Katalog - BINA

Organizatori: 

Društvo arhitekata Beograda 

Kulturni centar Beograda 

Pokrovitelji: 

Grad Beograd, Ministarstvo kulture Republike Srbije, Inženjerska komora Srbije 

Partneri: 

EUNIC - European Union National Institutes for Culture (Austrijski kulturni forum, Italijanski institut za kulturu, Goethe institut, 

Francuski kulturni centar), Magistrat glavnog grada Beča, Ambasada Sjedinjenih američkih država, 

Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Republički zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture, JP Urbanistički zavod grada Beograda, 

Društvo urbanista Beograda, Dečji kulturni centar, Opština Vračar, Opština Stari grad, galerija O3one, GRAD kulturni centar, 

Dom omladine Beograda, Turistička organizacija Beograda 

— 

Organisers: 

Društvo arhitekata Beograda – Association of Belgrade Architects 

Kulturni centar Beograda – Belgrade Cultural Centre 

Patrons: 

The City of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia - Ministry of Culture, Serbian Chamber of Engineers 

Partners: 

EUNIC – European Union National Institutes for Culture (Austrian Cultural Forum, Italian Institute for Culture in Belgrade, Goethe Institute, French 

Cultural Centre), Vienna City Administration, Embassy of the United States of America, Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, State 

Institute for The Protection of Cultural Heritage, Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, Town Planners Association Belgrade, Children’s Cultural Centre, 

Vračar Municipality, Stari grad Municipality, Gallery O3one, GRAD Cultural Centre, 

Cultural Centre Dom omladine, Belgrade Tourist Organization 

četvrta beogradska internacionalna nedelja arhitekture — Fourth Belgrade International Architecture Week 

na fotografiji stambena zgrada B–9, blok 21, Novi Beograd 

autori Lenarčić, Mitić, Petrović i Čanak, foto A. Mirić 

četvrta beogradska internacionalna 

nedelja arhitekture 

od 26. juna do 4. jula 2009. 

— 

Fourth Belgrade International 

Architecture Week 

from June 26 th till July 4 th 2009 

nedeljaarhitekture.org

BEOGRADSKA INTERNACIONALNA NEDELJA ARHITEKTURE 

− 

BELGRADE INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURE WEEK

Impresum 

Izdavači − Publishers 

Društvo arhitekata Beograda − Association of Belgrade Architects 

Kneza Miloša 7/III, Beograd 

Kulturni centar Beograda − Cultural Centre of Belgrade 

Knez Mihailova 6/I, Beograd 

Za izdavače − Acting on behalf of the publishers 

Ivan Rašković 

Društvo arhitekata Beograda − Association of Belgrade Architects 

Marina Đurđević 

Kulturni centar Beograda − Cultural Centre of Belgrade 

Urednik − Editor 

Ana Janković-Čorbić 

Lektor − Proofreader 

Sonja Šoć 

Prevod − Translation 

Mila Đurović i Bojan Cimbaljević 

Dizajn i oprema − Design and layout 

Aleksa Bijelović i Milica Maksimović 

petokraka 

Štampa − Printed by 

Interprint, Beograd 

Tiraž − Print run 

500 

Beograd, 2009.

2 

5 

6 

6 

8 

8 

10 

10 

12 

12 

14 

14 

17 

17 

20 

20 

SADRŽAJ 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

IZLOŽBE 

EXHIBITIONS 

Nagrade za arhitekturu 

Awards for Architecture 

– 

Arhitektonsko-urbanistički konkursi 2008/09. 

Architectural and Urban Planning Competitions 2008/09 

– 

E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti 

E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten 

E2A: Fractions of Reality 

E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten 

– 

Teritorijal ejdžensi 


Territorial Agency 


– 

RE_fokus 

Kenc Molo arhitekti 

RE_focus 

Könz Molo Architetti 

– 

Mladi bečki arhitekti (YO.V.A.²) 

organizator: Magistrat glavnog grada Beča 

koncept izložbe: Mihael Dim 

Young Viennese Architect (YO.V.A.²) 

organized by: Stadtentwicklung Wien 

exhibition concept: Michael Diem 

– 

Savremena arhitektura u regionu: 

Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u XXI veku 

koordinator: Ivan Kucina 

kuratori: Konstantin Goađea i Peter Torniov 

Contemporary architecture in the region: 

Architecture of Romania and Bulgaria in 21 st Century 


curators: Constantin Goagea and Peter Torniov 

– 

POVRATAK REKAMA – Pokretač života u gradu 

koncept: Ružica Bogdanović 

RIVERFRONT RECLAIMED – Charging City Life 

concept: Ružica Bogdanović 

23 

23 

26 

26 

28 

28 

30 

30 

32 

32 

34 

34 

36 

36 

Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Italiji 

Naselja INCIS-a u Rimu: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima 

kurator: Alesandra Čeroti 

koordinatori: Roberta Đentile i Paola Gvidulji 

Post-WWII Social Housing in Italy 

INCIS estates: Villaggio Olimpico and Decima 

curator: Alessandra Cerroti 

coordinators: Roberta Gentile and Paola Guidugli 

– 

Grad Avr, obnovljen po ideji Ogista Perea 

kustos: Žozef Abram 

Le Havre, the City reconstructed upon the idea of August Peret 

curator: Joseph Abram 

– 

Procesi REstauracije istorijskog nasleđa 

organizacija: TRANSEO 

REstoration processes of historic treasures 

organization: TRANSEO 

– 

Devedeset godina Bauhausa: Knjige o Bauhausu u biblioteci 

Gete instituta Beograd 

Ninety years of Bauhaus: Books about Bauhaus in the library of 

Goethe Institute Belgrade 

– 

Beograd - pozlaćeni presek: Valorizacija austrijskog 

graditeljskog nasleđa na teritoriji Beograda 

organizator: Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA) 

kurator: Jelica Jovanović 

Belgrade – the Gilded Ratio: Valorisation of Austrian Building 

Heritage on the Territory of Belgrade 

organisation: Young Architects’ Club (KMA) 

curator: Jelica Jovanović 

– 

Extra-mûros – Očaravajuće arhitekture 

Zavod za arhitekturu i baštinu grada Pariza, Francuska 

Extra-mûros – Architectures of Delight 

City of Architecture and Patrimony of Paris, France 

– 

Re... Beograd: stari i novi 

Izložba radova sa studentske radionice Arhitektonskog fakulteta 

Univerziteta u Beogradu 

Re... Belgrade: Old and New 

Exhibition of student works from the Design workshop, Faculty of 

Architecture University in Belgrade

40 

40 

42 

42 

44 

44 

46 

46 

48 

48 

50 

50 

52 

52 

54 

54 

PREDAVANJA 

LECTURES 


Vim Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten 


Wim Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten 

– 

RE _ fokus 

Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc, Kenc Molo Arhiteti 

RE _ focus 

Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz, Könz Molo Architetti 

– 

Ne-misliti 

Džon Palmezino, Teritorijal ejdžensi 

un-think 

John Palmesino, Territorial Agency 

– 

REkonstrukcija 

Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC 

REconstruction 

Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC 

– 

Šrek siti: Privatni prostor u Bukureštu i druge priče 

Konstantin Goađea 

Shreck city: The non public space in Bucharest and other stories 

Constantin Goagea 

– 

Akcija i REakcija: Slika postkomunističke graditeljske kulture u 

Bugarskoj 

Petar Torniov 

Action and Re-action: Picture of the post communist building 

culture in Bulgaria 

Peter Torniov 

– 

Dobronamerni vanzemaljci u kućama starih ljudi 

Grac: Savremena arhitektura u istorijskom gradskom ambijentu 

Markus Cehner 

Friendly aliens in old peoples’ homes 

Graz: contemporary architecture in historic townshape 

Markus Zechner 

– 

Centar Graca kao mešavina istorijskih fasada i palata, stalnih 

postavki umetničkih instalacija i moderne arhitekture 

Biljana Aranđelović 

Center of Graz as a mix of historical facades and domes, 

permanent art installations and modern architecture 

Biljana Aranđelović 

IV 

56 

56 

58 

58 

60 

60 

62 

62 

64 

64 

68 

68 

70 

70 

74 

74 

Projekti 

Andreas Bremhorst, Karl i Bremhorst Arhitekten 

Projects 

Andreas Bremhorst, Karl und Bremhorst Architekten 

– 

Svakodnevni život 

Zigfrid Los, polar ÷ 

Every Day Life 

Siegfried Loos, polar ÷ 

– 

TYPUS ili TOPOS: MRLV Arhitekten Hamburg – Projekti i 

misaone osnove 

Mirjana Marković, MRLV Arhitekten 

TYPUS or TOPOS: MRLV Architekten Hamburg – Design and 

Contemplative Basis 

Mirjana Marković, MRLV Architekten 

– 

Reinterpretacija slobodnog plana 

Stanko Gaković 

REinterpretation of the Open Plan Concept 

Stanko Gaković 

– 

MORFOZIS 

Tom Mejn 

MORPHOSIS 

Thom Mayne 

TRIBINE 

DEBATES 

Srbija na bijenalima arhitekture u Veneciji 

moderator: Snežana Ristić 

učesnici: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić 

Serbia at Architecture Biennales in Venice 


participants: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić 

– 

Šta sa Novim Beogradom? – okrugli sto 

moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević, Urbanistički zavod Beograda 

What to do with New Belgrade? – round table 

moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević, Institute for Urban Planning 

RADIONICE 

WORKSHOPS 

Dečje radionice 

organizator: Dečji kulturni centar 

Children’s workshops 

organized by: Children’s Cultural Centre

78 

80 

81 

81 

83 

84 

86 

86 

88 

88 

92 

92 

94 

95 

ŠETNJE 

CITY WALKS 

Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: Bez kontinuiteta nema 

identiteta 

vodi: Marta Vukotić-Lazar 

Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: Without Continuity 

there is no Identity 

led by: Marta Vukotić-Lazar 

– 

Na potezu od Slavije do Čuburskog parka 

Izložba radova i instalacija „Pejzažna arhitektura i grad” 

PUPA - Podmladak udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata 

On the Stretch from Slavija to Cuburski Park 

Exhibition of works and installations ‘Landscape Architecture and 

the City’ 

PUPA – Youth of the Association of Landscape Architects 

– 

Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: Istočni Vračar, Savinac i 

Neimar 

vodi: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević 

Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: East Vračar, Savinac 

and Neimar quarters 

led by: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević 

– 

Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: RE... na potezu od Terazija 

do Kalemegdana 

vodi: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović 

Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: RE... From Terazije 

to Kalemegdan 

led by: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović 

– 

Ponoćna šetnja kroz modernu arhitekturu starog Beograda 

vodi: Ivan Kucina 

Midnight walk around the modern architecture of old Belgrade 

led by: Ivan Kucina 

KONFERENCIJA 

CONFERENCE 

REdefinisanje posleratnog kolektivnog stanovanja 

uvodna reč: Tanja Konli 

REdefining Post-WWII Housing 

introduction: Tanja Conley 

– 

PROGRAM KONFERENCIJE 

CONFERENCE PROGRAMME 

V 

96 

96 

98 

98 

100 

100 

102 

102 

104 

105 

106 

107 

108 

108 

110 

110 

Pere, Le Korbizije, Zerfus: Rekonstrukcija stambenih naselja 

– zaštita moderne stambene arhitekture u Francuskoj nakon 

Drugog svetskog rata 

Žozef Abram, Univerzitet u Nansiju 

Perret, Le Corbusier, Zehrfuss: Reconstruction of Grandensambles 

– the protection of modern housing in France from 

post-WWII period 

Joseph Abram, University in Nancy 

– 

Makro-strukture i pejzaž: 

Vrednost i zaštita berlinskih predgrađa iz 60-ih i 70-ih 

Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper, Tehnički Univerzitet u Berlinu 

Macro-structures and Landscapes: Value and protection of 

Berlin’s 1960’s and 1970’s suburban settlements 

Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper, Technical University in Berlin 

– 

Stanovanje u Engleskoj posle 1945. 

Ilejn Harvud, Ingliš Heritedž 

Post-1945 Housing in England 

Elain Harwood, English Heritage 

– 

Mesta trezvenosti: Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Holandiji 

Marike Kajpers, Tehnički Univerzitet u Delftu 

Sites of Sobriety: Postwar Social Housing in the Netherlands 

Marijke Kuipers, Technical University Delft 

– 

Socijalno stanovanje posle Drugog svetskog rata u Italiji: „Javni 

grad“ kao laboratorija za moderne teorije o gradu i savremenu 

perspektivu urbane obnove 

Paola di Bjađi, Univerzitet u Trstu 

Post WWII Social Housing in Italy: The “public city” as 

a laboratory for modern city theories and urban renewal 

contemporary perspective 

Paola di Biagi, University of Trieste 

– 

Pitanja konzervacije i restauracije u socijalnom stanovanju 

posle Drugog svetskog rata 

Naselja INCIS-a: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima u Rimu 

Alesandra Čeroti, Univerzitet u Rimu 

Conservation and Restoration Issues in the Post-WWII Social 

Housing: INCIS Estates Villaggio Olimpico and Decima in Rome 

Alessandra Cerroti, University of Rome 

– 

Density, IntenCity: Stanovanje u Italiji 

Đovani Kaudo, Univerzitet u Rimu 

Density, IntenCity: Housing in Italy 

Giovanni Caudo, University of Rome 

– 

E2A: Post-CIAM Rekonfiguracija 

Pit Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten 

E2A: Post CIAM Reconfiguration 

Piet Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten

UVOD 

Beogradska internacionalna nedelje arhitekture 2009. 

(BINA ’09) - tematski naslovljena prefiksom RE... - 

posvećena je akutnom pitanju odnosa prema postojećem 

arhitektonsko-urbanističkom okruženju i mogućnosti 

njegove stalne REprodukcije, aktivno uključene u projekte 

budućnosti. Naša želja je da pokušamo preispitati 

tradicionalne koncepte REkonstrukcije i REvitalizacije 

graditeljskog nasleđa, uglavnom kontrolisane krutim 

metodologijama umrtvljenih institucija, ukazujući na 

nove koncepte pomoću kojih već izgrađeni arhitektonski 

okvir otvara mogućnosti REgeneracije i REintegracije u 

žive tokove vremena. Tema održivog razvoja i urbane 

REciklaže već dugo zaokupljaju pažnju struke u 

tehnološki razvijenim zemljama svesnim da zahuktale 

snage modernosti moraju biti upregnute u dublje 

naslojene vrednosti. Nove generacije arhitekata počinju 

da promišljaju vrednosti prostora kome neposredno 

pripadaju na delikatniji način nego što se viđa na 

glamuroznim ostvarenjima „starchitects” koji, poneseni 

sjajem sopstvenog brenda i zahtevima investitora, često 

zaboravljaju na kvalitete zatečenog konteksta. Naša želja 

je da pronađemo i pokažemo razmišljanja i delovanja 

onih koji se zalažu za REafirmaciju zatečenih resursa u 

službi kreativnosti i koji imaju sluha za RE… nasuprot 

zahtevima investitora, zaslepljenih prvostepenim profitom 

izraženim u kvadratnim metrima i težnjom za „woweffect” 

arhitekture svojih ulaganja, kao i administrativnim 

barijerama prevaziđenih normativa koje postavljaju 

branitelji birokratizovane pseudo-tradicije. 

Beogradska internacionalna nedelja arhitekture 2009. 

ponovo okuplja različite struke uključene u promišljanje 

životnog okruženja, različite generacije koje će ukrstiti 

stare ideje sa novim, kao i predstavnike različitih zemalja 

VI 

koji će osvetliti kretanja i iskustva iz specifičnih sredina. 

Ambicija ovogodišnje Nedelje jeste da podstakne teorijska 

razmišljanja i otvorene stručne debate s ciljem da pronađu 

plodno tlo u realnom delovanju: planiranju, projektovanju 

i realizaciji. Očekujemo da će ovakva razmena znanja i 

ideja iskristalisati nove vizije REanimacije i već prisutnog 

arhitekonskog okruženja i budućih projekata koji će 

svesno uspostavljati dijalog sa već postojećim. Kao i 

do sada, Nedelja arhitekture je otvorena ne samo prema 

struci već i ka široj javnosti kojoj će se, uz specifično 

ovogodišnju temu RE..., predstaviti i pribiližiti nedavna 

ostvarenja u oblasti arhitekture i urbanizma u Srbiji i 

svetu. U program Nedelje, kao i prethodnih godina, biće 

uključene izložbe, predavanja, tematske šetnje, radionice, 

projekcije filmova, seminari i tribine. Verujući da će i ova 

Nedelja arhitekture privući dobronamerne i otvorene 

učesnike, stručnjake i znalce, a takođe i građane, 

entuzijaste spremne da podele i prošire opseg svojih 

znanja, pozivamo Vas da nam se pridružite. 

BINA 09 tim

INTRO 

Belgrade International Architecture Week 2009 (BINA ’09) 

– titled simply RE…as an indicator of this year’s theme 

– is dedicated to the acute question of our relationship 

to the existing urban and architectural surroundings and 

the limitless possibilities of its permanent REproduction, 

actively involved in projects for the future. Our wish is to 

REquestion the traditional concepts of REconstruction 

and REvitalization of cultural heritage – mainly controlled 

by stiff methodologies promoted by lethargic institutions 

– in search for new concepts that can help REgeneration 

and REintegration of the existing fabrics into the lively 

contemporary practice. The theme of sustainable 

development and urban REcycling have been widely 

discussed in technologically advanced countries, 

conscious of the fact that the furious forces of modernity 

have to be correlated to the inherited values. The new 

generations of architects have started REthinking the 

potentials of their immediate surroundings more delicately 

than could be seen in the glamorous realizations of 

“starchitects”, who often forget to think about all the layers 

and qualities of the inherited contest in favor of celebrating 

their own brands. We wish to find and present a new way 

of thinking by those who argue for REafirmation of the 

inherited REsources in service of creativity. We search to 

promote those who pay attention to RE… in spite of the 

requests of investors (attracted as much to the easy profit, 

as they are to getting a “wow-effect”), but also argue 

against administrative norms invented by promoters of 

bureaucratized pseudo-traditions. 

Belgrade International Architecture Week 2009 again 

gathers various professionals involved in REthinking of 

the urban and architectural context, various generations 

ready to share the old with the new ideas, and the 

VII 

representatives from different countries across Europe and 

the USA. An ambition of this year’s event is to encourage 

theoretical thinking and open public debates in service of 

a fertile practice within real circumstances of designing, 

planning and building. We expect that such an exchange 

of knowledge, experience and ideas would generate 

new visions for the REanimation of the existing built 

environment, as well as future projects, open for a dialog 

with the already built domain. The program of Belgrade 

International Architecture Week ‘09 includes exhibitions, 

lectures, guided walking tours, workshops, films, seminars 

and roundtables. It presents recent accomplishments 

in the field of architecture and urban planning from the 

domestic and international scene. Like in previous years, 

Belgrade International Architecture Week ‘09 is open both 

to professionals and the broad public. With a belief that 

our event, as was the case in the past, will gather people 

of good-will and open attitudes, eager to expand their 

knowledge and ideas, we cordially invite you to joins us. 

BINA ‘09 TEAM

PROGRAM 

petak, 26. jun 

19.00 

Kulturni centar Beograda: Likovna galerija, Knez Mihailova 6 

Svečano otvaranje 

IV beogradske internacionalne nedelje arhitekture – 

– BINA 2009 

subota, 27. jun 

11.00 

Okupljanje: Cvetni trg, ispred samoposluge 

Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: 

Istočni Vračar, Savinac i Neimar 

Vodi: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević 

13.00 

Opština Vračar, hol u prizemlju — Otvaranje izložbe i 

proglašenje pobednika 

BINA konkurs za mlade arhitekte 

Urbanističko-arhitektonsko rešenje slobodne površine 

na uglu ulica Kneginje Zorke i Mekenzijeve na Vračaru u 

Beogradu 

14.00—17.00 

Na potezu od Slavije do Čuburskog parka 

Pejzažna arhitektura i grad, izložba studentskih radova 

i instalacija 

PUPA – Podmladak udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata 

Postavka traje 27–28. juna 2009. 

18.00—21.00 

Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget — Predavanja 

E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti, Vim Ekert 

(E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Švajcarska 

RE_fokus, Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc 

(Könz Molo Architetti), Švajcarska 

Ne–misliti, Džon Palmezino (Territorial Agency), 

Švajcarska 

Moderator diskusije: Srđan Jovanović Vajs 

IX 

nedelja, 28. jun 

11.00 

Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget 

Šetnja kroz izložbu E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti 

Vodi: Vim Ekert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), 

Švajcarska 

12.00 

Okupljanje: Centralni dom vojske Srbije 

Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda, autobusom: 

Bez kontinuiteta nema identiteta 

Vodi: Marta Vukotić-Lazar 

14.00 

Okupljanje: Ispred Likovne galerije KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 


RE... na potezu od Terazija do Kalemegdana 

Vodi: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović 

00.00 

Okupljanje: Ispred Likovne galerije KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 

Ponoćna šetnja kroz modernu arhitekturu starog 

Beograda 

Vodi: Ivan Kucina 

ponedeljak, 29. jun 

17.00 

Likovna galerija KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 

Dečja radionica: REci REd! 

Vodi: Dečji kulturni centar 

18.00 

Galerija Artget — Predavanje 


Zoran Radojičić, Srbija 

19.30—21.00 

Kulturni centar GRAD — Predavanja 

Šrek siti: Privatni prostor u Bukureštu i druge priče 

Konstantin Goađea, Rumunija 

Akcija i REakcija: Slika postkomunističke graditeljske 

kulture u Bugarskoj 

Peter Torniov, Bugarska

utorak, 30. jun 

17.00 


Dečja radionica: REži, REndaj! 


18.00—19.30 

Austrijski kulturni forum — Predavanja 

Uvodna reč: Markus Pifl, organizacija Transeo, Austrija 

Dobronamerni vanzemaljci u kućama starih ljudi 

Grac: Savremena arhitektura u istorijskom 

gradskom jezgru 

Markus Cehner, Austrija 

Centar Graca kao mešavina istorijskih fasada i palata, 

stalnih postavki umetničkih instalacija i moderne 

arhitekture 

Biljana Aranđelović, Austrija 

20.00 

Dom Omladine, foaje I sprat — Predavanja 

Svakodnevni život, Zigfrid Los (polar ÷), Austrija 

Projekti, Andreas Bremhorst (architekten CHRISTOPH 

KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST), Austrija 

sreda, 1. jul 

17.00 


Dečija radionica: REđaj, REđaj! 


19.00—20.45 

Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget — Razgovor 

Srbija na bijenalima arhitekture u Veneciji 

Uvodna reč: Snežana Ristić 

Učesnici: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, 

Zoran Erić 

X 

četvrtak, 2. jul 

17.00 


Dečija radionica: sREdi REsto! 


18.00 

Francuski kulturni centar — Predstavljanje izložbe 

Grad Avr, rekonstruisan po ideji Ogista Perea 

O izložbi govori: Žozef Abram, Francuska 

18.30 

Svečana sala Opštine Stari Grad — Predavanja 

TYPUS ili TOPOS: MRLV Architekten Hamburg – 

– Projekti i misaone osnove 

Mirjana Marković (MRLV Architekten), Nemačka 

od 19.00 

REinterpretacija slobodnog plana 

Stanko Gaković, SAD 

od 20.00 

Morfozis 

Tom Mejn, SAD 

petak, 3. jul 

9.00 – 19.30 

Italijanski institut za kulturu u Beogradu 

KONFERENCIJA: 

REdefinisanje posleratne stambene arhitekture 

Uvodna reč: Tanja Konli (Univerzitet u Beogradu) 

Učesnici: Žozef Abram (Škola arhitekture u Nansiju), 

Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper (Tehnički univerzitet u Berlinu), 

Ilejn Harvud (English Heritage), Marike Kajpers (Tehnički 

univerzitet u Delftu), Paola di Bjađi (Univerzitet u Trstu), 

Alesandra Čeroti (Univerzitet u Rimu), 

Đovani Kaudo (Univerzitet u Rimu), Pit Ekert (E2A Eckert 

Eckert Architekten) 

19.00 

Biblioteka grada Beograda, čitaonica odeljenja za 

umetnost, II sprat — Film 

Urbana rekreacija, Kongres studenata arhitekture ex 

Jugoslavije (ASK 09 EXYU) 

Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA)

subota, 4. jul 

10.00 

Okupljanje: Centralni dom vojske Srbije 

Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda, autobusom: 

Superblokovi Novog Beograda 

Vode: Tanja Konli i Ivan Kucina 

17.00 

Urbanistički zavod Beograda — Predstavljanje izložbe 

RE_Beograd: Stari i novi 

studentska radionica Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta 

u Beogradu 

18.00—19.30 

Urbanistički zavod Beograda — Okrugli sto 

Šta sa Novim Beogradom? 

Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević 

IZLOŽBE 

Kulturni centar Beograda: Likovna galerija 

Nagrade za arhitekturu i arhitektonsko – urbanistički 

konkursi u periodu 2008/09. 

Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget 


(E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Švajcarska 

Kulturni centar Beograda: hol ispred galerije Artget 

Territorial Agency (Territorial Agency), Švajcarska 

Galerija O3one 

RE_fokus (Könz Molo Architetti), Švajcarska 

Dom omladine, foaje I sprat 

Mladi bečki arhitekti (Young Viennese Architects 

– YO.V.A.2), Austrija 

Kulturni centar GRAD, I sprat 


Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u XXI veku 

kustosi: Konstantin Goađea, Rumunija i Peter Torniov, 

Bugarska 

Koordinator: Ivan Kucina, Srbija 

XI 

Kulturni centar GRAD, prizemlje 

Povratak rekama – pokretač života u gradu 

Koncept: Ružica Bogdanović, Društvo urbanista 

Beograda 

Postavka traje od 26. do 30. juna 

EUNIC – Italijanski institut za kulturu 

Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Italiji 


Kustos: Alesandra Čeroti, Italija 

EUNIC – Francuski kulturni centar 

Grad Avr, rekonstruisan po ideji Ogista Perea 

Kustos: Žozef Abram, Francuska 

EUNIC – Austrijski kulturni forum 

Procesi REstauracije istorijskog nasleđa, Austrija 

EUNIC – Gete institut 

Devedeset godina Bauhausa: 

Knjige o Bauhausu u biblioteci Gete instituta u 

Beogradu 

Opština Vračar: ulazni hol 

BINA konkurs za mlade arhitekte 

Urbanističko-arhitektonsko rešenje slobodne površine 

na uglu ulica Kneginje Zorke i Mekenzijeve na Vračaru u 

Beogradu, Pokrovitelj: Opština Vračar 

Organizator: Društvo arhitekata Beograda 

Izlozi u ulici Kneza Mihaila 

Beograd – pozlaćeni presek: Projekat LEGATIO 

– valorizacija austrijskog graditeljskog nasleđa na 

teritoriji Beograda 

Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA) 

BINA izložbeni prostori 

Extra – mûros: Očaravajuće arhitekture 

Zavod za arhitekturu i baštinu grada Pariza, Francuska 

Urbanistički zavod Beograda 

RE... Beograd: Stari i novi 

studentska radionica Arhitektonskog fakulteta 

Univerziteta u Beogradu

XII 

MESTA DEŠAVANJA — VENUES 

1 Kulturni centar Beograda: 

Likovna galerija, Knez Mihailova 6 

Galerija Artget, Trg Republike 5/I 

(radno vreme obe galerije svakog dana od 12.00 do 21.00) 

2 Galerija O3one, Andrićev venac 12 

(radno vreme svakog dana od 11.00 do 20.00, 

nedeljom zatvoreno) 

3 Dom omladine, foaje I sprat, Makedonska 22 

4 Kulturni centar GRAD, Braće Krsmanović 4 

(radno vreme svakog dana od 10.00 do 19.00h) 

5 Italijanski institut za kulturu, Kneza Miloša 56 

(radno vreme od 10.00 do 17.00, vikendom zatvoreno) 

6 Francuski kulturni centar, Zmaj Jovina 11 

(radno vreme od utorka do petka od 12.00 do 18.00 

subotom od 10.00 do 15.00, ponedeljkom zatvoreno) 

7 Austrijski kulturni forum, Kneza Mihaila 22/II–III 

(radno vreme od 8.00 do 16.00, vikendom zatvoreno) 

8 Gete institut Beograd, Kneza Mihaila 5 

9 Opština Vračar, Njegoševa 77 

10 Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Palmotićeva 30 

(radno vreme svakog dana od 8.00 do 18.00)

PROGRAMME 

Friday, June 26 th 

19.00 

Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery 

Opening Ceremony 

of the Fourth Belgrade International Architecture 

Week – BINA 2009 

Saturday, June 27 th 

11.00 

Gathering: Cvetni trg, in front of the supermarket 

A Walk Through Architecture of Belgrade: 

East Vračar, Savinac and Neimar quarters 

Led by: Mirjana Roter–Blagojević 

13.00 

Vračar Municipality, Entrance hall — Opening of the 

Exhibition and Award Ceremony 

BINA Competition for Young Architects: 

Urban–architectural design for the open space on the 

corner of Kneginje Zorke and Mekenzijeva St. in Vračar 

Municipality in Belgrade 

14.00 – 17.00 

From Slavija to Čuburski Park 

Landscape Architecture and the City 

Exhibition of students’ works and installations 

PUPA – Youth of The Association of Landscape Architects 

The exhibition is opened from June 27 th till 28 th 2009. 

18.00 – 21.00 

Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery — Lectures 

E2A: Fractions of Reality, Wim Eckert (E2A Eckert 

Eckert Architekten), Switzerland 

RE_focus, Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz (Könz Molo 

Architetti), Switzerland 

un–think, John Palmesino (Territorial Agency), Switzerland 

Discussion moderator: Srđan Jovanović Weiss 

XIII 

Sunday, June 28 th 

11.00 

Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery 

Expert Guidance Through the Exhibition 


Led by: Wim Eckert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), 

Switzerland 

12.00 

Gathering: In front of the Central Army Hall 

A Walk Through Architecture of Belgrade, by bus: 

Without Continuity there is no Identity 

Led by: Marta Vukotić–Lazar 

14.00 

Gathering: Art Gallery CCB, Knez Mihailova 6 

A Walk Through Architecture of Belgrade: 

RE... From Terazije to Kalemegdan 

Led by: Ljiljana Miletić–Abramović 

00.00 

Gathering: Art Gallery CCB, Knez Mihailova 6 

Midnight Walk Through Modern Architecture of Old 

Belgrade 

Led by: Ivan Kucina 

Monday, June 29 th 

17.00 


Children’s Workshop: REorder! 

Led by: Children’s Cultural Centre 

18.00 

Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery — Lecture 


Zoran Radojičić, Serbia 

19.30 – 21.00 

Cultural Centre GRAD — Lectures 

Shreck city: The Non Public Space in Bucharest and 

Other Stories 

Constantin Goagea, Romania 

Action and REaction: Picture of the Post Communist 

Building Culture in Bulgaria 

Peter Torniov, Bulgaria

Tuesday, June 30 th 

17.00 


Children’s Workshop: REcut, REgrate! 


18.00 – 19.30 

Austrian Cultural Forum — Lecture 

Introduction: Markus Piffl, Organisation Transeo, Austria 

Friendly Aliens in Old Peoples Homes 

Graz: Contemporary Architecture in Historic Town 

Shape 

Markus Zechner, Austria 

Center of Graz as a Mix of Historical Facades and 

Domes, Permanent Art Installations and Modern 

Architecture 

Biljana Aranđelović, Austria 

20.00 

Cultural Centre Dom omladine, foyer 1 st floor — Lectures 

Every Day Life, Siegfried Loos (polar ÷), Austria 

Projects, Andreas Bremhorst (architekten CHRISTOPH 

KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST), Austria 

Wednesday, July 1 st 

17.00 


Children’s Workshop: RElay, RElay! 


19.00 – 20.45 

Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery — Conversation 

Serbia on Venice Architecture Biennales 

Introduction: Snežana Ristić 

Participants: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, 

Zoran Erić 

XIV 

Thursday, July 2 nd 

17.00 


Children’s Workshop: REdo the REst! 


18.00 

French Cultural Centre — Exhibition Presentation 

Le Havre, the City Reconstructed Upon the Idea of 

August Peret 

Exhibition explanation: Joseph Abram, France 

18.30 

Formal Hall of the Stari Grad Municipality — Lectures 

TYPUS or TOPOS: MRLV Architekten Hamburg – 

– Designs and Contemplative Basis 

Mirjana Marković (MRLV Architekten), Germany 

from 19.00 

REinterpretation of the Open Plan Concept 

Stanko Gaković, USA 

from 20.00 

Morphosis 

Thom Mayne, USA 

Friday, July 3 rd 

9.00 – 19.30 

Italian Institute for Culture in Belgrade 

CONFERENCE: 

REdefining Post–WWII Housing 

Welcome: Tanja Conley (University of Belgrade) 

Participants: Joseph Abram (School of Architecture Nancy), 

Gabi Dolff–Bonekämper (Technical University Berlin), Elain 

Harwood (English Heritage), Marieke Kuipers (Technical 

University Delft), Paola di Biagi (University of Trieste), 

Alessandra Cerroti (University of Rome), Giovanni Caudo 

(University of Rome), Piet Eckert (E2A Eckert Eckert 

Architekten, Switzerland) 

19.00 

Belgrade City Library, Department of Art, Reading room 

2 nd floor — Movie 

Urban REcreation, The Congress of Architecture Students 

of former Yugoslavia 

(ASK 09 EXYU), Young Architects’ Club

Saturday, July 4 th 

10.00 

Gathering in front of The Central Army Hall 

Guided bus tour: Superblocks of New Belgrade 

Led by: Tanja Conley and Ivan Kucina 

17.00 

Institute of Urbanism Belgrade — Exhibition Presentation 

RE_Belgrade: Old and New 

Student’s workshop Faculty of Architecture, University of 

Belgrade 

18.00 – 19.30 

Institute of Urbanism Belgrade — Round table 

What Should We Do With New Belgrade? 

Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević (Institute of Urbanism 

Belgrade) 

EXHIBITIONS 


Awards for Architecture and Architectural and Urban 

Planning Competitions 2008/09 

Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery 


(E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Switzerland 

Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Hall in front of the Artget Gallery 


(Territorial Agency), Switzerland 

O3one Gallery 

RE_focus 

(Könz Molo architetti), Switzerland 

Cultural Centre Dom omladine, foyer 1 st floor 

Young Viennese Architects (YO.V.A. 2 ), Austria 

Cultural Centre GRAD, 1 st floor 

Contemporary Architecture in the Region: Architecture 

of Romania and Bulgaria in 21 st Century 

Curators: Constantin Goagea, Romania and Peter Torniov, 

Bulgaria, Coordinator: Ivan Kucina, Serbia 

XV 

Cultural Centre GRAD, groundfloor 

Riverfront REclaimed – Charging City Life 

Concept: Ružica Bogdanović, Town Planners Association 

EUNIC – Italian Institute for Culture 

Post-WWII social housing in Italy 

INCIS Estates in Rome: Villaggio Olimpico and Decima 

Curator: Alessandra Cerroti, Italy 

Coordinators: Roberta Gentile and Paola Guidugli, Italy 

EUNIC – French Cultural Centre 

Le Havre, the City reconstructed upon the idea of 

August Peret, Curator: Joseph Abram, France 

EUNIC – Austrian Cultural Forum 

REstoration processes of historic treasures, Austria 

EUNIC – Goethe Institute 

Ninety years of Bauhaus: Books about Bauhaus 

in the library of Goethe Institute Belgrade 

Vračar Municipality, entrance hall 

BINA Competition for Young Architects: 

Urban–architectural design for the open space on the 

corner of Kneginje Zorke and Mekenzijeva St. in Vračar 

Municipality in Belgrade, Patron: Vračar Municipality 

Windows at Knez Mihailova Street 

Belgrade – the Gilded Ratio: 

Project LEGATIO – Valorisation of Austrian Building 

Heritage on the Territory of Belgrade, Serbia 

Organisation: Young Architects’ Club 

BINA Venues 

Extra – mûros: Architecture of Delight 

City of Architecture and Patrimoine of Paris, France 

Institute of Urbanism Belgrade 

RE... Belgrade: Old and New 


Belgrade

IZLOŽBE 

EXHIBITIONS

Nagrade za arhitekturu 

Ovogodišnja BINA, četvrta u nizu, u svoj program uvrstila 

je jednu novu izložbu: „Nagrade za arhitekturu“. 

