<br />

• 25 metric tons of mixed oxide materials in the various glove boxes / storage were recovered in less than 5 years...<br />

SESSION 26 — D&D TECHNOLOGIES - PART 1 OF 2 (3.4)<br />

1) DISMANTLING/REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED SUMP<br />

IN RUNNING PLANT CONDITIONS (w/oP-59053)<br />

Jos Boussu, Koen Lenie, Tecnubel (Belgium)<br />

A sump in the RPE circuit in the EDF - Nuclear Power Plant of Cruas-Meysse, showed a extremely high radiation dose rate<br />

since 2007.<br />

Different attempts to decontaminate the sump did not have the desired effect.<br />

The sump is a so-called gatte where two flows of different fluida circulates. A chemical flow transverses the sump within stainless<br />

steel piping, the second flow which is (contaminated) residual water, flows through this sump in contact with the sumps walls.<br />

The dose rate was estimated at 20 Sv/h, and it was presumed being a single hotspot in the dead zone of the sump, where no<br />

chemicals from the chemical decontamination attempts, and no high pressure water contact had been possible, or had any effect.<br />

To protect the maintenance and exploitation people from the radiation, the sump had been protected with a physical protection<br />

system, named a sarcophage. The client asked to leave this protection system, which was modular, on place during the dismantling<br />

works to assure its radiation protection function.<br />

The paper describes the remote controlled dismantling of the sump within the particular running conditions of the power plant,<br />

the developments made to the equipment, and the conditions in which the works had to be carried out.<br />

Some lessons learnt and particular points of attention are revealed to complete this paper.<br />

2) NEW DEGREASING FORMULATIONS FOR THE DECONTAMINATION OF SOLID SUBSTRATES,<br />

CONSISTENT WITH VITRIFICATION PROCESS OF THE FINAL WASTES (w/oP-59166)<br />

Jeremy Causse, Cyril Roussignol, French Atomic Enrgy Commission; Jean-François<br />

Valery, Jean Charles Hamel, Areva NC (France)<br />

Decontamination shops use various techniques to decontaminate solid substrates. The aim of these shops is either to recover<br />

the substrate for a future second life, or to sufficiently lower the radioactivity level in order to reduce the final waste volume. One<br />

of these techniques remains in aqueous bathes possibly under ultrasonic agitation. This technique is very fit to small metallic pieces.<br />

Most of those pieces are covered with various greases or organic oils very resistant to classical aqueous washes. Thus, this oily<br />

layer contains some unfixed radionuclides that must be removed to reach the decontamination factor targeted. This urged decontamination<br />

shops operating staff to consider additive molecules necessary to render aqueous washes consistent with such a contamination.<br />

These molecules, namely surfactants, act on the liquid surface to increase affinity between aqueous and oily phases.<br />

The surfactant formulations used in French decontamination shops are industrial formulations. Those formulations are generally<br />

designed by international manufacturers to be consistent with several applications. Thus, there isnt any specific formulation fitted<br />

to nuclear applications. But, this way of working is no longer possible now. This is due to the changes of final wastes conditioning<br />

matrix. Indeed, bitumen matrix is devoted to disappear in the next…<br />

3) THE ORION SCANSORT SOIL SORTING SYSTEM (w/oP-59385)<br />

Jeffrey Lively, MACTEC (USA)<br />

Radiologically contaminated sites undergoing remediation or decommissioning typically have large volumes of soil which are<br />

heterogeneously contaminated by radioactivity from historic operations. There is a severe shortage of available disposal space for<br />

this type of material worldwide. It is, therefore, important that volumes being disposed are minimized as far as possible to ensure<br />

efficient use of scarcely available radioactive waste disposal facilities. There are also significant cost savings to be realized from<br />

segregating clean and exempt material from material classified as low-level (radioactive) waste (LLW) for disposal in other (nonradioactive)<br />

facilities or preferably for recycling onsite as part of the site closure process.<br />

The use of a proven dynamic measurement and soil sorting technology has the potential to speed up site closure, reduce LLW<br />

volumes, and save the decommissioning programs significant costs. Conveyor-based, radiological soil measurement systems developed<br />

have been used to process bulk soils with the potential to be contaminated with radioactivity, segregating soils that exceed the<br />

accepted regulatory limits from those that could be reused onsite or otherwise disposed in non-radioactive disposal facilities. This<br />

paper will describe the operation and advanced capabilities of MACTECs state-of-the-science bulk soil survey and sorting system<br />

developed and successfully used in the USA…<br />

86


Abstracts Session 26<br />

4) LIQUIDS, GELS, FOAMS AND SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS: FOUR STATES OF MATTER<br />

FOR RADIOACTIVE DECONTAMINATION OF SOLIDS (w/oP-59158)<br />

Sylvain Faure, Jérémy Causse, Bruno Fournel, CEA (France)<br />

To face the future challenges in the nuclear industry as dismantling and decommissioning, the Advanced Decontamination<br />

Processes Laboratory (Laboratoire des Procédés Avancés de Décontamination - LPAD) from the French Atomic Energy Commission<br />

(CEA) is developing new radioactive decontamination of solids processes to protect workers and to reduce strongly the quantity<br />

of secondary wastes produced. We have focused in the last past years on the use of four states of matter to develop new patented<br />

nuclear decontamination processes: micellar aqueous solutions, gels, foams and supercritical fluids.<br />

The conference gives an overview of these four ways to decontaminate a solid surface. The major applications and results<br />

obtained on real decontamination operations will be presented for each process. First, micellar solutions based on copolymers<br />

blocks surfactants are presented for radioactive degreasing. The advantage to formulate self-drying and cracking gels films sprayed<br />

on metallic surfaces is then detailed. For decontamination foams, an approach using new additives polymers or particles- is<br />

defended to obtain high life time foams that are able to treat huge and complex shape materials such as fission products tanks or<br />

steam generator. At the end, original works to treat textiles or gloves boxes using surfactants in CO2 supercritical fluid are given.<br />

<strong>Final</strong>ly, the major challenges to develop more secure processes and to reach a better decontamination efficiency are given.<br />

5) DECOMMISSIONING OF THE A-1 NPP HEAVY WATER EVAPORATOR FACILITY (wP-59225)<br />

Jan Medved, VUJE Inc.; Ladislav Vargovcik, ZTS VVU Kosice a.s. (Slovakia)<br />

The paper deals with experience and techniques in the application of remotely controlled robotic devices for the dismantling<br />

of the A-1 NPP technological equipment during undergoing decommissioning process of the A-1 NPP, which is characterized by<br />

high level of radioactivity and contamination. For liquidation of the heavy water evaporator has been applied a mobile robotic system<br />

MT 80, which had been developed, designed and constructed as a general-purpose decommissioning equipment. The heavy<br />

water evaporator as a part of the NPP heavy water system is located inside the main production unit building in Room No. 220<br />

where the inner surface contamination is from 101 Bq/cm2 to the level of 103 Bq/cm2 , dose rate up to 1.5 mGy/h and the feeding<br />

pipeline contained LRAW with high tritium content.<br />

The first step was the development of a work procedure with special focus on the elimination of activity and aerosols leaking<br />

into the environment. Special tooling was developed for application with the robot, such as hydraulic shears, circular saw, reciprocating<br />

saw, circular pipe cutter and a system for quick tool-change without direct intervention of the operators. Then, civil engineering<br />

modifications were made to the workplace and new technology was installed, including an efficient exhaust…<br />

6) REMOTE DECOMMISSIONING OF BLIND CELLS - APM 214 FACILITY CEA MARCOULE (w/oP-59206)<br />

Olivier Calixte, ONET Technologies - ONECTRA (France)<br />

The APM 214 facility (Marcoule Pilot Workshop) owns blind cells which were used to realize some chemical process operations.<br />

These ones are at their end of life and D&D operations are planned.<br />

Due to the high level of radiations these operations must be partially realized with remote machines. The CEA has entrusted<br />

ONECTRA, a subsidiary of ONET TECHNOLOGIES to define the best way to dismantle these blind cells by remote operations.<br />

The first step started with an inventory of main physical characteristics, constraints, nature of remote operations to do and possible<br />

tools.<br />

7) TRANSPORT OF NUCLEAR WASTE FLOWS - A MODELING AND SIMULATION APPROACH (wP-59136)<br />

Jonathan Adams, Michael Fairweather, James Young, Simon Biggs, Jun Yao, University of Leeds, Leeds (UK)<br />

The task of implementing safer and more efficient processing and transport techniques in the handling of nuclear wastes made<br />

up of liquid-solid mixtures provides a challenging and interesting area of research. The radioactive nature of nuclear waste means<br />

that it is difficult to perform experimental studies of its transport. In contrast, the use of modelling and simulation techniques can<br />

help to elucidate the physics that underpin such flows and provide valuable insights into common problems associated with them,<br />

as well as assisting in the focussing of any experimental studies. With nuclear waste in the form of solid-liquid sludges it is important<br />

to understand the nature of the flow, with particular interest in the settling characteristics of the particulate waste material.<br />

Knowledge of the propensity of pipe flows to form solid beds is important in avoiding unwanted blockages in pipelines and pumping<br />

systems. In cases where the formation of a solid bed is unavoidable, it is similarly important to know how the modified crosssectional<br />

area of the pipe, due to the presence of a bed, will affect particle behaviour through the creation of secondary flows. A<br />

greater understanding of particle deposition in pipes of circular cross-section is also of significant and…<br />

8) FUEL RACKS DISMANTLING WORKSHOP AT CENTRACO FACILITY (wP-59365)<br />

Jean-François Rives, Christophe Maufrais, SOCODEI (France)<br />

Initial context: EDF aims to replace all the ancient storage racks to gain place in the fuel ponds. This project represents about<br />

450 units up to 4m x 4,4m x 2,9m, weight 6,4te to dismantle, during 5 years The average density of the racks is very low (approx<br />

~ 0.15). Due to this low density, final repository route is not adapted. By its knowledge and capabilities, CENTRACO route was<br />

chosen to reduce volume, restore density, decontaminate & secure the elimination of the racks. With those data, CENTRACO has<br />

defined the ATG workshop to dismantle racks but also wide components as steam generators. It was designed with as much automated<br />

devices and skills as possible, in order to avoid dose rate and contamination and to save time. It is currently under construction<br />

and will be put in operation in the early 2012.<br />

87


Session 27 Abstracts<br />

SESSION 27 — ER SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND MONITORING - PART 1 OF 2 (4.5)<br />

1) SOILS RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION UNDER A NUCLEAR FACILITY (wP-59046)<br />

Emilie Aubonnet, Geovariances / CEA FAR, Fontenay aux Roses, France,<br />

Didier Dubot, CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS, Fontenay aux Roses (France)<br />

Nowadays, nuclear industry is facing a crucial need in establishing radiological characterization for the appraisal and the monitoring<br />

of any remediation work. Regarding its experience in this domain, the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) of Fontenay-aux-Roses,<br />

established an important feedback and developed a sound methodology for radiological characterization.<br />

This approach is based on several steps: • historical investigations • assumption and confirmation of the contamination • surface<br />

characterization • in depth characterization • rehabilitation objectives • remediation process<br />

In this methodology the amount of measures, samples and analysis is optimized for data treatment by geostatistics. This innovative<br />

approach is now used to characterize soils under facilities. In Fontenay-aux-Roses CEA Centre, there is an action plan aiming<br />

to assess the activity level under accessible facilities. The paper presents the radiological characterization of soils under RM1<br />

basement. This facility has been built after the first generation of nuclear facilities in place of a plutonium facility which has been<br />

dismantled in 1960. The presentation details the different steps of radiological characterization from historical investigations to<br />

optimization of excavation depths, impact studies and contaminated volumes.<br />

2) RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES AND SOILS VEGAS:<br />

AN EXPERTISE AND INVESTIGATING VEHICLE (wP-59057)<br />

Julien Attiogbe, GEOVARIANCES; Marie Lavielle, Patrick De Moura, CEA (France)<br />

The "Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique" (CEA, French Atomic Energy Commission) has set up over the last 10 years<br />

an innovative methodology aiming at characterizing radiological contaminations. The application of the latter relies on various tools<br />

such as recently developed software platform called Kartotrak which is used in the expertise vehicles with impressive detection performances<br />

(VEgAS). A Geographic Information System tailored to radiological needs constitutes the heart of the platform; it is surrounded<br />

by several modules dedicated to sampling optimization, data analysis and geostatistical modeling, real-time monitoring<br />

(Kartotrak-RT) and validation of proper clean-up operations. This paper presents the purpose and the performances of the VEgAS<br />

which provides exhaustive instruments for the radiological surface characterization of sites.<br />

3) DETERMINATION OF THE RADIONUCLIDE CONTAMINATION<br />

ON THE ABSHERON PENINSULA IN AZERBAIJAN (wP-59177)<br />

Tjalle Vandergraaf, Providence University College; Gudrat G Mamedov, Mahammadali A. Ramazanov,<br />

Baku State University; Jalal A. Naghiyev, Institute of Radiation Problems; Afat A. Mehdiyeva, National Aerospace<br />

Agency of Azerbaijan; Nazim A. Huseynov, Institute of Radiation Problems (Canada/Azerbaijan)<br />

Much of Azerbaijans Absheron Peninsula is contaminated by natural U-series and Th-series radionuclides, released in the production<br />

of oil and gas and, to a lesser extent, by anthropogenic radionuclides, including Sr-90 and Cs-137, from local industrial<br />

activities and trans-border transport. The region contains a large number of pipelines and artificial lagoons that have been used to<br />

retain excess groundwater and oil residues. In spite of the long history of the oil and gas industry, radioecological investigations<br />

have not been carried out until recently.<br />

The purpose of the current project is to determine the extent of radionuclide contamination in the Absheron Peninsula using a<br />

combination of radiation field measurements and laboratory analysis of selected samples, focusing on ten routes in the vicinity of<br />

Baku. The routes were selected as most likely to have become contaminated over time. Soil samples, taken from surface and to a<br />

depth of 1 m, aqueous samples from surface waters and marshes, and aqueous and sediment lagoons that showed elevated dosimetry<br />

readings, were analyzed by gamma spectrometry. Control samples were taken form non-contaminated areas. Samples of air and<br />

surface waters were analyzed for Rn-220 and Rn-222. The data will then be used to assess the potential impact<br />

4) HIGH-DENSITY GAMMA RADIATION SPECTROMETRY SURVEYS OF CONTAMINATED LAND (wP-59076)<br />

Mike Davies, Robert Clark, Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

The design of gamma radiation surveys of contaminated land has always had to compromise between the density of sampling<br />

and the accuracy of measurement. Large-area contamination is readily detected by a variety of measurement techniques, while the<br />

detection of small areas or particles requires a high density of measurement, generally one measurement per square metre.<br />

High Resolution Gamma-radiation Spectrometry (HRGS) can provide accurate qualitative (radionuclide identification) and<br />

quantitative (Bq.g-1 of the radionuclide for a stated scenario) assessment of the state of the land, but are not cost effective at high<br />

density. In contrast, simple walk-over or scan surveys using standard Health Physics instruments can provide a high density of<br />

measurement, but cannot provide the qualitative and quantitative accuracy of HRGS. In 1996, Nuvia Limited adopted methods to<br />

address some of these issues, by allowing scan surveys to include a degree of qualitative analysis of the gamma radiation detected<br />

using Low Resolution Gamma-radiation Spectrometry systems with Sodium Iodide detectors, while maintaining a high density of<br />

measurement.<br />

While low-resolution systems (including medium-resolution Lanthanum Bromide) have become the de-facto standard for large<br />

area land surveys, the use of the technology has changed little. High density scan surveys can be conducted using, for example,…<br />

88


Abstracts Session 27<br />

5) REMEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

STORAGE AND DISPOSAL SITE IN TAJIKISTAN (wP-59110)<br />

Nazirzhon Buriev, Dzhamshed Abdushukurov, Physical-Technical Institute of the Academy of Sciences<br />

of the Republic of Tajikistan; Tjalle Vandergraaf, Providence University College (Tajikistan/Canada)<br />

The National Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Site was established in 1959 in the Faizabad region approximately 50<br />

km east of the capital, Dushanbe. The site is located on the southern flank of the Fan Mountains facing the Gissar Valley in a sparsely<br />

populated agricultural area, with the nearest villages located a few km from the site. The site was initially designed to accept a<br />

wide range of contaminated materials, including obsolete smoke detectors, sealed radioactive sources, waste from medical institutions,<br />

and radioactive liquids.<br />

6) INTEGRATING HISTORY AND MEASUREMENT INTO A CASE FOR SITE RELEASE (wP-59131)<br />

Angela Bartlett, Research Sites Restoration Limited; Mike Davies, Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd;<br />

Gavin Coppins, Babcock International Group (UK)<br />

The United Kingdom nuclear research programme started in the 1940s. Research Sites Restoration Limited (RSRL) is responsible<br />

for two sites which were at the forefront of this research. These are the 100 hectare Harwell site in Oxfordshire and the 84<br />

hectare Winfrith site on the south coast of England. The work performed on these sites covered a huge range of nuclides, combinations<br />

of nuclides, chemical and physical processes, far more complicated than a power station, for example. The sites have a complex<br />

history with records of hundreds of buildings, many kilometres of drainage systems, groundwater contamination issues and<br />

land areas which require remediation. Formal work towards site release began in the 1990s, but demolition and clearance for reuse<br />

started many years earlier.<br />

An efficient restoration programme requires appropriate quality data. It is vital to decide what you need to know and how well<br />

you need to know it. As part of this, a challenging number of factors need to be considered in its design.<br />

This paper discusses these factors using the examples of the approach used at the Harwell and Winfrith sites including:<br />

• historical knowledge and associated uncertainties<br />

• relevant clearance criteria<br />

• availability and limitations of surveying equipment...<br />

7) CHARACTERIZATION OF A DEEP RADIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION:<br />

INTEGRATION OF GEOSTATISTICAL PROCESSING AND HISTORICAL DATA (wP-59062)<br />

Yvon Desnoyers, GEOVARIANCES; Patrick De Moura, CEA (France)<br />

Emerging in the early 80s, decommissioning is more than ever a major issue since hundreds of sites and facilities worldwide<br />

will end their operations over the next decades. Decontamination and remediation projects are all the more sensitive since they<br />

could last several years and turn out to be highly costly if not well-prepared. The key lies in an adequate contamination knowledge<br />

which helps to manage the remediation works and optimize the radiological waste production.<br />

The methodologies commonly applied base their recommended decision-process on more or less complex statistical analyses<br />

to validate the remediation target after the waste removal work (guidance for demonstrating compliance with a dose- or risk-based<br />

regulation). These techniques ignore the spatial behavior of the contamination and the importance of sample localization upstream.<br />

The lack of representation and data processing tools leads to inefficient radiological characterizations, which always maximize the<br />

amount of contaminated soils or concrete volumes.<br />

To solve these issues, the French Atomic Energy Authority (CEA) has developed a methodology over the last 10 years with<br />

Geovariances partnership to fulfill the radwaste categorization. This methodology consists of an ordered sequence of evaluation<br />

actions starting with historical and functional analyses, in-situ characterization if relevant using non-intrusive measurement techniques,<br />

...<br />

8) INDUSTRIAL EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK OF A GEOSTATISTICAL ESTIMATION<br />

OF CONTAMINATED SOIL VOLUMES (wP-59181)<br />

Claire Faucheux, Nicolas Jeannée, GEOVARIANCES(France)<br />

Data collected during the sampling of polluted sites are mainly used to characterize the concentration level and, through an<br />

exploratory and variographic analysis, to characterize the spatial variability; at fixed support, to estimate the concentrations in order<br />

to trace pollution map. In the case of kriging, this map is completed by the map of the standard deviation of the estimation error,<br />

making it possible to delimit the zones in which the estimation is considered to lack in precision. If a proportional effect is present<br />

(the local spatial variability depends on the local concentrations mean), the map of error standard deviation has to be corrected to<br />

take into account the increase of spatial variability with the local concentration mean.<br />

A confidence interval can be derived conventionaly from the kriging estimation and the associated error standard deviation.<br />

For a fixed limit threshold, the polluted site can then be divided in three areas:<br />

• the polluted zone, at a fixed statistical risk;<br />

• the not polluted zone, at a fixed statistical risk;<br />

• the zone of uncertainty , in which the estimated concentrations are close to the threshold. Because of the estimation error,<br />

it is not possible to specify if the exact concentrations exceed or not the threshold.<br />

In the case of a soil pollution by hydrocarbons, usual and geostatistical forecasts are compared. The effective consequences of<br />

these various forecasts on the quality of the site remediation are quantified and discussed.<br />

89


Session 28 Abstracts<br />

SESSION 28 — PUBLIC PERCEPTION ISSUES AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES<br />

IN RADIOACTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (5.5)<br />

1) PERSPECTIVES ON REVERSIBILITY AND RETRIEVABILITY OF A<br />

GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY IN FRANCE (wP - 59263)<br />

Jean-Noel Dumont, Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, Andra (France)<br />

In France it is required by law that the future geological repository for HLW and ILLW be reversible. Reversibility reflects<br />

social and political demand. The law, however, does not provide conditions for implementing reversibility. Instead, it calls upon<br />

scientists to issue specific proposals before a new law is promulgated as a preliminary to obtaining authorization to build a waste<br />

repository. A dialogue between various players, scientists and stakeholders is required to prepare these proposals. It gives designers<br />

of the repository the opportunity to assess social expectations and integrate them. It is also an opportunity to examine together<br />

possible technologies, as well as scientific and technical limits. Andra is involved in various forms of dialogue with social players.<br />

Several expectations related to reversibility have been detected by Andra through this dialogue. Reversibility means in particular<br />

retrievability of waste package(s) once disposed, which could be envisaged if future technical progress makes it re-useable, to<br />

switch to another mode of waste management, or if the repository does not evolve as planned. More generally, the demand for<br />

reversibility reflects the desire to control evolution of the process and make sure that the repository will not be abandoned after closure.<br />

These expectations call for answers…<br />

2) A DIALOGUE-CENTRIC APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION DECISION-MAKING (wP -59115)<br />

Laurel Boucher, The Laurel Co.; James Clark, CRX Group, Inc. (USA)<br />

This paper outlines a multi-step approach to streamline and enhance the decision-making process that guides environmental<br />

remediation. The inability of the responsible party and the various stakeholders to reach agreement on the remediation plan can<br />

delay the remediation, result in financial penalties, and lead to the development of an adversarial stance that inhibits the ability of<br />

the parties to work together in a creative and constructive manner. The approach presented by the authors is designed to expand<br />

dialogue in a way that moves it beyond technical or fiscal matters by addressing what the authors describe as the hidden barriers<br />

to productive dialogue. These hidden barriers include: self-interests, the perception as to how people are being treated, a lack of<br />

clarity or poor management of responsibilities and accountabilities, unclear or convoluted communication protocols, and an underlying<br />

tone of conflict and cynicism. A key element of the multi-step approach outlined in this paper is the process of uncovering<br />

these hidden barriers and addressing them in a way that turns discourse into collaboration.<br />

The paper describes a model the authors have used to streamline and enhance the process of creating sustainable agreements<br />

both for the U.S. Department of Energys Office of Environmental Management…<br />

3) OUTREACH AND EDUCATION - ENSURING A CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE FOR ALL (wP - 59339)<br />

Susan Hess, Areva Inc USA)<br />

As the nuclear industry continues to grow throughout the world, we find that support from government officials, local business<br />

leaders and the general public is becoming more and more important.<br />

In order to help raise awareness and inform these various publics, AREVA expanded upon a best practice from its worldwide<br />

operations and recently established a Community Advisory Council in the United States. The member organizations represent a<br />

variety of grassroots and minority organizations from across the United States and are active in various ways in local, state and federal<br />

arenas.<br />

4) CHALLENGE IN THE PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE AND COOPERATION IN THE VERGE OF<br />

BUILDING THE FIRST NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN INDONESIA (wP - 59119)<br />

Putero Susetyo Hario, Santosa Haryono Budi, Gadjah Mada University (Indonesia)<br />

Indonesia plans to build the first nuclear power plant (NPP) to solve the country’s energy problems. One of the challenges that<br />

must be handled before establishing the first NPP is the presence of anti-nuclear groups that have successfully made the government<br />

postpone its plan several times since the first nuclear research reactor was established in Bandung (1972). The basis for the<br />

groups’ dissent is the presence, and handling of radioactive waste. Further, the general public perception – even among educated<br />

Indonesians – is that Indonesia’s experts lack knowledge about nuclear technology, even though nuclear technology has been studied<br />

in Indonesia since 1954.<br />

So, the problem is one of disseminating information about nuclear technology. To address this challenge, the National Atomic<br />

Energy Board (BATAN) of Indonesia has to redesign its public outreach strategy by collaborating with the educational institutions<br />

and communications organizations. Gadjah Mada University is the only university in Indonesia offering a nuclear-engineering curriculum.<br />

Therefore, a teaming arrangement with this institution seems appropriate to help improve the public’s general knowledge<br />

about nuclear technology. There are several strategies that could be designed within the frame work of collaboration. The first strategy<br />

is to introduce nuclear technology into Indonesia’s elementary and secondary schools. These youngsters are still in their formative<br />

years and are absorbing science and technology with great attention.<br />

5) ANDRA LONG TERM MEMORY PROJECT (wP - 59277)<br />

Patrick Charton, Fabrice Boissier, Guillaume Martin, Andra (France)<br />

Long term memory of repositories is required by safety, reversibility and social expectations. Thus Andra has implemented<br />

since 2010 a long-term memory project to reinforce and diversify its current arrangements in this field, as well as to explore opportunities<br />

to extend memory keeping over thousands years.<br />

90


Abstracts Session 29<br />

The project includes opportunity studies of dedicated facilities. The écothèque and géothèque projects contribute to memory<br />

respectively through environmental and geological samples preservation. The options of creating (i) an archive centre for Andras<br />

interim and permanent archives, (ii) an artist center to study the contribution of arts to memory preservation, (iii) a museum of<br />

radioactive waste disposal history and technology (radium industry..., sea disposal&, current solutions...) are considered.<br />

Other studies provided by the project examine our heritage. This includes the continuity of languages and symbolic systems,<br />

the continuity of writing and engraving methods, the archaeology of landscapes (memory of the earths evolution, multi-century<br />

memory of industrial and agricultural landscapes&), the archaeology practices (how might a future archaeologist be interested in<br />

our current activity?), the preservation of historical sites and industrial memory, the continuity of institutional organizations, the<br />

memory and history of science evolution as well as broad history.<br />

Significant studies address social issues, such...<br />

6) ENGAGING LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS ON TECHNICAL ISSUES:<br />

TEST CASE AT THE LA HAGUE REPROCESSING PLANT (wP - 59211)<br />

Ludivine Gilli, Institut de radioprotection et de sûreténucléaire (IRSN) (France)<br />

As the French public expert in the nuclear field, the Institute for Nuclear Safety and Radioprotection (IRSN) has for several<br />

years advocated the need to engage citizens on technical issues pertaining to radioactive waste management. This belief in the usefulness<br />

of citizens involvement to enhance nuclear safety has led IRSN to initiate numerous pilot actions in cooperation with local<br />

actors.<br />

In 2009-2010, IRSN tackled a new pilot action regarding the decommissioning of the HAO (High Activity Oxide) workshop,<br />

located on Arevas fuel reprocessing plant site, in La Hague, North-western France. The purpose of that action was to experiment<br />

ways for IRSN and local actors to engage in technical discussions with a concrete objective in mind: contributing to enable the local<br />

stakeholders to take a stand on the operators decommissioning application.<br />

A pilot action was useful here, because the challenges are many when it comes to engaging with citizens on technical matters.<br />

First, there is a significant knowledge and cultural gap between most local stakeholders and the nuclear professionals, which<br />

prevents the formers to get a grip on technical issues. Hence, both parts must make an effort to understand and be understood. The<br />

local actors must moreover build a technical capacity...<br />

7) CREATING AND MANAGING RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES<br />

WITH THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE LOCAL POPULATIONS (w/oP - 59286)<br />

Sébastien Farin, Andra (France)<br />

Andra is responsible for proposing and implementing industrial management solutions for all French radioactive waste. Andra<br />

is in particular in charge of operating the two repositories in the Aube region, monitoring the Manche repository one of the world’s<br />

first surface repositories and creating disposal facilities for waste currently without an operational disposal solution.<br />

Andra’s communication approach.<br />

Andra’s communication role is stipulated by law and is an integral part of its activities, in the same way as research, industry<br />

or risk management. Andra’s aim is to make the subject of radioactive waste management one that is of nationwide interest comprehensible<br />

to the largest possible number, so that each citizen and stakeholder can, in full possession of the facts, make his or her<br />

own opinion and finally reach an informed decision.<br />

Andra’s communication policy is based on four main levers:<br />

• Information, through a full range of tools (websites, publications, periodicals) adapted to the level of expertise and understanding<br />

of its various target audiences;<br />

• Explanation, by means of opportunities throughout the year for those interested in the subject (site visits, fairs, meetings<br />

with schools, travelling exhibitions, etc.);<br />

• Local integration, through regular relations with local players and ...<br />

SESSION 29 — PANEL: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION:<br />

NEA ROAD MAP, HOW TO INCREASE SYNERGY (3.12)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 30 — SITING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION<br />

OF L/ILW DISPOSAL FACILITIES - PART 1 OF 2 (1.12)<br />

1) AN INNOVATIVE DESIGN FOR LOW AND INTERMEDIATE RADWASTE NEAR<br />

SURFACE REPOSITORY IN LITHUANIA (w/oP-59382)<br />

Boniface Jean-Michel, AREVA TA (France)<br />

In 2009, in response to an open tender, funded by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, a consortium comprising<br />

Lithuanian and French partners led by Areva was selected by Ignalina nuclear power plant (INPP) to design a dedicated<br />

100.000 m3 LILW-SL Near Surface Repository (NSR) planned to be constructed nearby the power plant.<br />

After preliminary siting studies, the site of Stabatiske was selected by the Lithuanian government in 2007. Following this decision,<br />

the projects technical and commercial requirements for the NSR design was prepared by experts from INPP with the support<br />

of the Lithuanian radwaste management agency (RATA).<br />

This NSR is to be developed and engineered for the disposal of INPP radwaste produced by its operation, and arising from its<br />

dismantling. The result of the project is to develop, following IAEA guidelines, an innovative multi-barrier repository design which<br />

is engineered for the Stabatiske site, with the presence of groundwater, for the sites characteristics, comprising clay layers, moraine<br />

deposits and aquifers, and for the volume and type of radwaste, the disposal containers and the engineered barriers. This design is<br />

on schedule for completion in 2013, and will provide the basis for the construction of the repository, the first facilities of…<br />

91


Session 30 Abstracts<br />

2) PRODUCT QUALITY CONTROL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE WITH A SPECIAL REGARD<br />

TO FEDERAL STATES COLLECTING FACILITIES (w/oP-59176)<br />

Markus Havertz, Research Centre Jülich GmbH (Germany)<br />

The KONRAD repository for low- and intermediate level radioactive waste is the first disposal facility approved by the Atomic<br />

Energy Act in Germany.<br />

For final disposal the radioactive waste products or waste packages have to meet the acceptance criteria of the final repository<br />

KONRAD.<br />

On behalf of the Federal Office for Radiation Protection the quality control group (PKS) at Research Centre Jülich accomplishes<br />

the product quality control of non-heat producing waste, which mainly arises from generation of electricity by nuclear power<br />

plants, research and development activities, medicine and industry, as well as decommissioning and dismantling of nuclear facilities.<br />

The product quality controlling process includes varies steps, inter alia checks of product quality control plans to be appropriate<br />

for the conditioning purposes, on site inspections to control the quality of the waste form, checks of waste package inventory<br />

declarations and accompanying waste package documentations with regard to the KONRAD specifications.<br />

According to the Atomic Energy Act the German Federal States have to establish State Collecting Facilities (FSCS) for the<br />

interim storage of the radioactive waste originating in their territories. The FSCFs deal in general with low active wastes arising in<br />

nuclear medicine and at smaller research facilities (universities, industrial and health…<br />

3) CENTRE DE LA MANCHE: A DISPOSAL FACILITY IN INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL (wP-59236)<br />

Michel Dutzer, Jean Pierre Vervialle, Alain André, Albert Marchiol, Andra (France)<br />

Centre de la Manche disposal facility is the first French surface disposal facility dedicated to low and intermediate level short<br />

lived radioactive waste. It started up in 1969. After a continuous improvement, in the design of disposal vaults, in operational<br />

modes, in the whole process of waste management, in the safety approach, the last packages were received in 1994. 527,000 m3 of<br />

waste packages have been disposed during the 25 years of operation. The facility was licensed for the institutional control period<br />

in 2003.<br />

The disposal vaults are covered with a multilayer capping system that includes a bituminous membrane to provide protection<br />

against rainwater infiltration. Water that might infiltrate through the membrane is collected by the bottom slab of the vaults to a<br />

pipe network implemented in an underground gallery. Measurements show an overall infiltration rate of about 2.7 l/m2 /year that<br />

complies with the objective of Andra of a few liters per square meter and per year.<br />

Investigations are performed in order to assess the behavior of the membrane in the long term. For this purpose periodically<br />

samples of the bituminous membrane are taken and measurements are performed.<br />

As at the beginning of the operational period waste packages were not…<br />

4) RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT OF CO-LOCATION OF THE VLLW AND<br />

LILW REPOSITORY AT MOCHOVCE SITE (wP-59152)<br />

Václav Hanusík, Zdena Kusovská, Jozef Morávek, VUJE, Inc.;<br />

J. Balaz, O. Chren, Nuclear and Decommissioning Company plc. (Slovakia)<br />

JAVYS, the Nuclear Decommissioning Company owner and operator of National Radioactive Waste Repository (NRR) at<br />

Mochovce, is planning the enlargement of the existing NRR. The enlargement consists of the construction of new structures (double<br />

rows) like the ones existing for LILW and of the new facility for the disposal of Very Low Level Waste (VLLW). A VLLW disposal<br />

site is being planned in Mochovce where a LILW disposal site is already located. As a part of ongoing licensing process for<br />

this change in utilization of the NRR we have updated the already existing assessment of potential radiological impact to members<br />

of the public after closure of the site, both from the migration of leachate in groundwater from the site and from possible inadvertent<br />

intrusion into the site, including future residence on the material excavated for the construction of the road. The radionuclides<br />

from the ground water reach the biosphere through a spring flowing into the lake. It is conservatively assumed that individual in<br />

the critical group uses biosphere of the lake (for irrigations, fishing and recreation). In the case of unintentional intrusion into the<br />

repository, the exposed group consists of a small number of workers who excavate or examine repository<br />

5) DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS<br />

AND PROCEDURES FOR A UK GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL FACILITY (wP-59160)<br />

Philip Rendell, NDA; Henry O’Grady, Parsons Brinckerhoff: Brendan Breen, Alastair Clark, Steve Reece, NDA (UK)<br />

In the United Kingdom the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) has been charged with implementing Government policy<br />

for the long-term management of higher activity radioactive waste. The UK Government is leading a site selection process<br />

based on voluntarism and partnership with local communities interested in hosting such a facility and as set out in the Managing<br />

Radioactive Waste Safely White Paper (2008).<br />

The NDA has set up the Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (RWMD) as the body responsible for planning, building<br />

and operating a geological disposal facility (GDF). RWMD will develop into a separately regulated Site Licence Company (SLC)<br />

responsible for the construction, operation and closure of the facility. RWMD will be the Design Authority for the GDF; requiring<br />

a formal process to ensure that the knowledge and integrity of the design is maintained.<br />

In 2010 RWMD published Geological Disposal - Steps towards implementation which described the preparatory work that it<br />

is undertaking in planning the future work programme, and the phases of work needed to deliver the programme. RWMD has now<br />

developed a process for the design of the GDF to support this work. The engineering design process follows a staged approach,<br />

encompassing options development, requirements definition, and conceptual and detailed…<br />

92


Abstracts Session 31<br />

6) STATE OF THE ART FOR FABRICATING AND EMPLACING CONCRETE CONTAINERS INTO LARGE<br />

HORIZONTAL DISPOSAL CAVERNS IN THE FRENCH GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY (wP-59267)<br />

Jean-Michel Bosgiraud, Maurice Guariso, François Pineau, Andra (France)<br />

The research and development work presented in this paper was initialized by Andra in 2007. The work necessary for manufacturing<br />

and testing a full scale demonstrator is presently implemented. The case story is twofold.<br />

The first part is related to the initial development of a high performance concrete formulation used for fabricating concrete storage<br />

containers (containing Medium Level and Long Lived Waste<br />

primary canisters) to be stacked and emplaced into 400-m long concrete lined horizontal disposal vaults (also called caverns,<br />

excavated in the Callovo-Oxfordian clay host formation at a 550 to 600-m depth) with an inside diameter of approximately 8-m.<br />

The concrete formulation qualification process is described and the design and fabrication case story of the concrete boxes is<br />

detailed. The rationale of the concept, the basics of its formulation and the technical achievements and performances obtained at<br />

the end of the fabrication phase are described.<br />

The second part presents the outcome at the end of the detailed design phase, for a system which is now being manufactured<br />

(for further test and assembly) for the emplacement of the concrete containers inside the vault. The application was engineered for<br />

remote emplacing a pile of 2 concrete containers (the containers are preliminarily…<br />

7) ON-SITE, NEAR SURFACE DISPOSAL OF GRAPHITE WASTES IN THE UK (wP-59078)<br />

Adam Meehan, Peter Sibley, EnergySolutions; Jeremy Lightfoot, Golder Associates (UK) Ltd.;<br />

Duncan Jackson, Eden Nuclear & Environment Ltd., (UK)<br />

Reactor graphite makes up about 30% by volume of the UKs inventory of intermediate level waste (ILW). There is estimated<br />

to be about 15,000m3 of graphite arisings prior to 2040, mainly comprising operational waste streams (Magnox and AGR fuel<br />

sleeves), along with core graphite from the decommissioning of experimental and prototype reactors. A further 65,000m3 of<br />

graphite is forecast to arise after 2040, comprising core graphite from the final decommissioning of the Magnox and AGR reactors.<br />

Consequently, the management and disposal of graphite wastes is of key strategic importance in the UK.<br />

The current baseline strategy for reactor graphite wastes in the UK is to encapsulate them upon retrieval using a cementitious<br />

grout in stainless steel Nirex containers in accordance with NDA Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (RWMD) Letter of<br />

Compliance (LoC) specifications, and to dispose of them following a period of interim storage to the UKs planned geological disposal<br />

facility (GDF), when this becomes available, currently planned for around 2040.<br />

Using Magnoxs Hunterston A site as a Pathfinder, EnergySolutions and its partner organisations have been engaged with the<br />

feasibility assessment, options assessment, engineering concept design and environmental safety case development for a proposed<br />

on-site, near surface disposal facility for operational…<br />

SESSION 31 — L/ILW WASTE CHARACTERIZATION, ASSAY, AND TRACKING SYSTEMS - PART 2 OF 2 (1.18)<br />

1) NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION OF TRU WASTE IN LOW AND HIGH DENSITY<br />

BOXES AND DRUMS, USING HIGH ENERGY REAL TIME RADIOSCOPY (HE-RTR)<br />

AND WIDE DYNAMIC RANGE IMAGING (wP-59302)<br />

Stephen Halliwell, VJ Technologies Inc. (USA)<br />

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the cornerstone of the Department of Energys nuclear waste cleanup effort, is designed<br />

to permanently dispose of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste. Real time radioscopy (RTR) using x-ray energies of up to 450keV,<br />

has been used extensively for the non-destructive examination (NDE) part of the characterization and certification of waste drums<br />

and low density waste boxes, prior to shipment to WIPP. However, to characterize drums and boxes containing a mixture of both<br />

low and high density waste, x-ray energies of up to 6MeV, together with an x-ray imaging system having a wide dynamic range,<br />

are required. The system, including the high energy vault, is required to be stand-alone, weatherproof and re-locatable, and must<br />

be fully compliant with ANSI.N43.3, classified as an exempt shielded facility for x-ray energies up to 6MeV.<br />

This paper describes the design, build and operation of the new generation of high energy RTR systems now being used in the<br />

characterization of waste destined for disposal at WIPP.<br />

Importance of this work. Characterization of TRU waste in boxes and drums by non-destructive examination reduces the need<br />

to open the containment and to visually examine the waste. The immediate benefits are a reduction in risk of operator dose uptake,<br />

a reduction in the generation of additional waste, and the saving of time and cost within the process.<br />

2) MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY FOR FULFILLING OF WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA<br />

FOR LOW AND INTERMEDIATE LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN STORAGES (wP-59016)<br />

Marina Sokcic-Kostic, Felix Langer, Roland Schultheis, NUKEM Technologies GmbH (Germany)<br />

Low level and intermediate level radioactive waste must be sorted and treated before it can be sent to radioactive waste storage.<br />

A variety of parameters must be considered to fulfil the acceptance criteria for these storages. NUKEM Technologies has a<br />

long time experience with the erection and management of radioactive waste treatment facilities and has developed methods and<br />

equipment to produce the waste packages where all the required information are compiled.<br />

The preferred methods are the non-destructive methods, which allow high throughput and give detailed information.<br />

The required waste acceptance information is divided into physical, chemical and radiological aspects. Experience has shown<br />

that different strategies have to be applied for their acquisition: the radiological information is acquired by measurements, whereas<br />

the physical and chemical information is gathered from origin of waste, sorting and treatment procedures. In rare cases direct<br />

measurements are applied in addition: the example for this is the grouting process.<br />

The tracking data base system developed by NUKEM Technologies tracks the waste streams through the waste treatment facility<br />

and combines the gathered information from the delivered waste to generate sophisticated waste declarations for further storage.<br />

