01.02.2013 Views

Guru10-spreads

Guru10-spreads

Guru10-spreads

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

#SCIENCE #FOOD #TECHNOLOGY #ART #POLITICS #MIND #MEDIA #HEALTH #SCEPTICISM<br />

ISSN 2048-2590<br />

ISSUE 10•<br />

FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013<br />

MARKS<br />

THE SPOT<br />

A LESSON ABOUT<br />

MACBETH YOU<br />

DIDN’T LEARN AT<br />

SCHOOL<br />

PLUS...<br />

HOW REAL MEN DANCE<br />

FROM PUNK TO PYTHAGORAS<br />

THE SECRET WORLD OF FOOD FLAVOURS


THE GURU TEAM<br />

Stuart Farrimond Editor / Science Guru<br />

realdoctorstu.com @realdoctorstu<br />

Jon Crowe Deputy Editor/ Molecular Guru<br />

@crowe_jon<br />

Ben Veal Media Guru<br />

benvealpr.com @benvealpr<br />

J. N. Lloyd Photographer<br />

jnlloyd@gmail.com<br />

Ian Wildsmith Design Guru<br />

ian@gurumagazine.org<br />

FEATURED IN THIS ISSUE<br />

Anina Mumm<br />

transcriptsc.com @aninja_m<br />

Matt Linsdell Fitness Guru<br />

smart-fit.ca @smartfitmatt<br />

Daryl Ilbury Sceptic Guru<br />

www.darylilbury.com @darylilbury<br />

Artem Cheprasov<br />

Leila Wildsmith Guru Opinions<br />

www.writingonthewall0612.blogspot.co.uk<br />

Kim Lacey Mind Guru<br />

kimberlylacey.com @kimlacey<br />

James Lloyd Physics Guru<br />

thesoftanonymous.com @jbb_lloyd<br />

Toby Brown<br />

Ross Harper @refharper<br />

Simon Makin<br />

Natasha Agabalyan Food Guru<br />

thescienceinformant.com @SciencInformant<br />

Abigail James<br />

aflyinmyprimordialsoup.wordpress.com @_abigailjames<br />

John Ankers<br />

Kathryn Lougheed<br />

germzoo.blogspot.co.uk<br />

Benjamin Chabot-Hanowell<br />

@JohnnyAnkers<br />

Berit Brogaard Guest Contributor<br />

Kristian Marlow Guest Contributor<br />

2013/01–02 ARRIVALS<br />

LOUNGE<br />

GURU 10 • February/March 2013 • ISSN 2048-2590<br />

© 2012 Guru Magazine Ltd.<br />

Guru Magazine Ltd. is a company registered in England & Wales.<br />

Company no. 7683000 • gurumagazine.org<br />

This work is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-<br />

Commercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of<br />

this licence, click the link above or send a letter to Creative Commons,<br />

171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.<br />

Advertising & letters info@gurumagazine.org<br />

Press & marketing enquiries press@gurumagazine.org<br />

The opinions expressed herein are of the individual authors<br />

and do not represent the views of Guru Magazine Ltd.<br />

Text and picture material is sent at the owner’s risk.<br />

Cover images: (X marks the spot) Flickr • disparkys<br />

Follow Guru on Twitter • Like Guru on Facebook<br />

I<br />

think there’s a little bit in all<br />

of us that dreams of being the<br />

best. For some of us it will<br />

be the fantasy of our cooking<br />

prowess being recognized by a<br />

Michelin Star; for others, it will<br />

be the penning of a novel that<br />

sells more than J.K. Rowling.<br />

For me, being a world-famous<br />

surgeon was high up the list. This<br />

ambition was dashed five years<br />

ago when I was diagnosed with a<br />

brain tumour.<br />

Surgeons twice needed to chop<br />

chunks out of my grey matter,<br />

ultimately forcing me to hang<br />

up my stethoscope for good. The<br />

upside of surviving the tumour<br />

has its downsides: I am told I<br />

am now less socially inhibited<br />

– speaking my mind too freely,<br />

and often being landing in hot<br />

water as a result. Brain damage<br />

rarely has a good outcome, but<br />

that’s not always the case: in this<br />

issue we read the story of ‘Jason’,<br />

a beer-swilling womaniser who<br />

was transformed into an artist<br />

and mathematics prodigy after<br />

serious head injury.<br />

Inspiration can also be found<br />

through Fitness Guru Matt<br />

Linsdell’s account of overcoming<br />

sporting injury and James Lloyd’s<br />

guide to dancing. Sceptic Guru<br />

Daryl Ilbury offers a crash course<br />

in dinner-party Latin, and our<br />

Food Guru Natasha Abagalyan<br />

explains how processed food<br />

gets infused with our favourite<br />

flavours.<br />

Read, enjoy – and be inspired.<br />

…<br />

Want to make Guru Magazine<br />

better? Join the Readers’ panel,<br />

complete a survey, and tell us<br />

what you think. We’re offering a<br />

new iPad and some great prizes<br />

for those who do. Find out more<br />

here.<br />

:<br />

Dr. Stu<br />

Your digital sciencelifestyle<br />

magazine.<br />

By you and for you.<br />

Next issue released: 1st April 2013.<br />

Guru is intended to be used for educational<br />

and entertainment purposes only.<br />

Please consult a qualified medical professional<br />

if you have any personal health concerns.<br />

Previous Page: (texture #70) Flickr • Asja., Next Page: (melting snow) Flickr • basic_sounds


CONTENTS<br />

#HUMAN BODY Page 8<br />

5 REASONS NOT TO PREPARE FOR A<br />

ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE<br />

The zombies are coming! The undead have<br />

infected movies, video games and even politics.<br />

South African journalist Anina Mumm comes up<br />

with five good reasons not to get a shotgun – just<br />

yet.<br />

#FITNESS Page 12<br />

TALES FROM THE WATER COOLER:<br />

GETTING THROUGH BACK PAIN<br />

To look at him, you’d consider Fitness Guru and<br />

personal trainer Matt Linsdell to be the pinnacle<br />

of health, with a physique people would pay good<br />

money for. Yet a hidden pain hampers his joie de<br />

vivre. He shares his hurt in the hope that we can<br />

avoid such pain ourselves.<br />

#ASKAGURU Page 15<br />

Every Friday we open up the digital gates to<br />

reader’s questions – both weird and wonderful.<br />

We endeavour to find the best answers and<br />

feature them on our website. Here’s a selection of<br />

some of the best from the last two months.<br />

#HUMAN BODY Page 18<br />

LATIN, AND THE MODUS OPERANDI OF THE<br />

SUPER SCEPTIC<br />

It’s never too late to learn new things. If your Latin<br />

knowledge is nil, then take a look at Sceptic Guru<br />

Daryl Ilbury’s crash course. It won’t just impress<br />

your friends: it could also help you win any<br />

argument!<br />

#GURU OPINIONS Page 22<br />

OF CAPITAL IMPORTANCE<br />

Why can’t kids spell? Leila Wildsmith wags her<br />

teacher’s finger at the media. It worries her<br />

because if we don’t understand language, we<br />

don’t really understand ourselves.<br />

#MIND Page 24<br />

OUT, DAMNED SPOT! THE MACBETH EFFECT<br />

A soak in the bath can wash away all manner of<br />

stresses. But a guilty conscience? Mind Guru Kim<br />

Lacey reports on how – subconsciously – regret<br />

makes us compelled to wash – remarkably, even<br />

after just playing video games.<br />

#LIFE Page 28<br />

STRIKE A POSE<br />

Michael Jackson liked to ‘Shake his Body’ and<br />

Billy Idol would ’Dance on his Own’. Lady Gaga<br />

says ‘Just Dance’. Few men can La Bomba like<br />

Ricky Martin, but Guru’s resident groovster James<br />

Lloyd explains how a guy’s dance floor grind can<br />

wow the women.<br />

#NEWS Page 32<br />

REPORTING THE NEWS YOU PROBABLY<br />

MISSED…<br />

Guru’s writers give a roundup of some interesting<br />

and quirky developments that didn’t make it into<br />

the popular press.<br />

#GUREVIEWS Page 36<br />

SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE: THE GAME<br />

A mobile app that explains your subconscious –<br />

from playing a game? Sounds like it could be fun,<br />

but Kim Lacey isn’t impressed…<br />

#FOOD Page 37<br />

THE CHEMISTRY OF WEIRD-TASTING FOOD<br />

In between the bread and milk, supermarket<br />

shelves are becoming populated by some very<br />

weird foods. Food Guru Natasha Agabalyan finds<br />

out what goes into making her banoffee pieflavoured<br />

yoghurt.<br />

#GENETICS Page 41<br />

THE FUTURE’S BRIGHT: CONSUMER<br />

GENETICS IS HERE<br />

It’s a safe bet a Tarot card reader won’t give you<br />

a reliable prediction of the future – but ‘buy your<br />

own’ genetic testing promises to be a crystal ball<br />

for your health. Abigail James asks whether you<br />

really want to know.<br />

#HEALTH Page 43<br />

YOUR GUTS FOR GLORY<br />

We all want to do something for humanity – but<br />

poo-ing into a pot? Simon Makin puts a peg on<br />

his nose…<br />

#TECHNOLOGY Page 46<br />

WANT TO BUILD THE PERFECT<br />

SMARTPHONE?<br />

Dropped calls, frozen screens, disappearing<br />

contacts: it can make you want to throw your<br />

smartphone in the bath. Doctor John Ankers<br />

looks to alternative sources for inspiration to solve<br />

mobile frustrations.<br />

#MIND Page 49<br />

ALICE IN WONDERLAND SYNDROME:<br />

WHEN REALITY GOES DOWN THE RABBIT-<br />

HOLE<br />

Kat Lougheed had an odd childhood: reality<br />

would distort and twist, making her feel the size<br />

of a hobbit. Alice in Wonderland Syndrome is truly<br />

bizarre – but helps us understand the mind of an<br />

anorexic.<br />

#LIFE Page 52<br />

LAST MINUTE SHOPPERS ARE NICER<br />

PEOPLE<br />

Hoping to get something special for Valentines?<br />

Benjamin Chabot-Hanowell recommends that you<br />

shouldn’t give your beloved too much advance<br />

warning of what you want - or those roses might<br />

turn out to be a bunch of chrysanthemums.<br />

#LIFE Page 56<br />

HEAD-BEATING TRANSFORMS TEENAGE<br />

SLOB INTO CREATIVE VIRTUOSO<br />

Guest writers Kristian Marlow and Dr Brogaard<br />

tell the real-life story of Jason, who underwent a<br />

miraculous change after a brutal mugging.<br />

#DEPARTURE LOUNGE Page 61<br />

#THE GURU STORY SO FAR... Page 62<br />

#THE EVOLUTION OF CUTLERY Page 63


#HUMAN BODY<br />

5 REASONS NOT TO<br />

PREPARE FOR A ZOMBIE<br />

APOCALYPSE<br />

ANINA MUMM<br />

5 REASONS NOT TO PREPARE FOR A ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE<br />

Once, not too long ago, a zombie<br />

apocalypse was just a daydream. Now<br />

though, the living dead are all the rage,<br />

with zombie-fever having spawned<br />

dozens of movies, video games and<br />

books. But some people are taking it<br />

a little too far. Anina Mumm explains<br />

why we should cast out all fear of the<br />

shuffling dead. At least for the time<br />

being…<br />

Gun sales in America are booming as Patriots<br />

everywhere empty their favourite zombie<br />

cartridges at life-size zombie targets – all in<br />

practice for their bloody zombie doom. For inspiration,<br />

they watch The Walking Dead, and<br />

then flip the channel to Discovery’s Zombie<br />

Apocalypse to learn more about how to shoot<br />

‘em in the head.<br />

This time we can’t just laugh and say “Only in<br />

America!”People worldwide are taking this zombie<br />

thing just a little too seriously. Australian<br />

Prime Minister, Julie Gillard, even namechecked<br />

zombies as a cause of the impending<br />

apocalypse (in a tongue-in-cheek kind of way).<br />

So should we be worried? In short: no. A basic<br />

biology lesson should convince you that life is<br />

for the living:<br />

The circulatory system<br />

If zombies are dead, they don’t have a heartbeat.<br />

Without a pulse, blood cannot be pumped<br />

around the body.<br />

Blood transports oxygen, blood cells, glucose,<br />

minerals and hormones to where they are<br />

needed in the body. Even zombies, who must<br />

retain some of their former biology, can’t survive<br />

without such things. The blood system ties<br />

together all the other systems, and so without<br />

it nothing in the body would work. In other<br />

words, this article could really end here. But, for<br />

argument’s sake, let’s pretend…<br />

The immune system<br />

Zombies have pale, smelly and oozy skin. This<br />

is because they are dead and dead things rot.<br />

Rotting happens when bacteria, maggots and<br />

all sorts of other bugs start to infest and feed<br />

on the body. One of the reasons this doesn’t<br />

happen to your lively self is because you have<br />

an immune system.<br />

So if zombies had this vital system they would<br />

not rot at all, and so would lose that winning,<br />

wormy smile. Instead, they would lack the<br />

white blood cells needed to fight infection.<br />

So save your bullets, because their own decay<br />

should finish them off before you can say “Ew,<br />

get it off me!”<br />

The digestive system<br />

According to the internet, and psychiatristcum-zombie-expert<br />

Dr Steven Scholzman,<br />

the most feasible way to kill and then re-animate<br />

a person is through a viral infection.<br />

Some say such a virus would cause the hypo-<br />

PAGE 9 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: Image courtesy Jay Caboz Copyright 2012, (He Sees Me) Flickr • My name is Randy,<br />

(How to Survive a Zombie Attack, by Acey Duecy) Flickr • Hryck.


Image courtesy Jay Caboz Copyright 2012<br />

5 REASONS NOT TO PREPARE FOR A ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE<br />

thalamus, the part of the brain that controls basic<br />

bodily functions, to develop a zombie’s taste<br />

for humans through the primal urge of hunger.<br />

Your ‘primal brain’ also controls your appetite,<br />

of course, but somehow when you become undead<br />

your brain would drive you to cannibalism.<br />

Really? Even if you were vegetarian?<br />

They also say this virus would change the zombie’s<br />

DNA so that it would no longer need energy<br />

from food. When you eat food, enzymes,<br />

acids and bacteria in your gut break it down into<br />

smaller pieces that, with the help of hormones<br />

like insulin, are absorbed by the body and used<br />

for energy. A very large number of genes control<br />

this complicated process of turning meat into<br />

movement, thoughts and, yes, even farts.<br />

Is it really likely then that a zombie-virus could<br />

rewrite the human recipe contained in DNA to<br />

such an extent that it would develop an entirely<br />

new way of getting energy without food, gut<br />

bacteria or metabolic hormones? I’ll let you answer<br />

that.<br />

The musculoskeletal system<br />

Speaking of meat and movement,the jerky advances<br />

of the un-dead must be powered by their<br />

muscles. Even if zombie muscles could get en-<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 10<br />

ergy from that amazingly unlikely new DNA<br />

recipe, they still wouldn’t work.<br />

Muscles need very specific amounts of minerals<br />

like calcium, potassium, phosphates and sodium<br />

chloride (that’s table salt to you and me).<br />

You should get these from your normal diet<br />

and they control how your intricate muscle<br />

fibres contract and relax to give you balance<br />

and movement. What’s more, without oxygen<br />

(from the blood) muscles would stiffen as rigor<br />

mortis sets in. If the zombies don’t eat ... and<br />

they don’t pop vitamin pills ... and their blood<br />

doesn’t flow ... how could they stagger so?<br />

Temperature and pH<br />

Some say that a zombie’s body temperature is<br />

higher than a human’s. It just so happens that<br />

every protein in the human body, including<br />

hormones, enzymes (proteins that make the<br />

chemical reactions in our body happen as they<br />

should) and antibodies (molecules used by the<br />

immune system to attack microbes and other<br />

alien invaders), work perfectly at 37 degrees<br />

Celsius. At lower temperatures (which arise, say,<br />

in the case of death) proteins can work, but very<br />

slowly. At higher temperatures, they become<br />

distorted and stop working. So unless this virus<br />

5 REASONS NOT TO PREPARE FOR A ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE<br />

can cause proteins to work at different temperatures,<br />

zombies won’t, unfortunately, end up in<br />

your cross-hair.<br />

The acidity of the body (its pH) also affects how<br />

well proteins can function. Death has this uncanny<br />

way of totally disrupting the body’s acid<br />

balance, which is normally kept in check by the<br />

respiratory and urinary systems. In other<br />

words, when you stop breathing and peeing to<br />

get rid of carbon dioxide and waste, your body’s<br />

pH changes and your proteins malfunction.<br />

The Real Zombie Virus<br />

It might be worth a mention that a zombie<br />

virus in itself is not altogether far-fetched. Viruses<br />

can definitely mutate DNA and can be<br />

spread through biting. What is far-fetched is<br />

the idea that a virus could recode DNA to such<br />

an extent that a corpse could survive rotting,<br />

convert to cannibalism, get energy without eating,<br />

move without minerals and function at a<br />

different temperature and pH.<br />

To put it simply, zombie biology just wouldn’t<br />

work, so you really can stop preparing for that<br />

apocalypse. Wrap your head in aluminium foil<br />

instead - because the aliens are coming...<br />

Extra reading:<br />

• A Harvard Psychiatrist Explains Zombie<br />

Neurobiology<br />

• Psychiatrist Steven Schlozman analyzes<br />

what makes the undead tick<br />

• From Voodoo to Viruses: The Evolution<br />

of the Zombie in Twentieth Century<br />

Popular Culture<br />

• The Undead Report<br />

• Zombie Biology<br />

And a few serious journal articles:<br />

• Munz, P., Hudea, I., Imad, J. and<br />

Smith?, R.J. (2009) ‘When Zombies<br />

Attack!: Mathematical Modelling Of<br />

An Outbreak Of Zombie Infection’,<br />

Infectious Disease Modelling Research<br />

Progress, pp. 133-150.<br />

• Ragan, S.M. (2005) ‘Etiology of Remoero-Fulci<br />

Disease: The Case for Prions’,<br />

J. Zom. Sci., vol. 6, pp. 1519-1523.<br />

• Smith, R. (2009) ‘A report on the zombie<br />

outbreak of 2009: how mathematics<br />

can save us (no, really)’, CMAJ, vol.<br />

181, no. 12, pp. E297-E300.<br />

• Stanley, D. (2012) ‘The nurses’ role<br />

in the prevention of Solanum infection:<br />

dealing with a zombie epidemic’,<br />

J. Clin. Nurs., vol. 21, no. 11-12, pp.<br />

1606-13.<br />

Anina Mumm is a biochemist/journalist by training. She runs Transcript, a science<br />

communication company specialising in writing, editing, infographics, social media and<br />

photos. She is also an executive member of the South African Science Journalists’<br />

