Shahzada Arshid - Univeristy of Kashmir Information Service
Shahzada Arshid - Univeristy of Kashmir Information Service
Shahzada Arshid - Univeristy of Kashmir Information Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
STUDIES ON REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY<br />
OF MYRIOPHYLLUM SPICATUM L.<br />
IN THE KASHMIR VALLEY<br />
Dissertation submitted to the University <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Kashmir</strong><br />
For award <strong>of</strong> the Degree <strong>of</strong><br />
Master <strong>of</strong> Philosophy (M. Phil)<br />
IN<br />
BOTANY<br />
By<br />
<strong>Shahzada</strong> <strong>Arshid</strong><br />
M.sc, NET (JRF)<br />
Post Graduate Department <strong>of</strong> Botany,<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biological Science,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>,<br />
Srinagar-190006, J&K India.<br />
2011<br />
Page 6
DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY<br />
UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR<br />
HAZRATBAL, SRINAGAR, KASHMIR - 190006<br />
CERTIFICATE<br />
No ................<br />
Dated...............<br />
Certified that the Dissertation entitled “Studies on<br />
Reproductive Biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum L. in the <strong>Kashmir</strong><br />
Valley.” submitted to the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>, Hazratbal, Srinagar<br />
for award <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> Master <strong>of</strong> Philosophy in Botany, embodies<br />
original research work carried out by <strong>Shahzada</strong> <strong>Arshid</strong> under my<br />
supervision. This work has not been submitted in part or in full for this<br />
or any other degree before.<br />
The candidate has worked for the period required under<br />
statutes and has put in the required attendance in the Department.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>.(Dr.) Zafar A. Reshi<br />
(Head)<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Botany<br />
University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>,<br />
Srinagar-190006.<br />
..<br />
Dr. Aijaz Ahmad Wani<br />
(Supervisor)<br />
Sr. Asst. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Botany,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>,<br />
Srinagar-190006<br />
Page 7
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
Foremost, my all praise for Almighty Allah, the most<br />
merciful and the most beneficent, for it is indeed through His<br />
blessings alone that the work has been completed.<br />
I feel privileged to express a pr<strong>of</strong>ound sense <strong>of</strong> gratitude<br />
and indebtness to Dr. Aijaz Ahmad Wani, (Sr.Assistant<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor) my esteemed teacher and worthy supervisor for his<br />
sagacious, enthusiastic, intellectual and encouraging<br />
stimulation which provided the guidelines for carrying out<br />
the proposed work. His invaluable scholarly suggestions,<br />
immense interest and the noble guidance throughout the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> present work provided me specific and sequential<br />
parameters for successfully completing this work. I have been<br />
fortunate enough to be inspired by his dynamic and<br />
innovative nature throughout the period <strong>of</strong> my study.<br />
I would like to express my deep sense <strong>of</strong> gratitude to Dr.<br />
Zaffar Ahmad Reshi, Head Deptt. <strong>of</strong> Botany, for his constant<br />
encouragement, valuable advises and the freedom <strong>of</strong> work he<br />
provided all throughout my research work.<br />
I am also grateful to my eminent teachers Dr. Irshad A<br />
Nawchoo, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. A. Wafai, Dr. Inayat-ul-lah Tahir, Dr. A.H.<br />
Wani, Dr. Zahoor Ahmad Kaloo, and Mr. Anzar A. Khuroo<br />
for their kind cooperation and timely help.<br />
I would also like to express a special thanks to my senior<br />
scholars Mr. Aijaz Hassan Ganaie,Fozia Amin and Fayaz<br />
Ahmad for their valuable suggestions and generous help<br />
during the entire course <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />
Special thanks also goes to my friends Peerzada <strong>Arshid</strong><br />
Shabir, Nida Aslam, Shugufta Bashir, Mushtaq Ahmad Bhat,<br />
Tajamul Islam, Zahoor Ahmad Itoo, Chesfeeda, Ishah, Samee<br />
ullaha,Abid Mohiuddin, Hilal Ahmad Bhat, Parveez Amin,<br />
Page 8
Mushtaq A Rather, Pervaiz Ahmad Dar, Showkat A, Burhan<br />
Ahad, Waseem and others for their company, support and<br />
encouragement.<br />
I candidly express my pr<strong>of</strong>ound indebtness from the core<br />
<strong>of</strong> my heart to my friend Mr.Farooq Ahmad (Research<br />
Scholar,CORD) for his kind and immense help, without his<br />
generous help and support during this study, the dissertation<br />
would have been less illuminating in its final form.<br />
I have no words to express my heartful gratitude to my<br />
beloved and Wonderful parents, (Ab.Hamid Shah and<br />
Dilafroza), who dedicated their entire life for my Success and<br />
are the tower <strong>of</strong> strength and source <strong>of</strong> inspiration for me.<br />
They always supported and encouraged me, in the moment <strong>of</strong><br />
despair; they came forth to kindle a ray <strong>of</strong> hope which<br />
rejuvenated me to work with renewed zeal and zest, so I can’t<br />
forget to recollect the kind support which they have provided<br />
throughout my educational career.<br />
To my greatest joy, a special word <strong>of</strong> thanks goes to my<br />
well wishers especially to my dear and loving Sisters and<br />
Mohd Ashraf shah (Uncle) without whose constant,<br />
affectionate, moral and kind support, and encouragement<br />
that helped me to push through the good and rough times,<br />
from zeroth to infinite, the present work would not have been<br />
here. My special thanks goes to kids Madeeha Ashraf, Sobia<br />
gul, Namat ul ayn, Suhail shafi and Rehana Fayaz.<br />
A sincere thanks also goes to CSIR New Delhi, for<br />
providing financial assistance during the course <strong>of</strong> study.<br />
(<strong>Shahzada</strong> <strong>Arshid</strong>)<br />
Page 9
Contents<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
Page<br />
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1-5<br />
Chapter 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 6-32<br />
Chapter 3 MATERIAL AND METHODS 33-43<br />
Chapter 4 OBSERVATIONS 44-110<br />
Chapter 5 DISCUSSION 111-125<br />
Chapter 6 REFERENCES 126-153<br />
No.<br />
Page 10
CHAPTER-1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Page 11
R<br />
eproductive biology is one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental fields for<br />
development <strong>of</strong> conservation protocols for elite and<br />
threatened plant species and on the other hand prevention<br />
protocols for invasive plant species which are increasingly<br />
becoming a threat to our terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> reproductive biology is regarded to be <strong>of</strong> nuclear importance in<br />
developing control methods for aggressive aquatic species (Haynes, 1988).<br />
The studies on various aspects <strong>of</strong> reproductive biology help us in<br />
understanding the nature, systematics, modes <strong>of</strong> propagation, adaptation,<br />
hybridization and speciation (Anderson et al., 2002, 2006; Neil and<br />
Anderson, 2005).<br />
Aquatic plants are essential components <strong>of</strong> healthy ecosystems in freshwater<br />
lakes and ponds, producing oxygen, reducing erosion and regulating nutrient<br />
cycling (Hutchinson, 1975). They provide food for many birds as well as<br />
habitat that supports rich communities <strong>of</strong> aquatic invertebrates and<br />
vertebrates (Sculthrope, 1967). Invasive aquatic plants, however, are not<br />
native species, and they are <strong>of</strong>ten destructive (Vitousek et al., 1996). Non-<br />
native plants are responsible for economic losses and control costs estimated<br />
in one analysis at 137 billion per year in the United States alone (Pimental et<br />
al., 2000). Invasive aquatic plants are noted for their explosive growth<br />
potential (Barrett, 1989) and their ability to grow from a few plants to cover<br />
hundreds <strong>of</strong> acres in a few years (Groth et al., 1996). Invasive aquatic plants<br />
have caused declines in native plant populations throughout New England<br />
Page 12
(Scheldon, 1994).In some water bodies, invasive plants have become so<br />
abundent that they displaced native species (Langeland, 1996). Many<br />
biologists feel invasive species are second only to habitat destruction as the<br />
most serious threat to endangered species globally (Wilcove et al., 1998).<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> their great growth potential, invasive aquatic plants can block<br />
navigation channels, irrigation ditches and water intake pipes, and can also<br />
reduce aesthetic and recreational value <strong>of</strong> water bodies, affecting tourism<br />
and real estate values (Catling and Dobson, 1985). In some cases, the plants<br />
have been found to increase breeding habitat for mosquitoes (Eiswerth et al.,<br />
2000). Attempts to eradicate invasive plants once they become established<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten have failed (Anonymous, 1993; Growth et al., 1996; Simberl<strong>of</strong>f,<br />
1997), and their management is expensive (Center et al., 1997). Early<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> invasive plant populations and knowing their reproductive<br />
strategies is critically important to prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> these plants<br />
(Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, 1997)<br />
The Myriophyllum, commonly known as watermilfoil is a genus <strong>of</strong><br />
aquatic mostly fresh water plants <strong>of</strong> the family Haloragaceae. The genus<br />
name has originated from two Greek words viz: Myrio means many and<br />
phyll means leaves. It is cosmopolitan in distribution (Moody and Les,<br />
2010) and is represented by 68 species (APG II, 2003). Myriophyllum is well<br />
known for its invasive species. The aggressive Myriophyllum spicatum is<br />
native to Europe, Asia and North Africa (Couch and Nelson, 1985) and has<br />
now established on all the continents except Antarctica (Orchard, 1986; Yu<br />
et al., 2002). It is distributed from Spain and UK in the west to China and<br />
Japan in the east and from Finland in the north to Morocco in the south<br />
(Meusel and Jager, 1978) and is introduced and invasive in North America,<br />
South America, India and Australia (Holm et al., 1979).<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum is a herbaceous perennial species. Leaves<br />
occur in whorls around the stem, usually four together at a node (Aiken et<br />
al., 1979) and each leaf is divided into more than 14 pairs <strong>of</strong> thread like<br />
leaflets. Reproductive characters are the most important characters in the<br />
Page 13
identification <strong>of</strong> the species. In the absence <strong>of</strong> flowers and fruits, the most<br />
distinctive characters are the reddish tips, more than 14 leaflets on each side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the central axis <strong>of</strong> the leaf and the truncated leaf base (Crow and<br />
Hellquist, 2000).<br />
Both sexual as well as asexual modes <strong>of</strong> reproduction are operative in<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum (Williams, 1975; Grant, 1981). A variety <strong>of</strong><br />
propagules and dispersal mechanisms involving seeds, rhizomes, axillary<br />
buds and stem fragments (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993;<br />
Vierssen, 1993) enable the species to grow in varied habitats all over the<br />
temperate areas <strong>of</strong> the world. The relative importance <strong>of</strong> sexual vs. clonal<br />
reproduction varies widely among plant species in response to ecological<br />
and/or genetic factors (Eckart, 2002). Very recently there has been much<br />
interest in exploring the role <strong>of</strong> reproductive modes in geographical<br />
distribution (Peck et al., 1998; Keitt et al., 2001) and the capacity for range<br />
expansion, which in extreme cases manifests as biological invasion (Barret<br />
and Richadson, 1986; Thompson et al., 1995; Pysek, 1997). The most<br />
obvious difference between sexual and clonal reproduction is that sexual<br />
reproduction generates genotypic diversity, whereas strictly asexual clonal<br />
reproduction does not. Limited sexual reproduction can be due to ecological<br />
factors that impair pollination, seed maturation and seedling establishment<br />
(Barrat, 1980).Sexual infertility may also be due to population-level genetic<br />
factors, such as limited mating-type diversity in self-incompatible or<br />
dioecious species (O‘Connel and Eckert, 1999). Understanding the<br />
underlying variations in reproduction may be crucial for predicting the<br />
reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />
Several working groups (Aiken et al., 1979; Smith and Barko, 1990;<br />
Cook, 1996; Nathan et al., 1993; Alwadie, 2008 ) are working on various<br />
facets <strong>of</strong> reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum. Such studies have revealed<br />
that the inflorescence in Myriophyllum spicatum is a spike and floral<br />
organization <strong>of</strong> the species is tetramerous (Aiken et al., 1979; Moody and<br />
Les, 2007). The pollination mechanisms operative are: anemophily and<br />
Page 14
epihydrophily ( Patten, 1956; Cook, 1996). The seed production is high in<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum and it has been found to play an important role in<br />
the establishment <strong>of</strong> new genotypes in existing populations (Kimber et al.,<br />
1995; McFerland, 2006), movement <strong>of</strong> populations into new regions (Arnold<br />
et al., 2000; Figuerola and Green, 2002; Harwell and Orth, 2002) and<br />
reestablishment <strong>of</strong> populations after episodic declines (Titus and Hoover,<br />
1991; Parveen et al, 1995; Jarvis and Moore, 2008). However studies on<br />
breeding system and pollination in Myriophyllum spicatum are few,<br />
probably due to aquatic habit and small flower size.<br />
Vegetative propagation is widespread in Myriophyllum spicatum and<br />
is ubiquitous among aquatic species regardless <strong>of</strong> their taxonomic affiliation<br />
(Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993; Les and Philbrick, 1993). Vegetative<br />
reproduction is <strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be the dominant mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in<br />
water plants (Hutchinson, 1975; Sculthrope, 1967). In Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum different types <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagules are produced viz;<br />
rhizomes, axillary buds and stem fragments which provide a mechanism for<br />
clonal reproduction with localized to intermediate distance dispersal<br />
(Madsen, 1991). However little work has been done on reproductive<br />
potential, germination and ecology <strong>of</strong> these propagules.<br />
Notwithstanding the diversity in vegetative and reproductive attributes<br />
and occurrence and abundance <strong>of</strong> various species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum in<br />
<strong>Kashmir</strong> valley, the information on reproductive biology and other allied<br />
aspects is meager in the literature. Therefore present study was focused on<br />
distribution pattern, phenotypic variability, floral morphology and<br />
reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in relation to its habitat<br />
characteristics in order to identify the key habitat specific reproductive<br />
attributes that contribute to the abundance <strong>of</strong> this species in different aquatic<br />
habitats <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley. Such information is obligatory for effective<br />
management <strong>of</strong> the species that invade aquatic habitats to damage the native<br />
biodiversity and functioning <strong>of</strong> these habitats.<br />
Page 15
CHAPTER-2<br />
REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />
Page 16
2.1: Distribution<br />
Worldover, the family Haloragaceae comprises <strong>of</strong> 8 genera and 120<br />
species; and these taxa are extremely diverse in their habit, ranging from<br />
small trees to submerged macrophytes (Moody and Les, 2007). The four<br />
genera (Glischrocaryon, Gonocarpus, Haloragis, Haloragodendron) are<br />
primarily terrestrial, whereas four (Laurembergia, Meizella, Myriophyllum,<br />
Prosperpinaca) are aquatic/semi-aquatic (Table 1).<br />
The Myriophyllum, commonly known as watermilfoil, is among the<br />
species rich (68 spp.) genus <strong>of</strong> the aquatic ―Core eudicots‖ (APGII, 2003). It<br />
shows a cosmopolitan distribution (except Antarctica), with a centre <strong>of</strong><br />
diversity in Australia (42 spp., 34 endemic); North America (14 spp., 7<br />
endemic) and Asia (16 spp., 8 endemic) also harbor a significant continental<br />
diversity and share seven common species as listed in Table 2 (Moody and<br />
Les, 2010). Myriophyllum is well-known for its invasive species. The<br />
aggressive M. spicatum L. (Eurasian watermilfoil) and South American M.<br />
aquaticum (Vell) Verdc. (Parrotfeather) are now established on most<br />
continents and listed as noxious weeds in United States. The North<br />
American endemic M. heterophyllum reportedly is naturalized in Europe<br />
(Wimmer, 1997), Asia (Yu et al., 2002), and also is considered to be<br />
invasive outside its endemic range in the northeast and northwest United<br />
States (Les and Mehrh<strong>of</strong>f, 1999). Hybridization also has been shown to play<br />
a role in North American invasions with two hybrid lineages recognized viz:<br />
M. spicatum x M. sibiricum and M. heterophyllum x M. laxum (Moody and<br />
Les, 2002).<br />
Page 17
Table 1: Distribution, habit and species diversity <strong>of</strong> Haloragaceae<br />
genera (Moody and Les, 2007).<br />
Genus Distribution Habit No. <strong>of</strong><br />
species<br />
1. Glischrocaryon Australia Terrestrial 4<br />
2. Gonocarpus Australia, New Zealand,<br />
S.E. Asia<br />
3. Haloragis Australia, New Zealand.<br />
S. Pacific<br />
Terrestrial 36<br />
Terrestrial *<br />
4. Haloragodendron Australia Terrestrial 5<br />
5. Laurembergia Pantropical Semiaquatic 4<br />
6. Meziella S.W. Australia Aquatic 1<br />
7. Myriophyllum Cosmopolitan Aquatic 60<br />
8. Proserpinaca New World Aquatic 3<br />
*Three species are aquatic.<br />
26<br />
Page 18
Table 2. Global distribution <strong>of</strong> Genus Myriophyllum.<br />
(Meijden, 1969; Meijden and Caspers, 1971; Orchard,1980, 1981, 1986; Aiken, 1981; Yu et al., 2002.)<br />
Continent No. <strong>of</strong><br />
species<br />
Australia<br />
Europe<br />
North<br />
America<br />
South<br />
America<br />
Africa<br />
44<br />
6<br />
14<br />
4<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> species<br />
M. balladoniense, M. caput-medusae, M. decussatum, M. porcatum, M. robustum, M.<br />
salsugineum, M. spicatum, M. triphyllum, M. verrucosum, M. aquaticum, M. trifidum, M.<br />
amphibium, M. pendunculatum, M. tillaeoides, M. dicoccum, M. latifolium, M. muricatum, M.<br />
coronatum, M. costatum, M. filiforme, M. implicatum, M. striatum, M. trachycarpum, M.<br />
alpinum, M. austropygmaeum, M. crispatum, M. drummondii, M. alpinum, M. gracile, M.<br />
integrifolium, M. lapidicola, M. limnophilum, M. lophatum, M. papillosum, M. petraeum, M.<br />
propinquum, M. pygmaeum, M. simulans, M. variifolium, M. votschii, M. artesium, M.<br />
callitrichoides, M. glomeratum, M. muelleri<br />
M. alterniflorum, M. sibiricum, M. spicatum, M. verticillatum, M. aquaticum, M. hterophyllum,<br />
M. alterniflorum, M. quitense, M. sibircum, M. spicatum, M. verticillatum, M. aquaticum, M.<br />
farwellii, M. heterophyllum, M. hippuroides, M. humile, M. laxum, M. pinnatum, M. tenellum,<br />
M. ussuriense.<br />
M. spicatum, M. aquaticum, M. mattogrossense, M. quitense<br />
4 M. spicatum, M. aquaticum, M. mezianum, M. axilliflorum.<br />
Asia 16 M. alterniflorum, M. sibiricum, M. spicatum, M. oguraense, M. verticillatum, M. aquaticum,<br />
M. dicoccum, M. exasperatum, M. tuberculatum, M. heterophyllum, M. bonii, M. siamense, M.<br />
ussuriense,<br />
M. indicum, M. oliganthum, M. tetrandrum.<br />
Page 19
From the Indian subcontinent, five species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum have been<br />
reported (Hooker, 1879). In the <strong>Kashmir</strong> Himalaya, earlier the genus has been<br />
reported to comprise <strong>of</strong> two species: M. spicatum and M. verticillatum (Kaul<br />
and Zutshi, 1965), while as later on three species have been reported viz. M.<br />
spicatum, M. verticillatum and M. tuberculatum (Kak, 1990).<br />
M. spicatum is native to Europe, Asia and North Africa (Couch and<br />
Nelson, 1985) occurring from Spain and UK in the west to China and Japan is<br />
the east, and from Finland in the North to Morocco in the South (Meusel and<br />
Jager, 1978). It was introduced into North America between 1880‘s and 1940‘s<br />
and now occurs in both Canada and the United States (Reed, 1977; Aiken et<br />
al., 1979; Couch and Nelson, 1985). From the initial point <strong>of</strong> introduction in<br />
the North America, M. spicatum has spread to 44 states and at least three<br />
Canadian provinces (Creed, 1998) and is now considered a major nuisance<br />
species throughout the Northeast, Northern Midwest and Pacific Northwest <strong>of</strong><br />
the United States (Couch and Nelsons, 1985; White et al., 1993). M. spicatum<br />
has spread to 46 states and three Canadian provinces <strong>of</strong> North America (Jacono<br />
and Richerson, 2003; Kim, 2005). M.spicatum is categorized among the five<br />
most noxious wetland plants (Cronk and Fennessy, 2001) and it is the most<br />
widely managed aquatic weed in the United States (Bartodziej and Ludlow,<br />
1998).<br />
2.2: Taxonomy<br />
The genus Myriophyllum L. belongs to the watermilfoil family,<br />
Haloragaceae, in the order saxifragales (Moody and Les, 2010). Myriophyllum<br />
has been hypothesized as a distinct within Haloragaceae due to a combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> characters including its aquatic habit (also found in Meionectes, Meziella<br />
and Proserpinaca), tendency towards monoecy (also found in Laurembrgia)<br />
and a fruit that splits at maturity into two or four individual nutlets (not found<br />
elsewhere in the family) (Orchard, 1986). Myriophyllum was found to be<br />
paraphyletic in regard to the monotypic Meziella, in recent phylogenetic<br />
analysis (Moody and Les, 2007). Meziella is similar in habit to Myriophyllum<br />
Page 44
ut possesses hermaphrodite flowers and while forming four nutlets, they do<br />
not split at maturity due to a persistent exocarp (Orchard and Keighery, 1993).<br />
The other aquatic Haloragaceae genera (Prosperpinaca and Meionectes) are<br />
distinct, having perfect, two or three merous flowers with a nut and are only<br />
distantly related (Moody and Les, 2007).<br />
A taxonomic confusion exists in the genus Myriophyllum, particularly<br />
with respect to the taxa Myriophyllum spicatum, M. exalbescens and M.<br />
verticillatum (Couch and Nelson, 1983). M. spicatum and M. verticillatum<br />
were first described by Linnaeus in the 1700‘s (Aiken and McNeill, 1980). In<br />
1919, Fernald described a new species for North America, M.exalbescens<br />
(Fernald, 1919). Thereafter Jepson (1925); Hulten (1947); (Patten, 1954, 1956)<br />
and Orchard (1981) found the differences between M. spicatum and M.<br />
exalbescens too significant to warrant separation. Hulten and Patten placed M.<br />
exalbescens within the older taxon as a subspecies, where as Jepson, Nichols<br />
and Orchard preferred the varietal level. Fernald (1919) steadfastly opposed<br />
considering M. spicatum and M. exalbescens as one species. Love (1961); Reed<br />
(1977), Aiken (1979), Aiken and Walz (1979), Aiken et al., (1979) agreed<br />
with Fernald and concluded that the native American species, M. exalbescens<br />
and M. verticillatum, should be separate taxa based on differences in<br />
morphology, physiology and phenology.<br />
All Haloragaceae species are herbs, submersed in quiet waters or rooted<br />
on muddy shores. The similarity <strong>of</strong> the species has led to much confusion about<br />
species identity and most species in the family cannot be separated using only<br />
individual specimens or without flowers (Johnson et al., 1998). A phylogenetic<br />
study based on nr DNA ITS sequence reveals that M. spicatum is most closely<br />
related to the holarctic species M. sibiricum and M. alterniflorum. There is also<br />
close relationship to M. verticillatum and the M. quitense. All other species<br />
analysed i.e., M. heterophyllum, M. laxum, M. hippuroides, M. tenellum, M.<br />
pinnatum, M. farwellii and M. humile are well separated from M. spicatum<br />
(Moody, 2004).<br />
Page 45
M. spicatum was found to hybridize with the M. sibiricum in North<br />
American (Moody & Les, 2002). While M. spicatum and M. sibiricum can be<br />
distinguished by morphological characters related to leaf segments and the<br />
presence (M. sibiricum) or absence (M. spicatum) <strong>of</strong> turions, hybrids overlap<br />
with both parents in leaf characters and lack turions, thus can only be<br />
distinguished using molecular analysis (Moody and Les, 2010). M. spicatum is<br />
variable in appearance with long stems, and usually 12 to 21 leaflet pairs,<br />
which are not stiff when out <strong>of</strong> the water, in contrast the very similar M.<br />
sibiricum usually have five to 10 leaf pairs with leaflets that stay rigid when out<br />
<strong>of</strong> the water, so leaf morphology can be used to separate these two very similar<br />
species successfully (Gerber and Les, 1994).<br />
As per Crow and Hellquist (2000), following taxonomic characters are<br />
used to identify M. spicatum.<br />
1. Leaves pinnately divided, with filiform segments; vegetative stems<br />
elongate.<br />
2. Leaves whorled.<br />
3. Bracts usually twice as long as pistillate flowers.<br />
4. Bracts <strong>of</strong> upper portion <strong>of</strong> inflorescence lanceolate, entire to denticulate,<br />
not glaucous.<br />
5. Middle leaves with 12 or more segments on each side <strong>of</strong> rachis; many <strong>of</strong><br />
the uppermost leaves truncate at apex; stem diameter below<br />
inflorescence greater, up to twice the diameter <strong>of</strong> the lower stem, stem<br />
tips usually reddish; winter buds not formed.<br />
Reproductive characters are the most important characters in the<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> the species. In the absence <strong>of</strong> flowers and/or seeds, the most<br />
distinctive characters are the reddish tips, the 12 or more filaments on each side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the central axis <strong>of</strong> each leaf and the truncated leaf tips.<br />
Page 46
2.3: Phenology<br />
Many factors affect the reproductive success <strong>of</strong> flowering plants. Among<br />
these factors, the timing, frequency and duration <strong>of</strong> the flowering period<br />
collectively referred to as phenology is obviously <strong>of</strong> great importance (Rathcke<br />
and Lacey, 1985). The phenology <strong>of</strong> a species not only encompasses when,<br />
how <strong>of</strong>ten, and how long reproduction takes place but also determines the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> reproduction synchrony with other plant species (Rathcke, 1988).<br />
Synchrony among species might be advantageous if the presence <strong>of</strong> one species<br />
facilitates increase in pollinator visitation and thus fruit/seed set in another<br />
species (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985). Phenology in general and reproductive<br />
phenology in particular is a critical and important trait <strong>of</strong> a plant because it<br />
determines the growth, developmental pattern and number <strong>of</strong> potential mates in<br />
a population thus providing a mechanism for reproductive isolation or<br />
speciation over time (Rathcke, 1983; Bronstein et al., 1990). Researchers<br />
always and continuously try to identify environmental factors that correlate<br />
with phenological events such as initiation <strong>of</strong> flowering, the synchronization <strong>of</strong><br />
flowering, the length <strong>of</strong> the flowering phase and variation in flower abundance<br />
(Opler et al., 1980; Borchert, 1983; Inouye et al., 2002). Environmental factors<br />
that initiate the onset <strong>of</strong> a particular phenophase include photoperiod,<br />
temperature and precipitation (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985). The same<br />
environmental factors can delimit a particular phenophase including flowering<br />
season in some specific ecoedaphic conditions or environments (Borchert,<br />
1980; Inouye and McGuire, 1991).<br />
Patten (1956) studied the phenological events <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
in Lake Musconetcong, New Jersey. The inflorescences first appeared on July<br />
11. Two days later these were abundent. Towards the beginning <strong>of</strong> August, the<br />
plants <strong>of</strong> this area were in full bloom and August 19, approximated the peak <strong>of</strong><br />
the flowering period for the lake as a whole. By the middle <strong>of</strong> September,<br />
flowering was over and the fruiting spikes were laid just beneath the surface <strong>of</strong><br />
water. During October the fruiting was in peak and most <strong>of</strong> the fruits were<br />
Page 47
eginning to drop <strong>of</strong>f from their spikes. Half or more <strong>of</strong> the year‘s seed crop<br />
was released by the end <strong>of</strong> November. Many fruits remained attached to the<br />
plants throughout the winter months and quite <strong>of</strong>ten were frozen into the ice.<br />
Fruits no longer remained by the late February.<br />
Leikic (1970) found that germination <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum generally takes<br />
place in March and April in Yugoslavia. The stem elongates during the<br />
vegetative phase, and leaf production commences. Relatively high water<br />
temperatures are necessary for vegetative growth. Branching starts in May and<br />
has a phototropic response which increased with the increase in light intensity.<br />
Flowering started in the end <strong>of</strong> the May and continued for 2 months with<br />
maximum flowering at the end <strong>of</strong> June and beginning <strong>of</strong> July. Lack <strong>of</strong> sunlight<br />
was found to delay the flowering. Seed production was found to be dependent<br />
upon the seasonal weather conditions; the first mature seeds were recorded at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> July, but may last through October. Seed maturation was followed<br />
by senescence <strong>of</strong> the plant, which ultimately falls to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the habitat.<br />
Unfavourable conditions for the development <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum can result in<br />
reduced size, vitality and seed production. During favourable conditions<br />
increase in the number <strong>of</strong> plants in the population resulted in an increase in<br />
plant height and a decrease in the number <strong>of</strong> fruits per plant.<br />
Spencer and Leikic (1974) reported flowering in early summer which<br />
continues for several months. Flowering in Myriophyllum dicoccum occurs<br />
from August to September and fruiting from September to October, in M.<br />
ussuriense flowering occur from April to September and fruit formation starts<br />
in the month <strong>of</strong> July and continues up to November and in M. aquaticum<br />
flowering occurs in May at low altitudes to July at high attitudes and fruit<br />
formation was not observed. Nathan et al., (1993) reported that flowering in M.<br />
spicatum occurs during April and May and fruit formation occurs from May to<br />
November. Aiken et al., (1979) stated that M. spicatum blooms during July to<br />
September and fruit matures late in September.<br />
Page 48
2.4: Sexual Reproduction<br />
Reproduction in aquatic angiosperms occurs by both sexual and asexual<br />
means (Wade, 1990). Sexual reproduction (the chief source <strong>of</strong> hereditary<br />
