TV3V7f A/ ^Afi 18 im - JScholarship - Johns Hopkins University

Introduction. xin
133 — 135 from: prthiv% in XL. 6. 6'^ to: abrahmanams tu
in XLI. 4. 6".
153 from: ta,rum ca ya in XLVI. 8. 2'' to: so- in XLVI.
10. 13.
155 — 174 from: -satir adyaisam, in XLVII. 1. 8" to: snanavidhih
tarpana- in XLIX. 4. 9.
V. Leaves from a manuscript of the same form and provenance,
but written in a different hand. The partial duplication
of contents, as well as the different pagination, proves
that they belonged to a different manuscript. The contents are:
67 — 72 from: n samasnuta iti end of XXXb to: adityaganah
\ 20 || end of XXXIL 19b.
74 from: -balasya savitrigana[h] sarlrasya in XXXIII. 1. 9
to: pu7'usamarmajna in XXXIII. 4. 5''.
78 — 82 from: ti sesah in XXXVI. 3. 3 to: purvardhani
samaptam iti after the close of XXXVI.
According to Peterson's list there are or were fifty leaves
of a manuscript dated: samvat 1471, and fifteen leaves of a
manuscript dated: samvat 1531. Whether the forty-eight leaves
sent to Dr. v. Negelein'are the fifty leaves first mentioned, or
whether he was sent thirty-six leaves of the first, and twelve
leaves of the second manuscript, is not clear. The date sarnvat
1671 stood on the paper in which the leaves were wrapped.
Both. A copy of a manuscript obtained by Buehler for
the library of the Deccan College in Poena, made in Latin
letters by Rudolph Roth, and now the property of the University
of Tubingen, cf. Garbe, Zuwachsverzeichnis der indischen
Handschriften, Tubingen 1899, p. 90. The copy includes only
Parisistas XXXVII—LXXII. Roth gives the colophon as
follows: "f. 115 von gleichem Papier und Format und anscheinend
demselben Alter, ist von anderer Hand geschrieben
als das vorgehende (hat auch wie d. vor. 9 Zeilen) und lautet:
svasti sarnvat '^^'^^ varse jyesthamase krsnapakse calurthyam
tithaio bhrguvasure vipaksonmulana vikramdkrantapraudhapratapa
parimanamardana patasaha srmiahimadasuratranavi-