Izložba predstavlja osam nagrada različitih institucija 

dodeljenih u periodu između prošlogodišnje i ovogodišnje 

Nedelje arhitekture, od juna 2008. do juna 2009. godine. 

O nagradama, u tekstu koji sledi, navodimo sledeće 

podatke: termin dodele nagrade, (1) naziv nagrade, 

(2) naziv institucije koja dodeljuje nagradu i (3) osnovne 

propozicije nagrade. 

decembar 

(1) NAGRADA RANKO RADOVIĆ 

(2) osnivač ULUPUDS i Arhitektonski fakultet u Beogradu, 

Fakultet tehničkih nauka u Novom Sadu – departman 

za arhitekturu i urbanizam, IAUS, Zadužbina Ilije 

Milosavljevića Kolarca 

(3) Nagrada je osnovana sa ciljem da podstiče, razvija i 

afirmiše kritičko - teorijsku misao u oblasti arhitekture i 

arhitektonsko stvaralaštvo. 

Kategorije: 1) kritičko – teorijski tekstovi o arhitekturi 

2) televizijske emisije, izložbe ili multimedijalne prezentacije 

i 3) realizovano arhitektonsko delo. 

januar 

(1) VELIKA NAGRADA ZA ARHITEKTURU SAS 

(2) Savez arhitekata Srbije 

(3) SAS dodeljuje Veliku nagradu svojim najistaknutijim 

članovima za celokupni opus. 

februar 

(1) GODIŠNJA NAGRADA ZA ARHITEKTURU SAS 

(2) Savez arhitekata Srbije pod pokroviteljstvom 

Ministarstva za zaštitu životne sredine i prostorno planiranje 

2 — IZLOŽBE 

(3) Kategorije: 1) najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo iz svih 

oblasti arhitekture – Godišnja nagrada i 2) izvedeno 

delo naših arhitekata koje je realizovano u inostranstvu 

– Povelja 

mart 

(1) NAGRADA ZA ARHITEKTURU KOMPANIJE “NOVOSTI” 

(2) Kompanija “Novosti” a.d. 

(3) Nagrada se dodeljuje radi podsticanja najviših 

dostignuća u arhitektonskom stvaralaštvu 

Kategorije: 1) za najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo 

realizovano u prethodnoj godini i 2) za najuspešniji 

projekat studenta arhitekture u prethodnoj godini 

mart 

(1) NAGRADA SALONA ARHITEKTURE U BEOGRADU 

(2) Muzej primenjene umetnosti – odsek za arhitekturu, 

urbanizam i arhitektonski dizajn 

(3) U okviru izložbene manifestacije dodeljuju se: 

Grand prix Salona i Priznanja u sledećim kategorijama: 

Arhitektura, Arhitektura – projekti, Enterijer, Urbanizam, 

Gosti Salona – delo u inostranstvu i Publikacije. 

april 

(1) NAGRADA GRADA BEOGRADA 

(2) Skupština grada Beograda 

(3) Nagrada grada Beograda dodeljuje se za delo koje 

predstavlja najvrednije dostignuće u umetnosti, nauci, 

medicini, arhitekturi i urbanizmu, novinarstvu, obrazovanju 

i sportu, realizovano u prethodnoj godini. 

maj 

(1) NAGRADA IZ FONDA ALEKSANDAR ŠALETIĆ 

(2) ULUPUDS, Majska izložba 

(3) Nagrada se dodeljuje za najbolja ostvarenja iz oblasti 

projektovanja enterijera. 

jun 

(1) NAGRADA INŽENJERSKE KOMORE SRBIJE 

(2) Upravni odbor Inžinjerske komore Srbije 

(3) Godišnja nagrada se dodeljuje: 1) za životno delo, 

2) za izuzetno dostignuće u struci iz delatnosti članova 

Komore i 3) za ostvarivanje izuzetnih rezultata na početku 

stručne karijere.

Milenija Marušić i Darko Marušić 

Upravno poslovni objekat METALS BANKE, Stražilovska 2, Novi Sad 

Nagrada Ranko Radović u kategoriji realizovano arhitektonsko delo 

Ognjenka Finci 

IZAJN SISTEMA URBANOG MOBILIJARA I VIZUELNIH KOMUNIKACIJA, 

Asocijacija arhitekata Sarajeva, 2008. 

Nagrada Ranko Radović u kategoriji kritičko teorijski tekstovi o arhitekturi, urbanizmu i gradu 

Goran Vojvodić, Gordana Šišović i Dušan Radišić 

Upravna zgrada “Porše” u Beogradu 

Godišnja nagrada za arhitekturu Saveza arhitekata Srbije 

u kategoriji za najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo – godišnja nagrada 

31. Salon arhitekture, Priznanje u kategoriji arhitekture 

Nagrada grada Beograda 

Vesna Cagić i Ksenija Bulatović 

Poslovni objekat u Takovskoj ulici u Beogradu 

Nagrada za arhitekturu kompanije «NOVOSTI» u kategoriji za 

najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo realizovano u prethodnoj godini 

Društvo arhitekata Beograda i Kulturni centar Beograda 

(Autori manifestacije: Jelena Ivanović-Vojvodic, Danica Jovović 

Prodanović, Ivan Kucina, Darko Marušić, Ružica Sarić) 

III MEĐUNARODNA NEDELJA ARHITEKTURE 2008. 

Nagrada Ranko Radović u kategoriji televizijske emisije, izložbe, 

multimedijalne prezentacije 

Dušan Krstić 

Velika nagrada za arhitekturu Saveza arhitekata Srbije 

Jovan Sarić i Ružica Sarić 

Stambeno poslovni objekat u Budvi 

Godišnja nagrada za arhitekturu Saveza arhitekata Srbije u kategoriji za 

izvedeno delo naših arhitekata koje je realzovano u inostranstvu 

31. Salon arhitekture, Priznanje u kategoriji arhitekture

Hana Drašković 

“Kula - hotel i garaža” 

Nagrada za arhitekturu kompanije «NOVOSTI» u kategoriji za 

najuspešniji projekat studenta arhitekture u prethodnoj godini 

Ela Nešić i Danilo Nedeljković 

Enterijer prodavnice “Prizma” 

Nagrada Aleksandar Šaletić za enterijer 

Marija Savković i Marija Milanović 

Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko rešenje zgrade Oblasnog centra 

kontrole letenja na aerodromu “Nikola Tesla” 

Nagrada Inženjerske komore Srbije za ostvarivanje izuzetnih rezultata 

na početku stučne karijere 

Katarina Bosnić 

Beogradski apartman 

Nagrada Aleksandar Šaletić za enterijer 

Branislav Mitrović 

Nagrada Inženjerske komore Srbije za životno delo 

Biljana Cvejić i Milan Dimitrijević 

Hotel “Townhouse 27” u Beogradu 

Grand prix 31. Salona arhitekture

Awards for Architecture 

This year BINA, fourth in a row, introduced a new 

Exhibition in its Programme. The Exhibition, entitled 

“Awards for Architecture”, presents eight awards 

bestowed by different Institutions in the period between 

last year’s and this year’s BINA, from June of 2008 until 

June of 2009. 

In the follow-up, we present a fact sheet about the 

Awards, which includes: the time when the award is 

announced (1) the name of the Award (2) name of 

the institutions that bestows the Award, and (3) basic 

description of the Awards. 

December 

(1) RANKO RADOVIĆ AWARD, 

(2) ULUPUDS (Association of Applied Arts Artists and 

Designers of Serbia), as the founder, together with Faculty 

of Architecture in Belgrade, Faculty of Technical Sciences 

in Novi Sad – Department for Architecture and Urbanism, 

IAUS, The Ilija M. Kolarac Foundation. 

(3) The Award was established with an aim to support, 

develop and foster analytical review and theoretic 

thought in the area of architecture as well as architectural 

endeavour. Categories: 1) analytic reviews and theoretical 

texts on architecture 2) television programmes, 

exhibitions, or multimedia presentations 3) realised work 

of architecture. 

January 

(1) ASSOCIATION OF ARCHITECTS OF SERBIA GRAND 

PRIX 

(2) Association of Architects of Serbia 

(3) AAS awards the Grand Prix to its most prominent 

members for their entire opus. 

February 

(1) AAS ANNUAL ARCHITECTURE AWARD, 

(2) Association of Architects of Serbia under auspices of 

the Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning 

(3) Categories: 1) most successful architecture work from 

all the areas of architecture – Annual Award 2) realised 

work of our architects abroad – Charter 


March 

(1) NOVOSTI COMPANY ARCHITECTURE AWARD 

(2) Publishing company “Novosti” 

(3) The Award is bestowed for the purpose of encouraging 

the highest achievements in architectural endeavour. 

Categories: 1) most successful architectural work realised 

in previous year 2) most successful project of a student of 

architecture in the previous year 

March 

(1) BELGRADE ARCHITECTURE SALON AWARD 

(2) Museum of Applied Arts - Department of architecture, 

urbanism and architectural design 

(3) Within the manifestations, the following awards are 

given: Grand Prix of the Salon and Commendations in 

the following categories: “Architecture”, “Architecture 

– Projects“, “Interior Design”, “Town Planning“, “ Guest of 

the Salon - Work done abroad” and “Publications“. 

April 

(1) CITY OF BELGRADE AWARD 

(2) Belgrade City Assembly 

(3) The Award of the City of Belgrade is bestowed for 

a work that represents the most valuable achievement 

in arts, science, medicine, architecture and urbanism, 

journalism, education and sport, and was completed in 

the previous year. 

May 

(1) ALEKSANDAR ŠALETIĆ FUND AWARD 

(2) ULUPUDS, May Exhibition 

(3) The Award is bestowed for best accomplishments in 

the area of interior design. 

June 

(1) AWARD OF THE CHAMBER OF ENGINEERS 

(2) Chamber of Engineers Steering Committee 

(3) The Annual Award is bestowed for: 1) Lifetime 

Achievment 2) for outstanding achievement in the 

profession performed by the members of the Chamber 3) 

for outstanding results at the beginning of a professional 

career.

Arhitektonski i urbanistički 

konkursi 2008/09. 

Prikaz godišnje produkcije arhitektonsko-urbanističkih 

konkursa, stalna je rubrika BINE. Osnovni cilj izložbe 

konkursnih radova je afirmacija dragocene institucije 

konkursa i ukazivanje na neophodnost negovanja 

konkursne tradicije. Neka primetna konkursna oseka, u 

periodu između proslogodišnje i ovogodišnje BINE, bude 

i svojevrstan apel Društva arhitekata Beograda nadležnim 

gradskim institucijama za raspisivanje konkursa. Konkursi 

su svetski priznata nadmetanja najboljih arhitektonskourbanističkih 

radova za najkvalitetnija rešenja. Ne postoji 

brži i jasniji način za unapređenje arhitekture i urbanizma 

neke sredine. 


Architectural and Urban Planning 

Competitions 2008/09 

One of the constant headings of BINA is review of the 

yearly production of the architectural and urban planning 

competitions. The main goal of the exhibition of the 

competition works is affirmation of the precious institution 

of competitions and pointing out to the necessity of 

cherishing its tradition. Let the noticeable low tide of 

competitions, between this and last year’s BINA, be a 

special appeal of the Association of Belgrade Architect, 

to the competent city administration for competition 

announcement. Competitions are worldwide accepted 

way of competing between the best architectural and 

urban planning works, for the best quality solutions. 

There is no faster and better way for improving of the 

architecture and urbanism of a certain envoirment.

Re:A.C.T.(Grozdana Šišović, Tanja Bajić i Dejan Milanović) 

Konkurs za idejno rešenje objekta u Ulici Skadarskoj br. 34 u Beogradu 

I nagrada 

Jelena Mandić i Mirjana Todorović 

Konkurs za idejno rešenje fontane sa partnernim rešenjem prostora 

ispred poslovne zgrade Jugoimport na Novom Beogradu 

I nagrada


Izložba radova biroa E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten, 

Švajcarska 

U svetu sa sve većim brojem izmučenih arhitektonskih 

uloga, sa sumnjivim kontekstualnim postojanostima, 

ekonomskim pritiskom, u svetu koji vrtoglavom brzinom 

stremi ka novim ekološkim standardima, dosežemo 

granice perfekcionizma. Našim radovima izrazili smo 

stanje uma koje konceptualizuje arhitekturu i urbanizam 

kao skladan nesklad, ukazujući na to da nova, moderna 

mreža povezuje nejednakosti. Modernizacija ne mora 

biti skladna, ne mora da se nameće čitavom sistemu. 

Ona postaje sistem osobenosti i neprekidno predviđanje, 

najzad, kolaž koji može da poveže razlike, polaritete i 

suprotnosti u jedan pojam mašte. Ona oslobađa otpor 

sistemu koji je neprijateljski nastrojen prema novim 

idejama i potrebama za prilagođavanjem, imajući na umu 

da bi stoga novina trebalo da bude izmenjena na čitavom 

opsegu „skladne” sfere. Prema tome, savršeni način 

čitanja naših stvarnosti je onaj koji je nemoguće dovršiti. 

Izloženo je jedanaest fragmenata protumačenih stvarnosti 

koji će biti detaljnije obrađeni tokom predavanja. 

— 

Braća Pit i Vim Ekert otvorili su svoj biro 1997. u Cirihu, 

koji je 2001. postao E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten. 

Ovaj biro trenutno zapošljava trideset arhitekata koji 

rade na petnaest projekata. E2A izrađuje arhitektonske 

i urbanističke projekte u vidu interdisciplinarnih procesa 

sa više autora. Konceptualni razvoj je spoj analitičke 

percepcije konteksta i hipotetičkog, programskog pristupa 

koji prikazuje jedno tumačenje savremenih uslova. 

Skorašnji i sadašnji projekti predstavljaju prelaz na širi 

opseg koji obuhvata više javnih projekata i urbanističkih 


studija. Biro je osvojio prvu nagradu za izradu glavnog 

projekta za Escher Wyss Areal, najveću industrijsku zonu 

u Cirihu. Projekat predviđa izgradnju Escher-Terrassen, 60 

m visoku zgradu sa apartmanima i pozornicama za probe 

ciriške Opere, čija je izrada naručena od E2A (planirano je 

da se radovi završe do 2011). Projekti E2A su objavljeni 

u brojnim časopisima i knjigama. Godine 2006. izdata je 

monografija 15 De aedibus. E2A (izdavač: Quart Verlag, 

Lucern). 


exhibition of the buro E2A 

Eckert Eckert Architekten, Switzerland 

Within a world of increasingly tortured architectural 

roles, of doubtful contextual stabilities, economic 

pressure and breathless speed towards new ecological 

standards, we reach the limits of a perfectionist world. 

Through our work we have formulated a mindset to 

conceptualize architecture and urbanism as a systematic 

incoherence reflecting that a new modern network 

interlocks inequalities. Modernization does not have to 

be coherent, does not need a form of imposition on the 

entire system. It becomes a system of particularities and 

continuous anticipation, finally a collage that is capable 

to cast difference, polarities and contrast into one idea of 

imagination. It frees the resistance of a system hostile to 

new ideas and to needs of adaptation, bearing in mind 

that consequently newness would need to be changed on 

an entire scale of a “coherent” sphere. The ideal reading 

of our realities is therefore one that is impossible to 

complete. 11 fractions of interpreted realities are exhibited 

and will be further elaborated throughout the lecture. 

— 

The brothers Piet and Wim Eckert established their 

office in 1997 in Zurich and became E2A Eckert Eckert 

Architekten in 2001. Currently, the practice employs 

30 architects working on15 projects. E2A conceives 

architectural and urban projects as an interdisciplinary 

process, as a multiple authorship. The conceptual 

development is a synthesis of an analytic perception of 

the context and a hypothetical, programmatic approach - 

outlining an interpretation of the contemporary conditions. 

Recent and current projects represent a change to a


Centar za sluh i jezik, Švajcarska, Cirih 

konkurs 2003, I nagrada, realizovano 2006 - 2008 

foto: Dominik Mark Verli 


Centre for Hearing and Language, CH-Zurich 

competition 2003, 1st Prize, realization 2006 - 2008 

photo: Dominique Marc Wehrli 

larger scale, which includes several public projects as 

well as urban studies. The practice was awarded with the 

first prize for the Master plan for the Escher Wyss Areal, 

the largest industrial area in Zurich. The plan foresees 

the construction of the Escher-Terrassen, a 60m highrise 

building with apartments and the rehearsal stages 

of the Zurich Opera, for which E2A was commissioned 

(completion planned 2011). Projects of E2A have been 

published in numerous magazines and books. In 2006, 

the monograph 15 De aedibus. E2A (Quart Verlag, 

Lucerne) was released.


Izložba radova biroa Teritorijal ejdžensi, 

Švajcarska 

Međuzavisnost je ključna karakteristika sveta u XXI veku. 

Transformacije u jednom sistemu utiču na dinamiku u 

drugim sistemima, a te veze često funkcionišu i na širokim 

prostorima. Naše naseobine postaju sve povezanije jedna 

s drugom, što je posledica globalizacije, i sve se više 

oslanjaju na prirodne prostore u koje su usađene kako bi 

prosperirale. 

Territorial Agency postavlja pitanje kako arhitektura 

može da organizuje koherentan skup širokih teritorijalnih 

transformacija uz integrisanje postojećih sila i dinamika. 

Gledano s konvencionalne tačke gledišta, od arhitekture 

se očekuje da proizvodi prostorna rešenja prema zadatim 

smernicama. Territorial Agency pokušava da preokrene 

ovo shvatanje i istraži kako arhitektonsko znanje može 

da se aktivira kako bi se stvorio zajednički koordinatni 

sistem za mnogobrojne aktere i zainteresovane činioce 

koji bi informisao, preoblikovao i transformisao budućnost 

naših teritorija. Territorial Agency se obraća pitanju 

kako arhitektura može da postavi kontinuitet promena i 

angažovanje prirodnih, političkih, kulturnih i ekonomskih 

snaga kao svoj osnovni stav, nasuprot svom trenutnom 

modernističkom pristupu pukog rešavanja problema. 

Izložba sakuplja materijale iz raznih izvora i oblasti kako 

bi predstavila niz hitnih pitanja o transformacijama 

savremenih naseljenih teritorija. U opsegu od geopolitičkih 

transformacija na dalekom severu do pregovora o 

kulturi urbanih promena u Unutrašnjoj Mongoliji, od 

klimatskih promena koje preoblikuju urbanu rečnu deltu 

u Holandiji do institucionalnih demokratskih instrumenata 

lokalne samouprave u Švajcarskoj, od cirkulacija i novih 

zbližavanja povezanih sa evropskim migracijama, do 


hermetičkih i gotovo samoreferentnih krugova proizvodnje 

znanja i inovacija; od preoblikovanja suverenog 

prostora kroz rad na terenu nevladinih organizacija do 

infrastrukturnih mreža Ujedinjenih nacija širokog obima, 

izložba istražuje kako međusobno delovanje komponenti 

savremene teritorije, od kojih mnoge nisu oblikovali ljudi, 

trajno regeneriše i transformiše procese koji su ih i stvorili. 

Territorial Agency istražuje kako arhitektura redefiniše 

svoju ulogu, kako se postavlja prema mogućnosti 

dinamičnog ljudskog okruženja koje je pod stalnim 

izmenama: jedno nedovršivo angažovanje u čijem je 

središtu prostor u transformaciji. 

— 

Territorial Agency je samostalna organizacija koja 

na inovativan način promoviše i radi na projektima 

održivih teritorijalnih transformacija. Territorial Agency 

radi na jačanju kapaciteta koji se tiču upravljanja 

prostornim transformacijama u lokalnim zajednicama, 

ali i na međunarodnom nivou. Territorial Agency se 

bavi uspostavljanjem instrumenata i metoda kojima 

se osigurava veći kvalitet arhitekture i urbanizma na 

savremenim prostorima. Projekti Territorial Agency 

kanališu dostupne prostorne resurse ka njihovom razvoju 

u punom kapacitetu. 

Territorial Agency su osnovali Džon Palmezino i 

En-Sofi Renskog. 

www.territorialagency.com 


exhibition of the buro Territorial Agency, 

Switzerland 

Interdependence is the defining characteristic of the 

21st century world. Transformations in one system affect 

dynamics in other systems, and the connections operate 

often over wide areas. Our inhabited environments are 

becoming more and more linked with one another, as an 

effect of globalisation, and they rely more and more on the 

natural spaces they are inserted in to flourish. 

Territorial Agency asks how architecture can organise 

a coherent set of wide-scale territorial transformations, 

integrating existing forces and dynamics. 

Conventionally architecture is seen to produce spatial 

solutions to defined briefs. Territorial Agency attempts to

Sariselka 

© Territorial Agency 

— 

Saariselkä 


reverse this and investigate how architecture knowledge 

can be activated to generate a shared image of reference 

for the multiple actors and stake-holders that will inform, 

reshape and transform the future of our territories. 

Territorial Agency addresses how architecture can pose 

continuity of change and engagement with natural, 

political, cultural, social and economic forces as its 

fundamental attitude, as opposed to its current modernist 

problem-solving approach. 

The exhibition collects materials from a variety of sources 

and domains to present a series of urgent questions 

about the transformations of contemporary inhabited 

territories. Ranging from the geopolitical transformations 

in the High North to cultural negotiations around urban 

change in Inner Mongolia, from climate change reshaping 

the metropolitan delta of the Netherlands to institutional 

assets of local democracy in Switzerland, from the 

circulations and new proximities linked to migrations 

in Europe, to the closed-off and almost self referential 

circuits of contemporary knowledge production and 

innovation; from the remoulding of sovereign space 

through the action on the ground of Non-Governmental 

Organisations to the sweeping infrastructural networks of 


the UN, the exhibition investigates how the interplay of the 

components of the contemporary territory, many of which 

non-human, continuously regenerate and transform the 

processes that formed them. 

Territorial Agency investigates how architecture is 

redefining its role, addressing the possibility of an 

ever changing and dynamic human environment: an 

unfinishable engagement with a space in transformation. 

— 

Territorial Agency is an independent organisation that 

innovatively promotes and works for sustainable territorial 

transformations. Territorial Agency works to strengthen 

the capacity of local and international communities in 

comprehensive spatial transformation management. 

Territorial Agency works for the establishment of 

instruments and methods for ensuring higher architectural 

and urban quality in the contemporary territories. Territorial 

Agency’s projects channel available spatial resources 

towards the development of their full potential. 

Territorial Agency is established by John Palmesino and 

Ann-Sofi Rönnskog. 

www.territorialagency.com

RE_fokus 

Izložba radova biroa Kenc Molo arhitekti, 

Švajcarska 

Pojedinačne aspiracije u vezi sa teritorijom proširile su se 

taktom motora sa unutrašnjim sagorevanjem: REpeticija 

(pojedinačnih objekata, pozicioniranih na podjednakim 

razdaljinama od svojih osa, stvorila je međuprostore bez 

značenja: nastanak prigradske periferije jeste univerzalan 

fenomen. 

Beskonačna REprodukcija „usamljenih“ zgrada slična je 

autističnom individualizmu. 

Skoro neograničena dostupnost resursa i energije imala je 

nesumnjiv uticaj na prirodu i društvenu ravnotežu. 

Takođe, ne možemo da umaknemo ovom fenomenu 

– nalazimo se na sredini njegovog razvoja. Ideja 

individualizma i slobode, u svakom slučaju ljudskog 

progresa, ne može se razumeti sama po sebi već samo 

u odnosu na njen kontekst, u širem smislu. Naša namera 

je da popunimo te međuprostore, da stvorimo veze, 

prostore koje su u dijalogu: koncentrisane REvolucionare 

protiv ekspanzije. Tražeći razliku – i što se tiče posebnosti, 

i što se tiče potencijala nekog mesta – tražimo 

zgušnjavanje. Pokušavamo da se fokusiramo na ono što 

je tipično. (RE-fokusirajmo se na tipično, i na osobeno.) 

Želeli bismo da skrenemo pažnju na tri projekta koji 

predstavljaju tri tipa stanovanja: 

1_ kuća za bračni par 

3_ zgrada za tri porodice 

72_ objekat za 72 studenta. 

— 

Kenc Molo arhitekti, Lugano, Švajcarska. Osnovani 1992. 

Partneri: Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc 

www.koenzmolo.ch 


RE_focus 

exhibition of the buro Könz Molo Architetti, 

Switzerland 

Individual aspirations for the territory have expanded 

at the rhythm of an internal combustion engine: the 

repetition (RE-petition) of single objects, positioned at 

legal distances from their property lines has produced 

interstitial spaces devoid of meaning: the invention of the 

suburban periphery is a universal phenomenon. 

The reproduction (RE-production) ad infinitum of free 

standing houses is akin to autistic individualism. 

The near unlimited availability of resources and energy has 

brought about an undeniable impact on nature and social 

equilibrium. 

We also can’t escape from this phenomenon – we 

find ourselves in the middle of its growth. The idea of 

individualism and liberty, in any case human progress, 

can’t be understood in and of itself but only in relation to 

its context, in the larger sense. 

Our intention is to fill these interstitial spaces, to create 

relationships, spaces with dialogue: concentration rebels 

(RE_bell) against expansion. Searching for a difference, 

for a particularity and for the potential of any place, we 

look for densification. We try to focus on the typical. 

(RE_focus the typical, peculiar). 

We would like to present three projects which represent 

three residential typologies: 

1_ a house for a single couple 

3_ a building for three families 

72_ a building for 72 students 

— 

Könz Molo architetti, Lugano, Switzerland. Established in 

1992. Partners: Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz. 

www.koenzmolo.ch

Jednoporodična kuća Al Ronco, 

Lugano Pregassona/TI, 2006-2007 

(Foto: Walter Mair) 

— 

Onefamily House Al Ronco, 

Lugano Pregassona/TI, 2006-2007 

(Foto: Walter Mair)

Mladi bečki arhitekti (YO.V.A. 2 ), 

Austrija 

organizator: Magistrat glavnog grada Beča 

koncept izložbe: Mihael Dim 

Radi davanja podsticaja mladim bečkim arhitektama, član 

Vlade grada Beča zadužen za razvoj grada i saobraćaj, 

dipl. inž. Rudolf Šiker je 2005. godine pokrenuo projekat 

„YO.V.A. – Young Viennese Architects“, kao sastavni deo 

Bečke godine arhitekture. Projekat je nastavljen u jesen 

2007. 

Izložba YO.V.A.2 (na nemačkom i engleskom jeziku) treba 

da posluži kao platforma za predstavljanje inovativnih 

kreacija, ideja i koncepata mladih arhitekata. U širokoj i 

otvorenoj potrazi za učesnicima pronađene su osobe i 

grupe koje su deo mladog, urbanog i živahnog bečkog 

arhitektonskog dešavanja. Pravo učešća imali su mladi 

arhitekti do 45 godina iz arhitektonskih biroa u Beču. 

Kriterijumi za izbor bili su, između ostalog, inovativni 

karakter i samostalnost prezentovanih projekata. 

Žiri sastavljen od predstavnika iz oblasti arhitekture, 

arhitektonskog obrazovanja, Grada Beča, Komore 

arhitekata i inženjerskih konzolenata, Austrijskog društva 

arhitekture i Interesnog udruženja arhitekture, izabrao je 

učesnike na osnovu projekata koje su predali. 

Od mnoštva kandidatura izabrano je dvanaest 

arhitektonskih timova: SUE ARCHITEKTEN, 

SOLID architecture, nonconform architektur vor ort, 

t-hoch-n ARCHITEKTUR, Veit Aschenbrenner Architekten, 

gharkhanzadeh sandbichler architekten zt gmbh, polar, 

HEIN-TROY Architekten, kiskan kaufmann, 

CHRISTOPH KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST 

Architekten, HOLODECK architects i x architekten. 

Pre izbora ovi timovi su se međusobno samo površno 

poznavali, pa su pripreme za izložbu iskoristili za stručnu 


diskusiju i umrežavanje. Kao konkretan proizvod nastao 

je zajednički panoramski kolaž sa arhitektonskim 

intervencijama iz priloga svih timova o aktuelnim pitanjima 

iz oblasti arhitekture i urbanizma. 

— 

Vlasnici 

Magistrat glavnog grada Beča 

Magistratsko odeljenje 18 – Razvoj grada i urbanizam 

Referat za rad s javnošću i upravljanje znanjem 

1, Rathausstrasse 14-16, 1082 Beč, Austrija 

Telefon: +43-1-4000 88720 

Telefax: +43-1-4000 7271 

E-mail: info@ma18.wien.gv.at 

Web: www.stadtentwicklung.wien.at 

Koncepcija sadržaja 

dipl. inž. Mihael Dim 

MA 19 – Arhitektura i uređenje grada 

Grafika i dizajn 

Izložba: Schreiner & Kastler 

Katalog: Schreiner & Kastler 

Internet: 

www.wien.at/stadtentwicklung/architektur/yova 

Young Viennese Architect (YO.V.A. 2 ), 

Austrija 

organized by: Stadtentwicklung Wien 

exhibition concept: Michael Diem 

Wanting to offer impetus to young Viennese architects, a 

Vienna City Councillor for Urban Development, Traffic and 

Transport, Mr. Rudolph Schicker, BE, started the project 

“YO.V.A”. – Young Viennese Architects – in 2005, as part 

of the Viennese Year of Architecture. The Project was 

continued in the autumn of 2007. 

Exhibition YO.V.A.2 (in German and in English) is 

supposed to serve as platform for the presentation 

of innovative creations, ideas and concepts of young 

architects. In a wide and open search for the participants, 

the Project found individuals, and groups, who are part 

of the young, urban and lively Viennese architectural 

activities. The right to participate was given to young

architects aged 45 or less that work in architecture 

bureaus in Vienna. The criteria for selection were, among 

others, innovative character and autonomy in realisation of 

the presented designs. 

A jury composed of representatives of the areas of 

architecture and architectural education from the City 

of Vienna, the Chamber of Architects and Engineers, 

Austrian Architectural Society and Architects’ Interest 

Association chose participants based on the designs they 

entered. 

From the multitude of entries, twelve architectonic teams 

were chosen for the Project: SUE ARCHITEKTEN, 

SOLID architecture, nonconform architektur vor ort, 

t-hoch-n ARCHITEKTUR, Veit Aschenbrenner Architekten, 

gharkhanzadeh sandbichler architekten zt gmbh, polar, 

HEIN-TROY Architekten, kiskan kaufmann, CHRISTOPH 

KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST Architekten, 

HOLODECK architects and x architekten. 

Before the selection, these teams knew each other just 

vaguely, so they used the preparations for the exhibition 

for a professional discussion and networking. As the 

concrete product of this discussion, a joint panoramic 

collage was incepted with architectural interventions from 

all the teams that reference current issues in the area of 

architecture and urbanism. 


— 

Owners 

City Council of Vienna 

Municipal Department 18 – City Development and 

Urbanism 

Sector for Public Relations and Knowledge Management 

1, Rathausstrasse 14-16, 1082 Vienna, Austria 

Telephone: +43-1-4000 88720 

Fax: +43-1-4000 7271 

E-mail: info@ma18.wien.gv.at 

Web: www.stadtentwicklung.wien.at 

Contents Concept 

Michael Diem, BE 

MA 19 – Municipal Department for Architecture and Urban 

Design 

Graphics & Design 

Exhibition: Schreiner & Kastler 

Catalogue: Schreiner & Kastler 

Internet: 

www.wien.at/stadtentwicklung/architektur/yova


Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u 

XXI veku 

po izboru časopisa Architectura / Bukurešt i 

Abitare / Sofija 


kuratori: Konstantin Goađea (Rumunija) i Peter 

Torniov (Bugarska) 

Izložba Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u XXI veku 

predstavlja drugi nastavak u seriji izložbi posvećenih 

savremenoj arhitekturi Balkana. Kao i prethodna 

– Arhitektura Slovenije, Hrvatske i Srbije – i ova izložba je 

organizovana tako što su odabrani kuratori, istaknuti mladi 

arhitekti, iz sredina čija se arhitektura predstavlja. Namera 

organizatora izložbe jeste da se prikažu radovi koji su 

realizovani posle 2000. godine i projekti koji tek treba da 

se realizuju. Izabrani radovi ne predstavljaju opšte stanje 

već, prema mišljenju kuratora, najnapredniji i najkvalitetniji 

deo arhitektonske produkcije. 

Značaj ove izložbe i onih koje će biti prikazane u okviru 

Beogradske internacionalne nedelje arhitekture jeste u 

tome što one pružaju mogućnost poređenja i povezivanja 

iskustava arhitekata iz država Balkana koji, iako 

teritorijalno i kulturno bliski, nisu imali mnogo prilika da 

razmene saznanja. A u tranzicionim vremenima, u kojima 

arhitektura gubi svoja prethodna vrednosna uporišta 

i pokušava da otkrije nova, razmena naprednih ideja i 

iskustva postaje neophodnost. 


Contemporary architecture in the 

region: Architecture of Romania 

and Bulgaria in 21st Century 

according to magazines Architectura / Bucarest 

and Abitare / Sofia 


curators: Constantin Goagea (Romania) and 

Peter Torniov (Bulgaria) 

The Exhibition about architecture of Romania and Bulgaria 

in 21st century represents the second continuation in 

the series of exhibitions dedicated to the contemporary 

architecture of the Balkans. Same as the previous ones 

– Architecture of Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia –this 

Exhibition also engaged curators who are eminent young 

architects from the countries whose architecture is 

exhibited. The intention of the exhibition organizers is to 

show the works realized after the year 2000 and projects 

that are yet to be realized. The chosen works do not 

represent the overall situation, but, according to curators’ 

opinions, the most advanced and quality portion of the 

architectural production. 

The importance of this Exhibition and the future ones, 

which will be presented within Belgrade International 

Architecture Week, lies in the fact that these exhibitions 

offer the possibility of comparing and linking the 

experiences of architects who come from the Balkan 

states, who did not have many opportunities to exchange 

their knowledge, even though they are territorially 

and culturally close. Yet, in transitional times, in which 

architecture loses its previous bases of value and tries to 

discover new ones, the exchange of progressive ideas 

and experiences becomes a necessity.

Stambeni blok Ljulin, 

2006-2007, Sofija, Bugarska 

IO Architects 

— 

Ljulin Apartment Block, 

2006-2007, Sofia, Bulgaria 

IO Architects 

Prenoćište 

2006-2008, Salciua, Alba district, Rumunija 

SKBD: Attila Kim, Tiberiu Bucsa, Adriana Diaconu 

— 

Boarding House 

2006-2008, Salciua, Alba district, Romania 

SKBD: Attila Kim, Tiberiu Bucsa, Adriana Diaconu 

19 — IZLOŽBE

POVRATAK REKAMA – 

Pokretač života u gradu 

koncept izložbe: Ružica Bogdanović 

Među mnogobrojnim gradovima na vodi značajna tema o 

kojoj se govori jeste „vodeni front”. 

Tokom istorijskog razvoja gradova pokretačke aktivnosti 

locirane su upravo na obalama koje su, nekada na obodu 

gradske zone, razvojem i širenjem grada postale deo šireg 

gradskog jezgra. 

Privredne zone, najčešće brodogradilišta locirana uz 

vodene tokove (na primerima evropskih gradova kao 

što su Bilbao, Geteborg, London, Amsterdam, Dablin...) 

transformišu se u pokretački mehanizam postindustrijskog 

grada tercijarnih i kvartalnih aktivnosti – usluga, rekreacije, 

kulture, zabave. 