variation via genetic recombination) in plants is considered to be advantageous<br />
in changing heterogeneous environments, and asexual reproduction (which<br />
perpetuates genetic uniformity) is considered to be more successful in stable or<br />
uniform habitats (Grant, 1981, Williams, 1975). Sexual reproduction is a<br />
primary mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction for terrestrial ancestors <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants. A shift<br />
from sexual to asexual (vegetative) reproduction is <strong>of</strong>ten associated with the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants, a complete absence <strong>of</strong> flowering and seed set is<br />
found in only a few aquatic species (Philbrick and Les, 1996). The majority <strong>of</strong><br />
aquatic angiosperms retain the ability to flower and seed set (Sculthrope,<br />
1967). Cook (1987) pointed out that <strong>of</strong> the 12 most notorious aquatic invaders,<br />
only one Trapa natans relies on sexual processes for its reproduction and<br />
success. Out <strong>of</strong> the remaining 11 species, only Myriophyllum spicatum, Najas<br />
minor and Pistia stratiotes regularly develop seed in their native and adventive<br />
ranges. Salvinia molesta is a sterile hybrid, and the rest have well developed<br />
self-incompatibility mechanisms. The retention <strong>of</strong> sexual reproduction by<br />
angiosperms in aquatic conditions represents a difficult evolutionary transition<br />
but floral systems <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants are generally conservative and reflect their<br />
terrestrial heritage (Philbrick and Les, 1996). The aquatic plants betray their<br />
terrestrial ancestors in their sexual phase with the greatest clearity (Sculthrope,<br />
1967).<br />
Sexual reproduction <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants departs from that <strong>of</strong> terrestrial<br />
plants. When flowers are adapted to aerial life, aquatic plants have to raise their<br />
inflorescence axis well above the water level, if cross pollination is to be<br />
secured (Arber, 1920). This is not always completely achieved. In Ranunculus<br />
penicillatus var. calcareus, the stem maintaining the flowers above the water<br />
are considerably more fragile than the normal submerged and vegetative ones<br />
and they are easily damaged and lost (Cook, 1966; Dawson, 1980). Arber<br />
Page 49
(1920) reports that Ranunculus fluitans does not hold its peduncles very erect,<br />
and <strong>of</strong>ten suffers the inundation <strong>of</strong> its flowers and thus fails to set seeds while<br />
Ranunculus trichopyllus <strong>of</strong>ten opens its flowers under the water surface, but it<br />
seems that it cannot set seeds under these conditions. It was, however,<br />
considered that the failure in setting ripe fruits in this species usually was not<br />
due to inundation, but mainly to genetic reasons. In hybrid populations <strong>of</strong><br />
Ranunculus fluitans the abortion <strong>of</strong> the anthers and abnormal pollen might be<br />
responsible for the seed sterility <strong>of</strong> the plants (Cook, 1966; Turala-Szybowska,<br />
1977); this feature is also observed in Ranunculus pencillatus (Turala, 1969,<br />
1970; Webster, 1986, 1988). The production <strong>of</strong> reproductive structures above<br />
the water surface can increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> herbivory and mechanical<br />
damage (Spencer and Bows, 1990).<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum reproduces sexually by forming large number <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds (Cook, 1987). Sexual reproduction appears unimportant in shaping<br />
population structure <strong>of</strong> Eurasian water milfoil (M. spicatum) in Minnesota<br />
(Furnier and Mustaphi, 1992); however, significant germination was observed<br />
in Lake George in New York State (Hartleb et al., 1993).<br />
2.4.1: Floral Organization<br />
The sexual stage <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum starts with the inflorescence which is a<br />
terminal, cylindrical, naked, interrupted spike, indeterminate in development<br />
and <strong>of</strong>ten very red (Patten, 1956). All flowers in the spike are whorled, with 4<br />
flowers in each whorl. Male flowers are on upper side <strong>of</strong> the spike with pinkish<br />
petals, female flowers on lower side without perianth. (Aiken et al., 1979). The<br />
inflorescence is a terminal spike and is born above the water surface; flowers<br />
are small and inconspicuous (Smith and Barko, 1990). The upper flowers on a<br />
spike are staminate and lower pistillate, the transition between appearing abrupt<br />
(Knupp, 1911). The entire spike may sometimes be staminate or pistillate -<br />
dioecious, considered to be a vestigial condition <strong>of</strong> a completely<br />
hermaphroditic phylogenetic origin <strong>of</strong> the group (Knupp, 1911 and Hagi,<br />
1926). Hagi (1926) reported that surrounding aqueous medium is the direct<br />
Page 50
cause <strong>of</strong> repression <strong>of</strong> the male sex in the lower flowers. Each flower is sessile<br />
in the axil <strong>of</strong> a strong bract, two more delicate bracteoles are also located at the<br />
base <strong>of</strong> each flower, these three bracts entirely enclose and protect the young<br />
flower and gradually open out as the spike elongates and the flowers mature,<br />
the flowers are verticillate in fours, each whorl being rotated about 45 degrees<br />
from the adjacent ones, so whorls are in two ranks and this rotation produces<br />
the spiral arrangement characteristic <strong>of</strong> the spikes before elongation (Patten,<br />
1956). The first report <strong>of</strong> flowering in the field is the appearance <strong>of</strong> small,<br />
green, compressed spikes at the stem apices, covered at least partially by the<br />
last leaves produced by the vegetative apex (Patten, 1956). This is followed by<br />
elongation <strong>of</strong> spike axis, elevation <strong>of</strong> the spike out <strong>of</strong> the water, pollination and<br />
resubmergence. The spike axis becomes thicker than the normal vegetative<br />
stem and blooming occurs just above the water surface regardless <strong>of</strong> the depth<br />
(Vaucher, 1841). Aiken (1981) reports that spike axis becomes almost double<br />
in width than the normal vegetative stem.<br />
2.4.2: Pollen morphology, Pollination system and Breeding behaviour<br />
Pollination has been <strong>of</strong> interest since ancient times. (Cox, 1988).<br />
Theophrastas (1976) deduced that pollen is a desiccant which prevents the<br />
rotting <strong>of</strong> developing fruits and pointed out the necessity <strong>of</strong> pollen to fruit<br />
formation. Pollen is a vital link between each generation <strong>of</strong> flowering plants,<br />
houses the male gametes and is <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ound importance in the classification<br />
and taxonomy <strong>of</strong> angiosperms (Ducker and Knox, 1985).<br />
There is a correlation between pollen morphology and pollination<br />
mechanism (Van Vierssen et al., 1982; Tanaka et al., 2004). A definite<br />
relationship is exhibited between pollen characters and pollination types<br />
especially in entomophily and anemophily. Pollen grains <strong>of</strong> entomophilous taxa<br />
are characterized by compound apertures i.e. 3-colporate, prolate-spheroidal<br />
shape, generally large, thick walled, sticky and with reticulate tectum, while<br />
pollen grains <strong>of</strong> anemophilous taxa are with simple apertures i.e. monoporate,<br />
Page 51
spheroidal, small thin walled, dry and with scabrate-areolate tectum (Shuang-<br />
Quan et al., 2001; Parveen et al., 1994).<br />
Underwater pollination systems in angiosperms are derived from aerial<br />
floral systems (Philbrick and Les, 1996). Exine reduction or complete exine<br />
loss appears to be an essential component in the evolution <strong>of</strong> hydrophily<br />
(Philbrick, 1991). This has been documented in hydrophilous members <strong>of</strong><br />
Hydrocharitaceae (Pettitt, 1981). There is a correlation between the variation in<br />
the exine and pollination mechanism (Tanaka et al., 2004). Pollen grains <strong>of</strong><br />
hydrophilous taxa are spheroidal non-aperturate coarsely reticulate tectum with<br />
thin exine. The thin elastic exine and reduced or omniapertures (non-aperture)<br />
are considered characters <strong>of</strong> hydrophilous taxa (Punt, 1986).<br />
Many authors have studies the pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> some species <strong>of</strong><br />
aquatic families such as Lemnaceae (Aiken, 1978), Potamogetonaceae<br />
(Parveen, 1999), Hydrocharitaceae (Takahashi, 1994; Tanaka et al., 2004),<br />
Podostemaceae (Obson et al., 2000), Haloragaceae (Labdolt, 1986; Sorsa,<br />
1988), Najadaceae (Shuang-Quan, 2001), Ceratophyllaceae (Takahashi,1995),<br />
Rubbiaceae (Lacroix and Kemp, 1997; Callitrichaceae (Cooper et al., 2000)<br />
and Nymphaceae (Shiga and Kadono, 2007).<br />
Alwadie (2008) examined pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> six species <strong>of</strong> aquatic<br />
angiosperms from Saudi Arabia belonging to five genera distributed in five<br />
families using both light and scanning electron microcopy. These species<br />
include Myriophyllum spicatum, Elodea canadensis, Potamogeton crispus, P.<br />
pectinatus and Ruppia maritima. The pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are<br />
generally radially symmetrical, isopolar, sub-oblate to oblate, 4-zonocolpate,<br />
colpi short, 4-5 colpate, tectum scabrate-punctate. Exine thick, sexine thicker<br />
than nexine. Parveen (1999) examined the pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> 16 species <strong>of</strong><br />
aquatic angiosperms in 14 families from Karachi using light and scanning<br />
electron microscope including Myriophyllum verticillatum. The Pollen grains<br />
<strong>of</strong> aquatic families are mostly apolar or isopolar and rarely heteropolar. The<br />
pollen shape is commonly spheroidal, rarely boat shaped (Nymphaea stellate).<br />
Page 52
However in the family Juncaceae and in the single species <strong>of</strong> Typhaceae<br />
(Typha elephantina) pollen grains are united in tetrads. Exine sculpturing is<br />
also extremely varied, ranging from reticulate to regulate, fossulate, scabrate or<br />
olate. Apertures are mostly colpate or porate. However in few taxa non-<br />
aperturate pollen are also found (Potamogeton, Juncus) rarely tricolporate as in<br />
Enhydra fluctuans. Pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. verticillatum are radially symmetrical,<br />
isopolar, sub-oblate, 4-5 colpate, colpi short. Exine thick, sexine thicker than<br />
nexine. Tectum scabrate-punctate, scabrae fine.<br />
The flowers <strong>of</strong> most aquatic angiosperms must be elevated above the<br />
water in order for pollination to occur by entomophily (pollination by insects)<br />
and anemophily (by wind), very rarely pollen transfer occur underwater<br />
(hydrophily) (Riemer, 1984). The transport and capture <strong>of</strong> pollen in 20% <strong>of</strong> all<br />
angiosperm families occurs in air and water (Ackerman, 2000). Delpino (1871)<br />
recognized that pollen transfer could take place without animals and divided<br />
abiotic pollination into wind (anemophily) and water pollination (hydrophily).<br />
Whereas anemophily occurs in the air, hydrophily is further divided into<br />
epihydrophily (surface pollination) and hypohydrophily (underwater<br />
pollination) (Knuth, 1906). Additional distinctions can be made for both<br />
epihydrophily and hypohydrophily, especially with respect to whether pollen<br />
and stigmas are wet (Les et al., 1997). The diversity in abiotic pollination<br />
reflects the fact that anemophily and hydrophily have evolved many times in<br />
terrestrial and aquatic plants (Arber, 1920; Sculthrope, 1967; Les et al, 1997;<br />
Niklas, 1997; Raven et al., 1999). Anemophily is much more common than<br />
hydrophily, 98% <strong>of</strong> the plants that pollinate abiotically are pollinated by wind<br />
(Faegri and Vander Pigl, 1979). Some <strong>of</strong> the earliest seed plants were<br />
pollinated by wind (Niklas,1997).<br />
Cook (1988) reported that in family Haloragaceae, genus Haloragis,<br />
Myriophyllum, Laurembergia, Prosperpinaca and Vinkia have aquatic species,<br />
all <strong>of</strong> which are well adapted to wind pollination. All have flowers with<br />
reduced petals and <strong>of</strong>ten caducous perianths and dry, powdery pollen liberated<br />
Page 53
from long filamented anthers. There is a trend from bisexual to unisexual<br />
flowers culminating in dioecy. Cook (1996) reported the occurence <strong>of</strong><br />
anemophily in different genera <strong>of</strong> family Haloragaceae including<br />
Myriophyllum. Patten (1956) reported that in Myriophyllum spicatum when the<br />
spikes emerge they exhibit protogynous dichogamy: The stigmas ripening well<br />
in advance <strong>of</strong> the stamens, thereby favouring cross-pollination, soon after, the<br />
deciduous petals abscise forecasting the ripening <strong>of</strong> the stamens. The mode <strong>of</strong><br />
pollination is the subject <strong>of</strong> diverse opinions and occurs when the spikes project<br />
out <strong>of</strong> the water and that the hydrophilous pollination does not occur in M.<br />
spicatum. This is substantiated by the observation that lowermost carpels on<br />
some inflorescences are <strong>of</strong>ten submerged, such submerged carpels have always<br />
been observed to abort instead <strong>of</strong> developing into mature achenes. Many spikes<br />
lean at an angle away from the perpendicular out <strong>of</strong> the water causing<br />
submergence <strong>of</strong> some carpels <strong>of</strong> a whorl while the others remain exposed to the<br />
atmosphere. The submerged carpels abort and the emersed ones develop into<br />
mature seeds at the same node giving an evidence <strong>of</strong> wind-pollination. It was<br />
also reported by him that self-pollination in M. spicatum is generally ruled out<br />
with the following exception. A single plant usually possesses a number <strong>of</strong><br />
flowering stems each <strong>of</strong> which has lateral branches which also flower. It<br />
happens that the main stems bloom before the laterals so that pollen from the<br />
central spike can ripe at the same time the lateral pistils are receptive. Even<br />
here, though, the chances for cross-pollination would be still greater due to the<br />
greater abundance <strong>of</strong> pollen freed from other sources. Patten pointed out that<br />
the staminate parts <strong>of</strong> the spike decline, <strong>of</strong>ten abscising completely and the<br />
pistillate portion with the staminate remnant disappears beneath the surface,<br />
along with a decrease in the thickness <strong>of</strong> the spike axis and develop into the<br />
mature achenes. The spikes slowly disintegrate until they are sufficiently rotted<br />
for the achenes to drop with the aid <strong>of</strong> wave action.<br />
Arber (1920) states that a certain number <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants have given up<br />
insect-pollination and taken to anemophily, along with simplification <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Page 54
flower and Myriophyllum is one such genus as evidenced by the structural<br />
adaptation <strong>of</strong> long anthers swinging on flexible filaments. Hagi (1926) also<br />
favoured wind-pollination. Ludwig (1881) cited wind pollination although he<br />
reported that whole populations <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum verticillatum flowers<br />
underwater. Knuth (1906) reported anemophily as well as hydrophily for M.<br />
spicatum. Hagi (1926) reported hydrophily in M. verticillatum. Vaucher (1841)<br />
overlooking the protogynous nature <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum stated that pollen falls out<br />
<strong>of</strong> the anthers directly on the stigmas below and hence pollination occurs.<br />
Knupp (1911) is in favour <strong>of</strong> hydrophily for M. spicatum.<br />
2.4.3: Pollen-Ovule Ratio<br />
The pollen-ovule ratio (P/O) is the ratio <strong>of</strong> pollen grains produced per<br />
ovule. Cruden (1977) reported that cleistogamous flowers should have the<br />
lowest pollen to ovule ratio‘s and that autogamous flowers will have lower<br />
pollen to ovule ratio‘s than xenogamous flowers i.e., pollen to ovule ratio‘s are<br />
correlated with breeding systems. The more efficient the transfer <strong>of</strong> pollen, the<br />
lower the pollen to ovule ratios should be. The evolutionary shift from<br />
xenogamy (outcrossing) to autogamy (selfing) has been mediated through<br />
decreased flower size and alterations in floral morphology which reduce the<br />
energetic cost per flower and facilitate self pollination (Ornduff, 1969).<br />
Flowers <strong>of</strong> self-incompatible and other xenogamous taxa produce more pollen<br />
grains than closely related self-compatible and/or autogamous taxa (Arroyo,<br />
1973; Baker, 1967; Cruden, 1973; Gibbs et al., 1975; Lloyd, 1965; Vries,<br />
1974).<br />
Pollen grain number has to be positively related to ovule number. This<br />
relationship was observed across families (Cruden and Miller-Ward, 1981) and<br />
within families (Small, 1988; Plitman and Levin, 1990; Kirk, 1993; Lopez et<br />
al., 1999). Variation in Pollen grain and/or ovule number may occur within<br />
individuals and within or among populations, or may be more or less constant<br />
(Arnold, 1982; Devlin, 1989). In homoecious species (species with<br />
hermaphroditic flowers), both pollen and ovule number may vary within a plant<br />
Page 55
during the flowering season (Cruden and Lloyed, 1995) and there is no change<br />
in the pollen to ovule ratio (Vasek et al., 1987). Some <strong>of</strong> the seasonal variation<br />
in pollen grain and ovule number may reflect dichogamy. In populations <strong>of</strong><br />
protoandrous plants or those with protoandrous flowers the pollen from the first<br />
flowers to open will not reach a stigma and the plants suffer a loss in<br />
reproductive success through male function. Brunet and Charlesworth (1995)<br />
suggested that this might result in plants investing less in male function in the<br />
first opening flowers and relatively more in female function. Protogyny should<br />
produce the opposite pattern.<br />
Pollen grain number and/or ovule number may vary among populations<br />
<strong>of</strong> a species. Such variation may be very small and no one has demonstrated a<br />
selective basis for it (Affre et al., 1995; Cruden, 1977; Diaz lifante, 1996;<br />
Ramsey et al., 1994, Vuille, 1988). Such variation may reflect sampling error<br />
or have an environmental basis. In some species there was substantial variation<br />
among populations that reflected difference in breeding system (Affre et al.,<br />
1995; Dahl, 1989; Thomas and Murray; 1981). There may be substantial<br />
difference in pollen to ovule ratio among populations with the same breeding<br />
system that may reflect pollination efficiency (Webb, 1994).<br />
A negative relationship between pollen grain number and size is well<br />
documented (Cruden, 1977; Dulberger and Ornduff, 1980; Cruden and Miller-<br />
ward, 1981; Small, 1988; Mione and Anderson, 1992; Knudsen and Olesen,<br />
1993; Lopez et al., 1999). Many attribute the relationship to a simple trade-<strong>of</strong>f<br />
between number and size (Charnov, 1982).<br />
There is a relationship between pollen number and duration <strong>of</strong> stigma<br />
receptivity. The number <strong>of</strong> pollen grains recieved by the stigma is increased by<br />
the length <strong>of</strong> time it is receptive. Differences in the period <strong>of</strong> receptivity may<br />
reflect ecological and/or physiological factors or genetic differences among<br />
populations and in many species unpollinated stigmas remain receptive longer<br />
than pollinated stigmas (Devlin and Stephenson, 1984; Richardson and<br />
Stephenson, 1989). The pollen to ovule ratios <strong>of</strong> plants whose pollen is<br />
Page 56
dispersed in tetrads, polyads and pollinia has lower pollen-ovule ratio than<br />
those dispersed as monads (Cruden, 1977, 1997). The pollen to ovule ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
species with secondary pollen presentation are lower than those <strong>of</strong> species with<br />
primary pollen presentation (Yeo, 1993) and the species that <strong>of</strong>fer only pollen<br />
as a reward produce more pollen per ovule than those that provide nectar as a<br />
reward (Vogel, 1978; Pellmyr, 1985, 1986).<br />
There is a strong correlation between pollen to ovule ratio and breeding<br />
system. Pollen to ovule ratio decreases from obligate xenogamous to<br />
facultative xenogamous to autogamous species. This holds within species<br />
(Dahl, 1989; Affre et al., 1995; and Hannen and Prucher, 1996), generas (Spira,<br />
1980; Vuille, 1987; Feliner, 1991; Sharma et al., 1992) and families (Schlising<br />
et al., 1980; Short, 1981; Webb, 1984; Lawrence, 1985; Preston, 1986; Vasek<br />
et al., 1987; Plitman and Levin, 1990; Feliner, 1991). Cruden (2000) reported<br />
that homoecious species have lower pollen to ovule ratio‘s than those with<br />
other sexual systems and that the pollen to ovule ratio‘s <strong>of</strong> wind-pollinated<br />
species are higher than those <strong>of</strong> animal pollinated species with the same<br />
breeding system .Wind pollinated, xenogamous plants produce large numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> pollen grains (Pohl, 1937; Proctor and Yeo, 1972), because most flowers<br />
have just a single ovule their pollen to ovule ratio‘s should be high relative to<br />
those <strong>of</strong> animal pollinated plants.<br />
Philbrick and Anderson (1987) examined the pollen-ovule ratio in genus<br />
Potamogeton. All the ten Potamogeton species studied with aerial flowers are<br />
xenogamous. Ratios in the aerial flowered species extended from a low <strong>of</strong><br />
about 3000 grains per ovule in P. robbinsii to a mean high <strong>of</strong> about 40,000 in<br />
P. zosteriformis. Species with aerial and submerged flowers and those with<br />
regularly submerged flowers possess significantly lower pollen to ovule ratios<br />
than aerial-flowered species.<br />
2.4.4: Fruit and Seed Biology<br />
The fruit <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum is called as achene and seed as nutlet (Patten,<br />
1955), where as fruit as nut which breaks at maturity into two or four<br />
Page 57
individual seeds called as nutlets (Orchard, 1986). Fruit is called as Schizocarp<br />
with 4 longitudinal ridges where it splits into 4 one seeded nutlets ( Aiken and<br />
Mc Neilt, 1980 ; Aiken, 1981).<br />
Although seed germination <strong>of</strong> terrestrial species has been extensively<br />
studied, few studies have examined submerged macrophytes (Coble and Vance,<br />
1987; Hartleb et al., 1993; Lal and Gopal, 1993; Baskin and Baskin, 1988; Ke<br />
and Li, 2006; Hay et al., 2008; Jarris and Moore, 2008). This may be due to the<br />
fact that most submerged macrophytes show dominant clonal reproduction, and<br />
their seeds are rarely observed to grow into mature plants in nature. However,<br />
seeds <strong>of</strong> submerged macrophytes have been found to play to important roles in<br />
the establishment <strong>of</strong> new genotypes in existing populations (Kimber et al.,<br />
1995; McFarland, 2006), movement <strong>of</strong> populations into new regions (Arnold et<br />
al., 2000; Figuerola and Green, 2002; Harwell and Orth, 2002) and<br />
reestablishment <strong>of</strong> populations after episodic declines (McMillan & Jewelt-<br />
Smith, 1988; Titus and Hoover, 1991; Parveen et al., 1995; Jarvis and Moore,<br />
2008). A recent study on the genetic pattern <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton malaianus<br />
suggested that bird mediated seed dispersal could greatly influence gene<br />
movements among lakes (Chen et al., 2009).<br />
Germination requirements and dormancy characteristics <strong>of</strong> species are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be adaptations to the particular habitats where the species<br />
occur (Angevine and Chabot, 1979; Meyer et al., 1990). Germination at the<br />
right time and in the right place is important to determine the probability <strong>of</strong> a<br />
seedling surviving to maturity (Thompson, 1973). Previous studies have<br />
indicated that temperature (Hartleb et al., 1993; Ke and Li, 2006; Hay et al.,<br />
2008; Jarvis and Moore, 2008) and light (Coble and Vance, 1987; Lal and<br />
Gopal, 1993) are important ecological triggers in the seed germination <strong>of</strong><br />
submerged species.<br />
Xiao et al., (2010) examined the effect <strong>of</strong> temperature, water level and<br />
burial depth on seed germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum and Potamogeton<br />
malaianus. There was no significant difference in final germination <strong>of</strong> M.<br />
Page 58
spicatum among water level treatments, but P. malaianus germinations at 1cm<br />
and 12 cm water levels where better than at 0 cm water level. Little to no<br />
germination was observed for either species at the temperature <strong>of</strong> 10 0 C but at<br />
15 0 C germination increased significantly to 66.3-70.6% for M. spicatum and<br />
to 29.4 -48.1% for P. malaianus under all three water level treatments.<br />
Increasing temperature from 15-30 0 C had no significant effect on final<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum, but enhanced significantly the germination <strong>of</strong> P.<br />
malaianus. The germination percentage <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum was 71.3% at 0 cm<br />
burial depth, but decreased to 5.0% and to 2.5% at depths <strong>of</strong> 1cm and 2cm<br />
respectively, where as germination percentage <strong>of</strong> P. malaianus were 40%,<br />
23.8%, 12.5%, 7.5% and 1.3% at depths <strong>of</strong> 0cm, 1cm, 2cm, 3cm, and 5cm<br />
respectively. Analysis <strong>of</strong> mean time to germination revealed that M. spicatum<br />
is a faster germinator relative to P. malaianus.<br />
Coble and Vance (1987) examined the affect <strong>of</strong> light quality on the<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum. Under favourable conditions, 92.2%<br />
germination rate was observed. The effect <strong>of</strong> white, red (700 and 725 nm),<br />
green (520 nm), and blue (445nm) light as well as darkness on the germination<br />
was studied. As many as 97% <strong>of</strong> the seeds germinated under red light (725nm).<br />
Blue light significantly inhibited germination and almost no seeds germinated<br />
in the darkness. The mean percent germination ranged from 77.8% to 97.2%<br />
for those seeds exposed to light wavelength above 500nm.Seeds exposed to<br />
light <strong>of</strong> 445nm and those left in the dark had lower germination rates <strong>of</strong> 30.5%<br />
and 5.6% respectively. These studies suggest that seed germination can be<br />
inhibited by an extreme increase or decrease in light intensity. The extremely<br />
high germination rate in the red light and inhibition <strong>of</strong> germination in the blue<br />
light both indicate the presence <strong>of</strong> an active Phytochrome system (Hartmann,<br />
1966; Rollin and Maignan, 1966; Rollin, 1970; Malcoste et al., 1972; Mitrakos<br />
and Shropshire, 1972).<br />
Standifer and Madsen (1997) studied the effect <strong>of</strong> drying period on the<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil seeds. The seeds were subjected to the<br />
Page 59
drying treatment for different periods. Maximum percent germination (81.6%)<br />
was observed in seeds <strong>of</strong> the control treatment while seeds exposed to the 36<br />
week drying period demonstrated the lowest rate <strong>of</strong> germination (53%). There<br />
is significant downward trend in germination rates as drying period increases.<br />
However a substantial percentage <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil seeds remain viable<br />
following a drying period <strong>of</strong> up to 36 weeks. The viability <strong>of</strong> these seeds<br />
following an extensive drying period demonstrates the resilience <strong>of</strong> these seeds<br />
to desiccation and suggests a potential role for reproduction.<br />
Patten (1955) studied the seed germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum by<br />
subjecting the seeds to different conditioning treatments. The seeds <strong>of</strong> M.<br />
spicatum doesn‘t germinate readily early in the first year unless exposed to<br />
certain conditioning treatments. There is a necessity for a period <strong>of</strong> after-<br />
ripening which increases the ability <strong>of</strong> seeds to germinate. Treatments which<br />
were found to enhance after-ripening, and hence germination, in decreasing<br />
order <strong>of</strong> effectiveness are:-<br />
1. Partial removal <strong>of</strong> the stony endocarp<br />
2. Scarification<br />
3. Freezing<br />
4. Alternate freezing and drying<br />
5. Drying<br />
6. Exposure to relatively high H-ion and OH-ion concentrations<br />
7. Prolonged exposure to exposure to low temperature<br />
The pericarps are inhibitory to germination. The conditioning treatments<br />
presumably increases germination through some action on pericarps. There is a<br />
minimum temperature below which germination does not occur normally.<br />
There is a prompt germination when water warms in the spring to this<br />
temperature. Cooling during the winter and possible freezing condition the<br />
seeds for such a spring eruption.<br />
Madsen and Boylen (1989) studied the seed germination <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum<br />
from an oligotrophic and eutrophic lake. The seeds <strong>of</strong> the eutrophic lake show<br />
Page 60
mean germination <strong>of</strong> 69% and the seeds <strong>of</strong> oligotrophic lake showed lower<br />
germination rates and the mean germination <strong>of</strong> 41% under light conditions. In<br />
oligotrophic lake the seeds not appear sufficient to contribute to the spread <strong>of</strong><br />
the population due to the low numbers <strong>of</strong> seed set and low rate <strong>of</strong> germination<br />
while as in eutrophic lake there is a potential for seeds to contribute to annual<br />
propagation and expansion <strong>of</strong> the population due to relatively high seed set<br />
percentages and germination rates.<br />
Hartleb et al., (1993) reported that M. spicatum require high temperature<br />
(above 14 0 C) for germination. Light is not considered as a limiting factor, but<br />
increased sedimentation can greatly suppress germination.<br />
Aiken et al., (1979) examined that flowering and seed production are<br />
common in M. spicatum, but the seeds exhibit prolonged dormancy and their<br />
germination is erratic. Even in areas where the plant is common, no seedlings<br />
have been found (Bates et al., 1985).<br />
Guppy (1897) reported that with proper scarification up to 85% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
seeds germinate, but under natural conditions seeds may actually have their<br />
germination delayed until at least their second spring. Seedling establishment<br />
appears to be a particularly fragile stage in the life cycle (Patten, 1956). Young<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil produced on an average 112 seeds per<br />
stalk. Despite the high seed production, the germination <strong>of</strong> seeds is not a<br />
significant factor in reproduction (Washington State Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology,<br />
2003).<br />
2.5: Asexual Reproduction<br />
Asexual reproduction includes both seed production without fertilization<br />
(agamospermy) and vegetative reproduction (Philbrick and Les, 1996). The<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> agamospermy among aquatic plants is poorly understood. Vegetative<br />
reproduction is <strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be the dominant mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in<br />
water plants (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975). The ability to reproduce<br />
vegetatively is ubiquitous among aquatic species, regardless <strong>of</strong> their taxonomic<br />
