Turkish Journal of Hematology Volume: 33 - Issue: 3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Volume</strong> <strong>33</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 3 September 2016 80 TL<br />
ISSN 1300-7777<br />
Review Article<br />
Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu; İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Research Articles<br />
The Mutation Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Calreticulin in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia<br />
Jingyi Wang, et al.; Shandong, China<br />
Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms <br />
Neslihan Andıç, et al.; Eskişehir, Aydın, Turkey<br />
Retrospective Study <strong>of</strong> Incidence and Prognostic Significance <strong>of</strong> Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem<br />
Cell Transplantation: Influence <strong>of</strong> Corticosteroid Therapy<br />
Wataru Yamamoto, et al.; Yokohama, Japan<br />
Cytokine Contents in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Association with ZAP70 Expression<br />
Nilgün Işıksaçan, et al.; İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Finding the Optimal Conditioning Regimen for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous<br />
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison <strong>of</strong> BEAM and High-Dose ICE<br />
Onur Esbah, et al.; Ankara, Turkey<br />
The Changing Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections and Resistance in Hematopoietic Stem Cell<br />
Transplantation Recipients<br />
Mücahit Yemişen, et al.; İstanbul, Turkey<br />
BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical Characteristics and Utility<br />
<strong>of</strong> Leflunomide Treatment<br />
Young Hoon Park, et al.; Incheon, Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea<br />
A Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy <strong>of</strong> Three Hepatitis B Vaccine Induction Regimens in Adult Patients<br />
with Hematological Malignancies<br />
Zübeyde Nur Özkurt, et al.; Ankara, Turkey<br />
Reliability and Validity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module for 2- to 7-Year-Old and the<br />
PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales for 5- to 7-Year-Old: The Hacettepe University Experience<br />
Vesile Yıldız Kabak, et al.; Ankara, Turkey<br />
Cover Picture:<br />
Mehmet Sönmez<br />
Trabzon, Turkey<br />
3
Editor-in-Chief<br />
Reyhan Küçükkaya<br />
İstanbul Bilim University, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Associate Editors<br />
Ayşegül Ünüvar<br />
İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Cengiz Beyan<br />
Gülhane Military Medical Academy,<br />
Ankara, Turkey<br />
Hale Ören<br />
Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey<br />
İbrahim C. Haznedaroğlu<br />
Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey<br />
M. Cem Ar<br />
İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Selami Koçak Toprak<br />
Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Semra Paydaş<br />
Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey<br />
Assistant Editors<br />
A. Emre Eşkazan<br />
İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Ali İrfan Emre Tekgündüz<br />
Dr. A. Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training<br />
and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Elif Ünal İnce<br />
Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey<br />
İnci Alacacıoğlu<br />
Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu<br />
İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Nil Güler<br />
Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey<br />
Olga Meltem Akay<br />
Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Şule Ünal<br />
Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Veysel Sabri Hançer<br />
İstanbul Bilim University, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Zühre Kaya<br />
Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey<br />
International Review Board<br />
Nejat Akar<br />
Görgün Akpek<br />
Serhan Alkan<br />
Çiğdem Altay<br />
Koen van Besien<br />
Ayhan Çavdar<br />
M. Sıraç Dilber<br />
Ahmet Doğan<br />
Peter Dreger<br />
Thierry Facon<br />
Jawed Fareed<br />
Gösta Gahrton<br />
Dieter Hoelzer<br />
Marilyn Manco-Johnson<br />
Andreas Josting<br />
Emin Kansu<br />
Winfried Kern<br />
Nigel Key<br />
Korgün Koral<br />
Abdullah Kutlar<br />
Luca Malcovati<br />
Robert Marcus<br />
Jean Pierre Marie<br />
Ghulam Mufti<br />
Gerassimos A. Pangalis<br />
Antonio Piga<br />
Ananda Prasad<br />
Jacob M. Rowe<br />
Jens-Ulrich Rüffer<br />
Norbert Schmitz<br />
Orhan Sezer<br />
Anna Sureda<br />
Ayalew Tefferi<br />
Nükhet Tüzüner<br />
Catherine Verfaillie<br />
Srdan Verstovsek<br />
Claudio Viscoli<br />
Past Editors<br />
Erich Frank<br />
Orhan Ulutin<br />
Hamdi Akan<br />
Aytemiz Gürgey<br />
Senior Advisory Board<br />
Yücel Tangün<br />
Osman İlhan<br />
Muhit Özcan<br />
Teoman Soysal<br />
TOBB Economy Technical University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Maryland School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Baltimore, USA<br />
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, USA<br />
Ankara, Turkey<br />
Chicago Medical Center University, Chicago, USA<br />
Ankara, Turkey<br />
Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden<br />
Mayo Clinic Saint Marys Hospital, USA<br />
Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany<br />
Lille University, Lille, France<br />
Loyola University, Maywood, USA<br />
Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden<br />
Frankfurt University, Frankfurt, Germany<br />
Colorado Health Sciences University, USA<br />
University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany<br />
Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Albert Ludwigs University, Germany<br />
University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, NC, USA<br />
Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA<br />
Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, USA<br />
Pavia Medical School University, Pavia, Italy<br />
Kings College Hospital, London, UK<br />
Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France<br />
King’s Hospital, London, UK<br />
Athens University, Athens, Greece<br />
Torino University, Torino, Italy<br />
Wayne State University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Detroit, USA<br />
Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Köln, Germany<br />
AK St Georg, Hamburg, Germany<br />
Memorial Şişli Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain<br />
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA<br />
İstanbul Cerrahpaşa University, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, Minnesota, USA<br />
The University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA<br />
San Martino University, Genoa, Italy<br />
Language Editor<br />
Leslie Demir<br />
Statistic Editor<br />
Hülya Ellidokuz<br />
Editorial Office<br />
İpek Durusu<br />
Bengü Timoçin<br />
A-I<br />
Publishing<br />
Services<br />
GALENOS PUBLISHER<br />
Molla Gürani Mah. Kaçamak Sk. No: 21, Fındıkzade, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Phone: +90 212 621 99 25 • Fax: +90 212 621 99 27 • www. galenos.com.tr
Contact Information<br />
Editorial Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Reyhan Küçükkaya<br />
E-mail : rkucukkaya@hotmail.com<br />
All inquiries should be addressed to<br />
TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY<br />
Address : İlkbahar Mahallesi, Turan Güneş Bulvarı 613. Sk. No:8 06550 Çankaya, Ankara / Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 312 490 98 97<br />
Fax : +90 312 490 98 68<br />
E-mail : info@tjh.com.tr<br />
ISSN: 1300-7777<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />
Ahmet Muzaffer Demir, President<br />
Güner Hayri Özsan, General Secretary<br />
T. Tiraje Celkan, Vice President<br />
M. Cem Ar, Research Secretary<br />
E. Naci Tiftik, Treasurer<br />
Meltem Yüksel, Member<br />
İlknur Kozanoğlu, Member<br />
Online Manuscript Submission<br />
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tjh<br />
Web page<br />
www.tjh.com.tr<br />
Owner on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong><br />
Türk Hematoloji Derneği adına yayın sahibi<br />
Ahmet Muzaffer Demir<br />
Üç ayda bir yayımlanan İngilizce süreli yayındır.<br />
International scientific journal published quarterly.<br />
Publishing Manager<br />
Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü<br />
Güner Hayri Özsan<br />
Management Address<br />
Yayın İdare Adresi<br />
Türk Hematoloji Derneği<br />
İlkbahar Mahallesi, Turan Güneş Bulvarı 613. Sk. No:8 06550 Çankaya,<br />
Ankara / Turkey<br />
Publishing House / Yayınevi<br />
Molla Gürani Mah. Kaçamak Sk. No: 21, 34093 Fındıkzade, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Tel: +90 212 621 99 25 Faks: +90 212 621 99 27<br />
E-posta: info@galenos.com.tr<br />
Baskı: Özgün Ofset Ticaret Ltd. Şti.<br />
Yeşilce Mah. Aytekin Sk. No: 21 34418 4. Levent / İSTANBUL<br />
Printing Date / Basım Tarihi<br />
15.08.2016<br />
Cover Picture<br />
Mehmet Sönmez is currently working at Karadeniz Technical University,<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Trabzon, Turkey.<br />
Türk Hematoloji Derneği, 07.10.2008 tarihli ve 6 no’lu kararı ile <strong>Turkish</strong><br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>’nin Türk Hematoloji Derneği İktisadi İşletmesi<br />
tarafından yayınlanmasına karar vermiştir.<br />
A-II
AIMS AND SCOPE<br />
The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> is published quarterly (March, June,<br />
September, and December) by the <strong>Turkish</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>. It is an<br />
independent, non-pr<strong>of</strong>it peer-reviewed international English-language<br />
periodical encompassing subjects relevant to hematology.<br />
The Editorial Board <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> adheres to the<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> the World Association <strong>of</strong> Medical Editors (WAME), International<br />
Council <strong>of</strong> Medical <strong>Journal</strong> Editors (ICMJE), Committee on Publication<br />
Ethics (COPE), Consolidated Standards <strong>of</strong> Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and<br />
Strengthening the Reporting <strong>of</strong> Observational Studies in Epidemiology<br />
(STROBE).<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> is to publish original<br />
hematological research <strong>of</strong> the highest scientific quality and clinical relevance.<br />
Additionally, educational material, reviews on basic developments, editorial<br />
short notes, images in hematology, and letters from hematology specialists<br />
and clinicians covering their experience and comments on hematology<br />
and related medical fields as well as social subjects are published. As <strong>of</strong><br />
December 2015, The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> does not accept case<br />
reports. Important new findings or data about interesting hematological<br />
cases may be submitted as a brief report.<br />
General practitioners interested in hematology and internal medicine<br />
specialists are among our target audience, and The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Hematology</strong> aims to publish according to their needs. The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Hematology</strong> is indexed, as follows:<br />
- PubMed Medline<br />
- PubMed Central<br />
- Science Citation Index Expanded<br />
- EMBASE<br />
- Scopus<br />
- CINAHL<br />
- Gale/Cengage Learning<br />
- EBSCO<br />
- DOAJ<br />
- ProQuest<br />
- Index Copernicus<br />
- Tübitak/Ulakbim <strong>Turkish</strong> Medical Database<br />
- Turk Medline<br />
Impact Factor: 0.827<br />
Subscription Information<br />
The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> is sent free-<strong>of</strong>-charge to members<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Turkish</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> and libraries in Turkey and abroad.<br />
Hematologists, other medical specialists that are interested in hematology,<br />
and academicians could subscribe for only 40 $ per printed issue. All<br />
published volumes are available in full text free-<strong>of</strong>-charge online at www.<br />
tjh.com.tr.<br />
Address: İlkbahar Mah., Turan Güneş Bulvarı, 613 Sok., No: 8, Çankaya,<br />
Ankara, Turkey<br />
Telephone: +90 312 490 98 97<br />
Fax: +90 312 490 98 68<br />
Online Manuscript Submission: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tjh<br />
Web page: www.tjh.com.tr<br />
E-mail: info@tjh.com.tr<br />
Permissions<br />
Requests for permission to reproduce published material should be sent to<br />
the editorial <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
Editor: Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Reyhan Diz Küçükkaya<br />
Adress: İlkbahar Mah, Turan Günes Bulvarı, 613 Sok., No: 8, Çankaya, Ankara,<br />
Turkey<br />
Telephone: +90 312 490 98 97<br />
Fax: +90 312 490 98 68<br />
Online Manuscript Submission: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tjh<br />
Web page: www.tjh.com.tr<br />
E-mail: info@tjh.com.tr<br />
Publisher<br />
Galenos Yayınevi<br />
Molla Gürani Mah. Kaçamak Sk. No:21 34093 Fındıkzade-İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Telephone : +90 212 621 99 25<br />
Fax : +90 212 621 99 27<br />
info@galenos.com.tr<br />
Instructions for Authors<br />
Instructions for authors are published in the journal and at www.tjh.com.tr<br />
Material Disclaimer<br />
Authors are responsible for the manuscripts they publish in The <strong>Turkish</strong><br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>. The editor, editorial board, and publisher do not<br />
accept any responsibility for published manuscripts.<br />
If you use a table or figure (or some data in a table or figure) from another<br />
source, cite the source directly in the figure or table legend.<br />
The journal is printed on acid-free paper.<br />
Editorial Policy<br />
Following receipt <strong>of</strong> each manuscript, a checklist is completed by the<br />
Editorial Assistant. The Editorial Assistant checks that each manuscript<br />
contains all required components and adheres to the author guidelines,<br />
after which time it will be forwarded to the Editor in Chief. Following the<br />
Editor in Chief’s evaluation, each manuscript is forwarded to the Associate<br />
Editor, who in turn assigns reviewers. Generally, all manuscripts will be<br />
reviewed by at least three reviewers selected by the Associate Editor, based<br />
on their relevant expertise. Associate editor could be assigned as a reviewer<br />
along with the reviewers. After the reviewing process, all manuscripts are<br />
evaluated in the Editorial Board Meeting.<br />
<strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>’s editor and Editorial Board members are<br />
active researchers. It is possible that they would desire to submit their<br />
manuscript to the <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>. This may be creating<br />
a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest. These manuscripts will not be evaluated by the<br />
submitting editor(s). The review process will be managed and decisions<br />
made by editor-in-chief who will act independently. In some situation, this<br />
process will be overseen by an outside independent expert in reviewing<br />
submissions from editors.<br />
A-III
TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY<br />
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS<br />
The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> accepts invited review articles, research<br />
articles, brief reports, letters to the editor, and hematological images that<br />
are relevant to the scope <strong>of</strong> hematology, on the condition that they have<br />
not been previously published elsewhere. Basic science manuscripts, such<br />
as randomized, cohort, cross-sectional, and case control studies, are given<br />
preference. All manuscripts are subject to editorial revision to ensure they<br />
conform to the style adopted by the journal. There is a double blind kind<br />
<strong>of</strong> reviewing system.<br />
Manuscripts should be prepared according to ICMJE guidelines (http://<br />
www.icmje.org/). Original manuscripts require a structured abstract. Label<br />
each section <strong>of</strong> the structured abstract with the appropriate subheading<br />
(Objective, Materials and Methods, Results, and Conclusion). Letters to<br />
the editor do not require an abstract. Research or project support should<br />
be acknowledged as a footnote on the title page. Technical and other<br />
assistance should be provided on the title page.<br />
Original Manuscripts<br />
Title Page<br />
Title: The title should provide important information regarding the<br />
manuscript’s content. The title must specify that the study is a cohort<br />
study, cross-sectional study, case control study, or randomized study (i.e.<br />
Cao GY, Li KX, Jin PF, Yue XY, Yang C, Hu X. Comparative bioavailability<br />
<strong>of</strong> ferrous succinate tablet formulations without correction for baseline<br />
circadian changes in iron concentration in healthy Chinese male subjects:<br />
A single-dose, randomized, 2-period crossover study. Clin Ther. 2011; <strong>33</strong>:<br />
2054-2059).<br />
The title page should include the authors’ names, degrees, and institutional/<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional affiliations, a short title, abbreviations, keywords, financial<br />
disclosure statement, and conflict <strong>of</strong> interest statement. If a manuscript<br />
includes authors from more than one institution, each author’s name<br />
should be followed by a superscript number that corresponds to their<br />
institution, which is listed separately. Please provide contact information<br />
for the corresponding author, including name, e-mail address, and<br />
telephone and fax numbers.<br />
Running Head: The running head should not be more than 40 characters,<br />
including spaces, and should be located at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the title page.<br />
Word Count: A word count for the manuscript, excluding abstract,<br />
acknowledgments, figure and table legends, and references, should be<br />
provided not exceed 2500 words. The word count for an abstract should<br />
be not exceed 300 words.<br />
Conflict-<strong>of</strong>-Interest Statement: To prevent potential conflicts <strong>of</strong><br />
interest from being overlooked, this statement must be included in each<br />
manuscript. In case there are conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest, every author should<br />
complete the ICMJE general declaration form, which can be obtained at:<br />
http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclose.pdf.<br />
Abstract and Keywords: The second page should include an abstract<br />
that does not exceed 300 words. For manuscripts sent by authors in<br />
Turkey, a title and abstract in <strong>Turkish</strong> are also required. As most readers<br />
read the abstract first, it is critically important. Moreover, as various<br />
electronic databases integrate only abstracts into their index, important<br />
findings should be presented in the abstract.<br />
Objective: The abstract should state the objective (the purpose <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study and hypothesis) and summarize the rationale for the study.<br />
Materials and Methods: Important methods should be written<br />
respectively.<br />
Results: Important findings and results should be provided here.<br />
Conclusion: The study’s new and important findings should be<br />
highlighted and interpreted.<br />
Other types <strong>of</strong> manuscripts, such as reviews, perspectives, and<br />
editorials, will be published according to uniform requirements.<br />
Provide 3-10 keywords below the abstract to assist indexers. Use<br />
terms from the Index Medicus Medical Subject Headings List<br />
(for randomized studies a CONSORT abstract should be provided (http://<br />
www.consort-statement.org).<br />
Introduction: The introduction should include an overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relevant literature presented in summary form (one page), and what ever<br />
remains interesting, unique, problematic, relevant, or unknown about<br />
the topic must be specified. The introduction should conclude with the<br />
rationale for the study, its design, and its objective(s).<br />
Materials and Methods: Clearly describe the selection <strong>of</strong> observational<br />
or experimental participants, such as patients, laboratory animals, and<br />
controls, including inclusion and exclusion criteria and a description <strong>of</strong> the<br />
source population. Identify the methods and procedures in sufficient detail<br />
to allow other researchers to reproduce your results. Provide references<br />
to established methods (including statistical methods), provide references<br />
to brief modified methods, and provide the rationale for using them and<br />
an evaluation <strong>of</strong> their limitations. Identify all drugs and chemicals used,<br />
including generic names, doses, and routes <strong>of</strong> administration. The section<br />
should include only information that was available at the time the plan<br />
or protocol for the study was devised (http://www.strobe-statement.org/<br />
fileadmin/Strobe/uploads/checklists/STROBE_checklist_v4_combined.<br />
pdf).<br />
Statistics: Describe the statistical methods used in enough detail to<br />
enable a knowledgeable reader with access to the original data to verify<br />
the reported results. Statistically important data should be given in the<br />
text, tables and figures. Provide details about randomization, describe<br />
treatment complications, provide the number <strong>of</strong> observations, and specify<br />
all computer programs used.<br />
A-IV
Results: Present your results in logical sequence in the text, tables, and<br />
figures. Do not present all the data provided in the tables and/or figures<br />
in the text; emphasize and/or summarize only important findings, results,<br />
and observations in the text. For clinical studies provide the number <strong>of</strong><br />
samples, cases, and controls included in the study. Discrepancies between<br />
the planned number and obtained number <strong>of</strong> participants should be<br />
explained. Comparisons, and statistically important values (i.e. P value<br />
and confidence interval) should be provided.<br />
Discussion: This section should include a discussion <strong>of</strong> the data. New and<br />
important findings/results, and the conclusions they lead to should be<br />
emphasized. Link the conclusions with the goals <strong>of</strong> the study, but avoid<br />
unqualified statements and conclusions not completely supported by<br />
the data. Do not repeat the findings/results in detail; important findings/<br />
results should be compared with those <strong>of</strong> similar studies in the literature,<br />
along with a summarization. In other words, similarities or differences in<br />
the obtained findings/results with those previously reported should be<br />
discussed.<br />
Study Limitations: Limitations <strong>of</strong> the study should be detailed. In<br />
addition, an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the implications <strong>of</strong> the obtained findings/<br />
results for future research should be outlined.<br />
Conclusion: The conclusion <strong>of</strong> the study should be highlighted.<br />
References<br />
Cite references in the text, tables, and figures with numbers in parentheses.<br />
Number references consecutively according to the order in which they<br />
first appear in the text. <strong>Journal</strong> titles should be abbreviated according to<br />
the style used in Index Medicus (consult List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Journal</strong>s Indexed in Index<br />
Medicus). Include among the references any paper accepted, but not yet<br />
published, designating the journal and followed by, in press.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> References:<br />
1. List all authors.<br />
Deeg HJ, O’Donnel M, Tolar J. Optimization <strong>of</strong> conditioning for marrow<br />
transplantation from unrelated donors for patients with aplastic anemia<br />
after failure immunosuppressive therapy. Blood 2006;108:1485-1491.<br />
2. Organization as author<br />
Royal Marsden Hospital Bone Marrow Transplantation Team. Failure <strong>of</strong><br />
syngeneic bone marrow graft without preconditioning in post-hepatitis<br />
marrow aplasia. Lancet 1977;2:742-744.<br />
3. Book<br />
Wintrobe MM. Clinical <strong>Hematology</strong>, 5th ed. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger,<br />
1961.<br />
4. Book Chapter<br />
Perutz MF. Molecular anatomy and physiology <strong>of</strong> hemoglobin. In:<br />
Steinberg MH, Forget BG, Higs DR, Nagel RI, (eds). Disorders <strong>of</strong> Hemoglobin:<br />
Genetics, Pathophysiology, Clinical Management. New York, Cambridge<br />
University Press, 2000.<br />
5. Abstract<br />
Drachman JG, Griffin JH, Kaushansky K. The c-Mpl ligand (thrombopoietin)<br />
stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation. Blood 1994;84:390a (abstract).<br />
6. Letter to the Editor<br />
Rao PN, Hayworth HR, Carroll AJ, Bowden DW, Pettenati MJ. Further<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> 20q deletion in myeloid leukemia using fluorescence in situ<br />
hybridization. Blood 1994;84:2821-2823.<br />
7. Supplement<br />
Alter BP. Fanconi’s anemia, transplantation, and cancer. Pediatr Transplant.<br />
2005;9(Suppl 7):81-86<br />
Brief Reports<br />
Abstract length: Not to exceed 150 words.<br />
Article length: Not to exceed 1200 words.<br />
Introduction: State the purpose and summarize the rationale for the study.<br />
Materials and Methods: Clearly describe the selection <strong>of</strong> the observational<br />
or experimental participants. Identify the methods and procedures in<br />
sufficient detail. Provide references to established methods (including<br />
statistical methods), provide references to brief modified methods, and<br />
provide the rationale for their use and an evaluation <strong>of</strong> their limitations.<br />
Identify all drugs and chemicals used, including generic names, doses, and<br />
routes <strong>of</strong> administration.<br />
Statistics: Describe the statistical methods used in enough detail to<br />
enable a knowledgeable reader with access to the original data to verify<br />
the reported findings/results. Provide details about randomization,<br />
describe treatment complications, provide the number <strong>of</strong> observations,<br />
and specify all computer programs used.<br />
Results: Present the findings/results in a logical sequence in the text,<br />
tables, and figures. Do not repeat all the findings/results in the tables and<br />
figures in the text; emphasize and/or summarize only those that are most<br />
important.<br />
Discussion: Highlight the new and important findings/results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study and the conclusions they lead to. Link the conclusions with the<br />
goals <strong>of</strong> the study, but avoid unqualified statements and conclusions not<br />
completely supported by your data.<br />
Invited Review Articles<br />
Abstract length: Not to exceed 300 words.<br />
Article length: Not to exceed 4000 words.<br />
Review articles should not include more than 100 references. Reviews<br />
should include a conclusion, in which a new hypothesis or study about the<br />
subject may be posited. Do not publish methods for literature search or<br />
level <strong>of</strong> evidence. Authors who will prepare review articles should already<br />
A-V
have published research articles on therel evant subject. The study’s new and<br />
important findings should be highlighted and interpreted in the Conclusion<br />
section. There should be a maximum <strong>of</strong> two authors for review articles.<br />
Images in <strong>Hematology</strong><br />
Article length: Not exceed 200 words.<br />
Authors can submit for consideration an illustration and photos that is<br />
interesting, instructive, and visually attractive, along with a few lines<br />
<strong>of</strong> explanatory text and references. Images in <strong>Hematology</strong> can include<br />
no more than 200 words <strong>of</strong> text, 5 references, and 3 figure or table. No<br />
abstract, discussion or conclusion are required but please include a brief<br />
title.<br />
Letters to the Editor<br />
Article length: Not to exceed 500 words.<br />
Letters can include no more than 500 words <strong>of</strong> text, 5-10 references, and<br />
1 figure or table. No abstract is required, but please include a brief title.<br />
Tables<br />
Supply each table on a separate file. Number tables according to the order<br />
in which they appear in the text, and supply a brief caption for each. Give<br />
each column a short or abbreviated heading. Write explanatory statistical<br />
measures <strong>of</strong> variation, such as standard deviation or standard error <strong>of</strong><br />
mean. Be sure that each table is cited in the text.<br />
Figures<br />
Figures should be pr<strong>of</strong>essionally drawn and/or photographed. Authors<br />
should number figures according to the order in which they appear in the<br />
text. Figures include graphs, charts, photographs, and illustrations. Each<br />
figure should be accompanied by a legend that does not exceed 50 words.<br />
Use abbreviations only if they have been introduced in the text. Authors<br />
are also required to provide the level <strong>of</strong> magnification for histological<br />
slides. Explain the internal scale and identify the staining method used.<br />
Figures should be submitted as separate files, not in the text file. Highresolution<br />
image files are not preferred for initial submission as the file<br />
sizes may be too large. The total file size <strong>of</strong> the PDF for peer review should<br />
not exceed 5 MB.<br />
Authorship<br />
Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to assume<br />
public responsibility for the content. Any portion <strong>of</strong> a manuscript that<br />
is critical to its main conclusions must be the responsibility <strong>of</strong> at least 1<br />
author.<br />
Contributor’s Statement<br />
All submissions should contain a contributor’s statement page. Each<br />
manuscript should contain substantial contributions to idea and design,<br />
acquisition <strong>of</strong> data, or analysis and interpretation <strong>of</strong> findings. All persons<br />
designated as an author should qualify for authorship, and all those that<br />
qualify should be listed. Each author should have participated sufficiently<br />
in the work to take responsibility for appropriate portions <strong>of</strong> the text.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Acknowledge support received from individuals, organizations, grants,<br />
corporations, and any other source. For work involving a biomedical<br />
product or potential product partially or wholly supported by corporate<br />
funding, a note stating, “This study was financially supported (in part)<br />
with funds provided by (company name) to (authors’ initials)”, must be<br />
included. Grant support, if received, needs to be stated and the specific<br />
granting institutions’ names and grant numbers provided when applicable.<br />
Authors are expected to disclose on the title page any commercial or other<br />
associations that might pose a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest in connection with the<br />
submitted manuscript. All funding sources that supported the work and<br />
the institutional and/or corporate affiliations <strong>of</strong> the authors should be<br />
acknowledged on the title page.<br />
Ethics<br />
When reporting experiments conducted with humans indicate that<br />
the procedures were in accordance with ethical standards set forth by<br />
the committee that oversees human experimentation. Approval <strong>of</strong><br />
research protocols by the relevant ethics committee, in accordance with<br />
international agreements (Helsinki Declaration <strong>of</strong> 1975, revised 2002<br />
available at http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm, “Guide for the Care and<br />
use <strong>of</strong> Laboratory Animals” www.nap.edu/catalog/5140.html/), is required<br />
for all experimental, clinical, and drug studies. Patient names, initials, and<br />
hospital identification numbers should not be used. Manuscripts reporting<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> experimental investigations conducted with humans must<br />
state that the study protocol received institutional review board approval<br />
and that the participants provided informed consent.<br />
Non-compliance with scientific accuracy is not in accord with scientific<br />
ethics. Plagiarism: To re-publish-whole or in part-the contents <strong>of</strong> another<br />
author’s publication as one’s own without providing a reference. Fabrication:<br />
To publish data and findings/results that do not exist. Duplication: Use <strong>of</strong><br />
data from another publication, which includes re-publishing a manuscript<br />
in different languages. Salamisation: To create more than one publication<br />
by dividing the results <strong>of</strong> a study preternaturally.<br />
We disapprove <strong>of</strong> such unethical practices as plagiarism, fabrication,<br />
duplication, and salamisation, as well as efforts to influence the<br />
review process with such practices as gifting authorship, inappropriate<br />
acknowledgements, and references. Additionally, authors must respect<br />
participant right to privacy.<br />
On the other hand, short abstracts published in congress books that do<br />
not exceed 400 words and present data <strong>of</strong> preliminary research, and those<br />
that are presented in an electronic environment are not accepted prepublished<br />
work. Authors in such situation must declare this status on the<br />
first page <strong>of</strong> the manuscript and in the cover letter.<br />
(The COPE flowchart is available at: http://publicationethics.org)<br />
We use iThenticate to screen all submissions for plagiarism before<br />
publication.<br />
A-VI
<strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> uses plagiarism screening service to verify<br />
the originality <strong>of</strong> content submitted before publication.<br />
Conditions <strong>of</strong> Publication<br />
All authors are required to affirm the following statements before their<br />
manuscript is considered: 1. The manuscript is being submitted only<br />
to The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>; 2. The manuscript will not be<br />
submitted elsewhere while under consideration by The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>; 3. The manuscript has not been published elsewhere,<br />
and should it be published in The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> it will<br />
not be published elsewhere without the permission <strong>of</strong> the editors (these<br />
restrictions do not apply to abstracts or to press reports for presentations<br />
at scientific meetings); 4. All authors are responsible for the manuscript’s<br />
content; 5. All authors participated in the study concept and design,<br />
analysis and interpretation <strong>of</strong> the data, drafting or revising <strong>of</strong> the<br />
manuscript, and have approved the manuscript as submitted. In addition,<br />
all authors are required to disclose any pr<strong>of</strong>essional affiliation, financial<br />
agreement, or other involvement with any company whose product<br />
figures prominently in the submitted manuscript.<br />
Authors <strong>of</strong> accepted manuscripts will receive electronic page pro<strong>of</strong>s and<br />
are responsible for pro<strong>of</strong>reading and checking the entire article within<br />
two days. Failure to return the pro<strong>of</strong> in two days will delay publication. If<br />
the authors cannot be reached by email or telephone within two weeks,<br />
the manuscript will be rejected and will not be published in the journal.<br />
Copyright<br />
At the time <strong>of</strong> submission all authors will receive instructions for<br />
submitting an online copyright form. No manuscript will be considered<br />
for review until all authors have completed their copyright form. Please<br />
note, it is our practice not to accept copyright forms via fax, e-mail, or<br />
postal service unless there is a problem with the online author accounts<br />
that cannot be resolved. Every effort should be made to use the online<br />
copyright system. Corresponding authors can log in to the submission<br />
system at any time to check the status <strong>of</strong> any co-author’s copyright form.<br />
All accepted manuscripts become the permanent property <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Turkish</strong><br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> and may not be published elsewhere-in whole or<br />
in part-without written permission.<br />
Note: We cannot accept any copyright that has been altered, revised,<br />
amended, or otherwise changed. Our original copyright form must be<br />
used as is.<br />
Units <strong>of</strong> Measurement<br />
Measurements should be reported using the metric system, according<br />
to the International System <strong>of</strong> Units (SI). Consult the SI Unit Conversion<br />
Guide, New England <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Medicine Books, 1992.<br />
An extensive list <strong>of</strong> conversion factors can be found at http://www.unc.<br />
edu/~rowlett/units/scales/clinical_data.html. For more details, see http://<br />
www.amamanual<strong>of</strong>style.com/oso/public/jama/si_conversion_table.html.<br />
