18.02.2013 Views

Word Expert Translation from German into Chinese in - Knowledge ...

Word Expert Translation from German into Chinese in - Knowledge ...

Word Expert Translation from German into Chinese in - Knowledge ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 2. MultiNet representation of the sentence Das K<strong>in</strong>d hat Angst und<br />

fängt an zu we<strong>in</strong>en (The Child is scared and beg<strong>in</strong>s to cry)<br />

shall be after L; (3) if both � and �are particles, � shall be<br />

before �besides obey<strong>in</strong>g rules (1) and (2); (4) if � is used<br />

twice, besides obey<strong>in</strong>g rule (2), they must be separated by<br />

lexemes of another word expert, and one must directly follow<br />

L.<br />

With the above pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, the follow<strong>in</strong>g order<strong>in</strong>gs are all<br />

understandable translations: ���– (1), ���– (2), ��<br />

�– (2), ����– (1)(2)(3), ����– (1)(2)(3), ���<br />

�– (2)(4).<br />

C. Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to Appear or Not<br />

Not all the word experts of a <strong>German</strong> sentence shall<br />

appear <strong>in</strong> the translated <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> sentence. For example, the<br />

<strong>German</strong> sentence Das K<strong>in</strong>d hat Angst und fängt an zu we<strong>in</strong>en<br />

(The Child is scared and beg<strong>in</strong>s to cry) shall be translated<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>to</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> �����(��/K<strong>in</strong>d/Child, �/Angst/scare,<br />

�/we<strong>in</strong>en/cry, �/particle), as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

word experts appear <strong>in</strong> the translated <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> sentence:<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d.1.1/child (c97), we<strong>in</strong>en.1.1/cry (c138), angst.1.1/scare<br />

(c101), and haben.1.1/have (c98). The carrier (SCAR) of<br />

haben.1.1/have is k<strong>in</strong>d.1.1/child, which is the actor (AGT)<br />

of both we<strong>in</strong>en.1.1/cry and anfangen.1.2/beg<strong>in</strong>. The affected<br />

object (AFF) of anfangen.1.2/beg<strong>in</strong> is we<strong>in</strong>en.1.1/cry, which<br />

is the second argument (ARG2) of anfangen.1.1. 4<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g the topic-comment relations among the word<br />

experts, we f<strong>in</strong>d that the comment of angst.1.1/scare is<br />

we<strong>in</strong>en.1.1/cry, and that the two word experts anfangen.1.2/beg<strong>in</strong><br />

and anfangen.1.1/beg<strong>in</strong> simply duplicate this<br />

topic-comment relation. Therefore, they shall not appear <strong>in</strong><br />

the translated <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> sentence – the redundancy is only an<br />

artifact of our deep semantic analysis. A pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is stated as<br />

follows.<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> WE Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple 5: A word expert shall not appear<br />

<strong>in</strong> the translated <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> sentence, if it duplicates an exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

topic-comment relation.<br />

4 This analysis reflects that if someone starts someth<strong>in</strong>g (anfangen.1.1), then<br />

this start<strong>in</strong>g actions causes someth<strong>in</strong>g to start (anfangen.1.2).<br />

D. Order<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Word</strong> <strong>Expert</strong> Translators<br />

For those word experts that will appear <strong>in</strong> the translated<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> sentence, a nested topic-comment order<strong>in</strong>g shall<br />

be constructed. As we have semantic representations <strong>from</strong><br />

WOCADI and lexemes tagged with semantic roles, topiccomment<br />

relations among word experts are not difficult to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> – we only need to exam<strong>in</strong>e the description of the lexeme<br />

and the possible MultiNet constructions, to see which elements<br />

can be the comment of which other elements <strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

representation. In Figure 2, angst.1.1/scare is the topic for<br />

we<strong>in</strong>en.1.1/cry, so we have a list (WE-angst.1.1/scare WEwe<strong>in</strong>en.1.1/cry),<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d.1.1/child is the topic for angst.1.1/scare,<br />

so we have (WE-k<strong>in</strong>d.1.1 (WE-angst.1.1 WE-we<strong>in</strong>en.1.)). By<br />

flatten<strong>in</strong>g this nested structure, we have a l<strong>in</strong>ear order<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

word experts: (WE-k<strong>in</strong>d.1.1 WE-angst.1.1 WE-we<strong>in</strong>en.1.1).<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> sentences can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by replac<strong>in</strong>g each word expert<br />

with their <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> lexeme(s). For example, �����,<br />

�����, and ������ are all understandable translations,<br />

where � is the particle of �, whose order<strong>in</strong>g follows<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> WE Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple 4.<br />

E. Choos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> Lexemes<br />

A word expert may have more than one correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> lexeme even <strong>in</strong> one <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> dialect. Communications<br />

among word experts are required to select the most suitable<br />

one, or to delete <strong>in</strong>compatible ones. For example, the word<br />

expert e<strong>in</strong>.1.1/a <strong>in</strong> the <strong>German</strong> phrase e<strong>in</strong> Baum (a tree) can be<br />

mapped to �����������.... By communicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with the word expert Baum.1.1/tree, word expert e<strong>in</strong>.1.1/a<br />

knows that it can only be mapped to ��. This requires word<br />

experts of countable objects to have measurement <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

F. A Slow Intelligence (SIS) Workflow<br />

The word expert translation system can be organized <strong>in</strong><br />

the slow <strong>in</strong>telligence architecture [2]. Each word expert that<br />

occurs <strong>in</strong> the <strong>German</strong> parse is a unit slow <strong>in</strong>telligence system.<br />

It enumerates possible <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> lexemes, determ<strong>in</strong>es possible<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear order<strong>in</strong>gs among themselves, and the topic-comment<br />

relation of its arguments. <strong>Word</strong> experts communicate among<br />

themselves and form a larger slow <strong>in</strong>telligence system: nested<br />

topic-comment structures are firstly enumerated, then duplicated<br />

topic-comment relation will be removed, <strong>in</strong>correct<br />

lexemes will be pruned, order<strong>in</strong>g of particles will be l<strong>in</strong>earized<br />

with lexemes of other word experts. At last possible <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong><br />

sentences will be produced.<br />

For the <strong>German</strong> sentence Ich fällte e<strong>in</strong>en Baum mit e<strong>in</strong>er Axt<br />

(I cut down a tree with an ax), the MultiNet analysis results<br />

<strong>in</strong> four word experts: WE-ich.1.1/I (abbreviated WE-I <strong>in</strong> the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g), WE-baum.1.1/tree (WE-tree), WE-axt.1.1/ax (WEax),<br />

and WE-fällen.1.1/cut-down (WE-cut-down). The system<br />

first creates one CWE for each word expert WE. All the<br />

CWEs are unit SIS, search<strong>in</strong>g for possible <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> lexemes<br />

and enumerat<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ear orders based on CWE pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. In our<br />

current <strong>German</strong>-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> dictionary CWE-I has one <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong><br />

lexeme: �; CWE-cut-down has five <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> lexemes: ��<br />

� � � � � � � � � � and two particles � and �;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!