30.01.2013 Views

Stroke During TAVI: An Unmet Clinical Need? - Paragon Conventions

Stroke During TAVI: An Unmet Clinical Need? - Paragon Conventions

Stroke During TAVI: An Unmet Clinical Need? - Paragon Conventions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>During</strong> <strong>TAVI</strong>: <strong>An</strong><br />

<strong>Unmet</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Need</strong>?<br />

Stephen J.D. Brecker


Disclosures<br />

I have the following financial<br />

relationships to disclose:<br />

Proctor: Medtronic<br />

(Moderate)<br />

*Type of relation: Consultancy, employment, honoraria, other<br />

compensation<br />

*Level of remuneration: high (over $50,000 yearly), moderate (10-50,000),<br />

modest (under 10,000)


<strong>Stroke</strong> prevention in <strong>TAVI</strong>: <strong>An</strong> unmet<br />

clinical need?<br />

• The impact of stroke on <strong>TAVI</strong> outcomes<br />

• The mechanisms of stroke during <strong>TAVI</strong><br />

• <strong>Stroke</strong> prevention – what can we do?


Results of <strong>TAVI</strong> are improving<br />

• Source<br />

• Corevalve 18F<br />

• UK registry<br />

• Partner trial


<strong>Stroke</strong> is still a major source of co-<br />

morbidity<br />

• 2.9%–6.7% of patients undergoing<br />

transfemoral <strong>TAVI</strong> (with both the Edwards<br />

SAPIEN or CoreValve device) and 1.8%–5% of<br />

patients undergoing transapical<br />

<strong>TAVI</strong> (Edwards SAPIEN).


<strong>Stroke</strong> post <strong>TAVI</strong> – The registry data


The Source Registry


Source 30 day outcomes<br />

No major difference between femoral and apical access


New Perspectives on <strong>Stroke</strong><br />

<strong>During</strong> <strong>TAVI</strong><br />

Ghanem et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1427–32.


Background<br />

• <strong>TAVI</strong>-related stroke is an important complication (1-<br />

10%). The risk of silent cerebral embolism is not<br />

elucidated yet.<br />

• Diffusion-weighted MRI allows detection and<br />

localization of acute - apparent and silent - ischemic<br />

cerebral lesions.<br />

• DW-MRI studies are of potential interest for preinterventional<br />

risk stratification, peri-interventional<br />

anticoagulation management...<br />

Grube et al., JACC (2007), Webb et al., Circulation (2008), Zajarias et al., JACC (2009)


Study design<br />

Evaluation<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> and neurological assessment (NIHSS)<br />

Lab - Tests (incl. Lactate, NSE)<br />

MRI<br />

<strong>TAVI</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> and neurological assessment (NIHSS)<br />

Lab - Tests (incl. Lactate, NSE)<br />

MRI<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> and neurological assessment (NIHSS)<br />

Lab - Tests (incl. Lactate, NSE)<br />

MRI<br />

E1<br />

E2<br />

E3


E1<br />

DW-MRI•<br />

NIHSS (n=30) •<br />

NSE•<br />

<strong>TAVI</strong><br />

E2<br />

DW-MRI (n=22) •<br />

NIHSS•<br />

NSE•<br />

E3<br />

DW-MRI (n=22) •<br />

NIHSS•<br />

NSE•<br />

Protocol<br />

Death (n=2)<br />

New onset of claustrophobia (n=1)<br />

Hemodynamic instability (n=1)<br />

PM-Therapy (n=4)<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />


DW - MRI


Lesion localisation and size<br />

Vascular<br />

territories<br />

<strong>An</strong>terior<br />

cerebral artery<br />

Middle<br />

cerebral artery<br />

Posterior<br />

cerebral artery<br />

Vertebrobasilary<br />

arteries<br />

DW-MRI lesion<br />

volume range [cm³]<br />

0.1 – 59.2<br />

0.1 – 4.5<br />

0.1 – 8.6<br />

0.1 – 1.6


NIH-<strong>Stroke</strong> Score<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

NIH <strong>Stroke</strong> Scale<br />

n=30<br />

n=1<br />

n=1<br />

n=1<br />

n=27<br />

E1 E2 E3


Results<br />

• DW-MRI, but not NSE, detects cerebral embolic<br />

lesions.<br />

• Silent cerebral embolism is frequent following<br />

<strong>TAVI</strong> (73%)<br />

• The incidence of apparent cerebral embolism is<br />

low (3.6%).


What about Transfemoral vs<br />

Transapical?