Example for CBC.<br />
<strong>Hematology</strong> component<br />
SI units<br />
RBC 6.7-11 x 10 12 /L<br />
WBC 5.5-19.5 x10 9 /L<br />
Hemoglobin<br />
PCV<br />
MCV<br />
MCHC<br />
MCH<br />
116-168 g/L<br />
0.31-0.46 L/L<br />
39-53 fL<br />
300-360 g/L<br />
19.5-25 pg<br />
Platelets 300-700 x 10 9 /L<br />
Source: http://www.vetstream.com/felis/Corporate/993fhtm/ha-mat.htm<br />
Abbreviations and Symbols<br />
Use only standard abbreviations. Avoid abbreviations in the title and<br />
abstract. The full term for an abbreviation should precede its first use<br />
in the text, unless it is a standard abbreviation. All acronyms used in the<br />
text should be expanded at first mention, followed by the abbreviation<br />
in parentheses; thereafter the acronym only should appear in the text.<br />
Acronyms may be used in the abstract if they occur 3 or more times<br />
therein, but must be reintroduced in the body <strong>of</strong> the text. Generally,<br />
abbreviations should be limited to those defined in the AMA Manual <strong>of</strong><br />
Style, current edition. A list <strong>of</strong> each abbreviation (and the corresponding<br />
full term) used in the manuscript must be provided on the title page.<br />
Online Manuscript Submission Process<br />
The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> uses submission s<strong>of</strong>tware powered<br />
by ScholarOne Manuscripts. The website for submissions to The <strong>Turkish</strong><br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> is http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tjh. This<br />
system is quick and convenient, both for authors and reviewers.<br />
Setting up an account<br />
New users to the submission site will need to register and enter their<br />
account details before they can submit a manuscript. Log in, or click<br />
the “Create Account” button if you are a first-time user. To create a<br />
new account: After clicking the “Create Account” button, enter your<br />
name and e-mail address, and then click the “Next” button. Your e-mail<br />
address is very important. Enter your institution and address information,<br />
as appropriate, and then click the “Next” Button. Enter a user ID and<br />
password <strong>of</strong> your choice, select your area <strong>of</strong> expertise, and then click the<br />
“Finish” button.<br />
If you have an account, but have forgotten your log-in details, go to<br />
“Password Help” on the journal’s online submission system and enter your<br />
e-mail address. The system will send you an automatic user ID and a new<br />
temporary password.<br />
Full instructions and support are available on the site, and a user ID and<br />
password can be obtained during your first visit. Full support for authors<br />
A-VII
is provided. Each page has a “Get Help Now” icon that connects directly<br />
to the online support system. Contact the journal administrator with any<br />
questions about submitting your manuscript to the journal (info@tjh.<br />
com.tr). For ScholarOne Manuscripts customer support, click on the “Get<br />
Help Now” link on the top right hand corner <strong>of</strong> every page on the site.<br />
The Electronic Submission Process<br />
Log in to your author center. Once you have logged in, click the “Submit a<br />
Manuscript” link in the menu bar. Enter the appropriate data and answer<br />
the questions. You may copy and paste directly from your manuscript.<br />
Click the “Next” button on each screen to save your work and advance to<br />
the next screen.<br />
Upload Files<br />
Click on the “Browse” button and locate the file on your computer. Select<br />
the appropriate designation for each file in the drop-down menu next to<br />
the “Browse” button. When you have selected all the files you want to<br />
upload, click the “Upload Files” button. Review your submission before<br />
sending to the journal. Click the “Submit” button when you are finished<br />
reviewing. You can use ScholarOne Manuscripts at any time to check<br />
the status <strong>of</strong> your submission. The journal’s editorial <strong>of</strong>fice will inform<br />
you by e-mail once a decision has been made. After your manuscript<br />
has been submitted, a checklist will then be completed by the Editorial<br />
Assistant. The Editorial Assistant will check that the manuscript contains<br />
all required components and adheres to the author guidelines. Once the<br />
Editorial Assistant is satisfied with the manuscript it will be forwarded to<br />
the Senior Editor, who will assign an editor and reviewers.<br />
The Review Process<br />
Each manuscript submitted to The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> is<br />
subject to an initial review by the editorial <strong>of</strong>fice in order to determine<br />
if it is aligned with the journal’s aims and scope, and complies with<br />
essential requirements. Manuscripts sent for peer review will be assigned<br />
to one <strong>of</strong> the journal’s associate editors that has expertise relevant to the<br />
manuscript’s content. All accepted manuscripts are sent to a statistical<br />
and English language editor before publishing. Once papers have been<br />
reviewed, the reviewers’ comments are sent to the Editor, who will then<br />
make a preliminary decision on the paper. At this stage, based on the<br />
feedback from reviewers, manuscripts can be accepted, rejected, or<br />
revisions can be recommended. Following initial peer-review, articles<br />
judged worthy <strong>of</strong> further consideration <strong>of</strong>ten require revision. Revised<br />
manuscripts generally must be received within 3 months <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong><br />
the initial decision. Extensions must be requested from the Associate<br />
Editor at least 2 weeks before the 3-month revision deadline expires;<br />
The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> will reject manuscripts that are not<br />
received within the 3-month revision deadline. Manuscripts with extensive<br />
revision recommendations will be sent for further review (usually by the<br />
same reviewers) upon their re-submission. When a manuscript is finally<br />
accepted for publication, the Technical Editor undertakes a final edit<br />
and a marked-up copy will be e-mailed to the corresponding author for<br />
review and to make any final adjustments.<br />
Submission <strong>of</strong> Revised Papers<br />
When revising a manuscript based on the reviewers’ and Editor’s feedback,<br />
please insert all changed text in red. Please do not use track changes, as<br />
this feature can make reading difficult. To submit revised manuscripts,<br />
please log into your author center at ScholarOne Manuscripts. Your<br />
manuscript will be stored under “Manuscripts with Decisions”. Please click<br />
on the “Create a Revision” link located to the right <strong>of</strong> the manuscript title.<br />
A revised manuscript number will be created for you; you will then need<br />
to click on the “Continue Submission” button. You will then be guided<br />
through a submission process very similar to that for new manuscripts.<br />
You will be able to amend any details you wish. At stage 6 (“File Upload”),<br />
please delete the file for your original manuscript and upload the revised<br />
version. Additionally, please upload an anonymous cover letter, preferably<br />
in table format, including a point-by-point response to the reviews’<br />
revision recommendations. You will then need to review your paper as<br />
a PDF and click the “Submit” button. Your revised manuscript will have<br />
the same ID number as the original version, but with the addition <strong>of</strong> an R<br />
and a number at the end, for example, TJH-2011-0001 for an original and<br />
TJH-2011-0001.R1, indicating a first revision; subsequent revisions will<br />
end with R2, R3, and so on. Please do not submit a revised manuscript<br />
as a new paper, as revised manuscripts are processed differently. If you<br />
click on the “Create a Revision” button and receive a message stating that<br />
the revision option has expired, please contact the Editorial Assistant at<br />
info@tjh.com.tr to reactivate the option.<br />
English Language Editing<br />
All manuscripts are pr<strong>of</strong>essionally edited by an English language editor<br />
prior to publication.<br />
Online Early<br />
The <strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> publishes abstracts <strong>of</strong> accepted<br />
manuscripts online in advance <strong>of</strong> their publication in print. Once an<br />
accepted manuscript has been edited, the authors have submitted any<br />
final corrections, and all changes have been incorporated, the manuscript<br />
will be published online. At that time the manuscript will receive a Digital<br />
Object Identifier (DOI) number. Both forms can be found at www.tjh.<br />
com.tr. Authors <strong>of</strong> accepted manuscripts will receive electronic page<br />
pro<strong>of</strong>s directly from the printer, and are responsible for pro<strong>of</strong>reading<br />
and checking the entire manuscript, including tables, figures, and<br />
references. Page pro<strong>of</strong>s must be returned within 48 hours to avoid delays<br />
in publication.<br />
A-VIII
CONTENTS<br />
Review Article<br />
172 Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu<br />
Research Articles<br />
180 The Mutation Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Calreticulin in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia<br />
Jingyi Wang, Jianguo Hao, Na He, Chunyan Ji, Daoxin Ma<br />
187 Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms<br />
Neslihan Andıç, Mustafa Ünübol, Eren Yağcı, Olga Meltem Akay, İrfan Yavaşoğlu, Vefki Gürhan Kadıköylü, Ali Zahit Bolaman<br />
196 Retrospective Study <strong>of</strong> Incidence and Prognostic Significance <strong>of</strong> Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation:<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Corticosteroid Therapy<br />
Wataru Yamamoto, Eriko Ogusa, Kenji Matsumoto, Atsuo Maruta, Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo, Heiwa Kanamori<br />
202 Cytokine Contents in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Association with ZAP70 Expression<br />
Nilgün Işıksaçan, Suzan Çınar, Esin Aktaş Çetin, Melih Aktan, Günnur Deniz<br />
209 Finding the Optimal Conditioning Regimen for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell<br />
Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison <strong>of</strong> BEAM and High-Dose ICE<br />
Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz, Sinem Civriz Bozdağ, Ali Kaya, Ayşegül Tetik, Ömür Kayıkçı, Gamze Durgun,<br />
Şerife Kocubaba, Fevzi Altuntaş<br />
216 The Changing Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections and Resistance in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients<br />
Mücahit Yemişen, İlker İnanç Balkan, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Ahmet Emre Eşkazan, Bilgül Mete, M. Cem Ar, Şeniz Öngören, Zafer Başlar,<br />
Reşat Özaras, Neşe Saltoğlu, Ali Mert, Burhan Ferhanoğlu, Recep Öztürk, Fehmi Tabak, Teoman Soysal<br />
223 BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical Characteristics and Utility <strong>of</strong> Leflunomide Treatment<br />
Young Hoon Park, Joo Han Lim, Hyeon Gyu Yi, Moon Hee Lee, Chul Soo Kim<br />
231 A Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy <strong>of</strong> Three Hepatitis B Vaccine Induction Regimens in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancies<br />
Zübeyde Nur Özkurt, Elif Suyanı, Rauf Haznedar, Münci Yağcı<br />
236 Reliability and Validity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module for 2- to 7-Year-Old and the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core<br />
Scales for 5- to 7-Year-Old: The Hacettepe University Experience<br />
Vesile Yıldız Kabak, Yavuz Yakut, Mualla Çetin, Tülin Düger<br />
Brief Reports<br />
244 Results <strong>of</strong> Four-Year Rectal Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Surveillance in a Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong>-Oncology Ward: From<br />
Colonization to Infection<br />
Hacer Aktürk, Murat Sütçü, Ayper Somer, Serap Karaman, Manolya Acar, Ayşegül Ünüvar, Sema Anak, Zeynep Karakaş, Aslı Özdemir,<br />
Kutay Sarsar, Derya Aydın, Nuran Salman<br />
248 Radiation-Induced Tumor Lysis Syndrome in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia<br />
Ali Alkan, Tuğçe Kütük, Ebru Karcı, Arzu Yaşar, Ayşe Hiçsönmez, Güngör Utkan<br />
A-IX
251 A Case <strong>of</strong> Superwarfarin Poisoning Due to Repetitive Occupational Dermal Rodenticide Exposure in a Worker<br />
Zehra Narlı Özdemir, Uğur Şahin, Mustafa Merter, Mehmet Gündüz, Berna Ateşağaoğlu, Meral Beksaç<br />
Letters to the Editor<br />
254 A Primary Bone Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Ocular Adnexal Involvement<br />
Rafet Eren, Ceyda Aslan, Cihan Gündoğan, Osman Yokuş, Mehmet Hilmi Doğu, Elif Suyanı<br />
255 Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis Mimicking Intracranial Mass<br />
Derya Özyörük<br />
256 A Rare Cause <strong>of</strong> Unexplained Refractory Iron Deficiency Anemia: Unicentric Plasma-Cell Type Castleman’s Disease<br />
Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık, İpek Yönal Hindilerden, Fehmi Hindilerden, İbrahim Öner Doğan, Fatih Beşışık<br />
Images in <strong>Hematology</strong><br />
259 Vaginal Lymphoma: A Possible Cause <strong>of</strong> Genital Hemorrhage<br />
Erdoğan Nohuz, Sharif Kullab, Albane Ledoux-Pilon, Cécile Moluçon-Chabrot, Maël Albaut, Luisa De Simone, Xavier Durando<br />
261 Endothelial Cells, Ankaferd Hemostat, and Estradiol<br />
Yasemin Ardıçoğlu, Nejat Akar, İbrahim Haznedaroğlu<br />
263 An Unusual Congenital Anomaly in Fanconi Aplastic Anemia: Congenital Lobar Emphysema<br />
Ali Fettah, Gökçe Pınar Reis, Soner Sertan Kara, Tekin Aksu, Afak Durur Karakaya, Mahmut Subaşı, Atilla Çayır<br />
A-X
Advisory Board <strong>of</strong> This <strong>Issue</strong> (September 2016)<br />
Agnieszka Bojarska Junak, Poland<br />
Ahmet Emre Eşkazan, Turkey<br />
Ahmet Soysal, Turkey<br />
Akif Selim Yavuz, Turkey<br />
Alessandro Allegra, Italy<br />
Anıl Tombak, Turkey<br />
Ayşegül Ünüvar, Turkey<br />
Bülent Kantarcıoğlu, Turkey<br />
Can Balkan, Turkey<br />
Canan Baydemir, Turkey<br />
Celalettin Üstün, USA<br />
Cem Ar, Turkey<br />
Dae-Young Kim, Korea<br />
Darko Antic, Serbia<br />
Dilber Talia İleri, Turkey<br />
Dilek Sevgi, Turkey<br />
Dorothy Funk, USA<br />
Düzgün Özatlı, Turkey<br />
Eda Tahir Turanlı, Turkey<br />
Elif Ünal, Turkey<br />
Eva Posfai, Hungary<br />
Fortunato Morabito, Italy<br />
François Vincent, France<br />
Gökhan Aygün, Turkey<br />
Güray Saydam, Turkey<br />
Hakan Özdoğu, Turkey<br />
Hakim Ouled Haddou, France<br />
Hüsnü Pullukçu, Turkey<br />
İbrahim Haznedaroğlu, Turkey<br />
İbrahim Köker, Turkey<br />
İhsan Karadoğan, Turkey<br />
Mahmut Töbü, Turkey<br />
Mehmet Ali Özcan, Turkey<br />
Mehmet Sönmez, Turkey<br />
Nazan Sarper, Turkey<br />
Nicolaus Kröger, Germany<br />
Özgür Mehtap, Turkey<br />
Qing Ma, USA<br />
Reşat Özaras, Turkey<br />
Şule Ünal, Turkey<br />
Takahiko Nakane, Japan<br />
Takahiro Yamauchi, Japan<br />
Tunç Fışgın, Turkey<br />
Türkan Patıroğlu, Turkey<br />
Umberto Gianelli, Italy<br />
Varinder Kaur, USA<br />
Veysel Sabri Hançer, Turkey<br />
Volkan Hazar, Turkey<br />
Yener Koç, Turkey<br />
Yusufhan Yazır, Turkey<br />
Zühre Kaya, Turkey
BİLİMSEL SEKRETERYA<br />
Kongre Sekreterleri<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Güner Hayri Özsan (Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir)<br />
E-posta: gensek@thd.org.tr<br />
Doç. Dr. Muhlis Cem Ar (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul)<br />
E-posta: arassek@thd.org.tr<br />
İletişim Adresi<br />
Turan Güneş Bulv. İlkbahar Mah. 613. Sok. No:8 Çankaya - Ankara<br />
Tel : (312) 490 98 97 • Faks: (312) 490 98 68<br />
E-posta: thd<strong>of</strong>is@thd.org.tr • Web: www.thd.org.tr<br />
Türk Hematoloji Derneği Merkez İletişim Bilgileri<br />
Mall <strong>of</strong> İstanbul Rezidans Süleyman Demirel Bulvarı 7 A<br />
Blok No: 26 34306 Başakşehir - İstanbul<br />
Tel: (212) 603 66 55 • Faks: (212) 603 66 35<br />
KONGRE SEKRETERYASI<br />
Serenas Uluslararası<br />
Turizm Kongre Organizasyon A.Ş.<br />
Tel: (312) 440 50 11 • Faks: (312) 441 45 62<br />
E-posta: ulusalhematoloji2016@serenas.com.tr<br />
Web: www.serenas.com.tr
REVIEW<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2016.0149<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
Genomik Varyasyonların Klinik Yorumlanması<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu<br />
İstanbul University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Institute <strong>of</strong> Experimental Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Novel high-throughput sequencing technologies generate largescale<br />
genomic data and are used extensively for disease mapping<br />
<strong>of</strong> monogenic and/or complex disorders, personalized treatment,<br />
and pharmacogenomics. Next-generation sequencing is rapidly<br />
becoming routine tool for diagnosis and molecular monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />
patients to evaluate therapeutic efficiency. The next-generation<br />
sequencing platforms generate huge amounts <strong>of</strong> genetic variation<br />
data and it remains a challenge to interpret the variations that are<br />
identified. Such data interpretation needs close collaboration among<br />
bioinformaticians, clinicians, and geneticists. There are several problems<br />
that must be addressed, such as the generation <strong>of</strong> new algorithms for<br />
mapping and annotation, harmonization <strong>of</strong> the terminology, correct<br />
use <strong>of</strong> nomenclature, reference genomes for different populations,<br />
rare disease variant databases, and clinical reports.<br />
Keywords: Genetic variation, Sequencing, Genomic data, Clinical<br />
interpretation<br />
Öz<br />
Yeni dizileme teknolojileri, tek genli ve/veya kompleks kalıtılan<br />
hastalıklarla ilgili genlerinin haritalanması, kişiye özel tedavi ve<br />
farmakogenomik alanları için yüksek verimde ve büyük ölçekte genomik<br />
data üreten teknolojilerdir. Yeni nesil dizileme, hastaların tanı ve tedavi<br />
yanıtlarını değerlendirecek moleküler izlem süreçlerinde kullanılmak<br />
üzere, hızlı bir şekilde rutin uygulamada yerini bulmaktadır. Yeni nesil<br />
dizileme platformları çok büyük ölçekte genetik varyasyon datası<br />
üretmektedir ve bu varyasyonların klinik olarak anlamlandırılması çok<br />
zordur. Klinik yorumlamalar, hekimler ile biyoinformatik ve genetik<br />
uzmanlarının yakın işbirliğine ihtiyaç duymaktadır. Yeni haritalama ve<br />
hizalama araçlarına duyulan ihtiyaç, terminolojinin harmonizasyonu,<br />
genetik isimlendirmenin doğru kullanımı, farklı populasyonlar için<br />
referans genom datasının bulunmaması, nadir hastalıklar için genomik<br />
veri bankalarının eksikliği ve klinik raporlama, halen aşılması gereken<br />
sorunlar arasında bulunmaktadır.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Genetik varyasyon, Dizileme, Genomik data, Klinik<br />
yorum.<br />
Introduction<br />
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods provide cheap<br />
and solid genomic data and are used extensively for de novo<br />
sequencing, disease mapping, quantifying <strong>of</strong> expression levels,<br />
and population genetic studies [1,2,3,4,5]. They can also be<br />
applied to complex disorders [6], personalized treatment, and<br />
pharmacogenomics [7,8,9]. The medical genetics field translates<br />
high-throughput genetic data to clinical settings in order to<br />
improve diagnostic efficiency and treatment decision-making<br />
[10,11]. The interpretation <strong>of</strong> the clinical significance <strong>of</strong> genomic<br />
variants in a given patient or in patients’ family members is<br />
the main challenge <strong>of</strong> resequencing. In the last decade, several<br />
diseases and syndromes have been analyzed by NGS, hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />
disease-associated genes have been found, and novel targeted<br />
therapies have been developed. The most powerful contribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> NGS [particularly whole-exome sequencing (WES) and<br />
whole-genome sequencing (WGS)] is the description <strong>of</strong> new<br />
candidate signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> a<br />
clinical condition that will help with prevention, diagnosis, and<br />
therapeutic opportunities.<br />
High-throughput sequencing can be implemented within<br />
different applications including WGS, WES, ribonucleic<br />
acid sequencing (RNA-seq), or targeted sequencing [12].<br />
Commercially available NGS platforms are generally employed<br />
with similar steps for all these approaches: generation <strong>of</strong><br />
sequencing libraries, sequencing simultaneously in a massively<br />
parallel fashion, and data analysis [12].<br />
Whole-exome sequencing studies have been commonly used to<br />
identify the responsible gene <strong>of</strong> a clinical phenotype. The WGS<br />
approach holds major advantages for the detection <strong>of</strong> variations<br />
not only in the exome but also in the noncoding regulatory<br />
regions for complex and/or multigenic diseases. The analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
WGS data is complicated by the amount <strong>of</strong> information and<br />
challenges in elimination <strong>of</strong> common genetic variations. Wholeexome<br />
sequencing studies require rough bioinformatics analysis<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Müge SAYİTOĞLU, M.D.,<br />
İstanbul University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Institute <strong>of</strong> Experimental Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 212 414 22 00-<strong>33</strong>312<br />
E-mail : mugeay@istanbul.edu.tr<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: April 13, 2016<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: August 07, 2016<br />
172
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu. Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
work and experts and national reference sequences to evaluate<br />
the population-based genetic variants, along with large budgets.<br />
Alternatively, WES is relatively cost-efficient and is able to<br />
discover disease-related rare variants in coding regions and splice<br />
sites. There are several variations that have been successfully<br />
identified by WES in monogenic diseases. On the other hand, the<br />
exome represents less than 1% <strong>of</strong> the genome and such analysis<br />
will be excluding noncoding genomic regions such as regulatory<br />
regions, repetitive sequences, or noncoding RNAs.<br />
Using gene panels in NGS studies is an alternative option<br />
that restricts screening to selected genetic regions. Although<br />
it may simplify the scale <strong>of</strong> the analysis and interpretation,<br />
incidental findings still require attention. The most suitable<br />
NGS approach for routine clinical applications is ampliconbased/targeted<br />
sequencing. Most genetic disorders have allelic<br />
and locus heterogeneity, which means that one disease may<br />
arise from different genetic variations within the same gene<br />
or different genes. Due to the genetic heterogeneity, it takes<br />
longer to obtain the genetic test result, which leads to a delay in<br />
diagnosis. Amplicon-based NGS has provided a major advantage<br />
for the molecular analysis <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous genetic disorders,<br />
including hereditary cancers [13].<br />
RNA-seq quantifies the amount <strong>of</strong> transcripts (all transcribed<br />
is<strong>of</strong>orms) and gives a chance to evaluate the whole RNA<br />
repertoire <strong>of</strong> a specific cell or tissue. The biggest limitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> RNA-seq is the “noncoding RNAs”; most <strong>of</strong> the genome<br />
is transcribed but the majority <strong>of</strong> these transcripts are not<br />
translated into proteins [14].<br />
Accurate Use <strong>of</strong> the Terminology: Is It a Polymorphism or a<br />
Disease-Related Variation?<br />
In common use, a DNA polymorphism is a heritable variation<br />
that is present in >1% <strong>of</strong> the population and increasingly<br />
detected by next-generation resequencing. One <strong>of</strong> two or<br />
more alternate forms <strong>of</strong> a locus (alleles) may result from<br />
the changes in the nucleotide sequence [single nucleotide<br />
polymorphisms (SNPs)], deletions, insertions, or other structural<br />
rearrangements. According to the novel terminology the term<br />
‘SNP’ is used as single nucleotide variation (SNV) [15]. A genome<br />
contains repetitive sequences differing in copy numbers (i.e.<br />
copy number variations) between individuals. Polymorphic<br />
variations may or may not have phenotypic effects and they<br />
are valuable tools for genetic mapping studies including linkage<br />
and association studies <strong>of</strong> diseases. The vast majority <strong>of</strong> these<br />
variations (more than 90%) have been found to be localized<br />
in the noncoding genomic regions and are possibly involved in<br />
regulation <strong>of</strong> gene expression. On the other hand, a mutation is<br />
defined as a DNA variant detectable in
Müge Sayitoğlu. Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
rely on complex interactions <strong>of</strong> the chemistry, the hardware, and<br />
the optical sensors that they use. For example, in the Illumina<br />
system, the images that are acquired from the instruments are<br />
prepared and analyzed to determine the base incorporated<br />
in the complementary strand. In this process, the ordering <strong>of</strong><br />
nucleotides in a template from the noisy signals is referred to<br />
as base calling [17]. In other words, base calling converts the<br />
fluorescence signals into actual sequence data with quality<br />
scores. Base calling accuracy is measured by a Q score (Phred<br />
quality score), which is a common metric to assess the accuracy<br />
<strong>of</strong> a sequencing run. The Q score is defined as the logarithmically<br />
related base calling error probability (Q=-10 log P/log 10) [18].<br />
For example, if Q=40 for a sequencing run, this is equal to the<br />
probability <strong>of</strong> an incorrect base call <strong>of</strong> 1 in 10,000 times, or<br />
with 99.99% base calling accuracy or a lower Q score <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
means, there is the probability <strong>of</strong> an incorrect call in 1 <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
bases. Low Q scores lead to false positive variant calls and need<br />
resequencing.<br />
Errors arising from NGS data are generally due to base<br />
calling and alignment applications. Moreover, low coverage<br />
sequencing (20× coverage). In association<br />
studies, sequencing many individuals at a low depth, rather than<br />
sequencing fewer individuals at a high depth, could maximize<br />
mapping power. Some <strong>of</strong> the genomic regions are difficult to<br />
interpret, such as homopolymer regions (a sequence <strong>of</strong> identical<br />
bases, like AAAA or TTTTTTTT), or simple repeats (minisatellitevariable<br />
number <strong>of</strong> tandem repeats and microsatellite-short<br />
tandem repeats). Bioinformaticians use VCF files, “Variant Call<br />
Format”, to store the gene sequence variations.<br />
4) Annotation and Prioritization <strong>of</strong> a Variation<br />
Several challenges arise for NGS-based diagnostic and research<br />
efforts in the identification <strong>of</strong> all genetic variations. Because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the increased complexity <strong>of</strong> data analysis and clinical<br />
interpretation <strong>of</strong> the data, it is best to use some universally<br />
accepted recommendations like those <strong>of</strong> the American College<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), EuroGentest, and<br />
the European Society <strong>of</strong> Human Genetics [25,26,27].<br />
The ACMG recommends that both “mutation” and<br />
“polymorphism” can be replaced by “variant” with the following<br />
modifiers: pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), variant <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertain significance (VUS), likely benign (LB), and benign<br />
(B) [26] (Figure 2). The “likely” term is used to define certainty<br />
greater than 90% <strong>of</strong> a variant either being disease-causing or<br />
benign.<br />
Pathogenic Variant<br />
174
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu. Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
in the general population, it is called a “benign” variant. These<br />
variations are nonpathogenic and have neutral effects.<br />
American College <strong>of</strong> Medical Genetics and Genomics suggested<br />
additional criteria including very strong, strong, and moderate<br />
support for being pathogenic, and likely pathogenic and likely<br />
benign variations.<br />
Nonsense mutations, frame shifts, exonic deletions, and<br />
promoter variations (very strong) are generally assumed to cause<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> function in the genes. These kinds <strong>of</strong> variations lead to<br />
reduced or absent gene function and nonsense-mediated decay<br />
<strong>of</strong> an altered transcript. These kinds <strong>of</strong> variations are expected<br />
to affect the clinical findings.<br />
Figure 2. Recommended terms for interpretation <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
variants.<br />
If the previously identified or novel variation has substantial<br />
evidence that it causes a disease with a known or unknown<br />
mechanism, is called a “pathogenic” variant. These kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
variations are generally nonsense mutations, frame shift<br />
variations, or splice site alterations.<br />
Likely Pathogenic Variant<br />
If the previously identified or novel variation is consistent<br />
with the diagnosis, it exists in the conserved genomic region,<br />
functional studies showed impaired gene product, or the<br />
function <strong>of</strong> the gene is known to be associated with a specific<br />
phenotype, the variation is called a “likely pathogenic” variant.<br />
Uncertain Significance Variant<br />
If a variant cannot be classified as pathogenic or benign, it<br />
is called a “variant <strong>of</strong> uncertain clinical significance” (VUS).<br />
It can be a missense variation, an in-frame deletion, or an<br />
insertion. These kinds <strong>of</strong> novel variations can cause confusion<br />
during interpretation and reporting. If there is no other variant<br />
identified, VUS should be highlighted in the report.<br />
Likely Benign Variant<br />
If a variant presents at high frequency in random individuals and<br />
is not a high penetrant or a disease-causing variant, it is called a<br />
“likely benign” variant. There is no absolute frequency threshold<br />
to classify that a variant is likely benign or likely pathogenic. This<br />
depends on the disease model, clinical characteristics, etc. These<br />
can be novel or previously reported variations with possible<br />
neutral effects. Generally, likely benign variants have enough<br />
evidence that they are not the cause <strong>of</strong> the disease, and the<br />
segregation analysis <strong>of</strong> haplotypes in affected and unaffected<br />
family members can support this finding.<br />
Benign Variant<br />
If a previously reported variation is present at a higher frequency<br />
Splice site variations may cause exon skipping and shortening or<br />
inclusion <strong>of</strong> intronic material due to loss or recreation <strong>of</strong> donor/<br />
acceptor splice sites. These kinds <strong>of</strong> variations are predicted to<br />
lead to a null effect that needs additional functional analysis<br />
(RNA or protein).<br />
A missense variation is mostly known to be pathogenic; it alters<br />
the protein function or the nucleotide change and may disrupt<br />
the splice site. It can be detected by in silico prediction tools<br />
and then concluded to be a disease-related variation. Missense<br />
variations should be evaluated with minor allele frequency<br />
(MAF) values, which refer the second most common allele<br />
that occurs in a given population. The MAF value provides<br />
information to differentiate between common and rare variants<br />
in the population. If the determined missense variation has a<br />
low MAF value (
Müge Sayitoğlu. Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
known variants that are present in public (dbSNP) and inhouse<br />
variant databases and published projects such as the<br />
1000 Genomes Project [28], EXAC, and the Exome Sequencing<br />
Project (ESP6500) [29] is a very helpful strategy to reduce the<br />
candidate list <strong>of</strong> disease-related variations. Population-based<br />
databases (such as the 1000 Genomes Project or ESP) have been<br />
created both for large and small local populations [30,31]. They<br />
are useful to obtain the frequencies <strong>of</strong> the variations. Disease<br />
databases mainly contain the variants <strong>of</strong> a specific disease or<br />
phenotype [32].<br />
There are some limitations to these databases. For example, there<br />
is no absolute frequency threshold for a given variant, many<br />
populations are not represented, and there is no information<br />
about the phenotype. Limited numbers <strong>of</strong> locus-specific<br />
databases also exist but those are not available for most genes,<br />
there are contradictory data between databases, and they may<br />
not be updated. For correct data interpretation, researchers<br />
should check the updates <strong>of</strong> the databases, confirm that HGVS<br />
nomenclature is being used, and read the relevant publications<br />
[16,<strong>33</strong>]. Gene- or disease-oriented biomedical information can<br />
be found from the OMIM website (Online Mendelian Inheritance<br />
in Man- http://www.omim.org), in published scientific articles<br />
(PubMed- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed), and in<br />
mutation databases (HGMD, Human Gene Mutation Databasehttp://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php).<br />
Clinicians can interpret a variant when it is reported and track<br />
the genotype-phenotype correlation, population frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
the variation, and clinical assertions. Clinical laboratories should<br />
increase their collaboration with clinicians to better understand<br />
the effect <strong>of</strong> the variation on the phenotype. The ClinVar<br />
database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) archives<br />
reports <strong>of</strong> the relationships among medically important human<br />
variations and phenotypes. It has access to dbSNP and dbVar<br />
and includes information about the location <strong>of</strong> variation and<br />
phenotypic descriptions included in MedGen (http://www.ncbi.<br />
nlm.nih.gov/medgen). ClinVar is an interactive tool that can be<br />
divided into submitter, variation, phenotype, interpretation,<br />
and evidence. ClinVar represents the interpretation <strong>of</strong> a single<br />
allele, compound heterozygotes, haplotypes, and combinations<br />
<strong>of</strong> alleles in different genes [34,35].<br />
Searching for previously published scientific and medical<br />
studies is also a valuable tool for the annotation <strong>of</strong> a detected<br />
variant. Researchers should be aware <strong>of</strong> using older versions <strong>of</strong><br />
nomenclature in published reports. The given information about<br />
the index case, affected family members, and the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
family should be carefully noted to avoid incorrect data.<br />
4.2. In Silico Functional Prediction<br />
A variety <strong>of</strong> algorithms (SIFT, PolyPhen, Provean, CADD, Condel,<br />
GERP, SNAP, SNPs&Go, PhyloP, and MutationTaster) are used to<br />
determine the effect <strong>of</strong> variations and that can be done at the<br />
nucleotide, amino acid, protein, and transcript/splice variant<br />
levels (Table 1). Mainly they have been developed to estimate<br />
the deleterious effect <strong>of</strong> a variant on a protein. The most<br />
Table 1. Representative in silico prediction tools and web pages.<br />
In Silico Prediction Tools<br />
Missense prediction<br />
SIFT<br />
http://sift.jcvi.org<br />
Mutation Tester<br />
http://www.mutationtester.org<br />
Mutation Assessor<br />
http://mutationassessor.org<br />
PolyPhen2<br />
http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2<br />
MutPred<br />
http://mutpred.mutdb.org<br />
nsSNP Analyzer<br />
http://snpanalyzer.uthsc.edu<br />
Condel<br />
http://bg.upf.edu/fannsdb/help/condel.html<br />
CADD<br />
http://cadd.gs.washington.edu/score<br />
Provean<br />
http://provean.jcvi.org/index.php<br />
Splice site prediction<br />
Gene Splicer<br />
http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/s<strong>of</strong>tware/GeneSplicer/gene_spl.html<br />
Human Splicing Finder<br />
http://umd.be/HSF/<br />
Net Gene 2<br />
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetGene2<br />
Conservation prediction<br />
PhastCons<br />
http://compgen.bscb.cornell.edu/phast/<br />
PhyloP<br />
http://compgen.bscb.cornell.edu/phast/<br />
GERP<br />
http://mendel.stanford.edu/sidowlab/downloads/gerp/index.html<br />
176
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu. Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
common use <strong>of</strong> these tools is to predict the impact <strong>of</strong> a missense<br />
variation on a protein and to predict the effect <strong>of</strong> the variation<br />
