18.06.2012 Views

ULUSLARARASI EKONOMİK SORUNLAR

ULUSLARARASI EKONOMİK SORUNLAR

ULUSLARARASI EKONOMİK SORUNLAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34<br />

A Review on the Dominance of Economic<br />

Powers over Politics in the Context of<br />

Current Globalization Process<br />

The question of how the globalization affects the current political configuration of<br />

world and nation-states is one of the main debate subjects in international relations.<br />

Globalization can be defined as “growing economic interdependence of countries<br />

worldwide through increasing volume and variety of cross-border transactions in goods<br />

and services, free capital flows, and more rapid and widespread diffusion of technology”<br />

(IMF 1997). From the theoretical perspective (especially the Liberal and Realist<br />

Schools), the link between globalization and international politics in terms of global<br />

governance, peace and welfare is about the economic interdependence and state<br />

sovereignty.<br />

Currently, there are two main arguments on the effects of economic globalization<br />

on the international politics, especially the state power. The first argument argues that<br />

due to the transformation of world economy and information technologies (IT), the<br />

nation-states have been losing capacity to control their own economies and political<br />

boundaries in the globalization process. Non-state actors (NGOs, international<br />

organizations, “markets”, especially transnational corporations-TNCs) are challenging<br />

the exercise of sovereignty of state. Some proponents of this argument say that the<br />

nation-state is “an outmoded institution, ill-equipped to deal with economic entities”.<br />

On the other hand, the second argument which depends on the Realist School<br />

considers that although globalization has posed new challenges to states; states are not<br />

being replaced, because no other non-state actor can equal the capabilities of the state.<br />

In response to the first argument, Waltz (2000) states, “Many globalizers believe that<br />

the world is increasingly ruled by markets. Looking at the state of states leads one to a<br />

different conclusion. Rather than elevating economic forces and depressing political<br />

ones, the inequalities of international politics enhance the political role of one country…<br />

Politics as usual prevails over economics” (p.7). Like most realists, Waltz argues that<br />

the dominance of markets over politics is an illusion of the last two decades.<br />

_____________________________<br />

(*) Master’s Student, Marmara University, Göztepe/İstanbul.<br />

Uluslararası Ekonomik Sorunlar<br />

Özgür ÇALIŞKAN*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!