15.11.2014 Views

2. Metodbeskrivning - SBU

2. Metodbeskrivning - SBU

2. Metodbeskrivning - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Referenser<br />

1. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S.<br />

Statistical outcome of random versus<br />

selected withdrawal of dental implants.<br />

Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:25-30.<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Herrmann I. Influences of statistical<br />

analyses on result presentation of oral<br />

implant treatment. Avhandling Göteborg:<br />

Göteborgs Universitet; 2007.<br />

3. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative<br />

content analysis in nursing research:<br />

concepts, procedures and measures to<br />

achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ<br />

Today 2004;24:105-1<strong>2.</strong><br />

4. Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological<br />

hermeneutical method for researching<br />

lived experience. Scand J Caring<br />

Sci 2004;18:145-53.<br />

5. Sandelowski M, Barroso J.<br />

Classifying the findings in qualita-<br />

tive studies. Qual Health Res 2003;<br />

13:905-23.<br />

6. Strauss A, Corbin, J. Basics of<br />

qualitative research. Techniques and<br />

procedures for developing grounded<br />

theory. 2 ed. Thousand Oaks California:<br />

Sage Publications; 1998.<br />

7. Howell Major C, Savin-Baden, M.<br />

An introduction to qualitative research<br />

synthesis. New York; Routledge; 2010.<br />

8. Timulak L. Meta-analysis of qualitative<br />

studies: a tool for reviewing qualitative<br />

research findings in psychotherapy.<br />

Psychother Res 2009;19:591-600.<br />

9. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Vist GE,<br />

Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P.<br />

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating<br />

quality of evidence and strenght of recommendations.<br />

BMJ 2008;336:924-6.<br />

56 TANDFÖRLUSTER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!