09.02.2013 Views

Shahzada Arshid - Univeristy of Kashmir Information Service

Shahzada Arshid - Univeristy of Kashmir Information Service

Shahzada Arshid - Univeristy of Kashmir Information Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STUDIES ON REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY<br />

OF MYRIOPHYLLUM SPICATUM L.<br />

IN THE KASHMIR VALLEY<br />

Dissertation submitted to the University <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Kashmir</strong><br />

For award <strong>of</strong> the Degree <strong>of</strong><br />

Master <strong>of</strong> Philosophy (M. Phil)<br />

IN<br />

BOTANY<br />

By<br />

<strong>Shahzada</strong> <strong>Arshid</strong><br />

M.sc, NET (JRF)<br />

Post Graduate Department <strong>of</strong> Botany,<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biological Science,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>,<br />

Srinagar-190006, J&K India.<br />

2011<br />

Page 6


DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY<br />

UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR<br />

HAZRATBAL, SRINAGAR, KASHMIR - 190006<br />

CERTIFICATE<br />

No ................<br />

Dated...............<br />

Certified that the Dissertation entitled “Studies on<br />

Reproductive Biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum L. in the <strong>Kashmir</strong><br />

Valley.” submitted to the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>, Hazratbal, Srinagar<br />

for award <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> Master <strong>of</strong> Philosophy in Botany, embodies<br />

original research work carried out by <strong>Shahzada</strong> <strong>Arshid</strong> under my<br />

supervision. This work has not been submitted in part or in full for this<br />

or any other degree before.<br />

The candidate has worked for the period required under<br />

statutes and has put in the required attendance in the Department.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>.(Dr.) Zafar A. Reshi<br />

(Head)<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Botany<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>,<br />

Srinagar-190006.<br />

..<br />

Dr. Aijaz Ahmad Wani<br />

(Supervisor)<br />

Sr. Asst. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Botany,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>,<br />

Srinagar-190006<br />

Page 7


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

Foremost, my all praise for Almighty Allah, the most<br />

merciful and the most beneficent, for it is indeed through His<br />

blessings alone that the work has been completed.<br />

I feel privileged to express a pr<strong>of</strong>ound sense <strong>of</strong> gratitude<br />

and indebtness to Dr. Aijaz Ahmad Wani, (Sr.Assistant<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor) my esteemed teacher and worthy supervisor for his<br />

sagacious, enthusiastic, intellectual and encouraging<br />

stimulation which provided the guidelines for carrying out<br />

the proposed work. His invaluable scholarly suggestions,<br />

immense interest and the noble guidance throughout the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> present work provided me specific and sequential<br />

parameters for successfully completing this work. I have been<br />

fortunate enough to be inspired by his dynamic and<br />

innovative nature throughout the period <strong>of</strong> my study.<br />

I would like to express my deep sense <strong>of</strong> gratitude to Dr.<br />

Zaffar Ahmad Reshi, Head Deptt. <strong>of</strong> Botany, for his constant<br />

encouragement, valuable advises and the freedom <strong>of</strong> work he<br />

provided all throughout my research work.<br />

I am also grateful to my eminent teachers Dr. Irshad A<br />

Nawchoo, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. A. Wafai, Dr. Inayat-ul-lah Tahir, Dr. A.H.<br />

Wani, Dr. Zahoor Ahmad Kaloo, and Mr. Anzar A. Khuroo<br />

for their kind cooperation and timely help.<br />

I would also like to express a special thanks to my senior<br />

scholars Mr. Aijaz Hassan Ganaie,Fozia Amin and Fayaz<br />

Ahmad for their valuable suggestions and generous help<br />

during the entire course <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />

Special thanks also goes to my friends Peerzada <strong>Arshid</strong><br />

Shabir, Nida Aslam, Shugufta Bashir, Mushtaq Ahmad Bhat,<br />

Tajamul Islam, Zahoor Ahmad Itoo, Chesfeeda, Ishah, Samee<br />

ullaha,Abid Mohiuddin, Hilal Ahmad Bhat, Parveez Amin,<br />

Page 8


Mushtaq A Rather, Pervaiz Ahmad Dar, Showkat A, Burhan<br />

Ahad, Waseem and others for their company, support and<br />

encouragement.<br />

I candidly express my pr<strong>of</strong>ound indebtness from the core<br />

<strong>of</strong> my heart to my friend Mr.Farooq Ahmad (Research<br />

Scholar,CORD) for his kind and immense help, without his<br />

generous help and support during this study, the dissertation<br />

would have been less illuminating in its final form.<br />

I have no words to express my heartful gratitude to my<br />

beloved and Wonderful parents, (Ab.Hamid Shah and<br />

Dilafroza), who dedicated their entire life for my Success and<br />

are the tower <strong>of</strong> strength and source <strong>of</strong> inspiration for me.<br />

They always supported and encouraged me, in the moment <strong>of</strong><br />

despair; they came forth to kindle a ray <strong>of</strong> hope which<br />

rejuvenated me to work with renewed zeal and zest, so I can’t<br />

forget to recollect the kind support which they have provided<br />

throughout my educational career.<br />

To my greatest joy, a special word <strong>of</strong> thanks goes to my<br />

well wishers especially to my dear and loving Sisters and<br />

Mohd Ashraf shah (Uncle) without whose constant,<br />

affectionate, moral and kind support, and encouragement<br />

that helped me to push through the good and rough times,<br />

from zeroth to infinite, the present work would not have been<br />

here. My special thanks goes to kids Madeeha Ashraf, Sobia<br />

gul, Namat ul ayn, Suhail shafi and Rehana Fayaz.<br />

A sincere thanks also goes to CSIR New Delhi, for<br />

providing financial assistance during the course <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

(<strong>Shahzada</strong> <strong>Arshid</strong>)<br />

Page 9


Contents<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

Page<br />

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1-5<br />

Chapter 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 6-32<br />

Chapter 3 MATERIAL AND METHODS 33-43<br />

Chapter 4 OBSERVATIONS 44-110<br />

Chapter 5 DISCUSSION 111-125<br />

Chapter 6 REFERENCES 126-153<br />

No.<br />

Page 10


CHAPTER-1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Page 11


R<br />

eproductive biology is one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental fields for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> conservation protocols for elite and<br />

threatened plant species and on the other hand prevention<br />

protocols for invasive plant species which are increasingly<br />

becoming a threat to our terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> reproductive biology is regarded to be <strong>of</strong> nuclear importance in<br />

developing control methods for aggressive aquatic species (Haynes, 1988).<br />

The studies on various aspects <strong>of</strong> reproductive biology help us in<br />

understanding the nature, systematics, modes <strong>of</strong> propagation, adaptation,<br />

hybridization and speciation (Anderson et al., 2002, 2006; Neil and<br />

Anderson, 2005).<br />

Aquatic plants are essential components <strong>of</strong> healthy ecosystems in freshwater<br />

lakes and ponds, producing oxygen, reducing erosion and regulating nutrient<br />

cycling (Hutchinson, 1975). They provide food for many birds as well as<br />

habitat that supports rich communities <strong>of</strong> aquatic invertebrates and<br />

vertebrates (Sculthrope, 1967). Invasive aquatic plants, however, are not<br />

native species, and they are <strong>of</strong>ten destructive (Vitousek et al., 1996). Non-<br />

native plants are responsible for economic losses and control costs estimated<br />

in one analysis at 137 billion per year in the United States alone (Pimental et<br />

al., 2000). Invasive aquatic plants are noted for their explosive growth<br />

potential (Barrett, 1989) and their ability to grow from a few plants to cover<br />

hundreds <strong>of</strong> acres in a few years (Groth et al., 1996). Invasive aquatic plants<br />

have caused declines in native plant populations throughout New England<br />

Page 12


(Scheldon, 1994).In some water bodies, invasive plants have become so<br />

abundent that they displaced native species (Langeland, 1996). Many<br />

biologists feel invasive species are second only to habitat destruction as the<br />

most serious threat to endangered species globally (Wilcove et al., 1998).<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> their great growth potential, invasive aquatic plants can block<br />

navigation channels, irrigation ditches and water intake pipes, and can also<br />

reduce aesthetic and recreational value <strong>of</strong> water bodies, affecting tourism<br />

and real estate values (Catling and Dobson, 1985). In some cases, the plants<br />

have been found to increase breeding habitat for mosquitoes (Eiswerth et al.,<br />

2000). Attempts to eradicate invasive plants once they become established<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten have failed (Anonymous, 1993; Growth et al., 1996; Simberl<strong>of</strong>f,<br />

1997), and their management is expensive (Center et al., 1997). Early<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> invasive plant populations and knowing their reproductive<br />

strategies is critically important to prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> these plants<br />

(Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, 1997)<br />

The Myriophyllum, commonly known as watermilfoil is a genus <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic mostly fresh water plants <strong>of</strong> the family Haloragaceae. The genus<br />

name has originated from two Greek words viz: Myrio means many and<br />

phyll means leaves. It is cosmopolitan in distribution (Moody and Les,<br />

2010) and is represented by 68 species (APG II, 2003). Myriophyllum is well<br />

known for its invasive species. The aggressive Myriophyllum spicatum is<br />

native to Europe, Asia and North Africa (Couch and Nelson, 1985) and has<br />

now established on all the continents except Antarctica (Orchard, 1986; Yu<br />

et al., 2002). It is distributed from Spain and UK in the west to China and<br />

Japan in the east and from Finland in the north to Morocco in the south<br />

(Meusel and Jager, 1978) and is introduced and invasive in North America,<br />

South America, India and Australia (Holm et al., 1979).<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum is a herbaceous perennial species. Leaves<br />

occur in whorls around the stem, usually four together at a node (Aiken et<br />

al., 1979) and each leaf is divided into more than 14 pairs <strong>of</strong> thread like<br />

leaflets. Reproductive characters are the most important characters in the<br />

Page 13


identification <strong>of</strong> the species. In the absence <strong>of</strong> flowers and fruits, the most<br />

distinctive characters are the reddish tips, more than 14 leaflets on each side<br />

<strong>of</strong> the central axis <strong>of</strong> the leaf and the truncated leaf base (Crow and<br />

Hellquist, 2000).<br />

Both sexual as well as asexual modes <strong>of</strong> reproduction are operative in<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum (Williams, 1975; Grant, 1981). A variety <strong>of</strong><br />

propagules and dispersal mechanisms involving seeds, rhizomes, axillary<br />

buds and stem fragments (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993;<br />

Vierssen, 1993) enable the species to grow in varied habitats all over the<br />

temperate areas <strong>of</strong> the world. The relative importance <strong>of</strong> sexual vs. clonal<br />

reproduction varies widely among plant species in response to ecological<br />

and/or genetic factors (Eckart, 2002). Very recently there has been much<br />

interest in exploring the role <strong>of</strong> reproductive modes in geographical<br />

distribution (Peck et al., 1998; Keitt et al., 2001) and the capacity for range<br />

expansion, which in extreme cases manifests as biological invasion (Barret<br />

and Richadson, 1986; Thompson et al., 1995; Pysek, 1997). The most<br />

obvious difference between sexual and clonal reproduction is that sexual<br />

reproduction generates genotypic diversity, whereas strictly asexual clonal<br />

reproduction does not. Limited sexual reproduction can be due to ecological<br />

factors that impair pollination, seed maturation and seedling establishment<br />

(Barrat, 1980).Sexual infertility may also be due to population-level genetic<br />

factors, such as limited mating-type diversity in self-incompatible or<br />

dioecious species (O‘Connel and Eckert, 1999). Understanding the<br />

underlying variations in reproduction may be crucial for predicting the<br />

reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />

Several working groups (Aiken et al., 1979; Smith and Barko, 1990;<br />

Cook, 1996; Nathan et al., 1993; Alwadie, 2008 ) are working on various<br />

facets <strong>of</strong> reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum. Such studies have revealed<br />

that the inflorescence in Myriophyllum spicatum is a spike and floral<br />

organization <strong>of</strong> the species is tetramerous (Aiken et al., 1979; Moody and<br />

Les, 2007). The pollination mechanisms operative are: anemophily and<br />

Page 14


epihydrophily ( Patten, 1956; Cook, 1996). The seed production is high in<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum and it has been found to play an important role in<br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> new genotypes in existing populations (Kimber et al.,<br />

1995; McFerland, 2006), movement <strong>of</strong> populations into new regions (Arnold<br />

et al., 2000; Figuerola and Green, 2002; Harwell and Orth, 2002) and<br />

reestablishment <strong>of</strong> populations after episodic declines (Titus and Hoover,<br />

1991; Parveen et al, 1995; Jarvis and Moore, 2008). However studies on<br />

breeding system and pollination in Myriophyllum spicatum are few,<br />

probably due to aquatic habit and small flower size.<br />

Vegetative propagation is widespread in Myriophyllum spicatum and<br />

is ubiquitous among aquatic species regardless <strong>of</strong> their taxonomic affiliation<br />

(Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993; Les and Philbrick, 1993). Vegetative<br />

reproduction is <strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be the dominant mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in<br />

water plants (Hutchinson, 1975; Sculthrope, 1967). In Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum different types <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagules are produced viz;<br />

rhizomes, axillary buds and stem fragments which provide a mechanism for<br />

clonal reproduction with localized to intermediate distance dispersal<br />

(Madsen, 1991). However little work has been done on reproductive<br />

potential, germination and ecology <strong>of</strong> these propagules.<br />

Notwithstanding the diversity in vegetative and reproductive attributes<br />

and occurrence and abundance <strong>of</strong> various species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum in<br />

<strong>Kashmir</strong> valley, the information on reproductive biology and other allied<br />

aspects is meager in the literature. Therefore present study was focused on<br />

distribution pattern, phenotypic variability, floral morphology and<br />

reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in relation to its habitat<br />

characteristics in order to identify the key habitat specific reproductive<br />

attributes that contribute to the abundance <strong>of</strong> this species in different aquatic<br />

habitats <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley. Such information is obligatory for effective<br />

management <strong>of</strong> the species that invade aquatic habitats to damage the native<br />

biodiversity and functioning <strong>of</strong> these habitats.<br />

Page 15


CHAPTER-2<br />

REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />

Page 16


2.1: Distribution<br />

Worldover, the family Haloragaceae comprises <strong>of</strong> 8 genera and 120<br />

species; and these taxa are extremely diverse in their habit, ranging from<br />

small trees to submerged macrophytes (Moody and Les, 2007). The four<br />

genera (Glischrocaryon, Gonocarpus, Haloragis, Haloragodendron) are<br />

primarily terrestrial, whereas four (Laurembergia, Meizella, Myriophyllum,<br />

Prosperpinaca) are aquatic/semi-aquatic (Table 1).<br />

The Myriophyllum, commonly known as watermilfoil, is among the<br />

species rich (68 spp.) genus <strong>of</strong> the aquatic ―Core eudicots‖ (APGII, 2003). It<br />

shows a cosmopolitan distribution (except Antarctica), with a centre <strong>of</strong><br />

diversity in Australia (42 spp., 34 endemic); North America (14 spp., 7<br />

endemic) and Asia (16 spp., 8 endemic) also harbor a significant continental<br />

diversity and share seven common species as listed in Table 2 (Moody and<br />

Les, 2010). Myriophyllum is well-known for its invasive species. The<br />

aggressive M. spicatum L. (Eurasian watermilfoil) and South American M.<br />

aquaticum (Vell) Verdc. (Parrotfeather) are now established on most<br />

continents and listed as noxious weeds in United States. The North<br />

American endemic M. heterophyllum reportedly is naturalized in Europe<br />

(Wimmer, 1997), Asia (Yu et al., 2002), and also is considered to be<br />

invasive outside its endemic range in the northeast and northwest United<br />

States (Les and Mehrh<strong>of</strong>f, 1999). Hybridization also has been shown to play<br />

a role in North American invasions with two hybrid lineages recognized viz:<br />

M. spicatum x M. sibiricum and M. heterophyllum x M. laxum (Moody and<br />

Les, 2002).<br />

Page 17


Table 1: Distribution, habit and species diversity <strong>of</strong> Haloragaceae<br />

genera (Moody and Les, 2007).<br />

Genus Distribution Habit No. <strong>of</strong><br />

species<br />

1. Glischrocaryon Australia Terrestrial 4<br />

2. Gonocarpus Australia, New Zealand,<br />

S.E. Asia<br />

3. Haloragis Australia, New Zealand.<br />

S. Pacific<br />

Terrestrial 36<br />

Terrestrial *<br />

4. Haloragodendron Australia Terrestrial 5<br />

5. Laurembergia Pantropical Semiaquatic 4<br />

6. Meziella S.W. Australia Aquatic 1<br />

7. Myriophyllum Cosmopolitan Aquatic 60<br />

8. Proserpinaca New World Aquatic 3<br />

*Three species are aquatic.<br />

26<br />

Page 18


Table 2. Global distribution <strong>of</strong> Genus Myriophyllum.<br />

(Meijden, 1969; Meijden and Caspers, 1971; Orchard,1980, 1981, 1986; Aiken, 1981; Yu et al., 2002.)<br />

Continent No. <strong>of</strong><br />

species<br />

Australia<br />

Europe<br />

North<br />

America<br />

South<br />

America<br />

Africa<br />

44<br />

6<br />

14<br />

4<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> species<br />

M. balladoniense, M. caput-medusae, M. decussatum, M. porcatum, M. robustum, M.<br />

salsugineum, M. spicatum, M. triphyllum, M. verrucosum, M. aquaticum, M. trifidum, M.<br />

amphibium, M. pendunculatum, M. tillaeoides, M. dicoccum, M. latifolium, M. muricatum, M.<br />

coronatum, M. costatum, M. filiforme, M. implicatum, M. striatum, M. trachycarpum, M.<br />

alpinum, M. austropygmaeum, M. crispatum, M. drummondii, M. alpinum, M. gracile, M.<br />

integrifolium, M. lapidicola, M. limnophilum, M. lophatum, M. papillosum, M. petraeum, M.<br />

propinquum, M. pygmaeum, M. simulans, M. variifolium, M. votschii, M. artesium, M.<br />

callitrichoides, M. glomeratum, M. muelleri<br />

M. alterniflorum, M. sibiricum, M. spicatum, M. verticillatum, M. aquaticum, M. hterophyllum,<br />

M. alterniflorum, M. quitense, M. sibircum, M. spicatum, M. verticillatum, M. aquaticum, M.<br />

farwellii, M. heterophyllum, M. hippuroides, M. humile, M. laxum, M. pinnatum, M. tenellum,<br />

M. ussuriense.<br />

M. spicatum, M. aquaticum, M. mattogrossense, M. quitense<br />

4 M. spicatum, M. aquaticum, M. mezianum, M. axilliflorum.<br />

Asia 16 M. alterniflorum, M. sibiricum, M. spicatum, M. oguraense, M. verticillatum, M. aquaticum,<br />

M. dicoccum, M. exasperatum, M. tuberculatum, M. heterophyllum, M. bonii, M. siamense, M.<br />

ussuriense,<br />

M. indicum, M. oliganthum, M. tetrandrum.<br />

Page 19


From the Indian subcontinent, five species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum have been<br />

reported (Hooker, 1879). In the <strong>Kashmir</strong> Himalaya, earlier the genus has been<br />

reported to comprise <strong>of</strong> two species: M. spicatum and M. verticillatum (Kaul<br />

and Zutshi, 1965), while as later on three species have been reported viz. M.<br />

spicatum, M. verticillatum and M. tuberculatum (Kak, 1990).<br />

M. spicatum is native to Europe, Asia and North Africa (Couch and<br />

Nelson, 1985) occurring from Spain and UK in the west to China and Japan is<br />

the east, and from Finland in the North to Morocco in the South (Meusel and<br />

Jager, 1978). It was introduced into North America between 1880‘s and 1940‘s<br />

and now occurs in both Canada and the United States (Reed, 1977; Aiken et<br />

al., 1979; Couch and Nelson, 1985). From the initial point <strong>of</strong> introduction in<br />

the North America, M. spicatum has spread to 44 states and at least three<br />

Canadian provinces (Creed, 1998) and is now considered a major nuisance<br />

species throughout the Northeast, Northern Midwest and Pacific Northwest <strong>of</strong><br />

the United States (Couch and Nelsons, 1985; White et al., 1993). M. spicatum<br />

has spread to 46 states and three Canadian provinces <strong>of</strong> North America (Jacono<br />

and Richerson, 2003; Kim, 2005). M.spicatum is categorized among the five<br />

most noxious wetland plants (Cronk and Fennessy, 2001) and it is the most<br />

widely managed aquatic weed in the United States (Bartodziej and Ludlow,<br />

1998).<br />

2.2: Taxonomy<br />

The genus Myriophyllum L. belongs to the watermilfoil family,<br />

Haloragaceae, in the order saxifragales (Moody and Les, 2010). Myriophyllum<br />

has been hypothesized as a distinct within Haloragaceae due to a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> characters including its aquatic habit (also found in Meionectes, Meziella<br />

and Proserpinaca), tendency towards monoecy (also found in Laurembrgia)<br />

and a fruit that splits at maturity into two or four individual nutlets (not found<br />

elsewhere in the family) (Orchard, 1986). Myriophyllum was found to be<br />

paraphyletic in regard to the monotypic Meziella, in recent phylogenetic<br />

analysis (Moody and Les, 2007). Meziella is similar in habit to Myriophyllum<br />

Page 44


ut possesses hermaphrodite flowers and while forming four nutlets, they do<br />

not split at maturity due to a persistent exocarp (Orchard and Keighery, 1993).<br />

The other aquatic Haloragaceae genera (Prosperpinaca and Meionectes) are<br />

distinct, having perfect, two or three merous flowers with a nut and are only<br />

distantly related (Moody and Les, 2007).<br />

A taxonomic confusion exists in the genus Myriophyllum, particularly<br />

with respect to the taxa Myriophyllum spicatum, M. exalbescens and M.<br />

verticillatum (Couch and Nelson, 1983). M. spicatum and M. verticillatum<br />

were first described by Linnaeus in the 1700‘s (Aiken and McNeill, 1980). In<br />

1919, Fernald described a new species for North America, M.exalbescens<br />

(Fernald, 1919). Thereafter Jepson (1925); Hulten (1947); (Patten, 1954, 1956)<br />

and Orchard (1981) found the differences between M. spicatum and M.<br />

exalbescens too significant to warrant separation. Hulten and Patten placed M.<br />

exalbescens within the older taxon as a subspecies, where as Jepson, Nichols<br />

and Orchard preferred the varietal level. Fernald (1919) steadfastly opposed<br />

considering M. spicatum and M. exalbescens as one species. Love (1961); Reed<br />

(1977), Aiken (1979), Aiken and Walz (1979), Aiken et al., (1979) agreed<br />

with Fernald and concluded that the native American species, M. exalbescens<br />

and M. verticillatum, should be separate taxa based on differences in<br />

morphology, physiology and phenology.<br />

All Haloragaceae species are herbs, submersed in quiet waters or rooted<br />

on muddy shores. The similarity <strong>of</strong> the species has led to much confusion about<br />

species identity and most species in the family cannot be separated using only<br />

individual specimens or without flowers (Johnson et al., 1998). A phylogenetic<br />

study based on nr DNA ITS sequence reveals that M. spicatum is most closely<br />

related to the holarctic species M. sibiricum and M. alterniflorum. There is also<br />

close relationship to M. verticillatum and the M. quitense. All other species<br />

analysed i.e., M. heterophyllum, M. laxum, M. hippuroides, M. tenellum, M.<br />

pinnatum, M. farwellii and M. humile are well separated from M. spicatum<br />

(Moody, 2004).<br />

Page 45


M. spicatum was found to hybridize with the M. sibiricum in North<br />

American (Moody & Les, 2002). While M. spicatum and M. sibiricum can be<br />

distinguished by morphological characters related to leaf segments and the<br />

presence (M. sibiricum) or absence (M. spicatum) <strong>of</strong> turions, hybrids overlap<br />

with both parents in leaf characters and lack turions, thus can only be<br />

distinguished using molecular analysis (Moody and Les, 2010). M. spicatum is<br />

variable in appearance with long stems, and usually 12 to 21 leaflet pairs,<br />

which are not stiff when out <strong>of</strong> the water, in contrast the very similar M.<br />

sibiricum usually have five to 10 leaf pairs with leaflets that stay rigid when out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the water, so leaf morphology can be used to separate these two very similar<br />

species successfully (Gerber and Les, 1994).<br />

As per Crow and Hellquist (2000), following taxonomic characters are<br />

used to identify M. spicatum.<br />

1. Leaves pinnately divided, with filiform segments; vegetative stems<br />

elongate.<br />

2. Leaves whorled.<br />

3. Bracts usually twice as long as pistillate flowers.<br />

4. Bracts <strong>of</strong> upper portion <strong>of</strong> inflorescence lanceolate, entire to denticulate,<br />

not glaucous.<br />

5. Middle leaves with 12 or more segments on each side <strong>of</strong> rachis; many <strong>of</strong><br />

the uppermost leaves truncate at apex; stem diameter below<br />

inflorescence greater, up to twice the diameter <strong>of</strong> the lower stem, stem<br />

tips usually reddish; winter buds not formed.<br />

Reproductive characters are the most important characters in the<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> the species. In the absence <strong>of</strong> flowers and/or seeds, the most<br />

distinctive characters are the reddish tips, the 12 or more filaments on each side<br />

<strong>of</strong> the central axis <strong>of</strong> each leaf and the truncated leaf tips.<br />

Page 46


2.3: Phenology<br />

Many factors affect the reproductive success <strong>of</strong> flowering plants. Among<br />

these factors, the timing, frequency and duration <strong>of</strong> the flowering period<br />

collectively referred to as phenology is obviously <strong>of</strong> great importance (Rathcke<br />

and Lacey, 1985). The phenology <strong>of</strong> a species not only encompasses when,<br />

how <strong>of</strong>ten, and how long reproduction takes place but also determines the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> reproduction synchrony with other plant species (Rathcke, 1988).<br />

Synchrony among species might be advantageous if the presence <strong>of</strong> one species<br />

facilitates increase in pollinator visitation and thus fruit/seed set in another<br />

species (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985). Phenology in general and reproductive<br />

phenology in particular is a critical and important trait <strong>of</strong> a plant because it<br />

determines the growth, developmental pattern and number <strong>of</strong> potential mates in<br />

a population thus providing a mechanism for reproductive isolation or<br />

speciation over time (Rathcke, 1983; Bronstein et al., 1990). Researchers<br />

always and continuously try to identify environmental factors that correlate<br />

with phenological events such as initiation <strong>of</strong> flowering, the synchronization <strong>of</strong><br />

flowering, the length <strong>of</strong> the flowering phase and variation in flower abundance<br />

(Opler et al., 1980; Borchert, 1983; Inouye et al., 2002). Environmental factors<br />

that initiate the onset <strong>of</strong> a particular phenophase include photoperiod,<br />

temperature and precipitation (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985). The same<br />

environmental factors can delimit a particular phenophase including flowering<br />

season in some specific ecoedaphic conditions or environments (Borchert,<br />

1980; Inouye and McGuire, 1991).<br />

Patten (1956) studied the phenological events <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

in Lake Musconetcong, New Jersey. The inflorescences first appeared on July<br />

11. Two days later these were abundent. Towards the beginning <strong>of</strong> August, the<br />

plants <strong>of</strong> this area were in full bloom and August 19, approximated the peak <strong>of</strong><br />

the flowering period for the lake as a whole. By the middle <strong>of</strong> September,<br />

flowering was over and the fruiting spikes were laid just beneath the surface <strong>of</strong><br />

water. During October the fruiting was in peak and most <strong>of</strong> the fruits were<br />

Page 47


eginning to drop <strong>of</strong>f from their spikes. Half or more <strong>of</strong> the year‘s seed crop<br />

was released by the end <strong>of</strong> November. Many fruits remained attached to the<br />

plants throughout the winter months and quite <strong>of</strong>ten were frozen into the ice.<br />

Fruits no longer remained by the late February.<br />

Leikic (1970) found that germination <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum generally takes<br />

place in March and April in Yugoslavia. The stem elongates during the<br />

vegetative phase, and leaf production commences. Relatively high water<br />

temperatures are necessary for vegetative growth. Branching starts in May and<br />

has a phototropic response which increased with the increase in light intensity.<br />

Flowering started in the end <strong>of</strong> the May and continued for 2 months with<br />

maximum flowering at the end <strong>of</strong> June and beginning <strong>of</strong> July. Lack <strong>of</strong> sunlight<br />

was found to delay the flowering. Seed production was found to be dependent<br />

upon the seasonal weather conditions; the first mature seeds were recorded at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> July, but may last through October. Seed maturation was followed<br />

by senescence <strong>of</strong> the plant, which ultimately falls to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the habitat.<br />

Unfavourable conditions for the development <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum can result in<br />

reduced size, vitality and seed production. During favourable conditions<br />

increase in the number <strong>of</strong> plants in the population resulted in an increase in<br />

plant height and a decrease in the number <strong>of</strong> fruits per plant.<br />

Spencer and Leikic (1974) reported flowering in early summer which<br />

continues for several months. Flowering in Myriophyllum dicoccum occurs<br />

from August to September and fruiting from September to October, in M.<br />

ussuriense flowering occur from April to September and fruit formation starts<br />

in the month <strong>of</strong> July and continues up to November and in M. aquaticum<br />

flowering occurs in May at low altitudes to July at high attitudes and fruit<br />

formation was not observed. Nathan et al., (1993) reported that flowering in M.<br />

spicatum occurs during April and May and fruit formation occurs from May to<br />

November. Aiken et al., (1979) stated that M. spicatum blooms during July to<br />

