08.02.2018 Views

Mster photo

master descróitopn

master descróitopn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SIGMA sd Quattro<br />

Sigma has created a mirrorless body using DSLR lenses, and fitted it with the<br />

acclaimed X3 Foveon Quattro sensor. The result is a distinctively different camera<br />

– and in theory, they could make a Canon or Nikon version too.<br />

Richard Kilpatrick takes a critical look at the professional potential.<br />

Developing a new sensor<br />

architecture for<br />

the LCD-based DP<br />

models, Sigma’s SLR solution<br />

may have looked a little dated<br />

– although the SD1 Merrill<br />

did provide the 46Mp 3-layer<br />

capture that would appear<br />

to be the final iteration of<br />

the original Foveon concept.<br />

Earlier this year the sd Quattro<br />

was announced, and as<br />

we’ve come to expect from<br />

Sigma, the design is far from<br />

conventional.<br />

A squat mirrorless body,<br />

the sd Quattro retains a<br />

deep lens mount, supporting<br />

Sigma’s own lenses and AF<br />

system from the SA/SD series<br />

SLRs. Sigma’s loyal users will<br />

be delighted to find the new<br />

sensor architecture so far<br />

only seen in compact bodies<br />

retains the separate infra-red<br />

hot mirror filter – this can be<br />

detached very quickly and is<br />

reasonably easy to reinstall,<br />

though with the exposed<br />

sensor it is even more crucial<br />

to do this in clean conditions<br />

rather than in the<br />

field. Processing and power<br />

management are evolutionary<br />

steps from the dp Quattro<br />

series, and no attempt has<br />

been made to provide any<br />

form of video recording; this<br />

is a purely stills camera. Grip<br />

and mount/barrel design are<br />

very comfortable, and the<br />

more central EVF location –<br />

in what looks like it could be<br />

an articulated module, but<br />

is fixed – is comfortable for<br />

right or left eye users alike.<br />

The rear LCD is rather clever,<br />

appearing to be a widescreen<br />

letterbox format but actually<br />

comprising two displays;<br />

an attractive monochrome<br />

LCD that resembles an OLED<br />

display aligned to the control<br />

buttons, and a 3:2 aspect<br />

ratio 1.6Mp LCD display.<br />

Although the specifications<br />

suggest the latest in<br />

Photographed by Paul Monaghan<br />

using the SD quattro, 18-35mm ƒ1.8<br />

Sigma ART lens, and studio flash.<br />

www.thekirkystudio.com<br />

Sigma sd Quattro – £799 body only. See: www.sigma-imaging-uk.com<br />

The sd<br />

Quattro has<br />

an unusually<br />

positioned<br />

EVF ocular,<br />

an internal<br />

removable IR<br />

filter, and a<br />

Sigma SA lens<br />

mount.<br />

EVF performance, the reality<br />

is vastly different from the<br />

mainstream. Yes, the unit is<br />

the latest 2.46Mp display, as<br />

evidenced by the fine detail<br />

on the menu and overlay<br />

graphics and quality of playback;<br />

however, it appears to<br />

be driven by the same VGA<br />

quality feed that is needed for<br />

the dp Quattro. At best, it’s<br />

the 1.6Mp of the rear LCD.<br />

It’s possible that this isn’t<br />

strictly the case, as the resolving<br />

power of the sensor gives<br />

clear moire when focus is<br />

secured, but the effect is compounded<br />

by a strong, distinctive<br />

lag even in good light.<br />

Such is the viewfinder (and<br />

LCD) lag that the image distorts<br />

centrally when panning.<br />

This lag isn’t as apparent on<br />

the dp Quattro, placing the sd<br />

at a disadvantage compared<br />

to the older, cheaper fixedlens<br />

models. AF performance<br />

yields a similar quandary –<br />

the dp’s optimised, compact<br />

16 • MASTER PHOTOGRAPHY SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!