Association. In her spare time she dabbles in data journalism and nurtures her<br />

addictions to food, the gym, social media and the colour purple. Anina fights ignorance<br />

on twitter as @aninja_m.<br />

PAGE 11 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Model of a Virus) Flickr • eviltomthai


#FITNESS<br />

GETTING THROUGH<br />

BACK PAIN<br />

TALES FROM THE WATER COOLER<br />

MATT LINSDELL • FITNESS GURU<br />

Chronic pain can be a terrible, distressing<br />

affliction. Is there ever a time<br />

when you need to eschew evidencebased<br />

treatments in favour of alternative<br />

relief, or rely on the adage that<br />

time is a great healer? Fitness Guru<br />

Matt Linsdell reflects on his own agonising<br />

lessons.<br />

In 2008 I developed tremendous back pain. The<br />

pain travelled down my left leg and restricted my<br />

normal daily activities. After several months, it<br />

had begun to diminish when, one day, I was out<br />

running and it appeared again. In fact, the pain<br />

came on so strongly it felt as if I had been shot<br />

with an arrow.<br />

My girlfriend forced me to take a bath with<br />

eucalyptus-scented Epsom salts. For the record,<br />

there is no scientific evidence that Epsom salts<br />

do anything other than make the bath water<br />

salty. And now I hate the smell of eucalyptus.<br />

Despite my girlfriend’s loving efforts, the pain<br />

persisted and so I finally went to a walk-in clinic.<br />

The attending doctor referred me to an orthopaedic<br />

surgeon – setting the wheels of the<br />

Canadian healthcare system in motion. Full of<br />

jokes, the surgeon examined me thoroughly. He<br />

explained that one of the inter-vertebral discs<br />

low down in my back had bulged and cracked,<br />

and now its juicy centre (known as the ‘nucleus’)<br />

was compressing the nerve root in my<br />

spine – hence the pain down my leg. Not really<br />

a laughing matter.<br />

I was destined for the Vancouver Spine Clinic.<br />

However, before the surgical consultation finished,<br />

the jovial surgeon lowered his voice and<br />

his face took on a very serious expression:<br />

“Matthew, if your symptoms become worse – if<br />

you have any loss of control of your bladder –<br />

then you must go to the emergency room immediately.<br />

It is possible that the nerve in your<br />

back could become irreparably damaged. If that<br />

happens you will never have control of your<br />

bowels again and you will never have an erection<br />

again.” Things got real for me right then.<br />

It became clear that this injury, although common,<br />

was more than a mere inconvenience – for<br />

me or my girlfriend.<br />

Pain? Wait until the surgeons get<br />

hold of you<br />

Several consultations and a CT scan later, I was<br />

offered both surgery and a ‘nerve root block’ – a<br />

GETTING THROUGH BACK PAIN<br />

steroid injection into the nerve that is causing<br />

the pain. Neither was a prospect I fancied: you<br />

don’t really want to mess around with sharp<br />

objects when the spinal cord is involved. I opted<br />

for the less risky nerve root block first. To<br />

make sure the needle goes into the right spot,<br />

the docs use X-ray imaging. Which is comforting<br />

to know.<br />

It hurt. Only for a few seconds – but during<br />

those seconds it felt like a fire hose was under<br />

the skin of my back leg. And the hose was<br />

turned on full blast. I endured it, but my symptoms<br />

persisted.<br />

Back to normal: the long road<br />

Months later I went for the surgery – a procedure<br />

called a discectomy (basically cutting out<br />

a bit of the broken vertebral disc). My recovery<br />

after the operation was slow and I still experienced<br />

some pain down the back of my left leg<br />

– although thankfully less than previously. 18<br />

months had passed from the time of my first<br />

symptoms to the day of the operation – and I<br />

learnt that when a nerve is aggravated continuously<br />

for this long it becomes hyper–sensitive.<br />

So even though the pressure on the spinal nerve<br />

had been relieved, it continued to send pain signals.<br />

In my case I had low-level ongoing pain. I<br />

was lucky. For some people the pain is continuous<br />

and extreme. My sister’s ex-boyfriend was<br />

one of the unlucky ones. Tragically, he committed<br />

suicide because he couldn’t bear the agony.<br />

What I want to stress is that some injuries to<br />

nerves, if dealt with in a rapid manner, can have<br />

much better outcomes. Through my experience<br />

as a personal trainer, I know people who have<br />

had the same injury as me, with the same surgical<br />

intervention, and their recovery was complete.<br />

This may have because they only waited<br />

weeks, rather than months, before seeking<br />

help. Maybe they are just the lucky ones.<br />

Avoid the quacks<br />

‘Non-Specific’ Lower Back Pain is a catch-all<br />

term used by medics for this very common malady.<br />

Doctors all over the world see people with<br />

it every day and often it resolves naturally: the<br />

pain restricts what you can do, you take it easy,<br />

and so it goes away. The symptoms commonly<br />

occur when the pain is from over-stressed muscles,<br />

rather than nerves. Because these problems<br />

are so common, and often get better over<br />

time, they offer ripe pickings for quackery and<br />

odd therapies.<br />

PAGE 13 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: (X-ray) Flickr • planetc1


GETTING THROUGH BACK PAIN<br />

Confusion arises when muscular back pain is<br />

‘treated’ and then gets better. Most people will<br />

attribute their recovery to their treatment –<br />

whatever it was. This leads many victims to the<br />

‘logical fallacy’ Post Hoc Ergo Proctor Hoc – translated<br />

‘After therefore because of’. (Check out<br />

Sceptic Guru’s (Daryl Ilbury) excellent guide to<br />

logical fallacies on page 18).<br />

When you are in pain you feel desperate. I know.<br />

You are prepared to try anything – and if you<br />

try something and notice a lessening of your<br />

pain, you sing the praises of the treatment and<br />

declare it to be a cure. Everyone is susceptible<br />

to this tendency because this is a part of human<br />

nature. All manner of quack nostrums have<br />

arisen because of this – with sensible-sounding<br />

claims of being able to cure back pain.<br />

I’ll stay humble: maybe your treatment did help,<br />

but maybe it didn’t. Time tends to heal most issues.<br />

And time is what passes after we swallow a<br />

pill, have a massage, get our backs cracked, stick<br />

dozens of little needles in our skin or rub stinky<br />

balms all over our body. All these ‘treatments’<br />

have something in common: the passage of<br />

time.<br />

I was fortunate to make a good recovery, but my<br />

pain lingers like a drill sergeant. If I do everything<br />

by the book, it won’t bother me. As soon<br />

as I stop following the advice given at the Spine<br />

Clinic, the pain flares up like that in-your-face<br />

shout-fest popularized by American war movies.<br />

It should be noted that not all shooting lower<br />

back (or ‘sciatic nerve pain’) requires surgery.<br />

But by sharing my story I hope to impart some<br />

knowledge to all Guru readers about a condition<br />

that is very common. This article is a recollection<br />

of experiences, not medical advice.<br />

My hope is for you to think critically about<br />

whatever course of action you take. Is your chosen<br />

remedy likely to be a placebo, or is there<br />

evidence to support that it works? Did you get<br />

better because of the treatment or did enough<br />

time pass that it went away on its own? Is your<br />

condition serious enough to merit a trip to an<br />

orthopaedic surgeon or will a few days of kicking<br />

back with a TV remote fix you up? Let my<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 14<br />

story ring in your ears next time you feel a stifling<br />

pain in your back. I sought out evidencebased<br />

medical science. I didn’t want just to feel<br />

better – I wanted to be fixed. And if I had to do<br />

it all over I would do the same again, only sooner.<br />

And I’d skip that nerve root block. Damn<br />

that hurt.<br />

THE ‘RED FLAGS’<br />

There are several warning signs<br />

that may mean back pain is caused<br />

by a serious condition. Immediate<br />

medical help should be sought if you<br />

experience:<br />

• a fever of 38ºC (100.4ºF) or<br />

above<br />

• unexplained weight loss<br />

• swelling of the back<br />

• constant back pain that does<br />

not ease after lying down<br />

• pain in your chest or high up<br />

in your back<br />

• pain down your legs and below<br />

the knees<br />

• pain caused by a recent trauma<br />

or injury to your back<br />

• loss of bladder control<br />

• inability to pass urine<br />

• loss of bowel control<br />

• numbness around your genitals,<br />

buttocks or back passage<br />

• pain that is worse at night<br />

(From NHS Back Pain advice)<br />

Matthew Linsdell has a degree in Environmental Science and is a certified personal<br />

trainer. He calls himself an evidence-based trainer, as training is a field littered with<br />

well-disguised pseudoscience. He owns a small exercise facility in Ottawa, Ontario<br />

where the emphasis is on teaching the biology behind the exercise – you find can out<br />

more at smart-fit.ca<br />

ASK A<br />

GURU<br />

Ever had one of those questions that really bugs<br />

you? Us too! Well here’s some most excellent news:<br />

every Friday our team of Gurus will be accepting<br />

your questions about (pretty much) anything –<br />

health, nutrition, psychology, space… or life!<br />

To ask a question, simply post it on our Facebook<br />

wall or tweet it to @GuruMag with the<br />

hashtag #AskAGuru on any Friday. We also<br />

accept questions via email.<br />

If a man has gender reassignment surgery will<br />

he suffer ‘phantom limb’ type feelings?<br />

Sent via twitter<br />

Phantom limb syndrome is the sensation of a body<br />

part being present even after it has been amputated.<br />

A most peculiar condition, the amputee can find the<br />

absent limb feeling very real and even as if it can be<br />

moved and manipulated. It’s a surprisingly common<br />

syndrome and can be extremely painful for many: an<br />

amputated hand may feel as if it is clenched and the<br />

fingernails are digging into the palm.<br />

The reasons for phantom limb sensations are unclear<br />

but they are thought to be due to the way the brain is<br />

‘hard-wired’ for all its body parts: a region within the<br />

parietal brain lobe (the top of the head) has a ‘map’<br />

for receiving sensations from different body regions.<br />

When a body part is removed, this – now redundant –<br />

brain segment ‘creates’ an image of the missing body<br />

part from other bodily sensations. It isn’t imagined<br />

– the feelings are just as real as when the body was<br />

whole.<br />

Answered by Dr Stu (Science Guru)<br />

Our diverse team of writers and Gurus will research<br />

and find you the answer. If we can’t, then we’ll<br />

hunt down an expert who can. It might take us<br />

a few days to find the answer, but we will do our<br />

best!<br />

See the full list of questions answered so far on our<br />

website. Here’s a selection of some of the best:<br />

Gender reassignment<br />

involves (obviously)<br />

the removal of body<br />

parts. For men, the<br />

penis (although not<br />

a ‘limb’) seems to be<br />

vulnerable to the same<br />

problem as for arms,<br />

hands, legs and feet.<br />

60% of transsexual<br />

men experience<br />

phantom ‘limb’ feelings<br />

for the absent genitalia<br />

after surgery. And not<br />

just men are affected:<br />

women commonly feel<br />

‘phantom’ breasts after<br />

a mastectomy.<br />

PAGE 15 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Male/Female) Flickr • © O de Andrade


(More Presents!) Flickr • MissMessie, (Sausages) Flickr • Paul Keller<br />

ASK A GURU<br />

Why does my atheist brother-in-law complain when<br />

his son refuses to believe in Father Christmas?<br />

Asked by @Christomill via twitter<br />

I have given this much thought because there are<br />

three ways of approaching the issue of challenging<br />

personal beliefs: by tip-toeing daintily through the<br />

tulips, bashing through the obstruction with a frontend<br />

loader, or – my personal favourite – obliterating<br />

the tulips with the front-end loader. I’m going to have<br />

to take the first route, because ideally as a science<br />

journalist I’d need to interview all parties before<br />

throwing any light on the matter; and besides, there<br />

are some sensitive issues at stake here.<br />

Firstly, I have to assume that your atheist brotherin-law<br />

doesn’t believe in Father Christmas either.<br />

That makes sense because the character doesn’t exist<br />

outside of folklore, and even then, in such apparently<br />

diverse forms as to render reports of him untenable<br />

as proof. Besides, in order to deliver as many presents<br />

as needed in a single night (even to only the good<br />

children), would require Father Christmas (and his<br />

reindeer) to do some interesting things with the laws<br />

Answered by Daryl Ilbury (Sceptic Guru)<br />

What is Sausage Skin Made of?<br />

Asked by Heather Young<br />

Oh boy. Those of you who are squeamish and want<br />

to ensure you continue to enjoy sausages better look<br />

away now as there are two answers – and one of them<br />

isn’t pretty.<br />

Sausage skins are also known as ‘casings’. It used to<br />

be the case that all sausage skins were made from the<br />

intestines of animals – cows, pigs, sheep, and so on.<br />

Yep, the stuff that digests food and makes faeces – the<br />

intestines – are used to encase the ground meat you so<br />

thoroughly enjoy.<br />

However, it’s not that simple. Your intestines, and<br />

those of the mammals you most likely eat, are made of<br />

four layers. Sausage casings are made from the second<br />

layer from the inside, called the submucosa. Somewhat<br />

reassuringly, this tough layer has never been in contact<br />

with the animal’s poo. During processing, the other<br />

layers are stripped off and the submucosa is then<br />

cleaned and used for the sausage casings.<br />

Answered by Artem Cheprasov<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 16<br />