September and fruit matures late in September.<br />

Page 48


2.4: Sexual Reproduction<br />

Reproduction in aquatic angiosperms occurs by both sexual and asexual<br />

means (Wade, 1990). Sexual reproduction (the chief source <strong>of</strong> hereditary<br />

variation via genetic recombination) in plants is considered to be advantageous<br />

in changing heterogeneous environments, and asexual reproduction (which<br />

perpetuates genetic uniformity) is considered to be more successful in stable or<br />

uniform habitats (Grant, 1981, Williams, 1975). Sexual reproduction is a<br />

primary mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction for terrestrial ancestors <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants. A shift<br />

from sexual to asexual (vegetative) reproduction is <strong>of</strong>ten associated with the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants, a complete absence <strong>of</strong> flowering and seed set is<br />

found in only a few aquatic species (Philbrick and Les, 1996). The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic angiosperms retain the ability to flower and seed set (Sculthrope,<br />

1967). Cook (1987) pointed out that <strong>of</strong> the 12 most notorious aquatic invaders,<br />

only one Trapa natans relies on sexual processes for its reproduction and<br />

success. Out <strong>of</strong> the remaining 11 species, only Myriophyllum spicatum, Najas<br />

minor and Pistia stratiotes regularly develop seed in their native and adventive<br />

ranges. Salvinia molesta is a sterile hybrid, and the rest have well developed<br />

self-incompatibility mechanisms. The retention <strong>of</strong> sexual reproduction by<br />

angiosperms in aquatic conditions represents a difficult evolutionary transition<br />

but floral systems <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants are generally conservative and reflect their<br />

terrestrial heritage (Philbrick and Les, 1996). The aquatic plants betray their<br />

terrestrial ancestors in their sexual phase with the greatest clearity (Sculthrope,<br />

1967).<br />

Sexual reproduction <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants departs from that <strong>of</strong> terrestrial<br />

plants. When flowers are adapted to aerial life, aquatic plants have to raise their<br />

inflorescence axis well above the water level, if cross pollination is to be<br />

secured (Arber, 1920). This is not always completely achieved. In Ranunculus<br />

penicillatus var. calcareus, the stem maintaining the flowers above the water<br />

are considerably more fragile than the normal submerged and vegetative ones<br />

and they are easily damaged and lost (Cook, 1966; Dawson, 1980). Arber<br />

Page 49


(1920) reports that Ranunculus fluitans does not hold its peduncles very erect,<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ten suffers the inundation <strong>of</strong> its flowers and thus fails to set seeds while<br />

Ranunculus trichopyllus <strong>of</strong>ten opens its flowers under the water surface, but it<br />

seems that it cannot set seeds under these conditions. It was, however,<br />

considered that the failure in setting ripe fruits in this species usually was not<br />

due to inundation, but mainly to genetic reasons. In hybrid populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Ranunculus fluitans the abortion <strong>of</strong> the anthers and abnormal pollen might be<br />

responsible for the seed sterility <strong>of</strong> the plants (Cook, 1966; Turala-Szybowska,<br />

1977); this feature is also observed in Ranunculus pencillatus (Turala, 1969,<br />

1970; Webster, 1986, 1988). The production <strong>of</strong> reproductive structures above<br />

the water surface can increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> herbivory and mechanical<br />

damage (Spencer and Bows, 1990).<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum reproduces sexually by forming large number <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds (Cook, 1987). Sexual reproduction appears unimportant in shaping<br />

population structure <strong>of</strong> Eurasian water milfoil (M. spicatum) in Minnesota<br />

(Furnier and Mustaphi, 1992); however, significant germination was observed<br />

in Lake George in New York State (Hartleb et al., 1993).<br />

2.4.1: Floral Organization<br />

The sexual stage <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum starts with the inflorescence which is a<br />

terminal, cylindrical, naked, interrupted spike, indeterminate in development<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ten very red (Patten, 1956). All flowers in the spike are whorled, with 4<br />

flowers in each whorl. Male flowers are on upper side <strong>of</strong> the spike with pinkish<br />

petals, female flowers on lower side without perianth. (Aiken et al., 1979). The<br />

inflorescence is a terminal spike and is born above the water surface; flowers<br />

are small and inconspicuous (Smith and Barko, 1990). The upper flowers on a<br />

spike are staminate and lower pistillate, the transition between appearing abrupt<br />

(Knupp, 1911). The entire spike may sometimes be staminate or pistillate -<br />

dioecious, considered to be a vestigial condition <strong>of</strong> a completely<br />

hermaphroditic phylogenetic origin <strong>of</strong> the group (Knupp, 1911 and Hagi,<br />

1926). Hagi (1926) reported that surrounding aqueous medium is the direct<br />

Page 50


cause <strong>of</strong> repression <strong>of</strong> the male sex in the lower flowers. Each flower is sessile<br />

in the axil <strong>of</strong> a strong bract, two more delicate bracteoles are also located at the<br />

base <strong>of</strong> each flower, these three bracts entirely enclose and protect the young<br />

flower and gradually open out as the spike elongates and the flowers mature,<br />

the flowers are verticillate in fours, each whorl being rotated about 45 degrees<br />

from the adjacent ones, so whorls are in two ranks and this rotation produces<br />

the spiral arrangement characteristic <strong>of</strong> the spikes before elongation (Patten,<br />

1956). The first report <strong>of</strong> flowering in the field is the appearance <strong>of</strong> small,<br />

green, compressed spikes at the stem apices, covered at least partially by the<br />

last leaves produced by the vegetative apex (Patten, 1956). This is followed by<br />

elongation <strong>of</strong> spike axis, elevation <strong>of</strong> the spike out <strong>of</strong> the water, pollination and<br />

resubmergence. The spike axis becomes thicker than the normal vegetative<br />

stem and blooming occurs just above the water surface regardless <strong>of</strong> the depth<br />

(Vaucher, 1841). Aiken (1981) reports that spike axis becomes almost double<br />

in width than the normal vegetative stem.<br />

2.4.2: Pollen morphology, Pollination system and Breeding behaviour<br />

Pollination has been <strong>of</strong> interest since ancient times. (Cox, 1988).<br />

Theophrastas (1976) deduced that pollen is a desiccant which prevents the<br />

rotting <strong>of</strong> developing fruits and pointed out the necessity <strong>of</strong> pollen to fruit<br />

formation. Pollen is a vital link between each generation <strong>of</strong> flowering plants,<br />

houses the male gametes and is <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ound importance in the classification<br />

and taxonomy <strong>of</strong> angiosperms (Ducker and Knox, 1985).<br />

There is a correlation between pollen morphology and pollination<br />

mechanism (Van Vierssen et al., 1982; Tanaka et al., 2004). A definite<br />

relationship is exhibited between pollen characters and pollination types<br />

especially in entomophily and anemophily. Pollen grains <strong>of</strong> entomophilous taxa<br />

are characterized by compound apertures i.e. 3-colporate, prolate-spheroidal<br />

shape, generally large, thick walled, sticky and with reticulate tectum, while<br />

pollen grains <strong>of</strong> anemophilous taxa are with simple apertures i.e. monoporate,<br />

Page 51


spheroidal, small thin walled, dry and with scabrate-areolate tectum (Shuang-<br />

Quan et al., 2001; Parveen et al., 1994).<br />

Underwater pollination systems in angiosperms are derived from aerial<br />

floral systems (Philbrick and Les, 1996). Exine reduction or complete exine<br />

loss appears to be an essential component in the evolution <strong>of</strong> hydrophily<br />

(Philbrick, 1991). This has been documented in hydrophilous members <strong>of</strong><br />

Hydrocharitaceae (Pettitt, 1981). There is a correlation between the variation in<br />

the exine and pollination mechanism (Tanaka et al., 2004). Pollen grains <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrophilous taxa are spheroidal non-aperturate coarsely reticulate tectum with<br />

thin exine. The thin elastic exine and reduced or omniapertures (non-aperture)<br />

are considered characters <strong>of</strong> hydrophilous taxa (Punt, 1986).<br />

Many authors have studies the pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> some species <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic families such as Lemnaceae (Aiken, 1978), Potamogetonaceae<br />

(Parveen, 1999), Hydrocharitaceae (Takahashi, 1994; Tanaka et al., 2004),<br />

Podostemaceae (Obson et al., 2000), Haloragaceae (Labdolt, 1986; Sorsa,<br />

1988), Najadaceae (Shuang-Quan, 2001), Ceratophyllaceae (Takahashi,1995),<br />

Rubbiaceae (Lacroix and Kemp, 1997; Callitrichaceae (Cooper et al., 2000)<br />

and Nymphaceae (Shiga and Kadono, 2007).<br />

Alwadie (2008) examined pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> six species <strong>of</strong> aquatic<br />

angiosperms from Saudi Arabia belonging to five genera distributed in five<br />

families using both light and scanning electron microcopy. These species<br />

include Myriophyllum spicatum, Elodea canadensis, Potamogeton crispus, P.<br />

pectinatus and Ruppia maritima. The pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are<br />

generally radially symmetrical, isopolar, sub-oblate to oblate, 4-zonocolpate,<br />

colpi short, 4-5 colpate, tectum scabrate-punctate. Exine thick, sexine thicker<br />

than nexine. Parveen (1999) examined the pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> 16 species <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic angiosperms in 14 families from Karachi using light and scanning<br />

electron microscope including Myriophyllum verticillatum. The Pollen grains<br />

<strong>of</strong> aquatic families are mostly apolar or isopolar and rarely heteropolar. The<br />

pollen shape is commonly spheroidal, rarely boat shaped (Nymphaea stellate).<br />

Page 52


However in the family Juncaceae and in the single species <strong>of</strong> Typhaceae<br />

(Typha elephantina) pollen grains are united in tetrads. Exine sculpturing is<br />

also extremely varied, ranging from reticulate to regulate, fossulate, scabrate or<br />

olate. Apertures are mostly colpate or porate. However in few taxa non-<br />

aperturate pollen are also found (Potamogeton, Juncus) rarely tricolporate as in<br />

Enhydra fluctuans. Pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. verticillatum are radially symmetrical,<br />

isopolar, sub-oblate, 4-5 colpate, colpi short. Exine thick, sexine thicker than<br />

nexine. Tectum scabrate-punctate, scabrae fine.<br />

The flowers <strong>of</strong> most aquatic angiosperms must be elevated above the<br />

water in order for pollination to occur by entomophily (pollination by insects)<br />

and anemophily (by wind), very rarely pollen transfer occur underwater<br />

(hydrophily) (Riemer, 1984). The transport and capture <strong>of</strong> pollen in 20% <strong>of</strong> all<br />

angiosperm families occurs in air and water (Ackerman, 2000). Delpino (1871)<br />

recognized that pollen transfer could take place without animals and divided<br />

abiotic pollination into wind (anemophily) and water pollination (hydrophily).<br />

Whereas anemophily occurs in the air, hydrophily is further divided into<br />

epihydrophily (surface pollination) and hypohydrophily (underwater<br />

pollination) (Knuth, 1906). Additional distinctions can be made for both<br />

epihydrophily and hypohydrophily, especially with respect to whether pollen<br />

and stigmas are wet (Les et al., 1997). The diversity in abiotic pollination<br />

reflects the fact that anemophily and hydrophily have evolved many times in<br />

terrestrial and aquatic plants (Arber, 1920; Sculthrope, 1967; Les et al, 1997;<br />

Niklas, 1997; Raven et al., 1999). Anemophily is much more common than<br />

hydrophily, 98% <strong>of</strong> the plants that pollinate abiotically are pollinated by wind<br />

(Faegri and Vander Pigl, 1979). Some <strong>of</strong> the earliest seed plants were<br />

pollinated by wind (Niklas,1997).<br />

Cook (1988) reported that in family Haloragaceae, genus Haloragis,<br />

Myriophyllum, Laurembergia, Prosperpinaca and Vinkia have aquatic species,<br />

all <strong>of</strong> which are well adapted to wind pollination. All have flowers with<br />

reduced petals and <strong>of</strong>ten caducous perianths and dry, powdery pollen liberated<br />

Page 53


from long filamented anthers. There is a trend from bisexual to unisexual<br />

flowers culminating in dioecy. Cook (1996) reported the occurence <strong>of</strong><br />

anemophily in different genera <strong>of</strong> family Haloragaceae including<br />

Myriophyllum. Patten (1956) reported that in Myriophyllum spicatum when the<br />

spikes emerge they exhibit protogynous dichogamy: The stigmas ripening well<br />

in advance <strong>of</strong> the stamens, thereby favouring cross-pollination, soon after, the<br />

deciduous petals abscise forecasting the ripening <strong>of</strong> the stamens. The mode <strong>of</strong><br />

pollination is the subject <strong>of</strong> diverse opinions and occurs when the spikes project<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the water and that the hydrophilous pollination does not occur in M.<br />

spicatum. This is substantiated by the observation that lowermost carpels on<br />

some inflorescences are <strong>of</strong>ten submerged, such submerged carpels have always<br />

been observed to abort instead <strong>of</strong> developing into mature achenes. Many spikes<br />

lean at an angle away from the perpendicular out <strong>of</strong> the water causing<br />

submergence <strong>of</strong> some carpels <strong>of</strong> a whorl while the others remain exposed to the<br />

atmosphere. The submerged carpels abort and the emersed ones develop into<br />

mature seeds at the same node giving an evidence <strong>of</strong> wind-pollination. It was<br />

also reported by him that self-pollination in M. spicatum is generally ruled out<br />

with the following exception. A single plant usually possesses a number <strong>of</strong><br />

flowering stems each <strong>of</strong> which has lateral branches which also flower. It<br />

happens that the main stems bloom before the laterals so that pollen from the<br />

central spike can ripe at the same time the lateral pistils are receptive. Even<br />

here, though, the chances for cross-pollination would be still greater due to the<br />

greater abundance <strong>of</strong> pollen freed from other sources. Patten pointed out that<br />

the staminate parts <strong>of</strong> the spike decline, <strong>of</strong>ten abscising completely and the<br />

pistillate portion with the staminate remnant disappears beneath the surface,<br />

along with a decrease in the thickness <strong>of</strong> the spike axis and develop into the<br />

mature achenes. The spikes slowly disintegrate until they are sufficiently rotted<br />

for the achenes to drop with the aid <strong>of</strong> wave action.<br />

Arber (1920) states that a certain number <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants have given up<br />

insect-pollination and taken to anemophily, along with simplification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Page 54


flower and Myriophyllum is one such genus as evidenced by the structural<br />

adaptation <strong>of</strong> long anthers swinging on flexible filaments. Hagi (1926) also<br />

favoured wind-pollination. Ludwig (1881) cited wind pollination although he<br />

reported that whole populations <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum verticillatum flowers<br />

underwater. Knuth (1906) reported anemophily as well as hydrophily for M.<br />

spicatum. Hagi (1926) reported hydrophily in M. verticillatum. Vaucher (1841)<br />

overlooking the protogynous nature <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum stated that pollen falls out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the anthers directly on the stigmas below and hence pollination occurs.<br />

Knupp (1911) is in favour <strong>of</strong> hydrophily for M. spicatum.<br />

2.4.3: Pollen-Ovule Ratio<br />

The pollen-ovule ratio (P/O) is the ratio <strong>of</strong> pollen grains produced per<br />

ovule. Cruden (1977) reported that cleistogamous flowers should have the<br />

lowest pollen to ovule ratio‘s and that autogamous flowers will have lower<br />

pollen to ovule ratio‘s than xenogamous flowers i.e., pollen to ovule ratio‘s are<br />

correlated with breeding systems. The more efficient the transfer <strong>of</strong> pollen, the<br />

lower the pollen to ovule ratios should be. The evolutionary shift from<br />

xenogamy (outcrossing) to autogamy (selfing) has been mediated through<br />

decreased flower size and alterations in floral morphology which reduce the<br />

energetic cost per flower and facilitate self pollination (Ornduff, 1969).<br />

Flowers <strong>of</strong> self-incompatible and other xenogamous taxa produce more pollen<br />

grains than closely related self-compatible and/or autogamous taxa (Arroyo,<br />

1973; Baker, 1967; Cruden, 1973; Gibbs et al., 1975; Lloyd, 1965; Vries,<br />

1974).<br />

Pollen grain number has to be positively related to ovule number. This<br />

relationship was observed across families (Cruden and Miller-Ward, 1981) and<br />

within families (Small, 1988; Plitman and Levin, 1990; Kirk, 1993; Lopez et<br />

al., 1999). Variation in Pollen grain and/or ovule number may occur within<br />

individuals and within or among populations, or may be more or less constant<br />

(Arnold, 1982; Devlin, 1989). In homoecious species (species with<br />

hermaphroditic flowers), both pollen and ovule number may vary within a plant<br />

Page 55


during the flowering season (Cruden and Lloyed, 1995) and there is no change<br />

in the pollen to ovule ratio (Vasek et al., 1987). Some <strong>of</strong> the seasonal variation<br />

in pollen grain and ovule number may reflect dichogamy. In populations <strong>of</strong><br />

protoandrous plants or those with protoandrous flowers the pollen from the first<br />

flowers to open will not reach a stigma and the plants suffer a loss in<br />

reproductive success through male function. Brunet and Charlesworth (1995)<br />

suggested that this might result in plants investing less in male function in the<br />

first opening flowers and relatively more in female function. Protogyny should<br />

produce the opposite pattern.<br />

Pollen grain number and/or ovule number may vary among populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> a species. Such variation may be very small and no one has demonstrated a<br />

selective basis for it (Affre et al., 1995; Cruden, 1977; Diaz lifante, 1996;<br />

Ramsey et al., 1994, Vuille, 1988). Such variation may reflect sampling error<br />

or have an environmental basis. In some species there was substantial variation<br />

among populations that reflected difference in breeding system (Affre et al.,<br />

1995; Dahl, 1989; Thomas and Murray; 1981). There may be substantial<br />

difference in pollen to ovule ratio among populations with the same breeding<br />

system that may reflect pollination efficiency (Webb, 1994).<br />

A negative relationship between pollen grain number and size is well<br />

documented (Cruden, 1977; Dulberger and Ornduff, 1980; Cruden and Miller-<br />

ward, 1981; Small, 1988; Mione and Anderson, 1992; Knudsen and Olesen,<br />

1993; Lopez et al., 1999). Many attribute the relationship to a simple trade-<strong>of</strong>f<br />

between number and size (Charnov, 1982).<br />

There is a relationship between pollen number and duration <strong>of</strong> stigma<br />

receptivity. The number <strong>of</strong> pollen grains recieved by the stigma is increased by<br />

the length <strong>of</strong> time it is receptive. Differences in the period <strong>of</strong> receptivity may<br />

reflect ecological and/or physiological factors or genetic differences among<br />

populations and in many species unpollinated stigmas remain receptive longer<br />

than pollinated stigmas (Devlin and Stephenson, 1984; Richardson and<br />

Stephenson, 1989). The pollen to ovule ratios <strong>of</strong> plants whose pollen is<br />

Page 56


dispersed in tetrads, polyads and pollinia has lower pollen-ovule ratio than<br />

those dispersed as monads (Cruden, 1977, 1997). The pollen to ovule ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

species with secondary pollen presentation are lower than those <strong>of</strong> species with<br />

primary pollen presentation (Yeo, 1993) and the species that <strong>of</strong>fer only pollen<br />

as a reward produce more pollen per ovule than those that provide nectar as a<br />

reward (Vogel, 1978; Pellmyr, 1985, 1986).<br />

There is a strong correlation between pollen to ovule ratio and breeding<br />

system. Pollen to ovule ratio decreases from obligate xenogamous to<br />

facultative xenogamous to autogamous species. This holds within species<br />

(Dahl, 1989; Affre et al., 1995; and Hannen and Prucher, 1996), generas (Spira,<br />

1980; Vuille, 1987; Feliner, 1991; Sharma et al., 1992) and families (Schlising<br />

et al., 1980; Short, 1981; Webb, 1984; Lawrence, 1985; Preston, 1986; Vasek<br />

et al., 1987; Plitman and Levin, 1990; Feliner, 1991). Cruden (2000) reported<br />

that homoecious species have lower pollen to ovule ratio‘s than those with<br />

other sexual systems and that the pollen to ovule ratio‘s <strong>of</strong> wind-pollinated<br />

species are higher than those <strong>of</strong> animal pollinated species with the same<br />

breeding system .Wind pollinated, xenogamous plants produce large numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollen grains (Pohl, 1937; Proctor and Yeo, 1972), because most flowers<br />

have just a single ovule their pollen to ovule ratio‘s should be high relative to<br />

those <strong>of</strong> animal pollinated plants.<br />

Philbrick and Anderson (1987) examined the pollen-ovule ratio in genus<br />

Potamogeton. All the ten Potamogeton species studied with aerial flowers are<br />

xenogamous. Ratios in the aerial flowered species extended from a low <strong>of</strong><br />

about 3000 grains per ovule in P. robbinsii to a mean high <strong>of</strong> about 40,000 in<br />

P. zosteriformis. Species with aerial and submerged flowers and those with<br />

regularly submerged flowers possess significantly lower pollen to ovule ratios<br />

than aerial-flowered species.<br />

2.4.4: Fruit and Seed Biology<br />

The fruit <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum is called as achene and seed as nutlet (Patten,<br />

1955), where as fruit as nut which breaks at maturity into two or four<br />

Page 57


individual seeds called as nutlets (Orchard, 1986). Fruit is called as Schizocarp<br />

with 4 longitudinal ridges where it splits into 4 one seeded nutlets ( Aiken and<br />

Mc Neilt, 1980 ; Aiken, 1981).<br />

Although seed germination <strong>of</strong> terrestrial species has been extensively<br />

studied, few studies have examined submerged macrophytes (Coble and Vance,<br />

1987; Hartleb et al., 1993; Lal and Gopal, 1993; Baskin and Baskin, 1988; Ke<br />

and Li, 2006; Hay et al., 2008; Jarris and Moore, 2008). This may be due to the<br />

fact that most submerged macrophytes show dominant clonal reproduction, and<br />

their seeds are rarely observed to grow into mature plants in nature. However,<br />

seeds <strong>of</strong> submerged macrophytes have been found to play to important roles in<br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> new genotypes in existing populations (Kimber et al.,<br />

1995; McFarland, 2006), movement <strong>of</strong> populations into new regions (Arnold et<br />

al., 2000; Figuerola and Green, 2002; Harwell and Orth, 2002) and<br />

reestablishment <strong>of</strong> populations after episodic declines (McMillan & Jewelt-<br />

Smith, 1988; Titus and Hoover, 1991; Parveen et al., 1995; Jarvis and Moore,<br />

2008). A recent study on the genetic pattern <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton malaianus<br />

suggested that bird mediated seed dispersal could greatly influence gene<br />

movements among lakes (Chen et al., 2009).<br />

Germination requirements and dormancy characteristics <strong>of</strong> species are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be adaptations to the particular habitats where the species<br />

occur (Angevine and Chabot, 1979; Meyer et al., 1990). Germination at the<br />

right time and in the right place is important to determine the probability <strong>of</strong> a<br />

seedling surviving to maturity (Thompson, 1973). Previous studies have<br />

indicated that temperature (Hartleb et al., 1993; Ke and Li, 2006; Hay et al.,<br />

2008; Jarvis and Moore, 2008) and light (Coble and Vance, 1987; Lal and<br />

Gopal, 1993) are important ecological triggers in the seed germination <strong>of</strong><br />

submerged species.<br />

Xiao et al., (2010) examined the effect <strong>of</strong> temperature, water level and<br />

burial depth on seed germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum and Potamogeton<br />

malaianus. There was no significant difference in final germination <strong>of</strong> M.<br />

Page 58


spicatum among water level treatments, but P. malaianus germinations at 1cm<br />

and 12 cm water levels where better than at 0 cm water level. Little to no<br />

germination was observed for either species at the temperature <strong>of</strong> 10 0 C but at<br />

15 0 C germination increased significantly to 66.3-70.6% for M. spicatum and<br />

to 29.4 -48.1% for P. malaianus under all three water level treatments.<br />

Increasing temperature from 15-30 0 C had no significant effect on final<br />

germination <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum, but enhanced significantly the germination <strong>of</strong> P.<br />

malaianus. The germination percentage <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum was 71.3% at 0 cm<br />

burial depth, but decreased to 5.0% and to 2.5% at depths <strong>of</strong> 1cm and 2cm<br />

respectively, where as germination percentage <strong>of</strong> P. malaianus were 40%,<br />

23.8%, 12.5%, 7.5% and 1.3% at depths <strong>of</strong> 0cm, 1cm, 2cm, 3cm, and 5cm<br />

respectively. Analysis <strong>of</strong> mean time to germination revealed that M. spicatum<br />

is a faster germinator relative to P. malaianus.<br />

Coble and Vance (1987) examined the affect <strong>of</strong> light quality on the<br />

germination <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum. Under favourable conditions, 92.2%<br />

germination rate was observed. The effect <strong>of</strong> white, red (700 and 725 nm),<br />

green (520 nm), and blue (445nm) light as well as darkness on the germination<br />

was studied. As many as 97% <strong>of</strong> the seeds germinated under red light (725nm).<br />

Blue light significantly inhibited germination and almost no seeds germinated<br />

in the darkness. The mean percent germination ranged from 77.8% to 97.2%<br />

for those seeds exposed to light wavelength above 500nm.Seeds exposed to<br />

light <strong>of</strong> 445nm and those left in the dark had lower germination rates <strong>of</strong> 30.5%<br />

and 5.6% respectively. These studies suggest that seed germination can be<br />

inhibited by an extreme increase or decrease in light intensity. The extremely<br />

high germination rate in the red light and inhibition <strong>of</strong> germination in the blue<br />

light both indicate the presence <strong>of</strong> an active Phytochrome system (Hartmann,<br />

1966; Rollin and Maignan, 1966; Rollin, 1970; Malcoste et al., 1972; Mitrakos<br />

and Shropshire, 1972).<br />

Standifer and Madsen (1997) studied the effect <strong>of</strong> drying period on the<br />

germination <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil seeds. The seeds were subjected to the<br />

Page 59


drying treatment for different periods. Maximum percent germination (81.6%)<br />

was observed in seeds <strong>of</strong> the control treatment while seeds exposed to the 36<br />

week drying period demonstrated the lowest rate <strong>of</strong> germination (53%). There<br />

is significant downward trend in germination rates as drying period increases.<br />

However a substantial percentage <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil seeds remain viable<br />

following a drying period <strong>of</strong> up to 36 weeks. The viability <strong>of</strong> these seeds<br />

following an extensive drying period demonstrates the resilience <strong>of</strong> these seeds<br />

to desiccation and suggests a potential role for reproduction.<br />

Patten (1955) studied the seed germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum by<br />

subjecting the seeds to different conditioning treatments. The seeds <strong>of</strong> M.<br />

spicatum doesn‘t germinate readily early in the first year unless exposed to<br />

certain conditioning treatments. There is a necessity for a period <strong>of</strong> after-<br />

ripening which increases the ability <strong>of</strong> seeds to germinate. Treatments which<br />

were found to enhance after-ripening, and hence germination, in decreasing<br />

order <strong>of</strong> effectiveness are:-<br />

1. Partial removal <strong>of</strong> the stony endocarp<br />

2. Scarification<br />

3. Freezing<br />

4. Alternate freezing and drying<br />

5. Drying<br />

6. Exposure to relatively high H-ion and OH-ion concentrations<br />

7. Prolonged exposure to exposure to low temperature<br />

The pericarps are inhibitory to germination. The conditioning treatments<br />

presumably increases germination through some action on pericarps. There is a<br />

minimum temperature below which germination does not occur normally.<br />

There is a prompt germination when water warms in the spring to this<br />

temperature. Cooling during the winter and possible freezing condition the<br />

seeds for such a spring eruption.<br />

Madsen and Boylen (1989) studied the seed germination <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum<br />

from an oligotrophic and eutrophic lake. The seeds <strong>of</strong> the eutrophic lake show<br />

Page 60


mean germination <strong>of</strong> 69% and the seeds <strong>of</strong> oligotrophic lake showed lower<br />

germination rates and the mean germination <strong>of</strong> 41% under light conditions. In<br />

oligotrophic lake the seeds not appear sufficient to contribute to the spread <strong>of</strong><br />

the population due to the low numbers <strong>of</strong> seed set and low rate <strong>of</strong> germination<br />

while as in eutrophic lake there is a potential for seeds to contribute to annual<br />

propagation and expansion <strong>of</strong> the population due to relatively high seed set<br />

percentages and germination rates.<br />

Hartleb et al., (1993) reported that M. spicatum require high temperature<br />

(above 14 0 C) for germination. Light is not considered as a limiting factor, but<br />

increased sedimentation can greatly suppress germination.<br />

Aiken et al., (1979) examined that flowering and seed production are<br />

common in M. spicatum, but the seeds exhibit prolonged dormancy and their<br />

germination is erratic. Even in areas where the plant is common, no seedlings<br />

have been found (Bates et al., 1985).<br />

Guppy (1897) reported that with proper scarification up to 85% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

seeds germinate, but under natural conditions seeds may actually have their<br />

germination delayed until at least their second spring. Seedling establishment<br />

appears to be a particularly fragile stage in the life cycle (Patten, 1956). Young<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil produced on an average 112 seeds per<br />

stalk. Despite the high seed production, the germination <strong>of</strong> seeds is not a<br />

significant factor in reproduction (Washington State Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology,<br />

2003).<br />

2.5: Asexual Reproduction<br />

Asexual reproduction includes both seed production without fertilization<br />

(agamospermy) and vegetative reproduction (Philbrick and Les, 1996). The<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> agamospermy among aquatic plants is poorly understood. Vegetative<br />

reproduction is <strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be the dominant mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in<br />

water plants (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975). The ability to reproduce<br />

vegetatively is ubiquitous among aquatic species, regardless <strong>of</strong> their taxonomic<br />

affiliation (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993; Les and<br />