affiliation (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993; Les and<br />
Page 61
Philbrick, 1993). Abrahamson (1980) considered that genetically identical<br />
<strong>of</strong>fsprings produced through the process <strong>of</strong> the vegetative reproduction make<br />
this process similar to the growth than to the reproduction, and ramets<br />
(vegetatively produced progeny) are not always genetically identical to the<br />
parent.<br />
Aquatic plants are more common proportionally in monocots than dicots<br />
(Les and Schneider, 1995). This correlation suggests that clonal growth<br />
contribute to the evolution <strong>of</strong> aquatic species. Triffney and Niklas (1985)<br />
postulated that the greater proportion <strong>of</strong> aquatic monocots is associated with<br />
high incidence <strong>of</strong> rhizomatous growth (i.e., by horizontal underground stems)<br />
in monocots. In contrast, fever dicots are rhizomatous (Grace, 1993).<br />
Most aquatic species show prolific clonal propagation or perennation,<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten in association with limited sexual reproduction (Les, 1988; Barrett et al.,<br />
1993). Clonal growth and propagation has been assumed to be more abundant<br />
in aquatic habitats than in terrestrial ones (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975;<br />
Grace, 1993; Duarte et al., 1994). The wide spread occurrence <strong>of</strong> clonality<br />
among aquatic plants serves the primary function <strong>of</strong> increasing genet survival<br />
under conditions that severely inhabit or restrict the success <strong>of</strong> sexual<br />
reproduction (Sculthrope, 1967; Grace, 1993). These conditions include<br />
decreased pollination success, particularly for submerged species (Duarte et al.,<br />
1994); unstable ecological conditions for seed production, maturation,<br />
germination and seedling success arising from small population size <strong>of</strong> many<br />
aquatic habitats (Barrett et al., 1993; Les and Philbrick, 1993). Clonal spread<br />
may contribute to the limited success <strong>of</strong> sexual reproduction by reducing<br />
pollination success in self-incompatible species (Charpentier et al., 2000).<br />
Perennial water plants posses many devices for vegetative reproduction,<br />
including corms, rhizomes, stolens, tubers and turions (Sculthrope, 1967;<br />
Hutchinson, 1975; Grace, 1993; Vierssen, 1993). Annual aquatic plant genera<br />
reproduce vegetatively by extensive lateral growth, fragmentation or the<br />
occasional production <strong>of</strong> turions (Agami et al., 1986; Sculthrope, 1967). The<br />
Page 62
most notable vegetative propagule in aquatic plants is the turion, the well<br />
insulated turions referred to as winter buds; enable the plans to overcome the<br />
stressful winter season (Vierssen, 1993). Turions are compact, club shaped<br />
apices that become detached as the parent shoot system decays and either float<br />
or sink to the bottom and each turion is able to develop into a new plant in the<br />
next spring (Barret-Segretain, 1996). Turions have been reported in many<br />
macrophytic species such as Utricularia vulgaris, Hydrilla verticillata, Lemna<br />
minor, L. trisulca, Spirodela polyrhiza, Hydrocharis morsusranae and many<br />
Potamogeton species (Arber, 1920; Jacobs, 1947; Patten, 1956; Aiken and<br />
Walz, 1979; Sastroutomo, 1981; Klaine and Ward, 1984; Van Wijk and<br />
Trompenaars, 1985; Brux et al., 1987; Dudley, 1987; Spencer and Ksander,<br />
1991; wiegleb et al., 1991).<br />
Fragments play an important role in the vegetative reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />
aquatic plants, with each individual node <strong>of</strong>ten capable <strong>of</strong> regeneration (Grier,<br />
1920). The fragments are unspecialized organs <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction. Any<br />
fragment <strong>of</strong> a shoot <strong>of</strong> Callitriche containing meristematic tissue is able to<br />
regenerate a new plant (Barret-Segretain, 1996). In Hydrilla verticillata, a few<br />
single node fragments produce new roots and shoots, but every three-node<br />
fragment is able to initiate a new plant (Langeland and Sutton, 1980). Brock et<br />
al., (1989) mentioned that detached shoots <strong>of</strong> Hottonia palustris can settle<br />
successfully on favourable substrates and give rise to new plants.<br />
Many aquatic plants have specialized vegetative organs <strong>of</strong> perennation<br />
and these organs are essential for multiplication and the infestation <strong>of</strong> new<br />
areas. These vegetative organs include rhizomes, runners or stolons and tubers.<br />
The rhizomes <strong>of</strong> Hippuris vulgaris, Scirpus lacustris, Nuphar lutea, Nymphea<br />
alba may be broken and each fragment bearing buds can develop into a new<br />
plant (Arber, 1920; Heslop-Harrison; 1955; Bartley and Spence, 1989; Smith et<br />
al., 1989). Runners or stolons are stems growing respectively just above the<br />
soil surface, or underground. Each runner or stolon travels away from the<br />
parent plant for some distance, its growing apex eventually becoming erect and<br />
Page 63
forms a new plant (Barrat-Segretain, 1996). Both runners and stolons are<br />
generally short lived and their prime function is undoubtedly as reproduction<br />
rather than perennation (Arber, 1920). Tubers are swollen portions <strong>of</strong> stems,<br />
rhizomes or roots that become independent because the connecting organs<br />
decay during the winter. In the spring adventitious roots and new leaves<br />
develop and each tuber can give rise to a new plant (Barrat-Segretain, 1996).<br />
Stem and rhizome tubers are very frequent. A single plant <strong>of</strong> Sagittaria<br />
sagittifolia may produce as many as ten tuber bearing stolons (Sculthrope,<br />
1967) and tubers <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton pectinatus are the most regularly occurring<br />
propagules <strong>of</strong> this species (Van Wijk, 1989).<br />
Vegetative reproduction is regarded as a more important mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />
population expansion than seed dispersal (Kimbel, 1982; Madsen and Boylen,<br />
1989; Madsen et al., 1988). In M. spicatum, asexual propagules provide a<br />
mechanism for short-term clonal reproduction with contiguous to intermediate<br />
distance dispersal (Madsen, 1991). Localized expansion is provided by stolon<br />
growth. Stems which form adventitious roots may establish new plants in the<br />
immediate area <strong>of</strong> the parent. Stolons located in the upper few centimeters <strong>of</strong><br />
the sediment, extend outward from the parent plant and produce new plants in<br />
the immediate area (Nichols and Shaw, 1986).<br />
Fragmentation is another type <strong>of</strong> vegetative clonal propagation which<br />
provides intermediate to long distance dispersal (Aiken et al., 1979). M.<br />
spicatum exhibit two types <strong>of</strong> fragmentation: aut<strong>of</strong>ragmentation and<br />
all<strong>of</strong>ragmentation. Aut<strong>of</strong>ragmentation is the self-induced abscission <strong>of</strong> shoot<br />
apices, which generally occur after peak biomass has been attained (Madsen et<br />
al., 1988; Madsen, 1997, Kimbel, 1982). Typically, one or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />
internodes located on the upper 15- 20cm <strong>of</strong> the apical tip develop roots and<br />
separation occurs shortly thereafter (Aiken et al., 1979). All<strong>of</strong>ragments are<br />
formed by the mechanical breakage <strong>of</strong> the parent stem by disturbances in the<br />
water, by boats, swimmers, animals and wave action. After separation from the<br />
parent plant, fragments usually descend to the sediment where they produce<br />
Page 64
oots, anchor and establish new plants, depending on the suitability <strong>of</strong> in-situ<br />
conditions. Aut<strong>of</strong>ragments which have higher total nonstructural carbohydrate<br />
content (TNC), have been shown to grow and over winter better than<br />
all<strong>of</strong>ragments (Kimbel, 1982).<br />
Smith et al., (1967) reported that the most efficient method <strong>of</strong><br />
reproduction and spread <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum is by fragmentation. Either large<br />
mature plant parts break <strong>of</strong>f or float to the new areas or very small portions (5-<br />
15 cm) <strong>of</strong> the plant tips are abscised, float for a period <strong>of</strong> time and then lose<br />
their buoyancy and settle to the lake bottom. Roots develop from the abscised<br />
tips which anchor the plant to the soil and under favourable conditions, new<br />
colonies are started. A single 5cm fragment may take root and grow 3.5m or<br />
more in one season. During the second year, multiple stems arise from the<br />
rooted base and may achieve lengths <strong>of</strong> 7 to 13m and their fragmentation<br />
continuous the spread <strong>of</strong> the plant. Patten (1956) reported that all new plant<br />
material <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum in Lake Musconetcong is provided by asexual means<br />
and the most efficient means <strong>of</strong> the reproduction was by the vegetative<br />
fragments. An excised or an abscised stem will vigorously sprout adventitious<br />
roots, bud pr<strong>of</strong>usely and increase in size. Such fragments float at first, but<br />
ultimately sink to a level where the roots are able to grasp the substratum.<br />
During late winter and early spring the plants develop a pr<strong>of</strong>usion <strong>of</strong> small<br />
axillary buds which differ from normal vegetative buds in their size and the<br />
ease with which they detach. Many species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum develop large and<br />
prominent winter buds known as turions (Arber, 1920; Hagi, 1926) or<br />
hibernaculae (Stover, 1951). Morphologically the small axillary buds <strong>of</strong> M.<br />
spicatum are not turions but physiologically they may be considered. These<br />
buds when detached, germinate into independent young plants. Turions have<br />
been reported in some species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum, such as M. verticillatum and<br />
M. exalbescens (Aiken and Walz, 1979, Arber, 1920). Arber (1920) stated that<br />
under normal conditions it is probably the lowering <strong>of</strong> water temperature in<br />
winter which induces turion formation. M. spicatum has been stated not to<br />
Page 65
produce turions (Hegi, 1926, Hulten, 1947; Patten, 1956). Sprouting from<br />
rhizomes is another mechanism for revegetation in the spring and effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> reproduction has been observed in mid April (Patten, 1956).<br />
Madsen et al., (1988) studied the relative importance <strong>of</strong> various<br />
methods <strong>of</strong> reproduction for the expansion <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil<br />
populations in Lake George, New York. The study indicated that local spread<br />
was largely dependent on stolons. Stoloniferous expansion was prominent<br />
during mid-summer followed by a decline later in the season. Fragmentation<br />
showed its prominence in September. The relative frequency <strong>of</strong> successful<br />
expansion by Stolons accounted for 87%, while by fragments accounted for<br />
13% only <strong>of</strong> the total expansion.<br />
Madsen and Smith (1997) studied the vegetative spread <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum<br />
in outdoor ponds at Lewisville, Texas. Colonies <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum expand via<br />
stolon and fragment production. Clonal expansion primarily by stolons<br />
provides Eurasian watermilfoil with a means <strong>of</strong> localized spread, while<br />
intermediate distance expansion is provided by fragment production. The<br />
predominant mechanism was stolon production. Stolon production accounted<br />
for 74% <strong>of</strong> the areal expansion while fragments accounted for 26%.<br />
Aiken et al., (1979) reported that in M. spicatum both fragments that<br />
are formed naturally and those formed if the plant in broken by man‘s activities<br />
are viable and have been responsible for the very rapid spread <strong>of</strong> this weed in<br />
North America. However Nicholos (1991) explained that the problem<br />
associated with fragments generated by harvesting does not survive and grow<br />
as good as naturally produced fragments (Kimbel, 1982). Fragmentation and<br />
winter buds are more important in reproduction. Winter buds are tight leaf<br />
clusters born near the end <strong>of</strong> the stem; they develop when water temperatures<br />
drop and day length shortens. The buds break<strong>of</strong>f and fall to the bottom, where<br />
they over winter. In the spring, the buds grow and elongate to form new plants<br />
(Washington State Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, 2003).<br />
Page 66
Asexual reproduction by fragmentation and winter bud formation in<br />
Myriophyllum has also been reported by other workers (Stanley, 1976; Cook,<br />
1987). The fragmentation has been reported either accidental or the result is<br />
abscission. Abscising fragments however, develop roots at the nodes before<br />
separation from the parent plant and float for a period before they sink and<br />
germinate into new plants. The over wintering buds or shoots <strong>of</strong> milfoil do not<br />
usually consist <strong>of</strong> compact, abortive leaf tissue generally associated with true<br />
turions.<br />
Page 67
CHAPTER-3<br />
MATERIAL & METHODS<br />
Page 68
3.1: Study Area<br />
The present study has been conducted in the valley <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> which is<br />
situated in the northern area <strong>of</strong> Indian subcontinent between 33 0 22' and 34 0 50'<br />
N latitudes and 73 0 55' and 73 0 33' E longitudes covering an area <strong>of</strong> about<br />
16,000 sq.km. The valley is surrounded by girdling chain <strong>of</strong> Himalayan<br />
mountains, namely the Pir Panjal in the South and the Great Himalayan range<br />
in the South East to North East and West. The climate <strong>of</strong> the valley is<br />
predominantly temperate and it changes to sub-alpine and alpine in the higher<br />
mountains. The valley <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> also called as paradise on earth has a<br />
network <strong>of</strong> rivers, glaciated streams, rivers as well as alpine, sub-alpine and<br />
valley lakes which add to its beauty. The alpine lakes are situated above the<br />
tree line and are fed mainly by glaciers. Their basins are rocky and are<br />
completely devoid <strong>of</strong> macrophytic vegetation and remain covered with ice from<br />
October to May. The sub- alpine lakes are situated in middle <strong>of</strong> the pine forest.<br />
The main water bodies <strong>of</strong> the valley include: Anchar lake, Dal Lake, Mansbal<br />
Lake, Wular Lake, Hokarsar and Hygam wetlands.<br />
The River Jhelum is the main river <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley. The major<br />
tributaries <strong>of</strong> this river system include; Lidder (Anantnag), Rambiara<br />
(Pulwama/ Kulgam), Sind (Ganderbal/ Srinagar) and pohru (Kupwara). In<br />
addition, there are many streams, irrigation channels, ponds and marshes which<br />
support various species <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants.<br />
3.2: Exploration and Collection <strong>of</strong> Plant Material<br />
Aquatic habitats in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley were extensively surveyed and<br />
explored for the collection <strong>of</strong> the plant material <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum. The<br />
sites were selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> the following criteria.<br />
a. Represent all types <strong>of</strong> aquatic habitats inhabited by Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum.<br />
b. Abundance <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
c. Trophic status and lentic and lotic water bodies.<br />
Page 69
The exact geographical location <strong>of</strong> the selected sites (Fig. 1) and their<br />
characteristic features are summarized in Table 3. The sites were surveyed<br />
from April 2009 to November 2010. The species was collected from different<br />
habitats.<br />
The specimens <strong>of</strong> the species from each population were collected<br />
prepared into vouchers using standard herbarium methodology (such as<br />
pressing, drying and preservation etc.) and deposited in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> University<br />
Herbarium (KASH) at the centre <strong>of</strong> plant taxonomy (COPT) <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Botany. The specimens <strong>of</strong> the species were initially identified with the help<br />
<strong>of</strong> available literature and described. The description <strong>of</strong> the species includes<br />
author citation and detailed morphological characterization. The species<br />
identification was got confirmed from Dr. Michael L. Moody <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong><br />
Plant Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Western Australia, Crawly, WA 6009 Australia.<br />
Table 3: Salient features <strong>of</strong> some <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley Sites selected for Studies<br />
on Myriophyllum spicatum L.<br />
Parameter Dal<br />
Lake<br />
(DL)<br />
Srinagar<br />
Nature Urban<br />
Valley<br />
Lake<br />
Location 3 km <strong>of</strong><br />
Srinagar<br />
city<br />
Altitude<br />
(m.a.s.l)<br />
Mansbal<br />
Lake<br />
(ML)<br />
Ganderbal<br />
Rural<br />
Valley<br />
Lake<br />
25 km<br />
NW <strong>of</strong><br />
Srinagar<br />
Hygam<br />
Wetlands(HW)<br />
Baramulla<br />
Rural Valley<br />
Wetland<br />
40 km NW <strong>of</strong><br />
Srinagar<br />
Shalimar<br />
Stream(SS)<br />
Srinagar<br />
Chanderhama<br />
Irrigation<br />
Canal(CIC)<br />
Baramulla<br />
Stream Irrigation<br />
canal<br />
8 Km NE<br />
<strong>of</strong> Srinagar<br />
35 Km NW<br />
<strong>of</strong> Srinagar<br />
1585 1584 1583 1585 1583<br />
Latitude<br />
(North) 34 0 6´ 34 0 15´ 34 0 7´<br />
Longitude<br />
(East)<br />
Area<br />
(Sq.Km)<br />
Maximum<br />
depth (m)<br />
34 0 7´ 34 0 7´<br />
74 0 8´ 74 0 41´ 74 0 14´ 74 0 10´ 74 0 14´<br />
11.5 2.8 - - -<br />
6 12.5 - - -<br />
Source: Surveyor General <strong>of</strong> India (SGI) Toposheet number =43J/Q.<br />
Page 70
1.<br />
2.<br />
3<br />
Hygam wetland<br />
Chanderhama<br />
irrigation canal<br />
3. Mansbal lake<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
Dal lake<br />
74 *<br />
Shalimar stream<br />
1<br />
2<br />
4<br />
5<br />
75 *<br />
Fig.1: Map <strong>of</strong> J&K showing different study sites.<br />
Page 71
3.3: Specie Morphology and Phenotypic Variability<br />
A Random sample <strong>of</strong> 25 plants <strong>of</strong> the Myriophyllum spicatum were<br />
drawn from each population (both running and standing waters) and the plants<br />
were analyzed for morphological features and phenotypic variability. The<br />
characters studied include number, shape and dimensions <strong>of</strong> leaves; petiole<br />
length <strong>of</strong> leaves; rhizome size and length; stem shape and inter node length;<br />
spike shape and length; peduncle length and number <strong>of</strong> flowers per spike;<br />
shape and dimensions <strong>of</strong> flowers, seed morphology and size and number <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds per spike and per flower. The variations were stastically analyzed; using<br />
SPSS 10. For microscopic studies Olympus stereo Zoom Trinocular<br />
microscope was used.<br />
3.4: Architectural Analysis<br />
For description <strong>of</strong> patch characteristics, terminology used by Wolfer<br />
(2004) was followed, according to which ‗plant‘ is defined as a complete unit<br />
<strong>of</strong> ramets connected by rhizomes originating from a single primary shoot.<br />
‗Ramet‘ is a single module <strong>of</strong> a clonal plant, consisting <strong>of</strong> shoots, rhizome and<br />
roots. ‗Spacer length‘ is the rhizome length between two consecutive shoots <strong>of</strong><br />
the same plant.<br />
In order to analyse the growth architecture <strong>of</strong> the species in various populations<br />
(both standing and as well as running) a random sample <strong>of</strong> 25 plants from each<br />
population was drawn and plants were analysed for spatio-temporal dynamics<br />
and plasticity <strong>of</strong> clonal architecture. The characters studied include: total length<br />
<strong>of</strong> rhizome, number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant, branching frequency, ramet length,<br />
spacer length and branching frequency <strong>of</strong> rhizome. The variation if any was<br />
analysed stastically.<br />
3.5: Phenology<br />
Healthy individuals <strong>of</strong> the species were selected from different<br />
populations, tagged and examined throughout the growing season to study the<br />
life history pattern and mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction operative in the species in relation<br />
to habitat condition <strong>of</strong> the study sites. The tagged individuals were monitored<br />
Page 72
to record data on various reproductive phenophases such as initiation <strong>of</strong><br />
budding, peduncle growth and anthesis, duration <strong>of</strong> flowering and seed<br />
formation. The axillary bud formation was examined regularly and their<br />
number was recorded to evaluate the importance <strong>of</strong> these propagules in the<br />
reproduction and fitness <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />
3.6: Reproductive Biology<br />
3.6.1: Floral Morphology, Development, Anthesis and Anther<br />
Dehiscence.<br />
A random sample <strong>of</strong> 25 inflorescences was used for studying the<br />
morphology <strong>of</strong> flower and inflorescence. The floral structure and<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> floral parts were determined by using magnifying lenses (10x<br />
and 20x) and olympus zoom stereo microscope. Observations on flower and<br />
inflorescence development and blossoming stage were made every day at<br />
regular time intervals. Observations on anthesis and anther dehiscence were<br />
also made at regular intervals, with the help <strong>of</strong> a 10x magnifying lens.<br />
3.6.2: Stigma Receptivity<br />
Stigma receptivity was checked by fixing stigmas <strong>of</strong> different ages in<br />
carnoy‘s fixative (3 alcohol: 1 acetic acid) for 3-4 hours. The stigmas were<br />
stained with aniline blue-lactophenol (Hauser and Morison, 1964) and scanned<br />
under light microscope (10x X 20x combination). The stigmas carrying the<br />
germinating pollen grains were considered as receptive. In order to find out<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> stigma receptivity, the stigmas <strong>of</strong> varying ages were pollinated<br />
manually by dusting on them the pollen grains obtained in bulk from freshly<br />
dehisced anthers with the help <strong>of</strong> a sterilized needle. The pollinated stigmas<br />
were fixed in 1: 3 acetic alcohol and subsequently stained in aniline blue-<br />
lactophenol and studied periodically under a microscope. The data obtained<br />
was recorded for determining the duration <strong>of</strong> stigma receptively. Stigma<br />
receptivity was also determined by visual observation. Stigmas which were<br />
transparent, shining and wet and adhere to 1mm 2 piece <strong>of</strong> paper were<br />
considered receptive (Teryokin et al., 2002).<br />
Page 73
3.6.3: Pollen Viability and Pollen to Ovule Ratio<br />
Pollen viability was estimated by two methods:<br />
1. Following Stanley and Linskens (1974), mature and undehised anthers<br />
were placed in 1% tetrazolium chloride for one hour and squashed.<br />
2. Dianne and Spicer, (1958) method in which mature and undehisced<br />
anthers were squashed in 1% aniline blue-lactophenol and observed after<br />
15 minutes. The healthy and plump stained pollen were recorded as<br />
viable in both the cases.<br />
Floral buds ready to anthese were collected for estimating pollen-ovule<br />
ratio. Pollen quantity was estimated by squashing one anther (Several times) in<br />
10 drops <strong>of</strong> distilled water in a cavity block and then shaken with a glass rod.<br />
The following equation was used to calculate the number <strong>of</strong> pollen per flower.<br />
Where<br />
p x q = r<br />
r x s = t<br />
p = mean pollen count per drop <strong>of</strong> water<br />
q = number <strong>of</strong> water drops taken initially in which one anther was squashed.<br />
r = mean number <strong>of</strong> pollen per anther<br />
s = mean number <strong>of</strong> anthers per flower<br />
t = total count per flower<br />
Average ovule number per pistil was counted by using dissection<br />
microscope.<br />
Pollen-ovule ratio was calculated following Cruden‘s (1977) method as<br />
follows:-<br />
P/O = pollen count per anther x No. <strong>of</strong> anthers per flower<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> ovules per flower<br />
Page 74
3.6.4: Pollen Volume<br />
For calculating pollen volume Zhang‘s (2009) method was followed. The<br />
pollen grains from fifty randomly selected dehisced anthers were put in a drop<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2% acetocarmine and pollen diameter measurements were taken at 400x<br />
using ocular micrometer. For spherical pollen grains, the volume was<br />
calculated by using the following formula.<br />
V= π D 3<br />
6 where D = Diameter <strong>of</strong> Pollen grain.<br />
3.6.5: In-vitro Pollen Germination<br />
The in-vitro pollen germination was analyzed in media containing<br />
sucrose, boric acid, calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate and potassium nitrate<br />
following Brew-Backer and Kwach (1963) with and without modifications<br />
(Table 4) keeping the normality same as in the Brew-Beaker and Kwach<br />
Solution. The pollen grains with their tube length more than their diameter<br />
were considered germinated.<br />
Table4: Combinations <strong>of</strong> Various Nutrients used for pollen germination <strong>of</strong><br />
Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
S. No Nutrient Combinations<br />
1. 10% sucrose<br />
2. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/10ml<br />
3. 10% sucrose + calcium nitrate 3 mg/10ml<br />
4. 10% sucrose + potassium nitrate 1 mg/10ml.<br />
5. 10% sucrose + magnesium sulphate 2 mg/10ml<br />
6. 10% sucrose + magnesium sulphate 2 mg/10ml + calcium nitrate<br />
3 mg/10ml<br />
7. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/10ml + Potassium nitrate 1<br />
mg/10ml<br />
8. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/10ml + calcium nitrate 3mg/10ml<br />
9. 10% sucrose + boric acid 1 mg/ 10 ml + calcium nitrate 3 mg/ 10<br />
ml + magnesium sulphate 2 mg/ 10 ml + potassium nitrate 1 mg/<br />
10 ml<br />
Final volume in each case is 30 ml.<br />
Page 75
3.7: Pollen Mother Cell Meiosis<br />
For studying pollen mother cell meiosis floral spikes when outside the<br />
leaf sheath were fixed in Carnoy‘s fixative [ethanol: acetic acid (3:1)] between<br />
1000hr-1300hr for 60-90 minutes, transferred to freshly prepared Carnoy‘s<br />
fixative for about 22 hours and then transferred to 70% ethanol for preservation<br />
at 4 0 C. During meiotic analysis a young spike was kept under dissection<br />
microscope and individual floral buds were removed carefully from the spike.<br />
Each floral bud was then taken on a neat and clean slide and a drop <strong>of</strong> 2%<br />
propionocarmine was put on it for squashing the anthers. Analysis <strong>of</strong> various<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> meiosis was done from temporary slides. The photographs were taken<br />
from temporary slides at USIC using Leica DM LS2 microscope.<br />
3.8: Resource Allocation<br />
Individual plants from natural populations were harvested at maturity<br />
(both pre and post pollinated), washed in the tap water and dried using blotting<br />
paper. The ramets were divided into individual parts (shoots, rhizomes and<br />
roots, spikes and seeds). Oven dried at 80 0 for 48 hours (Kawano and Masuda,<br />
1980) and the dry mass (representing the amount <strong>of</strong> resources allocated) <strong>of</strong><br />
each component was calculated using and electronic balance.<br />
3.9: Seed Biology: Seed biology was studied along the following lines:-<br />
3.9.1: Seed Set<br />
For estimating the seed set and reproductive success, plants were selected<br />
at random in different populations, tagged and scored for the number <strong>of</strong> spikes<br />
per ramet and the number <strong>of</strong> flowers and seeds per spike following Lubber and<br />
Christenson (1966).<br />
Percentage seed set was calculated as follows:<br />
% age seed set per ramet = Total number <strong>of</strong> seeds set X 100<br />
Total number <strong>of</strong> ovules born<br />
Page 76
3.9.2: Seed Viability<br />
Seed viability was analyzed using Tz-test. Twenty seeds <strong>of</strong> each replicate<br />
were placed in water at room temperature for 24 hours and longitudinally<br />
sectioned. The sections were incubated in dark in 2% aqueous solution <strong>of</strong> Tz<br />
for 24 hours. Seeds showing strong stained embryo were considered viable.<br />
3.9.3: In - Vitro Seed Germination<br />
For in vitro seed germination studies, the seeds were randomly collected<br />
from natural population and washed with 0.1% mercuric chloride for 5-7<br />
minutes, followed by washing 4-5 times with distilled water and subjected to<br />
different physical and chemical treatments (Table 5). All the experiments were<br />
conducted in temperature, light and humidity controlled incubation cabinets.<br />
The treatment solutions were made using deionized water and analytical grade<br />
chemicals. Each treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> three replicated <strong>of</strong> 10 seeds, placed<br />
within closed glass petri-dishes on Whatman No. 1 filter paper moistened with<br />
15 ml <strong>of</strong> the given treatment solution or distilled water. Seeds planed for dark<br />
treatment were moistened under green light and then quickly wrapped in black<br />
carbon papers to reduce the chances <strong>of</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> light. Emergence <strong>of</strong><br />
plumule was used as the indicator <strong>of</strong> germination and total germination was<br />
recorded at the culmination <strong>of</strong> the experiment in respect <strong>of</strong> all the treatments.<br />
Seed germination was also checked by placing 50 healthy and viable seeds in<br />
30 x 10 x 4 inch tray containing 2 kg (wet mass) <strong>of</strong> sediment and water level<br />
were maintained 1.5 inch above the surface <strong>of</strong> the sediment. These trays were<br />
placed inside the seed germinator where temperature was maintained at<br />
25±2°c.Seeds were considered to have germinated at the first visible plumule<br />
emergence.<br />
Page 77
Table 5: Physical and chemical treatments to test seed germination in<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
S.<br />
Treatment Time period Concentration<br />
No.<br />
(days) (mM)<br />
1. Dry chilling 40 -<br />
2. Wet chilling 40 -<br />
3. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo (epicarp,<br />
mesocarp and endocarp removal)<br />
4. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo + GA3 0.5<br />
5. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo+ GA3 1<br />
6. Surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo+ GA3 2<br />
7. GA3 1<br />
8. GA3 2<br />
9. Scarification (removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and<br />
mesocarp)<br />
10. Scarification + IAA 0.5<br />
11. Scarification + IAA 1<br />
3.10: Reproductive Potential <strong>of</strong> Shoot Fragments<br />
The reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> plant fragments was analyzed by placing 6<br />
noded and 3 noded (apical, 5 each) and 6 noded and 3 noded (intermediate, 5<br />
each) shoot fragments in three replicates in trays containing water without<br />
sediment for a period <strong>of</strong> 15 days. During this period the temperature ranged<br />
between 20 to 25 0 C and regular monitoring during this period was done to<br />
record the number <strong>of</strong> plantlets formed by the fragments.<br />
3.11: Reproductive Potential <strong>of</strong> Rhizomes<br />
The reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> rhizomes was estimated by placing five<br />
rhizome cuttings each 5 cm long (in three replicates) in 25x20x15 cm trays<br />
containing 3kg (dry mass) <strong>of</strong> sediment and water level was maintained at 2 cm<br />
above the sediment. The trays were kept in the laboratory for three months (<br />
Jan - March 2010) with regular monitoring at room temperature. During this<br />
period the temperature ranged between 8 to 20 0 C. At the culmination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experiment the characters studied include total number <strong>of</strong> plantlets formed per<br />
rhizome cutting.<br />
Page 78
3.12: Axillary Bud Germination<br />
Vegetatively produced axillary buds were used for in vitro germination<br />
studies. The axillary buds were germinated at different temperature regimes,<br />
two varying light exposures and with or without sediment. Each treatment, with<br />
three replicates, included five propagules placed in 1000 ml beakers. Sediment<br />
<strong>of</strong> 200 g (on dry weight basis) was added to beakers and distilled water was<br />
added to the saturation levels. The beakers were kept inside seed germinator<br />
(Yorko) at different temperature regimes for 10 days. Axillary buds intended<br />
for dark treatment were wrapped in aluminum foil. However the axillary buds<br />
in alternate light and dark treated were not covered with aluminum foil. Total<br />
germination was recorded at the culmination <strong>of</strong> the experiment in respect <strong>of</strong> all<br />
the treatments.<br />
3.13: Reproductive Potential <strong>of</strong> Axillary Buds<br />
The reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> axillary buds was estimated by placing five<br />
axillary buds (in three replicates) in 25 x 20 x 10 cm trays containing 2 kg<br />
(dry mass) <strong>of</strong> sediment. The trays were put in the laboratory at room<br />
temperature for one month, with regular monitoring. During this period, the<br />
temperature recorded ranged between 14 to 20 0 C. At the culmination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experiment the germinated auxiliary buds were collected and analyzed for<br />
reproductive potential. The characters studied include-total number <strong>of</strong> plantlets<br />
formed from each axillary bud, number <strong>of</strong> meristematic branches and newly<br />
formed axillary buds if any.<br />
3.14: Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Studies<br />
Double sided conductive tap was fixed to the stub and pollen from<br />
mature undehisced anthers were dusted over it. The dusted material sputter<br />
coated with gold was observed under SEM (S-3000 H). Mature and dry fruits<br />
and seeds were loaded on the stub and coated with gold and observed under<br />
SEM.<br />
3.15: Statistical Analysis<br />
For Statistical analysis s<strong>of</strong>tware SPSS(10) was used.<br />
Page 79
CHAPTER-4<br />
OBSERVATIONS<br />
Page 80
4.1: Distribution<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum is cosmopolitan, herbaceous perennial<br />
hydrophyte widely distributed in fresh to brackish waters throughout the world<br />
and inhabit a wide variety <strong>of</strong> habitats Fig. (2)<br />
In the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley, the species is distributed in lakes, ponds, rivers and<br />
streams . The species is found in all the major lakes <strong>of</strong> the valley viz: Dal lake,<br />
Mansbal lake, Anchar lake, Wular lake, Nilnag lake; wetlands viz: Hookersar<br />
wetland and Hygam wetland, river Jhelum, Achabal spring, Shalimar stream,<br />
Chanderhama irrigation canal, Bal kol and almost in all other fresh water<br />
bodies and irrigation chennels. From the above varied habitats <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum, three standing and two running water sites were selected in the<br />
present study. The characteristic features <strong>of</strong> these selected sites are summarized<br />
in Table ( 3) and Fig. (1).<br />
4.2: Species Morphology and Taxonomy<br />
Based on observations made in the present study, the overall Morpho-<br />
taxonomical features <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum are summarized as follows ;<br />
Perennial rhizomatous herb, rhizomes terete with prominent nodes and<br />
internodes, at each node <strong>of</strong> the rhizome adventitious roots arise. Stem 60-117<br />
cm long, 1.5-3 mm in diameter with nodes and internodes, flexible, slender,<br />
greenish or sometimes reddish in colour with internodes ranging from 1.74-3<br />
cm. Leaves in whorls <strong>of</strong> 4(3-5), 1.74-3.28 × 0.39-0.84, pinnately divided into<br />
24-33 filiform leaflets. Flowers whorled, with 4 flowers in each whorl,<br />
aggregated on 2.73-5.13 cm long aerial spike, with upper male and lower<br />
female flowers. The staminate flowers auxiliary, bracts 3 , shorter than petals, 3<br />
× 1 mm, rhombic to elongate , entire ; petals 4 , pinkish 2 mm long , entire ;<br />
stamens 8. Pistillate flowers without perianth; bracts 3, pectinate; stigmas 4,<br />
plumose, white or light pinkish; ovary tetragonal with 4 deep furrows. Fruit<br />
Page 81
5<br />
4<br />
Source: (Meijden, 1969; Meijden and Caspers, 1971; Orchard, 1975, 1980, 1981, 1986;<br />
Aiken, 1981<br />
1.<br />
Fig. 2: Global distribution <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
1. Asia, 2. Europe, 3. Africa, 4. South America, 5. North America, 6. Australia.<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
6<br />
Page 82
A<br />
3cm=3cm<br />
1cm= 4 cm 1cm= 4 cm<br />
1cm= 4 cm 1cm= 5 cm<br />
Fig. 3: Myriophyllum spicatum (A) Habit (B) Female flower (C) Gynoecium (D) Male<br />
flower ( E) Androecium.<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D E<br />
Page 83
globular 2.2×2.5 mm, dark brown, dehiscing by 4 longitudinal sutures. Seeds<br />
trigonal with two flat sides and an outer convex side, 2.2× 1.5 mm. Fig. (3).<br />
4.3: Phenotypic variability<br />
The species inhabit both standing and running waters and is highly<br />
variable in respect <strong>of</strong> its quantitative traits. The morphological traits analyzed<br />
in the present study include internodal length, leaf dimensions, number <strong>of</strong><br />
leaflets per leaf , mature spike length, peduncle length, number <strong>of</strong> spikes per<br />
ramet, total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet, number <strong>of</strong> male and female flowers<br />
per ramet and number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet. The results are summarized in Table<br />
(6) and Figs. (4-18).<br />
As depicted in the Table (7), a significant amount <strong>of</strong> variability was observed<br />
for various morphological traits analyzed in different populations. The<br />
differences were more prominent between standing and running water<br />
populations. Myriophyllum spicatum produces longer and narrower leaves in<br />
running water populations and smaller and broader ones in standing water<br />
populations. The species produces longer petioles in running waters as<br />
compared to standing waters. Mature spike length, peduncle length, number <strong>of</strong><br />
spikes and flowers per ramet were significantly higher in standing water<br />
populations, on the other hand internodal length was found higher in running<br />
water populations. Seeds were not formed in running water populations<br />
whereas high seed set was recorded in standing water populations.<br />
Dal Lake, Mansbal Lake and Hygam wetland populations were almost at par<br />
with each other with respect to various morphological features analyzed, but<br />
these three standing water populations were significantly different from two<br />
running water populations namely Shalimar stream and Chanderhama irrigation<br />
canal in these features.<br />
Based on Tukeys test, different letters a, b, c and d in the Table (6) and Figures<br />
(4-18) indicate means that are significantly different (Tukeys test≤0.05). The<br />
letter ‗a‘ indicates the smallest mean value whereas letter‗d‘ as the largest mean<br />
value for a particular trait.<br />
Page 84
Feature<br />
Table 6 : Phenotypic variability in morphological traits <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum from various populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />
Internode<br />
length(cm)<br />
Length <strong>of</strong><br />
leaves(cm)<br />
Breadth <strong>of</strong><br />
leaves(cm)<br />
Length <strong>of</strong><br />
apical<br />
leaves(cm)<br />
Breadth <strong>of</strong><br />
apical<br />
leaves(cm)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
leaflets per<br />
leaf.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
leaflets per<br />
apical leaves.<br />
Petiole<br />
length(cm)<br />
Mature spike<br />
length(cm)<br />
Peduncle<br />
length(cm)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
spikes per<br />
ramet.<br />
Total number<br />
<strong>of</strong> flowers per<br />
ramet.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
male flowers<br />
per ramet.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
female<br />
flowers per<br />
ramet.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds per<br />
ramet.<br />
Population<br />
Standing water (Mean±SE) Running water(Mean±SE)<br />
Dal lake Mansbal lake<br />
Hygam<br />
wetland<br />
Shalimar<br />
stream<br />
Chanderhama<br />
irigation canal<br />
b<br />
a<br />
c<br />
d<br />
d<br />
1.89 ± 0.06 1.74 ± 0.03 1.99± 0.07 3.0± 0.12 2.69± 0.15<br />
b<br />
a<br />
b<br />
c<br />
c<br />
2.41 ± 0.26 2.21± 0.11 2.48±0.12 3.28±0.32 3.05±0.29<br />
d<br />
c<br />
b<br />
a<br />
a<br />
0.84±0.08 0.76±0.09 0.64±0.04 0.40±0.03 0.39±0.02<br />
b<br />
a<br />
b<br />
c<br />
c<br />
1.92±0.07 1.74±0.04 2.06±0.08 2.88±0.22 2.83±0.10<br />
c<br />
0.59±0.06<br />
ab<br />
30±3.21<br />
b<br />
29±2.76<br />
a<br />
0.14±0.02<br />
c<br />
5.13±0.50<br />
c<br />
1.41±0.22<br />
b<br />
3.26±0.7<br />
c<br />
50.86±5.46<br />
c<br />
20.8±2.90<br />
bc<br />
30.06±3.58<br />
c<br />
93.5±5.93<br />
c<br />
0.55±0.02<br />
a<br />
28±2.26<br />
a<br />
24±1.51<br />
a<br />
0.11±0.01<br />
c<br />
4.98±0.43<br />
b<br />
1.11±0.10<br />
b<br />
3.33±0.49<br />
c<br />
53.93±5.17<br />
c<br />
21.53±2.34<br />
c<br />
32.40±3.85<br />
c<br />
92±5.22<br />
b<br />
0.49±0.03<br />
bc<br />
32±3.35<br />
b<br />
31±2.47<br />
b<br />
0.20±0.04<br />
b<br />
4.13±0.35<br />
b<br />
1.00±0.21<br />
b<br />
3.2±0.41<br />
b<br />
46.4±4.98<br />
b<br />
18.13±1.64<br />
b<br />
28.26±3.84<br />
b<br />
85±4.50<br />
a<br />
0.39±0.01<br />
c<br />
34±3.17<br />
b<br />
31±2.03<br />
c<br />
0.40±0.05<br />
a<br />
2.86±0.17<br />
a<br />
0.74±0.04<br />
a<br />
1.73±0.35<br />
a<br />
23.5±2.77<br />
a<br />
9.66±1.60<br />
a<br />
13.86±1.93<br />
a<br />
0.39±0.01<br />
c<br />
33±2.08<br />
b<br />
31±2.03<br />
c<br />
0.39±0.05<br />
a<br />
2.73±0.24<br />
a<br />
0.72±0.08<br />
a<br />
1.20±0.41<br />
a<br />
24.5±2.53<br />
a<br />
10.26±0.96<br />
a<br />
14.26±1.73<br />
Different letters a, b, c, d indicate means that are significantly different (Tukeys test ≤ 0.05)<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Page 85
Table 7: ANOVA <strong>of</strong> phenotypic characters in Myriophyllum spicatum across<br />
different populations.<br />
Character Df F P<br />
Internode length 4 573.84 0.000<br />
Length <strong>of</strong> leaves 4 61.61 0.000<br />
Breadth <strong>of</strong> leaves 4 122.58 0.000<br />
Length <strong>of</strong> apical leaves 4 141.56 0.000<br />
Breadth <strong>of</strong> apical leaves 4 35.60 0.000<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per leaf 4 10.73 0.000<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per apical leaf 4 28.35 0.000<br />
Petiole length 4 156.65 0.000<br />
Mature spike length 4 156.83 0.000<br />
Peduncle length 4 50.82 0.000<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> spikes per ramet 4 74.04 0.000<br />
Total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet 4 176.78 0.000<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> male flowers per ramet 4 120.32<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> female flowers per<br />
ramet<br />
4 125.43<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet 4 2233.90<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
Page 86
Internode length (cm)<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
b<br />
a<br />
c<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig. 4: Internode length in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Leaf length (cm)<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
b<br />
a<br />
DL ML<br />
standing water<br />
HW<br />
Population<br />
SS CIC<br />
running water<br />
Fig. 5 : Leaf length in different standing and running water populations.<br />
b<br />
d<br />
c<br />
d<br />
c<br />
Page 87
Leaf breadth (cm)<br />
Apical leaf length (cm)<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
d c<br />
DL ML<br />
standing water<br />
HW<br />
Population<br />
SS CIC<br />
running water<br />
Fig. 6: Leaf breadth in different standing and running water populations.<br />
b a<br />
b<br />
c c<br />
DL ML<br />
standing water<br />
HW<br />
Population<br />
SS CIC<br />
running water<br />
Fig.7: Apical leaf length in different standing and running water populations<br />
b<br />
a<br />
a<br />
Page 88
Apical leaf breadth (cm)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per leaf<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
c<br />
c<br />
b<br />
a a<br />
DL ML<br />
standing water<br />
HW SS CIC<br />
running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.8: Apical leaf breadth in different standing and running water populations<br />
ab<br />
a<br />
bc<br />
DL ML<br />
standing water<br />
HW SS CIC<br />
running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.9: Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per leaf in different standing and running water populations.<br />
c<br />
c<br />
Page 89
Petiole length (cm)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per apical leaf<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0.5<br />
0.45<br />
0.4<br />
0.35<br />
0.3<br />
0.25<br />
0.2<br />
0.15<br />
0.1<br />
0.05<br />
0<br />
b<br />
a<br />
b b b<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.10: Number <strong>of</strong> leaflets per apical leaves in different standing and running water populations.<br />
a<br />
a<br />
b<br />
c c<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water<br />
Population<br />
running water<br />
Fig.11: Petiole length in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Page 90
Peduncle length (cm)<br />
Mature spike length (cm)<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
c<br />
c<br />
b<br />
a a<br />
DL ML<br />
standing water<br />
HW SS CIC<br />
running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.12: Mature spike length in different standing and running water populations.<br />
c<br />
b b<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water<br />
running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.13: Peduncle length in different standing and running water populations.<br />
a<br />
a<br />
Page 91
Number <strong>of</strong> spikes per ramet<br />
4.5<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
b<br />
b b<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.14 : Number <strong>of</strong> spikes per ramet in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
c<br />
c<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.15 : Total number <strong>of</strong> flowers per ramet in different standing and running water<br />
populations.<br />
b<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
Page 92
Number <strong>of</strong> male flowers per ramet<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
c c<br />
b<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.16 : Number <strong>of</strong> male flowers in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> female flowers per ramet<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
bc<br />
c<br />
b<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water<br />
running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.17 : Number <strong>of</strong> female flowers per ramet in different standing and running water populations.<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
Page 93
Number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
c c<br />
b a a<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.18: Number <strong>of</strong> seeds per ramet in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Page 94
4.4: Growth Architecture<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum shows clonal growth form, consisting <strong>of</strong> a<br />
branched rhizome and from which arises a network <strong>of</strong> leafy shoots called<br />
ramets. The whole network <strong>of</strong> rhizome and ramets arising from it is called as<br />
genet. The number <strong>of</strong> ramets on each rhizome and the spacer length between<br />
two consecutive ramets are the important features in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
allowing the plant to some extent to adapt to heterogeneous environments such<br />
as running and standing waters. The various growth architectural features<br />
analyzed in the present study include: total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome, number <strong>of</strong><br />
ramets per plant (genet), number <strong>of</strong> branches per ramet, spacer length and<br />
average length <strong>of</strong> ramets Fig. (19).<br />
As the species inhabits both standing and running waters, it showed significant<br />
variability in almost all growth architectural features between standing and<br />
running water populations Table (9).It was observed that total length <strong>of</strong><br />
rhizome, branching <strong>of</strong> ramets, spacer length and average number <strong>of</strong> ramets per<br />
plant was highest in standing water populations, whereas number <strong>of</strong> ramets per<br />
plant and number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome was highest in running water<br />
populations. However these features do not show significant differences among<br />
standing water namely Dal lake, Mansbal lake and Hygam wetland populations<br />
or among two running water namely Shalimar stream and Chanderhama<br />
irrigation canal populations. Table (8) Figs. (20-25).<br />
The different letters a, b, c and d in Table (8) and Figs. (20-25) indicate means<br />
that are significantly different (Tukeys test≤ 0.05). The letter ‗a‘ indicate the<br />
smallest mean value whereas letter ‗d‘ indicate the largest mean value <strong>of</strong> a<br />
particular trait.<br />
Page 95
Table 8 : Growth architecture <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley<br />
Feature<br />
Total length <strong>of</strong><br />
rhizome(cm)<br />
Number<br />
ramets per<br />
plant/genet<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
branchs per<br />
ramet<br />
Spacer<br />
length(cm)<br />
Average length<br />
<strong>of</strong> ramets(cm)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
branchs per<br />
rhizome<br />
Mean±SE<br />
Dal lake<br />
c<br />
18.02±1.26<br />
a<br />
5.86±0.35<br />
d<br />
0.86±0.01<br />
b<br />
3.0±0.14<br />
c<br />
109.46±5.85<br />
a<br />
2.13±0.35<br />
Standing water<br />
Mansbal lake<br />
c<br />
18.59±1.20<br />
a<br />
5.80±0.25<br />
e<br />
0.93±0.02<br />
c<br />
3.20±0.15<br />
c<br />
111.53±5.85<br />
a<br />
2.06±0.25<br />
Population<br />
Hygam<br />
wetland<br />
b<br />
16.01±1.05<br />
a<br />
5.40±0.28<br />
c<br />
0.66±0.01<br />
b<br />
2.96±0.17<br />
b<br />
84.6±3.65<br />
a<br />
2.26±0.45<br />
Shalimar<br />
stream<br />
a<br />
12.26±1.04<br />
b<br />
14.2±0.94<br />
b<br />
0.33±0.01<br />
a<br />
0.83±0.03<br />
a<br />
64.33±3.37<br />
b<br />
3.0±0.37<br />
Running water<br />
Chanderhama<br />
irrigation<br />
canal<br />
a<br />
13.17±1.27<br />
c<br />
15.0±1.06<br />
a<br />
0.26±0.01<br />
a<br />
0.86±0.03<br />
a<br />
66.6±3.68<br />
b<br />
3.13±0.35<br />
Letters a, b , c, d depicted in the table indicate means that are significantly different<br />
(Tukeys test≤ 0.05)<br />
Page 96
Table 9 : ANOVA <strong>of</strong> Growth architecture <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum across<br />
different populations.<br />
Character<br />
Total length <strong>of</strong><br />
rhizome<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> ramets<br />
per plant/genet<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> branches<br />
per ramet<br />
Spacer length<br />
Average length <strong>of</strong><br />
ramets<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> branches<br />
per rhizome<br />
df<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
F<br />
87.66<br />
773.87<br />
7111.83<br />
1764.87<br />
317.62<br />
28.85<br />
P<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
Page 97
R<br />
A<br />
M<br />
E<br />
T<br />
Spacer length<br />
Genet<br />
Fig .19 : Clonal unit showing different parts.<br />
Branch<br />
Rhizome<br />
Page 98
Total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome(cm)<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
c<br />
c<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.20: Total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
a a<br />
b<br />
a<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.21: Number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant in different standing and running water populations.<br />
a<br />
b<br />
c<br />
a<br />
Page 99
Number <strong>of</strong> branches per ramet<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
d<br />
e<br />
c<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.22: Number <strong>of</strong> branches per ramet in different standing and running water populations<br />
Spacer length(cm)<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
b<br />
c<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.23: Spacer length in different standing and running water populations<br />
b<br />
b<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
Page 100
Average length <strong>of</strong> ramet(cm)<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
c<br />
c<br />
b<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig. 24: Average length <strong>of</strong> ramets in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> branches <strong>of</strong> rhizome<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water<br />
running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.25: Number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome in different standing and running water populations.<br />
a<br />
b<br />
a<br />
b<br />
Page 101
4.5: Phenology<br />
The species is a submerged, perennial herb with pinnately divided<br />
leaves inhabiting both standing and running water habitats. The phenological<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> the species was studied in both standing and running water<br />
populations. The phenology starts with the sprouting <strong>of</strong> rhizomes and axillary<br />
buds in the first week <strong>of</strong> March and continues upto first week <strong>of</strong> April in<br />
standing water populations, whereas sprouting <strong>of</strong> rhizomes and formation <strong>of</strong><br />
nodal plantlets commences in the second week <strong>of</strong> March and continues upto<br />
second week <strong>of</strong> April in running water populations. The planlets grow<br />
vegetatively from second week <strong>of</strong> April upto first week <strong>of</strong> June in standing<br />
waters, while in running waters the process is completed between second week<br />
<strong>of</strong> April and second week <strong>of</strong> July. The mature plantlets enter into the sexual<br />
phase during first week <strong>of</strong> June and flowering continues upto last week <strong>of</strong><br />
September in standing waters. However, in running waters this phase starts<br />
during fourth week <strong>of</strong> June and lasts upto third week <strong>of</strong> September. In standing<br />
waters fruiting sets from second week <strong>of</strong> September and ends in third week <strong>of</strong><br />
October. In running waters, however, fruits are not formed. The senescence <strong>of</strong><br />
the above sediment parts starts in the second week <strong>of</strong> October and continues till<br />
first week <strong>of</strong> December in standing water and in running waters the process<br />
starts during the fourth week <strong>of</strong> October and continues upto the last week <strong>of</strong><br />
December Table (10) and Fig.(26).<br />
Page 102
Table 10 : Phenological behavior <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in standing and<br />
running water populations in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />
Phenophase<br />
Sprouting <strong>of</strong> vegetative<br />
propagules(rhizomes,<br />
axillary buds)<br />
Vegetative growth<br />
Flowering phase<br />
Fruiting phase<br />
Senescence<br />
SW = Standing water<br />
RW = Running water<br />
Habitat<br />
SW<br />
RW<br />
SW<br />
RW<br />
SW<br />
RW<br />
SW<br />
RW<br />
SW<br />
RW<br />
Duration<br />
Week(month)<br />
1 (3) - 1 (4)<br />
2 (3) - 2 (4)<br />
2 (4) - 1 (6)<br />
2 (4 ) - 2 (7)<br />
1(6) - 4 (9)<br />
4(6) - 3(9)<br />
2 (9) - 3(10)<br />
-<br />
2 (10) - 1(12)<br />
4 (10) - 4(12)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />
27<br />
32<br />
62<br />
88<br />
110<br />
81<br />
39<br />
-<br />
54<br />
60<br />
Page 103
Standing water Runing water<br />
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan<br />
4.6: Reproductive Biology<br />
4.6.1: Sexual Reproduction<br />
4.6.1.1: Floral organization and development<br />
Sprouting<br />
Vegetative growth<br />
Flowering phase<br />
Fruting phase<br />
Senescence<br />
Fig.26: Phenological behaviour <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in standing and running water populations<br />
The inflorescence <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum is a cylindrical spike, red<br />
in colour, raised on an elongated peduncle. The flowers are arranged<br />
acropetally on the inflorescence axis. The flowers are unisexual; upper flowers<br />
on a spike are staminate whereas lower ones are pistillate. The staminate and<br />
pistillate flowers are tetramerous arising in the axil <strong>of</strong> a strong bract with two<br />
more delicate bracteoles located at the base <strong>of</strong> each flower. These three bracts<br />
entirely enclose and protect the young flower. Male flowers are having pinkish<br />
petals, female flowers are without perianth. The morphological organization <strong>of</strong><br />
the inflorescence and flowers show slight variation in the number <strong>of</strong> whorls and<br />
number <strong>of</strong> flowers in an inflorescence, but number <strong>of</strong> flowers in a whorl and<br />
Page 104
number <strong>of</strong> anthers and pistils per flower do not vary. The number <strong>of</strong> flowers in<br />
each whorl is 4, with 8 anthers per flower in the upper whorls and 4 pistils per<br />
flower in the lower whorls Fig. (27).<br />
The process <strong>of</strong> flowering can be divided chronologically into following<br />
phases Figs. (28,29).<br />
a) Formation <strong>of</strong> inflorescence (budding)<br />
b) Peduncle growth<br />
c) Female phase<br />
d) Anthesis- anther dehiscence- male phase<br />
a) Budding: During this stage differentiation <strong>of</strong> inflorescence axis and<br />
flower bud initiation takes place and it lasts for 7-9 days.<br />
b) Peduncle growth: Accelerated growth <strong>of</strong> the peduncle takes place during<br />
this phase and it continues upto anthesis/ anther dehiscence. The<br />
peduncle continues to grow for 8-12 days.<br />
c) Female phase: The species is protogynous. This phase lasts for 3-4 days.<br />
During this phase the female flowers open and stigmas look bright,<br />
shining, turgid and wet. The opening <strong>of</strong> the female flowers occurs<br />
acropetally during this phase, however bracts <strong>of</strong> the male flowers open<br />
but the opening <strong>of</strong> the male flowers does not take place and anthers still<br />
does not dehise and remain covered by pinkish petals.<br />
d) Anthesis: Towards the termination <strong>of</strong> the female phase, the pinkish<br />
petals <strong>of</strong> the male flowers open and anther dehiscence starts to facilitate<br />
pollination. During this phase the stigmas <strong>of</strong> the same spike are dry and<br />
shriveled, while as anther dehiscence is at its peak.<br />
4.6.2: Stigma Receptivity<br />
In Myriophyllum spicatum, the spikes after coming out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath<br />
have flowers with androecium enclosed by petals and bract and gynoecium<br />
enclosed by bract only. The stigma begin to come out <strong>of</strong> the bract on the 2 nd<br />
day after the spikes come out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath and do not have any germinated<br />
Page 105
a b<br />
c<br />
Fig.27 : (a) Inflorescence <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum (b) Tetramerous arrangement <strong>of</strong><br />
flowers (c) Male flower (d) Female flower<br />
d<br />
Page 106
Developing spike<br />
enclosed by leaf sheath<br />
Stigmas exerted and<br />
receptive<br />
Anther dehiscence<br />
Floral bud stage Peduncle growth Female phase initiates first<br />
(Protogyny)<br />
Dry, shrivelled<br />
stigmas<br />
Male phase (Anther dehiscence)<br />
Fig.28: Diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> the chronology <strong>of</strong> spike and floral development in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
Page 107
e<br />
a b<br />
c<br />
Fig. 29: Chronology <strong>of</strong> spike and floral development in Myriophyllum spicatum:<br />
a: Budding stage; b: Peduncle growth; c,d: Female phase; e,f: Male phase.<br />
f<br />
d<br />
Page 108
Table 11: Stigma receptivity <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum at different<br />
developmental stages.<br />
Stages <strong>of</strong> spike<br />
development after<br />
coming out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
leaf sheath<br />
0<br />
+1<br />
+2<br />
+3<br />
+4<br />
+5<br />
Pollen load on<br />
stigmatic<br />
surface<br />
0 = on the day spike comes out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
germinated<br />
pollen grains<br />
Percentage<br />
germination±SE<br />
0 0 0<br />
0 0 0<br />
15.46±4.17 0 0<br />
213.73 ±5.45 42.0±4.48 19.50±2.21<br />
309.26±24.50 90.0±4.11 29.31±2.91<br />
171.0±9.34 25.86±5.68 15.18±3.66<br />
+1, +2, +3, +4, +5 = days after spike comes out <strong>of</strong> leaf sheath.<br />
Beyond 4th day , the stigma shrivels and lose receptivity gradually.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> pollen on stigmatic surface<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
0Day 1Day 2Day 3day 4Day 5Day<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />
Fig.30: Pollen load on stigmatic surface is maximum on 4th day after the spike<br />
come out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath and gradually decreases 4th day onwards.<br />
Page 109
Number <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen grains<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0Day 1Day 2Day 3day 4Day 5Day<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />
Fig.31: Pollen germination initiates on stigmatic surface on 3rd day after the spike come out<br />
<strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath and frequency <strong>of</strong> germination is highest on 4th day and then sharply<br />
declines 4 th day onwards.<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen<br />
grains<br />
0Day 1Day 2Day 3day 4Day 5Day<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> days<br />
Fig.32 : Percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen grains is maximum on 4 th day after the spike comes<br />
out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath hence stigma receptivity and steadily decreases 4 th day onwards.<br />
Page 110
a<br />
Fig. 33 : Stigma receptivity a) pollen load on stigma b) germinating pollen grains on<br />
stigmatic surface.<br />
Page 111
pollen during this period. Subsequently, the stigma becomes receptive and the<br />
receptivity lasts for 3-4 days. The number <strong>of</strong> deposited pollen grains as well as<br />
the percentage germination <strong>of</strong> the pollen grains was highest on 4 th day after the<br />
spike comes out <strong>of</strong> the sheathing leaf Table (11) Figs. (30-33).After this the<br />
receptivity <strong>of</strong> the stigma decreases gradually within one or two days as the<br />