of physics (see The Physics of Santa)<br />

Secondly, I also have to assume that because the son<br />

has been brought up in a home where at least one<br />

the parents is an atheist, he has been encouraged to<br />

employ critical reasoning. He has therefore come to<br />

the logical conclusion that Father Christmas doesn’t<br />

exist. This means that – unlike his peers who have<br />

been encouraged to believe in nonsense – he won’t<br />

grow up to believe in horoscopes and homeopathy.<br />

The logical answer to your question is therefore<br />

simple… it’s love (altogether now, 1…2…3…”aaaah!”)<br />

I can imagine that your brother-in-law doesn’t want<br />

to risk his son being prejudiced by his peers (and<br />

their judgemental<br />

parents) by running<br />

around and telling<br />

everyone that Father<br />

Christmas doesn’t<br />

exist.<br />

Now, for those of you about to vomit at the thought<br />

of all of this, don’t despair. New technological<br />

developments have allowed the development of<br />

artificial casings.<br />

These artificial<br />

casings can either be<br />

made from natural<br />

substances, like the<br />

hide of a cow, or from<br />

cotton. Finally, truly<br />

artificial casings can<br />

be made from plastic.<br />

Only one question<br />

remains: how long<br />

will this ‘tasty’<br />

information keep<br />

you from eating<br />

your next juicy<br />

submucosal sausage?<br />

I have noticed that some products (such as Soy Milk)<br />

state a warning that it should be consumed within 4<br />

days after being opened. How accurate is this?<br />

Asked by Julio Vazquez via Facebook<br />

‘Best before’ and ‘use by’ dates are used on different<br />

types of food. ‘Use by’ dates relate to perishable foods,<br />

which can ‘go off’ easily (like dairy products and meat).<br />

The ‘use by’ date indicates the latest date on which the<br />

food is definitely safe to eat (if stored correctly, that is:<br />

don’t expect milk to be any good on its use by date if<br />

it’s been left out of the fridge all day).<br />

‘Best before’ dates are used for foods with a longer life<br />

than perishable goods – things like cookies and cakes.<br />

This date indicates how long you can expect the food<br />

to remain at its best quality. Such foods are typically<br />

still safe to eat after their best before date, but may<br />

just not be quite so pleasing on the palate. Not good<br />

unless you like stale-tasting muffins.<br />

Turning to things like soya milk, it’s generally best to<br />

heed the advice given on the packaging. Some things<br />

– like milk – may look and smell fine, even well after<br />

their use-by date, but that doesn’t mean it hasn’t<br />

become contaminated with some lurking bug or other<br />

since you opened it. As a UK Food Safety expert<br />

Answered by Jon Crowe (Molecular Guru)<br />

explains “It’s tempting just to give your food a sniff<br />

to see if you think it’s gone off, but food bugs like E.<br />

coli and salmonella don’t cause food to smell ‘off’ even<br />

when they may have grown to dangerous levels.” So<br />

food could look and smell fine but still be harmful.<br />

In short, ‘use by’ dates aren’t just produced as a result<br />

of guesswork, but<br />

rather as the result of<br />

careful testing. You<br />

can read more about<br />

the science behind<br />

‘use by’ dates here.<br />

Incidentally, US soya<br />

milk manufacturers<br />

state that their<br />

products remain<br />

fresh for between<br />

7 and 10 days, as<br />

reported here.<br />

There’s plenty more where they came from.<br />

Here are some corkers:<br />

• Could you make someone love you by dosing them with<br />

‘love’ hormones?<br />

• How true to real life forensics is CSI?<br />

• Why can’t women read maps? Why can’t men shop?<br />

• Do pets get mental health disorders?<br />

• Why don’t babies lose their voice from screaming?<br />

ASK A GURU<br />

• Is Sheldon Cooper or Leslie Winkle from TV’s The Big Bang<br />

Theory right?<br />

PAGE 17 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Fridge) Flickr • Ollie Crafoord


#SCEPTICISM<br />

LATIN, AND THE MODUS<br />

OPERANDI OF THE<br />

SUPER SCEPTIC<br />

HOW TO WIN ARGUMENTS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE<br />

DARYL ILBURY • SCEPTIC GURU<br />

RIGHT:<br />

A tablet with<br />

a 5th century<br />

Latin inscription<br />

located in the<br />

Colosseum in<br />

Rome.<br />

LATIN, AND THE MODUS OPERANDI OF THE SUPER SCEPTIC<br />

English is rapidly becoming the lingua<br />

franca of scientific communication,<br />

allowing scientists the world over to<br />

share their ideas and discoveries. But<br />

English is not the only language to<br />

empower scientists, and give voice<br />

to scientific reason. It’s ironic that<br />

one of the most powerful tools for<br />

debunking both pseudoscience and<br />

those superstitions rooted in archaic<br />

thinking is itself thousands of years<br />

old. So what is this language? Our<br />

Sceptic Guru, Daryl Ilbury, has the<br />

answer: it’s Latin.<br />

Don’t laugh and roll your eyes. It’s easy to<br />

dismiss Latin as a ‘dead’ language, particularly<br />

given that it’s no longer the official language<br />

of any country. However, not only is it still<br />

used, but it also remains the bedrock of several<br />

cornerstones of modern civilisation – most<br />

notably law and medicine. And for this reason<br />

it evokes strength and authority.<br />

It’s also impressive. Whip out the odd Latin<br />

phrase in polite discourse, especially with a<br />

dash of restrained ceremony, and it has the<br />

same impact as George Clooney announcing<br />

at a ladies’ book club that he also has a PhD<br />

in astrophysics: discussion suddenly stops and<br />

everyone pauses to ponder what’s just been<br />

said, invariably with at least an eyebrow cocked.<br />

So here are some handy Latin phrases to<br />

keep tucked into your sceptic tool belt, and<br />

explanations of how to use them in situations<br />

drenched in superstition and pseudoscience:<br />

The dinner party scenario: ‘How I<br />

got pregnant…’<br />

You’re at a dinner party and a woman claims<br />

that she is finally pregnant after months of<br />

trying, and it’s all because – on the advice of<br />

an aunt – she and her husband made love<br />

with a potato under the bed. After everyone<br />

has smiled and nodded, you lean forward and<br />

say wistfully: “Aaah – the classic post hoc ergo<br />

propter hoc fallacy”. When everyone looks at you<br />

with raised eyebrows you explain – with mild<br />

surprise that they obviously didn’t get it – it<br />

means ‘after this therefore because of this’.<br />

This is a commonly-used line of reasoning<br />

employed by peddlers of pseudoscience and<br />

superstitions, which basically goes like this: if<br />

B follows A then A must have caused B. This<br />

is ridiculous because it assumes coincidence<br />

is causation. Example: after successive games<br />

without scoring, a footballer dons a new pair of<br />

underpants when getting into his kit, and later<br />

scores a goal. Ergo, the new pair of underpants<br />

must have been responsible.<br />

PAGE 19 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: (People) Flickr • Ed Yourdon, (Tablet) Wikimedia • Wknight94, (Pregnant Woman) Flickr • mahalie


(Crystal Ball) Flickr • garryknight<br />

LATIN, AND THE MODUS OPERANDI OF THE SUPER SCEPTIC<br />

The argument erupts<br />

After hearing your explanation for the above<br />

pregnancy, the women in the room angrily<br />

snap, “What do you know? You’re stupid!” To<br />

this you raise a finger and say, “I see now you’re<br />

resorting to an ad hominem argument”. This<br />

means ‘to the man’ and refers to the act of saying<br />

something is wrong based purely on a – usually<br />

irrelevant – judgment of that person. This tactic<br />

is generally employed by people who cannot<br />

provide evidence to support their argument,<br />

so resort instead to attacking the person with<br />

whom they are arguing – because they are an<br />

atheist, or because they support Manchester<br />

City, for example.<br />

The office scenario: ‘Check out my<br />

magic crystal…’<br />

To some degree, this is the flip side of the<br />

women’s outburst. Someone in the office<br />

shows you a crystal they believe contains magic<br />

powers, and they rub it every day because,<br />

according to them, it will bring them good luck.<br />

They ‘know’ this to be so because the crystal<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 20<br />

was given to them by a friend of theirs who<br />

has traveled extensively throughout the world<br />

and is therefore very wise. Latin has a handy<br />

warning for moments such as this: nullius in<br />

verba – take nobody’s word for it. It is the motto<br />

of the Royal Society, and is explained thus: “It<br />

is an expression of the determination of Fellows<br />

to withstand the domination of authority and<br />

to verify all statements by an appeal to facts<br />

determined by experiment.”<br />

At the gym<br />

A friend shows you their new ‘Quantum<br />

Electro-Therapy’ bracelet that supposedly<br />

aligns the ‘geomagnetic arterial essences’ in<br />

their body. After finally composing yourself and<br />

wiping away the tears, you explain it’s a load of<br />

pseudoscientific rubbish. Clearly upset, they<br />

challenge you by saying: “How can you say that?<br />

I see a lot of people wearing them.” That’s when<br />

you slowly shake your head, smile and say, “Oh<br />

Bob, you’re a victim of the ad populum fallacy.<br />

The belief that something being popular is a<br />

reason for accepting it as true.”<br />

In the doctor’s waiting room<br />

A friend says they’ve decided to seek the<br />

help of a homeopath because “they’ve tried<br />

everything” that their doctor has prescribed,<br />

apparently without success. The Latin phrase<br />

for this ridiculous leap of logic is a non sequitur,<br />

meaning ‘does not follow’. Just because one<br />

doctor hasn’t successfully diagnosed or treated<br />

an ailment doesn’t mean that a homeopath will.<br />

At church<br />

You hear of someone who is denying their child<br />

medical attention because they believe some<br />

form of divine intervention will cure them.<br />

Their belief is based solely on faith, but the<br />

scientist in you knows this will place the health<br />

of the child at risk. You slowly shake your head,<br />

and say sadly, “Credo quia absurdum” (“I believe<br />

because it is absurd”). This is the seemingly<br />

paradoxical justification employed by those<br />

who believe that reason and faith are hostile to<br />

each other and that faith is superior at arriving<br />

at particular truths.<br />

So make a note of these phrases. Maybe even<br />

keep them in your mobile phone. And when the<br />

occasion arises (and if there’s one thing we know<br />

for sure it’s that superstition and pseudoscience<br />

remain ever popular) you’ll know what to do.<br />

LATIN, AND THE MODUS OPERANDI OF THE SUPER SCEPTIC<br />

Bitten by the Latin bug?<br />

Keen to impress your friends and family<br />

with your newfound linguistic skills?<br />

Then try these:<br />

Argumentum ad lapidem<br />

When someone simply dismisses your<br />

argument as being absurd, without<br />

providing any evidence thereof.<br />

Example: “Evolution? What a load<br />

of rubbish!”<br />

Argumentum ad baculum<br />

When someone threatens you in order<br />

to change your belief.<br />

Contra principia negantem<br />

non est disputandum<br />

A last resort. It means ‘against one who<br />

denies the principles, there can be no<br />

debate’. It should be directed at someone<br />

who rejects all logical principles of<br />

science. It is therefore fruitless to enter<br />

into any kind of discussion with them.<br />

Argumentum ad nauseum<br />

When someone says the same thing<br />

over and over again in an attempt<br />

to establish it as true, as opposed to<br />

providing proof thereof.<br />

Homo homini lupus est<br />

Which means ‘man is a wolf<br />

to his fellow man’. To be used<br />

sagaciously when witness to the<br />

horrors man often inflicts upon<br />

others, often in the name of some<br />

authority – for example, should<br />

some cult leader encourage his<br />

followers to do something that<br />

could result in their injury or<br />

demise.<br />

Daryl Ilbury is a multi-award winning broadcaster and op-ed columnist based in<br />

South Africa. He has a passion for science that has burned since he was a child. You can<br />

see an archive of his work on his website www.darylilbury.com or follow him on<br />

Twitter at @darylilbury.<br />

PAGE 21 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU


URU OPINIONS<br />

Of Capital Importance: why can’t<br />

people write properly anymore?<br />

As an English teacher, one of my pet-hates is<br />

the use of lower case letters instead of capitals.<br />

In 30 of my pupils’ books, I will see an average<br />

of 29 that are missing capital letters – at<br />

the start of sentences, for the date – even for<br />

a child’s own name. It seems as if they are not<br />

familiar with the concept of capital letters at all.<br />

In a world that is increasingly doing away with<br />

capitalisation, can we really blame them? Is culture,<br />

and specifically the media, responsible for<br />

this increasing illiteracy?<br />

In previous years, the decrease in ‘correct’ (or<br />

standard) spellings and grammar was blamed<br />

on the increased use of texting and Instant<br />

Messaging. A relaxed style of communicating,<br />

prompted by limited text message length (historically<br />

160 characters) seemed to encourage<br />

a more informal style of language. However,<br />

today’s smart phones (which many of us now<br />

own) have no such message length restriction<br />

and will automatically correct both spellings<br />

and grammar, ensuring that punctuation marks<br />

(especially capital letters), are in the right places.<br />

Perhaps instead of blaming mobile phones, we<br />

should look to the powerful force of the media,<br />

who seem to be doing away with capital letters<br />

with abandon.<br />

The British television channel ITV is one such<br />

culprit: they have recently overhauled their<br />

brand identity, replacing their familiar capitalised<br />

logo with a lower case, curvy alternative.<br />

The channel describes its new logo as “a warm,<br />

bold design based on a formalised version of<br />

human handwriting”. This flowing, curvy, new<br />

design may well be based on handwriting , but<br />

as the name of a brand (and acronym), it ought<br />

to be capitalised. (You can read about the decision<br />

behind the rebrand here).<br />

Branding that tries to replicate handwriting,<br />

and does away with linguistic conventions,<br />

raises the interesting question of language and<br />

influence. Just like the age-old question of the<br />

chicken and the egg, linguists have argued for<br />

a long time over which is more influential: language<br />

or culture? The words we use may very<br />

well shape how we see the world.<br />

One fascinating point of view is that the words<br />

we choose to represent certain things directly<br />

affect our perceptions. Known as ‘Linguistic<br />

Determinism’, it is considered the root of the<br />

argument for Political Correctness, in which<br />

language (along with attitudes, beliefs and policies),<br />

is amended to minimise offence in relation<br />

to gender, age, race, sexuality, belief etc.<br />

For example, masculine labels such as ‘fireman’<br />

or ‘actress’ are replaced by the gender neutral<br />

‘firefighter’ and ‘actor’.<br />

The interdependent relationship between language<br />

and cultural thought has long been debated,<br />

but Lera Borododitsky writes in her article<br />

‘Lost in Translation’:<br />

“All this new research shows us that the<br />

languages we speak not only reflect or express<br />

our thoughts, but also shape the very<br />

thoughts we wish to express. The structures<br />

that exist in our languages profoundly shape<br />

how we construct reality… If people learn another<br />

language, they inadvertently also learn<br />

a new way of looking at the world.”<br />

(You can read the article in full here.)<br />

Whilst language in general may shape how we<br />

construct reality, does the misuse of capitals really<br />

affect our thinking that much? Although<br />

students’ writing is not technically ‘correct’<br />

without capital letters, I can still understand it.<br />

If our culture is doing away with capital letters,<br />

perhaps now is it time for us to shed them too?<br />

Facebook and Twitter are two further examples<br />

of the interesting link between cultural shifts<br />

and language. Despite being proper nouns, neither<br />

use a capital to represent their name as it<br />

appears in company logos. Again, we can ask:<br />

does this reflect a shift in modern culture to<br />

omit capitals, or does the omission of capitals<br />

on such popular sites encourage others to do<br />

the same?<br />

Many say that language really does reflect the<br />

changes that are occurring in culture already.<br />

We see this in the addition of new words popularised<br />

by TV programmes, such as ’Amazeballs’<br />

and ’Bridezilla’, to online dictionaries (read<br />

GURU OPINIONS<br />

about this here).<br />

Perhaps the bigger issue is not the use or misuse<br />

of standard spellings and grammar, but the<br />

messages that are conveyed by inaccurate use.<br />

Yes, writing can still be understood without<br />

capital letters (I could have written this entire<br />

article without capitals; then again, my computer<br />

would make every effort to correct them<br />

for me), but what subconscious messages would<br />

I have conveyed about myself, or the magazine?<br />

That I wasn’t well educated?<br />

On a deeper level, inaccurate punctuation can<br />

lead us to construct an opinion, not just about<br />

a person’s literacy skills, but about their beliefs<br />

and values. If I didn’t use capitals, you might<br />

think me lazy, or that I didn’t care about my<br />

article or the magazine. You might not think<br />

much of the editorial staff who allowed this lack<br />

of capitalisation. At worst, you might doubt the<br />

validity of what we have to say.<br />

I doubt you would have thought me ‘cool’ or<br />

‘forward-thinking’.<br />

In such a public, professional setting as a digital<br />

magazine, there is an expectation that the language<br />

used is formal.<br />

To follow this line of thought to one extreme,<br />

could we perhaps say that there is a direct correlation<br />

between the lack of capitalisation of<br />

proper nouns and the lack of respect in our<br />

society today? If I do not use correct grammar,<br />

my students may very well see me in a different<br />

light. When I go to see doctor Jones instead of<br />

Doctor Jones when I am ill, will I still trust his<br />

or her judgment? If I don’t use a capital letter<br />

for your name, will you still feel that I value and<br />

respect you?<br />

Perhaps most importantly the language we<br />

use – and specifically the lack of capitals – affects<br />

our thoughts about other people and our<br />

thoughts about ourselves. If I see myself (and<br />

represent myself) as ’i’ and not ‘I’, then I may<br />

not appreciate my own significance and importance.<br />

Instead, I undermine my own worth and<br />

encourage others to do the same.<br />

Perhaps our use of capitals really is of capital<br />

importance.<br />

Leila Wildsmith is an English teacher in a secondary<br />

school and, in her spare time, loves writing and reading<br />

a wide variety of different books. She occasionally blogs<br />

about writing at www.writingonthewall0612.blogspot.co.uk<br />

and intensely dislikes misplaced apostrophe’s.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 22 PAGE 23 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Eye chart) Flickr • deege@fermentarium.com