Physical and chemical parameters are managed via the tracking methodology, which has proven<br />

93


Session 31 Abstracts<br />

3) DISPOSITION OF TRANSURANIC RESIDUES FROM PLUTONIUM ISENTROPIC COMPRESSION<br />

EXPERIMENT (PU-ICE) CONDUCTED AT Z MACHINE (LA-UR-10-05649) (wP-59186)<br />

Kapil K. Goyal, Los Alamos National Laboratory; Betty J. Humphrey, Weston Solutions Inc.; Jeffry Gluth, Ktech<br />

Corporation/Sandia National Laboratory; David M. French, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)<br />

In 1992, the U.S. Congress passed legislation to discontinue above- and below-ground testing of nuclear weapons. Because<br />

of this, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) must rely on laboratory experiments and computer-based calculations to verify the<br />

reliability of the nuclear stockpile. The Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) Z machine was developed to support<br />

the science-based approach for mimicking nuclear explosions and stockpile stewardship. Plutonium (Pu) isotopes with greater<br />

than ninety-eight percent enrichment were used in the experiments. In May 2006, SNL/NM received authority that the Z Machine<br />

Isentropic Compression Experiments could commence.<br />

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) provided the plutonium targets and loaded the target assemblies provided by<br />

SNL/NM. Three experiments were conducted from May through July 2006. The residues from each experiment, which weighed<br />

up to 913 pounds, were metallic and were packaged into a 55-gallon drum each.<br />

SNL/NM conducts the experiments and provides temporary storage for the drums until shipment to LANL for final waste certification<br />

for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in southeastern New Mexico. This paper presents a comprehensive<br />

approach for documenting generator knowledge for characterization of waste in cooperation with scientists at the two laboratories<br />

and addresses a variety of essential topics.<br />

4) DETECTION OF SHIELDED SEALED RADIOACTIVE SOURCES IN RADIOACTIVE<br />

WASTE BY NON-DESTRUCTIVE ASSAY TECHNIQUES (wP-59252)<br />

Leo P.M. Velzen, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group;<br />

Steven van der Marck, Nuclear Research Group (Netherlands)<br />

Experiences dealing with the detection of a SRS or its shielding in waste by non-destructive assay (NDA) methods are seldom<br />

reported in literature. Therefore the main objective of this paper is to assist operators of waste storage facilities or others responsible<br />

for the radiological characterisation of waste that they are able to interpret collected radiological data on the possible presence<br />

of a bare SRS or a shielded SRS.<br />

This objective can be reached by simulating the gamma flux that can be measured on the surface of a waste package containing<br />

a bare or shielded SRS. Appropriate simulations and presentations of the results will illustrate the problems that can occur by<br />

radiological data collection and interpretation in reality.<br />

The simulating calculations have been performed with the Monte Carlo Neutron Photon transport code (MCNP) for gamma<br />

photons of 60Co. Obtained results e.g. gamma and total energy flux are presented in iso-plots to help non-specialist operators interpreting<br />

own collected radiological data to recognize a SRS and dense materials in (historic) waste packages.<br />

The MCNP simulated waste packages have been defined to reflect, as close as possible, reality, i.e. the calculated data are disturbed,<br />

as would be the situation in the case of raw…<br />

5) USE OF LANTHANUM BROMIDE DETECTORS TO AUGMENT<br />

SITE SURVEYS FOR DEPLETED URANIUM (w/P-59169)<br />

Charles Waggoner, Mississippi State University; Ronald Unz, Institute for Clean Energy Technology;<br />

Donna Rogers, Mississippi State University; Charles R. Jones,<br />

Jay P. McCown, Institute for Clean Energy Technology/Mississippi State University (USA)<br />

A variety of systems have now been described for use in surveying sites for anthropogenic radiological contamination. Virtually<br />

all of these include use of sodium iodide detectors and register detection data with global positioning satellite data. This paper<br />

demonstrates how lanthanum bromide detectors can be used to augment existing field surveys in a manner to reduce uncertainty in<br />

areas of low count rates and to discriminate between depleted uranium and naturally occurring uranium.<br />

The survey system described is equipped with large (20 x 20 x 100 cm) sodium iodide (Alpha Spectra) and 7.6 x 7.6 cm lanthanum<br />

bromide (Saint Gobain) detectors. Additional radiological detection equipment (DigiBase) was obtained from ORTEC with<br />

survey data collected in the List Mode. Data collected in surveys were then used to generate digital maps using GeoSofts Oasis<br />

Montaj.<br />

Software has been developed to automatically identify areas of increased count rates using user-defined thresholds. This software<br />

can collect the count data for the masked area and generate a composite spectrum that can be compared to a reference spectrum<br />

believed to represent an uncontaminated area. Ratios of counts attributed to protactinium-234m (Pa-234m) are compared to<br />

counts attributed to Bismuth-214 (Bi-214) for both the composite filed survey spectrum…<br />

6) ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUES FOR THE IN SITU CHARACTERISATION<br />

OF ‘LEGACY’ WASTE SLUDGES & DISPERSIONS (wP-59111)<br />

Timothy Hunter, Jeff Peakall, Simon Biggs, Michael Fairweather, James Young, University of Leeds, Leeds (UK)<br />

Research being undertaken at the University of Leeds, as part of the DIAMOND university consortium, is exploring the effectiveness<br />

of various ultrasonic technologies as in situ probes to characterize and monitor nuclear waste slurries, such as the Legacy<br />

Magnesium hydroxide sludges found in Sellafield, U.K. Through use of a commercial Acoustic Backscatter Sensor (ABS) with 1<br />

5 MHz transducers, various properties of free-settling oxide simulant sludges were determined. Work was focused upon characterizing<br />

essentially static sludges (to give prospective use as tools for the wastes in current deposits); although, the sensors also have<br />

potential as dispersion monitors during any future processing and storage of the Legacy wastes, as well as many other storage, clarifier<br />

or thickener systems across a wide range of industrial processing operations.<br />

ABS data of mixed glass powder dispersions was analysed and compared to scattering theory, to understand the correlations<br />

between acoustic attenuation and particulate concentration. The ABS was also calibrated to measure changes in average particulate<br />

concentration within a settling suspension over time, and showed the depth-wise segregation of the dispersion through the settling<br />

column at different particular time intervals. It was found that observed hindered settling also led to an increase in particulate<br />

concentration…<br />

94


Abstracts Session 32<br />

7) FREE-RELEASE AND SORTING MONITORS DEVELOPED FOR NPP A-1<br />

DECOMMISSIONING, SLOVAKIA (wP-59071)<br />

Ondrej Slávik, VUJE; Alojz Slaninka, VUJE, a.s./ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava;<br />

Martin Liatjak, Kamil Kravárik, VUJE, a.s.; Igor Pély, JAVYS, a.s. (Slovakia)<br />

Bohunice NPP A-1, Slovakia, was a pilot NPP shut down after nuclear accident with loss of fuel integrity in 1977. Presently,<br />

the 2nd stage of decommissioning project implementation is carrying out. Within this stage of decommissioning it is necessary to<br />

decontaminate, monitor and if possible to free release large amounts of contaminated materials. From point of view of the material<br />

volume to be monitored, contaminated soil and concrete debris are the most crucial ones in this stage (thousands of tons). They<br />

were until now temporary stored in underground basins or similar places within the NPP controlled area. Within the mentioned project<br />

a pilot free-release and sorting monitoring post were developed in order to support the extended need to mentioned monitoring<br />

capabilities.<br />

The main goal expecting to the sorting monitor is to reduce the volume of contaminated materials to be monitored for freerelease.<br />

An operative monitor was designed for this purpose that is based on quick and direct in situ measurements of loader spoon<br />

filled with the excavated materials. A pair of NaI(Tl) detectors is used for the measurements. The spoon is fixed on a covered measurement<br />

frame with automatic fixation logic (pair of rails and an inductive sensor on the…<br />

8) DESIGN AND OPERATION OF THE COMBINED TECHNOLOGY AUTOMATED<br />

WASTE CHARACTERISATION SYSTEM (wP- 59308)<br />

John Mason, Marc R Looman, Robert A. Price, A. N. Technology Ltd. (UK)<br />

This paper describes the design and operation of the Combined Technology Automated Waste Characterisation System (CTA-<br />

WCS) at JRC Ispra. The WCS was designed for the measurement of fission products and uranium and plutonium containing waste<br />

arising from nuclear fuel and nuclear materials processing and reactor operations. The WCS covers a range of activity including<br />

Low and Intermediate Level Waste (LLW and ILW). The system is designed to measure the waste in 200 and 400 (440) litre drums<br />

with a maximum drum weight of 1500 kg. Gamma-ray measurements of radio-nuclide content are performed by a gamma ray measurement<br />

station which functions as either a Segmented Gamma Scanner (SGS) or Tomographic Segmented Gamma-ray Scanner<br />

(TSGS). Either of these two techniques may be employed to perform the functions of drum screening, non-destructive examination<br />

(NDE) and, where appropriate, final drum assay. Coupled to the gamma ray station is a surface dose-rate measurement station,<br />

which employs 6-shielded Geiger-Muller detectors. Active and passive neutron measurements are performed by an advanced,<br />

graphite lined Differential Die-away (DDA) system, which comprises the neutron measurement station. The DDA performs conventional<br />

passive neutron totals, coincidence, and multiplicity counting and active DDA total neutron counting. Data analysis is<br />

based on the use…<br />

SESSION 32 — REPOSITORY PROGRAMS: SITE SELECTION & CHARACTERIZATION,<br />

UNDERGROUND RESEARCH LABS, ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL BARRIERS - PART 1 OF 2 (2.3)<br />

1) SAFETY ASSESSMENT INPUT TO SITE SELECTION - THE SWEDISH EXAMPLE (wP-59031)<br />

Johan Andersson, JA Streamflow AB (Sweden)<br />

Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (SKB) has performed comprehensive investigations of two candidate sites for a final repository<br />

for Swedens spent nuclear fuel; in Forsmark (municipality of Östhammar) and in Laxemar (municipality of Oskarshamn). In<br />

March 2011 SKB decided to submit licence applications according to the Act on Nuclear Activities and the Environmental Code<br />

for a final repository at Forsmark. The license applications include comprehensive documentation to support that a KBS-3 repository<br />

at Forsmark will meet requirements in laws and regulations, including a full evaluation of long term safety. Before selection,<br />

SKB stated that the site that offers the best prospects for achieving long-term safety in practice would be selected. Based on experiences<br />

previous safety assessments, a number of issues related to long-term safety need to be considered in the context of site comparison.<br />

The factors include sensitivity to climate change such as periods of permafrost and glaciations, rock mechanics evolution<br />

including the potential for thermally induced spalling and sensitivity to potential future earthquakes, current and future groundwater<br />

flow, evolution of groundwater composition and proximity to mineral resources. Each of these factors related to long-term safety<br />

for the two candidate sites is assessed in a comparative analysis of site characteristics. The assessment ...<br />

2) TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW OF SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE HORONOBE<br />

UNDERGROUND RESEARCH LABORATORY AREA AND SITE (wP-59088)<br />

Takanori Kunimaru, Ryuji Takeuchi, Tatsuji Matsuzaki, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Japan)<br />

The Horonobe Underground Research Laboratory (URL) Project is being pursued by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)<br />

to enhance the reliability of relevant disposal technologies through investigations of the deep geological environment within the<br />

host sedimentary formations at Horonobe, northern Hokkaido, Japan. The project consists of two major research areas, Geoscientific<br />

Research and R&D on Geological Disposal, and proceeds in three overlapping phases, Phase I: Surface-based investigation<br />

Phase, Phase II: Construction Phase and Phase III: Operation Phase, over a period of 20 years.<br />

The early Phase I of the Horonobe URL project consisted of selecting a URL area and URL site, which involved establishing<br />

fundamental factors relating to the geological environment and safety, surface-based investigations of the geological environment,<br />

stepwise narrowing down of candidate or target areas (sites) from the whole Horonobe Town area through candidate URL areas<br />

and, finally, to a URL site.<br />

This study will be demonstrated the selection process for the URL area and URL site in sequence. Horonobe URL has been<br />

declared to be constructed within whole Horonobe Town to be selected early in the fiscal year 2002. The Horonobe URL area/site<br />

is required existence of host argillaceous sedimentary formations and saline groundwater. Further fundamental requirements ...<br />

95


Session 32 Abstracts<br />

3) CHARACTERISATION OF BEDROCK HYDROGEOLOGY AT THE OLKILUOTO<br />

SITE USING SURFACE BASED AND UNDERGROUND DATA (w/oP-59095)<br />

Lee Hartley, Dave Swan, Steven Baxter, SERCO (UK)<br />

Posiva Oy is responsible for implementing the programme for geological disposal of spent nuclear fuel in Finland. Olkiluoto<br />

in Eurajoki has been selected as the primary site for the repository, subject to further detailed characterisation which is currently<br />

focused on the construction of an underground rock characterisation and research facility (the ONKALO). An essential part of the<br />

site investigation programme is analysis of groundwater flow and solute transport to depth by means of numerical flow modelling<br />

as part of the 2011 site descriptive model. Groundwater flow in the crystalline rocks at Olkiluoto takes place predominantly in the<br />

void space of the interconnected fractures in the bedrock. Many of the hydraulic characteristics of flow through such a system can<br />

be represented by hydrogeological Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) models, since they capture some of the details of fracture<br />

geometry, size, connectivity and openings. The paper describes how field data is used to derive such models, ultimately for use in<br />

safety assessment.<br />

Surface based site investigations at Olkiluoto include 53 sub-vertical deep core drilled boreholes and 27 shallower sub-vertical<br />

boreholes. The characterisation of fractures is a key objective. Fracture geometrical data (fracture positions and orientations)<br />

are determined from drill core mapping and/or borehole ...<br />

4) SELF-DISPOSAL OPTION FOR HEAT-GENERATING WASTE (wP-59182)<br />

Michael Ojovan, University of Sheffield; Pavel Poluektov, Vladimir Kascheev, A.A. Bochvar’s VNIINM (UK/Russia)<br />

Self-descending heat generating capsules can be used for disposal of dangerous radioactive wastes in extremely deep layers of<br />

the Earth preventing any release of radionuclides into the biosphere. Self-disposal option for heat-generating radioactive waste such<br />

as spent fuel, high level reprocessing waste or spent sealed radioactive sources, known also as rock melting concept, was considered<br />

in the 70s as a viable alternative disposal option by both Department of Energy in the USA and Atomic Industry Ministry in<br />

the USSR. Self-disposal is currently reconsidered as a potential alternative route to existing options for solving the nuclear waste<br />

problem and is associated with the renaissance of nuclear industry. Self-disposal option utilises the heat generated by decaying<br />

radionuclides of radioactive waste inside a heavy and durable capsule to melt the rock on its way down. As the heat from radionuclides<br />

within the capsule partly melts the enclosing rock, the relatively low viscosity and density of the silicate melt allow capsule<br />

to be displaced upwards past the heavier capsule as it sinks. Eventually the melt cools and solidifies (e.g. vitrifies or crystallizes),<br />

sealing the route along which the capsule passed. Descending or self-disposal continues until enough heat is generated by radionuclides<br />

to provide partial ...<br />

5) NUMOS APPROACH FOR LONG-TERM SAFETY ASSESSMENT (wP-59404)<br />

Takeshi Ebashi, Kenichi Kaku, Katsuhiko Ishiguro, Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO) (Japan)<br />

In Japan, the Act on <strong>Final</strong> Disposal of Specified Radioactive Waste specifies that the repository siting process shall consist of<br />

three stages. The Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO) is responsible for geological disposal of vitrified<br />

high-level waste and some types of TRU waste. NUMO has chosen to implement a volunteer approach to siting.<br />

NUMO decided to prepare the 2010 Technical Report, which sets out three policies for ensuring safety. One of these is staged<br />

project implementation and decision-making based on iterative confirmation of safety. Based on this, NUMO will gradually integrate<br />

relevant interdisciplinary knowledge to build a safety case once a formal volunteer application is received that would allow<br />

site investigations to be initiated. The safety assessment takes the central role in multiple lines of reasoning and argumentation by<br />

providing a quantitative evaluation of long-term safety, a key aspect of which is uncertainty management.<br />

This paper presents NUMOs basic strategy for long-term safety assessment, based on the above policy.<br />

In concrete terms, safety assessment procedures are described in the context of the staged implementation programme, based<br />

on integration of knowledge obtained from site investigation/evaluation and engineering studies and reflection of the safety assessment<br />

results in the planning of ...<br />

6) MODELING APPROACHES FOR EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF HETEROGENEITY ON<br />

TWO-PHASE FLOW ASSOCIATED WITH THE MIGRATION OF WASTE GENERATED GAS<br />

FROM SF/HLW- AND L/ILW REPOSITORIES IN LOW-PERMEABILITY FORMATIONS (wP-59196)<br />

Alexandros Papafotiou, Rainer Senger, Intera Inc. Swiss Branch; Andrés Alcolea, TK Consult AG;<br />

William Lanyon, Fracture-Systems Ltd; John Ewing, Intera Inc. Swiss Branch (Switzerland/UK)<br />

Different low-permeability formations are considered as potential host rocks for Low / Intermediate Level waste (L/ILW) and<br />

spent fuel / high-level / long-lived intermediate-level waste (SF/HLW/ILW) in Switzerland. As part of a generic site evaluation<br />

process, emphasis is on the assessment of Mesozoic limestones, marls and claystones in six potential siting areas in Northern and<br />

Central Switzerland. An important aspect in the site evaluation process is the characterization of the low-permeability formations<br />

in terms of spatial variability of the relevant transport properties (porosity, permeability, clay content), as they may affect the migration<br />

of waste-generated gas from L/ILW and SF/HLW/ILW repositories.<br />

Numerical modeling studies are presented, aimed at quantifying the impact of spatial variability of rock properties on gas<br />

release through the host rock on a deca- to hectometer scale. For this purpose, 2-D models of an emplacement tunnel embedded in<br />

a low-permeability host rock are developed for both a sequence of limestones and marls with distinct lithological variability (Effingen<br />

Beds) and a claystone of moderate spatial variability (Opalinus Clay). For the Effingen Beds, a composite geological model is<br />

implemented, comprising stochastic representations of the different facies and the fracture systems. The facies model displays spatial<br />

variations in clay content, porosity ...<br />

96


Abstracts Session<br />

7) A NEW SAFETY CONCEPT FOR GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL IN JAPAN (II) (wP-59357)<br />

Kazumi Kitayama, Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO) (Japan)<br />

In a previous paper for ICEM2009 a new safety concept was proposed for the geological disposal program in Japan, which was<br />

a development of the conventional multi-barrier system concept that takes greater account of the actual behaviour in a deep geological<br />

environment. This paper describes progress of the study. In particular, it points out that geological disposal provides passive<br />

defence-in-depth safety functions based on geochemical equilibrium, and that natural analogues are effective in understanding the<br />

behaviour of engineered/natural barriers over hundreds of thousands of years and in further developing safety concepts. In addition,<br />

a long-term safety concept based on the realistic evolution of a geological disposal system can be explained to both the general<br />

public and experts in a straightforward and comprehensible manner.<br />

Detailed discussion of specific long-term behaviour of engineered and natural barriers, including possible interaction between<br />

barriers, will be reported in the paper.<br />

8) THERMO-HYDRO-MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF A HEATING AND HYDRATION<br />

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY (CHINA-MOCK-UP) IN UNSATURATED GMZ BENTONITE (wP-59212)<br />

Liang Chen, Ju Wang, Yuemiao Liu, Beijing Research Institute Of Uranium Geology;<br />

Federic Collin, University Of Liège; Jingli Xie, Beijing Research Institute Of Uranium Geology (China/Belgium)<br />

The preliminary repository concept for disposal of high level radioactive waste in China is a shaft-tunnel model, located in saturated<br />

zones in granite. The engineered barrier system (EBS) is composed of vitrified waste, canisters, buffer materials, backfill<br />

and seals. Unsaturated compacted bentonite is foreseen by lots of countries as a backfill and sealing material. At the present stage,<br />

the Gaomiaozi (GMZ) bentonite is considered as the candidate buffer and backfill material for the Chinese repository. In order to<br />

study the behavior of this material in coupled THMC conditions, a mock-up facility, named China-Mock-up, has been installed in<br />

Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology. The heater, which substitutes a loaded waste canister, is placed inside of the facility.<br />

To simulate the impact of groundwater, the water inflow of the barrier from outer surface is also possible. This paper presents<br />

a numerical study of the coupled THM behavior of China-mock-up test. In the paper, the basic physical characters of GMZ bentonite<br />

and experimental facility of China-mock-up test are firstly presented. Based on the experimental studies, the numerical simulation<br />

is realized by the program of LAGAMINE. In the simulation, the following physical phenomena are taken account: the<br />

transport of liquid (advection) and heat ...<br />

SESSION 33 — RECENT ADVANCES IN PROCESSING AND IMMBOLIZATION OF HLW,<br />

FISSLE MATERIAL AND TRANSUANIC (TRU) - PART 1 OF 2 (2.14)<br />

1) URANIUM METAL OXIDATION, GRINDING AND ENCAPSULATION IN BOROBOND:<br />

TRU WASTE MANAGEMENT (w/oP-59279)<br />

Kevin Cook, Larry Addington, Beth Utley, Boron Products (USA)<br />

Hydrogen generation mitigation for K Basin sludge was examined by encapsulation of uranium metal in BoroBond®, pre-oxidation<br />

of uranium metal with Fentons reagent and grinding of Densalloy SD170, an irradiated uranium metal surrogate. Encapsulation<br />

in BoroBond® resulted in pressure increase rates at 60°C ranging from 0.116 torr/h to 0.186 torr/h compared to 0.240 torr/h<br />

for a uranium metal in water standard. Samples cast with higher water content led to increased rates. A Fentons reagent system<br />

consisting of a simple reagent mix of FeSO4•7H2O, H2O2 and HCl effectively oxidized ¼ cubes of uranium metal in under four<br />

days at room temperature. Increased peroxide addition rate, increased FeSO4•7H2O concentration and low pH all increase the corrosion<br />

rate. Densalloy SD170 with an average particle size of 581 µm with 7.63 % of particles less than 90 µm was milled so that<br />

over 90 % of the Densalloy mass measured less than 90 µm in 6 hours of milling. Acceptable wear rates were seen on wear components<br />

that were from standard materials (Nitronic SS and 440SS).<br />

2) RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION OF HIGH LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

FROM PITS NO1 AND NO2 AT THE GREMIKHA SITE (w/oP-59390)<br />

B.S. Stepennov, V.M. Afanasyev, A.Yu. Kazennov, N.V. Kartashev, A.V. Korolev, O.E. Kiknadze, D.V. Pavlov, Kurchatov<br />

Institute; V.V. Eremenko, FGUP SevRAO; G. Fady, CEA; Lucien Pillette-Cousin, Areva TA (Russia/France)<br />

One of the legacies of the Cold War period is the unsafe and uncontrolled storage of high level radioactive waste at the former<br />

soviet navy bases. At the former naval maintenance base of Gremikha in the North-West of Russia, it has been necessary to conduct<br />

characterization of high level waste in order to decide the best way to recover and condition it, with good radiation protection<br />

and safety conditions. France, represented by CEA, associated with AREVA TA as technical support, funded the studies performed<br />

by the Russian partners to define conditions of characterization of this high level waste that has been stored for tens of years in two<br />

pits, filled with water and containing sludge. The Russian Kurchatov Institute conducted the clarification of the water contained in<br />

the pit by removal of sludge using filtration techniques. Then, a 3D model of the content of the pits was realized including all<br />

objects identified after water clarification. Specific methods and technologies were used for that because the dose rates near some<br />

objects were as high as 400 Gy/h. Data obtained makes it possible now to choose the best option for the management of the identified<br />

high level solid radioactive waste. The paper presents the techniques used for clarification of water contained in the pits, the<br />

main results and the expected way forward to recover and condition this high level waste.<br />

97


Session 34 Abstracts<br />

3) PILOT TEST OF PRECIPITATION SETUP FOR DUST SUPRESSOR AND TRANSURANIC ELEMENTS<br />

REMOVAL FROM WASTEWATERS OF CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (w/oP-59256)<br />

Valentin Avramenko, Svetlana Bratskaya, Dmitry Marinin, Institute of Chemistry FEBRAS; Anatoliy Terzi,<br />

Mariya Yarmolyuk, Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (Russia/Ukraine)<br />

In this paper we report the results of pilot tests of flocculation/precipitation setup for dust-suppressor (DS) and transuranic elements<br />

(TRU) removal from wastewaters of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP), including those of the Object Shelter . Tests<br />

were performed on the pilot unit (PU), which included service tank, precipitation tank, and accumulation tank, 300 dm3 each, connected<br />

with pipelines with dosing and pumping equipment, and throttle valves providing controlled dosing, mixing, precipitation<br />

and mechanical filtration of radioactive wastewaters under different conditions. Three samples of the wastewaters drainage waters<br />

from the Object Shelter , combined drainage waters of Object Shelter and 3rd reactor unit of ChNPP, and evaporator concentrate<br />

from SVO unit of ChNPP were tested. The reagent compositions used in pilot tests were based on coagulant POLYPACS-30 LF<br />

(aluminum polyoxychloride), synthetic cationic flocculants Besfloc K6634, K510CA, K6732 («Kolon Life Science, Inc», South<br />

Korea) varying in molecular weight and charge density, and natural cationic flocculant «Chitofloc» (Institute of Chemistry<br />

FEBRAS, Russia). The following wastewater parameters were controlled during the pilot tests: pH, dry residue, oxygen consumption,<br />

total alpha- and beta-activity, isotope composition, optical density and DS content.<br />

It was shown that wastewaters with DS content of 200-300 mg/L could be effectively…<br />

4) SEPARATION PROCESSES FOR THE PRETREATMENT OF HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR<br />

WASTES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (w/oP-59291)<br />

David Hobbs, Aiken, Thomas Peters, Kathryn Taylor-Pashow, Fernando Fondeur, Charles Nash, Samuel Fink,<br />

David Herman, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) (USA) Presentation by: Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

Separation methods for the pretreatment of the high-level nuclear wastes (HLW) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) include the<br />

Caustic Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) process for cesium and adsorption/ion exchange for the removal of cesium, strontium and<br />

alpha-emitting actinides. The CSSX process uses a calixarene extractant in combination with phase modifiers in a hydrocarbon<br />

diluent. Monosodium titanate (MST), a hydrous metal oxide, is the baseline material for the removal of strontium and alpha-emitting<br />

radionuclides (principally Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240 and Np-237). Two pretreatment facilities, the Modular Caustic Side Solvent<br />

Extraction Unit (MCU) and the Actinide Removal Process (ARP) facility began radioactive operations at SRS in 2008.<br />

Together these facilities can treat approximately 4 million liters of waste per year. The same separation processes are also planned<br />

for the much larger Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The SWPF, which has a design throughput of about 27 million liters<br />

per year, is under construction and scheduled to begin radioactive operations in 2014.<br />

Current R&D activities for the CSSX process are focused on implementing a new solvent system and stripping flowsheet that<br />

offers enhanced extraction and stripping of cesium. This next generation solvent system features a different calixarene extractant,<br />

uses caustic instead of nitric…<br />

SESSION 34 — URANIUM SITES, ER ISSUES, SITE CHARACTERIZATION<br />

AND MONITORING - PART 2 OF 2 (4.12) (4-6)<br />

1) SAMPLING IN DECOMMISSIONING: CETAMA SEMINAR AND INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW (w/oP-59209)<br />

Guy Granier, Daniele Roudil, CEA MARCOULE; Didier Dubot, CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS (France)<br />

The quality of measurement is crucial for the safety of nuclear facilities and is a primary requirement for the characterization<br />

of nuclear materials, fissile material monitoring and accountancy.<br />

The Commission for the Establishment of Analysis Methods (CETAMA) is a unit of the French Alternative Energies and Atomic<br />

Energy Commission (CEA) set up to improve the quality of analysis and measurement results, in the nuclear field, by proposing<br />

suitable scientific and technical developments:<br />

• Preparation and/or certification or reference materials;<br />

• Organization of interlaboratory comparisons to assess the quality of the results and to validate analysis methods<br />

• Published methods and reference documents validated by laboratory experiment<br />

• Organization of workshops to share the reporting of experience among analysts<br />

To ensure, at each level of its exploitation, a control of nuclear material dissemination is a main priority of nuclear industry in<br />

France. Analysis is the main tool of supervision to follow this goal.<br />

By the choice of adapted tracers, with definite frequencies the analysis allows a control and a follow-up of the nuclear operation<br />

of the installations.<br />

For more than 50 years of uninterrupted evolution this industry developed the comprehensive view about different aspects,<br />

civil, military, production of energy or medical…<br />

2) FOAM NOVEL DELIVERY TECHNOLOGY FOR REMEDIATION<br />

OF VADOSE ZONE ENVIRONMENTS (wP-59019)<br />

Dawn Wellman, Danielle P Jansik, Shas Mattigod, Lirong Zhong, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;<br />

Yuxin Wu, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab; Martin Foote, MSE Technology Applications;<br />

Z. F. (Fred) Zhang, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Susan Hubbard, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (USA)<br />

Deep vadose zone environments can be a primary source and pathway for contaminant migration to groundwater. These environments<br />

present unique characterization and remediation challenges that necessitate scrutiny and research. The thickness, depth,<br />

and intricacies of the deep vadose zone, combined with a lack of understanding of the key subsurface processes (e.g., biogeochemical<br />

and hydrologic) affecting contaminant migration, make it difficult to create validated conceptual and predictive models of subsurface<br />

flow dynamics and contaminant behavior across multiple scales. These factors also make it difficult to design and deploy<br />

sustainable remedial approaches and monitor long-term contaminant behavior after remedial actions.<br />

98


Abstracts Session 35<br />

Functionally, the methods for addressing contamination must remove and/or reduce transport of contaminants. This problem<br />

is particularly challenging in the arid western United States where the vadose zone is hundreds of feet thick, rendering transitional<br />

excavation methods exceedingly costly and ineffective. Delivery of remedial amendments is one of the most challenging and critical<br />

aspects for all remedy-based approaches. The conventional approach for delivery is through injection of aqueous remedial solutions.<br />

However, heterogeneous deep vadose zone environments present hydrologic and geochemical challenges which limit the<br />

effectiveness. Because the flow of solution infiltration is dominantly controlled by gravity and suction, injected liquid preferentially<br />

percolates…<br />

3) MOBILITY OF RADIUM FROM PYRITIC URANIUM MINE TAILINGS UNDER<br />

SUB-AQUEOUS DISPOSAL CONDITIONS (wP-59283)<br />

Nand Dave, Mining and Mineral Sciences Laboratories Canada (Canada)<br />

All uranium mines in the Elliot Lake uranium mining district of north-central Ontario, Canada, have been closed due to low<br />

ore grade and prevailing market conditions. A majority of the waste management facilities have been rehabilitated and decommissioned<br />

with in-situ shallow water covers to minimize sulphide oxidation, and hence acid generation and release of metal enriched<br />

effluents.<br />

Laboratory lysimeter investigations were undertaken to evaluate the leaching characteristics and mobility of Ra-226 and other<br />

heavy metals (U, Th and Pb) from pyritic uranium mine tailings under sub-aqueous disposal conditions for assessing the long-term<br />

radiological stability of such waste repositories. The experiments were conducted using three types of un-oxidized tailings: coarse,<br />

fine and gypsum depleted mill total tailings. Shallow water covers of depth ~ 0. 3 m were established using natural lake water. The<br />

leaching characteristics of radium and other major and trace metals were determined by monitoring both surface and pore water<br />

qualities as a function of time.<br />

The results showed that Ra-226 is leached from surface of the submerged tailings and released to both surface water and shallow<br />

zone pore water during initial low sulphate ion concentration of the surface water cover in all three cases. The release of Ra-<br />

226…<br />

4) REMEDIATION PROJECT PLANNING AT THE URANIUM PRODUCTION LEGACY SITES.<br />

LESSON LEARNED FROM THE BEST INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE AND CHALLENGES<br />

FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (wP-59043)<br />

Oleg Voitsekhovych, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute (Ukraine)<br />

The former Soviet Union countries such as Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine, where uranium<br />

production legacy sites are located (such as mines, waste rock piles, pits, chemical and hydrometallurgical plants, tailing<br />

dumps, etc.) are currently facing the challenge of making these objects environmentally safe. These countries share a common history<br />

of the uranium mining and milling industry, similar regulatory shortcomings and uncertainties regarding the strategy justification<br />

for such remediation projects. They also have to deal with scarcity of financial resources for long-term remediation programmes,<br />

and lack of experience with planning and management of environmental remediation projects at former uranium production<br />

sites.<br />

In the recent years, IAEA-supported programmes of international technical co-operation (the projects RER/0986 and<br />

RER/3010) were advancing actively, as well as those sponsored by the UNDP, EurAsEC and others, all aiming to assist with the<br />

preparedness and performance of future remediation projects. As demonstrated by analysis, effectiveness of the many programmes<br />

largely depends on the nations’ level of preparedness to carry out remediation projects in accordance with the international standards.<br />

The lessons learned from analyses of the different type of projects, which were already implemented or which are still in plan<br />

in different countries and in particular…<br />

5) CLOSE-OUT OF OPEN PIT AND WASTE ROCK PILES OF DAXIN URANIUM MINE OF CHINA (wP-59073)<br />

Lechang Xu, Changshun Ren, Min Shi, Liaoning Xueli Zhang,<br />

Jie Gao, Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, CNNC (China)<br />

Daxin Uranium Mine is an small open pit mine. Its contaminated facilities include open pit 87620m2 , East waste rock pile<br />

71710m2 , west waste rock pile 57828m2 , ore transfer station and industrial fields 9370m2 , building and structure 26600m2 , equipment<br />

246 pieces, plastic conduit 3000m. steel conduit 2500m2 and road for transporting ores 1020m. The integrated decommissioning<br />

programmes are presented: uranium extraction, slope stabilization, clear-up, backfill, reshape, covering, re-vegetation, dismantlement/demolishment,<br />

decontamination, re-smelting, waste water treatment.<br />

SESSION 35 — (MERGED WITH SESSION 34)<br />

SESSION 36 — RADIUM REMEDIATION: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES<br />

AND CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES - PART 1 OF 3 (4.11)<br />

1) RADIUM DIAGNOSIS CAMPAIGN (wP-59327)<br />

Florence Gabillaud-Poillion, Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire (France)<br />

In line with the approaches already adopted in France during the 90s on various sites where research and/or radium-extraction<br />

activities were mostly conducted in the past, the French public authorities wish from now on to pursue their prevention and siterehabilitation<br />

approach inherited from the French craftsman and medical sectors that used that radioelement.<br />

As a matter of fact, radium has been in use in several medical activities, notably in the initial methods of cancer therapy. Similarly,<br />

it was also used in some craftsman activities, such as the clock industry, for its radioluminescent properties, the fabrication<br />

of lightning conductors or cosmetics until the 60s. Those activities have generated various traces of pollution that have remained<br />

today.<br />

99


Session 36 Abstracts<br />

On the basis of the different inventories of industrial sites where radium may have been held or used, and notably the inventory<br />

updated by the French Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire<br />

IRSN) in 2007 at the request of the French Nuclear Safety Authority (Autorité de sûreté nucléaire ASN), French State services<br />

have potentially identified 134 sites that hosted radium-related activities in France. The radiological status of those sites is either<br />

unknown or very partially…<br />

2) ANDRA’S REMEDIATION MISSIONS (w/oP-59210)<br />

Patrick Poiret, Eric Lanes, Andra (France)<br />

For many years now, the French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency (Agence nationale pour la gestion des<br />

déchets radioactifs Andra) has been cleaning up several sites contaminated with radioactivity, bearing in mind that all such remediation<br />

missions share the unique peculiarity of being performed entirely outside the nuclear-power-generation field.<br />

Thanks to the 2006 Planning Act and the new corporate circular in the legal field, to the implementation of the CNAR for<br />

organisational purposes, to the public technical subsidy for dedicated storage facilities and the disposal facility for VLL waste (Centre<br />

TFA) from a financial standpoint, Andras new structure is now in place to ensure a proactive approach to manage the environmental<br />

liabilities arising from the sites polluted by radioactive materials, which, although scarce in number, each confront us with<br />

a specific challenge.<br />

3) URANIUM MILL TAILINGS REMEDIATION IN THE USA. A HISTORY AND LESSONS LEARNED (w/oP-59407)<br />

Steve Rima, AMEC (USA)<br />

Since the 1940s uranium ores have been processed at various locations in the United States to extract and produce uranium and<br />

other concentrated materials, first for government (weapons) research and production, and then for nuclear power production. The<br />

tailings residue from the uranium milling process contained radioactive (primarily Ra-226) and hazardous chemicals. Large volumes<br />

of tailings were produced during the milling process. In the early history of this process the tailings were not recognized as<br />

hazardous and were released to the general public for a wide variety of uses, resulting in significant spread of contamination in the<br />

vicinity of many operating mills.<br />

In the late 1960s and early 1970s laws were enacted at the state and federal level to begin to deal with the legacy of this contamination.<br />

Over the course of the next several decades various regulatory agencies were responsible for remediating these sites.<br />

Different approaches were used, different end points and definitions of clean were used, and very large sums of public funding were<br />

spent on remediating these sites. Rarely was the cost commensurate with the risk reduction obtained through remediation.<br />

This paper will present an overview of the history of the uranium mill tailings regulatory and remediation program in the United<br />

States, the cost of the program compared to risk reduction, successes and failures, and important lessons learned that should be<br />

applied to future efforts in this area.<br />

4) REMEDIATION OF CANADA’S HISTORIC HAUL ROUTE FOR RADIUM AND<br />

URANIUM ORES: THE NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION ROUTE (wP-59303)<br />

Robert Brian Geddes, Chris Wenzel, AMEC; Michael Owen,<br />

Mark J. Gardiner, AECL; Julie Brown, Natural Resources Canada’s (Canada)<br />

Established in the 1930s, the Northern Transportation Route (NTR) served to transport pitchblende ore 2,200km from the Port<br />

Radium Mine in Canadas Northwest Territories to Fort McMurray in Alberta. From there, the ore was shipped 3,000km by rail to<br />

the town of Port Hope, Ontario where it was refined for its radium content and used for medical purposes. Later, refinement<br />

focussed on uranium content.<br />

The corridor of lakes, rivers, portages and roads that made up the NTR included a number of transfer points, where ore was<br />

unloaded and transferred to other barges or trucks. Ore was occasionally spilled during these transfer operations and, in some cases,<br />

subsequently distributed over larger areas as properties were re-developed or modified. In addition, relatively small volumes of ore<br />

were sometimes transported by air to the south.<br />

Since 1992, the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office (LLRWMO) has conducted surveys to identify and characterize<br />

spill sites along the NTR where soils exhibit elevated concentrations of uranium, radium and/or arsenic. In addition to significant<br />

areas of impact in Fort McMurray, contamination along the NTR was centred in the Sahtu region near Great Bear Lake and<br />

along the southern part of the Slave River. Early radiological investigations found…<br />

SESSION 37 — YOUNG GENERATION NETWORK (YGN) AND<br />

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS (5.16)<br />

1) THE REESTABLISHMENT OF RADIOCHEMISTRY ACADEMIC<br />

PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATES (w/oP-59025)<br />

Craig Williamson, South Carolina Universities Research and Education Foundation (USA)<br />

Despite its importance in national security, medicine, energy, and in waste management radiochemistry education in the United<br />

States has gone through two lost decades. In the 1970s ten to fifteen universities were granting between thirty (30) and forty (40)<br />

doctoral degrees a year. By the 1980s those numbers had declined to twenty (20) and thirty (30) a year, by the 1990s the numbers<br />

had again decreased to below fifteen (15) Ph.D.s a year. In the year 2000, the data shows that only 5 Ph.D.s in radiochemistry were<br />

awarded. The causes for this decline is directly attributed to the lack of federal support for an academic discipline that for the most<br />

part depends on federal funding.<br />

In 2011, it is expected that over thirty (30) doctoral degrees in radiochemistry will be conferred. The turn around in radiochemistry<br />

education in the United States can be directly attributed to the support provided by the U.S. Departments of Energy, Defense<br />

and Homeland Security. In addition, support has come from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and from the National<br />

Nuclear Security Administration. The form of this support has been extensive from proposed undergraduate research programs,<br />

scholarships, graduate fellowships, junior faculty awards, curriculum awards, and grants…<br />

100


Abstracts Session 38<br />

2) PLANNING FOR DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES -<br />

THE VIEWS OF YOUNGER STAKEHOLDERS (wP-59222)<br />

Staffan Lindskog, Swedísh Radiation Safety Authority;<br />

Bea Labor, Badania Dydaktycne Project 2010 (Sweden/Poland) (<strong>Final</strong> paper received and Copyrights pending)<br />

Title: Nuclear as a semi-sustainable energy source the views of younger stakeholders<br />

It is planned that many nuclear facilities will be decommissioned in the near future. This challenge includes certified repositories<br />

for LLW and ILW, procedures for classification and free release, systems for transportation, planning activities, and liaison with<br />

the public. The last item can have a substantial impact on the efficiency of decommissioning projects. Insufficient dialogue with<br />

various stakeholder groups can be a factor that drives costs, whilst appropriate programs, means and environments for communication<br />

and knowledge transfer may facilitate the establishment of contemporary and comprehensive bases for decisions and thereby<br />

also enhance the possibility for consensus and thereby achieve feasible and sustainable solutions. The programs thus decided for<br />

the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and the management of the nuclear waste must then be communicated openly and constitute<br />

an integral part of the stakeholder related activities.<br />

The nuclear renaissance implies as well as calls for newer platforms for communications with the stakeholders. This communication<br />

must include how compliance with the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) (and also preferably the Extended Polluter Responsibility,<br />

