BoletÃƒÂn Chileno de OrnitologÃƒÂa - Wildlife Ecology and Conservation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

16 ARTICULOSDE SANTO, T. L., M. F. WILLSON, K. E. SIEVING,& J. J. ARMESTO. 2002. Nesting biologyof tapaculos (family Rhinocryptidae) infragmented south-temperate rainforests ofChile. Condor 104:482-495.ESTADES, C. F. & S. A. TEMPLE. 1999.Deciduous-forest bird communities in afragmented landscape dominated by exoticpine plantations. Ecological Applications9:573-585.FLASPOHLER, D. J., S. A. TEMPLE, & R. N.ROSENFELD. 2000. Relationship betweennest success and concealment in two groundnestingpasserines. J. Field Ornithology71:736-747.FJELDSÅ, J & N. KRABBE. 1990. Birds of theHigh Andes. Zoological Museum,Svendborg, Denmark.FRIESEN, L., M. D. CADMAN, & R. J. MACKAY.1999. Nesting success of Neotropical migrantsongbirds in a highly fragmented landscape.Conservation Biology 13: 338-346.GREENBERG, R. 1980. Demographic aspects oflong-distance migration. P. 493-504. In A.Keast and E. S. Morton [eds.], Migrant birdsin the Neotropics: ecology, behavior,distribution, and conservation. SmithsonianInstitution Press, Washington, DC.HENSLER, G. L. & J. D. NICHOLS. 1981. TheMayfield method of estimating nestingsuccess: a model, estimators and simulationresults. Wilson Bulletin 93:42-53.HINES, J. E. & J. R. SAUER. 1989. ProgramCONTRAST—a general program for theanalysis of several survival or recovery rateestimates. Fish and Wildlife Technical Report24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington,DC.HUSSELL, D. J. T., M. H. MATHER, & P. H.SINCLAIR. 1992. Trends in numbers of tropical-and temperate-wintering migrantlandbirds in migration at Long Point, Ontario,1961-1988. p. 101-114. In J. M. Hagan III andD. W. Johnston [eds.], Ecology andconservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds.Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.JEHLE, G., A. A. YACKEL ADAMS, J. A. SAVIDGE,& S. K. SKAGEN. 2004. Nest survivalestimation: a review of alternatives to theMayfield estimator. Condor 106: 472-484.JOHNSGARD, P. A. 1997. The avian broodparasites: deception at the nest. OxfordUniversity Press, New York.JOHNSON, A. W. 1967. The birds of Chile andadjacent regions of Argentina, Bolivia andPeru. Platt Establecimientos Gráficos S.A.,Buenos Aires.LARA, A., C. ECHEVERRÍA, & R. REYES.2002. Bosques nativos. Pp. 127-160 inInstituto Públicos, Universidad de Chile(eds.): Informe País. Estado del MedioAmbiente en Chile 2002. Universidad deChile, Santiago.MANOLIS, J. C., D. E. ANDERSON, & F. J.CUTHBERT. 2000. Uncertain nest fates insongbird studies and variation in Mayfieldestimation. Auk 117:615-626.MARTIN, T. E. & P. LI. 1992. Life history traits ofopen- vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology73:579-592.MASON, P. 1985. The nesting biology of somepasserines of Buenos Aires, Argentina.Ornithological Monographs 36:954-971.MAYFIELD, H. 1961. Nesting success calculatedfrom exposure. Wilson Bulletin 73:255-261.MAYFIELD, H. 1975. Suggestions for calculatingnest success. Wilson Bulletin 87:456-466.MORSE, S. F. & S. K. ROBINSON. 1999. Nestingsuccess of a Neotropical migrant in amultiple-use, forested landscape.Conservation Biology 13: 327-337.PEÑA, de la, M.R. & M. RUMBOLL. 2001. Birdsof southern South America and Antarctica.Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.RIDGLEY, R. S. & G. TUDOR. 1994 . The birds ofSouth America, Volumes I, II. University ofTexas Press, Austin, TX.ROZZI, R. J.J. ARMESTO, A. CORREA, J. C. TO-RRES-MURA, & M. SALLABERRY. 1996.Avifauna de bosques primarios templados enislas deshabitadas del archipiélago de Chiloé,Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural69: 125-139.SAS Institute Inc. 2000. The SAS system. Version8.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