on splicing. The prediction depends on the location, evolutionary<br />
conservation, amino acid charge, 2D and 3D calculations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
effect on protein structure, and biochemical consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
the amino acid substitution. Some <strong>of</strong> these tools are used for<br />
the prediction <strong>of</strong> the effects on splicing and loss or creation <strong>of</strong><br />
the splice sites. As a limitation <strong>of</strong> in silico tools, variable and<br />
incompatible interpretation results are derived from different<br />
algorithms and the use <strong>of</strong> multiple programs is recommended<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the differing performances <strong>of</strong> the tools [36].<br />
4.3. Clinical Interpretation and Reporting <strong>of</strong> Next-<br />
Generation Sequencing Results<br />
Interpretation and reporting <strong>of</strong> candidate genetic variations<br />
is the biggest challenge in NGS data analysis and reporting<br />
processes. Genetic testing based on WGS <strong>of</strong>ten results in<br />
several variations that are not directly clinically actionable.<br />
The reportable variations should be classified as pathogenic (P),<br />
likely pathogenic (LP), a variant <strong>of</strong> uncertain significance (VUS),<br />
likely benign (LB), or benign (B) as described by the ACMG.<br />
Misinterpretation <strong>of</strong> data may be due to annotation errors,<br />
analytical errors, ethnicity effects (differential MAF values),<br />
reduced reproducibility in consideration <strong>of</strong> low-level mutations,<br />
nomenclature or terminology differences, and variable<br />
databases. International guidelines and recommendations<br />
developed to standardize and regulate deep sequencing are<br />
good references for researchers and clinicians [37].<br />
Some general recommendations are summarized below to<br />
exclude possible incidental findings and ensure correct clinical<br />
interpretation and reporting <strong>of</strong> NGS results.<br />
Data Quality (Base Calling and Mapping)<br />
- If the Q score is low (Q30 score is lower than 70%) and total<br />
coverage is lower than 80%, sequencing should be repeated.<br />
- Different algorithms generate different outputs. Since the<br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> the annotation depends on the success <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mapping, it is best to use at least two algorithms for mapping.<br />
- Previous NGS data generated from the same laboratory (inhouse<br />
data) are valuable to evaluate and exclude variations that<br />
arise from technical effects or poor quality <strong>of</strong> amplicon design.<br />
In-house laboratory data provide simplified analysis to exclude<br />
false variants (false positivity).<br />
- Next-generation sequencing data aim to achieve a high<br />
diagnostic yield to achieve high coverage in all genomic<br />
regions covered. If genetic variation is detected by NGS with<br />
low coverage, resequencing should be repeated, and clear<br />
communication with the clinician is required if the test results<br />
cannot be used to exclude a particular clinical diagnosis.<br />
Reporting<br />
- Next-generation sequencing results should not be transferred<br />
to clinical reports and practice without acceptable validation. It<br />
is essential to confirm the variation from a new DNA sample by<br />
NGS, Sanger sequencing, or another proper technique to exclude<br />
false positive results. Validation results should be included in the<br />
NGS report.<br />
- All variants should be annotated and reported with regard<br />
to the gene name; gene symbol; heterozygous, homozygous,<br />
or compound heterozygous condition; nucleotide changes in<br />
coding regions; and amino acid changes in proteins according<br />
to the HGVS [16]. Mutalyzer is useful s<strong>of</strong>tware to check the<br />
nomenclature for variations (https://mutalyzer.nl/). Each report<br />
should include the reference sequence and the use <strong>of</strong> unique<br />
nomenclature is critical; “g” represents the genomic sequence,<br />
“c” represents the coding sequence, “p” represents protein and<br />
“m” represents mitochondria, and the first translational codon<br />
(ATG) is the starting point. The universal reference genome<br />
(hg18, hg19, or hg38) and the latest versions should be used to<br />
give the correct genomic coordinates and it should cover the 5’<br />
and 3′ untranslated regions and promoter regions (http://www.<br />
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/) [38,39].<br />
- Reports should state the limitations <strong>of</strong> each specific NGS test<br />
regarding the detection <strong>of</strong> different kinds <strong>of</strong> mutations.<br />
- The reference genome, s<strong>of</strong>tware, and databases (COSMIC,<br />
ClinVar, dbSNP, etc.) that are used should be specified in the<br />
report. If the variant was previously identified, the functional<br />
and clinical significance <strong>of</strong> the variation should be stated<br />
referring to the COSMIC database, the HGMD, or a scientific<br />
publication.<br />
- For diagnostic purposes, only genes with a known (i.e.<br />
published and confirmed) relationship between the aberrant<br />
genotype and the pathology should be included in the analysis.<br />
The NGS test results should be included with the disease name,<br />
its targets, the names <strong>of</strong> the genes tested, their reportable<br />
ranges, the analytical sensitivity and specificity, and, if possible,<br />
the diseases not relevant to the clinical phenotype that could be<br />
caused by mutations in the tested genes [40].<br />
- For diagnostic purposes, all pathogenic and likely pathogenic<br />
variants have to be reported. Whether or not variants <strong>of</strong> unknown<br />
significance (VUS) are reported will depend on local practice.<br />
Researchers should be very cautious if detailed laboratory<br />
analysis has not been performed and this should be included in<br />
the report. If no variation has been defined other than a VUS, it<br />
should be highlighted in the report. In that case, clinicians are<br />
strongly suggested to discuss the result with a clinical geneticist<br />
and it is acceptable to request additional analysis (parental<br />
177
Müge Sayitoğlu. Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
testing, etc.) in order to facilitate the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
result (http://www.acgs.uk.com). The latter has to be clear for<br />
laboratory scientists, as well as for the referring clinicians [40].<br />
Conclusions<br />
In medical use <strong>of</strong> genetic discoveries, it is quite important to<br />
improve the standards <strong>of</strong> data collection and sharing to define a<br />
systematic method for the clinical annotation and interpretation<br />
<strong>of</strong> genomic and phenotypic variations. Data-sharing platforms<br />
like the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN- https://www.<br />
genome.gov) or Matchmaker Exchange Network (http://www.<br />
matchmakerexchange.org) for researchers <strong>of</strong> rare diseases and<br />
clinicians for sharing clinical phenotypes and sequencing data,<br />
which may allow for identification <strong>of</strong> other patients with the<br />
same phenotype, help us to understand the functional relevance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the variant that is obtained and reported [41,42].<br />
Next-generation sequencing technology is being used as a<br />
diagnostic tool because <strong>of</strong> the expanded utility and reduced<br />
costs. Targeted sequencing <strong>of</strong>fers better running times, costs,<br />
datasets, and coverage compared to WES or WGS. However,<br />
there are still many concerns about the application <strong>of</strong> NGSbased<br />
diagnostics. The challenges and clinical applications<br />
<strong>of</strong> NGS results have been discussed here. These include the<br />
accumulation and storage <strong>of</strong> huge amounts <strong>of</strong> genomic data,<br />
the need for bioinformatics experts, the need for national<br />
reference genomes, reimbursement <strong>of</strong> sequencing costs, and, <strong>of</strong><br />
course, clinical interpretation <strong>of</strong> novel and VUS results.<br />
Glossary<br />
Allele: Alternative form <strong>of</strong> a given locus.<br />
Annotation: DNA annotation or genome annotation is the<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> the locations <strong>of</strong> genes and all <strong>of</strong> the coding<br />
regions in a genome and determination <strong>of</strong> their function.<br />
Frameshift variation: Genetic variation caused by indels<br />
(insertions or deletions) <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> nucleotides in DNA.<br />
Missense variation: A single nucleotide variation that leads<br />
to amino acid substitution and a codon change. Also called<br />
nonsynonymous substitution.<br />
Nonsense variation: A single nucleotide variation that results<br />
in a premature stop codon, or a nonsense codon in the<br />
transcribed mRNA, and in a truncated, incomplete, and usually<br />
nonfunctional protein product.<br />
Deep sequencing: Indicates that the total number <strong>of</strong> reads is<br />
many times larger than the length <strong>of</strong> the sequence under study.<br />
Depth: In DNA sequencing refers to the number <strong>of</strong> times a<br />
nucleotide is read during the sequencing process.<br />
Coverage: The average number <strong>of</strong> reads representing a given<br />
nucleotide in the reconstructed sequence.<br />
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS): A laboratory process<br />
that determines the complete DNA sequence <strong>of</strong> an organism’s<br />
genome at a single time.<br />
Whole-exome sequencing (WES): A technique for sequencing<br />
all the expressed genes in a genome (known as the exome).<br />
Amplicon (targeted) sequencing: Amplicon sequencing refers<br />
to ultradeep sequencing <strong>of</strong> PCR products for analyzing genetic<br />
variations. Amplicon sequencing is a highly targeted approach<br />
for analyzing genetic variation in specific genomic regions.<br />
Pathogenic: Anything that can produce disease.<br />
DNA polymorphism: A heritable variation that is present in >1%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the population and increasingly detected by next-generation<br />
resequencing.<br />
Mutation: DNA variants detectable in
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:172-179<br />
Müge Sayitoğlu. Clinical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Variations<br />
8. Frese KS, Katus HA, Meder B. Next-generation sequencing: From<br />
understanding biology to personalized medicine. Biology (Basel)<br />
2013;2:378-398.<br />
9. Dong L, Wang W, Li A, Kansal R, Chen Y, Chen H, Li X. Clinical next generation<br />
sequencing for precision medicine in cancer. Curr Genomics 2015;16:253-263.<br />
10. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat Rev Genet<br />
2010;11:31-46.<br />
11. Singh RR, Murugan P, Patel LR, Voicu H, Yoo SY, Majewski T, Mehrotra M,<br />
Wani K, Tannir N, Karam JA, Jonasch E, Wood CG, Creighton CJ, Medeiros<br />
LJ, Broaddus RR, Tamboli P, Baggerly KA, Aldape KD, Czerniak B, Luthra<br />
R, Sircar K. Intratumoral morphologic and molecular heterogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />
rhabdoid renal cell carcinoma: Challenges for personalized therapy. Mod<br />
Pathol 2015;28:1225-1235.<br />
12. Fernandez CA, Smith C, Yang W, Mullighan CG, Qu C, Larsen E, Bowman<br />
WP, Liu C, Ramsey LB, Chang T, Karol SE, Loh ML, Raetz EA, Winick NJ,<br />
Hunger SP, Carroll WL, Jeha S, Pui CH, Evans WE, Devidas M, Relling MV.<br />
Genome-wide analysis links nfatc2 with asparaginase hypersensitivity.<br />
Blood 2015;126:69-75.<br />
13. Shen T, Pajaro-Van De Stadt SH, Yeat NC, Lin JC. Clinical applications <strong>of</strong><br />
next generation sequencing in cancer: From panels, to exomes, to genomes.<br />
Front Genet 2015;6:215.<br />
14. Weirick T, Militello G, Muller R, John D, Dimmeler S, Uchida S. The<br />
identification and characterization <strong>of</strong> novel transcripts from rna-seq data.<br />
Brief Bioinform 2016;17:678-685.<br />
15. Vihinen M. Muddled genetic terms miss and mess the message. Trends<br />
Genet 2015;31:423-425.<br />
16. Den Dunnen JT, Dalgleish R, Maglott DR, Hart RK, Greenblatt MS,<br />
Mcgowan-Jordan J, Roux AF, Smith T, Antonarakis SE, Taschner PE. HGVS<br />
Recommendations for the Description <strong>of</strong> Sequence Variants: 2016 Update.<br />
Hum Mutat 2016;37:564-569.<br />
17. Das S, Vikalo H. Base calling for high-throughput short-read sequencing:<br />
Dynamic programming solutions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14:129.<br />
18. Richterich P. Estimation <strong>of</strong> errors in “raw” DNA sequences: A validation<br />
study. Genome Res 1998;8:251-259.<br />
19. Ledergerber C, Dessimoz C. Base-calling for next-generation sequencing<br />
platforms. Brief Bioinform 2011;12:489-497.<br />
20. Fonseca NA, Rung J, Brazma A, Marioni JC. Tools for mapping highthroughput<br />
sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:3169-3177.<br />
21. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis<br />
G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S. The Sequence Alignment/<br />
Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078-2079.<br />
22. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-<br />
Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754-1760.<br />
23. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat<br />
Methods 2012;9:357-359.<br />
24. Mccormick RF, Truong SK, Mullet JE. RIG: Recalibration and interrelation <strong>of</strong><br />
genomic sequence data with the GATK. G3 (Bethesda) 2015;5:655-665.<br />
25. Bao R, Huang L, Andrade J, Tan W, Kibbe WA, Jiang H, Feng G. Review <strong>of</strong><br />
current methods, applications, and data management for the bioinformatics<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> whole exome sequencing. Cancer Inform 2014;13:67-82.<br />
26. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde<br />
M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, Committee ALQA. Standards<br />
and guidelines for the interpretation <strong>of</strong> sequence variants: a joint<br />
consensus recommendation <strong>of</strong> the American College <strong>of</strong> Medical Genetics<br />
and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med<br />
2015;17:405-424.<br />
27. Matthijs G, Souche E, Alders M, Corveleyn A, Eck S, Feenstra I, Race V,<br />
Sistermans E, Sturm M, Weiss M, Yntema H, Bakker E, Scheffer H, Bauer<br />
P. Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet<br />
2016;24:2-5.<br />
28. Matthijs G, Dierking A, Schmidtke J. New EuroGentest/ESHG guidelines and<br />
a new clinical utility gene card format for NGS-based testing. Eur J Hum<br />
Genet 2016;24:1.<br />
29. Genomes Project C, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, Depristo MA, Durbin<br />
RM, Handsaker RE, Kang HM, Marth GT, McVean GA. An integrated map <strong>of</strong><br />
genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 2012;491:56-65.<br />
30. Fu W, O’Connor TD, Jun G, Kang HM, Abecasis G, Leal SM, Gabriel S, Rieder<br />
MJ, Altshuler D, Shendure J, Nickerson DA, Bamshad MJ, Project NES, Akey<br />
JM. Analysis <strong>of</strong> 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin <strong>of</strong> most human<br />
protein-coding variants. Nature 2013;493:216-220.<br />
31. Lee S, Emond MJ, Bamshad MJ, Barnes KC, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA, Team<br />
NGESP-ELP, Christiani DC, Wurfel MM, Lin X. Optimal unified approach for<br />
rare-variant association testing with application to small-sample case-control<br />
whole-exome sequencing studies. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:224-237.<br />
32. Depristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C,<br />
Philippakis AA, Del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, Mckenna A, Fennell TJ,<br />
Kernytsky AM, Sivachenko AY, Cibulskis K, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D, Daly MJ.<br />
A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation<br />
DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 2011;43:491-498.<br />
<strong>33</strong>. Vihinen M, Den Dunnen JT, Dalgleish R, Cotton RG. Guidelines for<br />
establishing locus specific databases. Hum Mutat 2012;<strong>33</strong>:298-305.<br />
34. Vihinen M, Hancock JM, Maglott DR, Landrum MJ, Schaafsma GC, Taschner<br />
P. Human Variome Project Quality Assessment Criteria for Variation<br />
Databases. Hum Mutat 2016;37:549-558.<br />
35. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, Maglott<br />
DR. ClinVar: Public archive <strong>of</strong> relationships among sequence variation and<br />
human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D980-985.<br />
36. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown G, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, Gu B,<br />
Hart J, H<strong>of</strong>fman D, Hoover J, Jang W, Katz K, Ovetsky M, Riley G, Sethi A,<br />
Tully R, Villamarin-Salomon R, Rubinstein W, Maglott DR. ClinVar: Public<br />
archive <strong>of</strong> interpretations <strong>of</strong> clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res<br />
2016;44:D862-868.<br />
37. Niroula A, Vihinen M. Variation interpretation predictors: Principles, types,<br />
performance, and choice. Hum Mutat 2016;37:579-597.<br />
38. Pruitt KD, Brown GR, Hiatt SM, Thibaud-Nissen F, Astashyn A, Ermolaeva<br />
O, Farrell CM, Hart J, Landrum MJ, Mcgarvey KM, Murphy MR, O’Leary NA,<br />
Pujar S, Rajput B, Rangwala SH, Riddick LD, Shkeda A, Sun H, Tamez P,<br />
Tully RE, Wallin C, Webb D, Weber J, Wu W, Dicuccio M, Kitts P, Maglott<br />
DR, Murphy TD, Ostell JM. RefSeq: An update on mammalian reference<br />
sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D756-763.<br />
39. O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, Mcveigh R, Rajput<br />
B, Robbertse B, Smith-White B, Ako-Adjei D, Astashyn A, Badretdin A, Bao<br />
Y, Blinkova O, Brover V, Chetvernin V, Choi J, Cox E, Ermolaeva O, Farrell<br />
CM, Goldfarb T, Gupta T, Haft D, Hatcher E, Hlavina W, Joardar VS, Kodali<br />
VK, Li W, Maglott D, Masterson P, Mcgarvey KM, Murphy MR, O’Neill K,<br />
Pujar S, Rangwala SH, Rausch D, Riddick LD, Schoch C, Shkeda A, Storz<br />
SS, Sun H, Thibaud-Nissen F, Tolstoy I, Tully RE, Vatsan AR, Wallin C, Webb<br />
D, Wu W, Landrum MJ, Kimchi A, Tatusova T, Dicuccio M, Kitts P, Murphy<br />
TD, Pruitt KD. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: Current<br />
status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res<br />
2016;44:D7<strong>33</strong>-745.<br />
40. Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Bustamante CD, Evans JP, Landrum MJ,<br />
Ledbetter DH, Maglott DR, Martin CL, Nussbaum RL, Plon SE, Ramos EM,<br />
Sherry ST, Watson MS, ClinGen. ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource. N<br />
Engl J Med 2015;372:2235-2242.<br />
41. Brownstein CA, Holm IA, Ramoni R, Goldstein DB; Members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Undiagnosed Diseases Network. Data sharing in the undiagnosed diseases<br />
network. Hum Mutat 2015;36:985-988.<br />
42. Philippakis AA, Azzariti DR, Beltran S, Brookes AJ, Brownstein CA, Brudno<br />
M, Brunner HG, Buske OJ, Carey K, Doll C, Dumitriu S, Dyke SO, Den Dunnen<br />
JT, Firth HV, Gibbs RA, Girdea M, Gonzalez M, Haendel MA, Hamosh A, Holm<br />
IA, Huang L, Hurles ME, Hutton B, Krier JB, Misyura A, Mungall CJ, Paschall<br />
J, Paten B, Robinson PN, Schiettecatte F, Sobreira NL, Swaminathan GJ,<br />
Taschner PE, Terry SF, Washington NL, Zuchner S, Boycott KM, Rehm HL. The<br />
Matchmaker Exchange: A platform for rare disease gene discovery. Hum<br />
Mutat 2015;36:915-921.<br />
179
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0220<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:180-186<br />
The Mutation Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Calreticulin in Patients with<br />
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia<br />
Miyeloproliferatif Neoplazisi ve Akut Lösemisi Olan Hastalarda Kalretikülin Mutasyon Pr<strong>of</strong>ili<br />
Jingyi Wang 1,2 , Jianguo Hao 3 , Na He 1 , Chunyan Ji 1 , Daoxin Ma 1<br />
1Qilu Hospital <strong>of</strong> Shandong University, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Shandong, China<br />
2Affiliated Hospital <strong>of</strong> Shandong University <strong>of</strong> Traditional Chinese Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Shandong, China<br />
3General Hospital <strong>of</strong> Shandong Stell Group Company, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Shandong, China<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: Calreticulin (CALR) plays important roles in cell<br />
proliferation, apoptosis, and immune responses. CALR mutations were<br />
described recently in Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2)-negative or MPLnegative<br />
primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis (PMF) and essential thrombocythemia<br />
(ET) patients. CALR trails JAK2 as the second most mutated gene in<br />
myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, little is known about<br />
CALR mutation in Chinese patients with leukemia. In the present<br />
study, a cohort <strong>of</strong> 305 Chinese patients with hematopoietic neoplasms<br />
was screened for CALR mutations, with the aim <strong>of</strong> uncovering the<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> CALR mutations in leukemia and MPNs.<br />
Materials and Methods: Polymerase chain reaction and direct<br />
sequencing were performed to analyze mutations <strong>of</strong> CALR in 305<br />
patients with hematopoietic malignancies, including 135 acute<br />
myeloid leukemia patients, 57 acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients,<br />
and 113 MPN patients.<br />
Results: CALR mutations were found in 10.6% (12 <strong>of</strong> 113) <strong>of</strong> samples<br />
from patients with MPNs. CALR mutations were determined in 11.3%<br />
(6 <strong>of</strong> 53), 21.7% (5 <strong>of</strong> 23), and 9.1% (1/11) <strong>of</strong> patients with ET, PMF,<br />
and unclassifiable MPN, respectively.<br />
Conclusion: We showed that MPN patients carrying CALR mutations<br />
presented with higher platelet counts and lower hemoglobin levels<br />
compared to those with mutated JAK2. However, all <strong>of</strong> the leukemia<br />
patients had negative results for CALR mutations.<br />
Keywords: Calreticulin mutation, Myeloproliferative neoplasms,<br />
Leukemia<br />
Öz<br />
Amaç: Kalretikülin (CALR) hücre çoğalması, apoptoz ve immün<br />
yanıtlarda önemli rol oynar. CALR mutasyonları yakın zamanda Janus<br />
kinaz 2 (JAK2) veya MPL geni negatif primer miyel<strong>of</strong>ibroz (PMF) ve<br />
esansiyel trombositemi (ET) hastalarında tanımlanmıştır. CALR JAK2’yi<br />
takiben miyeloproliferatif neoplazilerde (MPN) ikinci sıklıkta görülen<br />
mutant gendir. Ancak, Çinli lösemi hastalarında CALR mutasyonları<br />
hakkında bilgi sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmada, hematopoetik neoplazisi olan<br />
305 Çinli hasta CALR mutasyonları, bu mutasyonların lösemi ve MPN<br />
hastalarındaki sıklığının ortaya çıkarılması için taranmıştır.<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu ve direkt dizileme<br />
yöntemi 135 akut miyeloid lösemi, 57 akut lenfoblastik lösemi ve 113<br />
MPN olmak üzere toplam 305 hematopoetik malinitesi olan hastada<br />
CALR mutasyonlarını analiz etmede kullanılmıştır.<br />
Bulgular: CALR mutasyonu MPN hastalarının %10,6’sında (12/113)<br />
tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca bu mutasyonlar ET, PMF ve sınıflandırılamayan<br />
MPN hastalarında sırasıyla %11,3 (6/53), %21,7 (5/23) ve %9,1 (1/11)<br />
olarak bulunmuştur.<br />
Sonuç: CALR mutasyonu taşıyan MPN hastaları JAK2 pozitif olanlara<br />
göre tanı anında daha yüksek trombosit sayısı ve daha düşük<br />
hemoglobin düzeylerine sahip olduklarını gösterdik. Ancak, lösemi<br />
hastalarının tamamında CALR mutasyonları negatif tespit edildi.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Kalretikülin mutasyonu, Miyeloproliferatif<br />
neoplazi, Lösemi<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Daoxin MA, M.D.,<br />
Qilu Hospital <strong>of</strong> Shandong University, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Shandong, China<br />
Phone : +86 531 82169887<br />
E-mail : daoxinma@sdu.edu.cn<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: May 28, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: September 02, 2015<br />
180
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:180-186<br />
Wang J, et al: Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Leukemia<br />
Introduction<br />
Somatic frameshift mutations in exon 9 <strong>of</strong> calreticulin (CALR) have<br />
been identified in a large proportion <strong>of</strong> JAK2- or MPL-negative<br />
myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients, including those<br />
with primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis (PMF) and essential thrombocythemia<br />
(ET) [1,2]. The CALR gene, located on chromosome 19p13.3,<br />
encodes a 48-kDa protein that consists <strong>of</strong> three domains: the<br />
amino terminal N-domain (residues 1-180), central proline-rich<br />
P-domain (residues 181-290), and carboxyl terminal C-domain<br />
(residues 291-400). The CALR protein is localized primarily in<br />
the endoplasmic reticulum through its C-terminal KDEL motif<br />
[3], but it is also found in the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and<br />
extracellular matrix [4,5]. Functionally, CALR is believed to<br />
participate in Ca2+ homeostasis as a calcium-binding protein,<br />
handling misfolded proteins, cell adhesion, immune response to<br />
cancer, and phagocytosis [4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. CALR-knockout<br />
mice are born dead and display impaired cardiac development,<br />
whereas postnatal overexpression also leads to cardiac defects<br />
[14,15]. Therefore, CALR regulates key cellular functions like<br />
proliferation and apoptosis. CALR also plays an important role<br />
in immune responses [16].<br />
Mutations <strong>of</strong> CALR were found essential for the diagnosis<br />
and prognosis <strong>of</strong> MPNs in recent years. All CALR mutations<br />
seen so far in MPNs mainly involve exon 9 and are somatic<br />
insertions or deletions. Two mutation variants (type 1 and type<br />
2) were the most frequent: type 1 (c.1179_1230del) resulted<br />
from a 52-bp deletion, more frequent in PMF, and type 2<br />
(c.1234_1235insTTGTC) resulted from a 5-bp TTGTC insertion<br />
[1]. Andrikovics et al. demonstrated that CALR mutations are<br />
found in about one-fourth <strong>of</strong> patients with ET or PMF and are<br />
associated with distinct clinical characteristics, and another<br />
study also found that CALR mutations are associated with<br />
younger age, more severe anemia, higher white blood cell (WBC)<br />
and platelet counts, lower Dynamic International Prognostic<br />
Scoring System Plus scores, and better survival compared to<br />
subjects with JAK2 mutations [17,18].<br />
Similar to MPNs, acute leukemia, including acute myeloid<br />
leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL),<br />
is a group <strong>of</strong> disorders characterized by abnormal clonal<br />
proliferation and immune imbalance. To investigate whether<br />
CALR mutations were present in myeloid neoplasms, Andrikovics<br />
et al. detected JAK2, CALR, and MPL genes in 289 cases <strong>of</strong> ET<br />
and 99 cases <strong>of</strong> PMF, and they reported that in ET, 154 (53%)<br />
JAK2V617F mutation-positive, 96 (<strong>33</strong>%) CALR mutationpositive,<br />
9 (3%) MPL mutation-positive, and 30 triple-negative<br />
(11%) cases were identified, while in PMF 56 (57%) JAK2V617F<br />
mutation-positive, 25 (25%) CALR mutation-positive, 7 (7%)<br />
MPL mutation-positive, and 11 (11%) triple-negative cases were<br />
identified [18]. Qiao et al. screened CALR mutations in 104 AML<br />
patients, 55 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, 7 chronic<br />
myelomonocytic leukemia patients, and 8 myelodysplastic<br />
syndrome (MDS) patients. Although most <strong>of</strong> these patients<br />
had negative results, one AML patient was found to harbor a<br />
CALR mutation (c.1179_1230del) without JAK2V617F or MPL<br />
W515L/K mutations [19].<br />
Unlike AML, ALL is a heterogeneous malignancy caused by the<br />
clonal proliferation <strong>of</strong> lymphocytes. However, no data about the<br />
mutation frequency <strong>of</strong> CALR in ALL patients have been reported<br />
to date. Therefore, in the present study, a cohort <strong>of</strong> 305 Chinese<br />
patients with hematopoietic neoplasms was screened for CALR<br />
mutations, with the aim <strong>of</strong> uncovering the frequency <strong>of</strong> CALR<br />
mutations in leukemia and MPNs. The results demonstrate that<br />
CALR mutation status is an important diagnostic factor in MPN<br />
patients without JAK2 mutation while it is negative in leukemia<br />
patients.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Subjects and Ethics Statement<br />
Bone marrow or peripheral blood samples from 113 MPN patients<br />
were collected at Qilu Hospital <strong>of</strong> Shandong University between<br />
August 2012 and November 2014, including cases <strong>of</strong> ET (n=53),<br />
polycythemia vera (PV; n=20), PMF (n=23), MDS/MPN (n=6),<br />
and unclassifiable MPN (MPN-U; n=11). We also obtained bone<br />
marrow samples from 192 patients with other hematopoietic<br />
neoplasms including AML (n=135) and ALL (n=57). These patients<br />
were all newly diagnosed before treatment. The characteristics<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients at the time <strong>of</strong> sampling are presented in Tables<br />
1 and 2. The patients with AML were treated with standard<br />
induction chemotherapy (anthracycline and cytarabine).<br />
The patients with ALL were treated with standard induction<br />
chemotherapy (vincristine, daunorubicin, L asparaginase, and<br />
prednisone). Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) or<br />
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from<br />
patients using density-gradient centrifugation with the Ficoll-<br />
Hypaque technique (Ficoll, Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology Inc.,<br />
Piscataway, NY, USA). The samples were then stored at -80 °C.<br />
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee <strong>of</strong> Qilu<br />
Hospital, Shandong University (Jinan, China). Written informed<br />
consent was obtained from all participants for treatment and<br />
the cryopreservation <strong>of</strong> bone marrow and peripheral blood<br />
according to the Declaration <strong>of</strong> Helsinki.<br />
Genomic DNA Isolation, Polymerase Chain Reaction<br />
Amplification, and Sequencing<br />
Genomic DNA samples from BMMCs or PBMCs <strong>of</strong> patients were<br />
extracted using the TIANGEN DNA Extraction Kit (TIANamp<br />
Genomic DNA Kit, Beijing, China). Oligonucleotide primers<br />
targeting exon 9 <strong>of</strong> CALR were used to amplify a 377-bp product:<br />
forward 5’ - CTG GCA CCA TCT TTG ACA ACT T - 3’, reverse 5’ -<br />
GGC CTC TCT ACA GCT CGT C - 3’. Polymerase chain reaction<br />
181
Wang J, et al: Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Leukemia Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:180-186<br />
(PCR) was performed in a volume <strong>of</strong> 25 µL containing 150 ng <strong>of</strong><br />
DNA, 12.5 µL <strong>of</strong> PCR master mix, 400 nM each <strong>of</strong> forward and<br />
reverse primers, and ddH2O. Cycling parameters consisted <strong>of</strong> an<br />
initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min; 40 cycles <strong>of</strong> denaturation<br />
at 94 °C for 15 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s, and extension at<br />
72 °C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 1 min. PCR<br />
products were purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, QIAGEN,<br />
Valencia, CA, USA) and subjected to bidirectional sequencing.<br />
Mutations were identified using Mutation Surveyor S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
(S<strong>of</strong>t Genetics, LLC, State College, PA, USA).<br />
JAK2V617F mutation burden was assessed using a quantitative<br />
PCR-based allelic discrimination assay. Real-time quantitative<br />
PCR was conducted using an ABI Prism 7500 Real-Time PCR<br />
System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in accordance<br />
with the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers and probes<br />
were as follows: JAK2-PCR-Primer-F: AAG CTT TCT CAC AAG CAT<br />
TTG GTT T, JAK2-PCR-Primer-R: AGA AAG GCA TTA GAA AGC<br />
CTG TAG TT, MGB probe sequence: JAK2-Probe-WT: VIC- TCT CCA<br />
CAG ACA CAT AC; JAK2-Probe-V617F: FAM- TCC ACA GAA ACA<br />
TAC (all the primers and probes were synthesized by Invitrogen,<br />
USA). The real-time PCR contained, in a final volume <strong>of</strong> 10 µL, 1<br />
µL <strong>of</strong> DNA, 5 µL <strong>of</strong> Universal PCR Master Mix, 0.4 µL <strong>of</strong> Primer-F<br />
and Primer-R, 0.2 µL <strong>of</strong> Probe-WT, 0.2 µL <strong>of</strong> Probe-V617F, and<br />
2.8 µL <strong>of</strong> distilled water. PCR reaction was done at 50 °C for 2<br />
min and 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles <strong>of</strong> 95 °C for<br />
30 s and 62 °C for 1 min. The fluorescence signal was collected<br />
at 62 °C while ROX Reference Dye was used as a background<br />
to normalize the fluorescent signal. The cycle threshold (Ct)<br />
value <strong>of</strong> VIC or FAM reflects the number <strong>of</strong> wild-type or mutant<br />
JAK2V617F gene DNAs, denoted as Ct VIC and Ct FAM. JAK2V617F<br />
was considered as positive when CtFAM was lower than 38.<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to test whether<br />
variables were normally distributed. Then the independentsamples<br />
t-test was used to compare continuous variables. Chisquare<br />
or Fisher exact tests were used for dichotomous variables.<br />
The clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the leukemia and MPN patients,<br />
including sex, age, WBC count, and other factors, are presented<br />
in Tables 1 and 2. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS<br />
17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).<br />
Results<br />
The Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> CALR Mutations in MPN Patients<br />
Mutant CALR in MPNs is a result <strong>of</strong> frameshift mutations, caused<br />
by exon 9 deletions or insertions; the type 1 variant, a 52-bp<br />
deletion (c.1179_1230del), and type 2 variant, a 5-bp TTGTC<br />
insertion (c.1234_1235insTTGTC), constitute more than 80%<br />
<strong>of</strong> these mutations. In our study, a total <strong>of</strong> 10.6% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
(12 <strong>of</strong> 113) with MPNs were demonstrated to harbor CALR<br />
mutations. The CALR mutation was found in 11.3% (6 <strong>of</strong> 53) <strong>of</strong><br />
ET, 21.7% (5 <strong>of</strong> 23) <strong>of</strong> PMF, and 9.1% (1/11) <strong>of</strong> MPN-U patients,<br />
respectively (Table 3). Moreover, CALR mutations were found in<br />
24.0% <strong>of</strong> JAK2V617F-negative ET patients (6 <strong>of</strong> 25) and 35.7% <strong>of</strong><br />
JAK2V617F-negative PMF patients (5 <strong>of</strong> 14). No CALR mutation<br />
was found in patients with PV. For mutation types, a total <strong>of</strong> 5<br />
distinct variants <strong>of</strong> CALR mutation, including 4 deletions and<br />
1 insertion, were identified (Figure 1). c.1179_1230del, which<br />
resulted from a 52-bp deletion, and c.1234_1235insTTGTC,<br />
which resulted from a 5-bp insertion, were the most frequent<br />
CALR mutations. The two mutations accounted for 50% (6 <strong>of</strong> 12)<br />
and 25% (3 <strong>of</strong> 12) in all cases with mutant CALR, respectively.<br />
For ET patients, the two mutations were 50% (3 <strong>of</strong> 6) and 50%<br />
(3 <strong>of</strong> 6), respectively. For PMF patients, the two mutations were<br />
60% (3 <strong>of</strong> 5) and 0% (0 <strong>of</strong> 5), respectively. Moreover, we also<br />
identified other kinds <strong>of</strong> deletions <strong>of</strong> CALR genetic variation:<br />
c.1239_1257del (1/12) and c.1183_1228del (1/12) were found<br />
Table 1. Clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> 192 patients with acute<br />
leukemia.<br />
Characteristics AML ALL<br />
Patients, n<br />
Age at study entry, years<br />
Males, n (%)<br />
Bone marrow blasts at diagnosis, %<br />
WBC count, x10 3 cells/mm 3<br />
AML subtype, n (%)<br />
M2<br />
M3<br />
M4<br />
M5<br />
135<br />
42.4±16.1 a<br />
71 (52.6)<br />
74.0±0.0 a<br />
32.1±27.8 a<br />
16 (11.9)<br />
40 (29.6)<br />
29 (21.5)<br />
50 (37.0)<br />
57<br />
37.3±16.5 a<br />
29 (50.9)<br />
89.1±13.8 a<br />
45.1±27.1 a<br />
a : Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. WBC: White blood cell, AML: acute<br />
myeloid leukemia, ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia.<br />
Figure 1. Sequencing results <strong>of</strong> CALR mutations in patients with<br />
myeloproliferative neoplasms.<br />
182
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:180-186<br />
Wang J, et al: Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Leukemia<br />
in ET patients, and c.1183_1216del (1/12) was found in a MPN-U<br />
patient.<br />
The Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> CALR Mutations in Leukemia Patients<br />