stigma becomes brown and dry and the number <strong>of</strong> pollen grains deposited on<br />
the stigma and their percentage germination declines.<br />
4.6.3: Pollen morphology and viability<br />
Based on the light and scanning electron microscope studies it was<br />
observed that pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are small, sub-oblate to oblate,<br />
radially symmetrical, isopolar, 4-zono colpate with scabrate-punctate tectum<br />
Fig (35).The species produces high percentage <strong>of</strong> healthy, plump and stainable<br />
pollen grains Table (12) and Figs. (34,36), which ranges from 88.56±4.58 to<br />
89.19±4.90. There were no significant difference in the pollen viability<br />
between standing and running water populations. The lentic and lotic waters<br />
have no effect on the viability.<br />
Table 12: Pollen viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> pollen<br />
Population<br />
grains scanned<br />
M±SE<br />
Dal lake 2496±55.46<br />
Mansbal lake 2278±52.59<br />
Hygam wetland 2253±54.53<br />
Shalimar stream 2200±52.88<br />
Chanderhama<br />
irrigation canal<br />
21759±52.8<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> viable<br />
pollen<br />
M±SE<br />
2247±57.29 88.82±9<br />
2051±52.92 89.06±9.8<br />
2031±54.49 89.19±9.4<br />
1973±52.88 88.66±9.1<br />
1953±52.90 88.56±9.0<br />
Percentage<br />
viability<br />
M±SE<br />
Page 112
4.6.4: Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen diameter and pollen volume<br />
The species produces enormous quantities <strong>of</strong> pollen grains ranging from<br />
27416.08±1216.48 to 29982.86±2336.10 per flower but only 4 ovules per<br />
flower (1 ovule per carpel) are present. The pollen-ovule ratio worked out<br />
ranges from 6854.02±304.12 to 7495.71±584.02 across different populations.<br />
Pollen volume in the species ranges from 6540.82±387.81µm 3<br />
7076.19±752.81 µm 3 and diameter from 23.2±0.44 to 23.8±0.83 µm Fig. (41).<br />
Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen volume and pollen diameter did not show much<br />
variation across different populations Table(13) and Figs.(37-39).<br />
4.6.5: In-vitro pollen germination<br />
Pollen grains were germinated in media containing sucrose, boric acid,<br />
calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate and potassium nitrate in different<br />
combinations. Overall In-vitro pollen germination was very low and does not<br />
exceed 15%. The media containing 10% sucrose and calcium nitrate and 10%<br />
sucrose and magnesium sulphate yielded low percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen<br />
grains,<br />
Percentage viability<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC CIc<br />
Population<br />
Fig.34 : Pollen viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations<br />
to<br />
Page 113
a<br />
c<br />
b<br />
Fig.35: Pollen morphology: (a) Light microscopic view (b,c) SEM.<br />
Page 114
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.36: Pollen Viability (a) Tetrazolium chloride test (b) Aniline blue test.<br />
Page 115
Table 13 : Pollen-ovule ratio , Pollen diameter and Pollen volume <strong>of</strong><br />
Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />
Feature<br />
Pollenovule<br />
ratio<br />
Pollen<br />
diameter<br />
µm n=<br />
50<br />
Pollen<br />
volume<br />
µm³<br />
n=50<br />
Population<br />
Dal lake Mansbal lake Hygam<br />
wetland<br />
7495.71±548.02<br />
23.8±0.83<br />
7076.19±752.81<br />
Mean±SE<br />
N= number <strong>of</strong> pollen grain<br />
V= πD 3<br />
6<br />
Pollen - ovule ratio<br />
9000<br />
8000<br />
7000<br />
6000<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
7325±561.36<br />
23.6±0.54<br />
6887.69±474.96<br />
7309±546.84<br />
23.4±0.54<br />
6714.25±474.96<br />
Shalimar<br />
stream<br />
6993.60±455.36<br />
23.2±0.83<br />
6555.21±699.89<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
Population<br />
Fig.37: Pollen -ovule ratio <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations.<br />
Chanderhama<br />
irrigation canal<br />
6854.02±304.12<br />
23.2±0.44<br />
6540.82±387.81<br />
Page 116
Pollen diameter(µm)<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
DL ML HW<br />
Population<br />
SS CIC<br />
Fig.38: Pollen diameter <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations.<br />
Pollen volume(µm)<br />
9000<br />
8000<br />
7000<br />
6000<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
Population<br />
Fig.39: Pollen volume <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different populations.<br />
Page 117
Table 14 : In-vitro pollen germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in<br />
different media.<br />
Composition <strong>of</strong><br />
medium<br />
S<br />
S+B<br />
S+C<br />
S+P<br />
S+M<br />
S+M+C<br />
S+M+P<br />
S+B+C<br />
S+B+C+M+P<br />
Mean±SE<br />
S = 10% Sucrose (30 ml).<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> Pollen<br />
grains scanned<br />
200±10<br />
191±24.55<br />
184.66±5.03<br />
187.33±5.68<br />
191.33±19.50<br />
181.33±10.50<br />
209.66±11.06<br />
215.66±18.44<br />
213.00±16.32<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> pollen<br />
grains<br />
Germinated<br />
10±0.57<br />
13±1.73<br />
5.33±0.57<br />
11.24±0.34<br />
3.76±0.40<br />
7.49±0.49<br />
14.80±0.57<br />
26.30±1.57<br />
33.25±1.63<br />
S+B = 10% Sucrose(15ml) + Boric acid 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (15ml).<br />
Percentage<br />
germination<br />
5.16±0.28<br />
6.80±0.39<br />
2.89±0.38<br />
6.33±0.57<br />
1.96±0.10<br />
4.12±0.20<br />
7.06±0.20<br />
12.33±0.57<br />
15.61±0.65<br />
Page 118
S+C = 10% Sucrose (15ml) + Calcium nitrate 3mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water(15ml).<br />
S+P = 10% Sucrose(15ml) + Potassium nitrate 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water(15ml).<br />
S+M = 10% Sucrose(15ml) + Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water(125ml).<br />
S+M+C =10% Sucrose(10ml) + Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml (10ml) + Calcium nitrate<br />
3mg/10ml (10ml).<br />
S+M+P =10% Sucrose (10ml) +Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml(10ml) +Potassium nitrate<br />
1mg/10ml (10ml).<br />
S+B+C = 10% Sucr ose(10ml) +Boric acid 1mg/10ml (10ml) + Calcium nitrate 3mg/10ml<br />
(10ml).<br />
S+B+C+M+P = 10% Sucrose(6ml) + Boric acid 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (6ml)+ Calcium<br />
nitrate 3mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (6ml) + Megnesium sulphate 2mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water<br />
(6ml) + Potassium nitrate 1mg/10ml <strong>of</strong> distilled water (6ml).<br />
Percentage germination<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Composition <strong>of</strong> media<br />
Fig. 40 : In-vitro pollen germination in different media<br />
while media containing 10% sucrose, boric acid , calcium nitrate and 10%<br />
sucrose, boric acid, calcium nitrate, magnesium sulphate and potassium nitrate<br />
yielded highest percentage <strong>of</strong> germinated pollen Table(14) and Figs.(40,41 )<br />
Page 119
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.41 : (a) Pollen diameter ( b) In-vitro pollen germination.<br />
Page 120
4.6.6: Pollination mechanism<br />
The species produces unisexual flowers on a common spike, the upper<br />
male and lower female flowers. The spikes initially emerge just below the<br />
water surface but finally come out and remain above the water surface. In a<br />
population different spikes <strong>of</strong> the plant (genet) or different plants are at<br />
different developmental stages viz: budding, female phase, male phase and<br />
fruiting stage and continue to advance from one stage to another. The spikes<br />
bearing receptive stigmas are smaller in length as the male flowers are not yet<br />
fully developed and are around 3-3.5 cm above the water surface, whereas<br />
those having completed the female phase and advanced into the male phase<br />
with dehisced anthers and loaded with pollen are comparatively larger in length<br />
and are around 3.5-6 cm above the water surface. The female and male phases<br />
are distinct in that the male phase follows the female phase and the stigmas lose<br />
their receptivity during male phase and become dry and shriveled. This clearly<br />
depicts cross pollinated nature <strong>of</strong> the species, where pollen from spikes at male<br />
phase are transferred to the spikes which are yet at female phase bearing<br />
receptive stigmas Figs. (42,44). The first formed spikes in a population fail to<br />
produce seeds due to the non- availability <strong>of</strong> pollen at the time <strong>of</strong> stigma<br />
receptivity. As the spikes are well above the water surface, the primary mode<br />
<strong>of</strong> pollination is anemophily. Entomophily and hydrophily can be ruled out<br />
because it was observed that insects do not visit the spikes and the submerged<br />
carpels abort instead <strong>of</strong> developing into mature seeds. Another possible mode<br />
<strong>of</strong> pollination observed in the present study was anemo-ephydrophily where in<br />
pollen grains falling on the water surface sometimes travel through water<br />
currents and reach the receptive stigmas for pollination Fig.(42,44). However,<br />
the major pollination mechanism seems to be anemophily. In running water<br />
populations however, the spikes do not withstand the pressure <strong>of</strong> flowing water<br />
and remain submerged all along and eventually decay without accomplishment<br />
<strong>of</strong> effective pollination, hence fail to produce seed.Figs. (43,44).<br />
Page 121
a b<br />
Fig.42: Modes <strong>of</strong> pollination operative in Myriophyllum spicatum (a) Anemophily (b) Anemo-epihydrophily.<br />
Page 122
Fig.43: Flowers do not open and spikes decay under water.<br />
Page 123
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.44: Position <strong>of</strong> spikes with respect to water surface and pollination modes<br />
operative in Myriophyllum spicatum (a) standing water (b) running water<br />
Page 124
4.6.7: Fruit and seed morphology<br />
The stereo and scanning electron microscopic analysis revealed that fruit<br />
is a globular dark brown 2.2×2.5 mm schizocarp having smooth surface<br />
architecture with four deep longitudinal sutures and a square shaped scar on<br />
upper side having four elongated points which are the remains <strong>of</strong> the stigmas.<br />
The lower side (where from fruit is attached to the spike) is circular. Each fruit<br />
contains four individual seeds. The seed is a trigonal nutlet 2.2×1.5 mm with<br />
smooth epicarp and mesocarp and a hard endocarp,having two flat sides and an<br />
outer convex side Fig. (47).<br />
4.6.8: Seed set and viability<br />
The Myriophyllum spicatum produces a copious amount <strong>of</strong> seeds. The<br />
seed set <strong>of</strong> the species is presented in Table (15) and Figs.(45,48). It was<br />
observed in the present study that only standing water populations produce<br />
seeds, whereas running water populations are not able to produce seeds because<br />
effective pollination is not possible in running waters. The seed set percentage<br />
in three standing water populations viz: Dal lake, Mansbal lake and Hygam<br />
wetland was recorded as 77.91%, 70.98% and 75.19% respectively, indicating<br />
that good numbers <strong>of</strong> seeds are produced by the species.<br />
The seed viability <strong>of</strong> different populations do not very much. The dissected<br />
seeds having healthy embryo and stain deep red in 2% 2, 3, 5 triphenyl<br />
tetrazolium chloride (TTC) Fig. (48) were considered as viable. The percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> viable seeds was 90% in Dal lake population, 88% in Mansbal population<br />
and 85% in Hygam wetland population Table (15) and Fig. (46). In running<br />
water populations viz: Shalimar stream and Chanderhama irrigation canal, no<br />
seed set was recorded.<br />
Page 125
Table 15: Seed set and viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different<br />
populations .<br />
Character<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
spikes per<br />
ramet<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
flowers per<br />
ramet<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds per<br />
ramet<br />
Percentage<br />
seed set<br />
Percentage<br />
seed<br />
viability<br />
Mean±SE<br />
Dal lake<br />
3.26±0.21<br />
30.06±2.21<br />
93.5±5.93<br />
77.91<br />
90.0±5.0<br />
standing water<br />
Mansbal<br />
lake<br />
3.33±0.24<br />
32.40±2.50<br />
92.0±5.22<br />
70.98<br />
88.33±2.88<br />
Population<br />
Hygam<br />
wetland<br />
3.13±0.17<br />
28.26±2.10<br />
85.0±4.50<br />
75.19<br />
85.0±5.00<br />
Shalimar<br />
stream<br />
1.53±0.9<br />
13.86±1.20<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
running water<br />
Chanderhama<br />
irrigation<br />
canal<br />
1.60±1.00<br />
14.26±1.24<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Page 126
Percentage seed set per ramet<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
standing water<br />
running water<br />
Population<br />
Fig.45 : Seed set <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different standing and running water populations.<br />
Percentage seed viability<br />
DL ML HW<br />
Population<br />
Fig .46: Seed viability <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
Page 127
a b<br />
c d<br />
Fig. 47: Fruit and seed morphology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum (a,b) SEM <strong>of</strong> fruit and<br />
seed (c,d) Stereoscopic view <strong>of</strong> fruit and seed.<br />
Page 128
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.48 : (a) Spike with fruits attached (b) Seed viability in tetrazolium chloride.<br />
Page 129
4.6.9: Seed germination<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum produce seeds in the month <strong>of</strong> September-<br />
October. The mature seeds fall in water and then reach to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the<br />
water body .These seeds get buried in the sediment at the bottom and do not<br />
germinate immediately and remain dormant for long period. However, in order<br />
to work out the dormant nature and germination ability <strong>of</strong> the seeds, in vitro<br />
studies were carried out. The seeds were subjected to different concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> GA3 and IAA, surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> the embryo by removal <strong>of</strong> the seed wall,<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and mesocarp, chilling and incubation under alternating<br />
light and dark and continuous dark conditions in order to break dormancy. The<br />
results are summarized in Table (16) and Fig. (49). The data reveals that seeds<br />
in control and those treated with different concentrations <strong>of</strong> GA3 and IAA did<br />
not germinate. Moreover, the seeds in which epicarp and mesocarp was<br />
removed did not show any sign <strong>of</strong> germination. However, good germination<br />
percentage was observed in seeds subjected to both wet and dry chilling. It was<br />
observed that surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryos has a promoting effect on<br />
germination and maximum percentage germination was recorded due to<br />
surgical exposure <strong>of</strong> embryo plus different concentrations <strong>of</strong> GA3.<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> seeds and light regimes also has effect on percentage germination. The<br />
percentage germination <strong>of</strong> one year old seeds was less as compared to the<br />
current year seeds in all the treatments. The seeds <strong>of</strong> the current year<br />
germinate more vigorously and more in number as compared to the one year<br />
old seeds provided the seed wall is cut to expose the embryo indicating that<br />
hard endocarp is responsible for their dormancy. Moreover, it was observed<br />
that overall percentage germination was more in alternate light and dark as<br />
compared to continuous dark conditions in all the treatments. This<br />
Page 130
Table 16: Effect <strong>of</strong> various physical and chemical treatments on germination<br />
<strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> different ages under alternate light and dark (L) and<br />
continuous dark (D) conditions at 25°c in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
Treatment<br />
Controll<br />
40 days dry<br />
chilling<br />
40 days wet<br />
chilling<br />
Surgical exposure<br />
<strong>of</strong> embryo<br />
(epicarp, mesocarp<br />
and endocarp<br />
removal)<br />
Surgical exposure<br />
<strong>of</strong> embryo +<br />
0.5mM GA3<br />
Surgical exposure<br />
<strong>of</strong> embryo + 1mM<br />
GA3<br />
Surgical exposure<br />
<strong>of</strong> embryo + 2 mM<br />
GA3<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> seed Light regime Percentage<br />
germination±SE<br />
E0 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E1 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E0 L 31.66±2.88 fg<br />
D 13.33±2.88 bc<br />
E1 L 23.33±2.90 def<br />
D 10.00±0 b<br />
E0 L 33.33±2.90 g<br />
D 16.66±2.88 bcd<br />
E1 L 26.66±2.88 efg<br />
D 13.33±2.88 bc<br />
E0 L 63.00±5.77 hij<br />
D 28.33±2.35 efg<br />
E1 L 55.00±5.0 h<br />
D 16.66±2.88 bcd<br />
E0 L 68.33±5.77 ijk<br />
D 31.66±2.88 fg<br />
E1 L 60.00±5.00 hi<br />
D 20.00±0 cde<br />
E0 L 71.66±7.63 jk<br />
D 33.33±2.90 g<br />
E1 L 66.66±2.88 ij<br />
D 21.66±2.88 cde<br />
E0 L 76.66±5.77 k<br />
D 35.00±2.88 g<br />
E1 L 70.00±5.00 jk<br />
D 23.33±2.88 def<br />
GA3, 1mM E0 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E1 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
GA3, 2mM E0 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E1 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
Page 131
Scarification<br />
(removal <strong>of</strong><br />
epicarp and<br />
mesocarp)<br />
Scarification<br />
(removal <strong>of</strong><br />
epicarp and<br />
mesocarp) + IAA,<br />
0.5mM<br />
Scarification<br />
(removal <strong>of</strong><br />
epicarp and<br />
mesocarp) +IAA,<br />
1mM<br />
E0 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E1 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E0 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E1 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E0 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
E1 L 0 a<br />
D 0 a<br />
df= 47, F=231.60,<br />
P=0.000<br />
E0= Seeds <strong>of</strong> current year<br />
E1= Seeds collected one year before<br />
GA3= gibberlic acid<br />
IAA= Indole acetic acid<br />
Different letters a, b, c, d, e, f,……… indicate means that are significantly different<br />
(Tukeys test≤0.05)<br />
Percentage germination<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Treatment<br />
Fig.49 : Percentage germination in various effective treatments.<br />
L, E0<br />
D, E0<br />
D, E1<br />
L, E1<br />
Page 132
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.50: In-vitro seed germination in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
Page 133
eveals that with the increase in age <strong>of</strong> the seeds, there is decrease in their<br />
viability and light has promoting effect on seed germination Fig. (50).<br />
Seed germination was also tested by placing fifty healthy seeds in trays<br />
containing sediment and water. After one month <strong>of</strong> continuous observation, the<br />
seeds failed to germinate establishing the fact that seed germination is not<br />
possible under natural conditions unless the hard endocarp is broken.<br />
4.7: Pollen mother cell meiosis<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum showed 21 perfect bivalents at metaphase.<br />
Anaphasic disjunction was regular with 21 chromosomes at each pole Fig .(51).<br />
The basic chromosome number in the species is 7. Based on x = 7, the species<br />
turned out to be hexaploid with 2n =6x =42. Since 21 bivalents were observed<br />
at metaphase and no multivalent formation was observed, it remains to be seen<br />
whether the species is amphidiploids or not. The actual ploidy level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
species can only be worked out by root tip mitosis and karyotype analysis<br />
which was not possible in the present study due to small size <strong>of</strong> chromosomes.<br />
4.8: Resource allocation<br />
The allocation <strong>of</strong> dry mass to different plant parts in the species across<br />
different populations is summarized in Table (17).<br />
The dry mass allocation to different plant parts differs significantly across<br />
standing and running water populations Table(18) and Fig. (52). The allocation<br />
<strong>of</strong> dry mass to shoots is highest followed by seeds and spikes and much less is<br />
allocated to undersediment parts in standing water populations. In running<br />
water populations the trend is reverse, the undersediment parts in these<br />
populations allocate higher resources and have higher dry mass as compared to<br />
the standing water populations. The dry mass allocation in these populations is<br />
higher to shoots followed by undersediment parts and spikes. Seeds are not<br />
formed in these populations.<br />
Page 134
a b<br />
c<br />
Fig. 51: (a,b) Metaphase I (2n=42) and (c,d) Anaphase I.<br />
d<br />
Page 135
Table 17 : Resource allocation to different parts in Myriophyllum spictum across different standing and running water<br />
populations in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />
Dry<br />
weight(mg)↓<br />
Shoots<br />
Undersediment<br />
part<br />
Spikes<br />
Seeds<br />
Dal lake<br />
b<br />
4048±58.15<br />
a<br />
34.33±1.70<br />
b<br />
91.6±5.96<br />
c<br />
436.1±19.84<br />
%age<br />
87.80<br />
0.74<br />
1.98<br />
9.45<br />
Standing water (Mean±SE)<br />
Mansbal<br />
lake<br />
b<br />
4028.2±54.37<br />
a<br />
32.6±1.64<br />
b<br />
86.2±5.41<br />
b<br />
413±18.66<br />
%age<br />
88.33<br />
0.71<br />
1.89<br />
9.05<br />
Hgam<br />
wetland<br />
Population<br />
b<br />
4042.1±54.51<br />
a<br />
33.2±1.09<br />
b<br />
90.9±5.48<br />
bc<br />
419±18.77<br />
%age<br />
88.15<br />
0.72<br />
1.98<br />
Shalimar<br />
stream<br />
a<br />
2295.7±33.17<br />
b<br />
63.8±3.04<br />
a<br />
53±2.58<br />
Running water(Mean±SE)<br />
%age<br />
95.15<br />
2.64<br />
2.58<br />
Chanderhama<br />
irrigation<br />
canal<br />
a<br />
2305±35.74<br />
b<br />
65.4±3.77<br />
a<br />
55.00±2.58<br />
Different letters a, b, c, d in the table indicate means that are significantly different( Tukeys test≤0.05)<br />
9.13<br />
a<br />
0<br />
-<br />
a<br />
0<br />
%age<br />
95.03<br />
2.69<br />
2.26<br />
-<br />
Page 136
Table 18 : ANOVA <strong>of</strong> Resource allocation in Myriophyllum spicatum across<br />
different populations<br />
Character<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong> shoots<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong><br />
undersediment parts<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong> spikes<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
Percentage<br />
95<br />
90<br />
85<br />
80<br />
75<br />
70<br />
65<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
b<br />
a b c<br />
b<br />
df<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
b<br />
a b<br />
b<br />
bc<br />
a b<br />
F<br />
3814.27<br />
488.38<br />
177.39<br />
2449.80<br />
DL ML HW SS CIC<br />
Population<br />
a<br />
b a<br />
a<br />
b a<br />
P<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
Dry weght <strong>of</strong> shoots<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong><br />
undersediment part<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong> spikes<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
Fig.52: Resource allocation pattern <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in different standing and<br />
running water populations.<br />
Page 137
4.9: Vegetative reproduction<br />
Vegetative propagation is the dominant mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in<br />
aquatic plants. The speed and ease with which these aquatic weeds spread to<br />
non-indigenous regions confirms the potential <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction in<br />
these plants. The Myriophyllum spicatum also operate various modes <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetative reproduction to spread. The different vegetative propagules<br />
produced by this species include rhizomes, axillary buds, plant fragments<br />
and nodal plantlets. As the species inhabits both standing and running<br />
waters, it operates different modes in these two types <strong>of</strong> habitats. In standing<br />
waters, it reproduces mostly by means <strong>of</strong> plant fragments, axillary buds and<br />
rhizomes thus helping the species to spread in such type <strong>of</strong> habitats. In<br />
running waters the most prevalent modes <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction is by<br />
rhizomes, stem fragments and nodal plantlets arising from the older stems.<br />
Axillary bud formation in running waters and nodal plantlet in standing<br />
waters are rare. In lentic waters fragmentation <strong>of</strong> the stem is the most<br />
important mode <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagation followed by axillary buds and<br />
rhizomes. In running waters, rhizomes are the most prevalent mode followed<br />
by fragmentation and nodal plantlets.<br />
4.9.1: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments<br />
Fragmentation is the most important mode <strong>of</strong> vegetative reproduction in<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum. In the present study it was observed that under<br />
natural conditions two types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments are formed viz:<br />
aut<strong>of</strong>ragments formed by the self induced abscission <strong>of</strong> shoot apices and<br />
these fragments are generally formed when the plant has attained the peak<br />
biomass, whereas another type viz: all<strong>of</strong>ragments are formed by the<br />
mechanical breakage <strong>of</strong> the parent stem by disturbances in the water by<br />
boats, swimmers and water currents. To check out the potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fragments to form new plantlets, apical and intermediate fragments with<br />
varying number <strong>of</strong> nodes were used viz: six noded intermediate, three noded<br />
intermediate, six noded apical and three noded apical. The results <strong>of</strong><br />
Page 1
different types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments analysed for their reproductive potential<br />
are summarized in Table (19). It was revealed that the six noded<br />
intermediate fragments have the potential to form the maximum number <strong>of</strong><br />
plantlets followed by three noded intermediate and six noded apical<br />
fragments. The three noded apical fragments are not able to form any<br />
plantlet. It was also observed that length <strong>of</strong> six and three noded intermediate<br />
fragments do not increase, hence the number <strong>of</strong> nodes remains the same,<br />
whereas the length <strong>of</strong> six and three noded apical fragments increases and<br />
hence the number <strong>of</strong> nodes also increases, but they show least potential to<br />
form new plantlets, thus showing least reproductive capacity as compared to<br />
intermediate fragments Figs.(53,54). So fragmentation is a type <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetative clonal propagation which provides intermediate to long distance<br />
dispersal for the species.<br />
Table 19 : Different types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments and their reproductive<br />
potential in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
Fragment type<br />
6- noded<br />
intermediate<br />
3- noded<br />
intermediate<br />
6- noded apical<br />
3- noded apical<br />
Mean±SE<br />
()* = initial number <strong>of</strong> nodes<br />
()** = final number <strong>of</strong> nodes<br />
Mean initial<br />
length(cm)<br />
13.16 (6) *<br />
6.3 (6)<br />
7.7(6)<br />
2.86(3)<br />
Mean final<br />
length(cm)<br />
13.16(6) **<br />
6.3 (6)<br />
11.58(8.6)<br />
4.16 (4.6)<br />
Total number <strong>of</strong><br />
plantlets formed<br />
2.86±0.64<br />
2.3±0.41<br />
0.93±0.11<br />
0<br />
Page 2
Total number <strong>of</strong> plantlets formed<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
6 - noded int 3 - noded int 6 - noded api 3 - noded api<br />
4.9.2: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> rhizomes<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the growing season the above sediment parts <strong>of</strong><br />
Myriophyllum spicatum undergo senescence but the undersediment rhizome<br />
remain dormant during the winter. In the next growing season the rhizome<br />
gives rise to new leafy shoots which develop into full plants after<br />
undergoing vegetative growth and then enter into the reproductive phase.<br />
The rhizomes have a high potential to form new plantlets, the present study<br />
revealed that each 5 cm long rhizome cutting has the potential to form<br />
6.0±0.62 new plantlets Fig. (54). So rhizomes contribute to the new<br />
recruitments on arrival <strong>of</strong> the favourable conditions and help in<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> new populations. So rhizomes are a means <strong>of</strong> localized<br />
spread in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
4.9.3: Axillary bud germination<br />
Fragment type<br />
Fig.53 : Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> shoot fragments<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and sediment on axillary bud germination is<br />
presented in Table (20) and the effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and light is presented<br />
in Table (21). It was observed that the optimum temperature for axillary bud<br />
germination is 20-25°C, though considerable germination occurs at 15°C;<br />
the germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds tends to decrease below 15˚C and is almost<br />
Page 3
absent at 10˚C.The germination beyond 25°C also starts to decline<br />
progressively and<br />
c<br />
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.54 : (a) Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> stem fragments to form new plantlets (b)<br />
plantlet with adventitious roots (c) Rhizome giving rise to new plntlets.<br />
Page 4
percentage germination at 30°C is very low. The sediment does not have any<br />
role in axillary bud germination as good percentage germination was<br />
recorded without sediment also. Under alternate light and dark conditions,<br />
axillary buds germinate more rapidly and more in number as compared to<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> complete darkness Figs. (55-57).<br />
Table 20 : Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and sediment under alternate light and dark<br />
conditions on axillary bud germination.<br />
Temperature 0 c<br />
10<br />
15<br />
20<br />
25<br />
30<br />
Treatment<br />
Sediment/ without<br />
sediment<br />
S<br />
W<br />
S<br />
W<br />
S<br />
W<br />
S<br />
W<br />
S<br />
W<br />
S = with Sediment; W = without Sediment<br />
Percentage germination<br />
±SE<br />
0<br />
0<br />
57±3.86<br />
55.33±3.86<br />
75.53±3.86<br />
68.86±3.88<br />
88.85±3.86<br />
77.76±3.85<br />
37.77±3.85<br />
31.10±3.88<br />
Page 5
Table 21: Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and light on percentage axillary bud<br />
germination in Myriophyllum spicatum.<br />
Temperature 0 C<br />
10<br />
15<br />
20<br />
25<br />
30<br />
L=light and dark condition<br />
D=dark condition<br />
Treatment<br />
Light regime<br />
L<br />
D<br />
L<br />
D<br />
L<br />
D<br />
L<br />
D<br />
L<br />
D<br />
Percentage<br />
germination±SE<br />
0<br />
0<br />
42.2±3.81<br />
31.08±3.88<br />
68.88±3.85<br />
51.06±3.88<br />
82.2±3.81<br />
64.4±3.81<br />
31.06±3.86<br />
22.2±3.81<br />
Page 6
%age germination<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
15 20 25 30<br />
Temperature˚C<br />
with sediment<br />
without sediment<br />
Fig.55: Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and sediment under alternate light and dark<br />
conditions on percentage axillary bud germination.<br />
%age germination<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
15 20 25 30<br />
Temperature˚C<br />
alternate light and dark<br />
dark<br />
Fig.56 : Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature and light on axillary bud germination.<br />
Page 7
c<br />
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.57 : (a) Axillary buds attached to the plant (b) Axillary buds <strong>of</strong> varying sizes<br />
