A Vindication of the Rights of Woman with - Early Modern Texts

The Rights of Woman Mary Wollstonecraft 12: National education
them. •There are affections amongst children that are unlike
the affection a child may have for his parents, and a child
needs practice in the former, because ‘in youth the seeds
of every affection should be sown’. •A frank openness of
speech and feeling is possible between child and child but
not between child and parent; and this matters because
it ‘first opens the heart to friendship and confidence’ and
leads on to ‘more expansive benevolence’. •A little further
down she levels a further charge against home-schooling:
it leads to the children’s acquiring ‘too high an opinion of
their own importance’, to their ‘being allowed to tyrannize
over servants’, and to their becoming ‘vain and effeminate’
because they are treated like men when they are still boys’.
[Considerations like these, MW says, have affected her
former preference for private education; and yet she still has
that preference, because:] I still think that schools as they
are now regulated are hot-beds of vice and folly, and that the
only knowledge of human nature that could be learned from
them is merely cunning selfishness.
[She now holds forth strenuously against the schools:
at them ‘boys become gluttons and slovens’, and rush into
the libertinism that ‘hardens the heart as it weakens the
understanding’. Children at boarding-schools spend at least
‘half of the time’ longing for vacations, and when these come
‘they are spent in total dissipation and beastly indulgence’.
A little further on she refers to ‘the system of tyranny and
abject slavery that is established among the boys’.]
The only way to avoid two extremes that are equally harmful
to morality would be to contrive some way of combining
a public and private education. Thus to make men citizens,
two natural steps might be taken that seem to lead directly
to the desired point: cultivating the domestic affections that
first open the heart to the various modifications of humanity,
while also allowing the children to spend great part of their
94
time on terms of equality with other children. [MW follows
this up with a lyrical reminiscence of ‘a country day school’,
whose pupils had the desirable daily mixture of childhood
friends and family influence. She contrasts this fiercely with
the evils of ‘close confinement in an academy near London’,
ending with ‘. . . to say nothing of the slavery to forms that
makes religion worse than a farce’. This launches her on
an attack first on religious services in schools and then
cutting with a wider swathe through religious practices more
generally.]
·A DIATRIBE AGAINST RELIGIOUS PRACTICE IN ENGLAND·
What good can be expected from the youth who receives
the sacrament of the Lord’s supper so as to avoid paying
a fine? Half the employment of the youths is to elude the
necessity of attending public worship; and well they may, for
such a constant repetition of the same thing must be a very
irksome restraint on their natural vivacity. These ceremonies
•have the most fatal effect on their morals,
•are a ritual performed by the lips when the heart and
mind are far away, and
•are no longer stored up by our ·Protestant· church
as a bank to draw on for the fees of the poor souls in
purgatory;
so why shouldn’t they be abolished?
[This next paragraph is addressed to the situation of any school or college
which was founded by someone who provided a financial endowment and
laid down rules for how the institution was to be run. There were and
still are many of these.]
But in this country there is a fear of any innovation. This
hidden fear is really the apprehensive timidity of idle slugs
who guard the snug place that they view as an hereditary
estate—eating, drinking and enjoying themselves instead of
fulfilling the duties (except a few empty forms) for which the
‘estate’ was endowed. How do they guard it? By sliming