#MIND<br />

OUT, DAMNED SPOT!<br />

THE MACBETH EFFECT IS ALIVE AND WELL<br />

KIM LACEY • MIND GURU<br />

We went through childhood with the<br />

words ‘Wash your hands!’ ringing<br />

in our ears before every mealtime.<br />

But why would a grown adult find<br />

themselves reaching for cleansing<br />

products after playing a video game?<br />

It’s called the ‘MacBeth Effect’. Mind<br />

Guru Kim Lacey finds out more...<br />

Alright, get ready to have your mind stretched.<br />

(I am the ‘Mind Guru’ after all!) Dig into<br />

your memories of Shakespeare, recall the<br />

play MacBeth, and imagine yourself as Lady<br />

MacBeth for a minute. (Never seen it? Watch a<br />

fun condensed animated version here.) I want<br />

you to focus on that famous scene in which the<br />

guilt-ridden Queen Consort obsessively washes<br />

her hands, trying to rid them of imagined blood.<br />

She was hoping to rid herself of mental anguish<br />

– but how could hand-washing help her?<br />

Surprising though it may seem, morally<br />

objectionable actions can be ‘washed away’:<br />

in a 2006 article published in Science, Chen-<br />

Bo Zhong and Katie Liljenquist proved it. If<br />

you think about it, moral cleansing is pretty<br />

common. Religions, for example, often couple<br />

physical and mental cleansing in regular rituals<br />

(think baptism). But Zhong and Liljenquist set<br />

out to prove a tangible connection between<br />

these two types of cleansing. As a result, they<br />

coined term ‘The MacBeth Effect’.<br />

To test their theory, they asked participants<br />

to think of something ethical or unethical<br />

they had previously taken part in, while also<br />

bringing to mind any emotions they felt.<br />

Switching gears, the researchers then had<br />

the volunteers complete six fill-in-the-blank<br />

prompts. (There’s a small one on page 27 for<br />

you to try out.) Of these six prompts, some<br />

could<br />

OUT, DAMNED SPOT!<br />

be completed to form cleansing-related words.<br />

What they found was fascinating: participants<br />

who thought of an unethical action were more<br />

likely to complete the blanks with cleaning<br />

terms. Those who originally imagined an ethical<br />

action usually filled in the blank with other<br />

random words that sounded right to them.<br />

But it gets more interesting. They also tried a<br />

similar experiment using an assortment of<br />

cleaning products and other everyday items<br />

instead of fill-in-the-blank prompts. This time,<br />

Zhong and Liljenquist asked participants to<br />

handwrite a given story – of which some were<br />

ethical and others were not. After the writing<br />

session, the participants were asked to select<br />

an item from an assortment given to them.<br />

Those that copied the unethical stories chose<br />

cleaning products (like toothpaste<br />

or antibacterial wipes)<br />

instead of random<br />

objects (like candy<br />

bars or Post-It<br />

notes). Zhong<br />

and Liljenquist<br />

concluded that<br />

seeking physical<br />

cleansing does<br />

actually ease the<br />

mind’s worry over moral<br />

infractions.<br />

PAGE 25 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: (Washing Hands) Flickr • SCA Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget, (bloody hand) Flickr • Jo Naylor


(Virtual Route Clearance) Flickr • The U.S. Army<br />

OUT, DAMNED SPOT!<br />

Videogaming guilt<br />

Shift your focus just a bit and think about how<br />

playing videogames might alleviate the stress<br />

after a trying day. It’s a common reason to pick<br />

up the joypad: the US Army has enlisted the use<br />

of videogame consoles to help soldiers become<br />

desensitized to violence – or to simply let them<br />

blow off steam. But why does playing a violent<br />

game – one in which you would ‘kill’ someone –<br />

actually make you feel better? A recent study by<br />

Mario Gallwitzer and André Melzer, published<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 26<br />

in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,<br />

took ‘The MacBeth Effect’ one step further to<br />

find out the answer.<br />

Here’s the scenario: you’re trying to unwind<br />

after a tough day. Instead of kicking back with<br />

a book (which is my favorite!), you decide to<br />

relax by playing a first-person shooter (FPS),<br />

the type of video game that takes place from<br />

your perspective so it appears like you’re the<br />

one performing the action. So there you are,<br />

ready to strike from behind a digital bush, and<br />

BOOM! You successfully vaporise your target—<br />

another human character.<br />

OK, stop right there. How do you feel?<br />

Energised? Morally conflicted? Not affected?<br />

Though you may not realize it, your response<br />

to that question has something to do with the<br />

amount of time you spend gaming. Frequent<br />

gamers would be more likely to say ‘not<br />

affected’, while infrequent gamers (like myself)<br />

would likely choose ‘morally conflicted’.<br />

Gallwitzer and Melzer’s study drew on research<br />

that showed how gamers who played on a<br />

regular basis were more likely to automatically<br />

distance themselves from the characters and<br />

actions in the game than those who didn’t<br />

play video games often. They predicted that<br />

infrequent gamers were more likely to use<br />

hygiene products after playing because of the<br />

‘moral distress’ they endured. And they were<br />

right.<br />

For someone like myself, who’s not much of a<br />

gamer, Gallwitzer and Melzer’s study represents<br />

a key finding. Just as with the original ‘The<br />

MacBeth Effect’ experiment, they show that<br />

those who experience moral distress virtually<br />

(from a video game) are more likely to select<br />

cleaning products when given a choice. By<br />

contrast, regular gamers don’t feel any moral<br />

distress, so don’t feel the need to reach for the<br />

cleansing products. (Does this mean gamers smell<br />

worse? - Ed)<br />

Glancing round my house, I know it’s time for<br />

a good spring clean. I’ve not done anything<br />

immoral lately, so I’m pretty confident it’s the<br />

actual dirt that is prompting me to reach for<br />

the vacuum cleaner. That said, next time I’m<br />

out shopping I may just psychoanalyse the<br />

products in someone else’s cart. And see if they<br />

look guilty…<br />

References<br />

• Gollwitzer, M. and A. Melzer. (2012).<br />

Macbeth and the joystick: Evidence<br />

for moral cleansing after playing a<br />

violent video game. Journal of Experimental<br />

Social Psychology, 48:<br />

1356–1360<br />

ADVERTISMENT<br />

OUT, DAMNED SPOT!<br />

HERE’S A MINI-QUIZ: GIVE<br />

IT A GO YOURSELF.<br />

Make words by picking letters to fill<br />

in the gaps.<br />

W _ _ H<br />

SH_ _ER<br />

S _ _ P<br />

Are you naughty or nice?<br />

Wash? Wish?<br />

Shower? Shaker?<br />

Soap? Step?<br />

• Zhong, C. and K. Liljenquist. (2006).<br />

Washing away your sins: Threatened<br />

morality and physical cleansing. Science,<br />

313: 1451-1452<br />

With a PhD from Detroit’s Wayne State University, Kim Lacey from Detroit, USA<br />

knows a thing or two about memory studies, digital media and digital humanities. She<br />

also has a serious addiction to combo plates at restaurants. You can read about Kim at<br />

kimberlylacey.com or follow her on Twitter at @kimlacey.<br />

PAGE 27 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU


#LIFE<br />

STRIKE A POSE<br />

HOW MEN SHOULD REALLY DANCE<br />

JAMES LLOYD • PHYSICS GURU<br />

RIGHT:<br />

Examples of an<br />

avatar created<br />

for the rating<br />

purposes.<br />

This Valentine’s Day, romance will be<br />

on the minds of many men around<br />

the world. But how should a man go<br />

about wooing that special girl or guy<br />

of his dreams? Well, get your glad<br />

rags out guys: according to research<br />

published last year, an impressive<br />

display of dancing may be one way to<br />

win someone’s heart, as James Lloyd<br />

explains...<br />

It’s a common scenario. You’re at a wedding<br />

reception, the speeches are over, and a DJ<br />

starts doing his thing in the corner of the room,<br />

obscured by a wall of tacky disco lights.<br />

Before long, the complimentary champagne<br />

begins to work its magic on the revellers.<br />

A mildly inebriated Auntie Valerie is the first<br />

to wander onto the dance floor, deciding that<br />

a slightly dented reputation is a small price to<br />

pay for having a good time. Uncle Bob is next<br />

to follow, loosening his tie and rolling up his<br />

sleeves the minute he hears the opening blasts<br />

of ‘Y.M.C.A.’.<br />

Meanwhile, the best man – let’s call him Dave<br />

– has his eye on one of the bridesmaids, Emily.<br />

STRIKE A POSE<br />

Hugging his warm pint of Heineken, Dave looks<br />

longingly at Emily as she glides across the dance<br />

floor like a swan on roller skates. Feeling ever<br />

more tipsy, he puts down his beer and shuffles<br />

towards her.<br />

Suddenly, ‘Y.M.C.A.’ gives way to the moody<br />

drum and bass intro of ‘Billie Jean’. Dave spots<br />

his chance. Moving deftly through the throng<br />

of dancers, he positions himself opposite<br />

Emily and begins to engage in a mating ritual<br />

worthy of any bird of paradise. Completely<br />

oblivious to the onlooking crowd, Dave bends<br />

his torso from side to side like a man possessed,<br />

simultaneously shaking his head to the beat<br />

whilst performing an elaborate twisting routine<br />

with his right knee.<br />

The ritual seems to have worked: 30 minutes<br />

later both he and Emily are locked in a romantic<br />

embrace, gently swaying to ‘Lady in Red’ amidst<br />

a sea of teary-eyed couples.<br />

Dave’s secret? He’s familiar with a recent article<br />

in Biology Letters, which shows that certain<br />

dance moves are more likely than others to<br />

ignite the passions of a woman.<br />

Nick Neave and colleagues at Northumbria<br />

University and the University of Göttingen<br />

used motion-capture technology to record<br />

PAGE 29 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: (Dancing) Flickr • dicktay2000


Next Page: (Grass) Flickr • Titanas, (Wolf Spider) Wikimedia • Orest, (Manakin Bird) Wikimedia • chdwckvnstrsslhm, (Seahorse) Wikimedia • richard ling<br />

(Dancing By A Wall) Flickr • garryknight, (Ballroom Dancing) Flickr • mark sebastian<br />

STRIKE A POSE<br />

the movements of 19 men dancing to a basic<br />

drum beat. Each dancer was then mapped<br />

onto a computer-generated avatar, and 37<br />

heterosexual women were asked to rate the<br />

avatars on their dancing prowess.<br />

By correlating the women’s ratings with the<br />

avatars’ movements, the scientists were able to<br />

come up with a recipe for successful boogieing.<br />

The three factors that contributed most strongly<br />

to a high dance score were ‘neck internal/<br />

external rotation variability’ (head shaking),<br />

‘trunk adduction/abduction variability’<br />

(sideways bending) and ‘right knee internal/<br />

external rotation speed’ (twisting speed).<br />

These movements, claims the study, may<br />

provide signals of a man’s suitability as a sexual<br />

partner by indicating his physical strength,<br />

health, fitness, and/or genetic quality.<br />

According to Neave and his colleagues, dance<br />

in humans is “a set of intentional, rhythmic,<br />

culturally influenced, non-verbal body movements<br />

that are considered to be an important aspect of<br />

sexuality and courtship attraction”. This links us<br />

to wolf spiders, manakin birds, and seahorses<br />

(amongst other animals), all of whom perform<br />

courtship displays to entice members of the<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 30<br />

opposite sex (see sidebox: ‘Nature’s movers and<br />

shakers’).<br />

So, men, if you’re looking to woo on the dance<br />

floor, then you can’t do much better than<br />

shaking your body like the proverbial Polaroid<br />

picture. And don’t forget to twist those knees<br />

like there’s no tomorrow…*<br />

*NB: Guru does not accept any responsibility for minor injuries,<br />

deflated egos, or red-faced humiliation suffered as a result of<br />

this article. Dancing is to be undertaken solely at the reader’s<br />

discretion.<br />

Further reading:<br />

• Neave, N., et al. (2011). Male dance<br />

moves that catch a woman’s eye.<br />

Biology Letters, 7: 221-224.<br />

NATURE’S MOVERS AND<br />

SHAKERS<br />

Wolf Spider<br />

To entice sexy-looking females, the male wolf spider uses a strange kind<br />

of semaphore dance. He enthusiastically waves his feelers – or ‘palps’ –<br />

in an elaborate fashion, rather like a 1990s raver pulling shapes at the<br />

Haçienda. This impressive dance routine requires so much energy that<br />

the spider’s heartbeat triples while he’s performing.<br />

If she likes what she sees, the female spider will tap her legs to encourage<br />

the eight-legged lothario. Then, if successful, the dance will finish with a<br />

mating session, in which the male spider uses his palps to pump sperm<br />

into his besotted lover.<br />

White’s seahorse<br />

In one of nature’s most elegant courtship displays, White’s seahorses –<br />

unique to the Australian coast – carry out a sublime ballet worthy of Anna<br />

Pavlova herself.<br />

Before mating, the two lifelong partners entwine their tails, circling one<br />

another and mirroring each other’s movements. Once this intimate pas de<br />

deux is complete, the female deposits her eggs into the pouch of the male<br />

seahorse, who lovingly carries them until the tiny baby seahorses are ready<br />

to emerge fully-formed. Awwww.<br />

STRIKE A POSE<br />

Humans aren’t the only creatures to shake their<br />

booty in an effort to woo potential mates. Here<br />

are some of the animal kingdom’s best dancers.<br />

Beyoncé, eat your heart out…<br />

Manakin Bird<br />

The small manakin birds that live in the American tropics are well known for<br />

their spectacular courtship rituals. Some use their wing feathers to make<br />

buzzing and snapping noises; some fly around in circles; whilst others waggle<br />

their bottoms in the female’s face. But nothing compares to the sight of a<br />

manakin moonwalking backwards along a branch. That’s right... a bird doing<br />

a moonwalk. Backwards.<br />

If the female manakin isn’t impressed by that, then she clearly isn’t familiar<br />

with the works of Michael Jackson.<br />

James Lloyd studied physics at university and recently finished a climate science<br />