(c) In-vitro germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds.<br />
4.9.4: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> axillary buds<br />
Page 8
The axillary buds <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum are normal vegetative<br />
buds but they differ from the vegetative buds in their size and the ease with<br />
which they detach from the parent plant. Their size is larger than the normal<br />
vegetative buds and detach easily from the parent plant. These buds are<br />
formed during October to November and remain dormant during the chilling<br />
temperature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley and soon on arrival <strong>of</strong> the favourable<br />
conditions germinate to give rise to new planlets.<br />
The present study revealed that each axillary bud on germination<br />
produces a single ramet. The newly formed ramet undergoes vegetative<br />
growth and produces 8-12 new axillary buds which in a geometric<br />
progression produce 64-144 new ramets. So Myriophyllum spicatum has a<br />
very high potential to spread through axillary buds in lakes and ponds. Figs.<br />
(58-59).<br />
Axillary bud<br />
germination Vegetative growth<br />
Ramet<br />
Fig.58: Reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> an axillary bud<br />
bud.<br />
Ramet with<br />
8—12 axillary<br />
buds<br />
Geometric<br />
progressio<br />
n<br />
New Ramets<br />
(64—144)<br />
Page 9
a<br />
b<br />
Fig.59: Potential <strong>of</strong> axillary buds to form new plantlets (a) axillary buds <strong>of</strong><br />
different sizes (b) germinated axillary bud.<br />
Page 10
CHAPTER-5<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Page 11
5.1: Distribution<br />
The present work was carried out on Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
belonging to the genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) which is an aquatic<br />
genus having cosmopolitan distribution (Moody and Les, 2010). It is native<br />
to Europe, Asia and North Africa (Couch and Nelson, 1985). During the<br />
present study M. spicatum was found in all the major Lakes <strong>of</strong> the valley viz.<br />
Dal Lake, Mansbal Lake, Anchar Lake, Wular Lake, Nilnag Lake; wetlands<br />
which include Hygam wetland, Hookarsar wetland, river Jhelum, Achabal<br />
spring, Shalimar stream, Chanderhama irrigation canal, Bal kol and almost<br />
in all fresh water bodies and irrigation channels. The observations <strong>of</strong> Kaul<br />
and Zutshi (1965) and Kak (1990) on the distribution <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum in<br />
<strong>Kashmir</strong> valley support our results.<br />
5.2: Species morphology and phenotypic variability<br />
The present study revealed that the species is a perennial rhizomatous<br />
herb with adventitious roots having a long stem distinguished into nodes and<br />
internodes with leaves in whorls <strong>of</strong> 3-5(4) at nodes, pinnately divided into<br />
25-37 filiform leaflets, with four flowers in each whorl aggregated on aerial<br />
spike with upper male and lower female; staminate flowers axillary with<br />
three bracts, four pinkish petals and eight stamens; pistillate flowers without<br />
perianth, bracts three, pectinate with tetragonal ovary having four deep<br />
furrows and four stigmas; fruit globular schizocarp dark brown dehiscing by<br />
four longitudinal sutures, splitting at maturity into four individual seeds<br />
called nutlets; seed trigonal with two flat and an outer convex side. These<br />
results are in agreement with various studies at global level (Kak, A.M,<br />
1978; Aiken and McNeill, 1980; Aiken, 1981; Haynes, 1988; Orchard, 1986;<br />
Donaldson and Johnson, 1998; Johnson et al., 1998; Crow and Hellquist,<br />
2000 and Moody and Les, 2010).<br />
Aquatic plants, many <strong>of</strong> which propagate vegetatively tend to possess<br />
lower genetic diversity than terrestrial plants, implying an increased role <strong>of</strong><br />
phenotypic plasticity for diversity (Sculthrope, 1967; Barrett et al., 1993).<br />
During the present investigation it was observed that M. spicatum inhabit<br />
Page 12
oth standing as well as running waters. The species in response to different<br />
ecological environments have developed distinct morphological characters<br />
with respect to leaf dimensions, petiole length, mature spike and peduncle<br />
length as well as number <strong>of</strong> spikes, flowers and seeds per ramet to adapt<br />
itself in different habitats. It was observed that leaf dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
species do not vary much within different standing/running water<br />
populations but differ significantly between standing and running water<br />
populations. The species produces narrow and longer leaf blades as well as<br />
longer petioles in running waters whereas in standing waters wider and<br />
smaller leaf blades with short petioles are produced. Such variations in leaf<br />
morphology have been reported earlier in Potamogeton by Kaplan (2002,<br />
2008). Puijalon and Bornette (2006) also observed that leaf breadth reduces<br />
significantly in plants exposed to stress <strong>of</strong> water currents. Mature spike and<br />
peduncle length vary significantly across standing and running water<br />
populations. Mature spike and peduncle length was found smaller in running<br />
water populations as compared to standing water populations. This is<br />
because pressure <strong>of</strong> the flowing waters impairs the development <strong>of</strong> spikes as<br />
strong water currents in running waters lead to negative development <strong>of</strong><br />
plants due to mechanical stress ( Gants and Caro, 2001; Riis and Biggs,<br />
2003). The number <strong>of</strong> spikes and flowers per ramet in running water<br />
populations was less as compared to standing water population showing<br />
significant differences because <strong>of</strong> stress <strong>of</strong> flowing water, similar results<br />
were obtained by Kautsky (1987) who observed that in Potamogeton<br />
pectinatus floral number per m 2 was highest in sheltered populations and the<br />
number decreased from 945 to 672 per m 2 with increasing exposure to<br />
waves. In standing water populations copious amount <strong>of</strong> seeds were formed<br />
whereas no seed set was observed in running water populations because the<br />
plants growing in running waters fail to accomplish sexual reproduction and<br />
do not produce seeds (Kaplan, 2002, 2008).<br />
Page 13
5.3: Growth architecture<br />
Majority <strong>of</strong> the submerged macrophytes form clones, consisting <strong>of</strong><br />
complex network <strong>of</strong> ramets interconnected by rhizome. Clonal morphology<br />
changes in response to environmental factors, both at the level <strong>of</strong> individual<br />
ramet as well as at clonal level (Puijalon et al., 2008). The present study<br />
revealed that Myriophyllum spicatum showed considerable and significant<br />
variation in clonal growth between standing and running waters, however<br />
various growth architectural features do not vary much among different<br />
standing water populations or running water populations.<br />
In standing water populations branching <strong>of</strong> the ramets and spacer<br />
length is more as compared to the plants <strong>of</strong> running water populations. The<br />
ramets in running water populations do not produce many branches because<br />
fast flowing waters impairs the development <strong>of</strong> branches and there is also a<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> getting detached from the main axis by pressure <strong>of</strong> flowing water.<br />
However in running waters, the number <strong>of</strong> ramets per plant (clone) and the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome is more as compared to the plants <strong>of</strong><br />
standing waters. Thus in running waters increased number <strong>of</strong> ramets per<br />
plant, reduced spacer length and increased number <strong>of</strong> branches per rhizome<br />
could help in the formation <strong>of</strong> dense canopy and enhance anchorage<br />
efficiency; a strategy <strong>of</strong> resistance that reduces the effect <strong>of</strong> pressure <strong>of</strong><br />
flowing waters. This dense growth form described as Phalanx growth form<br />
by Lovett-Doust (1987) due to reduced spacer length and increased<br />
branching could allow the plants to occupy favourable patches in a<br />
heterogeneous environment (De kroon et al., 1994 ; Dong and De- kroon,<br />
1994; De-kroon and Hutchings, 1995).The present study is quite in<br />
agreement with the earlier findings for Mentha aquatic, where the species<br />
produces increased number <strong>of</strong> creeping stems and dense canopy in running<br />
waters to reduce the stress <strong>of</strong> flowing water (Puijalon et al., 2008). The<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> increased number <strong>of</strong> creeping stems, enhanced anchorage and<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> dense canopy are responsible for reducing the effect <strong>of</strong> aero or<br />
Page 14
hydrodynamic forces in many other plant species (Sand-Jenson and Mebus,<br />
1996; Speck, 2003; Lui et al., 2007).<br />
The length/height <strong>of</strong> ramets in standing water populations mostly<br />
depend upon the depth <strong>of</strong> water body; while in running waters ramets grow<br />
in the direction <strong>of</strong> flow. The alignment <strong>of</strong> creeping stems with the direction<br />
<strong>of</strong> flow may be induced by different mechanisms. First it could be due to<br />
drag forces exerted by water currents pushing the stems in the flow direction<br />
(Vogel, 1994; Kotshy and Rogers, 2008). Secondly, it could also result due<br />
to higher mortality <strong>of</strong> the creeping stems growing in the other directions, for<br />
instance due to damages by sandblasting and drifting particles (Cleugh et al.,<br />
1998). Third factor is the different activity <strong>of</strong> the meristems. The meristems<br />
could grow perfectly in the downstream direction that is partly sheltered<br />
from the water current and submitted to less stressful conditions (Sand-<br />
jenson and Pedersen, 1999), where as the other growth directions could be<br />
inhabited (Puijalone et al., 2008). Total length <strong>of</strong> rhizome in different<br />
populations could not be measured precisely as it depends upon the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
substratum <strong>of</strong> water body and handling <strong>of</strong> plant material during collection<br />
(plucking <strong>of</strong> plant material).<br />
5.4: Phenology<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum overwinters by means <strong>of</strong> rhizomes and winter<br />
buds. These structures start sprouting during the first week <strong>of</strong> March and<br />
continue upto second week <strong>of</strong> April when environmental conditions such as<br />
temperature and light are available, because these factors are important for<br />
the initiation <strong>of</strong> a particular phenophase (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985). The<br />
vegetative growth commences during April and continues till June; however<br />
in running water populations the vegetative growth phase is longer than in<br />
standing water populations. The flowering commences from June to<br />
September and continues for 1-4 months in standing water populations and<br />
for 1-3 months in running water populations. The longer vegetative phase,<br />
delayed and shorter flowering phase in running waters may be due to the<br />
lower allocation <strong>of</strong> resources to sexual reproduction and permanent exposure<br />
Page 15
<strong>of</strong> plants to mechanical stress (Niklas, 1998; Henery and Thomas, 2002; and<br />
Hodges et al., 2004). The fruiting phase completes from September to<br />
October in standing water populations where as in running water populations<br />
fruits are not formed. The senescence starts from second week <strong>of</strong> October<br />
and continues till December. These phenological events are in agreement<br />
with the work <strong>of</strong> Patten (1956) and Spencer and Lekic (1974).<br />
The knowledge about life history is very important for effective<br />
management <strong>of</strong> this species and can be utilized to identify week points in the<br />
plants life cycle and exploit them for long term management (Madsen,<br />
1993). M. spicatum produces flowers, seeds and axillary buds during June-<br />
October. Therefore removal <strong>of</strong> ramets before June can prove an effective<br />
method for control <strong>of</strong> this aggressive species. This is supported by the work<br />
<strong>of</strong> Caffery and Monahan (2006) who reported that in Myriophyllum<br />
verticillatum, removal <strong>of</strong> turions yielded desirable results in control <strong>of</strong> this<br />
species as compared to annual treatment with dichlobexil, followed by<br />
mechanical cutting. The present study revealed that knowledge about<br />
various life history traits, such as different types <strong>of</strong> sexual and vegetative<br />
propagules, their time <strong>of</strong> formation and germination is very important for<br />
long term management <strong>of</strong> this aggressive species in the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />
5.5: Sexual Reproduction<br />
Sexual reproduction in Myriophyllum spicatum starts with the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> an inflorescence which is a terminal spike, red in colour and<br />
raised on an elongated peduncle. The flowers are unisexual, aggregated<br />
acropetally on the inflorescence axis with upper male and lower female<br />
arising in the axil <strong>of</strong> a strong bract with two more delicate bracteoles located<br />
at the base <strong>of</strong> each flower. Male flowers are having pinkish petals whereas<br />
female flowers are without perianth. The morphological organization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
inflorescence and flowers show slight variation but the number <strong>of</strong> flowers in<br />
each whorl is four. These results are in agreement with works <strong>of</strong> Cook<br />
(1987); Smith and Barko (1990); Aiken et al., (1979) and Hartleb et al.,<br />
(1993). The process <strong>of</strong> flowering is chronologically divided into four distinct<br />
Page 16
phases viz: budding, peduncle growth, female phase and male phase and this<br />
is in close agreement with the observations <strong>of</strong> Patten (1956) and Aiken<br />
(1981).<br />
The stigmas <strong>of</strong> an inflorescence remain receptive for 3-4 days after<br />
the stigmas come out <strong>of</strong> the leaf sheath. During this period the anthers are<br />
enclosed by petals and the receptive stigmas are well exerted above the<br />
bracts surrounding the female flowers. The ―female phase‖ is quite distinct<br />
and follows the ―male phase‖ (protogyny). Protogyny is a well known<br />
adaptation to outcrossing in aquatic angiosperms as also demonstrated by<br />
Patten (1956) in Myriophyllum spicatum; Teryokhin et al., (2002) in<br />
different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton and Guo and Cook (1990) in Groenlandia<br />
densa. The long duration <strong>of</strong> stigma receptivity is attributed to blossoming <strong>of</strong><br />
the flowers in female phase acropetally along the axis <strong>of</strong> the inflorescence.<br />
The spikes having receptive stigmas (female phase) as well as those with<br />
fully opened flowers undergoing anther dehiscence (male phase) are always<br />
situated well above the water surface except few lower female flowers<br />
occasionally. This creates congenial conditions for aerial pollen transfer<br />
from anthers to stigmatic surface. The insect pollinators were never found<br />
visiting Myriophyllum spikes which further strengthen our belief <strong>of</strong><br />
anemophily operating in the present species.<br />
The pollen–ovule ratio (p/o) in a flower is a useful tool to study plant<br />
breeding systems (Cruden, 1977). Cruden (1977) observed that higher the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> autogamy, the lower the pollen ovule ratio. A number <strong>of</strong> studies<br />
have more or less confirmed the validity <strong>of</strong> pollen- ovule ratio as an<br />
indicator <strong>of</strong> the breeding system (Lopez et al., 1999; Cruden, 2000; Jurgens<br />
et al., 2002). During the present study it was observed that Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum depicts high pollen- ovule ratio which ranges from<br />
6854.02±304.12 to 7495.71±584.02 across different populations, which<br />
shows its anemophillous and outbreeding nature. Our results are well<br />
supported by the findings <strong>of</strong> Philbrick and Anderson (1987); Cruden (2000)<br />
and Zhang et al., (2009) which state that the species whose pollen-ovule<br />
Page 17
atio ranges from 6,000-8,200 are xenogamous and show anemophily or<br />
epihydrophily. The small amount <strong>of</strong> variation observed in pollen-ovule ratio<br />
between different populations in the present study may reflect sampling<br />
error or may have environmental basis (Diazlifante, 1996; Affre et al., 1995;<br />
Ramsay et al., 1994; Vuille, 1988 and Cruden, 1977). In the present study,<br />
pollen diameter <strong>of</strong> the species was found ranging from 23.2±0.44 to<br />
23.8±0.83 µm. Probably due this small size <strong>of</strong> pollen, the species is able to<br />
produce large amount <strong>of</strong> pollen grains per flower and hence pollen-ovule<br />
ratio, thus helping in its outbreeding nature. These observations are well<br />
supported by the findings <strong>of</strong> Zhang et al., (2009); Lopez et al., (1999);<br />
Vonh<strong>of</strong> and Harder (1995); Knudsen and Olesen (1993); Mione and<br />
Anderson (1992); Small (1988); Cruden and Miller-ward (1981); Ornduff<br />
(1980) and Cruden (1977). These investigators have reported a negative<br />
correlation between pollen grain number and size. Akerman (2000) reported<br />
that small pollen grains are an adaptation to anemophily.<br />
The pollen grains <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum were found small, spherical,<br />
radially symmetrical, isopolar having four colpi with a rough surface.<br />
Similar results have been reported in earlier studies on M. spicatum by<br />
Alwadie (2008) in Saudi Arabia and Parveen (1999) in Karachi. A strong<br />
correlation exists between pollen morphology and pollination mechanism<br />
(Tanaka et al., 2004; van Vierssen et al., 1982). Pollen grains <strong>of</strong><br />
anemophillous taxa are small, spheroidal, and dry with simple apertures and<br />
scabrate tectum (Shuang-Quan et al., 2001; Parveen et al., 1994). Based on<br />
the pollen morphology, the present investigation clearly indicates that M.<br />
spicatum comes under the category <strong>of</strong> anemophillous taxa. During my field<br />
surveys the mature spikes in M. spicatum were always found above the<br />
surface <strong>of</strong> water. These spikes were also found at different development<br />
stages. Some spikes were at female phase when stigmas were found<br />
receptive and male flowers completely closed, whereas other spikes were at<br />
male phase showing anther dehiscence and their stigmas have lost the<br />
receptivity. Based on this observation we can draw a conclusion that pollen<br />
Page 18
from male flowers <strong>of</strong> one spike would be available for pollination to the<br />
receptive stigmas <strong>of</strong> other spikes thus exhibiting cross pollination. As the<br />
spikes are found well above the water surface, insects do not visit the<br />
flowers and based on pollen morphology and pollen-ovule ratio it is clear<br />
that primary mode <strong>of</strong> pollination is anemophily. Anemophily in<br />
Myriophyllum has also been reported earlier (Cook, 1988, 1996; Patten,<br />
1956). An interesting alteration to anemophily observed in the present<br />
investigation was anemo-ephydrophily, where in due to the activity <strong>of</strong> wind<br />
pollen dust falls on the surface <strong>of</strong> water and due to water currents the pollen<br />
grains are transferred to the lowermost receptive stigmas which are at the<br />
surface <strong>of</strong> water. However this is not a primary mode <strong>of</strong> pollination and such<br />
anemo-ephydrophily has also been reported in Potamogeton (Zhang et al.,<br />
2009).<br />
5.6: Fruit and Seed Biology<br />
The fruit and seed <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum has been variously<br />
described by different workers and given different names. Fruit has been<br />
given the name achene and seed as nutlet by Patten (1955), but it is not an<br />
achene because achene is a single seeded indehiscent fruit. Orchard (1986)<br />
called fruit as nut and seed as nutlet but according to the present<br />
investigation it cannot be called as nut because nut is a single seeded<br />
indehiscent fruit. Based on the present stereo and scanning electron<br />
microscopic investigations the fruit is a schizocarp with four deep<br />
longitudinal sutures where from it splits into four individual seeds called<br />
nutlets. Because schizocarpic fruits are intermediate between dehiscent and<br />
indehiscent fruits. The fruit instead <strong>of</strong> dehiscing rather splits into a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> segments each containing one or more seeds. Our observations are<br />
strongly supported by the findings <strong>of</strong> Aiken (1981) .<br />
During the present investigation it was observed that Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum produce a copious amount <strong>of</strong> seeds and the seed set percentage<br />
ranges from 70.98% to 77.91% across different populations. The seed set<br />
depends upon various factors which include inflorescence size, position <strong>of</strong><br />
Page 19
inflorescence with respect to water surface, meiotic behaviour and habitat.<br />
The standing water populations possess large inflorescences which are<br />
always above the water surface and have more than thirty flowers per<br />
inflorescence. The pollen ovule ratio is high and the stigmas remain<br />
receptive for long duration along the whole length <strong>of</strong> the spike. All these<br />
features including normal meiotic behaviour are factors which favour<br />
effective pollination and in turn high seed set. The anaphasic segregation is<br />
normal and hence the species is able to produce viable pollen and seeds. The<br />
small amount <strong>of</strong> variation observed in seed set between different standing<br />
water population‘s viz. Dal Lake, Mansbal Lake and Hygam wetland may be<br />
due the eutrophic environment <strong>of</strong> the Dal Lake as compared to Mansbal<br />
Lake and Hygam wetland. This is supported by the work <strong>of</strong> Madsen and<br />
Boylin (1989) on Myriophyllum seed ecology from an oligotrophic and<br />
eutrophic Lake. The plants inhibiting running waters do not produce seeds.<br />
Probably the spikes in such populations do not withstand the pressure <strong>of</strong><br />
running waters and pollen grains are washed away without causing effective<br />
pollination.<br />
Seed germination in Myriophyllum spicatum was found significantly<br />
influenced by various factors such as physical and chemical treatments, age<br />
<strong>of</strong> seeds and light conditions. The seeds in which seed coat was not removed<br />
(intact seeds) do not germinate even when treated with different<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> GA3, IAA and also after removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and mesocarp.<br />
The study <strong>of</strong> Patten (1955) that partial removal <strong>of</strong> stony endocarp <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum seeds is effective in causing seed germination is in<br />
close agreement with the present study, however removal <strong>of</strong> epicarp and<br />
mesocarp causes seed germination is not in agreement with the present<br />
study.<br />
The cold stratification treatment to some extent improved seed<br />
germination. This confirms that dormancy is due to the mechanical barrier <strong>of</strong><br />
the seed coat, mainly because <strong>of</strong> hard stony endocarp <strong>of</strong> the coat. Low<br />
temperature <strong>of</strong> the seeds causes rupturing <strong>of</strong> the seed coat and thus their<br />
Page 20
dormancy is overcome. The results obtained are in conformity with those <strong>of</strong><br />
Patten (1955) who also reported that seed germination can be improved by<br />
following cold stratification in M. spicatum. Similar results have been<br />
obtained by Teltscherova and Hejny (1973); Baskin and Baskin (1998) and<br />
Hay et al., (2008) in different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. Under natural<br />
conditions also, the stratification treatment more closely akin to freezing<br />
winter temperatures <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley may have promotory effect on<br />
seed germination. Cold stratification is an effective way <strong>of</strong> alleviating<br />
dormancy in many species especially those from temperate regions (Baskin<br />
and Baskin, 1998, 2004) which ensured that germination does not occur<br />
until spring commences when water temperature is more favourable to the<br />
vegetative growth <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants (Hay et al., 2008).<br />
The seed age has significant effect on its germination. The present<br />
data confirms that M. spicatum seeds do survive desiccation. These results<br />
are in conformity with those <strong>of</strong> Standifer and Madsen (1997) who reported<br />
that M. spicatum seeds do survive desiccation and viability <strong>of</strong> seeds is<br />
reduced under storage. The freshly collected seeds as well as those dry<br />
stored upto one year germinate provided the seed coat is cut. Percent<br />
germination however, declines with age <strong>of</strong> the seed. Similar results were<br />
obtained by Hay et al., (2000, 2008) in case <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. These<br />
observations indicate that no after ripening period is needed by the embryo<br />
<strong>of</strong> M. spicatum and the seeds are an important means <strong>of</strong> propagation in the<br />
habitats where water dries up for some period during the year. These<br />
observations are in agreement with the work <strong>of</strong> Kadano (1984) who<br />
observed that Potamogeton distinctus overcomes the long lasting drought in<br />
irrigation reservoirs under warm temperature conditions by the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds.<br />
The seed germination varies significantly under continuous dark and<br />
alternate light and dark conditions. During the present study it was observed<br />
that the percentage germination was more in alternate light and dark<br />
conditions as compared to the seeds kept in continuous dark conditions in all<br />
Page 21
the treatments. These observations are in agreement with the results <strong>of</strong> Coble<br />
and Vance (1987). However, for aquatic plants effects <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> light are<br />
less clear, although some quantitative effects are known (Spencer et al.,<br />
1971; Sharma and Gopal, 1978).<br />
The seeds do not germinate in trays provided with sediment and<br />
water. The reason for this is the hard seed coat which restricts the water<br />
absorption and low temperature needed by the seeds for their germination<br />
causing prolonged seed dormancy. The ability to germinate under a range <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental conditions is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons why M. spicatum is found in<br />
range <strong>of</strong> habitats and has wide distribution in the diverse aquatic ecosystems<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley.<br />
5.7: Pollen mother cell meiosis<br />
Earlier work on pollen mother cell meiosis and chromosome count<br />
reveals that genus Myriophyllum is monobasic having x = 7 (Fedorov, 1969;<br />
Love and Love, 1956; Love and Ritchie, 1966). During the present<br />
investigation it was observed that Myriophyllum spicatum is hexaploid with<br />
2n = 6x =42. The 42 chromosomes pair into 21 bivalents which segregate to<br />
21 chromosomes to each pole without error. The anaphasic disjunction is<br />
regular and normal due to which enormous quantities <strong>of</strong> viable pollen grains<br />
are produced. The normal meiotic behaviour imposes genetic stability upon<br />
the species and ensures fertility and high pollen output.<br />
5.8: Resource allocation<br />
Every organism allocates its resources for various essential activities,<br />
like maintenance, growth and reproduction (Willson, 1983). The analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
resource allocation to different plant parts is useful in predicting allocation<br />
patterns and survival strategies <strong>of</strong> plants (Madsen, 1991).<br />
The dry mass allocation to different plant parts in Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
varies significantly between standing and running water populations. The<br />
dry mass allocation to shoots and spikes is less, and undersediment parts are<br />
higher in plants inhabiting running waters as compared to plants inhabiting<br />
standing waters. It is presumably because the ramets in running waters do<br />
Page 22
not produce more branches required to avoid the risk <strong>of</strong> getting detached by<br />
the pressure <strong>of</strong> running waters. Similarly the development <strong>of</strong> spikes gets<br />
impaired in such stressful environments. The undersediment parts (rhizome,<br />
roots) spread between the stones and sediment and in turn provide strong<br />
anchorage and protect the plants from completely being washed away. The<br />
rhizomes are mostly the means <strong>of</strong> propagation in running waters. Permanent<br />
exposure <strong>of</strong> plants to mechanical stress usually results in reduced size <strong>of</strong><br />
leaves, height and consequently biomass allocation (Niklas, 1998; Henery<br />
and Thomas, 2002; Boeger and Poulsan, 2003) and increased allocation to<br />
undersediment parts. Puijalon and Bornette (2006) also observed higher<br />
allocation to below ground organs in running waters. This result in better<br />
resource accumulation in the parts protected from the water currents and is<br />
considered to improve anchorage efficiency (Cook and Emnos, 1996;<br />
Niklas, 1998). A lower allocation to sexual reproduction associated with<br />
delayed flowering is also <strong>of</strong>ten observed in running water populations<br />
(Niklas, 1998; Hodges et al., 2004). The plants in standing waters allocate<br />
much <strong>of</strong> the resources to shoots, seeds and spikes followed by<br />
undersediment parts.<br />
5.9: Vegetative Reproduction<br />
Aquatic plants display a wide range <strong>of</strong> methods for clonal<br />
propagation which include the formation <strong>of</strong> rhizomes, runners, stolons,<br />
tubers, fragments and axillary buds. Vegetative reproduction is the dominant<br />
mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction in water plants (Sculthrope, 1967; Hutchinson, 1975).<br />
During the present study it was observed that Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
operates multiple modes <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagation by rhizomes, fragments,<br />
axillary buds and nodal planlets.<br />
Rhizomes have a tremendous potential to form new plantlets. The<br />
experimental data obtained during the present investigation reveals that each<br />
5 cm long rhizome cutting has the potential to form 6.0±0.62 new plantlets.<br />
The sprouting <strong>of</strong> rhizomes is an effective mechanism for revegetation and<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> reproduction has been observed in March to<br />
Page 23
April <strong>of</strong> the growing season. So rhizomes are a means <strong>of</strong> localized spread in<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum. These observations are strongly supported by the<br />
work <strong>of</strong> Patten (1956); Madsen et al., (1988) and Madsen and Smith (1997)<br />
who obtained almost similar type <strong>of</strong> results in Myriophyllum, and by Bartly<br />
and Spence (1987) in Scirpus lucustris, Smith et al., (1989) in case <strong>of</strong><br />