EPR) is to be achieved, i. e. how the generation harvesting the benefits from nuclear electricity will…<br />

3) GRADUATE OR APPRENTICE? HOW NUCLEAR TRAINING PROVISION HAS CHANGED<br />

THE SHAPE OF THE NUCLEAR EMPLOYMENT MARKET (w/oP- 59415)<br />

Corhyn Parr, Nuclear Enterprise (UK)<br />

ABSTRACT NOT AVAILABLE<br />

4) NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT - OVERVIEW OF THE ACTIVITIES<br />

PROPOSED BY SFEN YOUNG GENERATION (SFEN-JG)<br />

Guillaume Vaast, SGN–Pierrelatte (France)<br />

ABSTRACT NOT AVAILABLE<br />

SESSION 38 — MEETING: YOUNG GENERATION NETWORK (YGN)<br />

AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS (5.17)<br />

ABSTRACT NOT AVAILABLE<br />

SESSION 39A — POSTER SESSION: FACILITY DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING<br />

A-1) USE OF HIGHLY PRESURIZED LIQUID NITROGEN TECHNOLOGY FOR CONCRETE<br />

SCABBLING APPLICATION AT SICN NUCLEAR FACILITIY (wP-59282)<br />

Fabrice Moggia, Claire-Emilie Vaudey, Thierry Varet, Valérie Toulemonde, AREVA;<br />

Frédéric Richard, Air Liquide CTAS; Gary Anderson, Nitrocision; Frédérique Damerval, AREVA (France/USA)<br />

Dismantling and decommissioning (D&D) operations of nuclear site facilities usually involve the implementation of a large<br />

number of technologies. These technologies are mostly dedicated to decontamination, cutting and concrete scabbling operations.<br />

Technologies used for example for concrete scabbling are: disk sander, bush hammer, water jet, planer & Such mechanicals processes<br />

proved to work since facilities are being decommissioned; however as larger projects are foreseen, the capability of such applications<br />

to fulfill the requirement in term of economics, techniques and environment/social remains uncertain. Indeed, the efficiency<br />

and the speed rate remains low, many operators are required to operate, implying a high dosimetry, the working conditions are<br />

strenuous and finally the operations could last several years for large surfaces&<br />

For all these reasons, it seems necessary to search for new technologies, which would bring sustainability to the D&D operations<br />

while carrying a higher standard in terms of safety, easiness and economic value.<br />

The Nitrojet technology is a process able to produce liquid nitrogen at low temperature and very high pressure (up to 4000<br />

bar). Liquid nitrogen is collected from a tank to be pressurized in a specific skid. The nitrogen stream can then be applied on the<br />

substrate<br />

The use of this new…<br />

A-2) METHODOLOGY OF EXTERNAL EXPOSURE CALCULATION FOR REUSE OF<br />

CONDITIONAL RELEASED MATERIALS FROM DECOMMISSIONING (wP-59138)<br />

Frantisek Ondra, Marek Vaako, DECOM, a.s.; Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

Conditional release of materials is a part of nuclear installation decommissioning that can significantly influenced radioactive<br />

waste management, radioactive waste repository capacity usage as well as total decommissioning cost. For performance of conditional<br />

released materials scenarios it is needed to determine radiological, material, organizational and other conditions for conditionally<br />

released materials reuse to not breach exposure limits for staff and public during scenarios life cycle (preparation, construction<br />

and operation of scenario). The article presents a methodology for determination of above mentioned conditions to ensure that<br />

staff and public exposure does not breach the limits. The methodology comprises a proposal of following conditions in the view of<br />

staff and public exposure:<br />

• radionuclide limit concentration of conditionally released materials for specific scenarios and nuclide vectors,<br />

• specific deployment of conditionally released materials eventually shielding materials, staff and public during the scenarios<br />

life cycle,<br />

101


Session 39 Abstracts<br />

“ organizational measures concerning time of staffs or publics stay in the vicinity on conditionally released materials for<br />

individual performed scenarios and nuclide vectors.<br />

The article further describes VISIPLAN 3D ALARA calculation planning software tool, having been used for calculation of<br />

staffs and publics external exposure for individual scenarios. Several other parallel papers proposed for ICEM 11 are presenting<br />

selected details of the project.<br />

A-3) UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT OF NEW MONITORING SYSTEM<br />

FOR FREE-RELEASE FOR NPP A-1 DECOMMISSIONING, SLOVAKIA (wP-59244)<br />

Alojz Slaninka, VUJE, a.s./ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava; Ondrej Slávik, VUJE, a.s.;<br />

Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

Within 2nd stage of decommissioning project of NPP A-1 in Slovakia it is necessary to decontaminate, monitor and if possible<br />

to free release large amounts of contaminated materials, mainly contaminated soil and concrete debris (thousands of tons). Their<br />

contamination is caused by dominant 137Cs (33 years after shutdown) that emits 661.65 keV gamma ray that can be easily detected<br />

by scintillation or semiconductor detectors. In this connection a new free release monitoring post with a large volume 600 L container<br />

counting geometry was designed and developed. The monitoring system is based on a pair of electrically cooled semiconductor<br />

HPGe detectors that are placed into a modifiable vertical or horizontal pair of lead collimators. The detectors are equipped<br />

with a Canberra Packard gammaspectrometry chain including proper characterised HPGe detectors type GC 3020. The vertical<br />

arrangement of the collimator ensures monitoring of materials in 200 l rotating drums. The horizontal one ensures monitoring of<br />

the one side of a 600 l rectangular container. The monitoring system is integrated with an industrial scale for determination of massic<br />

activities of measured materials and in addition by a rotating table in the case of 200 l drums monitoring. Full-energy peak detection<br />

efficiency polynomial curves…<br />

A-4) LASER REMOVAL OF CONTAMINANTS ON THE METAL SURFACE (wP-59343)<br />

Hui Jun Won, Jei Kwon Moon, Sun Hee Jung, Chong Hun Jung,<br />

Kune Woo Lee, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute;<br />

Byung -Sun Choi, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (Korea)<br />

A Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with a 532 nm and 450 mJ/pulse was employed to study the decontamination characteristics of<br />

Type 304 stainless steel specimens and aluminum specimens artificially contaminated with CsNO3 , Co(NH4 ) 2 (SO4 )2, Eu2O3 and<br />

CeO2 , respectively. The relative atomic molar ratio of the contaminants on metal surface before and after laser irradiation was determined<br />

by EPMA. The morphology of specimen surface was examined by SEM. The optimum number of laser shots and the laser<br />

fluence for the system were determined. More than 98 % of CsNO3 , Co(NH4 ) 2 (SO4 )2, Eu2O3 on Type 304 stainless steel specimens<br />

could be removed by the circular type laser beam within the 16 laser shots at 13.3 J/cm2 and 10 Hz. The removal of contaminants<br />

on aluminum surface, however, was found to be more difficult by laser. Comparative study on the removal characteristics<br />

between the circular type laser beam and the string type laser beam was also performed. The variation of laser removal performance<br />

on the contaminants was investigated by changing the irradiation angle.<br />

A-5) INFLUENCE OF THE CONDITIONAL RELEASE OF THE MATERIALS WITH VERY<br />

LOW LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVITY ON THE ENVIRONMENT (wP -59132)<br />

Slavka Prvakova, University of Economics in Bratislava; Adela Mrskova, DECOM, A. S.;<br />

Jozef Pritrsky, DECOM (Slovakia)<br />

Significant amount of solid materials (metals, non-metals, building structures) that could be contaminated or activated is produced<br />

during operation and especially decommissioning of nuclear power plants. Considerable fraction of these materials has level<br />

of radioactivity close to the radiological limits allowing its safe release into the environment thereby could be potentially recycled<br />

within the special constructions, as for example tunnels, roads or bridges. If the requirements of legislation on the radiological limits<br />

for handling such material and long term safety of the constructions are fulfilled, contaminated material can be released in the<br />

form of recycled concrete, remelted steel, etc.<br />

The paper presents implementation of the IAEA and EC recommendations into the form of detailed analytical approaches with<br />

the aim to develop integrated scenarios and to analyse long-term influence of the conditional release of the material with very low<br />

level of radioactivity on the environment. Further, an estimation of the key input parameters characteristic for the specific conditions<br />

of Slovak case in order to fulfil the radiological limits according to the Slovak legislation is included. Analysed integrated scenarios<br />

represent surface or underground civil construction with radionuclides released directly into the geosphere and transported<br />

by a groundwater flow into the biosphere. The migration of radionuclides is modelled in the near-surface conditions with the advection<br />

as a dominant transport mechanism. Computer code GoldSim is used to evaluate the long-term safety assessment of the conditionally<br />

released material on the environment.<br />

A-6) CONDITIONAL RELEASE OF STEEL FROM DECOMMISSIONING<br />

IN A FORM OF REINFORCED CONCRETE (wP -59058)<br />

Jozef Pritrsky, DECOM; Miroslav Brodnan, University of Zilina;<br />

Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

The paper deals with the conditional release of low-level radioactive steel from decommissioning in a form of reinforced concrete.<br />

The main goal was to determine limits for radionuclides concentration and calculate the annual dose for a member of a critical<br />

group of public, which should not exceed 0.01 mSv/year (according to IAEA Safety Guide RS-G-1.7). Corrosion is the principle<br />

mechanism of radionuclides release in this case, therefore effort was devoted to assess the time-dependent rate of steel reinforcement<br />

corrosion. It was assumed, that concrete is initially highly alkaline (with pH of 12 to 13) because of hydration products<br />

such as calcium hydroxide, which keeps the steel surface passive and protected from corrosion. However, carbonic acid resulting<br />

from carbon dioxide and water in the atmosphere can react with these products to produce calcium carbonate. This process is<br />

102


Abstracts Session 39<br />

referred to as a -carbonation and leads after a period of time to significant reduction of the alkalinity (to pH as low as 8.5) followed<br />

by destruction of passive layer and starting corrosion of the embedded steel. The analytical principles and a set of input data have<br />

been implemented into a mathematical model developed by means of GoldSim software. The paper presents the results of mathematical<br />

simulation of corrosion precess, which are compared with real measured values.<br />

A-7) DECOMMISSIONING OF THE UF6 SPHERE (w/oP -59200)<br />

Sylvain Chevassu, ONET Technologies - ONECTRA (France)<br />

Technically, ONECTRA has started with the decontamination, under containment, with a teleoperated arm. The complete operations<br />

of internal cleaning and radiological controls will be operated with this arm. The internal particles are carried out applying<br />

two distinct processes: first, a mechanical decontamination process (brushing/aspiration), followed by a chemical decontamination<br />

process (pulverization of an acid solution). At the end of internal cleaning, the lower part of Sphere will be cut under containment<br />

with mechanical-cutting tools. An internal radiological map will validate that the final decontamination objectives have been<br />

reached. The final validation of the Spheres internal cleaning will be delivered through the agreement of the safety authority, mainly<br />

based at the end of the operation report.<br />

This safety authoritys agreement will allow the final Spheres dismantling sequence, consisting in outdoor cutting operations<br />

with no containment using oxy-gas cutting processes. The last step consists in building a cover slab under the Sphere. This last step<br />

requires a second agreement from the safety authority.<br />

A-8) DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES PIPING CLEANING<br />

SYSTEM USING MICROBUBBLE (w/oP-59070)<br />

Jongseon Jeon, SangChul Lee, Byoungsub Han, Enesys Co., LTD.;<br />

HakSoo Kim, Nuclear Engineering & Technology Institute; Wisoo Kim, Enesys Co., Ltd. (Korea)<br />

It removes radioactive sludge and corrosion products deposited on the inner walls of the pipes and valves in replacement or<br />

decommission, upon termination of life time, of nuclear power plant or nuclear facility. It lowers a cost of waste treatments taking<br />

advantage of a reduction of quantity of radioactive wastes by treating in classification of the radioactive wastes whose activities are<br />

lower than legal standards.<br />

The cleaning or decontamination methods developed until now have induced a damage on systems while being operated. A<br />

decontamination has been restrained if it was difficult to access physically. We are in development of the cleaning technique for<br />

pipelines by utilizing micro-bubbles in order to improve an efficiency and to prevent from any damage of systems. It aims to conduct<br />

a decontamination for spaces difficult to access there by applying cavitation phenomenon that is generated in collapse of<br />

micro-bubbles. In order to improve an efficiency of the micro-bubble device, the experimental conditions suitable to decontamination<br />

have been established and the auxiliary equipments have been added. The generation conditions and characteristics of microbubbles<br />

have been demonstrated by adjusting pHs and temperatures of cleaning solution. A decontamination effect has been confirmed<br />

by adding up an electrolytic method and ozone into micro-bubbles.<br />

A-9) A MATRIX INVERSION METHOD FOR GAMMA-SOURCE MAPPING<br />

FROM GAMMA COUNT DATA (wP -59082)<br />

Richard Bull, Claire Burgess, Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

Gamma ray counting is often used to survey the distribution of active waste material in various locations. Ideally the output<br />

from such surveys would be a map of the activity of the waste. In this paper a simple matrix inversion method is presented. This<br />

allows an array of gamma-count data to be converted to an array of source activities.<br />

For each survey area the response matrix is computed. The elements in this matrix are calculated using a gamma shielding code<br />

such as MicroShield (1). This matrix links the activity array to the count array. The activity array is then obtained via numerical<br />

matrix inversion. The method was tested on artificially created arrays of count data onto which statistical noise had been added.<br />

The method was able to reproduce, quite faithfully, the original activity distribution used to generate the dataset.<br />

The method has been applied to a number of practical cases, including the distribution of activated objects in a hot cell and to<br />

activated nimonic springs amongst fuel-element debris in vaults at a nuclear plant.<br />

Reference<br />

1) MicroShield, Version 8, Grove Software, 2009.<br />

A-10) DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES FOR SALASPILS RESEARCH REACTOR (wP -59055)<br />

Andris Abramenkovs, Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre;<br />

Jazeps Malnacs, State Environmental Service (Latvia)<br />

In May 1995, the Latvian government decided to shut down the Salaspils Research Reactor (SRR). The reactor is out of operation<br />

since July 1998. A conceptual study for the decommissioning of SRR has been carried out by Noell-KRC-Energie- und<br />

Umwelttechnik GmbH at 1998-1999. The Latvian government decided to start the direct dismantling to green field” in October 26,<br />

1999. The upgrade of decommissioning and dismantling plan was performed in 2003-2004 years, which change the main goal of<br />

decommissioning to the brown field.<br />

The paper deals with the SRR decommissioning experience during 1999-2010. The main decommissioning stages are discussed<br />

including spent fuel and radioactive wastes management. The legal aspects and procedures for decommissioning of SRR are<br />

described in the paper. It was found, that the involvement of stakeholders at the early stages significantly promotes the decommissioning<br />

of nuclear facility.<br />

Radioactive waste managements main efforts were devoted to collecting and conditioning of historical radioactive wastes from<br />

different storages outside and inside of reactor hall. All radioactive materials (more than 96 tons) were conditioned in concrete containers<br />

for disposal in the radioactive wastes repository Radons at Baldone site. The dismantling of contaminated and activated<br />

components of SRR systems is discussed in paper. The cementation of dismantled radioactive wastes in concrete containers is discussed.<br />

103


Session 39 Abstracts<br />

A-11) TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION & CHOICE FOR REMEDIATION METHODS (wP -59398)<br />

Mark Morton, Janaka Jayamaha, WorleyParsons (USA)<br />

When out of normal material or very high activity is encountered in a D&D project, special considerations are needed. As the<br />

source term increases, the level of attention to planning, project cost and risk management must increase as well. WorleyParsons<br />

Polestar (WPP) is engaged in defining and documenting (with follow on project design expected) the remediation methods to<br />

remove contaminated soils discovered under a hot cell. Soil dose rates have been measured in the 7000 to 8900 Rem/hour, with<br />

radionuclide mix to be defined in mid to late summer 2011 from samples drawn in June 2011. The scope of the current project is<br />

to search remedial techniques and removal methods and define a set of possible alternatives. These alternatives will be screened<br />

by WPP and client expert panel using a WPP defined process to short list the project alternatives. Transparency and un-biased<br />

choice of actions is key to owner and public confidence in the process and the choice of the ultimate path forward.<br />

The poster will show Phase 1- how possible means and methods were first identified, catalogued and the initial screening of<br />

the means and methods (technologies). The remaining means and methods are being mixed to form an alternative…<br />

A-12) NEW GENERATION OF DIAMOND TOOLINGS FOR FACILITATING<br />

DECOMMISSIONING OPERATIONS (wP-59396)<br />

Claude Besson, Erico Mariotti, Alexandre Mouysset, Lorenz Zur Nedden,<br />

Bernard Delannay, Carbodiam (France/Belgium)<br />

Diamond tools are well proven cutting, drilling and grinding technologies in many applications but need to be specifically optimized<br />

and adapted for the complex and varied structures of nuclear power plant in view of decontamination and decommissioning.<br />

The proper development and use of diamond tools in these extreme and complex conditions can only be achieved thanks to the<br />

combined talent of experienced nuclear plant contractors, engineers, technicians, operators of diamond tools, and the use of specialized<br />

equipment.<br />

This present paper is an overview of the possible applications of diamond tools in the different operations of Nuclear Decommissioning<br />

and Decontamination.<br />

KEY DIAMOND TOOL APPLICATIONS for Decommissioning and Decontamination of Nuclear Power Plant:<br />

1) Wet/dry concrete wall sawing (with remote control system)<br />

2) Wet/dry wire cutting of concrete<br />

3) Wet/dry wire sawing of metal<br />

4) Wet/dry core drilling<br />

5) Grinding and leveling for surface preparation including all edges<br />

6) Scraping for removing bituminous or neoprene glues and all kinds of coatings<br />

7) Shaving for horizontal and vertical surfaces and ceilings<br />

Each situation requires a detailed feasibility study and engineering report to select the optimal work method and answer concerns<br />

about safety, time to completion and waste volume...<br />

A-13) POMPE SECONDAIRE (w/oP -59413)<br />

Anne Durand, CEA (France)<br />

La caractérisation globale du composant a permis de classer entièrement la pompe secondaire en déchet TFA.<br />

Une étude a été menée avec lANDRA sur la faisabilité et les travaux de préparation à réaliser afin dévacuer en pièce unitaire<br />

cette pompe vers le centre CSTFA.<br />

Après son basculement en position horizontale, le corps de pompe (partie cylindrique) a été préparé* afin dassurer son remplissage<br />

en mortier au CSTFA.<br />

A-14) TRITIUM ANALYSIS : AN ACTUAL PROBLEM FOR LARGE<br />

BUILDING DECOMMISSIONING (w/oP-59406)<br />

Pascal Fichet, Florence Goutelard, Sylvie Guegan, Aurelie Robert-Ortis,<br />

Nadine Evenat-Robic, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (France)<br />

Radioactive waste management is nowadays, after nearly 50 years of concern, a technical and economical challenge faced by<br />

existing nuclear power countries. In decommissioning of nuclear facilities and after disposal of the nuclear equipments (laboratory<br />

materials, glove boxes, &), the radioactive inventory of the various building materials is needed to state the working condition<br />

for dismantling.<br />

A 150 m² laboratory which accommodated preparations of 3H and 14C labeled molecules is currently under investigation in<br />

order to be dismantled in the next decade. 3H is particularly difficult to measure because of its lability and because of the low energy<br />

of its beta emission. In order to classify the various building materials, different techniques of measurements have been implemented<br />

after a grid has been marked on the floor. Firstly, a smear of each square was carried out and 3H was analyzed leading to<br />

a first radiological area classification. Secondly, the technique called digital photo stimulated luminescence (PSL) autoradiography<br />

(usually used in biology) has been developed in order to identify radioactive spots in the laboratory. This technique consists in<br />

depositing the radiation sensitive film on the floor. After an exposure time of two days, a scan by laser leads to a 2D image…<br />

A-15) REUSE OF CONDITIONALLY RELEASED STEELS; PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION<br />

OF PROCESSES FOR MANUFACTURING OF STEEL ELEMENTS AND<br />

FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SELECTED SCENARIOS (wP-59130)<br />

Peter Bezák, Eva Hajková, Frantisek Ondra, Vladimír Daniska, DECOM, a.s.;<br />

Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

Conditional release of steels from decommissioning projects enables controlled reuse of considerable volumes of steels. For<br />

proposal of scenarios for steel reuse, it is needed to identify and evaluate partial elementary activities of the whole process from<br />

conditioned release of steels, manufacturing of various elements up to realisation of scenarios. As the scenarios for reuse of conditional<br />

released steel are considered the technical constructions such as bridges, tunnels, roads, railway constructions and others<br />

104


Abstracts Session 39<br />

which guarantee the long-term properties over the periods of 50-100 years. The paper presents the review of activities for manufacturing<br />

of various steel construction elements made of conditionally released steels and activities for realisation of selected scenarios<br />

for reuse of such construction elements. As the starting material for manufacturing of steel elements are the ingots as the<br />

product of melting within the frame of decommissioning radioactive materials management. These ingots are re-melted in industrial<br />

facilities in order to achieve the required physical and chemical properties. Most used technique for manufacturing the steel<br />

construction elements is rolling. As the products considered in scenarios for reuse of conditionally released steels are bars for reinforcement<br />

concrete, rolled steel sheets and other general rolled steel profiles. Lists of elementary activities are…<br />

A-16) THE ASSESSMENT OF THE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO DECOMMISSIONING<br />

OF CERNAVODA NPP FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REDUCTION (wP-59358)<br />

Gheorghe Barariu, National Authority for Nuclear Activity -<br />

Subsidiary of Technology and Engineering for Nuclear Project (Romania)<br />

At present, most of radioactive wastes generated in Romania are due to nuclear activities related to power generation at Cernavoda<br />

NPP Unit 1, commissioned in 1996. By the commissioning in 2007 of Cernavoda NPP Unit 2, nuclear power production<br />

doubled, and as a result the radioactive waste volumes doubled for this industrial activity field.<br />

Nuclear and Radioactive Waste Agency - AN&DR strategy on low and intermediate level waste disposal, has as objective the<br />

commissioning of <strong>Final</strong> Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Waste - DFDSMA until 2017. This facility is in the responsibility<br />

of AN&DR. On the other hand wastes arising from Cernavoda NPP must be treated in order to achieve the acceptance criteria<br />

of DFDSMA. Corresponding Radioactive Waste Treatment Facility - RWTF is in the responsibility of Cernavoda NPP.<br />

Main objective of the National Policy for radioactive waste management is to assure a theoretic nul negative impact or a practical<br />

minimum reasonable impact of the waste management activities on population and environment.<br />

The volume of low and intermediate level wastes that result from decommissioning of four units CANDU 6 and the environment<br />

impact reduction will be presented in this paper.<br />

The treatment facility for radioactive wastes generated by decommissioning<br />

A-17) APPLICATION OF THE DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVE PROCESS TO THE PARTIAL<br />

DE-LICENSING AT OLDBURY NUCLEAR POWER STATION (WP -59376)<br />

Denis Buckley, Magnox Ltd, Berkeley (UK)<br />

Early in 2011 Oldbury Nuclear Power station in South West England applied to the Office of Nuclear Regulation (ONR) to delicense<br />

an area of over 30 hectares of licensed land. This is the largest area of licensed land in the UK to undergo this procedure.<br />

As part of the process the site prepared a safety case to support the submission to the ONR. Also there has been a requirement to<br />

do sampling and analysis to characterise the land and show that any radioactive contamination is below the criterion for de-licensing.<br />

This has been achieved through the successful application of the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process which enabled both<br />

site and regulators to agree on the quantity of samples and the degree of analysis. The ONR has now issued the variation to Oldbury<br />

in July 2011 de-licensing approximately 32 hectares of land from regulatory control.<br />

This Paper outlines the process including the decisions and criteria that have been applied to the Sampling and Analysis at Oldbury<br />

and the Treatment and Interpretation of the data.<br />

This Paper outlines the process including the decisions and criteria that have been applied to the Sampling and Analysis at Oldbury<br />

and the Treatment and Interpretation of the data.<br />

A-18) MULTI-SITE RISK-BASED PROJECT PLANNING, OPTIMIZATION, SEQUENCING & BUDGETING<br />

PROCESS AND TOOL FOR THE INTEGRATED FACILITY DISPOSITION PROJECT (wP -59394)<br />

Jerel Nelson, Carlos Castillo, Julie Huntsman, Heather Lucek, WorleyParsons; Tim Marks, Omega Consultants (USA)<br />

Faced with the DOE Complex Transformation, NNSA was tasked with developing an integrated plan for the decommissioning<br />

of over 400 facilities and 300 environmental remediation units, as well as the many reconfiguration and modernization projects<br />

at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Y-12 Complex. Manual scheduling of remediation activities is time-consuming,<br />

labor intensive, and inherently introduces bias and unaccounted for aspects of the scheduler or organization in the process.<br />

Clearly a tool was needed to develop an objective, unbiased baseline optimized project sequence and schedule with a sound technical<br />

foundation for the Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP).<br />

In generating an integrated disposition schedule, each project (including facilities, environmental sites, and remedial action<br />

units) was identified, characterized, then ranked relative to other projects. Risk matrices allowed for core project data to be extrapolated<br />

into probable contamination levels, relative risks to the public, and other technical and risk parameters to be used in the<br />

development of an overall ranking. These matrices ultimately generated a complete data set that were used in the Ranking and<br />

Sequencing Model (RSM), commonly referred to as the SUPERmodel ,for its numerous abilities to support D&D planning, prioritization,<br />

and sequencing. The SUPERmodel provides rough order-of-magnitude cost estimating,…<br />

SESSION 39B — POSTER SESSION: ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION POSTERS (4.1)<br />

B-1) RADIUM REMEDIATION IN CANADA - HISTORY AND PRESENT DAY (w/oP-59157)<br />

Mark Gardiner, Michael Owen, Robert Zelmer, AECL (Canada)<br />

The environmental impact of radium remains even today. Radio-luminescent paints, radium therapy needles, mining and processing<br />

and their associated legacies have long been pursued in France, Canada, the USA and other countries. The management of<br />

these tasks provides a rich and fascinating history as well as successes and lessons learned in environmental remediation. In Canada,<br />

the radium story begins with the discovery of pitchblende on the shores of Great Bear Lake in Canadas far north and its transport<br />

south and refinement in Port Hope, Ontario. In the earliest days, the leading characters were the LaBine brothers, involved in<br />

exploration and mining, and at the recovery and refining end, Carl French and Marcel Pochon, a protégé of Marie Curie, all associated<br />

with the Eldorado Mining and Refining Company .<br />

105


Session 39 Abstracts<br />

To the current day in Canada, the work of environmental remediation of the radium legacy largely follows the trail of these<br />

individuals, just as in France, a parallel effort follows the trail of Madame Curie. The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management<br />

Office is the agent of the Canadian government for its responsibilities regarding the work at the affected sites and the management<br />

of the related wastes. The Office operates programs and facilities to…<br />

B-2) MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF REACTIVE TRANSPORT IN GROUNDWATER WITH METALS<br />

AND DISSOLVED ISOTOPES 226RA AND 228RA, USIN, SÃO PAULO, BRAZIL (w/oP-59245)<br />

Rodrigo Raposo de Almeida, Federal Fluminense University; Valter Mortágua, Industrias Nucleares do Brasil;<br />

Felipe Rosa, Luciano Magalhaes, Universidade Federal Fluminense (Brazil)<br />

This paper aims to present the results of the analytical model of transport and the mathematical model of flow and transport of<br />

radionuclides, considering the decay and adsorption of the byproducts. The study area is located in Sao Paulo, the largest city in<br />

Brazil and Latin America with about 11 million inhabitants, and it is a former unit of processing of rare earths which ran between<br />

the years 1960 and 1996 named the Plant Interlagos (USIN). The work focus is on groundwater contamination that occurred inside<br />

Warehouse A. This contamination of soil and groundwater occurred about in 1991 due to a crack and leak from a box of separation<br />

of ammonium chloride containing some dissolved radionuclides. The main source of contamination is no longer active, however<br />

the residual phase in the vadose zone still there as a secondary source of contamination. Monitoring of groundwater is done periodically<br />

since 1992, but only in 2007 a detailed groundwater study was undertaken from the impacted area. This study aimed to<br />

detail the plume of contamination of metals and radionuclide in Warehouse A (Galpão A). With the software 3GEO Bioscreen SI<br />

was developed an analytical model of transportation to establish and calibrate the parameters…<br />

B-3) QUANTIFYING THE RETENTION OF FOAM FORMULATION COMPONENTS TO SEDIMENTARY<br />

PHASES TO ENABLE PREDICTIONS OF MOBILITY AND TREATMENT EFFICACY (w/oP-59369)<br />

Rosa Ramirez, DOE EM; Danielle Jansik, Dawn Wellman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (USA)<br />

Deep vadose zone remediation remains the most challenging remediation problem in the DOE Complex. Foam delivery technology<br />

is being developed as a method for delivering remedial amendments within vadose zone environments for in situ contaminant<br />

stabilization. Thus far, the physical propagation of foam within subsurface media has been evaluated and quantified. However,<br />

foam propagation is a product of surfactant sorption which directly impacts foam stability. In order to predict the stability of<br />

foam during subsurface transport it is necessary to quantify the sorption of foam components as a function of concentration, competitive<br />

sorption, sediment mineralogy, and temperature. This investigation provides the results of standard static batch test quantifying<br />

these relationships. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was used to measure surfactant concentrations. The<br />

results of this investigation provide necessary understanding to predict foam stability during subsurface transport and determination<br />

of the remedial radius of influence. This study is part of a multiple step process for demonstrating the feasibility of foam transport<br />

to distribute amendments within in the vadose zone.<br />

B-4) TECHNIQUES OF RADIOACTIVE SOIL PROCESSING AT REHABILITATION<br />

OF CONTAMINATION TERRITORIES. (wP-59199)<br />

Victor Volkov, Alexander Chesnokov, Alexey Danilovich, Yury Zverkov, Sergey Koltyshev,<br />

Sergey Semenov, Anatoly Shisha, RRC Kurchatov Institute (Russia)<br />

Rehabilitation of nuclear- and radiation objects assumes dealing with and removal of considerable volumes of a radioactive<br />

soil. A similar situation was faced at the remediation of such sufficiently large objects, as old radioactive waste storages at the territory<br />

of «Kurchatov Institute» and elimination of consequences of radiation accident at Podolsk plant of nonferrous metals. At<br />

rough estimates the volumes of a radioactive soil at territory of «Kurchatov institute» were 15-20 thousand cub.m, volumes of a<br />

removed soil at carrying out of urgent measures in territory of Kirovo-Chepetsk chemical plant exceeded 20-25 thousand cub.m,<br />

volumes of a low active waste at the territory of Podolsk plant may reach 20 thousand cub.m.<br />

Such considerable volumes demand creation of technologies of their processing, an effective measuring technique of levels of<br />

their contamination and ways of considerable (in times) decrease of their volumes at the expense of decontamination or separation.<br />

Works have been aimed at the decision of these problems at carrying out of rehabilitation of territory «Kurchatov institute». During<br />

works technologies of radiation and water-gravitational separation of a radioactive soil have been offered and are realized in<br />

practice. A facility of water -gravitational separation of the soil was created and used within…<br />

B-5) OPTIMISATION (SAMPLING STRATEGIES AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES)<br />

FOR SITE SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENT MONITORING AT THE AREAS OF<br />

URANIUM LEGACY SITES CONTAMINATION CONCERN IN UKRAINE (wP-59045)<br />

Oleg Voitsekhovych, Tatiyana Lavrova, Alexander Kostezh, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute (Ukraine)<br />

There are many sites in the world, where Environment are still under influence of the contamination related to the Uranium<br />

production carried out in past. Author’s experience shows that lack of site characterization data, incomplete or unreliable environment<br />

monitoring studies can significantly limit quality of Safety Assessment procedures and Priority actions analyses needed for<br />

Remediation Planning. During recent decades the analytical laboratories of the many enterprises, currently being responsible for<br />

establishing the site specific environment monitoring program have been significantly improved their technical sampling and analytical<br />

capacities. However, lack of experience in the optimal site specific sampling strategy planning and also not enough experience<br />

in application of the required analytical techniques, such as modern alpha-beta radiometers, gamma and alpha spectrometry<br />

and liquid-scintillation analytical methods application for determination of U-Th series radionuclides in the environment, doesnt<br />

allow to these laboratories to develop and conduct efficiently the monitoring programs as a basis for further Safety Assessment in<br />

decision making procedures. This paper gives some conclusions, which were gained from the experience establishing monitoring<br />

programs in Ukraine and also propose some practical steps on optimization in sampling strategy planning and analytical procedures<br />

to be applied for the area required Safety assessment and justification for its potential remediation and safe management.<br />

106


Abstracts Session 39<br />

SESSION 39C — POSTER SESSION: MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT / PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (5.1)<br />

C-1) VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGY FOR RADIATION VISUALISATION DURING<br />

THE REMEDIATION AT ANDREEVA BAY IN RUSSIA AS SUPPORT TO<br />

OPERATIONAL AND REGULATORY SUPERVISION (wP-59400)<br />

Niels-Kristian Mark, Institute for Energy Technology,<br />

Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (Norway)<br />

The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authorities (NRPA) has since 1996 carried out a program of regulatory support projects,<br />

funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (NMFA) The objective of the program has been to support the Russian civilian<br />

and military regulators, the Federal Medical Biological Authorities of Russia (FMBA) and the Federal Environmental, Industrial<br />

and Nuclear Supervision Service of Russia, as well as the corresponding nuclear and radiation safety authority within the Russian<br />

Ministry of Defense with development and implementation of methods and tools for better regulatory supervision of the Andreeva<br />

Bay and Gremikha Sites of Temporary Storage (STS) for Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) and Radioactive Waste (RW).<br />

In 2005-2009 regulatory investigations were completed at the Andreeva Bay and Gremikha within the collaborative NRPA-<br />

FMBA program. The radiation and radio-ecological situation was assessed, and criteria and regulations of the STS remediation<br />

were developed, as well as the guidance for their application for three possible options of environmental remediation (conservation,<br />

conversion and liquidation). As part of the project the Federal Medical-Biological Centre, a technical support organisation to<br />

FMBA, developed the DOSEMAP and DATAMAP applications for the FMBA, supporting radiation risk monitoring, worker radiation<br />

exposure control and deeper understanding of the evolution of…<br />

C-2) TAKING RISK ASESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL (wP-59395)<br />

Jerel Nelson, Russel Lee Morton, WorleyParsons Polestar; Carlos Castillo, WorleyParsons;<br />

James T. McSwain, Terragraphics; George Dyer, Natalie Johnson, WorleyParsons;<br />

Gary Nick Kruskall, Link Technologies (USA)<br />

A multi-level (facility and programmatic) risk assessment was conducted for the facilities in the Nevada National Security Site<br />

(NNSS) Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities (RTBF) <strong>Program</strong> and results were included in a new Risk Management Plan<br />

(RMP), which was incorporated into the fiscal year (FY) 2010 Integrated Plans. Risks, risk events, probability, consequence(s),<br />

and mitigation strategies were identified and captured, for most scope areas (i.e., risk categories) during the facilitated risk workshops.<br />

Risk mitigations (i.e., efforts in addition to existing controls) were identified during the facilitated risk workshops when the<br />

risk event was identified. Risk mitigation strategies fell into two broad categories: threats or opportunities. Improvement projects<br />

were identified and linked to specific risks they mitigate, making the connection of risk reduction through investments for the annual<br />

Site Execution Plan.<br />

Due to the amount of that was collected, analysis to be performed, and reports to be generated, a Risk Assessment/ Management<br />

Tool (RAMtool) database was developed to analyze the risks in real-time, at multiple levels, which reinforced the site-level<br />

risk management process and procedures. The RAMtool database was developed and designed to assist in the capturing and analysis<br />

of the key elements of risk: probability, consequence, and impact. The…<br />

C-3) RADIOACTIVE WASTE, FROM MYTH TO REALITY: THE STAKES FOR<br />

ANDRA’S EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION EFFORTS (w/oP-59287)<br />

Annabelle Comte, Andra (France)<br />

Andra is responsible for proposing and implementing industrial management solutions for France’s radioactive waste. Andra’s<br />

goal is to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to make up his or her own mind on a subject that generates such heated debate<br />

within our society. This duty of communication is enshrined in law and is an integral part of Andra’s activities, in the same way as<br />

research, industry and risk management.<br />

Because the subject of radioactive waste is a complex one and concerns such a variety of audiences, Andra adapts its communication<br />

policy so that it is accessible to all, according to individual needs and levels of interest.<br />

For the “non-specialists” (general public, young people, etc.) Andra proposes a system built around education and awarenessraising.<br />

Its aim is to make the subject of radioactive waste accessible to and comprehensible to as many as possible.<br />

Its educational communication approach is built on 3 pillars: first and foremost information, the keystone of any system of<br />

communication, then explanation and finally sharing with the legitimate stakeholders in this pedagogical approach.<br />

Providing dependable information Andra offers information that is appropriate to the level of knowledge of its audiences and<br />

uses all communication media, from the most…<br />

SESSION 40— D&D MANAGEMENT APPROACHES AND PLANNING TOOLS (3.6)<br />

1) IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARDISED LISTING INTO DECOMMISSIONING<br />

COSTING; EXAMPLES AND RELATED IAEA PROJECTS (wP-59313)<br />

Vladimír Daniska, DECOM, a.s.; Michele Laraia, Paul Dinner, Patrick O’Sullivan, IAEA (Slovikia/Austria)<br />

In 1999, IAEA, the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the European Commission jointly proposed a standardised listing of<br />

activities to serve as a common basis for decommissioning cost estimates and thus promote greater harmonisation. This standardised<br />

structure, which is based on activities at three hierarchical levels, is currently being updated based on the experience gained<br />

over ten years of use. This paper comprises two main parts: in the first part, the revised standardised list of activities is presented,<br />

together with guidance on its use in decommissioning costing. The three-level hierarchical structure has been retained though with<br />

several detailed changes to ensure comprehensiveness and avoid ambiguity.<br />

107


Session 40 Abstracts<br />

The second part the paper provides examples of cost methodologies based on the standardised list, including a cost estimation<br />

model for research reactors and a spreadsheet-based cost estimation model, which might be used for scoping purposes or as a training<br />

tool for cost estimators. The cost estimation model for research reactors at IAEA is intended for preliminary cost estimations<br />

in IAEA member countries with limited previous experience in decommissioning costing. In this case, costs are determined largely<br />

at the second level of the hierarchical structure of activities, as the more detailed cost information required for…<br />

2) USE OF SOURCE TERM AND AIR DISPERSION MODELING IN PLANNING DEMOLITION<br />

OF HIGHLY ALPHA-CONTAMINATED BUILDINGS (wP-59254)<br />

James G Droppo, Bruce A. Napier, Jeremy P. Rishel, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;<br />

Richard W. Bloom, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (USA)<br />

The current cleanup of structures related to cold-war production of nuclear materials includes the need to demolish a number<br />

of highly alpha-contaminated structures. The process of planning for the demolition of such structures includes unique challenges<br />

related to ensuring the protection of both workers and the public. Pre-demolition modeling analyses were conducted to evaluate<br />

potential exposures resulting from the proposed demolition of a number of these structures. Estimated emission rates of transuranic<br />

materials during demolition are used as input to an air-dispersion model. The climatological frequencies of occurrence of peak<br />

air and surface exposures at locations of interest are estimated based on years of hourly meteorological records. The modeling<br />

results indicate that downwind deposition is the main operational limitation for demolition of a highly alpha-contaminated building.<br />

The pre-demolition modeling directed the need for better contamination characterization and/or different demolition methodsand<br />

in the end, provided a basis for proceeding with the planned demolition activities. Post-demolition modeling was also conducted<br />

for several contaminated structures, based on the actual demolition schedule and conditions. Comparisons of modeled and<br />

monitoring results are shown. Recent monitoring data from the demolition of a UO3 plant shows increments in concentrations that<br />

were previously identified in the pre-demolition modeling…<br />

3) HOW AND INTEGRATED CHANGE PROGRAMME HAS ACCELERATED THE REDUCTION<br />

IN HIGH RISK AND HIGH HAZARD NUCLEAR FACILITIES AT SELLAFIELD (wP-59014)<br />

Angela Mackintosh, Sellafield Ltd. (UK)<br />

For over five decades the Sellafield Site has been central to the UKs nuclear programme. Sellafield Ltd is managed by NMP<br />

(Nuclear Management Partners), a consortium of URS, AMEC and AREVA and is focussed on the decommissioning of historical<br />

facilities.<br />

When the activity of Decommissioning commenced in the late 1980s the site focus at that time was on commercial reprocessing<br />

and waste management. Now through the implementation of an integrated company change programme, emphasis has shifted<br />

towards accelerated risk and hazard reduction of degraded legacy plants with nuclear inventory whilst ensuring value for money<br />

for the customer, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA).<br />

This paper will describe the management approach that is being taken and the planning tools that are being applied by the Site<br />

owners in delivering an integrated change programme across the Decommissioning Directorate.<br />

The paper will explain how the management approach to change uses Peer Assist, Rapid Improvement <strong>Events</strong>, Organisational<br />

Review Self Evaluation, Value Stream Analysis and Accelerated Improvement <strong>Events</strong> as improvement tools. Use of these has<br />

enabled downsizing of the organisation, driven out hundreds of man day efficiencies within the maintenance and asset management<br />

areas, improved the management of spares reducing annual costs by £1000s, improved Commercial…<br />