PhD. He’s now swapped semiconductors for semicolons, writing about science and blogging<br />

at The Soft Anonymous. James enjoys music making, hill walking and trying to<br />

find the perfect flapjack. Find him on Twitter @jbb_lloyd.<br />

PAGE 31 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU


(Synchrotron Radiation) Flickr • CLS Research Office<br />

February/March 2013<br />

MAKING PEACE:<br />

IRAN AND ISRAEL<br />

SHUN CONFLICT TO<br />

WORK TOGETHER<br />

Author:<br />

Toby Brown<br />

Links:<br />

BBC News<br />

Sesame.co.jo<br />

RIGHT:<br />

Synchrotron radiation reflecting<br />

from a terbium single crystal.<br />

POLITICS<br />

Just as Ali Baba called out the words ‘open<br />

sesame’ to unseal the cave of treasures in<br />

Arabian Nights, Middle Eastern scientists are<br />

hoping to evoke the same spirit of opening<br />

doors by naming their collaborative particle<br />

accelerator project SESAME.<br />

In a region better known for violent conflict,<br />

countries including Iran, Turkey, Egypt and<br />

even Israel, are coming together to back the<br />

construction of a machine similar to the<br />

Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland – a<br />

synchrotron light-source, and the first of its<br />

kind in the Middle East.<br />

Set for completion in 2015, SESAME<br />

(Synchrotron light for Experimental Science<br />

and Applications in the Middle East) will<br />

be built in Jordan and will act somewhat<br />

like a giant microscope. Electrons are to be<br />

accelerated to near the speed of light around<br />

a circular chamber by powerful magnets,<br />

releasing an energy called ‘synchrotron<br />

radiation’, which is then diverted into<br />

‘beamlines’. These beamlines can be tweaked<br />

to the specific needs of the research being<br />

conducted, with applications ranging from<br />

the study of viruses to the development of<br />

new materials.<br />

The SESAME venture is aimed at fostering<br />

scientific excellence and economic<br />

development, using physics to bridge cultural<br />

and social rifts. Perhaps the most surprising<br />

aspect of SESAME is the cooperation<br />

between Iran and Israel, whose relationship<br />

has become increasingly strained recently.<br />

Officials from each country are putting aside<br />

accounts of industrial sabotage and calls for<br />

each other’s destruction, choosing to set<br />

an example by securing continued funding<br />

instead.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 32<br />

www.gurumagazine.org<br />

Observers from Western Europe and the US<br />

are overseeing the project to ensure that the<br />

national scientific interests of each member<br />

state are properly represented. Work<br />

conducted at the institute must be made<br />

available to all, with no allowance given<br />

for classified or military research so as not<br />

to exacerbate the already volatile political<br />

situation.<br />

Maintaining relations between the Arab,<br />

Iranian and Israeli backers presents the<br />

project’s organisers with a serious diplomatic<br />

challenge. The recent heightening of tensions<br />

between Tel Aviv and Tehran makes the<br />

task even more difficult, but the council’s<br />

members are hopeful that these usually<br />

hostile countries may find common ground<br />

in the goal of scientific advancement.<br />

Prof. Eliezer Rabinovici, a physicist at<br />

the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, is<br />

optimistic that peace will prevail: “We are<br />

having a rough period now – a very rough<br />

period – and it may become even rougher.<br />

But I think that as scientists, we have to<br />

look at the long range, and in the long range<br />

we see no conflict of interest between the<br />

people of Iran and the people of Israel.”<br />

1960S DRUG THAT<br />

HELPS US REMEMBER<br />

THE GOOD TIMES<br />

Author:<br />

Ross Harper<br />

Links:<br />

Beyond extinction: erasing<br />

human fear responses<br />

and preventing the return<br />

of fear<br />

RIGHT:<br />

An 80mg capsule of Propranolol<br />

MIND<br />

Anyone who saw the 1997 blockbuster, Men<br />

In Black, will be aware that one day – thanks<br />

to a pen torch and some strategically-placed<br />

sunglasses – troubling memories will be a<br />

thing of the past. Well we may not be there<br />

yet, but if Merel Kindt and her colleagues<br />

are correct, we’re not that far off. The results<br />

from their Amsterdam University labs<br />

showed that taking the old-fashioned blood<br />

pressure medicine, propranolol, can fully<br />

erase fear memories.<br />

Sixty volunteers were trained to associate a<br />

spider picture with fear by giving them small<br />

electric shocks. These volunteers demonstrated<br />

that their brains had learned to make<br />

the association by showing an exaggerated<br />

startle response whenever they were subsequently<br />

shown a spider photo. However,<br />

Kindt showed that, when individuals took<br />

propranolol and were then shown the spider<br />

picture days later, their expression of fear<br />

was completely abolished – unlike those<br />

who did not receive the tablet, whose startle<br />

response remained unchanged.<br />

This new memory-wiping technique is based<br />

on the principle of memory reconsolidation:<br />

when we remember something, the invoked<br />

memory is retrieved from its long-term<br />

storage location (in a part of the brain called<br />

the neocortex) – at which point it becomes<br />

vulnerable to disruption. (It’s a bit like retrieving<br />

a file from a filing cabinet. Once<br />

the file is removed, the papers stored in the<br />

file could get jumbled up in a way that’s not<br />

possible while the file is safely stored away.)<br />

The memory is then ‘restabilized’ by being<br />

stored back into the neocortex – where it<br />

becomes resistant to change once again. It is<br />

thought that this process may underlie our<br />

ability to strengthen and weaken individual<br />

memories based on new experiences.<br />

STRIKE A POSE<br />

In her experiment, Kindt managed to block<br />

restabilization of the fear memory, causing<br />

it to be lost forever: once retrieved from<br />

the ‘filing cabinet’ of our neocortex, the<br />

memory ‘file’ was basically shredded by the<br />

propranolol before it could be safely re-filed.<br />

Unfortunately for the sci-fi fans among us,<br />

taking propranolol did not cause individuals<br />

completely to forget the whole experience<br />

of being tested: they expected to receive a<br />

shock when presented with the picture of<br />

a spider, but didn’t seem to care anymore.<br />

This highlights a limitation of the memorywiping<br />

technique – the drug seemed only to<br />

target the fear-memory link, and nothing<br />

else.<br />

While it may seem positively ‘James Bond’<br />

that memories can be selectively erased,<br />

the idea of blocking restabilization is not a<br />

new one. Countless experiments carried out<br />

on animals have produced similar results.<br />

But Kindt’s work is special because she has<br />

shown that taking a drug, which is already<br />

well established in the medical community,<br />

can selectively erase fear memories in humans.<br />

This could prove to be a landmark<br />

discovery in the treatment of psychological<br />

trauma (in particular, post-traumatic stress<br />

disorder) and could even be extended to<br />

therapies for drug addiction.<br />

So what next? Well, as with all new treatments,<br />

rigorous testing will have to be carried<br />

out: history is littered with the empty<br />

packets of innovative new medicines, which<br />

never made it through clinical trials. Indeed,<br />

three years after the initial experiment, we<br />

are still waiting for any key developments.<br />

So, for now, psychologists and neuroscientists<br />

sit with crossed fingers – the hope being<br />

that the treatment of unpleasant memories<br />

will soon be readily achievable through<br />

a simple process of ‘therapeutic forgetting’.<br />

PAGE 33 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Capsule) Wikimedia • Parhamr


(E-Volve) Flickr • Keoni Cabral<br />

HARNESSING THE<br />

HIDDEN POWER OF<br />

YOUR BRAIN<br />

Author:<br />

Simon Makin<br />

THE THINKING<br />

ROBOT: YOUR NEW<br />

BEST FRIEND?<br />

Author:<br />

Simon Makin<br />

Location of Primary<br />

Visual Cortex.<br />

BRAIN<br />

Being able to watch your brain’s activity<br />

while you work might help you to control<br />

your thinking and boost performance,<br />

according to a new study from researchers<br />

at the Wellcome Trust Centre for<br />

Neuroimaging at University College<br />

London (UCL).<br />

The approach, known as neurofeedback,<br />

involves letting people watch what their<br />

brains are doing on a screen – as it’s actually<br />

happening. The team at UCL monitored<br />

brain activity using a technology called<br />

functional magnetic resonance imaging<br />

(fMRI) to show volunteers the location of<br />

activity in their brains as they imagined<br />

images. During this ‘training’, volunteers<br />

were asked to try to change how they<br />

thought to increase activity in the back of<br />

their brain – the visual cortex, where visual<br />

BIOTECH<br />

Scientists at the University of Waterloo,<br />

Canada, led by Professor Chris Eliasmith,<br />

have built the most sophisticated simulation<br />

of a working brain ever constructed.<br />

Although much smaller than the human<br />

brain itself, consisting of only 2.5 million<br />

brain cells (compared to 100 billion) and<br />

many fewer than some previous simulations<br />

– it displays an impressive range of<br />

different behaviours. The artificial brain can<br />

recognise images, remember sequences, and<br />

even complete the kind of complex task you<br />

might find in an IQ test.<br />

The supercomputer program, called SPAUN<br />

(Semantic Pointer Architecture Unified<br />

Network), uses a 28 x 28 pixel digital camera<br />

‘eye’ to gather input from its surroundings<br />

and then gives its responses with a<br />

robot arm. For instance, when shown the<br />

sequence 1 2 3 - 5 6 7 - 3 4 ?, together with<br />

an instruction, SPAUN will scrawl the digit<br />

‘5’ on a piece of paper.<br />

Unlike IBM’s Watson supercomputer,<br />

which was built in 2011 to do one thing<br />

(play Jeopardy!) and do it well, but made<br />

information is processed.<br />

After a training session, the subjects were<br />

given the job of spotting subtle changes<br />

in the contrast of a picture – that is,<br />

tiny differences in colour intensity and<br />

brightness. Those who had been able to<br />

control their brain activity during the initial<br />

training – by successfully learning how to<br />

increase visual cortex activity – were better<br />

able to detect the subtle changes in the task.<br />

The scientists hope the technique could be<br />

used to benefit people with impaired brain<br />

function, such as people who have had a<br />

stroke, and often have difficulty seeing even<br />

though their eyes aren’t damaged.<br />

Who knows, maybe one day ‘neurofeedback’<br />

might be a technique we could all use to<br />

boost our mental abilities. Well, here’s<br />

hoping…<br />

no attempt<br />

to copy how<br />

the brain<br />

w o r k s ,<br />

S P A U N<br />

replicates<br />

actual brain<br />

cell activity<br />

and wiring.<br />

More importantly,<br />

though, it turns this<br />

activity into behaviour. This is in contrast<br />

to larger, more detailed brain models,<br />

such as the Blue Brain Project, which produce<br />

detailed simulations of neural activity,<br />

but don’t necessarily do anything.<br />

SPAUN has two software systems that<br />

work in harmony: a ‘working memory’<br />

system that is modelled on the ‘higher’<br />

thinking part of the brain (called the<br />

prefrontal cortex – where we make our<br />

decisions), and an ‘action selection’ system,<br />

which is based on other parts of the brain<br />

called the basal ganglia and thalamus (more<br />

primitive, instinctual regions). The ‘action<br />

Toby Brown describes himself as an aspiring<br />

writer and purveyor of science and is currently<br />

studying for a Masters in Astrophysics at Liverpool<br />

University.<br />

selection’ system routes data to the part of<br />

the ‘working memory’ system appropriate<br />

for the task, which then stores that data, and<br />

performs the necessary ‘thinking’ functions.<br />

All this is accomplished by software running<br />

on a supercomputer, but, as it stands,<br />

is still very limited compared to a real brain:<br />

SPAUN can only tackle eight predefined<br />

tasks, and is far slower than the real thing,<br />

taking around two hours of computing time<br />

to simulate one second of brain activity. It<br />

does however demonstrate a range of cognitive<br />

skills and even makes some of the same<br />

mistakes we do, such as remembering the<br />

first and last items in a list better than the<br />

others (known to psychologists as primacy<br />

and recency). The team also looked at the<br />

Ross Harper recently graduated from Cambridge<br />

University having studied Biological Natural Sciences. He<br />

spent the last year running his somewhat unconventional<br />

advertising business, BuyMyFace.com, and is now<br />

trying his hand at app development with his new company,<br />

Wriggle Ltd. Ross is living proof that you can take the<br />

boy out of the lab, but you can’t take the lab out of the<br />

boy - no matter what crazy scheme he’s currently working<br />

on, he makes sure to devote a bit of time to keeping with<br />

the latest in science news. Feel free to say ‘hi’ to Ross on<br />

Twitter (@refharper).<br />

ADVERTISMENT<br />

STRIKE A POSE<br />

effects of ‘killing off’ neurons to simulate<br />

ageing, and have seen patterns of decline<br />

similar to what happens in old age.<br />

Crucially though, SPAUN lacks adaptivity<br />

– the ability to learn new tasks. This is<br />

a shortcoming the team hopes to tackle in<br />

future. Even so, there’s no reason to presume<br />

that building on this simulation will<br />

at some point produce the more elusive<br />

qualities of living brains, such as awareness<br />

or intentions: SPAUN doesn’t do any of its<br />

impressive tricks because it wants to – it is<br />

explicitly programmed and fed instructions,<br />

like any other computer system. So without<br />

free will, there’s probably not much need to<br />

worry about a future version taking control<br />

of our missile defence systems just yet…<br />

Simon Makin is an ex-post-doc researcher in<br />

auditory perception turned journalist.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 34 PAGE 35 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Robots) Flickr • ricardodiaz11


#STUFF<br />

GUREVIEWS<br />

SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE: THE GAME<br />

Developer: GameTogether<br />

Content Developed by: In-Mind Foundation<br />

Price: Free (Android), £0.69 (iTunes)<br />

Rating:<br />

I had high hopes for Social Knowledge. It<br />

promises to be the perfect app for me as I’m<br />

a sucker for quizzes and fun challenges. The<br />

app combines a daily quiz, psychology and<br />

‘fun’ whilst on the go. Available for iPhone and<br />

Android, Social Knowledge is a lightweight app<br />

that asks one psychology-themed question<br />

per day. Your selected response is recorded<br />

and the correct answer is given the next day.<br />

Users can then click on the ‘Why?’ button to<br />

see a summary of the psychology research that<br />

verifies the answer.<br />

Social Knowledge should please the psychologyinclined,<br />

but ultimately I found it didn’t fully<br />

satisfy. The ‘daily question’ is more of a ‘daily<br />

statement’ and is pitched in a limited ‘true or<br />

false’ format. Multiple choice answers are pretty<br />

The GuReview<br />

rating system<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 36<br />

typical of quiz apps, so there’s nothing to really<br />

quibble about here. However, the let-down is<br />

that the statements are only mildly interesting.<br />

Take this example: “If people are persuaded by<br />

a message, they probably paid attention to the<br />

message.”<br />

With only one statement available per day,<br />

sadly this app didn’t hold my attention. Social<br />

K would be far more engaging if at least a few<br />

questions came with immediate answers –<br />

rather than having to wait 24 hours. This sort<br />

of instant feedback might prompt me to open<br />

the app regularly. That said, it’s not all bad<br />

news: discovering the research that backs up<br />

the correct answer is genuinely interesting.<br />

In-Mind’s commitment to research and the<br />

inclusion of a full list of the relevant research<br />

is to be applauded. However, without a bank of<br />

questions or even an archive, I can’t see this app<br />

being a good use of time. Overall, it is a great<br />

idea but it doesn’t do enough as it stands to<br />

make for a truly engaging experience.<br />

With a PhD from Detroit’s Wayne State University, Kim Lacey from Detroit, USA<br />

knows a thing or two about memory studies, digital media and digital humanities. She<br />

also has a serious addiction to combo plates at restaurants. You can read about Kim at<br />

kimberlylacey.com or follow her on Twitter at @kimlacey.<br />

WACK NOT GREAT MIDDLING<br />

VERY NOT BAD<br />

iPad, iPhone and Android app<br />

WICKED IN A GOOD WAY<br />

#FOOD<br />

THE CHEMISTRY OF<br />

WEIRD–TASTING FOOD!<br />

NATASHA AGABALYAN • FOOD GURU


Previous Page: (hazmat mold) Flickr • x-ray delta one, (Cheese) Flickr • Patrick Hoesly<br />

