STEPHENS ENERGY CORP. - The Railroad Commission of Texas
STEPHENS ENERGY CORP. - The Railroad Commission of Texas
STEPHENS ENERGY CORP. - The Railroad Commission of Texas
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
February 28,2005<br />
via Certifed Mail<br />
Re: Letter Dated February 2,2005;<br />
Dear Mr-:<br />
At the outset, let me say that we are always concerned abwt the fuel and lost 8<br />
unaccounted gas (FLUG) on every system Enbridge operates. We have, in fact added<br />
resources in recent years and collaborated to some extent with industry as this issue is a<br />
shared challenge among the industry. As you noted, the December 2004 FLUG<br />
percentage was 24%. approximately 5% and 2.5% <strong>of</strong> which was system fuel and<br />
condensate. respectively.<br />
<strong>The</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> the lost and unacoounted for gas is a function <strong>of</strong> many components. most<br />
<strong>of</strong> which are not measurable. Gathering systems consist <strong>of</strong> various Interconnects,<br />
pressure relief valves, fittings, block valves. meter installations, risen, compressor<br />
stations, dehydrators, processing plants, treating plants, just to name a few. Each <strong>of</strong><br />
these locations is a potential source <strong>of</strong> gas loss. For example, a pressure change can<br />
trigger additional losses as relief valves protect the pipeline system. Free water delivered<br />
into our system by producer's faulty wellhead separation equipment introduces<br />
measurement error. Water entrained as vapor in the gas stream also contributes to<br />
inaccurate measurement on gathering systems. <strong>The</strong> thawing <strong>of</strong> line freezes and<br />
Mowdowns, gas sampllng and a host <strong>of</strong> other numerous items all can contribute to<br />
losses. Likewise. measurement variances due to the nature <strong>of</strong> measurement equipment<br />
operating in Beld conditions-, even within industry standards <strong>of</strong> a +I- 2% tderance.<br />
contribute to LUG.<br />
To further explore, and correct, the multitude <strong>of</strong> problems along the system that could be<br />
a contributing factor, we have long conducted on-the-ground leakage surveys'<br />
periodically, following industry common practices and standards. We recently initiated<br />
field trials <strong>of</strong> new technology using aerial surveillance coupled with the infrared<br />
technology which, if found reliable. would significantly enhance the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
previously undiscovered losses. Along with other pipeline preventive maintenance and<br />
inspection progtams, we have a program <strong>of</strong> planned equipment upgrades and