Page 61


Philbrick, 1993). Abrahamson (1980) considered that genetically identical<br />

<strong>of</strong>fsprings produced through the process <strong>of</strong> the vegetative reproduction make<br />

this process similar to the growth than to the reproduction, and ramets<br />

(vegetatively produced progeny) are not always genetically identical to the<br />

parent.<br />

Aquatic plants are more common proportionally in monocots than dicots<br />

(Les and Schneider, 1995). This correlation suggests that clonal growth<br />

contribute to the evolution <strong>of</strong> aquatic species. Triffney and Niklas (1985)<br />

postulated that the greater proportion <strong>of</strong> aquatic monocots is associated with<br />

high incidence <strong>of</strong> rhizomatous growth (i.e., by horizontal underground stems)<br />

in monocots. In contrast, fever dicots are rhizomatous (Grace, 1993).<br />

Most aquatic species show prolific clonal propagation or perennation,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten in association with limited sexual reproduction (Les, 1988; Barrett et al.,<br />

1993). Clonal growth and propagation has been assumed to be more abundant<br />

in aquatic habitats than in terrestrial ones (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975;<br />

Grace, 1993; Duarte et al., 1994). The wide spread occurrence <strong>of</strong> clonality<br />

among aquatic plants serves the primary function <strong>of</strong> increasing genet survival<br />

under conditions that severely inhabit or restrict the success <strong>of</strong> sexual<br />

reproduction (Sculthrope, 1967; Grace, 1993). These conditions include<br />

decreased pollination success, particularly for submerged species (Duarte et al.,<br />

1994); unstable ecological conditions for seed production, maturation,<br />

germination and seedling success arising from small population size <strong>of</strong> many<br />

aquatic habitats (Barrett et al., 1993; Les and Philbrick, 1993). Clonal spread<br />

may contribute to the limited success <strong>of</strong> sexual reproduction by reducing<br />

pollination success in self-incompatible species (Charpentier et al., 2000).<br />

Perennial water plants posses many devices for vegetative reproduction,<br />

including corms, rhizomes, stolens, tubers and turions (Sculthrope, 1967;<br />

Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993; Vierssen, 1993). Annual aquatic plant genera<br />

reproduce vegetatively by extensive lateral growth, fragmentation or the<br />

occasional production <strong>of</strong> turions (Agami et al., 1986; Sculthrope, 1967). The<br />

Page 62


most notable vegetative propagule in aquatic plants is the turion, the well<br />

insulated turions referred to as winter buds; enable the plans to overcome the<br />

stressful winter season (Vierssen, 1993). Turions are compact, club shaped<br />

apices that become detached as the parent shoot system decays and either float<br />

or sink to the bottom and each turion is able to develop into a new plant in the<br />

next spring (Barret-Segretain, 1996). Turions have been reported in many<br />

macrophytic species such as Utricularia vulgaris, Hydrilla verticillata, Lemna<br />

minor, L. trisulca, Spirodela polyrhiza, Hydrocharis morsusranae and many<br />

Potamogeton species (Arber, 1920; Jacobs, 1947; Patten, 1956; Aiken and<br />

Walz, 1979; Sastroutomo, 1981; Klaine and Ward, 1984; Van Wijk and<br />

Trompenaars, 1985; Brux et al., 1987; Dudley, 1987; Spencer and Ksander,<br />

1991; wiegleb et al., 1991).<br />

Fragments play an important role in the vegetative reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic plants, with each individual node <strong>of</strong>ten capable <strong>of</strong> regeneration (Grier,<br />

1920). The fragments are unspecialized organs <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction. Any<br />

fragment <strong>of</strong> a shoot <strong>of</strong> Callitriche containing meristematic tissue is able to<br />

regenerate a new plant (Barret-Segretain, 1996). In Hydrilla verticillata, a few<br />

single node fragments produce new roots and shoots, but every three-node<br />

fragment is able to initiate a new plant (Langeland and Sutton, 1980). Brock et<br />

al., (1989) mentioned that detached shoots <strong>of</strong> Hottonia palustris can settle<br />

successfully on favourable substrates and give rise to new plants.<br />

Many aquatic plants have specialized vegetative organs <strong>of</strong> perennation<br />

and these organs are essential for multiplication and the infestation <strong>of</strong> new<br />

areas. These vegetative organs include rhizomes, runners or stolons and tubers.<br />

The rhizomes <strong>of</strong> Hippuris vulgaris, Scirpus lacustris, Nuphar lutea, Nymphea<br />

alba may be broken and each fragment bearing buds can develop into a new<br />

plant (Arber, 1920; Heslop-Harrison; 1955; Bartley and Spence, 1989; Smith et<br />

al., 1989). Runners or stolons are stems growing respectively just above the<br />

soil surface, or underground. Each runner or stolon travels away from the<br />

parent plant for some distance, its growing apex eventually becoming erect and<br />

Page 63


forms a new plant (Barrat-Segretain, 1996). Both runners and stolons are<br />

generally short lived and their prime function is undoubtedly as reproduction<br />

rather than perennation (Arber, 1920). Tubers are swollen portions <strong>of</strong> stems,<br />

rhizomes or roots that become independent because the connecting organs<br />

decay during the winter. In the spring adventitious roots and new leaves<br />

develop and each tuber can give rise to a new plant (Barrat-Segretain, 1996).<br />

Stem and rhizome tubers are very frequent. A single plant <strong>of</strong> Sagittaria<br />

sagittifolia may produce as many as ten tuber bearing stolons (Sculthrope,<br />

1967) and tubers <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton pectinatus are the most regularly occurring<br />

propagules <strong>of</strong> this species (Van Wijk, 1989).<br />

Vegetative reproduction is regarded as a more important mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />

population expansion than seed dispersal (Kimbel, 1982; Madsen and Boylen,<br />

1989; Madsen et al., 1988). In M. spicatum, asexual propagules provide a<br />

mechanism for short-term clonal reproduction with contiguous to intermediate<br />

distance dispersal (Madsen, 1991). Localized expansion is provided by stolon<br />

growth. Stems which form adventitious roots may establish new plants in the<br />

immediate area <strong>of</strong> the parent. Stolons located in the upper few centimeters <strong>of</strong><br />

the sediment, extend outward from the parent plant and produce new plants in<br />

the immediate area (Nichols and Shaw, 1986).<br />

Fragmentation is another type <strong>of</strong> vegetative clonal propagation which<br />

provides intermediate to long distance dispersal (Aiken et al., 1979). M.<br />

spicatum exhibit two types <strong>of</strong> fragmentation: aut<strong>of</strong>ragmentation and<br />

all<strong>of</strong>ragmentation. Aut<strong>of</strong>ragmentation is the self-induced abscission <strong>of</strong> shoot<br />

apices, which generally occur after peak biomass has been attained (Madsen et<br />

al., 1988; Madsen, 1997, Kimbel, 1982). Typically, one or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

internodes located on the upper 15- 20cm <strong>of</strong> the apical tip develop roots and<br />

separation occurs shortly thereafter (Aiken et al., 1979). All<strong>of</strong>ragments are<br />

formed by the mechanical breakage <strong>of</strong> the parent stem by disturbances in the<br />

water, by boats, swimmers, animals and wave action. After separation from the<br />

parent plant, fragments usually descend to the sediment where they produce<br />

Page 64


oots, anchor and establish new plants, depending on the suitability <strong>of</strong> in-situ<br />

conditions. Aut<strong>of</strong>ragments which have higher total nonstructural carbohydrate<br />

content (TNC), have been shown to grow and over winter better than<br />

all<strong>of</strong>ragments (Kimbel, 1982).<br />

Smith et al., (1967) reported that the most efficient method <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction and spread <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum is by fragmentation. Either large<br />

mature plant parts break <strong>of</strong>f or float to the new areas or very small portions (5-<br />

15 cm) <strong>of</strong> the plant tips are abscised, float for a period <strong>of</strong> time and then lose<br />

their buoyancy and settle to the lake bottom. Roots develop from the abscised<br />

tips which anchor the plant to the soil and under favourable conditions, new<br />

colonies are started. A single 5cm fragment may take root and grow 3.5m or<br />

more in one season. During the second year, multiple stems arise from the<br />

rooted base and may achieve lengths <strong>of</strong> 7 to 13m and their fragmentation<br />

continuous the spread <strong>of</strong> the plant. Patten (1956) reported that all new plant<br />

material <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum in Lake Musconetcong is provided by asexual means<br />

and the most efficient means <strong>of</strong> the reproduction was by the vegetative<br />

fragments. An excised or an abscised stem will vigorously sprout adventitious<br />

roots, bud pr<strong>of</strong>usely and increase in size. Such fragments float at first, but<br />

ultimately sink to a level where the roots are able to grasp the substratum.<br />

During late winter and early spring the plants develop a pr<strong>of</strong>usion <strong>of</strong> small<br />

axillary buds which differ from normal vegetative buds in their size and the<br />

ease with which they detach. Many species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum develop large and<br />

prominent winter buds known as turions (Arber, 1920; Hagi, 1926) or<br />

hibernaculae (Stover, 1951). Morphologically the small axillary buds <strong>of</strong> M.<br />

spicatum are not turions but physiologically they may be considered. These<br />

buds when detached, germinate into independent young plants. Turions have<br />

been reported in some species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum, such as M. verticillatum and<br />

M. exalbescens (Aiken and Walz, 1979, Arber, 1920). Arber (1920) stated that<br />

under normal conditions it is probably the lowering <strong>of</strong> water temperature in<br />

winter which induces turion formation. M. spicatum has been stated not to<br />

Page 65


produce turions (Hegi, 1926, Hulten, 1947; Patten, 1956). Sprouting from<br />

rhizomes is another mechanism for revegetation in the spring and effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> reproduction has been observed in mid April (Patten, 1956).<br />

Madsen et al., (1988) studied the relative importance <strong>of</strong> various<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> reproduction for the expansion <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil<br />

populations in Lake George, New York. The study indicated that local spread<br />

was largely dependent on stolons. Stoloniferous expansion was prominent<br />

during mid-summer followed by a decline later in the season. Fragmentation<br />

showed its prominence in September. The relative frequency <strong>of</strong> successful<br />

expansion by Stolons accounted for 87%, while by fragments accounted for<br />

13% only <strong>of</strong> the total expansion.<br />

Madsen and Smith (1997) studied the vegetative spread <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum<br />

in outdoor ponds at Lewisville, Texas. Colonies <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum expand via<br />

stolon and fragment production. Clonal expansion primarily by stolons<br />

provides Eurasian watermilfoil with a means <strong>of</strong> localized spread, while<br />

intermediate distance expansion is provided by fragment production. The<br />

predominant mechanism was stolon production. Stolon production accounted<br />

for 74% <strong>of</strong> the areal expansion while fragments accounted for 26%.<br />

Aiken et al., (1979) reported that in M. spicatum both fragments that<br />

are formed naturally and those formed if the plant in broken by man‘s activities<br />

are viable and have been responsible for the very rapid spread <strong>of</strong> this weed in<br />

North America. However Nicholos (1991) explained that the problem<br />

associated with fragments generated by harvesting does not survive and grow<br />

as good as naturally produced fragments (Kimbel, 1982). Fragmentation and<br />

winter buds are more important in reproduction. Winter buds are tight leaf<br />

clusters born near the end <strong>of</strong> the stem; they develop when water temperatures<br />

drop and day length shortens. The buds break<strong>of</strong>f and fall to the bottom, where<br />

they over winter. In the spring, the buds grow and elongate to form new plants<br />

(Washington State Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, 2003).<br />

Page 66


Asexual reproduction by fragmentation and winter bud formation in<br />

Myriophyllum has also been reported by other workers (Stanley, 1976; Cook,<br />

1987). The fragmentation has been reported either accidental or the result is<br />

abscission. Abscising fragments however, develop roots at the nodes before<br />

separation from the parent plant and float for a period before they sink and<br />

germinate into new plants. The over wintering buds or shoots <strong>of</strong> milfoil do not<br />

usually consist <strong>of</strong> compact, abortive leaf tissue generally associated with true<br />

turions.<br />

Page 67


CHAPTER-3<br />

MATERIAL & METHODS<br />

Page 68


3.1: Study Area<br />

The present study has been conducted in the valley <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> which is<br />

situated in the northern area <strong>of</strong> Indian subcontinent between 33 0 22' and 34 0 50'<br />

N latitudes and 73 0 55' and 73 0 33' E longitudes covering an area <strong>of</strong> about<br />

16,000 sq.km. The valley is surrounded by girdling chain <strong>of</strong> Himalayan<br />

mountains, namely the Pir Panjal in the South and the Great Himalayan range<br />

in the South East to North East and West. The climate <strong>of</strong> the valley is<br />

predominantly temperate and it changes to sub-alpine and alpine in the higher<br />

mountains. The valley <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> also called as paradise on earth has a<br />

network <strong>of</strong> rivers, glaciated streams, rivers as well as alpine, sub-alpine and<br />

valley lakes which add to its beauty. The alpine lakes are situated above the<br />

tree line and are fed mainly by glaciers. Their basins are rocky and are<br />

completely devoid <strong>of</strong> macrophytic vegetation and remain covered with ice from<br />

October to May. The sub- alpine lakes are situated in middle <strong>of</strong> the pine forest.<br />

The main water bodies <strong>of</strong> the valley include: Anchar lake, Dal Lake, Mansbal<br />

Lake, Wular Lake, Hokarsar and Hygam wetlands.<br />

The River Jhelum is the main river <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley. The major<br />

tributaries <strong>of</strong> this river system include; Lidder (Anantnag), Rambiara<br />

(Pulwama/ Kulgam), Sind (Ganderbal/ Srinagar) and pohru (Kupwara). In<br />

addition, there are many streams, irrigation channels, ponds and marshes which<br />

support various species <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants.<br />

3.2: Exploration and Collection <strong>of</strong> Plant Material<br />

Aquatic habitats in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley were extensively surveyed and<br />

explored for the collection <strong>of</strong> the plant material <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum. The<br />

sites were selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> the following criteria.<br />

a. Represent all types <strong>of</strong> aquatic habitats inhabited by Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum.<br />

b. Abundance <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

c. Trophic status and lentic and lotic water bodies.<br />

Page 69


The exact geographical location <strong>of</strong> the selected sites (Fig. 1) and their<br />

characteristic features are summarized in Table 3. The sites were surveyed<br />

from April 2009 to November 2010. The species was collected from different<br />

habitats.<br />

The specimens <strong>of</strong> the species from each population were collected<br />

prepared into vouchers using standard herbarium methodology (such as<br />

pressing, drying and preservation etc.) and deposited in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> University<br />

Herbarium (KASH) at the centre <strong>of</strong> plant taxonomy (COPT) <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Botany. The specimens <strong>of</strong> the species were initially identified with the help<br />

<strong>of</strong> available literature and described. The description <strong>of</strong> the species includes<br />

author citation and detailed morphological characterization. The species<br />

identification was got confirmed from Dr. Michael L. Moody <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Plant Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Western Australia, Crawly, WA 6009 Australia.<br />

Table 3: Salient features <strong>of</strong> some <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley Sites selected for Studies<br />

on Myriophyllum spicatum L.<br />

Parameter Dal<br />

Lake<br />

(DL)<br />

Srinagar<br />

Nature Urban<br />

Valley<br />

Lake<br />

Location 3 km <strong>of</strong><br />

Srinagar<br />

city<br />

Altitude<br />

(m.a.s.l)<br />

Mansbal<br />

Lake<br />

(ML)<br />

Ganderbal<br />

Rural<br />

Valley<br />

Lake<br />

25 km<br />

NW <strong>of</strong><br />

Srinagar<br />

Hygam<br />

Wetlands(HW)<br />

Baramulla<br />

Rural Valley<br />

Wetland<br />

40 km NW <strong>of</strong><br />

Srinagar<br />

Shalimar<br />

Stream(SS)<br />

Srinagar<br />

Chanderhama<br />

Irrigation<br />

Canal(CIC)<br />

Baramulla<br />

Stream Irrigation<br />

canal<br />

8 Km NE<br />

<strong>of</strong> Srinagar<br />

35 Km NW<br />

<strong>of</strong> Srinagar<br />

1585 1584 1583 1585 1583<br />

Latitude<br />

(North) 34 0 6´ 34 0 15´ 34 0 7´<br />

Longitude<br />

(East)<br />

Area<br />

(Sq.Km)<br />

Maximum<br />

depth (m)<br />

34 0 7´ 34 0 7´<br />

74 0 8´ 74 0 41´ 74 0 14´ 74 0 10´ 74 0 14´<br />

11.5 2.8 - - -<br />

6 12.5 - - -<br />

Source: Surveyor General <strong>of</strong> India (SGI) Toposheet number =43J/Q.<br />

Page 70


1.<br />

2.<br />

3<br />

Hygam wetland<br />

Chanderhama<br />

irrigation canal<br />

3. Mansbal lake<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

Dal lake<br />

74 *<br />

Shalimar stream<br />

1<br />

2<br />

4<br />

5<br />

75 *<br />

Fig.1: Map <strong>of</strong> J&K showing different study sites.<br />

Page 71


3.3: Specie Morphology and Phenotypic Variability<br />

A Random sample <strong>of</strong> 25 plants <strong>of</strong> the Myriophyllum spicatum were<br />

drawn from each population (both running and standing waters) and the plants<br />

were analyzed for morphological features and phenotypic variability. The<br />

characters studied include number, shape and dimensions <strong>of</strong> leaves; petiole<br />

length <strong>of</strong> leaves; rhizome size and length; stem shape and inter node length;<br />

spike shape and length; peduncle length and number <strong>of</strong> flowers per spike;<br />

shape and dimensions <strong>of</strong> flowers, seed morphology and size and number <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds per spike and per flower. The variations were stastically analyzed; using<br />

SPSS 10. For microscopic studies Olympus stereo Zoom Trinocular<br />

microscope was used.<br />

3.4: Architectural Analysis<br />

For description <strong>of</strong> patch characteristics, terminology used by Wolfer<br />

(2004) was followed, according to which ‗plant‘ is defined as a complete unit<br />

<strong>of</strong> ramets connected by rhizomes originating from a single primary shoot.<br />

‗Ramet‘ is a single module <strong>of</strong> a clonal plant, consisting <strong>of</strong> shoots, rhizome and<br />

roots. ‗Spacer length‘ is the rhizome length between two consecutive shoots <strong>of</strong><br />

the same plant.<br />

In order to analyse the growth architecture <strong>of</strong> the species in various populations<br />

(both standing and as well as running) a random sample <strong>of</strong> 25 plants from each<br />

population was drawn and plants were analysed for spatio-temporal dynamics<br />

and plasticity <strong>of</strong> clonal architecture. The characters studied include: total length<br />

<strong>of</strong> rhizome, number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant, branching frequency, ramet length,<br />

spacer length and branching frequency <strong>of</strong> rhizome. The variation if any was<br />

analysed stastically.<br />

3.5: Phenology<br />

Healthy individuals <strong>of</strong> the species were selected from different<br />

populations, tagged and examined throughout the growing season to study the<br />

life history pattern and mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction operative in the species in relation<br />

to habitat condition <strong>of</strong> the study sites. The tagged individuals were monitored<br />

Page 72


to record data on various reproductive phenophases such as initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

budding, peduncle growth and anthesis, duration <strong>of</strong> flowering and seed<br />

formation. The axillary bud formation was examined regularly and their<br />

number was recorded to evaluate the importance <strong>of</strong> these propagules in the<br />

reproduction and fitness <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />

3.6: Reproductive Biology<br />

3.6.1: Floral Morphology, Development, Anthesis and Anther<br />

Dehiscence.<br />

A random sample <strong>of</strong> 25 inflorescences was used for studying the<br />

morphology <strong>of</strong> flower and inflorescence. The floral structure and<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> floral parts were determined by using magnifying lenses (10x<br />

and 20x) and olympus zoom stereo microscope. Observations on flower and<br />

inflorescence development and blossoming stage were made every day at<br />

regular time intervals. Observations on anthesis and anther dehiscence were<br />

also made at regular intervals, with the help <strong>of</strong> a 10x magnifying lens.<br />

3.6.2: Stigma Receptivity<br />

Stigma receptivity was checked by fixing stigmas <strong>of</strong> different ages in<br />

carnoy‘s fixative (3 alcohol: 1 acetic acid) for 3-4 hours. The stigmas were<br />

stained with aniline blue-lactophenol (Hauser and Morison, 1964) and scanned<br />

under light microscope (10x X 20x combination). The stigmas carrying the<br />

germinating pollen grains were considered as receptive. In order to find out<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> stigma receptivity, the stigmas <strong>of</strong> varying ages were pollinated<br />

manually by dusting on them the pollen grains obtained in bulk from freshly<br />

dehisced anthers with the help <strong>of</strong> a sterilized needle. The pollinated stigmas<br />

were fixed in 1: 3 acetic alcohol and subsequently stained in aniline blue-<br />

lactophenol and studied periodically under a microscope. The data obtained<br />

was recorded for determining the duration <strong>of</strong> stigma receptively. Stigma<br />

receptivity was also determined by visual observation. Stigmas which were<br />

transparent, shining and wet and adhere to 1mm 2 piece <strong>of</strong> paper were<br />

considered receptive (Teryokin et al., 2002).<br />

Page 73


3.6.3: Pollen Viability and Pollen to Ovule Ratio<br />

Pollen viability was estimated by two methods:<br />

1. Following Stanley and Linskens (1974), mature and undehised anthers<br />

were placed in 1% tetrazolium chloride for one hour and squashed.<br />

2. Dianne and Spicer, (1958) method in which mature and undehisced<br />

anthers were squashed in 1% aniline blue-lactophenol and observed after<br />

15 minutes. The healthy and plump stained pollen were recorded as<br />

viable in both the cases.<br />

Floral buds ready to anthese were collected for estimating pollen-ovule<br />

ratio. Pollen quantity was estimated by squashing one anther (Several times) in<br />

10 drops <strong>of</strong> distilled water in a cavity block and then shaken with a glass rod.<br />

The following equation was used to calculate the number <strong>of</strong> pollen per flower.<br />

Where<br />

p x q = r<br />

r x s = t<br />

p = mean pollen count per drop <strong>of</strong> water<br />

q = number <strong>of</strong> water drops taken initially in which one anther was squashed.<br />

r = mean number <strong>of</strong> pollen per anther<br />

s = mean number <strong>of</strong> anthers per flower<br />

t = total count per flower<br />

Average ovule number per pistil was counted by using dissection<br />

microscope.<br />

Pollen-ovule ratio was calculated following Cruden‘s (1977) method as<br />

follows:-<br />

P/O = pollen count per anther x No. <strong>of</strong> anthers per flower<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> ovules per flower<br />

Page 74


3.6.4: Pollen Volume<br />

For calculating pollen volume Zhang‘s (2009) method was followed. The<br />

pollen grains from fifty randomly selected dehisced anthers were put in a drop<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2% acetocarmine and pollen diameter measurements were taken at 400x<br />

using ocular micrometer. For spherical pollen grains, the volume was<br />

calculated by using the following formula.<br />

V= π D 3<br />

6 where D = Diameter <strong>of</strong> Pollen grain.<br />

3.6.5: In-vitro Pollen Germination<br />

The in-vitro pollen germination was analyzed in media containing<br />

sucrose, boric acid, calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate and potassium nitrate<br />

following Brew-Backer and Kwach (1963) with and without modifications<br />

(Table 4) keeping the normality same as in the Brew-Beaker and Kwach<br />

Solution. The pollen grains with their tube length more than their diameter<br />

were considered germinated.<br />

Table4: Combinations <strong>of</strong> Various Nutrients used for pollen germination <strong>of</strong><br />

Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

S. No Nutrient Combinations<br />

1. 10% sucrose<br />

2. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/10ml<br />

3. 10% sucrose + calcium nitrate 3 mg/10ml<br />

4. 10% sucrose + potassium nitrate 1 mg/10ml.<br />

5. 10% sucrose + magnesium sulphate 2 mg/10ml<br />

6. 10% sucrose + magnesium sulphate 2 mg/10ml + calcium nitrate<br />

3 mg/10ml<br />

7. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/10ml + Potassium nitrate 1<br />

mg/10ml<br />

8. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/10ml + calcium nitrate 3mg/10ml<br />

9. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/ 10 ml + calcium nitrate 3 mg/ 10<br />

ml + magnesium sulphate 2 mg/ 10 ml + potassium nitrate 1 mg/<br />

10 ml<br />

Final volume in each case is 30 ml.<br />

Page 75


3.7: Pollen Mother Cell Meiosis<br />

For studying pollen mother cell meiosis floral spikes when outside the<br />

leaf sheath were fixed in Carnoy‘s fixative [ethanol: acetic acid (3:1)] between<br />

1000hr-1300hr for 60-90 minutes, transferred to freshly prepared Carnoy‘s<br />

fixative for about 22 hours and then transferred to 70% ethanol for preservation<br />

at 4 0 C. During meiotic analysis a young spike was kept under dissection<br />

microscope and individual floral buds were removed carefully from the spike.<br />

Each floral bud was then taken on a neat and clean slide and a drop <strong>of</strong> 2%<br />

propionocarmine was put on it for squashing the anthers. Analysis <strong>of</strong> various<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> meiosis was done from temporary slides. The photographs were taken<br />

from temporary slides at USIC using Leica DM LS2 microscope.<br />

3.8: Resource Allocation<br />

Individual plants from natural populations were harvested at maturity<br />

(both pre and post pollinated), washed in the tap water and dried using blotting<br />

paper. The ramets were divided into individual parts (shoots, rhizomes and<br />

roots, spikes and seeds). Oven dried at 80 0 for 48 hours (Kawano and Masuda,<br />

1980) and the dry mass (representing the amount <strong>of</strong> resources allocated) <strong>of</strong><br />

each component was calculated using and electronic balance.<br />

3.9: Seed Biology: Seed biology was studied along the following lines:-<br />

3.9.1: Seed Set<br />

For estimating the seed set and reproductive success, plants were selected<br />

at random in different populations, tagged and scored for the number <strong>of</strong> spikes<br />

per ramet and the number <strong>of</strong> flowers and seeds per spike following Lubber and<br />

Christenson (1966).<br />

Percentage seed set was calculated as follows:<br />

% age seed set per ramet = Total number <strong>of</strong> seeds set X 100<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> ovules born<br />

Page 76


3.9.2: Seed Viability<br />

Seed viability was analyzed using Tz-test. Twenty seeds <strong>of</strong> each replicate<br />

were placed in water at room temperature for 24 hours and longitudinally<br />

sectioned. The sections were incubated in dark in 2% aqueous solution <strong>of</strong> Tz<br />

for 24 hours. Seeds showing strong stained embryo were considered viable.<br />

3.9.3: In - Vitro Seed Germination<br />

For in vitro seed germination studies, the seeds were randomly collected<br />

from natural population and washed with 0.1% mercuric chloride for 5-7<br />

minutes, followed by washing 4-5 times with distilled water and subjected to<br />

different physical and chemical treatments (Table 5). All the experiments were<br />

conducted in temperature, light and humidity controlled incubation cabinets.<br />

The treatment solutions were made using deionized water and analytical grade<br />

chemicals. Each treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> three replicated <strong>of</strong> 10 seeds, placed<br />

within closed glass petri-dishes on Whatman No. 1 filter paper moistened with<br />

15 ml <strong>of</strong> the given treatment solution or distilled water. Seeds planed for dark<br />

treatment were moistened under green light and then quickly wrapped in black<br />

carbon papers to reduce the chances <strong>of</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> light. Emergence <strong>of</strong><br />

plumule was used as the indicator <strong>of</strong> germination and total germination was<br />

recorded at the culmination <strong>of</strong> the experiment in respect <strong>of</strong> all the treatments.<br />

Seed germination was also checked by placing 50 healthy and viable seeds in<br />

30 x 10 x 4 inch tray containing 2 kg (wet mass) <strong>of</strong> sediment and water level<br />

were maintained 1.5 inch above the surface <strong>of</strong> the sediment. These trays were<br />

placed inside the seed germinator where temperature was maintained at<br />

25±2°c.Seeds were considered to have germinated at the first visible plumule<br />

emergence.<br />

Page 77


Table 5: Physical and chemical treatments to test seed germination in<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

S.<br />

Treatment Time period Concentration<br />

No.<br />

(days) (mM)<br />

1. Dry chilling 40 -<br />

2. Wet chilling 40 -<br />

3. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo (epicarp,<br />

mesocarp and endocarp removal)<br />

4. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo + GA3 0.5<br />

5. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo+ GA3 1<br />

6. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo+ GA3 2<br />

7. GA3 1<br />

8. GA3 2<br />

9. Scarification (removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and<br />

mesocarp)<br />

10. Scarification + IAA 0.5<br />

11. Scarification + IAA 1<br />

3.10: Reproductive Potential <strong>of</strong> Shoot Fragments<br />

The reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> plant fragments was analyzed by placing 6<br />

noded and 3 noded (apical, 5 each) and 6 noded and 3 noded (intermediate, 5<br />

each) shoot fragments in three replicates in trays containing water without<br />

sediment for a period <strong>of</strong> 15 days. During this period the temperature ranged<br />

between 20 to 25 0 C and regular monitoring during this period was done to<br />

record the number <strong>of</strong> plantlets formed by the fragments.<br />

3.11: Reproductive Potential <strong>of</strong> Rhizomes<br />

The reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> rhizomes was estimated by placing five<br />

rhizome cuttings each 5 cm long (in three replicates) in 25x20x15 cm trays<br />

containing 3kg (dry mass) <strong>of</strong> sediment and water level was maintained at 2 cm<br />

above the sediment. The trays were kept in the laboratory for three months (<br />

Jan - March 2010) with regular monitoring at room temperature. During this<br />

period the temperature ranged between 8 to 20 0 C. At the culmination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experiment the characters studied include total number <strong>of</strong> plantlets formed per<br />

rhizome cutting.<br />

Page 78


3.12: Axillary Bud Germination<br />

Vegetatively produced axillary buds were used for in vitro germination<br />

studies. The axillary buds were germinated at different temperature regimes,<br />

two varying light exposures and with or without sediment. Each treatment, with<br />

three replicates, included five propagules placed in 1000 ml beakers. Sediment<br />