THE CHEMISTRY OF WEIRD–TASTING FOOD!<br />

Today’s supermarkets offer us every<br />

item we could possibly need. But take<br />

a closer look. In amongst the stacked<br />

shelves you’ll notice some seriously<br />

weird-flavoured foods in between<br />

the veg, meat and bread. Where do<br />

these flavours come from and should<br />

we be worried? Food Guru Natasha<br />

Agabalyan finds out. Banoffee pie<br />

yoghurt anyone?<br />

It seems the food industry is changing – and<br />

weird and wonderful tastes are the future.<br />

There’s even charcoal-topped cheesecake<br />

– made in response to we consumers, who<br />

are apparently looking to broaden our taste<br />

horizons. There’s more than a little Willy Wonka<br />

and the Chocolate Factory in all of this – but<br />

there’s plenty of intriguing food-science that<br />

makes it possible.<br />

“Mommy – I want to be a flavourist<br />

when I grow up!”<br />

Few people realise that most food producers<br />

don’t actually conceive the flavours of their<br />

foods. Instead, they employ the services of<br />

a flavour company and its specially trained<br />

chemists: flavourists.<br />

A specialist chemist who uses tools and methods<br />

similar to perfumers, a flavourist tweaks and<br />

THE BASICS OF<br />

FLAVOUR-MAKING:<br />

Replicating a flavour is something of an art<br />

form. Our friends the flavourists would say<br />

that a flavour has three key components:<br />

• A character item, which makes a large<br />

contribution to the flavour as it smells or<br />

tastes of the required flavour.<br />

• A contributory item, which enhances the<br />

main flavour even if, on its own, it doesn’t<br />

actually have the flavour we’re after.<br />

• A differential item, which is not essential<br />

but can add some character reminiscent<br />

of the target flavour.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 38<br />

modifies the taste and smell of food. Much of<br />

the training is done on-the-job, so an up-andcoming<br />

flavourist may have fairly little formal<br />

education. The profession only came about once<br />

home refrigeration became affordable. It soon<br />

became important to the food industry to make<br />

foods which stayed flavourful even after being<br />

preserved for long periods.<br />

Today, the tools of the trade are often artificiallycreated<br />

flavours. Cheaper and more economical<br />

than herbs and fruit extracts, many of these<br />

concoctions are truly bizarre.<br />

The alchemist’s guide to flavour<br />

creation<br />

How do scientists discover how to make these<br />

synthetic flavours? The best place to start is<br />

their naturally-occurring cousins. Chemists<br />

start out by analysing the natural oil, juice or<br />

extract to discover all the chemical compounds<br />

it contains. Armed with the list of taste bud<br />

tickling chemicals, the chemists then try to<br />

reassemble the natural product in the lab.<br />

Those of you still haunted by the memory<br />

of school chemistry classes may remember<br />

a process called distillation – which involves<br />

various bits of glassware, rubber tubing and the<br />

trusty school Bunsen burner. Chemicals all boil<br />

at different temperatures (water boils at 100°C,<br />

while alcohol boils at a lower temperature of<br />

78°C). And because the boiling points of major<br />

chemical are well known, the lab workers can<br />

use them as clues to figure out the identity of<br />

chemicals present in a mixture.<br />

Scientists can also look at the chemicals in<br />

more high-tech ways – one popular technique is<br />

‘spectroscopy’, which exploits the way different<br />

chemicals behave when bombarded with<br />

infrared and ultraviolet light to help identify<br />

them. The mixture of chemicals in a natural oil or<br />

juice can even be analysed using a more visuallyappealing<br />

technique called ‘chromatography’.<br />

(Going back to school science classes, you may<br />

have used a type of chromatograph to separate<br />

out all the colours that make up the ink of a pen;<br />

other kinds of chromatography work according<br />

to a similar principle.)<br />

Using these various tests, an astounding<br />

number of different chemicals have been found<br />

in flavours that we would otherwise have<br />

thought to be simple: apple contains 29 and the<br />

satisfying taste of coffee relies on nearly 100<br />

different chemicals!<br />

Now you might think all chemists would have<br />

to do is recombine these chemicals to create<br />

the perfect flavour. Sadly, though, it seems<br />

nature is a lot more complicated: no one has<br />

yet been able to recombine the 29 chemicals in<br />

apple flavour in the same way nature has. It’s<br />

uncertain why man cannot recreate apple, but<br />

imperfect testing that misses some essential<br />

flavour components is probably the reason.<br />

My favourite flavour secrets<br />

Meat flavoured crisps<br />

Despite having subjected friends to endless<br />

rants on how revolting the concept of meatflavoured<br />

crisps (or potato chips, if you prefer)<br />

are, I am clearly in the minority: sales of meatflavoured<br />

crisps have overtaken many other<br />

more ‘savoury’ flavours.<br />

So what’s behind meat-flavoured snacks? The<br />

chemicals giving meat its main ‘roast’ flavour<br />

are created when the meat is cooked – thanks to<br />

a chemical reaction called the Maillard reaction.<br />

Meats are protein-rich – and proteins are made<br />

of strings of chemicals called amino acids.<br />

When these amino acids react with sugar in the<br />

presence of heat a chemical called gylcosylamine<br />

is formed, and this reacts further to form the<br />

flavour-giving chemicals. When you know what<br />

these chemicals are, you can simply add them to<br />

a food to give it that familiar roast meat flavour.<br />

(See sidebox.)<br />

Cherry flavoured Yoghurt<br />

Love cherries but hate cherry-flavoured<br />

products? Me too! I’ve never understood why<br />

artificial cherry flavour in particular seems to<br />

taste nothing like real cherries.<br />

THE FLAVOURISTS<br />

RECIPE BOOK: CHERRY<br />

The first synthetic formula for cherry flavour was published<br />

in 1917 and was supposed to contain an array of different<br />

chemicals:<br />

• Ethyl acetate – a type of chemical called an ester, which<br />

has a fruity smell (also found in nail varnish removers)<br />

• Ethyl benzoate – a colourless liquid and an ester that has<br />

a minty kind of smell<br />

• Oil of persicot – extracted from the kernels of apricots<br />

and similar fruits<br />

• Benzoic acid – a type of chemical called a carboxylic<br />

acid that is also used as a preservative (E210 on<br />

ingredient packets).<br />

• Glycerine – a sweet-tasting liquid, also used in lowcalorie<br />

foods<br />

• Alcohol<br />

Today, the main chemical in cherry<br />

flavouring is bensaldehyde, a<br />

chemical that emits a<br />

Modern<br />

cherry flavours<br />

imitate the taste of<br />

pleasant almond<br />

odour.<br />

maraschino cherries – the bright red cherries<br />

that have been preserved and sweetened. (You<br />

normally see them atop an iced cake or gracing a<br />

cocktail.) Maraschino cherries are best because<br />

the natural flavour of most cherries is very<br />

weak, and when this flavour is ‘amplified’ it just<br />

doesn’t taste nice.<br />

THE FLAVOURISTS RECIPE BOOK: PORK<br />

2-methyl-3-furanthiol<br />

is the character item<br />

and gives the food<br />

the required meaty<br />

impact.<br />

O<br />

For a meaty pork flavour, here’s the winning chemical combination. Mix the<br />

ingredients until the desired taste is achieved.<br />

Butyl-2-decanoate<br />

is the differential<br />

item and makes the<br />

flavour taste ‘fattier’.<br />

SH<br />

CH 3<br />

THE CHEMISTRY OF WEIRD–TASTING FOOD!<br />

Pyridinemethanol is<br />

the contributory item<br />

and adds some pork<br />

flavour.<br />

N OH<br />

O<br />

O<br />

Ingredients available from<br />

your local flavourist lab.<br />

PAGE 39 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Cherry) Wikimedia • Benjamint444/Fir0002


(Orange Slices) Flickr • Nina Matthews Photography, (Lemon) Flickr • *clairity*<br />

THE CHEMISTRY OF WEIRD–TASTING FOOD!<br />

Citrus with a twist<br />

Did you know that the chemicals that give us<br />

the flavour of lemons and oranges are exactly<br />

the same, chemically speaking? The main<br />

component of both is called limonene; the<br />

only difference between ‘orange’ and ‘lemon’ is<br />

a very subtle difference in the structure of the<br />

limonene molecule.<br />

The ‘orange’ and ‘lemon’ versions of limonene<br />

are made from exactly the same atoms, which<br />

are joined to each other in the same order. The<br />

difference is that the two molecules are mirror<br />

images of one another. (It’s a bit like a pair of<br />

hands: our left and right hands are mirror<br />

images of one another, and if you try to put<br />

your left hand on top of your right, they don’t<br />

match.)<br />

This subtle difference is enough for the taste<br />

receptors on our tongues to recognize one<br />

of the mirror images of limonene as ‘orange’<br />

flavour, and the other as ‘lemon’. Quite a feat!<br />

So next time you’re munching your way through<br />

a bag of crisps, or chewing on some fruity gum,<br />

spare a thought for the army of flavourists<br />

who’ve worked wonders with chemistry to<br />

tantalise your tastebuds!<br />

Natasha Agabalyan is on her way to becoming a Doctor of Cell Biology in Brighton,<br />

UK. In between drinking far too much coffee and blogging at The Science Informant,<br />

she has a love of finding out interesting tit-bits from all aspects of life. You can follow her<br />

on twitter at @SciencInformant.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 40<br />

The ability of our bodies to<br />

distinguish between chemicals<br />

that are seemingly identical<br />

can have its down-sides,<br />

though. Thalidomide, the<br />

infamous drug that was used<br />

during the late 1950s and<br />

early 1960s to relieve morning<br />

sickness, exists as two mirrorimage<br />

forms, like limonene.<br />

While one of the mirror images<br />

acts as a sedative, the other<br />

causes devastating sideeffects<br />

– most often, missing or<br />

truncated limbs. When these<br />

side-effects were discovered,<br />

thalidomide was quickly<br />

withdrawn from use.<br />

There’s a silver lining to<br />

this cloud, though. While<br />

thalidomide can be seriously<br />

damaging to healthy cells, its<br />

growth-limiting effects are now<br />

being explored as a potential<br />

way to treat both cancerous<br />

tumours and leprosy.<br />

#GENETICS<br />

THE FUTURE’S BRIGHT,<br />

THE FUTURE’S GENOMIC<br />

WELCOME TO THE AGE OF CONSUMER GENETICS<br />

ABIGAIL JAMES


#HEALTH<br />

YOUR GUTS FOR<br />

GLORY<br />

DOO-DOO-ING YOUR BIT TO HELP<br />

SIMON MAKIN<br />

Did you know that most of the cells<br />

inside you aren’t human? There are<br />

roughly ten times as many microbes<br />

in your gut as there are cells in your<br />

body – and these include several<br />

hundred different species of bacteria.<br />

They are just part of the trillions<br />

of micro-organisms known as the<br />

human microbiome that we have<br />

living on and inside us.<br />

The exact make-up of these microbial<br />

communities differs between different body<br />

areas and from person to person. They change<br />

over a lifetime, and over the centuries. The last<br />

100 years have seen a rapid change in the<br />

industrialised world, presumably due to diet,<br />

antibiotics, and sterilisation.<br />

Many of these tiny passengers do important<br />

jobs, such as bolstering our immune systems or<br />

helping our digestion. (See ‘In sickness and in<br />

health’ in Issue 9 to find out more.) We don’t yet<br />

fully understand how our microbiome relates to<br />

health or disease – we just know that it does.<br />

The composition of our microbiome has been<br />

linked to conditions such as irritable bowel<br />

syndrome, obesity, diabetes, cancer, and even<br />

depression. Although specific organisms have<br />

been implicated in some conditions, often it’s<br />

the overall diversity that matters – just like any<br />

ecosystem.<br />

Now, two new ’citizen science’ projects are<br />

YOUR GUTS FOR GLORY<br />

getting the public involved in the study of the<br />

human microbiome to help us understand how<br />

diet and lifestyle might be influencing these<br />

personal ecosystems – and affecting our health<br />

as a result.<br />

The first of these projects, known as ‘American<br />

Gut’, is being run by researchers at the<br />

University of Colorado, US, and collaborators at<br />

many other institutions, in association with<br />

the Human Food Project. The project has been<br />

encouraging thousands of Americans to get<br />

involved, either by paying fees to submit their<br />

own samples for analysis, by simply making<br />

a financial donation, or by examining data<br />

from the project, which will be made publicly<br />

available.<br />

Many conditions linked to the microbiome are<br />

more common in Western populations. With<br />

this in mind, the researchers plan to compare the<br />

inhabitants of American intestines with those<br />

of people living more traditional existences in<br />

places like Namibia and Peru.<br />

The project builds on previous efforts, such as<br />

the Human Microbiome Project, but is the<br />

first to look at this issue on such a large scale.<br />

The Human Microbiome Project recruited a few<br />

hundred volunteers, whereas this one hopes to<br />

enlist 10,000 people - and their household pets.<br />

Participants can also send samples from their<br />

dogs or cats to help scientists understand the<br />

relationship between our own microbes and<br />

those of our furry companions.<br />

A similar – but smaller – project, UBiome, aims<br />

to gather samples from as many people as it can<br />

from all over the world.<br />

Both projects are now possible thanks to the<br />

rapid drop in the cost of DNA sequencing.<br />

This, together with computational advances,<br />

will allow the researchers to analyse microbial<br />

genomes far more cheaply than was previously<br />

possible.<br />

Participants in both projects will receive a<br />

personal analysis, listing the critters living<br />

inside them and showing how they compare to<br />

others. You can see how many people signed up<br />

for American Gut here, or UBiome here.<br />

Simon Makin is an ex-post-doc researcher in auditory perception turned journalist.<br />

PAGE 45 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: (Stool) Flickr • bradhoc, (Toilet) Flickr • kodomut


#TECHNOLOGY<br />

WANT TO BUILD THE<br />

PERFECT SMARTPHONE?<br />

TAKE A LESSON FROM YOUR CELLS<br />

JOHN ANKERS<br />

WANT TO BUILD THE PERFECT SMARTPHONE?<br />

The race for gadget supremacy never<br />

stops: Apple, Samsung and HTC have<br />

all launched new smartphones in recent<br />

months. But could the next generation<br />

of this evolving technology<br />

find inspiration in a not-so-unlikely<br />

place? John Ankers finds out.<br />

Today’s smartphones could do better. Yes, they<br />

send texts; make video calls; talk to satellites;<br />

take, edit and share your pictures; play games<br />

and music... one even makes a whipping noise<br />

if you waggle it a bit. And some of them can<br />

even make phone calls, too. But surely there’s<br />

so much more that could be crammed in?<br />

Smartphones are still evolving. They’re getting<br />

smaller, lighter and more streamlined. At the<br />

same time we’re always wanting more – ‘more<br />

connectivity!’, ‘more integration!’, ‘more features!’<br />

We want apps that talk to other apps;<br />

Facebook statuses that automatically log GPS<br />

positions; whips that crack by themselves. May-<br />

be we’re spoilt – or perhaps this is all part of<br />

the evolution: people expect more because the<br />

technology promises so much.<br />

Yet increasing the ‘smartness’ of your next<br />

phone will probably require a balance between<br />

reliability and functionality. A microchip’s capacity<br />

will only stretch so far: apps must share<br />

the phone’s limited resources. In order for you<br />

to multitask, so must your phone. Intriguingly,<br />

smartphone developers could learn a thing or<br />

two by taking a look inside a mammalian cell.<br />

The human cell is multifaceted enough to put<br />

any smartphone to shame. The secret, as new<br />

research investigates, lies in learning how to<br />

multitask. The circuitry inside your cells is very<br />

different from what you’d expect in the average<br />

phone: microchips and computer code are replaced<br />

by networks of genes and proteins that<br />

work together to transfer information and carry<br />

out app-like tasks.<br />

Your cellular circuitry has evolved over millions<br />

of years to co-ordinate life’s essential processes.<br />

PAGE 47 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: (Circuit Board) Flickr • BotheredByBees, (Sea of Phones) Wikimedia • saschapohflepp


(Circuit Board) Flickr • Mrs. Gemstone<br />

BELOW:<br />

A burnt out<br />

circuit board.<br />

WANT TO BUILD THE PERFECT SMARTPHONE?<br />

But in research published in PLoS Computational<br />

Biology1, Jeffrey Wong and colleagues found<br />

that, surprisingly, trying to do everything at<br />

once isn’t always the best option.<br />

The team from Duke University, North Carolina,<br />

investigated the wiring of one cellular circuit<br />

– the E2-Factor (E2F) network. This network of<br />

proteins and genes is the program for controlling<br />

how our cells grow and proliferate – and<br />

when they must die. The team asked a simple<br />

question: what happens when you increase the<br />

demand on E2F’s wiring? After all, unreasonable<br />

demands on your phone might cause it to<br />

crash (normally just as you’ve finished writing<br />

a text message). So how do our cells’ cirucuitry<br />

fare when pushed to the limit?<br />

Wong and colleagues built a precise computer<br />

simulation of E2F’s wiring, using algebra in<br />

place of genes and proteins. (Similar techniques<br />

are used to accurately predict everything from<br />

air traffic to climate change to volcanic ash<br />

clouds. They’ve been used in biology for almost<br />

100 years.) The model was used to simulate the<br />

cellular equivalent of an app overload - starting<br />

a pair of tasks at the same time to pull E2F in<br />

opposite directions. The virtual proteins might<br />

have dealt with this by attempting the two<br />

tasks simultaneously. But the team found that<br />

this didn’t happen. As the strain or ‘tension’ in<br />

the network increased, it would become less ‘robust’<br />

and more liable to break or crash – with<br />

disastrous consequences for the cell.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 48<br />

