11.02.2013 Views

CN LINES V12N3 - Canadian National Railways Historical Association

CN LINES V12N3 - Canadian National Railways Historical Association

CN LINES V12N3 - Canadian National Railways Historical Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stemmed, largely, from the status of the<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>National</strong> as a post-First World<br />

War amalgam of a number of failing or<br />

undermaintained railways. Eight drivers<br />

spread a locomotive’s weight enough that<br />

the seemingly endless miles of less-thanperfect<br />

hinterland trackage could be navigated<br />

with a minimum of peril. <strong>Canadian</strong><br />

Pacific, on the other hand, with its comparatively<br />

better infrastructure, embraced<br />

the 4-6-4 as its latter-day heavy passenger<br />

wheel arrangement of choice (the <strong>CN</strong>R,<br />

by contrast, rostered only five Hudsons).<br />

<strong>CN</strong>R+NRC=6400<br />

Design work on the streamlining for<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>National</strong>’s U-4 locomotives had<br />

begun in 1931—well before the New York<br />

Central’s Commodore Vanderbilt made its<br />

widely publicized debut as North America’s<br />

first streamlined steam locomotive—with a<br />

series of wind-tunnel tests conducted on<br />

models at the <strong>National</strong> Research Council<br />

(NRC) in Ottawa.<br />

The Assistant Director of the NRC’s<br />

Department of Physics, John H. Parkin,<br />

assigned the task to physicist and aerody-<br />

Retained after retirement as part of <strong>CN</strong>’s historical collection, U-4-a No. 6400 was<br />

cosmetically refurbished in 1967 before it was conveyed to the <strong>National</strong> Museum of Science<br />

&Technology in Ottawa. It remains a static showpiece at the renamed Canada Science &<br />

Technology Museum.—<strong>CN</strong> photo<br />

namicist Dr. John J. Green. Both men<br />

were at the fore of the emerging discipline<br />

of aerodynamics. Parkin, a University of<br />

Toronto graduate in mechanical and electrical<br />

engineering, had taught at the<br />

University between 1912 and 1929, during<br />

which time he gave Canada’s first<br />

aeronautics courses and also supervised<br />

the UofT wind tunnel. Upon joining the<br />

NRC in 1929, Parkin oversaw the aeronautical<br />

research undertaken by the<br />

Council. Dr. Green joined the NRC staff<br />

in 1930 after receiving a PhD in aeronautics<br />

from London University. Both men<br />

went on to particularly distinguished, yet<br />

often intertwined, careers. Parkin was<br />

instrumental in the founding of what<br />

became Canada’s <strong>National</strong> Aviation<br />

Museum, with Dr. Green a strong advocate<br />

as well. During the Second World<br />

War, Dr. Green became the Royal<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> Air Force’s chief research engineer<br />

and a test pilot, contributing, along<br />

with Parkin, to such ground-breaking<br />

aeronautical efforts as the NRC/RCAF<br />

“Tailless” flying wing of 1945-48.<br />

It was perhaps ironic, then, that a locomotive,<br />

and not an aircraft, would be one<br />

of the earliest examples—and most enduring<br />

legacies—of Parkin and Green’s NRC<br />

work. Using a pair of 1:12 scale models of<br />

the <strong>CN</strong>R’s most recent 6100-series U-2-c<br />

Northerns—one a detailed model made<br />

of steel and the other a simpler wooden<br />

affair—Dr. Green developed several<br />

potential shroud configurations in conjunction<br />

with <strong>CN</strong>R motive power officials.<br />

The railway, and the government,<br />

had imposed a number of restrictions on<br />

the NRC’s streamlining freedom, ranging<br />

from the placement of safety appliances<br />

and a desire to keep running gear uncovered<br />

to the goal of achieving the greatest<br />

aerodynamic benefit with the minimum<br />

possible cost and complexity.<br />

The objective was more practical than<br />

esthetic: to reduce or eliminate the tendency<br />

of smoke to obscure vision from the cab<br />

while the locomotive was “drifting,” when<br />

low speed and ambient air currents could<br />

combine to blow exhaust smoke down<br />

over the boiler and across the cab.<br />

In a progression of modifications to the<br />

wind-tunnel models, Dr. Green added a<br />

hemispherical nose, then a “skyline” casing<br />

to conceal the various domes and turrets<br />

atop the boiler, then altered the skyline and<br />

the angle of the cab front, and added a<br />

teardrop fairing around the stack. The next<br />

12 <strong>CN</strong> <strong>LINES</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!