<strong>of</strong> 200 g (on dry weight basis) was added to beakers and distilled water was<br />

added to the saturation levels. The beakers were kept inside seed germinator<br />

(Yorko) at different temperature regimes for 10 days. Axillary buds intended<br />

for dark treatment were wrapped in aluminum foil. However the axillary buds<br />

in alternate light and dark treated were not covered with aluminum foil. Total<br />

germination was recorded at the culmination <strong>of</strong> the experiment in respect <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the treatments.<br />

3.13: Reproductive Potential <strong>of</strong> Axillary Buds<br />

The reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> axillary buds was estimated by placing five<br />

axillary buds (in three replicates) in 25 x 20 x 10 cm trays containing 2 kg<br />

(dry mass) <strong>of</strong> sediment. The trays were put in the laboratory at room<br />

temperature for one month, with regular monitoring. During this period, the<br />

temperature recorded ranged between 14 to 20 0 C. At the culmination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experiment the germinated auxiliary buds were collected and analyzed for<br />

reproductive potential. The characters studied include-total number <strong>of</strong> plantlets<br />

formed from each axillary bud, number <strong>of</strong> meristematic branches and newly<br />

formed axillary buds if any.<br />

3.14: Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Studies<br />

Double sided conductive tap was fixed to the stub and pollen from<br />

mature undehisced anthers were dusted over it. The dusted material sputter<br />

coated with gold was observed under SEM (S-3000 H). Mature and dry fruits<br />

and seeds were loaded on the stub and coated with gold and observed under<br />

SEM.<br />

3.15: Statistical Analysis<br />

For Statistical analysis s<strong>of</strong>tware SPSS(10) was used.<br />

Page 79


CHAPTER-4<br />

OBSERVATIONS<br />

Page 80


4.1: Distribution<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum is cosmopolitan, herbaceous perennial<br />

hydrophyte widely distributed in fresh to brackish waters throughout the world<br />

and inhabit a wide variety <strong>of</strong> habitats Fig. (2)<br />

In the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley, the species is distributed in lakes, ponds, rivers and<br />

streams . The species is found in all the major lakes <strong>of</strong> the valley viz: Dal lake,<br />

Mansbal lake, Anchar lake, Wular lake, Nilnag lake; wetlands viz: Hookersar<br />

wetland and Hygam wetland, river Jhelum, Achabal spring, Shalimar stream,<br />

Chanderhama irrigation canal, Bal kol and almost in all other fresh water<br />

bodies and irrigation chennels. From the above varied habitats <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum, three standing and two running water sites were selected in the<br />

present study. The characteristic features <strong>of</strong> these selected sites are summarized<br />

in Table ( 3) and Fig. (1).<br />

4.2: Species Morphology and Taxonomy<br />

Based on observations made in the present study, the overall Morpho-<br />

taxonomical features <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum are summarized as follows ;<br />

Perennial rhizomatous herb, rhizomes terete with prominent nodes and<br />

internodes, at each node <strong>of</strong> the rhizome adventitious roots arise. Stem 60-117<br />

cm long, 1.5-3 mm in diameter with nodes and internodes, flexible, slender,<br />

greenish or sometimes reddish in colour with internodes ranging from 1.74-3<br />

cm. Leaves in whorls <strong>of</strong> 4(3-5), 1.74-3.28 × 0.39-0.84, pinnately divided into<br />

24-33 filiform leaflets. Flowers whorled, with 4 flowers in each whorl,<br />

aggregated on 2.73-5.13 cm long aerial spike, with upper male and lower<br />

female flowers. The staminate flowers auxiliary, bracts 3 , shorter than petals, 3<br />

× 1 mm, rhombic to elongate , entire ; petals 4 , pinkish 2 mm long , entire ;<br />

stamens 8. Pistillate flowers without perianth; bracts 3, pectinate; stigmas 4,<br />

plumose, white or light pinkish; ovary tetragonal with 4 deep furrows. Fruit<br />

Page 81


5<br />

4<br />

Source: (Meijden, 1969; Meijden and Caspers, 1971; Orchard, 1975, 1980, 1981, 1986;<br />

Aiken, 1981<br />

1.<br />

Fig. 2: Global distribution <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

1. Asia, 2. Europe, 3. Africa, 4. South America, 5. North America, 6. Australia.<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

6<br />

Page 82


A<br />

3cm=3cm<br />

1cm= 4 cm 1cm= 4 cm<br />

1cm= 4 cm 1cm= 5 cm<br />

Fig. 3: Myriophyllum spicatum (A) Habit (B) Female flower (C) Gynoecium (D) Male<br />

flower ( E) Androecium.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D E<br />

Page 83


globular 2.2×2.5 mm, dark brown, dehiscing by 4 longitudinal sutures. Seeds<br />

trigonal with two flat sides and an outer convex side, 2.2× 1.5 mm. Fig. (3).<br />

4.3: Phenotypic variability<br />

The species inhabit both standing and running waters and is highly<br />

variable in respect <strong>of</strong> its quantitative traits. The morphological traits analyzed<br />

in the present study include internodal length, leaf dimensions, number <strong>of</strong><br />

leaflets per leaf , mature spike length, peduncle length, number <strong>of</strong> spikes per<br />

ramet, total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet, number <strong>of</strong> male and female flowers<br />

per ramet and number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet. The results are summarized in Table<br />

(6) and Figs. (4-18).<br />

As depicted in the Table (7), a significant amount <strong>of</strong> variability was observed<br />

for various morphological traits analyzed in different populations. The<br />

differences were more prominent between standing and running water<br />

populations. Myriophyllum spicatum produces longer and narrower leaves in<br />

running water populations and smaller and broader ones in standing water<br />

populations. The species produces longer petioles in running waters as<br />

compared to standing waters. Mature spike length, peduncle length, number <strong>of</strong><br />

spikes and flowers per ramet were significantly higher in standing water<br />

populations, on the other hand internodal length was found higher in running<br />

water populations. Seeds were not formed in running water populations<br />

whereas high seed set was recorded in standing water populations.<br />

Dal Lake, Mansbal Lake and Hygam wetland populations were almost at par<br />

with each other with respect to various morphological features analyzed, but<br />

these three standing water populations were significantly different from two<br />

running water populations namely Shalimar stream and Chanderhama irrigation<br />

canal in these features.<br />

Based on Tukeys test, different letters a, b, c and d in the Table (6) and Figures<br />

(4-18) indicate means that are significantly different (Tukeys test≤0.05). The<br />

letter ‗a‘ indicates the smallest mean value whereas letter‗d‘ as the largest mean<br />

value for a particular trait.<br />

Page 84


Feature<br />

Table 6 : Phenotypic variability in morphological traits <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum from various populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />

Internode<br />

length(cm)<br />

Length <strong>of</strong><br />

leaves(cm)<br />

Breadth <strong>of</strong><br />

leaves(cm)<br />

Length <strong>of</strong><br />

apical<br />

leaves(cm)<br />

Breadth <strong>of</strong><br />

apical<br />

leaves(cm)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

leaflets per<br />

leaf.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

leaflets per<br />

apical leaves.<br />

Petiole<br />

length(cm)<br />

Mature spike<br />

length(cm)<br />

Peduncle<br />

length(cm)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

spikes per<br />

ramet.<br />

Total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> flowers per<br />

ramet.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

male flowers<br />

per ramet.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

female<br />

flowers per<br />

ramet.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds per<br />

ramet.<br />

Population<br />

Standing water (Mean±SE) Running water(Mean±SE)<br />

Dal lake Mansbal lake<br />

Hygam<br />

wetland<br />

Shalimar<br />

stream<br />

Chanderhama<br />

irigation canal<br />

b<br />

a<br />

c<br />

d<br />

d<br />

1.89 ± 0.06 1.74 ± 0.03 1.99± 0.07 3.0± 0.12 2.69± 0.15<br />

b<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

c<br />

2.41 ± 0.26 2.21± 0.11 2.48±0.12 3.28±0.32 3.05±0.29<br />

d<br />

c<br />

b<br />

a<br />

a<br />

0.84±0.08 0.76±0.09 0.64±0.04 0.40±0.03 0.39±0.02<br />

b<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

c<br />

1.92±0.07 1.74±0.04 2.06±0.08 2.88±0.22 2.83±0.10<br />

c<br />

0.59±0.06<br />

ab<br />

30±3.21<br />

b<br />

29±2.76<br />

a<br />

0.14±0.02<br />

c<br />

5.13±0.50<br />

c<br />

1.41±0.22<br />

b<br />

3.26±0.7<br />

c<br />

50.86±5.46<br />

c<br />

20.8±2.90<br />

bc<br />

30.06±3.58<br />

c<br />

93.5±5.93<br />

c<br />

0.55±0.02<br />

a<br />

28±2.26<br />

a<br />

24±1.51<br />

a<br />

0.11±0.01<br />

c<br />

4.98±0.43<br />

b<br />

1.11±0.10<br />

b<br />

3.33±0.49<br />

c<br />

53.93±5.17<br />

c<br />

21.53±2.34<br />

c<br />

32.40±3.85<br />

c<br />

92±5.22<br />

b<br />

0.49±0.03<br />

bc<br />

32±3.35<br />

b<br />

31±2.47<br />

b<br />

0.20±0.04<br />

b<br />

4.13±0.35<br />

b<br />

1.00±0.21<br />

b<br />

3.2±0.41<br />

b<br />

46.4±4.98<br />

b<br />

18.13±1.64<br />

b<br />

28.26±3.84<br />

b<br />

85±4.50<br />

a<br />

0.39±0.01<br />

c<br />

34±3.17<br />

b<br />

31±2.03<br />

c<br />

0.40±0.05<br />

a<br />

2.86±0.17<br />

a<br />

0.74±0.04<br />

a<br />

1.73±0.35<br />

a<br />

23.5±2.77<br />

a<br />

9.66±1.60<br />

a<br />

13.86±1.93<br />

a<br />

0.39±0.01<br />

c<br />

33±2.08<br />

b<br />

31±2.03<br />

c<br />

0.39±0.05<br />

a<br />

2.73±0.24<br />

a<br />

0.72±0.08<br />

a<br />

1.20±0.41<br />

a<br />

24.5±2.53<br />

a<br />

10.26±0.96<br />

a<br />

14.26±1.73<br />

Different letters a, b, c, d indicate means that are significantly different (Tukeys test ≤ 0.05)<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Page 85


Table 7: ANOVA <strong>of</strong> phenotypic characters in Myriophyllum spicatum across<br />

different populations.<br />

Character Df F P<br />

Internode length 4 573.84 0.000<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leaves 4 61.61 0.000<br />

Breadth <strong>of</strong> leaves 4 122.58 0.000<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> apical leaves 4 141.56 0.000<br />

Breadth <strong>of</strong> apical leaves 4 35.60 0.000<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per leaf 4 10.73 0.000<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per apical leaf 4 28.35 0.000<br />

Petiole length 4 156.65 0.000<br />

Mature spike length 4 156.83 0.000<br />

Peduncle length 4 50.82 0.000<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> spikes per ramet 4 74.04 0.000<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet 4 176.78 0.000<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> male flowers per ramet 4 120.32<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> female flowers per<br />

ramet<br />

4 125.43<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet 4 2233.90<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

Page 86


Internode length (cm)<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

b<br />

a<br />

c<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig. 4: Internode length in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Leaf length (cm)<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

b<br />

a<br />

DL ML<br />

standing water<br />

HW<br />

Population<br />

SS CIC<br />

running water<br />

Fig. 5 : Leaf length in different standing and running water populations.<br />

b<br />

d<br />

c<br />

d<br />

c<br />

Page 87


Leaf breadth (cm)<br />

Apical leaf length (cm)<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

d c<br />

DL ML<br />

standing water<br />

HW<br />

Population<br />

SS CIC<br />

running water<br />

Fig. 6: Leaf breadth in different standing and running water populations.<br />

b a<br />

b<br />

c c<br />

DL ML<br />

standing water<br />

HW<br />

Population<br />

SS CIC<br />

running water<br />

Fig.7: Apical leaf length in different standing and running water populations<br />

b<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Page 88


Apical leaf breadth (cm)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per leaf<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

c<br />

c<br />

b<br />

a a<br />

DL ML<br />

standing water<br />

HW SS CIC<br />

running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.8: Apical leaf breadth in different standing and running water populations<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

bc<br />

DL ML<br />

standing water<br />

HW SS CIC<br />

running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.9: Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per leaf in different standing and running water populations.<br />

c<br />

c<br />

Page 89


Petiole length (cm)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per apical leaf<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0.5<br />

0.45<br />

0.4<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0<br />

b<br />

a<br />

b b b<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.10: Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per apical leaves in different standing and running water populations.<br />

a<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c c<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water<br />

Population<br />

running water<br />

Fig.11: Petiole length in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Page 90


Peduncle length (cm)<br />

Mature spike length (cm)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

c<br />

c<br />

b<br />

a a<br />

DL ML<br />

standing water<br />

HW SS CIC<br />

running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.12: Mature spike length in different standing and running water populations.<br />

c<br />

b b<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water<br />

running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.13: Peduncle length in different standing and running water populations.<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Page 91


Number <strong>of</strong> spikes per ramet<br />

4.5<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

b<br />

b b<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.14 : Number <strong>of</strong> spikes per ramet in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

c<br />

c<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.15 : Total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet in different standing and running water<br />

populations.<br />

b<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Page 92


Number <strong>of</strong> male flowers per ramet<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

c c<br />

b<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.16 : Number <strong>of</strong> male flowers in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> female flowers per ramet<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

bc<br />

c<br />

b<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water<br />

running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.17 : Number <strong>of</strong> female flowers per ramet in different standing and running water populations.<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Page 93


Number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

c c<br />

b a a<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.18: Number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Page 94


4.4: Growth Architecture<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum shows clonal growth form, consisting <strong>of</strong> a<br />

branched rhizome and from which arises a network <strong>of</strong> leafy shoots called<br />

ramets. The whole network <strong>of</strong> rhizome and ramets arising from it is called as<br />

genet. The number <strong>of</strong> ramets on each rhizome and the spacer length between<br />

two consecutive ramets are the important features in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

allowing the plant to some extent to adapt to heterogeneous environments such<br />

as running and standing waters. The various growth architectural features<br />

analyzed in the present study include: total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome, number <strong>of</strong><br />

ramets per plant (genet), number <strong>of</strong> branches per ramet, spacer length and<br />

average length <strong>of</strong> ramets Fig. (19).<br />

As the species inhabits both standing and running waters, it showed significant<br />

variability in almost all growth architectural features between standing and<br />

running water populations Table (9).It was observed that total length <strong>of</strong><br />

rhizome, branching <strong>of</strong> ramets, spacer length and average number <strong>of</strong> ramets per<br />

plant was highest in standing water populations, whereas number <strong>of</strong> ramets per<br />

plant and number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome was highest in running water<br />

populations. However these features do not show significant differences among<br />

standing water namely Dal lake, Mansbal lake and Hygam wetland populations<br />

or among two running water namely Shalimar stream and Chanderhama<br />

irrigation canal populations. Table (8) Figs. (20-25).<br />

The different letters a, b, c and d in Table (8) and Figs. (20-25) indicate means<br />

that are significantly different (Tukeys test≤ 0.05). The letter ‗a‘ indicate the<br />

smallest mean value whereas letter ‗d‘ indicate the largest mean value <strong>of</strong> a<br />

particular trait.<br />

Page 95


Table 8 : Growth architecture <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley<br />

Feature<br />

Total length <strong>of</strong><br />

rhizome(cm)<br />

Number<br />

ramets per<br />

plant/genet<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

branchs per<br />

ramet<br />

Spacer<br />

length(cm)<br />

Average length<br />

<strong>of</strong> ramets(cm)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

branchs per<br />

rhizome<br />

Mean±SE<br />

Dal lake<br />

c<br />

18.02±1.26<br />

a<br />

5.86±0.35<br />

d<br />

0.86±0.01<br />

b<br />

3.0±0.14<br />

c<br />

109.46±5.85<br />

a<br />

2.13±0.35<br />

Standing water<br />

Mansbal lake<br />

c<br />

18.59±1.20<br />

a<br />

5.80±0.25<br />

e<br />

0.93±0.02<br />

c<br />

3.20±0.15<br />

c<br />

111.53±5.85<br />

a<br />

2.06±0.25<br />

Population<br />

Hygam<br />

wetland<br />

b<br />

16.01±1.05<br />

a<br />

5.40±0.28<br />

c<br />

0.66±0.01<br />

b<br />

2.96±0.17<br />

b<br />

84.6±3.65<br />

a<br />

2.26±0.45<br />

Shalimar<br />

stream<br />

a<br />

12.26±1.04<br />

b<br />

14.2±0.94<br />

b<br />

0.33±0.01<br />

a<br />

0.83±0.03<br />

a<br />

64.33±3.37<br />

b<br />

3.0±0.37<br />

Running water<br />

Chanderhama<br />

irrigation<br />

canal<br />

a<br />

13.17±1.27<br />

c<br />

15.0±1.06<br />

a<br />

0.26±0.01<br />

a<br />

0.86±0.03<br />

a<br />

66.6±3.68<br />

b<br />

3.13±0.35<br />

Letters a, b , c, d depicted in the table indicate means that are significantly different<br />

(Tukeys test≤ 0.05)<br />

Page 96


Table 9 : ANOVA <strong>of</strong> Growth architecture <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum across<br />

different populations.<br />

Character<br />

Total length <strong>of</strong><br />

rhizome<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> ramets<br />

per plant/genet<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> branches<br />

per ramet<br />

Spacer length<br />

Average length <strong>of</strong><br />

ramets<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> branches<br />

per rhizome<br />

df<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

F<br />

87.66<br />

773.87<br />

7111.83<br />

1764.87<br />

317.62<br />

28.85<br />

P<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

Page 97


R<br />

A<br />

M<br />

E<br />

T<br />

Spacer length<br />

Genet<br />

Fig .19 : Clonal unit showing different parts.<br />

Branch<br />

Rhizome<br />

Page 98


Total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome(cm)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

c<br />

c<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.20: Total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

a a<br />

b<br />

a<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.21: Number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant in different standing and running water populations.<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

a<br />

Page 99


Number <strong>of</strong> branches per ramet<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

d<br />

e<br />

c<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.22: Number <strong>of</strong> branches per ramet in different standing and running water populations<br />

Spacer length(cm)<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

b<br />

c<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.23: Spacer length in different standing and running water populations<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Page 100


Average length <strong>of</strong> ramet(cm)<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

c<br />

c<br />

b<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig. 24: Average length <strong>of</strong> ramets in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> branches <strong>of</strong> rhizome<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water<br />

running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.25: Number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome in different standing and running water populations.<br />

a<br />

b<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Page 101


4.5: Phenology<br />

The species is a submerged, perennial herb with pinnately divided<br />

leaves inhabiting both standing and running water habitats. The phenological<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> the species was studied in both standing and running water<br />

populations. The phenology starts with the sprouting <strong>of</strong> rhizomes and axillary<br />

buds in the first week <strong>of</strong> March and continues upto first week <strong>of</strong> April in<br />

standing water populations, whereas sprouting <strong>of</strong> rhizomes and formation <strong>of</strong><br />

nodal plantlets commences in the second week <strong>of</strong> March and continues upto<br />

second week <strong>of</strong> April in running water populations. The planlets grow<br />

vegetatively from second week <strong>of</strong> April upto first week <strong>of</strong> June in standing<br />

waters, while in running waters the process is completed between second week<br />

<strong>of</strong> April and second week <strong>of</strong> July. The mature plantlets enter into the sexual<br />

phase during first week <strong>of</strong> June and flowering continues upto last week <strong>of</strong><br />

September in standing waters. However, in running waters this phase starts<br />

during fourth week <strong>of</strong> June and lasts upto third week <strong>of</strong> September. In standing<br />

waters fruiting sets from second week <strong>of</strong> September and ends in third week <strong>of</strong><br />

October. In running waters, however, fruits are not formed. The senescence <strong>of</strong><br />

the above sediment parts starts in the second week <strong>of</strong> October and continues till<br />

first week <strong>of</strong> December in standing water and in running waters the process<br />

starts during the fourth week <strong>of</strong> October and continues upto the last week <strong>of</strong><br />

December Table (10) and Fig.(26).<br />

Page 102


Table 10 : Phenological behavior <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in standing and<br />

running water populations in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />

Phenophase<br />

Sprouting <strong>of</strong> vegetative<br />

propagules(rhizomes,<br />

axillary buds)<br />

Vegetative growth<br />

Flowering phase<br />

Fruiting phase<br />

Senescence<br />

SW = Standing water<br />

RW = Running water<br />

Habitat<br />

SW<br />

RW<br />

SW<br />

RW<br />

SW<br />

RW<br />

SW<br />

RW<br />

SW<br />

RW<br />

Duration<br />

Week(month)<br />

1 (3) - 1 (4)<br />

2 (3) - 2 (4)<br />

2 (4) - 1 (6)<br />

2 (4 ) - 2 (7)<br />

1(6) - 4 (9)<br />

4(6) - 3(9)<br />

2 (9) - 3(10)<br />

-<br />

2 (10) - 1(12)<br />

4 (10) - 4(12)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

27<br />

32<br />

62<br />

88<br />

110<br />

81<br />

39<br />

-<br />

54<br />

60<br />

Page 103


Standing water Runing water<br />

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan<br />

4.6: Reproductive Biology<br />

4.6.1: Sexual Reproduction<br />

4.6.1.1: Floral organization and development<br />

Sprouting<br />

Vegetative growth<br />

Flowering phase<br />

Fruting phase<br />

Senescence<br />

Fig.26: Phenological behaviour <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in standing and running water populations<br />

The inflorescence <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum is a cylindrical spike, red<br />

in colour, raised on an elongated peduncle. The flowers are arranged<br />

acropetally on the inflorescence axis. The flowers are unisexual; upper flowers<br />

on a spike are staminate whereas lower ones are pistillate. The staminate and<br />

pistillate flowers are tetramerous arising in the axil <strong>of</strong> a strong bract with two<br />

more delicate bracteoles located at the base <strong>of</strong> each flower. These three bracts<br />

entirely enclose and protect the young flower. Male flowers are having pinkish<br />

petals, female flowers are without perianth. The morphological organization <strong>of</strong><br />

the inflorescence and flowers show slight variation in the number <strong>of</strong> whorls and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> flowers in an inflorescence, but number <strong>of</strong> flowers in a whorl and<br />

Page 104


number <strong>of</strong> anthers and pistils per flower do not vary. The number <strong>of</strong> flowers in<br />

each whorl is 4, with 8 anthers per flower in the upper whorls and 4 pistils per<br />

flower in the lower whorls Fig. (27).<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> flowering can be divided chronologically into following<br />

phases Figs. (28,29).<br />

a) Formation <strong>of</strong> inflorescence (budding)<br />

b) Peduncle growth<br />

c) Female phase<br />

d) Anthesis- anther dehiscence- male phase<br />

a) Budding: During this stage differentiation <strong>of</strong> inflorescence axis and<br />

flower bud initiation takes place and it lasts for 7-9 days.<br />

b) Peduncle growth: Accelerated growth <strong>of</strong> the peduncle takes place during<br />

this phase and it continues upto anthesis/ anther dehiscence. The<br />

peduncle continues to grow for 8-12 days.<br />

c) Female phase: The species is protogynous. This phase lasts for 3-4 days.<br />

During this phase the female flowers open and stigmas look bright,<br />

shining, turgid and wet. The opening <strong>of</strong> the female flowers occurs<br />

acropetally during this phase, however bracts <strong>of</strong> the male flowers open<br />

but the opening <strong>of</strong> the male flowers does not take place and anthers still<br />

does not dehise and remain covered by pinkish petals.<br />

d) Anthesis: Towards the termination <strong>of</strong> the female phase, the pinkish<br />

petals <strong>of</strong> the male flowers open and anther dehiscence starts to facilitate<br />

pollination. During this phase the stigmas <strong>of</strong> the same spike are dry and<br />

shriveled, while as anther dehiscence is at its peak.<br />

4.6.2: Stigma Receptivity<br />

In Myriophyllum spicatum, the spikes after coming out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath<br />

have flowers with androecium enclosed by petals and bract and gynoecium<br />

enclosed by bract only. The stigma begin to come out <strong>of</strong> the bract on the 2 nd<br />

day after the spikes come out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath and do not have any germinated<br />

Page 105


a b<br />

c<br />

Fig.27 : (a) Inflorescence <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum (b) Tetramerous arrangement <strong>of</strong><br />

flowers (c) Male flower (d) Female flower<br />

d<br />

Page 106


Developing spike<br />

enclosed by leaf sheath<br />

Stigmas exerted and<br />

receptive<br />

Anther dehiscence<br />

Floral bud stage Peduncle growth Female phase initiates first<br />

(Protogyny)<br />

Dry, shrivelled<br />

stigmas<br />

Male phase (Anther dehiscence)<br />

Fig.28: Diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> the chronology <strong>of</strong> spike and floral development in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

Page 107


e<br />

a b<br />

c<br />

Fig. 29: Chronology <strong>of</strong> spike and floral development in Myriophyllum spicatum:<br />

a: Budding stage; b: Peduncle growth; c,d: Female phase; e,f: Male phase.<br />

f<br />

d<br />

Page 108


Table 11: Stigma receptivity <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum at different<br />

developmental stages.<br />

Stages <strong>of</strong> spike<br />

development after<br />

coming out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

leaf sheath<br />

0<br />

+1<br />

+2<br />

+3<br />

+4<br />

+5<br />

Pollen load on<br />

stigmatic<br />

surface<br />

0 = on the day spike comes out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

germinated<br />

pollen grains<br />

Percentage<br />

germination±SE<br />

0 0 0<br />

0 0 0<br />

15.46±4.17 0 0<br />

213.73 ±5.45 42.0±4.48 19.50±2.21<br />

309.26±24.50 90.0±4.11 29.31±2.91<br />

171.0±9.34 25.86±5.68 15.18±3.66<br />

+1, +2, +3, +4, +5 = days after spike comes out <strong>of</strong> leaf sheath.<br />

Beyond 4th day , the stigma shrivels and lose receptivity gradually.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> pollen on stigmatic surface<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0Day 1Day 2Day 3day 4Day 5Day<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

Fig.30: Pollen load on stigmatic surface is maximum on 4th day after the spike<br />

come out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath and gradually decreases 4th day onwards.<br />

Page 109


Number <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen grains<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0Day 1Day 2Day 3day 4Day 5Day<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

Fig.31: Pollen germination initiates on stigmatic surface on 3rd day after the spike come out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath and frequency <strong>of</strong> germination is highest on 4th day and then sharply<br />

declines 4 th day onwards.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen<br />

grains<br />

0Day 1Day 2Day 3day 4Day 5Day<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

Fig.32 : Percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen grains is maximum on 4 th day after the spike comes<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath hence stigma receptivity and steadily decreases 4 th day onwards.<br />

Page 110


a<br />

Fig. 33 : Stigma receptivity a) pollen load on stigma b) germinating pollen grains on<br />

stigmatic surface.<br />

Page 111


pollen during this period. Subsequently, the stigma becomes receptive and the<br />

receptivity lasts for 3-4 days. The number <strong>of</strong> deposited pollen grains as well as<br />

the percentage germination <strong>of</strong> the pollen grains was highest on 4 th day after the<br />

spike comes out <strong>of</strong> the sheathing leaf Table (11) Figs. (30-33).After this the<br />

receptivity <strong>of</strong> the stigma decreases gradually within one or two days as the<br />

stigma becomes brown and dry and the number <strong>of</strong> pollen grains deposited on<br />

the stigma and their percentage germination declines.<br />

4.6.3: Pollen morphology and viability<br />

Based on the light and scanning electron microscope studies it was<br />

observed that pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are small, sub-oblate to oblate,<br />

radially symmetrical, isopolar, 4-zono colpate with scabrate-punctate tectum<br />

Fig (35).The species produces high percentage <strong>of</strong> healthy, plump and stainable<br />

pollen grains Table (12) and Figs. (34,36), which ranges from 88.56±4.58 to<br />

89.19±4.90. There were no significant difference in the pollen viability<br />

between standing and running water populations. The lentic and lotic waters<br />

have no effect on the viability.<br />

Table 12: Pollen viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> pollen<br />

Population<br />

grains scanned<br />

M±SE<br />

Dal lake 2496±55.46<br />

Mansbal lake 2278±52.59<br />

Hygam wetland 2253±54.53<br />

Shalimar stream 2200±52.88<br />

Chanderhama<br />

irrigation canal<br />

21759±52.8<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> viable<br />

pollen<br />

M±SE<br />

2247±57.29 88.82±9<br />

2051±52.92 89.06±9.8<br />

2031±54.49 89.19±9.4<br />

1973±52.88 88.66±9.1<br />

1953±52.90 88.56±9.0<br />

Percentage<br />

viability<br />

M±SE<br />

Page 112


4.6.4: Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen diameter and pollen volume<br />

The species produces enormous quantities <strong>of</strong> pollen grains ranging from<br />

27416.08±1216.48 to 29982.86±2336.10 per flower but only 4 ovules per<br />

flower (1 ovule per carpel) are present. The pollen-ovule ratio worked out<br />

ranges from 6854.02±304.12 to 7495.71±584.02 across different populations.<br />

Pollen volume in the species ranges from 6540.82±387.81µm 3<br />

7076.19±752.81 µm 3 and diameter from 23.2±0.44 to 23.8±0.83 µm Fig. (41).<br />

Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen volume and pollen diameter did not show much<br />

variation across different populations Table(13) and Figs.(37-39).<br />

4.6.5: In-vitro pollen germination<br />

Pollen grains were germinated in media containing sucrose, boric acid,<br />

calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate and potassium nitrate in different<br />

combinations. Overall In-vitro pollen germination was very low and does not<br />

exceed 15%. The media containing 10% sucrose and calcium nitrate and 10%<br />

sucrose and magnesium sulphate yielded low percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen<br />

grains,<br />

Percentage viability<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC CIc<br />

