03.01.2015 Views

leistikow-proefschrift-patientveiligheid-de-rol-van-de-bestuurder

leistikow-proefschrift-patientveiligheid-de-rol-van-de-bestuurder

leistikow-proefschrift-patientveiligheid-de-rol-van-de-bestuurder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 Prescriptive<br />

- How can the results be translated to general strategies that a board can<br />

apply to lead patient safety improvements<br />

Methodology – literature research and case study strategy<br />

This research is composed of three parts: a theoretical part, an empirical<br />

part and a prescriptive part.<br />

- For the theoretical part a literature research has been conducted to build an<br />

hypothesis on how boards could effectively lead patient safety improvements.<br />

- For the empirical part the case study strategy has been used to examine<br />

three cases which were part of the hospital wi<strong>de</strong> patient safety program in<br />

the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (UMC Utrecht) in<br />

the period 2003-2006. The strategies used by the board are i<strong>de</strong>ntified and<br />

their effect is analyzed. Because the direct effect on patient safety could<br />

not be measured, proxy measures were used (e.g. amount of inci<strong>de</strong>nts<br />

reported, satisfaction of professionals involved, amount of implemented<br />

recommendations). The outcome of the empirical research is compared to<br />

the outcome of the theoretical research.<br />

- Based on this outcome, the prescriptive part recommends which strategies a<br />

board can use to lead patient safety improvements.<br />

Theory part 1 - The four traits of patient safety<br />

Based on the literature research, four traits have been i<strong>de</strong>ntified that make it<br />

difficult for a board to lead patient safety improvements: visibility, ambiguity,<br />

diversity and si<strong>de</strong>-effects of professionalism.<br />

Visibility<br />

Unsafety in healthcare often hardly visible. There is almost never a visible<br />

distinction between a patient who has died due to a preventable adverse<br />

event, and any other <strong>de</strong>ceased patient. Even if the problem is recognized on<br />

the individual patient level, the magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the problem can remain<br />

hid<strong>de</strong>n for the healthcare professionals involved. Serious adverse events can<br />

have a major emotional impact, but they will often be seen as a freak occurrence<br />

rather than a daily problem. This low visibility diminishes the opportunities<br />

for learning. It also makes it har<strong>de</strong>r to create a sense of urgency.<br />

Safety thus often loses the battle for attention against more visible problems<br />

Patiëntveiligheid, <strong>de</strong> <strong>rol</strong> <strong>van</strong> <strong>de</strong> bestuur<strong>de</strong>r 381

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!