To investigate whether CALR mutations were present in other<br />
hematopoietic neoplasms, we screened 135 patients with AML<br />
and 57 patients with ALL. However, no CALR exon 9 mutations<br />
were found in any <strong>of</strong> these patients. One single nucleotide<br />
polymorphism (SNP) <strong>of</strong> CALR, rs143880510 (Figure 2), was found<br />
in one ALL patient.<br />
Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> Patients with CALR Mutations<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the 20 PV patients and 6 MDS/MPN patients had wildtype<br />
CALR. ET patients with mutant CALR had lower WBC counts<br />
(7.5±4.1×109/L; p
Wang J, et al: Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Leukemia Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:180-186<br />
JAK2 exon 12 [23], though much less prevalent in the patients, is<br />
considered as another robust molecular marker for Ph-negative<br />
MPNs, and especially for PV patients.<br />
The mutations in JAK2, MPL, and CALR are driver mutations, and<br />
they all activate the JAK2 pathway, but additional recurrent<br />
somatic mutations in several genes (TET2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, CBL,<br />
LNK, IDH1/2, IKF1, EZH2, TP53, SRSF2), encoding transcriptional<br />
and epigenetic regulators and signaling proteins, occur in MPNs.<br />
These additional mutations modulate disease progression and<br />
can also occur as primary mutations, but it is now convincingly<br />
demonstrated that MPNs can be initiated from a single<br />
JAK2V617F hematopoietic stem cell.<br />
JAK mutations have also emerged in other hematologic diseases,<br />
and the majority <strong>of</strong> the pathogenic mutations in JAK2 (also in<br />
JAK1 and JAK3) localize in or near the pseudokinase domain.<br />
To date, somatic frameshift mutations in exon 9 <strong>of</strong> CALR<br />
have been identified in a large proportion <strong>of</strong> JAK2- and<br />
MPL-negative PMF and ET patients. In a study <strong>of</strong> 617 PMF<br />
patients by Rumi et al., 399 (64.7%) carried JAK2V617F, 140<br />
(22.7%) had a CALR exon 9 indel, 25 (4.0%) carried an MPL<br />
(W515) mutation, and 53 (8.6%) had nonmutated JAK2,<br />
CALR, and MPL (so-called triple-negative PMF) [24]. Kim et<br />
al. investigated mutation pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> CALR, JAK2, and MPL in<br />
199 Korean patients with MPNs. The overall frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
CALR mutations was 12.6%; it was most frequent in MPN-U<br />
cases (37.5%), followed by ET (17.7%) and PMF (14.8%).<br />
CALR mutations were not found in PV or acute panmyelosis<br />
with myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis. CALR and JAK2 or MPL mutations were<br />
mutually exclusive [25]. Wu et al. also found two kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
CALR mutations, c.1179_1230del and c.1234_1235insTTGTC,<br />
in Chinese patients with MPNs, and female patients showed<br />
a predisposition to CALR mutation [26]. Li et al. studied 1088<br />
Chinese patients with MPNs including ET (n=234) and PMF<br />
(n=50) without JAK2V617F or MPL exon 10 mutations. CALR<br />
mutation was detected in 53% <strong>of</strong> subjects with ET and 56%<br />
<strong>of</strong> subjects with PMF, and 152 CALR mutations were identified<br />
clustering into 15 types, including deletions (n=8), insertions<br />
(n=3), and complex indels (n=4) [27].<br />
In our study, mutations in CALR were present in 12 <strong>of</strong> 113 patients<br />
with Ph-negative MPNs (10.6%). Mean while, an overwhelming<br />
majority (75%) <strong>of</strong> the CALR mutation pattern still lies in<br />
c.1179_1230del and c.1234_1235insTTGTC. CALR mutations<br />
were present in 12 <strong>of</strong> 50 MPN patients without JAK2 mutations<br />
(24%). Among patients with ET, those with CALR mutations, as<br />
compared with those with JAK2V617F mutations, presented with<br />
significantly higher platelet counts and lower hemoglobin levels.<br />
Whereas the frequency <strong>of</strong> CALR mutations in MPNs is quite<br />
consistent in recent studies, it is unclear whether CALR<br />
mutations occur in up to 8.3% <strong>of</strong> patients with MDS (10 <strong>of</strong><br />
120 MDS patients) as reported by Nangalia et al. [2], or are<br />
infrequent in MDS (none <strong>of</strong> 73) and AML (none <strong>of</strong> 254) patients<br />
as reported by Klampfl et al. [1]. This inconsistency could be<br />
due to the relatively small number <strong>of</strong> investigated patients.<br />
Therefore, in addition to MPNs, the mutation pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> CALR<br />
in other hematopoietic diseases such as leukemia and MDS has<br />
been given more attention than in the past. CALR mutations<br />
were identified in 2 <strong>of</strong> 527 MDS patients (0.38%). None <strong>of</strong> 328<br />
patients with MDS were found to have CALR mutations. Two <strong>of</strong><br />
199 patients with AML following MDS had mutated CALR, and<br />
the frequency <strong>of</strong> CALR mutations is very low in MDS, supporting<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> CALR mutations as a diagnostic marker for ET and PMF<br />
patients [28]. Recently in a Chinese study, Cui et al. sequenced<br />
CALR mutations in 14 patients who met the WHO criteria for<br />
chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) and found that 1 <strong>of</strong> 14 CNL<br />
patients had a CALR mutation (c.1154-1155insTTGTC) [29].<br />
No CALR mutations were found in 62 patients with ALL [2].<br />
However, little attention has been paid to AML and no data<br />
about the mutation frequency <strong>of</strong> CALR in Chinese ALL patients<br />
have been reported until now. Therefore, we screened 135<br />
AML patients and 57 ALL patients. However, no CALR exon 9<br />
mutations were found in any <strong>of</strong> these patients. Only one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
leukemia patients was found to have a CALR SNP, rs143880510.<br />
To date, detection <strong>of</strong> CALR mutations in peripheral blood has<br />
been used as a diagnostic tool in the same way that tests for<br />
JAK2 mutations have simplified and improved the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> patients with MPNs. However, in order to develop<br />
novel therapeutic drugs, further research is needed to explore<br />
Table 4. Clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> essential thrombocythemia and primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis patients with CALR and JAK2 mutation.<br />
Characteristics ET PMF<br />
CALR+ JAK2+ p CALR+ JAK2+ p<br />
Patients, n<br />
Males, n<br />
Age, years<br />
WBC count (x10 9 /L)<br />
Hemoglobin (g/L)<br />
Platelets (x10 9 /L)<br />
6<br />
2<br />
44.0±15.1 a<br />
7.5±4.1 a<br />
137±34.2 a<br />
982±24.2 a 28<br />
11<br />
56.2±12.9 a<br />
14±11.0 a<br />
145±21.4 a<br />
515±31.6 a 0.784<br />
0.001<br />
0.001<br />
0.002<br />
0.001<br />
5<br />
4<br />
59.8±3.6 a<br />
10.42±3.6 a<br />
66.5±14.1 a<br />
171±35.2 a 9<br />
5<br />
61.9±7.4 a<br />
15.12±3.6 a<br />
150±25.7 a 603±56.2 a 0.58<br />
0.626<br />
0.612<br />
0.001<br />
0.091<br />
a : Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. ET: Essential thrombocythemia, PMF: primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis.<br />
184
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:180-186<br />
Wang J, et al: Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Leukemia<br />
the relationship between the pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> MPNs and the<br />
function <strong>of</strong> CALR.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In summary, our data from this cohort <strong>of</strong> Chinese patients with<br />
MPNs confirmed that CALR mutations were novel molecular<br />
markers in JAK2V617F-negative MPNs. Patients with the<br />
c.1179_1230del and c.1234_1235insTTGTC mutations have<br />
shown distinct clinical characteristics, but further research is<br />
required to confirm this result.<br />
Acknowledgment<br />
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural<br />
Science Foundation <strong>of</strong> China (No. 81470319, No. 81170515).<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: The present study was approved<br />
by the Ethics Committee <strong>of</strong> Qilu Hospital, Shandong University<br />
(Jinan, China); Informed Consent: Written informed consent<br />
was obtained from all participants for treatment and the<br />
cryopreservation <strong>of</strong> bone marrow and peripheral blood<br />
according to the Declaration <strong>of</strong> Helsinki.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Medical Practices: Jingyi Wang, Jianguo Hao, Na He; Concept:<br />
Daoxin Ma, Chunyan Ji; Design: Daoxin Ma, Chunyan Ji; Data<br />
Collection or Processing: Jingyi Wang, Jianguo Hao, Na He,<br />
Chunyan Ji, Daoxin Ma; Analysis or Interpretation: Daoxin Ma,<br />
Chunyan Ji; Literature Search: Jingyi Wang, Jianguo Hao, Na He,<br />
Chunyan Ji, Daoxin Ma; Writing: Jingyi Wang, Jianguo Hao, Na<br />
He, Chunyan Ji, Daoxin Ma.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, Nivarthi H, Rumi E, Milosevic JD,<br />
Them NC, Berg T, Gisslinger B, Pietra D, Chen D, Vladimer GI, Bagienski<br />
K, Milanesi C, Casetti IC, Sant’Antonio E, Ferretti V, Elena C, Schischlik F,<br />
Cleary C, Six M, Schalling M, Schönegger A, Bock C, Malcovati L, Pascutto C,<br />
Superti-Furga G, Cazzola M, Kralovics R. Somatic mutations <strong>of</strong> calreticulin<br />
in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2379-2390.<br />
2. Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, Nice FL, Gundem G, Wedge DC, Avezov<br />
E, Li J, Kollmann K, Kent DG, Aziz A, Godfrey AL, Hinton J, Martincorena<br />
I, Van Loo P, Jones AV, Guglielmelli P, Tarpey P, Harding HP, Fitzpatrick JD,<br />
Goudie CT, Ortmann CA, Loughran SJ, Raine K, Jones DR, Butler AP, Teague<br />
JW, O’Meara S, McLaren S, Bianchi M, Silber Y, Dimitropoulou D, Bloxham D,<br />
Mudie L, Maddison M, Robinson B, Keohane C, Maclean C, Hill K, Orchard K,<br />
Tauro S, Du MQ, Greaves M, Bowen D, Huntly BJ, Harrison CN, Cross NC, Ron<br />
D, Vannucchi AM, Papaemmanuil E, Campbell PJ, Green AR. Somatic CALR<br />
mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Engl<br />
J Med 2013;369:2391-2405.<br />
3. Michalak M, Groenendyk J, Szabo E, Gold LI, Opas M. Calreticulin, a multiprocess<br />
calcium-buffering chaperone <strong>of</strong> the endoplasmic reticulum.<br />
Biochem J 2009;417:651-666.<br />
4. Gold LI, Eggleton P, Sweetwyne MT, Van Duyn LB, Greives MR, Naylor SM,<br />
Michalak M, Murphy-Ullrich JE. Calreticulin: non-endoplasmic reticulum<br />
functions in physiology and disease. FASEB J 2010;24:665-683.<br />
5. Eggleton P, Michalak M. Calreticulin for better or for worse, in sickness and<br />
in health, until death do us part. Cell Calcium 2013;54:126-131.<br />
6. Raghavan M, Wijeyesakere SJ, Peters LR, Del Cid N. Calreticulin in the<br />
immune system: ins and outs. Trends Immunol 2013;34:13-21.<br />
7. Lee D, Oka T, Hunter B, Robinson A, Papp S, Nakamura K, Srisakuldee<br />
W, Nickel BE, Light PE, Dyck JR, Lopaschuk GD, Kardami E, Opas M,<br />
Michalak M. Calreticulin induces dilated cardiomyopathy. PLoS One<br />
2013;8:56387.<br />
8. Wang WA, Groenendyk J, Michalak M. Calreticulin signaling in health and<br />
disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012;44:842-846.<br />
9. Wemeau M, Kepp O, Tesnière A, Panaretakis T, Flament C, De Botton S,<br />
Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Chaput N. Calreticulin exposure on malignant blasts<br />
predicts a cellular anticancer immune response in patients with acute<br />
myeloid leukemia. Cell Death Dis 2010;1:104.<br />
10. Papp S, Dziak E, Opas M. Embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyogenesis: a<br />
novel role for calreticulin as a regulator. Stem Cells 2009;27:1507-1515.<br />
11. Panaretakis T, Kepp O, Brockmeier U, Tesniere A, Bjorklund AC, Chapman DC,<br />
Durchschlag M, Joza N, Pierron G, van Endert P, Yuan J, Zitvogel L, Madeo F,<br />
Williams DB, Kroemer G. Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> pre-apoptotic calreticulin exposure<br />
in immunogenic cell death. EMBO J 2009;28:578-590.<br />
12. Obeid Tesniere A, Ghiringhelli F, Fimia GM, Apetoh L, Perfettini JL, Castedo<br />
M, Mignot G, Panaretakis T, Casares N, Métivier D, Larochette N, van Endert<br />
P, Ciccosanti F, Piacentini M, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Calreticulin exposure<br />
dictates the immunogenicity <strong>of</strong> cancer cell death. Nat Med 2007;13:54-<br />
61.<br />
13. Coppolino MG, Woodside MJ, Demaurex N, Grinstein S, St-Arnaud R, Dedhar<br />
S. Calreticulin is essential for integrin-mediated calcium signalling and cell<br />
adhesion. Nature 1997;386:843-847.<br />
14. Nakamura K, Robertson M, Liu G, Dickie P, Nakamura K, Guo JQ, Duff HJ,<br />
Opas M, Kavanagh K, Michalak M. Complete heart block and sudden death<br />
in mice overexpressing calreticulin. J Clin Invest 2001;107:1245-1253.<br />
15. Mesaeli N, Nakamura K, Zvaritch E, Dickie P, Dziak E, Krause KH, Opas<br />
M, MacLennan DH, Michalak M. Calreticulin is essential for cardiac<br />
development. J Cell Biol 1999;144:857-868.<br />
16. Burns K, Duggan B, Atkinson EA, Famulski KS, Nemer M, Bleackley RC,<br />
Michalak M. Modulation <strong>of</strong> gene expression by calreticulin binding to the<br />
glucocorticoid receptor. Nature 1994;367:476-480.<br />
17. Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke CM, Knudson RA, Ketterling R, Hanson CH, Maffioli<br />
M, Caramazza D, Passamonti F, Pardanani A. CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated<br />
or triple-negative myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular<br />
comparisons. Leukemia 2014;28:1472-1477.<br />
18. Andrikovics H, Krahling T, Balassa K, Halm G, Bors A, Koszarska M, Batai A,<br />
Dolgos J, Csomor J, Egyed M, Sipos A, Remenyi P, Tordai A, Masszi T. Distinct<br />
clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> myeloproliferative neoplasms with calreticulin<br />
mutations. Haematologica 2014;99:1184-1190.<br />
19. Qiao C, Sun C, Ouyang Y, Wang JJ, Qian SX, Li JY, Zhang SJ. Clinical<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> different calreticulin gene mutation types in wild-type<br />
JAK2 essential thrombocythemia and myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis patients. Haematolgica<br />
2014;99:182-184.<br />
20. Dameshek W. Some speculations on the myeloproliferative syndromes.<br />
Blood 1951;6:372-375.<br />
21. James C, Ugo V, Le Couédic JP, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C, Garçon<br />
L, Raslova H, Berger R, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Villeval JL, Constantinescu SN,<br />
Casadevall N, Vainchenker W. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to<br />
constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 2005;434:1144-<br />
1148.<br />
185
Wang J, et al: Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Leukemia Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:180-186<br />
22. Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, East C, Fourouclas N, Swanton S, Vassiliou<br />
GS, Bench AJ, Boyd EM, Curtin N, Scott MA, Erber WN, Green AR; Cancer<br />
Genome Project. Acquired mutation <strong>of</strong> the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human<br />
myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet 2005;365:1054-1061.<br />
23. Scott LM, Tong W, Levine RL, Scott MA, Beer PA, Stratton MR, Futreal PA,<br />
Erber WN, McMullin MF, Harrison CN, Warren AJ, Gilliland DG, Lodish HF,<br />
Green AR. JAK2 exon 12 mutations in polycythemia vera and idiopathic<br />
erythrocytosis. N Engl J Med 2007;356:459-468.<br />
24. Rumi E, Pietra D, Pascutto C, Guglielmelli P, Martínez-Trillos A, Casetti I,<br />
Colomer D, Pieri L, Pratcorona M, Rotunno G, Sant’Antonio E, Bellini M,<br />
Cavalloni C, Mannarelli C, Milanesi C, Boveri E, Ferretti V, Astori C, Rosti<br />
V, Cervantes F, Barosi G, Vannucchi AM, Cazzola M; Associazione Italiana<br />
per la Ricerca sul Cancro Gruppo Italiano Malattie Mieloproliferative<br />
Investigators. Clinical effect <strong>of</strong> driver mutations <strong>of</strong> JAK2, CALR, or MPL in<br />
primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis. Blood 2014;124:1062-1069.<br />
25. Kim SY, Im K, Park SN, Kwon J, Kim JA, Lee DS. CALR, JAK2, and MPL mutation<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles in patients with four different subtypes <strong>of</strong> myeloproliferative<br />
neoplasms: primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia<br />
vera, and myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable. Am J Clin Pathol<br />
2015;143:635-644.<br />
26. Wu Z, Zhang X, Xu X, Chen Y, Hu T, Kang Z, Li S, Wang H, Liu W, Ma X,<br />
Guan M. The mutation pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> JAK2 and CALR in Chinese Han patients<br />
with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. J<br />
Hematol Oncol 2014;7:48.<br />
27. Li N, Yao QM, Gale RP, Li JL, Li LD, Zhao XS, Jiang H, Jiang Q, Jiang B, Shi HX, Chen<br />
SS, Liu KY, Huang XJ, Ruan GR. Frequency and allele burden <strong>of</strong> CALR mutations<br />
in Chinese with essential thrombocythemia and primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis without<br />
JAK2 V617F or MPL mutations. Leuk Res 2015;39:510-514.<br />
28. Heuser M, Panagiota V, Koenecke C, Fehse B, Alchalby H, Badbaran A,<br />
Shahswar R, Stadler M, Eder M, Göhring G, Trummer A, Schroeder T, Kobbe<br />
G, Thiede C, Platzbecker U, Schlegelberger B, Kroeger N, Ganser A, Thol<br />
F. Low frequency <strong>of</strong> calreticulin mutations in MDS patients. Leukemia<br />
2014;28:19<strong>33</strong>-1934.<br />
29. Cui Y, Li B, Gale RP, Jiang Q, Xu Z, Qin T, Zhang P, Zhang Y, Xiao Z. CSF3R,<br />
SETBP1 and CALR mutations in chronic neutrophilic leukemia. J Hematol<br />
Oncol 2014;7:77.<br />
186
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0041<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic<br />
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms<br />
Miyeloproliferatif Hastalığı Olan 294 Türk Hastanın Klinik Verileri<br />
Neslihan Andıç 1 , Mustafa Ünübol 2 , Eren Yağcı 3 , Olga Meltem Akay 1 , İrfan Yavaşoğlu 2 , Vefki Gürhan Kadıköylü 2 , Ali Zahit Bolaman 2<br />
1Osmangazi University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Eskişehir, Turkey<br />
2Adnan Menderes University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Aydın, Turkey<br />
3Osmangazi University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) share common clonal<br />
stem cells but show significant differences in their clinical courses.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this retrospective study was to evaluate thrombotic and<br />
hemorrhagic complications, JAK2 status, gastrointestinal and cardiac<br />
changes, treatment modalities, and survival in MPNs in <strong>Turkish</strong><br />
patients.<br />
Materials and Methods: Medical files <strong>of</strong> 294 patients [112 essential<br />
thrombocythemia (ET), 117 polycythemia vera (PV), 46 primary<br />
myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis, and 19 unclassified MPN cases] from 2 different<br />
universities in Turkey were examined.<br />
Results: Older age, higher leukocyte count at diagnosis, and<br />
JAK2 mutation positivity were risk factors for thrombosis. Platelet<br />
count over 1000x10 9 /L was a risk factor for hemorrhagic episodes.<br />
Hydroxyurea treatment was not related to leukemic transformation.<br />
Median follow-up time was 50 months (quartiles: 22.2-81.75) in<br />
these patients. Patients with primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis had the shortest<br />
survival <strong>of</strong> 137 months when compared with 179 months for ET and<br />
231 months for PV. Leukemic transformation, thromboembolic events,<br />
age over 60 years, and anemia were found to be the factors affecting<br />
survival.<br />
Conclusion: Thromboembolic complications are the most important<br />
preventable risk factors for morbidity and mortality in MPNs. Drug<br />
management in MPNs is done according to hemoglobin and platelet<br />
counts. Based on the current study population our results support<br />
the idea that leukocytosis and JAK2 positivity are more important risk<br />
factors for thrombosis than hemoglobin and platelet values.<br />
Keywords: Myeloproliferative neoplasms, Survival, Thrombosis,<br />
Treatment<br />
Öz<br />
Amaç: Miyeloproliferatif hastalıklar (MPH) ortak klonal bir kök<br />
hücreden köken almalarına karşın klinik seyirleri belirgin farklılıklar<br />
göstermektedir. Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı MPH’lardaki<br />
trombotik ve hemorajik komplikasyonların, JAK2 mutasyon durumunun,<br />
gastrointestinal ve kardiyak değişikliklerin, tedavi şekillerinin ve yaşam<br />
sürelerinin incelenmesidir.<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Türkiye’nin iki farklı üniversite hastanesinden<br />
294 hastanın [112 esansiyel trombositemi (ET), 117 polisitemia vera<br />
(PV), 46 primer miyel<strong>of</strong>ibozis, 19 sınıflanamayan MPH] kayıtları<br />
incelenmiştir.<br />
Bulgular: İleri yaş, tanıda yüksek lökosit sayısı JAK2 mutasyon<br />
pozitifliği tromboz için risk faktörü olarak bulunmuştur. Trombosit<br />
sayımının 1000x10 9 /L üzerinde olması kanama komplikasyonları<br />
açısından risk faktörüdür. Hidroksiüre tedavisi lösemik dönüşümle<br />
ilişkili bulunmamıştır. Bu hastalarda: Medyan takip süresi 50 ay (22,2-<br />
81,75 çeyrekler) idi. Primer miyel<strong>of</strong>ibrozisli hastalar ET için 179 ay ve<br />
PV için 231 ay olan yaşam süreleri ile karşılaştırıldığında 137 ay ile<br />
en kısa yaşam süresine sahip hastalardır. Lösemik transformasyon,<br />
tromboembolik olaylar, 60 yaş üstü olmak ve anemi yaşam süresinin<br />
etkileyen faktörler olarak bulunmuştur.<br />
Sonuç: Tromboembolik komplikasyonlar MPH’da en önemli önlenebilir<br />
mortalite ve morbidite nedenidir. İlaç düzenlemeleri çoğunlukla<br />
hemoglobin ve trombosit sayımlarına göre yapılmaktadır. Bu<br />
çalışmamızdaki hasta popülasyonundan elde ettiğimiz veriler lökositoz<br />
ve JAK2 pozitifliğinin hemoglobin ve trombosit sayımlarından daha<br />
önemli risk faktorleri olduğu savını desteklemektedir.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Miyeloproliferatif hastalıklar, Sağkalım, Tromboz,<br />
Tedavi<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Neslihan ANDIÇ, M.D.,<br />
Osmangazi University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Eskişehir, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 532 518 22 63<br />
E-mail : neslihandic@yahoo.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: January 20, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: September 15, 2015<br />
187
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
Introduction<br />
According to the revised World Health Organization (WHO)<br />
classification, BCR-ABL-negative chronic myeloproliferative<br />
disorders are now referred to as myeloproliferative neoplasms<br />
(MPNs) [1,2]. MPNs share common clonal stem cells and<br />
phenotypic differences occur due to different molecules<br />
affecting signal transduction. The JAK2V617F mutation is an<br />
acquired point mutation causing valine-to-phenylalanine<br />
substitution at codon 617 on the JAK2 gene. JAK2V617F will<br />
be referred to as JAK2 mutation in the text. JAK2 mutations<br />
affecting the JAK-STAT signal transduction pathway are found<br />
in 90%-95% <strong>of</strong> patients with polycythemia vera (PV) [3], 50%-<br />
70% <strong>of</strong> patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), and<br />
40%-50% <strong>of</strong> patients with primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis (PMF) [4].<br />
JAK2 mutations cannot be used in distinguishing one MPN from<br />
another but are useful in excluding reactive hematocrit and<br />
platelet elevations and reactive myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis. Absence <strong>of</strong> JAK2<br />
mutations cannot exclude the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> PV, ET, or PMF. Some<br />
clinical criteria and bone marrow findings are required for the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> JAK2-negative MPN [2].<br />
Prognosis <strong>of</strong> MPNs is determined by thromboembolic and<br />
hemorrhagic complications and progression to myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis<br />
and acute leukemia. The cumulative rate <strong>of</strong> nonfatal thrombosis<br />
in PV is 3.8 events per 100 persons per year, and in ET the rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> fatal and nonfatal thrombotic events ranges from 2% to 4%<br />
<strong>of</strong> patient years. Primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis seems less susceptible<br />
for thrombotic events as the cumulative percentage is 2.23%<br />
per patient years [5]. Age and previous thrombosis are known<br />
risk factors for future thrombosis in MPNs. Leukocytosis and<br />
JAK2 mutation are shown to be additional risk factors. Extreme<br />
thrombocytosis (count over 1000 or 1500x109/L) was found to<br />
be related to hemorrhagic complications but not thrombosis [5].<br />
Other complications like gastrointestinal ulcers and<br />
echocardiographic changes are also reported. Their importance<br />
in the course <strong>of</strong> the disease is only partially understood [6,7].<br />
Hydroxyurea and anagrelide are the most commonly used drugs<br />
in the treatment <strong>of</strong> MPN. Hydroxyurea was shown to reduce<br />
the incidence <strong>of</strong> thrombotic events in several studies, but there<br />
is some evidence that it may increase the risk <strong>of</strong> leukemic<br />
transformation [8]. Anagrelide is effective in reducing platelet<br />
counts in ET and PV patients who are resistant or intolerant to<br />
hydroxyurea. Risk increment <strong>of</strong> leukemia has not been shown<br />
for this drug [9].<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to evaluate thrombotic and hemorrhagic<br />
complications, JAK2 status, gastrointestinal and cardiac changes,<br />
treatment modalities, and survival in MPN cases.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
The medical files <strong>of</strong> patients diagnosed with Philadelphia<br />
chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative disease<br />
(CMPD) and MPN between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively<br />
examined. Two centers in Turkey entered the study: Eskişehir<br />
Osmangazi University and Adnan Menderes University.<br />
Diagnoses were made according to PV Study Group and WHO<br />
recommendations. The WHO criteria were revised in 2005 after<br />
the discovery <strong>of</strong> JAK2 mutations. In the revision <strong>of</strong> WHO criteria<br />
made in 2008, ‘CMPD’ was changed to ‘MPN’. Patients with<br />
significant fibrosis in the bone marrow but otherwise clinically<br />
diagnosed with ET by the primary clinician were placed in the<br />
category <strong>of</strong> unclassified MPN and will be referred to here as<br />
MPN(u) patients. We included MPN(u) patients in the statistical<br />
analysis done for the whole patient group, like statistics <strong>of</strong> risk<br />
factors for thrombosis. On the other hand, we did not include<br />
MPN(u) in one-to-one comparisons with the three MPN groups<br />
(ET, PV, and PMF) because we wanted to compare the patients<br />
with exact diagnoses.<br />
The study was approved by the local ethics committees <strong>of</strong> both<br />
universities. Patients above the age <strong>of</strong> 16 at the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis<br />
were enrolled in the study. All consecutively admitted patients<br />
during the mentioned period were taken into consideration.<br />
Clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded. JAK2<br />
status and other cytogenetic abnormalities and bone marrow<br />
findings were evaluated. Treatment modalities, thrombotic and<br />
hemorrhagic complications, and gastrointestinal and cardiac<br />
findings were noted.<br />
Proteins C and S were studied by the Siemens BCSX coagulometric<br />
method and antithrombin was studied by Siemens BNII<br />
nephelometric method. Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene<br />
mutations were studied with a Roche 480 II LightCycler by<br />
the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Bone<br />
marrow samples were cultured in 24-48 h in standard 10 µg/<br />
mL colcemid solution without mitogen in order to perform<br />
conventional bone marrow cytogenetics. Twenty metaphases<br />
were evaluated. A locus-specific LSI D20S108 (20q12) probe was<br />
used for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and<br />
200 cells (metaphase/interphase) were evaluated. JAK2V617F<br />
mutations were studied by real-time PCR method with a Roche<br />
480 II LightCycler using the TIB Molbiol LightMix Kit. Bone<br />
marrow aspirates and biopsies were evaluated in the pathology<br />
and hematology departments <strong>of</strong> both universities. Increases in<br />
megakaryocytes and grades <strong>of</strong> reticulin fibrosis were defined<br />
according to the WHO classification <strong>of</strong> tumors [10,11].<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS 20.0 for<br />
Windows and p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms<br />
assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test<br />
was used for univariate comparisons. The effect <strong>of</strong> prognostic<br />
factors on survival was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards<br />
regression models.<br />
Results<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 294 patients’ medical files were eligible for the study;<br />
143 (48.6%) patients were female and 151 (51.4%) were male.<br />
Median age was 60 years (quartiles: 48-79), with a minimum <strong>of</strong><br />
16 and maximum <strong>of</strong> 84 years. Sex and age were not statistically<br />
different between patient groups. The number <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
diagnosed with ET was 112 (38.1%), with PV was 117 (39.8%),<br />
and with PMF was 46 (15.6%). Nineteen patients who were<br />
diagnosed with and treated for ET by the primary physician<br />
were later classified as having MPN(u). These patients had no<br />
leukoerythroblastosis in peripheral blood and their median<br />
platelet count was 1146x109/L (quartiles: 844-1416). All <strong>of</strong> them<br />
had megakaryocytic proliferation in their bone marrow and had<br />
neither dysplasia nor prominent granulocytic and erythroid<br />
proliferation. Median follow-up time was 68 months (quartiles:<br />
15-81). Six <strong>of</strong> them had grade 2-3 and 13 <strong>of</strong> them had grade<br />
3 reticulin fibrosis in their bone marrow. We could not classify<br />
these cases as ET or PMF so we classified them as MPN(u).<br />
The longest follow-up period was 311 months (median: 43<br />
months; quartiles: 15.7-77.2). In 103 patients there were<br />
no comorbidities, while 155 patients had hypertension and/<br />
or diabetes mellitus, and 53 patients had diseases including<br />
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver failure, renal<br />
failure, congestive heart disease, and arrhythmias including<br />
atrial fibrillation. One patient had lung cancer and another<br />
had prostate cancer. Eighty-five patients (28%) were smoking<br />
cigarettes. The clinical and laboratory characteristics <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
are summarized in Table 1. Splenomegaly and hepatomegaly<br />
were significantly more frequent in PMF than in other MPNs.<br />
Hemoglobin was significantly higher in PV than in other<br />
groups and significantly lower in PMF than in other groups.<br />
Platelet count was higher in ET than in other groups. Lactate<br />
dehydrogenase (LDH), potassium, and uric acid values were<br />
higher in PMF compared to other MPN subtypes. Median LDH was<br />
above normal limits in all study groups. Bone marrow findings<br />
at diagnosis are summarized in Table 2. Megakaryocytes were<br />
more prominent in ET and reticulin fibrosis was more pr<strong>of</strong>ound<br />
in PMF than in other MPNs, as expected.<br />
It was found that 58.5% (38 patients) <strong>of</strong> ET patients, 86.2%<br />
(50 patients) <strong>of</strong> PV patients, and 70.6% (12 patients) <strong>of</strong> PMF<br />
patients were positive for JAK2 mutation. Patients with PV were<br />
carrying JAK2 mutations significantly more so than patients with<br />
ET (p
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
these cerebral arterial occlusions were seen in ET patients (16 out<br />
<strong>of</strong> 37). Coronary artery disease was the second most common<br />
thrombotic complication (32 out <strong>of</strong> 108). Ten patients had deep<br />
vein thrombosis (9.3%). Twelve patients (11.1%) had thrombosis<br />
in an intraabdominal vein. Ten patients had both arterial and<br />
venous thrombotic attacks and most <strong>of</strong> them were ET patients<br />
(8 out <strong>of</strong> 10). Diagnostic groups, sex, treatment modality, and<br />
bone marrow findings did not differ between patients with<br />
or without thrombosis. Older age, higher leukocyte count at<br />
diagnosis, and JAK2 mutation positivity were risk factors for<br />
thrombosis after univariate analysis. Data are shown in Table 3.<br />
Hemorrhagic complications were seen in 34.4% (n=101)<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients. Almost all (94%) patients with hemorrhagic<br />
complications had mucocutaneous or gastrointestinal tract<br />
bleeds. There was no statistical significance between MPN<br />
groups regarding the frequency and the source <strong>of</strong> bleeding.<br />
Hemoglobin values were significantly lower in patients with<br />
hemorrhagic episodes than patients without hemorrhage<br />
(p=0.012). Medians and quartiles were 13.1 g/dL (10.3-17)<br />
and 14.6 g/dL (12.7-17.1), respectively. Platelets count over<br />
1000x10 9 /L was a risk factor for hemorrhagic episodes; 30.1%<br />
(n=59) <strong>of</strong> patients with platelet count less than or equal to<br />
1000x10 9 /L had hemorrhagic events, whereas 42.9% (n=42) <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with platelet count over 1000x10 9 /L had hemorrhagic<br />
episodes (p=0.030). Leukocyte counts, fibrinogen levels, and<br />
treatment modalities were not statistically different between<br />
patients with and without hemorrhage.<br />
Electrocardiogram results were considered as normal in 78.2%<br />
(n=230) <strong>of</strong> cases. Atrial fibrillation was present in 7.4%<br />
(n=22) and signs <strong>of</strong> ischemia in 8.2% (n=24) <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
Echocardiography was performed in 95 patients. Forty-one<br />
(43.2%) <strong>of</strong> them had cardiac valve abnormalities and 10 (10.5%)<br />
had pulmonary hypertension.<br />
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in 80 patients.<br />
Gastritis and duodenitis were frequent findings (56 patients,<br />
70%). Nine patients (11.3%) had ulcers. Nine patients had<br />
esophageal varices. Helicobacter pylori testing was done in 56<br />
patients and 53.6% <strong>of</strong> them were positive.<br />
Treatment modalities are shown in Table 4. Hydroxyurea was the<br />
first choice in ET, PV, and PMF cases. Anagrelide was mainly used<br />
in ET. Patients who were receiving anagrelide treatment were<br />
significantly younger than the patients receiving hydroxyurea<br />
treatment [49.5 years (39.7-63) and 60 years (50-69), respectively,<br />
p0.05). Thirty-six patients (12.2%) were treated with<br />
phlebotomy alone, and 159 patients (54%) received any kind <strong>of</strong><br />
Table 2. Bone marrow findings at diagnosis.<br />
PV ET PMF p-value<br />
Increased number <strong>of</strong> megakaryocytes (% within MPNs) PV-ET
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms<br />
cytoreductive therapy along with phlebotomy. Seven patients<br />
developed acute myeloid leukemia during follow-up. Three<br />
<strong>of</strong> them had ET, 2 <strong>of</strong> them had PV, and 2 <strong>of</strong> them had MPN(u).<br />
Patients who developed leukemia were not different from others<br />
by means <strong>of</strong> sex, megakaryocyte number, or grade <strong>of</strong> reticulin<br />
fibrosis in the initial bone marrow. Among 3 patients with excess<br />
(>5%) blasts in the initial bone marrow, 1 developed leukemia<br />
and the other 2 were diagnosed with PMF. Receiving previous<br />
treatment with hydroxyurea was not found to be a risk factor<br />
for leukemic transformation. Median follow-up time <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
receiving hydroxyurea treatment was 50 months (quartiles: 22.2-<br />
81.75). One patient with ET previously treated with hydroxyurea<br />
showed transition to myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis.<br />
Forty-four patients died during follow-up. Among diseaserelated<br />
deaths, thromboembolic events were the main cause for<br />
ET patients and progression <strong>of</strong> the disease was the main cause<br />
for PMF patients.<br />
Factors affecting survival in MPN are shown in Table 5. Overall<br />
survival <strong>of</strong> the PMF patients was shorter than in the other<br />
MPN groups (p
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
Discussion<br />
This retrospective study was aimed at evaluating the<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> MPNs in <strong>Turkish</strong> patients. Two centers<br />
contributed to the study and 294 patients were enrolled.<br />
Median age was 60 years and the female/male ratio was 0.9.<br />
These two findings were consistent with the literature [12,13].<br />
Although there is knowledge in the literature that ET is more<br />
common in women and PV more common in men, we did<br />