ARTICULOS17SAUER, J. R. & B. K. WILLIAMS. 1989.Generalized procedures for testinghypotheses about survival or recovery rates.Journal of Wildlife Management 53:137-142.SMITH-RAMÍREZ, C. 1993. Los picaflores y surecurso floral en el bosque templado de la Islade Chiloé, Chile. Revista Chilena de HistoriaNatural 66:65-73.TEWKSBURY, J.J., L. GARNER, S. GARNER, J.S. LLOYD, V. SAAB, AND T. E. MARTIN.2006. Tests of landscape influence: nestpredation and bood parasitism in fragmentedecosystems. Ecology 87: 759-768.TRINE, C. L. 1998. Wood thrush population sinksand implications for the scale of regionalconservation strategies. Conservation Biology12: 576-585.VAN HORNE, B. 1983. Density as a misleadingindicator of habitat quality. Journal of WildlifeManagement 47:893-901.VEBLEN, T. T., R. S. HILl, & J. READ, eds. 1996.The ecology and biogeography of Nothofagusforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.VICKERY, P. C., M. L. HUNTER Jr., & J. V. WELLS.1992. Is density an indicator of breedingsuccess? Auk 109: 706-710.VUILLEUMIER, F. 1985. Forest birds of Patagonia:Ecological geography, speciation, endemism,and faunal history. OrnithologicalMonographs 36:255-305.WILLSON, M. F. & J. J. ARMESTO. 1996. The naturalhistory of Chiloé: On Darwin’s trail. RevistaChilena de Historia Natural 69: 149-161.WILLSON, M. F., T. L. DE SANTO, C. SABAG, &J. J. ARMESTO. 1994. Avian communitiesof fragmented south-temperate rainforests inChile. Conservation Biology 8:508-520.WILLSON, M. F., T. L. DE SANTO, C. SABAG, &J. J. ARMESTO. 1996a. Avian communitiesin temperate rainforests of North and SouthAmerica. Pp. 228-247 in R.G. Lawford, P.B.Alaback, & E. Fuentes [eds.], High-latituderainforests and associated ecosystems of thewest coast of the Americas: climate,hydrology, ecology, and conservation.Springer-Verlag, Berlin.WILLSON, M. F., C. SMITH-RAMÍREZ, C. SABAG,& J. F. HERNANDEZ. 1996b. Mutualismosentre plantas y animals in bosque templadosde Sudamerica. p. 251-264. In J. J. Armesto,C. Villagrán, and M. T. K. Arroyo [eds.],Ecología de los bosques natives de Chile, EditorialUniversitaria, Santiago, Chile.WILLSON, M. F., J. L. MORRISON, K. E. SIEVING,T. L. DE SANTO, L. SANTISTEBAN, & I.DÍAZ. 2001. Predation risk and survival ofbird nests: patterns in a Chilean agriculturallandscape. Conservation Biology 15: 447-456.WILLSON, M. F., K. E. SIEVING, & T. L. DE SAN-TO. 2004. Aves de Chiloé: diversidad, amenazasy estrategias de conservación. In:History, biodiversity and ecology of thecoastal rainforest, Chile. C. Smith-Ramírez,J. J. Armesto, & C. Valdovinos (eds.). EditorialUniversitaria, Santiago.ZAR, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4 th edition.Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Table 1: Apparent nest success of three common species in the study sites on Isla Grande de Chiloé. Only nests of knownoutcome are included.Family Scientific name Chilean name English name Apparent nest successfragment fragment nationaledge interior parkTrochilidae Sephanoides picaflor green-backed 35% 45% 41%sephanoides firecrown n = 20 n = 64 n = 17Tyrannidae Elaenia albiceps fío- fío white-crested 9% 31% 39%elaenia n = 11 n = 13 n = 13Turdidae Turdus falcklandii zorzal austral thrush 42% 44% 50%(or Muscicapidae) n = 24 n = 9 n = 6
Page 1 and 2: Boletín Chileno de OrnitologíaNú
Page 3 and 4: ARTICULOS3ABSTRACTAt “El Morado
Page 5 and 6: ARTICULOS5RESULTADOSEn el sector en
Page 7 and 8: ARTICULOS7AGRADECIMIENTOSA la Corpo
Page 9 and 10: ARTICULOS9CONTINUACIÓN ANEXO 1PERI
Page 11 and 12: Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 11
Page 13 and 14: ARTICULOS13also monitored nests in
Page 15: ARTICULOS15are all important mutual
Page 19 and 20: ARTICULOS19La comunidad de aves que
Page 21 and 22: ARTICULOS21Este trabajo muestra que
Page 27 and 28: CONTRIBUCIONES BREVES27sandivicensi
Page 31 and 32: CONTRIBUCIONES BREVES31Cuadro 1: Da
Page 33 and 34: NOTAS33alimentaban en la entrada de
Page 35 and 36: NOTAS35Presencia de cisne coscoroba

BoletÃƒÂ­n Chileno de OrnitologÃƒÂ­a - Wildlife Ecology and Conservation ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

BoletÃƒÂn Chileno de OrnitologÃƒÂa - Wildlife Ecology and Conservation ...