4) USE OF IN-SITU GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY DURING NUCLEAR<br />

POWER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING (w/oP-59340)<br />

Richard McGrath, Karen Kim, Electric Power Research Institute (USA) - Presentation by Sean Bushart, EPRI (USA)<br />

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is a non-profit research organization that supports the energy industry. The<br />

Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Technology <strong>Program</strong> conducts research and develops technology for the safe and efficient<br />

decommissioning of nuclear power plants.<br />

One of the key objectives of the EPRI Decommissioning Technology <strong>Program</strong> is to capture the good practices and lessons<br />

learned from plants currently undergoing decommissioning. Several major plant decommissioning programs have been successfully<br />

completed, so EPRI is documenting relevant experiences to aid future decommissioning activities, both in the United States and<br />

internationally. In-situ Gamma Spectroscopy is powerful technology with the potential for widespread application in nuclear power<br />

plant radiological surveys.<br />

Due to leakage and other events that may occur during nuclear power plant operations, soil, concrete and bedrock have the<br />

potential to become contaminated, and therefore must be characterized to demonstrate that they meet strict regulatory site release<br />

limits. The radiological surveys conducted during power plant decommissioning have historically been very labor intensive, time<br />

consuming and often extend decommissioning duration. The use of hand-held survey meters was typical during early decommissionings.<br />

As engineers gained experience, they often replaced the hand-held meters with advanced technologies such as the In-situ<br />

Gamma Spectroscopy instruments. The…<br />

5) LEGACY RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE - MAGNOX SWARF STORAGE<br />

SILO LIQUOR EFFLUENT MANAGEMENT (wP-59271)<br />

Stephen Le Clere, Sellafield Ltd (UK)<br />

The liquid effluent activity arising from Sellafield Ltds Magnox Swarf Storage Silo (MSSS) emptying operations represents<br />

the greatest liquid effluent treatment challenge within the companys Legacy Ponds and Silos portfolio.<br />

The Magnox Swarf Storage Silo (MSSS) was constructed to provide an underwater storage facility for irradiated magnox<br />

cladding swarf that was removed from fuel prior to processing.<br />

Construction of the original silo was initiated in the early 1960s, as the existing Pile Fuel Cladding Silo reached its storage<br />

capacity however the original silo was filled by 1972 so three further silo extensions were constructed between the early 1970s and<br />

mid-1980s.<br />

108


Abstracts Session 40<br />

A significant programme of work has been underway over the last two decades, to support the programmes strategic intent of<br />

retrieving and treat all legacy wastes and remediate the structures of both the legacy plant and the new build construction plants<br />

necessary to support decommissioning.<br />

The paper will look at the challenges faced by the team as they ready the facility for retrievals and decommissioning and discuss<br />

how these were managed or overcome through a coordinated programme of work.<br />

This will include a review of the significant asset restoration programme which culminated recently in the commencement of<br />

production liquor transfers…<br />

6) EXPERIENCE OF APPLICATION OF NEW REMOTE CONTROLLED INSTRUMENTS FOR SCANNING OF<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION IN ROOMS WITH HIGH DOSE RATE (wP-59354)<br />

Vyacheslav Stepanov, Alexey Danilovich, Oleg Ivanov, Victor Potapov, Sergey Smirnov,<br />

Anatoly Volkovich, NRC Kurchatov Institute (Russia)<br />

When carrying out the decommissioning of nuclear facilities is necessary to measure the distribution of radioactive contamination<br />

in the rooms and the equipment at high levels of background radiation. In the decommissioning of the reactor in the MR<br />

Research Center “Kurchatov Institute” for such problems is developed and applied a few special systems with remote control. For<br />

a survey of high-level objects used mounted on the robot radiometric system [V.E. Stepanov, etc. Using collimated radiometer systems<br />

mounted on the robot for inspection of storage Brokk CPS inside the reactor MR Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”//<br />

Atomic Energy. 2010. v.109. no4. P. 194]. To determine the composition of pollutants and use a portable collimated spectrometric<br />

system [V.E. Stepanov et. Al. Remotely controlled collimated detector to measure the distribution of radioactive contamination //<br />

Atomic Energy. 2010. v.109. no2. S. 106]. To obtain a detailed distribution of contamination of used remote-controlled gamma camera<br />

[Stepanov V. E., et al. Application of portable gamma camera for the control on extraction of the radioactive wastes from temporal<br />

storage in territory of RRC Kurchatov Institute// ICEM05/DECOM05 Glasgow 2005, Abstract Book pp.97]. Described works<br />

conducted under the Federal <strong>Program</strong> for Nuclear and Radiation Safety of Russia.<br />

7) HUMAN AND ORGANISATIONAL FACTORS AS KEY LEVERS OF PERFORMANCE<br />

IN D&D PROJECT MANAGEMENT (W/OP-59323)<br />

Thierry Flament, Bertrand Willmann, Grégoire de Laval, Jean-Louis Lemarch, Alain Cordoba, AREVA (France)<br />

In a number pf D&D projects, the type of installations to be dismantled and the variety of their equipments (glove-boxes,<br />

tanks&) and the products present on site (plutonium, uranium) in the form of powder are making many operations manual ones.<br />

Key phases in HR and organisation management:<br />

• The first D&D experience, the learning curve ramp-up<br />

• To begin any project, you usually try to benefit from benchmark of similar projects to be able to build up the first scenario,<br />

by using the best practices. The first experimental team consisted of operators who already had experienced dismantling<br />

at least once in the course of their career.This first dismantling operation is preferably to be conducted on an installation<br />

relatively poorly contaminated. This was to implement the correct techniques thus reducing the consequences of a possible<br />

unforeseen event.<br />

The capitalisation on the return on experience<br />

The success of this first dismantling site operation allowed us to implement a process of experience feedback to build the scenarios<br />

and the operating procedures of the following sites. In particular, targeted safety-security stop points are positioned for validation<br />

on the operations by people responsible for safety and security.<br />

• HR training<br />

• Implementation of new equipments (saws, stalls&) allows experimental…<br />

8) DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ESTIMATING DECOMMISSIONING COST (wP-59037)<br />

HakSoo Kim, JongKil Park, Nuclear Engineering & Technology Institute (Korea)<br />

The programs for estimating the decommissioning cost have been developed for many different purposes and applications. The<br />

estimation of decommissioning cost is required a large amount of data such as unit cost factors, plant area and its inventory, waste<br />

treatment, etc. These make it difficult to use manual calculation or typical spreadsheet software such as Microsoft Excel. The cost<br />

estimation for eventual decommissioning of nuclear power plants is a prerequisite for safe, timely and cost-effective decommissioning.<br />

To estimate the decommissioning cost more accurately and systematically, KHNP, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co.<br />

Ltd, developed a decommissioning cost estimating computer program called “DeCAT-Pro”, which is Decommissioning Cost<br />

Assessment Tool Professional. (Hereinafter called “DeCAT”) This program allows users to easily assess the decommissioning cost<br />

with various decommissioning options. Also, this program provides detailed reporting for decommissioning funding requirements<br />

as well as providing detail project schedules, cash-flow, staffing plan and levels, and waste volumes by waste classifications and<br />

types. KHNP is planning to implement functions for estimating the plant inventory using 3-D technology and for classifying the<br />

conditions of radwaste disposal and transportation automatically.<br />

SESSION 41 — D&D TECHNOLOGIES - PART 2 OF 2 (3.13)<br />

1) AN INNOVATIVE PROCESS FOR SEGMENTING OF GUIDE TUBES (wP-59029)<br />

Patrick (PJ) Gobert, Pierre-Henri Ponchon, Stefan Fallström,<br />

Joseph Boucau, Westinghouse Electric Company (Belgium/France/Sweden)<br />

The purpose of this paper is to describe an innovative process for segmenting PWR Guide Tubes (GT’s) and the service (training<br />

and execution) that can be performed successfully and safely.<br />

Over time, some utilities are replacing control rod GTs and store them in temporary disposal facilities. Due to lack of space, it<br />

is sometimes needed to cut and condition them in waste packages for final disposal and waste treatment.<br />

Based on its more than 20 years of strong experience and lessons learned in the development of nuclear components segmentation<br />

and packaging technology, Westinghouse has recently developed a complete solution for cutting and consolidating GTs.<br />

109


Session 41 Abstracts<br />

One of the challenges related to such equipment is to consider two routes for the waste management: one for the highly activated<br />

segments and another for the less activated segments.<br />

The length of the segments has been defined to minimize the volume of highly activated waste and therefore develop a process<br />

which is adapted to the size of containers specified by the customer. A model with five cutting operations and generating six segments<br />

has been chosen.<br />

In order to minimize risks and ensure safety for people and facilities, radiological studies were performed for various configurations.<br />

All…<br />

2) ASSAY OF PLUTONIUM CONTAMINATED WASTE BY GAMMA SPECTROMETRY (wP-59039)<br />

Ian Adsley, Michael Green, Ian Pearman, Mike Davies, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

The extreme toxicity of plutonium necessitates the segregation of plutonium contaminated materials (PCM) with extremely<br />

small (sub-?g) levels of contamination. The driver to accurately measure these small quantities of plutonium within (relatively)<br />

large volumes of waste is (in part) financial. The range of waste costs in the UK varies considerably typically by an order of magnitude<br />

for each step in category from Exempt, through VLLW, LLW and ILW.<br />

Within the UK, there has been a historical reluctance to use low energy gamma radiation to sentence PCM because of the potential<br />

for self attenuation by dense materials. This is unfortunate because the low-energy gamma radiation from PCM offers the only<br />

practicable technique for segregating PCM within the various LLW and sub-LLW categories. Whilst passive neutron counting techniques<br />

have proved successful for assay of waste well into the ILW category, a cursory study of the neutron yield data from spontaneous<br />

fission and ?-n reactions reveals that these techniques are barely capable of detecting mg quantities of plutonium let alone<br />

the sub-?g quantities present in LLW.<br />

This paper considers the use of two types of gamma detector for assay of PCM: the thin sodium iodide FIDLER (Field Instrument<br />

for the Detection…<br />

3) REUSE OF CONDITIONAL RELEASED MATERIALS FROM DECOMMISSIONING; A REVIEW OF<br />

APPROACHES AND SCENARIOS WITH LONG-TERM CONSTRUCTIONS (w/oP-59149)<br />

Vladimír Daniska, Jozef Pritrsky, Frantisek Ondra, Ivan Rehák, Matej Zachar, DECOM, a.s,;<br />

Vladimir Necas, Slovak University of Technology (Slovakia)<br />

Paper presents the overall scope and actual results of the project for evaluation of representative scenarios for reuse of conditionally<br />

released materials from decommissioning. Aim of the project is to evaluate the possibilities of reuse of conditionally<br />

released steels and concrete in technical constructions which guarantee the long-term preservation of design properties over periods<br />

of 50-100 years. Interaction of conditionally released materials with public is limited and predictable due to design and purpose<br />

of selected constructions and due to fact that in many scenarios these materials are embedded in non-radioactive materials<br />

such as bars in reinforced concrete. Workers scenarios for preparation, operation and maintenance of these constructions are<br />

analysed in detail including the manufacturing of elements for these constructions. Project aims to evaluate the scenarios of reuse<br />

of conditionally released materials in a complex way in order to develop the data for designers of scenarios and to evaluate the volumes<br />

of conditionally released materials based on facility (to be decommissioned) inventory data. The long-term constructions considered<br />

are bridges, tunnels, roads, railway constructions, industrial buildings, power industry equipment and others. Evaluation<br />

covers following areas:<br />

• Analysis of activities for manufacturing of reinforcement bars, rolled steel sheets and other steel elements and…<br />

4) REMEDIATION OF A VENTILATION DUCT CONTAMINATED BY PA-231 (wP-59248)<br />

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd; Clare Irving, Forest Environmental; Keith Stevens, Nuvia Ltd, (UK)<br />

Cambridge University had worked in the 1960s and 1970s with Pa-231, a decay product of U-235. The fume cupboards discharged<br />

into ventilation ducting made from asbestos cement. The university wished to refurbish the laboratory and the RPA had<br />

negotiated over many years with the Environment Agency to set up a project to remove the ducting both to reduce the radiological<br />

hazards and as part of a programme to ,remove unwanted circuits and upgrade the ventilation system to modern standards. Contamination<br />

levels were significant and low dose rates were measurable on the external surface. The aim was to be able to remove<br />

the ducting and treat it as asbestos waste, rather than to have to treat the debris as asbestos contaminated radioactive waste. The age<br />

of the contaminant was such that a large fraction of the decay chain had grown in, giving a mixture of alpha, beta and gamma emissions.<br />

The most useful nuclides for surface monitoring were Pb-211 and Tl-207, both of which are energetic beta emitters. A wide<br />

energy range beta detector was used, but it was fitted with a filter to absorb any alpha radiation which otherwise would have contributed<br />

to the signal for good surfaces but not…<br />

5) MEASUREMENT OF PLUTONIUM CONTAMINATION THROUGH PAINT USING A FIDLER PROBE (wP-59250)<br />

Robert Clark, Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd; Ian Croudace, GAU-Radioanalytical Laboratories (UK)<br />

Alpha contamination detection usually relies on good surface conditions - smooth, clean and flat. However, in many circumstances,<br />

this is not the case, or it may be that there is a significant chance that contamination has been deliberately or accidentally<br />

painted over. The alpha emitting isotopes of plutonium also emit significant L x-rays in the 11 to 20 keV energy range, as does Am-<br />

241, which also emits a 60 keV gamma with a 36 % probability. These X-rays are unattenuated to any extent in air over a range<br />

of 1 metre. They also penetrate paint significantly. The Fidler probe was designed as an efficient detector of these X and gamma<br />

radiations. The window is thin beryllium and the scintillator is thin sodium iodide. This leads to a very efficient detection of both<br />

the X-rays in question and the 60 keV gamma radiation while keeping the background as low as possible. The signal from such a<br />

detector can be processed in several ways gross counting above a threshold, counting in regions of interest or full spectrometry.<br />

The advantages of the latter include the minimisation of background, easy background correction, the ability to look at the recorded<br />

X-ray spectrum and the…<br />

110


Abstracts Session 41<br />

6) THE USE OF STANDARD ALPHA AND BETA SURFACE SCINTILLATION CONTAMINATION MONITORS TO<br />

CONFIRM THE CONTAMINATION FINGERPRINT AND TO CHECK ON SOURCE QUALITY (wP-59249)<br />

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd (UK)<br />

Normally, alpha and beta surface contamination monitors are used with a simple counting threshold, i.e. any pulse over a predetermined<br />

amplitude is counted. This is very different from gamma monitoring, where the use of counting windows is very popular<br />

and the use of full multi-channel analysis is common. Many current surface contamination ratemeters have the capacity to<br />

drive dual phosphor detectors and can be set up to provide alpha and beta channels. Effectively, the beta channel is a counting window,<br />

i.e. all pulses which are bigger than the threshold and smaller than the alpha threshold are counted. Larger pulses go into the<br />

alpha channel.<br />

This paper addresses how this can be used with beta only and alpha only detectors to provide information on the source. The<br />

detector is set up conventionally to a plateau for the lowest beta energy anticipated. The instrument is then switched to alpha+beta<br />

mode and the alpha threshold set to 3 times the beta threshold. With this set up, the alpha to beta channel count rate ratio varies<br />

smoothly by a factor of 14 between Y-90 (Emax 2.27 MeV) and C-14 (Emax 0.16 MeV). Hence the instrument can be used to estimate<br />

the energy of an…<br />

7) CLEARANCE OF BUILDINGS OF NPP WÜRGASSEN (GERMANY) USING<br />

AN INNOVATIVE CLEARANCE CONCEPT (wP-59280)<br />

Stefan Woerlen, Marco Steinbusch, Alexander Kummer,<br />

Stefan Thierfeldt, Frank Schartmann, Brenk Systemplanung (Germany)<br />

The nuclear power plant Würgassen in Germany entered into decommissioning in 1995. The project has currently advanced to<br />

the clearance of the buildings. Clearance of buildings has commenced in 2007 with establishing the clearance procedure in pilot<br />

rooms. It has entered the productive phase in 2010 and will last until about 2014.<br />

In 2007, Brenk Systemplanung has been commissioned by E.ON / NPP Würgassen to perform clearance of the pilot rooms in<br />

the turbine building as well as of rooms with higher contamination levels in other buildings in 2010 and 2011. It has been one of<br />

the goals of this work to establish an innovative clearance procedure which would not rely on 100% surface measurements but<br />

which should be based on the use of in situ gamma spectrometry and the application of approaches to minimise the number of clearance<br />

measurements.<br />

Central points of the concept for clearance of buildings which is presented in this paper were the establishment of averaging<br />

areas of up to 10 m², which is an ideal size for the use of in situ gamma spectrometry, and the application of statistical methods,<br />

which allow an efficient performance of the clearance measurements. As a first step the measurement…<br />

8) CHARACTERIZATION OF IRAQ’S REMOTE NUCLEAR FACILITIES<br />

FOR DECOMMISSIONING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT (wP-59167)<br />

Fouad Al-Musawi, Adnan S. Jarjies, Ministry of Science and Technlogy;<br />

Ross Miller, Sandia National Laboratories (Iraq/USA)<br />

The Government of Iraq (GOI) has engaged serious efforts to decommission and dismantle former nuclear facilities. The GOI<br />

has only preliminary information on some of the former nuclear facilities, and this paper summarizes the missions that were undertaken<br />

to characterize those facilities. The facilities are located at various sites throughout Iraq, from locations close to Baghdad to<br />

those in the north and far western desert areas. Some of the facilities, such as those at the Al Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center<br />

have been visited and somewhat characterized. Other facilities, including the following, have not been visited or thoroughly characterized.<br />

• Akashat Mine, Uranium ore production<br />

• Al Qaim, Uranium enrichment facility<br />

• Al Jesira, Uranium feed stock production facility<br />

• Adaya, Burial location for contaminated equipment<br />

• Al Tarmiya,Electromagnetic isotope separation site<br />

• Rashdiya, Centrifuge development center<br />

• Djerf al Naddah, Spent fuel storage facility<br />

Missions were conducted to develop an inventory the buildings/structures that need to be included in decommissioning/dismantlement<br />

efforts. The number of buildings, type of construction, size and general condition of the buildings was noted. In addition,<br />

attempts were made to determine contamination levels and types on surfaces, equipment, rubble, etc. This information will<br />

be used to support…<br />

SESSION 42 — LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT PROCESS AND EXPERIENCE (1.8)<br />

1) NUCLIDE SEPARATION BY HYDROTHERMAL TREATMENT AND ION EXCHANGE (wP-59217)<br />

Georg Braehler, Ronald Rieck, NUKEM Technologies GmbH; Valentin Avramenko, Valentin Sergienko,<br />

Sergej Shmatko, Valentin Dobrzhanskyi, Institute of Chemistry FEBRAS; Elmar Antonov, NTP (Germany/Russia)<br />

Liquid low level radioactive effluents, when solidified in e g. cement matrix, contribute to a significant extend to the waste<br />

amount to be disposed of in final repositories.<br />

Accordingly, since many years scientists and engineers investigate processes to remove the radioactive nuclides selectively<br />

from the effluents, to split the raw solution into two separate fractions: a large fraction with activity concentrations below the limits<br />

for free release; and a small fraction, containing the activity in concentrated form one g ion exchanger materials (ion exchange<br />

has proven to be the most promising method for such nuclide separation).<br />

The challenge to be taken up is: When (and this is most often the case) the effluent contains organic materials and complexing<br />

agents, the formation of e. g. the 60-Co-EDTA complex prohibits its fixation to the ion exchangers.<br />

Accordingly the complexing agent needs to be removed or destroyed.<br />

111


Session 42 Abstracts<br />

The Institute for Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences has applied the method of hydrothermal treatment (at elevated<br />

temperature and pressure, 200 °C, 200 bar), supported by Hydrogen peroxide oxidation, to allow virtually complete removal of<br />

radioactive nuclides on inorganic ion exchangers.<br />

Pilot plants have been operated successfully in Russian power stations, and an…<br />

2) DECONTAMINATION OF STRONTIUM FROM LIQUID RADIOACTIVE<br />

WASTES BY SODIUM NONATITANATE (wP-59083)<br />

Merceille Aurélie, CEA Marcoule; Agnès Grandjean, Institut de Chimie Séparative de Marcoule;<br />

Yves Barre, CEA Marcoule (France)<br />

Environmental impact of toxic, biological and radioactive pollutants release is of great importance for all industrial societies<br />

today. The development of efficient process for purification filtration and waste removal- of these industrials effluents is booming.[1]<br />

Nuclear industry produces a wide range of radioactive liquid effluents. Many of these wastes need treatment in order to<br />

reduce the quantities of radioactive contaminants and of course to reduce human exposure. 90Sr is one of the major pollutants in<br />

nuclear liquid wastes. A promising way for extraction of this radioelement from mobile phase (liquid) to a solid phase is the use of<br />

specific ion exchange solids. Contrary to conventional organic ion exchange resins, inorganic ion exchangers possess a number of<br />

advantages such as superior chemical, thermal and radiation stability.<br />

For strontium removal from aqueous solutions, many inorganic ion exchange solids are described in the literature. One of them<br />

is sodium nonatitanate [3] which seems to be a very good candidate for this use. We present here a study of the effect of synthesis<br />

temperature on the kinetics and on the adsorption capacity of this ion exchanger [2]. For this purpose, first, three materials were<br />

synthesized at 100°C, 160°C and 200°C. They were compared thanks…<br />

3) RUSSIA: RESULTS AND PROSPECTS OF LIQUID SOLIDIFICATION<br />

EXPERIMENTS AT ROSATOM SITES (w/oP-59112)<br />

Dennis Kelley, Pacific Nuclear Solutions (USA)<br />

Ongoing experimental work has been underway at selected nuclear sites in the Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation<br />

(ROSATOM) during the past two years to determine the effectiveness, reliability, application and acceptability of high technology<br />

polymers for liquid radioactive waste solidification. The long term project is funded by the U.S. Department of Energys Initiatives<br />

for Proliferation Prevention (IPP) program. IPP was established in 1994 as a non-proliferation program of DOE / National Nuclear<br />

Security Administration and receives its funding each year through Congressional appropriation. The primary objective of IPP is<br />

to engage former Soviet nuclear weapons scientists, currently or formerly involved with weapons of mass destruction, in peaceful<br />

and sustainable commercial activities.<br />

Argonne National Laboratory provides management oversight for this project. More than 60 former weapons scientists are<br />

engaged in this project.<br />

With the project entering its mid-point, the emphasis is now on expanding the experimental work to include the sub-sites of<br />

Seversk (SCC), Zheleznogorsk (MCC) located in Siberia and Gatchyna (KRI) and applying the polymer technology to actual problematic<br />

waste streams. Work to date includes the solidification of over 100 waste streams for the purpose of evaluating all aspects<br />

of the polymers effectiveness with LLW and ILW complex waste. Waste…<br />

4) PRE-TREATMENT OF ORGANIC LIQUID WASTE STREAM AT CERNAVODA NPP (w/oP-59079)<br />

Gabriela Teodorov, Laszlo Toro, Adina Sandru, MATEFIN; Dennis Kelley, Pacific Nuclear Solutions;<br />

Dorin Dumitrescu, NPP Cernavoda (Romania/ USA)<br />

The radioactive waste management system at Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) was designed to maintain acceptable levels<br />

of safety for workers and to protect human health and the environment from exposure to unacceptable levels of radiation.<br />

During the ten years operation of the Cernavoda NPP, a series of waste streams have been developed for waste management<br />

purpose. Some of these streams consist of radioactive organic liquid wastes: spent oils, spent solvents, liquid scintillation cocktails<br />

(LSC), flammable solids (solid-organic liquid mixture) and sludge.<br />

Effective treatment of organic liquids waste from the initial to the final stage has been a challenge for NPP Cernavoda. All components<br />

of the organic liquid waste stream have been stored in liquid form in stainless steel drums in the Solid Radioactive Waste<br />

Intermediate Storage Facility (SRWISF). This facility was originally designed for solid wastes only, consequently, the regulatory<br />

body has asked Cernavoda NPP to remove the flammable liquids from this repository as soon as possible.<br />

As a result, at the end of 2008, Cernavoda NPP initiated the solidification of organic liquid wastes (both historical and fresh<br />

wastes) together with a separation of solids associated with the organic liquids. In accordance with terminology of the International<br />

Atomic Energy…<br />

5) TRANSPORT AND DEPOSITION PROPERTIES OF MODEL SLURRIES<br />

OF ONE AND TWO PARTICLE SPECIES (wP-59140)<br />

Hugh Rice, Simon Biggs, Michael Fairweather, James Young, University of Leeds, Leeds, (UK)<br />

The UK nuclear industry has in its inventory legacy waste in the form of complex, polydisperse and polydense suspensions,<br />

slurries and sludges in a variety of storage and transport vessels. This waste has been difficult to characterise because of radioactivity<br />

and limited accessibility, and containment and disposal of the waste presents a continuing challenge. Our objectives are to<br />

investigate the effect of mono- and bidisperse suspensions with a range of particle sizes and densities on the turbulence characteristics<br />

and transport and settling behaviour of slurries that are chosen to be analogues of those found on nuclear sites. Two versatile<br />

slurry pipe-flow loops of different diameters have been commissioned which can be operated over a large range of Reynolds numbers<br />

and are amenable to ultrasonic, optical and physical measurement methods. In addition, a variety of particle characterisation<br />

studies have been performed on the particle species that form the suspensions. In particular, the effect of settled beds on the flow<br />

112


Abstracts Session 43<br />

velocity and turbulence characteristics and of inter-species interactions in bidisperse suspensions has been investigated. Results of<br />

particle characterisation are presented, along with mean and turbulent velocity profiles over a range of Reynolds number and particle<br />

concentration. The implications of the work for waste processing within the industrial context will be discussed in the full<br />

paper.<br />

6) APPLICATION OF A NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR REPROCESSING OF WASTES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK<br />

OF REHABILITATION OF URANIUM MINES OPERATED BY IN SITU LEACHING (wP-59403)<br />

Gagik Martoyan, Garik Nalbandyan, Lavrenti Gagiyan,<br />

AREV SI CJS Company; Gagik Karamyan, Artak Barseghyan, Gagik Brutyan, Ecoatom LLC (Armenia)<br />

It is essential the environmentally safe industrial production of nuclear fuel especially in the case of uranium extraction by In<br />

Situ Leaching, when the environment and the deep extraction of uranium are important problems. In the presented paper it is studied<br />

the feasibility of the application of an electrodialysis method for the deep extraction of uranium and radium from liquid (acid)<br />

streams. It is proposed to apply a new electrodialysis method to ensure the necessary extraction level of elements. In the same time<br />

the new method ensures the recycling of acids used in the process.<br />

7) A FULLY OPERATIONAL PILOT PLANT FOR ELIMINATING RADIOACTIVE<br />

OILS MIXED WITH CHLORINATED SOLVENTS (wP-59044)<br />

Albert Jacobs, William Everett, Dewdrops Company (France)<br />

Disposal of organic liquid waste has become an increasing issue for many nuclear sites. Existing disposal solutions such as<br />

incineration or super critical water techniques are not compatible with wastes containing chlorinated solvents or fluorine owing to<br />

corrosion problems. As an example several hundred cubic meters of lubricating oils mixed with trichloroethylene (TCE) or perchloroethylene<br />

(PCE) are stockpiled on several French nuclear sites. For several years Dewdrops has been developing an original<br />

combination of mineralization processes for waste oils and solvents particularly well suited to the nuclear field. The patented technology<br />

relies on the alternation of chemical and biological oxidation mechanisms. The oxidized organic material predominately<br />

forms carbon dioxide, water and inorganic salts. This paper details the procedure and the results obtained for a particular case at<br />

the Tricastin nuclear site of Areva NC (South France). The organic waste used in this study was a 85/15 v/v ratio mix of lubricating<br />

oil and TCE. The pilot plant build upon the technology has a daily treatment capacity of approximately 10 liters. In the first<br />

step the TCE is mineralized by the photo Fenton reaction. Using hydrogen peroxide with an ultraviolet regenerated iron catalyst,<br />

TCE is transformed to carbon dioxide, water and…<br />

8) ADSORPTION OF CESIUM RADIONUCLIDES BY THE COMPOSITE SORBENTS<br />

CARBON FIBER/TRANSITION METALS FERROCYANIDES (wP-59255)<br />

Irina Sheveleva, Veniamin Zheleznov, Svetlana Bratskaya, Valeriy Kuryavyi,<br />

Valentin Avramenko, Institute of Chemistry FEBRAS (Russia)<br />

Among various methods of cesium removal from aqueous solutions, sorption using transition metals (Ni, Zn, Cu, Fe) ferrocyanides<br />

is the most efficient method due to extremely high affinity of cesium ions to ferrocyanides. Preparation of selective sorbents<br />

by fixation of ferrocyanides crystals in porous matrix of natural clinoptilolite, synthetic zeolites, alumosilicates, and carbon<br />

materials is an efficient way to increase decontamination factors and reduce sorbents expenditure in treatment of 137Cs-containing<br />

wastewaters.<br />

It is known that the efficiency of transition metals ferrocyanides application depends on the crystal size being the highest for<br />

nanocrystals. Although nanocrystals are difficult to handle in a direct application, they can be used in composite materials. In this<br />

case two main problems arise: how to control the crystal size of transition metals ferrocyanides and how to fix them reliably in the<br />

supporting matrix.<br />

In this paper we suggest a new route to preparation of composite materials selective to cesium ions using transition metals ferrocyanides<br />

stabilized by siloxane-acrylate latexes. The size of transition metals ferrocyanides is controlled by the size of the latex<br />

particles and their stability is determined by ionization of polyacrylic acid carboxylic groups on the functionalized latex surface.<br />

These functionalized particles can be used as…<br />

SESSION 43 — SITING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION<br />

OF L/ILW DISPOSAL FACILITIES - PART 2 OF 2 (1.19)<br />

1) 20 YEARS OF OPERATION FOR CENTRE DE L’AUBE<br />

DISPOSAL FACILITY: LESSONS LEARNED (w/oP-59235)<br />

Patrice Torres, Laurent Schacherer, Franck Duret, Pascal Lecoq, Alain Delaplanche, Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

The presentation will show the evolution of the facility during thes 20 years: in terms of deliveries, of type of waste packages,<br />

in terms of lexibility to answer the needs of waste generators, in terms of disposal vault design. Lessons leanrd will be emphasized.<br />

It will provide information on the environmental monitoring of the facility.<br />

2) DEMONSTRATION TEST OF UNDERGROUND CAVERN-TYPE<br />

DISPOSAL FACILITIES FISCAL 2010 STATUS (w/oP-59180)<br />

Yoshihiro Akiyama, Kenji Terada, Nobuaki Oda, Tsutomu Yada,<br />

Takahiro Nakajima, Radioactive Waste Management Funding And Research Center (Japan)<br />

The underground cavern-type disposal facilities for low-level waste (LLW) with relatively high radioactivity levels mainly generated<br />

from power reactor decommissioning and for part of transuranic (TRU) waste mainly from spent fuel reprocessing are<br />

designed to be constructed in a cavern around 100 meters below ground, and to employ an engineered barrier system (EBS) of a<br />

combination of bentonite and cement materials in Japan. In order to advance the feasibility study for this disposal, The Demonstration<br />

Test for Underground Cavern-Type Disposal Facilities has commissioned by Japanese government since fiscal 2005, and since<br />

fiscal 2007 a full-scale mock-up test facilities has been constructed under actual subsurface environment. The main objective of the<br />

113


Session 44 Abstracts<br />

test is to establish construction methodology and procedures which ensure the required quality of the engineered barrier system<br />

(EBS) on-site. By fiscal 2010 some parts of the facilities has been constructed, and the test has demonstrated both practicability of<br />

the construction and achievement of the quality. They are respectively taken as low-permeability of less than 5E-13 m/s and lowdiffusion<br />

of less than 1E-12 m2 /s at the time of completion of construction. This paper covers the test results obtained by the construction<br />

of some parts of a bentonite and cement materials.<br />

3) DEMONSTRATION OF GAS PERMEABLE SEALS FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

REPOSITORIES LABORATORY AND IN-SITU EXPERIMENTS (wP-59224)<br />

Joerg Rueedi, Paul Marschall, Nagra (Switzerland)<br />

In low/intermediate-level waste (L/ILW) repositories, anaerobic corrosion of metals and degradation of organic materials produce<br />

hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide. Gas migration in a L/ILW repository is one of the processes evaluated in the safety<br />

assessment of deep geological disposal in low-permeability formations, in particular with respect to the development of gas pressures<br />

in the repository caverns which could negatively affect the host rock or the engineered barrier system (EBS). In order to<br />

restrict build-up of gas overpressures in the emplacement caverns, Nagra (National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive<br />

Waste, Switzerland) has proposed design options aimed at increasing the gas transport capacity of the backfilled underground structures,<br />

compromising neither the low hydraulic conductivity nor the radionuclide retention capacity of the EBS (Nagra, 2008). They<br />

involve specially designed backfill and sealing materials such as high porosity mortars as backfill materials for the emplacement<br />

caverns and sand/bentonite (S/B) mixtures with a bentonite content of 20% to 30% for the seals themselves and for backfilling other<br />

underground structures. These increased gas permeability materials can supplement the gas flow that is expected to occur through<br />

the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) and avoid the creation of overpressures.<br />

Preliminary experimental studies have confirmed the gas…<br />

4) POST-IODINE PRODUCTION NORM REPOSITORY TECHNICAL DESIGN AND<br />

RECONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE IN TURKMENISTAN (wP-59183)<br />

Alexander Gelbutovsky, Peter Cheremisin, Alexander Troshev, Alexander Egorov,<br />

Mikhail M. Boriskin, Mikhail Bogod, ECOMET-S (Russia)<br />

Continuous extraction of the iodine, bromine and other elements from the underground mineral waters at the Balkanabat<br />

Iodine and Khazar chemical plants (Turkmenistan) resulted in their territories NORM contamination and significant waste quantities<br />

formation. Sites radiation safety is the major issue. Usually there are no any radiation monitoring systems and staff providing<br />

personnel, population and environment radiation safety and negative influence elimination. The most dangerous sites are the ones<br />

which are situated in the Caspian Sea coastal area. In 2009 the remediation project was initiated to prevent NORM distribution and<br />

eliminate environmental threat. The project frame covers a number of preparation and design works, charcoal sorption shops demolition,<br />

territories remediation, production waste conditioning and transportation to the repository for further safe storage. For that<br />

purposes the repository has been built in the near-by natural hollow. In the given report the materials related to repository design,<br />

reconstruction and operations start are presented. The brief data on the facilities condition, contamination characteristics and waste<br />

quantities are indicated. It is shown that that the mechanical method has been chosen for contaminated materials collecting and disposal.<br />

Main demolition, remediation and transportation decisions, activities and results are mentioned also.<br />

SESSION 44 — DISPOSAL SITE AND WASTE FORM CHARACTERIZATION<br />

AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - PART 1 OF 2 (1.13)<br />

1) RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DUTCH INTERIM<br />

WASTE STORAGE FACILITY SITE (w/oP-59023)<br />

Jeroen Welbergen, COVRA; Leo P.M. Velzen, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (Netherlands)<br />

The Central Organization for Radioactive Waste (COVRA) in the Netherlands operates since 1993 in the south-west of the<br />

Netherlands a facility for treatment of radioactive waste including interim storage buildings for HLW, LILW and NORM wastes as<br />

calcinate and depleted uranium (U3O8 ). The site of the interim waste storage facility has a size of about 200,000 m2 and is situated<br />

close to the Dutch nuclear power plant Borssele and a large phosphate production plant.<br />

It is evident that the waste storage site is subjected at regular time intervals at non-intrusive radiological measurements (e.g.<br />

dose-rate and contamination) to detect elevated radiation levels. However, these radiological measurements have not yet been performed<br />

according to approaches as described in the Environment Radiation Site Survey Execution Manual EURSSEM or the Multi<br />

Agency Radiation Site Survey Inspection Manual MARSSIM .<br />

The aim of the paper is threefold, first to describe in detail the process how to apply EURSSEM and especially for fast nonintrusive<br />

multi radiological detection techniques with control measurements. Second aim is to present and discuss the analyze<br />

results and follow up actions. The third and last aim is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of combining the analyze results<br />

of fast non-intrusive measurements…<br />

2) CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON THE DISPOSAL ENVIRONMENT:<br />

A CLIMATE ANALOGUE APPROACH (wP-59274)<br />

Bertrand Leterme, Dirk Mallants, SCK●CEN (Belgium)<br />

The Belgian Agency for Radioactive Waste and Enriched Fissile Materials (ONDRAF/NIRAS) aims to develop a surface disposal<br />

facility for L/ILW in Dessel (North-East of Belgium). The objective of this study is to provide estimates for the next few millennia<br />

of both infiltration through the planned earth cover and groundwater recharge in the vicinity of the Dessel site. Available predictions<br />

of future temperature and precipitation often extend until AD 2100 only (e.g. IPCC). To circumvent this data limitation,<br />

we use existing records of climatic analogue stations deemed representative of future climates in Belgium. The following climate<br />

114


Abstracts Session 45<br />

states are considered: DO (maritime temperate, present-day climate in Dessel), Cs/Cr (subtropical with dry summers/no rainfall seasonality),<br />

EO (cold without permafrost) and FT (cold with permafrost). Climate data is then used in 1-D modelling of the soil-plantatmosphere<br />

system to quantify infiltration through the earth cover and recharge to groundwater for a sequence of probable future<br />

climate states.<br />

Using criteria including altitude, distance to moisture source, and atmospheric circulation system, several analogue stations<br />

were selected for each climate state Cs/Cr and EO/FT. They provided time series (30 years) of meteorological observations that<br />

allowed calculating potential evapotranspiration and water balance components for soils overlying either the repository…<br />

3) MINERALOGICAL ANALYSES OF OLD (78 AND 98 YEARS) CONCRETE (wP-59093)<br />

Tomoko Ishii, Hitoshi Owada, Radioactive Waste Management Funding and Research Center;<br />

Hiroyuki Sakamoto, Masahito Shibata, Kumi Negishi, Taiheyo Consultant Co.,Ltd. (Japan)<br />

Because Ca-dissolution from cementitious material is thought as a source of the long-term alteration of the performance of<br />

radioactive waste repository, much research such as dissolution test had been carried out. Those research brought some calculation<br />

models for leaching of cementitious material such as Atkinson’s model. Those calculation models have been verified that the results<br />

represent the alteration of cementitious minerals and the composition of the leachate by many researches. By using these calculation<br />

models, many estimation calculation for long-term mineralogical alteration in repository, such as cementitious barrier system,<br />

cement-clay interaction and so on, were carried out and the performance change of the repository were evaluated. However, results<br />

of immersion test by using bulky cementitious material had often pointed out that the actual alteration of cementitious material<br />

might be slower than the results of estimation calculation. This difference might be due to the change of mass-transport characteristics<br />

in the bulky cementitious material and/or at interfaces with the other materials.<br />

In this study, mineralogical analyses of two types old concretes were carried out. Drilled cores were collected from under<br />

groundwater level of the foundations of rotary kiln of cement production factory. Both of these concrete were made from Japanese<br />

ordinarily cement…<br />

4) MODELING OF ALTERATION BEHAVIOR ON BLENDED CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS (wP-59096)<br />

Hitoshi Owada, Tomoko ISHII, Radioactive Waste Management Funding and Research Center;<br />

Mayumi Takazawa, Hiroyasu Kato, Mitsubishi Materials Corporation;<br />

Hiroyuki Sakamoto, Taiheyo Consultant Co.,Ltd.; Masahito Shibata, Taiheyo Consultant Co., Ltd. (Japan)<br />

Weve been trying to set the realistic alteration model for carious cementitious materials. Imaginary settings of mineral composition<br />

calculated by using chemical composition of cement, such as Atkinss model, had been used for the alteration calculation<br />

of cementitious material. However, calculated values of the concentration for some elements such as Al and S in leachate had been<br />

different from experimental values. In our previous study, we had set the mineralogical alteration model by using an allocation to<br />

some hydrated cement minerals from an experimentally analyzed initial chemical composition of the cementictious materials, and<br />

by the setting of secondary generated minerals that considered the leaching of Ca. As the result, the change of Al and S concentration<br />

in simulated leachate had approached to that in actual leachate in the alteration calculation for ordinary portland cement<br />

(OPC) in groundwater.<br />

In this study, for development of an appropriate mineral alteration model for blended cementictious materials, batch type<br />

leaching experiments that used the crushed sample of blast furnace slag cement and the silica cement were done. Blast furnace<br />

slaggy cements that mixed OPC with the blast furnace slag of 70wt.% and 90wt.% were used. Similarly, the silica cement that<br />

mixed OPC with an amorphous…<br />

SESSION 45 — REPOSITORY PROGRAMS: SITE SELECTION & CHARACTERIZATION,<br />

UNDERGROUND RESEARCH LABS, ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL BARRIERS - PART 2 OF 2 (2.7)<br />

1) EBS BEHAVIOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER REPOSITORY CLOSURE IN A CLAY HOST ROCK:<br />

THE HE-E EXPERIMENT (MONT TERRI URL) (wP-59288)<br />

Irina Gaus, Nagra; Klaus Wieczorek, GRS; Juan Carlos Mayor, ENRESA; Kristof Schuster, BGR;<br />

Thomas Trick, Solexperts; José-Luis Garcia-Siñeriz, Aitemin; Benoit Garitte, CIMNE; Uli Kuhlman,<br />