Nymphea alba. Rhizomes are the most important means <strong>of</strong> proliferation in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> running waters. Weigleb and Kadano (1989) opined that highly<br />
disturbed sites are colonized by the species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton by means <strong>of</strong><br />
rhizomes and stolons. The rhizomatous growth form helps to resist the<br />
damaging forces <strong>of</strong> waves and tidal currents (Hartog, 1970).<br />
Fragmentation is another important mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction operative in<br />
the species. During the present study it was observed that Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum produces two types <strong>of</strong> stem fragments viz: aut<strong>of</strong>ragments and<br />
all<strong>of</strong>ragments in natural populations. The aut<strong>of</strong>ragments are formed by the<br />
self induced abscission <strong>of</strong> shoot apices and these fragments are generally<br />
formed when peak biomass has been attained whereas all<strong>of</strong>ragments are<br />
formed by the mechanical breakage <strong>of</strong> the parent stem. These fragments<br />
provide a means <strong>of</strong> intermediate to long distance dispersal <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />
These observations are strongly supported by the work <strong>of</strong> Aiken et al.,<br />
(1979); Madsen et al., (1988); Madsen (1997) and Kimbel (1982) in<br />
Myriophyllum and by Riis et al., (2009) in case <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. The<br />
deweeding produces a large number <strong>of</strong> all<strong>of</strong>ragments. This is however, a<br />
common practice in different water bodies <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley. These<br />
all<strong>of</strong>ragments are usually more important than seeds for dispersal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
plant and colonization <strong>of</strong> open stream beds (Riis, 2008). Moreover, the<br />
reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> apical and intermediate fragments with varying<br />
number <strong>of</strong> nodes was also analysed during the present study. It was observed<br />
that among six and three noded apical and intermediate fragments, the six<br />
noded intermediate fragments showed the maximum potential to form the<br />
new plantlets followed by three noded intermediate and six noded apical<br />
fragments. The three noded apical fragments are not able to form any<br />
Page 24
plantlet. Moreover it was also observed that apical fragments showing the<br />
least potential to form new plantlets showed an increase in length and<br />
number <strong>of</strong> nodes while as intermediate fragments does not showed any<br />
change in length and number <strong>of</strong> nodes.<br />
These observations reveal that both the number <strong>of</strong> nodes <strong>of</strong> the stem<br />
fragment and position <strong>of</strong> the fragment whether apical or intermediate<br />
determine the reproductive potential <strong>of</strong> the stem fragments in case <strong>of</strong><br />
Myriophyllum spicatum. These observations are in accordance with the work<br />
<strong>of</strong> Langeland and Sutton (1980) in Hydrilla verticillata in which a single<br />
noded fragment produces roots and shoots but every three noded fragment is<br />
able to initiate a new plant.<br />
Another type <strong>of</strong> vegetative propagule produced by Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum is axillary bud. The axillary buds <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are normal<br />
vegetative buds but they differ from vegetative buds in their size and the<br />
ease with which they detach. Many species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum develop large<br />
and prominent winter buds known as turions. Morphologically the small<br />
axillary buds <strong>of</strong> M. spicatum are not turions but physiologically they may be<br />
considered. These buds are formed during October-November and remain<br />
dormant during the chilling winter and germinate immediately on arrival <strong>of</strong><br />
the spring when the conditions are favourable. The present experimental<br />
studies reveal that the germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds is controlled by<br />
temperature and light and the presence <strong>of</strong> sediment is not obligatory for<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds provided sufficient quantity <strong>of</strong> water is<br />
available. These observations draw support from Jain et al., (2003) who<br />
observed that turions <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton crispus are capable <strong>of</strong> germinating in<br />
any water body irrespective <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> substratum. As demonstrated during<br />
the present study, the optimum temperature for axillary bud germination is<br />
20-25°C. Similar results have been reported in Potamogeton pectinatus by<br />
Madsen and Adams (1988). The germination <strong>of</strong> these propagules is<br />
inhabited below 10°C and beyond 30°C. Under natural conditions also, the<br />
axillary buds remain dormant during the cold winters <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong> valley<br />
Page 25
when the temperature <strong>of</strong> water bodies is much lower, mostly less than 4°C.<br />
The germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds begins from March and proceeds upto<br />
ending April, when the temperature is optimum for their germination. Some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ungerminated axillary buds do not germinate after April because<br />
temperature beyond 30°C inhabits germination. The temperature dependence<br />
<strong>of</strong> turion germination was also observed by Rogers and Breen (1980) in case<br />
<strong>of</strong> Potamogeton crispus. The experimental studies conducted during the<br />
present study on axillary bud germination revealed that both rate and overall<br />
percentage germination <strong>of</strong> axillary buds was higher under alternate light and<br />
dark than in continuous dark conditions indicating that axillary bud<br />
germination is also influenced by light. This observation is strongly<br />
supported by the work <strong>of</strong> Jain et al., (2003) who observed that percentage<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> turions decreases with increase in the depth <strong>of</strong> water body<br />
because <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> low light intensity at deeper depths.<br />
The axillary buds have very high potential to spread Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum locally. Each axillary bud has the potential to form a single<br />
plantlet. The newly formed plantlet (ramet) undergoes vegetative growth and<br />
produce 8-12 new axillary buds which in a geometric progression produce<br />
80-144 new ramets. This could be an important mechanism contributing to<br />
the spread <strong>of</strong> this species in Lakes and a pond experiencing high predation<br />
pressure from herbivorous fishs as has been reported by Jain et al., (2003)<br />
for different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. This clearly indicates that a single<br />
axillary bud is capable <strong>of</strong> establishing a large population in few years. These<br />
axillary buds not only produce plantlets but also spread throughout the space<br />
available and also give rise to new propagules which invade the water bodies<br />
and produce large populations <strong>of</strong> the species covering the entire water body<br />
as a green mat. The removal <strong>of</strong> these axillary buds has a great role in<br />
providing long term safety against the spread <strong>of</strong> this aggressive species. The<br />
axillary bud removal can be carried out during October to November when<br />
these are produced.<br />
Page 26
CHAPTER-6<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Page 27
Abrahamson, W. G. (1980). Demography and vegetative reproduction. In<br />
Solbrig OT, ed. Demography and Evolution in plant populations. Pp.<br />
89-106. Barkeley (CA): University <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />
Affre, L; Thompson, J. D. and Debussche, M. (1995). The reproductive<br />
biology <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean endemic Cyclamen balearicum Willk<br />
(Primulaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.118: 309-330.<br />
Agami, M; Beer, S & Waisel, Y. (1986). The morphology and physiology<br />
<strong>of</strong> turions in Najas marina L. in Israel. Aquatic Botany. 26: 371-376.<br />
Aiken, S. G; Newroth, P. R. and Wile, I. (1979). The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian<br />
weeds 34. Myriophyllum spicatum L. Candian Jornal <strong>of</strong> Plant<br />
Sciences. 59: 201-215.<br />
Aiken, S. G. (1978). Pollen morphology in the genus Myriophyllum<br />
(Haloragaceae). Can. J. Bot. 56(2): 976-982.<br />
Aiken, S. G. (1981). A conspectus <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in North<br />
America. Brittonia. 33: 57-69.<br />
Aiken, S. G. and McNeill, J. (1980). The discovery <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
exalbescens Fernald (Haloragaceae) in Europe and the typification <strong>of</strong><br />
M.spicatum L and M.verticillatum L. Bot. J. Linn.Soc. 80: 213-222.<br />
Aiken, S. G. and Walz, K. F. (1979). Turions <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum exalbescens.<br />
Aquatic Botany. 6: 357-363.<br />
Aiken, S. G. and Walz, K. F. (1979). Turions <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum exalbescens.<br />
Aquatic Botany . 6: 357-363.<br />
Aiken, S. G; Newroth, P. R. and Wile, I. (1979). The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian<br />
weeds. 34-Myriophyllum spicatum L. Candian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant<br />
Science. 59: 201-215.<br />
Aiken. S. G. (1979). North American species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
(Haloragaceae). Ph. D Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota. Pp, 250.<br />
Akerman, J. D. (2000). Abiotic pollen and pollination: ecological, functional<br />
and evolutionary perspectives. Plant syst. Evol. 222: 167-185.<br />
Alwadie, M. H. (2008). Pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> six aquatic angiosperms from<br />
Saudi Arabia. Asian journal <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences. 1(1): 45-50.<br />
Page 28
Anderson, G. J; Johson, S. D; Neil, P. R. and Bernardello, G. (2002).<br />
Reproductive biology and plant systematics, the growth <strong>of</strong> a<br />
symbiotic association. Taxon. 51: 637-653.<br />
Anderson, G. J; Bernardello, G; Opel, M. R; Santos-Guerra, A. and<br />
Anderson, M. (2006). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> dioecious Canary<br />
island endemic Withania aristata (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 93:<br />
1295-1305.<br />
Angevine, M. W and Chabot, B. F. (1979). Seed germination syndromes in<br />
higher plants. In: Solbrig, O. T., Jain, S., Johnson, B., Raven, P. H.,<br />
(eds), Topics in plant population biology. Columbia University Press,<br />
New York, pp. 188-206.<br />
Anonymous. (1993). Harmful non-indigenous species in united states.<br />
Office <strong>of</strong> technology assessment, U.S. Congress. Washington, D. C.<br />
Arber, A. (1920). Water Plants, a study <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms. Cambridge<br />
University Press, Cambridge. Pp.46-97.<br />
Arnold, R. M. (1982). Pollination, predation and seed set in Linaria vulgaris<br />
(Scrophulariaceae). Amer. Midl. Naturalist. 107: 360-369.<br />
Arnold, R. R; Cornwell, J. C; Dennison, W.C. and Stevenson, J. C. (2000).<br />
Sediment based reconstruction <strong>of</strong> submersed aquatic vegetation<br />
distribution in the Severn river, a sub-estuary <strong>of</strong> Chesapeake Bay. J.<br />
Coast. Res. 16: 188-195.<br />
Arroyo, M. T. K. (1973). Chiasma frequency evidence on the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
autogamy in Limanthes floccose (Limnanthaceae). Evolution. 27:<br />
679-688.<br />
Baker, H. G. (1967). The Evolution <strong>of</strong> weedy taxa in the Eupatorium<br />
microstemon species aggregate. Taxon. 16: 293-300.<br />
Barrat-segretain, M. H. (1996). Strategies <strong>of</strong> reproduction, dispersion and<br />
competition in river plants: A review. Vegetatio. 123: 13-37.<br />
Barret, S. C. H and Richardson, B. J. (1986). Genetic attributes <strong>of</strong> invading<br />
species.In : Groves R. and Burdon, J. J. (eds). Ecology <strong>of</strong> Biological<br />
Page 29
Invasions: An Australian Perspective, PP.21-33. Australian Academy<br />
<strong>of</strong> Science, Jaracaranda, Canberra, Australia.<br />
Barret, S. C. H. (1980). Sexual reproduction in Echhornia crassipes (water<br />
hyacinth) I. Fertility <strong>of</strong> clones from diverse regions. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
applied ecology, 17: 101-112.<br />
Barrett, S. C. H. (1989). Waterweed invasions. Scientific American. 261: 90-<br />
97.<br />
Barrett, S. C. H; Eckert, D. G. and Husband, B. C. (1993). Evolutionary<br />
processes in aquatic plant populations. Aquatic Botany. 44: 105-145.<br />
Bartely, M. R. and Spence, D. H. N. (1989). Dormancy and propagation in<br />
helophytes and hydrophytes. Arch. Hydrobiol. Ergebn. Limnol. 27:<br />
139-155.<br />
Bartodziej, W. and Ludlow, L. (1998). Aquatic vegetation monitoring by<br />
natural resource agencies in the United States. Aquatics. 20: 15-18.<br />
Baskin, C. C. and Baskin, J. M. (1998). Seeds, ecology, biogeography and<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> dormancy and germination. Academic Press, New York.<br />
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. (2004). A classification system for seed<br />
dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 14: 1-16.<br />
Bates, A. L; Burns, E. R. and Webb, D. H. (1985). EWM (M. spicatum) in<br />
the Tennessee valley: an update on biology and control. Pp. 104-115.<br />
L. W. J. Anderson, Ed Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the first International<br />
symposium on watermilfoil.<br />
Boeger, M. R. T. and Poulsan, M. E. (2003). Morphological adaptation and<br />
photosynthetic rates <strong>of</strong> amphibious Veronica angallis-aquatica L.<br />
(Scrophulariaceae) under different flow regimes. Aquatic Botany. 75:<br />
123-135.<br />
Borchert, R. (1980). Phenology and ecophysciology <strong>of</strong> tropical trees:<br />
Erythrina poeppigiana Cook. Ecology. 61: 1065-1074.<br />
Borchert, R. (1983). Phenology and Control <strong>of</strong> flowering in tropical trees.<br />
Biotropica. 15: 81-89.<br />
Page 30
Brewbacker, J. L. and Kwach, B. H. (1963). The essential role <strong>of</strong> calcium<br />
ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Amer. J. Bot. 50:<br />
859-865.<br />
Brock, T. C. M; Mielo, H. and Oestermeijer, G. (1989). On the life cycle and<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> Hottonia palustris L. in a wetland forest. Aquatic<br />
Botany. 35: 153-166.<br />
Bronstein, J. L; Gouyon, P.H; Gliddon, C; Kjellberg, F. and Michaloud, G<br />
(1990). The Ecological consequences <strong>of</strong> flowering asynchrony in<br />
monoecious fogs: A simulation study. Ecology. 71: 2145-2156.<br />
Brunet, J. and Charlesworth, D. (1995). Floral sex allocation in sequentially<br />
blooming plants. Evolution. 49: 70-79.<br />
Brux, H; Todeskino, D. and Wiegleb, G. (1987). Growth and reproduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> Potamogeton alpines Balbis growing in disturbed habitats. Archiv.<br />
Hydrobiol. Ergebn. Limnol. 27: 115-127.<br />
Caffrey, J. M. and Monahan, C. (2006). Control <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
verticillatum L. in Irish cannals by turion removal. Hydrobiologia.<br />
570: 211-215.<br />
Catling, P. M. and Dobson, I. (1985). The biology <strong>of</strong> canadian weeds. 69.<br />
Potamogeton crispus L. Can. J. plant sci. 65: 655-668.<br />
Center, T. D; Frank, J. H. and Dray, F. A. (1997). Biological controll. Pp<br />
245-266 in : Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, D; d. C. Schmitz and T. C. Brown , eds.<br />
Strangers in paradise. Island press, Washington , D.c.<br />
Charnov, E. L. (1982). The theory <strong>of</strong> sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press,<br />
Princeton.<br />
Charpentier, A; Grillas, P. and Thompson, J. D. (2000). The effect <strong>of</strong><br />
population size on fecundity in mosaic populations <strong>of</strong> the clonal<br />
macrophyte. Scirpus maritimus (Cyperaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87: 502-<br />
507.<br />
Chen, Y; Li, X; Yin, L; Cheng, Y and Li, W. (2009). Genetic diversity and<br />
migration patterns <strong>of</strong> the aquatic macrophyte Potamogeton malaianus<br />
in a potamolacustrine system. Freshwater Biology. 54: 1178-1188.<br />
Page 31
Cleugh, H. A; Miller, J. M. and Böhm, M. (1998). Direct mechanical effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> deweeding on crops. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems. 41: 85-112.<br />
Coble, T. A. and Vance, B. D. (1987). Seed germination is Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum L . J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 25: 8-10.<br />
Cook, C. D. K. (1966). A monographic study <strong>of</strong> Ranunculus subgenus<br />
Batrachium. Bot.Mitt. (Munchen) 6: 47-237<br />
Cook, C. D. K. (1987). Vegetative growth and genetic mobility in some<br />
aquatic weeds. pp. 217-225 in Differentiation patterns in higher<br />
plants. Academic Press, London.<br />
Cook, C. D. K. (1988). Wind pollination in aquatic angiosperms. Ann.<br />
Missouri Bot. Garden.75: 768-777.<br />
Cook, C. D. K. (1990). Aquatic plant book. The Hague (the Netherlands):<br />
SPB Academic publishing.<br />
Cook, C. D. K. (1996). The aquatic plant book. SPB Academic Publishing,<br />
New York.<br />
Cook, M. J. and Emnos, A. R. (1996). Mechanical differences between free-<br />
standing and supported wheat plant Triticum aestivum L. Annals <strong>of</strong><br />
Botany. 77: 197-202.<br />
Cooper, R. L; Osborn, J. M. and Philbrick, C. T. (2000). Comprative pollen<br />
morphology and ultrastructure <strong>of</strong> the Callitrichaceae. Am. J. Bot.<br />
87(2): 161-175.<br />
Couch, R. and Nelson, E. (1983). Myriophyllum in Oklahoma. Proc. Okla.<br />
Acad. Sci. 63: 103-104.<br />
Couch, R. and Nelson, E. (1985). Myriophyllum spicatum in North America.<br />
Proc. 1 st International symposium on watrmilfoil (Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum) and related Haloragaceae species. Aquatic Plant Manage.<br />
Soc. pp. 8-18.<br />
Cox, P. A. (1988). Hydrophilous pollination. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 261-<br />
280.<br />
Page 32
Creed, R. P. (1998). A biogeographic perspective on Eurasian watermilfoil<br />
declines: additional evidence for the role <strong>of</strong> herbivorous weevils in<br />
promoting declines. J. Aquatic Plant Manage. 36: 16-22.<br />
Cronk, J. K and Fennessy, M. S. (2001) Wetland plants: biology and<br />
ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.<br />
Crow, G. E. and Hellquist, B. C. (2000). Aquatic and wetland plants <strong>of</strong><br />
northeastern North America. I: Peteridophytes, gymnosperms and<br />
angiosperms: Dictoyladons. University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Press,<br />
Wisconsin.<br />
Cruden, R. W. (1973). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> weedy and cultivaeted<br />
Mirabilis (Nyctaginaceae). Amr. J. Bot. 60: 802-809.<br />
Cruden, R. W. (1977). Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator <strong>of</strong><br />
breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32-46.<br />
Cruden, R. W. (1997). Implications <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary theory to applied<br />
pollination ecology. In: Richards K. W. (ed). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 7 th<br />
International symposium or pollination. Acta Horticulture. 437: 27-<br />
51.<br />
Cruden, R. W. (2000). Pollen grains: why so many ? Plant Syst. Evol. 222:<br />
143-165.<br />
Cruden, R. W. and Lloyd, R. M. (1995). Embryophytes have equivalent<br />
sexual phenotypes and breeding systems: why not a common<br />
terminology to describe them? Amer. J. Bot. 82: 816-825.<br />
Cruden, R. W. and Miller-ward, S. (1981). Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen size<br />
and the ratio <strong>of</strong> stigmatic area to the pollen-bearing area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pollinator: an hypothesis. Evolution . 35: 964-974.<br />
Dahl, A. E. (1989). Taxonomic and morphological studies in Hypecoum<br />
Sect. hypecoum (Papeveraceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 163: 227-280.<br />
Dawson, F. H. (1980). Flowering <strong>of</strong> Ranunculus pencillatus . Aquatic<br />
Botany. 9:145-157.<br />
Page 33
De Kroon, H; Stueffer, J. F; Dong, M. and During, H. J. (1994). On plastic<br />
and non-plastic variation in clonal plant morphology and its<br />
ecological significance. Folia Geobotanica. 29: 123-138.<br />
De-Kroon, H. and Hutchings, M. J. (1995). Morphological plasticity in<br />
clonal plants: the foraging concept revisited. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 83:<br />
143-152.<br />
Delpino, F. and Ascherson, P. (1871). Federico delphino‘s eintheilung der<br />
pflanzen nach dem mechanimus der dichogamischen befruchtung and<br />
bemerkungen uber die befruchtungs-vorgange bei wasserpflanzen.<br />
Bot. Zeit. 29: 443-447.<br />
Devlin, B. (1989). Components <strong>of</strong> seed yield and pollen yield <strong>of</strong> Lobelia<br />
cardinals: variation and correlations. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 204-214.<br />
Devlin, B. and Stephenson, A. G. (1984). Factors that influence the duration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the staminate and pistillate phases <strong>of</strong> Lobelia cardinalis flowers.<br />
Bot. Gaz. 145: 323-328.<br />
Dianne, L. A. and Spicer, P. B. (1958). Aceto analine blue-safranin method<br />
<strong>of</strong> staining germinating pollen and pollen tubes. Stain Technol. 33:<br />
15-17.<br />
Diaz Lifante, Z. (1996). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Ashphodelus aestivus<br />
(Asphodelaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 200: 177-191.<br />
Donaldson, S. and Johnson, W. S. (1998). Eurasian watermilfoil. Reno:<br />
university <strong>of</strong> Nevada Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet.pp 4.<br />
Dong, M. and de Kroon, H. (1994). Plasticity in morphology and biomass<br />
allocation in Cynodon dactylon, a grass species forming stolons and<br />
rhizomes. Oikos. 70:99-106.<br />
Duarte, C. M; Planas, D and Penuelas, J. (1994). Macrophytes, taking<br />
control <strong>of</strong> an ancestral home. In : Margelef, R. (Ed.) Limnoogy Now:<br />
a paradigm <strong>of</strong> planetary problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 59-79.<br />
Ducker, S. C. and Knox, R. B. (1985). Pollen and pollination: A historical<br />
review. Taxon. 34(3): 401-419.<br />
Page 34
Dudley, J. L. (1987). Turion formation in strains <strong>of</strong> Lemna minor and<br />
Lemna turionifera. Aquatic Botany. 27: 207-215.<br />
Dulberger, R and Ornduff, R. (1980). Floral morphology and reproductive<br />
biology <strong>of</strong> four species <strong>of</strong> Cyanella (Tecophilaceae). New Phytol. 86:<br />
45-56.<br />
Eckart, C. G. (2002). The loss <strong>of</strong> sex in Clonal plants. Evolutionary Ecology,<br />
15: 501-520<br />
Eiswerth, M. E; Donaldson, S. G. and Johnson, W.S. (2000). Potential<br />
environmental impacts and economic demages <strong>of</strong> Eurasian<br />
watermilfoil (M. spicatum) in Western Nevada and northeastern<br />
California. Weed Technology. 14: 511-518.<br />
Faegri, K. and Vander Pijl L. (1979). The principles <strong>of</strong> pollination ecology,<br />
3 rd edn. Pergamon, Oxford.<br />
Fedôrov, A. A. (1969). Chromosome number <strong>of</strong> flowering plants. Acad.<br />
Sci. U.S.S.R. Leningrad.<br />
Feliner, G. N. (1991). Breeding systems and related floral traits in several<br />
Erysimum (Cruciferae). Canad. J. Bot. 69: 2515-2521.<br />
Fernald, M. L. (1919). Two new Myriophyllum and a species new to the<br />
Untied States. Rhodora. 21: 121-124.<br />
Figuerola, J. and Green, A. J. (2002). How frequent is external transport <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds and invertebrate eggs by waterbirds? A study in Donana, SW<br />
spain. Arch. Hydrobiol. 155: 557-565.<br />
Furnier, G. R. and Mustaphi, M. M. (1992). Isozyme variation in Minnesota<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil. Aquatic Botany .43: 305-309.<br />
Gantes, H. P. and Caro, A. S. (2001). Environmental heterogeneity and<br />
spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> macrophytes in plain streams. Aquatic Botany.<br />
70: 225-236.<br />
Gerber, D. T. and Les, D. H. (1994). Comparison <strong>of</strong> leaf morphology among<br />
submersed species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) from different<br />
Page 35
habitats and geographic distributions. Amer. J. <strong>of</strong> Botany 81: 973-<br />
979.<br />
Gibbs, P. E; Milne, C. and Carrillo, M. (1975). Correlation between the<br />
breeding systems and recombination index in five species <strong>of</strong> Senecio.<br />
New Phytol. 75: 619-626.<br />
Grace, J. B. (1993). The adaptive significance <strong>of</strong> clonal reproduction in<br />
angiosperms: an aquatic perspective. Aquatic Botany. 44: 159-180.<br />
Grant, V. (1981). Plant Speciation. 2 nd ed. New York: Columbia University<br />
Press.<br />
Grier, N. M. (1920). Notes on comparative regeneration in Elodea and<br />
Ceratophyllum. American Botanist. 26: 80-84.<br />
Groth, A. T; Lovett-Doust, L. and Lovett- Doust, J. (1996).Population<br />
density and module demography in Trapa natans (Trapaceae) , an<br />
annual, clonal aquatic macrophyte. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1406-1415.<br />
Guo, Y. H. and Cook, C. D. K. (1990). The Floral biology <strong>of</strong> Groenlandia<br />
densa L. Fourreau (Potamogetonaceae). Aquatic Botany. 18: 283-<br />
288.<br />
Guppy, H. B. (1897). On the postponement <strong>of</strong> germination <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong><br />
aquatic plants. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Ediburgh 13: 344-360.<br />
Hagi, G. (1926). Illustrierte flora von mittel-Europa. Bd. V. T. Z. Munchen.<br />
Hannan, G. L. and Prucher, H. A. (1996). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong><br />
Caulophyllum thalictroides (Berberidaceae) an early flowering<br />
perennial <strong>of</strong> eastern North America. Amer. Midl. Naturalist. 136:<br />
267-277.<br />
Hartleb, C. F; Madsen, J. D. and Boylen, C. W. (1993). Environmental<br />
factors affecting seed germination in Myriophyllum spicatum L.<br />
Aquatic Botany. 45: 15-25.<br />
Hartmann, K. M. (1966). A general hypothesis to interpret ―high energy<br />
phenomenon‖ <strong>of</strong> photomorphogenesis on the basis <strong>of</strong> phytochrome.<br />
Photochem. Photobiol. 5: 349-366.<br />
Page 36
Hartog, C. Den. (1970). The Seagrasses <strong>of</strong> the World. Verhandl. Kon. Ned.<br />
Akad. Wetensch. Nat. 59: 161-170.<br />
Harwell, M. C and Orth, R. J. (2002). Long distance dispersal potential in<br />
marine macrophyte. Ecology. 83: 3319-3330.<br />
Hauser, E. J. P. and Morrison, J. P. (1964). The cytochemical reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
nitroblue tetrazolium as an index <strong>of</strong> pollen viability. Amer. J. Bot. 51:<br />
659-664<br />
Hay, F. R; Probert, R. J; Marro, J., Dawson, M. (2000). Towards the ex situ<br />
conservation <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms: a review <strong>of</strong> seed storage<br />
behavior. In: Black, M., Bradford, K. J., Vasquez-Ramos, J. (Eds.),<br />
Seed Biology: Advances and application. CAB international,<br />
Walligford, UK, 161-177.<br />
Hay, F; Probert, R. and Dawson, M. (2008). Laboratory germination <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds from 10 British species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton. Aquatic Botany. 88:<br />
353-357.<br />
Haynes, R. R. (1988). Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> selected aquatic plants. Ann.<br />
Missouri Bot. Gard. 75: 805-810.<br />
Henry, H. A. L. and Thomas, S. C. (2002). Interactive effects <strong>of</strong> shade and<br />
wind on stem, allometry, biomass allocation and mechanical stability<br />
in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany.<br />
89: 1609-1615.<br />
Heslop-Harrison, Y. (1955). Nuphar J. Ecol. 43: 342-355.<br />
Hodges, L; Suratman, M. N; Brandle, J. R. and Hubbage, K. G.( 2004).<br />
Growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Snap beans as affected by wind protection and<br />
microclimate changes due to shelter-belts and planting dates. Hort.<br />
Science. 39: 996-1004.<br />
Holm, L; Pancho, J. V; Herberger, J. P. and Plucknett, D. L. (1979). A<br />
geographical atlas <strong>of</strong> world weeds. John Wiley and Sons, New York.<br />
Hooker, J. D. (1879). The flora <strong>of</strong> British India Vol. II. L. Reeve and Co.<br />
Ltd., London. Pp, 432-434.<br />
Page 37
Hulten, E. (1947). Flora <strong>of</strong> Alaska and Yukon. 7: 1159.<br />
Hutchinson, G. E. (1975). A treatise on limnology. Vol. 3: Limnological<br />
Botany. New York: John Wiley and Sons.<br />
Inouye, D. W; Morales. M. and Dodge, G. (2002). Variation in timing and<br />
abundance in flowering by Delphinium barbeyi Huth<br />
(Rananculaceae). The role <strong>of</strong> snowpeak, frost in the context <strong>of</strong><br />
climate change. Oecologia 139: 453-550.<br />
Inouyl, D. W and McGure, A.D. (1991). Effects <strong>of</strong> snowpeak on timing and<br />
abudndance <strong>of</strong> flowering in Delphenium nelsonii (Rananculaceae):<br />
implications for climate change. Am. J. Bot. 78: 997-1001.<br />
Jacobs, D. L. (1947). An ecological life-history <strong>of</strong> Spirodela polyrhiza<br />
(greater duckweed) with emphasis on the turion phase. Ecol. Monogr.<br />
17: 439-468.<br />
Jacono, C. C. and Richerson, M. M. (2003). Aquatic and wetland plants <strong>of</strong><br />
northeastern North America. Vol. I. The University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin<br />
Press, Madison, Wisconsin.<br />
Jain, Y; Li, B; Wang, J. and Chen, J. (2003). Control <strong>of</strong> turion germination<br />
in Potamogeton crispus. Aquatic Botany. 75: 59-69.<br />
Jarvis, J. C. and Moore, K. A. (2008). Influence <strong>of</strong> environmental factors on<br />
Vallisneria americana seed germination. Aquatic Botany. 88: 283-<br />
294.<br />
Jepson, W. L. (1925). Manual <strong>of</strong> flowering plants <strong>of</strong> California. University<br />
<strong>of</strong> California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1238.<br />
Johnson, R. K; Gross, E. M. and Hariston, N. G. (1998). Decline <strong>of</strong> the<br />
invasive submersed macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
(Haloragaceae) associated with herbivory by larvae <strong>of</strong> Acentria<br />
ephemerella (Lepidoptera). Aquatic Ecology 31: 273-282.<br />
Jurgens, A; Witt, T. and Gottsberger. (2002). Pollen grain numbers, ovule<br />
numbers and pollen-ovule ratios in Caryophylloideae: Correlation<br />
with breeding system, pollination, life form, style number and sexual<br />
system. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14: 279-289.<br />
Page 38
Kadano, Y. (1984). Comparative ecology <strong>of</strong> Japanese Potamogeton: an<br />
extensive survey with special reference to growth form and life cycle.<br />
Jpn. J. Ecol. 34: 161-172.<br />
Kak, A. M. (1978). Taxonomical studies <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>.<br />
Ph.D thesis. Lakeline 58: 29-30.<br />
Kak, A. M. (1990). Aquatic and wetland vegetation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kashmir</strong><br />
Himalaya. Jour. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 14: 1-14.<br />
Kaplan, Z. (2002). Phenotypic plasticity in Potamogeton<br />
(Potamogetonaceae). Folia Geobotanica. 37: 141-170.<br />
Kaplan, Z. (2008). A taxonomic revision <strong>of</strong> Stuckenia (Potamogetonaceae)<br />
in Asia, with notes on the diversity and variation <strong>of</strong> the genus on a<br />
worldwide scale. Folia Geobotanica. 43:159-234.<br />
Kaul, V and Zutshi, D. P. (1965). A study <strong>of</strong> aquatic and marshland<br />
vegetation <strong>of</strong> Srinagar lakes. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. Ind. 33: 111-127.<br />