not find any difference in sex between MPN groups [3,14].<br />
Splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were common findings in<br />
physical examination. They were seen in almost 80% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
with PMF, more commonly than in the other MPN groups. This<br />
finding is consistent with the literature, but our frequencies<br />
in PV and ET are higher than those reported in other studies<br />
[13,14,15]. Even minimal enlargement in the spleen, like 130 mm<br />
in a male patient, was noted as splenomegaly in this study. This<br />
could be the reason for higher splenomegaly rates in ET and PV<br />
patients compared with the literature. Hemoglobin levels were<br />
higher in PV and platelet levels were higher in ET, and they were<br />
both lower in PMF, as expected (p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms<br />
mutation monitoring during follow-up is not recommended<br />
[9]. Based on our results and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the literature,<br />
JAK2 mutation positivity could be another high-risk factor<br />
for thrombosis along with age, previous thrombosis, and<br />
leukocytosis. However, regarding the high frequency <strong>of</strong> positive<br />
results, we cannot recommend cytotoxic treatment for every<br />
JAK2 mutation-positive patient.<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 101 (34.4%) patients had hemorrhagic episodes.<br />
Almost all episodes were mucocutaneous or gastrointestinal.<br />
This finding is consistent with the literature [13,22]. The only<br />
risk factor for hemorrhage was platelet count over 1000x109/L.<br />
Elliot and Tefferi reached the same result [41]. It is thought<br />
that during extreme thrombocytosis the reduced levels <strong>of</strong><br />
high-molecular-weight von Willebrand (vW) factor causes<br />
acquired vW disease, which is responsible for bleeding tendency.<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> hemorrhagic and thrombotic episodes was virtually<br />
the same among the MPN groups.<br />
Hydroxyurea was the most commonly used agent in all MPN<br />
groups. Anagrelide was almost always used in ET cases. Patients<br />
with ET who were using anagrelide were significantly younger<br />
than the other ET patients. Our treatment choices correlated<br />
nicely with the current recommendations. Hydroxyurea is the<br />
initial choice <strong>of</strong> treatment because <strong>of</strong> its proven efficiency,<br />
especially in reducing thrombotic risk [42,43]. However,<br />
hydroxyurea is recommended to be used with caution in young<br />
patients regarding the data showing a risk increment <strong>of</strong> leukemia<br />
in long-term usage <strong>of</strong> hydroxyurea by Kiladjian et al. [8]. In the<br />
ANAHYDRET study, it was shown that anagrelide is as effective<br />
as hydroxyurea [44]. Secondary leukemia has not been reported<br />
with anagrelide treatment yet. Interferon alpha was the least<br />
commonly used agent in all MPN groups, probably because <strong>of</strong><br />
its parenteral usage and poor tolerability. In our study, we did<br />
not find any relation between the complications <strong>of</strong> MPN and<br />
the treatment methods.<br />
Survival was longest in PV and shortest in PMF cases.<br />
Polycythemia vera has a life expectancy <strong>of</strong> 10 to 20 years<br />
according to the literature and our finding was consistent with<br />
this knowledge [45]. Although we found that patients with<br />
PMF had the shortest survival, their mean overall survival was<br />
11.4 years, which is longer than 5.5 years as reported in the<br />
literature [46]. None <strong>of</strong> the PMF cases transformed to leukemia<br />
and this could be one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for the finding above.<br />
Life expectancy <strong>of</strong> ET patients ranges from 13 to 22.3 years<br />
according to the literature [14,47,48]. In our ET patient group,<br />
mean overall survival was 14.9 years. Although the survival <strong>of</strong><br />
ET patients was shorter than that <strong>of</strong> PV patients, this was not<br />
statistically significant.<br />
Older age, leukocytosis, and low hemoglobin and high platelet<br />
count were found to be related to survival in ET patients in the<br />
literature [48,49]. In our study, patients older than 60 years at<br />
diagnosis had shorter survival than those younger than 60. We<br />
also found that anemia (defined as hemoglobin <strong>of</strong>
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
3. Bai J, Xue Y, Ye L, Yao J, Zhou C, Shao Z, Qian L, Yang R, Li H, Zhang H, Zheng<br />
Y. Risk factors <strong>of</strong> long-term incidences <strong>of</strong> thrombosis, myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis and<br />
evolution into malignance in polycythemia vera: a single center experience<br />
from China. Int J Hematol 2008;88:530-535.<br />
4. Campbell PJ, Scott LM, Buck G, Wheatley K, East CL, Marsden JT, Duffy<br />
A, Boyd EM, Bench AJ, Scott MA, Vassiliou GS, Milligan DW, Smith SR,<br />
Erber WN, Bareford D, Wilkins BS, Reilly JT, Harrison CN, Green AR; United<br />
Kingdom Myeloproliferative Disorders Study Group; Medical Research<br />
Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party; Australasian Leukaemia and<br />
Lymphoma Group. Definition <strong>of</strong> subtypes <strong>of</strong> essential thrombocythaemia<br />
and relation to polycythaemia vera based on JAK2 V617F mutation status:<br />
a prospective study. Lancet 2005;366:1945-1953.<br />
5. Barbui T, Finazzi G, Falanga A. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and thrombosis.<br />
Blood 2013;122:2176-2184.<br />
6. Reisner SA, Rinkevich D, Markiewicz W, Tatarsky I, Brenner B. Cardiac<br />
involvement in patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Am J Med<br />
1992;93:498-504.<br />
7. Torgano G, Mandelli C, Massaro P, Abbiati C, Ponzetto A, Bertinieri G, Bogetto<br />
SF, Terruzzi E, de Franchis R. Gastroduodenal lesions in polycythaemia vera:<br />
frequency and role <strong>of</strong> Helicobacter pylori. Br J Haematol 2002;117:198-202.<br />
8. Kiladjian JJ, Chevret S, Dosquet C, Chomienne C, Rain JD. Treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
polycythemia vera with hydroxyurea and pipobroman: final results <strong>of</strong> a<br />
randomized trial initiated in 1980. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3907-3913.<br />
9. Barbui T, Barosi G, Birgegard G, Cervantes F, Finazzi G, Griesshammer M,<br />
Harrison C, Hasselbalch HC, Hehlmann R, H<strong>of</strong>fman R, Kiladjian JJ, Kröger N,<br />
Mesa R, McMullin MF, Pardanani A, Passamonti F, Vannucchi AM, Reiter A,<br />
Silver RT, Verstovsek S, Tefferi A; European LeukemiaNet. Philadelphia-negative<br />
classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management<br />
recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:761-770.<br />
10. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW. World Health Organization<br />
Classification <strong>of</strong> Tumours: Pathology and Genetics <strong>of</strong> Tumours <strong>of</strong><br />
Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France, IARC Press, 2001.<br />
11. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J,<br />
Vardiman JW. WHO Classification <strong>of</strong> Tumours <strong>of</strong> Haematopoietic and<br />
Lymphoid Tissues. 4th ed. Lyon, France, IARC Press, 2008.<br />
12. Landgren O, Goldin LR, Kristinsson SY, Helgadottir EA, Samuelsson<br />
J, Björkholm M. Increased risks <strong>of</strong> polycythemia vera, essential<br />
thrombocythemia, and myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis among 24,577 first-degree relatives<br />
<strong>of</strong> 11,039 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms in Sweden. Blood<br />
2008;112:2199-2204.<br />
13. Schafer AI. Bleeding and thrombosis in the myeloproliferative disorders.<br />
Blood 1984;64:1-12.<br />
14. Passamonti F, Rumi E, Arcaini L, Boveri E, Elena C, Pietra D, Boggi S, Astori<br />
C, Bernasconi P, Varettoni M, Brusamolino E, Pascutto C, Lazzarino M.<br />
Prognostic factors for thrombosis, myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis, and leukemia in essential<br />
thrombocythemia: a study <strong>of</strong> 605 patients. Haematologica 2008;93:1645-<br />
1651.<br />
15. Lan HF, Fang ZH, Zhang Y, Wang XY, Xue F, Zhang L, Guo ZX, Dong XW, Li<br />
SZ, Zheng YZ, Zhang FK, Qian LS, Ji LX, Xiao ZJ, Yang RC. Clinical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
438 patients with essential thrombocythemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi<br />
2008;29:587-591a (in Chinese with English abstract).<br />
16. Beer PA, Campbell PJ, Green AR. Comparison <strong>of</strong> different criteria for<br />
the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> primary myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis reveals limited clinical utility<br />
for measurement <strong>of</strong> serum lactate dehydrogenase. Haematologica<br />
2010;95:1960-1963.<br />
17. Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, East C, Fourouclas N, Swanton S, Vassiliou<br />
GS, Bench AJ, Boyd EM, Curtin N, Scott MA, Erber WN, Green AR; Cancer<br />
Genome Project. Acquired mutation <strong>of</strong> the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human<br />
myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet 2005;365:1054-1061.<br />
18. James C, Ugo V, Le Couédic JP, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C, Garçon L,<br />
Raslova H, Berger R, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Villeval JL, Constantinescu SN,<br />
Casadevall N, Vainchenker W. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to<br />
constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 2005;434:1144-<br />
1148.<br />
19. Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, Teo SS, Tiedt R, Passweg JR, Tichelli<br />
A, Cazzola M, Skoda RC. A gain-<strong>of</strong>-function mutation <strong>of</strong> JAK2 in<br />
myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1779-1790.<br />
20. Levine RL, Wadleigh M, Cools J, Ebert BL, Wernig G, Huntly BJ, Boggon<br />
TJ, Wlodarska I, Clark JJ, Moore S, Adelsperger J, Koo S, Lee JC, Gabriel S,<br />
Mercher T, D’Andrea A, Fröhling S, Döhner K, Marynen P, Vandenberghe<br />
P, Mesa RA, Tefferi A, Griffin JD, Eck MJ, Sellers WR, Meyerson M, Golub<br />
TR, Lee SJ, Gilliland DG. Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2<br />
in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia<br />
with myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis. Cancer Cell 2005;7:387-397.<br />
21. No authors listed. Polycythemia vera: the natural history <strong>of</strong> 1213 patients<br />
followed for 20 years. Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitemia. Ann Intern Med<br />
1995;123:656-664.<br />
22. Colombi M, Radaelli F, Zocchi L, Maiolo AT. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic<br />
complications in essential thrombocythemia. A retrospective study <strong>of</strong> 103<br />
patients. Cancer 1991;67:2926-2930.<br />
23. Cortelazzo S, Viero P, Finazzi G, D’Emilio A, Rodeghiero F, Barbui T. Incidence<br />
and risk factors for thrombotic complications in a historical cohort <strong>of</strong> 100<br />
patients with essential thrombocythemia. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:556-562.<br />
24. De Stefano V, Za T, Rossi E, Vannucchi AM, Ruggeri M, Elli E, Micò C,<br />
Tieghi A, Cacciola RR, Santoro C, Gerli G, Vianelli N, Guglielmelli P, Pieri L,<br />
Scognamiglio F, Rodeghiero F, Pogliani EM, Finazzi G, Gugliotta L, Marchioli<br />
R, Leone G, Barbui T; GIMEMA CMD-Working Party. Recurrent thrombosis<br />
in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia:<br />
incidence, risk factors, and effect <strong>of</strong> treatments. Haematologica<br />
2008;93:372-380.<br />
25. Carobbio A, Thiele J, Passamonti F, Rumi E, Ruggeri M, Rodeghiero F, Randi<br />
ML, Bertozzi I, Vannucchi AM, Antonioli E, Gisslinger H, Buxh<strong>of</strong>er-Ausch V,<br />
Finazzi G, Gangat N, Tefferi A, Barbui T. Risk factors for arterial and venous<br />
thrombosis in WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia: an international<br />
study <strong>of</strong> 891 patients. Blood 2011;117:5857-5859.<br />
26. Harrison CN, Campbell PJ, Buck G, Wheatley K, East CL, Bareford D, Wilkins<br />
BS, van der Walt JD, Reilly JT, Grigg AP, Revell P, Woodcock BE, Green AR;<br />
United Kingdom Medical Research Council Primary Thrombocythemia<br />
1 Study. Hydroxyurea compared with anagrelide in high-risk essential<br />
thrombocythemia. N Engl J Med 2005;353:<strong>33</strong>-45.<br />
27. Pósfai É, Marton I, Szöke A, Borbényi Z, Vécsei L, Csomor A, Sas K. Stroke in<br />
essential thrombocythemia. J Neurol Sci 2014;<strong>33</strong>6:260-262.<br />
28. Barbui T, Carobbio A, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Guglielmelli P, Antonioli<br />
E, Alvarez-Larrán A, Rambaldi A, Finazzi G, Barosi G. Thrombosis in primary<br />
myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis: incidence and risk factors. Blood 2010;115:778-782.<br />
29. Marchioli R, Finazzi G, Landolfi R, Kutti J, Gisslinger H, Patrono C, Marilus R,<br />
Villegas A, Tognoni G, Barbui T. Vascular and neoplastic risk in a large cohort<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients with polycythemia vera. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2224-2232.<br />
30. Falanga A, Marchetti M, Barbui T, Smith CW. Pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> thrombosis in<br />
essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: the role <strong>of</strong> neutrophils.<br />
Semin Hematol 2005;42:239-247.<br />
31. Barbui T, Carobbio A, Rambaldi A, Finazzi G. Perspectives on thrombosis<br />
in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: is leukocytosis a<br />
causative factor? Blood 2009;114:759-763.<br />
32. Carobbio A, Finazzi G, Guerini V, Spinelli O, Delaini F, Marchioli R, Borrelli G,<br />
Rambaldi A, Barbui T. Leukocytosis is a risk factor for thrombosis in essential<br />
thrombocythemia: interaction with treatment, standard risk factors, and<br />
Jak2 mutation status. Blood 2007;109:2310-2313.<br />
<strong>33</strong>. Palandri F, Polverelli N, Catani L, Ottaviani E, Baccarani M, Vianelli N. Impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> leukocytosis on thrombotic risk and survival in 532 patients with essential<br />
thrombocythemia: a retrospective study. Ann Hematol 2011;90:9<strong>33</strong>-938.<br />
34. Wolanskyj AP, Schwager SM, McClure RF, Larson DR, Tefferi A. Essential<br />
thrombocythemia beyond the first decade: life expectancy, long-term<br />
complication rates, and prognostic factors. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:159-166.<br />
194
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:187-195<br />
Andıç N, et al: Clinical Features <strong>of</strong> 294 <strong>Turkish</strong> Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms<br />
35. Landolfi R, Di Gennaro L, Barbui T, De Stefano V, Finazzi G, Marfisi R,<br />
Tognoni G, Marchioli R; European Collaboration on Low-Dose Aspirin in<br />
Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP). Leukocytosis as a major thrombotic risk factor<br />
in patients with polycythemia vera. Blood 2007;109:2446-2452.<br />
36. Lussana F, Caberlon S, Pagani C, Kamphuisen PW, Büller HR, Cattaneo M.<br />
Association <strong>of</strong> V617F Jak2 mutation with the risk <strong>of</strong> thrombosis among<br />
patients with essential thrombocythaemia or idiopathic myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis: a<br />
systematic review. Thromb Res 2009;124:409-417.<br />
37. Vannucchi AM, Antonioli E, Guglielmelli P, Longo G, Pancrazzi A, Ponziani V,<br />
Bogani C, Ferrini PR, Rambaldi A, Guerini V, Bosi A, Barbui T; MPD Research<br />
Consortium. Prospective identification <strong>of</strong> high-risk polycythemia vera<br />
patients based on JAK2 V617F allele burden. Leukemia 2007;21:1952-1959.<br />
38. De Grandis M, Cambot M, Wautier MP, Cassinat B, Chomienne C, Colin Y,<br />
Wautier JL, Le Van Kim C, El Nemer W. JAK2V617F activates Lu/BCAMmediated<br />
red cell adhesion in polycythemia vera through an EpoRindependent<br />
Rap1/Akt pathway. Blood 2013;121:658-665.<br />
39. Arellano-Rodrigo E, Alvarez-Larrán A, Reverter JC, Villamor N, Colomer D,<br />
Cervantes F. Increased platelet and leukocyte activation as contributing<br />
mechanisms for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia and correlation<br />
with the JAK2 mutational status. Haematologica 2006;91:169-175.<br />
40. Falanga A, Marchetti M, Vignoli A, Balducci D, Russo L, Guerini V, Barbui<br />
T. V617F JAK-2 mutation in patients with essential thrombocythemia:<br />
relation to platelet, granulocyte, and plasma hemostatic and inflammatory<br />
molecules. Exp Hematol 2007;35:702-711.<br />
41. Elliott MA, Tefferi A. Thrombosis and haemorrhage in polycythaemiavera<br />
and essential thrombocythaemia. Br J Haematol 2005;128:275-290.<br />
42. Berk PD, Goldberg JD, Donovan PB, Fruchtman SM, Berlin NI, Wasserman LR.<br />
Therapeutic recommendations in polycythemia vera based on Polycythemia<br />
Vera Study Group protocols. Semin Hematol 1986;23:132-143.<br />
43. Cortelazzo S, Finazzi G, Ruggeri M, Vestri O, Galli M, Rodeghiero F, Barbui T.<br />
Hydroxyurea for patients with essential thrombocythemia and a high risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1995;<strong>33</strong>2:1132-1136.<br />
44. Gisslinger H, Gotic M, Holowiecki J, Penka M, Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM,<br />
Kralovics R, Petrides PE; ANAHYDRET Study Group. Anagrelide compared with<br />
hydroxyurea in WHO-classified essential thrombocythemia: the ANAHYDRET<br />
Study, a randomized controlled trial. Blood 2013;121:1720-1728.<br />
45. Passamonti F, Rumi E, Pungolino E, Malabarba L, Bertazzoni P, Valentini<br />
M, Orlandi E, Arcaini L, Brusamolino E,Pascutto C, Cazzola M, Morra<br />
E, Lazzarino M. Life expectancy and prognostic factors for survival in<br />
patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Am J Med<br />
2004;117:755-761.<br />
46. Tefferi A. Myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. N Engl J Med<br />
2000;342:1255-1265.<br />
47. Chim CS, Kwong YL, Lie AK, Ma SK, Chan CC, Wong LG, Kho BC, Lee HK,<br />
Sim JP, Chan CH, Chan JC, Yeung YM, Law M, Liang R. Long-term outcome<br />
<strong>of</strong> 231 patients with essential thrombocythemia: prognostic factors<br />
for thrombosis, bleeding, myel<strong>of</strong>ibrosis, and leukemia. Arch Intern Med<br />
2005;165:2651-2658.<br />
48. Gangat N, Wolanskyj AP, McClure RF, Li CY, Schwager S, Wu W, Tefferi A.<br />
Risk stratification for survival and leukemic transformation in essential<br />
thrombocythemia: a single institutional study <strong>of</strong> 605 patients. Leukemia<br />
2007;21:270-276.<br />
49. Girodon F, Dutrillaux F, Broséus J, Mounier M, Goussot V, Bardonnaud P,<br />
Chrétien ML, Maynadié M. Leukocytosis is associated with poor survival<br />
but not with increased risk <strong>of</strong> thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia: a<br />
population-based study <strong>of</strong> 311 patients. Leukemia 2010;24:900-903.<br />
50. Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F, Rumi E, Boveri E, Ruggeri M, Rodeghiero<br />
F, d’Amore ES, Randi ML, Bertozzi I, Marino F, Vannucchi AM, Antonioli E,<br />
Carrai V, Gisslinger H, Buxh<strong>of</strong>er-Ausch V, Müllauer L, Carobbio A, Gianatti A,<br />
Gangat N, Hanson CA, Tefferi A. Survival and disease progression in essential<br />
thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic<br />
diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3179-3184.<br />
195
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0047<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:196-201<br />
Retrospective Study <strong>of</strong> Incidence and Prognostic Significance<br />
<strong>of</strong> Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell<br />
Transplantation: Influence <strong>of</strong> Corticosteroid Therapy<br />
Allojenik Hematopoetik Kök Hücre Nakli Sonrası Eozin<strong>of</strong>ilinin Sıklığı ve Prognostik Öneminin<br />
Değerlendirildiği Geriye Dönük Çalışma: Kortikosteroid Tedavisinin Etkisi<br />
Wataru Yamamoto 1 , Eriko Ogusa 1 , Kenji Matsumoto 1 , Atsuo Maruta 1 , Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo 2 , Heiwa Kanamori 1<br />
1Kanagawa Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Yokohama, Japan<br />
2Yokohama City University Graduate Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Yokohama, Japan<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: The clinical significance <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia after allogeneic<br />
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is controversial. This study<br />
aimed to retrospectively study the impact <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia on the<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by<br />
taking into account the influence <strong>of</strong> corticosteroid therapy.<br />
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied 204 patients<br />
with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and<br />
myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic<br />
stem cell transplantation from January 2001 to December 2010.<br />
Results: The median age was 43 years (minimum-maximum: 17-<br />
65 years). Myeloablative conditioning was used in 153 patients and<br />
reduced intensity conditioning was employed in 51 patients. Donor<br />
cells were from bone marrow in 132 patients, peripheral blood in 34,<br />
and cord blood in 38. Eosinophilia was detected in 71 patients and<br />
there was no significant predictor <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia by multivariate<br />
analysis. There was no relationship between occurrence <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia<br />
and the incidence or grade <strong>of</strong> acute graft-versus-host disease when<br />
the patients were stratified according to corticosteroid treatment.<br />
Although eosinophilia was a prognostic factor for 5-year overall<br />
survival by univariate analysis, it was not a significant indicator by<br />
multivariate analysis.<br />
Conclusion: These results suggest that the clinical significance <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophilia in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell<br />
transplantation should be assessed with consideration <strong>of</strong> systemic<br />
corticosteroid administration.<br />
Keywords: Eosinophilia, Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell<br />
transplantation, Corticosteroid therapy, Prognostic factor, Graftversus-host<br />
disease<br />
Öz<br />
Amaç: Allojenik hematopoetik kök hücre nakli sonrası eozin<strong>of</strong>ilinin<br />
önemi tartışmalıdır. Bu çalışma kortikosteroid tedavisinin etkisini<br />
hesaba katarak, eozin<strong>of</strong>ilinin allojenik hematopoetik kök hücre<br />
naklinin sonuçları üzerine etkisini geriye dönük değerlendirmeyi<br />
amaçladık.<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2001’den Aralık 2010’a kadar akut myeloid<br />
lösemi, akut lenfoblastik lösemi ve myelodisplastik sendrom tanısıyla<br />
allojenik hematopoetik kök hücre nakli olan 204 hastayı geriye dönük<br />
değerlendirdik.<br />
Bulgular: Ortanca yaş 43 (aralık: 17-65 yaş) idi. Yüz elli üç hastada<br />
miyeloablatif, 51 hastada azaltılmış yoğunluklu hazırlama rejimi<br />
uygulandı. Kök hücre kaynağı 132 hastada kemik iliği, 34 hastada<br />
periferik kan ve 38 hastada kordon kanıydı. Yetmiş bir hastada<br />
eozin<strong>of</strong>ili saptandı ve çoklu değişken analizinde eozin<strong>of</strong>iliyi anlamlı<br />
olarak öngörecek bir belirteç saptanmadı. Hastalar kortikosteroid<br />
tedavisine göre gruplandığında eozin<strong>of</strong>ili gelişimi ile akut graftverus-host<br />
hastalığı sıklığı ya da derecesi arasında bağlantı yoktu.<br />
Tek değişkenli analizde eozin<strong>of</strong>ili 5 yıllık genel sağkalım açısından<br />
prognostik bir faktör olmasına karşın, çok değişkenli analizde anlamlı<br />
bir belirteç değildi.<br />
Sonuç: Bu sonuçlar allojenik hematopoetik kök hücre nakli olan<br />
hastalarda eozin<strong>of</strong>ilinin klinik öneminin, sistemik kortikosteroid<br />
uygulamasını dikkate alarak değerlendirilmesi gerektiğinin<br />
düşündürmektedir.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Eozin<strong>of</strong>ili, Allojenik hematopoetik kök hücre<br />
nakli, Kortikosteroid tedavisi, Prognostik faktör, Graft-versus-host<br />
hastalığı<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Wataru YAMAMOTO, M.D.,<br />
Kanagawa Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Yokohama, Japan<br />
Phone : 81-45-391-5761<br />
E-mail : watadesu@yahoo.co.jp<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: January 23, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: November 18, 2015<br />
196
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:196-201<br />
Yamamoto W, et al: Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation<br />
Introduction<br />
Results<br />
Proliferation <strong>of</strong> eosinophils is induced by stimulation with<br />
cytokines [1] and eosinophilia occurs in various clinical<br />
settings. Eosinophilia is <strong>of</strong>ten found in patients receiving<br />
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT)<br />
and a relationship between eosinophilia and the outcome<br />
and/or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has been reported<br />
[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. However, the role <strong>of</strong> corticosteroid (CS)<br />
therapy should be taken into consideration with regard to<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia after allo-HSCT, because it is known<br />
that eosinophilia is influenced by such drugs [11,12]. Therefore,<br />
we retrospectively studied the impact <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia on the<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> allo-HSCT by taking into account the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
CS therapy.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Patients who underwent allo-HSCT for hematologic malignancies<br />
from January 2001 to December 2010 at the Kanagawa<br />
Cancer Center were retrospectively investigated. We defined<br />
eosinophilia as a peripheral blood eosinophil count <strong>of</strong> >500<br />
µL on more than one occasion, while systemic steroid therapy<br />
meant CS administration at more than 0.5 mg/kg/day within<br />
100 days after allo-HSCT. Standard-risk disease was defined as<br />
acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/acute lymphoblastic leukemia<br />
(ALL) in the first or second remission and myelodysplastic<br />
syndrome (MDS) without leukemic transformation, while highrisk<br />
disease was defined as all others. Grading <strong>of</strong> acute GVHD<br />
was done according to established criteria [13].<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Statistical analyses were performed with R s<strong>of</strong>tware (version<br />
2.11.1; R Development Core Team). Differences between groups<br />
were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher’s exact<br />
test, as was appropriate for univariate analysis and logistic<br />
regression analysis for multivariate analysis. Overall survival<br />
(OS) was calculated from the date <strong>of</strong> transplantation to the<br />
date <strong>of</strong> death from any cause or the date <strong>of</strong> last follow-up.<br />
Non-relapse mortality was defined as death without disease<br />
relapse or resistance. Time-to-event curves were drawn<br />
according to the Kaplan-Meier method and the statistical<br />
significance <strong>of</strong> differences in survival was assessed by the<br />
log-rank test. Prognostic factors included age, sex mismatch,<br />
disease risk, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, donor<br />
type, cytomegalovirus infection, CS therapy, and eosinophilia.<br />
Either the Cox proportional hazard model or the Fine-Gray<br />
proportional hazard model was used for analysis. Death without<br />
relapse was considered to be a competing risk for relapse, relapse<br />
was a competing risk for non-relapse mortality, and relapse and<br />
death without GVHD were competing risks for GVHD.<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 204 patients received allo-HSCT for AML, ALL, or MDS.<br />
The median follow-up period was 5.7 years and patients’ clinical<br />
characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age was 43<br />
years (minimum-maximum: 17-65 years) and there were 102<br />
patients <strong>of</strong> each sex. The underlying disease was AML in 126<br />
patients, ALL in 63, and MDS in 15. Myeloablative conditioning<br />
was used in 153 patients and reduced intensity conditioning was<br />
employed in 51 patients. Donor cells were from bone marrow in<br />
132 patients, peripheral blood in 34, and cord blood in 38.<br />
Eosinophilia was detected in 71 patients (34.8%). Its appearance<br />
was associated with total body irradiation (TBI), unrelated donor,<br />
and CS administration within 100 days after transplantation<br />
by univariate analysis. However, no significant predictors <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophilia were identified by multivariate analysis (Table 1).<br />
Among the 204 patients, 90 patients (44%) received systemic<br />
CS therapy. The reason for CS treatment was acute GVHD in<br />
76 patients, engraftment syndrome in 4, interstitial pneumonia<br />
in 4, organizing pneumonia in 3, disease relapse in 1, diffuse<br />
alveolar hemorrhage in 1, and vasculitis in 1. The incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophilia within 100 days after transplantation was higher in<br />
patients without CS (47/114 patients, 41.2%) than in patients<br />
with CS (24/90, 26.7%) (p=0.038). Among the 90 patients with<br />
CS, 11 were first given CS therapy after the appearance <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophilia. The frequency <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia was higher among<br />
patients who were not given CS therapy before eosinophilia<br />
appeared than among patients who were already receiving CS<br />
therapy (58/125 patients, 46.4% vs. 13/79, 16.5%, respectively;<br />
p
Yamamoto W, et al: Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:196-201<br />
OS between patients with and without eosinophilia among<br />
those not receiving CS therapy (66.3%, 95% CI: 53.6-82.1 vs.<br />
57.4%, 95% CI: 46.5-70.8, respectively; p=0.139) (Figure 3A).<br />
Furthermore, the cumulative incidence <strong>of</strong> relapse showed no<br />
significant association with eosinophilia (Figures 1B, 2B, and<br />
3B). However, non-relapse mortality was significantly higher<br />
in patients receiving CS therapy (Figures 2C and 3C). According<br />
to univariate analysis, eosinophilia was a good prognostic<br />
indicator for 5-year OS (hazard ratio: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9;<br />
p=0.017), but it was not an independent prognostic indicator<br />
by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.5-1.3;<br />
p=0.385). Finally, high-risk disease, unrelated donor, and CS<br />
therapy were adverse prognostic indicators for 5-year OS<br />
according to multivariate analysis (Table 3).<br />
Discussion<br />
In the present study, we investigated the incidence and clinical<br />
implications <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia occurring within 100 days after allo-<br />
HSCT, and we also analyzed the prognostic value <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia<br />
in relation to the influence <strong>of</strong> CS administration. The incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophilia (34.8%) in our patient cohort was comparable with<br />
that in previous reports, although the definition <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia<br />
varies among studies. It is well known that a decrease <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophils is caused by CS administration [10,11]; hence, we<br />
assessed the clinical implications <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia in relation to<br />
systemic CS administration. The incidence <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia was<br />
significantly lower in patients receiving CS treatment compared<br />
with that for those without CS treatment in the present<br />
study, and the same result for patients with acute GVHD has<br />
already been described [2]. In our study, MDS, use <strong>of</strong> TBI, and<br />
transplantation from an unrelated donor were also associated<br />
with a lower incidence <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia, but the reasons for these<br />
associations are unknown.<br />
The relationship between eosinophilia and acute GVHD after allo-<br />
HSCT remains controversial. We could not find any association<br />
between eosinophilia and acute GVHD among patients with or<br />
without CS therapy in this study. Some previous reports suggested<br />
that eosinophilia is significantly related to the onset <strong>of</strong> acute GVHD<br />
[2,9,10]. However, Aisa et al. reported that the onset <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia<br />
within 100 days after allo-HSCT is associated with a lower rate <strong>of</strong><br />
grade II-IV acute GVHD (43% vs. 98%; p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:196-201<br />
Yamamoto W, et al: Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation<br />
Table 1. Patient characteristics and predictors <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia within 100 days after transplantation.<br />
Eosinophilia (+) Eosinophilia (-) Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis<br />
(n=71) (n=1<strong>33</strong>) HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p<br />
Age. median (range) 43 (17-65) 43 (18-64) 0.541<br />
Sex<br />
Male 31 71 1.0 -<br />
Female 40 62 1.5 (0.8-2.8) 0.240 - -<br />
Disease<br />
Acute myelogenous leukemia 45 81 1.0 -<br />
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 25 38 1.2 (0.6-2.3) 0.6<strong>33</strong> - -<br />
Myelodysplastic syndrome 1 14 0.1 (0.0-0.9) 0.022 - -<br />
Disease risk at transplantation<br />
Standard risk 51 77 1.0 -<br />
High risk 20 56 0.5 (0.3-1.0) 0.068 - -<br />
Conditioning regimen<br />
Myeloablative 49 104 1.0 -<br />
Reduced-intensity 22 29 1.6 (0.8-3.2) 0.175 - -<br />
Total body irradiation<br />
No 14 9 1.0 1.0<br />
Yes 57 124 0.3 (0.1-0.8) 0.009 0.4 (0.2-1.0) 0.058<br />
GVHD prophylaxis*<br />
Cyclosporine+sMTX 25 35 1.0 -<br />
Tacrorimus+sMTX 45 98 0.6 (0.3-1.3) 0.196 - -<br />
Donor type<br />
Related 37 49 1.0 1.0<br />
Unrelated 34 84 0.5 (0.3-1.0) 0.039 0.7 (0.4-1.3) 0.236<br />
Stem cell source<br />
Bone marrow 49 83 1.0 -<br />
Peripheral blood 13 21 1.0 (0.4-2.4) 1.000 - -<br />
Cord blood 9 29 0.5 (0.2-1.3) 0.174 - -<br />
HLA disparity*<br />
Match 51 86 1.0 -<br />
Mismatch 19 47 0.7 (0.3-1.3) 0.272 - -<br />
Cytomegarovirus †<br />
Other 61 122 1.0 -<br />
Recipient negative and donor positive 6 4 2.9 (0.7-14.9) 0.098 - -<br />
Sex mismatch<br />
Other 61 108 1.0 -<br />
Female to male 10 25 0.7 (0.3-1.7) 0.441 - -<br />
Acute GVHD<br />
Grade 0-I 42 70 1.0 -<br />
Grade II-IV 29 63 0.8 (0.4-1.4) 0.381 - -<br />
CS administration 100 days after transplantation<br />
No 47 67 1.0 1.0<br />
Yes 24 66 0.5 (0.3-1.0) 0.038 0.6 (0.3-1.1) 0.090<br />
*Data is uncertain in one case. † Data is uncertain in eleven cases. HR: Hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval, GVHD: graft-versus-host disease, sMTX: short-term methotrexate,<br />
CS: corticosteroid.<br />
199
Yamamoto W, et al: Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:196-201<br />
Only one study showed that there was no correlation between<br />
eosinophilia and the outcome <strong>of</strong> cord blood transplantation in<br />
adults [8]. In the present study, eosinophilia was associated with a<br />
better outcome by univariate analysis, but this was not confirmed<br />
by multivariate analysis. Since the incidence <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia<br />
differs among patients with or without CS treatment, we also<br />
analyzed its effect on prognosis in patients stratified according<br />
to systemic CS administration, but there was no significant<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia on the outcome in either group. Finally,<br />
multivariate analysis showed that high-risk disease, unrelated<br />
donor, and CS therapy were adverse predictors <strong>of</strong> survival with<br />
statistical significance. However, there is a limitation in that<br />
we did not treat eosinophilia and CS administration as timedependent<br />
covariates in multivariate analyses.<br />
Table 2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> patients with acute graft-versus-host disease.<br />
Acute GVHD Corticosteroid (+) (n=90) Corticosteriod (-) (n = 114)<br />
Grade<br />
Eosinophilia (+)<br />
(n=24)<br />
0 2 4<br />
Eosinophilia (-)<br />
(n=66)<br />
p<br />
Eosinophilia (+)<br />
(n=47)<br />
21 36<br />
I 2 6 17 24<br />
II 13 26 0.709 8 7<br />
III 6 24 1 0<br />
IV 1 6 0 0<br />
GVHD: Graft-versus-host disease.<br />
Eosinophilia (-)<br />
(n=67)<br />
p<br />
0.424<br />
Table 3. Prognostic factors for overall survival.<br />
Variables<br />
Univariate Analysis<br />
Multivariate Analysis<br />
HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p<br />
Age (years)<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:196-201<br />
Yamamoto W, et al: Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation<br />
Especially after allo-HSCT, systemic CS administration is done<br />
in patients who develop various complications, such as acute<br />
GVHD or pulmonary complications. Imahashi et al. reported that<br />
eosinophilia has an independent influence on the prognosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients with acute GVHD receiving CS treatment, but not<br />
