02.02.2013 Views

Forecasting and Policy Making (Paper) - Center for Financial Studies

Forecasting and Policy Making (Paper) - Center for Financial Studies

Forecasting and Policy Making (Paper) - Center for Financial Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

0<br />

−5<br />

20<br />

0<br />

−20<br />

−40<br />

Figure 10 displays <strong>for</strong>ecasts <strong>for</strong> quarterly real output growth, consumption <strong>and</strong> investment. The<br />

Quarterly annualized real output growth<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Quarterly annualized real investment growth<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

5<br />

0<br />

−5<br />

Quarterly annualized real consumption growth<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Figure 10: Data (black line) <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>ecasts (blue lines) of annualized real output growth, annualized real consumption growth, annualized<br />

real investment growth <strong>and</strong> the level of external spending. The <strong>for</strong>mer three variables are observed in the data, while the latter is estimated<br />

using the Kalman Filter.<br />

output growth <strong>for</strong>ecasts are roughly similar to those computed with the small structural IMF model<br />

in the previous section. There is a strong comovement of output, consumption <strong>and</strong> investment. The<br />

fluctuations of investment growth are much larger than those of consumption growth. The model<br />

cannot predict the large recession in 2008/2009 <strong>and</strong> tends to predict a relatively quick return to the<br />

balanced growth part in 2008Q3 while the recession actually deepened. Once the turning point has<br />

been reached in 2008Q4 the recovery is predicted quite well (see Wiel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wolters, 2011, <strong>for</strong><br />

a detailed analysis of the predictive ability of DSGE models around turning points). Forecasts are<br />

quite accurate from 2009 onwards even though growth turned out to be somewhat lower in 2010 than<br />

predicted by the model.<br />

The <strong>for</strong>ecast <strong>for</strong> investment is extremely persistent. Investment is predicted slightly below 12<br />

percent <strong>for</strong> 2011 <strong>and</strong> decreases afterwards slowly to the much lower investment steady state growth<br />

rate. Steady-state investment growth equals the steady state output growth rate of about 2.4 percent.<br />

The high degree of persistence can be explained by the discrepancy between the average output growth<br />

rate <strong>and</strong> the much higher observed average investment growth rate in the data. The model en<strong>for</strong>ces<br />

that both time series have the same steady state value leading to a very high persistence in investment<br />

to fit the actual data series.<br />

Figure 11 displays <strong>for</strong>ecasts <strong>for</strong> annualized quarterly inflation <strong>and</strong> the federal funds rate. 34 The<br />

model cannot predict the spikes in inflation in 2008 <strong>and</strong> overpredicts inflation from 2009 to the end of<br />

two-sided filter uses in<strong>for</strong>mation about data points in the future.<br />

34 The inflation rate is not directly comparable to the IMF model because the IMF model uses the CPI inflation rate, while<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!