Grad Beograd, sa izuzetnom dispozicijom najužeg 

gradskog jezgra lociranog u neposrednoj blizini ušća Save 

u Dunav, nema kvalitetnu vezu s vodenim frontom. 

Tema priobalja je zastupljena u istraživanjima i analizama, 

kao i manjim intervencijama (konkursno rešenje i realizacija 

pristaništa, zatim niz parcijalnih projekata za Savski 

amfiteatar i Staro beogradsko sajmište, Dorćolsku marinu, 

Kalemegdansku tvrđavu i objekte donjeg Kalemegdana, 

Dunavski amfiteatar – područje Ade Huje). Međutim, 

potrebno je da se zona priobalja integralno i planski 

definiše, ali je – u nedostatku takvog plana – i bavljenje 

parcijalnim zahvatima kroz navedene teme dobrodošlo. 

Izložba Društva urbanista Beograda na Beogradskoj 

internacionalnoj nedelji arhitekture 2009. prikazuje 

projekte koji su tokom prethodne dve godine promovisali 

temu „silaska grada” na reke. 

Izložba prikazuje postojeće stanje Savskog amfiteatra, 

Starog sajmišta i Dunavskog amfiteatra, zatim pregled 

projekata: Analiza Savskog amfiteatra, Izložba Staro 


sajmište kao nukleus Novog Beograda, izabrani radovi 

projekta Ada Huja (autori: Dragana Bazik i saradnici, 

Predrag Milošević i saradnici, Vladan Đokića i saradnici) i 

projekat revitalizacije Kule Nebojše (autori: Dejan Miljković, 

Branko Pavić, Jovan Mitrović). 

— 

Društvo urbanista Beograda je posvećeno promovisanju, 

organizovanju i objavljivanju širokog spektra projekata u 

domenu urbanističkog planiranja u Beogradu. Društvo 

urbanista Beograda predstavilo je svoju delatnost na 

Belgrade design Week 2007 prostornom postavkom 

Riverfront reclaimed, koja je zatim prikazana i tokom 

međunarodne Nedelje arhitekture 2007. Društvo urbanista 

Beograda je 2008. godine učestvovalo sa autorskom 

izložbom multimedijalnih projekata Staro beogradsko 

sajmište kao staro jezgro Novog Beograda, na Salonu 

arhitekture 2008, u Muzeju primenjene umetnosti u 

Beogradu. Sa projektom Staro beogradsko sajmište, 70 

godina od otvaranja prvog beogradskog međunarodnog 

sajma uzoraka, Društvo urbanista Beograda je 

promovisalo svoju delatnost tokom dana Evropske 

kulturne baštine 2007. godine. 

RIVERFRONT RECLAIMED – 

Charging City Life 

exhibition concept: Ružica Bogdanović 

In many cities that lie on water, an important topic of 

conversation is the “water front”. During the historical 

development of the cities, the driving force activities have 

been particularly located on the river banks, which, once 

on the borders of city zones, today belong to the wider 

city core, a result of the development and the expansion 

of the city. 

Industrial zones, most frequently shipyards located 

alongside the water flows (as in examples of the cities 

as Bilbao, Goteborg, London, Amsterdam, Dublin 

etc) are being transformed into the driving force of the 

post-industrial city’s tertiary and quaternary activities 

– recreation, culture, entertainment. 

The City of Belgrade, with the extraordinary layout of its 

city core located close to the confluence of the rivers 

Sava and Danube, does not have a quality connection 

with the water front. The theme of riverfronts is present in


Povratak obalama 

Beton hala na obali reke Save, Beograd 

— 

Riverfront reclaimed 

Beton hala on the river Sava, Belgrade

esearches and analyses, as well as minor interventions 

(competition for the pier, a series of partial designs for the 

Sava’s amphitheatre and the Old Belgrade Fairgrounds, 

the Dorcol marina, Kalemegdan Fortress and the lower 

Kalemegdan, Danube’s amphitheatre – Ada Huja area). 

However, it is necessary to integrate and define the 

coastal zone through plans, but, in the shortage of a plan, 

partial actions relating stated themes are also welcome. 

The exhibition of the Town Planners Association of 

Belgrade within the Belgrade International Architecture 

Week 2009 shows the projects which in the previous two 

years have promoted the theme of the “city descent” to 

the rivers, 

The exhibition shows the existing state of the Sava’s 

amphitheatre, Old Fairgrounds and the Danube 

amphitheatre, the review of the project: Analysis of the 

Sava’s amphitheatre; Exhibition Old Fairgrounds as the 

nucleus of the New Belgrade; chosen works from the 

project Ada Huja (authors: Dragana Bazik and associates, 

Predrag Milosevic and associates, Vladan Djokic and 

associates) and the project of revitalisation of the Nebojsa 

Tower (authors: Dejan Miljkovic, Branko Pavic and Jovan 

Mitrovic). 

— 

Town Planners Association Belgrade 

Town Planners Association Belgrade is dedicated to 

promotion , organization and publishing of the wide 

spectrum of projects in the domain of the urban planning 

in Belgrade. Association of the Belgrade Urban Planners 

has presented its activity within the Belgrade design Week 

2007, with the three-dimensional display RIVERFRONT 

RECLAIMED, which has later been exhibited within the 

international Architecture Week 2007. 

Association of the Belgrade Urban Planners has 

participated with the author’s exhibition of the multimedia 

project Old Belgrade fairground as the old nucleus of the 

New Belgrade, within the Architecture Salon 2008, held in 

the Museum of the Applied Arts in Belgrade. 

With the project Old Belgrade fairground, 70 years from 

the opening of the First international fair of samples, 

ABUP has promoted its activity during the European 

cultural heritage days 2007. 

22 — IZLOŽBE

Posleratno socijalno stanovanje 

u Italiji. Naselja INCIS-a u Rimu: 

Villaggio Olimpico i Decima 

kurator: Alesandra Čeroti 

koordinatori: Roberta Đentile i Paola Gvidulji 

Izgradnja Olimpijskog sela i Dečime jedan su od najvećih 

projekata Nacionalnog instituta za stanove državnih 

službenika (INCIS), čija je uloga bila da civilnim i vojnim 

državnim službenicima obezbedi rezidencijalne javne 

stanove pod povoljnim uslovima. 

Između 1958. i 1965. grupa talentovanih arhitekata 

(Vitorio Kafjero, Injacio Gvidi, Adalberto Libera, Ugo 

Lučikenti, Vinčenco Monako i Luiđi Moreti) realizovali 

su dva rezidencijalna kompleksa po narudžbini državne 

ustanove, na severu i na jugu Rima. 

Dakle, kvart Dečima, kojem je bilo namenjeno centralno 

mesto između Eura i budućih stambenih kompleksa koji 

će nići na jugoistoku Rima, treba posmatrati i razumeti u 

odnosu sa njegovim “blizancem”, kvartom Olimpijsko selo, 

napravljenim za atletičare Olimpijskih igara 1960. u Rimu 

koji je kasnije, dodeljen državnim službenicima. Pored 

karakteristične tipologije i sličnog uređenja, Olimpijsko 

selo je smešteno na liniji Olimpika koja će, po projektu 

produženja, predstavljati ulicu sa centralnom funkcijom 

unutar četvrti Dečima. 

Projektanti su postavili cilj da „izgrade četvrt živih, 

organskih, nepravilnih formi, koje izazivaju izvesnu radost, 

čak i ponavljanjem planimetrijskih tipova”. 

Dva kompleksa čine niz linijski poređanih zgrada, 

krstastog preseka sa dvorištem, podignutih na pilotise, 

povezanih ulicama i uronjenih u zelenilo. Naročito 

prisustvo prizemlja izdignutog na pilotise, čime se 

izbegava nepovoljan položaj stanova, garantuje ujednačen 


pregled i dopušta osećaj veće otvorenosti i daha na čitavu 

kompoziciju. 

Struktura zgrada je u armiranom betonu, dok je zid od 

opeke u dvema bojama, pucolana crvene i rimske žute. 

Ujednačenost urbanističkog karaktera i arhitektonskog 

kvaliteta koja izbija iz umerenog odnosa između 

prirodnih i izgrađenih elemenata, od velikog je značaja za 

rezidencijalne i formalne aspekte. 

Što se tiče gradskog dizajna, iako postoji kontinuitet 

u namerama, u Dečimi se primećuje veća zrelost i 

dovršenost u globalnom izrazu. U svakom slučaju, 

dve četvrti rađaju se povezane u jednoobraznoj viziji 

razvoja grada: očigledan je, u oba slučaja, odnos sa 

savremenim severnoevropskim iskustvom u vezi sa 

socijalnim aspektima „susedstva”, zatim podela pešačkih 

i saobraćajno prohodnih prelaza različitim nivoima, kao i 

projektantski izgled zelenila koje se posmatra kao vezivni 

prostor. 

— 

Alesandra Čeroti diplomirala je arhitekturu na Univerzitetu 

Sapijenca u Rimu, na kome se i specijalizovala 

za restauraciju spomenika. Od 2003. sarađuje na 

laboratorijskom kursu iz arhitektonske restauracije na 

Arhitektonskom fakultetu „Vale Đulija” i učestvovala je 

u istraživanjima i na međunarodnim seminarima u Kini 

i Brazilu, u okviru kojih je priredila brojne publikacije. 

U svojim studijama bavi se pretežno savremenom 

arhitektonskom restauracijom; trenutno završava 

doktorat na Univerzitetu Sapijenca u Rimu na temu javne 

rezidencijalne gradnje u periodu posle II svetskog rata 

s obzirom na probleme konzervacije i restauracije. Radi 

u Rimu a svoje profesionalne aktivnosti usmerila je na 

restauraciju spomenika. 

Post-WWII Social Housing in Italy. 

INCIS estates: Villaggio Olimpico 

and Decima 

curator: Alessandra Cerroti 

coordinators: Roberta Gentile and Paola Guidugli 

Development of the estates Villaggio Olimpico (Olympic 

Village) and Decima, is one of the hugest projects 

undertaken by The National Institute for the Houses of

the State Employees (INCIS), whose role was to provide 

the residential public apartments for the civil and military 

employees, under the favourable conditions. 

Between 1958 and 1965, a group of talented architects 

(Vittorio Cafiero, Ignazio Guidi, Adalberto Libera, Ugo 

Luccichenti, Vincenzo Monaco and Luigi Moretti) have 

realized two residential complexes, ordered by this 

governmental institution, on the north and south of Rome. 

Therefore, Decima estate, which was planned for 

the central part between EUR and future residential 

complexes, built on the south-east of Rome, should be 

observed and comprehend in the relation to his “twinbrother”, 

Villaggio Olimpico estate, developed for the 

athletics who participated in the Olympic games held in 

Rome in 1960, and later distributed to the government 

employees. Besides the specific typology and the similar 

structure, Villaggio Olimpico is settled on the line of 

via Olimpica which became the street with the central 

function within the estate Decima, after the completion of 

the design for the extension. 

The designers posed the goal to “build the quarter of 

lively, irregular forms, which can provoke certain delight, 

even with repetition of the planimetry types”. 

The two complexes are formed by the line of the 


buildings, cross-section like with the yard, raised on 

pilotis, connected with streets and surrounded with 

greenery. Specially, the presence of the ground floor 

elevated on pilotis, by which the unpleasant position of 

apartments is avoided, the unified view is guaranteed and 

the feeling of the greater openness and the view to the 

whole composition is allowed. 

Structure of the buildings is made of reinforced concrete, 

while the wall is made of brick in two colours – red 

puzzolane and roman yellow. 

The unification of the urban character and architectural 

quality, which emerges from the moderate relationship 

between natural and built elements, is very important for 

residential and formal aspects. 

As far as the city design is concerned, although there 

is continuity in intentions, the greater maturity and the 

global expression is shown in Decima. In any case, the 

two estates were born from the unique vision of the city 

development: in both cases, the relationship with the 

contemporary north-European experience with social 

aspects of “neighbourhood” is obvious, together with 

the division between the pedestrian and car-accessible 

approaches to different levels, as well as the design of the 

greenery seen as the connective space.


Villaggio Olimpico, Rim, Italija 

— 

Villaggio Olimpico, Rome, Italy

Grad Avr, 

obnovljen po ideji Ogista Perea 

kustos: Žozef Abram 

Izložba prikazuje obnovljeni centar grada Avra koji se 

od 15. jula 2005. nalazi na Uneskovom spisku svetske 

baštine. 

Namenjena široj publici, izložba može da zadovolji i 

stručnu javnost koja zahteva naučnu preciznost, tako i 

amatere arhitekture. Predstavljen je savremeni identitet 

ovog grada, njegova vekovna veza lukom i morem kao i 

aktuelna dinamika njegovog razvoja. 

Izložba se sastoji od dvadeset panoa koji kroz istorijske 

planove i fotografije ilustruju formiranje urbane teritorije. 

Podsećaju nas na stari grad, na njegov izuzetni privredni 

značaj u prošlosti, na kolevku impresionizma, zatim na 

rat, bombardovanja i razaranja krajem Drugog svetskog 

rata, nakon kojih sledi izrada privremenog grada i njegovo 

postepeno obnavljanje. Veliki deo izložbe odnosi se 

na arhitektonsku i gradsku baštinu izuzetne vrednosti. 

Obnova grada najveće je arhitektonsko delo Ogista Perea 

i škole strukturnog klasicizma. Nekoliko panoa posvećeno 

je savremenom Avru, aktivnostima luke i velikim 

ekonomskim i urbanim projektima. 

Ovi veliki horizontalni panoi u skladu su sa sadržajem: 

tu su stari planovi, marine, urbani pejzaži, javni prostori, 

zgrade... 

Izložba je dopunjena 40-minutnim filmom o izgradnji Avra 

(na francuskom). Većim delom je posvećen arhivskim 

snimcima i razvoju savremenog grada, a predstavljeno je i 

mišljenje lokalnih čelnika. 

— 

Žozef Abram, arhitekta i istoričar, profesor je na 

Arhitektonskoj školi u Nansiju i istraživač na Laboratoriji 


za istoriju savremene arhitekture. Predavao je na 

Arhitektonskom institutu u Ženevi i u Školi lepih umetnosti 

u Metsu. Deset godina je bio član uređivačkog odbora 

časopisa Faces. Godine 1999. je objavio „Moderna 

arhitektura u Francuskoj 1940-1966, od haosa do 

uspona” (Éditions Picard), a 2002, sa Žan-Luj Koenom i Gi 

Lamberom „Enciklopedija Pere” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). 

Izradio je naučnu podlogu zahteva za upis obnovljenog 

centra Avra na Listu svetske baštine (klasifikacija 

UNESCO, 2005). 

Le Havre, the City reconstructed 

upon the idea of August Peret 

curator: Joseph Abram 

This exhibition shows the renewed centre of the city of Le 

Havre, which, since 15th July 2005.has been added to 

UNESCO’s list of the world cultural heritage sites. 

Intended to the wider public, the exhibition can satisfy 

both the expert public, which requires scientific 

precision, and the amateurs of architecture. It shows 

the contemporary identity of this city, its century-old 

relationship with the port and the sea, as well as the 

current dynamics of its development. 

The exhibition consists of 20 panels which, through 

historic plans and photographs, illustrate the formation 

of the urban territory. They remind us of the old city, 

its extraordinary economic importance in the past, 

of the cradle of impressionism, as well as of the war, 

bombardments and devastations at the end of the 

WWII, after which the development of the temporary 

city and its gradual renovation started. A large portion 

of the exhibition relates to the architectural and city 

heritage of extraordinary value. The restoration of the 

City is the greatest work of August Peret and the School 

of Structural Classicism. A few panels are dedicated 

to contemporary Havre, its port activities and huge 

economic and urban projects. 

These big horizontal panels are in harmony with their 

content: they show old plans, marines, urban landscapes, 

public spaces, buildings, etc. 

The exhibition is complemented with a 40 minute film 

about the construction of Havre (in French). Its greater 

part is dedicated to the archive recordings and the

Trgovački basen 

foto: Žozef Abram 

— 

Commercial basin 

photo: Joseph Abram 

Avenija Foš i Port osean 

foto: Žozef Abram 

— 

Avenue Foch and La porte océane 

photo: Joseph Abram 

development of the contemporary city, as well as to the 

opinions of the local chiefs. 

— 

Joseph Abram, architect and historian, is professor at 

the Nancy School of Architecture and researcher at the 

Laboratory of contemporary architecture history. 

He has taught at the Geneva Institute of Architecture and 

at the Metz School of fine arts. For ten years he has been 

member of the editorial board of the revue Faces. In 1999 


he published “Modern architecture in France, 1940-1966, 

from chaos to 

growth” (Edition Picard) and in 2002, with Jean-Louis 

Cohen and Guy Lambert, 

“The Perret encyclopedia” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). He 

made the scientific file of the request for the inscription of 

the reconstructed center of the city of Havre on the World 

heritage list (classification of the UNESCO, 2005).

Procesi REstauracije istorijskog 

nasleđa, Austrija 

organizacija: TRANSEO 

Na izložbi će biti prikazano nekoliko projekata restauracije 

koje su ostvarili članovi organizacije TRANSEO 

(Transnacionalna razmena pri primenjenoj konzervaciji 

spomenika). Osim fotografija projekata, posetioci će moći 

da vide i stvarne primerke konzervacije i restauracije. 

Nakon utemeljenja organizacije različitih disciplina 

restauracije u arhitekturi, na domaćim i stranim 

univerzitetima i školama, više od dvadeset pet godina 

bavimo se zaštitom, brigom i očuvanjem istorijskog blaga. 

Naš posao je očuvanje lepote i posebnosti objekata koji 

su nam povereni na čuvanje. Svako remek delo se tretira 

sa posebnim zadovoljstvom i preciznošću i prvoklasnom 

veštinom našeg tima. Savršeni tretman istorijskog 

materijala i veliko znanje o modernim umetničko- 

-tehnološkim metodama garantuju profesionalni tretman 

svakog objekta. Naše stalno učešće na predavanjima 

i kursevima nije samo stvar našeg usmerenja već, 

pre svega, preduslov za ispunjenje sve većih potreba 

restauracije. 

— 

Organzacija TRANSEO i učesnici izložbe: 

Markus Pifl, diplomirani restaurator za istorijske enterijere 

od drveta, Grac 

Markus Cehner, arhitekta, istraživač u oblastima zaštite 

kulturnog nasleđa i istorijskih objekata, Grac 

Martin Proske, restaurator istorijskih predmeta od drveta, 

gipsanih odlivaka i fasada 


REstoration processes of historic 

treasures, Austria 

organization: TRANSEO 

This exhibition will show several restoration projects made 

by members of Organisation TRANSEO (Transnational 

exchange in applied monument conservation). These 

projects will be shown mainly by photographs, but the 

public will be also able to see some real samples of 

conservation and restoration. 

After a funded formation in different disciplines of 

restoration and architecture in domestic and foreign 

universities and schools, we apply ourselves since 

more than 25 years to the protection, the care and the 

maintenance of historic treasures. We have made it 

our business to preserve the beauty and the particular 

character of an object entrusted to our care. Each 

masterpiece is treated with joy and accurateness, and 

the high- class skill of our team, the perfect treatment 

of historic material and the profound knowledge about 

modern art-technological methods guarantee the 

professional treatment of every object. Our constant 

participation on lectures and courses is not only a matter 

of course for us but also a pre-condition to fulfil the evergrowing 

needs of restoration. 

— 

Organization TRANSEO and participants in the exhibition: 

Markus Piffl, Diploma restorer for historic wooden interieur, 

Graz 

Markus Zechner, architect, heritage care and historic 

building research, Graz 

Martin Proske, Restorer of historical wooden objects, 

gypsum casts and facades


Projekat restauracije, TRANSEO 

— 

Restoration project, TRANSEO

Devedeset godina Bauhausa: 

Knjige o Bauhausu u biblioteci 

Gete instituta Beograd 

Godine 1919. Valter Gropijus je u Vajmaru (pokrajina 

Tiringen) osnovao Državnu školu Bauhaus (Staatliche 

Bauhaus). Osnivanje Bauhausa bilo je usko povezano 

s osnivanjem Vajmarske Republike. Za nekoliko godina 

koliko je postojao, od 1919. do 1933. godine, postao je 

najuticajnija škola dizajna dvadesetog veka. Raznoliki svet 

oblika kojim Bauhaus pleni − do današnjeg dana ostavio 

je svoj pečat u našoj svakodnevici, u umetnosti, dizajnu i 

arhitekturi. Umetnici koji su proistekli iz Bauhausa uživaju 

svetsku slavu. 

Jubilej Bauhausa biće proslavljen nizom upečatljivih 

izložbi i manifestacija u Nemačkoj, pre svega u mestima 

poznatim po ovoj školi, kao što su Vajmar, Jena, Erfurt, 

Desau i Berlin, ali i u drugim gradovima. 

Izlog sa knjigama o Bauhausu predstavlja doprinos 

biblioteke Gete instituta IV beogradskoj nedelji arhitekture. 

— 

Goethe-Institut je kulturna ustanova Savezne Republike 

Nemačke koja svoju delatnost obavlja širom sveta. 

Mi potpomažemo i unapređujemo učenje nemačkog 

jezika u inostranstvu i negujemo međunarodnu kulturnu 

saradnju. Takođe prenosimo sveobuhvatnu sliku 

Nemačke putem informacija o kulturnom, društvenom 

i političkom životu. Mrežom Goethe-Instituta, Goethecentara, 

kulturnih društava, čitaonica, ispitnih centara i 

centara za učenje jezika, preuzimamo centralne zadatke 

obrazovne i kulturne politike Savezne Republike Nemačke 

u inostranstvu. Prihvatamo kulturnopolitičke izazove 

globalizacije i razvijamo inovativne koncepte u cilju 

stvaranja humanijeg sveta, u kojem se kulturna raznolikost 


smatra bogatstvom. Goethe-Institut postoji u Beogradu 

od 1970. godine. Institut poseduje biblioteku sa oko 

12.000 naslova, koji se najvećim delom mogu pozajmiti, 

kao i prostranu čitaonicu sa velikim brojem dnevnih 

novina, časopisa, magazina, i stručne periodike. Pored 

toga u Institutu se nalazi i sala za kulturne manifestacije. 

Ninety years of Bauhaus: Books 

about Bauhaus in the library of 

Goethe Institute Belgrade 

Ninety years of Bauhaus 

Books about Bauhaus in the library of Goethe Institute in 

Belgrade 

In 1919, Walter Gropius founded The State School of 

Bauhaus (Staatliche Bauhaus) in Weimar (Thuringia 

province). The foundation of Bauhaus is closely connected 

to the foundation of the Weimar Republic. In afew years 

of its existence, from 1919 until 1933, it became the most 

influential design school of the 20th century. The Diversity 

of shapes characteristic to Bauhaus, have left their mark 

in the contemporary everyday life, in art, design and 

architecture, up to this day. Artists who originated from 

Bauhaus have had the world famous reputation. 

The jubilee of Bauhaus will be celebrated with an array of 

striking exhibitions and manifestations in Germany, above 

all at locations renowned by this school, like Weimar, 

Jena, Erfurt, Dessau and Berlin, but at others, as well. 

Contribution of the Goethe Institute Belgrade to the Fourth 

Belgrade International Architecture Week is a window 

containing books about Bauhaus. 

— 

Goethe Institute is cultural institution of the Federal 

Republic of Germany, which performs its activities 

worldwide. We support and promote learning of the 

German language abroad and cherish international

cultural collaboration. Also, we transmit the allencompassing 

picture of Germany through the information 

about cultural, social and political life. With a network of 

Goethe Institutes, Goethe Centres, cultural associations, 

reading rooms, examination centres and foreign language 

learning centres, we overtake the central tasks of the 

educational and cultural politics of Federal Republic of 

Germany abroad. We accept cultural-political challenges 

of globalization and develop innovative concepts for the 


purpose of creating the more humanely world, in which 

the cultural diversity is considered as the richness. Goethe 

Institute exists in Belgrade from 1970. Institute has the 

library with approx. 12,000 titles, among many of them 

could be borrowed, as well as the spacious reading room 

with many daily newspapers, journals, magazines and 

professional periodicals. Among these, the Institute has 

also the hall for the cultural manifestations.

Beograd - pozlaćeni presek: 

Valorizacija austrijskog 

graditeljskog nasleđa na teritoriji 

Beograda 

organizator: Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA) 

kurator: Jelica Jovanović 

Beograd je grad kompleksne i slojevite prošlosti, koja 

se samo delimično može pročitati iz njegove postojeće 

fizičke strukture. Među mnogim graditeljskim poduhvatima 

koji su realizovani na teritoriji današnjeg Beograda izdvaja 

se rekonstrukcija grada koju su sproveli Austrijanci. Deo 

austrijskih intervencija jasno je uočljiv u gradskoj strukturi – 

tvrđava, pojedine kuće, pravci ulica, staro jezgro Zemuna. 

Značajan deo ove celine, međutim, fizički više ne postoji, 

pa sliku o ovom segmentu našeg nasleđa sklapamo iz 

raspoložive arhivske građe. 

Austrijsko nasleđe u Beogradu i u Srbiji ima izvanredan 

potencijal za kulturno umrežavanje sa zemljama u širem 

okruženju, ali ono nije u potpunosti revitalizovano u našoj 

zemlji. Ideja projekta LEGATIO jeste da istraži različite 

mogućnosti prezentacije ovog nasleđa, a ono što je pred 

publikom predstavlja samo naš početni korak. Izložba 

predstavlja segmente materijala do kojeg je, radom 

na arhivskoj i bibliografskoj građi i radom na terenu, 

došao tim studenata tokom istraživačke faze projekta 

LEGATIO. Materijal je obrađen i prezentovan raznovrsnim 

interaktivnim programima u Knez Mihailovoj ulici i na 

Arhitektonskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Beogradu, s ciljem 

da se uspostavi dijalog sa širim krugom posetilaca izložbe 

– „korisnicima” arhitekture. 

LEGATIO je samostalni projekat u okviru Kluba mladih 

arhitekata koji se bavi proučavanjem i zaštitom prirodnog 

i kulturnog nasleđa na teritoriji Srbije i u regionu. 


Učesnici projekta dobijaju priliku da se, radeći na 

valorizaciji i revitalizaciji graditeljskog nasleđa, susretnu 

sa specifičnostima rada u oblasti očuvanja kulturne 

baštine. Ideja je da se formira savremeni, održivi model 

revitalizacije graditeljskog nasleđa, koji podrazumeva 

međusobnu saradnju i participaciju svih aktera i njihovo 

angažovanje u realizaciji pojedinačnih etapa projekta. 

— 

Jelica Jovanović je apsolventkinja Arhitektonskog fakulteta 

Univerziteta u Beogradu, IG Razvoj i teorija arhitekture 

i umetnosti. Aktivna je članica Kluba mladih arhitekata 

od decembra 2006. godine. Učestvovala je u realizaciji 

projekata Radionica 06, 07 i 08 kao koordinatorka i 

autorka postavke. Autorka projekta BIG. Saradnica u 

nastavi na Arhitektonskom fakultetu na studio projektu 

Arhitektonsko-urbanistički projekat revitalizacije prostora 

srednjovekovnog grada Rama i njegove okoline i više 

projektantskih radionica. Organizovala i učestvovala na 

više kolektivnih strukovnih izložbi. 

Učestvovala u pilot-projektu radionice Jevrejska umetnost 

i tradicija Filozofskog fakulteta UB. Polaznica Beogradske 

otvorene škole. Učestvuje u međunarodnoj razmeni 

studenata IAESTE. 

Belgrade – the Gilded Ratio: 

Valorisation of Austrian Building 

Heritage on the Territory of 

Belgrade 

organisation: Young Architects’ Club (KMA) 

curator: Jelica Jovanović 

Belgrade is a city of complex and layered past that can 

only partially be read from its existing physical layout. 

Among the many building endeavours that have been 

realised on the territory of present-day Belgrade, what 

stands out is the reconstruction of the city done by the 

Austrians. A portion of Austrian interventions is clearly 

visible in the city’s structure – the fortress, certain houses, 

street directions, the old core of Zemun. However, 

significant parts of this unity no longer physically exist, so 

the image of this segment of our heritage we can glean 

only from the available archival sources. 

The Austrian heritage in Belgrade and in Serbia has

an outstanding potential for cultural networking with 

countries in our wider surroundings, but it still is not fully 

revitalised in our country. The idea of the project LEGATIO 

is to research the various possibilities of presentation of 

this heritage, and what now stands before the audience 

is just our opening step. The Exhibition unveils segments 

of material that a team of students, during the research 

phase of project LEGATIO, uncovered by working on the 

archival and bibliographical sources, as well as by working 

in the field. The material was processed and presented in 

a variety of interactive programs in Knez Mihajlova Street 

and at University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, 

with an aim to establish a dialogue with a wide circle of 

Exhibition’s visitors – the “users” of architecture. 

LEGATIO is an autonomous project within the framework 

of the Club of Young Architects that pursues the study of 

the natural and cultural heritage on the territory of Serbia, 

and in the wider region. By working on the valorisation 

and revitalisation of the building heritage, the participants 

to the Project get a chance to encounter the specificities 

of working in the area of preservation of cultural heritage. 

The idea is to create a modern, sustainable model of 

revitalisation of building heritage, which invariably entails 

cooperation and participation of all of the stakeholders 

and their engagement in the realisation of individual 

stages of the Project. 

— 

Jelica Jovanović is senior graduate student of the 

University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, Elective 

Group Development and Theory of Architecture and Art. 

An active member of the Club of Young Architects since 

December 2006. Has participated in the realisation of 

Project Workshop 06, 07 and 08 as a coordinator and 

author of the exhibitions. The author of the project BIG. 

Collaborator in teaching at the Faculty of Architecture 

on a studio project Architectural-Urbanism Project of 

Revitalisation of Medieval Town of Ram and Its Vicinity 

and of several project workshops. She has organised 

and taken part in several collective vocational exhibitions. 

She has participated in a Belgrade University Faculty of 

Philosophy pilot project workshop entitled Jewish Arts 

and Tradition. She is attending Belgrade Open School. 

Participates in international IASTE student exchange 

programs. 


Prikaz Eliasa Beka - austrijska rekonstrukcija Beograda, 

prva polovina 18. veka 

— 

Showing Elias Baeck - the Austrian reconstruction of Belgrade, 

first half of the 18th century

Extra-mûros – Očaravajuće 

arhitekture, Francuska 

Zavod za arhitekturu i baštinu 

grada Pariza, Francuska 

Izložba je koncipirana i ostvarena na osnovu fotografskog 

i kritičkog inventara savremene arhitekture u okviru 

Zavoda za arhitekturu i baštinu / Instituta za arhitekturu, u 

saradnji sa Francuskim institutom iz Diseldorfa. Posebno 

je adaptirana da bude predstavljena međunarodnoj 

javnosti u organizaciji CulturesFrance, uz podršku 

francuskih kulturnih centara u inostranstvu i Odeljenja za 

arhitekturu i baštinu pri francuskom Ministarstvu za kulturu 

i komunikacije. 

Tema i koncepcija izložbe jeste pitanje savremene 

arhitekture. Ne može se reći da je savremena arhitektura, 

od pedesetih godina prošlog veka očarala, pa čak ni 

da je zainteresovala, širu javnost. Smatra se da svaki 

novoizgrađeni objekat još više ruži okolinu ili, još gore, 

da učestvuje u rušenju ravnoteže same planete Zemlje. 

Međutim, iza opšte osrednjosti kriju se mnoga pažljivo 

osmišljena, maštovita i često poetska ostvarenja. Dovoljno 

je pogledati oko sebe. Kako, u ovim uslovima, ohrabriti 

stvaraoce? Prošlost zaista nije idealna ali ne znači da 

savremenost, zato što je nekad loše protumačena, treba 

mrzeti. Drugim rečima, potrebno je ponovo zainteresovati 

ljude za savremenu arhitekturu, zagolicati njihovu maštu 

i produbiti znatiželju tako što ćemo im pokazati koliko je 

ova arhitektura zanimljiva, začuđujuća i privlačna. Time 

ćemo izazvati njihovu želju da otkriju motive, da prošire 

vidike i stvore mišljenje o savremenoj arhitekturi. 

Predstavljajući samo arhitekture sposobne da očaraju 

stvarnost, izložba Extra-mûros nudi mogućnost da se 

oni koji su oduvek smatrali da je savremena arhitektura 

nepodnošljiva zainteresuju za nju. Ova izložba ih tera 


da promene ugao gledanja, da zaborave predrasude, 

jer govori o avanturi, inventivnosti i kreativnosti i, samim 

tim, neprimetno utiče na posetioce da ne posmatraju 

arhitekturu samo kao zatvoreni svet ili rezervisani posed. 

Zahvaljujući efektu kritične mase, serija od četrdeset 

projekata objašnjava nam da takozvana dobra arhitektura 

i nije toliko retka kao što se čini na prvi pogled, a ako je ne 

vidimo to je zato što nije tu gde je očekujemo i zato što je 

jednostavnija i skromnija ili samo manje zabrinuta za svoju 

besmrtnost nego što zamišljamo. 

Ova izložba je s velikim uspehom predstavljala Francusku 

2007. na prvom Međunarodnom trijenalu arhitekture u 

Lisabonu. 

Extra-mûros – Architectures of 

Delight, France 

City of Architecture and Patrimony of Paris, France 

This Exhibition was devised and realised on the basis 

of photographic and critique inventory of contemporary 

architecture within the Bureau for architecture and 

heritage / Institute of Architecture, in close cooperation 

with the French Institute in Düsseldorf. It has been 

specially adapted for international display in organisation 

of CULTURESFRANCE and with support of French 

cultural centres abroad, together with the aid of 

Department of Architecture and Heritage with the French 

Ministry for Culture and Communication. 

The theme and the concept of this Exhibition deals with 

the issue of contemporary architecture. Since the 1950s, 

one cannot assume that contemporary architecture has 

enchanted, not even interested wider public. The general 

consideration is that each newly built edifice disfigures 

the ambience around it even further, or worse, that it 

participates in the destroying the balance of the planet 

itself. However, behind the general mediocrity hide many 

carefully devised, imaginative and often poetic works. 

One look around you is enough. In such circumstances, 

how can one encourage designers in their creativity? 

The past is truly not ideal, but the fact that modern times 

are sometimes wrongly interpreted does not mean they 

should be loathed. In other words, what needs to be

Bretzel-Pretzel - Žil Eberso i Deni Pegaz Blan 

© L Pyot H Setsumaa F Demange 

— 

Bretzel-Pretzel - Gilles Ebersolt & Denis Pegaz Blanc 

© L Pyot H Setsumaa F Demange 

done is to rekindle the people’s interest in contemporary 

architecture and with that in mind deepen their curiosity, 

tickle their imagination and arouse their desire for it 

by showing how this architecture can be interesting, 

enchanting, attractive, and with this cause a wish to have 

its motives unveiled, to cause the horizons to expand and 

a new kind of thinking be created. 

By its presentation of only architectures that are capable 

of enchanting the reality around them, Extra-muros 

exhibition offers a possibility to those who have always 

thought that contemporary architecture is unbearable 

to become interested in it. This exhibition forces them 

to change their perspective, to forget the prejudices, 

because it speaks of adventure, inventiveness and 

creativity and by this it seamlessly influences the visitors 

not to look at architecture either as a closed world, or a 

dominion reserved. Owing to the effect of critical mass, 


Rasklopivo drvo - Tetrac & Concept plastique 

© Philippe Ruault 

— 

Dismountable Tree - Tetrac & Concept plastique 

© Philippe Ruault 

a series of 40 designs explains to us that so-called 

‘good architecture’ is not so rare as it may seem upon 

first glance, and if we do not see it, it is because it is not 

located where we expect it and because it is simpler and 

more modest, or maybe just less concerned about its 

immortality, than we imagine.This Exhibition represented 

France with great success at the first International 

Architecture Triennial in Lisbon in 2007.