that <strong>of</strong> patients without CS treatment [2]. Taking our results<br />
together with these findings raises the possibility that the<br />
severity <strong>of</strong> acute GVHD and CS therapy for GVHD may strongly<br />
influence transplantation outcomes regardless <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia.<br />
Furthermore, systemic CS administration is <strong>of</strong>ten done for allo-<br />
HSCT patients with severe complications in addition to acute<br />
GVHD, and eosinophilia may be suppressed in those patients.<br />
Our findings about non-relapse mortality in the presence or<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> CS treatment support this interpretation.<br />
In addition to the relationship between eosinophilia and acute<br />
GVHD, there have been several reports on the pathogenesis <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophilia in the setting <strong>of</strong> allo-HSCT. Akhtari et al. reported<br />
that eosinophilia is observed in patients with eosinophilic<br />
pulmonary syndrome after allo-HSCT [14], but there were no<br />
specific causes <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia in our cohort.<br />
In conclusion, eosinophilia after allo-HSCT was not related<br />
to the outcome <strong>of</strong> transplantation or the incidence <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
GVHD in patients with or without systemic CS therapy, although<br />
this study had some limitations because it was a retrospective<br />
investigation conducted at a single institution.<br />
Acknowledgment<br />
This study was supported by a grant from the Kanagawa Health<br />
Foundation.<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: Retrospective study; Informed<br />
Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Surgical and Medical Practices: Wataru Yamamoto, Heiwa<br />
Kanamori; Concept: Wataru Yamamoto, Heiwa Kanamori;<br />
Design: Wataru Yamamoto, Heiwa Kanamori; Data Collection or<br />
Processing: Wataru Yamamoto, Eriko Ogusa, Kenji Matsumoto,<br />
Atsuo Maruta, Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo, Heiwa Kanamori; Analysis or<br />
Interpretation: Wataru Yamamoto, Heiwa Kanamori; Literature<br />
Search: Wataru Yamamoto, Eriko Ogusa, Kenji Matsumoto,<br />
Atsuo Maruta, Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo, Heiwa Kanamori; Analysis or<br />
Interpretation: Wataru Yamamoto, Heiwa Kanamori; Literature<br />
Search: Wataru Yamamoto, Eriko Ogusa, Kenji Matsumoto,<br />
Atsuo Maruta, Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo, Heiwa Kanamori; Writing:<br />
Wataru Yamamoto, Eriko Ogusa, Kenji Matsumoto, Atsuo<br />
Maruta, Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo, Heiwa Kanamori.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilia. N Engl J Med 1998;<strong>33</strong>8:1592-1600.<br />
2. Imahashi N, Miyamura K, Seto A, Watanabe K, Yanagisawa M, Nishiwaki S,<br />
Shinba M, Yasuda T, Kuwatsuka Y, Terakura S, Kodera Y. Eosinophilia predicts<br />
better overall survival after acute graft-versus-host-disease. Bone Marrow<br />
Transplant 2010;45:371-377.<br />
3. Aisa Y, Mori T, Nakazato T, Shimizu T, Yamazaki R, Ikeda Y, Okamoto S. Blood<br />
eosinophilia as a marker <strong>of</strong> favorable outcome after allogeneic stem cell<br />
transplantation. Transpl Int 2007;20:761-770.<br />
4. Kim DH, Popradi G, Xu W, Gupta V, Kuruvilla J, Wright J, Messner HA,<br />
Lipton JH. Peripheral blood eosinophilia has a favorable prognostic<br />
impact on transplant outcomes afterallogeneic peripheral blood stem cell<br />
transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009;15:471-482.<br />
5. Sato T, Kobayashi R, Nakajima M, Iguchi A, Ariga T. Significance <strong>of</strong><br />
eosinophilia after stem cell transplantation as a possible prognostic marker<br />
for favorable outcome. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005;36:985-991.<br />
6. Nakane T, Nakamae H, Hirose A, Nakamae M, Koh H, Hayashi Y, Nishimoto<br />
M, Umemoto Y, Yoshimura T, Bingo M, Okamura H, Yoshida M, Ichihara H,<br />
Aimoto M, Terada Y, Nakao Y, Ohsawa M, Hino M. Eosinophilia, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />
degree, is related to better outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem<br />
cell transplantation. Intern Med 2012;51:851-858.<br />
7. Ahmad I, Labbé AC, Chagnon M, Busque L, Cohen S, Kiss T, Lachance S, Roy<br />
DC, Sauvageau G, Roy J. Incidence and prognostic value <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia<br />
in chronic graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic<br />
cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011;17:1673-1678.<br />
8. Tomonari A, Takahashi S, Ooi J, Tsukada N, Konuma T, Kato S, Kasahara<br />
S, Iseki T, Tojo A, Asano S. Blood eosinophilia after unrelated cord blood<br />
transplantation for adults. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008;42:63-65.<br />
9. Basara N, Kiehl MG, Fauser AA. Eosinophilia indicates the evolution to acute<br />
graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2002;100:3055.<br />
10. McNeel D, Rubio MT, Damaj G, Emile JF, Belanger C, Varet B, Brousse N,<br />
Hermine O, Buzyn A. Hypereosinophilia as a presenting sign <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.<br />
Transplantation 2002;74:1797-1800.<br />
11. Walsh GM. Eosinophil apoptosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in<br />
asthmatic and allergic inflammation. Br J Haematol 2000;111:61-67.<br />
12. Schleimer RP. Effects <strong>of</strong> glucocorticosteroids on inflammatory cells relevant<br />
to their therapeutic applications in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:59-<br />
69.<br />
13. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J,<br />
Thomas ED. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone<br />
Marrow Transplant 1995;15:825-828.<br />
14. Akhtari M, Langston AA, Waller EK, Gal AA. Eosinophilic pulmonary<br />
syndrome as a manifestation <strong>of</strong> GVHD following hematopoietic stem cell<br />
transplantation in three patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009;43:155-<br />
158.<br />
201
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2014.0469<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:202-208<br />
Cytokine Contents in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Association<br />
with ZAP70 Expression<br />
Kronik Lenfositik Lösemi Sitokin İçeriği: ZAP70 Ekspresyonu ile İlişkisi<br />
Nilgün Işıksaçan 1 , Suzan Çınar 2 , Esin Aktaş Çetin 2 , Melih Aktan 3 , Günnur Deniz 2<br />
1Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Central Laboratory, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
2İstanbul University Institute <strong>of</strong> Experimental Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Immunology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
3İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine, Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease that shows<br />
varying clinical progression, and expression <strong>of</strong> the protein tyrosine<br />
kinase ZAP70 has been described as a very valuable prognostic<br />
factor. Patients with ZAP70 positivity are characterized by worse<br />
clinical course and significantly shorter progression-free and overall<br />
survival. In this study, intracytoplasmic interferon gamma (IFN-γ)<br />
and interleukin-4 (IL-4) content <strong>of</strong> T, B, and CLL cells in CLL patients<br />
and their correlations with Rai staging and ZAP70 positivity were<br />
investigated.<br />
Materials and Methods: CLL patients newly diagnosed or in followup<br />
at the İstanbul University İstanbul Medical Faculty <strong>Hematology</strong><br />
Department were included in this study. These patients were classified<br />
according to Rai staging and ZAP70 expression. IL-4, IFN-γ, and ZAP70<br />
expressions in peripheral blood T, B, and CLL cells were measured by<br />
four-color flow cytometry.<br />
Results: There was a statistically significant correlation between<br />
advanced disease and ZAP70 positivity. IL-4-secreting T cells were<br />
significantly increased; however, IFN-γ secretion was significantly<br />
decreased in CLL patients compared to healthy individuals, whereas<br />
IL-4-secreting B cells were significantly diminished in contrast to T<br />
cells.<br />
Conclusion: These findings suggest damage in the cellular immunity<br />
and that IL-4 might lead to many complications and may be important<br />
in disease progression.<br />
Keywords: ZAP70, Interleukin-4, Interferon gamma, T cells, B cells,<br />
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia<br />
Öz<br />
Amaç: Kronik lenfositik lösemi (KLL) klinik olarak çok farklı seyir<br />
gösterebilen bir hastalıktır ve tirozin kinaz ZAP70’in ekspresyonu,<br />
çok değerli bir prognostik faktör olarak tanımlanmıştır. ZAP70 pozitif<br />
hastalar, kötü klinik seyir, belirgin olarak kısa hastalıksız geçen süre ve<br />
düşük sağkalım oranı ile karakterizedir. Bu çalışmada KLL hastalarının<br />
T, B ve KLL hücrelerinde intrasitoplazmik interferon gama (IFN-y) ve<br />
interlökin-4 (IL-4) içeriği, Rai evrelemesi ve ZAP70 pozitifliği arasındaki<br />
korelasyon araştırılmıştır.<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya İstanbul Üniversitesi İstanbul Tıp<br />
Fakültesi Hematoloji Kliniği’nde tanısı yeni konan veya takip edilmekte<br />
olan KLL hastaları dahil edilmiştir. Bu hastalar Rai evreleme sistemi<br />
ve ZAP70 ekspresyonlarına göre sınıflandırılmıştır. Periferik kan T, B<br />
ve KLL hücrelerinin IL-4, IFN-g ve ZAP70 ekspresyonları 4 renkli flow<br />
sitometri ile ölçülmüştür.<br />
Bulgular: Hastalığın evresindeki ilerleme ile ZAP70 pozitifliği<br />
arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir korelasyon bulunmaktadır.<br />
KLL hastalarının sağlıklı bireylerle kıyaslandığında IL-4 salgılayan T<br />
hücreleri sayısı anlamlı olarak artmış, ancak IFN-g salgıları anlamlı<br />
olarak azalmış, IL-4 salgılayan B hücre sayısı ise T hücrelerinin aksine<br />
anlamlı olarak azalmıştır.<br />
Sonuç: Bu bulgular, hücresel immünitede hasarın olabileceğini ve<br />
IL-4’ün birçok komplikasyonlara yol açarak hastalığın ilerlemesinde<br />
önemli olabileceğini düşündürtmektedir.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: ZAP70, Interlökin-4, Interferon gama, T hücreleri,<br />
B hücreleri, Kronik lenfositik lösemi hücreleri<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Günnur DENİZ, PhD.,<br />
İstanbul University Institute <strong>of</strong> Experimental Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Immunology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 212 414 20 00 (pbx) <strong>33</strong>306<br />
E-mail : gdeniz@istanbul.edu.tr<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: December 06, 2014<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: April 20, 2015<br />
202
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:202-208<br />
Işıksaçan N, et al: Cytokines’ Association with ZAP70 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia<br />
Introduction<br />
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease that shows<br />
varying clinical progression. The Rai and Binet classification<br />
systems are useful to predict treatment requirements and<br />
survival rates for CLL patients, but current classifications fail<br />
to distinguish patients who may develop aggressive disease<br />
[1,2,3,4]. The somatic mutations in the immunoglobulin heavy<br />
chain variable (IGVH) region are very valuable prognostic factors<br />
and, in CLL cases, IGVH-mutated patients have a better clinical<br />
outcome while nonmutated patients have a poorer prognosis<br />
and impaired response to chemotherapy [5,6,7].<br />
The protein tyrosine kinase zeta-associated protein (ZAP70) is a<br />
protein tyrosine kinase in the T cell receptor signal transduction<br />
system that can be detected in CLL cells. Studies have pointed<br />
out a correlation between ZAP70 expression in CLL cells and<br />
IGVH status, and showed that ZAP70 positive patients have an<br />
aggressive course, an immediate treatment requirement, longer<br />
therapy time, and lower survival rates [8,9,10]. Expression <strong>of</strong><br />
ZAP70 has been described as a very valuable prognostic factor<br />
[2,8].<br />
Many researchers have recently examined the cytokine content<br />
<strong>of</strong> the T cells in CLL patients and emphasized the significance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the T cell activity in the prognosis <strong>of</strong> the disease [11,12].<br />
Interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by T cells has been shown<br />
to significantly increase in patients with progressive disease<br />
[11,12]. In light <strong>of</strong> these data, it was suggested that in CLL, the<br />
type 1 T cell cytokine pr<strong>of</strong>ile is converted to the type 2 T cell<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile in the advanced stages <strong>of</strong> the disease [13]. The aim <strong>of</strong><br />
this study was to evaluate the expression <strong>of</strong> ZAP70 changing<br />
during disease progression, the intracellular interferon gamma<br />
(IFN-γ) and IL-4 content <strong>of</strong> T and B lymphocytes and the CLL cell<br />
subset (CD5 + CD19 + ) in CLL patients and healthy subjects, and<br />
ZAP70 correlation with cytokine production.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Study Population<br />
Twenty-eight patients in follow-up at the İstanbul University<br />
İstanbul Medical Faculty <strong>Hematology</strong> Department were included<br />
in the study. Patients were diagnosed according to the CLL<br />
diagnosis criteria published in 1996 by a study group supported<br />
by the National Cancer Institute. Clinical data and follow-up<br />
files <strong>of</strong> all the patients included in the study were gathered. All<br />
patients received written information about the study, including<br />
ethics committee approval, before the study was initiated.<br />
Twenty-eight CLL patients (18 males, 10 females) and 10 healthy<br />
individuals (3 males, 7 females) were involved in this study<br />
(Table 1). The ZAP70 expression was measured for all CLL cases<br />
and cytokine levels were measured for 12 CLL cases and the 10<br />
healthy volunteers. The ages <strong>of</strong> the patients were between 36<br />
and 81 (59±11) years, and the mean values were 60±12 years for<br />
males and 56±7 years for females.<br />
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Isolation and Flow Cytometric<br />
Analyses <strong>of</strong> Lymphocyte Subsets<br />
Samples were processed using a whole-blood lysis method<br />
to analyze lymphocyte subsets. Heparinized blood samples<br />
were collected from patient and healthy donors and stained<br />
with anti-CD19-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), anti-CD3-<br />
allophycocyanin (APC), anti-CD5-TRI-COLOR (TC), anti-CD45-<br />
FITC, anti-CD14-phycoerythrin (PE), anti-CD23-PE, anti-CD38-<br />
PE, and PE, FITC, TC, or APC conjugated isotype control (IC)<br />
monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (all from Caltag Laboratories,<br />
Austria) for 30 min at room temperature. Lysis was performed<br />
with FACS Lysing Solution (BD Biosciences, USA). After washing<br />
cells with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), stained cells were<br />
fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and the cells were analyzed with<br />
BD FACSCalibur with CellQuest S<strong>of</strong>tware (BD Biosciences).<br />
For the intracytoplasmic ZAP70 expression, the cells were labeled<br />
with anti-CD19-FITC and anti-CD5-TC mAbs (Caltag Laboratories)<br />
for 30 min at room temperature. After the lysing period, cells<br />
were washed with PBS and were fixed and permeabilized with<br />
paraformaldehyde/saponin solution (Cyt<strong>of</strong>ix&Cytoperm Kit, BD<br />
Biosciences), and then were stained with PE-conjugated-IgG1<br />
or PE-labeled ZAP70 (Caltag Laboratories) mAbs for 30 min<br />
at room temperature and analyzed by flow cytometry. Each<br />
analysis was performed using at least 5000 cells gated in the<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the B cell population, and the cells were analyzed<br />
with BD FACSCalibur with CellQuest S<strong>of</strong>tware (BD Biosciences).<br />
ZAP70 expression was investigated in CLL patients for positivity;<br />
20% was used as the cut-<strong>of</strong>f [9].<br />
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> patient<br />
group.<br />
Variables<br />
CLL (n=28)<br />
Age, years 59±11<br />
Sex, female, n (%) 10 (35.7)<br />
Sex, male, n (%) 18 (64.3)<br />
Rai stage 0-1, n (%) 15 (43.9)<br />
Rai stage 2-4, n (%) 13 (19.3)<br />
Zap70 expression, % 23.5<br />
CD38 expression, % 5.9<br />
CD23 (n=10), % ≥20<br />
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or<br />
number or percentage <strong>of</strong> patients. CLL: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Rai staging:<br />
Stage 0: lymphocytosis, Stage 1: lymphocytosis with lymphadenopathy; Stage 2:<br />
lymphocytosis with either hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, Stage 3: lymphocytosis<br />
and anemia (hemoglobin
Işıksaçan N, et al: Cytokines’ Association with ZAP70 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:202-208<br />
CD19+ cells were analyzed for the expression <strong>of</strong> CD5, CD38,<br />
and ZAP70 (Figure 1A). Most <strong>of</strong> the CD19+ B cells expressed<br />
CD5; however, there was only one patient expressing both CD5<br />
and CD38 (Figures 1B and 1C, respectively). Expression <strong>of</strong> CD5<br />
showed heterogeneity among the patients. Intracytoplasmic<br />
ZAP70 together with CD5 was expressed in different levels in<br />
CD19+ B cells (Figures 1D, 1E, and 1F).<br />
Intracytoplasmic Cytokine Staining<br />
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated<br />
using Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma Chem. Co., USA) density gradient<br />
centrifugation, and cells were washed twice in Hank’s<br />
balanced salt solution. The cells were finally adjusted to a final<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> 1x10 6 cells/mL in complete RPMI-1640 medium<br />
(Sigma Chem. Co.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated<br />
fetal calf serum, penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 mg/<br />
mL), gentamicin (50 mg/mL), and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol.<br />
Freshly purified PBMCs were washed and 1x106 cells/mL were<br />
stimulated for 18 h by a combination <strong>of</strong> phorbol ester, phorbol-<br />
12-myristate-13-acetate (50 ng/mL), and Ca2+ ionophore<br />
(ionomycin, 250 ng/mL) in a 24-well round-bottom plate (all<br />
from Sigma Chem. Co.). The combination <strong>of</strong> these two stimuli<br />
was used to achieve the strongest stimulus for intracytoplasmic<br />
cytokine secretion. Monensin (Sigma Chem. Co.) was added at<br />
a final concentration <strong>of</strong> 1 µM to the cultures in the final 4 h.<br />
After incubation, PBMCs were washed with PBS solution and<br />
stained with anti-CD19-PE and anti-CD3-APC mAbs for 30 min<br />
(Caltag Laboratories) for determining the cytokine secretion<br />
<strong>of</strong> T and B cells. Cells were washed with PBS and then fixed<br />
and permeabilized with paraformaldehyde/saponin solution<br />
(Cyt<strong>of</strong>ix&Cytoperm Kit, BD Biosciences). After washing, the<br />
cells were stained with FITC conjugated IC (IgG1), anti-IL-4-<br />
FITC, and anti-IFN-γ-FITC (Caltag Laboratories) mAbs for 30 min<br />
at room temperature. After washing, cells were resuspended in<br />
1% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Chem. Co.) and analyzed by flow<br />
cytometry. Each sample was acquired with a BD FACSCalibur<br />
(BD Biosciences) and analyzed with the instrument’s operating<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware, CellQuest (BD Biosciences).<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Statistical analysis was performed using a standard nonparametric<br />
Mann-Whitney U test using SPSS 17.0 for Windows. The results<br />
are presented as median values and p0.05). Seventeen patients were<br />
SSC<br />
Figure 1. Gating strategy <strong>of</strong> chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from chronic lymphocytic leukemia<br />
patients (n=28) were stained for CD5, CD19, CD38, and ZAP70 mAbs and analyzed by flow cytometry. CD19 + cells were gated versus<br />
SSC (A). Representative dot-plot analyses for the expression <strong>of</strong> a patient negative (B) and positive (C) for CD38 with CD5 + in CD19 +<br />
cells are shown. In the CD19 + B cell population, CD5 + ZAP70 + (D, E) and CD5 + ZAP70- (F) plots from three different patients with chronic<br />
lymphocytic leukemia are also indicated. The numbers indicate the proportion <strong>of</strong> cells positive for indicated markers.<br />
204
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:202-208<br />
Işıksaçan N, et al: Cytokines’ Association with ZAP70 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia<br />
positive for ZAP70; 8 <strong>of</strong> them were Rai 0-1 and 9 <strong>of</strong> them were<br />
Rai 2-4. However, 7 patients negative for ZAP70 were Rai 0-1<br />
and 4 patients for Rai 2-4. When patients are divided into two<br />
groups according to Rai staging system, the first group includes<br />
15 patients in stages 0 and 1, and the second group includes<br />
13 patients in stages 2 and 4. The difference between ZAP70<br />
expression in the first and second Rai groups was statistically<br />
significant (p
Işıksaçan N, et al: Cytokines’ Association with ZAP70 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:202-208<br />
Discussion<br />
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is leukemia <strong>of</strong> small, mature<br />
B cells; it mostly affects adults over 65 years <strong>of</strong> age and it is<br />
the most common form <strong>of</strong> lymphoid malignancy. The Rai and<br />
Binet classification systems are useful to predict treatment<br />
requirements and survival for CLL patients, but the prognostic<br />
value <strong>of</strong> these classifications is limited in early stage cases.<br />
From 30% to 40% <strong>of</strong> patients in the early stage may develop<br />
aggressive disease and die in a short time period [15,16].<br />
It has been shown that for ZAP70 positivity, when a cut-<strong>of</strong>f<br />
value <strong>of</strong> 20% was used, CLL patients could be classified into<br />
two groups: those with levels <strong>of</strong>
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:202-208<br />
Işıksaçan N, et al: Cytokines’ Association with ZAP70 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia<br />
the disease. On the other hand, IL-4 can lead to the release <strong>of</strong><br />
the growth factors that are increased in the cytoplasm <strong>of</strong> CLL<br />
cells.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Projects<br />
Coordination Unit <strong>of</strong> İstanbul University, project number<br />
T697/30062005. It was presented at the 20 th National<br />
Immunology Congress held in Cyprus in 2009 (best poster<br />
award, poster reference no. 97).<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approved<br />
by the local ethical committee; Informed Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Concept and Design: Melih Aktan, Günnur Deniz, Nilgün<br />
Işıksaçan; Data Collection or Processing: Melih Aktan, Nilgün<br />
Işıksaçan; Analysis: Suzan Çınar, Nilgün Işıksaçan, Esin Aktaş<br />
Çetin; Interpretation: Suzan Çınar, Nilgün Işıksaçan, Günnur<br />
Deniz; Literature Search: Nilgün Işıksaçan; Writing: Nilgün<br />
Işıksaçan, Suzan Çınar, Esin Aktaş Çetin, Melih Aktan, Günnur<br />
Deniz.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
Financial Disclosure: This work was supported by the Scientific<br />
Research Projects Coordination Unit <strong>of</strong> İstanbul University,<br />
project number T697/30062005.<br />
References<br />
1. Orchard JA, Ibbotson RE, Davis Z, Wiestner A, Rosenwald A, Thomas PW,<br />
Hamblin TJ, Staudt LM, Oscier DG. ZAP-70 expression and prognosis in<br />
chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Lancet 2004;363:105-111.<br />
2. Dürig J, Nückel H, Cremer M, Führer A, Halfmeyer K, Fandrey J, Möröy T,<br />
Klein-Hitpass L, Dührsen U. ZAP-70 expression is a prognostic factor in<br />
chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2003;17:2426-2434.<br />
3. Dighiero G. CLL biology and prognosis. <strong>Hematology</strong> Am Soc Hematol Educ<br />
Program 2005;278-284.<br />
4. Rozman C, Montserrat E. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Eng J Med<br />
1995;<strong>33</strong>3:1052-1057.<br />
5. Hamblin TJ, Davis Z, Gardier A, Oscier DG, Stevenson FK. Unmutated IgV(H)<br />
genes are associated with a more aggressive form <strong>of</strong> chronic lymphocytic<br />
leukemia. Blood 1999;94:1848-1854.<br />
6. Maloum K, Davi F, Merle-Béral H, Pritsch O, Magnac C, Vullier F, Dighiero<br />
G, Troussard X, Mauro FF, Bénichou J. Expression <strong>of</strong> unmutated VH genes<br />
is a detrimental prognostic factor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood<br />
2000;96:377-379.<br />
7. Morilla A, Gonzalez de Castro D, Del Giudice I, Osuji N, Else M, Morilla R,<br />
Brito Babapulle V, Rudenko H, Matutes E, Dearden C, Catovsky D, Morgan<br />
GJ. Combinations <strong>of</strong> ZAP-70, CD38 and IGHV mutational status as predictors<br />
<strong>of</strong> time to first treatment in CLL. Leuk Lymphoma 2008;49:2108-2115.<br />
8. Wiestner A, Rosenwald A, Barry TS, Wright G, Davis RE, Henrickson SE,<br />
Zhao H, Ibbotson RE, Orchard JA, Davis Z, Stetler-Stevenson M, Raffeld<br />
M, Arthur DC, Marti GE, Wilson WH, Hamblin TJ, Oscier DG, Staudt LM.<br />
ZAP-70 expression identifies a chronic lymphocytic leukemia subtype with<br />
unmutated immunoglobulin genes, inferior clinical outcome, and distinct<br />
gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Blood 2003;101:4944-4951.<br />
9. Crespo M, Bosch F, Villamor N, Bellosillo B, Colomer D, Rozman M, Marcé<br />
S, López-Guillermo A, Campo E, Montserrat E. ZAP-70 expression as a<br />
surrogate for immunoglobulin-variable region mutations in chronic<br />
lymphocytic leukemia. N Eng J Med 2003;348:1764-1775.<br />
10. Rassenti LZ, Huynh L, Toy TL, Chen L, Keating MJ, Gribben JG, Neuberg DS,<br />
Flinn IW, Rai KR, Byrd JC, Kay NE, Greaves A, Weiss A, Kipps TJ. ZAP-70<br />
compared with immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene mutation status as a<br />
predictor <strong>of</strong> disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Eng J<br />
Med 2004;351:893-901.<br />
11. Rossman ED, Lewin N, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Osterborg A, Mellstedt H.<br />
Intracellular T cell cytokines in patients with B cell chronic lymphocytic<br />
leukaemia (B-CLL). Eur J Haematol 2002;68:299-306.<br />
12. Podhorecka M, Dmoszynska A, Rolinski J, Wasik E. T type 1/type 2 subsets<br />
balance in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia-the three-color flow<br />
cytometry analysis. Leuk Res 2002;26:657-660.<br />
13. Mantovani G, Maccio A, Esu S, Lai P, Massa E, Dessi D. Levels <strong>of</strong> IL-4,<br />
IL-10 and INF-γ in the serum and in the PBMC culture supernatants<br />
from 31 patients with hematological malignancies. Br J Haematol<br />
1998;102:118.<br />
14. Damle RN, Wasil T, Fais F, Ghiotto F, Valetto A, Allen SL, Buchbinder A,<br />
Budman D, Dittmar K, Kolitz J, Lichtman SM, Schulman P, Vinciguerra<br />
VP, Rai KR, Ferrarini M, Chiorazzi N. Ig V gene mutation status and CD38<br />
expression as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.<br />
Blood 1999;94:1840-1847.<br />
15. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, Chanana AD, Levy RN, Pasternack BS.<br />
Clinical staging <strong>of</strong> chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1975;46:219-234.<br />
16. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M, Kay N, Keating MJ, O’Brien S, Rai KR.<br />
National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic<br />
lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.<br />
Blood 1996;87:4990-4997.<br />
17. Kay S, Herishanu Y, Pick M, Rogowski O, Baron S, Naparstek E, Polliack<br />
A, Deutsch VR. Quantitative flow cytometry <strong>of</strong> ZAP-70 levels in chronic<br />
lymphocytic leukemia using molecules <strong>of</strong> equivalent soluble fluorochrome.<br />
Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2006;70:218-226.<br />
18. Hamblin T. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: one disease or two? Ann Hematol<br />
2002;81:299-303.<br />
19. Sagatys EM, Zhang L. Clinical and laboratory prognostic indicators in<br />
chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Control 2012;19:18-25.<br />
20. Üre U, Ar MC, Başlar Z, Soysal T, Öngören S, Gülseven M, Aydın Y, Ülkü<br />
B, Tüzüner N, Ferhanoğlu B. The effect <strong>of</strong> ZAP-70 expression on disease<br />
progression in early-stage (Binet A) B-CLL patients. Balkan Med J<br />
2009;26:317-321.<br />
21. Thurmes P, Call T, Slager S, Zent C, Jenkins G, Schwager S, Bowen D, Kay<br />
N, Shanafelt T. Comorbid conditions and survival in unselected, newly<br />
diagnosed patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma<br />
2008;49:49-56.<br />
22. Assem M, Abel Hamid T, Kohla S, Arsanyos S. The prognostic significance <strong>of</strong><br />
combined expression <strong>of</strong> ZAP-70 and CD38 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.<br />
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2009;21:287-297.<br />
23. Shanafelt TD, Rabe KG, Kay NE, Zent CS, Jelinek DF, Reinalda MS, Schwager<br />
SM, Bowen DA, Slager SL, Hanson CA, Call TG. Age at diagnosis and utility<br />
<strong>of</strong> prognostic testing in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer<br />
2010;116:4777-4787.<br />
24. Hus I, Podhorecka M, Bojarska-Junak A, Roliński J, Schmitt M, Sieklucka M,<br />
Wasik-Szczepanek E, Dmoszyńska A. The clinical significance <strong>of</strong> ZAP-70 and<br />
clinical CD38 expression in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ann Oncol<br />
2006;17:683-690.<br />
207
Işıksaçan N, et al: Cytokines’ Association with ZAP70 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:202-208<br />
25. H<strong>of</strong>fbrand AV, Panayiotidis P, Reittie J, Ganeshaguru K. Autocrine and<br />
paracrine growth loops in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Semin Hematol<br />
1993;30:306-317.<br />
26. Pistoria V. Production <strong>of</strong> cytokines by human B cells in health and disease.<br />
Immunol Today 1997;18:343-350.<br />
27. Ghamlouch H, Ouled-Haddou H, Damaj G, Royer B, Gubler B, Marolleau JP.<br />
A combination <strong>of</strong> cytokines rescues highly purified leukemic CLL B-cells<br />
from spontaneous apoptosis in vitro. PLoS One 2013;8:60370.<br />
28. Jewell AP, Yong KL, Worman CP, Giles FJ, Goldstone AH, Lydyard PM.<br />
Cytokine induction <strong>of</strong> leucocyte adhesion molecule-1 (LAM-1) expression<br />
on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leukemia 1992;6:400-404.<br />
29. Monserrat J, Sánchez MÁ, de Paz R, Díaz D, Mur S, Reyes E, Prieto A, de la<br />
Hera A, Martínez-A C, Alvarez-Mon M. Distinctive patterns <strong>of</strong> naïve/memory<br />
subset distribution and cytokine expression in CD4 T lymphocytes in ZAP-70<br />
B-chronic lymphocytic patients. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2014;86:32-43.<br />
208
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2014.0214<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:209-215<br />
Finding the Optimal Conditioning Regimen for Relapsed/<br />
Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous<br />
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison<br />
<strong>of</strong> BEAM and High-Dose ICE<br />
Otolog Hematopoetik Kök Hücre Nakli Yapılan Nüks/Dirençli Lenfoma Hastalarında BEAM ve<br />
Yüksek Doz ICE Rejimlerinin Geriye Dönük Karşılaştırılması<br />
Onur Esbah 1 , Emre Tekgündüz 2 , Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz 2 , Sinem Civriz Bozdağ 2 , Ali Kaya 2 , Ayşegül Tetik 2 , Ömür Kayıkçı 2 , Gamze Durgun 2 ,<br />
Şerife Kocubaba 2 , Fevzi Altuntaş 2<br />
1Ankara Oncology Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey<br />
2Ankara Oncology Hospital, <strong>Hematology</strong> and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous<br />
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is a well-defined<br />
treatment modality for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma<br />
(NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). Although there are several options<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> conditioning regimens before AHCT, no one treatment is<br />
accepted as a standard <strong>of</strong> care. This study aimed to compare different<br />
conditioning regimens for the treatment <strong>of</strong> NHL and HL.<br />
Materials and Methods: Medical records <strong>of</strong> 62 patients who had<br />
undergone AHCT following BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and<br />
melphalan) and high-dose ICE (hICE; ifosfamide, carboplatin, and<br />
etoposide) conditioning regimens were analyzed retrospectively and<br />
compared in terms <strong>of</strong> efficacy and adverse effects. <br />
Results: The study included a total <strong>of</strong> 29 and <strong>33</strong> patients diagnosed<br />
with relapsed/refractory NHL and HL, respectively. Patients received<br />
BEAM (n=37) or hICE (n=25) regimens for conditioning. One-year<br />
overall survival was 73±6% in all patients. One-year overall survival<br />
was 71±8% and 74±9% in the BEAM and hICE groups, respectively<br />
(p=0.86). The incidences <strong>of</strong> nausea/vomiting (grade ≥2) (84% vs.<br />
44.7%; p=0.04) and mucositis (grade ≥2) (13% vs. 3%; p=0.002) were<br />
higher in the hICE group compared to the BEAM group. In addition,<br />
we witnessed significantly more hepatotoxicity <strong>of</strong> grade ≥2 (40%<br />
vs. 2.7%; p
Esbah O, et al: Comparison <strong>of</strong> Conditioning Regimens: BEAM vs. High-Dose ICE Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:209-215<br />
Introduction<br />
About 50% and 20% <strong>of</strong> patients presenting with non-Hodgkin’s<br />
lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) will not be<br />
cured after initial combination chemotherapy, respectively<br />
[1,2]. High-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous<br />
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is an accepted<br />
treatment option for relapsed/refractory chemosensitive NHL/<br />
HL patients [3,4]. Predictive markers for post-AHCT outcome<br />
are chemosensitivity, number <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy lines before<br />
AHCT, disease status at the time <strong>of</strong> AHCT, relevant prognostic<br />
scores for histological subtypes <strong>of</strong> lymphoma, and time <strong>of</strong><br />
relapse following first-line therapy (12<br />
months) [5,6,7,8]. The best conditioning regimen before AHCT<br />
in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma is an undefined<br />
issue. Commonly used regimens in this scenario are BEAM<br />
(BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) [8,9], BEAC<br />
(BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide) [9], highdose<br />
ICE (hICE; ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) [10],<br />
CMV (cyclophosphamide, melphalan, and etoposide) [11],<br />
CBV (cyclophosphamide, BCNU, and etoposide), combination<br />
regimens including total body irradiation (TBI) [12], and<br />
rituximab or I 131-tositumomab combined with BEAM [13].<br />
Few studies were reported comparing conditioning regimens in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> toxicity and efficacy [9,13,14,15,16]. As we are unaware<br />
<strong>of</strong> any study comparing hICE and BEAM, we retrospectively<br />
analyzed our lymphoma patients who had undergone AHCT and<br />
received either hICE or BEAM regimens as conditioning.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Patient Characteristics<br />
The clinical and laboratory records <strong>of</strong> all consecutive relapsed/<br />
refractory HL/NHL patients who were treated with AHCT between<br />
2010 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. We did not use<br />
any exclusion criteria. All patients gave informed consent for<br />
all aspects <strong>of</strong> AHCT and the institutional review board approved<br />
the study.<br />
Mobilization Strategy<br />
We used a step-by-step mobilization strategy. Granulocytecolony<br />
stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim or lenograstim) at<br />
a dose <strong>of</strong> 10 µg/kg/day in two divided doses is our first-line<br />
mobilization protocol. A progenitor cell yield <strong>of</strong> 500/mm3). Platelet<br />
transfusions were given if platelet counts were
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:209-215<br />
Esbah O, et al: Comparison <strong>of</strong> Conditioning Regimens: BEAM vs. High-Dose ICE<br />
for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and<br />
then annually.<br />
Definition <strong>of</strong> Engraftment, Febrile Neutropenia, and Veno-<br />
Occlusive Disease<br />
Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first <strong>of</strong> 3 consecutive<br />
days on which the absolute neutrophil count exceeded 500/<br />
mm3 without G-CSF support. Platelet engraftment was defined<br />
as the first day <strong>of</strong> 7 consecutive days on which platelet count<br />
exceeded 20,000/mm3 without platelet transfusion [25]. We<br />
used Infectious Disease Society <strong>of</strong> America [26] and Seattle [27]<br />
criteria for defining febrile neutropenia and veno-occlusive<br />
disease, respectively.<br />
Management <strong>of</strong> Febrile Neutropenia<br />
