Role of the endotracheal tube in VAP - Assistance Publique ...
Role of the endotracheal tube in VAP - Assistance Publique ...
Role of the endotracheal tube in VAP - Assistance Publique ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ventilator-Associated<br />
Pneumonia<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>endotracheal</strong> <strong>tube</strong><br />
Dr Emmanuelle Girou<br />
Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil Cr Créteil teil<br />
<strong>Assistance</strong> <strong>Publique</strong> – Hôpitaux de Paris<br />
Université Universit Université Paris 12
<strong>VAP</strong><br />
Pathogenesis<br />
Estes et al.<br />
ICM 1995;21:365
Airway<br />
Colonisation<br />
Patients ventilated<br />
at least 5 days<br />
Girou et al.<br />
ICM 2004
Hanson et al.<br />
Endotracheal <strong>in</strong>tubation<br />
Celis et al.<br />
Endotracheal <strong>in</strong>tubation<br />
Goldmann et al.<br />
Endotracheal <strong>in</strong>tubation<br />
Cook et al.<br />
MV <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous 24h<br />
Van der Sar et al.<br />
Risk per day <strong>of</strong> MV<br />
Cunnion et al.<br />
MV more than one day<br />
Torres et al.<br />
MV more than 3 days<br />
Vanhems et al.<br />
MV more than 7 days<br />
Memish et al.<br />
MV more than 19 days<br />
First Risk Factor <strong>of</strong> <strong>VAP</strong>:<br />
Endotracheal <strong>in</strong>tubation<br />
Adjusted Odds<br />
Ratio (95%CI)<br />
5.2 (1.1-25.6)<br />
6.7 (4.1-10.9)<br />
7.0 (NA)<br />
2.28 (1.11-4.68)<br />
1.3 (1.0-1.6)<br />
12.1 (NA)<br />
1.17 (1.15-1.19)<br />
2.1 (1.3-3.4)<br />
10.2 (3.1-33.2)<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />
Girou. Cl<strong>in</strong> Pulm Med 2001
Pathogenesis<br />
Low level evidence
Mucus Shaver<br />
Kolobow et et al. al. Anes<strong>the</strong>siol 2005<br />
Every 6 hours, after suction<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Shaver<br />
72h MV<br />
New ETT<br />
Controls<br />
72h MV
Do not <strong>in</strong>tubate!<br />
<strong>in</strong>tubate <strong>in</strong>tubate!
Non<strong>in</strong>vasive Ventilation and <strong>VAP</strong> Prevention<br />
Essais randomisés<br />
Etudes de cohorte<br />
Brochard, 1995<br />
Kramer, 1995<br />
Antonelli, 1998<br />
Wood, 1998<br />
Confalonieri, 1999<br />
Antonelli, 2000<br />
Nava, 1998<br />
Guér<strong>in</strong>, 1997<br />
Nourd<strong>in</strong>e, 1999<br />
Girou, 2000<br />
Carlucci, 2001<br />
Toutes les études<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50<br />
% de pneumopathies nosocomiales<br />
Girou 2002 (Masson Book)
Non<strong>in</strong>vasive Ventilation and<br />
Nosocomial Infections<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> nosocomial <strong>in</strong>fections<br />
25 CMV (n=50)<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
NP UTI CRI<br />
VNI (n=50)<br />
Girou et al. JAMA 2000
Secular Trends <strong>in</strong> Mortality<br />
and Use <strong>of</strong> NIV<br />
<strong>in</strong> COPD and Severe CPE<br />
Girou et al. JAMA 2003<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1994<br />
(n=39)<br />
NIV use<br />
NIV Use use<br />
NI<br />
Nosocomial<br />
Infections<br />
ICU Mortality<br />
ICU<br />
Mortality<br />
1995<br />
(n=52)<br />
1996<br />
(n=64)<br />
1997<br />
(n=61)<br />
1998<br />
(n=70)<br />
1999<br />
(n=63)<br />
P
What Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Endotracheal Tube?
% d ’utilisation<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Subglottic Secretions Suction<strong>in</strong>g<br />
0<br />
SSD Standard Equal use<br />
France (n=72)<br />
Canada (n=31)<br />
Cook et al. CCM<br />
Oct. 2000<br />
CDC Recommendation 2003
�� Mahul et al. Intensive Intensive Care Care Med Med 1992<br />
– Reduction <strong>VAP</strong> rates: 12,8% vs 29,1%, p 72h (n=150); Intermittent dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />
– Reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>VAP</strong> rates: 6,4% vs 21,3%, p
Patient position
% d ’utilisation<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Semirecumbent Body Position<br />
Semirec Sup<strong>in</strong>e equal use<br />
France (n=72)<br />
Canada (n=31)<br />
Cook et al. CCM<br />
Oct. 2000<br />
CDC Recommendation 2003
Sup<strong>in</strong>e body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia<br />
<strong>in</strong> mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised trial<br />
Drakulovic et al. Lancet. 1999;354:1851-8<br />
1999;354:1851<br />
1999;354:1851-8<br />
45°<br />
5% de PAVM 23% de PAVM<br />
-78%<br />
0°<br />
Drakulovic et al. Lancet 1999
Limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Drakulovic’s Study<br />
�� Documented <strong>VAP</strong>:<br />
– 2/39 vs 11/47: P=0.018<br />
– 3/40 vs 11/47: P=O.O77<br />
�� Semirecumbency was achieved and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> protractors to bedside nurses,<br />
researcher measurements us<strong>in</strong>g a protractor 7–8 7 8 times<br />
per day <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g weekends, trunk position checks<br />
throughout <strong>the</strong> night by on-call on call physicians, notification<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research team about any position change, and<br />
frequent educational <strong>in</strong>-services.<br />
<strong>in</strong> services.
13/112 (10.7%) vs 8/109 (6.5%)<br />
P=0.381<br />
Van Nieuwenhoven et al. CCM 2006
The daily risk <strong>of</strong> <strong>VAP</strong> was reduced <strong>in</strong> both<br />
treatment groups compared with PLAC:<br />
- 65%
Conclusion<br />
��Measures Measures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bundle:<br />
– Non <strong>in</strong>vasive ventilation<br />
– Oral decontam<strong>in</strong>ation with 2% chlorhexid<strong>in</strong>e<br />
– Endotracheal <strong>tube</strong> with microcuff<br />
– Adequate monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> cuff pressure<br />
– Procedures Procedures for for wean<strong>in</strong>g wean<strong>in</strong>g to to limit limit duration duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> MV MV<br />
– Optimal Optimal use use <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> sedation sedation<br />
– Semirecumbent position?<br />
– Subglottic dra<strong>in</strong>age?