Selangor Appeal Board Issue1 - JPBD Selangor
Selangor Appeal Board Issue1 - JPBD Selangor
Selangor Appeal Board Issue1 - JPBD Selangor
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SELANGOR APPEAL BOARD LAW REPORTS<br />
REJOINDER TO THE APPEAL<br />
In objecting to the <strong>Appeal</strong> the Respondent contends that it is a policy of the Respondent not<br />
to allow two centres to operate across from each other. It states “Secara umumnya dasar<br />
MPSJ tidak membenarkan Pusat Jagaan Kanak-Kanak beroperasi berhadapan di antara<br />
satu sama lain.”<br />
The <strong>Appeal</strong> <strong>Board</strong> is not obligated at all times to be governed by local authority policies. If<br />
it were, the <strong>Board</strong> will be compelled to accept every local authority’s decision every time a<br />
local authority says, “It is our policy!”<br />
While the <strong>Board</strong> encourages local authorities to formulate policies to guide their planning<br />
approval process in order to facilitate administration and ensure consistency, the <strong>Board</strong> has<br />
the responsibility to evaluate whether any particular policy brought to its attention is just<br />
and fair, whether it promotes good town planning and the creation of a liveable environment,<br />
and whether it is practicable and reasonable in the circumstances encountered.<br />
In the opinion of the <strong>Board</strong> a policy of not allowing day-care centres to be located across<br />
from one another is simplistic and not well thought out. The reasons for the <strong>Board</strong>’s opinion<br />
are as follows:-<br />
i. A day-care centre of the type being dealt with is a feeder service to a particular type<br />
of primary school. It has to be located within walking distance of the school. There is,<br />
therefore, a very limited area it can be located in.<br />
ii.<br />
Ideally, a day-care centre should be a building large enough for multiple bathrooms<br />
and toilets to be installed, separate changing rooms for boys and for girls, space for a<br />
large study room to contain at least about fifteen to twenty desks, a reasonably-sized<br />
refectory, at least one room for a sick bay, and if possible a recreation room with indoor<br />
games facilities. There are generally no such premises available in the vicinity of<br />
the type of primary schools we are dealing with. Our urban planning has not taken<br />
into consideration day-care centres. The situation is, therefore, a “make do” situation<br />
and given such circumstances we will have to make the best of what is available.<br />
There are only two types of existing premises available for day-care centres to use<br />
– residential houses or shop-houses. Of the two, residential premises are the better<br />
choice because there is at least some garden space for the children to have access<br />
to fresh air, sunlight and room to move about. The best choice is possibly a corner lot.<br />
A large luxurious bungalow may be ideal but it may not be available within walking<br />
distance of the target school, besides the rental could make the service unaffordable<br />
to most parents.<br />
55