Population<br />

Fig.34 : Pollen viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations<br />

to<br />

Page 113


a<br />

c<br />

b<br />

Fig.35: Pollen morphology: (a) Light microscopic view (b,c) SEM.<br />

Page 114


a<br />

b<br />

Fig.36: Pollen Viability (a) Tetrazolium chloride test (b) Aniline blue test.<br />

Page 115


Table 13 : Pollen-ovule ratio , Pollen diameter and Pollen volume <strong>of</strong><br />

Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />

Feature<br />

Pollenovule<br />

ratio<br />

Pollen<br />

diameter<br />

µm n=<br />

50<br />

Pollen<br />

volume<br />

µm³<br />

n=50<br />

Population<br />

Dal lake Mansbal lake Hygam<br />

wetland<br />

7495.71±548.02<br />

23.8±0.83<br />

7076.19±752.81<br />

Mean±SE<br />

N= number <strong>of</strong> pollen grain<br />

V= πD 3<br />

6<br />

Pollen - ovule ratio<br />

9000<br />

8000<br />

7000<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

7325±561.36<br />

23.6±0.54<br />

6887.69±474.96<br />

7309±546.84<br />

23.4±0.54<br />

6714.25±474.96<br />

Shalimar<br />

stream<br />

6993.60±455.36<br />

23.2±0.83<br />

6555.21±699.89<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

Population<br />

Fig.37: Pollen -ovule ratio <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations.<br />

Chanderhama<br />

irrigation canal<br />

6854.02±304.12<br />

23.2±0.44<br />

6540.82±387.81<br />

Page 116


Pollen diameter(µm)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

DL ML HW<br />

Population<br />

SS CIC<br />

Fig.38: Pollen diameter <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations.<br />

Pollen volume(µm)<br />

9000<br />

8000<br />

7000<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

Population<br />

Fig.39: Pollen volume <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations.<br />

Page 117


Table 14 : In-vitro pollen germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in<br />

different media.<br />

Composition <strong>of</strong><br />

medium<br />

S<br />

S+B<br />

S+C<br />

S+P<br />

S+M<br />

S+M+C<br />

S+M+P<br />

S+B+C<br />

S+B+C+M+P<br />

Mean±SE<br />

S = 10% Sucrose (30 ml).<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Pollen<br />

grains scanned<br />

200±10<br />

191±24.55<br />

184.66±5.03<br />

187.33±5.68<br />

191.33±19.50<br />

181.33±10.50<br />

209.66±11.06<br />

215.66±18.44<br />

213.00±16.32<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> pollen<br />

grains<br />

Germinated<br />

10±0.57<br />

13±1.73<br />

5.33±0.57<br />

11.24±0.34<br />

3.76±0.40<br />

7.49±0.49<br />

14.80±0.57<br />

26.30±1.57<br />

33.25±1.63<br />

S+B = 10% Sucrose(15ml) + Boric acid 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (15ml).<br />

Percentage<br />

germination<br />

5.16±0.28<br />

6.80±0.39<br />

2.89±0.38<br />

6.33±0.57<br />

1.96±0.10<br />

4.12±0.20<br />

7.06±0.20<br />

12.33±0.57<br />

15.61±0.65<br />

Page 118


S+C = 10% Sucrose (15ml) + Calcium nitrate 3mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water(15ml).<br />

S+P = 10% Sucrose(15ml) + Potassium nitrate 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water(15ml).<br />

S+M = 10% Sucrose(15ml) + Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water(125ml).<br />

S+M+C =10% Sucrose(10ml) + Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml (10ml) + Calcium nitrate<br />

3mg/10ml (10ml).<br />

S+M+P =10% Sucrose (10ml) +Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml(10ml) +Potassium nitrate<br />

1mg/10ml (10ml).<br />

S+B+C = 10% Sucr ose(10ml) +Boric acid 1mg/10ml (10ml) + Calcium nitrate 3mg/10ml<br />

(10ml).<br />

S+B+C+M+P = 10% Sucrose(6ml) + Boric acid 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (6ml)+ Calcium<br />

nitrate 3mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (6ml) + Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water<br />

(6ml) + Potassium nitrate 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (6ml).<br />

Percentage germination<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Composition <strong>of</strong> media<br />

Fig. 40 : In-vitro pollen germination in different media<br />

while media containing 10% sucrose, boric acid , calcium nitrate and 10%<br />

sucrose, boric acid, calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate and potassium nitrate<br />

yielded highest percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen Table(14) and Figs.(40,41 )<br />

Page 119


a<br />

b<br />

Fig.41 : (a) Pollen diameter ( b) In-vitro pollen germination.<br />

Page 120


4.6.6: Pollination mechanism<br />

The species produces unisexual flowers on a common spike, the upper<br />

male and lower female flowers. The spikes initially emerge just below the<br />

water surface but finally come out and remain above the water surface. In a<br />

population different spikes <strong>of</strong> the plant (genet) or different plants are at<br />

different developmental stages viz: budding, female phase, male phase and<br />

fruiting stage and continue to advance from one stage to another. The spikes<br />

bearing receptive stigmas are smaller in length as the male flowers are not yet<br />

fully developed and are around 3-3.5 cm above the water surface, whereas<br />

those having completed the female phase and advanced into the male phase<br />

with dehisced anthers and loaded with pollen are comparatively larger in length<br />

and are around 3.5-6 cm above the water surface. The female and male phases<br />

are distinct in that the male phase follows the female phase and the stigmas lose<br />

their receptivity during male phase and become dry and shriveled. This clearly<br />

depicts cross pollinated nature <strong>of</strong> the species, where pollen from spikes at male<br />

phase are transferred to the spikes which are yet at female phase bearing<br />

receptive stigmas Figs. (42,44). The first formed spikes in a population fail to<br />

produce seeds due to the non- availability <strong>of</strong> pollen at the time <strong>of</strong> stigma<br />

receptivity. As the spikes are well above the water surface, the primary mode<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollination is anemophily. Entomophily and hydrophily can be ruled out<br />

because it was observed that insects do not visit the spikes and the submerged<br />

carpels abort instead <strong>of</strong> developing into mature seeds. Another possible mode<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollination observed in the present study was anemo-ephydrophily where in<br />

pollen grains falling on the water surface sometimes travel through water<br />

currents and reach the receptive stigmas for pollination Fig.(42,44). However,<br />

the major pollination mechanism seems to be anemophily. In running water<br />

populations however, the spikes do not withstand the pressure <strong>of</strong> flowing water<br />

and remain submerged all along and eventually decay without accomplishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> effective pollination, hence fail to produce seed.Figs. (43,44).<br />

Page 121


a b<br />

Fig.42: Modes <strong>of</strong> pollination operative in Myriophyllum spicatum (a) Anemophily (b) Anemo-epihydrophily.<br />

Page 122


Fig.43: Flowers do not open and spikes decay under water.<br />

Page 123


a<br />

b<br />

Fig.44: Position <strong>of</strong> spikes with respect to water surface and pollination modes<br />

operative in Myriophyllum spicatum (a) standing water (b) running water<br />

Page 124


4.6.7: Fruit and seed morphology<br />

The stereo and scanning electron microscopic analysis revealed that fruit<br />

is a globular dark brown 2.2×2.5 mm schizocarp having smooth surface<br />

architecture with four deep longitudinal sutures and a square shaped scar on<br />

upper side having four elongated points which are the remains <strong>of</strong> the stigmas.<br />

The lower side (where from fruit is attached to the spike) is circular. Each fruit<br />

contains four individual seeds. The seed is a trigonal nutlet 2.2×1.5 mm with<br />

smooth epicarp and mesocarp and a hard endocarp,having two flat sides and an<br />

outer convex side Fig. (47).<br />

4.6.8: Seed set and viability<br />

The Myriophyllum spicatum produces a copious amount <strong>of</strong> seeds. The<br />

seed set <strong>of</strong> the species is presented in Table (15) and Figs.(45,48). It was<br />

observed in the present study that only standing water populations produce<br />

seeds, whereas running water populations are not able to produce seeds because<br />

effective pollination is not possible in running waters. The seed set percentage<br />

in three standing water populations viz: Dal lake, Mansbal lake and Hygam<br />

wetland was recorded as 77.91%, 70.98% and 75.19% respectively, indicating<br />

that good numbers <strong>of</strong> seeds are produced by the species.<br />

The seed viability <strong>of</strong> different populations do not very much. The dissected<br />

seeds having healthy embryo and stain deep red in 2% 2, 3, 5 triphenyl<br />

tetrazolium chloride (TTC) Fig. (48) were considered as viable. The percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> viable seeds was 90% in Dal lake population, 88% in Mansbal population<br />

and 85% in Hygam wetland population Table (15) and Fig. (46). In running<br />

water populations viz: Shalimar stream and Chanderhama irrigation canal, no<br />

seed set was recorded.<br />

Page 125


Table 15: Seed set and viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different<br />

populations .<br />

Character<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

spikes per<br />

ramet<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

flowers per<br />

ramet<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds per<br />

ramet<br />

Percentage<br />

seed set<br />

Percentage<br />

seed<br />

viability<br />

Mean±SE<br />

Dal lake<br />

3.26±0.21<br />

30.06±2.21<br />

93.5±5.93<br />

77.91<br />

90.0±5.0<br />

standing water<br />

Mansbal<br />

lake<br />

3.33±0.24<br />

32.40±2.50<br />

92.0±5.22<br />

70.98<br />

88.33±2.88<br />

Population<br />

Hygam<br />

wetland<br />

3.13±0.17<br />

28.26±2.10<br />

85.0±4.50<br />

75.19<br />

85.0±5.00<br />

Shalimar<br />

stream<br />

1.53±0.9<br />

13.86±1.20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

running water<br />

Chanderhama<br />

irrigation<br />

canal<br />

1.60±1.00<br />

14.26±1.24<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Page 126


Percentage seed set per ramet<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

standing water<br />

running water<br />

Population<br />

Fig.45 : Seed set <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different standing and running water populations.<br />

Percentage seed viability<br />

DL ML HW<br />

Population<br />

Fig .46: Seed viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

Page 127


a b<br />

c d<br />

Fig. 47: Fruit and seed morphology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum (a,b) SEM <strong>of</strong> fruit and<br />

seed (c,d) Stereoscopic view <strong>of</strong> fruit and seed.<br />

Page 128


a<br />

b<br />

Fig.48 : (a) Spike with fruits attached (b) Seed viability in tetrazolium chloride.<br />

Page 129


4.6.9: Seed germination<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum produce seeds in the month <strong>of</strong> September-<br />

October. The mature seeds fall in water and then reach to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

water body .These seeds get buried in the sediment at the bottom and do not<br />

germinate immediately and remain dormant for long period. However, in order<br />

to work out the dormant nature and germination ability <strong>of</strong> the seeds, in vitro<br />

studies were carried out. The seeds were subjected to different concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> GA3 and IAA, surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> the embryo by removal <strong>of</strong> the seed wall,<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and mesocarp, chilling and incubation under alternating<br />

light and dark and continuous dark conditions in order to break dormancy. The<br />

results are summarized in Table (16) and Fig. (49). The data reveals that seeds<br />

in control and those treated with different concentrations <strong>of</strong> GA3 and IAA did<br />

not germinate. Moreover, the seeds in which epicarp and mesocarp was<br />

removed did not show any sign <strong>of</strong> germination. However, good germination<br />

percentage was observed in seeds subjected to both wet and dry chilling. It was<br />

observed that surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryos has a promoting effect on<br />

germination and maximum percentage germination was recorded due to<br />

surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo plus different concentrations <strong>of</strong> GA3.<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> seeds and light regimes also has effect on percentage germination. The<br />

percentage germination <strong>of</strong> one year old seeds was less as compared to the<br />

current year seeds in all the treatments. The seeds <strong>of</strong> the current year<br />

germinate more vigorously and more in number as compared to the one year<br />

old seeds provided the seed wall is cut to expose the embryo indicating that<br />

hard endocarp is responsible for their dormancy. Moreover, it was observed<br />

that overall percentage germination was more in alternate light and dark as<br />

compared to continuous dark conditions in all the treatments. This<br />

Page 130


Table 16: Effect <strong>of</strong> various physical and chemical treatments on germination<br />

<strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> different ages under alternate light and dark (L) and<br />

continuous dark (D) conditions at 25°c in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

Treatment<br />

Controll<br />

40 days dry<br />

chilling<br />

40 days wet<br />

chilling<br />

Surgical exposure<br />

<strong>of</strong> embryo<br />

(epicarp, mesocarp<br />

and endocarp<br />

removal)<br />

Surgical exposure<br />

<strong>of</strong> embryo +<br />

0.5mM GA3<br />

Surgical exposure<br />

<strong>of</strong> embryo + 1mM<br />

GA3<br />

Surgical exposure<br />

<strong>of</strong> embryo + 2 mM<br />

GA3<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> seed Light regime Percentage<br />

germination±SE<br />

E0 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E1 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E0 L 31.66±2.88 fg<br />

D 13.33±2.88 bc<br />

E1 L 23.33±2.90 def<br />

D 10.00±0 b<br />

E0 L 33.33±2.90 g<br />

D 16.66±2.88 bcd<br />

E1 L 26.66±2.88 efg<br />

D 13.33±2.88 bc<br />

E0 L 63.00±5.77 hij<br />

D 28.33±2.35 efg<br />

E1 L 55.00±5.0 h<br />

D 16.66±2.88 bcd<br />

E0 L 68.33±5.77 ijk<br />

D 31.66±2.88 fg<br />

E1 L 60.00±5.00 hi<br />

D 20.00±0 cde<br />

E0 L 71.66±7.63 jk<br />

D 33.33±2.90 g<br />

E1 L 66.66±2.88 ij<br />

D 21.66±2.88 cde<br />

E0 L 76.66±5.77 k<br />

D 35.00±2.88 g<br />

E1 L 70.00±5.00 jk<br />

D 23.33±2.88 def<br />

GA3, 1mM E0 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E1 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

GA3, 2mM E0 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E1 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

Page 131


Scarification<br />

(removal <strong>of</strong><br />

epicarp and<br />

mesocarp)<br />

Scarification<br />

(removal <strong>of</strong><br />

epicarp and<br />

mesocarp) + IAA,<br />

0.5mM<br />

Scarification<br />

(removal <strong>of</strong><br />

epicarp and<br />

mesocarp) +IAA,<br />

1mM<br />

E0 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E1 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E0 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E1 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E0 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

E1 L 0 a<br />

D 0 a<br />

df= 47, F=231.60,<br />

P=0.000<br />

E0= Seeds <strong>of</strong> current year<br />

E1= Seeds collected one year before<br />

GA3= gibberlic acid<br />

IAA= Indole acetic acid<br />

Different letters a, b, c, d, e, f,……… indicate means that are significantly different<br />

(Tukeys test≤0.05)<br />

Percentage germination<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Treatment<br />

Fig.49 : Percentage germination in various effective treatments.<br />

L, E0<br />

D, E0<br />

D, E1<br />

L, E1<br />

Page 132


a<br />

b<br />

Fig.50: In-vitro seed germination in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

Page 133


eveals that with the increase in age <strong>of</strong> the seeds, there is decrease in their<br />

viability and light has promoting effect on seed germination Fig. (50).<br />

Seed germination was also tested by placing fifty healthy seeds in trays<br />

containing sediment and water. After one month <strong>of</strong> continuous observation, the<br />

seeds failed to germinate establishing the fact that seed germination is not<br />

possible under natural conditions unless the hard endocarp is broken.<br />

4.7: Pollen mother cell meiosis<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum showed 21 perfect bivalents at metaphase.<br />

Anaphasic disjunction was regular with 21 chromosomes at each pole Fig .(51).<br />

The basic chromosome number in the species is 7. Based on x = 7, the species<br />

turned out to be hexaploid with 2n =6x =42. Since 21 bivalents were observed<br />

at metaphase and no multivalent formation was observed, it remains to be seen<br />

whether the species is amphidiploids or not. The actual ploidy level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

species can only be worked out by root tip mitosis and karyotype analysis<br />

which was not possible in the present study due to small size <strong>of</strong> chromosomes.<br />

4.8: Resource allocation<br />

The allocation <strong>of</strong> dry mass to different plant parts in the species across<br />

different populations is summarized in Table (17).<br />

The dry mass allocation to different plant parts differs significantly across<br />

standing and running water populations Table(18) and Fig. (52). The allocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> dry mass to shoots is highest followed by seeds and spikes and much less is<br />

allocated to undersediment parts in standing water populations. In running<br />

water populations the trend is reverse, the undersediment parts in these<br />

populations allocate higher resources and have higher dry mass as compared to<br />

the standing water populations. The dry mass allocation in these populations is<br />

higher to shoots followed by undersediment parts and spikes. Seeds are not<br />

formed in these populations.<br />

Page 134


a b<br />

c<br />

Fig. 51: (a,b) Metaphase I (2n=42) and (c,d) Anaphase I.<br />

d<br />

Page 135


Table 17 : Resource allocation to different parts in Myriophyllum spictum across different standing and running water<br />

populations in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />

Dry<br />

weight(mg)↓<br />

Shoots<br />

Undersediment<br />

part<br />

Spikes<br />

Seeds<br />

Dal lake<br />

b<br />

4048±58.15<br />

a<br />

34.33±1.70<br />

b<br />

91.6±5.96<br />

c<br />

436.1±19.84<br />

%age<br />

87.80<br />

0.74<br />

1.98<br />

9.45<br />

Standing water (Mean±SE)<br />

Mansbal<br />

lake<br />

b<br />

4028.2±54.37<br />

a<br />

32.6±1.64<br />

b<br />

86.2±5.41<br />

b<br />

413±18.66<br />

%age<br />

88.33<br />

0.71<br />

1.89<br />

9.05<br />

Hgam<br />

wetland<br />

Population<br />

b<br />

4042.1±54.51<br />

a<br />

33.2±1.09<br />

b<br />

90.9±5.48<br />

bc<br />

419±18.77<br />

%age<br />

88.15<br />

0.72<br />

1.98<br />

Shalimar<br />

stream<br />

a<br />

2295.7±33.17<br />

b<br />

63.8±3.04<br />

a<br />

53±2.58<br />

Running water(Mean±SE)<br />

%age<br />

95.15<br />

2.64<br />

2.58<br />

Chanderhama<br />

irrigation<br />

canal<br />

a<br />

2305±35.74<br />

b<br />

65.4±3.77<br />

a<br />

55.00±2.58<br />

Different letters a, b, c, d in the table indicate means that are significantly different( Tukeys test≤0.05)<br />

9.13<br />

a<br />

0<br />

-<br />

a<br />

0<br />

%age<br />

95.03<br />

2.69<br />

2.26<br />

-<br />

Page 136


Table 18 : ANOVA <strong>of</strong> Resource allocation in Myriophyllum spicatum across<br />

different populations<br />

Character<br />

Dry weight <strong>of</strong> shoots<br />

Dry weight <strong>of</strong><br />

undersediment parts<br />

Dry weight <strong>of</strong> spikes<br />

Dry weight <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />

Percentage<br />

95<br />

90<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

b<br />

a b c<br />

b<br />

df<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

4<br />

b<br />

a b<br />

b<br />

bc<br />

a b<br />

F<br />

3814.27<br />

488.38<br />

177.39<br />

2449.80<br />

DL ML HW SS CIC<br />

Population<br />

a<br />

b a<br />

a<br />

b a<br />

P<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

0.000<br />

Dry weght <strong>of</strong> shoots<br />

Dry weight <strong>of</strong><br />

undersediment part<br />

Dry weight <strong>of</strong> spikes<br />

Dry weight <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />

Fig.52: Resource allocation pattern <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different standing and<br />

running water populations.<br />

Page 137


4.9: Vegetative reproduction<br />

Vegetative propagation is the dominant mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in<br />

aquatic plants. The speed and ease with which these aquatic weeds spread to<br />

non-indigenous regions confirms the potential <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction in<br />

these plants. The Myriophyllum spicatum also operate various modes <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetative reproduction to spread. The different vegetative propagules<br />

produced by this species include rhizomes, axillary buds, plant fragments<br />

and nodal plantlets. As the species inhabits both standing and running<br />

waters, it operates different modes in these two types <strong>of</strong> habitats. In standing<br />

waters, it reproduces mostly by means <strong>of</strong> plant fragments, axillary buds and<br />

rhizomes thus helping the species to spread in such type <strong>of</strong> habitats. In<br />

running waters the most prevalent modes <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction is by<br />

rhizomes, stem fragments and nodal plantlets arising from the older stems.<br />

Axillary bud formation in running waters and nodal plantlet in standing<br />

waters are rare. In lentic waters fragmentation <strong>of</strong> the stem is the most<br />

important mode <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagation followed by axillary buds and<br />

rhizomes. In running waters, rhizomes are the most prevalent mode followed<br />

by fragmentation and nodal plantlets.<br />

4.9.1: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments<br />

Fragmentation is the most important mode <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction in<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum. In the present study it was observed that under<br />

natural conditions two types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments are formed viz:<br />

aut<strong>of</strong>ragments formed by the self induced abscission <strong>of</strong> shoot apices and<br />

these fragments are generally formed when the plant has attained the peak<br />

biomass, whereas another type viz: all<strong>of</strong>ragments are formed by the<br />

mechanical breakage <strong>of</strong> the parent stem by disturbances in the water by<br />

boats, swimmers and water currents. To check out the potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fragments to form new plantlets, apical and intermediate fragments with<br />

varying number <strong>of</strong> nodes were used viz: six noded intermediate, three noded<br />

intermediate, six noded apical and three noded apical. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

Page 1


different types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments analysed for their reproductive potential<br />

are summarized in Table (19). It was revealed that the six noded<br />

intermediate fragments have the potential to form the maximum number <strong>of</strong><br />

plantlets followed by three noded intermediate and six noded apical<br />

fragments. The three noded apical fragments are not able to form any<br />

plantlet. It was also observed that length <strong>of</strong> six and three noded intermediate<br />

fragments do not increase, hence the number <strong>of</strong> nodes remains the same,<br />

whereas the length <strong>of</strong> six and three noded apical fragments increases and<br />

hence the number <strong>of</strong> nodes also increases, but they show least potential to<br />

form new plantlets, thus showing least reproductive capacity as compared to<br />

intermediate fragments Figs.(53,54). So fragmentation is a type <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetative clonal propagation which provides intermediate to long distance<br />

dispersal for the species.<br />

Table 19 : Different types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments and their reproductive<br />

potential in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

Fragment type<br />

6- noded<br />

intermediate<br />

3- noded<br />

intermediate<br />

6- noded apical<br />

3- noded apical<br />

Mean±SE<br />

()* = initial number <strong>of</strong> nodes<br />

()** = final number <strong>of</strong> nodes<br />

Mean initial<br />

length(cm)<br />

13.16 (6) *<br />

6.3 (6)<br />

7.7(6)<br />

2.86(3)<br />

Mean final<br />

length(cm)<br />

13.16(6) **<br />

6.3 (6)<br />

11.58(8.6)<br />

4.16 (4.6)<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong><br />

plantlets formed<br />

2.86±0.64<br />

2.3±0.41<br />

0.93±0.11<br />

0<br />

Page 2


Total number <strong>of</strong> plantlets formed<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

6 - noded int 3 - noded int 6 - noded api 3 - noded api<br />

4.9.2: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> rhizomes<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the growing season the above sediment parts <strong>of</strong><br />

Myriophyllum spicatum undergo senescence but the undersediment rhizome<br />

remain dormant during the winter. In the next growing season the rhizome<br />

gives rise to new leafy shoots which develop into full plants after<br />

undergoing vegetative growth and then enter into the reproductive phase.<br />

The rhizomes have a high potential to form new plantlets, the present study<br />

revealed that each 5 cm long rhizome cutting has the potential to form<br />

6.0±0.62 new plantlets Fig. (54). So rhizomes contribute to the new<br />

recruitments on arrival <strong>of</strong> the favourable conditions and help in<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> new populations. So rhizomes are a means <strong>of</strong> localized<br />

spread in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

4.9.3: Axillary bud germination<br />

Fragment type<br />

Fig.53 : Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and sediment on axillary bud germination is<br />

presented in Table (20) and the effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and light is presented<br />

in Table (21). It was observed that the optimum temperature for axillary bud<br />

germination is 20-25°C, though considerable germination occurs at 15°C;<br />

the germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds tends to decrease below 15˚C and is almost<br />

Page 3


absent at 10˚C.The germination beyond 25°C also starts to decline<br />

progressively and<br />

c<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Fig.54 : (a) Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> stem fragments to form new plantlets (b)<br />

plantlet with adventitious roots (c) Rhizome giving rise to new plntlets.<br />

Page 4


percentage germination at 30°C is very low. The sediment does not have any<br />

role in axillary bud germination as good percentage germination was<br />

recorded without sediment also. Under alternate light and dark conditions,<br />

axillary buds germinate more rapidly and more in number as compared to<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> complete darkness Figs. (55-57).<br />

Table 20 : Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and sediment under alternate light and dark<br />

conditions on axillary bud germination.<br />

Temperature 0 c<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

Treatment<br />

Sediment/ without<br />

sediment<br />

S<br />

W<br />

S<br />

W<br />

S<br />

W<br />

S<br />

W<br />

S<br />

W<br />

S = with Sediment; W = without Sediment<br />

Percentage germination<br />

±SE<br />

0<br />

0<br />

57±3.86<br />

55.33±3.86<br />

75.53±3.86<br />

68.86±3.88<br />

88.85±3.86<br />

77.76±3.85<br />

37.77±3.85<br />

31.10±3.88<br />

Page 5


Table 21: Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and light on percentage axillary bud<br />

germination in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />

Temperature 0 C<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

L=light and dark condition<br />

D=dark condition<br />

Treatment<br />

Light regime<br />

L<br />

D<br />

L<br />

D<br />

L<br />

D<br />

L<br />

D<br />

L<br />

D<br />

Percentage<br />

germination±SE<br />

0<br />

0<br />

42.2±3.81<br />

31.08±3.88<br />

68.88±3.85<br />

51.06±3.88<br />

82.2±3.81<br />

64.4±3.81<br />

31.06±3.86<br />

22.2±3.81<br />

Page 6


%age germination<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

15 20 25 30<br />

Temperature˚C<br />

with sediment<br />

without sediment<br />

Fig.55: Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and sediment under alternate light and dark<br />

conditions on percentage axillary bud germination.<br />

%age germination<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

15 20 25 30<br />

Temperature˚C<br />

alternate light and dark<br />

dark<br />

Fig.56 : Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and light on axillary bud germination.<br />

Page 7


c<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Fig.57 : (a) Axillary buds attached to the plant (b) Axillary buds <strong>of</strong> varying sizes<br />

(c) In-vitro germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds.<br />

4.9.4: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> axillary buds<br />

Page 8


The axillary buds <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum are normal vegetative<br />

buds but they differ from the vegetative buds in their size and the ease with<br />

which they detach from the parent plant. Their size is larger than the normal<br />

vegetative buds and detach easily from the parent plant. These buds are<br />

formed during October to November and remain dormant during the chilling<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley and soon on arrival <strong>of</strong> the favourable<br />

conditions germinate to give rise to new planlets.<br />

The present study revealed that each axillary bud on germination<br />

produces a single ramet. The newly formed ramet undergoes vegetative<br />

growth and produces 8-12 new axillary buds which in a geometric<br />

progression produce 64-144 new ramets. So Myriophyllum spicatum has a<br />

very high potential to spread through axillary buds in lakes and ponds. Figs.<br />

(58-59).<br />

Axillary bud<br />

germination Vegetative growth<br />

Ramet<br />

Fig.58: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> an axillary bud<br />

bud.<br />

Ramet with<br />

8—12 axillary<br />

buds<br />

Geometric<br />

progressio<br />

n<br />

New Ramets<br />

(64—144)<br />

Page 9


a<br />

b<br />

Fig.59: Potential <strong>of</strong> axillary buds to form new plantlets (a) axillary buds <strong>of</strong><br />

different sizes (b) germinated axillary bud.<br />

Page 10


CHAPTER-5<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Page 11


5.1: Distribution<br />

The present work was carried out on Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

belonging to the genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) which is an aquatic<br />

genus having cosmopolitan distribution (Moody and Les, 2010). It is native<br />

to Europe, Asia and North Africa (Couch and Nelson, 1985). During the<br />

present study M. spicatum was found in all the major Lakes <strong>of</strong> the valley viz.<br />

Dal Lake, Mansbal Lake, Anchar Lake, Wular Lake, Nilnag Lake; wetlands<br />

which include Hygam wetland, Hookarsar wetland, river Jhelum, Achabal<br />

spring, Shalimar stream, Chanderhama irrigation canal, Bal kol and almost<br />

in all fresh water bodies and irrigation channels. The observations <strong>of</strong> Kaul<br />

and Zutshi (1965) and Kak (1990) on the distribution <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum in<br />

<strong>Kashmir</strong> valley support our results.<br />

5.2: Species morphology and phenotypic variability<br />

The present study revealed that the species is a perennial rhizomatous<br />

herb with adventitious roots having a long stem distinguished into nodes and<br />

internodes with leaves in whorls <strong>of</strong> 3-5(4) at nodes, pinnately divided into<br />

25-37 filiform leaflets, with four flowers in each whorl aggregated on aerial<br />

spike with upper male and lower female; staminate flowers axillary with<br />

three bracts, four pinkish petals and eight stamens; pistillate flowers without<br />

perianth, bracts three, pectinate with tetragonal ovary having four deep<br />

furrows and four stigmas; fruit globular schizocarp dark brown dehiscing by<br />

four longitudinal sutures, splitting at maturity into four individual seeds<br />

called nutlets; seed trigonal with two flat and an outer convex side. These<br />

results are in agreement with various studies at global level (Kak, A.M,<br />

1978; Aiken and McNeill, 1980; Aiken, 1981; Haynes, 1988; Orchard, 1986;<br />

Donaldson and Johnson, 1998; Johnson et al., 1998; Crow and Hellquist,<br />

2000 and Moody and Les, 2010).<br />

Aquatic plants, many <strong>of</strong> which propagate vegetatively tend to possess<br />

lower genetic diversity than terrestrial plants, implying an increased role <strong>of</strong><br />

phenotypic plasticity for diversity (Sculthrope, 1967; Barrett et al., 1993).<br />