The details <strong>of</strong> our protocol can be found elsewhere [28].<br />
Briefly, patients with febrile neutropenia who were not<br />
responding to broad-spectrum antibiotics for 72 h were<br />
evaluated for opportunistic fungal infections. Patients who had<br />
hemodynamic instability and/or two consecutive positive serum<br />
galactomannan assays (ELISA: optical density <strong>of</strong> ≥0.5) and/or<br />
thorax computerized tomography findings suggesting invasive<br />
pulmonary aspergillosis (nodules with/without halo sign, air<br />
crescent sign, and cavitation) supported by mycological cultures<br />
received antifungal treatment. Patients with mycological<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus spp. were treated with voriconazole. All<br />
others received casp<strong>of</strong>ungin.<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong> Direct Treatment Costs <strong>of</strong> Conditioning Regimens<br />
Direct drug costs <strong>of</strong> BEAM and hICE conditioning regimens were<br />
calculated based on an average patient with a body surface area<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.7 m2 as <strong>of</strong> October 2013.<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Descriptive statistics are presented as median and minimummaximum.<br />
Comparisons <strong>of</strong> continuous variables between the<br />
two groups were performed using the nonparametric Mann-<br />
Whitney U test. Proportions were compared using the chisquare<br />
test. Survival analysis was calculated with Kaplan-Meier<br />
analysis. A p-value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically<br />
significant.<br />
Results<br />
The demographic and clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
cohort are summarized in Table 1. Fifteen (40%) and 5 (20%)<br />
patients had primary refractory disease following their firstline<br />
chemotherapy in the BEAM and hICE groups, respectively<br />
(p=0.09). While 6 patients in the BEAM group received<br />
standard-dose ICE (sICE) as rescue before AHCT, no patient in<br />
the hICE arm was treated with sICE as salvage chemotherapy.<br />
Fourteen (38%) and 6 (25%) patients <strong>of</strong> the BEAM and hICE<br />
arms had refractory disease at AHCT, respectively. Twenty-six,<br />
28, 8 patients were mobilized with G-CSF alone, G-CSF plus<br />
chemotherapy, G-CSF plus plerixafor, respectively. There were<br />
no significant differences in terms <strong>of</strong> conditioning regimens<br />
among patient groups (p=0.5 both for HL and NHL patients).<br />
The treatment arms were also similar according to age, sex,<br />
stage, previous radiotherapy, chemotherapy history, and disease<br />
status at AHCT and mobilization protocol. On the other hand,<br />
the BEAM group had significantly worse performance status<br />
compared to the hICE arm (p=0.011) (Table 1).<br />
Mobilization success, engraftment kinetics, and side effect<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the conditioning regimens are given in Table 2. The<br />
BEAM and hICE treatment arms were similar in terms <strong>of</strong> infused<br />
stem cells, median days with febrile neutropenia, engraftment<br />
kinetics, and duration <strong>of</strong> hospitalization. We observed<br />
significantly more adverse effects (grade ≥2) in terms <strong>of</strong> nausea/<br />
vomiting, mucositis, hepatotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity among<br />
patients treated with hICE conditioning compared to patients<br />
who received BEAM. Significantly more patients (n=4; 25%) in<br />
the hICE group experienced veno-occlusive disease compared<br />
to the BEAM arm, where no patients developed veno-occlusive<br />
disease (p=0.01). The treatment arms were comparable according<br />
to diarrhea rate (p=0.09).<br />
Relapse rates following BEAM and hICE conditioning regimens<br />
were 13.5% (5/37) and 32% (8/25) (p=0.07). One patient <strong>of</strong><br />
the BEAM arm died before day 30 following AHCT as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> sepsis. Additionally, two patients (one patient in each arm)<br />
died before day 100. The reasons for mortality were sepsis/<br />
engraftment failure and Cytomegalovirus pneumonia in the<br />
patients <strong>of</strong> the BEAM and hICE groups, respectively. Transplantrelated<br />
mortality for the entire cohort on day 100 was 4.8%<br />
(BEAM: 5.4%; hICE: 4%; p=0.8). Following AHCT, 5 (13.5%) and<br />
8 (32%) patients <strong>of</strong> the BEAM and hICE arms relapsed (p=0.07).<br />
Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)<br />
rates were 52±10% and 57±6% in the whole study cohort,<br />
respectively. There was no difference in terms <strong>of</strong> 3-year DFS<br />
rates according to conditioning regimens (BEAM: 63±13%; hICE:<br />
42±15%; p=0.187) (Figure 1). Three-year OS was 56.8±8% and<br />
58±10% in the BEAM and hICE groups, respectively (p=0.781)<br />
(Table 2, Figure 2).<br />
Direct treatment costs <strong>of</strong> hICE and BEAM regimens were found<br />
to be 1721 and 582 euro, respectively.<br />
Discussion<br />
Although many different conditioning regimens for relapsed/<br />
refractory HL and NHL have been proposed, none <strong>of</strong> them can<br />
be considered as a standard <strong>of</strong> care [8,9,10,11,12]. Different<br />
types <strong>of</strong> hICE conditioning regimens were described according<br />
211
Esbah O, et al: Comparison <strong>of</strong> Conditioning Regimens: BEAM vs. High-Dose ICE Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:209-215<br />
to large ranges <strong>of</strong> cumulative dosages and administrations <strong>of</strong><br />
drugs [10,29]. To our knowledge, there is no direct comparison<br />
in the literature <strong>of</strong> BEAM and hICE chemotherapy regimens<br />
in patients who have undergone AHCT for relapsed/refractory<br />
lymphoma.<br />
In the current study, we observed statistically significant<br />
differences in terms <strong>of</strong> toxicity favoring the BEAM regimen<br />
compared to hICE. It was not surprising that nausea and<br />
vomiting were more frequent in the hICE arm, as ifosfamide<br />
and carboplatin have high emetogenic potential. Mucositis is an<br />
important toxicity <strong>of</strong> BCNU and etoposide [30,31]. According to<br />
several studies, BCNU-related mucositis rates were higher when<br />
the BCNU dose was increased from 450 to 600 mg/m2 [30]. The<br />
BCNU dose in the BEAM conditioning arm was 300 mg/m2 in<br />
our study. The total doses <strong>of</strong> etoposide were 1500 mg/m2 and<br />
800 mg/m2 in the hICE and BEAM arms, respectively. The higher<br />
etoposide dose may be responsible for the higher mucositis<br />
rate observed in the hICE arm. Nephrotoxicity was significantly<br />
higher in the hICE group (p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:209-215<br />
Esbah O, et al: Comparison <strong>of</strong> Conditioning Regimens: BEAM vs. High-Dose ICE<br />
Head-to-head comparisons <strong>of</strong> different conditioning regimens<br />
in relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients before AHCT are<br />
scarce. Jo et al. observed superior OS and event-free survival at<br />
2 years in patients on BEAM compared to BEAC regimens (62.4%<br />
vs. 32.1% and 62.4% vs. 28.6%, respectively). However, diarrhea<br />
and mucositis were more frequent in patients <strong>of</strong> the BEAM arm<br />
[9]. In their single-center analysis, Jantunen et al. reported similar<br />
efficacy <strong>of</strong> BEAM and BEAC conditioning regimens in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
OS and progression-free survival in patients undergoing AHCT<br />
for NHL, but BEAM was found more toxic to the gastrointestinal<br />
system [16]. In recent years the BEAM regimen was also<br />
compared with the CEB (carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin)<br />
regimen with better OS in favor <strong>of</strong> BEAM [14], but other<br />
studies reported conflicting results [15]. Salar et al. reported<br />
Spanish GEL/TAMO registry data including 395 consecutively<br />
autografted diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.<br />
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier plots <strong>of</strong> disease-free survival following<br />
autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation according<br />
to conditioning regimens. Three-year disease-free survival rates<br />
were 63±13% (BEAM) vs. 42±15% (hICE) (p=0.187).<br />
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier plots <strong>of</strong> overall survival following<br />
autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation according<br />
to conditioning regimens. Three-year overall survival rates were<br />
56±8% (BEAM) vs. 58±10% (hICE) (p=0.781).<br />
Table 2. Mobilization yield, engraftment kinetics, efficacy, and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> conditioning regimens.<br />
BEAM (n=37) hICE (n=25) p<br />
CD34+ cell counts, median (min-max) 5.9 (2.5-16.7) 5.7 (3.5-11.29) 0.36<br />
Febrile neutropenic days, median (min-max) 4 (1-10) 3 (1-12) 0.79<br />
Neutrophil engraftment, days, median (min-max) 11 (8-19) 12 (9-34) 0.24<br />
Platelet engraftment, days, median (min-max) 12 (8-16) 12 (10-25) 0.24<br />
Hospitalization days, median (min-max) 24 (12-67) 26 (20-50) 0.53<br />
Nausea/vomiting, n (grade ≥2) 17 21 0.04<br />
Diarrhea, n (grade ≥2) 22 20 0.09<br />
Mucositis, n (grade ≥2) 3 13 0.002<br />
Nephrotoxicity, n, (grade ≥2) 1 12
Esbah O, et al: Comparison <strong>of</strong> Conditioning Regimens: BEAM vs. High-Dose ICE Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:209-215<br />
The main message <strong>of</strong> that study was that chemotherapy-only<br />
conditioning regimens (BEAM, BEAC, or CBV) significantly<br />
improved 8-year OS compared to TBI + cyclophosphamide [15].<br />
Recently, the rituximab-BEAM (R-BEAM) conditioning regimen<br />
was compared to the I131-tositumomab-BEAM (B-BEAM) in a<br />
phase III randomized study in relapsed, chemosensitive DLBCL<br />
patients. Two-year progression-free survival and OS rates were<br />
comparable, but B-BEAM was found to be more toxic in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> mucositis [13]. Although the observation period <strong>of</strong> our study<br />
cohort is limited, 3-year OS rates were similar in the BEAM and<br />
hICE arms (56±8% vs. 58±10%; p=0.781). There was a trend for<br />
lower relapse rates following BEAM compared to hICE (13.5% vs.<br />
32%; p=0.07). There were more patients with primary refractory<br />
disease (40% vs. 20%) and refractory disease at AHCT (38% vs.<br />
24%) in the BEAM arm compared to patients receiving hICE<br />
conditioning. The aforementioned points underline the strong<br />
antitumor effect <strong>of</strong> the BEAM regimen compared to hICE.<br />
Taking the cost and safety advantages <strong>of</strong> BEAM over hICE in<br />
addition to similar short-term DFS and OS into account, it seems<br />
reasonable to suggest that BEAM seems to be a better option<br />
than hICE for conditioning in relapsed/refractory lymphoma<br />
patients undergoing AHCT.<br />
Our study has several limitations that make it difficult to<br />
draw firm conclusions, such as the limited number <strong>of</strong> patients,<br />
retrospective design, and heterogeneous lymphoma subtypes<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cohort. As we included patients with HL and various<br />
pathologic subgroups <strong>of</strong> NHL (DLBCL, follicular lymphoma,<br />
mantle cell lymphoma, peripheral T cell lymphoma, and<br />
anaplastic large cell lymphoma), generalization <strong>of</strong> our findings<br />
may not be appropriate for specific patient populations with<br />
lymphoma. We also had a very limited number <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />
each subtype <strong>of</strong> lymphoma, making disease-specific statistical<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> hICE and BEAM conditioning regimens impossible.<br />
Although the BEAM treatment arm included more patients with<br />
poor performance status, the toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> BEAM was lower<br />
compared to ICE. This point again emphasizes that BEAM is a<br />
safe and effective conditioning regimen even for patients with<br />
poor performance.<br />
In conclusion, the current retrospective study showed that<br />
BEAM seems to be a better option compared to hICE as a<br />
conditioning regimen in relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients<br />
before AHCT with similar efficacy but low toxicity. Although<br />
there was no difference in 3-year DFS and OS, the nausea/<br />
vomiting, mucositis, nephrotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity rates<br />
were significantly higher in the hICE group compared to the<br />
BEAM group. Prospective studies with homogeneous patient<br />
populations and incorporating novel agents in the therapeutic<br />
armamentarium will be very informative in the search for the<br />
optimal conditioning regimen in specific lymphoma subtypes in<br />
the future.<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: Ethical Committee approval has<br />
been not taken because it is retrospective research; Informed<br />
Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Medical Practices: Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu<br />
Demiriz, Sinem Civriz Bozdağ, Ali Kaya, Ayşegül Tetik, Ömür<br />
Kayıkçı, Gamze Durgun, Şerife Kocubaba, Fevzi Altuntaş; Concept:<br />
Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz; Design: Onur<br />
Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz; Data Collection or<br />
Processing: Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz,<br />
Sinem Civriz Bozdağ, Ali Kaya, Ayşegül Tetik, Ömür Kayıkçı, Gamze<br />
Durgun, Şerife Kocubaba, Fevzi Altuntaş; Analysis or Interpretation:<br />
Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz, Sinem Civriz<br />
Bozdağ; Literature Search: Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır<br />
Şirinoğlu Demiriz, Sinem Civriz Bozdağ, Ali Kaya, Ayşegül Tetik,<br />
Ömür Kayıkçı, Gamze Durgun, Şerife Kocubaba, Fevzi Altuntaş;<br />
Writing: Onur Esbah, Emre Tekgündüz, Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz,<br />
Sinem Civriz Bozdağ, Ali Kaya, Ayşegül Tetik, Ömür Kayıkçı, Gamze<br />
Durgun, Şerife Kocubaba, Fevzi Altuntaş.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, Oken MM, Grogan TM, Mize EM, Glick<br />
JH, Coltman CA Jr, Miller TP. Comparison <strong>of</strong> a standard regimen (CHOP)<br />
with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’s<br />
lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1002-1006.<br />
2. Diehl V, Stein H, Hummel M, Zollinger R, Connors JM. Hodgkin’s lymphoma:<br />
biology and treatment strategies for primary, refractory, and relapsed<br />
disease. <strong>Hematology</strong> Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2003:225-247.<br />
3. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Van der Lelie H, Bron D,<br />
Sonneveld P, Gisselbrecht C, Cahn JY, Harousseau JL, Coiffier B, Biron<br />
P, Mandelli F, Chauvin F. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as<br />
compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses <strong>of</strong> chemotherapysensitive<br />
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995;<strong>33</strong>3:1540-1545.<br />
4. Linch DC, Winfield D, Goldstone AH, Moir D, Hancock B, McMillan A, Chopra<br />
R, Milligan D, Hudson GV. Dose intensification with autologous bonemarrow<br />
transplantation in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin’s disease: results<br />
<strong>of</strong> a BNLI randomised trial. Lancet 1993;341:1051-1054.<br />
5. Crump M, Smith AM, Brandwein J, Couture F, Sherret H, Sutton DM, Scott<br />
JG, McCrae J, Murray C, Pantolony D, Sutcliffe SB, Keating A. High-dose<br />
etoposide and melphalan, and autologous bone marrow transplantation for<br />
patients with advanced Hodgkin’s disease: importance <strong>of</strong> disease status at<br />
transplant. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:704-711.<br />
6. O’Brien ME, Milan S, Cunningham D, Jones AL, Nicolson M, Selby P, Hickish<br />
T, Hill M, Gore ME, Viner C. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone<br />
marrow transplant in relapsed Hodgkin’sdisease--a pragmatic prognostic<br />
index. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1272-1277.<br />
7. Gordon LI, Andersen J, Colgan J, Glick J, Resnick GD, O’Connell M, Cassileth<br />
PA. Advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Analysis <strong>of</strong> prognostic<br />
factors by the international index and by lactic dehydrogenase in an<br />
intergroup study. Cancer 1995;75:865-873.<br />
214
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:209-215<br />
Esbah O, et al: Comparison <strong>of</strong> Conditioning Regimens: BEAM vs. High-Dose ICE<br />
8. Abdel-Rahman F, Hussein A, Aljamily M, Al-Zaben A, Hussein N, Addasi<br />
A. High-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells<br />
transplantation for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma: analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> King Hussein Cancer Center results and prognostic variables. ISRN Oncol<br />
2012;2012:249124.<br />
9. Jo JC, Kang BW, Jang G, Sym SJ, Lee SS, Koo JE, Kim JW, Kim S, Huh J, Suh C.<br />
BEAC or BEAM high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell<br />
transplantation in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: comparative analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> efficacy and toxicity. Ann Hematol 2008;87:43-48.<br />
10. Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ, Lazarus HM, Cooper BW, Perkins JB, Creger RJ,<br />
Ballester OF, Hiemenz JH, Janssen WE, Zorsky PE. Maximum-tolerated doses<br />
<strong>of</strong> ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide given over 6 days followed by<br />
autologous stem-cell rescue: toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:323-<strong>33</strong>2.<br />
11. Schütt P, Passon J, Ebeling P, Welt A, Müller S, Moritz T, Seeber S,<br />
Nowrousian MR. Ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and dexamethasone as<br />
salvage treatment followed by high-dose cyclophosphamide, melphalan,<br />
and etoposide with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation<br />
for relapsed or refractory lymphomas. Eur J Haematol 2007;78:93-101.<br />
12. Stiff PJ, Dahlberg S, Forman SJ, McCall AR, Horning SJ, Nademanee AP,<br />
Blume KG, LeBlanc M, Fisher RI. Autologous bone marrow transplantation<br />
for patients with relapsed or refractorydiffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin’s<br />
lymphoma: value <strong>of</strong> augmented preparative regimens--a Southwest<br />
Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:48-55.<br />
13. Vose JM, Carter S, Burns LJ, Ayala E, Press OW, Moskowitz CH, Stadtmauer<br />
EA, Mineshi S, Ambinger R, Fenske T, Horowitz M, Fisher R, Tombly M.<br />
Phase III randomized study <strong>of</strong> rituximab/carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine,<br />
and melphalan (BEAM) compared with iodine-131 tositumomab/BEAM<br />
with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed diffuse<br />
large B-cell lymphoma: results from the BMT CTN 0401 trial. J Clin Oncol<br />
2013;31:1662-1668.<br />
14. Wang EH, Chen YA, Corringham S, Bashey A, Holman P, Ball ED, Carrier E.<br />
High-dose CEB vs BEAM with autologous stem cell transplantin lymphoma.<br />
Bone Marrow Transplant 2004;34:581-587.<br />
15. Salar A, Sierra J, Gandarillas M, Caballero MD, Marín J, Lahuerta JJ, García-<br />
Conde J, Arranz R, León A, Zuazu J, García-Laraña J, López-Guillermo A,<br />
Sanz MA, Grañena A, García JC, Conde E; GEL/TAMO Spanish Cooperative<br />
Group. Autologous stem cell transplantation for clinically aggressive non-<br />
Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the role <strong>of</strong> preparative regimens. Bone Marrow<br />
Transplant 2001;27:405-412.<br />
16. Jantunen E, Kuittinen T, Nousiainen T. BEAC or BEAM for high-dose therapy<br />
in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma? A single centre analysis on<br />
toxicity and efficacy. Leuk Lymphoma 2003;44:1151-1158.<br />
17. Tekgündüz E, Altuntaş F, Sıvgın S, Akı SZ, Dönmez A, Topçuoğlu P, Yıldırım<br />
R, Baysal NA, Ayyıldız E, Yüksel MK, Sarı I, Tombuloğlu M, Unal A, Ilhan O.<br />
Plerixafor use in patients with previous mobilization failure: a multicenter<br />
experience. Transfus Apher Sci 2012;47:77-80.<br />
18. Goldschmidt H, Hegenbart U, Haas R, Hunstein W. Mobilization <strong>of</strong> peripheral<br />
blood progenitor cells with high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 or 7 g/m 2 ) and<br />
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with multiple myeloma.<br />
Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;17:691-697.<br />
19. Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N, Singh Gill D, Linch DC, Trneny M, Bosly A,<br />
Ketterer N, Shpilberg O, Hagberg H, Ma D, Brière J, Moskowitz CH, Schmitz<br />
N. Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large<br />
B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4184-4190.<br />
20. Aydin S, Dührsen U, Nückel H. Rituximab plus ASHAP for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a<br />
single-centre study <strong>of</strong> 20 patients. Ann Hematol 2007;86:271-276.<br />
21. Nückel H, Dürig J, Dührsen U. Salvage chemotherapy according to the ASHAP<br />
protocol: a single-center study <strong>of</strong> 24 patients with relapsed or refractory<br />
aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Ann Hematol 2003;82:481-486.<br />
22. Di Renzo N, Brugiatelli M, Montanini A, Vigliotti ML, Cervetti G, Liberati<br />
AM, Luminari S, Spedini P, Giglio G, Federico M. Vinorelbine, gemcitabine,<br />
procarbazine and prednisone (ViGePP) as salvage therapy in relapsed or<br />
refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL): results <strong>of</strong> a phase<br />
II study conducted by the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Linfomi. Leuk<br />
Lymphoma 2006;47:473-479.<br />
23. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ,<br />
Coiffier B, Fisher RI, Hagenbeek A, Zucca E,Rosen ST, Stroobants S, Lister TA,<br />
Hoppe RT, Dreyling M, Tobinai K, Vose JM, Connors JM, Federico M, Diehl<br />
V; International Harmonization Project on Lymphoma. Revised response<br />
criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:579-586.<br />
24. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Terminology Criteria for<br />
Adverse Events v3.0. Bethesda, MD, USA, CTEP, 2006.<br />
25. Liu H, Rich ES, Godley L, Odenike O, Joseph L, Marino S, Kline J, Nguyen<br />
V, Cunningham J, Larson RA, del Cerro P, Schroeder L, Pape L, Stock W,<br />
Wickrema A, Artz AS, van Besien K. Reduced-intensity conditioning with<br />
combined haploidentical and cord blood transplantation results in rapid<br />
engraftment, low GVHD, and durable remissions. Blood 2011;118:6438-<br />
6445.<br />
26. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad<br />
II, Rolston KV, Young JA, Wingard JR; Infectious Diseases Society <strong>of</strong><br />
America. Clinical practice guidelines for the use <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial agents in<br />
neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:56-93.<br />
27. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Fisher LD, Schoch HG, Wolford JL, Banaji M,<br />
Hardin BJ, Shulman HM, Clift RA. Veno-occlusive disease <strong>of</strong> the liver and<br />
multiorgan failure after bone marrow transplantation: a cohort study <strong>of</strong><br />
355 patients. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:255-267.<br />
28. Ciledağ N, Arda K, Arıbaş BK, Tekgündüz AI, Altuntaş F. The role <strong>of</strong><br />
multidetector computed tomography in early diagnosis <strong>of</strong> invasive<br />
pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with febrile neutropenia undergoing<br />
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Turk J Hematol 2012;29:28-<strong>33</strong>.<br />
29. Wilson WH, Jain V, Bryant G, Cowan KH, Carter C, Cottler-Fox M, Goldspiel<br />
B, Steinberg SM, Longo DL, Wittes RE. Phase I and II <strong>of</strong> high-dose<br />
ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow rescue<br />
in lymphomas and solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1712-1722.<br />
30. Fleming DR, Wolff SN, Fay JW, Brown RA, Lynch JP, Bolwell BJ, Stevens<br />
DA, Goodman SA, Greer JP, Stein RS, Pineiro LA, Collins RH, Goldsmith<br />
LJ, Herzig GP, Herzig RH. Protracted results <strong>of</strong> dose-intensive therapy<br />
using cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and continuous infusion etoposide<br />
with autologous stem cell support in patients with relapse or refractory<br />
Hodgkin’s disease: a phase II study from the North American Marrow<br />
Transplant Group. Leuk Lymphoma 1999;35:91-98.<br />
31. Ritchie DS, Szer J, Roberts AW, Shuttleworth P, Grigg AP. A phase I doseescalation<br />
study <strong>of</strong> etoposide continuous infusion added to busulphan/<br />
cyclophosphamide as conditioning prior to autologous or allogeneic stem<br />
cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002;30:645-650.<br />
32. Kim YI, Yoon JY, Hwang JE, Shim HJ, Bae WK, Cho SH, Chung IJ. Reversible<br />
proximal renal tubular dysfunction after one-time Ifosfamide exposure.<br />
Cancer Res Treat 2010;42:244-246.<br />
<strong>33</strong>. Cheung MC, Jones RL, Judson I. Acute liver toxicity with ifosfamide in the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> sarcoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2011;5:180.<br />
215
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2014.0378<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:216-222<br />
The Changing Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections and<br />
Resistance in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients<br />
Hematopoetik Kök Hücre Nakli Alıcılarında Kan Akım Enfeksiyonu ve Direnç<br />
Epidemiyolojisindeki Değişim<br />
Mücahit Yemişen1, İlker İnanç Balkan1, Ayşe Salihoğlu2, Ahmet Emre Eşkazan2, Bilgül Mete1, M. Cem Ar2, Şeniz Öngören2, Zafer Başlar2,<br />
Reşat Özaras1, Neşe Saltoğlu1, Ali Mert1, Burhan Ferhanoğlu3, Recep Öztürk1, Fehmi Tabak1, Teoman Soysal2<br />
1İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
2İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine, Division <strong>of</strong> Heamatology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
3Koç University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, American Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine, Division <strong>of</strong> Heamatology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: Patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation<br />
(HSCT) are exposed to highly immunosuppressive conditions and<br />
bloodstream infections (BSIs) are one <strong>of</strong> the most common major<br />
complications within this period. Our aim, in this study, was to<br />
evaluate the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> BSIs in these patients retrospectively.<br />
Materials and Methods: The epidemiological properties <strong>of</strong> 312<br />
patients with HSCT were retrospectively evaluated.<br />
Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 312 patients, followed between 2000 and 2011,<br />
who underwent autologous (62%) and allogeneic (38%) HSCT were<br />
included in the study. The most common underlying malignancies<br />
were multiple myeloma (28%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (21.5%). A<br />
total <strong>of</strong> 142 (45%) patients developed at least 1 episode <strong>of</strong> BSI and<br />
193 separate pathogens were isolated from the blood cultures. There<br />
was a trend <strong>of</strong> increase in the numbers <strong>of</strong> BSIs in 2005-2008 and<br />
a relative increase in the proportion <strong>of</strong> gram-positive infections in<br />
recent years (2009-2011), and central venous catheter-related BSI was<br />
found to be most common source. Coagulase-negative staphylococci<br />
(49.2%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (8.8%) were the most common<br />
pathogens. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strains<br />
were 23% and 22% among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.<br />
isolates, respectively. Quinolone resistance was detected in 10% <strong>of</strong><br />
Enterobacteriaceae. Resistance to carbapenems was not detected<br />
in Enterobacteriaceae, while it was seen at 11.1% and 23.5% in<br />
Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter strains, respectively.<br />
Conclusion: A shift was detected from gram-negative bacteria to<br />
gram-positive in the etiology over the years and central lines were the<br />
most common sources <strong>of</strong> BSIs.<br />
Keywords: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Bloodstream<br />
infection, Epidemiology, Resistance, Central venous catheter<br />
Öz<br />
Amaç: Hematopoetik kök hücre transplantasyonu (HKHT) yapılan<br />
hastaların bağışıklık sistemi ciddi şekilde baskılanmıştır ve kan<br />
akımı enfeksiyonları (KAE) bu süre içinde karşılaşılan majör<br />
komplikasyonlardan biridir. Bu çalışmada amacımız, geriye dönük<br />
olarak bu hastalarda KAE’lerinin epidemiyolojisini değerlendirmektir.<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: HKHT yapılan 312 hastanın epidemiyolojik<br />
özellikleri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi.<br />
Bulgular: 2000 ve 2011 yılları arasında otolog (%62) ve allojeneik<br />
(%38) HKHT yapılan 312 hasta, çalışmaya dahil edildi. Çalışmaya<br />
dahil edilen hasta grupları en sık multipl miyelom (%28) ve Hodgkin<br />
lenfoma (%21,5) tanılı hastalar idi. Yüz kırk iki hastada (%45) en az bir<br />
kez KAE gelişmiş ve kan kültürlerinden 193 ayrı patojen elde edilmiştir.<br />
KAE’lerde 2005-2008 yılları arası bir artışın yanında, 2009-20011<br />
yılları arasında da gram pozitiflerde göreceli bir artış da saptanmış<br />
ve en sık KAE kaynağı santral venöz kataterler olarak tespit edilmiştir.<br />
Koagülaz negatif staphylococi (%49,2) ve Acinetobacter baumannii<br />
(%8,8), kan kültürlerinden en sık elde edilen patojenlerdir. Genişlemiş<br />
spektrumlu beta laktamaz üretimi Escherichia coli ve Klebsiella<br />
spp. suşları arasında sırası ile %23 ve %22 idi. Kinolon dirençli<br />
Enterobacteriaceae oranı %10 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Pseudomonas<br />
ve Acinetobacter suşlarında karbapenem direni sırasıyla, %11,1 ve<br />
%23,5 iken, Enterobacteriaceae grubunda karbapenemlere hiç direnç<br />
saptanmamıştır.<br />
Sonuç: Yıllar içinde, gram negatif bakterilerden gram pozitiflere<br />
doğru bir kayma gözlenirken, en sık KAE kaynağı santral kataterler<br />
olarak saptanmıştır.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Hematopoetik kök hücre nakli, Kan akımı<br />
enfeksiyonu, Epidemiyoloji, Direnç, Santral venöz kateter<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Mücahit YEMİŞEN, M.D.,<br />
İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology,<br />
İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 212 414 30 95 E-mail: yemisenmucahit@hotmail.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: September 24, 2014<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: December 15, 2014<br />
216
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:216-222<br />
Yemişen M, et al: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections<br />
Introduction<br />
Bloodstream infection (BSI) is the most common infectious<br />
problem in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell<br />
transplantations (HSCTs). Depending on the protocol used for<br />
transplantation and the duration <strong>of</strong> neutropenia, approximately<br />
13%-60% <strong>of</strong> patients develop BSIs, which can result in delays in<br />
chemotherapies, extension <strong>of</strong> admission period, and increased<br />
costs <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial therapy against target organisms [1,2].<br />
The differences in results <strong>of</strong> these studies are probably due<br />
to different study designs, study populations, conditioning<br />
regimens, and prophylactic antibiotic protocols [1]. Beside<br />
neutropenia, the other risk factors for BSI include age,<br />
underlying disease, presence <strong>of</strong> a central catheter, severe graftversus-host<br />
disease (GVHD), mucositis, and steroid use [1,3,4].<br />
The etiology <strong>of</strong> BSIs has changed and showed different patterns<br />
in the past years. While gram-negative BSIs among neutropenic<br />
cancer patients were formerly the leading cause <strong>of</strong> bacteremia,<br />
the etiology <strong>of</strong> BSIs in this patient population has become<br />
predominantly gram-positive, and especially viridans group<br />
streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, over the last<br />
2 decades [5,6]. Besides this shift, resistance rates and patterns<br />
also started to change and more resistant microorganisms are<br />
now found as the causes <strong>of</strong> BSIs. For example, the emergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria, increase in multidrugresistant<br />
gram-negative bacteria, increase in nosocomial<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, and<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)<br />
producers have all been reported in the literature in neutropenic<br />
patients [3]. Due to the diversity <strong>of</strong> the causative microorganisms<br />
<strong>of</strong> BSIs in patients with HSCT, information about etiology and<br />
antibiotic susceptibility <strong>of</strong> BSIs is important to initiate effective<br />
antibiotic treatment, a parameter that has been shown to be<br />
closely associated with survival in bacteremic patients [7]. In this<br />
study, we aimed to assess the etiology and clinical characteristics<br />
<strong>of</strong> BSIs in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing<br />
HSCT over a 12-year period. We also evaluate the risk factors,<br />
resistance patterns, and sources <strong>of</strong> BSIs in this group <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
as a secondary objective.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Patients<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 312 patients who underwent autologous and allogeneic<br />
bone marrow transplantation in the Stem Cell Transplantation<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong> the İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical School from<br />
1 January 2000 to 31 December 2011 were included in the<br />
study. Data on demographic features <strong>of</strong> the patients, underlying<br />
disease, disease status prior to HSCT, HSCT protocols, prophylaxis<br />
regimens, and emerging resistance pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> bacteremia were<br />
retrospectively analyzed. The data <strong>of</strong> the patients were recorded<br />
from the initiating day <strong>of</strong> conditioning until the 100th day after<br />
transplantation.<br />
Hematologic Definitions<br />
All patients were followed in isolated single rooms equipped<br />
with high-efficiency particulate air filters and underwent<br />
central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. Conditioning was<br />
done using standard protocols such as cyclophosphamide alone<br />
or in combination with total body irradiation for allogeneic<br />
transplantation and CBV (cyclophosphamide, VP-16, BCNU) or<br />
BEAM (BCNU, VP-16, cytarabine, melphalan) for autologous<br />
stem cell transplantation. Almost all allogeneic transplantations<br />
were done from HLA-identical sibling or matched unrelated<br />
donors. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first <strong>of</strong><br />
3 consecutive days on which the absolute neutrophil count<br />
remained at or above 500/mm 3 after stem cell infusion. GVHD<br />
diagnosis and staging were performed according to previously<br />
established criteria [8,9].<br />
Microbiological Definitions<br />
We obtained at least 2 blood cultures from all febrile neutropenic<br />
patients and initiated an antipseudomonal antibiotic. Febrile<br />
neutropenia was investigated and managed according to the<br />
Infectious Disease Society <strong>of</strong> America guidelines [10,11].<br />
BSI (mono or poly) and catheter-associated BSI were accepted<br />
according to the established criteria [12,13,14]. Antimicrobial<br />
susceptibility tests <strong>of</strong> bacteria obtained from blood cultures<br />
were evaluated by the disk diffusion method according to<br />
the current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI,<br />
formerly NCCLS) criteria [15]. Intermediate sensitivity or<br />
resistance results were accepted as resistant. The screening <strong>of</strong><br />
multidrug-resistant phenotypes including methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus, ampicillin- and vancomycin-resistant<br />
enterococci, ESBL production, and carbapenemase production<br />
was conducted according to CLSI recommendations [16,17].<br />
Multidrug resistance was defined as acquired nonsusceptibility<br />
to at least 1 agent in 3 or more antimicrobial categories;<br />
extensive drug resistance was defined as nonsusceptibility to<br />
at least 1 agent in all but 2 or fewer antimicrobial categories,<br />
and pandrug resistance was defined as nonsusceptibility to all<br />
agents in all antimicrobial categories [18].<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
The categorical data were compared by chi-square tests,<br />
and p
Yemişen M, et al: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:216-222<br />
Results<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 312 patients were included in the study. The number<br />
<strong>of</strong> female patients was 137 (44%) and the mean age was 39<br />
