12.02.2013 Views

Book of Abstracts Book of Abstracts - Universität Konstanz

Book of Abstracts Book of Abstracts - Universität Konstanz

Book of Abstracts Book of Abstracts - Universität Konstanz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A - 23<br />

132<br />

Surface Entropy <strong>of</strong> Argon Clusters<br />

Mikael Kjellberg, Sergey Prasalovich, Vladimir Popok, Klavs Hansen, Eleanor E. B. Campbell<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Physics, Göteborg University, SE-41296 Göteborg, Sweden<br />

The enhanced stability <strong>of</strong> certain cluster sizes is traditionally inferred from the enhanced<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> these species in mass spectra. For rare gas clusters, the stability pattern can be<br />

described as due to a close packing <strong>of</strong> atoms into closed structures (shells) with the symmetry <strong>of</strong><br />

Mackay icosahedra. The mere presence <strong>of</strong> shell closings does not give any information on the<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> the energies involved. A quantitative comparison requires knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

binding energies <strong>of</strong> the clusters. It is possible to extract this information from the mass spectra<br />

by making reasonable general assumptions [1] with the restriction that only relative values can<br />

be found. The flat abundance spectrum (after background subtraction) is related to relative<br />

I ∝ D + C D − D G.<br />

energies as ( )<br />

N N+ 1 v N N+<br />

1 /<br />

This has been done in Fig 1(A) for masses around the N = 55 “magic number”. The amplitude<br />

in the relative energy variations does not follow the same trend as the local abundance<br />

variations. In particular the maximum in the relative energy is shifted to smaller N. The reason<br />

for this is that the relative energies obtained in this procedure are not the dissociation energies,<br />

DN, <strong>of</strong> the clusters but the free energies, FN = DN – TSN, where SN is identified with the surface<br />

entropy (the natural logarithm <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> ways the configurational ground state can be<br />

contructed). This can be estimated from the structures calculated by Northby [2] and used to<br />

extract the dissociation energies. This is shown in Fig. 1(B) and compared with the calculated<br />

dissociation energies, where the absolute scale was obtained by scaling with the bulk and<br />

surface energy. The agreement <strong>of</strong> the trend in the values is very satisfactory.<br />

∆F (meV)<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

Figure 1. A, Left:Integrated peak intensities from Ar N + mass spectrum filled squares, (right y-axis) and the<br />

dissociation energies extracted from the spectrum (free energies) (open squares, left y-axis). B, Right: Extracted<br />

dissociation energies (free energies) (open circles), dissociation energies after subtraction <strong>of</strong> the entropy term (open<br />

squares), calculated energies from Northby [2] (filled squares).<br />

References<br />

50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60<br />

0<br />

61<br />

N<br />

[1] K. Hansen and U. Näher, Phys. Rev. A , 60 1240 (1999).<br />

[2] J.A. Northby, J. Xie, D.L. Freeman, J.D. Doll, Z. Phys. D 12 69 (1989)<br />

∆F<br />

I N<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

I N<br />

Energies [meV]<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

∆F N,exp<br />

D N,exp<br />

D N,Northby<br />

50 52 54 56 58 60<br />

N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!