TK Consult (Switzerland/Germany/Spain)<br />

The evolution of the engineered barrier system (EBS) of geological repositories for radioactive waste has been the subject of<br />

many research programmes during the last decade. The emphasis of the research activities was on the elaboration of a detailed<br />

understanding of the complex thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical processes, which are expected to evolve in the early post closure<br />

period in the near field. It is important to understand the coupled THM-C processes occurring in the EBS during the early post-closure<br />

phase so it can be confirmed that the safety functions will be fulfilled. Especially, it needs to be ensured that unexpected<br />

process interactions during the resaturation phase (heat pulse, gas generation, non-uniform water uptake from the host rock) do not<br />

affect the homogeneity of the safety-relevant parameters in the EBS (e.g. swelling pressure, hydraulic conductivity, diffusivity).<br />

The 7th Framework PEBS project (Long Term Performance of Engineered Barrier Systems) is using in depth process understanding<br />

for constraining the conceptual and parametric uncertainties in the context of long-term safety assessment. In previous EUsupported<br />

research programmes remarkable advances have been made to broaden the scientific understanding of THM-C coupled<br />

processes in the near field around the waste canisters. However, the detailed thermo-hydraulic behaviour of a bentonite EBS in a<br />

clay hostrock in response to anticipated temperatures of up to 140°C, produced by HLW (and spent fuel) at the canister surface, has<br />

so far not been evaluated at a large scale. Furthermore, earlier THM experiments have shown that upscaling of thermal conductivities<br />

and its dependency on the water contents from the laboratory scale to a field scale needs further attention.<br />

115


Session 46 Abstracts<br />

2) PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT MODELING FOR THE GEOLOGICAL SITING REGIONS FOR THE L/ILW<br />

AND HLW REPOSITORIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SWISS SITE SELECTION PLAN (wP-59306)<br />

Andreas Poller, Juerg Schneider, Piet Zuidema, Nagra; Johannes Holocher,<br />

Gerhard Mayer, AF-Consult Switzerland Ltd. (Switzerland)<br />

In Switzerland, the Nuclear Energy Law requires the disposal of all radioactive waste in deep geological repositories. The procedure<br />

for selecting the repository sites is defined in the Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories and consists of three stages.<br />

In Stage 1, the National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra) proposed geological siting regions based on<br />

criteria relating to safety and engineering feasibility. As part of Stage 2, Nagra has to select at least one site within each siting region,<br />

to carry out a provisional safety analysis for each site and a safety-based comparison of the sites. In order to achieve these objectives,<br />

the state of knowledge of the geological conditions in the siting regions has to be sufficient to perform the provisional safety<br />

analyses. In October 2010, Nagra published a report which documents Nagra’s technical-scientific assessment of this precondition,<br />

based on a comprehensive list of processes and parameters relevant for safety and engineering feasibility. A part of this assessment<br />

consists of test calculations for the provisional safety analyses. This paper summarizes how the numerous test calculations<br />

have been identified, how the concepts of radionuclide release from the repository are implemented into numerical codes and how<br />

input data and results are organized in order to ensure transparency and traceability.<br />

3) INVESTIGATIONS OF THE POSSIBLE SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN SPENT<br />

FUEL/HIGH-LEVEL WASTE AND A LOW/INTERMEDIATE-LEVEL WASTE REPOSITORIES<br />

DUE TO GAS AND HEAT GENERATION (wP-59220)<br />

Rainer Senger, John Ewing, Intera Inc. Swiss Branch; (Switzerland)<br />

This study is part of a generic investigation for the assessment of the required minimum distance between a Spent Fuel/High-<br />

Level Waste/ Intermediate-Level Waste (SF/HWL/ ILW) repository and a Low/ Intermediate-Level Waste (L/ILW) repository. For<br />

this, a large-scale numerical model was constructed to investigate the two-phase flow behavior for such a repository configuration<br />

in a low-permeability claystone formation. The modeling focused on the pressurization mechanisms associated with (a) resaturation<br />

of backfilled underground facilities, (b) thermal effects caused by heat generation from the SF/HLW canisters, and (c) gas generation<br />

from corrosion and degradation of different wastes in the L/ILW and ILW caverns and in the SF/HLW emplacement tunnels.<br />

The model accounts for gas generation from corrosion and degradation of both L/ILW and ILW wastes indicating decreasing<br />

rates with time, and from corrosion of the SF/HLW canisters characterized by a constant rate. Heat generation from radioactive<br />

decay of radionuclides of MOX/UO2 wastes is described by an exponential decay with time. The preceding operational phases of<br />

the different repository components were simulated representing the transient initial conditions for the post-closure phase.<br />

4) HYDRAULIC/MECHANICAL MODELING OF SMECTITIC MATERIALS FOR HMC ANALYTICAL<br />

EVALUATION OF THE LONG TERM PERFORMANCE OF TRU GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY (wP-59090)<br />

Ichizo Kobayashi, Kajima Corporation; Hitoshi Owada,<br />

Tomoko Ishill, Radioactive Waste Management Funding and Research Center (Japan)<br />

Aiming at evaluation of the long term performance of TRU geological repositories, the HMC analytical method has been studied.<br />

In this phase of the research, which is for four years, the hydraulic/mechanical modeling of smectitic materials for HMC analyses<br />

has been studied. In this paper, especially, the new experimental methods for investigation of the hydraulic/mechanical behavior<br />

of smectitic materials were developed.<br />

For the hydraulic modeling, the measurement method of the specific surface area of compacted smectitic materials was developed<br />

using XRD. The results of the method were applied to the Kozeny-Carman law. Since the specific surface area represents the<br />

microstructure of smectitic materials such as degree of swelling, it was found that the Kozeny-Carman law using measured specific<br />

surface area of compacted smectitic materials was useful to evaluating the hydraulic performance of smectitic materials. Moreover,<br />

since the Kozeny-Carman law can take the alteration of content of pore water into consideration by not only a coefficient of<br />

viscosity but also change of specific surface area, the Kozeny-Carman law will be more suitable to chemical and mechanical couple<br />

analyses than ordinary Darcy’s law.<br />

SESSION 46 — NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR<br />

SPENT FUEL, FISSILE, TRU, AND HLW MANAGEMENT (2.2)<br />

1) IMPLICATIONS OF CO-EXISTING NATIONAL AND MULTINATIONAL GEOLOGICAL<br />

REPOSITORY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES IN EUROPE (wP-59118)<br />

Neil A. Chapman, Charles McCombie, Arius Association; Ewoud Verhoef, Covra (Switzerland/Netherlands)<br />

The aim of this paper is to identify interactions between national and multi-national geological repository programmes that are<br />

potentially either beneficial or problematic, so as to avoid any unintended negative impacts on national or multinational programmes<br />

and to maximise mutual benefits wherever possible. Regional, multi-national cooperation on geological disposal is a topical<br />

issue at present at the IAEA and also in the EU, which has produced a new proposed Directive that explicitly allows agreements<br />

on sharing.<br />

Two extended tables in the paper identify and comment briefly on historic and current positive and negative perceptions of coexisting<br />

national and multinational geological disposal programmes. It would, we believe, be a positive message to the global<br />

nuclear community to know that leading national disposal programmes are interacting constructively with regional initiatives. The<br />

extensive experience already gained in national programmes could be very beneficial to new nuclear countries. In particular, it is<br />

crucial for all nuclear programmes that the new entrants develop credible, long-term waste management programmes, whether these<br />

be national, regional or dual-track. For global safety and security reasons, the nuclear community must move towards a situation<br />

where both national and shared programmes will co-exist and interact symbiotically.<br />

116


Abstracts Session 47<br />

2) REGULATION OF AGEING FACILITIES - THE UK REGULATORS PERSPECTIVE (wP-59353)<br />

Ryan Maitland, Unit 2G Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (UK)<br />

The UKs strategy for spent Magnox reactor fuel demands continued operation of the Magnox Reprocessing facility at Sellafield<br />

(located in the North West of England) to reprocess the remaining spent fuel in the shutdown Magnox reactor stations and<br />

fuel from the two remaining operational Magnox reactor stations, Wylfa and Oldbury. Safety, security, environmental, transport,<br />

energy and economic issues provide the initiative to continue reprocessing in ageing facilities that are prone to chronic operational<br />

and nuclear safety challenges. One of the responsibilities of the UKs Office for Nuclear Regulation is to regulate the safety of continuing<br />

Magnox Reprocessing Operations against relevant health and safety legislation; this largely non-prescriptive framework<br />

requires dutyholders to demonstrably reduce risk so far as is reasonably practicable.<br />

This paper articulates the often complex balances that have to be made to demonstrate compliance with safety law to sustain<br />

continued operation of ageing reprocessing facilities. This paper details how the UKs regulatory framework facilitates a flexible,<br />

proportionate and goal-setting approach to regulating operational facilities where it is difficult to satisfy relevant good practice or<br />

standards that would be expected of a modern facility. The challenges presented by regulation of ageing, operational facilities is<br />

analogous to those from legacy waste retrieval and decommissioning; this paper reflects the versatility of the UKs regulatory<br />

approach to these two different areas of the fuel cycle.<br />

3) ESTABLISHMENT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES REGARDING<br />

THE GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL OF NUCLEAR WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES AND<br />

STRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION (wP-59168)<br />

Mark Nutt, Argonne National Laboratory; Michael Voegele, Complex Systems LLC; Jens Birkholzer,<br />

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Peter Swift, Sandia National Laboratories;<br />

Jeff Williams, U.S. Department of Energy; Kevin McMahon, Sandia National Laboratories;<br />

Mark Peters, Argonne National Laboratory (USA)<br />

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies (OFCT) has established<br />

the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct research and development (R&D) activities related to storage,<br />

transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high level radioactive waste (HLW).<br />

The U.S. has, in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Waste Policy Act (as amended), focused efforts for the past twenty-plus<br />

years on disposing of UNF and HLW in a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The recent decision by the U.S. DOE<br />

to no longer pursue the development of that repository has necessitated investigating alternative concepts for the disposal of UNF<br />

and HLW that exists today and that could be generated under future fuel cycles. The disposal of UNF and HLW in a range of geologic<br />

media has been investigated internationally. Considerable progress has been made by in the U.S and other nations, but gaps<br />

in knowledge still exist.<br />

The U.S. national laboratories have participated in these programs and have conducted R&D related to these issues to a limited<br />

extent. However, a comprehensive R&D program investigating a variety of storage, geologic media, and disposal concepts has<br />

not been a part of the U.S. waste management program since the mid 1980s because of its focus on the Yucca Mountain site. Such<br />

a comprehensive R&D program is being developed and executed in the UFDC using a systematic approach to identify potential<br />

R&D opportunities. This paper describes the process used by the UFDC to identify and prioritize R&D opportunities.<br />

4) THE CIGÉO GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY PROJECT (wP-59265)<br />

Thibaud Labalette, Alain Harman, Marie-Claude Dupuis, Andra (France)<br />

The future industrial geological repository Cigéo will provide France with a long term safe management solution for high level<br />

and long-lived intermediate waste produced by the French nuclear industry. According to the French Act of 28 June 2006, Andra<br />

carries out design studies so that the application can be examined in 2015 and, subject to licensing, the facility can be operated in<br />

2025.<br />

To be successful, the project must address issues related to local integration, industrial planning, safety and reversibility, while<br />

controlling costs. Andra is the guarantor of the balance between these concerns.<br />

A significant project milestone was reached in 2009 with the definition of an area of interest to locate the underground repository<br />

facilities. A new phase of dialogue with local actors is being performed to precise implementation scenarios of surface facilities.<br />

The site selection will be approved after a public debate planned for late 2012-early 2013.<br />

Cigéo will be an atypical nuclear facility, built and operated on over a hundred years. This long duration leads to develop repository<br />

facilities in successive operational phases. The characteristics of the first delivered waste packages will determine the investments<br />

by 2025 on the repository site as well as on waste production and interim storage sites.<br />

The underground repository facilities include specific features that cannot be simply transposed from current nuclear industry<br />

practices such as the co-activity between mining and nuclear operations, the ventilation and the fire risk management.<br />

SESSION 47 — RADIUM REMEDIATION HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES<br />

AND CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES - PART 2 OF 3 (4.47)<br />

1) PORT RADIUM START TO FINISH LIFE CYCLE: A CASE STUDY ON CANADA’S<br />

HISTORIC RADIUM/URANIUM MINE, INITIAL OPERATION AND CLOSURE, CONCERNS OF<br />

THE ABORIGINAL DENE PEOPLE, SUBSEQUENT ASSESSMENTS, REMEDIATION (wP-59332)<br />

Gerd Wiatzka, SENES Consultants Ltd. (Canada)<br />

Presentation by Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd (USA)<br />

This paper provides a life study cycle case study on the historic Port Radium mine. In addition to the history of operations, it<br />

discusses the unique and successful approach used to identify the key issues and concerns associated with the former radium, uranium<br />

and silver mining property and the program activities undertaken to define the remedial issues and options that ultimately lead<br />

to the development of a preferred remedial plan. The Port Radium Mine site, situated approximately 275 km north of Yellowknife<br />

117


Session 47 Abstracts<br />

on the east shore of Great Bear Lake, Northwest Territories, was operated almost continuously between 1932 and 1982, initially for<br />

recovery of radium and uranium and subsequently for recovery of silver. Tailings production equalled an estimated 900,000 tons<br />

from uranium ore processing and 800,000 tons from silver processing operations. While the site was decommissioned at mine closure,<br />

site investigations were undertaken to address concerns expressed by residents of the community of Déline about residual contamination<br />

at the site and exposure of Déline residents as traditional land users and to identify residual environmental and safety<br />

issues based on current closure standards. Assessment of past radiation exposures of worker based on past practices associated with<br />

ore handling and concentrate shipping were also addressed. The paper provides insights into the approach and activities undertaken<br />

over a seven (7) year period that ultimately concluded with the final decommissioning of the site in 2007 and post remedial<br />

actions being carried out under the long term care and maintenance program.<br />

2) CHALLENGES IN DEVELOPING A REMEDIATION PLAN, PROCUREMENT PLAN<br />

AND LONG TERM MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE FORMER PORT RADIUM URANIUM<br />

MINE THAT MEETS THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY OF DELINE (w/oP-59333)<br />

Julie Ward, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (Canada)<br />

After a five year political process to investigate historic and present day concerns about the former Port Radium Uranium Mine,<br />

the site has being remediated to present day standards. Prior to remediation Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) worked<br />

with Deline First Nations to develop a Remediation Plan that was suitable to the known environmental conditions and identified<br />

risks on site. Prior to remediation INAC obtained a land use permit and Waste Nuclear Substance Licence for the work that was<br />

carried out and for future storage of radioactive wastes. After the remediation plan was complete a procurement plan was developed<br />

for the work which followed Federal contracting polices, met the intent of the Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land<br />

Claim Agreement and abided by INACs commitment under the Canada Deline Uranium Table to maximize local participation and<br />

subcontracting opportunities. Lastly, INAC worked with Deline to develop a monitoring plan in hopes to begin to restore their confidence<br />

in their environment while monitoring engineered remedial structures and residual risks on site.<br />

3) OVERVIEW OF RADIUM LEGACIES IN BELGIUM (wP-59367)<br />

Stephane Pepin, Koen Mannaerts, Boris Dehandschutter, André Poffijn, Ludo Jadoul,<br />

Walter Blommaert, Michel Sonck, FANC (Belgium)<br />

The Belgian metallurgical company, Union Minière, has been a key-player in the sector of radium production between 1922<br />

and 1969. The factory based in Olen has extracted radium from minerals and produced radium sources during that period. The radium<br />

production facilities have been dismantled in the 70s but legacies of the former production have still to be remediated. An<br />

overview of these legacies and of their radiological characteristics will be given.<br />

Next to the sites related to radium production, other radium legacies are related to NORM industries, essentially from the phosphate<br />

sector (phosphogypsum and CaF2 stacks).<br />

4) PREPARING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PORT HOPE AREA INITIATIVE:<br />

CANADA’S LARGEST LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE CLEAN-UP PROJECT (wP-59307)<br />

Christine Fahey, Andrea Denby, Glenn Case, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.;<br />

Tim Palmeter, Public Works Government Services Canada (Canada)<br />

The Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) is the largest clean-up of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) ever undertaken in Canada.<br />

Situated within two adjacent Ontario municipalities, Port Hope and Clarington, the project scope includes the remediation of<br />

an estimated 1.7 million cubic metres (m3) of contaminated material and its consolidation within two new local waste management<br />

facilities in the form of above-ground, engineered containment mounds. The waste is primarily the by-product of uranium and radium<br />

ore processing activities of the former crown corporation Eldorado Nuclear Limited between 1932 and 1988.<br />

The PHAI is sponsored by the Government of Canada under the federal historic liabilities management program that is the<br />

responsibility of Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). Following the development of a new project execution framework in 2008,<br />

the PHAI Management Office, consisting of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), Public Works & Government Services<br />

Canada (PWGSC) and NRCan staff, was established to perform the majority of Canadas obligations for the clean-up.<br />

The terms of reference for the PHAI are set out in a Legal Agreement signed in 2001 between the Government of Canada and<br />

the host municipalities. The Legal Agreement outlines a three-phased approach for the implementation of the PHAI:<br />

Phase 1 - planning and regulatory approvals; Phase 2 - remediation and construction; and Phase 3 - long-term monitoring and<br />

maintenance.<br />

118


Abstracts Session 48<br />

SESSION 48 — PANEL: RADIUM REMEDIATION - HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES<br />

AND CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES - PART 3 OF 3 (4.13)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 49 — PANEL: COMMUNICATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT - PART 1 OF 2 (5-21)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 50 — PANEL: COMMUNICATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT - PART 2 OF 2 (5-21)<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

SESSION 51 — SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH L/ILW MANAGEMENT (1.14)<br />

1) UK LLWR ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY CASE SUBMISSION 2011 (wP-59135)<br />

Richard Cummings, LLWR Ltd; Andrew Baker, LLWR; Trevor Sumerling, LLWR;<br />

John Shevelan, Amy Huntington, LLWR Ltd. (UK)<br />

The UK’s Low Level Waste Repository Ltd submitted an Environmental Safety Case (ESC) for the disposal of low-level waste<br />

to the Environment Agency on the 1st of May 2011. The ESC is a major submission that will decide the future use of the Repository<br />

and has major implications for the success of the UK’s LLW Strategy and decommissioning programme. This paper provides<br />

an overview of the work that has been carried out to support the submission.<br />

Key aspects of this ESC include:<br />

detailed investigations of existing disposals, based on careful examination of existing records and other investigations, including<br />

interviews with former operational staff; analysis of uncertainties in future disposals; modelling of the biogeochemical evolution<br />

of the disposal system, which provides understanding of the evolution of pH, Eh and gas generation and thence underpinning<br />

for radionuclide releases in groundwater and gas; development of a 3-D groundwater flow model, calibrated against observed heads<br />

and with a detailed representation of the engineered features; analysis of coastal erosion and its impacts; a major focus on optimisation<br />

based on detailed technical studies; a conclusion that existing disposals do not require remediation; the choice of a concrete<br />

vault design with permeable side walls designed to avoid bathtubbing after the end of management control; a comprehensive set of<br />

assessment calculations, including thorough analysis of uncertainties, which demonstrate consistency with the Environment<br />

Agency’s risk and dose guidance levels; revision of the LLWR’s WAC, based in part on the use of the ‘sum of fractions’ approach;<br />

the use of a safety case document structure that emphasises key safety arguments in a Level 1 document and provides supporting<br />

evidence in a series of Level 2 documents; the provision of a Level 2 document that describes in detail how each aspect of the regulatory<br />

guidance has been addressed.<br />

2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT OF COASTAL EROSION<br />

OF THE UK LOW-LEVEL WASTE REPOSITORY (wP-59137)<br />

Trevor Sumerling, LLWR; Paul Fish, Halcrow Ltd.; George Towler, James Penfold, Quintessa Ltd;<br />

John Shevelan, Richard Cummings, LLWR Ltd. (UK)<br />

The UK Low Level Waste Repository Ltd submitted an Environmental Safety Case for the disposal of low-level waste to our<br />

regulator, the Environment Agency, on the 1st of May 2011. This includes assessments of the long-term radiological safety of past<br />

and future disposals.<br />

A particular feature of the Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) is that, because of its proximity to the coast, the site is vulnerable<br />

to coastal erosion. Our present understanding is that the site will be eroded on a timescale of a few hundred to a few thousand<br />

years, with consequent disruption of the repository, and dispersal of the wastes.<br />

We have undertaken a programme of scientific research and monitoring to characterise the evolution and function of the current<br />

coastal system that provides a basis for forecasting its future evolution. This has included modelling of contemporary hydrodynamics,<br />

geomorphological mapping, repeat LiDAR and aerial photographic surveys to detect patterns and rates of change, coastal<br />

inspections and reconstructions of post-glacial (i.e. last 15,000 years) sea levels and sediment budgets. Estimates of future sealevel<br />

rise have been derived from international sources and consideration given to the impact of such on the local coastline. Two<br />

alternative models of coastal recession have then been applied, one empirical and one physical-process based, taking account of the<br />

composition of Quaternary-age sediments between the coast and the site and uncertainties in future local sea level change.<br />

3) DEVELOPMENT OF A METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING ILW PACKAGE<br />

MONITORING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (wP-59156)<br />

Jenny E. Morris, Timothy W. Hicks, Stephen M. Wickham, Galson Sciences Limited;<br />

Antonio Guida, Babcock International Group; Melanie Brownridge, James McKinney<br />

Darrell Morris, Nuclear Decommissioning Authority; Mark Tearle, Magnox Limited (UK)<br />

In the UK, monitoring and inspection is required by the regulators to ensure continued safe storage, retrievability and disposability<br />

of packages of radioactive waste in interim storage. Monitoring and inspection requirements may also be determined by any<br />

requirements for transport, further storage or disposal when the store is emptied. This paper presents an approach to establishing<br />

a monitoring and inspection strategy for stored intermediate level waste (ILW) packages that was developed under the UK Nuclear<br />

Decommissioning Authoritys Direct Research Portfolio programme.<br />

The key aspects to be considered when developing a package monitoring and inspection strategy are identified and used to<br />

develop a generic multi-stage process that will enable store operators to identify a justifiable monitoring and inspection strategy for<br />

ILW packages in long-term interim storage. Two spreadsheet tools have also been developed to facilitate use of the multi-stage<br />

process by store operators (IMPS - Inspection and Monitoring of Packages in Stores and CBAT - Cost / Benefit Analysis Tool).<br />

119


Session 51 Abstracts<br />

A statistically based methodology has been used to identify the number of waste packages to be inspected and an appropriate<br />

frequency of inspection, and aspects such as cost, risk and operational feasibility are taken into account.<br />

4) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT OF HUMAN INTRUSION<br />

AT THE UK LOW LEVEL WASTE REPOSITORY (LLWR) (wP-59356)<br />

Timothy Hicks, Tamara Baldwin, Galson Sciences Ltd; Richard Cummings, LLWR Ltd.; Trevor Sumerling, LLWR (UK)<br />

The UK Low Level Waste Repository Ltd submitted an Environmental Safety Case for the disposal of low level waste (LLW)<br />

to the Environment Agency on the 1st of May 2011. The Environmental Safety Case (ESC) presents a complete case for the environmental<br />

safety of the Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) both during operations and in the long term (Cummings et al, in these<br />

proceedings). This includes an assessment of the long-term radiological safety of the facility, including an assessment of the potential<br />

consequences of human intrusion at the site.<br />

The human intrusion assessment is based on a cautiously realistic approach in defining intrusion cases and parameter values.<br />

A range of possible human intrusion events was considered based on present-day technologies and credible future uses of the site.<br />

This process resulted in the identification of geotechnical investigations, a housing development and a smallholding as requiring<br />

quantitative assessment.<br />

A particular feature of the site is that, because of its proximity to the coast and in view of expected global sea level rise, it is<br />

vulnerable to coastal erosion. During such erosion, wastes and engineered barrier materials will be exposed, and could become targets<br />

for investigation or recovery. Therefore, human intrusion events have been included that are associated with such activities.<br />

5) FACTORS AFFECTING THE LONGEVITY OF INTERIM ILW STORES, MONITORING METHODS<br />

AND TECHNIQUES SUPPORTING STORE LIFE EXTENSION (wP-59151)<br />

Jenny E. Morris, Stephen Wickham, Timothy Hicks, Phil J. Richardson, Galson Sciences Limited; Melanie Brownridge,<br />

Darrell Morris, James McKinney, Nuclear Decommissioning Authority; Mark Tearle, Magnox Limited (UK)<br />

Life-limiting features of stores (i.e. components of a typical Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) store that are vulnerable to failure)<br />

can be separated into those related to store design, the continuing operation of the store and equipment and store management.<br />

Environmental factors, including temperature, humidity, atmospheric pollutants and radiation fields also affect the longevity of ILW<br />

storage buildings and the integrity of the waste packages within the store.<br />

The current condition of the store and the causes and rates of any observed deterioration need to be determined to estimate the<br />

current operating life of the store and to analyse the costs and benefits associated with life extension.<br />

Suitable monitoring techniques and methods for extending the operating life of stores, either by remediation or replacement of<br />

identified life-limiting features, have also been assessed. Techniques including visual inspection (directly or by use of CCTV or<br />

inspection cells), corrosion coupons, crane monitoring and a wide range of indirect measurement methods can be used to monitor<br />

the condition of life-limiting features and the store environment. Methods for extending store life include the application of paint<br />

or coatings to retard degradation, use of electro-chemical treatments and repair of the concrete structure or replacement of components.<br />

6) DIFFERENT TYPES OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE REPOSITORIES, EACH SUITED<br />

FOR A GIVEN TYPE OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE (wP-59293)<br />

Sylvie Voinis, Fabrice Boissier, Lise Griffault, Jean Louis Maillard, Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

The aim of this article is to present how Andra implements a dedicated solution per waste category. It relies on response to a<br />

series of questions concerning the appropriate waste disposal system such as: What type of radiological inventory is involved?<br />

What are the half-lives of the radionuclides and the associated timescales concerned for achieving the fundamental protection objective?<br />

.<br />

In that respect, Andra has developed and has implemented methods for all disposal facilities in order to reach common objectives:<br />

The immediate and long term protections of human beings and the environment constitute the fundamental objectives of all<br />

radioactive-waste disposal facilities.<br />

In order to achieve those protections, disposal facilities must be safe. Thus, Andra safety encompasses all design, implementation<br />

and operational measures for preventing risks of all kind internal, external during operation and after closure in consistency<br />

with defence in depth principles taken into account the peculiarity of waste disposal facilities: (i) balancing operational safety and<br />

post-closure safety, (ii) management of nuclear risks in underground repository for some of them, (iii) management of scientific<br />

understanding and related uncertainties, and (iv) management of long or very long- timescales.<br />

The presentation will illustrate Andras approach that has or will be conducted and will focus on communalities or peculiarities<br />

according to the type of waste and related disposal options regarding the following iterative steps: regulatory safety rules, input<br />

data, scenarios, safety assessments.<br />

SESSION 52 — DISPOSAL SITE AND WASTE FORM CHARACTERIZATION<br />

AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - PART 2 OF 2 (1.20)<br />

1) CHARACTERISATION OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE UK LOW LEVEL WASTE REPOSITORY (wP-59146)<br />

John Shevelan, LLWR Ltd; Nicholas Smith, National Nuclear Laboratory (UK)<br />

The UK Low Level Waste Repository Ltd (LLWR) submitted an Environmental Safety Case (ESC) for the disposal of lowlevel<br />

waste (LLW) to the UK Environment Agency on the 1st of May 2011. As part of the ESC, the LLWR have to demonstrate<br />

that a programme of site investigation and site characterisation has been carried out to provide the requisite information for the ESC<br />

and support facility design and construction. This paper explains the development of the site investigation programme and how the<br />

understanding of the geology of the site has developed.<br />

120


Abstracts Session 52<br />

The geological environment in the region of the LLWR consists of Quaternary age deposits overlying older bedrock. The site<br />

has been subjected to a series of site investigation programmes from 1939 to the present day. The development of 3-D geological<br />

models was necessary to integrate data from boreholes, trial pits, geophysical investigations and beach exposures and data gained<br />

from site operations.<br />

The understanding of the geology has developed with each new set of data. Early simple interpretations from a few boreholes<br />

have been superseded by a series of more complex interpretations each incorporating the increasingly detailed observations. Initial<br />

attempts to develop a lithostratigraphic representation of the geology proved difficult. It was also difficult provide a clear link<br />

between the geology and the hydrogeology using a lithostratigraphic approach as required for the development of hydrogeological<br />

models.<br />

2) IN-SITU INTERFEROMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF COMPACTED SMECTITE<br />

UNDER HYPERALKALINE CONDITION (w/oP-59124)<br />

Hisao Satoh, Susumu Kurosawa, Mitsubishi Materials Corporation; Tomoko Ishii,<br />

Hitoshi Owada, Radioactive Waste Management Funding and Research Center (Japan)<br />

Alteration of bentonite buffer at the repository for radioactive waste is an unavoidable phenomenon. However, precise kinetic<br />

data is useful for evaluation of the endurance for long-term safety. Alkaline attack to bentonite by cement-leachates may enhance<br />

alteration of smectite into the other phase such as zeolite. Until recently, there are a number of detailed dissolution studies (e.g.,<br />

Cama et al., 2000; Yokoyama et al., 2005; Rozalen et al., 2008) for suspended smectite, using high precision measurements by ICP-<br />

MS and AFM analyses. In contrast, dissolution study of compacted smectite is very limited (e.g., Nakayama et al., 2003). In order<br />

to verify the previous data, the dissolution rate of compacted smectite with realistic density needs to be confirmed experimentally.<br />

We have, for the first time, applied in-situ vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) along with the auto-compaction cell for measuring<br />

dissolution rates of smectite compacted at 0.04-20.0 MPa and 70 ̊C in 0.3 M NaOH (pH12.1).<br />

At less-compaction (0.04 MPa), Kunipia-P smectite initially showed a relatively fast dissolution of ~2E-11 mol/m2/s which is<br />

comparable to the rate for suspended smectite under same pH-T condition. At high-compaction (


Session 53 Abstracts<br />

design, closure design, and quantitative assessments. Each of these issues requires an understanding of the movement of water<br />

through the facility and the surrounding geology during operations and following facility closure. Groundwater flow modelling has<br />

been used extensively in support of interpretation of field investigations, development of vault design, and assessment of the<br />

groundwater pathway as one of the major pathways by which contaminants may reach the environment. This paper describes these<br />

important aspects of the Environmental Safety Case.<br />

SESSION 53 — GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS AND NATIONAL INITIATIVES IN<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - PART 1 OF 2 (5.13)<br />

1) RUSSIAN NUCLEAR SUBMARINE ELIMINATION 2001 - 2011 BY THE<br />

INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY (w/oP-59041)<br />

Michael Washer, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada; Alan Heyes, King’s College (Canada/UK)<br />

Following the 911 attack on the USA in 2001 the international community under Canadas G8 leadership established a $20 billion<br />

Global Partnership initiative to collaboratively address threats to global security posed by the proliferation and potential terrorist<br />

use of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction (WMMD) and related materials and knowledge. As an integral component<br />

of this initiative the international community agreed to assist Russia in advancing the elimination of its Cold War legacy of<br />

nearly 200 nuclear powered submarines left over from the collapse of the Soviet Union. This presentation presents an overview of<br />

the 10 years work that has now entirely eliminated that submarine legacy. The scale and complexity of the challenge along with<br />

each countrys contribution and approach is discussed along with key success factors and unique solutions adopted.<br />

2) THE GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP: ITS ACHIEVEMENTS, MISSED OPPORTUNITIES AND POTENTIAL TO<br />

ADDRESS FUTURE THREATS FROM THE SPREAD OF CBRN MATERIALS AND EXPERTISE (w/oP-59335)<br />

Alan Heyes, Wyn Bowen, Hugh Chalmers, King’s College (UK)<br />

In 2002, the G8 launched the Global Partnership (GP) against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction. The<br />

partnerships budget was placed at $20 billion over 10 years, and it was supported by some 23 countries and the European Union<br />

(EU).Though it has had little public recognition, the partnership has been one of the G8s most successful initiatives and has led to<br />

many benefits, including improved international security and addressing a sizeable proportion of the Cold War nuclear and chemical<br />

weapons arsenal in the Former Soviet Union. Its future, however, remains undecided, as its funding is set to expire in less than<br />

two years.<br />

In 2009 and 2010 Kings College London with generous funding support from the US John D and Catherine T MacArthur<br />

Foundation, carried out a detailed evaluation of the achievements and benefits of the GP to date, its failings and lost opportunities,<br />

and potential future direction. Our findings indicate that the partnership has aided security in the Former Soviet Union and had a<br />

significant number of wider benefits with the potential to continue to do the same on a broader geographic level in future. As such,<br />

it is a valuable tool to assist the international community to work together to address global threats relating to chemical, biological,<br />

radiological and nuclear materials and related expertise and the G8 should take steps to renew its funding.<br />

3) THE GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVES RADIOLOGICAL<br />

SECURITY COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA (wP-59361)<br />

Tiffany Blanchard, U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration;<br />

William Abramson, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; James W. (J.R.) Russell, National Security Technologies;<br />

Catherine Roberts, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (USA)<br />

The United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security Administrations (NNSA) Global Threat<br />

Reduction Initiative (GTRI) supports both U.S. and international threat reduction goals by securing vulnerable nuclear and radiological<br />

material located at civilian sites throughout the world. GTRIs approach to reducing the threat posed by vulnerable, highactivity<br />

radioactive sources includes: removing and disposing of orphan or disused radioactive sources; implementing physical<br />

security upgrades at civilian sites containing radioactive sources; and establishing a cooperative sustainability program at sites to<br />

ensure that upgrades are maintained. For many years GTRI has collaborated successfully with the Russian Federation and international<br />

partners to improve radiological security in Russia. This paper provides a synopsis of GTRIs accomplishments and cooperation<br />

with Russia in the following areas: 1.) recovering and disposing of orphan and disused radioactive sources, 2.) recovering<br />

and disposing of radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs), and 3.) providing physical security upgrades at civilian sites that<br />

contain vulnerable radiological material.<br />

4) KOLA PENINSULA RADWASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE ITALIAN-RUSSIAN<br />

COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP (wP-59392)<br />

Massimiliano Nobile, SOGIN (Russia)<br />

On the 5th of November 2003 a Cooperation Agreement, envisaging a grant of 360 Meuro in 10 years, was signed in Rome<br />

between Italy and Russia in the framework of Global Partnership <strong>Program</strong> launched by G8 at Kananaskis (Canada) in 2002. Funds<br />

availability was assured in March 2006.<br />

Competent Organizations are the Ministry of Economic Development for Italy and Rosatom for Russia. They act through a<br />

Steering Committee and a Project Management Unit, based in Moscow.<br />

So far, in five years of concrete work, 33 contracts have been signed and 145 Meuro have been spent.<br />

Together with other significant lines of activities, e.g. nuclear submarine dismantling, the management of waste, presently<br />

located at Andreeva Bay site, is surely the most important, not only for the amount of allocated funds (about half of available ones)<br />

but also for the urgency to solve serious environmental problems linked to the actual unsafe conditions of these waste, both as<br />

regards possible incidents and malicious attacks from outside.<br />

Volume of LL/IL waste at Andreeva Bay site are 17000 tons and 3000 tons, respectively for solid and liquid; moreover is<br />

expected, during the next 15 years, the production of additional 33000 tons of liquid and 8000 tons of solid, due to the need of<br />

demolishing existing facilities and final closing of the site.<br />

122


Abstracts Session 54<br />

5) SECURING OF THE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORED ON GREMIKHA SITE - THE<br />

FORMER SOVIET SUBMARINE BASE IN NORTH-WEST OF RUSSIA (w/oP-59371)<br />

Alexandre Gorbatchev, CEA; Lucien Pillette-Cousin, AREVA TA: Boris Stepennov, NRC KI;<br />

Valery Eremenko, SevRAO; Anatoly Zakharchev, ROSATOM (France/Russia)<br />

In the framework of the G8 Global Partnership the French Commission on Atomic Energy (CEA) is in charge of the French<br />

funded projects aimed to secure the materials susceptible to be a subject of the proliferation or a malicious use. The securing of the<br />

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) from the former soviet submarines is of a special importance for CEA and the Russian Rosatom. Our<br />

main bilateral project has focused on two kinds of the SNF (alpha cores and VVR assemblies) stored at Gremikha, the former submarine<br />

base in the North-West of Russia. As of 2011 a significant results have been achieved: 2/3 of VVR type assemblies have<br />

been removed from Gremikha and reprocessed at PO Mayak. Nine alpha cores are unloaded and stored on at Gremikha. The main<br />

task now is to prepare the removal from Gremikha of all the remaining SNF and also to set up the needed infrastructure at the sites<br />

where this SNF will be moved. Substantial funding and technical assistance both from France and Russia will be required for that.<br />

Beyond the operator of the Gremikha site (SevRAO), the CEA and Rosatom involve many expert organizations from both countries<br />

such as AREVA, Kurchatov Institute and many others. Their contribution is one of the key elements of the success.<br />

SESSION 54 — GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - PART 2 OF 2 (5.20)<br />

1) ENVIRONMENTAL AND RADIOLOGICAL REMEDIATION UNDER CANADA’S<br />

GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 2004-11 (wP - 59185)<br />

Michael J. Washer, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (Canada)<br />

Following the 911 attack on the USA in 2001 the international community under Canadas G8 leadership established a $20 billion<br />

Global Partnership initiative in 2002 to collaboratively address threats to global security posed by the proliferation and potential<br />

terrorist use of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction (WMMD) and related materials and knowledge. This major international<br />

initiative addressed four priority areas (1) Chemical Weapon Destruction (2) Nuclear powered submarine eliminations (3)<br />

Nuclear and radiological security; and (4) Employment for former weapon scientists. Additionally the Global Partnership initiative<br />

has addressed Biological Non-Proliferation. Canadas execution of all these program areas has resulted in substantial environmental<br />

benefits aside from the eradication and securing of WMMD. This paper will review specific environmental and radiological<br />

remediation achievements of all Global Partnership program areas addressed under Canadian funding 2004 through 2011.<br />

2) UK CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE DECOMMISSIONING OF THE BN-350<br />

REACTOR IN KAZAKHSTAN: 2002 – 2011 (wP-59099)<br />

Steven Laws, Department of Energy and Climate Change (UK), David Wells and Andrew Herrick, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

Since 2002, the UKs Global Threat Reduction <strong>Program</strong>me managed by the Department of Energy and Climate Change has provided<br />

assistance to the Republic of Kazakhstan with the decommissioning of the BN-350 sodium cooled fast reactor. Assistance<br />

has focused on non-proliferation, safety and security projects to ensure the permanent and irreversible shutdown of the reactor and<br />

the reduction of security, safety and environmental hazards, particularly those associated with the large inventory of liquid metal<br />

coolants (sodium and sodium-potassium alloy) and the presence of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). UK assistance efforts have been coordinated<br />

with those of the USA and have made use of the UKs experience in decommissioning its own fast reactor power stations,<br />

the Dounreay Fast Reactor (DFR) and the Prototype Fast Reactor (PFR).<br />

The paper describes work undertaken with UK technical and funding assistance support in the following areas:<br />

• Provision of training and technical support in project management and technical topics, including assistance with finalisation<br />

of the BN-350 Decommissioning Plan.<br />

• Liquid metal coolant treatment projects, including immobilisation of liquid products from the Sodium Processing Facility<br />

and processing of residual sodium remaining within the drained coolant circuits.<br />

• Immobilisation of highly active caesium traps, arising from sodium clean-up both during reactor operations and post-shutdown.<br />

• Operations to transfer the entire inventory of spent nuclear fuel from the reactor storage pond into dual-use storage and<br />

transport casks and then consign these casks to long-term secure storage remote from the reactor site. This activity was<br />

part of the major US-Kazakhstan SNF Storage Project.<br />

• Surveys of spent fuel route facilities to establish the absence of any significant amount of nuclear material.<br />

3) DISMANTLING OF CIVILIAN NUCLEAR POWERED FLEET TECHNICAL<br />

SUPPORT VESSELS. ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS (wP-59386)<br />

Konstantin Kulikov, Rinat Nizamutdinov, NIPTB Onega OAO (Russia)<br />

At the present time six nuclear technical support ships are under supervision of Atomflot FGUP. Two of them (Volodarsky<br />

FTB and Lepse FTB) were decommissioned and are berthing. One more ship Lotta FTB should be decommissioned during next<br />

two years.<br />

The nuclear technological support ships carrying SNF and radwastes appear to be a possible radiation contamination of Murmansk<br />

region and Kola Bay because the Ship long-term storage afloat has the negative effect on hull’s structures technical condition.<br />

As a result of this in the context of the Federal <strong>Program</strong> Nuclear and Radiation Safety (2008-2015) NIPTB Onega was engaged<br />

by state corporation Rosatom to develop the dismantling procedure for Volodarsky FTB and Lotta FTB.<br />

Developing of nuclear technological support ships dismantling projects the technical and economic assessment of dismantling<br />

was carried out. The following variants were examined: formation of SRW module for long-term storage at Saida Bay; complete<br />

dismantlement and allocation of all generated SRW into certified protective containers. The report contains description of variants,<br />

research procedure, comparative analysis of variants of dismantling of nuclear technological support ships with dismantling of<br />

nuclear submarine and propositions concerning further research of specified problem.<br />

123


Session 55 Abstracts<br />

4) PROGRESS IN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ON REGULATORY OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT:<br />