During the present investigation it was observed that M. spicatum inhabit<br />

Page 12


oth standing as well as running waters. The species in response to different<br />

ecological environments have developed distinct morphological characters<br />

with respect to leaf dimensions, petiole length, mature spike and peduncle<br />

length as well as number <strong>of</strong> spikes, flowers and seeds per ramet to adapt<br />

itself in different habitats. It was observed that leaf dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

species do not vary much within different standing/running water<br />

populations but differ significantly between standing and running water<br />

populations. The species produces narrow and longer leaf blades as well as<br />

longer petioles in running waters whereas in standing waters wider and<br />

smaller leaf blades with short petioles are produced. Such variations in leaf<br />

morphology have been reported earlier in Potamogeton by Kaplan (2002,<br />

2008). Puijalon and Bornette (2006) also observed that leaf breadth reduces<br />

significantly in plants exposed to stress <strong>of</strong> water currents. Mature spike and<br />

peduncle length vary significantly across standing and running water<br />

populations. Mature spike and peduncle length was found smaller in running<br />

water populations as compared to standing water populations. This is<br />

because pressure <strong>of</strong> the flowing waters impairs the development <strong>of</strong> spikes as<br />

strong water currents in running waters lead to negative development <strong>of</strong><br />

plants due to mechanical stress ( Gants and Caro, 2001; Riis and Biggs,<br />

2003). The number <strong>of</strong> spikes and flowers per ramet in running water<br />

populations was less as compared to standing water population showing<br />

significant differences because <strong>of</strong> stress <strong>of</strong> flowing water, similar results<br />

were obtained by Kautsky (1987) who observed that in Potamogeton<br />

pectinatus floral number per m 2 was highest in sheltered populations and the<br />

number decreased from 945 to 672 per m 2 with increasing exposure to<br />

waves. In standing water populations copious amount <strong>of</strong> seeds were formed<br />

whereas no seed set was observed in running water populations because the<br />

plants growing in running waters fail to accomplish sexual reproduction and<br />

do not produce seeds (Kaplan, 2002, 2008).<br />

Page 13


5.3: Growth architecture<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> the submerged macrophytes form clones, consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

complex network <strong>of</strong> ramets interconnected by rhizome. Clonal morphology<br />

changes in response to environmental factors, both at the level <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

ramet as well as at clonal level (Puijalon et al., 2008). The present study<br />

revealed that Myriophyllum spicatum showed considerable and significant<br />

variation in clonal growth between standing and running waters, however<br />

various growth architectural features do not vary much among different<br />

standing water populations or running water populations.<br />

In standing water populations branching <strong>of</strong> the ramets and spacer<br />

length is more as compared to the plants <strong>of</strong> running water populations. The<br />

ramets in running water populations do not produce many branches because<br />

fast flowing waters impairs the development <strong>of</strong> branches and there is also a<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> getting detached from the main axis by pressure <strong>of</strong> flowing water.<br />

However in running waters, the number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant (clone) and the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome is more as compared to the plants <strong>of</strong><br />

standing waters. Thus in running waters increased number <strong>of</strong> ramets per<br />

plant, reduced spacer length and increased number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome<br />

could help in the formation <strong>of</strong> dense canopy and enhance anchorage<br />

efficiency; a strategy <strong>of</strong> resistance that reduces the effect <strong>of</strong> pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

flowing waters. This dense growth form described as Phalanx growth form<br />

by Lovett-Doust (1987) due to reduced spacer length and increased<br />

branching could allow the plants to occupy favourable patches in a<br />

heterogeneous environment (De kroon et al., 1994 ; Dong and De- kroon,<br />

1994; De-kroon and Hutchings, 1995).The present study is quite in<br />

agreement with the earlier findings for Mentha aquatic, where the species<br />

produces increased number <strong>of</strong> creeping stems and dense canopy in running<br />

waters to reduce the stress <strong>of</strong> flowing water (Puijalon et al., 2008). The<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> increased number <strong>of</strong> creeping stems, enhanced anchorage and<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> dense canopy are responsible for reducing the effect <strong>of</strong> aero or<br />

Page 14


hydrodynamic forces in many other plant species (Sand-Jenson and Mebus,<br />

1996; Speck, 2003; Lui et al., 2007).<br />

The length/height <strong>of</strong> ramets in standing water populations mostly<br />

depend upon the depth <strong>of</strong> water body; while in running waters ramets grow<br />

in the direction <strong>of</strong> flow. The alignment <strong>of</strong> creeping stems with the direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> flow may be induced by different mechanisms. First it could be due to<br />

drag forces exerted by water currents pushing the stems in the flow direction<br />

(Vogel, 1994; Kotshy and Rogers, 2008). Secondly, it could also result due<br />

to higher mortality <strong>of</strong> the creeping stems growing in the other directions, for<br />

instance due to damages by sandblasting and drifting particles (Cleugh et al.,<br />

1998). Third factor is the different activity <strong>of</strong> the meristems. The meristems<br />

could grow perfectly in the downstream direction that is partly sheltered<br />

from the water current and submitted to less stressful conditions (Sand-<br />

jenson and Pedersen, 1999), where as the other growth directions could be<br />

inhabited (Puijalone et al., 2008). Total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome in different<br />

populations could not be measured precisely as it depends upon the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

substratum <strong>of</strong> water body and handling <strong>of</strong> plant material during collection<br />

(plucking <strong>of</strong> plant material).<br />

5.4: Phenology<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum overwinters by means <strong>of</strong> rhizomes and winter<br />

buds. These structures start sprouting during the first week <strong>of</strong> March and<br />

continue upto second week <strong>of</strong> April when environmental conditions such as<br />

temperature and light are available, because these factors are important for<br />

the initiation <strong>of</strong> a particular phenophase (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985). The<br />

vegetative growth commences during April and continues till June; however<br />

in running water populations the vegetative growth phase is longer than in<br />

standing water populations. The flowering commences from June to<br />

September and continues for 1-4 months in standing water populations and<br />

for 1-3 months in running water populations. The longer vegetative phase,<br />

delayed and shorter flowering phase in running waters may be due to the<br />

lower allocation <strong>of</strong> resources to sexual reproduction and permanent exposure<br />

Page 15


<strong>of</strong> plants to mechanical stress (Niklas, 1998; Henery and Thomas, 2002; and<br />

Hodges et al., 2004). The fruiting phase completes from September to<br />

October in standing water populations where as in running water populations<br />

fruits are not formed. The senescence starts from second week <strong>of</strong> October<br />

and continues till December. These phenological events are in agreement<br />

with the work <strong>of</strong> Patten (1956) and Spencer and Lekic (1974).<br />

The knowledge about life history is very important for effective<br />

management <strong>of</strong> this species and can be utilized to identify week points in the<br />

plants life cycle and exploit them for long term management (Madsen,<br />

1993). M. spicatum produces flowers, seeds and axillary buds during June-<br />

October. Therefore removal <strong>of</strong> ramets before June can prove an effective<br />

method for control <strong>of</strong> this aggressive species. This is supported by the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Caffery and Monahan (2006) who reported that in Myriophyllum<br />

verticillatum, removal <strong>of</strong> turions yielded desirable results in control <strong>of</strong> this<br />

species as compared to annual treatment with dichlobexil, followed by<br />

mechanical cutting. The present study revealed that knowledge about<br />

various life history traits, such as different types <strong>of</strong> sexual and vegetative<br />

propagules, their time <strong>of</strong> formation and germination is very important for<br />

long term management <strong>of</strong> this aggressive species in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />

5.5: Sexual Reproduction<br />

Sexual reproduction in Myriophyllum spicatum starts with the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> an inflorescence which is a terminal spike, red in colour and<br />

raised on an elongated peduncle. The flowers are unisexual, aggregated<br />

acropetally on the inflorescence axis with upper male and lower female<br />

arising in the axil <strong>of</strong> a strong bract with two more delicate bracteoles located<br />

at the base <strong>of</strong> each flower. Male flowers are having pinkish petals whereas<br />

female flowers are without perianth. The morphological organization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inflorescence and flowers show slight variation but the number <strong>of</strong> flowers in<br />

each whorl is four. These results are in agreement with works <strong>of</strong> Cook<br />

(1987); Smith and Barko (1990); Aiken et al., (1979) and Hartleb et al.,<br />

(1993). The process <strong>of</strong> flowering is chronologically divided into four distinct<br />

Page 16


phases viz: budding, peduncle growth, female phase and male phase and this<br />

is in close agreement with the observations <strong>of</strong> Patten (1956) and Aiken<br />

(1981).<br />

The stigmas <strong>of</strong> an inflorescence remain receptive for 3-4 days after<br />

the stigmas come out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath. During this period the anthers are<br />

enclosed by petals and the receptive stigmas are well exerted above the<br />

bracts surrounding the female flowers. The ―female phase‖ is quite distinct<br />

and follows the ―male phase‖ (protogyny). Protogyny is a well known<br />

adaptation to outcrossing in aquatic angiosperms as also demonstrated by<br />

Patten (1956) in Myriophyllum spicatum; Teryokhin et al., (2002) in<br />

different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton and Guo and Cook (1990) in Groenlandia<br />

densa. The long duration <strong>of</strong> stigma receptivity is attributed to blossoming <strong>of</strong><br />

the flowers in female phase acropetally along the axis <strong>of</strong> the inflorescence.<br />

The spikes having receptive stigmas (female phase) as well as those with<br />

fully opened flowers undergoing anther dehiscence (male phase) are always<br />

situated well above the water surface except few lower female flowers<br />

occasionally. This creates congenial conditions for aerial pollen transfer<br />

from anthers to stigmatic surface. The insect pollinators were never found<br />

visiting Myriophyllum spikes which further strengthen our belief <strong>of</strong><br />

anemophily operating in the present species.<br />

The pollen–ovule ratio (p/o) in a flower is a useful tool to study plant<br />

breeding systems (Cruden, 1977). Cruden (1977) observed that higher the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> autogamy, the lower the pollen ovule ratio. A number <strong>of</strong> studies<br />

have more or less confirmed the validity <strong>of</strong> pollen- ovule ratio as an<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> the breeding system (Lopez et al., 1999; Cruden, 2000; Jurgens<br />

et al., 2002). During the present study it was observed that Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum depicts high pollen- ovule ratio which ranges from<br />

6854.02±304.12 to 7495.71±584.02 across different populations, which<br />

shows its anemophillous and outbreeding nature. Our results are well<br />

supported by the findings <strong>of</strong> Philbrick and Anderson (1987); Cruden (2000)<br />

and Zhang et al., (2009) which state that the species whose pollen-ovule<br />

Page 17


atio ranges from 6,000-8,200 are xenogamous and show anemophily or<br />

epihydrophily. The small amount <strong>of</strong> variation observed in pollen-ovule ratio<br />

between different populations in the present study may reflect sampling<br />

error or may have environmental basis (Diazlifante, 1996; Affre et al., 1995;<br />

Ramsay et al., 1994; Vuille, 1988 and Cruden, 1977). In the present study,<br />

pollen diameter <strong>of</strong> the species was found ranging from 23.2±0.44 to<br />

23.8±0.83 µm. Probably due this small size <strong>of</strong> pollen, the species is able to<br />

produce large amount <strong>of</strong> pollen grains per flower and hence pollen-ovule<br />

ratio, thus helping in its outbreeding nature. These observations are well<br />

supported by the findings <strong>of</strong> Zhang et al., (2009); Lopez et al., (1999);<br />

Vonh<strong>of</strong> and Harder (1995); Knudsen and Olesen (1993); Mione and<br />

Anderson (1992); Small (1988); Cruden and Miller-ward (1981); Ornduff<br />

(1980) and Cruden (1977). These investigators have reported a negative<br />

correlation between pollen grain number and size. Akerman (2000) reported<br />

that small pollen grains are an adaptation to anemophily.<br />

The pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum were found small, spherical,<br />

radially symmetrical, isopolar having four colpi with a rough surface.<br />

Similar results have been reported in earlier studies on M. spicatum by<br />

Alwadie (2008) in Saudi Arabia and Parveen (1999) in Karachi. A strong<br />

correlation exists between pollen morphology and pollination mechanism<br />

(Tanaka et al., 2004; van Vierssen et al., 1982). Pollen grains <strong>of</strong><br />

anemophillous taxa are small, spheroidal, and dry with simple apertures and<br />

scabrate tectum (Shuang-Quan et al., 2001; Parveen et al., 1994). Based on<br />

the pollen morphology, the present investigation clearly indicates that M.<br />

spicatum comes under the category <strong>of</strong> anemophillous taxa. During my field<br />

surveys the mature spikes in M. spicatum were always found above the<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> water. These spikes were also found at different development<br />

stages. Some spikes were at female phase when stigmas were found<br />

receptive and male flowers completely closed, whereas other spikes were at<br />

male phase showing anther dehiscence and their stigmas have lost the<br />

receptivity. Based on this observation we can draw a conclusion that pollen<br />

Page 18


from male flowers <strong>of</strong> one spike would be available for pollination to the<br />

receptive stigmas <strong>of</strong> other spikes thus exhibiting cross pollination. As the<br />

spikes are found well above the water surface, insects do not visit the<br />

flowers and based on pollen morphology and pollen-ovule ratio it is clear<br />

that primary mode <strong>of</strong> pollination is anemophily. Anemophily in<br />

Myriophyllum has also been reported earlier (Cook, 1988, 1996; Patten,<br />

1956). An interesting alteration to anemophily observed in the present<br />

investigation was anemo-ephydrophily, where in due to the activity <strong>of</strong> wind<br />

pollen dust falls on the surface <strong>of</strong> water and due to water currents the pollen<br />

grains are transferred to the lowermost receptive stigmas which are at the<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> water. However this is not a primary mode <strong>of</strong> pollination and such<br />

anemo-ephydrophily has also been reported in Potamogeton (Zhang et al.,<br />

2009).<br />

5.6: Fruit and Seed Biology<br />

The fruit and seed <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum has been variously<br />

described by different workers and given different names. Fruit has been<br />

given the name achene and seed as nutlet by Patten (1955), but it is not an<br />

achene because achene is a single seeded indehiscent fruit. Orchard (1986)<br />

called fruit as nut and seed as nutlet but according to the present<br />

investigation it cannot be called as nut because nut is a single seeded<br />

indehiscent fruit. Based on the present stereo and scanning electron<br />

microscopic investigations the fruit is a schizocarp with four deep<br />

longitudinal sutures where from it splits into four individual seeds called<br />

nutlets. Because schizocarpic fruits are intermediate between dehiscent and<br />

indehiscent fruits. The fruit instead <strong>of</strong> dehiscing rather splits into a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> segments each containing one or more seeds. Our observations are<br />

strongly supported by the findings <strong>of</strong> Aiken (1981) .<br />

During the present investigation it was observed that Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum produce a copious amount <strong>of</strong> seeds and the seed set percentage<br />

ranges from 70.98% to 77.91% across different populations. The seed set<br />

depends upon various factors which include inflorescence size, position <strong>of</strong><br />

Page 19


inflorescence with respect to water surface, meiotic behaviour and habitat.<br />

The standing water populations possess large inflorescences which are<br />

always above the water surface and have more than thirty flowers per<br />

inflorescence. The pollen ovule ratio is high and the stigmas remain<br />

receptive for long duration along the whole length <strong>of</strong> the spike. All these<br />

features including normal meiotic behaviour are factors which favour<br />

effective pollination and in turn high seed set. The anaphasic segregation is<br />

normal and hence the species is able to produce viable pollen and seeds. The<br />

small amount <strong>of</strong> variation observed in seed set between different standing<br />

water population‘s viz. Dal Lake, Mansbal Lake and Hygam wetland may be<br />

due the eutrophic environment <strong>of</strong> the Dal Lake as compared to Mansbal<br />

Lake and Hygam wetland. This is supported by the work <strong>of</strong> Madsen and<br />

Boylin (1989) on Myriophyllum seed ecology from an oligotrophic and<br />

eutrophic Lake. The plants inhibiting running waters do not produce seeds.<br />

Probably the spikes in such populations do not withstand the pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

running waters and pollen grains are washed away without causing effective<br />

pollination.<br />

Seed germination in Myriophyllum spicatum was found significantly<br />

influenced by various factors such as physical and chemical treatments, age<br />

<strong>of</strong> seeds and light conditions. The seeds in which seed coat was not removed<br />

(intact seeds) do not germinate even when treated with different<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> GA3, IAA and also after removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and mesocarp.<br />

The study <strong>of</strong> Patten (1955) that partial removal <strong>of</strong> stony endocarp <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum seeds is effective in causing seed germination is in<br />

close agreement with the present study, however removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and<br />

mesocarp causes seed germination is not in agreement with the present<br />

study.<br />

The cold stratification treatment to some extent improved seed<br />

germination. This confirms that dormancy is due to the mechanical barrier <strong>of</strong><br />

the seed coat, mainly because <strong>of</strong> hard stony endocarp <strong>of</strong> the coat. Low<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> the seeds causes rupturing <strong>of</strong> the seed coat and thus their<br />

Page 20


dormancy is overcome. The results obtained are in conformity with those <strong>of</strong><br />

Patten (1955) who also reported that seed germination can be improved by<br />

following cold stratification in M. spicatum. Similar results have been<br />

obtained by Teltscherova and Hejny (1973); Baskin and Baskin (1998) and<br />

Hay et al., (2008) in different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. Under natural<br />

conditions also, the stratification treatment more closely akin to freezing<br />

winter temperatures <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley may have promotory effect on<br />

seed germination. Cold stratification is an effective way <strong>of</strong> alleviating<br />

dormancy in many species especially those from temperate regions (Baskin<br />

and Baskin, 1998, 2004) which ensured that germination does not occur<br />

until spring commences when water temperature is more favourable to the<br />

vegetative growth <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants (Hay et al., 2008).<br />

The seed age has significant effect on its germination. The present<br />

data confirms that M. spicatum seeds do survive desiccation. These results<br />

are in conformity with those <strong>of</strong> Standifer and Madsen (1997) who reported<br />

that M. spicatum seeds do survive desiccation and viability <strong>of</strong> seeds is<br />

reduced under storage. The freshly collected seeds as well as those dry<br />

stored upto one year germinate provided the seed coat is cut. Percent<br />

germination however, declines with age <strong>of</strong> the seed. Similar results were<br />

obtained by Hay et al., (2000, 2008) in case <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. These<br />

observations indicate that no after ripening period is needed by the embryo<br />

<strong>of</strong> M. spicatum and the seeds are an important means <strong>of</strong> propagation in the<br />

habitats where water dries up for some period during the year. These<br />

observations are in agreement with the work <strong>of</strong> Kadano (1984) who<br />

observed that Potamogeton distinctus overcomes the long lasting drought in<br />

irrigation reservoirs under warm temperature conditions by the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds.<br />

The seed germination varies significantly under continuous dark and<br />

alternate light and dark conditions. During the present study it was observed<br />

that the percentage germination was more in alternate light and dark<br />

conditions as compared to the seeds kept in continuous dark conditions in all<br />

Page 21


the treatments. These observations are in agreement with the results <strong>of</strong> Coble<br />

and Vance (1987). However, for aquatic plants effects <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> light are<br />

less clear, although some quantitative effects are known (Spencer et al.,<br />

1971; Sharma and Gopal, 1978).<br />

The seeds do not germinate in trays provided with sediment and<br />

water. The reason for this is the hard seed coat which restricts the water<br />

absorption and low temperature needed by the seeds for their germination<br />

causing prolonged seed dormancy. The ability to germinate under a range <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental conditions is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons why M. spicatum is found in<br />

range <strong>of</strong> habitats and has wide distribution in the diverse aquatic ecosystems<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />

5.7: Pollen mother cell meiosis<br />

Earlier work on pollen mother cell meiosis and chromosome count<br />

reveals that genus Myriophyllum is monobasic having x = 7 (Fedorov, 1969;<br />

Love and Love, 1956; Love and Ritchie, 1966). During the present<br />

investigation it was observed that Myriophyllum spicatum is hexaploid with<br />

2n = 6x =42. The 42 chromosomes pair into 21 bivalents which segregate to<br />

21 chromosomes to each pole without error. The anaphasic disjunction is<br />

regular and normal due to which enormous quantities <strong>of</strong> viable pollen grains<br />

are produced. The normal meiotic behaviour imposes genetic stability upon<br />

the species and ensures fertility and high pollen output.<br />

5.8: Resource allocation<br />

Every organism allocates its resources for various essential activities,<br />

like maintenance, growth and reproduction (Willson, 1983). The analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

resource allocation to different plant parts is useful in predicting allocation<br />

patterns and survival strategies <strong>of</strong> plants (Madsen, 1991).<br />

The dry mass allocation to different plant parts in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

varies significantly between standing and running water populations. The<br />

dry mass allocation to shoots and spikes is less, and undersediment parts are<br />

higher in plants inhabiting running waters as compared to plants inhabiting<br />

standing waters. It is presumably because the ramets in running waters do<br />

Page 22


not produce more branches required to avoid the risk <strong>of</strong> getting detached by<br />

the pressure <strong>of</strong> running waters. Similarly the development <strong>of</strong> spikes gets<br />

impaired in such stressful environments. The undersediment parts (rhizome,<br />

roots) spread between the stones and sediment and in turn provide strong<br />

anchorage and protect the plants from completely being washed away. The<br />

rhizomes are mostly the means <strong>of</strong> propagation in running waters. Permanent<br />

exposure <strong>of</strong> plants to mechanical stress usually results in reduced size <strong>of</strong><br />

leaves, height and consequently biomass allocation (Niklas, 1998; Henery<br />

and Thomas, 2002; Boeger and Poulsan, 2003) and increased allocation to<br />

undersediment parts. Puijalon and Bornette (2006) also observed higher<br />

allocation to below ground organs in running waters. This result in better<br />

resource accumulation in the parts protected from the water currents and is<br />

considered to improve anchorage efficiency (Cook and Emnos, 1996;<br />

Niklas, 1998). A lower allocation to sexual reproduction associated with<br />

delayed flowering is also <strong>of</strong>ten observed in running water populations<br />

(Niklas, 1998; Hodges et al., 2004). The plants in standing waters allocate<br />

much <strong>of</strong> the resources to shoots, seeds and spikes followed by<br />

undersediment parts.<br />

5.9: Vegetative Reproduction<br />

Aquatic plants display a wide range <strong>of</strong> methods for clonal<br />

propagation which include the formation <strong>of</strong> rhizomes, runners, stolons,<br />

tubers, fragments and axillary buds. Vegetative reproduction is the dominant<br />

mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in water plants (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975).<br />

During the present study it was observed that Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

operates multiple modes <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagation by rhizomes, fragments,<br />

axillary buds and nodal planlets.<br />

Rhizomes have a tremendous potential to form new plantlets. The<br />

experimental data obtained during the present investigation reveals that each<br />

5 cm long rhizome cutting has the potential to form 6.0±0.62 new plantlets.<br />

The sprouting <strong>of</strong> rhizomes is an effective mechanism for revegetation and<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> reproduction has been observed in March to<br />

Page 23


April <strong>of</strong> the growing season. So rhizomes are a means <strong>of</strong> localized spread in<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum. These observations are strongly supported by the<br />

work <strong>of</strong> Patten (1956); Madsen et al., (1988) and Madsen and Smith (1997)<br />

who obtained almost similar type <strong>of</strong> results in Myriophyllum, and by Bartly<br />

and Spence (1987) in Scirpus lucustris, Smith et al., (1989) in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Nymphea alba. Rhizomes are the most important means <strong>of</strong> proliferation in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> running waters. Weigleb and Kadano (1989) opined that highly<br />

disturbed sites are colonized by the species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton by means <strong>of</strong><br />

rhizomes and stolons. The rhizomatous growth form helps to resist the<br />

damaging forces <strong>of</strong> waves and tidal currents (Hartog, 1970).<br />

Fragmentation is another important mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction operative in<br />

the species. During the present study it was observed that Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum produces two types <strong>of</strong> stem fragments viz: aut<strong>of</strong>ragments and<br />

all<strong>of</strong>ragments in natural populations. The aut<strong>of</strong>ragments are formed by the<br />

self induced abscission <strong>of</strong> shoot apices and these fragments are generally<br />

formed when peak biomass has been attained whereas all<strong>of</strong>ragments are<br />

formed by the mechanical breakage <strong>of</strong> the parent stem. These fragments<br />

provide a means <strong>of</strong> intermediate to long distance dispersal <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />

These observations are strongly supported by the work <strong>of</strong> Aiken et al.,<br />

(1979); Madsen et al., (1988); Madsen (1997) and Kimbel (1982) in<br />

Myriophyllum and by Riis et al., (2009) in case <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. The<br />

deweeding produces a large number <strong>of</strong> all<strong>of</strong>ragments. This is however, a<br />

common practice in different water bodies <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley. These<br />

all<strong>of</strong>ragments are usually more important than seeds for dispersal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plant and colonization <strong>of</strong> open stream beds (Riis, 2008). Moreover, the<br />

reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> apical and intermediate fragments with varying<br />

number <strong>of</strong> nodes was also analysed during the present study. It was observed<br />

that among six and three noded apical and intermediate fragments, the six<br />

noded intermediate fragments showed the maximum potential to form the<br />

new plantlets followed by three noded intermediate and six noded apical<br />

fragments. The three noded apical fragments are not able to form any<br />

Page 24


plantlet. Moreover it was also observed that apical fragments showing the<br />

least potential to form new plantlets showed an increase in length and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> nodes while as intermediate fragments does not showed any<br />

change in length and number <strong>of</strong> nodes.<br />

These observations reveal that both the number <strong>of</strong> nodes <strong>of</strong> the stem<br />

fragment and position <strong>of</strong> the fragment whether apical or intermediate<br />

determine the reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> the stem fragments in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Myriophyllum spicatum. These observations are in accordance with the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Langeland and Sutton (1980) in Hydrilla verticillata in which a single<br />

noded fragment produces roots and shoots but every three noded fragment is<br />

able to initiate a new plant.<br />

Another type <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagule produced by Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum is axillary bud. The axillary buds <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are normal<br />

vegetative buds but they differ from vegetative buds in their size and the<br />

ease with which they detach. Many species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum develop large<br />

and prominent winter buds known as turions. Morphologically the small<br />

axillary buds <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are not turions but physiologically they may be<br />

considered. These buds are formed during October-November and remain<br />

dormant during the chilling winter and germinate immediately on arrival <strong>of</strong><br />

the spring when the conditions are favourable. The present experimental<br />

studies reveal that the germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds is controlled by<br />

temperature and light and the presence <strong>of</strong> sediment is not obligatory for<br />

germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds provided sufficient quantity <strong>of</strong> water is<br />

available. These observations draw support from Jain et al., (2003) who<br />

observed that turions <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton crispus are capable <strong>of</strong> germinating in<br />

any water body irrespective <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> substratum. As demonstrated during<br />

the present study, the optimum temperature for axillary bud germination is<br />

20-25°C. Similar results have been reported in Potamogeton pectinatus by<br />

Madsen and Adams (1988). The germination <strong>of</strong> these propagules is<br />

inhabited below 10°C and beyond 30°C. Under natural conditions also, the<br />

axillary buds remain dormant during the cold winters <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley<br />

Page 25


when the temperature <strong>of</strong> water bodies is much lower, mostly less than 4°C.<br />

The germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds begins from March and proceeds upto<br />

ending April, when the temperature is optimum for their germination. Some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ungerminated axillary buds do not germinate after April because<br />

temperature beyond 30°C inhabits germination. The temperature dependence<br />

<strong>of</strong> turion germination was also observed by Rogers and Breen (1980) in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> Potamogeton crispus. The experimental studies conducted during the<br />

present study on axillary bud germination revealed that both rate and overall<br />

percentage germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds was higher under alternate light and<br />

dark than in continuous dark conditions indicating that axillary bud<br />

germination is also influenced by light. This observation is strongly<br />

supported by the work <strong>of</strong> Jain et al., (2003) who observed that percentage<br />

germination <strong>of</strong> turions decreases with increase in the depth <strong>of</strong> water body<br />

because <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> low light intensity at deeper depths.<br />

The axillary buds have very high potential to spread Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum locally. Each axillary bud has the potential to form a single<br />

plantlet. The newly formed plantlet (ramet) undergoes vegetative growth and<br />

produce 8-12 new axillary buds which in a geometric progression produce<br />

80-144 new ramets. This could be an important mechanism contributing to<br />

the spread <strong>of</strong> this species in Lakes and a pond experiencing high predation<br />

pressure from herbivorous fishs as has been reported by Jain et al., (2003)<br />

for different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. This clearly indicates that a single<br />

axillary bud is capable <strong>of</strong> establishing a large population in few years. These<br />

axillary buds not only produce plantlets but also spread throughout the space<br />

available and also give rise to new propagules which invade the water bodies<br />

and produce large populations <strong>of</strong> the species covering the entire water body<br />

as a green mat. The removal <strong>of</strong> these axillary buds has a great role in<br />

providing long term safety against the spread <strong>of</strong> this aggressive species. The<br />

axillary bud removal can be carried out during October to November when<br />

these are produced.<br />

Page 26


CHAPTER-6<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Page 27


Abrahamson, W. G. (1980). Demography and vegetative reproduction. In<br />

Solbrig OT, ed. Demography and Evolution in plant populations. Pp.<br />

89-106. Barkeley (CA): University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />

Affre, L; Thompson, J. D. and Debussche, M. (1995). The reproductive<br />

biology <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean endemic Cyclamen balearicum Willk<br />

(Primulaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.118: 309-330.<br />

Agami, M; Beer, S & Waisel, Y. (1986). The morphology and physiology<br />

<strong>of</strong> turions in Najas marina L. in Israel. Aquatic Botany. 26: 371-376.<br />

Aiken, S. G; Newroth, P. R. and Wile, I. (1979). The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian<br />

weeds 34. Myriophyllum spicatum L. Candian Jornal <strong>of</strong> Plant<br />

Sciences. 59: 201-215.<br />

Aiken, S. G. (1978). Pollen morphology in the genus Myriophyllum<br />

(Haloragaceae). Can. J. Bot. 56(2): 976-982.<br />

Aiken, S. G. (1981). A conspectus <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in North<br />

America. Brittonia. 33: 57-69.<br />

Aiken, S. G. and McNeill, J. (1980). The discovery <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

exalbescens Fernald (Haloragaceae) in Europe and the typification <strong>of</strong><br />

M.spicatum L and M.verticillatum L. Bot. J. Linn.Soc. 80: 213-222.<br />

Aiken, S. G. and Walz, K. F. (1979). Turions <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum exalbescens.<br />

Aquatic Botany. 6: 357-363.<br />

Aiken, S. G. and Walz, K. F. (1979). Turions <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum exalbescens.<br />

Aquatic Botany . 6: 357-363.<br />

Aiken, S. G; Newroth, P. R. and Wile, I. (1979). The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian<br />

weeds. 34-Myriophyllum spicatum L. Candian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant<br />

Science. 59: 201-215.<br />

Aiken. S. G. (1979). North American species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

(Haloragaceae). Ph. D Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota. Pp, 250.<br />

Akerman, J. D. (2000). Abiotic pollen and pollination: ecological, functional<br />

and evolutionary perspectives. Plant syst. Evol. 222: 167-185.<br />

Alwadie, M. H. (2008). Pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> six aquatic angiosperms from<br />

Saudi Arabia. Asian journal <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences. 1(1): 45-50.<br />

Page 28


Anderson, G. J; Johson, S. D; Neil, P. R. and Bernardello, G. (2002).<br />

Reproductive biology and plant systematics, the growth <strong>of</strong> a<br />

symbiotic association. Taxon. 51: 637-653.<br />

Anderson, G. J; Bernardello, G; Opel, M. R; Santos-Guerra, A. and<br />

Anderson, M. (2006). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> dioecious Canary<br />

island endemic Withania aristata (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 93:<br />

1295-1305.<br />

Angevine, M. W and Chabot, B. F. (1979). Seed germination syndromes in<br />

higher plants. In: Solbrig, O. T., Jain, S., Johnson, B., Raven, P. H.,<br />

(eds), Topics in plant population biology. Columbia University Press,<br />

New York, pp. 188-206.<br />

Anonymous. (1993). Harmful non-indigenous species in united states.<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> technology assessment, U.S. Congress. Washington, D. C.<br />

Arber, A. (1920). Water Plants, a study <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms. Cambridge<br />

University Press, Cambridge. Pp.46-97.<br />

Arnold, R. M. (1982). Pollination, predation and seed set in Linaria vulgaris<br />

(Scrophulariaceae). Amer. Midl. Naturalist. 107: 360-369.<br />

Arnold, R. R; Cornwell, J. C; Dennison, W.C. and Stevenson, J. C. (2000).<br />

Sediment based reconstruction <strong>of</strong> submersed aquatic vegetation<br />

distribution in the Severn river, a sub-estuary <strong>of</strong> Chesapeake Bay. J.<br />

Coast. Res. 16: 188-195.<br />

Arroyo, M. T. K. (1973). Chiasma frequency evidence on the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

autogamy in Limanthes floccose (Limnanthaceae). Evolution. 27:<br />

679-688.<br />

Baker, H. G. (1967). The Evolution <strong>of</strong> weedy taxa in the Eupatorium<br />

microstemon species aggregate. Taxon. 16: 293-300.<br />

Barrat-segretain, M. H. (1996). Strategies <strong>of</strong> reproduction, dispersion and<br />

competition in river plants: A review. Vegetatio. 123: 13-37.<br />

Barret, S. C. H and Richardson, B. J. (1986). Genetic attributes <strong>of</strong> invading<br />

species.In : Groves R. and Burdon, J. J. (eds). Ecology <strong>of</strong> Biological<br />

Page 29


Invasions: An Australian Perspective, PP.21-33. Australian Academy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Science, Jaracaranda, Canberra, Australia.<br />

Barret, S. C. H. (1980). Sexual reproduction in Echhornia crassipes (water<br />

hyacinth) I. Fertility <strong>of</strong> clones from diverse regions. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

applied ecology, 17: 101-112.<br />

Barrett, S. C. H. (1989). Waterweed invasions. Scientific American. 261: 90-<br />

97.<br />

Barrett, S. C. H; Eckert, D. G. and Husband, B. C. (1993). Evolutionary<br />

processes in aquatic plant populations. Aquatic Botany. 44: 105-145.<br />

Bartely, M. R. and Spence, D. H. N. (1989). Dormancy and propagation in<br />

helophytes and hydrophytes. Arch. Hydrobiol. Ergebn. Limnol. 27:<br />

139-155.<br />

Bartodziej, W. and Ludlow, L. (1998). Aquatic vegetation monitoring by<br />

natural resource agencies in the United States. Aquatics. 20: 15-18.<br />

Baskin, C. C. and Baskin, J. M. (1998). Seeds, ecology, biogeography and<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> dormancy and germination. Academic Press, New York.<br />

Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. (2004). A classification system for seed<br />

dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 14: 1-16.<br />

Bates, A. L; Burns, E. R. and Webb, D. H. (1985). EWM (M. spicatum) in<br />

the Tennessee valley: an update on biology and control. Pp. 104-115.<br />

L. W. J. Anderson, Ed Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the first International<br />

symposium on watermilfoil.<br />

Boeger, M. R. T. and Poulsan, M. E. (2003). Morphological adaptation and<br />

photosynthetic rates <strong>of</strong> amphibious Veronica angallis-aquatica L.<br />

(Scrophulariaceae) under different flow regimes. Aquatic Botany. 75:<br />

123-135.<br />

Borchert, R. (1980). Phenology and ecophysciology <strong>of</strong> tropical trees:<br />

Erythrina poeppigiana Cook. Ecology. 61: 1065-1074.<br />

Borchert, R. (1983). Phenology and Control <strong>of</strong> flowering in tropical trees.<br />

Biotropica. 15: 81-89.<br />

Page 30


Brewbacker, J. L. and Kwach, B. H. (1963). The essential role <strong>of</strong> calcium<br />

ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Amer. J. Bot. 50:<br />

859-865.<br />

Brock, T. C. M; Mielo, H. and Oestermeijer, G. (1989). On the life cycle and<br />

germination <strong>of</strong> Hottonia palustris L. in a wetland forest. Aquatic<br />

Botany. 35: 153-166.<br />

Bronstein, J. L; Gouyon, P.H; Gliddon, C; Kjellberg, F. and Michaloud, G<br />

(1990). The Ecological consequences <strong>of</strong> flowering asynchrony in<br />

monoecious fogs: A simulation study. Ecology. 71: 2145-2156.<br />

Brunet, J. and Charlesworth, D. (1995). Floral sex allocation in sequentially<br />

blooming plants. Evolution. 49: 70-79.<br />

Brux, H; Todeskino, D. and Wiegleb, G. (1987). Growth and reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Potamogeton alpines Balbis growing in disturbed habitats. Archiv.<br />

Hydrobiol. Ergebn. Limnol. 27: 115-127.<br />

Caffrey, J. M. and Monahan, C. (2006). Control <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

verticillatum L. in Irish cannals by turion removal. Hydrobiologia.<br />

570: 211-215.<br />

Catling, P. M. and Dobson, I. (1985). The biology <strong>of</strong> canadian weeds. 69.<br />

Potamogeton crispus L. Can. J. plant sci. 65: 655-668.<br />

Center, T. D; Frank, J. H. and Dray, F. A. (1997). Biological controll. Pp<br />

245-266 in : Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, D; d. C. Schmitz and T. C. Brown , eds.<br />

Strangers in paradise. Island press, Washington , D.c.<br />

Charnov, E. L. (1982). The theory <strong>of</strong> sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press,<br />

Princeton.<br />

Charpentier, A; Grillas, P. and Thompson, J. D. (2000). The effect <strong>of</strong><br />

population size on fecundity in mosaic populations <strong>of</strong> the clonal<br />

macrophyte. Scirpus maritimus (Cyperaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87: 502-<br />

507.<br />

Chen, Y; Li, X; Yin, L; Cheng, Y and Li, W. (2009). Genetic diversity and<br />

migration patterns <strong>of</strong> the aquatic macrophyte Potamogeton malaianus<br />

in a potamolacustrine system. Freshwater Biology. 54: 1178-1188.<br />

Page 31


Cleugh, H. A; Miller, J. M. and Böhm, M. (1998). Direct mechanical effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> deweeding on crops. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems. 41: 85-112.<br />

Coble, T. A. and Vance, B. D. (1987). Seed germination is Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum L . J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 25: 8-10.<br />

Cook, C. D. K. (1966). A monographic study <strong>of</strong> Ranunculus subgenus<br />

Batrachium. Bot.Mitt. (Munchen) 6: 47-237<br />

Cook, C. D. K. (1987). Vegetative growth and genetic mobility in some<br />

aquatic weeds. pp. 217-225 in Differentiation patterns in higher<br />

plants. Academic Press, London.<br />

Cook, C. D. K. (1988). Wind pollination in aquatic angiosperms. Ann.<br />

Missouri Bot. Garden.75: 768-777.<br />

Cook, C. D. K. (1990). Aquatic plant book. The Hague (the Netherlands):<br />

SPB Academic publishing.<br />

Cook, C. D. K. (1996). The aquatic plant book. SPB Academic Publishing,<br />

New York.<br />

Cook, M. J. and Emnos, A. R. (1996). Mechanical differences between free-<br />

standing and supported wheat plant Triticum aestivum L. Annals <strong>of</strong><br />

Botany. 77: 197-202.<br />

Cooper, R. L; Osborn, J. M. and Philbrick, C. T. (2000). Comprative pollen<br />

morphology and ultrastructure <strong>of</strong> the Callitrichaceae. Am. J. Bot.<br />

87(2): 161-175.<br />

Couch, R. and Nelson, E. (1983). Myriophyllum in Oklahoma. Proc. Okla.<br />

Acad. Sci. 63: 103-104.<br />

Couch, R. and Nelson, E. (1985). Myriophyllum spicatum in North America.<br />

Proc. 1 st International symposium on watrmilfoil (Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum) and related Haloragaceae species. Aquatic Plant Manage.<br />

Soc. pp. 8-18.<br />

Cox, P. A. (1988). Hydrophilous pollination. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 261-<br />

280.<br />

Page 32


Creed, R. P. (1998). A biogeographic perspective on Eurasian watermilfoil<br />

declines: additional evidence for the role <strong>of</strong> herbivorous weevils in<br />

promoting declines. J. Aquatic Plant Manage. 36: 16-22.<br />

Cronk, J. K and Fennessy, M. S. (2001) Wetland plants: biology and<br />

ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.<br />

Crow, G. E. and Hellquist, B. C. (2000). Aquatic and wetland plants <strong>of</strong><br />

northeastern North America. I: Peteridophytes, gymnosperms and<br />

angiosperms: Dictoyladons. University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Press,<br />

Wisconsin.<br />

Cruden, R. W. (1973). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> weedy and cultivaeted<br />

Mirabilis (Nyctaginaceae). Amr. J. Bot. 60: 802-809.<br />

Cruden, R. W. (1977). Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32-46.<br />

Cruden, R. W. (1997). Implications <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary theory to applied<br />

pollination ecology. In: Richards K. W. (ed). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 7 th<br />

International symposium or pollination. Acta Horticulture. 437: 27-<br />

51.<br />

Cruden, R. W. (2000). Pollen grains: why so many ? Plant Syst. Evol. 222:<br />

143-165.<br />

Cruden, R. W. and Lloyd, R. M. (1995). Embryophytes have equivalent<br />

sexual phenotypes and breeding systems: why not a common<br />

terminology to describe them? Amer. J. Bot. 82: 816-825.<br />

Cruden, R. W. and Miller-ward, S. (1981). Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen size<br />

and the ratio <strong>of</strong> stigmatic area to the pollen-bearing area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pollinator: an hypothesis. Evolution . 35: 964-974.<br />

Dahl, A. E. (1989). Taxonomic and morphological studies in Hypecoum<br />

Sect. hypecoum (Papeveraceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 163: 227-280.<br />

Dawson, F. H. (1980). Flowering <strong>of</strong> Ranunculus pencillatus . Aquatic<br />

Botany. 9:145-157.<br />

Page 33


De Kroon, H; Stueffer, J. F; Dong, M. and During, H. J. (1994). On plastic<br />

and non-plastic variation in clonal plant morphology and its<br />

ecological significance. Folia Geobotanica. 29: 123-138.<br />

De-Kroon, H. and Hutchings, M. J. (1995). Morphological plasticity in<br />

clonal plants: the foraging concept revisited. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 83:<br />

143-152.<br />

Delpino, F. and Ascherson, P. (1871). Federico delphino‘s eintheilung der<br />

pflanzen nach dem mechanimus der dichogamischen befruchtung and<br />

bemerkungen uber die befruchtungs-vorgange bei wasserpflanzen.<br />

Bot. Zeit. 29: 443-447.<br />

Devlin, B. (1989). Components <strong>of</strong> seed yield and pollen yield <strong>of</strong> Lobelia<br />

cardinals: variation and correlations. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 204-214.<br />

Devlin, B. and Stephenson, A. G. (1984). Factors that influence the duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the staminate and pistillate phases <strong>of</strong> Lobelia cardinalis flowers.<br />

Bot. Gaz. 145: 323-328.<br />

Dianne, L. A. and Spicer, P. B. (1958). Aceto analine blue-safranin method<br />

<strong>of</strong> staining germinating pollen and pollen tubes. Stain Technol. 33:<br />

15-17.<br />

Diaz Lifante, Z. (1996). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Ashphodelus aestivus<br />

(Asphodelaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 200: 177-191.<br />

Donaldson, S. and Johnson, W. S. (1998). Eurasian watermilfoil. Reno:<br />

university <strong>of</strong> Nevada Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet.pp 4.<br />

Dong, M. and de Kroon, H. (1994). Plasticity in morphology and biomass<br />

allocation in Cynodon dactylon, a grass species forming stolons and<br />

rhizomes. Oikos. 70:99-106.<br />

Duarte, C. M; Planas, D and Penuelas, J. (1994). Macrophytes, taking<br />

control <strong>of</strong> an ancestral home. In : Margelef, R. (Ed.) Limnoogy Now:<br />

a paradigm <strong>of</strong> planetary problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 59-79.<br />

Ducker, S. C. and Knox, R. B. (1985). Pollen and pollination: A historical<br />

review. Taxon. 34(3): 401-419.<br />

Page 34


Dudley, J. L. (1987). Turion formation in strains <strong>of</strong> Lemna minor and<br />

Lemna turionifera. Aquatic Botany. 27: 207-215.<br />

Dulberger, R and Ornduff, R. (1980). Floral morphology and reproductive<br />

biology <strong>of</strong> four species <strong>of</strong> Cyanella (Tecophilaceae). New Phytol. 86:<br />

45-56.<br />

Eckart, C. G. (2002). The loss <strong>of</strong> sex in Clonal plants. Evolutionary Ecology,<br />

15: 501-520<br />

Eiswerth, M. E; Donaldson, S. G. and Johnson, W.S. (2000). Potential<br />

environmental impacts and economic demages <strong>of</strong> Eurasian<br />

watermilfoil (M. spicatum) in Western Nevada and northeastern<br />

California. Weed Technology. 14: 511-518.<br />

Faegri, K. and Vander Pijl L. (1979). The principles <strong>of</strong> pollination ecology,<br />

3 rd edn. Pergamon, Oxford.<br />

Fedôrov, A. A. (1969). Chromosome number <strong>of</strong> flowering plants. Acad.<br />

Sci. U.S.S.R. Leningrad.<br />

Feliner, G. N. (1991). Breeding systems and related floral traits in several<br />

Erysimum (Cruciferae). Canad. J. Bot. 69: 2515-2521.<br />

Fernald, M. L. (1919). Two new Myriophyllum and a species new to the<br />

Untied States. Rhodora. 21: 121-124.<br />

Figuerola, J. and Green, A. J. (2002). How frequent is external transport <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds and invertebrate eggs by waterbirds? A study in Donana, SW<br />

spain. Arch. Hydrobiol. 155: 557-565.<br />

Furnier, G. R. and Mustaphi, M. M. (1992). Isozyme variation in Minnesota<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil. Aquatic Botany .43: 305-309.<br />

Gantes, H. P. and Caro, A. S. (2001). Environmental heterogeneity and<br />

spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> macrophytes in plain streams. Aquatic Botany.<br />

70: 225-236.<br />

Gerber, D. T. and Les, D. H. (1994). Comparison <strong>of</strong> leaf morphology among<br />

submersed species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) from different<br />

Page 35


habitats and geographic distributions. Amer. J. <strong>of</strong> Botany 81: 973-<br />

979.<br />

Gibbs, P. E; Milne, C. and Carrillo, M. (1975). Correlation between the<br />

breeding systems and recombination index in five species <strong>of</strong> Senecio.<br />

New Phytol. 75: 619-626.<br />

Grace, J. B. (1993). The adaptive significance <strong>of</strong> clonal reproduction in<br />

angiosperms: an aquatic perspective. Aquatic Botany. 44: 159-180.<br />

Grant, V. (1981). Plant Speciation. 2 nd ed. New York: Columbia University<br />

Press.<br />

Grier, N. M. (1920). Notes on comparative regeneration in Elodea and<br />

Ceratophyllum. American Botanist. 26: 80-84.<br />

Groth, A. T; Lovett-Doust, L. and Lovett- Doust, J. (1996).Population<br />

density and module demography in Trapa natans (Trapaceae) , an<br />

annual, clonal aquatic macrophyte. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1406-1415.<br />

Guo, Y. H. and Cook, C. D. K. (1990). The Floral biology <strong>of</strong> Groenlandia<br />

densa L. Fourreau (Potamogetonaceae). Aquatic Botany. 18: 283-<br />

288.<br />

Guppy, H. B. (1897). On the postponement <strong>of</strong> germination <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic plants. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Ediburgh 13: 344-360.<br />

Hagi, G. (1926). Illustrierte flora von mittel-Europa. Bd. V. T. Z. Munchen.<br />

Hannan, G. L. and Prucher, H. A. (1996). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong><br />

Caulophyllum thalictroides (Berberidaceae) an early flowering<br />

perennial <strong>of</strong> eastern North America. Amer. Midl. Naturalist. 136:<br />

267-277.<br />

Hartleb, C. F; Madsen, J. D. and Boylen, C. W. (1993). Environmental<br />

factors affecting seed germination in Myriophyllum spicatum L.<br />

Aquatic Botany. 45: 15-25.<br />

Hartmann, K. M. (1966). A general hypothesis to interpret ―high energy<br />

phenomenon‖ <strong>of</strong> photomorphogenesis on the basis <strong>of</strong> phytochrome.<br />

Photochem. Photobiol. 5: 349-366.<br />

Page 36


Hartog, C. Den. (1970). The Seagrasses <strong>of</strong> the World. Verhandl. Kon. Ned.<br />

Akad. Wetensch. Nat. 59: 161-170.<br />

Harwell, M. C and Orth, R. J. (2002). Long distance dispersal potential in<br />

marine macrophyte. Ecology. 83: 3319-3330.<br />

Hauser, E. J. P. and Morrison, J. P. (1964). The cytochemical reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

nitroblue tetrazolium as an index <strong>of</strong> pollen viability. Amer. J. Bot. 51:<br />

659-664<br />

Hay, F. R; Probert, R. J; Marro, J., Dawson, M. (2000). Towards the ex situ<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms: a review <strong>of</strong> seed storage<br />

behavior. In: Black, M., Bradford, K. J., Vasquez-Ramos, J. (Eds.),<br />

Seed Biology: Advances and application. CAB international,<br />

Walligford, UK, 161-177.<br />

Hay, F; Probert, R. and Dawson, M. (2008). Laboratory germination <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds from 10 British species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. Aquatic Botany. 88:<br />

353-357.<br />

Haynes, R. R. (1988). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> selected aquatic plants. Ann.<br />

Missouri Bot. Gard. 75: 805-810.<br />

Henry, H. A. L. and Thomas, S. C. (2002). Interactive effects <strong>of</strong> shade and<br />

wind on stem, allometry, biomass allocation and mechanical stability<br />

in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany.<br />

89: 1609-1615.<br />

Heslop-Harrison, Y. (1955). Nuphar J. Ecol. 43: 342-355.<br />

Hodges, L; Suratman, M. N; Brandle, J. R. and Hubbage, K. G.( 2004).<br />

Growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Snap beans as affected by wind protection and<br />

microclimate changes due to shelter-belts and planting dates. Hort.<br />

Science. 39: 996-1004.<br />

Holm, L; Pancho, J. V; Herberger, J. P. and Plucknett, D. L. (1979). A<br />

geographical atlas <strong>of</strong> world weeds. John Wiley and Sons, New York.<br />

Hooker, J. D. (1879). The flora <strong>of</strong> British India Vol. II. L. Reeve and Co.<br />

Ltd., London. Pp, 432-434.<br />

Page 37


Hulten, E. (1947). Flora <strong>of</strong> Alaska and Yukon. 7: 1159.<br />

Hutchinson, G. E. (1975). A treatise on limnology. Vol. 3: Limnological<br />

Botany. New York: John Wiley and Sons.<br />

Inouye, D. W; Morales. M. and Dodge, G. (2002). Variation in timing and<br />

abundance in flowering by Delphinium barbeyi Huth<br />

(Rananculaceae). The role <strong>of</strong> snowpeak, frost in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

climate change. Oecologia 139: 453-550.<br />

Inouyl, D. W and McGure, A.D. (1991). Effects <strong>of</strong> snowpeak on timing and<br />

abudndance <strong>of</strong> flowering in Delphenium nelsonii (Rananculaceae):<br />

implications for climate change. Am. J. Bot. 78: 997-1001.<br />

Jacobs, D. L. (1947). An ecological life-history <strong>of</strong> Spirodela polyrhiza<br />

(greater duckweed) with emphasis on the turion phase. Ecol. Monogr.<br />

17: 439-468.<br />

Jacono, C. C. and Richerson, M. M. (2003). Aquatic and wetland plants <strong>of</strong><br />

northeastern North America. Vol. I. The University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin<br />

Press, Madison, Wisconsin.<br />

Jain, Y; Li, B; Wang, J. and Chen, J. (2003). Control <strong>of</strong> turion germination<br />

in Potamogeton crispus. Aquatic Botany. 75: 59-69.<br />

Jarvis, J. C. and Moore, K. A. (2008). Influence <strong>of</strong> environmental factors on<br />

Vallisneria americana seed germination. Aquatic Botany. 88: 283-<br />

294.<br />

Jepson, W. L. (1925). Manual <strong>of</strong> flowering plants <strong>of</strong> California. University<br />

<strong>of</strong> California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1238.<br />

Johnson, R. K; Gross, E. M. and Hariston, N. G. (1998). Decline <strong>of</strong> the<br />

invasive submersed macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

(Haloragaceae) associated with herbivory by larvae <strong>of</strong> Acentria<br />

ephemerella (Lepidoptera). Aquatic Ecology 31: 273-282.<br />

Jurgens, A; Witt, T. and Gottsberger. (2002). Pollen grain numbers, ovule<br />

numbers and pollen-ovule ratios in Caryophylloideae: Correlation<br />

with breeding system, pollination, life form, style number and sexual<br />

system. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14: 279-289.<br />

Page 38


Kadano, Y. (1984). Comparative ecology <strong>of</strong> Japanese Potamogeton: an<br />

extensive survey with special reference to growth form and life cycle.<br />

Jpn. J. Ecol. 34: 161-172.<br />

Kak, A. M. (1978). Taxonomical studies <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>.<br />

Ph.D thesis. Lakeline 58: 29-30.<br />

Kak, A. M. (1990). Aquatic and wetland vegetation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong><br />

Himalaya. Jour. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 14: 1-14.<br />

Kaplan, Z. (2002). Phenotypic plasticity in Potamogeton<br />

(Potamogetonaceae). Folia Geobotanica. 37: 141-170.<br />

Kaplan, Z. (2008). A taxonomic revision <strong>of</strong> Stuckenia (Potamogetonaceae)<br />

in Asia, with notes on the diversity and variation <strong>of</strong> the genus on a<br />

worldwide scale. Folia Geobotanica. 43:159-234.<br />

Kaul, V and Zutshi, D. P. (1965). A study <strong>of</strong> aquatic and marshland<br />

vegetation <strong>of</strong> Srinagar lakes. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. Ind. 33: 111-127.<br />

Kautsky, L. (1987). Life cycles <strong>of</strong> three populations <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton<br />

pectinatus L. at different degree <strong>of</strong> wave exposure in the Askö area,<br />

Northern Baltic Proper. Aquatic Botany. 27: 177-186.<br />

Kawano, S. and Masuda, J. (1980). The productive and reproductive biology<br />

<strong>of</strong> flowering plants. VIII. Resource allocation and reproduction<br />

capacity in wild population <strong>of</strong> Heloniopsis orientalis.(Thunb) C.<br />

Tanaka (Liliaceae). Oecologia .45: 307-317<br />

Ke, X and Li, W. (2006). Germination requirements <strong>of</strong> Vallisneria natans<br />

seeds: implications for restoration in chinese lakes. Hydrobiologia.<br />

559: 357-362.<br />

Keit, T. H; Lewis, M. A. and Holt, R. D. (2001). Alle effects invasion<br />

pinning and species borders. American naturalist, 157: 203-216.<br />

Kim, A. S. (2005). Milfoil Campaign spreading. Portland Press Herald.<br />

Kimbel, J. C. (1982). Factors influencing potential intralake colonization by<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum L. Aquatic Botany. 14: 295-307.<br />

Page 39


Kimber, A; Korschgen, C. E and Vander Valk, A. G. (1995). The<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> Vallisneria amricana seeds and seedling light<br />

requirements in the upper Mississippi river. Can. J. Bot. 73: 1966-<br />

1973.<br />

Kirk, W. D. J. (1993). Interspecific size and number variation in pollen<br />

grains and seeds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49: 239-248.<br />

Klaine, S. J. and Ward, C. H. (1984). Environmental and chemical control <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetative dormant bud production in Hydrilla verticillata. Ann. Bot.<br />

53: 503-514.<br />

Knudsen, J, T and Olesen, J. M. (1993). Buzz-pollination and paterns <strong>of</strong><br />

sexual traits in north European Pyrolaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 900-<br />

913.<br />

Knupp, N. D. (1911). The flowers <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum L. Proc. Iowa<br />

Acad. Sci. 18:61-73.<br />

Knuth, P. (1906). Handbook <strong>of</strong> flower pollination, based upon Hermann<br />

Muller‘s work ‗fertilisation <strong>of</strong> flowers by insects‘. Vol. I:<br />

Introduction and literature. Translated by J. R. Ainsworth Davis.<br />

Oxford University Press, London.<br />

Kotshy, K. and Rogers, K.( 2008). Reed clonal characteristics and response<br />

disturbance in a semi-arid river. Aquatic Botany 88: 47-56.<br />

Labdolt, E. (1986). The family Lemnaceae. a monographic study. Vol. 1<br />

Ver<strong>of</strong>f Geobot Inst. ETH Stiftung. Rubel . Zurich, 71: 1-566.<br />

Lacroix, C. R. and Kemp, J. R. (1997). Developmental morphology <strong>of</strong> the<br />

androecium and gynoecium in Rubia maritima L. considerations for<br />

pollination. Aquatic Botany. 59: 253-262.<br />

Lal, C. and Gopal, B. (1993). Production and germination <strong>of</strong> seeds in<br />

Hydrilla verticillata. Aquatic Botany. 45: 257-261.<br />

Langeland, K. A. and Sutton, D. L. (1980). Regrowth <strong>of</strong> Hydrilla from<br />

axillary buds. J. Aquat. Palnt Manage. 18: 27-29.<br />

Langland, K. A. (1996). Hydrilla verticilla (L.F). Royle (Hydrocharitaceae).<br />

The perfect aquatic weed. Castanea. 61: 293- 304.<br />

Page 40


Lawrence, M. E. (1985). Senecio L. (Astraceae) in Australia: reproductive<br />

biology <strong>of</strong> a genus found primarily in unstable environments. Austral.<br />

J. Bot. 33: 197-208.<br />

Leikic, M. (1970). Ecology <strong>of</strong> the aquatic insect species Parapoynx<br />

stratiotata L. (Pyraustidae, Lepidoptera). J. Sci. Agr. Res. 83:49-62.<br />

Les , D. H and Mehrh<strong>of</strong>f, L. J. (1999).Introduction <strong>of</strong> nonindigenous aquatic<br />

vascular plants in Southern New England: a historical perspective.<br />

Biological Invasions.1: 281-300.<br />

Les, D. H. (1988). Breeding system, population structure, and evolution in<br />

hydrophilous angiosperms. Annals <strong>of</strong> the Missouri Botanical Garden.<br />

75: 819-835.<br />

Les, D. H. and Philbrick, C. T. (1993). Studies <strong>of</strong> hybridization and<br />

chromosome number variation in aquatic angiosperms: evolutionary<br />

implications. Aquatic Botany. 44: 181-228.<br />

Les, D. H. and Schneider, E. L. (1995). The Nymphaeales, Alismatidae, and<br />

the theory <strong>of</strong> an aquatic monocotyledon origin. pp, 23-42 in Rudall,<br />

PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ. eds. Monocotyledons:<br />

systematics and evolution. Kew (UK): Royal Botanic Gardens.<br />

Les, D. H., Cleland, M. A. and Waycott, M. (1997). Phylogenetic studies in<br />

the Alismatidae, II: Evolution <strong>of</strong> marine angiosperms (seagrasses)<br />

and hydrophily. Syst. Bot. 22: 443-463.<br />

Lloyd, D. G. (1965). Evolution <strong>of</strong> self-compatibility and racial<br />

differentiation in Leavenworthia (cruciferae). Contr. Gray Herb.<br />

Harvard. 195: 3-133.<br />

Lopez, J; Rodriguez-Raino, T; Ortega-Olivencia, A; Devesa, J. A; Ruiz, T.<br />

(1999). Pollination mechanisms and pollen-ovule ratios in some<br />

Genisteae (Fabaceae) from southwestern Europe. Plant Syst. Evol.<br />

216: 23-47.<br />

Love, A. (1961). Some notes on Myriophyllum spicatum. Rhodora. 63: 139-<br />

145.<br />

Page 41


Löve, A. and Löve, D. (1956). Cytotaxonomical conspectus <strong>of</strong> the icelandic<br />

flora. Acta Horti. Gothoburgensis. 20(4): 65-291.<br />

Löve, A. and Ritchie, J. C. (1966). Chromosome numbers from central<br />

northern Canada. Canadian Journ. Bot. 35(5): 715-761.<br />

Lovett-Doust, L. (1987). Population dynamics and local specialization in a<br />

clonal perenial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> ramets in<br />

contrasting habitats. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 69: 743-755.<br />

Lubber, A. E. and Christensen, N. L. (1966). Intra seasonal variation in seed<br />

production among flowers and plants <strong>of</strong> Thalictrum thalictroides<br />

(Ranunculaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 72: 190-203.<br />

Ludwig, F. (1881). Ueber die Bestaubungsuerhaltnisse einiger<br />

Susswasserpflanzen und ihre Aanpassungen an das Wasser und<br />

gewisse wasserbewohnende Insekten.Kosmos. Jahrg.10:7-12.<br />

Lui, Y; Schieving, F; Stuefer, J. F. and Anten, N. P. R. (2007). The effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> mechanical stress and spectral shadding on the growth and<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> ten genotypes <strong>of</strong> stoloniferous plant. Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany.<br />

99: 121-130.<br />

Madsen, J. D and Boylen, C. W. (1989). Eurasian watermilfoil seed ecology<br />

from an oligotrophic and eutrophic lake. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 27:<br />

119-121.<br />

Madsen, J. D and Smith, D. H. (1997). Vegetative spread <strong>of</strong> Euasian<br />

watrmilfoil colonies. J. Aquat. Plant. Manage. 35: 63-68.<br />

Madsen, J. D. (1991). Resource allocation at the individual plant level.<br />

Aquatic Botany. 41: 67-86.<br />

Madsen, J. D. (1993). Control points in the phonological cycle <strong>of</strong> Eurasian<br />

water milfoil. <strong>Information</strong> Exchange Bulletin A-93-1, U.S. Army<br />

Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, M.S. 10pp.<br />

Madsen, J. D. (1997). Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate allocation in a<br />

southern population <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil. J.Aquat. Plant.<br />

Manage. 35: 15-21.<br />

Page 42


Madsen, J. D. and. Adams, M.S. (1988). The germination <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton<br />

pectinatus: environmental control by temperature and light. Can. J.<br />

Bot. 66: 2523-2526.<br />

Madsen, J. d; Eichler, L. W. and Boylen, C. W. (1988). Vegetative spread<br />

<strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil in lake George, New York, and J. Aquat.<br />

Plant Manage. 26: 47-50.<br />

Malacoste, R; Tzanni, H; Jacques, R. and Rollin, R. (1972). The influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> blue light on dark germinating seeds <strong>of</strong> Nemophila insignis L.<br />

Planta. 103: 24-34.<br />

McFarland, D. (2006). Reproductive ecology <strong>of</strong> Vallisneria americana<br />

Michaux. SAV technical notes collection (ERDC/TN SAV-06-4)<br />

U.S. Army engineer research and development centre, Vicksburg,<br />

MS.<br />

Mcmillan, C. and Jewett-Smith, J. (1988). The sex ratio and fruit production<br />

<strong>of</strong> laboratory germinated seedlings <strong>of</strong> Halophila engelmannii<br />

Aschers. (Hydrocharitaceae) from Redfish Bay, TX. Aquatic Botany.<br />

32: 329-339.<br />

Meijden, R. V and Caspers, N. (1971). Haloragaceae. In: C. G. G. J. van<br />

Steenis (ed). Flora Malesisiana. Vol.7, Wolters- Noordh<strong>of</strong>f<br />

Publishing, Groningen.pp.239-263.<br />

Meijden, R. V. (1969). An annotated key to the South East Asiatic,<br />

Malesian, Mascarene, and African species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

(Haloragaceae). Blumea.17: 303-311.<br />

Meusel, H. and Jager, E. (1978). Vergleichende chorologie der<br />

zentraleuropaischen flora. Volume 2. Fischer, Jena.<br />

Meyer, S. E; Monsen, S. B. and McArthur, E. D. (1990). Germination<br />

response <strong>of</strong> Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae) to light and chill,<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> between population variation. Bot. Gaz. 151: 176-183.<br />

Mione, T. and Anderson, G. L. (1992). Pollen-ovule ratios and breeding<br />

system evolution in Solanum section basarthrum (Solanaceae). Amer.<br />

J. Bot. 79: 279-287.<br />

Page 43


Mitrakos, K. and Shropshire, W. J. (1972). Phytochrome. Academic Press<br />

London.<br />

Moody, M. H. and Les, D. H. (2007). Phylogenetic systematic and<br />

characters evolution in angiosperm family Haloragaceae. Amer. J.<br />

Bot. 94: 2005-2025.<br />

Moody, M. L. (2004). Systematic <strong>of</strong> the angiosperm family Haloragaceae R.<br />

Br. emphasizing the aquatic genus Myriophyllum: Phylogeny,<br />

hybridization and character evolution. Thesis University <strong>of</strong><br />

Connecticut.<br />

Moody, M. L. and Les, D. H. (2002). Evidence <strong>of</strong> hybridity in invasive<br />

watermilfoil (Myriophylllum) populations. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong> United States <strong>of</strong> America, 99:<br />

14867-14871.<br />

Moody, M. L. and Les, D. H. (2010). Systematic <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms<br />

genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae). Syst. Bot. 35: 121-139.<br />

Nathan, E; Standifer and Madsen, J.D. (1993). The effects <strong>of</strong> drying period<br />

on the germination <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfol seeds. J.Aquat Plant<br />

Manage.35:35-36.<br />

Neil, P. and Anderson, G. J. (2005). Are ‗mating systems,‘ ‗breeding<br />

systems‘ inconsistent and confusing terminology in reproductive<br />

biology? Or is it other way around? Plant syst. Evol. 250: 173-185.<br />

Nichols, S. A. (1991). The Interaction between biology and the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> aquatic macrophytes. Aquatic Botany. 41: 225-253.<br />

Nichols, S. A. and Shaw, B. H. (1986). Ecological life histories <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton<br />

crispus and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia. 131: 3-21.<br />

Niklas, K. J. (1997). The evolutionary biology <strong>of</strong> plants. University Chicago<br />

Press, Chicago.<br />

Niklas, K. J. (1998). Effect <strong>of</strong> variation on mechanical properties and<br />

biomass allocation pattern <strong>of</strong> Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae).<br />

Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany. 82: 147-156.<br />

Page 44


O‘Connell, L. M. and Eckert, C. G. (1999). Differentiation in sexuality<br />

among populations <strong>of</strong> Antennaria parlinii (Astraceae). Inter. J.Plant<br />

Sci. 160: 567-575.<br />

Obson, J. M; O‘Neil, S. P. and Ei-Ghazaly, G. (2000). Pollen morphology<br />

and ultrastrucure <strong>of</strong> Marathrum schiedeanum (Podostemaceae).<br />

Grana. 39(2): 221-225.<br />

Opter, P. A; Franke, G. W and Baker, H. G. (1980). Comparative<br />

phenological studies <strong>of</strong> treelet and shrub species in tropical wet and<br />

dry forests in the lowlands <strong>of</strong> Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 68: 167-188.<br />

Orchard, A. E. (1981). A revision <strong>of</strong> South American Myriophyllum<br />

(Haloragaceae) and its repercussion on some Australian and North<br />

American Species. Brunonia. 4: 27-65.<br />

Orchard, A. E. (1986). Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in Australia. 11. The<br />

Australian species. Brunonia. 8: 173-291.<br />

Orchard, A. E. and Keighery, G. J. (1993). The Status, ecology and<br />

relationship <strong>of</strong> Meziella (Haloragaceae). Nuytsia. 9: 111-117.<br />

Ornduff, R. (1969). Reproductive biology in relation to systematics.<br />

Taxon.18: 121-133.<br />

Parveen, A. (1999). A Palynological survey <strong>of</strong> aquatic flora <strong>of</strong> karachi<br />

Pakistan. Tr. J. Bot. 23(2): 309-317.<br />

Parveen, A; Ali, T. and Quaiser, M. (1994). Pollination types and pollen<br />

characters within flora <strong>of</strong> Karachi. Pak. J. Bot. 26(1): 35-56.<br />

Parveen, A; Lee Long, W. J. and Coles, R. G. (1995). Flood and cyclone<br />

related loss and partial recovery <strong>of</strong> more than 1, 000 Km 2 <strong>of</strong> seagrass<br />

in Harvey Bay, Queensland, Austrlia. Aquatic Botany. 52: 3-17.<br />

Patten, B. C. J. (1955). Germination <strong>of</strong> the seed <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum<br />

L. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. 82: 50-56.<br />

Patten, B. C. J. (1956). Notes on the biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in a<br />

New Jersey Lake. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. 83: 5-18.<br />

Page 45


Patten. B. C. (1954). The status <strong>of</strong> some American species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

as revealed by the discovery <strong>of</strong> intergrade material between M.<br />

exalbescens Fern. and M. spicatum L. in New Jersey. Rhodora. 56:<br />

213-225.<br />

Peck, J. R., Yearsley, J. M and Waxman, D. (1998). Explaining the<br />

geographical distributions <strong>of</strong> sexual and asexual populations. Nature,<br />

391: 889-892.<br />

Pellmyr, O. (1985). Pollination ecology <strong>of</strong> Cimicifuga arizonica<br />

(Ranunculaceae). Bot. Gaz. 146: 404-412.<br />

Pellmyr, O. (1986). Pollination ecology <strong>of</strong> two nectariferous Cimicifuga sp.<br />

(Ranunculaceae) and the evolution <strong>of</strong> andromonoecy. Nordic. J. Bot.<br />

6: 129-138.<br />

Pettitt, J. M. (1981). Reproduction in sea grasses: pollen development in<br />

Thalassia hemprichii, Halophila stipulacea and Thalassodendron<br />

ciliatum. Ann. Bot. 48(4): 609-622.<br />

Philbrick, C. T and Les, D. H. (1996). Evolution <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperm<br />

reproductive systems. Bioscience. 46(11): 813-826.<br />

Philbrick, C. T. (1991). Hydrophily: Phylogenetic and evolutionary<br />

considerations. Rhodora. 93(1): 36-50.<br />

Philbrick, C. T. and Anderson, G. J. (1987). Implications <strong>of</strong> pollen/ovule<br />

ratios and pollen size for the reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton<br />

and autogamy in aquatic angiosperms. Syst. Bot. 12: 98-105.<br />

Pimental; Lach, L., Zumga, R. and Morrison. (2000). Environmental and<br />

economic costs <strong>of</strong> nonindigenous species in United States.<br />

Bioscience. 50: 53-65.<br />

Plitmann, U. and Levin, D. A. (1990). Breeding systems in the<br />

Polemoniaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 170: 205-214.<br />

Pohl, F. (1937). Die pollenevzeugung der windblutler. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.<br />

56: 365-470.<br />

Page 46


Preston, R. E. (1986). Pollen-ovule ratios in the Cruciferae. Amer. J Bot. 73:<br />

1732-1740.<br />

Proctor, M. and Yeo, P. (1972). The pollination <strong>of</strong> flowers. Taplinger<br />

publishing company, New York.<br />

Puijalon, S. and Bornette, G. (2006). Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical<br />

stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth <strong>of</strong> an aquatic plant<br />

species. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 93: 1090-1099.<br />

Puijalon, S; Bouma, T. J; Van Groenendeal, J. and Bornette, G. (2008).<br />

Clonal plasticity <strong>of</strong> aquatic plant species to mechanical stress: Escape<br />

verse resistance strategy. Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany. 102: 989-996.<br />

Punt. W. (1986). Functional factors influencing pollen form. In: Blackmore.<br />

S and I. K. Ferguson (eds) pollen and spores: Form and function.<br />

Academic Press London.<br />

Pysek, P. (1997).Clonality and plant invasion: can a trait make a difference?<br />

In: de Kroon, H. and von Groenendeal, J. (eds.). The ecology and<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> clonal plants, pp.405-427. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.<br />

The Netherlands.<br />

Ramsay, M. W; Cairns, S. C. and Vaughton, G. V. (1994). Geographical<br />

variation in morphological and reproductive characters <strong>of</strong> coastal and<br />

tableland populations <strong>of</strong> Blanfordia grandiflora (Liliaceae). Plant<br />

Syst. Evol. 192: 215-230.<br />

Rathcke, B. (1983). Competition and facilitation among plants for<br />

pollination. In: Pollination Biology. Real, L. (Ed), Academic Press,<br />

Orlando, Florida, USA, pp: 305-329.<br />

Rathcke, B. (1988). Interactions for pollination among c<strong>of</strong>lowering shrubs.<br />

Ecology.69:446-457.<br />

Rathcke, B. and Lacey, E. D. (1985). Phenological patterns <strong>of</strong> terrestrial<br />

plants. Annual Review <strong>of</strong> Ecology and systematic. 16: 179-214.<br />

Raven, P. H; Evert, R. F. and Eichhorn, S. E. (1999). Biology <strong>of</strong> Plants. 6 th<br />

Edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.<br />

Page 47


Reed, C. F. (1977). History and disturbance <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil in<br />

united states and Canada. Phytologia. 36: 417-436.<br />

Richardson, T. E and Stephenson, A. G. (1989). Pollen removal and pollen<br />

and deposition affects the duration <strong>of</strong> the staminate and pistillate<br />

phases in Campanula rapunculoides. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 532-538.<br />

Riemer, D. N. (1984). Introduction to freshwater vegetation. Westport, CN:<br />

The Avil Publishing Company.<br />

Riis, T. (2008). Dispersal and colonization <strong>of</strong> plants in lowland streams.<br />

Success rates and bottlenecks. Hydrobiologia. 596: 341-351.<br />

Riis, T. and Biggs, B. G. F. (2003). Hydrologic and hydraulic control <strong>of</strong><br />

macrophyte establishment and performance in streams. Limnol.<br />

Oceanogr. 48: 1488-1497.<br />

Riis, T; Madsen Tom, V. and Sennels Rikke, S. H. (2009). Regeneration,<br />

colonisation and growth rates <strong>of</strong> all<strong>of</strong>ragments in four common<br />

stream plants. Aquatic Botany. 90: 209-212.<br />

Rogers, K. H., Breen, C. M. (1980). Growth and reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />

Potamogeton crispus in a South African Lake. J. Ecol. 58: 561-571.<br />

Rollin, P. (1970). Phytochrome, photomorphogensis, et photoperiodism.<br />

Masson (ed), Paris.<br />

Rollin, P. and Maignan, G. (1966). La necessite du phytochrome prl pour la<br />

germination des akenes de Lactuca sativa L. variete ―reinede mai‖<br />

Compt. Rend. Paris. 263: 756-757.<br />

Sand-Jensen, K. and Mebus, J. R. (1996). Fine-scale patterns <strong>of</strong> water<br />

velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos. 76: 169-180.<br />

Sand-Jensen, K. and Pedersen, O. (1999). Velocity gradients and turbulence<br />

around macrophyte stands in streams. Freshwater Biology. 42: 315-<br />

328.<br />

Sastroutomo, S. S. (1981). Turion formation, dormancy and germination <strong>of</strong><br />

curly pond weed, Potamogeton crispus L. Aquatic Botany. 10: 161-<br />

173.<br />

Page 48


Scheldon, S. P. (1994). Invasions and declines <strong>of</strong> submerged macrophytes in<br />

New England, with particular reference to vermount lakes and<br />

herbivorous invertebrates in New England. Lake and Reservoir<br />

management. 10: 13-17.<br />

Schlising, R. A; Ikeda, D. H. and Morey, S. C. (1980). Reproduction in a<br />

great basin evening primrose, Camissonia tanacetifolia (Onagraceae).<br />

Bot. Gaz. 141: 290-293.<br />

Sculthrope, C. D. (1967). The Biology <strong>of</strong> aquatic vascular plants. Edward<br />

Arnold, London.<br />

Sharma, K. P. and Gopal, B. (1978). Seed germination and occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

seedlings <strong>of</strong> Typha species in nature. Aquatic Botany. 4: 353-358.<br />

Sharma, N; Kould, P. and Koul, A. K. (1992). Genetic systems <strong>of</strong> six<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Plantago (Plantaginaceae). Plant syst. Evol. 181:1-9.<br />

Shiga, T. and Kadono, Y. (2007). Natural hybridization <strong>of</strong> the two Nuphar<br />

species in Northern Japan: Homoploid hybrid speciation in progress?<br />

Aquatic Botany. 86: 123-131.<br />

Short, P. S. (1981). Pollen-ovule ratios, breeding system and distribution<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> some Australian Gnaphaliinae (Compositae: inuleae).<br />

Muelleria. 4: 395-417.<br />

Shung-Quan, H; You-Hao; Robert, G.W; Yao-Hua,. S and Kun, S. (2001).<br />

Mechanism <strong>of</strong> underwater pollination in Najas marina (Najadaceae).<br />

Aquatic Botany. 70(1): 67-78.<br />

Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, D. C. (1997). Eradication, pp.221-228 in : Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, D; D.C.<br />

Schimtz and T. C. Brown, eds; Strangers in paradise, Island press,<br />

Washington , D.C.<br />

Small, E. (1988). Pollen-ovule patterns in tribe Trifolieae (Leguminosae).<br />

Plant Syst. Evol. 160: 195-205.<br />

Smith, C. S. and Barko, J. W. (1990). Ecology <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil. J.<br />

Aquat. Plant Manage. 28: 55-64.<br />

Page 49


Smith, G. E; Hall, T. F. J. and Stanley, R. A. (1967). Eurasian watermilfoil<br />

in the Tennessee valley. Weeds. 15: 95-98.<br />

Smiths, A. J. M; Van Ruremonde, R. and Vandervelde, G. (1989). Seed<br />

dispersal <strong>of</strong> three nymhaeid macrophytes. Aquatic Botany. 35: 167-<br />

180.<br />

Sorsa, P. (1988). Pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton and Groenlandia<br />

(Potamogetonaceae) and its taxonomic significance. Ann. Bot.<br />

Fennici. 25(2): 179-199.<br />

Speck, O. 2003. Field measurements <strong>of</strong> wind speed and reconfiguration in<br />

Aurundo donex (Poaceae) with estimates <strong>of</strong> drag forces. American<br />

Jornal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 90: 1253-1256.<br />

Spencer, D. F and Bowes, G. (1990). Ecophysiology <strong>of</strong> the worlds<br />

troublesome aquatic weeds. In: Pieterse, A. N and Murphy, K. (eds)<br />

Aquatic weeds. The ecology and management <strong>of</strong> nuisance aquatic<br />

vegetation. Oxford University Press, oxford England.<br />

Spencer, D. F. and Ksander, G. G. (1991). Comparative growth and<br />

propagule production by Hydrilla verticillata grown from axillary<br />

turions or subterranean turion. Hydrobiologia. 222. 153-158.<br />

Spencer, D. H. N; Milburn, T. R; Nduwala-Sknyimba, M. and Roberts, E.<br />

(1971). Fruit biology and germination <strong>of</strong> two tropical Potamogeton<br />

species. New Phytol. 70: 197-212.<br />

Spencer, N. R. and Leikic, M (1974). Prospects for biological control <strong>of</strong><br />

Eurasian watermilfoil .Weed Science. 22: 401-404.<br />

Spira, T. P. (1980). Floral parameters, breeding system and pollinator type in<br />

Trichostema (Labiatae). Amer. J. Bot. 67: 278-284.<br />

Standifer, N. E and Madsen,J. D. (1997). The effect <strong>of</strong> drying period on the<br />

germinaton <strong>of</strong> Eurasian waterfoil seeds. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 35:<br />

35-36.<br />

Stanley, R. A; Shackelford, E; Wade, D. and Warren, C. (1976). Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

season and waterdepth on Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquatic Plant<br />

Mange. 14: 32-36.<br />

Page 50


Stanley, R. G. and Linskens, H. F. (1974). Pollen biology, biochemistry and<br />

Management. Springer, Berlin. Heidelberg, New York.<br />

Stover, E. L. (1951). An introduction to the anatomy <strong>of</strong> seed plants. Boston<br />

academic press.<br />

Takahashi, M. (1994). Pollen development in a submerged plant, Ottelia<br />

alismoides L. (Hydrocharitaceae). J. Plant Res. 107: 161-164.<br />

Takahashi, M. (1995). Development <strong>of</strong> structure-less pollen wall in<br />

Ceratophyllum demersum L. (Ceratophylacease). J. Plant Res. 108:<br />

205-208.<br />

Tanaka, N; Uehara, K. and Murata, J. (2004). Correlation between pollen<br />

morphology and pollination mechanisms in Hydrocharitaceae. J.<br />

Plant. Res. 117: 265-276.<br />

Teltscherova, L. and Hejny, S. (1973). The germination <strong>of</strong> some<br />

Potamogeton species from South-Bohemian Fishponds. Folia<br />

Geobot. 8: 231-239.<br />

Teryokhin, E. S; Chubarov, S. I. and Romanova, V. O. (2002). Pollination,<br />

mating systems and self-incompatibility in some species <strong>of</strong> the genus<br />

Potamogeton L. Phytomorphology. 52: 250 - 261.<br />

Theophrastus. (1976). De Causis Plantarum. Cambridge Harvard University<br />

Press.<br />

Thomas, S. M. and Murray, B. G. (1981). Breeding systems and<br />

hybridization in Petrorhagia Sect. kohlrauschia (Caryophyllaceae).<br />

Plant Syst. Evol. 139: 77-94.<br />

Thompson, K; Hodgson, J. G and Rhich, T. C. G. (1995). Native and alien<br />

plants: More <strong>of</strong> the same? Ecography, 18:390-402.<br />

Thompson, P. A. (1973). Seed germination in relation to ecological and<br />

geographical distribution. In: Heywood, V. A. (ed), Taxonomy and<br />

ecology, Academic Press London, pp, 93-119.<br />

Titus, J. E. and Hoover, D. T. (1991). Towards predicting reproductive<br />

success in submersed freshwater angiosperms. Aquatic Botany. 41:<br />

111-136.<br />

Page 51


Triffney, B. H. and Niklas, K. J. (1985). Clonal growth in land plants: a<br />

paleobotanical perspective. P. 35-66 in Jackson, J. B. C. Buss Lw,<br />

Cook R. E. eds. Population biology and evolution in clonal<br />

organisms. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.<br />

Turala, K. (1969). Cyto-taxonomical studies in Ranunculus subgenus<br />

batrachium (DC). A gray from Poland. Acta. Biol. Cracoviensa, Ser.<br />

Bot. 12: 9-20.<br />

Turala, K. (1970). Cyto-taxonomical studies in Ranunclus fluitans Lam and<br />

R. pencillatus (Dumort). Bab from lower Silesia (Poland).<br />

Preliminary report. Acta. Biol. Cracoviensa. Ser. Bot. 13: 119-123.<br />

Turala-Szybowska, K. (1977). Karyological studies in Ranunclus fluitans<br />

Ham. from Thuringia and Vilnius with its sourroudnings. Acta. Bio.<br />

Cracoviensa. Ser. Bot. 20: 1-9.<br />

Van Vierssen, R. J; Van Wijkvan and Derzee, J. R. (1982). On the<br />

pollination mechanism <strong>of</strong> some eurysaline Potamogetonaceae.<br />

Aquatic Botany. 14: 339-347.<br />

Van Wijk, R. J. (1989). Ecological studies on Potamogeton pectinatus L.<br />

reproductive strategies and germination ecology. Aquatic Botany. 33:<br />

271-299.<br />

Van Wijk, R. J. and Trompenars, H. J. (1985). On the germination <strong>of</strong> turion<br />

and the life cycle <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton trichoides cham.et Schld. Aquatic<br />

Botany. 22: 165-172.<br />

Varies, A. P. (1974). Some aspects <strong>of</strong> cross-pollinaton in wheat (Triticum<br />

aestivum L.), anther length and number <strong>of</strong> pollen grains per anther.<br />

Euphytica. 23: 11-19.<br />

Vasek, F. C; Weng, V; Beaver, R. J. and Huszar, C. K. (1987). Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

mineral nutrition on components <strong>of</strong> reproduction in Clarkia<br />

unguiculata. Aliso. 11: 599-618.<br />

Vaucher, J. P. (1841). Histoire physiologique des plants D‘Europa. II. Paris.<br />

Vierssen, W. Van. (1993). Relationship between survival strategies <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic weeds and control measures. Aquatic weeds: The ecology and<br />

Page 52


management <strong>of</strong> nuisance aquatic vegetation, New York, Oxford<br />

University Press. pp, 238-253.<br />

Vitousek, P. M; Antonio, C. M; Loope, L. I. and Westerbrooks, R. (1996).<br />

Biological invasions as global environment change. American<br />

Scientist. 84: 468-478.<br />

Vogel, S. (1978). Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen<br />

flowers. In: Richards A. J. (eds). The pollination <strong>of</strong> flowers by<br />

insects. Academic Press, London, pp. 89-96.<br />

Vogel, S. (1994). Life in moving fluids: the physical biology <strong>of</strong> flow.<br />

Princeton ,NJ: princeton University Press.<br />

Vuille, F. L. (1987). Reproducitve biology <strong>of</strong> the genus Damasonium<br />

(Alismataceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 157: 63-71.<br />

Vuille, F. L. (1988). The reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> the genus Baldellia<br />

(Alismataceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 159: 173-183.<br />

Vunh<strong>of</strong>, J.J., and Harder, L. D. (1995). Size-number trade-<strong>of</strong>fs and pollen<br />

production by Papilionaceous.<br />

Wade, P. M. (1990). General biology and ecology <strong>of</strong> aquatic weeds, pp, 17-<br />

30. In: Pieterse, A. N. and Murphy, K. (eds) Aquatic Weeds. The<br />

Ecology and management <strong>of</strong> nuisance aquatic vegetation. Oxford<br />

University Press, Oxford.<br />

Washington State Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology (2003). Water quality Home. 3.<br />

Non-native freshwater palnts. Eurasian watermilfoil.<br />

Webb, C. J. (1994). Pollination, self-incompatibility and fruit production in<br />

Corokia cotoneaster (Escallohiaceae). New Zealand J. Bot. 32: 385-<br />

392.<br />

Webster, S. D. (1986). Two natural hydrids in Ranunclus L. submgenus<br />

batrachium (D.C) A. Gray. Watsonia. 16: 25-30.<br />

Webster, S. D. (1988). Ranunclus pencillatus (Dumort) Bab. In Great<br />

Britain and Ireland. Irish Nat. 23: 346-354.<br />

Page 53


Weigleb, G; Brux, H; and Herr, W. (1991). Human impact on the ecological<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton species in northwestern Germany.<br />

Vegetation. 97: 161-172.<br />

White, D. J; Haber, E. and Keddy, C. (1993). Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

habitats in Canada. Canadian wildlife service, Environment Cannada,<br />

Ottawa, Ontario.<br />

Wiegleb, G. and Kadano, Y. (1989). Growth and development <strong>of</strong><br />

Potamogeton distinctus in an irrigation pond in SW Japan. Nordic. J.<br />

Bot. 9: 241-249<br />

Wilcove, D. S; Rothstein, D; Dubow, A; Phillips, A. and Losos, E. (1998).<br />

Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States.<br />

Bioscience.48: 607-615.<br />

Williams, G. C. (1975). Sex and evolution. Princeton (NJ): Princeton<br />

University Press.<br />

Willson, M. F. (1983). Plant Reproductive Ecology. A Wiley-Interscience<br />

publication. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, 5-32.<br />

Wimmer, W. (1997). Myriophyllum heterophyllum Michaux in<br />

Niedersachsen Und Bremen Sowie seine Bestimmung im vegetativen<br />

Zustand. Flora Rundbriefe.31:23-31.<br />

Wolfer, S. R. and Straife, D. (2004.) Saptio-temporal dynamics and<br />

plasticity <strong>of</strong> clonal architecture in Potamogeton perfoliatus. Aquat.<br />

Bot. 78: 307-318.<br />

Xiao, C; Wang, X; Xia, J and Liu, G. (2010). The effect <strong>of</strong> temperature,<br />

waterlevel and burial depth on seed germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />

spicatum and Potamogeton malainus.<br />

Yeo, P. F. (1993). Secondary pollen presentation- form, fuction and<br />

evolution. Spinger, Wien New York.<br />

Yu, D; Wang, D; Li, Z; Funston, A. M. (2002). Taxonomic revision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in China. Rhodora, 104:396-<br />

421.<br />

Page 54


Zhang, X. L; Gituru, R. W; Yang, C. F. and Guo, Y. H. (2009). Variation<br />

<strong>of</strong> floral traits among different life forms illustrate the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

pollination system in Potamogeton species from China. Aquatic<br />

Botany. 90: 124-128.<br />

Page 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!