Re... Beograd: stari i novi 

Izložba radova sa studentske radionice 

Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu 

Podsticaj za pokretanje aktivnosti u okviru Projektantske 

radionice je želja da se u okviru BINA 09 predstavi 

studentsko istraživanje i doživljaj istorijskog razvoja, 

sadašnje situacije i mogućnosti buduće REafirmacije, 

REvitalizacije, REgeneracije, REkonstrukcije ... bazičnih 

poteza ukupnog, istorijskog i modernog, graditeljskog 

nasleđa Beograda. Izložba predstavlja rezultat 

istraživačkog procesa i saznanja do kojih su studenti, 

učesnici radnog tima, došli tokom svog rada. 

Prikazani reprezentatitvni potezi starog Beograda (duž 

ose Slavija – Cvetni trg – Terazije – Rajićeva ulica), kao 

i dva reprezentativna pravca Novog Beograda (prvi duž 

ose Savski most – Staro Sajmište – SIV – Opština Novi 

Beograd – Fontana i drugi duž ose SIV – Železnička 

stanica) izabrani su kao dominantne urbane akse jasnog i 

jedinstvenog identiteta. Ispitane su sa različitih aspekata: 

istorijskog, političkog, društvenog, socijalnog, kulturnog… 

Razmatrani su značenje i identitet javnih i privatnih 

građevina i prostora duž njih, kroz praćenje različitih ideja i 

realizacija, predlaganih zahvata i ostvarenih transformacija, 

analizu predlaganih formi i sadržaja u GUP i drugim 

planovima. 

Cilj prezentacije ovog značajnog urbanog i arhitektonskog 

nasleđa jeste da se javnost podstakne na razmišljanje o 

njemu kao o jedinstvenoj i specifičnoj vrednosti, bazičnom 

graditeljskom i kulturnom nasleđu, osnovnom utemeljenju 

identiteta i autentičnosti grada, kao i o neophodnosti 

njihovog očuvanja i uključivanju u sadašnje i buduće 

planove transformacije Beograda. 


— 

Autori: Bojana Čitaković, Ivana Ibraimov, Ivka Marković, 

Jelena Grdić, Marija Golubović, Marina Marmelić, Milica 

Vučković i Tamara Miljanić 

Izložba RE... Beograd: stari i novi nastala je kao proizvod 

rada studenata Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u 

Beogradu, u okviru nastave na predmetu Projektantska 

radionica, na prvoj godini diplomskih akademskih master 

studija, u saradnji sa BINA 09 i Urbanističkim zavodom 

Beograda. Mentori radionice su: doc. dr Mirjana Roter- 

Blagojević, dr Tanja Damljanović-Conley, mr Marta 

Vukotić-Lazar i asist. arh. Marko Nikolić 

Re... Belgrade: Old and New 

Exhibition of student works from the Design 

workshop, Faculty of Architecture 

University in Belgrade 

Exhibition RE... Belgrade: old and new was incepted as a 

product of students of the University of Belgrade Faculty 

of Architecture, within the framework of the of the course 

entitled Design Workshop, at the first year of academic 

master studies, in cooperation with BINA 09 and the 

Institute of Town Planners Belgrade. The Mentors of 

the Workshop are: assistant professor Mirjana Roter- 

Blagojević, PhD, Tanja Conley, PhD, Marta Vukotić-Lazar, 

MA, and teaching assistant, architect Marko Nikolić. 

Incentive for the start of activities within the Design 

Workshop was the desire to present, within the framework 

of BINA 09, a students’ research and experience of 

historical development, current situation and possibilities 

for future REaffirmation, REvitalisation, REgeneration, 

REconstruction… of basic outlines of the overall, historical 

and modern, building heritage of Belgrade. The Exhibition 

is a result of a research process and knowledge that the 

students, participants of the work team, acquired in the 

course of their work. 

The shown representative stretches of old Belgrade (along 

the axis of Slavija Square – Flower Square – Terazije street 

– Rajićeva street), as well as two representative runs of 

Novi Beograd (the first along the axis of Sava Bridge –Old 

Fairgrounds – SIV building – Novi Beograd municipality 

building – the “Fontana”, and the other along the axis of

SIV building – Central Railroad Station) were chosen as 

dominant urban axes of clear and unique identity. They 

were examined from different point of view: historical, 

political social, cultural etc. What was considered is the 

meaning and identity of public and private edifices and 

spaces along their sides, through tracking of various ideas 

and methods of realisation, proposed interventions and 

exercised transformations, an analysis of proposed forms 

and contents inside Master Plan and regulative plans. 

The goal of presentation of this significant urbane and 

architectural heritage is to give an impetus to the overall 

public to think about it as a unique and specific value, a 

basic building and cultural heritage, the foundational root 

of identity and authenticity of the city, as well as of the 

necessity of their preservation and introduction into the 

present and future plans of Belgrade’s transformation. 

— 

Authors: Bojana Čitaković, Ivana Ibraimov, Ivka Marković, 

Jelena Grdić, Marija Golubović, Marina Marmelić, Milica 

Vučković and Tamara Miljanić 

37 — IZLOŽBE

PREDAVANJA 

LECTURES


Vim Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten, 

Švajcarska 

U svetu u kome je sve više izmučenih arhitektonskih 

uloga, sa sumnjivim kontekstualnim postojanostima, 

ekonomskim pritiskom, svetu koji vrtoglavom brzinom 

stremi ka novim ekološkim standardima, dosežemo 

granice perfekcionizma. U svom radu izražavamo stanje 

uma koje konceptualizuje arhitekturu i urbanizam kao 

skladan nesklad, ukazujući na to da nova, moderna 

mreža povezuje nejednakosti. Modernizacija ne mora 

biti skladna, ne mora da se nameće čitavom sistemu. 

Ona postaje sistem osobenosti i neprekidno predviđanje, 

najzad, kolaž koji može da poveže razlike, polaritete i 

suprotnosti u jedan pojam mašte. Ona oslobađa otpor 

sistemu koji je neprijateljski nastrojen prema novim 

idejama i potrebama za prilagođavanjem, imajući na 

umu da bi stoga novina trebalo da bude izmenjena na 

čitavom opsegu „skladne” sfere. Prema tome, savršeni 

način čitanja naših stvarnosti jeste onaj koji je nemoguće 

dovršiti. Jedanaest fragmenata protumačenih stvarnosti 

prikazanih na izložbi biće detaljnije obrađeni tokom 

predavanja. 

— 

Vim Ekert (rođen 1969. u Cirihu, Švajcarska) suvlasnik je 

biroa E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten iz Ciriha. Studirao je 

arhitekturu na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Cirihu (diplomirao 

je 1995). Od 1996. do 1997. radio je u Office for 

Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) u Roterdamu. Sa Pitom 

Ekertom je 1997. osnovao biro koji je 2001. postao E2A 

Eckert Eckert Architekten AG. Vim Ekert redovno drži 

predavanja i radionice u školama i drugim ustanovama. 

40 — PREDAVANJA 


Wim Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert 

Architekten, Switzerland 

Within a world of increasingly tortured architectural 

roles, of doubtful contextual stabilities, economic 

pressure and breathless speed towards new ecological 

standards, we reach the limits of a perfectionist world. 

Through our work we have formulated a mindset to 

conceptualize architecture and urbanism as a systematic 

incoherence reflecting that a new modern network 

interlocks inequalities. Modernization does not have to 

be coherent, does not need a form of imposition on the 

entire system. It becomes a system of particularities and 

continuous anticipation, finally a collage that is capable 

to cast difference, polarities and contrast into one idea of 

imagination. It frees the resistance of a system hostile to 

new ideas and to needs of adaptation, bearing in mind 

that consequently newness would need to be changed 

on an entire scale of a “coherent” sphere. The ideal 

reading of our realities is therefore one that is impossible 

to complete. 11 fractions of interpreted realities, as shown 

in the exhibition, will be further elaborated throughout the 

lecture. 

— 

Wim Eckert (1969, Zurich, Switzerland ) is Partner at E2A 

Eckert Eckert Architekten, Zurich. He studied architecture 

at the ETH in Zurich (Diploma 1995). From 1996 to 1997 

he worked at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture 

(OMA) in Rotterdam. In 1997 he established his own 

office with Piet Eckert, which became E2A Eckert Eckert 

Architekten AG in 2001. 

Wim Eckert regularly gives lectures and workshops at 

schools and institutions.


Fondacija Hajnrih Bel, Nemačka, Berlin 

konkurs 2006, I nagrada, projektovano 2006 - 2007, realizovano 2007 - 2008. 

foto: Jan Biter 

— 


Heinrich Boell Foundation, D-Berlin 

competition 2006, 1st Prize, project 2006 - 2007, realization 2007 - 2008 

photo: Jan Bitter

RE _ fokus 

Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc, 

Kenc Molo Arhiteti, Švajcarska 

Pojedinačne aspiracije u vezi sa teritorijom proširile su se 

taktom motora sa unutrašnjim sagorevanjem: repeticija 

(RE-peticija) pojedinačnih objekata, pozicioniranih na 

podjednakim razdaljinama od svojih osa stvorile su 

međuprostore bez značenja: nastanak prigradske 

periferije jeste univerzalan fenomen. 

Beskonačna RE-produkcija „usamljenih“ zgrada slična je 

autističnom individualizmu. 

Skoro neograničena dostupnost resursa i energije donela 

je nesumnjiv uticaj na prirodu i društvenu ravnotežu. 

Takođe, ne možemo da umaknemo ovom fenomenu 

– nalazimo se na sredini njegovog razvoja. Ideja 

individualizma i slobode, u svakom slučaju ljudskog 

progresa, ne može se razumeti sama po sebi, već samo 

u odnosu na njen kontekst, u širem smislu. Naša namera 

je da popunimo te međuprostore, da stvorimo veze, 

prostore koje su u dijalogu: koncentrisane REvolucionare 

protiv ekspanzije. Tražeći razliku, i što se tiče posebnosti, i 

što se tiče potencijale nekog mesta, tražimo zgušnjavanje. 

Pokušavamo da se fokusiramo na ono što je tipično. 

(RE-fokusirajmo se na tipično, i osobeno.) 

— 

Ludovika Molo je kodirektorka biroa Könz Molo a 

rchitetti u Luganu, u Švajcarskoj, koji je osnovala 1998. 

godine zajedno sa Jahenom Kencom. Njihovi radovi su 

stekli širok publicitet u lokalnoj sredini, na nacionalnom 

i međunarodnom nivou, i osvajali su brojne projektne 

nagrade za izvrsnost. Ludovika Molo je rođena u Luganu 

i diplomirala je arhitekturu na Švajcarskom federalnom 

institutu za tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu. Nakon toga preselila 


se u Los Anđeles, gde je radila u nekoliko arhitektonskih 

biroa, putovala zapadnom obalom SAD, i obilazila 

arhitektonske lokalitete i upoznala dela lend-arta. 

U Švajcarskoj je radila kao asistent na Federalnoj 

politehničkoj školi (EPFL) u Lozani i na Akademiji za 

arhitekturu (Accademia di architettura) u Mendisiju, pre 

nego što je počela da predaje na školi SCI-arc u Viko 

Morkoteu, u Švajcarskoj. 

Jahen Kenc je kodirektor biroa Könz Molo architetti. 

Studirao je na Švajcarskom federalnom institutu za 

tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu i na Federalnoj politehničkoj 

školi (École Polytechnique Fédérale – EPFL) u Lozani. 

Pre odlaska u Tičino, gde je 1992. godine osnovao 

sopstveni biro, radio je u Nemačkoj i u Barseloni. Kenc, 

koji je stekao i diplomu u oblasti urbanog projektovanja 

i planiranja 1992. godine, učestvuje u radu različitih 

švajcarskih odbora za arhitekturu na lokalnom i 

federalnom nivou. Radio je i kao nastavnik i član žirija u 

različitim školama visokog obrazovanja u inostranstvu: 

u Udruženju arhitekata u Londonu (Architectural 

Association, London), na Švajcarskom federalnom 

institutu za tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu, Akademiji za 

arhitekturu u Mendrisiju, u Švajcarskoj, u Školi dizajna Rod 

Ajlenda (Rhode Island School of Design) u Providensu, u 

SAD, kao i u školi SCI-arc u Viko Morkoteu, u Švajcarskoj. 

RE _ focus 

Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz, 

Könz Molo Architetti, Switzerland 

Individual aspirations for the territory have expanded 

at the rhythm of an internal combustion engine: the 

repetition (RE-petition) of single objects, positioned at 

legal distances from their property lines has produced 

interstitial spaces devoid of meaning: the invention of the 

suburban periphery is a universal phenomenon. 

The reproduction (RE-production) ad infinitum of free 

standing houses is akin to autistic individualism. 

The near unlimited availability of resources and energy has 

brought about an undeniable impact on nature and social 

equilibrium. 

We also can’t escape from this phenomenon – we 

find ourselves in the middle of its growth. The idea of 

individualism and liberty, in any case human progress,

can’t be understood in and of itself but only in relation to 

its context, in the larger sense. 

Our intention is to fill these interstitial spaces, to create 

relationships, spaces with dialogue: concentration rebels 

(RE_bell) against expansion. Searching for a difference, 

for a particularity and for the potential of any place, we 

look for densification. We try to focus on the typical. 

(RE_focus the typical, peculiar). 

— 

Ludovica Molo is a principal of könz.molo architects in 

Lugano, Switzerland, which she founded in 1998 with 

Jachen Könz. Their work has been published extensively 

locally, nationally and internationally and has received 

numerous awards for design excellence. Molo was 

born in Lugano and gained a degree in architecture 

at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in 

Zurich. After she received her diploma, she moved to 

Los Angeles, working in a number of architecture offices 

and travelling throughout the west to visit architectural 

and land art sites. Back in Switzerland, she worked as a 

Objekat za 72 studenta 

Casa dell’Accademia, Mendrisio/TI, 1998-2006 

Foto: Walter Mair 

— 

Building for 72 students 

Casa dell’Accademia, Mendrisio/TI, 1998-2006 

Photo: Walter Mair 

teaching assistant at the École Polytechnique Fédérale 

(EPFL) in Lausanne and at the Accademia di architettura 

in Mendrisio, before starting to teach at SCI-arc Vico 

Morcote in 2003. 

Jachen Könz is a principal of könz.molo architects in 

Lugano, Switzerland, which he founded in 1998 with 

Ludovica Molo. He was trained at the Swiss Federal 

Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich and at the École 

Polytechnique Fédérale (EPFL) in Lausanne. Before 

moving to Ticino, where he eventually set up his own 

practice in 1992, he worked in Germany and in Barcelona. 

Könz, who gained a degree also as an urban designer 

and planner in 1992, is involved in different architecture 

boards at local and federal level. He was a lecturer 

and juror in various international schools, including 

Architectural Association in London, Swiss Federal 

Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich, Accademia di 

architettura in Mendrisio, Rhode Island School of Design 

in Providence, SCI-arc Vico Morcote.

Ne-misliti 

Džon Palmezino, Teritorijal ejdžensi, 

Švajcarska 

Ne znati je naš potencijal. 

Posle stotinu godina ubrzane urbanizacije, arhitektura 

se našla u neizvesnom polju delovanja. Savremena 

teritorija je poprište različitih šema transformacije i 

razvojnih ritmova, kao posledice istovremenih i često 

različitih interesa koje zastupa sve veći broj aktera. Tokom 

međusobnog delovanja i takmičenja, oni transformišu, 

oblikuju, uobličavaju i reorganizuju prostor u kome 

deluju. Istovremeno, stručno znanje stvara niz jasno 

ograničenih intervencija i nadležnosti, uz tehnike kontrole i 

menadžmenta ograničenog obima koje se same nameću. 

U ovoj evoluciji, savremeni grad ne prati linearno kretanje, 

u kome je sled elemenata određen i priroda uzroka jasno 

uočljiva. Dobivši ovu pluralističku prirodu, ponašanje 

savremenog grada je dinamično i u stalnoj promeni. Kako 

arhitektura može upisati ne-znanje u svoje aktivnosti u 

okviru ovih procesa transformacije? Kako može prevazići 

ono što je već poznato i pri ruci? 

— 

Džon Palmezino, arhitekta i urbanista, rođen je u 

Švajcarskoj. Inicijator je interdisciplinarnog istraživanja 

neutralnosti kao modaliteta prostorne transformacije i 

upravljanja, što je bio deo njegovih doktorskih studija 

u Centru za istraživačku arhitekturu Fakulteta Goldsmit 

Londonskog univerziteta, gde je takođe i nastavnik. 

Vodio je i zajednička istraživanja Federalnog univerziteta 

za tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu i „Studija: Bazel - moderni 

grad“ koja su trajala od 2003. do 2007. godine. Osnovao 

je međunarodnu istraživačku mrežu multiplicity, koja se 

bavi savremenom arhitekturom, urbanizmom, umetnošću 


i opštim pitanjima kulture. Njegovi glavni radovi su 

MUTATIONS (Mutacije), USE – uncertain States of 

Europe (NED – Nesigurne evropske države), Solid Sea 

(Čvrsto more). Radovi mreže multiplicity izlagani su na 

Venecijanskom bijenalu, u Muzeju moderne umetnosti u 

Parizu, na KW u Berlinu, na Milanskom trijenalu i na izložbi 

documenta11. Izabran je za jednog od projektanata vile u 

Unutrašnjoj Mongoliji, kao deo projekta Ordos100. 

un-think 

John Palmesino, Territorial Agency, 

Switzerland 

Not to know is our potential. 

After one hundred years of rapid urbanisation, 

architecture finds itself operating in an uncertain field. 

The contemporary territory is the seat of a multiplicity of 

transformation patterns and evolutive rhythms, wrought 

by concurrent and often distant interests, promoted 

by a growing number of actors. Through their mutual 

interplay and competition, they reshape, carve, mould 

and re-organise their spaces of operation. At the same 

time, expert knowledge is constructing a series of welldelimited 

boundaries of intervention and competence, 

contained and almost self-referential circuits of control 

and management techniques. In its evolution, the 

contemporary city does not follow a linear movement 

where the succession of elements is distinct and the 

nature of the causes clearly identifiable. Given this plural 

nature, the behaviour of the contemporary city is dynamic 

and ever-changing. How can architecture inscribe nonknowledge 

into its operations within these transformation 

processes? How can it move beyond what is already 

known and at hand? 

— 

John Palmesino is an architect and urbanist, born in 

Switzerland. He is the initiator of the interdisciplinary 

research on neutrality as a modality of spatial 

transformation and control, for his PhD at the Research 

Architecture Centre, Goldsmiths, University of London, 

where he also teaches. He has led the researches 

at ETH Zurich / Studio Basel–Contemporary City 

Institute between 2003 and 2007. He has co-founded

multiplicity, an international research network involved in 

contemporary architecture, urbanism, arts and general 

culture. Main works include MUTATIONS, USE uncertain 

States of Europe, Solid Sea. Multiplicity’s works have 

been exhibited at the Venice Biennale, at the Musée d’Art 

Moderne de la Ville de Paris, at the KW Berlin, at the 

Triennale di Milano and at documenta11. He has been 

selected to design a villa in Inner Mongolia as part of the 

Ordos100 project. 

Neutralnost – Svet bez granica, 2005 


— 

Ordos, Unutrašnja Mongolia, 2008 

© Territorial Agency


Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC, Srbija 

Tipologija i pristup rešavanju problema rekonstrukcije biće 

prikazani na primeru pet odabranih projekata: 

1. Rekonstrukcija Jugoslovenskog dramskog pozorišta 

(I plasman na javnom arhitektonskom konkursu) 

2. Rekonstrukcija enterijera Narodne biblioteke Srbije 

(I plasman na javnom arhitektonskom konkursu) 

3. Rekonstrukcija i dogradnja garaže na Obilićevom vencu 

(II plasman na javnom arhitektonskom konkursu) 

4. Rekonstrukcija Kalenić pijace (III plasman na javnom 

arhitektonskom konkursu) 

5. Rekonstrukcija i dogradnja galerije Čolaković. 

Razmišljanja i delovanje prilikom rekonstrukcije objekata, 

rekonstrukcije programa, rekonstrukcije mesta, 

rekonstrukcije enterijera, kao i valorizacijie zatečenih 

elemenata, stvaranja i primene programa, intervencija u 

prostoru, tehničko-tehnološkog unapređenja. 

— 

Zoran Radojičić, arhitekta, je rođen 1967. godine u 

Beogradu, diplomirao je 1993. godine na Arhitektonskom 

fakultetu Univerziteta u Beogradu. Od 1994. do 1999. 

godine radi u HK Energoprojekt, MDD Urbanizam i 

arhitektura. Godine 1999. godine osniva arhitektonski 

studio „ARCHTIC“ d.o.o. 

Dobitnik je većeg broja priznanja za ostvarenja u 

profesionalnom radu, među kojima su: 

- Nagrada Inženjerske komore Srbije za izuzetna 

dostignuća u struci, 2007. 

- Nagrada lista „Novosti”, 2007. 

- Priznanje 29. salona arhitekture za izvedeni objekat, 

2007. 

- Nagrada Saveza arhitekata Srbije, 2005. 


- Gran pri 26. salona arhitekture, 2004. 

- Nagrada grada Beograda iz oblasti urbanizma i 

arhitekture, 2003. 

- Nagrada lista „Novosti”, 2003. 

- Priznanje 25. salona arhitekture, 2003. 

Nagrađen na više od trideset domaćih i inostranih 

arhitektonskih konkursa. Izlagao je svoje radove i izvedene 

objekte na više grupnih i samostalnih izložbi u zemlji i 

inostranstvu (Bijenale u Veneciji, Praško kvadrijenale, 

Salon arhitekture). Kao gostujući nastavnik, više puta 

držao predavanja na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Univerziteta 

u Beogradu. Član je Inženjerske komore Srbije, Saveza 

arhitekata Srbije, Društva arhitekata Beograda i 

ULUPUDS–a. 


Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC, Serbia 

Typology and approach to reconstruction problem-solving 

will be shown on the example of five chosen projects: 

1. Reconstruction of the Yugoslav Drama Theatre 

(Jugoslovensko dramsko pozorište) (1st place at a public 

architecture competition) 

2. Reconstruction of the interior of the National Library of 

Serbia (Narodna biblioteka Srbije) (1st place on the public 


3. Reconstruction and annexing of the garage at Obilićev 

venac (2nd place on a public architecture competition) 

4. Reconstruction of Kalenić Market (3rd place on a public 


5. Reconstruction and annexing of Čolaković Gallery. 

Thinking and actions when reconstructing the buildings, 

reconstruction of program, reconstruction of location, 

reconstruction of interior, as well as revalorisation of 

found elements, creation and application of programs, 

intervention on the space, technical and technological 

advancement. 

Architect Zoran Radojičić was born in 1967 in Belgrade. 

He graduated from the Faculty of Architecture at 

University of Belgrade. 

From 1994 to1999 he worked in HK Energoprojekt 

- MDD Urbanizam i arhitektura. In 1999 he founded an 

architectonic studio ARCHTIC, d.o.o.

He is a laureate of a number of awards for his work in the 

profession, among which are: 

- Award of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers for 

outstanding achievements in the profession, 2007. 

- Award of Novosti newspaper, 2007. 

- Commendation at the 29th Salon of Architecture for 

erected building, 2007. 

- Award of the Association of Architects of Serbia, 2005. 

- Grand Prix of the 26th Salon of Architecture, 2004. 

- Award of the City of Belgrade in the area of urbanism 

and architecture, 2003. 

- Award of Novosti newspaper, 2003. 

- Commendation at the 25th Salon of Architecture, 2003. 

Narodna biblioteka Srbije – CIP/ISBN/ISSN/ISMN agencija 

— 

National Library of Serbia – CIP/ISBN/ISSN/ISMN agency 

He has been awarded at more than thirty domestic and 

foreign architecture competitions. 

He has exhibited his works and completed buildings 

at several group and solo exhibitions in the country 

and abroad (Venice Biennale, Prague Quadrennial, 

Architecture Salon). As a guest lecturer, he has held 

several lectures at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade. 

He is a member of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers, 

Association of Architects of Serbia, Association of 

Architects of Belgrade, and the Association of Applied 

Arts Artists and Designers of Serbia (ULUPUDS).

Šrek siti: Privatni prostor u 

Bukureštu i druge priče 

Konstantin Goađea, Rumunija 

Prilično sam siguran da se svi sećaju animiranog filma 

Šrek i da je pitanje koje postavljaju opravdano: kakve veze 

ima magare iz Šreka sa nekim arhitektonskim pojavama? 

Ima. Naime, kada je reč o gradskim navikama, uvek je 

bolje opredeliti se za magare nego za ogra. Magare želi 

da odvrati Šreka od nedruštvene iracionalnosti koja se 

ispoljava kroz njegovu ljubav prema svemu što je zeleno, 

prema netaknutoj prirodi koju želi samo za sebe. Što je 

najgore, on mrzi komšije i, sve u svemu, ništa mu nije 

potrebno. Očigledno, Šrek nije oličenje poštenog seljaka 

kome je bliska seoska poslušnost i jednostavan način 

života već je on, naprotiv, odraz aktuelnog nepristojnog 

prigradskog mentaliteta. Šrek siti bi mogao biti prikladan 

pojam za opis nekog sna o izgradnji nekretnina usred 

prirode, pri čemu ta izgradnja uništava prirodu u ime 

ljubavi prema prirodi i umesto prirode stvara prostore u 

kojima vlada društvena izolacija uz odsustvo moralnih 

obaveza, odsustvo interakcije, raznolikosti i društvene 

dinamike. Koristim priliku da se zahvalim magaretu iz filma 

što mi je omogućilo da uvedem ovaj radni koncept – Šrek 

siti – koji sam tek sada shvatio kao autentičan stav koji se 

suprotstavlja gradu i ispoljava antipatije prema njemu. 

„La rue courbe est le chemin des ânes, la rue droite le 

chemin des hommes” (Krivudavi put je onaj kojim idu 

magarci, pravolinijski put onaj kojim idu ljudi), rekao je 

Korbizje. Možda se prevario. S jedne strane, magarci su 

racionalni jer znaju da odaberu najblažu padinu za silazak, 

što znači da umeju da štede svoju snagu, a s druge strane, 

skoro sto godina nakon što je izrečena ova duhovita opaska 

potreban nam je prostor oslobođen automobila isto toliko 

koliko nam je potreban vazduh koji dišemo. 


— 

Konstantin Goađea od dvanaeste godine radi kao 

arhitekta i teoretičar, baveći se istraživanjima u oblasti 

arhitekture. Možda je pravilnije i njega i njegove saradnike 

nazvati gradskim kritičarima. To je, u najmanju ruku, 

ono što on radi sve vreme, bilo da je reč o tekstovima ili 

projektima, izložbama ili konferencijama – i to je razlog što 

stalno osvaja nagrade. Dakle, preskačući delove biografije, 

osvojio je prvu nagradu na konkursu za Rimski paviljon 

na Venecijanskom bijenalu 2006. godine (pod nazivom 

„remix”), a godinu kasnije i Nagradu za publikaciju na 

Godišnjoj arhitektonskoj izložbi u Bukureštu za Remiks 

– fragmente države (Remix - fragments of a country). Već 

šest godina Konstantin je organizator Rumunskog bijenala 

arhitekture – što je nacionalna nagrada za arhitekturu u 

Rumuniji. Bio je kustos na dvadeset pet izložbi, a trenutno 

se na njegovom radnom stolu nalaze tri projekta u vezi 

sa rehabilitacijom javnih prostora. Ostatak vremena 

provodi kao direktor biltena „Arhitectura“, a takođe je i 

osnivač udruženja „zeppelin“ – koje se bavi umetnošću, 

arhitekturom, dizajnom i drugim savremenim temama. 

Shreck city: The non public space 

in Bucharest and other stories 

Constantin Goagea, Romania 

I am preatty sure everybody remembers Shreck, that 

cartoon film and the question is reasonable: what does 

Donkey from Shreck have to do with architectural 

phenomena? Well, it does since on the side of urban 

habits it is always better to choose the donkey instead 

of the ogre. The donkey wishes to turn away Shreck’s 

antisocial irrationality embodied by his love for whatever 

is green, for a complete nature he wants for himself 

only. Worst of all, he hates neighbors and on the whole, 

he does not need anything. Obviously, Shreck is not 

the image of the good peasant familiar with the village 

obedience and a simple life style, but he is actually the 

exponent of current rude suburbanites. Shrek-city would 

be an appropriate term to describe any dream of real 

estate development in the middle of nature that destroys 

nature on behalf of the love for nature and creates instead 

spaces where social isolation, lack of moral commitment, 

lack of interaction, diversity and social dynamism reign. 

I am taking this opportunity to thank the donkey in the

Remiks 

— 

Remix 

film for having allowed me to launch this working concept 

– Shrek-city – which only now I understood as a genuine 

attitude opposing and showing aversion to the city. 

Some donkeys-little donkeys across the lecture as you 

have never seen before. “La rue courbe est le chemin 

des ânes, la rue droite le chemin des hommes” (A curved 

road is a way for donkeys, while a straight road is a way 

for human beings), Corbusier said. Maybe he had been 

wrong. On one hand, donkeys are rational since they 

know to choose a way down a smoothest slope, which 

means they manage to spare their efforts, and on the 

other hand, nearly hundred years further to this witticism 

we need carless spaces as much as we need air to 

breathe. 

— 

Constantin Goagea has been working from twelve 

years as an architect and theorist, making research in 

the field of architecture. It is more appropriate to call 

him and his fellows city critics. At least, this is what he 

does all the time, no matter it is about text or projects, 


exhibitions or conferences – the very reason for constantly 

receiving awards. So, going on fast forward, he won the 

competition for the Romanian Pavilion at Venice Biennale 

in 2006 (called “remix”), and one year later the Publication 

Award at the Bucharest Annual Architectural Exhibition for 

Remix – fragments of a country, he has been organizing 

from six years the Romanian Bienalle of Architecture 

– meaning the national professional awards in this field. 

Constantin has been the curator of 25 exhibitions, and 

three projects for public place rehabilitation are in pending 

now on his desktop. In the rest of time, he is the director 

of Arhitectura review, the founding member of zeppelin 

association – having again as a subject of interest the art, 

architecture, design and other contemporary stuff.

Akcija i REakcija: Slika 

postkomunističke graditeljske 

kulture u Bugarskoj 

Petar Torniov, Bugarska 

1. Reakcija. Početak tranzicije – rane devedesete godine 

XX veka. Potraga za novim identitetom. Političke i 

društvene promene – takozvana „nežna” transformacija 

od komunističko-totalitarističkog uređenja u „slobodno, 

demokratsko” društvo izazvala je razdor i pometnju u 

društvenom i ekonomskom životu. Ova transformacija 

dovela je do gubitka identiteta i radikalne izmene 

sistema vrednosti. Reakcija društva je impulsivna i 

uslovljena novim, uvreženim „globalnim” vrednostima. 

Političari, investitori i arhitekte tragaju za novim putevima, 

zapostavljajući kulturno i društveno nasleđe. Istorijski 

simboli i zgrade su nepoželjni i nestaju pod pritiskom 

novog slobodnog tržišta. 

2. Repliciranje. Nov način života i rada i novo urbanističko 

uređenje. Sofija kao prestonica prvi je njegov veliki 

projekat 2007. godine. Urbanistički razvoj je urađen 

deo po deo i uglavnom je uslovljen privatnim interesima. 

Odsustvo vizije i dugoročne strategije doveli su do 

raznih neobičnih pojava, ne samo u gradovima već i na 

obali Crnog mora i u planinskim predelima. Stara teška 

industrija je mrtva a nova se zove „turizam”. Saobraćaj i 

gustina naseljenosti neprestano rastu a, istovremeno, broj 

stanovnika opada. Novi stambeni kompleksi su nikli kao 

zajednice sa ograničenim pristupom. Industrijsko-poslovni 

parkovi kao zajednice sa ograničenim pristupom, pružaju 

međunarodnim kompanijama osećaj „da su kod kuće”. 

Tržni centri – uzdanice globalnog potrošačkog društva 


– nalik su „rajskim ostrvima”, kao reakcija na izostanak 

infrastrukture. 

3. Reorijentacija kao reakcija i pokušaji da se poboljša 

kultura gradnje. Napori, uspeli i bezuspešni, da se izmeni 

i poboljša kultura gradnje, urbanistički kvalitet i društveni 

uticaj arhitekture. 

- Takmičenja i rezultati. 

- Političke odluke, udruženja građana i javne rasprave. 

- Međunarodna razmena. 

- Pozitivni primeri. 

— 

Peter Torniov, dipl. inž. arh. rođen je 1970. u Sofiji, 

Bugarska. Diplomirao je arhitekturu i stekao master 

diplomu na Tehnološkom univerzitetu u Beču (1999). 

Radio je kao honorarni saradnik za nekoliko arhitektonskih 

biroa u Beču i ostvario saradnju sa biroom Kop Himelblau 

(1999–2000). Od 2001. do 2005. bio je asistent na 

Tehnološkom univerzitetu u Beču. Godine 2003. osnovao 

je +architecture ltd u Sofiji, a 2005. je sa svojim partnerom 

Stefanom Petkovim otvorio i ogranak u Bukureštu, 

Rumunija. 

Action and Re-action: Picture 

of the post communist building 

culture in Bulgaria 

Peter Torniov, Bulgaria 

1. Reaction. The begin of transition – early 90’s. Searching 

for a new identity. The political and social changes – the 

so called “gentle” transformation” from communisttotalitarian 

system to “free and democratic” society 

opened a social gap and confusion in the social and 

economical life. This transformation led to lost of identity 

and radically break of the value system. The reaction of 

the society is impulsive and dictated by new imported 

“global” values. Politicians, investors and architects are 

searching for new ways, neglecting the cultural and social 

heritage. Historical Symbols and buildings are unwanted 

and disappear under the pressure of the new free market.

2. Replication. The new form of living and working and the 

new urban organization. Sofia as capital became his first 

Master Plan in 2007. The urban development were done 

piece by piece and dictated mainly by private interests. 

The missing of vision and long term strategy led to diverse 

bizarre occurrences not only in the cities, but also on the 

Black Sea cost and the mountain regions. The old heavy 

industry is dead and the new one is named “Tourism”. 

The traffic and the density are constantly growing and in 

the same time the population is shrinking. New residential 

compounds grew up as gated communities. Business 

parks as gated communities offer international companies 

the feeling of “being home”. Shopping malls as flagships 

of the global consumer society are like “paradise islands” 

as reaction of the missing infrastructure. 

3. Reorientation as reaction and attempts to improve the 

building culture. The efforts, successful and unsuccessful 

to change and improve the building culture, urban quality 

and social influence of the architecture. 

Skijalište Banjsko, Crno more 

— 

Bansko Skiresort, Black Sea 

- competitions and results. 

- political decisions, citizen organizations and public 

discussions 

- international exchange 

- positive examples. 

— 

Peter Torniov was born in 1970 in Sofia, Bulgaria. He got 

his Master degree and architecture diploma from Vienna 

University of Technology (1999). He was a freelancer in 

several architecture offices in Vienna, which led him to his 

collaboration with Coop Himmelblau (between 1999 and 

2000). From 2001 Peter Torniov was assistant professor 

for four years at the Vienna University of Technology, in 

2003 founded +architecture ltd in Sofia and in 2005 a 

branch in Bucharest, Romania along with his partner 

Stefan Petkov.

Dobronamerni vanzemaljci u 

kućama starih ljudi 

Grac: Savremena arhitektura u 

istorijskom gradskom ambijentu 

Markus Cehner, Austrija 

Grad Grac ima dugu tradiciju u privlačenju ljudi 

inovativnog duha. Godinama pre 2003, kada je grad 

imao titulu Kulturne prestonice Evrope, uspostavljena je 

harmonična koegzistencija novog i starog kao važnog 

dela lokalne arhitekture. 

Priča o uspehu moderne arhitekture u Gracu počinje 

oko 1965. godine pobunom u salama za crtanje 

Arhitektonskog fakulteta. Dve decenije kasnije, 

Arhitektonska škola Graca bila je u punom naponu, 

na veliko iznenađenje savremene međunarodne 

arhitektonske scene – imala je političku podršku, bila je 

inovativna i spremna da eksperimentiše. 