EXPERIENCE IN NORWEGIAN COOPERATION PROGRAMMES (wP-59399)<br />

Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (Norway)<br />

This paper describes the Norwegian Radiation Protection Authoritys (NRPA) experience in regulatory cooperation projects in<br />

Russia, with special focus on legacy issues. These legacies include many different kinds of objects and activities: obsolete large<br />

waste sources, such as those used in radioisotope thermoelectric generators; remediation of former military sites used for storage<br />

of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste; and wastes from uranium mining and ore processing. The objectives of these bi-lateral<br />

cooperation programmes are to promote effective and efficient regulatory supervision, taking into account international recommendations<br />

and good practice in other countries. Specific projects in the program address specific challenges which require practical<br />

local interpretation of ICRP recommendations, the IAEA Basic Safety Standards and other IAEA requirements and guidance<br />

documents. In some cases, new regulatory documentation has been required, as well as new regulatory procedures. In the long term,<br />

the program is intended to lead to an enhanced and enduring safety culture. The positive experience in Russia has encouraged the<br />

Norwegian government to extend the regulatory collaboration programme to countries in central Asia, using experience gained with<br />

Russian regulatory authorities as well as support from Russian Technical Support Organisations. The programmes are evolving into<br />

a regional regulatory support group. Noting this experience, the paper includes suggestions and ideas for how such regional groups<br />

can be effective in addressing common radiation safety objectives while addressing local differences in technical, geographical,<br />

economic and cultural matters in each country...<br />

5) METHODOLOGICAL AND PRACTICAL BASES OF PROVIDING INFORMATION SUPPORT TO<br />

ACTIVITIES ON ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION OF THE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AND<br />

RADIOACTIVE WASTE TEMPORARY STORAGE FACILITY IN GREMIKHA (wP-59375)<br />

Dmitry Stepennov, Anatoly P. Varnavin, NRC Kurchatov Institute; Anatoly A. Zakharchev, Rosatom;<br />

Lucien Pillette-Cousin, AREVA TA (Russia/France)<br />

Remediation of a spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and radioactive waste (RW) temporary storage facility is a multifaceted process that<br />

includes a number of stages, such as development of a remediation programme, performance of comprehensive engineering and<br />

radiological survey, development of a remediation design, removal of SNF and RW up to the site cleanup. At any stage of the remediation,<br />

making of justified decisions is ensured by availability and completeness of associated information. Huge amount of information<br />

has to be managed. Therefore an information analysis system (IAS) was developed by the National Research Centre «Kurchatov<br />

Institute» within the framework of the project for environmental remediation of the SNF and RW temporary storage facility<br />

in Gremikha with financial and technical support provided by France (CEA) and the Russian Federation (Rosatom). The IAS<br />

accumulates all information about the project: technical and radiological characteristics of objects/facilities, cartographic information,<br />

documentation, data on the project participants, technologies and equipment involved. The IAS architecture includes the following<br />

functional subsystems: data management, data analytical processing, project management, geoinformation, 3D modeling,<br />

and public information. The IAS allows developers and performers of environmental remediation of the SNF and RW temporary<br />

storage facility in Gremikha to fulfill tasks arising at all stages of the work. The IAS operating experience can be transferred for<br />

use during surveys and remediation of any radiation hazardous facilities.<br />

SESSION 55 — SAFETY AND SECURITY RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

AND NUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT (5.11)<br />

1) REMOTE RADIATION AND VISUAL SURVEYS OF THE HOT CELL WASTE VAULT<br />

AND SPENT FUEL TRANSFER ROUTE AT KAZAKHSTANS BN-350 REACTOR (wP-59101)<br />

David Wells, Nuvia Limited, Dorchester,United Kingdom, Collin Knight, Idaho National Laboratory;<br />

Alexander Klepikov, Nuclear Technology Safety Center; Igor Yakovlev, CRT&TD MAEC-Kazatomprom LLP;<br />

Evgeniy Tur, National Nuclear Center of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Andrew Herrick, Nuvia Limited (USA/Kazakhatan/UK)<br />

Kazakhstans BN-350 fast reactor was shut down in 1999 and is in the process of being decommissioned in preparation for Safestore.<br />

A key achievement during 2010 was the removal of the known inventory of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from the reactor to offsite<br />

secure storage. As a complementary activity, surveys of areas of the fuel discharge route where it was considered possible for<br />

fuel pins or fuel residues to have collected over many years of operation were also arranged to confirm that no significant amounts<br />

of fuel of remained at the plant.<br />

This paper reports on the remote radiation and visual (video and still photograph) surveys undertaken on the following areas<br />

of the spent fuel route:<br />

• The waste storage repository or vault underneath the Post-Irradiation Examination Hot Cell in which non-destructive and<br />

destructive examination of irradiated fuels was undertaken throughout the operating life of the reactor.<br />

• The fuel transfer and washing cells within which irradiated fuel sub-assemblies were processed and residual sodium<br />

coolant removed.<br />

• The fuel storage ponds.<br />

Man access to several areas (particularly the waste vault) was not possible due to very high radiation levels from stored ??active<br />

wastes or residual contamination and in these cases specially engineered remote camera and detector deployment systems<br />

were developed and used. In other areas, such as the ponds, limited man access was possible under prepared and controlled conditions.<br />

124


Abstracts Session 56<br />

2) HUMAN RELIABILITY-BASED MC&A MODELING FOR EVALUATING<br />

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTECTING NUCLEAR MATERIAL (wP-59379)<br />

Felicia A Durán, Gregory D. Wyss, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)<br />

Material control and accountability (MC&A) operations that track and account for critical assets at nuclear facilities provide a<br />

key protection approach for defeating insider adversaries. MC&A activities, from monitoring to inventory measurements, provide<br />

critical information about target materials and define security elements that are useful against insider threats. However, these activities<br />

have been difficult to characterize in ways that are compatible with the path analysis methods that are used to systematically<br />

evaluate the effectiveness of a sites protection system. The path analysis methodology focuses on a systematic, quantitative evaluation<br />

of the physical protection component of the system for potential external threats, and often calculates the probability, P(E),<br />

that the PPS is effective in defeating an adversary who uses that attack pathway. In previous work, Dawson and Hester observed<br />

that many MC&A activities can be considered a type of sensor system with alarm and assessment capabilities that provide reoccurring<br />

opportunities for detecting the status of critical items. This work has extended this characterization of MC&A activities as<br />

probabilistic sensors that are interwoven within each protection layer of the PPS. In addition, MC&A activities have similar characteristics<br />

to operator tasks performed in a nuclear power plant (NPP) in that the reliability of these activities depends significantly<br />

on human performance. Many of the procedures involve human performance in checking for anomalous conditions. Further<br />

characterization of MC&A activities as operational procedures that check the status of critical assets provides a basis for applying<br />

human reliability analysis (HRA) models and methods to determine probabilities of detection for MC&A protection elements...<br />

3) RISK-BASED SECURITY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: METHOD AND EXAMPLE<br />

APPLICATIONS (w/oP-59381)<br />

Gregory Wyss, John Hinton, John Clem, Consuelo Silva, Felicia A Durán, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)<br />

Decision makers wish to use risk-based cost-benefit analysis to prioritize security investments. However, understanding security<br />

risk requires estimating the likelihood of attack, which is extremely uncertain and depends on unquantifiable psychological factors<br />

like dissuasion and deterrence. In addition, the most common performance metric for physical security systems, probability<br />

of effectiveness at the design basis threat [P(E)], performs poorly in cost-benefit analysis. It is extremely sensitive to small changes<br />

in adversary characteristics when the threat is near a systems breaking point, but very insensitive to those changes under other conditions.<br />

This makes it difficult to prioritize investment options on the basis of P(E), especially across multiple targets or facilities.<br />

To overcome these obstacles, a Sandia National Laboratories Laboratory Directed Research and Development project has<br />

developed a risk-based security cost-benefit analysis method. This approach characterizes targets by how difficult it would be for<br />

adversaries to exploit each targets vulnerabilities to induce consequences. Adversaries generally have success criteria (e.g., adequate<br />

or desired consequences and thresholds for likelihood of success), and choose among alternative strategies that meet these<br />

criteria while considering their degree of difficulty in achieving their successful outcome. Investments reduce security risk as they<br />

reduce the severity of consequences available and/or increase the difficulty for an adversary to successfully accomplish their most<br />

advantageous attack...<br />

SESSION 56 — ADVANCED L/ILW TECHNOLOGIES - PART 2 OF 2 (1.21)<br />

1) APPLYING FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS TO IMPROVE PROCESSING AND<br />

REMEDIATION OF NUCLEAR WASTE (wP-59172)<br />

Kelly J Knight, Jon M. Berkoe, Brigette M. Rosendall, L. Joel Peltier, Chris A Kennedy, Bechtel National (USA)<br />

Transport and processing of hazardous nuclear waste for treatment and storage can involve unique and complex thermal and<br />

fluid dynamic conditions that pose potential for safety risk and/or design uncertainty and also are likely to be subjected to more<br />

precise performance requirements than in other industries. From an engineering analysis perspective, certainty of outcome is essential.<br />

Advanced robust methods for engineering analysis and simulation of critical processes can help reduce risk of design uncertainty<br />

and help mitigate or reduce the amount of expensive full-scale demonstration testing.<br />

This paper will discuss experience gained in applying computational fluid dynamics models to key processes for mixing, transporting,<br />

and thermal treatment of nuclear waste as part of designing a massive vitrification process plant that will convert high and<br />

low-level nuclear waste into glass for permanent storage. Examples from industrial scale simulations will be presented. The computational<br />

models have shown promise in replicating several complex physical processes such as solid-liquid flows in suspension,<br />

blending of slurries, and cooling of materials at extremely high temperature. Knowledge gained from applying simulation has provided<br />

detailed insight into determining the most critical aspects of these complex processes that can ultimately be used to help guide<br />

the optimum design of waste handling equipment based on credible calculations while ensuring risk of design uncertainty is minimized.<br />

2) LIFETIME PERFORMANCE OF ASME AG-1 SECTION FK RADIAL FLOW FILTERS (wP-59170)<br />

CHARLES WAGGONER, Michael Parsons, Paxton Giffen, Mississippi State University;<br />

Jaime Rickert, Institute for Clean Energy Technology (USA)<br />

A series of 18 filters Section FK filters have been tested. This included testing two different configurations of 2000 cfm filters,<br />

12 remote change filters and 6 safe change filters. Testing consisted of lifetime performance evaluations using three different<br />

aerosol challenges and two different relative humidity/temperature conditions. Challenge aerosols ranged in mass median diameter<br />

(MMD) size from 500 nm (alumina) to 3000 nm (Arizona road dust). All testing was conducted consistent with NQA-1 standards.<br />

Test data were continuously collected for volumetric airflow, air temperature, relative humidity, up and downstream particle<br />

size distribution, up and downstream particle count, and filter differential pressure.<br />

Data provided in this paper include the mass versus differential pressure (dP) loading curves demonstrating loading capacity<br />

as a function of particle size. Results of mass loading are shown to follow current models for smaller aerosols, but large particle<br />

challenges demonstrated higher loading capacities than expected. Data will also be provided to demonstrate changes in the filter<br />

pack geometry during latter stages of loading (at differential pressures greater than 12-14 in. w.c. dP). This change in pleat geom-<br />

125


Session 57 Abstracts<br />

etry (pleat collapse) leads to a threshold dP at which the differential pressure will continue to increase even if aerosols are no longer<br />

added to the air flow. Data will be presented to demonstrate that reducing the airflow by 25 percent will counteract this runaway<br />

increase in dP, even if reduction of airflow is done as late as 25+ in. w.c. Filter failure for the units tested ranged from 30 to 50 in.<br />

wc...<br />

3) ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES TO REDUCE COST AND WASTE VOLUME IN<br />

HEPA FILTRATION USING METALLIC FILTER MEDIA (wP-59348)<br />

Chris Chadwick, Porvair Filtration Group (UK)<br />

The disposal costs of contaminated HEPA and THE filter elements have been proved to be disproportionately high compared<br />

with the cost of the elements themselves.<br />

Work published elsewhere (Moore, et el 1992; Bergman et al 1997) suggests that the cost of use of traditional, panel type, glass<br />

fibre HEPA filtration trains to the DOE was, during that period, $29.5million, based on a five year life cycle, and including installation,<br />

testing, removal and disposal life cycle costs being based on estimates dating from 1987-1990.<br />

Within that cost estimate, $300 was the value given to the filter and $4,450 was given to the peripheral activity. Clearly, if the<br />

$4,450 component could be reduced, tremendous saving could ensue, in addition to the reduction of the legacy burden of waste volume.<br />

This issue exists for operators in both the US and in Europe.<br />

If HEPA filters could be cleaned to a condition where they could either be re-used or decontaminated to the extent that they<br />

could be stored as a lower cost wasteform or if HEPA/THE filter elements were available without any organic content likely to give<br />

rise to flammable or explosive decomposition gases during long term storage this would also reduce the costs and monitoring necessary<br />

in storage.<br />

4) ADVANCED DRYING SYSTEM TO MEET RADIOLYSIS CRITERIA OF METALLIC WASTE (wP-59116)<br />

Masamichi Obata, Yasushi Ooishi, Toshiba Corporation (Japan)<br />

High dose rate metal waste from core internals, such as BWR channel boxes or control rods are stored in fuel pool or site<br />

bunker pool. Waste form for final disposal of these high dose rate metal wastes should eliminate water to prevent hydrogen gas<br />

which can be caused by radiolysis of water. Toshiba’s newly developed drying system for high dose rate metal wastes enable very<br />

low content of water even if the waste have a powder layer. Toshiba will provide the total system to fabricate the waste form for<br />

high dose rate metal wastes.<br />

SESSION 57 — RECENT ADVANCES IN PROCESSING AND IMMOBILIZATION<br />

OF HLW, FISSILE AND TRU - PART 2 OF 2 (2.6)<br />

1) MITIGATION OF SLIDING MOTION OF A CASK-CANISTER BY FLUID-STRUCTURE<br />

INTERACTION IN AN ANNULAR REGION (wP-59208)<br />

Tomohiro Ito, Atsuhiko Shintani, Chihiro Nakagawa, Osaka Prefecture University;<br />

Kazuhisa Furuta, Osaka Prefcture University (Japan)<br />

Many spent fuels coming out of the nuclear power station are planned to be stored in the special site in Japan until they are<br />

reprocessed. In this site, the spent fuels are installed in a cylindrical container called canister. The canister, intern, will be installed<br />

in the outer cylinder called cask that is a free-standing structure. When this system is subjected to the strong seismic motions, sliding<br />

and rocking motions will be induced. And, in the worst case, the cask may collide to each other or overturn. Therefore, it is very<br />

important to reduce these motions of the cask in order to avoid the consequent contamination of radioactive substances.<br />

The authors have already conducted analytical investigations on the sliding and rocking motions of a cask-canister system subjected<br />

to a seismic excitation, and clarified the effects of the vibration of the inner canister. It was shown that the inner canister<br />

gives large influences on the sliding and rocking motions of the outer cask.<br />

In this study, we propose a mitigation method for sliding motion. Water is installed in an annular region between a cask and a<br />

canister. Fluid-structure interaction is taken into consideration for nonlinear sliding motion analyses. The effects of fluid-structure<br />

interaction on mitigation of sliding motions are studied. Furthermore, these effects are confirmed experimentally using a fundamental<br />

test model.<br />

2) IODINE CONDITIONING AS IODATE ION IN AN APATITE-LIKE CERAMIC (w/oP-59015)<br />

Lionel Campayo, CEA; Danielle Laurencin, Institut Charles Gerhardt De Montpellier;<br />

Agnès Grandjean, Institut De Chimie Séparative De Marcoule; Remy Delorme, CEA (France)<br />

Nuclear industry produces radionuclides like iodine-129 for which one of the management strategies could be an efficiently<br />

conditioning over a geological time scale. Several materials have been proposed to meet this objective. One of the most promising<br />

approaches consists in incorporating the element in robust inorganic matrices like apatites.<br />

Apatites are a large family of compounds of general formula M10 (XO4 ) 6Y2 (M = Ca2+, Sr2+, Pb2+&; XO4 = (PO4 ) 3-, (VO4 ) 3- &; Y = OH-, F-&). Iodine has been incorporated in apatites under the form of iodide anions (I-), in compounds like<br />

Pb10 (VO4 ) 4 . 8 (PO4 )1.2I2 which exhibits a good chemical resistance to the leaching by water. However, the number of apatite compositions<br />

able to incorporate iodine as iodide is limited. Recently, we have started to develop a new way of incorporating iodine in<br />

hydroxyapatite structures (M10 (PO4 ) 6 (OH) 2 , M = Ca or Sr) under mild conditions, using iodate anions (IO3 )-.<br />

Here, the synthesis and characterization of these new iodate-substituted apatite phases will be presented. Their thermal stability<br />

and their resistance to leaching will be described, revealing promising properties in view of radioactive iodine confinement<br />

applications.<br />

126


Abstracts Session 57<br />

3) STATUS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF IN-TANK/AT-TANK SEPARATIONS TECHNOLOGIES<br />

FOR HIGH-LEVEL WASTE PROCESSING FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (wP-59109)<br />

Bill Wilmarth, SRNL; Nicholas P. Machara, US DOE Office of Technology Innovation and Deployment;<br />

Steve P. Schneider, US DOE Office of Waste Processing; Reid A. Peterson, PNNL;<br />

Sheryl R. Bush, SRNL (USA) Presentation by Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

Within the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Office of Technology Innovation and Development, the Office of Waste Processing<br />

manages a research and development program related to the treatment and disposition of radioactive waste. At the Savannah<br />

River (South Carolina) and Hanford (Washington) Sites, approximately 90 million gallons of waste are distributed among 226<br />

storage tanks (grouped or collocated in tank farms). This waste may be considered to contain mixed and stratified high activity and<br />

low activity constituent waste liquids, salts and sludges that are collectively managed as high level waste (HLW). A large majority<br />

of these wastes and associated facilities are unique to the DOE, meaning many of the programs to treat these materials are firstof-a-kind<br />

and unprecedented in scope and complexity. As a result, the technologies required to disposition these wastes must be<br />

developed from basic principles, or require significant re-engineering to adapt to DOEs specific applications. Of particular interest<br />

recently, the development of In-tank or At-Tank separation processes have the potential to treat waste with high returns on financial<br />

investment. The primary objective associated with In-Tank or At-Tank separation processes is to accelerate waste processing.<br />

Insertion of the technologies will (1) maximize available tank space to efficiently support permanent waste disposition including<br />

vitrification; (2) treat problematic waste prior to transfer to the primary processing facilities at either site (i.e., Hanfords Waste<br />

Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) or Savannah Rivers Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF)); and (3) create a parallel<br />

treatment process to shorten the overall treatment duration...<br />

4) THE DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DEMONSTRATION OF A NEW CLASS<br />

OF INORGANIC ION SPECIFIC MEDIA EMPHASIZING THE OPTIMIZATION, STABILIZATION<br />

AND VOLUME REDUCTION OF THE FINAL NUCLEAR WASTE FORM (w/oP-59126)<br />

Mark Denton, Kurion Inc.; William D. Bostick, MCL, Inc. (USA)<br />

The primary focus of this paper is on the development of two novel classes of Ion Specific Media (ISM). However, it is important<br />

to note that these exclusively inorganic media were selectively designed to be compatible with advanced stabilization technologies<br />

(e.g., solidification and vitrification) and act as the final, stabilized waste forms required for storage or disposal on site. The<br />

purpose of developing such a class of high capacity and high specificity Ion Specific Media is to remove the recalcitrant isotopes<br />

(e.g., Cs-137, Sr-90,Tc-99 and I 129) during supplemental treatment (including Pretreatment, Off-Spec Tanks and Secondary Waste<br />

Treatment) and place them into very small packages for on-site storage, or HLW vitrification. These ISMs must also be a very stable<br />

form themselves for such potentially long-term, in-tank or dry storage (i.e.,inorganic in nature, leach resistant, non-hydrogen<br />

generating and amenable to future stabilization by thermal, or other, means).<br />

Having completed testing on a full spectrum of ISMs with these qualifications and ones that will selectively handle the prominent<br />

class drivers and recalcitrant isotopes in Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) (e.g., Cs-137, Ni-63 and Sr-90), a further<br />

down select was done at our licensed facility, Materials and Chemistry Laboratories (MCL), in Oak Ridge, Tennessee for DOE specific<br />

isotope removal. This down select was carried out on batch reactors and columns at an analytical- and bench-scale on 1) near<br />

neutral pH surrogates and actual feeds, 2) secondary waste stream, pH ~8-9 surrogates, 3) strontium (Sr 90) removal from chelated<br />

tanks (weapons complex off-spec. tanks), and 4) high alkali tank Cs pretreatment, pH ~14. To further the efficacy testing here,<br />

prior to on-site hot-cell testing at a government facility, testing was also successfully carried out on actual Commercial Nuclear<br />

Power Plant waste streams, in both our Oak Ridge Lab as well as on site (including fuel pool and Boron Waste Storage Tank,<br />

BWST) waste waters.<br />

5) HIGH WASTE LOADING GLASS FORMULATIONS FOR HANFORD<br />

HIGH-ALUMINUM HLW STREAMS (wP-59388)<br />

Albert Kruger, US DOE (USA)<br />

The current estimates and glass formulation efforts have been conservative in terms of achievable waste loadings. These formulations<br />

have been specified to ensure that the glasses are homogenous, contain essentially no crystalline phases, are processable<br />

in joule-heated, ceramic-lined melters and meet WTP Contract terms. The WTPs overall mission will require the immobilization<br />

of tank waste compositions that are dominated by mixtures of aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), bismuth (Bi), iron (Fe), phosphorous<br />

(P), zirconium (Zr), and sulfur (S) compounds as waste-limiting components. Glass compositions for these waste mixtures<br />

have been developed based upon previous experience and current glass property models. Recently, DOE has initiated a testing program<br />

to develop and characterize HLW glasses with higher waste loadings. Results of this work have demonstrated the feasibility<br />

of increases in waste loading from about 25 wt% to 33-50 wt% (based on oxide loading) in the glass depending on the waste stream.<br />

It is expected that these higher waste loading glasses will reduce the HLW canister production requirement by about 25% or more.<br />

Refractory components, such as crystalline alumina (corundum) or zirconia (baddeleyite) slow down the melting of glass<br />

batches in continuous melters. This effect can be considerable. Gibbsite and boehmite are common minerals found in high-level<br />

wastes.<br />

6) THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION OF A NEW MODULAR VITRIFICATION<br />

SYSTEM (MVS®) FOR THE TREATMENT OF NUCLEAR WASTE (w/oP-59127)<br />

Mark Denton, Gaetan Bonhomme, Kurion Inc. (USA)<br />

The design and performance capabilities, of the Modular Vitrification System (MVS®), together with the latest results of<br />

experimental tests, is herein described. The MVS® is a novel heat treatment system in which nuclear waste can be processed directly<br />

inside the single-use, final disposal container. The MVS® single-use module consists of an outer canister, typically to be made<br />

of stainless steel specified by the clients site and by the waste acceptance criteria of waste repositories, and an inner induction susceptor/crucible,<br />

typically made out of graphite, which can be thermally insulated from the outer stainless canister. The inner crucible<br />

is inductively heated to the appropriate temperature, from 800°C (low melting point glasses) to up to 1550°C, by an external<br />

low frequency, alternating current (AC), water-cooled induction coil. The very wide range of operating temperatures, the independ-<br />

127


Session 58 Abstracts<br />

ence of melter to the chemistry of the waste and glass (e.g., conductivity) and the fact that parts exposed to high temperature molten<br />

glass are single-use, significantly decreases pre-treatment needs and permits making a wide range of vitrified products from borosilicate<br />

glass to iron phosphate glass. Moreover, technology development cycles and deployment are much faster and less costly on a<br />

single-use system designed to work for only a few hours at high temperatures in extreme conditions as compared to approximately<br />

5 years for incumbent technologies.<br />

SESSION 58 — D&D RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND MONITORING (3.5)<br />

1) QUANTIFYING TC-99 CONTAMINATION IN A FUEL FABRICATION PLANT (wP-59024)<br />

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Ltd; Carol Darbyshire, Springfield Fuels Ltd (UK)<br />

The need was to quantify contamination in a large redundant building at the Springfields fuel manufacturing facility. The aim<br />

was to be able to identify any areas where the bulk activity exceeded 0.4 Bq/g Tc-99 as this would preclude the demolition rubble<br />

being sent to the local disposal facility. The problems associated with this project were the presence of significant uranium contamination,<br />

the realisation that both the Tc-99 and the uranium had diffused into the brickwork to a significant depth and the relatively<br />

low beta energy of Tc-99. The uranium was accompanied by Pa-234m, an energetic beta emitter.<br />

The first decision was to set up standard beta contamination monitors in an unusual way which minimised the response to other<br />

nuclides present while leaving the response to Tc-99 unchanged. The response of the monitor was then determined for Tc-99 activity<br />

buried at different depths. This could then be folded with any known concentration/depth profile to produce a response in<br />

counts/s/Bq/g. The concentration/depth profile was determined for several areas on the plant for Tc-99 and for uranium. The radiochemical<br />

analysis was performed locally but the performance of the local laboratory was checked during the initial investigation<br />

by splitting samples three ways and having confirmation analyses performed by 2 other laboratories. The results showed surprisingly<br />

consistent concentration gradients for Tc-99 and for uranium across the samples but the Tc-99 was clearly more “sticky” than<br />

the uranium.<br />

2) THE SCIENCE, ASSAYING AND WASTE SENTENCING OF ACTIVATED BIOSHIELDS (wP-59038)<br />

Ian Adsley, Nuvia Limited (UK)<br />

This paper describes the design and operation of the Combined Technology Automated Waste Characterisation System (CTA-<br />

WCS) at JRC Ispra. The WCS was designed for the measurement of fission products and uranium and plutonium containing waste<br />

arising from nuclear fuel and nuclear materials processing and reactor operations. The WCS covers a range of activity including<br />

Low and Intermediate Level Waste (LLW and ILW). The system is designed to measure the waste in 200 and 400 (440) litre drums<br />

with a maximum drum weight of 1500 kg. Gamma-ray measurements of radio-nuclide content are performed by a gamma ray<br />

measurement station which functions as either a Segmented Gamma Scanner (SGS) or Tomographic Segmented Gamma-ray Scanner<br />

(TSGS). Either of these two techniques may be employed to perform the functions of drum screening, non-destructive examination<br />

(NDE) and, where appropriate, final drum assay. Coupled to the gamma ray station is a surface dose-rate measurement station,<br />

which employs 6-shielded Geiger-Muller detectors. Active and passive neutron measurements are performed by an advanced,<br />

graphite lined Differential Die-away (DDA) system, which comprises the neutron measurement station.<br />

The DDA performs conventional passive neutron totals, coincidence, and multiplicity counting and active DDA total neutron<br />

counting. Data analysis is based on the use of a range of matrix calibrations, some determined by Monte Carlo analysis. Linking<br />

the gamma ray and neutron measurement stations is an automated roller conveyor with a 20 drum buffer capability and a weight<br />

measurement station. Drums are identified by bar code reading technology...<br />

3) GAMMA-RAY IMAGING FOR GENERATING 3D DOSE RATE MAPS (wP-59123)<br />

Karl Hughes, Edmund Cracknell, Babcock International Group (UK)<br />

The use of gamma-ray imaging has become established in the nuclear industry, especially in the fields of decommissioning and<br />

clean-up, for identifying the origins of elevated gamma dose rates. Since their first use in the mid 1990s, gamma-ray imaging<br />

devices, such as the Babcock RadScan 800, have been used to produce colour overlay plots that indicate, in two dimensions, the<br />

locations and distribution of radioactive contaminants. This information is invaluable in helping project managers to plan clean-up<br />

and shielding activities, ensuring that all work carried out is cost effective and ALARP. Recent work undertaken by Babcock<br />

demonstrates the capability to generate 3D maps of dose rate fields from the output of gamma-ray imaging work. The combination<br />

of gamma-ray imaging survey and resultant dose map is a very powerful tool for planning decommissioning. The conventional<br />

gamma-ray image provides an unambiguous identification of the origins of the dose rates present whilst the 3D dose map allows<br />

the dose uptake to personnel to be determined. Furthermore, the ability to quantify the effect of clean-up or shielding on the dose<br />

rates is possible, providing project teams with a metric for determining the best option available.<br />

4) SAMPLING VS. TAKING SOME (wP-59349)<br />

Dominique Francois-Bongarcon, AGORATEK International Consultants (Canada)<br />

The problem of sampling in general, and for nuclear decontamination in particular, is properly defined. A theory is presented<br />

(Gy’s Theory of Sampling, a.k.a. TOS) that brings all the answers and allows us to put them to work.<br />

The author draws from his lifelong experience in research, teaching and practical applications in this domain to emphasize the<br />

critical odds (i.e. risks) of not taking sampling explicitly into account when assessing grades and concentrations.<br />

The evolution of the acceptance of this theory in the nuclear industry is finally illustrated, and a hopeful glimpse into the future<br />

concludes the presentation.<br />

128


Abstracts Session 58<br />

5) WASTE ASSESSMENT: A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO PROVING WASTE METALS SUITABLE<br />

FOR CONSIGNMENT AS RADIOLOGICALLY EXEMPT MATERIALS (wP-59266)<br />

Iain Carvel, RSRL; Richard D Gunn, Robin Strange, Christopher Orr, Babcock International Group (UK)<br />

B220 at Harwell was built as a Radiochemical Research and Development facility in the latter part of the 1940s. The facility<br />

has been operational since 1949 and has been extended several times, most notably the Plutonium Glove Box Wing in the 1950s<br />

and the Remote Handling Wing in the 1980s. Only the Remote Handling wing remains operational, processing Historic Waste<br />

which is being recovered from storage holes elsewhere on site. The remainder of the facility is undergoing progressive strip out and<br />

decommissioning. In the Plutonium Wing and associated areas the waste fingerprint (nuclide vector) consists predominately of<br />

alpha emitting radionuclides.<br />

Decommissioning and Decontamination (D&D) operations often result in the production of large volumes of scrap metal waste<br />

with little or no radioactive contamination. Proving that the waste is clean can be costly and time consuming, as the shape and size<br />

of the metallic waste items often means that it is difficult or impossible to monitor all surfaces using conventional hand-held survey<br />

meters. This is a particular problem for alpha contamination measurement.<br />

Traditional radiological surveying techniques are very labour intensive and involve surveyors checking every surface using<br />

hand held instruments and smear sampling the hard to access areas. Even then 100% monitoring cannot be guaranteed.<br />

6) DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR SUPPORT AND DOCUMENTATION<br />

OF CLEARANCE OF BUILDINGS OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS (wP-59278)<br />

Christoph Winkler, Stefan Woerlen, Stefan Thierfeldt, Frank Schartmann, Brenk Systemplanung (Germany)<br />

Clearance of buildings of nuclear installations in Germany has to comply with general requirements laid down in Section 29<br />

of the German Radiation Protection Ordinance (RPO; Strahlenschutzverordnung), clearance levels as stipulated in Table 1 of Annex<br />

III RPO and technical guidance given in the technical standard DIN 25457. Clearance procedures are usually proposed by the<br />

licensee and are made part of a decommissioning licence after appropriate review by the authorities. The clearance procedures consist<br />

of a radiological characterisation of the various parts of the buildings, a decontamination step if necessary, followed by measurements<br />

for checking the success of decontamination, and the actual decision measurements for demonstrating compliance with<br />

clearance levels.<br />

These three steps rely on various measurement methods, selected depending on the relevant radionuclides to be measured, like<br />

sampling with subsequent gamma spectrometry (and if necessary separate evaluation of beta and alpha emitting nuclides), measurements<br />

with surface contamination monitory and in situ gamma spectrometry. For a nuclear power plant, the number of samples<br />

taken during this procedure can easily reach a few 10,000, while the number of single measurements can reach several 100,000 single<br />

surface measurements and several 10,000 measurements with in situ gamma spectrometry. This large number of data together<br />

with the correct interpretation according to the valid nuclide vector, the penetration depth of the contamination, the correction for<br />

radioactive decay etc have to be managed, which is a error-prone process if carried out manually or with insufficient support by<br />

customised software.<br />

7) GEOSTATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR WASTE OPTIMIZATION<br />

OF CONTAMINATED PREMISES (wP-59344)<br />

Yvon Desnoyers, GEOVARIANCES; Didier Dubot, CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS (France)<br />

At the end of process equipment dismantling, the complete decontamination of nuclear facilities requires the radiological<br />

assessment of residual activity levels of building structures. As stated by the IAEA: Segregation and characterization of contaminated<br />

materials are the key elements of waste minimization.<br />

From this point of view, the set up of an appropriate evaluation methodology is of prime importance. The radiological characterization<br />

of contaminated premises can be divided into three steps. First, the most exhaustive facility analysis provides historical<br />

and qualitative information. Then, a systematic (exhaustive or not) control of the radiation signal is performed by means of in situ<br />

measurement methods such as surface control device combined with in situ gamma spectrometry. Besides, in order to assess the<br />

contamination depth, samples can be collected at several locations within the premises and analysed. Combined with historical<br />

information and radiation maps, such data improve and reinforce the preliminary waste zoning.<br />

The relevance of the geostatistical methodology relies on the presence of a spatial continuity for radiological contamination.<br />

In this case, geostatistics provides reliable methods for activity estimation, uncertainty quantification and risk analysis, which are<br />

essential decision-making tools for decommissioning and dismantling projects of nuclear installations.<br />

Besides, the geostatistical framework provides answers to several key issues that generally occur during the clean-up preparation<br />

phase: How to optimise the investigation costs? How to deal with data quality issues? How to consistently take into account<br />

auxiliary information such as historical inventory? How to integrate the remediation support into the modelling? How to quantify<br />

uncertainties in the remediation costs while computing contaminated volumes?<br />

8) DISCRIMINATION MONITORS FOR VARIOUS KINDS OF WASTE TO BE DOWN GRADED (wP-59117)<br />

Susumu Naito, Syuji Yamamoto, Mikio Izumi, Masamichi Obata, Yukio Yoshimura,<br />

Jiro Sakurai, Hitoshi Sakai, Toshiba Corporation (Japan)<br />

During operation and maintenance, or decommissioning of nuclear power plant, various kind of waste should be treated, and<br />

exposure control is also required. These wastes have a wide range of contamination, different composition of nuclides, and a different<br />

shape, so each measurement instrument would be optimized for its use especially for very low level radioactivity measurement.<br />

TOSHIBA provides appropriate equipment for any needs to discriminate the very low and non radioactive waste to save cost<br />

of waste disposal, based on our original and innovative technology. For alpha emitting nuclides, we are ready to supply instruments<br />

based on ionized particle measurement technology. For beta, gamma-emitting nuclides, we are ready to customize a shape of detector<br />

based on our original plastic scintillation material. Some examples will be introduced.<br />

129


Session 59 Abstracts<br />

SESSION 59— RISK/PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS AND CONTAMINANT MIGRATION (4.7)<br />

1) UNCERTAINTIES ON THE EXTENSION OF A POLLUTED ZONE (wP-59198)<br />

Chantal de Fouquet, Mines ParisTech - Ecole des mines de Paris (France)<br />

Data collected during the sampling of polluted sites are mainly used to characterize the concentration level and, through an<br />

exploratory and variographic analysis, to characterize the spatial variability; at fixed support, to estimate the concentrations in order<br />

to trace pollution map. In the case of kriging, this map is completed by the map of the standard deviation of the estimation error,<br />

making it possible to delimit the zones in which the estimation is considered to lack in precision. If a proportional effect is present<br />

(the local spatial variability depends on the local concentrations mean), the map of error standard deviation has to be corrected to<br />

take into account the increase of spatial variability with the local concentration mean.<br />

A confidence interval can be derived conventionaly from the kriging estimation and the associated error standard deviation.<br />

For a fixed limit threshold, the polluted site can then be divided in three areas: the polluted zone, at a fixed statistical risk; the not<br />

polluted zone, at a fixed statistical risk; the zone of uncertainty, in which the estimated concentrations are close to the threshold.<br />

Because of the estimation error, it is not possible to specify if the exact concentrations exceed or not the threshold.<br />

In the case of a soil pollution by hydrocarbons, usual and geostatistical forecasts are compared. The effective consequences of<br />

these various forecasts on the quality of the site remediation are quantified and discussed.<br />

2) IDENTIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF END-USER NEEDS DURING DEVELOPMENT<br />

OF A STATE-OF-THE-ART MODELING TOOLSET (wP-59069)<br />

Roger Seitz, SRNL; Mark Freshley, PNNL; Susan Hubbard, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab;<br />

Mark Williamson, US DOE; Paul Dixon, LANL; Kurt Gerdes, DOE EM; Yvette Collazo , US DOE (USA)<br />

The U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) Office of Environmental Management, Technology Innovation and Development is<br />

supporting development of the Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM). ASCEM is an emerging<br />

state-of-the-art scientific approach and software infrastructure for understanding and predicting contaminant fate and transport<br />

in natural and engineered systems. The modular and open-source high performance computing tools will facilitate integrated<br />

approaches that enable standardized assessments of performance and risk for EM cleanup and closure decisions.<br />

Recognizing end-user needs and engaging end-users in the development process is expected to lead to better development and<br />

implementation of the toolsets in the user community. End-user involvement in ASCEM covers a broad spectrum of perspectives,<br />

including: performance assessment (PA) and risk assessment practitioners, research scientists, decision-makers, oversight personnel,<br />

and regulators engaged in the USDOE cleanup mission. The intent is to facilitate regular feedback between the scientists and<br />

modeling experts developing the tools and the practitioners and stakeholders in the field who will be implementing the tools for<br />

decision-making.<br />

End-users are engaged in ASCEM in three specific activities: User Steering Committee, user needs interface task, and demonstrations<br />

of the ASCEM tools. The User Steering Committee comprises management from USDOE Field Offices, USDOE Contractors,<br />

and regulatory bodies and is tasked with providing suggestions and feedback for the development team from a higher-level<br />

implementation perspective. The user needs interface task is targeted at gathering and documenting suggestions and feedback from<br />

practitioners and oversight personnel involved in day-to-day modeling, research and review activities at USDOE Sites. The demonstration<br />

activities involve application of developing ASCEM tools and capabilities for representative problems at DOE sites.<br />

3) URANIUM INVESTIGATION IN AN ALLUVIAL AQUIFER WITH DIRECT PUSH METHODS (w/oP-59281)<br />

Fabian De Weirdt, Geoprobe Environmental Technologies s.a. (Belgium)<br />

The U.S. EPA has established a maximum contaminant level of 30ug/l for uranium in drinking water due to its toxicity as a<br />

heavy metal. This regulation has affected many small public water supply systems in the US and several of them are struggling to<br />

come into compliance with the new standard. One such community is Clarks, NE, US which is situated on the alluvial deposits of<br />

the Platte River that are underlain by the Cretaceous Age Niobrara formation. Geoprobe Systems coordinated with the Nebraska<br />

Dept. of Health and Human Services, Water Well Stds. <strong>Program</strong> to investigate the cause of the elevated uranium in the groundwater<br />

that supplies drinking water to the village of Clarks.<br />

Initially hydraulic profiling tool (HPT) logs were obtained at selected locations across the Clarks well field. The HPT probe<br />

was advanced to depths of almost 36m (120ft) at several locations and the logs provided detailed information about the hydrostratigraphy<br />

of the local aquifer not available from the drillers logs. The HPT logs were used to guide selection of screen depths for<br />

small diameter wells that were installed with direct push (DP) methods. A total of nine wells were installed at two locations at the<br />

facility with well depths ranging from as little as 6m (20ft) to a maximum of 36m (118ft). All wells were grouted bottom-up with<br />

a tremie tube using 25% solids bentonite slurry to assure screen interval isolation.<br />

4) INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEWS FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL REMEDIATION<br />

PROJECTS AT US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SITES (w/oP-59188)<br />

Dawn Kaback, AMEC; Grover Chamberlain, DOE EM; John G. Morse, US DOE; Scott W. Petersen, CH2M Hill (USA)<br />

The Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management has supported independent technical reviews of soil and<br />

groundwater projects at multiple DOE sites over the last 10 years. These reviews have resulted in significant design improvements<br />

to remedial plans that have accelerated cleanup and site closure. Many have also resulted in improved understanding of complex<br />

subsurface conditions, promoting better approaches to design and implementation of new technologies.<br />

Many of these reviews have been sponsored and coordinated through the Office of Technology Innovation and Development<br />

(OTID), whose mission is to promote the practical application of innovative technologies and approaches. Reviews have also been<br />

sponsored within the EM site cleanup program in concert with local regulators and stakeholders.<br />

130


Abstracts Session 59<br />

Independent technical reviews add value, because they provide another perspective to problem solving and act as a check for<br />

especially challenging problems. By bringing in a team of independent experts with a broad experience base, alternative solutions<br />

are recommended for consideration and evaluation. In addition, the independence of the panel can is significant, because it is able<br />

to address politically sensitive issues. The expert panel members typically bring lessons learned from other sites to help solve problems<br />

associated with their task at hand. However, their recommendations at a particular DOE site can often be applied at other DOE<br />

sites, because of the common nature of many of the problems, making the review potentially even more valuable.<br />

5) ADVANCED SIMULATION CAPABILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ASCEM) (wP-59065)<br />

Paul Dixon, LANL; Mark Williamson, US DOE; Mark Freshley, Pacific Northwest National Lab;<br />

David Moulton, LANL; Ian Gorton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Elizabeth H. Keating, LANL;<br />

Yvette Collazo , US DOE; Kurt Gerdes, DOE EM; Juan Meza, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (USA)<br />