Instead, the team found that the E2F network<br />

copes by hopping between competing tasks – or<br />

even by duplicating part of its wiring temporarily<br />

to cope with the tug-o-war. And these findings<br />

reflect real life: the real E2F network does<br />

dynamically change as cells grow, divide, and<br />

ultimately die.<br />

Dr Wong believes E2F (and other circuits in<br />

our cells) evolved to minimise the tension in<br />

our cells’ wiring. He suggests that multitasking<br />

in this way is an “evolutionary feasible” way of<br />

“reusing a common set of components... to accomplish<br />

multiple biological goals.”<br />

Of course, today’s smartphones also juggle<br />

tasks, giving priority to important apps and<br />

keeping others ‘frozen’ or running in the background.<br />

And yet there are still problems: internet<br />

forums are plagued with complaints, customer<br />

service hotlines glow in fury. Phones are<br />

unreliable: sometimes they just crash. You see,<br />

today’s smartphone developers have a problem:<br />

demands keep changing. Tearing their hair out<br />

behind easels and blueprints, developers are<br />

forced to second-guess us, the fickle consumers.<br />

Is it really possible to design a phone for everyone<br />

– the teenage tweeter, the young professional,<br />

and the ageless cynic who doesn’t care<br />

about Angry Birds but would quite like to finish<br />

a phone call without the battery running out?<br />

The evolving cell discovered – as phone developers<br />

are now realising – that there is often a balance<br />

between functionality and reliability. Even<br />

so, our cells still manage to co-ordinate and control<br />

hundreds of processes – even while communicating<br />

with their surroundings and defending<br />

themselves against attack from the viruses in<br />

the world around them. Given the similarities,<br />

perhaps the truly smart smartphone developer<br />

will be keeping an eye on cell biology research.<br />

They might just save themselves millions of<br />

years’ worth of trial and error.<br />

References:<br />

• Wong, J. V., Li, B. & You, L. (2012)<br />

Tension and robustness in multitasking<br />

cellular networks.<br />

Doctor John Ankers is a researcher at the University of Liverpool’s Institute of Integrative<br />

Biology. He’s normally found in a dark room looking at the inner workings<br />

of cancer cells. Or sleeping. He won the BSCB Science Writing Prize in 2011 and<br />

currently writes freelance for the MRC’s Biomedical Picture of the Day. He blogs<br />

at toomanylivewires and you can follow him on Twitter @JohnnyAnkers.<br />

#MIND<br />

ALICE IN WONDERLAND<br />

SYNDROME<br />

WHEN REALITY GOES DOWN THE RABBIT-HOLE<br />

KAT LOUGHEED


Previous Page: (Large Order Of Toast) Flickr • JD Hancock<br />

ALICE IN WONDERLAND SYNDROME<br />

They say it is what’s inside that<br />

counts. Yet how we view ourselves<br />

always seems linked to what we<br />

see in the mirror. Close your eyes<br />

and the ‘inner you’ navigating your<br />

imagination probably looks a lot like<br />

the outer version everyone else sees<br />

(if perhaps a bit better-looking). But<br />

very odd things start to happen when<br />

the normal link between these two<br />

versions of ‘you’ gets broken. Take<br />

a journey with me down the rabbithole…<br />

As a child, I occasionally experienced the<br />

unsettling sensation that my limbs had grown<br />

to a size approaching that of a small planet. I<br />

now know that this wasn’t the onset of insanity,<br />

or the beginnings of my metamorphosis into a<br />

superhero, but a condition known as Alice in<br />

Wonderland Syndrome (AIWS). For a sufferer<br />

like me, AIWS may mean you perceive your<br />

body to be ballooning, shrinking, or distorting<br />

in shape. A truly bizarre condition, the cause<br />

is often unknown although it has been linked<br />

to some viral infections including influenza.<br />

It is also sometimes experienced by epileptics<br />

or during a migraine – making it tempting to<br />

speculate that migraine-sufferer Lewis Carroll<br />

found inspiration for his fantastical stories<br />

from this condition. Of course, his laudanum<br />

habit may also have helped.<br />

The Alice in Wonderland Brain<br />

What goes on in the brain of an AIWS sufferer<br />

to make them believe they are shape-shifting<br />

is a bit of a riddle – but one that Kathleen<br />

Brumm and her colleagues from San Diego<br />

State University have tried to solve. They used<br />

magnetic resonance imaging on a 12-year-old<br />

boy with viral-onset AIWS to watch what goes<br />

on in the brain (a technique called functional<br />

MRI). During an AIWS episode they saw some<br />

unusual activity in the regions of the brain<br />

involved with making sense of what we see and<br />

for processing the sensations we feel. The boy’s<br />

brain seemed to be misfiring and incorrectly<br />

processing information arriving from his eyes,<br />

which made him think that objects around him<br />

were much smaller than they were in reality.<br />

When AIWS is triggered from an infection<br />

(as with my episode) it seems likely that the<br />

virus inflames such brain areas, and effectively<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 50<br />

messing around with the normal firing patterns.<br />

But fully understanding a rarely-diagnosed<br />

condition isn’t an easy task, especially when<br />

the number of people who suffer AIWS (in the<br />

absence of other conditions) is vanishingly<br />

small. I grew out of my AIWS, but a few can<br />

be stuck with this sometimes debilitating<br />

condition forever.<br />

Voodoo dolls and phantom limbs<br />

It turns out that Kathleen Brumm’s study is just<br />

one of many where a specific area of the brain<br />

– called the parietal lobe – has been linked to<br />

problems with the mind’s construction of body<br />

image. Building our inner perception of our<br />

outer self relies on our brain building a complete<br />

point-for-point map of our body (see image).<br />

Like a giant voodoo doll, the physical body<br />

transmits information from different body<br />

parts to this map, which acts as a switchboard,<br />

piecing together physical sensations to form our<br />

personal experience of the world. However, the<br />

brain map on the inside doesn’t always match<br />

up with the body on thr outside, which can lead<br />

to us perceiving ourselves differently from how<br />

we actually are.<br />

LEFT:<br />

The location<br />

of the parietal<br />

lobe.<br />

LEFT:<br />

A rough layout<br />

of how the brain<br />

maps out the<br />

body’s surface<br />

sensations<br />

located inside the<br />

parietal lobe.<br />

One of the leading names in this field of body<br />

image research is Vilayanur Ramachandran<br />

from the University of California. His work<br />

revolutionised our understanding of phantom<br />

limbs – the phenomenon that causes amputees<br />

to continue to feel the presence of an arm<br />

or leg long after it has been removed. As a<br />

member of his laboratory explained, “Our<br />

brain has to dynamically update our internal<br />

representation of our body, but this doesn’t<br />

happen instantaneously.” It seems that, in its<br />

effort to make sense of a sudden loss of sensory<br />

information, an amputee’s brain effectively<br />

‘borrows’ signals and sensations from other<br />

parts of the body to trick itself into believing<br />

the limb is still present.<br />

But what happens when it is the inner map<br />

that is ‘missing a limb’? Body Integrity<br />

Identity Disorder is a rare condition in which<br />

purportedly sane people find the presence of a<br />

healthy limb so intrusive that they express the<br />

desire for it to be chopped off – often seeking<br />

an amputation. In these cases, the brain’s sense<br />

of body ownership appears to not include the<br />

offending body part.<br />

Even more distressing, a disorder known as<br />

Cotard’s syndrome takes this feeling of ‘not<br />

belonging’ to its extreme: a person becomes<br />

so disconnected with the outer version of<br />

themselves that they believe themselves to be<br />

dead, or decaying, or sometimes immortal –<br />

despite all evidence to the contrary.<br />

A link to anorexia?<br />

While such disorders have been linked to<br />

changes in normal brain activity (as Kathleen<br />

Brumm’s work found), cause and effect can<br />

be difficult to tease apart. What comes first<br />

— the changes in the brain or the delusional<br />

behaviour? Eating disorders are one case in<br />

point:<br />

Workers in Vilayanur Ramachandran’s<br />

laboratory have proposed that similar brain<br />

‘errors’ could partially explain eating disorders<br />

such as anorexia nervosa. Author of the study<br />

Laura Case has considered the following<br />

conundrum: people with anorexia feel large,<br />

ALICE IN WONDERLAND SYNDROME<br />

but why can’t they look in a mirror and use the<br />

accurate visual image of themselves to correct<br />

their distorted sensations? Her theory is that<br />

anorexics have difficulty incorporating sensory<br />

information into a correct body image. If true,<br />

this explanation adds an extra dimension to the<br />

well-known psychological issues that occur in<br />

such disorders.<br />

‘Who in the world am I? Ah, that’s<br />

the great puzzle!’ says Alice.<br />

In the words of Francis Crick, co-discoverer of<br />

the structure of DNA:<br />

“You, your joys and your sorrows, your<br />

memories and your ambitions, your sense of<br />

personal identity and free will, are in fact no<br />

more than the behavior of a vast assembly of<br />

nerve cells and their associated molecules. As<br />

Lewis Carroll’s Alice might have phrased it,<br />

‘You’re nothing but a pack of neurons.’”<br />

Each of us faces the ‘great puzzle’ of who we are<br />

and how we see ourselves. Thanks to the work<br />

of people like Brumm and Ramachandran, we<br />

now possess some, but not all, of the pieces.<br />

References:<br />

• Brumm K. et al. Functional MRI of<br />

a child with Alice in Wonderland<br />

syndrome during an episode of<br />

micropsia. J AAPOS. 2010;14(4):<br />

317–322.<br />

• Ramachandran VS. et al.<br />

Synaesthesia in phantom limbs<br />

induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci.<br />

1996;263(1369):377-86.<br />

• Case LK., et al. Diminished sizeweight<br />

illusion in anorexia nervosa:<br />

evidence for visuo-proprioceptive<br />

integration deficit. Exp Brain Res.<br />

2012;217(1):79-87.<br />

• Ramachandran, VS. Consciousness<br />

and body image: lessons from<br />

phantom limbs, Capgras syndrome<br />

and pain asymbolia. Philos Trans R<br />

Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998; 353(1377):<br />

1851–1859.<br />

Kathryn Lougheed is a research scientist at Imperial College London, working<br />

on the lung disease tuberculosis. She has an unhealthy interest in bacteria, blogging<br />

about research of the single-celled variety at germzoo.blogspot.co.uk in addition<br />

to running a popular science website for kids at ilovebacteria.com, answering<br />

such important questions as ‘Why do papercuts hurt so much?’<br />

PAGE 51 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU


#LIFE<br />

SPONTANEOUS GENEROSITY<br />

(AND CALCULATED<br />

STINGINESS)<br />

WHY LAST-MINUTE SHOPPERS ARE NICER PEOPLE<br />

BENJAMIN CHABOT-HANOWELL<br />

SPONTANEOUS GENEROSITY (AND CALCULATED STINGINESS)<br />

In the Game of Thrones, Ned Stark<br />

warns us to brace ourselves because<br />

winter is coming. In our Earthly<br />

realm, however, it’s less about bracing<br />

ourselves from the White Walkers of<br />

Westeros and more for the onslaught<br />

of needing to continually buy stuff.<br />

December brought Christmas and<br />

this month it is Valentine’s Day. Some<br />

cope with the onslaught by shopping<br />

early. Procrastinators, however—well,<br />

they procrastinate. These last-minute<br />

shoppers may be spending more<br />

on gifts than the early birds: recent<br />

research published in the prestigious<br />

Nature hints at one possible reason<br />

for this phenomenon…<br />

By monitoring individual’s behavior in a variety<br />

of money-orientated situations, psychology<br />

researchers have observed that people are more<br />

generous when they make decisions quickly –<br />

and more stingy when they take their time. One<br />

conclusion is that kindness and co-operation<br />

are intuitive to humans, and that we become<br />

selfish only when we calculate and think too<br />

much.<br />

How to get what you want<br />

Based on such results, we could employ some<br />

rather devious tactics. Should we consider<br />

buying gifts earlier, whilst encouraging family<br />

members to put it off so that we get more<br />

expensive gifts?<br />

The evidence that last-minute shoppers<br />

spend more stretches back many years and is<br />

controversial. In 1993, marketing researcher<br />

Anthony Miyazaki found no link between the<br />

amount spent on Christmas gifts and time<br />

pressure. However, his experiments were flawed:<br />

for each individual he observed, Miyazaki only<br />

recorded one day out of what might have been<br />

many days of holiday shopping. More recently,<br />

former Internet company Meebo sampled<br />

shopping and personality data from over 2,000<br />

users. They found that last-minute shoppers<br />

were 45 percent more likely than regular<br />

shoppers to purchase luxury gift items and 27<br />

percent more likely to plan on spending more<br />

during the holiday season this year than last<br />

PAGE 53 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

Previous Page: (Gift) Flickr • Vincent_AF, (Tons of money) Flickr • pfala


(Pound) Flickr • Mukumbura, (Mall) Flickr • ceratosaurrr.<br />

SPONTANEOUS GENEROSITY (AND CALCULATED STINGINESS)<br />

year. In contrast, early bird shoppers were 34<br />

percent more likely than regular shoppers to say<br />

they were bargain hunters, and 30 percent more<br />

likely to use coupons. So there’s at least some<br />

evidence that late shoppers are willing to spend<br />

more at crunch time.<br />

Are we mean-spirited or just<br />

masking the pain?<br />

The traditional theory for why time pressure<br />

leads to higher spending has nothing to do<br />

with being generous. Renowned marketing<br />

researchers like Leonard Berry and economists<br />

like Gary Becker claimed that as we run out of<br />

time (a limited ‘resource’ that can be ‘saved’<br />

or ‘spent’), we become more willing to give up<br />

other resources (like money) to fulfill our goals<br />

– like getting a gift for paternal affine Great<br />

Uncle Bart to help him remember you in his<br />

will. Other marketing researchers believe that<br />

we are willing to pay more when we are pressed<br />

for time because we are trying to make up for<br />

the emotional pain we will feel in the aftermath<br />

of disappointing someone else with our lack of<br />

planning and forethought.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 54<br />

The tortoise and the hair: the devil<br />

and the angel<br />

For psychologist-economist-Nobel Laureate<br />

and best-selling author Daniel Kahneman,<br />

emotions and gut feelings play a central role<br />

in our gift giving. In his recent book, Thinking,<br />

Fast and Slow, Kahneman describes two<br />

reasoning systems that operate on different<br />

time scales. ‘System 1’ is fast: it is automatic,<br />

emotional, stereotypic, and subconscious. We<br />

use it frequently because rules of thumb, while<br />

imperfect, aren’t too intellectually taxing, and<br />

they often work. ‘System 2’ is slow: it is effortful,<br />

logical, calculating, and conscious. We use it<br />

infrequently because it takes a lot of energy and<br />

time to think this way. Evolutionary biologists<br />

and some economists think that we use System<br />

2 so much because today’s problems are so<br />

varied and complex. Under such circumstances,<br />

methodical calculation is more costly than<br />

more flexible – albeit flawed – rules of thumb.<br />

Among humans, natural selection has favored<br />

a brain that operates under System 1 when we<br />

find ourselves in a tight spot. Yet given enough<br />

time to think about something, we shift into<br />

‘analytical’ System 2 thinking, which is less<br />

cooperative – and, as a new study suggests,<br />

more stingy.<br />

Experts from Harvard’s Department of<br />

Psychology wrap it up like this: when in doubt,<br />

cooperate. Harvard researchers analyzed the<br />

behavior of four participants in a ‘public goods’<br />

game. The rules are that players are given a<br />

number of money tokens at the start and<br />

secretly choose how many to put into a public<br />

pot. The researchers found that individuals<br />

who took 10 seconds or less to make a decision<br />

made contributions about 1.2 times the size<br />

of those made by individuals taking longer<br />

than 10 seconds to decide. More generally,<br />

contributions decreased with each additional<br />

second of decision time.<br />

They also found that individuals forced to<br />

make a decision quickly made slightly larger<br />

contributions than individuals whose decision<br />

time was unconstrained, who in turn made<br />

slightly larger contributions than individuals<br />

SPONTANEOUS GENEROSITY (AND CALCULATED STINGINESS)<br />

whose decisions were<br />

deliberately delayed.<br />

An even more interesting<br />

finding may reassure<br />

anyone with a happy home<br />

life: generosity came more<br />

naturally to people who<br />

graded their daily social<br />

partners (e.g. their husband<br />

or wife) as cooperative.<br />

So what does this mean for<br />

your gift shopping? Will<br />

you overspend on your true<br />

love this Valentine’s Day? If<br />

you are worried about being<br />

a disappointment, I might<br />

advise that you give it some<br />

serious thought. But then<br />

again, your Valentine won’t<br />

thank me for that.<br />

References<br />

• Berry LL (1979) The time buying<br />

consumer. J. Retailing 55: 58-69.<br />

• Binmore K, Samuelson L (1994)<br />

An economist’s perspective on<br />

the evolution of norms. J. Inst.<br />

Theoretical Econ. 150: 45-63.<br />

• Becker G (1965) A theory of the<br />

allocation of time. The Economic<br />

Journal 75: 493-517.<br />

• Houston AI, McNamara JM, Steer MD<br />

(2007) Do we expect natural selection<br />

to produce rational behaviour? Phil.<br />

Trans. R. Soc. B 29: 1531-1543.<br />

• Hutchinson JMC, Gigerenzer G (2005)<br />

Simple heuristics and rules of thumb:<br />

Where psychologists and behavioural<br />

biologists might meet. Behavioural<br />

Processes 69: 97-124.<br />

• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast<br />

and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus<br />

and Giroux. 499 p.<br />

• Miyazaki AD (1993) How many<br />

shopping days until Christmas? A<br />

preliminary investigation of time<br />

pressures, deadlines, and planning<br />

levels on holiday gift purchases. In:<br />

McAlister L, Rothschild ML, editors.<br />

Advances in Consumer Research<br />

Volume 20. Association for Consumer<br />

Research. pp. 331-335.<br />

• Morgilin C, Aaker JL, Pennington<br />

GL (2008) Time will tell: The distant<br />

appeal of promotion and imminent<br />

appeal of prevention. J. Consum. Res.<br />

34: 670-681.<br />

• Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA<br />

(2012) Spontaneous giving and<br />

calculated greed. Nature 489: 427-<br />

430.<br />

• The Meebo study was originally<br />

reported by Ki Mae Heussner for<br />

Adweek.<br />

Benjamin Chabot-Hanowell is an evolutionary anthropologist who studies generosity, social<br />

inequality, aggression, warfare, and cooperation. He was a Fulbrighter to the Eastern Caribbean,<br />

where he learned to play a mean game of dominoes. His is better known as ‘Brash Equilibrium’. His<br />

wife calls him Babe. His daughter calls him Papa. He blogs intelligently and publishes statistical<br />

analyses of political fact checking at www.mynof3.com and tweets impulsively<br />