Kunsthaus (Muzej savremene umetnosti) i Ada na reci Mur 

određeni su za događaje 2003. godine i to su lokacije 

koje dale glavne impulse za razvoj kulture gradnje u srcu 

grada. Sprovođenje ideja u istorijskom centru grada pod 

zaštitom Uneska nije moguće bez široke diskusije koja 

pokazuje da je dijalog starog i novog zasnovan, pre svega, 

na sposobnosti komunikacije unutar jednog društva. 

— 

Markus CEHNER, dipl. inž. arh., rođen 1967. u 

Gracu, Austrija. Od 1996. radi u oblasti planiranja 

projekata konzervacije. Okupio je ekipu nezavisnih, 

specijalizovanih arhitekata i konzervatora koji su osnovali 

malu projektantsku kompaniju „ZECHNER Monument 

Consulting”. Svojim mušterijama - privatnicima, 

investitorima i državnoj administraciji, pruža usluge 


temeljne tehničke provere istorijskih zgrada i konsultacija 

sa profesionalcima koji im nude rešenja za konzervaciju, 

procenu arhitektonskih prednosti i predračun troškova. 

U bliskoj saradnji sa austrijskim Državnim odsekom za 

zaštitu spomenika (Bundesdenkmalamt) poslednjih godina 

je urađeno preko šezdeset projekata. Od tih projekata, u 

najuzbudljivija iskustva spada rad na gradu Gracu koji se 

nalazi na Uneskovoj listi svetske baštine. 

Friendly aliens in old peoples’ homes 

Graz: contemporary architecture in 

historic townshape 

Markus Zechner, Austria 

The city of Graz has a long tradition in attracting 

innovative spirits. Years before 2003, when the town was 

celebrating Cultural Capital of Europe, the harmonious coexistence 

of new and old was established as an important 

part of local architecture. The success story of modern 

architecture in Graz started around 1965 with a rebellion 

in the drawing rooms of the Faculty of Architecture. Two 

decades later, the Graz School was in full cry, much to 

the surprise of the contemporary international architecture 

scene - politically supported, innovative and very keen on 

experimenting. 

The Kunsthaus (Museum of Contemporary Art) and the 

Island in the Mur were established for the event period of 

2003 and gave important impulses to the development 

of building culture in heart of the city. To realise this ideas 

in an UNESCO protected historic centre is not possible 

without a wide ranged discussion showing that the dialog 

of old and new is first of all based on the conversational 

ability of a society. 

— 

Markus ZECHNER, Dipl.-Ing. arch., was born 1967 in 

Graz, Austria. He has been working in the field of planning 

in conservation projects since 1996. He created a free 

lanced team of specialised architects and conservators 

in founding the ZECHNER Monument Consulting as a 

small projecting company. Private owners, investors and 

official departments as clients, are supported in having 

a fundamental check up on their historic buildings and

to receive an professional consulting advice forecasting 

conservation concepts, architectural benefits and costs. 

In close cooperation with the Austrian State Department 

for Monumental Care (Bundesdenkmalamt) over 60 

projects could be done in the last years. Among that, to 

work on the UNESCO heritage city of Graz was one of the 

most exciting experiences. 

Muzej savremene umetnosti, Grac 

— 

Museum of Contemporary Art, Graz

Centar Graca kao mešavina 

istorijskih fasada i palata, stalnih 

postavki umetničkih instalacija i 

moderne arhitekture 

Biljana Aranđelović, Austrija 

Grac, evropska kulturna prestonica 2003, poznat je ne 

samo po svom istorijskom centru koji je pod zvaničnom 

zaštitom Uneska već i po modernoj arhitekturi. U 

istorijskom centru grada uočavaju se prelepe linije 

fasada i palata, uglavnom iz vremena baroka i kasnijih 

perioda. Podjednako su atraktivne i moderne umetničke 

instalacije i postavke kao sastavni deo projekta gradske 

vlasti „umetnost na otvorenom prostoru“ kao i moderne 

arhitektonske građevine. 

U izlaganju će biti predstavljeni najzanimljiviji urbani detalji 

savremenog gradskog jezgra. Kao primer umetničke 

intervencije u urbanoj strukturi navodi se umetnica Sonja 

Gangle, sa svojom postavkom instalacija na glavnom 

gradskom trgu pod nazivom „t+4e – think positive forever“ 

(Razmišljaj pozitivno zauvek), zatim statua pod nazivom 

Light Sword, visoka 54 m, delo umetnika Hartmuta 

Skerbiša, kao jedno od poznatijih obeležja i atrakcija 

modernog Graca. Jedan od primera moderne arhitekture 

u istorijskom gradskom jezgru je ostrvo na Muri nastalo 

2003, kada je dizajner i umetnik iz Njujorka Vito Akonti 

pozvan da napravi neku vrstu umetničke instalacije 

na reci, veštačko jezero sa kafe barom i amfiteatrom 

– binom za izvođenje preformansa. Ovi projekti i dela, 

zajedno sa mnogim drugim umetničkim instalacijama i 

modernim arhitektonskim oblicima, najbolji su primeri 

kako se tradicija i moderno susreću na istom mestu, bez 

ometanja okoline i rušenja vrednih spomenika iz prošlosti. 


— 

Biljana Aranđelović, arhitekta i slikarka, rođena je 1979. 

u Nišu. Od 2005. živi i radi u Gracu. Studije arhitekture 

završila je na Građevinsko-arhitektonskom fakultetu u 

Nišu. Doktorirala je 2008. na Tehničkom univerzitetu 

u Gracu, na Institutu za urbanizam. Od 2006. je u 

programu privatne umetničke galerije Art moments iz 

Graca i, kao deo stalne postavke galerije, učestvuje 

na međunarodnim sajmovima umetnosti. Izlagala je na 

samostalnim i grupnim izložbama u Austriji, Srbiji, Grčkoj 

i Nemačkoj. Godine 2009. izabrana je u zvanje docenta 

na Građevinsko-arhitektonskom fakultetu u Nišu za užu 

naučnu oblast Istorija i teorija arhitekture. 

Center of Graz as a mix of 

historical facades and domes, 

permanent art installations and 

modern architecture 

Biljana Arandjelovic, Austria 

Graz, Europe`s 2003 Capital of Culture, is well-known 

not only because of its historical centre, which became a 

UNESCO world cultural heritage site, but also because of 

its modern architecture. Observing the historical centre, 

the beautiful lines of domes and facades, predominantly 

of Baroque and later periods could be find, but also 

modern art at open urban space, as well as modern 

architecture buildings. 

In this presentation the most interesting examples of 

urban details in contemporary Graz would be seen. 

One of the great examples of art intervention in central 

urban structure is artist Sonja Gangle with her t+4e 

(think positive forever) project as main square permanent 

installation. Then also, 54m high Light Sword statue, 

made by artist Hartmut Skerbisch, is one of the well 

known modern landmarks and attractions in Graz. One 

of the examples of modern architecture in city centre is 

island in Mur. In 2003, New York artist and designer Vito 

Acconti was invited to make some kind of art attraction 

in the river, an artificial island with coffeehouse and the 

performance stage for contemporary events. 

Those examples together with many other art installations 

and architectural buildings are definitely the best 

example how modern can meet past without disturbing

environment and demolishing the valuable historical 

monuments. 

— 

Biljana Arandjelovic, architect and painter, was born in 

Nis 1979. Since 2005 she lives and works in Graz. She 

studied architecture at University of Nis, Faculty for Civil 

Engineering and Architecture. From 2005-2008 she made 

her Doctoral Thesis at Graz University of Technology at 

Institute for Urbanism at Faculty of Architecture. Since 

2006, she is in program of the Art moments gallery in 

Graz. She had solo and group exhibitions in Austria, 

Greece, Germany, Serbia and also participated at art fairs 

in Innsbruck and Vienna with Art moments gallery. Since 

2009 she works as Assistent Professor of History and 

Theory of architecture at University of Nis, Faculty for Civil 

Engineering and Architecture. 

Projekat trajne instalacije na glavnom trgu: t+4e 

(razmišljaj pozitivno zauvek) 

— 

Permanent installation project on the main square: t+4e 

(think positive forever)

Projekti 

Andreas Bremhorst, 

Karl und Bremhorst Arhitekten, Austrija 

Analiza zadatka je centar nacrta. Rešenja mogu biti 

teorijska, praktična, jednostavna, komplikovana ili 

nemoguća. Ona su ipak uvek skrojena, individualna, 

vremenski određena. Naše ideje i građevine su ekološki 

orijentisane, funkcionalne, svrsishodne, jednostavne. 

Škola „Hertha Firnberg“, Beč 

Škola je najmanja i najniža zgrada usred ogromnih 

visokih stambenih građevina u Vinaberg sitiju. Otvoreni 

prostor se kao pešačka zona prostire duž novog dela 

grada. Uvučeno prizemlje kompaktne uzduž podignute 

građevine otvara se staklom ka esplanadi. Otvoreni 

stepenik vodi ka gornjim spratovima. Široki hodnici u 

sredini su istovremeno površine za prilaz i pauzu. Spratovi 

su povezani vazdušnim prostorom a kroz stakleni krov 

dobijaju sunčevu svetlost. Niše, proseci i vidici variraju 

konfiguraciju prostora po spratovima. Sve učionice 

okrenute su ka istočnoj strani koja je sklonjena od 

saobraćaja. Sa prozora učionica vidi se školsko dvorište i 

bašta dečijeg obdaništa. Duž ulice planirane su prostorije 

za snabdevanje i upravu koje su manje osetljive na buku. 

Tako se zgrada deli na „posluženi“ deo i deo koji „služi“. 

Sportska sala postavljena je jedan sprat niže. Krovni 

prostor je centralna terasa za pauzu, jedan atraktivni 

dobitak prostora na prilično malom zemljištu. 

Trostruka fiskulturna sala u gradiću Vels-Pernau, 

Gornja Austrija 

Trostruka fiskulturna sala Pernau smeštena je na 

građevinski značajnom mestu – na glavnom ulazu u Vels. 

Predviđeno mesto za gradnju je precizno izmereno. Da bi 


spoljne razmere građevine bile što manje, fiskulturna sala 

se za tri metra spušta ispod nivoa okruženja. Ozelenjeni 

atrijum razdvaja postojeću građevinu od novoizgrađene, u 

kojoj se odvijaju fiskulturne radnje i manifestacije. Pogled 

sa ulaza ka sportskom terenu i od foajea ka uličnom 

prostoru daje utisak lakoće i transparentnosti zgrade. 

Dobrovoljni vatrogasci i trg, Potendorf, Donja Austrija 

Projekat definiše novi trg, čija je površina podeljena u tri 

funkcionalne zone. Jedna infrastrukturna osa prostire 

se preko ove tri zone i čini funkcionalni centar. Zgrada 

vatrogasaca okrenuta je ka trgu, tako da sa njim može 

da se uspostavi veza pri održavanju manifestacija. Na 

gornjem spratu je velika sala, sa pogledom na trg, koja 

može da se podeli i da se koristi za organizovanje 

kulturnih događaja. Velike staklene površine treba da 

podstaknu znatiželju i pruže uvid u delatnost vatrogasaca. 

— 

Andreas Bremhorst (1969) je rođen u Viener Nojštatu 

(Donja Austrija). Maturirao je u BRG Viktring, Klagenfurt 

i studirao arhitekturu na Akademiji likovnih umetnosti, 

Beč, u klasi prof. Pentile. Godine 1995, dobio je nagradu 

Fridrih-Oman na Akademiji likovnih umetnosti, Beč. Od 

1999 radi samostalno, a od 2002 u zajedničkom birou sa 

arhitektom Kristofom Karlom. 

Projects 

Andreas Bremhorst, 

Karl und Bremhorst Architekten, Austria 

The analysis of the specific task at hand is at the centre 

of all our designs. Solutions may be theoretical, practical, 

simple, complicated or impossible, but they are always 

customised, individual, referenced to their time. Our 

ideas and buildings take account of the environment, 

are unpretentious and never lose sight of the underlying 

purpose. 

Hertha Firnberg School, Vienna 

The school is the smallest and lowest building amidst the 

large-volume, towering housing estates of Wienerberg 

City. An esplanade traverses the new city quarter axially, 

providing easy walking access. The recessed ground floor 

of the compact, longitudinal structure opens up a glazed

Škola Vinerberg, Beč 

I nagrada na konkursu 2003, realizovano 2005. 

foto: Rupert Steiner 

— 

School Wienerberg, Vienna 

1st price on competition 2003, realized 2005 

photo: Rupert Steiner 

façade to the esplanade. An open staircase leads to the 

upper levels. The broad central corridors serve both as 

access routes and relax zones. The storeys are interlinked 

by airspaces and receive sunlight through a glass roof. 

Niches, views across rooms as well as vistas of the world 

outside vary the spatial configurations of the individual 

storeys. All classrooms face the eastern front, which 

is shielded from traffic. From the classroom window, 

pupils and teachers can enjoy an unobstructed view of 

the schoolyard and the garden of the daycare nursery. 

The less noise-sensitive utility rooms and administrative 

premises are situated along the street. Thus the building 

is split into a “served” and a “serving” section. The gym 

is located one storey below. The roof becomes a central 

terrace to enjoy recess time – an attractive additional 

space on this limited-size plot. 

Pernau triple gym, Wels (Upper Austria) 

The Pernau triple gym is situated in an urbanistically 

prominent point on a main access road to Wels. The 

plot size is rather limited, so in order to keep the outside 

dimensions of the building low, the gym was positioned 

by three metres below the surrounding terrain level. A 

greened atrium provides a caesura between old and 

new building stock; the access zone leading to the 

gym and event space unfolds along this caesura. Visual 

links form entrances to sports grounds and from lobby 


to streetscape endow the building with a lightweight, 

transparent appeal. 

Volunteer fire department and market square, Pottendorf 

(Lower Austria) 

This project defines a new market square whose surface 

is structured into three functional zones. An infrastructure 

axis spans these three zones and forms the functional 

centre. The Fire Department building is oriented towards 

the market square, which creates a clear reference to 

the square whenever special events take place at the 

building. The upper storey houses a big sub-divisible hall 

with a view of the market square, which may also be used 

for cultural functions. Ample glass panes whet curiosity 

and offer glimpses of the work of the Volunteer Fire 

Department. 

— 

Andreas Bremhorst (1969) was born in Wiener Neustadt 

(Lower Austria). He graduated from secondary technical 

school in Viktring, Klagenfurt (Carinthia) and studied 

architecture at the Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna, at 

master class of professor T.Penttilä. In 1995, he was 

awarded with Friedrich Ohmann Award of Academy 

of Fine Arts, Vienna. Since 1999 he worked in his own 

studio, and from 2002 in office partnership with architect 

Christoph Karl.

Svakodnevni život 

Zigfrid Los, polar ÷, Austrija 

ovo predavanje je o tome kako biti zajedno: 

biti zajedno kao ljudi 

biti zajedno kao prostorije 

biti zajedno kao kuće 

biti zajedno kao pejzaži 

ukatko, to znači prostori između 

koji započinju svoje bivstvovanje kada se nešto spoji. 

ovo predavanje nije predavanje 

već priča o ne-događaju, 

kao najvećem događaju. 

— 

Zigfrid Los, rođen 1965. godine u Feldbahu, studirao je 

arhitekturu na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Gracu i Tehničkom 

univerzitetu u Delftu. Diplomirani inženjer arhitekture, 

civilni tehničar sa državnom dozvolom, od 1993. godine 

u partnerskom birou sa Margot Firč (M. Fürtsch). Godine 

2002. osnovali su zajednički arhitektonski brend polar÷ u 

Beču i Bad Glajhenbergu (Bad Gleichenberg). Predavač 

na Višoj stručnoj školi Joanneum. Direktor radionice za 

prostorno uređenje Bečke škole umetnosti (Wiener kunst 

schule). 


Every Day Life 

Siegfried Loos, polar ÷, Austria 

the lecture is about being together: 

being together like people 

being together like rooms 

being together like houses 

being together like landscapes 

in common it means the spaces in between, 

they start being when something is together. 

the lecture is no lecture 

it is a story about the non happening event, 

as the strongest point. 

— 

Siegfried Loos was born in 1965 in Feldbach. Since 

1993, he works in the partnership bureau with Margot 

Fürtsch. In 2002, the co-founded their joint architectural 

brand polar÷ in Vienna and Bad Gleichenberg. He is a 

lecturer at the Higher Vocational School Joanneum. He 

is the Director of the Spatial Arrangement Workshop at 

the Viennese School of Art (Wiener Kunst Schule). He has 

studied architecture at the Technical University in Delft. 

He is a bachelor of architecture, and a state-licensed civil 

technician.

polar÷ Austrija 

— 

polar÷ Austria

TYPUS ili TOPOS: MRLV Arhitekten 

Hamburg – Projekti i misaone 

osnove 

Mirjana Marković, MRLV Arhitekten 

Hamburg, Nemačka 

Slika grada Hamburga je upečatljivija nego njegovi 

pojedinačni arhitektonski objekti. Građani Hamburga 

i hamburški arhitekti, neguju taj mit. Početkom 

devedesetih godina XX veka, počinje diskusija o vrednosti 

arhitektonskih simbola. U međuvremenu, u Hamburg stižu 

i svetski arhitektonski nomadi. Koja teorija će dobiti primat 

– Bilbao- effect ili teorija evropejskog grada? Da li postoji 

jedan „hamburški put“? 

Mirjana Marković, Aleksandar Ronai, Vili Litjen, Manfred 

Fos – MRLV Architekten Hamburg – projektuju i grade u 

Hamburgu skoro tri decenije. Radove arhitektonskog biroa 

karakteriše unapred nedefinisani arhitektonski stil – uvek 

se ponovo generišu koncepti iz duha mesta, materijalnog 

i nematerijalnog. Ipak, oni nisu tome podređeni već često 

nude novu definiciju i oblikovnu artikulaciju toposa. Sigurni 

u funkcionalnoj dispoziciji, konstruktivnim rešenjima, 

arhitektonskom detalju i energetskim rešenjima, projekti 

MRLV Arhitekten predstavljaju se kao generativna čestica 

evropskog grada. 

— 

Mirjana Marković, slobodni arhitekta i profesor, studirala 

je na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Beogradu i Umetničkoj 

akademiji u Hamburgu. Živi u Hamburgu i bavi se 

urbanizmom, arhitekturom i enterijerom. Do sada 

je učestvovala u projektovanju i građenju stambenih 

objekata i kompleksa, vila, poslovnih objekata, školskih, 

sportskih i univerzitetskih objekata, kao i u procesima 


restauracije i dogradnje objekata pod zaštitom. Od 

1979, zajedno sa Aleksandrom Ronai, Vilijem Litjenom 

i Manfredom Fosom, vodi samostalni arhitektonski 

biro u Hamburgu – MRLV Architekten – koji ima širok 

spektar stručnog rada, od idejnog projekta do nadzora 

nad izvođenjem. Osvojila je mnogobrojne nagrade na 

urbanističkim i arhitektonskim konkursima, kao i više 

nagrada za izvedene objekte. Objavila je mnoge radove 

i prikaze o radu biroa u stručnoj štampi. Bila je gostujući 

profesor na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Hamburg, ETH 

Zürich, Tsinghua Univerzitetu Peking i Umetničkoj 

akademiji Hamburg. Aktivna je u stručnim organizacijama, 

kao BDA (Bund Deutscher Architekten Hamburg – Savez 

slobodnih arhitekata Nemačke), kojem je bila i prva 

žena predsednica. Dugogodišnja je članica redakcije 

časopisa Der Architekt i savetnica DAM Deutsches 

Architekturmuseum Frankfurt. 

TYPUS or TOPOS: MRLV 

Architekten Hamburg – Design and 

Contemplative Basis 

Mirjana Markovic, MRLV Architekten 

Hamburg, Germany 

The image of the city of Hamburg is more consummate 

than the city’s individual architectural structures. The 

citizens of Hamburg and its architects do nurture this 

trend. By the beginning of 1990s, the discussion on the 

value of architectural symbols begins. In the meantime, 

the world’s nomads of architecture reach Hamburg. 

Which theory will gain primacy – the Bilbao effect, or 

the theory of the European City? Is there one single 

“Hamburg’s way”? Mirjana Marković, Aleksandar Ronai, 

Willi Lütjen, Manfred Voss – MRLV Architekten Hamburg 

– design and build in Hamburg for almost three decades. 

The designs of the architecture bureau are characterised 

by an architectural style not defined in advance – again 

and again, the concepts are generated from the spirit 

of the location, both material and immaterial. Yet, 

the concepts are not subordinate to the existing but 

frequently offer a new definition and material articulation 

of the topology. Secure in their functional disposition, 

constructive solutions, architectonic detail and energy 

solutions, MRLV Architekten designs are showcased as a 

generative particle of the European City.

— 

Mirjana Marković, a free architect and professor, has 

studied at the Faculty of Architecture in Bel-grade and at 

The Art Academy in Hamburg. She lives in Hamburg and 

is engaged in urban planning, architecture and interior. 

So far, she has been involved in designing and building of 

residential build-ings and complexes, villas, commercial 

buildings, schools, sports and university buildings, as 

well as in the processes of restoration and enlargement 

of the buildings under heritage protection. From 1979, 

together with Alexander Ronai, Willi Lütjen and Manfred 

Voss, she leads the independent architectural biro in 

Hamburg – MRLV Architekten – which provides for 

a wide spectrum of expert work, from the phases of 

preliminary design to the construction supervision. She 

Emporio Hamburg 

MRLV Arhitekten - Markovic Ronai Voss 

Copyright www.datenland.de 

— 

Emporio Hamburg 

MRLV Architekten - Markovic Ronai Voss 

Copyright www.datenland.de 

has been awarded many times for urban planning and 

architectural competitions, as well as for constructed 

buildings. She has published many papers and reviews 

of the bureau’s work in the professional magazines. She 

was a guest pro-fessor at the Architectural Faculty in 

Hamburg, ETH Zürich, Tsinghua University in Beijing and 

The Art Academy Hamburg. She is active in professional 

organizations, such as BDA (Bund Deutscher Ar-chitekten 

Hamburg – Association of the free architects in Germany), 

where she was the first female president. She is also 

a long-standing member of the editorial staff of the 

magazine Der Architekt (The Architect) and the counsellor 

of DAM (Deutsches Architekturmuseum – German 

Architecture Museum) in Frankfurt.

Reinterpretacija slobodnog plana 

Stanko Gaković, SAD 

Savremeni poslovni prostor u Americi je zasnovan na 

konceptu otvorenog plana. Radna mesta su opremljena 

sistemskim nameštajem i prostorno definisana lakim 

pregradama male visine za osnovnu privatnost. Na taj 

način obezbeđuje se visok stepen fleksibilnosti, tako da 

se raspored nameštaja i opreme brzo prilagođava novim 

zahtevima radnog procesa. 

Kritička analiza američkog savremenog poslovnog 

prostora odnosi se, pre svega, na ekstremnu 

funkcionalnost i standardizaciju koji ne dopuštaju 

varijacije. Fiksna tipologija sistemskog nameštaja i 

isključivost u primeni organizacionih shema doprinose 

monotoniji radnog prostora u kome ljudi provode više od 

jedne četvrtine svog dnevnog ili nedeljnog vremena. U 

kombinaciji sa minimalnom površinom radnog prostora 

i nemogućnopšću individualne kontrole mikroklime, 

ovakva sredina podstiče alijenaciju, bolest i povećano 

odsustvovanje sa posla. 

Primena koncepta otvorenog plana danas treba da 

bude realizovana i u skladu sa sledećim savremenim 

trendovima: 

- Pokretljivost zaposlenih u okviru firme na 

međugradskom i međunarodnom planu, uključujući i rad 

od kuće. Iz ovog trenda proizlazi potreba za univerzalnim 

radnim mestima za različite korisnike. 

- Prosečno radno vreme je sve duže – iako korišćenje 

kompjutera obezbeđuje veću produktivnost. Duže radno 

vreme stvara nove potrebe i nove sadržaje za rad i 

rekreaciju. 

- Radni prostor koji podstiče neposrednu komunikaciju 

i saradnju. Upotreba kompjutera promenila je način 

komuniciranja među zaposlenima. Umesto direktnim 


razgovorom, komunikacija između susednih radnih 

mesta ostvaruje se elektronskom poštom. Iz ovog trenda 

proizlazi potreba za formiranjem ambijenata koji podstiču 

direktnu komunikaciju. 

- Ekološki održiv radni prostor. Primenom standarda 

za zdravu sredinu kroz „Leadership in Energy and 

- Environmental Design” omogućava se programiranje i 

planiranje ekološki održive sredine. 

Radi daljeg usavršavanja poslovnog prostora, na 

predmetu Advanced Commercial Design, koristimo model 

grada u procesu planiranja. U istraživanjima gradskih 

struktura afirmišu se principi kontinuiteta, raznolikosti i 

konflikta, pa se njihovom primenom postižu dobri rezultati 

u projektovanju savremenog poslovnog prostora. 

— 

Stanko Gaković diplomirao je 1972, a doktorirao 1987. 

na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Beogradu. Sarađivao sa 

više firmi na arhitektonsko -urbanističkom projektovanju. 

Gostujući je profesor arhitekture Fulbrajtovog programa 

u SAD 1976, a potom nastavnik na Arhitektonskom 

fakultetu u Beogradu do 1992, gde je radio kao vanredni 

profesor, prodekan za nastavu, urednik Arhitektonike 

i aktivni učesnik u razvijanju saradnje sa evropskim 

školama arhitekture. Gostovao u SAD. Njegovi projekti 

u oblasti arhitekture, urbanizma i dizajna dobili su više 

nagrada i priznanja na konkursima i izložbama u kojima 

je učestvovao u autorskom timu ili kao autor. Dobitnik 

je specijalne nagrade Društva arhitekata Beograda za 

arhitektonsko ostvarenje u inostranstvu 1996. godine. U 

Hjustonu, gde živi i radi, osnovao je G! studio u kojem, 

sa Dankom Gaković, projektuje stambene kuće i manje 

poslovne objekte. Učestvuje u formiranju novog programa 

u školi unutrašnje arhitekture za Art Institut, gde radi 

sa studentima na istraživanju, planiranju i projektovaju 

poslovnog prostora (Advanced Commercial Design). 

REinterpretation of the Open Plan 

Concept 

Stanko Gakovic, USA 

Modern commercial space in the US is based on the open 

plan concept. Workstations are equipped with systems 

furniture and are partitioned in space with light low-height 

panels that provide basic privacy. In this way, a high level

of flexibility is achieved making the layout of furniture and 

equipment easily adapted to new requirements of the 

work process. 

A critical analysis of modern American commercial 

space would primarily refer to the extreme functionality 

and standardization that does not allow variations. 

Fixed typology of systems furniture and rigidness in the 

application of organizational layouts both contribute to 

the monotony of the work space in which people spend 

more than one quarter of their daily and weekly time. In 

combination with minimal surface area of the work space, 

and inability of individual control of the microclimate, 

such environment encourages alienation, illnesses and 

increased work absence. 

At present, application of the open plan concept should 

also be made in line with the following modern trends: 

- Mobility of employees within the company on the 

inter-city and international levels, including working from 

home. From this trend ensues the need for universal 

workstations for varying users. 

- Average working time is getting longer and longer – even 

though the use of computers provides for increased 

productivity. Longer working hours create new needs and 

contents for both labour and recreation. 

- Workspace that encourages direct communication 

and cooperation. The use of computers has changed 

the manner of communication among the employees. 

Instead of direct conversation, neighbouring workstations 

communicate by e-mail. This trend indicates a need 

for creation of ambiences that encourage direct 

communication. 

- Environmentally sustainable work space. By applying 

healthy environmental standards through “Leadership in 

Energy and Environmental Design”, programming and 

Studija sklopa za poslovni prostor kompanije Facebook 

Marikruz Miranda 

— 

Composition design for Facebook Company business premises 

Maricruz Miranda 


planning of environmentally sustainable surroundings 

becomes possible. 

To pursue further advancement of commercial space, in 

the Advanced Commercial Design class, we use a city 

model in the planning process. In the research of urban 

structures, we affirm principles of continuity, diversity and 

conflict, so that their application achieves good results in 

the design of modern commercial space. 

— 

Stanko Gaković graduated in 1972, and received his 

doctorate at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade in 

1987. He has cooperated with numerous companies 

on architectural and urban designs. He was a Fulbright 

Program visiting professor of architecture in the US in 

1976, and later a lecturer at the Faculty of Architecture 

in Belgrade until 1992, where he worked as an associate 

professor, vice dean for academic affairs, for teaching, the 

editor of Arhitektonika magazine and an active participant 

in the development of cooperation with European schools 

of architecture. He has professionally visited the US. His 

architectural, urbanism and design projects have won 

several prizes and awards at competitions and exhibitions 

at which he participated either in a team of authors, or 

as a sole author. In 1996, he was a laureate of a special 

prize of the Association of Architects of Belgrade for 

architectural accomplishments abroad. In Huston, where 

he now lives and works, he founded G! studio, where, 

together with Danka Gaković, he designs residential 

housing and small commercial spaces. He participates 

in the creation of a new program in the School of Internal 

Architecture for the Art Institute, where he works with 

students on research, planning and advanced commercial 

design.

MORFOZIS 

Tom Mejn, SAD 

… Njegov arhitektonski idiom je vezan za podneblje i 

kulturnu sredinu iz koje potiče. Jednostavno, klimatske 

pogodnosti Južne Kalifornije omogućile su mladim 

arhitektima da eksperimentišu mnogo više nego bilo gde 

u Americi, uz mnogo manje ograničavajućih faktora i više 

prostora za projektovanje. 

„Kako ja vidim, osnova mog umetničkog ostvarenja leži u 

spontanosti. Ja volim spontanost u rešavanju izazova koje 

stvarnost nameće. Oduvek sam težio tome da izgradim 

svoje projekte. Dakle, u mom svetu, u mojoj kreativnoj 

svesti nastaje arhitektonska vizija u sukobu stvarnosti i 

individualne sfere. Kroz interakciju i sučeljavanje često 

suprotnih vrednosti pronalazim pitanja i odgovore. U 

preseku stvarnog i idejnog nastaje nova realnost – zgrada. 

Treba proći dug put kroz izazove i utrošiti veliku energiju 

da bi se ostvarila zamisao.“ 

Iz intervjua sa Tomom Mejnom za časopis 

Forum+, br. 50. Nenad Stjepanović, jun 2005. 

— 

Tom Mejn, dobitnik Prickerove nagrade 2005. godine, 

osnivač je i vodeći projektant u grupi Morfozis, koja 

je poznata po beskompromisnom dizajnu i težnji ka 

prevazilaženju ograničenja tradicionalnih formi i materijala, 

ali i po radu na otkrivanju nove teritorije, izvan modernizma 

i postmodernizma. Morfozis su 1972. osnovali Mejn i Džim 

Staford, a godinu dana kasnije im se pridružio i Majkl 

Rotiondi i ostao partner do 1991. 

Tom Mejn je rođen u Vestberiju, Konektikat, 1944, a 

diplomirao arhitekturu na Univerzitetu Južna Kalifornija, 

1968. Svoju profesorsku karijeru započeo je na Cal Poly 


u Pomoni, ali je ubrzo, sa još šest svojih kolega, bio 

otupšten. To je bio početak osnivanja Arhitektonskog 

instituta u Južnoj Kaliforniji (SCI-Arch) 1972. godine. Vratio 

se školovanju i dobio diplomu mastera arhitekture (MA) 

na Harvardu, 1987. Držao je predavanja na univerzitetu 

Kolumbija, Harvardu, Jejlu, Berlahe institutu u Holandiji i u 

Školi arhitekture Bartlet u Londonu. 

MORPHOSIS 

Thom Mayne, USA 

…His architectural idiom is connected to the climate and 

the cultural environment from which he comes. Simply 

put, with its climate comfort, South California has enabled 

young architects to experiment much more than anywhere 

else in America, have less limiting factors and more space 

for design. 

“The way I see my artistic realizations is that they have 

root in spontaneity. I love spontaneity in solving the 

challenges imposed by the reality. I have always been 

interested in realizing my projects. Therefore, in my world, 

in my creative consciousness, the architectural vision 

arises in the clash of reality and the individual sphere. 

Through the interaction and confrontation of often 

opposed values, I find the questions and the answers. In 

the touch of real and ideological, a new reality is born – a 

house. It takes a long way through the challenges and a 

lot of energy to make realization happen”. 

From the interview of Thom Mayne for the 

Forum+ magazine, no. 50. 

Interview conducted by Nenad Stjepanović, June 2005. 

— 

Thom Mayne, the 2005 Pritzker Architecture Prize 

laureate, is a founder and design principal of Morphosis 

group, which has always been known for uncompromising 

designs and a drive to surpass the bounds of traditional 

forms and materials, while also working to carve 

out a territory beyond the limits of modernism and 

postmodernism. The firm was founded in 1972 by Mayne 

and Jim Stafford and one year later Micahel Rotiondi

Caltrans District 7 Headquarters 

Los Anđeles, SAD, 2004. 

— 

Caltrans District 7 Headquarters 

Los Angeles, USA, 2004 


joined them and remained as partner until 1991. 

Thom Mayne was born in Westbury, Connecticut in 1944 

and received his bachelor of architecture degree from 

the University of Southern California in 1968. He began 

his teaching career at Cal Poly at Pomona, but soon he, 

along with six colleagues, was fired. That was the genesis 

of the founding of the Southern California Institute of 

Architecture (SCI-Arch) in 1972. He returned to school 

and received his master of architecture degree from 

Harvard University in 1987. He has held teaching posts 

at Columbia University, Harvard University, Yale University, 

the Berlage Institute in the Netherlands and the Bartlett 

School of Architecture in London.

TRIBINE 

DEBATES

Srbija na bijenalima arhitekture u 

Veneciji 

moderatorka: Snežana Ristić 

učesnici: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, 

Zoran Erić 

Prošle, 2008. godine prvi put je raspisan javni konkurs 

za predstavljanje Srbije na 11. međunarodnoj izložbi 

arhitekture u Veneciji. Bilo je to važno iskustvo za sve 

učesnike, stručni savet, učesnike konkursa, Ministarstvo 

kulture, novinare, javnost… Na tribini će se govoriti o 

načinu i proceduri izbora našeg predstavnika na Bijenalu u 

Veneciji, o dosadašnjim iskustvima, o onome što bi trebalo 

promeniti i onome što bi trebalo zadržati u proceduri 

izbora, šta našim arhitektima znači učešće na Bijenalu, 

koliko je ono važno da bismo shvatilio sopstvenu poziciju 

u arhitekturi ovog trenutka, kako se biraju predstavnici u 

drugim državama, a kako u regiji… Projekcija fotografija: 

Bijenale u Veneciji 2008. (dokumentarne fotografije s 

posebnim osvrtom na paviljon Republike Srbije). 

— 

Snežana Ristić je diplomirala na Arhitektonskom 

fakultetu u Beogradu. Bavi se arhitektonskom kritikom, 

publicistikom i fotografijom. Objavljuje u domaćim i 

stranim stručnim časopisima, nedeljnicima i dnevnim 

novinama (Politika, Kvart, Oris…). Autorka je brojnih 

radio emisija u kojima se bavi savremenom arhitekturom; 

vodila je intervjue sa nekim od najznačajnijih arhitekata 

i teoretičara arhitekture (Danijel Libeskind, Bogdan 

Bogdanović, Kengo Kuma, Adam Tihani, Rem Kolhas, 

Aron Betski, Dejan Suđić i dr). Koautorka je (sa Radonjom 

Leposavićem) knjige Šta ste radili u ratu – glasovi iz 

crne rupe, Beograd 1999. Koautorka (sa Radonjom 

Leposavićem) brojnih radijskih emisija, dokumentarnih i 

68 — TRIBINE 

radiofonskih emisija izvedenih na evropskim festivalima, 

od kojih je jedna i nagrađena na Festivalu dokumentarne 

i radio drame Prix Marulić na Hvaru 2007. Urednica je 

redakcije za kulturu Radio Beograda 2. 

