Consenso Uruguayo de Función Ventricular - Sociedad Uruguaya ...

§ Se mide la pendiente en el primer aliasing desde el borde libre de las valvas, unos 4 cm hacia el VI Hay que
promediar varias medidas en pacientes con ritmo irregular. Las mediciones son dificultosas en ritmos rápidos y en
bloqueos auriculoventriculares de primer grado.19-23
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
1. Appleton CP, Galloway JM, Gonzalez MS, Gaballa M, Basnight MA. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressures
using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in adult patients with cardiac disease: additional values of
analyzing lef atrial size, left atrial ejection fraction and the difference in duration of pulmonary venous and mitral
flow velocity at atrial contraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1972-82.
2. Nishimura RA, Abel ME, Hatle LK,Tajik AJ. Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current
applicationts of Doppler echocardiography. Part II. Clinical Studies. Mayo Clin Proc 1989;64:181-204.
3. Gardin JM, Dabestani A, Takenaka K, Rohan MK, Knoll M, Russell D, Henry WL. Effect of imaging view and sample
volume location on evaluation of mitral flow velocity by pulsed Doppler echocadiography. Am J Cardiol 1986;
57:1335-9.
4. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic
function: nes insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiography study, J Am Coll Cardiol
1988;12:426-40.
5. Ding ZP, Oh JK, Klein AL,Tajik J. Effect of sample volume location on Doppler-derived transmitral inflow velocity
values. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991;4:451-6.
6. Appleton CP; Jensen JL; Hatle LK; Oh JK. Doppler evaluation of left and right ventricular diastolic function: a
technical guide for obtaining optimal flow velocity recordings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997;10:271-92.
7. Rakowski H, Appleton CP, Chan KL, Dumesnil JG, Honos G, Jue J, Koilpillai C, Papage S, Martin RP, Mercier LA,
O'Kelly B, Prieur T, Sanfilippo A, Sasson Z, Alvarez N, Pruitt R, Thompson C, Tomlinson C. Canadian consensus
recommendations for the measurement and reporting of diastolic dysfunction by echocardiography. J Am Soc
Echocardiogr 1996;9:736-60.
8. Valentine HA, Hatle LK, Appleton CP,Gibbons R, Popp RL. Variability of Doppler echocardiographic indexes of left
ventricular filling in transplant recipients and in normal subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1990;3:276-84.
9. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic
function: nes insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol
1988;12:426-40.
10. Yamamoto K, Nishimura RA, Burnett JC, Redfield MM. Assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by
Doppler echocardiography: contribution of duration of pulmonary venous versus mitral flow velocity curves at atrial
contraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997;10: 52-9.
11. Klein AL, Tajik J. Doppler assessment of pulmonary venous flow in healthy subjects and in patients with heart
disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991;4:379-92.
12. Jensen JL, Williams FE, Beilby BJ, Johnson BL, Miller LK, Ginter TL, Tomaselli-Martin G, Appleton CP. Feasibility
of obtaining pulmonary venous flow velocity in cardiac patients using transthoracic pulsed wave Doppler technique.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997;10;60-6.
13. Masuyama T, Nagano R, Nariyama K, Lee J, Yamamoto K, Naito J, Mano T, Kondo H, Hori M, Kamada T.
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic measurements of pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns: comparison
with transesophageal measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995;8:61-9.
14. Castello R, Pearson AC, Lenzen P, Labovitz AJ. Evaluation of pulmonary venous flow by transesophageal
echocardiography in subjects with normal heart: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol
1991;18:65-71.
15. Klein AL; Bailey AS; Cohen GI; Stewart WJ; Duffy CI; Pearce GL, Salcedo EE. Importance of sampling both
pulmonary veins in grading mitral regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr
1993;6:115-123.
16. Lee CH, Bancher IF, Josen MF, Gibson DG. Discrepancies in the measurement of isovolumic relaxation time: a
study comparing M-mode an Doppler. Br Heart J 1982;47:253-60.
17. Yamamoto K, Nishimura RA, Chaliki HP, Appleton CP, Holmes DR, Tenenbaum A, Motro M, Hod H, Kaplinsky E,
Vered Z. Shortened Doppler-derived mitral A wave deceleration time: an important predictor of elevated left
ventricular filling pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:700-5.
18. Appleton CP. The Doppler assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: the refinements continue. J Am Coll
Cardiol 1993;21:1697-700.
19. García MJ,Thomas JD, Kliein AL. New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:865-75.
20. Appleton CP, Firstenberg MS, Garcia MJ, Thomas JD. The echo-Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic
function. Cardiology Clinics 2000;18:513-46.
21. Stugaard M, Risöe C, Ihlen H, Smiseth OA. Intracavitary pattern in the failing left ventricular assessed by color
M-mode doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24:663-70.
22. García MJ, Palac RT, Malenka DJ, Terrell Patricia, Plehn JF. Color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity is a
relatively preload-independent index of left ventricular filling. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:129-37.