Kautsky, L. (1987). Life cycles <strong>of</strong> three populations <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton<br />
pectinatus L. at different degree <strong>of</strong> wave exposure in the Askö area,<br />
Northern Baltic Proper. Aquatic Botany. 27: 177-186.<br />
Kawano, S. and Masuda, J. (1980). The productive and reproductive biology<br />
<strong>of</strong> flowering plants. VIII. Resource allocation and reproduction<br />
capacity in wild population <strong>of</strong> Heloniopsis orientalis.(Thunb) C.<br />
Tanaka (Liliaceae). Oecologia .45: 307-317<br />
Ke, X and Li, W. (2006). Germination requirements <strong>of</strong> Vallisneria natans<br />
seeds: implications for restoration in chinese lakes. Hydrobiologia.<br />
559: 357-362.<br />
Keit, T. H; Lewis, M. A. and Holt, R. D. (2001). Alle effects invasion<br />
pinning and species borders. American naturalist, 157: 203-216.<br />
Kim, A. S. (2005). Milfoil Campaign spreading. Portland Press Herald.<br />
Kimbel, J. C. (1982). Factors influencing potential intralake colonization by<br />
Myriophyllum spicatum L. Aquatic Botany. 14: 295-307.<br />
Page 39
Kimber, A; Korschgen, C. E and Vander Valk, A. G. (1995). The<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> Vallisneria amricana seeds and seedling light<br />
requirements in the upper Mississippi river. Can. J. Bot. 73: 1966-<br />
1973.<br />
Kirk, W. D. J. (1993). Interspecific size and number variation in pollen<br />
grains and seeds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49: 239-248.<br />
Klaine, S. J. and Ward, C. H. (1984). Environmental and chemical control <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetative dormant bud production in Hydrilla verticillata. Ann. Bot.<br />
53: 503-514.<br />
Knudsen, J, T and Olesen, J. M. (1993). Buzz-pollination and paterns <strong>of</strong><br />
sexual traits in north European Pyrolaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 900-<br />
913.<br />
Knupp, N. D. (1911). The flowers <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum L. Proc. Iowa<br />
Acad. Sci. 18:61-73.<br />
Knuth, P. (1906). Handbook <strong>of</strong> flower pollination, based upon Hermann<br />
Muller‘s work ‗fertilisation <strong>of</strong> flowers by insects‘. Vol. I:<br />
Introduction and literature. Translated by J. R. Ainsworth Davis.<br />
Oxford University Press, London.<br />
Kotshy, K. and Rogers, K.( 2008). Reed clonal characteristics and response<br />
disturbance in a semi-arid river. Aquatic Botany 88: 47-56.<br />
Labdolt, E. (1986). The family Lemnaceae. a monographic study. Vol. 1<br />
Ver<strong>of</strong>f Geobot Inst. ETH Stiftung. Rubel . Zurich, 71: 1-566.<br />
Lacroix, C. R. and Kemp, J. R. (1997). Developmental morphology <strong>of</strong> the<br />
androecium and gynoecium in Rubia maritima L. considerations for<br />
pollination. Aquatic Botany. 59: 253-262.<br />
Lal, C. and Gopal, B. (1993). Production and germination <strong>of</strong> seeds in<br />
Hydrilla verticillata. Aquatic Botany. 45: 257-261.<br />
Langeland, K. A. and Sutton, D. L. (1980). Regrowth <strong>of</strong> Hydrilla from<br />
axillary buds. J. Aquat. Palnt Manage. 18: 27-29.<br />
Langland, K. A. (1996). Hydrilla verticilla (L.F). Royle (Hydrocharitaceae).<br />
The perfect aquatic weed. Castanea. 61: 293- 304.<br />
Page 40
Lawrence, M. E. (1985). Senecio L. (Astraceae) in Australia: reproductive<br />
biology <strong>of</strong> a genus found primarily in unstable environments. Austral.<br />
J. Bot. 33: 197-208.<br />
Leikic, M. (1970). Ecology <strong>of</strong> the aquatic insect species Parapoynx<br />
stratiotata L. (Pyraustidae, Lepidoptera). J. Sci. Agr. Res. 83:49-62.<br />
Les , D. H and Mehrh<strong>of</strong>f, L. J. (1999).Introduction <strong>of</strong> nonindigenous aquatic<br />
vascular plants in Southern New England: a historical perspective.<br />
Biological Invasions.1: 281-300.<br />
Les, D. H. (1988). Breeding system, population structure, and evolution in<br />
hydrophilous angiosperms. Annals <strong>of</strong> the Missouri Botanical Garden.<br />
75: 819-835.<br />
Les, D. H. and Philbrick, C. T. (1993). Studies <strong>of</strong> hybridization and<br />
chromosome number variation in aquatic angiosperms: evolutionary<br />
implications. Aquatic Botany. 44: 181-228.<br />
Les, D. H. and Schneider, E. L. (1995). The Nymphaeales, Alismatidae, and<br />
the theory <strong>of</strong> an aquatic monocotyledon origin. pp, 23-42 in Rudall,<br />
PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ. eds. Monocotyledons:<br />
systematics and evolution. Kew (UK): Royal Botanic Gardens.<br />
Les, D. H., Cleland, M. A. and Waycott, M. (1997). Phylogenetic studies in<br />
the Alismatidae, II: Evolution <strong>of</strong> marine angiosperms (seagrasses)<br />
and hydrophily. Syst. Bot. 22: 443-463.<br />
Lloyd, D. G. (1965). Evolution <strong>of</strong> self-compatibility and racial<br />
differentiation in Leavenworthia (cruciferae). Contr. Gray Herb.<br />
Harvard. 195: 3-133.<br />
Lopez, J; Rodriguez-Raino, T; Ortega-Olivencia, A; Devesa, J. A; Ruiz, T.<br />
(1999). Pollination mechanisms and pollen-ovule ratios in some<br />
Genisteae (Fabaceae) from southwestern Europe. Plant Syst. Evol.<br />
216: 23-47.<br />
Love, A. (1961). Some notes on Myriophyllum spicatum. Rhodora. 63: 139-<br />
145.<br />
Page 41
Löve, A. and Löve, D. (1956). Cytotaxonomical conspectus <strong>of</strong> the icelandic<br />
flora. Acta Horti. Gothoburgensis. 20(4): 65-291.<br />
Löve, A. and Ritchie, J. C. (1966). Chromosome numbers from central<br />
northern Canada. Canadian Journ. Bot. 35(5): 715-761.<br />
Lovett-Doust, L. (1987). Population dynamics and local specialization in a<br />
clonal perenial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> ramets in<br />
contrasting habitats. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 69: 743-755.<br />
Lubber, A. E. and Christensen, N. L. (1966). Intra seasonal variation in seed<br />
production among flowers and plants <strong>of</strong> Thalictrum thalictroides<br />
(Ranunculaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 72: 190-203.<br />
Ludwig, F. (1881). Ueber die Bestaubungsuerhaltnisse einiger<br />
Susswasserpflanzen und ihre Aanpassungen an das Wasser und<br />
gewisse wasserbewohnende Insekten.Kosmos. Jahrg.10:7-12.<br />
Lui, Y; Schieving, F; Stuefer, J. F. and Anten, N. P. R. (2007). The effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> mechanical stress and spectral shadding on the growth and<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> ten genotypes <strong>of</strong> stoloniferous plant. Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany.<br />
99: 121-130.<br />
Madsen, J. D and Boylen, C. W. (1989). Eurasian watermilfoil seed ecology<br />
from an oligotrophic and eutrophic lake. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 27:<br />
119-121.<br />
Madsen, J. D and Smith, D. H. (1997). Vegetative spread <strong>of</strong> Euasian<br />
watrmilfoil colonies. J. Aquat. Plant. Manage. 35: 63-68.<br />
Madsen, J. D. (1991). Resource allocation at the individual plant level.<br />
Aquatic Botany. 41: 67-86.<br />
Madsen, J. D. (1993). Control points in the phonological cycle <strong>of</strong> Eurasian<br />
water milfoil. <strong>Information</strong> Exchange Bulletin A-93-1, U.S. Army<br />
Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, M.S. 10pp.<br />
Madsen, J. D. (1997). Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate allocation in a<br />
southern population <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil. J.Aquat. Plant.<br />
Manage. 35: 15-21.<br />
Page 42
Madsen, J. D. and. Adams, M.S. (1988). The germination <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton<br />
pectinatus: environmental control by temperature and light. Can. J.<br />
Bot. 66: 2523-2526.<br />
Madsen, J. d; Eichler, L. W. and Boylen, C. W. (1988). Vegetative spread<br />
<strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil in lake George, New York, and J. Aquat.<br />
Plant Manage. 26: 47-50.<br />
Malacoste, R; Tzanni, H; Jacques, R. and Rollin, R. (1972). The influence<br />
<strong>of</strong> blue light on dark germinating seeds <strong>of</strong> Nemophila insignis L.<br />
Planta. 103: 24-34.<br />
McFarland, D. (2006). Reproductive ecology <strong>of</strong> Vallisneria americana<br />
Michaux. SAV technical notes collection (ERDC/TN SAV-06-4)<br />
U.S. Army engineer research and development centre, Vicksburg,<br />
MS.<br />
Mcmillan, C. and Jewett-Smith, J. (1988). The sex ratio and fruit production<br />
<strong>of</strong> laboratory germinated seedlings <strong>of</strong> Halophila engelmannii<br />
Aschers. (Hydrocharitaceae) from Redfish Bay, TX. Aquatic Botany.<br />
32: 329-339.<br />
Meijden, R. V and Caspers, N. (1971). Haloragaceae. In: C. G. G. J. van<br />
Steenis (ed). Flora Malesisiana. Vol.7, Wolters- Noordh<strong>of</strong>f<br />
Publishing, Groningen.pp.239-263.<br />
Meijden, R. V. (1969). An annotated key to the South East Asiatic,<br />
Malesian, Mascarene, and African species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
(Haloragaceae). Blumea.17: 303-311.<br />
Meusel, H. and Jager, E. (1978). Vergleichende chorologie der<br />
zentraleuropaischen flora. Volume 2. Fischer, Jena.<br />
Meyer, S. E; Monsen, S. B. and McArthur, E. D. (1990). Germination<br />
response <strong>of</strong> Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae) to light and chill,<br />
patterns <strong>of</strong> between population variation. Bot. Gaz. 151: 176-183.<br />
Mione, T. and Anderson, G. L. (1992). Pollen-ovule ratios and breeding<br />
system evolution in Solanum section basarthrum (Solanaceae). Amer.<br />
J. Bot. 79: 279-287.<br />
Page 43
Mitrakos, K. and Shropshire, W. J. (1972). Phytochrome. Academic Press<br />
London.<br />
Moody, M. H. and Les, D. H. (2007). Phylogenetic systematic and<br />
characters evolution in angiosperm family Haloragaceae. Amer. J.<br />
Bot. 94: 2005-2025.<br />
Moody, M. L. (2004). Systematic <strong>of</strong> the angiosperm family Haloragaceae R.<br />
Br. emphasizing the aquatic genus Myriophyllum: Phylogeny,<br />
hybridization and character evolution. Thesis University <strong>of</strong><br />
Connecticut.<br />
Moody, M. L. and Les, D. H. (2002). Evidence <strong>of</strong> hybridity in invasive<br />
watermilfoil (Myriophylllum) populations. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the<br />
National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong> United States <strong>of</strong> America, 99:<br />
14867-14871.<br />
Moody, M. L. and Les, D. H. (2010). Systematic <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperms<br />
genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae). Syst. Bot. 35: 121-139.<br />
Nathan, E; Standifer and Madsen, J.D. (1993). The effects <strong>of</strong> drying period<br />
on the germination <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfol seeds. J.Aquat Plant<br />
Manage.35:35-36.<br />
Neil, P. and Anderson, G. J. (2005). Are ‗mating systems,‘ ‗breeding<br />
systems‘ inconsistent and confusing terminology in reproductive<br />
biology? Or is it other way around? Plant syst. Evol. 250: 173-185.<br />
Nichols, S. A. (1991). The Interaction between biology and the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> aquatic macrophytes. Aquatic Botany. 41: 225-253.<br />
Nichols, S. A. and Shaw, B. H. (1986). Ecological life histories <strong>of</strong> the three<br />
aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton<br />
crispus and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia. 131: 3-21.<br />
Niklas, K. J. (1997). The evolutionary biology <strong>of</strong> plants. University Chicago<br />
Press, Chicago.<br />
Niklas, K. J. (1998). Effect <strong>of</strong> variation on mechanical properties and<br />
biomass allocation pattern <strong>of</strong> Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae).<br />
Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany. 82: 147-156.<br />
Page 44
O‘Connell, L. M. and Eckert, C. G. (1999). Differentiation in sexuality<br />
among populations <strong>of</strong> Antennaria parlinii (Astraceae). Inter. J.Plant<br />
Sci. 160: 567-575.<br />
Obson, J. M; O‘Neil, S. P. and Ei-Ghazaly, G. (2000). Pollen morphology<br />
and ultrastrucure <strong>of</strong> Marathrum schiedeanum (Podostemaceae).<br />
Grana. 39(2): 221-225.<br />
Opter, P. A; Franke, G. W and Baker, H. G. (1980). Comparative<br />
phenological studies <strong>of</strong> treelet and shrub species in tropical wet and<br />
dry forests in the lowlands <strong>of</strong> Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 68: 167-188.<br />
Orchard, A. E. (1981). A revision <strong>of</strong> South American Myriophyllum<br />
(Haloragaceae) and its repercussion on some Australian and North<br />
American Species. Brunonia. 4: 27-65.<br />
Orchard, A. E. (1986). Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in Australia. 11. The<br />
Australian species. Brunonia. 8: 173-291.<br />
Orchard, A. E. and Keighery, G. J. (1993). The Status, ecology and<br />
relationship <strong>of</strong> Meziella (Haloragaceae). Nuytsia. 9: 111-117.<br />
Ornduff, R. (1969). Reproductive biology in relation to systematics.<br />
Taxon.18: 121-133.<br />
Parveen, A. (1999). A Palynological survey <strong>of</strong> aquatic flora <strong>of</strong> karachi<br />
Pakistan. Tr. J. Bot. 23(2): 309-317.<br />
Parveen, A; Ali, T. and Quaiser, M. (1994). Pollination types and pollen<br />
characters within flora <strong>of</strong> Karachi. Pak. J. Bot. 26(1): 35-56.<br />
Parveen, A; Lee Long, W. J. and Coles, R. G. (1995). Flood and cyclone<br />
related loss and partial recovery <strong>of</strong> more than 1, 000 Km 2 <strong>of</strong> seagrass<br />
in Harvey Bay, Queensland, Austrlia. Aquatic Botany. 52: 3-17.<br />
Patten, B. C. J. (1955). Germination <strong>of</strong> the seed <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum<br />
L. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. 82: 50-56.<br />
Patten, B. C. J. (1956). Notes on the biology <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum spicatum in a<br />
New Jersey Lake. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. 83: 5-18.<br />
Page 45
Patten. B. C. (1954). The status <strong>of</strong> some American species <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
as revealed by the discovery <strong>of</strong> intergrade material between M.<br />
exalbescens Fern. and M. spicatum L. in New Jersey. Rhodora. 56:<br />
213-225.<br />
Peck, J. R., Yearsley, J. M and Waxman, D. (1998). Explaining the<br />
geographical distributions <strong>of</strong> sexual and asexual populations. Nature,<br />
391: 889-892.<br />
Pellmyr, O. (1985). Pollination ecology <strong>of</strong> Cimicifuga arizonica<br />
(Ranunculaceae). Bot. Gaz. 146: 404-412.<br />
Pellmyr, O. (1986). Pollination ecology <strong>of</strong> two nectariferous Cimicifuga sp.<br />
(Ranunculaceae) and the evolution <strong>of</strong> andromonoecy. Nordic. J. Bot.<br />
6: 129-138.<br />
Pettitt, J. M. (1981). Reproduction in sea grasses: pollen development in<br />
Thalassia hemprichii, Halophila stipulacea and Thalassodendron<br />
ciliatum. Ann. Bot. 48(4): 609-622.<br />
Philbrick, C. T and Les, D. H. (1996). Evolution <strong>of</strong> aquatic angiosperm<br />
reproductive systems. Bioscience. 46(11): 813-826.<br />
Philbrick, C. T. (1991). Hydrophily: Phylogenetic and evolutionary<br />
considerations. Rhodora. 93(1): 36-50.<br />
Philbrick, C. T. and Anderson, G. J. (1987). Implications <strong>of</strong> pollen/ovule<br />
ratios and pollen size for the reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton<br />
and autogamy in aquatic angiosperms. Syst. Bot. 12: 98-105.<br />
Pimental; Lach, L., Zumga, R. and Morrison. (2000). Environmental and<br />
economic costs <strong>of</strong> nonindigenous species in United States.<br />
Bioscience. 50: 53-65.<br />
Plitmann, U. and Levin, D. A. (1990). Breeding systems in the<br />
Polemoniaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 170: 205-214.<br />
Pohl, F. (1937). Die pollenevzeugung der windblutler. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.<br />
56: 365-470.<br />
Page 46
Preston, R. E. (1986). Pollen-ovule ratios in the Cruciferae. Amer. J Bot. 73:<br />
1732-1740.<br />
Proctor, M. and Yeo, P. (1972). The pollination <strong>of</strong> flowers. Taplinger<br />
publishing company, New York.<br />
Puijalon, S. and Bornette, G. (2006). Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical<br />
stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth <strong>of</strong> an aquatic plant<br />
species. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 93: 1090-1099.<br />
Puijalon, S; Bouma, T. J; Van Groenendeal, J. and Bornette, G. (2008).<br />
Clonal plasticity <strong>of</strong> aquatic plant species to mechanical stress: Escape<br />
verse resistance strategy. Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany. 102: 989-996.<br />
Punt. W. (1986). Functional factors influencing pollen form. In: Blackmore.<br />
S and I. K. Ferguson (eds) pollen and spores: Form and function.<br />
Academic Press London.<br />
Pysek, P. (1997).Clonality and plant invasion: can a trait make a difference?<br />
In: de Kroon, H. and von Groenendeal, J. (eds.). The ecology and<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> clonal plants, pp.405-427. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.<br />
The Netherlands.<br />
Ramsay, M. W; Cairns, S. C. and Vaughton, G. V. (1994). Geographical<br />
variation in morphological and reproductive characters <strong>of</strong> coastal and<br />
tableland populations <strong>of</strong> Blanfordia grandiflora (Liliaceae). Plant<br />
Syst. Evol. 192: 215-230.<br />
Rathcke, B. (1983). Competition and facilitation among plants for<br />
pollination. In: Pollination Biology. Real, L. (Ed), Academic Press,<br />
Orlando, Florida, USA, pp: 305-329.<br />
Rathcke, B. (1988). Interactions for pollination among c<strong>of</strong>lowering shrubs.<br />
Ecology.69:446-457.<br />
Rathcke, B. and Lacey, E. D. (1985). Phenological patterns <strong>of</strong> terrestrial<br />
plants. Annual Review <strong>of</strong> Ecology and systematic. 16: 179-214.<br />
Raven, P. H; Evert, R. F. and Eichhorn, S. E. (1999). Biology <strong>of</strong> Plants. 6 th<br />
Edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.<br />
Page 47
Reed, C. F. (1977). History and disturbance <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil in<br />
united states and Canada. Phytologia. 36: 417-436.<br />
Richardson, T. E and Stephenson, A. G. (1989). Pollen removal and pollen<br />
and deposition affects the duration <strong>of</strong> the staminate and pistillate<br />
phases in Campanula rapunculoides. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 532-538.<br />
Riemer, D. N. (1984). Introduction to freshwater vegetation. Westport, CN:<br />
The Avil Publishing Company.<br />
Riis, T. (2008). Dispersal and colonization <strong>of</strong> plants in lowland streams.<br />
Success rates and bottlenecks. Hydrobiologia. 596: 341-351.<br />
Riis, T. and Biggs, B. G. F. (2003). Hydrologic and hydraulic control <strong>of</strong><br />
macrophyte establishment and performance in streams. Limnol.<br />
Oceanogr. 48: 1488-1497.<br />
Riis, T; Madsen Tom, V. and Sennels Rikke, S. H. (2009). Regeneration,<br />
colonisation and growth rates <strong>of</strong> all<strong>of</strong>ragments in four common<br />
stream plants. Aquatic Botany. 90: 209-212.<br />
Rogers, K. H., Breen, C. M. (1980). Growth and reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />
Potamogeton crispus in a South African Lake. J. Ecol. 58: 561-571.<br />
Rollin, P. (1970). Phytochrome, photomorphogensis, et photoperiodism.<br />
Masson (ed), Paris.<br />
Rollin, P. and Maignan, G. (1966). La necessite du phytochrome prl pour la<br />
germination des akenes de Lactuca sativa L. variete ―reinede mai‖<br />
Compt. Rend. Paris. 263: 756-757.<br />
Sand-Jensen, K. and Mebus, J. R. (1996). Fine-scale patterns <strong>of</strong> water<br />
velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos. 76: 169-180.<br />
Sand-Jensen, K. and Pedersen, O. (1999). Velocity gradients and turbulence<br />
around macrophyte stands in streams. Freshwater Biology. 42: 315-<br />
328.<br />
Sastroutomo, S. S. (1981). Turion formation, dormancy and germination <strong>of</strong><br />
curly pond weed, Potamogeton crispus L. Aquatic Botany. 10: 161-<br />
173.<br />
Page 48
Scheldon, S. P. (1994). Invasions and declines <strong>of</strong> submerged macrophytes in<br />
New England, with particular reference to vermount lakes and<br />
herbivorous invertebrates in New England. Lake and Reservoir<br />
management. 10: 13-17.<br />
Schlising, R. A; Ikeda, D. H. and Morey, S. C. (1980). Reproduction in a<br />
great basin evening primrose, Camissonia tanacetifolia (Onagraceae).<br />
Bot. Gaz. 141: 290-293.<br />
Sculthrope, C. D. (1967). The Biology <strong>of</strong> aquatic vascular plants. Edward<br />
Arnold, London.<br />
Sharma, K. P. and Gopal, B. (1978). Seed germination and occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
seedlings <strong>of</strong> Typha species in nature. Aquatic Botany. 4: 353-358.<br />
Sharma, N; Kould, P. and Koul, A. K. (1992). Genetic systems <strong>of</strong> six<br />
species <strong>of</strong> Plantago (Plantaginaceae). Plant syst. Evol. 181:1-9.<br />
Shiga, T. and Kadono, Y. (2007). Natural hybridization <strong>of</strong> the two Nuphar<br />
species in Northern Japan: Homoploid hybrid speciation in progress?<br />
Aquatic Botany. 86: 123-131.<br />
Short, P. S. (1981). Pollen-ovule ratios, breeding system and distribution<br />
patterns <strong>of</strong> some Australian Gnaphaliinae (Compositae: inuleae).<br />
Muelleria. 4: 395-417.<br />
Shung-Quan, H; You-Hao; Robert, G.W; Yao-Hua,. S and Kun, S. (2001).<br />
Mechanism <strong>of</strong> underwater pollination in Najas marina (Najadaceae).<br />
Aquatic Botany. 70(1): 67-78.<br />
Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, D. C. (1997). Eradication, pp.221-228 in : Simberl<strong>of</strong>f, D; D.C.<br />
Schimtz and T. C. Brown, eds; Strangers in paradise, Island press,<br />
Washington , D.C.<br />
Small, E. (1988). Pollen-ovule patterns in tribe Trifolieae (Leguminosae).<br />
Plant Syst. Evol. 160: 195-205.<br />
Smith, C. S. and Barko, J. W. (1990). Ecology <strong>of</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil. J.<br />
Aquat. Plant Manage. 28: 55-64.<br />
Page 49
Smith, G. E; Hall, T. F. J. and Stanley, R. A. (1967). Eurasian watermilfoil<br />
in the Tennessee valley. Weeds. 15: 95-98.<br />
Smiths, A. J. M; Van Ruremonde, R. and Vandervelde, G. (1989). Seed<br />
dispersal <strong>of</strong> three nymhaeid macrophytes. Aquatic Botany. 35: 167-<br />
180.<br />
Sorsa, P. (1988). Pollen morphology <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton and Groenlandia<br />
(Potamogetonaceae) and its taxonomic significance. Ann. Bot.<br />
Fennici. 25(2): 179-199.<br />
Speck, O. 2003. Field measurements <strong>of</strong> wind speed and reconfiguration in<br />
Aurundo donex (Poaceae) with estimates <strong>of</strong> drag forces. American<br />
Jornal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 90: 1253-1256.<br />
Spencer, D. F and Bowes, G. (1990). Ecophysiology <strong>of</strong> the worlds<br />
troublesome aquatic weeds. In: Pieterse, A. N and Murphy, K. (eds)<br />
Aquatic weeds. The ecology and management <strong>of</strong> nuisance aquatic<br />
vegetation. Oxford University Press, oxford England.<br />
Spencer, D. F. and Ksander, G. G. (1991). Comparative growth and<br />
propagule production by Hydrilla verticillata grown from axillary<br />
turions or subterranean turion. Hydrobiologia. 222. 153-158.<br />
Spencer, D. H. N; Milburn, T. R; Nduwala-Sknyimba, M. and Roberts, E.<br />
(1971). Fruit biology and germination <strong>of</strong> two tropical Potamogeton<br />
species. New Phytol. 70: 197-212.<br />
Spencer, N. R. and Leikic, M (1974). Prospects for biological control <strong>of</strong><br />
Eurasian watermilfoil .Weed Science. 22: 401-404.<br />
Spira, T. P. (1980). Floral parameters, breeding system and pollinator type in<br />
Trichostema (Labiatae). Amer. J. Bot. 67: 278-284.<br />
Standifer, N. E and Madsen,J. D. (1997). The effect <strong>of</strong> drying period on the<br />
germinaton <strong>of</strong> Eurasian waterfoil seeds. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 35:<br />
35-36.<br />
Stanley, R. A; Shackelford, E; Wade, D. and Warren, C. (1976). Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
season and waterdepth on Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquatic Plant<br />
Mange. 14: 32-36.<br />
Page 50
Stanley, R. G. and Linskens, H. F. (1974). Pollen biology, biochemistry and<br />
Management. Springer, Berlin. Heidelberg, New York.<br />
Stover, E. L. (1951). An introduction to the anatomy <strong>of</strong> seed plants. Boston<br />
academic press.<br />
Takahashi, M. (1994). Pollen development in a submerged plant, Ottelia<br />
alismoides L. (Hydrocharitaceae). J. Plant Res. 107: 161-164.<br />
Takahashi, M. (1995). Development <strong>of</strong> structure-less pollen wall in<br />
Ceratophyllum demersum L. (Ceratophylacease). J. Plant Res. 108:<br />
205-208.<br />
Tanaka, N; Uehara, K. and Murata, J. (2004). Correlation between pollen<br />
morphology and pollination mechanisms in Hydrocharitaceae. J.<br />
Plant. Res. 117: 265-276.<br />
Teltscherova, L. and Hejny, S. (1973). The germination <strong>of</strong> some<br />
Potamogeton species from South-Bohemian Fishponds. Folia<br />
Geobot. 8: 231-239.<br />
Teryokhin, E. S; Chubarov, S. I. and Romanova, V. O. (2002). Pollination,<br />
mating systems and self-incompatibility in some species <strong>of</strong> the genus<br />
Potamogeton L. Phytomorphology. 52: 250 - 261.<br />
Theophrastus. (1976). De Causis Plantarum. Cambridge Harvard University<br />
Press.<br />
Thomas, S. M. and Murray, B. G. (1981). Breeding systems and<br />
hybridization in Petrorhagia Sect. kohlrauschia (Caryophyllaceae).<br />
Plant Syst. Evol. 139: 77-94.<br />
Thompson, K; Hodgson, J. G and Rhich, T. C. G. (1995). Native and alien<br />
plants: More <strong>of</strong> the same? Ecography, 18:390-402.<br />
Thompson, P. A. (1973). Seed germination in relation to ecological and<br />
geographical distribution. In: Heywood, V. A. (ed), Taxonomy and<br />
ecology, Academic Press London, pp, 93-119.<br />
Titus, J. E. and Hoover, D. T. (1991). Towards predicting reproductive<br />
success in submersed freshwater angiosperms. Aquatic Botany. 41:<br />
111-136.<br />
Page 51
Triffney, B. H. and Niklas, K. J. (1985). Clonal growth in land plants: a<br />
paleobotanical perspective. P. 35-66 in Jackson, J. B. C. Buss Lw,<br />
Cook R. E. eds. Population biology and evolution in clonal<br />
organisms. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.<br />
Turala, K. (1969). Cyto-taxonomical studies in Ranunculus subgenus<br />
batrachium (DC). A gray from Poland. Acta. Biol. Cracoviensa, Ser.<br />
Bot. 12: 9-20.<br />
Turala, K. (1970). Cyto-taxonomical studies in Ranunclus fluitans Lam and<br />
R. pencillatus (Dumort). Bab from lower Silesia (Poland).<br />
Preliminary report. Acta. Biol. Cracoviensa. Ser. Bot. 13: 119-123.<br />
Turala-Szybowska, K. (1977). Karyological studies in Ranunclus fluitans<br />
Ham. from Thuringia and Vilnius with its sourroudnings. Acta. Bio.<br />
Cracoviensa. Ser. Bot. 20: 1-9.<br />
Van Vierssen, R. J; Van Wijkvan and Derzee, J. R. (1982). On the<br />
pollination mechanism <strong>of</strong> some eurysaline Potamogetonaceae.<br />
Aquatic Botany. 14: 339-347.<br />
Van Wijk, R. J. (1989). Ecological studies on Potamogeton pectinatus L.<br />
reproductive strategies and germination ecology. Aquatic Botany. 33:<br />
271-299.<br />
Van Wijk, R. J. and Trompenars, H. J. (1985). On the germination <strong>of</strong> turion<br />
and the life cycle <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton trichoides cham.et Schld. Aquatic<br />
Botany. 22: 165-172.<br />
Varies, A. P. (1974). Some aspects <strong>of</strong> cross-pollinaton in wheat (Triticum<br />
aestivum L.), anther length and number <strong>of</strong> pollen grains per anther.<br />
Euphytica. 23: 11-19.<br />
Vasek, F. C; Weng, V; Beaver, R. J. and Huszar, C. K. (1987). Effects <strong>of</strong><br />
mineral nutrition on components <strong>of</strong> reproduction in Clarkia<br />
unguiculata. Aliso. 11: 599-618.<br />
Vaucher, J. P. (1841). Histoire physiologique des plants D‘Europa. II. Paris.<br />
Vierssen, W. Van. (1993). Relationship between survival strategies <strong>of</strong><br />
aquatic weeds and control measures. Aquatic weeds: The ecology and<br />
Page 52
management <strong>of</strong> nuisance aquatic vegetation, New York, Oxford<br />
University Press. pp, 238-253.<br />
Vitousek, P. M; Antonio, C. M; Loope, L. I. and Westerbrooks, R. (1996).<br />
Biological invasions as global environment change. American<br />
Scientist. 84: 468-478.<br />
Vogel, S. (1978). Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen<br />
flowers. In: Richards A. J. (eds). The pollination <strong>of</strong> flowers by<br />
insects. Academic Press, London, pp. 89-96.<br />
Vogel, S. (1994). Life in moving fluids: the physical biology <strong>of</strong> flow.<br />
Princeton ,NJ: princeton University Press.<br />
Vuille, F. L. (1987). Reproducitve biology <strong>of</strong> the genus Damasonium<br />
(Alismataceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 157: 63-71.<br />
Vuille, F. L. (1988). The reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> the genus Baldellia<br />
(Alismataceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 159: 173-183.<br />
Vunh<strong>of</strong>, J.J., and Harder, L. D. (1995). Size-number trade-<strong>of</strong>fs and pollen<br />
production by Papilionaceous.<br />
Wade, P. M. (1990). General biology and ecology <strong>of</strong> aquatic weeds, pp, 17-<br />
30. In: Pieterse, A. N. and Murphy, K. (eds) Aquatic Weeds. The<br />
Ecology and management <strong>of</strong> nuisance aquatic vegetation. Oxford<br />
University Press, Oxford.<br />
Washington State Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology (2003). Water quality Home. 3.<br />
Non-native freshwater palnts. Eurasian watermilfoil.<br />
Webb, C. J. (1994). Pollination, self-incompatibility and fruit production in<br />
Corokia cotoneaster (Escallohiaceae). New Zealand J. Bot. 32: 385-<br />
392.<br />
Webster, S. D. (1986). Two natural hydrids in Ranunclus L. submgenus<br />
batrachium (D.C) A. Gray. Watsonia. 16: 25-30.<br />
Webster, S. D. (1988). Ranunclus pencillatus (Dumort) Bab. In Great<br />
Britain and Ireland. Irish Nat. 23: 346-354.<br />
Page 53
Weigleb, G; Brux, H; and Herr, W. (1991). Human impact on the ecological<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton species in northwestern Germany.<br />
Vegetation. 97: 161-172.<br />
White, D. J; Haber, E. and Keddy, C. (1993). Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
habitats in Canada. Canadian wildlife service, Environment Cannada,<br />
Ottawa, Ontario.<br />
Wiegleb, G. and Kadano, Y. (1989). Growth and development <strong>of</strong><br />
Potamogeton distinctus in an irrigation pond in SW Japan. Nordic. J.<br />
Bot. 9: 241-249<br />
Wilcove, D. S; Rothstein, D; Dubow, A; Phillips, A. and Losos, E. (1998).<br />
Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States.<br />
Bioscience.48: 607-615.<br />
Williams, G. C. (1975). Sex and evolution. Princeton (NJ): Princeton<br />
University Press.<br />
Willson, M. F. (1983). Plant Reproductive Ecology. A Wiley-Interscience<br />
publication. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, 5-32.<br />
Wimmer, W. (1997). Myriophyllum heterophyllum Michaux in<br />
Niedersachsen Und Bremen Sowie seine Bestimmung im vegetativen<br />
Zustand. Flora Rundbriefe.31:23-31.<br />
Wolfer, S. R. and Straife, D. (2004.) Saptio-temporal dynamics and<br />
plasticity <strong>of</strong> clonal architecture in Potamogeton perfoliatus. Aquat.<br />
Bot. 78: 307-318.<br />
Xiao, C; Wang, X; Xia, J and Liu, G. (2010). The effect <strong>of</strong> temperature,<br />
waterlevel and burial depth on seed germination <strong>of</strong> Myriophyllum<br />
spicatum and Potamogeton malainus.<br />
Yeo, P. F. (1993). Secondary pollen presentation- form, fuction and<br />
evolution. Spinger, Wien New York.<br />
Yu, D; Wang, D; Li, Z; Funston, A. M. (2002). Taxonomic revision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in China. Rhodora, 104:396-<br />
421.<br />
Page 54
Zhang, X. L; Gituru, R. W; Yang, C. F. and Guo, Y. H. (2009). Variation<br />
<strong>of</strong> floral traits among different life forms illustrate the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
pollination system in Potamogeton species from China. Aquatic<br />
Botany. 90: 124-128.<br />
Page 55