Serbia at Architecture Biennales in 

Venice 


participants: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav 

Mitrović, Zoran Erić 

Last year, 2008, saw for the first time opening of a public 

competition for the slot for representation of Serbia at 

the 11th International Exhibition of Architecture in Venice. 

This was an important experience for all stakeholders, 

the expert council, participants to the competition, the 

Ministry of Culture, journalists, the public... 

The panel will address the manner and the procedure of 

how our representative at the Biennale was elected, the 

hitherto experiences, the things that should be changed 

and the things that should be kept in the election process, 

followed by what it means to our architects to participate 

at the Biennale, how important it is for us to properly 

understand our own position in the architecture of the day, 

how representatives are picked in other countries, and in 

the countries in the region… 

Photography display: Venetian Biennale 2008 

(documentary photographs with a special attention to the 

pavilion of the Republic of Serbia). 

— 

Snežana Ristić received her university diploma from the 

Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade. She practices critique 

in the realm of architecture, she is a publicist and a 

photographer. She has published in domestic and foreign 

professional almanacs, weekly newspapers and daily 

newspapers (Politika, Kvart, Oris…). She has authored 

numerous radio broadcasts in which she deals in 

contemporary architecture; she has interviewed some of 

the most important architects and theorists of architecture 

(Daniel Libeskind, Bogdan Bogdanović, Kengo Kuma, 

Adam Tihany, Rem Koolhaas, Aron Betsky, Dejan Suđić, 

et al). She co-authored (with Radonja Leposavić) a 

book entitled Šta ste radili u ratu – glasovi iz crne rupe

(What Did You Do in War – Voices from the Black Hole), 

Belgrade, 1999. With the same colleague, she also 

co-authored numerous radio broadcasts, documentary 

and radiophone broadcasts performed at European 

festivals, of which one received an award at the Festival 

of Documentary and Radio Play – Prix Marulić in Hvar in 

2007. 

Srpski paviljon u Veneciji 

— 

Serbian Pavilion in Venice 

69 — TRIBINE

Šta sa Novim Beogradom? 

– okrugli sto 

moderatorka: Žaklina Gligorijević, 

Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Srbija 

Beograd još nedovoljno voli i promoviše Novi Beograd, 

koga svi gosti iz inostranstva smatraju jedinstvenim živim 

primerom grada moderne. Osim visokog kvaliteta životne 

sredine u ovom delu Beograda, sa sve više komercijalnih 

i javnih sadržaja koji dopunjuju lokalnu urbanu ponudu, 

ostaje da se profesija opredeli kako će u u budućnosti 

profilisati razvoj i rast ovog grada. Hoće li dopustiti da 

se u njega useli visoki poslovni „city”, koji se do danas 

nije formirao po uzoru na zapadne prestonice, ili će se 

poštovati izgrađeni identitet i kontekst, ostaje da se 

rasprai i o tome odlučuje strateškim projektima grada. 

Svako iskustvo revitalizacije ili unapređenja sličnih gradova 

i svaki pogled „sa strane” urbanistima i upravi može da 

bude od velike koristi i da otvori perspektive koje možda 

još nisu razmatrane. 

— 

Žaklina Gligorijević, dipl. inž. arh. direktorka Urbanističkog 

zavoda Beograda, studirala arhitekturu i magistrirala u 

Beogradu i Kembridžu, MA. Veliki deo profesionalnog 

iskustva stekla je u CEP-u, gde je izgradila karijeru od 

studenta saradnika do rukovodioca projekata i direktora. 

Jedno vreme bila je koordinatorka kancelarije Gradskog 

arhitekte grada Beograda za međunarodnu saradnju. U 

više od dvadeset godina širokog profesionalnog iskustva 

najviše se bavila urbanim razvojem gradova, a od pre četiri 

godine uglavnom Beograda. Direktorka je Urbanističkog 

zavoda Beograda. Potpisala je arhitektonske i urbanističke 

projekte i prostorne i urbanistične planove u Srbiji i Crnoj 

Gori, strateške studije i međunarodne projekte, konkurse 

u zemlji, na Kipru, u Irskoj, Americi, Rumuniji. Bavi se 

70 — TRIBINE 

istraživanjima unapređenja sistema planiranja, upravljanja 

i razvoja gradova, kreativnim sektorom i urbanom 

reciklažom, koju promoviše od ranih devedesetih godina 

kroz profesionalni i nevladin sektor i akademiju. Bila je 

predsednica Društva urbanista Beograda, članica je 

upravnog odbora Društva arhitekata Beograda i Izvršnog 

odbora sekcije urbanista IKS. Rukovodila je studijom 

Financing Metropolitan Governments in Transitional 

Countries, predstavljajući Beograd u međunarodnom 

projektu devet glavnih gradova Evrope. 

What to do with New Belgrade? 

– round table 

moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević, 

Institute for Urban Planning, Serbia 

Belgrade still does not sufficiently like and promote New 

Belgrade, which is considered to be, according to the 

views of guests from abroad, a unique living example of 

a modern city. Apart from high quality environment in this 

part of Belgrade, with a growing amount of commercial 

and public amenities that supplement the local urban 

offering, what remains for the profession is to choose how 

to profile the development and the growth of this urban 

area in the future. Will it allow for the high business “city” 

to move into it, with it still not completely formed in the 

shape of that in Western capitals, or will it respect the 

identity and context already built; the question remains to 

be discussed and decided upon in the strategic plans for 

the City. Any experience of revitalisation and advancement 

of cities that are similar, and any look “from outside”, can 

be of great advantage to the town planners and the city 

administration and could open some perspectives that 

may have not been yet considered. 

— 

Žaklina Gligorijević, MA, B.Arch, Managing Director of 

Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, studied architecture and 

received a magisterial degree in Belgrade, and a Master 

of Arts degree at Cambridge University. A large share of 

her professional experience comes from CEP (Centre for 

Urban Development Planning) where she built her carrer 

from a student-collaborator to the Project Manager and 

Director. For a time, she was the coordinator at the Office

of City Architect of Belgrade in charge of international 

cooperation. In more than twenty years of her wide 

professional experience, she has mostly dealt in urban 

development of towns and cities, and since four years 

ago, primarilly with urban development of Belgrade. 

Currently, she is the Director of the Institute of Urbanism 

Belgrade. She has signed numerous architectural and 

urbanism projects and spatial and urban plans in Serbia 

and Montenegro, strategic studies and international 

projects, entries for competition in the country, in Cyprus, 

Ireland, the US, and Romania. She practices research 

aimed at the development of planning, management 

and development systems for urban areas. She also 

deals in creative sector and urban recycling, which she 

promotes since the early 90s through professional and 

NGO sectors, and the academia. She was the President 

of the Association of Town Planners of Belgrade, member 

of the Steering Commitee of the Association of Architects 

of Belgrade and the Executive Committee of the Section 

of Town Planners of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers. 

She governed a study entitled Financing Metropolitan 

Governments in Transitional Countries, representing 

Belgrade at an international project involving nine 

European capitals.

RADIONICE 

WORKSHOPS

Dečje radionice 

organizator: Dečji kulturni centar 

Inspirisani ovogodišnjom temom Beogradske 

internacionalne nedelje arhitekture – RE..., osmislili smo 

radionice u kojima će deca promišljati o sopstvenom 

okruženju i gradeći ga iskazati svoje mišljenje. Pružiće 

im se mogućnost da likovnim izrazom, koristeći različite 

materijale, rekonstruišu i dekorišu spoljašnji i unutrašnji 

prostor Dečjeg kulturnog centra Beograd. 

Učesnici radionica će biti podeljeni u pet grupa i svaka 

od njih će imati zadatak da preoblikuje, nadogradi i 

ukrasi deo pripremljene makete Dečjeg kulturnog centra 

Beograd. Koristići različite likovne i nelikovne materijale, 

tehnike kolažiranja, modelovanja i oblikovanja osmisliće i 

izraditi objekat po svojoj želji. 

Likovne radionice Dečjeg kulturnog centra Beograd 

osmišljavaju i realizuju Nataša Katalina i Katarina 

Bunuševac. 

Nazivi radionica: 

1) REci REd! 

Prvog dana, učesnici radionica će osmisliti i izraditi deo 

unutrašnjeg prostora Dečjeg centra (galeriju, salu, kafić, 

hodnik...). 

2) REži, REndaj! 

Drugog dana, deca će ukrašavati unutrašnji prostor 

ambijenta u kome borave. Svaka grupa će dobiti zadatak 

da dekoriše jednu prostoriju sa određenom namenom. 

3) REđaj, REđaj! 

U okviru ove radionice deca će osmisliti i izraditi fasadu 

svoje kuće. Svaka grupa će dobiti deo makete koji će 

nadograditi i ukrasiti po svojoj želji. 

4) sREdi REsto! 

Na poslednjoj radionici, deca će sklopiti maketu Dečjeg 

74 — RADIONICE 

centra, dodati delove koji nedostaju i urediti prostor oko 

objekta. Biće u prilici da zamisle i postave svoj objekat u 

novo, adekvatno okruženje. 

— 

Dečji kulturni centar Beograd je ustanova kulture, čiji je 

osnivač Gradska uprava – Grad Beograd. Od osnivanja, 

1952. godine, u njemu se ostvaruju mnogobrojni programi 

namenjeni deci i mladima. Danas se dnevni programi u 

Dečjem kulturnom centru Beograd kreiraju u redakcijama 

za scenske, literarne, likovne, muzičke, dečje zabavne, 

edukativne programe i za umetničku igru. Pored dnevnih 

programa, Dečji kulturni centar Beograd organizuje 

nekoliko značajnih manifestacija za decu. Najveća od njih 

je „Radost Evrope’’, koja već 38 godina okuplja mališane 

iz čitave Evrope. Veliki završni koncert prati nekoliko 

hiljada dece u samoj dvorani i nekoliko miliona gledalaca 

u direktnom televizijskom prenosu. Od 1997. godine 

upućuje se poziv deci sveta da učestvuju u likovnom 

konkursu „Radost Evrope” čija je tema uvek Rečnik 

prijateljstva. Stručni žiri najbolje nagrađuje medaljama, a 

tokom manifestacije organizuje se izložba najboljih radova. 

Svake godine, iz celog sveta, pristigne i do trideset hiljada 

dečjih radova. 

Children’s workshops 

organized by: Children’s Cultural Centre 

Inspired by this year’s theme of Belgrade International 

Architecture Week – RE… – we have devised workshops 

in which the children will contemplate on their own 

surroundings and, by building it, express their own 

opinions. With use of various materials, they will be given 

a chance to reconstruct, and redecorate exterior and 

interior spaces of the Children’s Cultural Centre by means 

of art. 

The participants of the workshops will be divided into five 

groups and each one will be tasked to reshape, add on 

and decorate a portion of the ready-made scale model of 

the Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade. By using different 

artistic and non-artistic materials, collage, modelling and 

shaping techniques, they will design and construct a 

building the way they wish. 

The Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade art workshops are

conceptualised and implemented by Nataša Katalina and 

Katarina Bunuševac. 

Names of Workshop: 

1) REorder! 

On day one, participants to the Workshops will devise and 

fabricate a portion of the internal space of the Cultural 

Centre (the gallery, the hall, the café, the hallway...). 

2) REcut, REgrate! 

On the second day, the children will decorate the internal 

space of their ambience. Each group will be tasked to 

decorate one room with a specific use. 

3) RElay, RElay! 

Within this workshop, the children will conceptualise 

and fabricate the façade of their home. Each group will 

get a piece of the scale model that they will add on and 

decorate as they wish. 

4) REdo the Rest 

On the final workshop, the children will assemble the 

scale model of the Children’s Centre, add the missing 

pieces and arrange the space around the structure. They 

will have the chance to envisage and set their building into 

a new, adequate environment. 

Nedelja arhitekture 2008. 

— 

Architecture Week 2008 

75 — RADIONICE 

— 

Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade is an institution of 

culture, founded by the City Administration of the City 

of Belgrade. Since its foundation in 1952, it realises 

numerous programs intended for children and the young. 

Today, the daily programs in the Children’s Cultural Centre 

Belgrade are created by separate editorial boards for 

stage, literary, fine arts, music, children’s entertainment, 

and educational programs, and one for artistic play. Apart 

from daily programs, Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade 

is also an organiser of several important manifestations for 

children. The largest of them is the “Joy of Europe”, which 

for 38 years already gathers youngsters from throughout 

Europe. The grand finale concert is viewed by several 

thousand children in the arena itself, and several million 

viewers in live TV coverage. Since 1997, children around 

the world are invited to send their contribution to the “Joy 

of Europe” fine art competition, in which the theme is 

always The Dictionary of Friendship. The jury of experts 

awards medals to the best entries, and the exhibition of 

the best works lasts throughout the manifestation of “Joy 

of Europe”. Each year, up to thirty thousand children’s 

works arrive from around the globe.

ŠETNJE 

CITY WALKS


Bez kontinuiteta nema identiteta 

vodi: Marta Vukotić-Lazar 

„Stvari nas zovu u pomoć i u nas se uzdaju, ali mi ih 

možemo spasti samo ako smo ih već prihvatili srcem. 

Kada se to dogodi, stanujemo u pravom smislu te reči.“ 

K. Norberg-Šulc 

Prošlost grada se samo delimično može pronaći u 

makro i mikro slikama, u njegovoj silueti, vizurama ili 

slikama frontova ulica. Drugi deo se nalazi u „skrivenoj“ 

dokumentaciji o njihovom nastanku. Ipak, sveukupni 

osvrt na razvoj naše moderne arhitekture i urbanizma nije 

moguć bez materijalnih dokaza trajanja, kao važnih slika u 

memoriji grada, njegovoj kulturi i identitetu. 

Šetnja započinje u prostoru nekadašnjeg Novog srpskog 

Beograda XIX veka, oko raskrsnice ulice Kneza Miloša 

i Nemanjine. Bavićemo se njegovim urbo-hronološkim 

slojevima, sa posebnim osvrtom na kompleks zgrada 

(ul. Kneza Miloša 35 i 37), tzv. Dobrovićevog generalštaba 

(1954–1963). Simbolika kompleksa zgrada Dobrovićevog 

generalštaba u Beogradu uklapa se u simboliku 

izgradnje Novog Beograda, „središnjeg dela budućeg 

Velikog Beograda”, kojom je do donošenja Generalnog 

urbanističkog plana 1950. godine rukovodio Nikola 

Dobrović (1897–1967). Šetnja će se potom nastaviti 

Nemanjinom i Karađorđevom ulicom, preko Železničkog 

mosta na levu obalu Save, na mesto gde je nekada bio 

Stari beogradski sajam. 

Ova dva vredna prostora u samom srcu Starog i 

Novog dela Beograda, danas su devastirana do krajnjih 

granica: Dobrovićev generalštab je urušen u NATO 

bombardovanju, kada je dva puta bio meta, 1. i 9. maja 

78 — ŠETNJE 

1999. godine. Ove godine se navršava tačno deset 

godina od kada su zgrade bombardovane. 

Kompleks Starog beogradskog sajmišta je prostrano 

područje koje je fizički i funkcionalno izolovano od 

ostatka grada, devastirano, naseljeno siromašnim 

stanovništvom, često i pripadnicima marginalnih, ranjivih 

grupacija, opterećeno slojevitom i tragičnom prošlošću. 

Zaboravljeno je da je njihova vrednost i u susretanja dva 

URBANA MODELA: tradicionalne matrice istorijskog 

Beograda i funkcionalističke matrice Grada budućnosti, 

svetske urbanističke avangarde iz 20-ih godina XX 

veka, koja dominira Novim Beogradom. Potpunim 

brisanjem ovih kompleksa sa mape gradskog prostora 

prekinuo bi se istorijski kontinuitet grada i nestale bi 

uporišne tačke njegovog identiteta. Preko ovakvih javnih 

prostora specifične tipologije, karaktera i dizajna, grad 

se u potpunosti ostvaruje. Cilj ŠETNJE je upravo da se 

razmotri svrhovitost rekonstrukcije kompleksa i analizira 

način kako da se to učini, primereno njihovoj istoriji i 

kompatibilno sa budućim razvojem grada, uz čvrsto 

uverenje da dalje ignorisanje taj problem čini još težim. 

— 

Marta Vukotić-Lazar rođena je u Podgorici. Filozofski 

fakultet, Odeljenje za istoriju umetnosti, završila je na 

Univerzitetu u Beogradu, gde je i magistrirala, kod istih 

mentora, akademika Vojislava Koraća, prof. dr Marice 

Šuput i prof. dr Aleksandra Kadijevića. Članica je Društva 

urbanista Beograda i Udruženja primenjenih umetnika 

i dizajnera Srbije gde je trenutno predsednica Odbora 

za dodelu Nagrade Ranko Radović. Realizovala je više 

autorskih izložbi iz oblasti likovnih i primenjenih umetnosti. 

Bila je selektor i član žirija brojnih likovnih manifestacija 

u Beogradu. Bavi se i likovnom kritikom. Autorka je više 

predgovora za kataloge umetničkih izložbi, stručnih studija 

i članaka o likovnoj i primenjenoj umetnosti. Godine 1996. 

objavila je knjigu Arhitekta Momčilo Belobrk, a 2002. 

knjigu Beogradsko razdoblje arhitekte Nikole Dobrovića 

(1945–1967). Autorka je koncepta Multimedijalnog 

projekta „Staro beogradsko sajmište, kao staro jezgro 

Novog Beograda“ u timu Društva urbanista Beograda i 

urednica pratećeg kataloga. Marta Vukotić-Lazar živi i radi 

u Beogradu.

B.Strugar 

Kompleks zgrada Generalštaba nakon NATO bombardovanja 

— 

B. Strugar 

Complex of Army Headquarters after NATO bombardment 

79 — ŠETNJE

Walk around the architecture of 

Belgrade: Without Continuity there 

is no Identity 

led by: Marta Vukotić-Lazar 

“Things call as to aid and rely on use, but we can save 

them only if we had already accepted them in our heart. 

When that happens, we dwell in the true sense of the 

word.“, C. Norberg-Schultz. 

The past of the city can only partially be found in macro 

and micro pictures, in its silhouette, in its views, or images 

of street fronts. The other part is lodged in the “hidden” 

documentation about their inception. 

Yet, the overall retrospection into the development of our 

modern architecture and town planning is not possible 

without the material evidence of continuity, as important 

images in the memory of the city, its culture and identity. 

The walk begins at the location of the erstwhile New 

Serbian Belgrade of the 19th century, around the 

intersection of Kneza Miloša and Nemanjina Streets. 

We shall deal with its urban and chronological layers, 

with a special retrospection given to the complex of 

buildings (Kneza Miloša Street no. 35 and 37), the socalled 

Dobrovic’s Army Headquarters (1954–1963). The 

symbolism of Dobrovic’s Army Headquarters complex in 

Belgrade fits well with the symbolism of construction of 

Novi Beograd (New Belgrade), the “central part of future 

Great Belgrade”, construction which, until the adoption 

of General Urban Development Plan in 1950, was under 

the helm of Nikola Dobrović (1897–1967) himself. The 

stroll will then continue down Nemanjina and Karađorđeva 

Streets, across the Railway Bridge onto the left bank of 

the Sava river, to a site where Old Belgrade Fairgrounds 

used to stand. 

These two valuable spaces in the very heart of the 

Old and New parts of Belgrade are today ultimately 

devastated: Dobrovic’s Army Headquarters was 

demolished in the NATO campaign, when it had been 

targeted twice, on May 1 and 9, 1999. This year sees the 

tenth anniversary of their bombing. 

The Old Belgrade Fairgrounds complex is a spacious area 

that is both physically and functionally isolated from the 

rest of the city, devastated, inhabited by underprivileged 

population, often members of marginal, vulnerable 


groups, burdened by layered and tragic past. Forgotten is 

the fact that the value of these two sites is in the meeting 

of two URBAN MODELS: a traditional matrix of historical 

Belgrade and functionalistic matrix of a City of Future, of 

the world’s avant-garde in urban planning in the 1920s, 

which dominates Novi Beograd. The complete removal 

of these complexes from the city map would interrupt 

the historic continuity of the city and would dislodge its 

supporting pillars. Through the likes of such public spaces 

with specific typology, character and design, the city is 

realised in its entirety. The goal of the stroll is exactly that, 

to consider the purposefulness of reconstruction of these 

complexes and to analyse the ways to do it, in a manner 

suitable to their history and compatible with the future 

development of the city, with a firm conviction that further 

ignoring of this problem makes it ever graver. 

— 

Marta Vukotić-Lazar was born in Podgorica. She 

graduated at the University of Belgrade Faculty of 

Philosophy, Department of History of Art, where she 

also completed her magisterial studies, having the 

same mentors, academician Vojislav Korać, professor 

dr Marica Šuput and professor dr Aleksandar Kadijević. 

She is a member of the Association of Town Planners of 

Belgrade and the Association of Applied Arts Artists and 

Designers of Serbia, where she currently presides over 

the Committee for the presentation of Ranko Radović 

Award. She has had several auteur exhibitions in the 

domain of fine arts and applied arts. She has been 

a selector and member of jury to numerous fine arts 

manifestations in Belgrade. She also pursues art critique. 

She has written a number of prefaces for art exhibition 

catalogues and expert studies, as well as several articles 

on fine arts and applied arts. In 1996, she published a 

book entitled Momčilo Belobrk, the Architect (Arhitekta 

Momčilo Belobrk), and in 2002 a book with the title The 

Belgrade Era of Architect Nikola Dobrović (1945–1967) 

(Beogradsko razdoblje arhitekte Nikole Dobrovića (1945- 

1967). She designed the concept of a multimedia project 

“Old Belgrade Fairgrounds as the Core of Novi Beograd” 

(Staro beogradsko sajmište, kao jezgro Novog Beograda), 

in a team with colleagues of the Association of Town 

Planners of Belgrade, together with being the editor of the 

accompanying catalogue. Marta Vukotić-Lazar lives and 

works in Belgrade.

Na potezu od Slavije do 

Čuburskog parka 

Izložba radova i instalacija 

„Pejzažna arhitektura i grad” 

vodi: PUPA - Podmladak udruženja 

pejzažnih arhitekata 

Izložba predstavlja završni projekat radionice studenata 

završne godine Odseka za pejzažnu arhitekturu i 

hortikulturu Šumarskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, 

na temu „Pejzažna arhitektura i grad – oseti razliku!”. 

Predstavljeni radovi i instalacije su rezultat nastavnog 

procesa, a bave se višečulnom percepcijom prostora 

delovanjem pejzažne arhitekture u urbanom okruženju. 

Radovi ukazuju na potrebu da se „metropolitenski 

stanovnik“ (Georg Simmel) zaštiti i rastereti od intenzivne 

nervne stimulacije u urbanom habitatu, na činjenicu da je 

pejzažna arhitektura u današnjem gradskom okruženje 

potreba a ne luksuz. Cilj studenata je da ukažu na značaj 

pejzažne arhitekture u životu gradskog stanovnika 

u različitim aspektima i nivoima delovanja pejzažne 

arhitekture – sociološkom, ekološkom, estetskom, 

funkcionalnom, kulturološkom... Radovi se bave i 

samom Makenzijevom ulicom i predstavljaju moguća 

rešenja određenih problema te ulice, uz težnju da se 

stvori celovitost jednog uličnog sistema i identitet ulice, 

ukazujući na potencijalnu multifunkcionalnost i uličnog 

i urbanog ambijenta u celini. Izložba je zamišljena kao 

interaktivna šetnja u kojoj će posetioci svojim čulima moći 

da osete razliku između delovanja pejzažne arhitekture i 

njenog izostanka : razliku između hodanja po travnatom 

tepihu i hodanja po vrućem asfaltu, da osete razliku 

između stajanja u senci drveta i stajanja na vrelom letnjem 

suncu. 


— 

PUPA (Podmladak Udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata) je 

studentsko udruženje formirano februara 2008. godine, 

kao ogranak strukovnog Udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata 

Srbije (UPAS) radi aktivnijeg delovanja studenata pejzažne 

arhitekture i hortikulture, razmene znanja i iskustava, lakše 

međusobne saradnje i saradnje sa stranim studentima, 

kao i radi promocije same struke. PUPA promoviše 

pejzažnu arhitekturu kao struku budućnosti, u javnosti, 

umetnosti, nauci i biznisu, a baveći se ekološkim, 

sociološkim i estetskim unapređenjem otvorenih prostora 

posebnu pažnju posvećuje održivom dizajnu. Njenu 

organizaciju trenutno čine Upravni odbor od desetak 

članova i tri grupe koje su zadužene za delatnost 

u tri različite oblasti: ORGANIZACIJA, CREATIVE, 

MARKETING. Udruženje podržavaju Evropsko udruženje 

pejzažnih arhitekata (EFLA), Sekretarijat za zaštitu životne 

sredine, Vladina kancelarija Održivo napred, Šumarski 

fakultet u Beogradu. 

On the Stretch from Slavija to 

Cuburski Park 

Exhibition of works and installations 

‘Landscape Architecture and 

the City’ 

led by: PUPA – Youth of the Association of 

Landscape Architects 

The Exhibition is the final project of the workshop for 

students of the senior year of the University of Belgrade 

Faculty of Forestry, Department of Landscape Architecture 

and Horticulture, with the topic ‘Landscape Architecture 

and the City – Feel the Difference!’. 

The exhibited works and installations are a result of 

the teaching process, as they pursue multi-sensory 

perception of space by operation of landscape 

architecture in urban surroundings. The works indicate a 

need to protect and liberate the “metropolitan inhabitant” 

(Georg Simmel) from intensive sensory stimulation in 

an urban habitat, together with the fact that landscape 

architecture in present-day city environment is a need, 

not a luxury. The goal of the students is to point out

Senke 

— 

Shadows 


the importance of landscape architecture in the life of 

a city dweller in various aspects and levels of operation 

of landscape architecture – sociological, esthetical, 

functional, cultural… 

The works also deal with McKenzie Street in Belgrade and 

unveil possible solutions for the Street, with a tendency to 

create a unity of a street system and uphold its identity, 

indicating a potential multi-functionality of both street and 

urban ambience as a whole. 

The Exhibition is conceived as an interactive stroll in 

which the visitors will sense the difference between the 

operation of landscape architecture, and the lack thereof: 

the difference between walking on a carpet of grass and 

walking on hot asphalt, the difference between standing in 

a shade of a tree, and standing in hot sun of a summer’s 

day. 

— 

PUPA (Podmladak Udruženja Pejzažnih Arhitekata) or 

YALA, Youth of Association of Landscape Architects is 

a students’ association established in February 2008, 

as a branch of the professional Serbian Association of 

Landscape Architects (Udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata 

Srbije) – SALA – for the purpose of more active 

contribution of students of landscape architecture and 

horticulture, exchange of knowledge and experiences, 

facilitation of cooperation and cooperation with foreign 

students, and for the promotion of the profession itself. 

PUPA aids landscape architecture as a profession of 

the future, in public realm, in the art world, scientific and 

business environments, by practicing environmental, 

sociological and aesthetical advancement of open spaces 

while giving special attention to sustainable designing. Its 

organization currently consists of the Managing Board that 

has a dozen or so members and three groups that are in 

charge of activities in the distinct areas: ORGANISATION, 

CREATIVITY, MARKETING. The Association receives 

support from the European Association of Landscape 

Architects (EFLA), the Secretariat for the Protection of the 

Environment, Government Office ‘Sustainably forward’ 

(Održivo napred), and the Faculty of Forestry in Belgrade.


Istočni Vračar, Savinac i Neimar 

vodi: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević 

U želji da se, u duhu osnovne teme ovogodišnje 

Beogradske internacionalne nedelje arhitekture, 

REdefiniše naš odnos prema istorijskim ambijentima 

grada i REafirmišu vrednosti prostora istočnog Vračara, 

Savinca i Neimara, koji su poslednjih decenija poprište 

veoma intezivne i agresivne savremene REkonstrukcije, 

upoznavanje sa istorijskim i arhitektonskim vrednostima 

ovih istorijskih ambijenata započinje iz parka Manjež, 

odakle se nastavlja preko Cvetnog trga, danas veoma 

živog stecišta brojnih žitelja grada. Šetnja će se 

nastaviti Njegoševom ulicom, pored III beogradske 

gimnazije, oblikovane u duhu veoma bogate akademske 

neorenesansne arhitekture. 

Krajem XIX i početkom XIX veka, beogradska varoš se 

širila i osvajala prostor van tadašnjeg gradskog rejona. 

Izgrađuje se prostor od Beogradske ulice ka Kalenića 

guvnu, tzv. Grantovac. U ovom delu grada danas se 

posebno izdvajaju ulice Smiljanićeva i Kneginje Zorke, u 

kojima su sačuvani brojni primeri prizemnih porodičnih 

kuća u kojima su živeli viđeniji građani. 

Naspram ovog reprezentativnog dela varoši, na 

Englezovcu, kao i na Savincu i Čuburi, naseljava se 

siromašnije stanovništvo, koje je živelo u malim dvorišnim 

kućama sa jeftinim stanovima. 

Na kraju šetnje predviđen je obilazak Kotež-Neimara, 

novog planski formiranog naselja sa porodičnim vilama, 

koje se izgrađuju tokom tridesetih i četrdesetih godina XX 

veka po ugledu na primere engleskog vrtnog grada. 

Obilazak prostora istočnog Vračara, Savinca i Neimara 

omogućava nam da sagledamo urbani i arhitektonski 

razvoj perifernih rezidencijalnih delova Beograda s kraja 


XIX i početka XX veka i transformaciju njegove stambene 

arhitekture. Prostorna struktura i oblikovanje porodičnih 

kuća, vila i prvih višeporodičnih, višespratnih zgrada u 

novim rezidencijalnim delovima varoši pokazuju da se 

inicijalno dosledno sledi evropska akademska arhitektura 

istorijskih stilova krajem XIX veka i veoma široko prihvata 

moderna secesijska arhitektura na samom početku XX 

veka. Nakon toga, u periodu između dva svetska rata, 

stambena arhitektura ovih delova grada postepeno 

je poprimila sve elemente savremenog evropskog 

koncepta prostorne organizacije i oblikovanja u duhu 

moderne. Relativno retke sačuvane porodične vile i 

prve višespratnice iz tog perioda svedoče o veoma 

prosperitetnom i za savremenu arhitekturu veoma 

značajnom vremenu prvih decenija prošlog veka. One 

danas predstavljaju bazične elemente autentičnosti i 

identiteta gradskih ambijenata koji se moraju očuvati. 

— 

Mirjana Roter-Blagojević završila je Arhitektonski 

fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, gde danas radi kao 

docent na Departmanu za arhitekturu i vodi predmete 

Istorija arhitekture i naseljavanja u Srbiji i Integrativna 

zaštita graditeljskog nasleđa. Nakon specijalizacije iz 

oblasti Proučavanje, zaštita i revitalizacija graditeljskog 

nasleđa (1992), tokom rada na magistarskoj tezi 

(1994) Arhitektura građevina javnih namena izgrađenih 

u Beogradu od 1930. do 1900. godine, posvetila se 

istraživanju i tumačenju arhitekture srpske prestonice. 

To dugogodišnje proučavanje zaokružila je doktorskom 

disertacijom (2004) Razvoj stambene arhitekture 

Beograda u 19. i početkom 20. veka. Objavila je 

monografiju Stambena arhitektura Beograda u 19. i 

početkom 20. veka 2006. godine, za koju je dobila 

Nagradu Pavle Vasić i Priznanje Salona arhitekture 2007. 

Pored proučavanja i tumačenja transformacije srpske 

arhitekture tokom XIX i početkom XX veka u evropskom 

kontekstu, posebno polje njenog interesovanja predstavlja 

razvijanje i usavršavanje savremene metodologije 

valorizacije i integrativne zaštite gradske arhitekture XIX i 

XX veka, kao i urbane i arhitektonske obnove prostornih 

kulturno-istorijskih celina i istorijskih delova grada.


Belgrade: East Vračar, Savinac and 

Neimar quarters 

led by: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević 

In a desire, and the spirit of the theme of this year’s 

Belgrade International Architecture week, to have our 

relationship toward the historic ambiences of the city REdesigned 

and RE-affirm the values of the spaces of east 

Vračar, Savinac and Neimar, which for the last decades 

have been sites of a very intensive and aggressive 

modern RE-construction, getting to know the historic and 

architectural values of these historic ambiances starts 

from Manjež Park, wherefrom it continues via Square 

of Flowers (Cvetni Trg), which is today a quite vibrant 

meeting point for numerous city dwellers. The stroll will 

continue down Njegoševa Street, past the III Belgrade 

Gymnasium, modelled in the spirit of opulent academic 

neo-renaissance architecture. 

By the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th 

centuries, the town of Belgrade kept expanding and 

conquering the space outside of what the city rayon 

used to be then. The area around Beogradska Street is 

developed, toward an empty track that used to belong 

to Kalenić, the so-called Grantovac. Nnowadays, the 

most interesting in this portion of the city are Smiljanićeva 

and Knjeginje Zorke Streets, which preserve numerous 

examples of ground family houses, inhabited by 

prominent citizens. 

Opposite to this representative part of the town, 

Englezovac, as well as Savinac and Čubura are inhabited 

by less affluent population, which lived in small courtyard 

houses with cheap dwellings. 

The stroll is meant to end with a tour around Kotež 

Neimar, a newly-designed with family villas, which were 

being built in the 1930s and 1940s, modeled after the 

English garden towns. 

A tour around the stretches of east Vračar, Savinac 

and Neimar enables us to comprehend the urban and 

architectural development of 19th and 20th century 

Belgrade, as well as the transformation of its residential 

architecture, The spatial structure and modelling of family 

houses, villas and the first condominium multi-storey 


Kuća braće Nikolić, Njegoševa 11 

arh. Branko Tanazević, 1912. 

— 

House of Nikolic Brothers, Njegoseva Street No. 11 

arch. Branko Tanazevic, 1912.

uildings in the new residential quarters of the town, tell 

us of the initial very consistent adherence to the European 

historic styles of academic architecture at the end of 

the 19th century and of the widely accepted modern 

secession architecture at the immediate beginning of the 

20th century. Subsequently, in the period between two 

World Wars, the residential architecture of these parts of 

the city has gradually taken on all elements of the modern 

European concept of spatial organisation and modelling 

in the spirit of Modernity. Today, relatively rare preserved 

family villas and first multi-storey buildings from this 

period testify of a very prosperous and for the modern 

architecture significant time of the first decades of the 

20th century. At present, they represent basic elements 

of authenticity and identity of these urban ambiences that 

need to be preserved. 

— 

Mirjana Roter-Blagojević has graduated from the Faculty 

of Architecture University of Belgrade, where she now 

works as an assistant professor on the Department for 

Architecture and runs subjects “History of Architecture 

and Inhabitation in Serbia” and “Integrative Protection 

of Architectural Heritage”. Subsequent to specialization 

in the field of Study, protection and revitalization of 

architectural heritage (1992), during the work on her 

magisterial thesis (1994) Architecture of Buildings of 

Public Uses Built in Belgrade from 1900 to 1930, she 

devoted herself to research and interpretation of the 

architecture of the Serbian capital. This long-term study 

she crowned with the doctoral dissertation (2004) entitled 

Development of Residential Architecture of Belgrade in the 

19th and beginning of the 20th Century. She published a 

monograph entitled Residential Architecture of Belgrade in 

the 19th and beginning of 20th Century in 2006, for which 

she received the Pavle Vasić Award and a Commendation 

from the Architecture Salon in 2007. Apart from study and 

interpretation of transformation of Serbian architecture 

during the 19th and beginning of the 20th century in the 

European context, the field of her interest is especially 

marked by the development and harmonisation of the 

modern methodology of valorisation and integrative 

protection of urban architecture of the 19th and 20th 

century, as well as urban and architectural renewal of 

cultural and historic spatial parts of the city. 