Study Design


DW-MRI Results Post <strong>TAVI</strong>


Larger Number of MRI Lesions in<br />

TA group


Neurological and Cognitive Test<br />

Results


Conclusions<br />

• <strong>TAVI</strong> was associated with a high rate ( 68% ) of<br />

new silent cerebral ischaemic lesions as<br />

evaluated by DW-MRI, with no differences<br />

between the TF ( 66%) and the TA (71%)<br />

approaches<br />

• The occurrence of new silent cerebral<br />

ischaemic lesions was not associated with an<br />

impairment of neurological or cognitive<br />

functions


Significance of MRI lesions?<br />

• No long term clinical significance or just<br />

NIHSS/Cognitive function testing not sensitive<br />

enough to pick them up?


What are the mechanisms of<br />

• Crossing the aortic valve<br />

• Arch atheroma<br />

• Balloon valvuloplasty<br />

• Pigtail catheter thrombosis<br />

• Valve deployment<br />

<strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong><br />

• Post dilatation balloon/valvuloplasty


Mechanisms of <strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong><br />

– Crossing the aortic valve


Mechanisms of <strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong> –<br />

Crossing the aortic valve<br />

• Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after<br />

retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve<br />

in valvular stenosis : a prospective,randomised<br />

study Omran H Lancet 2003 12;361(9365):1241-6<br />

• 22% (22/101) patients had focal diffusion<br />

imaging abnormalities on MRI<br />

• 3% clinically apparent neurological defects<br />

• All 51 patients with AS who did not have the<br />

valve crossed had no abnormalities on MRI


Mechanisms of <strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong> –<br />

Arch Atheroma


Aortic Atheroma <strong>An</strong>d AS


Mechanisms of <strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong> –<br />

Balloon valvuloplasty


Mechanisms of <strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong> –<br />

Balloon valvuloplasty<br />

• <strong>Stroke</strong> rates in literature range from 1-5%<br />

Cribier A,Percutaneous transluminal valvuloplasty of acquired aortic stenosis in elderly patients:<br />

an alternative to valve replacement? Lancet. 1986;1:63-67.<br />

Safian RD, Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:125-<br />

130.<br />

Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW, et al. Three year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty:<br />

insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1994;89:642-650.<br />

Eltchaninoff H, Cribier A, Tron C, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in elderly patients at high risk<br />

for surgery or inoperable. Immediate and mid-term results. Eur Heart J. 1995;16:1079-1084.<br />

Pedersen WR, Klaassen PJ, Boisjolie CR, et al. Feasibility of transcatheter intervention for severe<br />

aortic stenosis in patients > 90 years of age: aortic valvuloplasty revisited. Cathet Cardiovasc<br />

Interv. 2007;70:149-154.


Mechanisms of <strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong> –<br />

Catheter Thrombosis<br />

• Long periods of valve repositioning in difficult<br />

cases<br />

• Pigtail catheter thrombosis<br />

• Trade off in anticoagulation between stroke<br />

risk and vascular complications from closure<br />

device failure<br />

• Ideal ACT for procedure?


Mechanisms of <strong>Stroke</strong> during <strong>TAVI</strong> –<br />

Valve Deployment


What can we do stop the shower?


The Future of <strong>Stroke</strong> Prevention in <strong>TAVI</strong>?<br />

Umbrella/deflector devices<br />

3 currently available devices:<br />

The Claret Dual Filter device•<br />

The Embrella device•<br />

The Aortic Embolic Protection Device (AEPD )<br />


Brachiocephalic trunk<br />

Cerebral Filter Protection<br />

Claret Device<br />

Left<br />

Common<br />

carotid


Claret Dual Filter


Embolic Material


Embolic Material


Embrella Embolic Deflector<br />

• Porous membrane<br />

designed to deflect<br />

embolic debris<br />

• Nitinol frame and shaft<br />

• Polyurethane Porous<br />

membrane<br />

• Heparin coating<br />

• 3 radiopaque markers<br />

• Suture, Monofilament<br />

Nylon


Concept Embrella<br />

Separate access site from main •<br />

procedure, Radial or brachial<br />

artery<br />

Fits through a 6F sheath•<br />

Minimal orientation•<br />

Ease of use, no new techniques•<br />

Low profile•<br />

One size fits all•<br />

Deflect debris•


Embrella Case Example


Embrella Case Example


Embrella Case Example


Embrella Case Example – No<br />

difficulty crossing device


Embrella <strong>Clinical</strong> Experience


11 fold decrease in MRI lesion<br />

volume


Average number of Lesions/Subject


55% decrease in TCD Hits


Aortic Embolic Protection Device<br />

( AEPD)<br />

SMT Research and Development, Ltd.,<br />

Herzliya, Israel


What about post <strong>TAVI</strong>?


Post <strong>TAVI</strong> <strong>An</strong>tiplatelet Therapy<br />

• No randomised trials as yet.<br />

• Initial experiences with <strong>TAVI</strong> and no DAP –<br />

thrombus noted on the valves.<br />

• Elderly patients on DAP have a significant<br />

incidence of bleeding<br />

• <strong>Need</strong>s evaluation


Thank you for your attention

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!