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management, Technology Innovation and Development determined<br />

that the uniform application advanced modeling in the subsurface could potentially reduce the cost and risk associated with their<br />

environmental cleanup mission. In response to this determination, the EM office of Technology Innovation and Development,<br />

Groundwater and Soil Remediation (EM-32) began the program Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management<br />

(ASCEM) in 2010. ASCEM is a state-of-the-art scientific tool and approach for understanding and predicting contaminant fate and<br />

transport in natural and engineered systems. The modular and open source high performance computing tool will facilitate integrated<br />

approaches to modeling and site characterization that enable robust and standardized assessments of performance and risk for<br />

EM cleanup and closure activities.<br />

The ASCEM initiative supports the reduction of uncertainties and risks associated with DOE-EMs environmental cleanup and<br />

closure programs by better understanding and quantifying the subsurface flow and contaminant transport behavior in complex geological<br />

systems. This includes the long-term performance of engineered components, including cementitious materials in nuclear<br />

waste disposal facilities that may be sources for future contamination of the subsurface. This paper, at a high level, will describe<br />

the ASCEM tools, approach, recent technical reports and programmatic accomplishments completed in 2010.<br />

6) A PHYSIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANISMS FOR TRANSPORT AND<br />

RETENTION OF TECHNETIUM (TC-99) IN UNSATURATED SOILS (w/oP-59050)<br />

Danielle P Jansik, Dawn Wellman, Elsa Cordova, DeNomy Dage, PNNL;<br />

Dorthe Wildenschild, Oregon State University (USA)<br />

The transport of technetium (Tc-99), is of interest due to the potential for human exposure and impact on ecosystems. Technetium<br />

has been released to the environment through nuclear power production and nuclear fuel processing; as a result, further<br />

spreading of Tc-99 is a concern at DOE sites across the US. Specifically, technetium is a contaminant of concern at the Hanford<br />

Site in southeastern Washington, due to the magnitude of material that was disposed. The current body of work conducted on Tc-<br />

99 has provided a wealth of information regarding the redox relationships, sorption, solubility, and stability of the mineral phases<br />

(Artinger et al., 2003; Beals and Hayes, 1995; Cui and Eriksen, 1996b; Gu and Schulz, 1991; Jaisi et al., 2009; Keith-Roach et al.,<br />

2003; Kumar et al., 2007), however little work has been conducted on the transport of technetium in unsaturated soils.<br />

Current conceptual models do not explain the persistence and presence of technetium in deep vadose zone environments such<br />

as the Hanford site. In an oxic reducing environment with low organic content the residence time of technetium is the soil would<br />

be expected to be low, due to its low sorption and high solubility. Surprisingly, nearly 50 years following the release of contamination<br />

into the site, much of the element has persisted in the subsurface. Using an integrated testing approach we examined the mechanisms<br />

for physical and chemical retention and transport of technetium. By employing transport and breakthrough curve analysis<br />

as well as pore water and sequential extractions, we evaluated transport behavior, technetium mineral association, and technetium<br />

leachability with regard to pore size distribution.<br />

7) INTERMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNCONTROLLED<br />

SALINE SOLUTION ACCESS INTO ASSE MINE (wP-59163)<br />

Veronika Ustohalova, Christian Küppers, Öko-Institut e.V. (Germany)<br />

The Asse salt mine was used as a test site for radioactive waste disposal in salt formations between 1967 and 1978. At that<br />

time, low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste was placed in chambers at a depth of about 750 m and 511 m below ground.<br />

Due to geological conditions and anthropogenic activities, the mine is instable such that water penetrates into it. The main cause of<br />

the mines instabilities comes from a large volume of dead space in the form of drifts and chambers in the salt rock. This space is<br />

close to the adjoining rock. As a consequence, clefts in surrounding rocks have developed. Since 1988, salt-saturated groundwater<br />

has been leaking into the upper part of the southern flank of the mine. These instabilities create a high risk of mine collapse with<br />

an uncontrolled inflow of brine. There-fore, a suitable decommissioning concept is currently in development.<br />

Brine inflow is managed under solution management. Uncontrolled brine inflow, however, occurs when there is a higher inflow<br />

of solution, that beyond the capability of solution management. In this case, radionuclides from radioactive wastes come into contact<br />

with brine and are dissolved into the solution. If the mine collapses, the brine is pressed into groundwater. The radionuclides<br />

could then migrate with groundwater into the biosphere and cause radioactive exposure.<br />

8) COST BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACCORDING TO FRENCH METHODOLOGY (w/oP-59310)<br />

Philippe Pouget-Abadie, Pricop-Bass Tudor, URS (France)<br />

The site has been operated since 1903 for various metallurgy-related activities, as well as foundry activities. It covers a total<br />

surface area of 11 ha. Following the partial cessation of industrial activities, the sites western part (approximately 5 ha) was sold<br />

to a developer for the creation of an artisanal, tertiary and industrial activity estate.<br />

URS was jointly commissioned by the sites former operator and by the developer to perform complementary site characterisation<br />

studies in order to assess the sites compatibility with the future site use as well as to assess the costs of potential remedial<br />

works.<br />

131


Session 60 Abstracts<br />

A cost-benefit assessment was conducted by URS and focused on management of soils excavated in the context of the development<br />

project. The solutions considered comprised:Disposal of excavated soils in Class II or Class I landfills. This solution is the<br />

most systematic and therefore the fastest, which is an advantage in the context of the implementation of the development. However,<br />

associated costs are estimated at 2.3 M¬ and will have to be managed based on unit prices. Reuse of excavated soils on site as<br />

fill materials, combined with off-site disposal of excess non-reusable volumes. The projects grades were adjusted on this…<br />

SESSION 60 — BEST POSTERS OF ICEM 2011<br />

ABSTRACTS NOT REQUIRED<br />

NOTES<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

132


ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Last Name<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

A<br />

Dzhamshed Abdushukurov S.U.UMAROV PHYSICAL -<br />

TECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF<br />

ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF<br />

REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN<br />

Tajikistan<br />

Andris Abramenkovs LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT,<br />

GEOLOGY AND<br />

METEOROLOGY CENTRE<br />

Latvia<br />

William Abramson LAWRENCE LIVERMORE<br />

NATIONAL LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Rateb (Boby) Abu-Eid U.S. NRC United States<br />

Valerie Adsley GUEST United Kingdom<br />

Ian Adsley NUVIA LTD United Kingdom<br />

Joerg Aign WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC Germany<br />

GERMANY GMBH<br />

Fouad Al-Musawi IRAQ MINISTRY<br />

OF SCIENCEAND<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Iraq<br />

Keith Anderson ECC United States<br />

Johan Andersson JA STREAMFLOW AB Sweden<br />

Thierry Andre ONET TECHNOLOGIES<br />

GRANDS PROJETS<br />

France<br />

Andrea Antus PAKS NUCLEAR POWER<br />

PLANT LTD<br />

Hungary<br />

Shiho Asai JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY<br />

AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Rosemarie Atabek CEA SACLAY France<br />

Julien Attiogbe GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Emilie Aubonnet GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Annabelle Axinn<br />

B<br />

GUEST Unites States<br />

Douglas Bablitch AMEC EARTH AND<br />

INRASTRUCTURE<br />

United States<br />

Ian Bainbridge ATOMIC ENERGY OF<br />

CANADA LIMITED<br />

Canada<br />

Andrew Baker EDEN NUCLEAR AND<br />

ENVIRONMENT LTD.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Jonathan Baker CH2M HILL United Kingdom<br />

Francesco Basile EUROPEAN COMMISSION<br />

- JRC ISPRA<br />

Italy<br />

Tamara Baldwin GALSON SCIENCES<br />

LIMITED<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Gheorghe Barariu RAAN-SITON Romania<br />

Yves Barré CEA France<br />

Angela Bartlett RESEARCH SITES<br />

RESTORATION LTD<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Olga Batyukhnova GUEST Ukraine<br />

Ian Beadle AMEC United States<br />

Christophe Behar CEA France<br />

Stephane Belbeze ANTEA France<br />

Gary Benda ICEM'11 CONFERENCE<br />

MANAGER<br />

United States<br />

Dianne Benda ICEM'11 GUEST TOURS United States<br />

Michel Berte AREVA France<br />

Claude Besson CARBODIAM S.A. Belgium<br />

Hervé Bienvenu ANDRA France<br />

Christophe Binet AREVA France<br />

Yvon Bladier CONSULTANT France<br />

Ludovic Blanc SARP INDUSTRIES France<br />

Tiffany Blanchard USDOE / NATIONAL<br />

NUCLEAR<br />

United States<br />

James Blankenhorn PERMAFIX<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

SERVICES INC<br />

United States<br />

Mikhail Bogod JSC ECOMET-S Russia<br />

Wilhelm Bollingerfehr DBE TECHNOLOGY GmbH Germany<br />

Jean-Michel Boniface AREVA TA France<br />

Robert Bonner URS United Kingdom<br />

Peter Booth WSP E&E United Kingdom<br />

Jorge Borque ENRESA Spain<br />

Jean-Michel Bosgiraud ANDRA France<br />

María Cecilia Bossio NUCLEAR REGULATORY<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

Argentina<br />

Joseph Boucau WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC United States<br />

COMPANY<br />

Laurel Boucher THE LAUREL CO. United States<br />

Bernard Boullis CEA-SACLAY France<br />

Jos Boussu TECNUBEL Belgium<br />

Shari Brabham CISS CORPORATION United States<br />

Pam Bradford CISS CORPORATION Unites States<br />

Marnix Braeckeveldt ONDRAF/NIRAS Belgium<br />

Georg Braehler NUKEM TECHNOLOGIES<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Peter Brennecke CONSULTANT Germany<br />

Daniel Brew ANSTO Australia<br />

Kimberly Brewer ARS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unites States<br />

Steven Brown SENES CONSULTANTS LTD United States<br />

Kathryn Brown GUEST United States<br />

Jerome Brueziere AREVA NC France<br />

Guy Brunel CEA France<br />

Peter Burgess NUVIA LTD United Kingdom<br />

Nazirzhon Buriev S.U.UMAROV PHYSICAL -<br />

TECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF<br />

ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF<br />

REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN<br />

Tajikistan<br />

Klaus Büttner<br />

C<br />

NUKEM<br />

TECHNOLOGIES GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Maria Teresa Cafaggi GUEST Belgium<br />

Bruno Cahen ANDRA France<br />

Olivier Calixte ONET TECHNOLOGIES - France<br />

ONECTRA France<br />

Lionel Campayo CEA France<br />

Dwight Campbell CONTAINER PRODUCTS<br />

CORPORATION<br />

Unites States<br />

Jan Carlsson SKB Sweden<br />

Andy Carr CALDER GROUP United Kingdom<br />

Iain Carvel RESEARCH SITES<br />

RESTOTATION LTD.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Mike Cashin PORVAIR FILTRATION<br />

GROUP LTD<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Jeremy Causse CEA France<br />

Charlotte Cazala IRSN France<br />

Didier Cerat CEA - CENTRE DE<br />

MARCOULE<br />

France<br />

Michiel Ceulemans UMICORE Belgium<br />

Jean-Michel Chabeuf AREVA France<br />

Pascal Champ CEGELEC France<br />

Neil Chapman ARIUS ASSOCIATES United States<br />

Mrs. Chapman GUEST Unites States<br />

Yih Ping Chen INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH (INER)<br />

Taiwan<br />

Sylvain Chevassu ONET TECHNOLOGIES -<br />

ONECTRA<br />

France<br />

Jean-Paul Chiles ECOLE DES MINES DE<br />

PARIS<br />

France<br />

Apostolos Christodoulou VJ TECHNOLOGIES France<br />

Robert Clark NUVIA LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Jane Clarke GUEST Canada<br />

Gilles Clement AREVA BUVAL United States<br />

Jean Pierre Cizel AREVA United States<br />

John Cochran SANDIA NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORIES<br />

United States<br />

Hans Codée COVRA N.V. Netherlands<br />

Matthew Cole SA TECHNOLOGY United States<br />

Danny Coleman ARS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unites States<br />

Yvette Collazo U.S. DEPARTMENT OF<br />

ENERGY<br />

Unites States<br />

Judith Connell FLUOR United States<br />

Carl Connell GUEST Unites States<br />

Kevin Cook CERADYNE BORON<br />

PRODUCTS<br />

United States<br />

133


134<br />

ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Last Name<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Michael Cournoyer LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Jean-Marie Cuchet BELGONUCLEAIRE Belgium<br />

Michael Cull TELEDYNE BROWN<br />

ENGINEERING<br />

United States<br />

Dan Curry<br />

D<br />

URS United Kingdom<br />

Erik Dagorn BUREAU VERITAS France<br />

Vladimir Daniska DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Didier Dall'ava CEA SACLAY France<br />

Frederique Damerval AREVA France<br />

Géraldine Dandrieux ASN France<br />

Carol Darbyshire SPRINGFIELDS FUELS LTD United Kingdom<br />

Mike Davies NUVIA LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Chantal De Fouquet ECOLE DES MINES DE<br />

PARIS<br />

France<br />

Grégoire De Laval AREVA France<br />

Pierre-Edouard<br />

De La Ronciere<br />

SPIE France<br />

Patrick De Moura CEA France<br />

Renate De Vos NUCLEAR RESEARCH<br />

AND CONSULTANCY<br />

GROUP<br />

Netherlands<br />

Fabian De Weirdt GEOPROBE<br />

ENVIROMENTAL<br />

TECHNOLOGIES S.A.<br />

Belgium<br />

Frank Deconinck CNE France<br />

Ronald Dekker NRG Netherlands<br />

Bernard Delannay CARBODIAM S.A. Belgium<br />

Sylvie Delaplace SFEN France<br />

Carole Delchet INSTITUT DE CHIMIE<br />

SÉPARATIVE DE<br />

MARCOULE, UMR 5257<br />

France<br />

Anne Delos AMPHOS 21<br />

CONSULTING SL<br />

France<br />

Andrea Denby ATOMIC ENERGY OF<br />

CANADA LIMITED<br />

Canada<br />

Mark Denton KURION, INC. United States<br />

Debbie Denton GUEST Unites States<br />

Yvon Desnoyers GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Jas Devgun SARGENT & LUNDY United States<br />

Michel Dilles AMTEK SAS Unites States<br />

Vince Dilworth ASME United States<br />

Nick DiMascio BARTLETT SERVICES INC. United States<br />

Paul Dixon LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Mrs. Dixon Dixon GUEST Unites States<br />

Ryosuke Doke JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Emma Dorado Lopez ONDRAF/NIRAS Belgium<br />

Philippe Doumerc AREVA NC France<br />

Andrew Drom ENERGYSOLUTIONS<br />

EU LTD<br />

United States<br />

James Droppo PACIFIC NORTHWEST<br />

NATIONAL LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Tamar Droppo GUEST Unites States<br />

Didier Dubot CEA France<br />

Géraldine Dupuy DEWDROPS France<br />

Felicia Durán SANDIA NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORIES<br />

United States<br />

Anne Durand CEA CENTRE DE<br />

MARCOULE<br />

France<br />

Michel Dutzer<br />

E<br />

ANDRA France<br />

Takeshi Ebashi NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION OF<br />

JAPAN (NUMO)<br />

Japan<br />

Andrew Edwards GUEST Unites States<br />

Henrik Efraimsson SWEDISH RADIATION<br />

SAFETY AUTHORITY<br />

Sweden<br />

Fredrik Ekenborg AB SVAFO Sweden<br />

Enik Elter PAKS NUCLEAR<br />

POWER PLANT LTD<br />

Hungary<br />

William Everett<br />

F<br />

DEWDROPS France<br />

Sebastien Farin ANDRA France<br />

Kapila Fernando AUSTRALIAN NUCLEAR<br />

SCIENCE AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

ORGANISATION<br />

Australia<br />

Enoka Fernando GUEST Australia<br />

Christopher Fisher OFFICE OF NUCLEAR<br />

REGULATION<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Amelia Fogleman GUEST Unites States<br />

Dyan Foss CH2M HILL PLATEAU<br />

REMEDIATION COMPANY<br />

United States<br />

Adam Foster STUDSVIK, INC. United States<br />

Angelika Fox CWN GRUPPE<br />

BARSBÜTTEL<br />

Germany<br />

Dominique AGORATEK Canada<br />

Francois-Bongarcon INTERNATIONAL<br />

Laszlo Fritz<br />

G<br />

PUBLIC LIMITED<br />

COMPANY FOR<br />

RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (PURAM)<br />

Hungary<br />

Miklos Garamszeghy NWMO Canada<br />

Ester García Tapias ENRESA Spain<br />

Irina Gaus NAGRA Switzerland<br />

Arnaud Gay AREVA France<br />

Robert Geddes AMEC Canada<br />

Alexander Gelbutovskiy JSC ECOMET-S Russia<br />

Mark Gerchikov AMEC NSS Canada<br />

Ludivine Gilli IRSN France<br />

Emmanuel Girasa GDF SUEZ NUCLÉAIRE<br />

FRANCE<br />

France<br />

Patrick Gobert WESTINGHOUSE<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

United States<br />

Rebecca Goddard GUEST Unites States<br />

François-Michel Gonnot ANDRA France<br />

Alexandre Gorbatchev COMMISSARIAT A<br />

L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE<br />

ET AUX ENERGIES<br />

ALTERNATIVES<br />

France<br />

Florence Goutelard CEA United States<br />

Kapil Goyal LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Achla Goyal GUEST Unites States<br />

Agnes Grandjean CEA France<br />

Guy Granier CEA MARCOULE France<br />

Dominique Grenêche SFEN France<br />

Christian Gronemeyer GRS MBH Germany<br />

Philippe Gros-Gean ONET TECHNOLOGIES France<br />

Bertil Grundfelt KEMAKTA KONSULT AB Sweden<br />

Philippe Guetat CEA France<br />

Philippe Guiberteau<br />

H<br />

CEA SACLAY France<br />

Steve Halliwell VJ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. United States<br />

Matthieu Hallouin ANTEA GROUP France<br />

Patricia Hamel-Bloch SFEN France<br />

Eduard Hanslík T.G.MASARYK WATER<br />

RESEARCH INSTITUTE<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Vaclav Hanusik VUJE, Inc. Slovak Republic<br />

Tomoko Haraga JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY<br />

AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Frank Hardeman SCK-CEN Belgium<br />

Susetyo Hario Putero GADJAH MADA<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

Indonesia<br />

Lee Hartley SERCO United Kingdom<br />

Haruhi Hata JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY<br />

AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Markus Havertz FORSCHUNGZENTRUM<br />

JÜLICH GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Susan Hess AREVA United States<br />

Alan Heyes KING'S COLLEGE, LONDON United Kingdom


ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Last Name<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Cathy Hickey CH2M HILL United States<br />

Tim Hicks GALSON SCIENCES<br />

LIMITED<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Günter Hillebrand NUCLEAR ENGINEERING<br />

SEIBERSDORF GMBH<br />

Austria<br />

John Hollinden CONTAINER PRODUCTS<br />

CORPORATION<br />

Unites States<br />

Dae-Seok Hong KAERI (KOREA ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE)<br />

Korea<br />

Koch Horst RÖHR+STOLBERG GMBH Germany<br />

Tomas Hrncir SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF<br />

TECHNOLOGY IN<br />

BRATISLAVA<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Karl Hughes BABCOCK<br />

INTERNATIONAL<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Tim Hunter THE UNIVERSITY<br />

OF LEEDS<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Arne Hüttmann<br />

I<br />

UMICORE Belgium<br />

Atsushi Iizuka KOBE UNIVERSITY Japan<br />

Nathalie Impens SCK-CEN Belgium<br />

Tomoko Ishii RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT FUNDING<br />

AND RESEARCH CENTER<br />

Japan<br />

Tomohiro Ito OSAKA PREFECTURE<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

Japan<br />

Oleg Ivanov<br />

J<br />

NRC KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE<br />

Russia<br />

Albert Jacobs DEWDROPS France<br />

Michael James SELLAFIELD LTD United Kingdom<br />

David James DW JAMES<br />

CONSULTING, LLC<br />

United States<br />

Juanita James GUEST Unites States<br />

Steven Jameson STUDSVIK United States<br />

Danielle Jansik PACIFIC NORTHWEST<br />

NATIONAL LABORARY<br />

United States<br />

Michel Jeanjacques CEA/DEN/MAR/DPAD/CPRP France<br />

Nicolas Jeannee GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Chun-Ping Jen DEPT. MECHNICAL<br />

ENGINEERING, NATIONAL<br />

CHUNG CHENG<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

Taiwan<br />

Jongseon Jeon ENESYS CO., LTD. Korea<br />

Bernard Jolly SFEN France<br />

Angie Jones AMEC United States<br />

Sammy Jones GUEST Unites States<br />

Steven Joyce SERCO United Kingdom<br />

Lawrence Judd NUVISION ENGINEERING United States<br />

László Juhász NATIONAL RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE FOR<br />

RADIOBIOLOGY AND<br />

RADIOHYGIENE<br />

Hungary<br />

Hagen Gunther Jung<br />

K<br />

NLWKN Germany<br />

Dawn Kaback AMEC GEOMATRIX United States<br />

Dennis Kelley PACIFI NUCLEAR<br />

SOLUTIONS<br />

United States<br />

Terry Kelly PAR SYSTEMS LTD United Kingdom<br />

Jeffrey Kerridge CH2M HILL United States<br />

Ronald Keyser ORTEC United States<br />

Merry Keyser GUEST Unites States<br />

Kwang-Wook Kim KOREA ATOMIC ENERGY<br />

RESEARCH INSTITUTE<br />

Korea<br />

Karen Kim ELECTRIC POWER<br />

RESEARCH INSTITUTE<br />

United States<br />

Kazumi Kitayama NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION OF<br />

JAPAN (NUMO)<br />

Japan<br />

Heather Klebba NFT United States<br />

Thomas Kluth SIEMPELKAMP<br />

NUK+LEARTECHNIK<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Kelly Knight BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC. United States<br />

Ichizo Kobayashi KAJIMA CORPORATION Japan<br />

Frank Köhler RÖHR + STOLBERG GMBH Germany<br />

Ken Kok ASME United States<br />

Ville Koskinen FORTUM Finland<br />

Paul Kreitman WESTINGHOUSE<br />

NUCLEAR SERVICES<br />

United States<br />

Heinz Kröger TÜV NORD ENSYS<br />

HANNOVER GMBH<br />

& CO. KG<br />

Germany<br />

Albert Kruger US DOE United States<br />

Konstantin Kulikov NIPTB ONEGA OAO Russia<br />

Takanori Kunimaru<br />

L<br />

JAEA Japan<br />

Jean Paul Labeur AREVA - DAP France<br />

Alastair Laird PROJECT TIME & COST United Kingdom<br />

Tai-Wei Lan FUEL CYCLE AND<br />

MATERIAL<br />

ADMINISTRATION ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY COUNCIL<br />

Taiwan<br />

Patrick Landais ANDRA France<br />

Eric Lanes ANDRA France<br />

Barbara Larsen GUEST Unites States<br />

Toro Laszlo MATEFIN BUCURESTI Romania<br />

Agnes Launay AREVA France<br />

Gerard Laurent EDF/CIDEN United States<br />

Marie Lavielle CEA France<br />

Michèle Le Goff SFEN France<br />

Arnaud Leclaire ANDRA France<br />

Stephen Leclere SELLAFIELD LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

John Lehew CH2M HILL PLATEAU<br />

REMEDIATION COMPANY<br />

United States<br />

Alain Lemmens GDF SUEZ Belgium<br />

Koen Lenie TECNUBEL Belgium<br />

Célia Lepeytre CEA France<br />

Bertrand Leterme SCK-CEN Belgium<br />

Maria Lindberg STUDSVIK NUCLEAR AB Sweden<br />

Pierre Lisbonne CEA France<br />

Yung Liu ARGONNE NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Jeffrey Lively<br />

M<br />

AMEC United States<br />

Angela Mackintosh SELLAFIELD LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Juliann Maffett EDGEN MURRAY United States<br />

Ryan Maitland OFFICE FOR NUCLEAR<br />

REGULATION<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Tatiana Makarchuk JSC ATOMSTROYEXPORT Russia<br />

Annafrancesca Mariani SOGIN S.P.A. Italy<br />

Simon Martin SELLAFIELD LTD United Kingdom<br />

Laurent Martinet AREVA NC France<br />

John Mathieson NUCLEAR<br />

DECOMMISSIONING<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Mrs. McCombie GUEST Switzerland<br />

Charles McCombie ARIUS ASSOCIATION Switzerland<br />

Keith McConnell U.S. NUCLEAR<br />

REGULATORY<br />

COMMISSION<br />

United States<br />

Jan Medved VUJE, INC. Slovak Republic<br />

Afat Mehdiyeva NATIONAL AEROSPACE<br />

AGENCY OF AZERBAIJAN<br />

Azerbaijan Republic<br />

Irena Mele IAEA Austria<br />

Aurélie Merceille CEA MARCOULE France<br />

Matthias Messer GNS Germany<br />

Betty Meyer GUEST United States<br />

Greg Meyer FLUOR GOVERNMENT<br />

GROUP<br />

United States<br />

Arnaud Michelle SARP INDUSTRIES France<br />

Maxime Michel-Noel ONET TECHNOLOGIES<br />

- ONECTRA<br />

France<br />

Bill Miller AMEC United Kingdom<br />

Ross Miller SANDIA NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORIES<br />

United States<br />

135


136<br />

ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Last Name<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Sergii Mitichkin CHERNOBYL NPP Ukraine<br />

Motoyuki Mitsuda JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Satoru Miyoshi OBAYASHI CORPORATION Japan<br />

Fabrice Moggia AREVA France<br />

Barry Moloney ENERGYSOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

Jenny Morris GALSON SCIENCES<br />

LIMITED<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Ronald Morris WESTINGHOUSE<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

USA<br />

United States<br />

Mark Morton WORLEYPARSONS<br />

POLESTAR<br />

United States<br />

Virginia Morton GUEST Unites States<br />

Gary Mottershead VJ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. United States<br />

Joachim Mueth PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT Switzerland<br />

Virgene Mulligan ARS INTERNATIONAL United States<br />

Ronnie Mulligan GUEST Unites States<br />

André Musolff BAM FEDERAL INSTITUTE Germany<br />

FOR MATERIALS<br />

RESEARCH AND TESTING<br />

Tracy Mustin U.S. DEPARTMENT OF<br />

ENERGY<br />

Unites States<br />

Gus Myers<br />

N<br />

BABCOCK SERVICES INC. United States<br />

Jalal Naghiyev INSTITUTE OF RADIATION<br />

PROBLEMS<br />

Azerbaijan Republic<br />

Takahiro Nakajima RWMC, JAPAN Japan<br />

Garik Nalbandyan AREV SI CJSC Armenia<br />

Vladimir Necas SLOVAK UNIVERSITY<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Linde Nel NECSA South Africa<br />

Thomas Nellemann DANISH<br />

DECOMMISSIONING<br />

Denmark<br />

Tino Neumeyer BAM FEDERAL<br />

INSTITUTE FOR<br />

MATERIALS RESEARCH<br />

AND TESTING<br />

Germany<br />

Mike Nichols PACTEC EPS LTD. Unites States<br />

Massimiliano Nobile PROJECT<br />

MANAGEMENT UNIT<br />

Russia<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon CEA France<br />

Christian Nowak CWN GRUPPE BARSBÜTTEL Germany<br />

Bálint Nos PURAM Hungary<br />

William Nutt<br />

O<br />

ARGONNE NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Palut-Laurent Odile ASN France<br />

Rachel O'donnell LLWR United Kingdom<br />

Takao Ohi NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION OF<br />

JAPAN (NUMO)<br />

Japan<br />

Michael Ojovan UNIVERSITY OF<br />

SHEFFIELD<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Ralf Ohlhof TUEV NORD ENSYS<br />

GMBH & CO<br />

Germany<br />

Keisuke Okumura JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY<br />

AGENCY (JAEA)<br />

Japan<br />

Donald Olson COLUMBIANA HI TECH United States<br />

Frantisek Ondra DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Hironori Onoe JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Peter Ormai INTERNATIONAL<br />

ATOMIC AGENCY (IAEA)<br />

Austria<br />

Gérald Ouzounian ANDRA France<br />

Hitoshi Owada RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT FUNDING<br />

AND RESEARCH CENTER<br />

Japan<br />

Eliza Ozaine WESTINGHOUSE<br />

ELECTRIC GERMANY<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

P<br />

Michal Panik SLOVAK UNIVERSITY<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY IN<br />

BRATISLAVA<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Alexandros Papafotiou INTERA INC. SWISS<br />

BRANCH<br />

Switzerland<br />

Martial Pardoen ELECTRABEL - GDF SUEZ Belgium<br />

Alan Paulley QUINTESSA United Kingdom<br />

Maiju Paunonen FORTUM POWER &<br />

HEAT/ NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

Finland<br />

Stéphane Pepin FEDERAL AGENCY FOR<br />

NUCLEAR CONTROL<br />

Belgium<br />

Jean-Jacques Peraudin GEOVARIANCES United States<br />

Janez Perko BELGIAN NUCLEAR<br />

RESEARCH CENTRE<br />

SCK-CEN<br />

Belgium<br />

Geoffrey Peter OREGON INSTITUTE<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY<br />

PORTLAND CAMPUS<br />

United States<br />

Lucien Pillette-Cousin AREVA TA France<br />

Patrick Pin AREVA NC France<br />

Martin Plys FAUSKE &<br />

ASSOCIATES, LLC<br />

United States<br />

Richard Poisson ANDRA France<br />

Andreas Poller NAGRA, SWITZERLAND Switzerland<br />

Edward Posivak WMG, INC. United States<br />

Gilles Potier AREVA NC France<br />

Calvert Pratt BABCOCK<br />

NUCLEAR LIMITED<br />

France<br />

Jozef Pritrsky DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

John Proni FLORIDA<br />

INTERNATIONAL<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

United States<br />

Maria Elena Proni<br />

Q<br />

GUEST Unites States<br />

Thomas Quercetti BAM FEDERAL Germany<br />

INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS<br />

RESEARCH AND TESTING<br />

R<br />

Krisztian Rado PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY Hungary<br />

FOR RADIOACTIVE<br />

WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />

(PURAM)<br />

Rodolphe Raffard ANDRA France<br />

Rosa Ramirez U.S. DEPARTMENT<br />

OF ENERGY<br />

United States<br />

Rodrigo Raposo FEDERAL FLUMINENSE Brazil<br />

De Almeida UNIVERSITY<br />

John Raymont KURION, INC. United States<br />

Marilyn Raymont GUEST Unites States<br />

Reginald Recco AMETEK SAS Unites States<br />

Philip Rendell NDA (RADIOACTIVE<br />

WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />

DIRECTORATE)<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Ian Richardson SELLAFIELD LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Steve Rima AMEC United States<br />

Stéphanie Romero ALSTOM GRID France<br />

Julie Rosello CEA CADARACHE France<br />

Francesco Rossi EUROPEAN COMMISSION<br />

- JRC ISPRA<br />

Italy<br />

David Rossiter LLW REPOSITORY LTD United Kingdom<br />

Bernard Rottner ONET TECHNOLOGIES Unites States<br />

Anne Marie Roux CEA France<br />

Jean-Paul Roux GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Joerg Rueedi NAGRA Switzerland<br />

James Russell NEVADA NATIONAL<br />

SECURITY SITE<br />

United States<br />

Woo-Seog Ryu<br />

S<br />

KAERI (KOREA ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE)<br />

Korea<br />

Mike Sanchez PACTEC, INC. Unites States<br />

Juan L. Santiago ENRESA Spain<br />

Satoshi Sato INTERNATIONAL<br />

ACCESS CORPORATION<br />

Japan


ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Last Name<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Hisao Satoh MITSUBISHI MATERIALS<br />

CORPORATION<br />

Japan<br />

Lutz Schneider STOLLER<br />

INGENIEURTECHNIK GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Jürg Schneider NAGRA, SWITZERLAND Switzerland<br />

Richard Schwent GUEST Unites States<br />

Daniela Seda GUEST Brazil<br />

Kelly Sedor NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION<br />

Canada<br />

Sergey Semenov NATIONAL RESEARCH<br />

CENTRE "KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE<br />

Russia<br />

Rainer Senger INTERA INC. SWISS<br />

BRANCH<br />

Switzerland<br />

Emad Sharmsaldin IRAQ MINISTRY OF<br />

SCIENCE AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Iraq<br />

John Shevelan LLWR LTD United Kingdom<br />

Bill Shingler FLUOR GOVERNMENT<br />

GROUP<br />

United States<br />

Peter Sibley ENERGYSOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

Rolf Sjöblom TEKEDO AB Sweden<br />

Alojz Slaninka VUJE, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Ondrej Slávik VUJE, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Joe Small UK NATIONAL<br />

NUCLEAR LABORATORY<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Graham Smith GMS ABINGDON LTD United Kingdom<br />

Jager Smith ENTERGY United States<br />

Janet Smith GUEST Unites States<br />

Malgorzata Sneve NRPA Norway<br />

Marina Sokcic-Kostic NUKEM TECHNOLOGIES<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Stephanie Soton AREVA NC France<br />

Thorsten Stahl GRS MBH Germany<br />

Mathias Steinhoff ÖKO-INSTITUT Germany<br />

Hans-Juergen Steinmetz FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM<br />

JÜLICH GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Vyacheslav Stepanov NRC KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE<br />

Russia<br />

Dmitry Stepennov NATIONAL RESEARCH<br />

CENTRE "KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE"<br />

Russia<br />

Howard Stevens STUDSVIK, INC. United States<br />

Dawn Stevens GUEST Unites States<br />

Trevor Sumerling LLWR LTD United Kingdom<br />

Karel Svoboda NUCLEAR RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE REZ PLC.<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Milena Svoboda GUEST Czech Republic<br />

Bryan Swinson PAJARITO SCIENTIFIC<br />

CORPORATION<br />

United States<br />

Susan Sykes GUEST Canada<br />

Jonathan Sykes<br />

T<br />

UNIVERSITY OF<br />

WATERLOO<br />

Canada<br />

Ulrike Tack-Hillebrand GUEST Austria<br />

Yusuke Takayama KOBE UNIVERSITY Japan<br />

Stefan Thierfeldt BRENK<br />

SYSTEMPLANUNG GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Chauveau Thomas BOUYGUES<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

SERVICES NUCLEAIRES<br />

France<br />

Simon Thompson ENERGY SOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

Patrice Torres ANDRA France<br />

Yuki Tosaki GEOLOGICAL SURVEY<br />

OF JAPAN, AIST<br />

Japan<br />

Pierre Trabuc CEA France<br />

Ivo Tripputi SOGIN S.P.A. Italy<br />

Peter Turza PUBLIC LIMITED<br />

COMPANY FOR<br />

RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (PURAM),<br />

HUNGARY<br />

Hungary<br />

Chou Tzu-Hsing<br />

U<br />

INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH<br />

Taiwan<br />

Daniele Ugolini CONSULTANT Italy<br />

Ehrlicher Ulrich PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT Switzerland<br />

Veronika Ustohalova<br />

V<br />

OEKO-INSTITUT E.V. Germany<br />

Walter Van Hecke AREVA France<br />

Leo Van Velzen NUCLEAR RESEARCH &<br />

CONSULTANCY GROUP<br />

Netherlands<br />

Rik Vanbrabant BELGOPROCESS Belgium<br />

Tjalle Vandergraaf PROVIDENCE COLLEGE Canada<br />

Evelyn Vandergraaf GUEST Canada<br />

Serge Vanderperre TRACTEBEL ENGINEERING Belgium<br />

Thierry Varet AREVA France<br />

Tero Varjoranta INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA)<br />

Austria<br />

Claire-Emilie Vaudey AREVA France<br />

Romain Vede AREVA France<br />

Andreas Vesely NUCLEAR ENGINEERING<br />

SEIBERSDORF<br />

Austria<br />

Jean-Marc Vidal COMMISSARIAT À<br />

L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE<br />

France<br />

Joerg Viermann GNS GESELLSCHAFT FUER Germany<br />

NUKLEAR-SERVICE MBH<br />

Bernard Vigreux SFEN France<br />

Bernard Vignau<br />

W<br />

CEA SACLAY United States<br />

Charles Waggoner INSTITUTE FOR CLEAN<br />

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY<br />

United States<br />

André Wakker NRG Netherlands<br />

Julie Ward ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS<br />

AND NORTHERN<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

Canada<br />

Michael Washer FOREIGN AFFAIRS<br />

AND INTERNATIONAL<br />

TRADE CANADA<br />

Canada<br />

Pippa Waterman ENERGYSOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

Tsong-Yang Wei INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH,<br />

AEC, TAIWAN<br />

Taiwan<br />

Jeroen Welbergen COVRA N.V. United States<br />

David Wells NUVIA LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Stephen Wickham GALSON SCIENCES LTD United Kingdom<br />

Anders Wiebert SWEDISH RADIATION<br />

SAFETY AUTHORITY Sweden<br />

Craig Williamson SOUTH CAROLINA<br />

RESEARCH AND<br />

EDUCATION<br />

FOUNDATION<br />

United States<br />

Bertrand Willmann AREVA United States<br />

Keith Witwer IMPACT SERVICES, INC.,<br />

GEOMELT DIVISION United States<br />

Hui-Jun Won KAERI Korea<br />

Christopher Woodhead<br />

Y<br />

SA ROBOTICS LTD United Kingdom<br />

Shuichi Yamamoto OBAYASHI CORPORATION Japan<br />

James Young<br />

Z<br />

UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS United Kingdom<br />

Matej Zachar DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

André Zech SARP INDUSTRIES France<br />

Robert L. Zelmer AECL - LLRWMO Canada<br />

Donna Zelmer GUEST Canada<br />

Franco Zorzoli CAMPOVERDE SRL Italy<br />

Maria Zorzoli GUEST Italy<br />

137


138<br />

ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Country<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Armenia<br />

Garik Nalbandyan AREV SI CJSC Armenia<br />

Argentina<br />

María Cecilia Bossio<br />

Australia<br />

NUCLEAR REGULATORY<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

Argentina<br />

Daniel Brew ANSTO Australia<br />

Kapila Fernando AUSTRALIAN NUCLEAR<br />

SCIENCE AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

ORGANISATION<br />

Australia<br />

Enoka Fernando<br />

Austria<br />

GUEST Australia<br />

Günter Hillebrand NUCLEAR ENGINEERING<br />

SEIBERSDORF GMBH<br />

Austria<br />

Irena Mele IAEA Austria<br />

Peter Ormai INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC<br />

AGENCY (IAEA)<br />

Austria<br />

Ulrike Tack-Hillebrand GUEST Austria<br />

Tero Varjoranta INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA)<br />

Austria<br />

Andreas Vesely<br />

Azerbaijan Republic<br />

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING<br />

SEIBERSDORF<br />

Austria<br />

Afat Mehdiyeva NATIONAL AEROSPACE<br />

AGENCY OF AZERBAIJAN<br />

Azerbaijan Republic<br />

Jalal Naghiyev<br />

Belgium<br />

INSTITUTE OF<br />

RADIATION PROBLEMS<br />

Azerbaijan Republic<br />

Claude Besson CARBODIAM S.A. Belgium<br />

Jos Boussu TECNUBEL Belgium<br />

Marnix Braeckeveldt ONDRAF/NIRAS Belgium<br />

Maria Teresa Cafaggi GUEST Belgium<br />

Michiel Ceulemans UMICORE Belgium<br />

Jean-Marie Cuchet BELGONUCLEAIRE Belgium<br />

Fabian De Weirdt GEOPROBE<br />

ENVIROMENTAL<br />

TECHNOLOGIES S.A.<br />

Belgium<br />

Bernard Delannay CARBODIAM S.A. Belgium<br />

Emma Dorado Lopez ONDRAF/NIRAS Belgium<br />

Frank Hardeman SCK-CEN Belgium<br />

Arne Hüttmann UMICORE Belgium<br />

Nathalie Impens SCK-CEN Belgium<br />

Alain Lemmens GDF SUEZ Belgium<br />

Koen Lenie TECNUBEL Belgium<br />

Bertrand Leterme SCK-CEN Belgium<br />

Martial Pardoen ELECTRABEL - GDF SUEZ Belgium<br />

Stéphane Pepin FEDERAL AGENCY FOR<br />

NUCLEAR CONTROL<br />

Belgium<br />

Janez Perko BELGIAN NUCLEAR<br />

RESEARCH CENTRE<br />

SCK-CEN<br />

Belgium<br />

Rik Vanbrabant BELGOPROCESS Belgium<br />

Serge Vanderperre<br />

Brazil<br />

TRACTEBEL ENGINEERING Belgium<br />

Rodrigo Raposo FEDERAL FLUMINENSE Brazil<br />

De Almeida UNIVERSITY<br />

Daniela Seda<br />

Canada<br />

GUEST Brazil<br />

Ian Bainbridge ATOMIC ENERGY OF<br />

CANADA LIMITED<br />

Canada<br />

Jane Clarke GUEST Canada<br />

Andrea Denby ATOMIC ENERGY OF<br />

CANADA LIMITED<br />

Canada<br />

Dominique AGORATEK Canada<br />

Francois-Bongarcon INTERNATIONAL<br />

Miklos Garamszeghy NWMO Canada<br />

Robert Geddes AMEC Canada<br />

Mark Gerchikov AMEC NSS Canada<br />

Kelly Sedor NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION<br />

Canada<br />

Susan Sykes GUEST Canada<br />

Jonathan Sykes UNIVERSITY OF<br />

WATERLOO<br />

Canada<br />

Tjalle Vandergraaf PROVIDENCE COLLEGE Canada<br />

Evelyn Vandergraaf GUEST Canada<br />

Julie Ward ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS<br />

AND NORTHERN<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

Canada<br />

Michael Washer FOREIGN AFFAIRS<br />

AND INTERNATIONAL<br />

TRADE CANADA<br />

Canada<br />

Robert L. Zelmer AECL - LLRWMO Canada<br />

Donna Zelmer<br />

Czech Republic<br />

GUEST Canada<br />

Eduard Hanslík T.G.MASARYK WATER<br />

RESEARCH INSTITUTE<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Karel Svoboda NUCLEAR RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE REZ PLC.<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Milena Svoboda<br />

