24.01.2013 Views

Photometric Redshifts from Empirically Derived SED Templates

Photometric Redshifts from Empirically Derived SED Templates

Photometric Redshifts from Empirically Derived SED Templates

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Photometric</strong> <strong>Redshifts</strong> <strong>from</strong><br />

<strong>Empirically</strong> <strong>Derived</strong> <strong>SED</strong> <strong>Templates</strong><br />

Roberto J. Assef<br />

The Ohio State University<br />

C.S. Kochanek, M. Brodwin, M.J.I. Brown, N. Caldwell,<br />

R.J. Cool, P. Eisenhardt, D. Eisenstein, A.H. Gonzalez,<br />

B.T. Jannuzi, C. Jones, E. McKenzie, S.S. Murray, D.<br />

Stern, J. Moustakas, C. Onken and J. Kollmeier


Introduction<br />

● Large and deep photometric surveys are becoming<br />

increasingly more common<br />

– SDSS<br />

– LSST<br />

– DES<br />

– Pan-STARRS, etc.<br />

● Spectroscopic follow-up is expensive<br />

● Most analysis must come <strong>from</strong> photometric data<br />

– <strong>Redshifts</strong><br />

– Spectral Classifications<br />

– K-Corrections


● Major development in photometric redshift techniques in the<br />

last decade.<br />

– Empirical methods.<br />

– <strong>SED</strong> fitting.<br />

● Empirical methods are only good within training set<br />

boundaries. Cannot do spectral classification, K-Corrections,<br />

etc.<br />

● <strong>SED</strong> fitting methods rely on spectral templates. Can do<br />

spectral analysis.<br />

– Spectral templates are empirical or come <strong>from</strong> models.<br />

– No templates reproduce mid-IR or UV reliably.<br />

● Best method would be a combination of both.


● Budavari et al. (2000) and Csabai et al. (2000) proposed a<br />

method that combines both approaches.<br />

● Idea is to fit for the templates <strong>from</strong> a broad-band photometry<br />

training set.<br />

● Training set must be deep enough in redshift to optimize<br />

wavelength coverage.<br />

● We have determined low resolution templates <strong>from</strong> NUV to<br />

mid-IR that accurately reproduce galaxy properties.<br />

– Training set <strong>from</strong> NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey<br />

● Most results in this talk already published in Assef et al. 2008,<br />

ApJ, 676, 286.


<strong>Photometric</strong> Data<br />

● NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey (NDWFS)<br />

– Cetus and Boötes fields<br />

● Available Imaging<br />

– Bw, R, I and K (NDWFS)<br />

– J and Ks (FLAMEX)<br />

– 4 IRAC bands (Shallow Survey, SDWFS)<br />

– z-Band (zBoötes)<br />

– FUV and NUV (GALEX)<br />

– MIPS 24µm (MAGES)<br />

– X-Ray (XBoötes)<br />

– Radio (FIRST, NVSS, WENSS)


Spectroscopic Data<br />

● AGN and Galaxy Evolution Survey (AGES,<br />

Kochanek et al. in prep.)<br />

– Low resolution spectra<br />

– ~17000 Galaxies<br />

● I


Fitting the <strong>Templates</strong><br />

● Based on the method proposed by Budavari (2000)<br />

and Csabai (2000).<br />

– Find PCA components <strong>from</strong> photometry<br />

● Assumption: Every galaxy <strong>SED</strong> is a non-negative<br />

linear combination of:<br />

– Old stellar population (Elliptical)<br />

– Continuously star-forming (Spiral)<br />

– Starburst<br />

– Post-Starburts (E+A, alternative model)<br />

● Non-negative combinations avoid unphysical<br />

<strong>SED</strong>s


Fitting the <strong>Templates</strong><br />

● Low Resolution<br />

– Each template is divided in 160 wavelength bins<br />

– Each bin is convolved with the filter band pass and fit<br />

to the data<br />

● Initial guesses<br />

– Coleman, Wu & Weedman (CWW,1980)<br />

– Bruzual & Charlot (2003) UV & mid-IR<br />

– M83 & VC1003 PAH features (Devriendt et al. 1999)<br />

● Smoothing <strong>Templates</strong><br />

– Resulting templates must be smooth<br />

● <strong>Photometric</strong> zero point / aperture corrections


Resulting <strong>Templates</strong><br />

● Significant<br />

deviations <strong>from</strong><br />

initial <strong>SED</strong>s<br />

● E has lower UV<br />

● SF templates have<br />

much higher PAHs<br />

● E+A gives a much<br />

better overall fit,<br />

but...


Photo-zs for NDWFS Galaxies<br />

● 4T slightly worse<br />

then 3T<br />

● 90% of objects<br />

within blue lines<br />

● Simple<br />

luminosity prior<br />

<strong>from</strong> LCRS<br />

luminosity<br />

function


● Error distribution has very non-gaussian tails.<br />

● When clipping to 95%, dispersion similar to 68.3% interval.<br />

● Average median deviation small.


Planned and Current Updates<br />

● GALEX and MIPS data added<br />

– Effective wavelength <strong>from</strong> 0.03 to 30µm.<br />

● Added upper<br />

limits for most bands<br />

● Deeper IRAC<br />

imaging (SDWFS)<br />

● Variable IGM<br />

absorption


AGN Template<br />

● Added an AGN template following the same<br />

procedure<br />

– Assumption: All AGNs have the same <strong>SED</strong> + variable<br />

reddening<br />

● Initial guess<br />

– Power-law (UV-optical) + black body (IR)<br />

● Goals<br />

– Photo-zs for AGNs<br />

– AGN identification<br />

– Luminosity Functions<br />

– Eddington Ratios


<strong>Templates</strong>


Photo-zs for AGNs in Extended<br />

Sources<br />

● Bright hosts<br />

provide photo-z<br />

accuracy<br />

● σ = 0.2<br />

σ 95% = 0.1<br />

● Outliers<br />

dominate the<br />

formal<br />

dispersion


Photo-zs for AGNs in Point<br />

Sources<br />

● σ = 0.75<br />

σ 95% = 0.60<br />

● <strong>SED</strong> is too flat<br />

for good photo-z<br />

● Work in<br />

progress!


Applications<br />

● AGN selection<br />

– Recover most AGNs found by other methods (IRAC<br />

colors, MIPS, X-Ray, Radio, line-ratios)<br />

– Classified ~100 new objects as AGNs in AGES data set<br />

● AGN LF<br />

– Limit to I


Summary<br />

● We have derived a basis of empirical <strong>SED</strong><br />

templates for galaxies and AGNs.<br />

● <strong>Photometric</strong> redshifts and K-corrections code is<br />

publicly available.<br />

● Accurate galaxy photo-zs can be calculated with<br />

this technique.<br />

● <strong>Templates</strong> <strong>from</strong> Assef et al. (2008) are being<br />

updated to include GALEX, MIPS and new IRAC<br />

data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!