@BrashEQLibrium.<br />

PAGE 55 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

(Hands and Gift) Flickr • asenat29


#LIFE<br />

WHEN A BAD BOY<br />

TURNS GOOD<br />

A VIOLENT ATTACK TRANSFORMS TEENAGE DROPOUT INTO<br />

BOY-WONDER<br />

BERIT BROGAARD<br />

• GUEST CONTRIBUTORS<br />

KRISTIAN MARLOW<br />

On Friday September 13, 2002, 32year<br />

old Jason Padgett stopped by<br />

a local bar to pick up his friend. As<br />

he left, he noticed two patrons giving<br />

him dirty looks. These bar thugs<br />

advanced upon him and struck the<br />

back of his head, bringing him to the<br />

ground. His next memory was of being<br />

in a Tacoma hospital. For Jason,<br />

reality would never be the same again.<br />

After a hasty in-and-out by the doctor, he<br />

was diagnosed with internal bleeding and a<br />

concussion and sent home to rest. But Jason<br />

barely made it home before he sensed that<br />

something was wrong – unusually freaky,<br />

in fact. Reality was broken! Jason looked<br />

around at a grotesque, almost eerie world:<br />

vases and windows would seemingly shatter<br />

spontaneously. It was as if someone had<br />

grabbed a rock and powerfully tossed it at<br />

reality, cutting the contours of everyday objects<br />

into tiny pieces. As cars moved away, reality<br />

split into geometrical patterns: light bounced<br />

off their shiny paint, ripping open empty air to<br />

reveal rainbows of right-angled triangles.<br />

To Jason’s dismay, these new visions didn’t go<br />

away. Frightened, he locked himself inside his<br />

apartment and stayed there for three years. He<br />

left only when his reservoir of canned beans<br />

was running low.<br />

Jason also saw motion differently. After<br />

his violent attack, objects no longer moved<br />

smoothly. Instead, he saw motion in ‘picture<br />

frames’. He was apparently suffering from<br />

‘motion blindness’, an exceptionally rare<br />

condition that gives the appearance that<br />

reality is frozen. In 1983, Josef Zihl and his<br />

colleagues wrote of a patient (called ‘LM’) who<br />

had sustained damage to both sides of the brain<br />

(in an area known as the posterior temporal<br />

cortex). LM found pouring a cup of coffee<br />

nearly impossible “because the fluid appeared<br />

to be frozen, like a glacier.” The frozen image<br />

would eventually be replaced by an image of the<br />

cup overflowing with coffee.<br />

Jason’s condition was similar: though motion<br />

did not appear completely frozen to him, it<br />

did seem discontinuous. “It is as if someone<br />

is pressing the pause button on a video very<br />

quickly,” Jason told us. Thankfully, because his<br />

‘picture frames’ are replaced by new images very<br />

quickly, Jason could pour a cup of coffee as well<br />

WHEN A BAD BOY TURNS GOOD<br />

as we can.<br />

In 2005, Jason decided to draw what he saw<br />

when he looked at light bouncing off a car<br />

window. He grabbed a pencil and created a<br />

striking image using only straight lines. Putting<br />

pencil to paper helped Jason deal with the new<br />

world he had found himself in. Eventually he<br />

returned to his job as a furniture store sales<br />

person – and, from his first day back, started<br />

decorating the white walls with his colorful<br />

drawings.<br />

Customers were curious about the peculiar<br />

but fascinating artwork. “Who made them?”<br />

they asked. “I did,” the skinny, autodidact artist<br />

would reply. “They are hand-drawn. If you look<br />

at them close up, you can see it for yourself.”<br />

People were shocked: Who knew the dorky guy<br />

in the furniture store could draw? Soon enough,<br />

most locals in town were talking about the<br />

eccentric man in the furniture store who was<br />

drawing amazingly complex images by hand.<br />

Jason couldn’t think about anything but<br />

patterns all day long. But, as time went by, he<br />

realised that, while his drawings captivated<br />

people’s attention, most couldn’t understand<br />

his explanations for his creations. He might as<br />

well have spoken Russian! Try as he may, he<br />

couldn’t explain why, but had the odd sense that<br />

his imagery somehow related to mathematics.<br />

In an attempt to ease his frustrations, a<br />

mathematician friend advised him that if<br />

he wanted to make himself understood, he<br />

would have to learn to speak the language of<br />

mathematics. Until then, Jason’s only interests<br />

had been getting drunk (and getting women),<br />

but eager to find answers, he signed up for a<br />

trigonometry class and a couple of calculus<br />

PAGE 57 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU<br />

LEFT:<br />

‘Pi’ drawn by<br />

Jason Padgett<br />

Previous Page: (Maths) Flickr • trindade.joao, (Eye) Flickr • dwmizell, (PI) Jason Padgett


RIGHT:<br />

Jason in 1988.<br />

His only<br />

interests were<br />

to in alcohol,<br />

women and a<br />

combination of<br />

the two.<br />

(Jason ‘88) Rick Cordova<br />

WHEN A BAD BOY TURNS GOOD<br />

classes at a local community college. A schooldropout,<br />

Jason was about to embark on a truly<br />

exciting journey.<br />

Last time, Jason had cheated on his geometry<br />

high school exam. Now he couldn’t get enough.<br />

He absorbed mathematics with enthusiasm<br />

and, after learning the basics, Jason found<br />

himself understanding mathematics in terms<br />

of the images he continuously saw around<br />

him. Over time, he began to intuitively form<br />

images for mathematical formulae in his<br />

mind’s eye. He didn’t stop his sketching and<br />

eventually started submitting his drawings to<br />

competitions, achieving recognition in 2010 as<br />

Best International Newcomer in the Art Basel<br />

Miami Beach Competition.<br />

We meet Jason<br />

It was a chance encounter with New York author<br />

and journalist Maureen Seaberg that first put<br />

us in contact with Jason. After seeing him on<br />

the local news in Tacoma, Maureen realised<br />

that he had not yet met any scientists working<br />

on conditions such as his. She knew our lab was<br />

looking for new subjects and so recommended<br />

that he contact us to see if we could find out<br />

what was going on in his brain.<br />

After completing initial interviews and<br />

standard tests, we performed a functional<br />

magnetic resonance imaging study (fMRI) in<br />

collaboration with neuroscientists Simo Vanni<br />

and Juha Silvanto from the Research Unit and<br />

Magnetic Imaging Centre at Aalto University in<br />

Finland. Unlike regular MRI brain scans, this<br />

type of imaging allows us to see which areas<br />

of the brain become active when someone<br />

performs a particular task.<br />

GURU • ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • PAGE 58<br />

As anyone who has had an MRI can testify,<br />

getting inside a brain scanner is a tight squeeze:<br />

think Tom Cruise crawling through the vents<br />

in Mission: Impossible. Once inside a scanner,<br />

subjects have to lie extremely still for the<br />

brain images to come out clearly. Given these<br />

restrictions, we weren’t able to test Jason’s<br />

brain activity while he drew his complex images.<br />

Instead, we chose to focus on the visions<br />

(which we call ‘synesthetic images’) that Jason<br />

experiences when he looks at mathematical<br />

formulae. We worked with Jason to create one<br />

list of formulae that caused him to experience<br />

complex geometrical images and another list<br />

that another list that didn’t. Inside the brain<br />

scanner Jason was shown the formulae, one at<br />

a time, in a random order. We then studied the<br />

differences in his brain activity when looking at<br />

image-inducing versus non-inducing formulae.<br />

What we found was surprising. The popular<br />

explanation for the emergence of special talents<br />

after brain injury, such as artistic or musical<br />

abilities, is that certain regions of the left brain<br />

– responsible for the inhibition of ‘creative right<br />

brain’ – have been damaged. This loss of the<br />

left brain results in the hyperactivation of the<br />

BELOW:<br />

Jason being<br />

tested for metal<br />

before the fMRI<br />

scan.<br />

right brain, giving rise to heightened creativity.<br />

Research has shown that most cases of special<br />

talent involve injury to the left side of the brain,<br />

supporting this theory. But our results showed<br />

that, for Jason, his visual experiences weren’t<br />

actually occurring in the right side of his brain,<br />

but the left! Our finding means that there<br />

needs to be a rethink in the accepted theories<br />

for ‘acquired savant syndrome’.<br />

Inside the prodigy’s mind<br />

It is difficult to say what sort of brain injury took<br />

place when Jason was mugged. When someone<br />

is hit on one side of the head, brain damage may<br />

occur on both sides: a forceful impact makes<br />

the brain violently bounce back and forth inside<br />

the skull. Also, Jason was hit and kicked many<br />

times on both sides of the head when he had<br />

collapsed, which may have injured many parts<br />

of his brain.<br />

However, our results do offer us some insight<br />

into what happened on that fateful day. The<br />

initial blows that rendered him unconscious<br />

landed on the right side towards the back of<br />

his skull; it is underneath these locations where<br />

the regions of the visual cortex process visual<br />

properties such as object boundary and color.<br />

Damage here is probably what prevents him<br />

from seeing continuous motion.<br />

Our functional MRI study also helps to<br />

explain why Jason has visual experiences.<br />

We knew that the left side of the brain is<br />

normally largely responsible for producing<br />

visual images, which goes hand-in-hand with<br />

Jason’s hallucinations. When Jason enrolled<br />

in community college he suddenly had to make<br />

sense of mathematical equations, so it is likely<br />

that his brain turned this new learning into<br />

complex imagery. Remarkably, these visual<br />

images probably helped him understand tricky<br />

new mathematical concepts.<br />

Our study had one final surprise. Previous<br />

WHEN A BAD BOY TURNS GOOD<br />

research into such visual hallucinations have<br />

consistently shown increased activity in the<br />

region at the very back of the brain that processes<br />

visual information – the visual cortex. So, we<br />

expected this area to also become activated<br />

when Jason experienced mathematical imagery<br />

– but it didn’t. Instead several areas with<br />

altogether different functions – thinking in<br />

three dimensions, planning and calculating –<br />

were stimulated. (see sidebox)<br />

The main activity associated with the image-<br />

generating equations in Jason was found in an<br />

area of the temporal cortex, located on the side<br />

of the head, and areas of the parietal cortex,<br />

located on top of the head. The temporal cor-<br />

tex is used when thinking and planning about<br />

things in three dimensions. The parietal cortex<br />

is associated with numerous functions, including<br />

preparing for spontaneous action and every-<br />

day mathematical activity, such as counting.<br />

Despite these remarkable insights, we cannot<br />

say on the basis of Jason’s brain scans why his<br />

brain produces equation-induced geometrical<br />

visions. We think it could be his failure to<br />

see continuous movement that triggers his<br />

visions: His brain may interpret fragmented,<br />

overlapping images of moving objects as<br />

complex geometrical patterns. All of this, of<br />

course, will remain speculative until scanning<br />

technology becomes more sensitive.<br />

Jason’s assault was traumatic and devastating.<br />

For most people, such an ordeal would change<br />

their life for the worst. He is one of the lucky<br />

ones – a directionless dropout transformed into<br />

an artist and mathematical prodigy. It gives us<br />

all hope, for further unlocking Jason’s mind<br />

may someday show us how to turn the tragedy<br />

of brain damage into something good.<br />

Berit Brogaard, DMSci, PhD is Professor of Philosophy with joint appointments in<br />

the Department of Philosophy, Psychology, and the Center for Neurodynamics at the<br />

University of Missouri in St. Louis as well as the Network for Sensory Research at the<br />

University of Toronto. She is Director of the St. Louis Synesthesia Lab, a research group<br />

focused on synesthesia and savant syndrome.<br />

Kristian Marlow, MA is a graduate student, member of the Center for<br />

Neurodynamics and Associate Director of the lab. Like all good academics – after a<br />

few too many glasses of wine – Berit and Kristian began writing about the fascinating<br />

cases they’ve studied for their forthcoming book The Superhuman Mind: True<br />

Tales of Extraordinary Mental Ability.<br />

PAGE 59 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 • ISSUE 10 • GURU


FREE EXHIBITION<br />

“ Beautiful, macabre,<br />

harrowing, comforting<br />

and funny” REUTERS<br />

“ A global gamut of<br />

artistic and textual<br />

odes to death” GUARDIAN<br />

Exhibitions at Wellcome Collection<br />

ADVERTISMENT<br />

“ Constantly fresh, and<br />

constantly surprising.”<br />

NEW STATESMAN<br />

Tuesday–Sunday until 18.00. Thursday until 22.00. 183 Euston Road, London NW1 Euston, Euston Square<br />

The Richard Harris Collection<br />

Open until 24 February<br />

“ Pretty much an A-Z<br />

of the fi nal curtain”<br />

HUFFINGTON POST<br />

“ spectacularly amazing<br />

new exhibition”<br />

MORBID ANATOMY<br />

www.wellcomecollection.org/death The free destination for the incurably curious<br />

Wellcome Collection is part of the Wellcome Trust. The Wellcome Trust is a charity registered in England and Wales, no. 210183. Its sole trustee is The Wellcome Trust Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, no. 2711000 (whose registered offi ce is at 215 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, UK).<br />

‘Tête de Mort’ postcard, c.1900. Richard Harris Collection<br />

Alas, another issue draws to a close. The next issue will be<br />

released 1st April – and if you’re interested in getting involved<br />

then you can drop us a line here. Writers, photographers,<br />

artists, designers are all welcome to take part – that’s the<br />

beauty of being crowd-sourced!<br />

Since Issue Zero – the pilot issue – was released in June<br />

2011, we’ve had an amazing journey (check out the comic<br />

strip on the next page!) and that journey continues with our<br />

new app. Of course, future issues will remain free – and we’re<br />

proud to be one of the few magazines on Newsstand that has<br />

no subscription fee.<br />

But before you turn your screen off, we have an earnest<br />

plea: We need readers (you!) to take part in some surveys<br />

about Guru Magazine, and your opinions about science. The<br />

Wellcome Trust’s support of our magazine is incredible; we’re<br />

Shop Guru at the<br />

GURU BOUTIQUE<br />

Guru back issues at<br />

GURUMAGAZINE.ORG<br />

DEPARTURE LOUNGE<br />

repaying this support by finding out whether individuals’<br />

attitudes to science change during the course of 2013 as they<br />

read Guru. It’s citizen science at its best – so do take part.<br />

There are three (fairly short) surveys to complete over the rest<br />

of the year – and we’re offering some pretty stonking prizes<br />

to say thanks for your time. Just go to gurumagazine.org/<br />

the-readers-panel or tap the Readers’ Panel icon below.<br />

Oh, and if you’ve got one of those annoying questions<br />

niggling away at you, ‘Ask A Guru’ goes live every Friday – so<br />

just send over your questions for our team to answer.<br />

Keep in touch with us via Facebook and Twitter – and<br />

if you’re reading on the App, make sure you’ve got Push<br />

Notifications turned on and we’ll flag up competitions,<br />

important news and new releases.<br />

Follow Guru on<br />

TWITTER<br />

Find Guru on<br />

FACEBOOK<br />

THE GURU TEAM


ISSUE 10<br />

FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013<br />

ISSUE 10 • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013<br />

gurumagazine.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!