Denmark<br />

GUEST Czech Republic<br />

Thomas Nellemann<br />

Finland<br />

DANISH<br />

DECOMMISSIONING<br />

Denmark<br />

Ville Koskinen FORTUM Finland<br />

Maiju Paunonen<br />

France<br />

FORTUM POWER &<br />

HEAT/ NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

Finland<br />

Thierry Andre ONET TECHNOLOGIES<br />

GRANDS PROJETS<br />

France<br />

Rosemarie Atabek CEA SACLAY France<br />

Julien Attiogbe GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Emilie Aubonnet GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Yves Barré CEA France<br />

Christophe Behar CEA France<br />

Stephane Belbeze ANTEA France<br />

Michel Berte AREVA France<br />

Hervé Bienvenu ANDRA France<br />

Christophe Binet AREVA France<br />

Yvon Bladier CONSULTANT France<br />

Ludovic Blanc SARP INDUSTRIES France<br />

Jean-Michel Boniface AREVA TA France<br />

Jean-Michel Bosgiraud ANDRA France<br />

Bernard Boullis CEA-SACLAY France<br />

Jerome Brueziere AREVA NC France<br />

Guy Brunel CEA France<br />

Bruno Cahen ANDRA France<br />

Olivier Calixte ONET TECHNOLOGIES -<br />

ONECTRA<br />

France<br />

Lionel Campayo CEA France<br />

Jeremy Causse CEA France<br />

Charlotte Cazala IRSN France<br />

Jean-Michel Chabeuf AREVA France<br />

Pascal Champ CEGELEC France<br />

Sylvain Chevassu ONET TECHNOLOGIES -<br />

ONECTRA<br />

France<br />

Jean-Paul Chiles ECOLE DES MINES<br />

DE PARIS<br />

France<br />

Apostolos Christodoulou VJ TECHNOLOGIES France<br />

Didier Cerat CEA - CENTRE DE<br />

MARCOULE<br />

France<br />

Erik Dagorn BUREAU VERITAS France<br />

Didier Dall'ava CEA SACLAY France<br />

Frederique Damerval AREVA France<br />

Géraldine Dandrieux ASN France<br />

Chantal De Fouquet ECOLE DES MINES<br />

DE PARIS<br />

France<br />

Grégoire De Laval AREVA France<br />

Pierre-Edouard<br />

De La Ronciere<br />

SPIE France<br />

Patrick De Moura CEA France<br />

Frank Deconinck CNE France<br />

Sylvie Delaplace SFEN France<br />

Carole Delchet INSTITUT DE CHIMIE<br />

SÉPARATIVE DE<br />

MARCOULE, UMR 5257<br />

France


ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Country<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Anne Delos AMPHOS 21 France<br />

CONSULTING SL<br />

Yvon Desnoyers GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Philippe Doumerc AREVA NC France<br />

Didier Dubot CEA France<br />

Géraldine Dupuy DEWDROPS France<br />

Anne Durand CEA CENTRE DE France<br />

MARCOULE<br />

Michel Dutzer ANDRA France<br />

William Everett DEWDROPS France<br />

Sebastien Farin ANDRA France<br />

Florence Gabillaud-Poillion ASN France<br />

Arnaud Gay AREVA France<br />

Ludivine Gilli IRSN France<br />

Emmanuel Girasa GDF SUEZ France<br />

NUCLÉAIRE FRANCE<br />

François-Michel Gonnot ANDRA France<br />

Alexandre Gorbatchev COMMISSARIAT A France<br />

L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE<br />

ET AUX ENERGIES<br />

ALTERNATIVES<br />

Agnes Grandjean CEA France<br />

Guy Granier CEA MARCOULE France<br />

Dominique Grenêche SFEN France<br />

Philippe Gros-Gean ONET TECHNOLOGIES France<br />

Philippe Guetat CEA France<br />

Philippe Guiberteau CEA SACLAY France<br />

Matthieu Hallouin ANTEA GROUP France<br />

Patricia Hamel-Bloch SFEN France<br />

Albert Jacobs DEWDROPS France<br />

Michel Jeanjacques CEA/DEN/MAR/DPAD/CPRP France<br />

Nicolas Jeannee GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Bernard Jolly SFEN France<br />

Jean Paul Labeur AREVA - DAP France<br />

Patrick Landais ANDRA France<br />

Eric Lanes ANDRA France<br />

Agnes Launay AREVA France<br />

Marie Lavielle CEA France<br />

Michèle Le Goff SFEN France<br />

Arnaud Leclaire ANDRA France<br />

Célia Lepeytre CEA France<br />

Pierre Lisbonne CEA France<br />

Laurent Martinet AREVA NC France<br />

Aurélie Merceille CEA MARCOULE France<br />

Arnaud Michelle SARP INDUSTRIES France<br />

Maxime Michel-Noel ONET TECHNOLOGIES - France<br />

ONECTRA<br />

Fabrice Moggia AREVA France<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon CEA France<br />

Palut-Laurent Odile ASN France<br />

Gérald Ouzounian ANDRA France<br />

Lucien Pillette-Cousin AREVA TA France<br />

Patrick Pin AREVA NC France<br />

Richard Poisson ANDRA France<br />

Gilles Potier AREVA NC France<br />

Calvert Pratt BABCOCK NUCLEAR France<br />

LIMITED<br />

Rodolphe Raffard ANDRA France<br />

Stéphanie Romero ALSTOM GRID France<br />

Julie Rosello CEA CADARACHE France<br />

Anne Marie Roux CEA France<br />

Jean-Paul Roux GEOVARIANCES France<br />

Stephanie Soton AREVA NC France<br />

Chauveau Thomas BOUYGUES France<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

SERVICES NUCLEAIRES<br />

Patrice Torres ANDRA France<br />

Pierre Trabuc CEA France<br />

Walter Van Hecke AREVA France<br />

Thierry Varet AREVA France<br />

Claire-Emilie Vaudey AREVA France<br />

Romain Vede AREVA France<br />

Jean-Marc Vidal COMMISSARIAT À France<br />

L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE<br />

Bernard Vigreux SFEN France<br />

André Zech SARP INDUSTRIES France<br />

Germany<br />

Joerg Aign WESTINGHOUSE<br />

ELECTRIC GERMANY<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Wilhelm Bollingerfehr DBE TECHNOLOGY GmbH Germany<br />

Georg Braehler NUKEM TECHNOLOGIES<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Peter Brennecke CONSULTANT Germany<br />

Klaus Büttner NUKEM TECHNOLOGIES<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Angelika Fox CWN GRUPPE<br />

BARSBÜTTEL<br />

Germany<br />

Christian Gronemeyer GRS MBH Germany<br />

Markus Havertz FORSCHUNGZENTRUM<br />

JÜLICH GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Koch Horst RÖHR+STOLBERG GMBH Germany<br />

Hagen Gunther Jung NLWKN Germany<br />

Thomas Kluth SIEMPELKAMP<br />

NUK+LEARTECHNIK<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Frank Köhler RÖHR + STOLBERG GMBH Germany<br />

Heinz Kröger TÜV NORD ENSYS<br />

HANNOVER GMBH<br />

& CO. KG<br />

Germany<br />

Matthias Messer GNS Germany<br />

André Musolff BAM FEDERAL INSTITUTE Germany<br />

FOR MATERIALS<br />

RESEARCH AND TESTING<br />

Tino Neumeyer BAM FEDERAL INSTITUTE Germany<br />

FOR MATERIALS<br />

RESEARCH AND TESTING<br />

Christian Nowak CWN GRUPPE BARSBÜTTEL Germany<br />

Ralf Ohlhof TUEV NORD ENSYS<br />

GMBH & CO<br />

Germany<br />

Eliza Ozaine WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC Germany<br />

GERMANY GMBH<br />

Thomas Quercetti BAM FEDERAL INSTITUTE Germany<br />

FOR MATERIALS<br />

RESEARCH AND TESTING<br />

Lutz Schneider STOLLER<br />

INGENIEURTECHNIK<br />

GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Marina Sokcic-Kostic NUKEM<br />

TECHNOLOGIES GMBH\<br />

Germany<br />

Thorsten Stahl GRS MBH Germany<br />

Mathias Steinhoff ÖKO-INSTITUT Germany<br />

Hans-Juergen Steinmetz FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM<br />

JÜLICH GMBH<br />

Germany<br />

Stefan Thierfeldt BRENK<br />

SYSTEMPLANUNG GMBH\<br />

Germany<br />

Veronika Ustohalova OEKO-INSTITUT E.V. Germany<br />

Joerg Viermann<br />

Hungary<br />

GNS GESELLSCHAFT FUER Germany<br />

NUKLEAR-SERVICE MBH\<br />

Andrea Antus PAKS NUCLEAR POWER<br />

PLANT LTD<br />

Hungary<br />

Enik Elter PAKS NUCLEAR POWER<br />

PLANT LTD<br />

Hungary<br />

Laszlo Fritz PUBLIC LIMITED<br />

COMPANY FOR<br />

RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (PURAM)<br />

Hungary<br />

László Juhász NATIONAL RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE FOR<br />

RADIOBIOLOGY AND<br />

RADIOHYGIENE\<br />

Hungary<br />

Bálint Nos PURAM Hungary<br />

Krisztian Rado PUBLIC LIMITED<br />

COMPANY FOR<br />

RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (PURAM)<br />

Hungary<br />

Peter Turza<br />

Indonesia<br />

PUBLIC LIMITED<br />

COMPANY FOR<br />

RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT (PURAM),<br />

HUNGARY<br />

Hungary<br />

Susetyo Hario Putero GADJAH MADA<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

Indonesia<br />

139


140<br />

ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Country<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Iraq<br />

Fouad Al-Musawi IRAQ MINISTRY OF<br />

SCIENCE AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Iraq<br />

Emad Sharmsaldin<br />

Italy<br />

IRAQ MINISTRY OF<br />

SCIENCE AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Iraq<br />

Francesco Basile EUROPEAN COMMISSION<br />

- JRC ISPRA<br />

Italy<br />

Annafrancesca Mariani SOGIN S.P.A. Italy<br />

Francesco Rossi EUROPEAN COMMISSION<br />

- JRC ISPRA<br />

Italy<br />

Ivo Tripputi SOGIN S.P.A. Italy<br />

Daniele Ugolini CONSULTANT Italy<br />

Franco Zorzoli CAMPOVERDE SRL Italy<br />

Maria Zorzoli<br />

Japan<br />

GUEST Italy<br />

Shiho Asai JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Ryosuke Doke JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Takeshi Ebashi NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION OF<br />

JAPAN (NUMO)<br />

Japan<br />

Tomoko Haraga JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Haruhi Hata JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Atsushi Iizuka KOBE UNIVERSITY Japan<br />

Tomoko Ishii RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT FUNDING<br />

AND RESEARCH CENTER<br />

Japan<br />

Tomohiro Ito OSAKA PREFECTURE<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

Japan<br />

Kazumi Kitayama NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION OF<br />

JAPAN (NUMO)<br />

Japan<br />

Ichizo Kobayashi KAJIMA CORPORATION Japan<br />

Takanori Kunimaru JAEA Japan<br />

Motoyuki Mitsuda JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY<br />

Japan<br />

Satoru Miyoshi OBAYASHI CORPORATION Japan<br />

Takahiro Nakajima RWMC, JAPAN Japan<br />

Takao Ohi NUCLEAR WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

ORGANIZATION OF<br />

JAPAN (NUMO)<br />

Japan<br />

Keisuke Okumura JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY (JAEA)<br />

Japan<br />

Hironori Onoe JAPAN ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY AGENCY (JAEA)<br />

Japan<br />

Hitoshi Owada RADIOACTIVE WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT FUNDING<br />

AND RESEARCH CENTER<br />

Japan<br />

Satoshi Sato INTERNATIONAL ACCESS<br />

CORPORATION<br />

Japan<br />

Hisao Satoh MITSUBISHI MATERIALS<br />

CORPORATION<br />

Japan<br />

Yusuke Takayama KOBE UNIVERSITY Japan<br />

Yuki Tosaki GEOLOGICAL SURVEY<br />

OF JAPAN, AIST<br />

Japan<br />

Shuichi Yamamoto<br />

Korea<br />

OBAYASHI CORPORATION Japan<br />

Dae-Seok Hong KAERI (KOREA ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE)<br />

Korea<br />

Jongseon Jeon ENESYS CO., LTD. Korea<br />

Kwang-Wook Kim KOREA ATOMIC ENERGY<br />

RESEARCH INSTITUTE<br />

Korea<br />

Woo-Seog Ryu KAERI (KOREA ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH<br />

INSTITUTE)<br />

Korea<br />

Hui-Jun Won KAERI Korea<br />

Latvia<br />

Andris Abramenkovs<br />

Netherlands<br />

LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT,<br />

GEOLOGY AND<br />

METEOROLOGY CENTRE<br />

Latvia<br />

Hans Codée COVRA N.V. Netherlands<br />

Renate De Vos NUCLEAR RESEARCH &<br />

CONSULTANCY GROUP<br />

Netherlands<br />

Ronald Dekker NRG Netherlands<br />

Leo Van Velzen NUCLEAR RESEARCH &<br />

CONSULTANCY GROUP<br />

Netherlands<br />

André Wakker<br />

Norway<br />

NRG Netherlands<br />

Malgorzata Sneve<br />

Romania<br />

NRPA Norway<br />

Gheorghe Barariu RAAN-SITON Romania<br />

Toro Laszlo<br />

Russia<br />

MATEFIN BUCURESTI Romania<br />

Mikhail Bogod JSC ECOMET-S Russia<br />

Alexander Gelbutovskiy JSC ECOMET-S Russia<br />

Oleg Ivanov NRC KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE<br />

Russia<br />

Konstantin Kulikov NIPTB ONEGA OAO Russia<br />

Massimiliano Nobile PROJECT MANAGEMENT<br />

UNIT<br />

Russia<br />

Tatiana Makarchuk JSC ATOMSTROYEXPORT Russia<br />

Sergey Semenov NATIONAL RESEARCH<br />

CENTRE "KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE<br />

Russia<br />

Vyacheslav Stepanov NRC KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE<br />

Russia<br />

Dmitry Stepennov<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

NATIONAL RESEARCH<br />

CENTRE "KURCHATOV<br />

INSTITUTE"<br />

Russia<br />

Vladimir Daniska DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Vaclav Hanusik VUJE, Inc. Slovak Republic<br />

Tomas Hrncir SLOVAK UNIVERSITY<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY IN<br />

BRATISLAVA<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Jan Medved VUJE, INC. Slovak Republic<br />

Vladimir Necas SLOVAK UNIVERSITY<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Frantisek Ondra DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Michal Panik SLOVAK UNIVERSITY<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY<br />

IN BRATISLAVA<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Jozef Pritrsky DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Alojz Slaninka VUJE, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Ondrej Slávik VUJE, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Matej Zachar<br />

South Africa<br />

DECOM, A.S. Slovak Republic<br />

Linde Nel<br />

Spain<br />

NECSA South Africa<br />

Jorge Borque ENRESA Spain<br />

Juan L. Santiago ENRESA Spain<br />

Ester García Tapias<br />

Sweden<br />

ENRESA Spain<br />

Johan Andersson JA STREAMFLOW AB Sweden<br />

Jan Carlsson SKB Sweden<br />

Fredrik Ekenborg AB SVAFO Sweden<br />

Henrik Efraimsson SWEDISH RADIATION<br />

SAFETY AUTHORITY<br />

Sweden<br />

Bertil Grundfelt KEMAKTA KONSULT AB Sweden<br />

Maria Lindberg STUDSVIK NUCLEAR AB Sweden<br />

Johanna Sandwall SWEDISH RADIATION<br />

SAFETY AUTHORITY<br />

Sweden<br />

Rolf Sjöblom TEKEDO AB Sweden<br />

Anders Wiebert SWEDISH RADIATION<br />

SAFETY AUTHORITY<br />

Sweden


ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Country<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Switzerland<br />

Irina Gaus NAGRA Switzerland<br />

Mrs. McCombie GUEST Switzerland<br />

Charles McCombie ARIUS ASSOCIATION Switzerland<br />

Joachim Mueth PAUL SCHERRER<br />

INSTITUT<br />

Switzerland<br />

Alexandros Papafotiou INTERA INC.<br />

SWISS BRANCH<br />

Switzerland<br />

Andreas Poller NAGRA, SWITZERLAND Switzerland<br />

Joerg Rueedi NAGRA Switzerland<br />

Jürg Schneider NAGRA, SWITZERLAND Switzerland<br />

Rainer Senger INTERA INC. SWISS<br />

BRANCH<br />

Switzerland<br />

Ehrlicher Ulrich<br />

Taiwan<br />

PAUL SCHERRER<br />

INSTITUT<br />

Switzerland<br />

Yih Ping Chen INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH (INER)<br />

Taiwan<br />

Chun-Ping Jen DEPT. MECHNICAL<br />

ENGINEERING,<br />

NATIONAL CHUNG<br />

CHENG UNIVERSITY<br />

Taiwan<br />

Tai-Wei Lan FUEL CYCLE AND<br />

MATERIAL<br />

ADMINISTRATION ATOMIC<br />

ENERGY COUNCIL<br />

Taiwan<br />

Chou Tzu-Hsing INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH<br />

Taiwan<br />

Tsong-Yang Wei<br />

Tajikistan<br />

INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR<br />

ENERGY RESEARCH,<br />

AEC, TAIWAN<br />

Taiwan<br />

Dzhamshed Abdushukurov S.U.UMAROV PHYSICAL -<br />

TECHNICAL INSTITUTE<br />

OF ACADEMY OF SCIENCES<br />

Tajikistan<br />

OF REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN<br />

Nazirzhon Buriev<br />

Ukraine<br />

S.U.UMAROV PHYSICAL -<br />

TECHNICAL INSTITUTE<br />

OF ACADEMY OF<br />

SCIENCES OF REPUBLIC<br />

OF TAJIKISTAN<br />

Tajikistan<br />

Olga Batyukhnova GUEST Ukraine<br />

Sergii Mitichkin<br />

United Kingdm<br />

CHERNOBYL NPP Ukraine<br />

Valerie Adsley GUEST United Kingdom<br />

Ian Adsley NUVIA LTD United Kingdom<br />

Andrew Baker EDEN NUCLEAR AND<br />

ENVIRONMENT LTD.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Jonathan Baker CH2M HILL United Kingdom<br />

Tamara Baldwin GALSON SCIENCES<br />

LIMITED<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Angela Bartlett RESEARCH SITES<br />

RESTORATION LTD<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Robert Bonner URS United Kingdom<br />

Peter Booth WSP E&E United Kingdom<br />

Peter Burgess NUVIA LTD United Kingdom<br />

Andy Carr CALDER GROUP United Kingdom<br />

Iain Carvel RESEARCH SITES<br />

RESTOTATION LTD.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Mike Cashin PORVAIR FILTRATION<br />

GROUP LTD<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Robert Clark NUVIA LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Dan Curry URS United Kingdom<br />

Carol Darbyshire SPRINGFIELDS FUELS LTD United Kingdom<br />

Mike Davies NUVIA LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Christopher Fisher OFFICE OF NUCLEAR<br />

REGULATION<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Lee Hartley SERCO United Kingdom<br />

Alan Heyes KING'S COLLEGE,<br />

LONDON United Kingdom<br />

Tim Hicks GALSON SCIENCES<br />

LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Karl Hughes BABCOCK<br />

INTERNATIONAL United Kingdom<br />

Tim Hunter THE UNIVERSITY<br />

OF LEEDS<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Michael James SELLAFIELD LTD United Kingdom<br />

Steven Joyce SERCO United Kingdom<br />

Terry Kelly PAR SYSTEMS LTD United Kingdom<br />

Alastair Laird PROJECT TIME & COST United Kingdom<br />

Stephen Leclere SELLAFIELD LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Angela Mackintosh SELLAFIELD LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Ryan Maitland OFFICE FOR NUCLEAR<br />

REGULATION<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Simon Martin SELLAFIELD LTD United Kingdom<br />

John Mathieson NUCLEAR<br />

DECOMMISSIONING<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Bill Miller AMEC United Kingdom<br />

Barry Moloney ENERGYSOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

Jenny Morris GALSON SCIENCES<br />

LIMITED<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Rachel O'donnell LLWR United Kingdom<br />

Michael Ojovan UNIVERSITY OF<br />

SHEFFIELD<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Alan Paulley QUINTESSA United Kingdom<br />

Philip Rendell NDA (RADIOACTIVE<br />

WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />

DIRECTORATE)<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Ian Richardson SELLAFIELD LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

David Rossiter LLW REPOSITORY LTD United Kingdom<br />

John Shevelan LLWR LTD United Kingdom<br />

Peter Sibley ENERGYSOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

Joe Small UK NATIONAL NUCLEAR<br />

LABORATORY<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Graham Smith GMS ABINGDON LTD United Kingdom<br />

Trevor Sumerling LLWR LTD United Kingdom<br />

Simon Thompson ENERGY SOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

Pippa Waterman ENERGYSOLUTIONS United Kingdom<br />

David Wells NUVIA LIMITED United Kingdom<br />

Stephen Wickham GALSON SCIENCES LTD United Kingdom<br />

Christopher Woodhead SA ROBOTICS LTD United Kingdom<br />

James Young<br />

United States<br />

UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS United Kingdom<br />

William Abramson LAWRENCE LIVERMORE<br />

NATIONAL LABORATORY<br />

United States<br />

Keith Anderson ECC United States<br />

Annabelle Axinn GUEST United States<br />

Ian Beadle AMEC United States<br />

Douglas Bablitch AMEC EARTH AND<br />

INRASTRUCTURE<br />

United States<br />

Gary Benda ICEM'11 CONFERENCE<br />

MANAGER<br />

United States<br />

Dianne Benda ICEM'11 GUEST TOURS United States<br />

Tiffany Blanchard USDOE / NATIONAL<br />

NUCLEAR<br />

United States<br />

James Blankenhorn PERMAFIX<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

SERVICES INC<br />

United States<br />

Joseph Boucau WESTINGHOUSE<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

United States<br />

Laurel Boucher THE LAUREL CO. United States<br />

Shari Brabham CISS CORPORATION United States<br />

Pam Bradford CISS CORPORATION United States<br />

Kimberly Brewer ARS INTERNATIONAL, INC. United States<br />

Steven Brown SENES<br />

CONSULTANTS LTD<br />

United States<br />

Kathryn Brown GUEST United States<br />

Dwight Campbell CONTAINER PRODUCTS<br />

CORPORATION<br />

United States<br />

Mrs.Chapman GUEST United States<br />

Neil Chapman ARIUS ASSOCIATES United States<br />

Jean Pierre Cizel AREVA United States<br />

Gilles Clement AREVA BUVAL United States<br />

John Cochran SANDIA NATIONAL<br />

LABORATORIES<br />

United States<br />

Matthew Cole SA TECHNOLOGY United States<br />

Danny Coleman ARS INTERNATIONAL, INC. United States<br />

141


142<br />

ICEM'11 Pre-Registration Attendee List — By Country<br />

(Listed are only confirmed paid registrants as of 9-5-2011)<br />

Yvette Collazo U.S. DEPARTMENT United States<br />

OF ENERGY<br />

Carl Connell GUEST United States<br />

Judith Connell FLUOR United States<br />

Kevin Cook CERADYNE BORON United States<br />

PRODUCTS<br />

Michael Cournoyer LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL United States<br />

LABORATORY<br />

Michael Cull TELEDYNE BROWN United States<br />

ENGINEERING<br />

Mark Denton KURION, INC. United States<br />

Jas Devgun SARGENT & LUNDY United States<br />

Debbie Denton GUEST United States<br />

Michel Dilles AMTEK SAS United States<br />

Vince Dilworth ASME United States<br />

Nick DiMascio BARTLETT SERVICES INC. United States<br />

Paul Dixon LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL United States<br />

LABORATORY<br />

Mrs. Dixon Dixon GUEST Unites States<br />

Andrew Drom ENERGYSOLUTIONS United States<br />

EU LTD<br />

James Droppo PACIFIC NORTHWEST United States<br />

NATIONAL LABORATORY<br />

Tamar Droppo GUEST United States<br />

Felicia Durán SANDIA NATIONAL United States<br />

LABORATORIES<br />

Rateb (Boby) Abu-Eid U.S. NRC United States<br />

Andrew Edwards GUEST United States<br />

Amelia Fogleman GUEST United States<br />

Dyan Foss CH2M HILL PLATEAU United States<br />

REMEDIATION COMPANY<br />

Adam Foster STUDSVIK, INC. United States<br />

Patrick Gobert WESTINGHOUSE United States<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY<br />

Rebecca Goddard GUEST United States<br />

Florence Goutelard CEA United States<br />

Achla Goyal GUEST United States<br />

Kapil Goyal LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL United States<br />

LABORATORY<br />

Steve Halliwell VJ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. United States<br />

Susan Hess AREVA United States<br />

Cathy Hickey CH2M HILL United States<br />

John Hollinden CONTAINER PRODUCTS United States<br />

CORPORATION<br />

David James DW JAMES United States<br />

CONSULTING, LLC<br />

Juanita James GUEST United States<br />

Steven Jameson STUDSVIK United States<br />

Danielle Jansik PACIFIC NORTHWEST United States<br />

NATIONAL LABORARY<br />

Angie Jones AMEC United States<br />

Sammy Jones GUEST United States<br />

Lawrence Judd NUVISION ENGINEERING United States<br />

Dawn Kaback AMEC GEOMATRIX United States<br />

Dennis Kelley PACIFI NUCLEAR United States<br />

SOLUTIONS<br />

Jeffrey Kerridge CH2M HILL United States<br />

Merry Keyser GUEST United States<br />

Ronald Keyser ORTEC United States<br />

Karen Kim ELECTRIC POWER United States<br />

RESEARCH INSTITUTE<br />

Heather Klebba NFT United States<br />

Kelly Knight BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC. United States<br />

Ken Kok ASME United States<br />

Paul Kreitman WESTINGHOUSE United States<br />

NUCLEAR SERVICES<br />

Albert Kruger US DOE United States<br />

Barbara Larsen GUEST Unites States<br />

Gerard Laurent EDF/CIDEN United States<br />

John Lehew CH2M HILL PLATEAU United States<br />

REMEDIATION COMPANY<br />

Yung Liu ARGONNE NATIONAL United States<br />

LABORATORY<br />

Jeffrey Lively AMEC United States<br />

Juliann Maffett EDGEN MURRAY United States<br />

Keith McConnell U.S. NUCLEAR United States<br />

REGULATORY<br />

COMMISSION<br />

Betty Meyer GUEST United States<br />

Greg Meyer FLUOR GOVERNMENT United States<br />

GROUP<br />

Ross Miller SANDIA NATIONAL United States<br />

LABORATORIES<br />

Ronald Morris WESTINGHOUSE United States<br />

ELECTRIC COMPANY USA<br />

Mark Morton WORLEYPARSONS United States<br />

POLESTAR<br />

Virginia Morton GUEST United States<br />

Gary Mottershead VJ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. United States<br />

Ronnie Mulligan GUEST United States<br />

Virgene Mulligan ARS INTERNATIONAL United States<br />

Tracy Mustin U.S. DEPARTMENT United States<br />

OF ENERGY<br />

Gus Myers BABCOCK SERVICES INC. United States<br />

Mike Nichols PACTEC EPS LTD. United States<br />

William Nutt ARGONNE NATIONAL United States<br />

LABORATORY<br />

Donald Olson COLUMBIANA HI TECH United States<br />

Jean-Jacques Peraudin GEOVARIANCES<br />

Geoffrey Peter OREGON INSTITUTE OF United States<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

PORTLAND CAMPUS<br />

Martin Plys FAUSKE & United States<br />

ASSOCIATES, LLC<br />

Edward Posivak WMG, INC. United States<br />

John Proni FLORIDA United States<br />

INTERNATIONAL<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

Maria Elena Proni GUEST United States<br />

Rosa Ramirez U.S. DEPARTMENT United States<br />

OF ENERGY<br />

John Raymont KURION, INC. United States<br />

Marilyn Raymont GUEST United States<br />

Reginald Recco AMETEK SAS United States<br />

Steve Rima AMEC United States<br />

Bernard Rottner ONET TECHNOLOGIES United States<br />

James Russell NEVADA NATIONAL United States<br />

SECURITY SITE<br />

Mike Sanchez PACTEC, INC. United States<br />

Richard Schwent GUEST United States<br />

Bill Shingler FLUOR GOVERNMENT United States<br />

GROUP<br />

Jager Smith ENTERGY United States<br />

Janet Smith GUEST United States<br />

Dawn Stevens GUEST United States<br />

Howard Stevens STUDSVIK, INC. United States<br />

Bryan Swinson PAJARITO SCIENTIFIC United States<br />

CORPORATION<br />

Bernard Vignau CEA SACLAY United States<br />

Charles Waggoner INSTITUTE FOR United States<br />

CLEAN ENERGY<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Jeroen Welbergen COVRA N.V. United States<br />

Craig Williamson SOUTH CAROLINA United States<br />

RESEARCH AND<br />

EDUCATION FOUNDATION<br />

Bertrand Willmann AREVA United States<br />

Keith Witwer IMPACT SERVICES, INC., United States<br />

GEOMELT DIVISION


Technical <strong>Program</strong> Organizers<br />

TRACK CO-CHAIRS<br />

TECHNICAL PROGRAM CO-CHAIRS<br />

Gary Benda, Bartlett Services, Inc. (USA) and Dominique Grenêche, Consultant (FRANCE)<br />

TRACK 1<br />

Low/Intermediate-Level (L/ILW) Radioactive Waste Management<br />

Angie Jones, AMEC (USA), Michel Dutzer, Andra (France), Jerome Brueziere, CEA (France), Marc Butez, CEA (France),<br />

Christopher Joussot-Dubien, CEA (France)<br />

TRACK 2<br />

Spent Fuel, Fissile Material, Transuranic (TRU) and High-Level Radioactive Waste (HLW) Management<br />

Heather Klebba, Nuclear Filter Technology (USA), Gerald Ouzounian, Andra (France)<br />

TRACK 3<br />

Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D)<br />

Jas Devgun, Sargent & Lundy (USA), Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA (France), Thierry Varet, AREVA – BU Value (France)<br />

TRACK 4<br />

Environmental Remediation (ER)<br />

Steve Brown, Senes Consultants (USA), Didier Dubot, CEA (France), Sandrine Magdaliniuk, AREVA (France),<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN (France)<br />

TRACK 5<br />

Environmental Management (EM)/Public Involvement/Crosscutting Issues/Global Partnering<br />

Judith (Judy) Connell, Fluor (USA), Regis Dalmas, EDF (France), Yvette Collazo, US DOE (USA)<br />

Ana Han, US DOE (USA), Jim Marra, US DOE (USA), Gerald Ouzounian, Andra (France),<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN (France)<br />

Session Organizers<br />

Keith Anderson, ECC (USA)<br />

Johan Andersson, JA Streamflow AB (Sweden)<br />

Andrew Baker, Eden Nuclear and Environment Ltd. (UK)<br />

Ian Beadle, AMEC (UK)<br />

Gary Benda, Bartlett Services (USA)<br />

Ed Bentz, EJ Bentz & Associates (USA)<br />

Paul Black, Neptune and Company Inc (USA)<br />

James Blankenhorn, Perma-Fix (USA)<br />

Steve Brown, SENES Consultants Ltd (USA)<br />

Jerome Brueziere, AREVA (France)<br />

Sean Bushart, Electric Power Research Institute (USA)<br />

Jean Paul Chiles, Ecole Mines (France)<br />

Hans Codee, Corva (Netherlands)<br />

Judith (Judy) Connell, Fluor (USA)<br />

Yvette Collazo, US DOE (USA)<br />

Ian Crossland, Crossland Consulting (UK)<br />

Jean-Marie Cuchet, BELGONUCLEAIRE (Belgium)<br />

Michael Cull, Teledyne (USA)<br />

Didier Delmont, CEA (France)<br />

Mark Denton, Kurion Inc. (USA)<br />

Jas Devgun, Sargent & Lundy(USA)<br />

Didier Dubot, CEA/FAR/USLT/SPRE/SAS (France)<br />

Michel Dutzer, Andra (France)<br />

Kapila Fernando, ANSTO (Australia)<br />

Dominique Francois-Bongarcon, AGORATEK<br />

International Consultants (Canada)<br />

Mike Garamszeghy, Nuclear Waste Management<br />

Organization (Canada)<br />

Irina Gaus, Nagra (Switzerland)<br />

Dominique Greneche, Consultant (France)<br />

Mark Gerchikov, AMEC (Canada)<br />

Donald Goebel, SEC (USA)<br />

Jeffrey Griffin, SRNL (USA)<br />

Ana Han, US DOE (USA)<br />

Paul Haigh, The Paul Haigh Partnership (UK)<br />

Cathy Hickey, CH2M Hill (USA)<br />

Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke, ANDRA (France)<br />

Natraj Iyer, SRNL (USA)<br />

Angie Jones, AMEC (USA)<br />

Heather Klebba, NFT (USA)<br />

Ronald Keyser, ORTEC - AMETEK (USA)<br />

John Mathieson, NDA (UK)<br />

Vicki Maranville, AMEC (UK)<br />

Jim Marra, US DOE (USA)<br />

Adrian Mendez-Torres, SRNL (USA)<br />

Bill Miller, AMEC (UK)<br />

Horst Monken Fernandes, IAEA (Austria)<br />

Jean-Guy Nokhamzon, CEA/DEN/DADN (France)<br />

Karan North, Magnox Ltd (UK)<br />

Michael Ojovan, University of Sheffield (UK)<br />

Peter Ormai, IAEA (Austria)<br />

Gerald Ouzounian, Andra (France)<br />

Corhyn Parr, Nuclear Enterprises (UK)<br />

Kanwar Raj, Bhabha Atomic Research Center (India)<br />

Philip Rendell, NDA (UK)<br />

Hans Riotte, OECD/NEA (France)<br />

Roger Seitz, SRNL (USA)<br />

Andy Szilagyi, US DOE (USA)<br />

Anibal Taboas, Consultant (USA)<br />

Patricia Torres, ANDRA (France)<br />

Walter Van Hecke, AREVA (France)<br />

Leo Van Velzen, NRG (Netherlands)<br />

Thierry Varet, AREVA (France)<br />

Bill Wilmarth, SRNL (USA)<br />

David Wallace, CDM (USA)<br />

Susan Walter, AECOM (USA)<br />

Stephen Wickham, Galson Sciences Limited (UK)<br />

Robert Zelmer, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (Canada)<br />

143


144<br />

Conference Steering Committee<br />

General Co-Chairs<br />

Anibal Taboas, Consultant<br />

Dominique Grenêche, Consultant<br />

Conference Manager<br />

Gary Benda, Bartlett Services<br />

ICEM Project Director<br />

Vince Dilworth, ASME<br />

European Event Manager<br />

Bernard Jolly, French Nuclear Energy Society (SFEN)<br />

Technical Paper Submission; Abstracts, Bio's, Copyright, Drafts and/or <strong>Final</strong> Papers<br />

Stacey Cooper, ASME<br />

Shari Brabham, CISS Corporation<br />

US <strong>Program</strong> Coordinator for the Technical <strong>Program</strong>, Non-Eu Conference Registration or Non-European<br />

Union Vendor Exhibition<br />

Shari Brabham, CISS Corporation<br />

EU Coordinator for Reims, France and Other Local Aspects, Conference Facilities, Social <strong>Program</strong>s, Vendor<br />

Arrangements, European Union (EU) Vendor Exhibition or EU Conference Registrations<br />

Sylvie Delaplace, French Nuclear Energy Society (SFEN)<br />

Technical Tours<br />

Sylvie Delaplace, French Nuclear Energy Society (SFEN)<br />

US Federal Liaison(s)<br />

Yvette Collazo, US Department of Energy<br />

Larry Camper US Nuclear Regulatory Commission<br />

EU Liaison(s)<br />

Bernard Jolly, French Nuclear Energy Society (SFEN)<br />

IAEA Liaison<br />

Irena Mele, IAEA, Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology<br />

ASME ICEM'11 Conference Committee Liaisons<br />

Vincent Dilworth, ASME<br />

Anibal Taboas, Consultant, Environmental Engineering Division<br />

Ken Kok, Consultant, Nuclear Engineering Division<br />

French Nuclear Energy Society (SFEN)<br />

Bernard Jolly, French Nuclear Energy Society (SFEN)


Schedule of <strong>Events</strong><br />

— SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2011 —<br />

Event Time Location<br />

Golf Tournament 7:30am - 3:00pm Le Golf de Reims Champagne<br />

Technical Training Course 9:00am - 4:00pm RCC - Room 5, 2nd Floor<br />

Exhibitor Set Up 2:00pm - 8:00pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Registration 4:00pm - 7:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Author/Panelist/Co-Chair Check-in 4:00pm - 7:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Speakers Ready Area 4.00pm - 7:00pm RCC - Salle De Presse, 2nd Floor<br />

Welcome Reception 6:00pm - 8:00pm RCC - “Le Bouchon” Space, 2nd Floor<br />

— MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2011 —<br />

Event Time Location<br />

Registration 7:15am - 6:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Author/Panelist/Co-Chair Check-in 7:15am - 6:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Speakers Ready Area 7:15am - 5:00pm RCC - Salle De Presse, 2nd Floor<br />

Speakers Briefing 7:30am - 8:00am RCC - “Le Millesime” Space, 1st Floor<br />

Guest Welcome Reception 8.00am - 9:00am RCC - Room 1, 2nd Floor<br />

Coffee Service - Pre Opening Session 8:00am - 9:00am RCC - “Le Bouchon” Space, 2nd Floor<br />

Exhibitor Set up 8:00am - 11:00am RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Monday Morning Opening Session 9:00am - 12:30pm RCC - Salle Royale, 2nd Floor<br />

Coffee Break After 3rd Speaker RCC - “Le Bouchon” Space, 2nd Floor<br />

Poster Session 9 12:00pm - 5:45pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Exhibition Open 12:00pm - 6:00pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Lunch Break 12:30pm - 1:40pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Sessions 2 - 8 1:45pm - 6:00pm RCC - Rooms 1 - 10, 2nd Floor<br />

Coffee Break 3:30pm - 4:10pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

— TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 —<br />

Event Time Location<br />

Speakers Ready Area 7:15am - 5:00pm RCC - Salle De Presse, 2nd Floor<br />

Registration 7:15am - 6:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Author/Panelist/Co-Chair Check-in 7:15am - 6:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Speakers Briefing 7:30am - 8:00am RCC - “Le Millesime” Space, 1st Floor<br />

Exhibit Hall Hours 8:30am - 8:00pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Sessions 10 - 18 8:30am - 12:30pm RCC - Rooms 1 - 10, 2nd Floor<br />

Poster Session 19 8:30am - 5:45pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Coffee Break 10:15am - 10:40am RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Lunch Break 12:30pm - 1:40pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Sessions 20 - 28 1:45pm - 6:00pm RCC - Rooms 1 - 10, 2nd Floor<br />

Coffee Break 3:30pm - 4:10pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Tuesday Exhibit Reception 6:00pm - 8:00pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

— WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2011 —<br />

Event Time Location<br />

Speakers Ready Area 7:15am - 5:00pm RCC - Salle De Presse, 2nd Floor<br />

Registration 7:15am - 6:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Author/Panelist/Co-Chair Check-in 7:15am - 6:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Speakers Briefing 7:30am - 8:00am RCC - “Le Millesime” Space, 1st Floor<br />

Sessions 29- 38 8:30am - 12:30pm RCC - Rooms 1 - 10, 2nd Floor<br />

Exhibit Hall Hours 8:30am - 5:00pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Poster Session 39 8:30am - 5:45pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Coffee Break 10:15am - 10:40am RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Lunch Break 12:30pm - 1:40pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Sessions 40 – 49 1:45pm - 6:00pm RCC - Rooms 1 - 10, 2nd Floor<br />

Coffee Break 3:30pm - 4:10pm RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Wednesday Banquet 7:30pm - 11:30 pm Champagne De Castelnau Caveau<br />

— THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2011 —<br />

Event Time Location<br />

Registration 7:15am - 12:30pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Speakers Ready Area 7:15am - 12:30pm RCC - Salle De Presse, 2nd Floor<br />

Author/Panelist/Co-Chair Check-in 7:15am - 1:00pm RCC - Foyer, 1st Floor<br />

Speakers Briefing 7:30am - 8:00am RCC - “Le Millesime” Space, 1st Floor<br />

Exhibit Hall Hours 8:30am - 11:00am RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Poster Session 60 8:30am - 11:00am RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Sessions 50 – 59 8:30am - 12:30pm RCC – Rooms 1 - 10, 2nd Floor<br />

Coffee Break 10:15am - 10:40am RCC - Exhibition Hall, 1st Floor<br />

Conference Ends 12:30pm RCC - 1st Floor<br />

— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 —<br />

Event Time Location<br />

Technical Tours Departure 7:00am Departs RCC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!