1. 

Kuća Janka Šafarika 

Kneginje Zorke 73, ugao Krunske ulice,1912. 

— 

House of Janko Safarik 

Kneginje Zorke Street No. 73, 

corner with Krunska Street,1912. 

2. 

Zgrada Društva za ulepšavanje Vračara 

arh. Milan Antonović, 1901. 

— 

The Society for beutification of Vracar building 

arch. Milan Antonovic, 1901. 

1. 

2.


RE... na potezu od Terazija do 

Kalemegdana 

vodi: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović 

Šetnja RE... od Terazija do Kalemegdana osmišljena 

je sa idejom da se zainteresovana publika upozna sa 

neprekidnim procesom promene arhitektonskog ambijenta 

centralne beogradske zone. Preispitaće se kvalitet i 

mogućnosti te stalne REprodukcije u kontekstu vremena 

sadašnjeg i vremena budućeg. Kulturološka višeslojnost 

postojećeg arhitektonskog okvira planirane šetnje 

omogućava da se sagledaju kompleksni tokovi razvoja 

urbanizma i arhitekture Beograda od sredine XIX veka do 

danas, ali i da se otvori pitanje njene REintegracije kao 

nasleđenog konteksta. Ova šetnje će omogućiti drugačiju 

vizuru na deo grada kroz koji godinama svakodnevno 

prolazimo, a osim objekata i lokacija osvetliće i 

REafirmisati ličnosti značajnih srpskih arhitekata poput 

Alekseja Brkića, Miladina Prljevića, Ratomira Bogojevića, 

Konstantina Jovanovića, Aleksandra Bugarskog, Andre 

Stevanovića, Nikole Nestorovića, Danila Vladisavljevića, 

Milutina Borisavljevića, Vojina Simeonovića, Miroslava 

Jovanovića, Branislava Mitrovića i drugih. 

— 

Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović, istoričarka arhitekture, 

kustos - muzejski savetnik Odseka za arhitekturu 

Muzeja primenjene umetnosti u Beogradu, diplomirala i 

magistrirala Istoriju umetnosti na Filozofskom fakultetu 

Univerziteta u Beogradu sa temama iz srpske arhitekture 

XX veka. Radila kao kustos u Muzeju „25. maj” 

(1982–1992), sarađivala u Institutu za istoriju umetnosti 

Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu (1992–1994) i Institutu 


za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije (1994–1998). Zaposlena 

kao kustos Odseka za arhitekturu Muzeja primenjene 

umetnosti u Beogradu (od 2002). Od ranih osamdesetih 

godina bavi se istorijom srpske arhitekture novijeg doba i 

autorka je većeg broja radova iz te oblasti. 


Belgrade: RE... From Terazije to 

Kalemegdan 

led by: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović 

The walk named RE... on the Stretch from Terazije to 

Kalemegdan was designed with an idea to introduce 

the interested audience with the continuous process of 

transformation of architectural ambience of the central 

zone of Belgrade. To be examined is the quality and the 

possibilities for this constant REproduction in the context 

of today, and tomorrow. The cultural multi-layered milieu 

of the existing architectural framework of the planned 

stroll enables the viewer to perceive the complex flows 

of development of urban planning and architecture of 

Belgrade from the mid XIX century until today, but also 

to open the question of its REintegration as a context 

inherited. This stroll will enable us to have a different 

outlook on the part of the city through which we have 

been traversing for years, and aside from buildings and 

locations, it will shine light and REaffirm the personalities 

of significant Serbian architects, such as Aleksej 

Brkić, Miladin Prljević, Ratomir Bogojević, Konstantin 

Jovanović, Aleksandar Bugarski, Andra Stevanović, Nikola 

Nestorović, Danilo Vladisavljević, Milutin Borisavljević, 

Vojin Simeonović, Miroslav Jovanović, Branislav Mitrović 

and others. 

— 

Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović graduated from and received 

a masters degree in history of architecture at the 

University of Belgrade Faculty of Phylosophy on topics 

relating Serbian architecture of the 20th century. She has 

worked as a curator of Museum ’25. maj’ (1982–1992), 

cooperated at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy

History of Arts Institute (1992–1994) and Architecture 

and Urbanism Institute of Serbia (1994–1998). She is 

employed as the curator of the Museum of Applied Arts 

in Belgrade, Department of Architecture (since 2002). 

Since the early 1980s she pursues history of Serbian 

architecture of recent times and is an author of numerous 

papers on the subject. 

Aleksej Brkić, 

zgrada Invest-importa (kasnije Hempro) na Terazijama 

1953 –1956. 

— 

Aleksej Brkić, 

’Invest-Import’ office building (later ‘Hempro’) on Terazije 

1953 –1956.

Ponoćna šetnja kroz modernu 

arhitekturu starog Beograda 

vodi: Ivan Kucina 

Želja je da se iz opuštajućeg ugla noći sagledaju 

neočekivane vrednosti moderne arhitekture u centru 

starog i novog Beograda. Od Kulturnog centra Beograda 

do Muzeja savremene umetnosti posetiće se sledeći 

objekti: 

- Dom štampe, Ratomir Bogojević, 1957; 

- Stambene zgrade u Braće Jugovića, Mihajlo Mitrović, 

1964; 

- Filozofski fakultet, Svetislav Ličina, 1967; 

- Stambena zgrada u Pariskoj, Miroslav Jovanović, 1956; 

- Jugoslovenska banka u Kralja Petra, Grigorije Samojlov i 

Borivoje Nanić, 1963; 

- Stambeni blok u Kralja Petra, Milorad Macura, 1953; 

- Poslovna zgrada Energoprojekta u Brankovoj, Milica 

Šterić, 1957; 

- Zgrada SDK u Pop Lukinoj, Petar Vulović, 1967; 

- Restoran na Savskom keju, Mihailo Jovanović, 1957; 

- Muzej savremene umetnosti, Ivan Antić i Ivanka 

Raspopović, 1961. 

— 

Ivan Kucina je arhitekta, docent, član Upravnog odbora 

Društva arhitekata Beograda i saveta Oktobarskog salona, 

član Stealth Group iz Roterdama i School of Missing 

Studies iz Njujorka, inicijator istraživanja, izložbi i radionica 

posvećenih neformalnim procesima transformacije 

urbanog sistema Beograda i formalnim procesima 

reformisanja postojećih institucija. 


Midnight walk around the modern 

architecture of old Belgrade 

led by: Ivan Kucina 

The aim is to observe from a relaxing angle the 

unexpected values of modern architecture in the centers 

of old and new Belgrade.The following building will be 

visited - from KCB (Cultural Center of Belgrade) to MSU 

(Museum of Contemporary Art): 

- Press House, Ratomir Bogojević, 1957 

- Residential buildings in the street of Braće Jugovića, 

Mihajlo Mitrović, 1964 

- Faculty of Philosophy,Svetislav Ličina, 1967 

- Residential building in the Pariska street, Miroslav 

Jovanović, 1956 

- Yugoslav Bank in the Kralja Petra street, Grigorije 

Samojlov and Borivoje Nanić, 1963 

- Residential block in the Kralja Petra street, Milorad 

Macura 1953 

- Energoprojekt Business Building in the Brankova street, 

Milica Šterić, 1957 

- SDK Building in the Pop Lukina street, Petar Vulović, 

1967 

- Restaurant on the Sava quay, Mihailo Jovanović, 1957 

- Museum of Contemporary Art, Ivan Antić and Ivanka 

Raspopović, 1961 

— 

Ivan Kucina is an architect, assistant professor, member 

of the Board of the Association of Belgrade Architects 

and the Council of October Salon, member of the Stealth 

Group from Rotterdam and the School of Missing Studies 

from New York, initiator of many researches, exhibitions 

and workshops dedicated to informal processes 

of transforming Belgrade urban system and formal 

processes of reforming existing institutions.

Muzej savremene umetnosti 

Ivan Antić i Ivanka Raspopović, 1961. 

— 

Museum of Contemporary Art 

Ivan Antić and Ivanka Raspopović, 1961

KONFERENCIJA 

CONFERENCE

REdefinisanje posleratnog 

kolektivnog stanovanja 

uvodna reč: Tanja Konli 

RE…Konferencija: REdefinisanje posleratnog kolektivnog 

stanovanja okupiće vodeće stručnjake sa evropskih 

univerziteta i ustanova zaštite kulturnog nasleđa da 

daju svoje viđenje o aktuelnom problemu valorizacije i 

budućeg tretiranja urušavajućih stambenih konglomeracija 

iz vremena posle Drugog svetskog rata. Bez obzira na 

rascep između istočne i zapadne Evrope, prouzrokovan 

ideologijom Hladnog rata, kolosalni projekti kolektivnog 

stanovanja gradili su se u svim delovima kontinenta tokom 

druge polovine dvadesetog veka. Kriterijumi vrednovanja 

i mogućnosti rekonstrukcije ovih, najčešče širokih 

zahvata, vrlo su površno razmatrani od strane stručnjaka: 

istoričara arhitekture, konzervatora, urbanista i arhitekata. 

Zvanične institucije zaštite nemaju jasan stav u definisanju 

metodologije vrednovanja nasleđa iz bliske prošlosti. 

Labavo postavljen i komplikovan sistem vlasničkih odnosa 

nad zajedničkim prostorima i stambenim jedinicama 

u okviru blokovskih kompleksa, otežava sprovođenje 

sistematskih akcija s ciljem da se poboljša trenutno loše 

stanje. Konferencija će dati jedinstvenu priliku za razmenu 

mišljenja o ovoj slabo razmatranoj temi. Uz prisustvovanje 

predavanjima, učesnici skupa imaće priliku da doprinesu 

zaključnoj diskusiji, da se priključe stručno vođenoj šetnji 

kroz blokove Novog Beograda i daju svoje mišljenje na 

okruglom stolu “Šta sa Novim Beogradom?” 

— 

Tanja Damljanović-Konli diplomirala je i magistrirala 

na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Bogradu, a doktorsku 

tezu odbranila na Cornell univerzitetu. Od 1992. bila je 

zaposlena u Republičkom zavodu za zaštitu spomenika 

92 — KONFERENCIJA 

kulture Srbije. Predavala je na Cornell univerzitetu, 

Univerzitetu u Beogradu, Univerzitetu Teksasa i Karlovom 

univerzitetu. 

Odabrane publikacije: Češko-srpske arhitektonske 

veze 1918–1941 (Beograd: RZZSK, 2004), Valtrović i 

Milutinović I–III (Beograd: IMUS, 2006–2008) i Capital 

Cities in the Aftermath of the Empires: Planning in Central 

and Southeastern Europe (Routledge, 2010). 

REdefining 

Post-WWII Housing 

introduction: Tanja Conley 

RE…Conference: REdefining Post-WWII Housing will 

gather leading scholars from European universities and 

heritage institutes to present their answers to the acute 

question of valorization and further treatment of the 

rapidly dilapidating post-WWII housing conglomerations. 

Regardless of the boundary between the East and the 

West during the Age of Cold War, the huge-scale housing 

projects appeared all over Europe in the second half of 

the twentieth century. Until now, the criteria for evaluation 

and possible reconstruction of those vast built areas 

have been vaguely considered by the professionals, 

including architectural historians, preservationists, 

urban planners and practicing architects. The official 

preservationist institutions have been struggling with 

defining methodologies for the valorization of heritage 

from the recent past. Loosely structured and complicated 

systems of ownership over the common areas and 

private units within housing complexes make difficult 

to administrate clearly defined and systematic actions 

for the improvement of the existing conditions. This 

conference will provide a unique opportunity for sharing 

different attitudes about the poorly discussed subject of 

the values of post-WWII housing. In addition to lectures 

by the invited speakers, the participants in the conference 

will have a chance to contribute to the discussion, take 

a guided tour through the impressive housing projects of 

New Belgrade and give their opinion in the concluding 

roundtable titled “What Should We Do With New 

Belgrade?”

— 

Tanja Damljanović Conley received Architectural Engineer 

and Master of Technical Sciences degrees from the 

Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade and a PhD degree from 

Cornell University. She has been working for the State 

Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Serbia 

since 1992, teaching and lecturing at Cornell University, 

University of Belgrade, University of Texas and Charles 

University. 

A selected list of her publications includes Czech-Serbian 

Architectural Connections 1918-1941 (Belgrade: RZZSK 

2004), Valtrović and Milutinović I-III (Belgrade: IMUS, 

2006-2008) and Capital Cities in the Aftermath of the 

Empires: Planning in Central and Southeastern Europe 

(Routledge, 2010). 

Stambena zgrada B-9, blok 21, Novi Beograd 

Autori: Lenarčić, Mitić, Petrović i Čanak 

Foto: A. Mirić 

— 

Residential building B-9, block 21, New Belgrade 

Authors: Lenarčić, Mitić, Petrović i Čanak 

Photo A. Mirić

PROGRAM KONFERENCIJE 

Petak, 3. juli 2009. 

9.00−9.15 

Italijanski institut za kulturu u Beogradu, Kneza Miloša 56 

Uvodna reč: Tanja Konli (Univerzitet u Beogradu) 

9.15−10.00 

Žozef Abram (Škola arhitekture u Nansiju) 

Pere, Le Korbizije, Zerfus: Rekonstrukcija grand– 

ensambles: zaštita moderne stambene arhitekture u 

posleratnoj Francuskoj 

10.00−10.45 

Gabi Dolf–Bonekemper (Tehnički Univerzitet u Berlinu) 

Makrostrukture i pejzaži: Vrednost i zaštita berlinskih 

predgrađa iz 60-ih i 70-ih godina XX veka 

PAUZA 

11.15−12.00 

Ilejn Harvud (English Heritage) 

Posleratna stambena arhitektura u Engleskoj 

12.00 –12.45 

Marike Kajpers (Tehnički Univerzitet u Delftu) 

Mesta trezvenosti: Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u 

Holandiji 

PAUZA 

14:00 –14:45 

Paola di Bjađi (Univerzitet u Trstu) 

Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Italiji: Javni grad 

kao laboratorija modernih teorija o gradu i perspektive 

savremene urbane obnove 

14:45 –15:30 

Alesandra Čeroti (Univerzitet u Rimu) 

Pitanja konzervacije i restauracije u posleratnom 

socijalnom stanovanju 


PAUZA 


16.00 –17.15 

Đovani Kaudo (Univerzitet u Rimu) 

DenSity – IntenCity: Stambena arhitektura u Italiji 

17.15 –18.00 

Pit Ekert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Švajcarska) 

E2A: Post CIAM Rekonfiguracija 

18.00 –19:00 

DISKUSIJA 

Moderator: Tanja Konli (Univerzitet u Beogradu) 

Subota, 4. juli 2009. 

od 10.00 

Okupljanje: Centralni dom vojske Srbije, Braće Jugovića 19 

Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda, autobusom 

Superblokovi Novog Beograda 

vode: Tanja Konli i Ivan Kucina 

17.00 

Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Palmotićeva 30 

Predstavljanje izložbe RE_Beograd: Stari i novi 

Studentska radionica Arhitektonskog fakulteta 

Univerziteta u Beogradu 

18.00 – 19.30 

Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Palmotićeva 30 

Okrugli sto: Šta sa Novim Beogradom? 

Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević (Urbanistički zavod 

Beograda) 

20.00 

KOKTEL

CONFERENCE PROGRAMME 

Friday, July 3 rd 2009 

9.00 – 9.15 

Italian Institute for Culture, Kneza Miloša 56, Belgrade 

Welcome: Tanja Conley (University of Belgrade) 

9.15 – 10.00 

Joseph Abram (School of Architecture Nancy) 

Perret, Le Corbusier, Zehrfuss: Reconstruction of 

Grand–Ensambles: the protection of modern housing in 

France from the post–WWII period 

10.00 – 10.45 

Gabi Dolff–Bonekämper (TU Berlin) 

Macro–structures and Landscapes: Value and protection 

of Berlin’s 1960s and 1970s suburban settlements 

Coffee Break 

11.15 – 12.00 

Elain Harwood (English Heritage) 

Post – 1945 Housing in England 

12.00 – 12.45 

Marieke Kuipers (TU Delft) 

Sites of Sobriety: Postwar Social Housing in the 

Netherlands 

Lunch Break 

14.00 – 14.45 

Paola Di Biagi (University of Trieste) 

Post–WWII Social Housing in Italy: The public city as a 

laboratory for modern city theories and urban renewal 

contemporary perspective 

14.45 – 15.30 

Alessandra Cerroti (University of Rome) 

Conservation and Restoration Issues in the Post–WWII 

Social Housing 

INCIS Estates in Rome: Villaggio Olimpico and Decima 

Coffee Break 


16.00 – 17.15 

Giovanni Caudo (University of Rome) 

DenSity, IntenCity: Housing in Italy 

17:15 – 18:00 

Piet Eckert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Switzerland) 


18.00 – 19.00 

DISCUSSION 

Moderator: Tanja Conley (University of Belgrade) 

Saturday, July 4 th 2009 

10.00 

Gathering in front of The Central Army Hall, Braće 

Jugovića 19 

Guided bus tour: Superblocks of New Belgrade 

Led by: Tanja Conley and Ivan Kucina 

17.00 

Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, Palmotićeva 30 

Exhibition Presentation RE_Belgrade: Old and New 


Belgrade 

18.00 – 19.30 

Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, Palmotićeva 30 

Roundtable: What Should We Do With New Belgrade? 

Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević (Institute of Urbanism 

Belgrade) 

20.00 

RECEPTION

Pere, Le Korbizije, Zerfus: 

Rekonstrukcija stambenih naselja 

– zaštita moderne stambene 

arhitekture u Francuskoj nakon 


Žozef Abram, Univerzitet u Nansiju, Francuska 

Decenije koje su nastupile posle Drugog svetskog rata 

u istoriji francuske arhitekture predstavljaju period velikih 

preokreta. Obnovom i stalnim naporima da se kriza 

stanovanja prebrodi, zemlja pribavlja jedno izuzetno 

proizvodno sredstvo koje povećanje broja zgrada 

zasniva na značajnom posredovanju države (Ministarstva 

za obnovu i urbanizam, zatim raznih ministarstava za 

izgradnju i opremanje), na koncentrovanju investicija u 

velika preduzeća (teška montažna izgradnja i ogromna 

gradilišta), i na sve savršenijem upravljanju zemljištem 

(komasacija, zatim podela na zone koje imaju prvenstvo u 

procesu urbanizacije i zone koje se uređuju po dogovoru). 

Industrijalizacija stanovanja je magična reč u tom periodu. 

Međutim, smanjenje troškova nije jedina posledica 

postignutog napretka u oblasti izgradnje. Arhitektura 

daje svoj doprinos i pojavi masovne kulture. Ona 

navikava publiku na jedan formalni univerzum koji je 

prožet stručnošću te epohe. Arhitekti koji su počeli 

svoju karijeru pre rata (Pere, Le Korbizje, Boduen...) 

stvaraju svoja najznačajnija dela posle Drugog svetskog 

rata. Suočena sa izgradnjom kolektivnih stanova i sa 

velikim aparaturama, mlađa će generacija (Zerfis, Pujon, 

Dibuison, Voženski, Lanjo...) doneti novine u strogom 

okviru racionalističkih tema. Ovaj period je stvorio bogatu 

baštinu. 

Kako u okeanu izgrađenog izdvojiti značajne elemente 

koji zaslužuju da budu stavljeni pod zaštitu i čija vrednost 


treba da bude utvrđena? Predlažem da tokom ove 

prezentacije analiziramo tri stambena kompleksa koja 

su izgrađena u nejednakim istorijskim uslovima i koja 

postavljaju različite probleme očuvanja i adaptacije: zgrade 

koje je projektovao atelje Pere u Avru, Le Korbizjeova 

stambena jedinica u Brie-an-Fore (Briey-en-Forêt) i veliki 

kompleks u četvrti O-di-Lijevr (Haut-du-Lièvre) Bernara 

Zerfisa u Nansiju. 

— 

Žozef Abram, arhitekta i istoričar, profesor je na 

Arhitektonskoj školi u Nansiju i istraživač u Laboratoriji 

za istoriju savremene arhitekture. Predavao je na 

Arhitektonskom institutu u Ženevi i u Školi lepih umetnosti 

u Metsu. Deset godina je bio član uređivačkog odbora 

časopisa Faces. Godine 1999. objavio je „Moderna 

arhitektura u Francuskoj 1940-1966, od haosa do 

uspona” (Éditions Picard), a 2002, sa Žan-Luj Koenom i Gi 

Lamberom „Enciklopedija Pere” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). 

Izradio je naučnu podlogu zahteva za upis obnovljenog 

centra Avra na Listu svetske baštine (klasifikacija 

UNESCO, 2005). 

Perret, Le Corbusier, Zehrfuss: 

Reconstruction of Grand-ensambles 

– the protection of modern housing 

in France from post-WWII period 

Joseph Abram, University in Nancy, France 

The decades that came forth after the WWII, represent 

the period of unexpected turn of events in French 

architecture. Through the restoration and constant 

efforts for the overcoming of the housing crises, the 

country obtains one extraordinary production tool which 

bases the increasing of the quantity of buildings on the 

important intervention of the government (Ministry for 

the restoration and urban planning, as well as the other 

ministries for development and outfit), the concentration 

of the investments into the huge companies (through vast 

prefabrication and huge building sites) and the growing 

perfection of land management (through redistribution 

of land, division to the zones with the priority in the 

urbanization processes and zones which has to be

arranged according to the agreement). Industrialization of 

housing is the magic word in that period. 

Nevertheless, the cutting of expenses is not the only 

consequence of the achieved progress in the field of 

construction. Architecture gives its contribution also to 

the appearance of the mass culture. It accustoms the 

public to the formal universe, imbued with the experience 

of the epoch. Architects who begun their careers before 

the WWII (Perret, Le Corbusier, Beaudouin etc), produce 

their masterpieces after the WWII. Confronted with 

the construction of the social housing and the huge 

equipments, the younger generation (Zehrfuss, Pouillon, 

Dubuisson, Wogenscky, Lagneau etc) will bring the 

innovation in the strict framework of the rationalist themes. 

This period has created the rich heritage. 

How can the significant elements which deserve to be put 

under protection and whose value should be established, 

be distinguished from the ocean of constructed? 

I suggest that, during the presentation, we should analyze 

three housing complexes, which have been built in the 

unequal historical conditions and which pose different 

Le Korbizje 

UNITÉ D’HABITATION DE BRIEY-EN-FORÊT 

1958-1960 

Fotografija: Žan-Pjer Bourraux, 1960 

— 

Le Corbusier 

UNITÉ D’HABITATION DE BRIEY-EN-FORÊT 

1958-1960 

Photo, Jean-Pierre Bourraux, 1960 


problem of the protection and adaptation: buildings 

designed by the Atelier Perret in Havre, Le Corbusier’s 

housing unit in Briey-en-Forêt and the huge complex in 

the Haut-du-Lièvre quarter, designed by Bernard Zehrfuss 

in Nancy. 

— 

Joseph Abram, architect and historian, is professor at 

the Nancy School of Architecture and researcher at the 

Laboratory of contemporary architecture history. 

He has taught at the Geneva Institute of Architecture 

and at the Metz School of fine arts. For ten years he has 

been member of the editorial board of the revue Faces. 

In 1999 he published “Modern architecture in France, 

1940-1966, from chaos to growth” (Edition Picard) and 

in 2002, with Jean-Louis Cohen and Guy Lambert, “The 

Perret encyclopedia” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). He made 

the scientific file of the request for the inscription of the 

reconstructed center of the city of Havre on the World 

heritage list (classification of the UNESCO, 2005).

Makro-strukture i pejzaž: 

Vrednost i zaštita berlinskih 

predgrađa iz 60-ih i 70-ih 

Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper, 

Tehnički Univerzitet u Berlinu, Nemačka 

Kultura i tradicija projektovanja berlinskih predgrađa, 

seže u dvadesete godine XX veka, do Bruna Tauta, Ota 

Rudolfa Salvisberga i mladog Hansa Šaruna. Suočavajući 

se sa izazovom da zamisle strukture gušće od ruralnih, ali 

manje guste nego urbane, oni su stvorili nove prostorne 

tipologije, uveli su, oko 1930, koncept velikih naselja u 

predgrađima, apstraktne kompozicije prostora i objekata 

(Großsiedlung Siemensstadt 1930/31). 

Posle 1945, kada je bilo potrebno više stanova nego 

ikada, oživeo je model većeg naselja u predgrađu , a još 

kreativnija, politička i tehnička, energija bila je usmerena 

na razvoj većih i ambicioznijih projekata, koji su izgrađeni 

tokom pedesetih, šezdesetih i sedamdesetih godina XX 

veka. Kako je u Zapadnom Berlinu postojala ograničena 

površina za izgradnju, zahtevana je veća gustina. 

Apstraktna prostorna rešenja su tada kombinovana sa 

novim tipovima objekata, ali sa blokovima visokih tornjeva. 

Hans Šarun, majstor za ne-ortogonalno, stvorio je visoke 

makrostrukture, potpuno inovativne, kakve do tada nisu 

viđene. Njegovi saradnici i studenti osmislili su veoma 

upečatljive pejzaže predgrađa (Vorstadt-Landschaft) u 

četvrti Märkisches Viertel, sa objektima poput planinskih 

lanaca i zelenim prostorima poput dolina. 

Posle perioda oštre kritike i snažnih napada upućenih 

takozvanoj nehumanoj razmeri, monotoniji i beznađu 

(Trostlosigkeit), mišljenje publike i stručne javnosti se 

promenilo, estetika i društvene vrednosti postale su 

vidljive i mogli su se stvoriti prvi spiskovi i restauracije. 


Posebna pažnja posvećena je zelenim prostorima, sada 

već razvijenim, koji su sami po sebi kreativna inovacija. 

Pokazaću primere i ponuditi neke napomene o stručnim 

procenama i društvenom prihvatanju. 

— 

Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper, istoričarka umetnosti, od 1988. 

do 2002. konzervatorka u Nacionalnom birou za očuvanje 

istorijskih zgrada u Berlinu (Landesamt für Denkmalpflege). 

Od novembra 2001. do januara 2002. gostujuća naučna 

saradnica u Institutu za konzervaciju Geti u Los Anđelesu. 

Oko 2003/2004. postala je članica međunarodne 

ekspertske grupe UNESCO za rekonstrukciju mosta 

u Mostaru. Od oktobra 2005. redovni je profesor na 

Tehničkom univerzitetu u Berlinu (TU Berlin), a njena uža 

specijalnost su spomenici iz skorije prošlosti, ugroženi 

lokaliteti koji spadaju u arhitektonsku baštinu, savremena 

umetnost komemoracije, arhitektura XX veka i teorija 

konzervacije. 

Macro-structures and Landscapes: 

Value and protection of Berlin’s 

1960’s and 1970’s suburban 

settlements 

Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper, 

Technical University in Berlin, Germany 

Berlin’s culture and tradition of sub-urban design 

reaches back to the 1920ies, to Bruno Taut, Otto Rudolf 

Salvisberg and the young Hans Scharoun. Facing the 

challenge to conceive structures denser than the rural 

but less dense than the urban, they invented new spatial 

typologies, inaugurating, around 1930, the concept of the 

greater suburban settlement, an abstract composition 

of spaces and buildings. (Großsiedlung Siemensstadt 

1930/31). 

After 1945, with more demand for housing than ever 

before, the model of the larger suburban settlement is 

revived and much creative, political and technical energy 

goes into the development of ever larger and more 

ambitious projects, built throughout the 1950ies, 60ies 

and 70ies. With limited surface available in West-Berlin, 

more density was required. The abstract spatial layout 

was then combined with new building-types, nut just with

higher tower blocks and slabs. Hans Scharoun, master 

of the non-orthogonal, creates high-rise macro-structures 

that are complete innovations, never seen before. His 

collaborators and pupils will conceive the most striking 

sub-urban landscape (Vorstadt-Landschaft) in a part of 

Märkisches Viertel, with buildings like chains of mountains 

and green spaces like valleys. 

After a period of fierce critique and heavy attacks, aiming 

at what was called non-human scale, monotony and 

desperateness (Trostlosigkeit), the public and expert’s 

opinions change, the aesthetic and social values 

become visible and first listings and restorations could be 

managed. Special attention goes to the green spaces, 

now well developed, that often were creative inventions 

Berlinsko predgrađe, Nemačka 

— 

Berlin suburbia, Germany 


in their own right. I will show examples and offer some 

reflections on experts’ evaluation and social appreciation. 

— 

Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper is an art historian, from 1988 to 

2002 Conservator at the Berlin office for the conservation 

of historic buildings. Nov. 2001 - Jan. 2002 Guest- 

Scholar at the Getty Conservation Institute in Los Angeles/ 

Ca. 2003/2004 member of the UNESCO international 

experts group for the rebuilding of the Bridge of Mostar. 

Since October 2005 regular Professor at the TU Berlin, 

specializing in monuments of recent history, contested 

sites of heritage, contemporary art of commemoration, 

20th century architecture and conservation-theory.

Stanovanje u Engleskoj posle 1945. 

Ilejn Harvud, Ingliš Heritedž, Engleska 

Ovo predavanje pratiće istoriju posleratnog stanovanja, 

kolektivnog i individualnog, i poteškoće sa kojima se 

susrećemo kada ova naselja treba predložiti za spiskove 

zaštite, uključujući i naselje Bajker (koje je projektovao 

Ralf Erskin), Robin Hud Garden (projektovali Alison i Piter 

Smitson), kao i naselje Span (projektovao Erik Lajons). 

U Londonu su određenim stepenom zaštite obuhvaćeni 

objekti koji su uglavnom bili uspešni, a njihovo pojavljivanje 

u listinzima omogućava dalju džentrifikaciju; u Šefildu je, 

međutim Park Hil bio predmet programa regeneracije i 

njegova je sudbina izvesnija. 

— 

Ilejn Harvud je istoričarka u institutu English Heritage čija je 

uža specijalnost arhitektura dvadesetog veka – posebno 

period posle 1945. godine. Od 1996. do 2005. rukovodila 

je istraživanjima za period posle Drugog svetskog rata, a 

trenutno učestvuje u istraživanjima koje sprovodi Institut, 

kao i u koncipiranju novih istraživanja koja su u planu. 

Autorka je knjige Engleska, vodič kroz listu posleratnih 

objekata (izdavač Elipsis, 2000; reizdanje: Batsford 2003) 

i Pevsnerov vodič grada Notingema (2008). Harvudova 

trenutno piše knjigu o godinama između 1945. i 1975. 

za izdavača Yale University Press, pod radnim naslovom 

„Prostor, nada i brutalizam”, koja se bavi kolektivnim 

stanovanjem, a radi i na doktoratu čija je tema arhitektura 

četvrti South Bank u Londonu, na Univerzitetu Bristol. 

Upravnica je udruženja Dvadeseti vek (Twentieth Century 

Society) i članica veća udruženja Cinema Theatre. 


Post-1945 Housing in England 

Elain Harwood, English Heritage, United Kingdom 

The paper will look at the history of post-war housing, 

public and private, and the difficulties faced when 

recommending these developments for listing, including 

the Byker Estate by Ralph Erskine, Robin Hood Gardens 

by Alison and Peter Smithson, and Span housing by 

Eric Lyons. In London the housing that has been listed 

have been those that are generally successful and the 

designation has encouraged further gentrification; in 

Sheffield, however, Park Hill has been the subject of a 

regeneration programme whose future is more uncertain. 

— 

Elain Harwood is a historian with the English Heritage, and 

its leading specialist on the architecture of the twentieth 

century - particularly on the years after 1945. From 

1996 until 2005 she was responsible for its post-war 

research and listing programme, and remains involved 

in its casework and future research programme. She 

is the author of ‘England, a Guide to Post-War Listed 

Buildings’ (ellipsis 2000, revised Batsford 2003) and the 

Pevsner City Guide to ‘Nottingham’ (2008). Harwood is 

currently writing a major book on the years 1945-75 for 

Yale University Press, provisionally entitled ‘Space, Hope 

and Brutalism’, in which public housing plays a major 

part, and a PhD on the architecture of London’s South 

Bank, for Bristol University. She is also a Trustee of the 

Twentieth Century Society and committee member of the 

Cinema Theatre Association.

1. 

2. 

1. 

2. 

Naselje Brenč Hil 

Hampsted, London Borough of Camden (Benson i Forsajt) 1972-9 

— 

Branch Hill Estate 

Hampstead, London Borough of Camden (Benson and Forsyth) 1972-9 

Naselje Alton Vest 

(Rohempton Lejn) London County Council 1953-61 

— 

Alton West 

(Roehampton Lane) Estate, London County Council 1953-61 

101 — KONFERENCIJA

Mesta trezvenosti: Posleratno 

socijalno stanovanje u Holandiji 

Marijke Kajpers, 

Tehnički Univerzitet u Delftu, Holandija 

Prilikom planiranja i proizvodnje socijalnog stanovanja u 

Holandiji, kao odgovor na veliki nedostatak stambenih 

objekata posle destrukcije u Drugom svetskom ratu, 

postojale su tri glavne prekretnice: prva – snažno 

angažovanje države u planiranju (finansiranje, kontrole 

i smernice); druga – ideja o „jedinicama susedstva“, 

prikazana u precizno planiranim proširenjima gradova u 

kojima je dominiralno jednoporodično stanovanje, i treća 

– opšta prihvaćenost prefabrikacije, standardizacije i 

blokova visokih objekata. 

Nova susedstva sa svojim kompaktnim stambenim 

jedinicama u Zeilenbau, svojim rasporedom oko javnih 

zelenih površina, postali su ideal slobode i zajedništva. 

Oni oličavaju „ostvarivo društvo“, u kome svaki deo ima 

svoje mesto. Umerenost je propagirana kao neophodno 

sredstvo koje treba da pobedi opšteg neprijatelja 

– nedostatak stanova. 

Danas su ovakvi ideali prošlost. Holandska stambena 

politika se, favorizovanjem privatnog stanovanja, iz osnova 

promenila, posebno nakon neoliberalizma iz devedesetih 

godina XX veka. Korporacije socijalnog stanovanja bile 

su primorane da se privatizuju i okrenu ka komercijalnoj 

delatnosti. Nasleđe socijalnog stanovanja postalo je 

problematično usled demografskih promena, mešavine 

interesa i novih paradigmi. Ministarstvo stanovanja je 

planiralo veliki program radikalne urbane obnove, a 

Ministarstvo socijalne politike stimuliše renoviranje ili 

zamenu kuća za starije; oba ministarstva imaju nameru 

da postignu više standarde životnog komfora i uštedu 

energije, uprkos mnogim protestima protiv tako velikih 


razmera destrukcije vrednog kulturnog nasleđa. 

Kao posledica toga, razvijeni su novi instrumenti da bi 

otvorili oči urbanističkih i arhitektonskih kvaliteta novijeg 

nasleđa. Za neka važna, ali ugrožena područja (kao 

što je Frankendael u Amsterdamu i celina Lijnbaan u 

Roterdamu), procedura proglašenja je počela da dobija 

zakonsku zaštitu. To je podstaklo Ministarstvo kulture 

da razvije listing-program za posleratno nasleđe, čiji je 

rezultat lista prvih stotinu posleratnih spomenika (2007), ali 

je još uvek neizvesno da li će sve nominovane lokacije biti 

konzervirane. 

— 

Marike Kajpers, istoričarka arhitekture, od 1977. članica 

je niza državnih agencija za konzervaciju u Holandiji i 

bila je uključena u identifikaciju, evaluaciju i prezervaciju 

arhitektonskog nasleđa dvadesetog veka. Trenutno 

je vanredna profesorka na predmetu Kulturno nasleđe 

na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Tehničkog univerziteta u 

Delftu (nakon sličnog položaja na Fakultetu umetnosti 

i društvenih nauka na univerzitetu u Mastrihtu, od 

2000. do 2008). Pored toga, ona je potpredsednica 

Internacionalnog komiteta za registraciju pri organizaciji 

DOCOMOMO (Documentation and conservation of 

buildings, sites and neighbouhoods of the modern 

movement – Dokumentacija i konzervacija objekata, 

lokacija i susedstva modernog pokreta). 

Sites of Sobriety: Postwar Social 

Housing in the Netherlands 

Marieke Kuipers, 

Technical University Delft, Netherlands 

Both in the planning and the production of social housing 

schemes three major turns got shape in the Netherlands 

in response to the immense housing shortage after 

the destructions of World War II. Firstly, the strong 

State involvement in the schemes (financing, control 

and guidelines). Secondly, the wide spread idea of 

‘neighbourhood units’, represented by precisely planned 

town extensions in which one-family housing dominated. 

Thirdly, the broad acceptance of pre-fabrication, 

standardization and towerblocks. 

The new neighbourhoods with their compact housing 

units in Zeilenbau arrangements around public greens

epresented the ideals of freedom and community. They 

embody the ‘makeable society’ where every part had its 

own place. Sobriety was propagated as a necessary tool 

to tackle the common enemy of housing shortage. 

Nowadays such ideals are past. Especially since the neoliberal 

1990s, the Dutch housing policy has fundamentally 

changed in favour of private housing. The social housing 

corporations were forced to privatize and have turned 

into commercial organizations. The inheritance of social 

housing has become problematic due to demographic 

changes, mixed interests and new paradigms. The 

Ministry of Housing has scheduled a huge programme 

of radical urban renewal and the Ministry of Social Affairs 

stimulates to renovate or replace the homes for elderly 

people; both intend to achieve higher standards of living 

comfort and energy saving, in spite of various protests 

against such large-scaled demolition of a valuable cultural 

heritage. 

Therefore, new evaluation instruments are developed 

to open the eyes for the urbanistic and architectural 

qualities of this recent heritage. For some important 

Frankendael, Amsterdam, Holandija 

— 

Frankendael, Amsterdam, Netherlands 

though endangered sites (like Frankendael at Amsterdam 

and the Lijnbaan ensemble in Rotterdam) an assignment 

procedure has been started to obtain legal protection. 

This urged the Minister of Culture to develop a listing 

programme for post-war heritage and resulted in a ‘top 

100 list’ of postwar monuments (2007), but it is still 

uncertain if the nominated sites will be all conserved. 

— 

Marieke Kuipers is trained as an architectural historian; 

since 1977 she has been affiliated with the successive 

state Agencies for Conservation in the Netherlands 

and been involved in the identification, evaluation and 

preservation of 20th architectural heritage. At present she 

is a parttime Professor of Cultural Heritage at the faculty 

of Architecture of the Technical University of Delft (after 

a similar occupaton with the Faculty of Arts and Social 

Sciences at Maastricht University, 2000-2008). Besides, 

she is vice-chair of the International Specialist Committee 

on registers of DOCOMOMO.

Socijalno stanovanje posle Drugog 

svetskog rata u Italiji: „Javni grad“ 

kao laboratorija za moderne teorije 

o gradu i savremenu perspektivu 

urbane obnove 

Paola di Bjađi, Univerzitet u Trstu, Italija 

Socijalne stambene četvrti u Evropi dvadesetog veka, 

izgrađene da bi se porodicama, koje ih nisu mogle sebi 

priuštiti po tržišnim cenama, obezbedili zdravi i pristojni 

stanovi, danas se mogu tumačiti kao delovi šireg i 

kompleksnijeg „javnog grada”. Takozvani javni grad je 

urbana forma, u kojoj su svoje mesto pronašli određeni 

principi modernog pokreta: od pažnje ka osnovnim 

ljudskim potrebama do prava na stanovanje. Tokom 

konstrukcije „javnog grada“ smišljeni su i isprobani 

drugačiji vidovi građenja kao alternativa tradicionalnom 

načinu stanovanja, dok su veliki broj i raznolikost urbanih 

prostora (posebno otvorenih prostora i prostora sa 

društvenim sadržajima) često bili predloženi kao sredstva 

izgradnje novih građanskih zajednica. 

Danas „javni grad“ leži između savremenih urbanih 

prostora, zadržava svoje razlike, pokazujući raznolike 

forme i probleme. Iako se u određenim četvrtima 

socijalnog stanovanja kvalitet urbanog plana još može 

prepoznati, mnoge od njih su za kratko vreme propale i 

fizički i u društvenom smislu. Štaviše, ovakve uslove često 

pogoršavaju široko rasprostranjene predrasude i u društvu 

i među stručnjacima. 

Ipak, ukoliko oslobodimo našu percepciju predrasuda 

i potražimo potencijale i sredstva koja ova velika 

naselja mogu da ponude savremenom gradu, ne može 

nam promaći centralna i strateška uloga koju ove 


socijalne stambene četvrti imaju (ili bi mogle imati) u 

metropolitenskom prostoru, urbanim politikama, stručnim 

debatama i procesima transformacije. 

U tom smislu, današnje četvrti socijalnog stanovanja 

mogu se interpretirati kao prostorne figure ne samo 

modernizma već i savremenog grada, modernog nasleđa 

ali i sredstva za obnovu urbanih predgrađa. Oni mogu 

postati laboratorija savremenih planerskih i projektantskih 

procesa, u kojima se može testirati sposobnost 

transformacije da se udruži sa zaštitom ovih naselja 

izgrađenih i otvorenih prostora, gde različiti i integrisani 

istraživački putevi mogu podržati početak projekata i 

strategija za procese šire urbane regeneracije i nove 

prostorne i društvene ravnoteže. 

S ciljem da se prikažu navedeni argumenti, prezentacija 

će prvo ilustrovati neke studije slučaja, odabrane 

kao reprezentativne za različite periode posleratnog 

italijanskog „javnog grada“, a potom prikazati rezultate 

Nacionalnog istraživačkog programa „Javni grad kao 

projektantska laboratorija. Stvaranje smernica za održivu 

obnovu urbanih predgrađa“, koju su izveli univerziteti u 

Trstu, Rimu, Palermu, Napulju, i politehnike u Milanu i 

Bariju. 

— 

Paola di Bjađi je redovna profesorka urbanizma na 

Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Trstu, predavala je i na 

Univerzitetu IUAV u Veneciji, držala seminare i konferencije 

u Italiji i u inostranstvu. Bavi se proučavanjem i 

projektovanjem savremenog grada, pri čemu posebnu 

pažnju poklanja društvenoj gradnji i javnom prostoru. 

Autorka je više publikacija, među kojima su Italijanski 

urbanisti (priredila zajedno sa P. Đibelini), Laterza, 

Rim 1992; Velika rekonstrukcija. Plan Ina-Casa i Italija 

pedesetih godina, Donzelli, Rim 2001; Javni grad. 

Društvena gradnja i prekvalifikacija gradskog prostora u 

Torinu, Allemandi, Torino, 2008; Umetnost i grad. Dela i 

umetničke intervencije u gradskom prostoru (priredila sa L. 

Carlini i L. Safred), Univerzitet u Trstu, Trst, 2008.

Post WWII Social Housing in Italy: 

The “public city” as a laboratory 

for modern city theories and urban 

renewal contemporary perspective 

Paola di Biagi, University of Trieste, Italy 

XXth century social housing districts, built in Europe to 

provide those families who could not afford market prices 

with healthy and decent dwellings, can today be read as 

part of a larger and more complex “public city”. 

The so called “public city” is an urban form, where some 

principles of the Modern Movement have found “place”: 

from the attention to fundamental human needs to the 

right to inhabit. Through the construction of the “public 

city” alternatives to traditional ways of building and living 

the city have been devised and tried out, whereas the 

large amount and variety of urban spaces (in particular 

of open spaces and social equipments) have often been 

proposed as means to build new citizens’ communities. 

Today the “public city”, laying in-between contemporary 

urban spaces, maintains its differences, showing manifold 

forms and problems. Even though in some social housing 

districts the quality of urban layout can still be recognized, 

many of them have been quickly plagued by spatial 

decay and social unease. Moreover, such conditions are 

frequently worsened by a widespread stigmatization both 

in social and disciplinary imagination. 

Nonetheless, if we free our perceptions and approaches 

from common places and look for the potentialities 

and resources these large settlements can offer to the 

contemporary city, we cannot miss the central and 

strategic role that social housing districts play (or could 

play) in metropolitan space, urban policies, disciplinary 

debate, transformation processes. 

In this sense, today social housing districts can be 

interpreted as spatial figures not only of Modernity, but 

also of the contemporary city; as both a Modern heritage 

and a resource for the renewal of urban outskirts. They 

can become a laboratory for new planning and design 

processes, where transformation can test its capacity 

to combine with the protection of this estate of built and 

open spaces; where different and integrated research 

paths can support the start of projects and strategies for 

wider urban regeneration processes and new spatial and 


social balance. 

In order to demonstrate the aforementioned arguments, 

the presentation will first illustrate some case studies 

selected as representative of different periods of post 

XXII Italian “public city”, then show the results of the 

National Research Programme “The ‘public city’ as a 

design laboratory. The construction of guidelines for the 

sustainable renewal of urban outskirts” developed by the 

Universities of Trieste, Rome, Palermo, Naples and the 

Polytechnics of Milan and Bari. 

— 

Paola Di Biagi is Professor of Urban Planning at the 

Faculty of Architecture Trieste, she taught at the University 

of Venice IUAV and carried out activities of teaching, 

seminars and conferences in Italy and abroad. Deals with 

the study and designing of the contemporary city, with 

particular attention to issues public housing and public 

space. Among her publications: Urbanisti italiani, with P. 

Gabellini, Laterza, Rome 1992; La grande ricostruzione. 

Il piano Ina Casa e l’Italia degli anni cinquanta, Donzelli, 

Roma 2001; La città pubblica. Edilizia sociale e 

riqualicazione urbana a Torino, Allemandi, Torino 2008; 

Arte e città. Opere e interventi artistici nello spazio urbano, 

edited by L. Carlini and L. Safred, Published by University 

of Trieste, Trieste in 2008.

Pitanja konzervacije i restauracije 

u socijalnom stanovanju posle 


Naselja INCIS-a: Villaggio Olimpico 

i Decima u Rimu 

Alesandra Čeroti, Univerzitet u Rimu, Italija 

Izgradnja četvrti Olimpijsko selo i Dečima deo je šire 

aktivnosti Nacionalnog instituta za izgradnju kuća državnih 

službenika (INCIS), koji je nastao Kraljevskim dekretom br. 

1165, od 28. aprila 1938, s namerom da za civilne i vojne 

državne službenike obezbedi, uz povoljne uslove, stanove 

javne rezidencijalne gradnje. 

Iako su pripadala rezidencijalnoj javnoj gradnji u 

posleratnom periodu, u odnosu na objekte sagrađene 

zahvaljujući programu INA CASA (Nacionalnog instituta 

za osiguranja), arhitektonska ostvarenja INCIS-a predlažu 

formalno zrelije projektantske karakteristike, verovatno 

zbog raznolikosti budućih stanara, državnih funkcionera i 

službenika. U suštini, iako su negovala istu pažnju prema 

ambijentalnom aspektu, ova arhitektonska ostvarenja 

delovala su dovršenije, a upotrebi materijala i tehnološkim 

rešenjima konstruktivnih detalja bila je posvećena veća 

pažnja . 

Dva INCIS kompleksa, sagrađena krajem pedesetih 

i tokom šezdesetih godina, prema projektu grupe 

sposobnih arhitekata, među kojima su bili Adalberto 

Libera i Luiđi Moreti, iako su nudili osetne razlike, bili 

su, svakako, osmišljeni istim arhitektonskim jezikom: 

sastojali su se od brojnih zgrada u nizu, sa dvorištem 

i krstastog preseka, podignuti na pilotise, povezani 

prohodnim ulicama i pešačkim stazama i uronjeni u 

zelenilo. Jedinstveni urbani krarakter i arhitektonski kvalitet 


nukleusa proizlaze iz odmerenih odnosa između prirodnih 

i izgrađenih elemenata, a zbog slaganja sličnih elemenata 

i ponovljivih oblika, ali uvek u različitim perspektivama, ne 

postoji rizik od jednoličnosti. 

Sinergija malo raspoloživih izvora ilošeg održavanja 

koja traje duži niz godina uzrokovala je propadanje 

arhitektonskih ostvarenja i arhitektonskih elemenata oba 

kompleksa. 

Postavlja se, dakle, sve ozbiljnije pitanje: kako očuvati ovu 

arhitektonsku baštinu i kako delovati na njoj.. Poseban 

je problem to što njena kompleksnost ne dozvoljava 

jednostavni odabir intervencija (srušiti, očuvati, iznova 

sagraditi), bez odgovarajućih procena. Naime, ta baština 

se može posmatrati sa upotrebne tačke gledišta, s 

obzirom njenu kulturnu vrednost, vrednost simbola i 

pamćenja, budući da je reč o istorijskom nasleđu, ali tek 

nakon pažljive analize tih vrednosti može da se odredi tip 

intervencije, od najradikalnijeg do najkonzervativnijeg, kao 

i načini izvršenja. 

U tom smislu, odabiru tipova intervencije treba da 

se posveti velika briga i – a to je faza koja sledi i koja 

je direktno povezana sa prepoznavanjem vrednosti 

(arhitektonske, urbane itd.) – nepogrešivo razlikujući dva 

termina koja su često i pogrešno korišćena: obnovu i 

restauraciju, čije nerazumevanje ima dramatične posledice 

na polju delovanja. 

Iz ove perspektive je, dakle, neophodno znanje kako da 

se upravlja promenama na delu i poznavanje neophodnih 

procesa održavanja, uz prethodno jasno definisanje i 

usaglašavanje karakteristika njihove realizacije. 

— 

Alesandra Čeroti diplomirala je arhitekturu na Univerzitetu 

Sapijenca u Rimu, na kome se i specijalizovala 

za restauraciju spomenika. Od 2003. sarađuje na 

laboratorijskom kursu iz arhitektonske restauracije na 

Arhitektonskom fakultetu „Vale Đulija”. Učestvovala je 

u istraživanjima i na međunarodnim seminarima u Kini i 

Brazilu, u okviru kojih je priredila brojne publikacije. 

U svojim studijama bavi se pretežno savremenom 

arhitektonskom restauracijom; trenutno završava 

doktorat na Univerzitetu Sapijenca u Rimu na temu javne 

rezidencijalne gradnje u periodu posle II svetskog rata 

s obzirom na probleme konzervacije i restauracije. Radi 

u Rimu a svoje profesionalne aktivnosti usmerila je na 

restauraciju spomenika.

Conservation and Restoration 

Issues in the Post-WWII Social 

Housing: INCIS Estates Villaggio 

Olimpico and Decima in Rome 

Alessandra Cerroti, University of Rome, Italy 

Development of the estates Villaggio Olimpico (Olympic 

Village) and Decima, is a part of the wider activities of The 

National Institute for the Houses of the State Employees 

(INCIS), which has been proclaimed by the Royal decree 

No. 1165, from 28 th April 1938, with the intention to 

provide the residential public apartments for the civil and 

military employees, under the favourable conditions. 

Even though they belonged to the residential public 

development in the post-WWII period, compared to 

the objects built with the support of the program INA 

CASA (National Institute for Insurance), the architectural 

achievements of INCIS suggest formally more mature 

design characteristics, probably because of the diversity 

of the future residents, state officials and employees. 

Basically, even though they have given as much attention 

to ambient aspect, these architectural achievements 

seemed more complete, and more attention was given 

to the use of material and technological solutions of the 

structural details. 

The two INCIS estates, built at the end of 50’s and during 

the 60’s, according to the design of the distinguished 

architects, among whom was Adalberto Libera and 

Luigi Moretti, even though they offered some notable 

differences, were, by all means, concieved by the same 

architectural language: they consisted of the numerous 

buildings forming rows, with the yards and crosssection 

like, raised on pilotis, connected with streets 

and pedestrian paths and surrounded with greenery. 

The unique urban character and architectural quality 

of nucleus, emerges from the moderate relationships 

between natural and built elements. Because of 

composing of similar elements and repeating of shapes, 

but always in different perspectives, there is not risk of 

monotony. 

Synergy of low availability of resources and poor 

maintenance of long duration, has caused the decay of 

the architectural achievements and elements of the both 

estates. 


A serious question could be posed: how to preserve this 

architectural heritage and how to affect it? A particular 

problem is that its complexity makes no allowance for a 

simple choice of interventions (to pull down, preserve, 

rebuild), without appropriate evaluations. Namely, this 

heritage could be observe from the utilitarian point of view, 

due to its cultural value, symbolic and memory values, 

since it is historical heritage. But only after the careful 

analysis of these values, it is possible to determine the 

type of intervention, from the most radical to the most 

conservative, as well as the means of realization. 

In this sense, much attention should be given to the 

selection of the intervention types – the successive phase 

directly connected with the recognizing of the values 

(architectural, urban etc) – unmistakably differentiating the 

two terms, often misused: recuperation and restoration, 

whose misunderstanding has dramatic consequences in 

the field of action. 

From this perspective is, therefore, necessary knowledge 

of how to manage the changes in action and necessary 

maintenance, with the previous clear definition and 

harmonization of the conditions for their realization. 

— 

Alessandra Cerroti has graduated architecture at the 

University La Sapienza where she further specialized in 

restoration of monuments. 

From 2003 she collaborates on the course Laboratory 

for the architectural restoration on Faculty of Architecture 

in Valle Giulia and has participated in researches and 

international seminars in China and Brazil, within which 

she prepared many publications. 

Her field of interest are mainly the problems of 

contemporary architecture restoration: she is finishing 

PhD studies at University of Rome La Sapienza on post- 

WWII social housing related to conservation issues. 

She works in Rome and her professional activities are 

aimed to restoration of monuments.

Density, IntenCity: 

Stanovanje u Italiji 

Đovani Kaudo, Univerzitet u Rimu, Italija 

Grad Rim i dan-danas raste i razvija se, a lice grada 1 

obuhvata sve veći prostor. Dve trećine urbanizovanog 

zemljišta Rima izgrađeno je u poslednjih pedeset godina 

– to bi bio, vremenski posmatrano, najnoviji korpus 

grada.. U ovom procesu razvoja grada značajnu ulogu 

imale su četvrti kolektivnog stanovanja. I upravo izgradnja 

prostranih stambenih kompleksa na osnovu zakona 167 

predstavlja, i kvantitativno i kvalitativno, specifičnost Rima. 

Tako se, na razne načine, učvrstio korpus grada kakav 

je danas. Ali taj organizam nije stabilan, nije konačan, 

on i dalje podrazumeva „sve ozbiljniju i opasniju zbrku, 

neizvesnost, jer je predstavljen kao udobnost, kao manje 

zlo, dok bi, naprotiv, bilo još toliko toga da se uradi”. 2 Na 

Rim, „grad svojih žitelja”, najveći grad koji je izgrađen u 

Italiji, spustila se neka vrsta zaborava, nemara. U pitanju 

su, zapravo, delovi grada sa velikim potencijalom za 

promenu. To je ono što nazivamo periferijom – prostor 

kojim se rasipa, neiskorišćene površine, međuprostori, 

bezoblični ostaci bez definisane svrhe koji ispunjavaju 

teritoriju, infiltriraju se kao ničija zemlja, dok razdvajaju, 

rasparčavaju delove metropole. 3 Za više od trideset 

godina opština Rim stekla je javne površine na prostoru 

od oko 7.000 ha, za koje su izrađeni prostorni planovi. 

Od te površine, skoro tri hiljade hektara namenjeno je 

za javne objekte i ulice. Proces njihove realizacije, često 

dug, mučan i pun kontradiktornosti, učinio je da mnoge 

od ovih površina i danas stoje neiskorišćene ili se koriste 

na pogrešan način, a u nekim slučajevima su čak i 

zaboravljene. Simulacija koja se sprovodi u tri stambene 

četvrti (Serpentara, Valmelaina, Torsapienca) beleži 

momentalnu raspoloživost zemljišta na 128.000.000 m². 


Međutim, nijedna od ovih površina nije iskorišćena na 

takav način da zadovoljava standarde. Radi se o pravom 

pravcatom rasipanju zemljišta. 

1 Pier Paolo Pasolini, Il fronte della città, Vie Nuove, Roma, 1958. 

2 Isto. 

3 SLOAP (Space Left Over After Planning – prostor izostavljen iz 

planiranja), Leslie Ginsburg, Architectural Review, 1973. 

— 

Đovani Kaudo, arhitekta, rođen je 1964. godine u 

Fjumefredu na Siciliji, u italijanskoj provinciji Katanja. 

Diplomirao je s najvećim počastima na arhitektonskom 

fakultetu Univerziteta u Rimu, 30. oktobra 1991. Živi i radi 

u Rimu. Istraživač je u Laboratoriji za urbano planiranje 

na rimskom univerzitetu Tre (Roma Tre Universitá degli 

Studi), gde je takođe nastavnik urbanog planiranja u 

okviru trogodišnjeg nastavnog programa arhitekture, 

a radi i kao koordinator doktorskih studija na temu 

Regionalna politika i lokalno planiranje. Dr Kaudo trenutno 

radi na istraživanju aspekata procesa odabira planova za 

implementaciju i planiranja gradova i urbanog okruženja. 

Bavio se istraživanjem planerske prakse u različitim 

urbanim kontekstima (planovi za gradove južne Italije i 

strateško planiranje) direktnim nadzorom planerske prakse 

i dokumenata, kao i istraživanjem urbanog konteksta u 

procesu transformacije, posebno u oblastima u kojima se 

sprovodi javna izgradnja i koje su podvrgnute procesima 

destrukcije i povećanja gustine. Njegove aktivnosti kao 

profesionalnog arhitekte (projekti i urbanistički planovi) 

i učešće na konkursima (između ostalih, Shrinking 

Cities Berlin i unapređenje urbaniteta oblasti Via della 

Lega Lombarda u Rimu) odnose se najviše na urbano 

planiranje, temu koja čini središte njegovih istraživačkih 

interesovanja, i predstavljaju koristan način da iskustvo 

koje je stekao u naučno-istraživačkom radu bude na 

najbolji način provereno u praksi. 

Density, IntenCity: Housing in Italy 

Giovanni Caudo, University of Rome, Italy 

The city of Rome still grows and develops, the city 

frontline 1 is in constant growth. Two-thirds of the 

urbanized terrain of Rome has been built in the last 50 

years: that is the newest corpus of the city in its temporal

sequence. In this process of development of the city, 

the housing quarters played a very important role. This 

development of the spacious housing complexes based 

on article 167 of the Constitution, represent a specificity of 

Rome, both a qualitative and quantitative one. 

That is how, the today’s corpus of the city was formed, 

using various trajectories. But this organism is not stable 

or final; it still is in a state of “serious and dangerous 

confusion, uncertainty, for it presents itself as a bonanza, 

as something less bad, while, on the contrary, there is so 

much more to be done”. 2 Upon Rome’s public spaces, 

biggest ever built in Italy, a kind of oblivion, negligence 

has descended. Those are, actually, part of the city with 

huge potential for change. This is the corpus of the 

city that we call the periphery – space which is wasted, 

unused surfaces, space gaps, amorphous residues that 

fill the territory, without defined purpose, infiltrating as 

no-man’s land, while dividing the parts of the metropolis. 3 

For more than 30 years, the Municipality of Rome has 

been acquiring public areas in the amount of 7,000 ha, 

for which spatial planes were developed. From this area, 

almost 3,000 ha is intended for the public structures 

and streets. The process of their realization, often long, 

tedious and full of contradiction, has made many of these 

surfaces to still stand unused or misused till today, and 

in some cases even to become forgotten. The simulation 

conducted in the three housing quarters (Serpentara, 

Valmelaina, Torsapienza), shows immediate availability 

of 128 million square meters of land. However, none of 

these surfaces is used in a way that complies with the 

standards. We are indeed dealing with wasting of land. 

1 Pier Paolo Pasolini, Il fronte della città, Vie Nuove, Roma, 1958. 

2 Ibid. 

3 SLOAP (Space Left Over After Planning), Leslie Ginsburg, 

Architectural Review, 1973. 

— 

Giovanni Caudo, architect, was born in 1964 in 

Fiumefreddo in Sicily, in the Province of Catania. He 

graduated summa cum laude in Architecture at the 

University of Rome on 30 October 1991. He now lives 

and works in Rome. 

He is a Researcher in Urban Planning at Rome Tre 

University (Roma Tre Universitá degli Studi), where he 

lectures in the Urban Planning Laboratory in the three- 


year degree course in Architectural Sciences, and 

coordinates the teaching of the PhD in Regional Policies 

and Local Planning. Dr. Caudo’s research in progress 

concerns aspects of the process of selecting a plan for 

implementation and of designing cities and the urban 

environment. In particular he has carried out research 

activities into planning practices in various Italian urban 

contexts (plans for cities in South Italy and strategic 

planning) through direct observation of planning practices 

and documents; and research (in progress) on urban 

contexts in the process of transformation, especially in 

districts affected by public building and that are involved 

in processes of demolition and increasing density. 

His activities as a professional architect (project work on 

executive town plans) and his participation in competitions 

(among these: Shrinking Cities Berlin, and the Via della 

Lega Lombarda Urban Upgrade in Rome) have covered 

topics of urban planning that are linked to his research 

interests, and have been useful in verifying empirically 

or putting into practice the experience developed in the 

course of his academic research.

E2A: Post-CIAM Rekonfiguracija 

Pit Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten, Švajcarska 

Urbanističko planiranje se ostvaruje u tananom prelazi od 

zamišljenog ka ostvarenom. Često se manjak ostvarenog 

ostavlja u nasleđe narednoj generaciji arhitekata i 

projektanata koji se suočavaju sa novim kompenzacijama 

i provokacijama prethodno stvorenog. Na osnovu primera 

vezanih za CIAM (Međunarodni kongres moderne 

arhitekture), raspravljaće se o očiglednom propadanju 

rezultata projekata iz 60-ih godina prošlog veka, o 

očekivanju da će širom Evrope doći do masovnog 

porasta stanovništva, o trenutnim poražavajućim javnim 

procenama koje sumnjaju u „mega i nadstrukture” i 

strahovanja da će projektu izrađenom u prirodnoj veličini 

nedostajati identitet. 

Predavanje će obuhvatiti poređenje sa sličnim iskustvima 

u urbanističkom planiranju, primere i predloge koje je E2A 

nedavno izneo kada je suočen sa zadatkom da preuredi 

suvišne i preostale urbane lokalitete. 

— 

Pit Ekert (rođen 1968. u Mumbaiju, Indija) suvlasnik je 

biroa E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten iz Ciriha. Studirao 

je arhitekturu na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Cirihu i na 

Arhitektonskom fakultetu Kolumbija univerziteta u Njujorku 

(diplomirao je 1994). Od 1995. do 1997. radio je u Office 

for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) u Roterdamu. Godine 

1997, zajedno sa Vimom Ekertom, osniva biro koji je 

2001. postao E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten. Pit Ekert 

redovno drži predavanja i radionice u školama i drugim 

ustanovama. Predavao je na Tehničkom fakultetu u Delftu, 

Holandija, i na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Cirihu. Bio je član 

raznih akademskih žirija u Evropi i van nje. 



Piet Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, 

Switzerland 

Urban planning operates along a sensitive transition from 

the imagined to the realized. Often the lack of the realized 

is passed to a next generation of architects and planners 

dealing with new compensations and provocations 

of the previous. The obvious decay of CIAM related 

planning results of 1960s, its European wide forecasted 

expectation of massive population growth, the currently 

devastating public estimations disbelieving in “mega- and 

superstructures”, fearing the lack of identity of the large 

scale composed plan, will be discussed along examples. 

The lecture will include cross-references to analog urban 

planning experiences, examples and recent proposals of 

E2A dealing with a task of reprogramming redundant and 

residual urban sites. 

— 

Piet Eckert is Partner at E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, 

Zurich. He studied architecture at the ETH in Zurich and at 

the Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture 

in New York (Diploma 1994). From 1995 to 1997 he 

worked at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) 

in Rotterdam. In 1997 he established his own office 

with Wim Eckert, which became E2A Eckert Eckert 

Architekten in 2001. Piet Eckert regularly gives lectures 

and workshops at schools and institutions. He has taught 

at the Technical University of Delft in the Netherlands and 

at the ETH in Zurich. He has been a member of several 

academic juries in Europe and elsewhere.

Wallisellen, Švajcarska, 2007. 

— 

Wallisellen, Switzerland, 2007

PREZENTACIJA 

PRESENTATION

EURODOM je firma koja se bavi uvozom i distribucijom 

keramičkih i sanitarnih proizvoda renomiranih proizvođača 

iz Italije. 

Iza imena kakva su Cerim Ceramiche, Floor Gres 

Ceramiche, Rex Ceramiche Artistiche, Casa Dolce Casa, 

Casa Mood, Appiani i Sicis, stoje decenije iskustva i 

stalnih inovacija u programima keramičkih i granitnih 

keramičkih proizvoda.Ponuda sanitarija i armatura 

obuhvata proizvode renomiranih proizvođača, kao što su 

Ceramica Flaminia, Catalano, Vitruvit, Gessi, Hansgrohe 

i drugi, a linija, stil, funkcionalnost i „predviđanje“ želja su 

specifičnost ovih proizvođača. Tu je i prateća galenterija 

Gessi i Geesa koja svojim dizajnom upotpunjuje sliku 

savremenog i modernog kupatila. 

Iz programa hidromasažnih kada, hidromasažnih tuš 

kabina i kombinovanih hidromasažnih sistema, nudi se 

program kompanije Jacuzzi, firme koja je pre pedeset 

godina osmislila i proizvela prvu hidromasažnu kadu i koja 

kvalitetom svojih proizvoda i danas zauzima prvo mesto u 

svetu u ovoj oblasti. U ponudi su saune i tursko kupatilo 

italijanske firme Effegibi, kao i tuš kabine italijanske firme 

Cesana. 

— 

Cilj nam je da budemo adekvatna podrška arhitektama, 

od faze idejnog projektovanja do nadzora nad izvođenjem 

objekta. Naši kapaciteti Vam stoje na raspolaganju od 

dostavljanja arhitektonskih kataloga, džepnih uzoraka, 

gotovih blok crteža u AutoCAD-u, 3D modela, keramičkih 

slogova, tehničkih karakteristika i detalja određenih 

sanitarnih rešenja, kako bi Vas uputili na evropske i 

svetske trendove u uređenju enterijera i eksterijera. 

Pravovremenom distribucijom, kvalitetom koji garantuju 

sertifikati EU i evropski standardi, dugogodišnjim 

iskustvom u implementiranju i servisiranju selektovanih 

keramičkih i sanitarnih rešenja, ostajemo podrška i 

sigurnost za dugogodišnju saradnju. 

EURODOM is a company whose scope of works is 

importing and distribution of ceramic and sanitary 

equipment produced by renowned companies from Italy. 

There are decades of experience and permanent 

innovations in ceramic and granite programs of ceramic 

products, behind the names such as Cerim Ceramiche, 

Floor Gres Ceramiche, Rex Ceramiche Artistiche, Casa 

Dolce Casa,Casa Mood, Appiani and Sicis. 

This company offers sanitary equipment and accessories 

produced by renowned producers, such as Ceramica 

Flaminia, Catalano, Vitruvit, Gessi, Hansgrohe etc. 

Line, style, functionality and “anticipation” of the client’s 

wishes, are characteristics of these producers. Among 

other products, there are accessories Gessi and Geesa, 

which complete the image of contemporary and modern 

bathroom, by its design. 

From the program of hydro massage tubs, shower cabins 

and combined hydro massage systems, this company 

offers the products produced by company Jacuzzi, which 

has invented and produced the first hydro massage tub, 

and which is still the number one company in the world in 

their field, by the quality of their products. 

The selection of the company includes also saunas and 

Turkish bathrooms of Italian company Effegibi, as well as 

shower cabins produced by Italian company Cesana. 

— 

Our goal is to offer adequate support to architects, from 

the phase of preliminary design up to the supervision of 

executing the works. Our capacities are placed to your 

disposal, with submitting of architectural catalogues, 

pocket samples, pre-designed AutoCAD drawings, 

3D models, ceramic patterns, technical characteristics 

and details of the certain sanitary solutions, in order to 

refer you to European and world interior and exterior 

decoration trends. We are offering our support and 

security for the long cooperation, by providing the 

distribution of products in time, quality guaranteed by 

EU certificates and standards, long-term experience with 

implementation and servicing of the selected ceramic and 

sanitary solutions.

Web: 

www.eurodomsaloni.co.yu 

Email: 

eurodom@eunet.rs 

Showroom: 

Nikole Grulovića 71e 

+381 11 3046 462 

Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 388 

+381 11 3808 393 

Ruzveltova 16 

+381 11 3809 543 

Contact: 

Bojan Vujičić, project division 

mob +381 63 342 859 

Goran Ivić, project division 

mob +381 63 1165 035 

Predrag Šarac 

mob +381 63 1165 037

Beogradska internacionalna nedelja arhitekture 

Belgrade international architecture week 

Organizatori – Organisers 



Uređivački odbor – Board 

Jelena Ivanović-Vojvodić, Danica Jovović-Prodanović, Ružica Sarić, Tanja Konli, Darko Marušić, Ivan Kucina 

Društvo arhitekata Beograda, Projekat BINA – Association of Belgrade Architects, Project BINA 

Društvo arhitekata Beograda, konsultanti – Association of Belgrade Architects, Consultants 

Ivan Rašković, Bojan Kovačević, Ana Kovenc-Vujić, Vasilije Milunović, Dejan Miljković, Mustafa Musić, Branimir Popović, 

Branislav Redžić, Aleksandar Stjepanović, Žaklina Gligorijević, Milan Đurić, Borislav Petrović, Zorica Savičić, Jelena 

Stojkov, Srđan Jovanović Weiss 

Stručni saradnici – Programme Assistants 

Davorka Tolić Milosavljević 

Zorana Đaković 


Tehnička Podrška – Technical Support 

Branko Tošić, Ana Glavički, Vanja Enbulajev 


Vizuelni identitet – Visual Identity 

petokraka 

Dizajn izložbe u Likovnoj galeriji – Art Gallery Exhibition Design 

petokraka, Aleksa Bijelović, Milica Maksimović i Una Momirović

Pokrovitelji − Patrons 

Grad Beograd − The City of Belgrade 

Ministarstvo kulture Republike Srbije − Republic of Serbia - Ministry of Culture 

Inženjerska komora Srbije − Serbian Chamber of Engineers 

Partneri − Partners 

EUNIC – European Union National Institutes for Culture: 

Austrijski kulturni forum − Austrian Cultural Forum 

Italijanski institut za kulturu − Italian Institute for Culture in Belgrade 

Gete institut − Goethe Institute 

Francuski kulturni centar − French Cultural Centre 

Magistrat glavnog grada Beča − Vienna City Administration 

Ambasada Sjedinjenih američkih država − Embassy of the United States of America 

Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu − Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade 

Republički zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture − State Institute for The Protection of Cultural Heritage 

JP Urbanistički zavod grada Beograda − Institute of Urbanism Belgrade 

Društvo urbanista Beograda − Town Planners Association Belgrade 

Dečji kulturni centar − Children’s Cultural Centre 

Opština Vračar − Vračar Municipality 

Opština Stari grad − Stari grad Municipality 

Galerija O3one − Gallery O3one 

GRAD kulturni centar − GRAD Cultural Centre 

Dom omladine Beograda − Cultural Centre Dom omladine 

Turistička organizacija Beograda − Belgrade Tourist Organization

Sponzori − Sponsors 

Eurodom 

Tarkett 

Konkav Konvex 

Gemax 

Porcelanosa 

Xella Srbija 

Potisje Kanjiža Tondach 

Telekom Srbija 

Alukönig Stahl - Schüco - Jansen 

Trimo 

Rukkii 

Uslužni sponzori − Technical sponsors 

Grafix 

Heineken 

Zelena jabuka 

Građevinska knjiga 

Medijski partneri − Media partners 

A10 new European architecture 

Kvart 

Bus TV 

Media Max 

Time Out Beograd 

AG Nekretnine

Katalog - BINA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?