years (minimum-maximum: 12-73 years). The most common<br />
underlying conditions <strong>of</strong> the patients were multiple myeloma in<br />
87 (28%) and Hodgkin lymphoma in 67 (21.5%). The number <strong>of</strong><br />
patients who underwent autologous and allogeneic HSCT was<br />
194 (62%) and 118 (38%), respectively. The stem cell source was<br />
peripheral blood in 295 (94.5%) patients and bone marrow in<br />
17 (5.5%) patients. The mean time to neutrophil engraftment<br />
was 14 days and the number <strong>of</strong> patients having detectable<br />
cytomegalovirus-DNA was 38 (12.2%). The number <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
having acute GVHD equal to or above stage 2 was 36 (11.5%).<br />
Table 1 shows the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />
We obtained a total <strong>of</strong> 193 microbial isolates from patients’<br />
blood cultures; <strong>of</strong> these 193 isolates, 12 were obtained after<br />
the conditioning regimen (before infusion <strong>of</strong> cells), 140 were<br />
obtained after infusion <strong>of</strong> cells (before neutrophil engraftment),<br />
and 41 were obtained after engraftment. Table 2 shows<br />
the properties <strong>of</strong> the isolates obtained from blood cultures.<br />
Gram-positive, gram-negative, and fungal isolates obtained<br />
from the blood cultures were 112 (58%), 74 (38.3%), and 7<br />
(3.7%), respectively. A total <strong>of</strong> 142 (45.5%) <strong>of</strong> 312 patients<br />
developed at least 1 episode <strong>of</strong> BSI. Of these 142 patients, 68<br />
had autologous and 74 had allogeneic HSCT. In our study, 106<br />
patients developed 1 episode <strong>of</strong> BSI, 32 patients had 2 episodes,<br />
3 patients had 3 episodes, and 1 patient had 4 episodes. The<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> monomicrobial and polymicrobial episodes were<br />
168 and 14, respectively. The source <strong>of</strong> BSI was determined as<br />
CVC-associated for 151 (78.2%) isolates while no source could<br />
be determined for the remaining isolates. Of those 151 CVCassociated<br />
isolates, 69.5% were gram-positive bacteria.<br />
The most frequently isolated gram-positive bacteria were<br />
coagulase-negative staphylococci with 95 isolates, and then<br />
Streptococcus spp. with 8, S. aureus with 5, Enterococcus spp.<br />
with 2, and gram-positive rods with 2 isolates. The numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> gram-negative isolates obtained from blood cultures were<br />
as follows: Acinetobacter baumannii, 17; Stenotrophomonas<br />
maltophilia, 14; Escherichia coli, 13; Klebsiella spp., 9;<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 9; and other gram-negative bacteria,<br />
12 isolates. A total <strong>of</strong> 7 fungal isolates comprised 3 Candida<br />
parapsilosis, 1 Candida tropicalis, 1 Fusarium spp., and 2<br />
Candida spp. isolates.<br />
Between 2000 and 2005, the number <strong>of</strong> gram-negative isolates<br />
was greater than the number <strong>of</strong> gram-positive isolates; after<br />
2005, gram-positive isolates increased in frequency and became<br />
the major causative group for BSIs. Figure 1 shows the etiology<br />
<strong>of</strong> BSIs (gram-positive, gram-negative, and fungal) according<br />
to year; there was a trend <strong>of</strong> increase in the numbers <strong>of</strong> BSIs<br />
Figure 1. Evolution <strong>of</strong> bloodstream infection etiology.<br />
Table 1. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />
Characteristics n (%)<br />
Total number <strong>of</strong> patients 312<br />
Patients with BSI 142 (45.5%)<br />
Patients without BSI 170 (54.5%)<br />
Median age 39 (12-73)<br />
Sex<br />
Male 175 (56%)<br />
Female 137 (44%)<br />
Underlying disease<br />
MM 87 (28%)<br />
HL 67 (21.5%)<br />
NHL 44 (14%)<br />
AML 42 (13.5%)<br />
ALL 39 (12.5%)<br />
CML 19 (6%)<br />
Others 14 (4.5%)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> transplantation<br />
Autologous 194 (62%)<br />
Allogeneic 118 (38%)<br />
Graft source<br />
Peripheral blood 295 (94.5%)<br />
Bone marrow 17 (5.5%)<br />
Mean duration <strong>of</strong> neutrophil engraftment (days) 14 (7-36)<br />
Comorbid conditions<br />
DM 13 (4.1%)<br />
Hepatic 11 (3.5%)<br />
Cardiac 11 (3.5%)<br />
Pulmonary 6 (1.9%)<br />
Solid tumor 4 (1.2%)<br />
Rheumatic disease 3 (0.9%)<br />
Crude mortality (in 100 days) 40 (12.8%)<br />
BSI: Bloodstream infection, MM: multiple myeloma, HL: Hodgkin lymphoma, NHL:<br />
non-Hodgkin lymphoma, AML: acute myeloid leukemia, ALL: acute lymphoblastic<br />
leukemia, CML: chronic myeloid leukemia, DM: diabetes mellitus.<br />
218
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:216-222<br />
Yemişen M, et al: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections<br />
in 2005-2008 and also a relative increase in the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
gram-positive BSIs in more recent years (2009-2011).<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates was<br />
6 (20.6%). Among the 13 E. coli isolates, 3 were ESBL-producing<br />
and 4 were resistant to cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin, 5 to aminoglycosides,<br />
2 to cefepime, and 3 to third-generation cephalosporin and<br />
piperacillin/tazobactam. For Klebsiella spp., 2 isolates were<br />
resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, 3 to piperacillin/<br />
tazobactam, and 2 to cefepime, and 2 were ESBL-producing. We<br />
found no resistant isolates for aminoglycosides or cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin.<br />
The proportion <strong>of</strong> isolates that were ESBL-producing among<br />
E. coli and Klebsiella spp. was 23% and 22%, respectively. No<br />
resistance to carbapenems was observed.<br />
In the P. aeruginosa group, 2 strains were resistant to ceftazidime;<br />
1 was resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, and<br />
carbapenems; and no strains were resistant to aminoglycosides or<br />
cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin. Of the 17 A. baumannii strains, 4 were resistant to<br />
carbapenems; 3 to aminoglycosides, ceftazidime, and cefepime; 2<br />
to piperacillin/tazobactam; and 1 to cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin. All S. maltophilia<br />
strains were susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Among<br />
all gram-negative strains, the rate <strong>of</strong> multidrug-resistant bacteria<br />
was 12.1%, and the rate <strong>of</strong> extensively drug resistant bacteria was<br />
8.1%. We did not identify any pandrug resistance in our study.<br />
Table 3 shows the resistance patterns <strong>of</strong> the gram-negative<br />
bacteria obtained from blood cultures.<br />
Among all gram-positive bacteria, 95 (84.8%) were coagulasenegative<br />
staphylococci, and only 3 (3.1%) strains were susceptible<br />
to methicillin. In 5 S. aureus strains, only 1 was resistant<br />
to methicillin, and the remaining were susceptible. Among<br />
the 8 Streptococcus strains isolated, 7 were viridans group<br />
streptococci and 1 was group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus.<br />
Table 2. Etiology and source <strong>of</strong> bloodstream infections.<br />
Bacteria Eng Total<br />
CVC<br />
Source<br />
Unknown<br />
MRCNS 7 71 14 92 92 0<br />
MSCNS 0 3 0 3 3 0<br />
Enterococcus sp. 0 0 2 2 2 0<br />
Streptococcus sp. 0 8 0 8 2 6<br />
MRSA 0 1 0 1 1 0<br />
MSSA 0 3 1 4 3 1<br />
Other gram-positives 0 2 0 2 2 0<br />
Escherichia coli 2 9 2 13 6 7<br />
Klebsiella sp. 0 5 4 9 3 6<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0 8 1 9 6 3<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii 2 10 5 17 11 6<br />
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 0 10 4 14 8 6<br />
Other gram-negatives 0 7 5 12 6 6<br />
Candida parapsilosis 0 3 0 3 3 0<br />
Other fungi 1 0 3 4 3 1<br />
Total 12 (6.2%) 140 (72.5%) 41 (21.3%) 193 151 (78.2%) 42 (21.8%)<br />
BSI: Bloodstream infection, Eng: engraftment, CVC: central venous catheter, MRCNS: methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, MSCNS: methicillin-susceptible<br />
coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.<br />
Table 3. Resistance pattern <strong>of</strong> gram-negative isolates.<br />
AK CIP CAZ CTX/ TZP FEP ESBL IPM/MEM MDR XDR PDR Total<br />
CRO<br />
Escherichia coli 5 4 3 3 3 2 3 - 3 2 - 13<br />
Klebsiella sp. - - 2 2 3 2 2 - 1 - - 9<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa - - 2 - 1 1 - 1 - - - 9<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii 3 1 3 - 2 3 - 4 2 2 - 17<br />
Others 3 1 3 4 2 3 1 1 - - - 12<br />
AK: Amikacin, CIP: cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin, CAZ: ceftazidime, CTX/CRO: cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, TZP: piperacillin/tazobactam, FEP: cefepime, ESBL: extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, IPM/<br />
MEM: imipenem/meropenem, MDR: multidrug-resistant, XDR: extensively drug resistant, PDR: pandrug resistant.<br />
219
Yemişen M, et al: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:216-222<br />
Univariate analysis to determine risk factors for bacteremia<br />
identified HSCT type, any comorbidity, duration <strong>of</strong> engraftment<br />
longer than 10 days, and GVHD grade <strong>of</strong> 2-4 (p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:216-222<br />
Yemişen M, et al: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections<br />
Our study had some limitations. It was performed retrospectively<br />
and, due to missing data, some patients had to be excluded. The<br />
initial empiric antibiotic treatment might have influenced the<br />
resistance <strong>of</strong> the bacteria, but we could not account for the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> empiric antibiotic treatment. The impact <strong>of</strong> the stem<br />
cell source on bacteremia in allogeneic HSCT recipients could<br />
not be analyzed since almost all patients received peripheral<br />
stem cells from fully matched donors.<br />
In conclusion, BSI in HSCT recipients is still a great problem.<br />
The global switch from a gram-negative etiology to a grampositive<br />
one was also observed in our study. In addition to other<br />
gram-negative bacteria, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia were<br />
frequent causes <strong>of</strong> bacteremia but were generally not covered<br />
by initial empirical therapy. Accordingly, we observed a higher<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> mortality due to S. maltophilia bacteremia. It is generally<br />
difficult to identify the source <strong>of</strong> bacteremia in HSCT patients.<br />
In our study, CVCs were the only source suggested and they<br />
were usually associated with unusual pathogens. However, with<br />
a dedicated CVC team and the use <strong>of</strong> a catheter-care bundle, we<br />
could reduce the rate <strong>of</strong> catheter-related BSIs. HSCT recipients<br />
are especially at risk <strong>of</strong> CVC-related BSIs, which may include<br />
difficult-to-treat pathogens.<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: Retrospective study; Informed<br />
Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Concept: Mücahit Yemişen, İlker İnanç Balkan; Design: Mücahit<br />
Yemişen, Ahmet Emre Eşkazan; Data Collection or Processing:<br />
Mücahit Yemişen, İlker İnanç Balkan, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Ahmet Emre<br />
Eşkazan, Bilgül Mete, M. Cem Ar, Şeniz Öngören, Zafer Başlar,<br />
Reşat Özaras, Neşe Saltoğlu, Ali Mert, Burhan Ferhanoğlu, Recep<br />
Öztürk, Fehmi Tabak, Teoman Soysal; Analysis or Interpretation:<br />
Mücahit Yemişen, İlker İnanç Balkan, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Ahmet<br />
Emre Eşkazan, Bilgül Mete, M. Cem Ar, Şeniz Öngören, Zafer<br />
Başlar, Reşat Özaras, Neşe Saltoğlu, Ali Mert, Burhan Ferhanoğlu,<br />
Recep Öztürk, Fehmi Tabak, Teoman Soysal; Literature Search:<br />
Bilgül Mete, Ayşe Salihoğlu; Writing: Mücahit Yemişen.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Poutsiaka DD, Price LL, Ucuzian A, Chan GW, Miller KB, Snydman DR. Blood<br />
stream infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated<br />
with increased mortality. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;40:63-70.<br />
2. Kwon JC, Kim SH, Choi JK, Cho SY, Park YJ, Park SH, Choi SM, Lee DG, Choi<br />
JH, Yoo JH. Epidemiology and clinical features <strong>of</strong> bloodstream infections in<br />
hematology wards: one year experience at the Catholic Blood and Marrow<br />
Transplantation Center. Infect Chemother 2013;45:51-61.<br />
3. Liu CY, Lai YC, Huang LJ, Yang YW, Chen TL, Hsiao LT, Liu JH, Gau JP, Chen<br />
PM, Tzeng CH, Chiou TJ. Impact <strong>of</strong> bloodstream infections on outcome<br />
and the influence <strong>of</strong> prophylactic oral antibiotic regimens in allogeneic<br />
hematopoietic SCT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011;46:1231-1239.<br />
4. Ali N, Adil SN, Shaikh MU. Bloodstream and central line isolates from<br />
hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: data from a developing<br />
country. Transpl Infect Dis 2014;16:98-105.<br />
5. Gudiol C, Garcia-Vidal C, Arnan M, Sánchez-Ortega I, Patiño B, Duarte R,<br />
Carratalà J. Etiology, clinical features and outcomes <strong>of</strong> pre-engraftment and<br />
post-engraftment bloodstream infection in hematopoietic SCT recipients.<br />
Bone Marrow Transplant 2014;49:824-830.<br />
6. Gudiol C, Bodro M, Simonetti A, Tubau F, González-Barca E, Cisnal M,<br />
Domingo-Domenech E, Jiménez L, Carratalà J. Changing aetiology, clinical<br />
features, antimicrobial resistance, and outcomes <strong>of</strong> bloodstream infection<br />
in neutropenic cancer patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:474-479.<br />
7. Blennow O, Ljungman P, Sparrelid E, Mattsson J, Remberger M. Incidence, risk<br />
factors, and outcome <strong>of</strong> bloodstream infections during the pre-engraftment<br />
phase in 521 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. Transpl<br />
Infect Dis 2014;16:106-114.<br />
8. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J,<br />
Thomas ED. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone<br />
Marrow Transplant 1995;15:825-828.<br />
9. Sullivan KM, Agura E, Anasetti C, Appelbaum F, Badger C, Bearman S,<br />
Erickson K, Flowers M, Hansen J, Loughran T, Martin P, Matthews D,<br />
Petersdorf E, Radich J, Riddell S, Rovira D, Sanders J, Schuening F, Siadak<br />
M, Storb R, Witherspoon RP. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other<br />
late complications <strong>of</strong> bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol<br />
1991;28:250-259.<br />
10. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Brown AE, Edwards JE, Feld R, Pizzo P,<br />
Rolston KV, Shenep JL, Young LS. 1997 guidelines for the use <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial<br />
agents in neutropenic patients with unexplained fever. Infectious Diseases<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> America. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:551-573.<br />
11. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, Feld R,<br />
Pizzo PA, Rolston KV, Shenep JL, Young LS. 2002 guidelines for the use <strong>of</strong><br />
antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis<br />
2002;34:730-751.<br />
12. Narimatsu H, Matsumura T, Kami M, Miyakoshi S, Kusumi E, Takagi S, Miura<br />
Y, Kato D, Inokuchi C, Myojo T, Kishi Y, Murashige N, Yuji K, Masuoka K,<br />
Yoneyama A, Wake A, Morinaga S, Kanda Y, Taniguchi S. Bloodstream<br />
infection after umbilical cord blood transplantation using reduced-intensity<br />
stem cell transplantation for adult patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant<br />
2005;11:429-436.<br />
13. Tomlinson D, Mermel LA, Ethier MC, Matlow A, Gillmeister B, Sung L.<br />
Defining bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters in<br />
patients with cancer: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:697-710.<br />
14. Downes KJ, Metlay JP, Bell LM, McGowan KL, Elliott MR, Shah SS.<br />
Polymicrobial bloodstream infections among children and adolescents<br />
with central venous catheters evaluated in ambulatory care. Clin Infect Dis<br />
2008;46:387-394.<br />
15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for<br />
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 20th Informational Supplement. CLSI<br />
Document M100-S20. Wayne, PA, USA, Clinical and Laboratory Standards<br />
Institute, 2010.<br />
16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution<br />
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. 8th<br />
ed. Approved Standard M07-A8. Wayne, PA, USA, Clinical and Laboratory<br />
Standards Institute, 2009.<br />
17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for<br />
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twentieth Informational Supplement.<br />
CLSI Document M100-S22. Wayne, PA, USA, Clinical and Laboratory<br />
Standards Institute, 2012.<br />
18. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG,<br />
Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G,Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice<br />
LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. Multidrugresistant,<br />
extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an<br />
international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired<br />
resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:268-281.<br />
221
Yemişen M, et al: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Bloodstream Infections<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:216-222<br />
19. Cappellano P, Viscoli C, Bruzzi P, Van Lint MT, Pereira CA, Bacigalupo A.<br />
Epidemiology and risk factors for bloodstream infections after allogeneic<br />
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. New Microbiol 2007;30:89-99.<br />
20. Mikulska M, Del Bono V, Raiola AM, Bruno B, Gualandi F, Occhini D, di<br />
Grazia C, Frassoni F, Bacigalupo A, Viscoli C. Blood stream infections in<br />
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: reemergence <strong>of</strong><br />
Gram-negative rods and increasing antibiotic resistance. Biol Blood Marrow<br />
Transplant 2009;15:47-53.<br />
21. Almyroudis NG, Fuller A, Jakubowski A, Sepkowitz K, Jaffe D, Small TN, Kiehn<br />
TE, Pamer E, Papanicolaou GA. Pre- and post-engraftment bloodstream<br />
infection rates and associated mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem<br />
cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2005;7:11-17.<br />
22. Collin BA, Leather HL, Wingard JR, Ramphal R. Evolution, incidence, and<br />
susceptibility <strong>of</strong> bacterial bloodstream isolates from 519 bone marrow<br />
transplant patients. Clin Infect Dis 2001;<strong>33</strong>:947-953.<br />
23. Chaplow R, Palmer B, Heyderman R, Moppett J, Marks DI. Stenotrophomonas<br />
maltophilia bacteraemia in 40 haematology patients: risk factors, therapy<br />
and outcome. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010;45:1109-1110.<br />
24. Williamson EC, Millar MR, Steward CG, Cornish JM, Foot AB, Oakhill A,<br />
Pamphilon DH, Reeves B, Caul EO, Warnock DW, Marks DI. Infections in<br />
adults undergoing unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation. Br J<br />
Haematol 1999;104:560-568.<br />
25. Labarca JA, Leber AL, Kern VL, Territo MC, Brankovic LE, Bruckner DA, Pegues<br />
DA. Outbreak <strong>of</strong> Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in allogeneic<br />
bone marrow transplant patients: role <strong>of</strong> severe neutropenia and mucositis.<br />
Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:195-197.<br />
26. Zuckerman T, Benyamini N, Sprecher H, Fineman R, Finkelstein R, Rowe JM,<br />
Oren I. SCT in patients with carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: a<br />
single center experience with oral gentamicin for the eradication <strong>of</strong> carrier<br />
state. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011;46:1226-1230.<br />
27. Mitchell AE, Derrington P, Turner P, Hunt LP, Oakhill A, Marks DI. Gramnegative<br />
bacteremia (GNB) after 428 unrelated donor bone marrow<br />
transplants (UD-BMT): risk factors, prophylaxis, therapy and outcome. Bone<br />
Marrow Transplant 2004;<strong>33</strong>:303-310.<br />
28. Busca A, Cavecchia I, Locatelli F, D’Ardia S, De Rosa FG, Marmont F, Ciccone<br />
G, Baldi I, Serra R, Gaido E, Falda M. Blood stream infections after allogeneic<br />
stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience with the use <strong>of</strong><br />
lev<strong>of</strong>loxacin prophylaxis. Transpl Infect Dis 2012;14:40-48.<br />
29. Marena C, Zecca M, Carenini ML, Bruschi A, Bassi ML, Olivieri P, Azzaretti<br />
S, Locatelli F. Incidence <strong>of</strong>, and risk factors for, nosocomial infections<br />
among hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients, with impact on<br />
procedure-related mortality. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:510-517.<br />
30. Yuen KY, Woo PC, Hui CH, Luk WK, Chen FE, Lie AK, Liang R. Unique risk<br />
factors for bacteremia in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients<br />
before and after engraftment. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;21:1137-1143.<br />
222
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0131<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis Following Allogeneic Stem Cell<br />
Transplantation: Clinical Characteristics and Utility <strong>of</strong> Leflunomide<br />
Treatment<br />
Allojenik Kök Hücre Transplantasyonu Sonrası BK Virüs Hemorajik Sistiti: Klinik Özellikleri<br />
ve Leflunomid Tedavisinin Etkisi<br />
Young Hoon Park, Joo Han Lim, Hyeon Gyu Yi, Moon Hee Lee, Chul Soo Kim<br />
Inha University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>-Oncology, Incheon, Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: BK virus-hemorrhagic cystitis (BKV-HC) is a potential cause<br />
<strong>of</strong> morbidity and mortality in patients having undergone allogeneic<br />
stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). We analyzed the clinical features<br />
<strong>of</strong> BKV-HC following Allo-SCT and reported the utility <strong>of</strong> leflunomide<br />
therapy for BKV-HC.<br />
Materials and Methods: From January 2005 to June 2014, among the<br />
69 patients that underwent Allo-SCT in our institution, the patients<br />
who experienced BKV-HC were investigated retrospectively.<br />
Results: HC was observed in 30 patients (43.5%), and among them,<br />
18 <strong>of</strong> the cases (26.1%) were identified as BKV-HC. The median age<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients (12 males and 6 females) was 45 years (minimummaximum:<br />
13-63). Patients received Allo-SCT for acute myeloid<br />
leukemia (n=11), aplastic anemia (n=4), myelodysplastic syndrome<br />
(n=2), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1). The donor types were<br />
human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor for six<br />
patients, HLA-matched unrelated donor for nine, and haploidentical<br />
familial donor for two. The median onset and duration <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC<br />
was on day 21 after transplantation (minimum-maximum: 7-97)<br />
and 22 days (minimum-maximum: 6-107). Eleven patients (62.1%)<br />
had grade I-II HC and seven patients (38.9%) had grade III-IV (highgrade)<br />
HC. Among the seven patients who had high-grade HC, one<br />
had complete response, one had partial response, and five had<br />
no response. Among the five nonresponders, one died <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC<br />
associated complications. The remaining four patients were treated<br />
with leflunomide, achieving complete response (n=2) and partial<br />
response (n=2). The median duration from the start <strong>of</strong> leflunomide<br />
therapy to response was 13 days (minimum-maximum: 8-17 days).<br />
All patients tolerated the leflunomide treatment well, with three<br />
patients having mild gastrointestinal symptoms, including anorexia<br />
and abdominal bloating.<br />
Conclusion: BKV-HC was commonly observed in patients with<br />
HC following Allo-SCT. In high-grade BKV-HC patients who do not<br />
respond to supportive care, leflunomide may be a feasible option<br />
without significant toxicity.<br />
Keywords: BK virus, Hemorrhagic cystitis, Allogeneic stem cell<br />
transplantation, Leflunomide<br />
Öz<br />
Amaç: BK-virüs hemorajik sistiti (BKV-HS) allojenik kök hücre nakli<br />
(Allo-KHN) uygulanan hastalarda morbidite ve mortalitenin önemli<br />
bir nedenidir. Bu çalışmada Allo-KHN sonrası BKV-HS olan olguların<br />
klinik özellikleri ve leflunomid tedavisinin BKV-HS’deki etkinliği<br />
araştırılmıştır.<br />
Öz<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2005-Haziran 2014 arası Allo-<br />
KHN uygulanmış 69 hastada, BKV-HS geçirmiş olanlar retrospektif<br />
olarak değerlendirildi.<br />
Bulgular: Otuz hastada (%43,5) HS gözlendi. Bu olguların 18’inde<br />
(%26,1) BKV-HS’si saptandı. Hastaların (12’si erkek, altısı kadın)<br />
medyan yaşı 45 (13-63) idi. Hastalara akut miyeloid lösemi (n=11),<br />
aplastik anemi (n=4), miyelodisplastik sendrom (n=2) ve non-Hodgkin<br />
lenfoma (n=1) nedeni ile Allo-KHN uygulanmıştı. Altısında insan<br />
lökosit antijeni (İLA)-uygun kardeş, dokuzunda İLA-uygun akraba<br />
dışı donör ve ikisinde haplo-identik donör kullanılmıştı. Transplant<br />
sonrası BKV-HS medyan başlangıç zamanı 21 gün (7-97 gün), medyan<br />
süresi 22 gün (6-107 gün) idi. On bir olguda (%62,1) derece I-II, yedi<br />
olguda (%38,9) derece III-IV (yüksek derecede) HS saptandı. Yüksek<br />
derece HS’li yedi hastanın, birinde tam yanıt, birinde kısmi yanıt elde<br />
edilirken, beş hastada yanıt alınamadı. Yanıt alınmayan beş hastanın<br />
birisi BKV-HS ilişkili komplikasyonlardan kaybedildi. Geri kalan dört<br />
hasta leflunomid ile tedavi edildi. Bu hastaların ikisinde tam yanıt,<br />
ikisinde kısmi yanıt elde edildi. Leflunomidin başlangıcından itibaren<br />
medyan yanıt süresi 13 gündü (8-17 gün). Tüm hastalar leflunomidi iyi<br />
tolere ederken, üç hastada anoreksi ve abdominal gaz şikayetleri dahil<br />
hafif şiddetli gastrointestinal yan etkiler gözlendi.<br />
Sonuç: Allo-KHN sonrası izlemde BKV-HS yaygın olarak gözlenmiştir.<br />
Destek tedavisine yanıt vermeyen yüksek derece BKV-HS’li olgularda<br />
leflunomid, anlamlı toksisitesi olmaksızın bir seçenek olabilir.<br />
Anahtar Kelimeler: BK virüs, Hemorajik sistit, Allojenik kök hücre<br />
transplantasyonu, Leflunomid<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Chul Soo KIM, M.D.,<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: March 23, 2015<br />
Inha University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>-Oncology, Incheon, Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea Accepted/Kabul tarihi: December 21, 2015<br />
Phone : +82-32-890-2581<br />
E-mail : cskimmd@inha.ac.kr<br />
223
Park YH, et al: BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
Introduction<br />
Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a potential cause <strong>of</strong> morbidity and<br />
mortality in patients that have undergone allogeneic stem cell<br />
transplantation (Allo-SCT) [1,2,3]. Its incidence ranges from 5%<br />
to 68% <strong>of</strong> Allo-SCT recipients, with severe-grade hematuria<br />
in 29%-44% <strong>of</strong> cases [3,4,5,6,7]. Variable etiologies for the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> HC in Allo-SCT recipients include noninfectious<br />
and infectious causes. As an infectious cause <strong>of</strong> HC, BK virus-<br />
HC (BKV-HC) occurs later after transplantation, usually in<br />
the post-engraftment period [3]. The BKV, a member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
family Polyomaviridae, is typically acquired in childhood and<br />
embedded in urothelial cells <strong>of</strong> the urinary tract in the latent<br />
dormant stage [8]. BKV reactivation is commonly associated<br />
with HC in Allo-SCT settings, occurring in 10% to 25% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients [8]. The clinical symptoms <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC vary to a great<br />
extent in Allo-SCT recipients from asymptomatic hematuria to<br />
massive hemorrhage leading to urinary obstruction and renal<br />
failure [2,9,10]. Previous studies demonstrated that BKV-HC<br />
is associated with not only increased morbidity and but also<br />
increased mortality in Allo-SCT patients [6,7,11,12], and studies<br />
have also defined potential risk factors for the development <strong>of</strong><br />
BKV-HC [4,5,13,14,15], most <strong>of</strong> which have not been observed<br />
consistently in several reports.<br />
Leflunomide, an immunomodulatory agent with antiviral<br />
activity, has been found effective against cytomegalovirus<br />
(CMV), herpes simplex, and BKV based on in vitro data [6,16,17].<br />
In renal allografts, leflunomide has been widely used to treat<br />
biopsy-proven BKV nephropathy [18,19], but it has not been<br />
well studied in Allo-SCT settings. Only two reports showed<br />
satisfactory results <strong>of</strong> leflunomide therapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
BKV-HC after Allo-SCT [20,21].<br />
In this retrospective study, we report the incidence, severity,<br />
and outcome <strong>of</strong> clinical BKV-HC in patients who underwent<br />
Allo-SCT to treat variable hematologic diseases. Furthermore,<br />
we report high-grade BKV-HC patients who achieved favorable<br />
response to leflunomide therapy.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Patients<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 69 patients underwent Allo-SCT in our institution from<br />
January 2005, when BKV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing<br />
became clinically available, to June 2014. Baseline demographic<br />
and transplantation data were collected, including age, sex,<br />
underlying disease, conditioning regimen, stem cell source, donor<br />
type, prophylaxis to infection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD),<br />
time to engraftment, presence and grade <strong>of</strong> GVHD, and survival at<br />
last follow-up. Patients received either myeloablative or reducedintensity<br />
conditioning regimen according to disease status, age,<br />
or comorbidities. As prophylaxis against HC, hyperhydration<br />
(intravenous isotonic saline over 3 L/m 2 per day) with forced<br />
diuresis was used to prevent toxicity <strong>of</strong> conditioning regimen for<br />
Allo-SCT. In addition, for patients receiving a preparative regimen<br />
containing cyclophosphamide (Cy), 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate<br />
(MESNA) was given prior to the Cy administration and thereafter<br />
as a continuous infusion until the last dose <strong>of</strong> Cy. Acute GVHD and<br />
chronic GVHD were diagnosed and graded according to previously<br />
published criteria [22,23].<br />
Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
HC was defined as the presence <strong>of</strong> sustained hematuria and<br />
urinary symptoms after the beginning <strong>of</strong> conditioning therapy<br />
in the absence <strong>of</strong> gynecological-related bleeding, generalized<br />
bleeding diathesis, and urinary tract infection. Severity <strong>of</strong><br />
HC was graded according to the following criteria [7]: grade<br />
0 (no hematuria), grade I (microscopic hematuria), grade II<br />
(macroscopic hematuria), grade III (macroscopic hematuria<br />
with presence <strong>of</strong> blood clots), and grade IV (macroscopic<br />
hematuria with clots and renal impairment due to urinary<br />
obstruction). Grades III and IV were defined as high-grade<br />
HC. The date <strong>of</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> HC was defined as the first day <strong>of</strong><br />
symptoms or laboratory evidence appearing after transplant.<br />
Routine urinalysis was performed at least twice a week during<br />
hospitalization and thereafter at outpatient visits. For patients<br />
who had urinary symptoms or gross hematuria, BKV testing by<br />
a qualitative PCR-based method was performed with the urine<br />
specimen to identify the presence <strong>of</strong> virus.<br />
BK Virus Polymerase Chain Reaction Test<br />
Each urine sample was submitted to DNA extraction using a<br />
QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to<br />
the manufacturer’s instructions. A primer was designed for a<br />
highly conserved region <strong>of</strong> gene large T antigen to obtain a 160-<br />
bp amplicon from the BKV genome using the GeneAmp 2720<br />
Thermal Cycler (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR <strong>of</strong> urine for BKV<br />
viruria had a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 90% and a specificity <strong>of</strong> 96.5% (cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />
value: 160 copies/mL).<br />
Urine Cytology<br />
Each urine specimen was processed for cytological evaluation by<br />
centrifugation. After removal <strong>of</strong> the supernatant, the sediment<br />
was examined for clarity. Cytospin slides were fixed in 95%<br />
alcohol, stained by the Papanicolaou method, and observed for<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> urine decoy cells (characterized by a groundglass<br />
appearance with an enlarged nucleus, which is occupied by<br />
a homogeneous basophilic inclusion surrounded by chromatin)<br />
by a well-trained pathologist.<br />
Treatment and Criteria <strong>of</strong> Response<br />
All patients diagnosed with BKV-HC received supportive<br />
treatment, including hyperhydration with normal saline, forced<br />
224
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
Park YH, et al: BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
diuresis, urine alkalinization, analgesics, and blood transfusion<br />
to maintain platelet counts at ≥50x109/L and a hemoglobin<br />
level <strong>of</strong> ≥8 g/dL. Foley catheterization and bladder irrigation<br />
were considered for patients with high-grade HC who had<br />
no response (NR) to supportive care. Leflunomide therapy<br />
was indicated as follows: 1) grade III-IV HC; 2) no change or<br />
worsening in urinary symptoms or grade <strong>of</strong> hematuria during<br />
supportive care within 2 weeks; 3) no abnormality in liver<br />
function tests; 4) absolute neutrophil count <strong>of</strong> >1.0x109/L; and<br />
5) no abnormality on chest radiology. For the patients receiving<br />
leflunomide therapy, leflunomide at 100 mg/day orally was<br />
used as a loading dose for 5 days, followed by maintenance<br />
doses <strong>of</strong> 20 mg/day until resolution <strong>of</strong> hematuria and urinary<br />
symptoms. Clinical response was defined as follows: complete<br />
response (CR), completely improved in symptoms with absence<br />
<strong>of</strong> hematuria; partial response (PR), downgrading <strong>of</strong> severity<br />
with persistent hematuria; NR, unchanged or worsening urinary<br />
symptoms or grade <strong>of</strong> hematuria; refractoriness, NR even after<br />
about 2 weeks <strong>of</strong> supportive care. The response was evaluated<br />
after 20 days <strong>of</strong> leflunomide treatment.<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
The cumulative incidence <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC was estimated with the<br />
interval starting at Allo-SCT until the day <strong>of</strong> the first PCRpositive<br />
urine sample. The Mann-Whitney test and chi-square<br />
test were used for comparisons for continuous and categorical<br />
data, respectively, between the patients with low-grade BKV-HC<br />
and those with high-grade BKV-HC. Univariate and multivariate<br />
analyses <strong>of</strong> risk factors for BKV-HC occurrence were performed<br />
using the Cox proportional hazard model. SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc.,<br />
Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses, and all<br />
were two-sided. Statistical significance was defined as p
Park YH, et al: BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
Table 1. Demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the hemorrhagic cystitis patients and posttransplant outcomes.<br />
Variable BKV-HC (n=18) Non-BKV-HC (n=12)<br />
Age, years 45 (13-63) 42 (21-66)<br />
Sex<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Diagnosis<br />
Acute myeloid leukemia<br />
Aplastic anemia<br />
Myelodysplastic syndrome<br />
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> donor<br />
Matched sibling<br />
Matched unrelated<br />
Haploidentical familial<br />
Donor source<br />
Peripheral blood stem cell<br />
Bone marrow stem cell<br />
Conditioning regimen<br />
Busulfan/fludarabine<br />
Busulfan/cyclophosphamide<br />
Fludarabine/melphalan<br />
Cyclophosphamide/fludarabine<br />
Cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation<br />
T-cell depletion<br />
None<br />
In vivo<br />
Engraftment<br />
Neutrophil engraftment (ANC >0.5x10 9 /L)<br />
Platelet engraftment (>20x10 9 /L)<br />
Acute GVHD<br />
Grade II-IV<br />
Chronic GVHD<br />
None<br />
Limited<br />
Extensive<br />
Values are presented as median (minimum-maximum) or number (%).<br />
HC: Hemorrhagic cystitis, ANC: absolute neutrophil count, GVHD: graft-versus-host disease.<br />
12 (66.7)<br />
6 (<strong>33</strong>.3)<br />
11 (61.1)<br />
4 (22.2)<br />
2 (11.1)<br />
1 (5.6)<br />
7 (38.9)<br />
9 (50.0)<br />
2 (11.1)<br />
18 (100)<br />
0 (0)<br />
8 (44.4)<br />
5 (27.8)<br />
3 (16.7)<br />
1 (5.6)<br />
1 (5.6)<br />
11 (61.1)<br />
7 (38.9)<br />
18 (100)<br />
14 (77.7)<br />
9 (50.0)<br />
6 (<strong>33</strong>.3)<br />
6 (<strong>33</strong>.3)<br />
5 (27.8)<br />
7 (38.9)<br />
7 (58.3)<br />
5 (41.7)<br />
6 (50)<br />
2 (16.7)<br />
3 (25)<br />
1(8.3)<br />
8 (66.7)<br />
3 (25)<br />
1 (8.3)<br />
11 (91.7)<br />
1 (8.3)<br />
6 (50)<br />
5 (41.7)<br />
0 (0)<br />
1 (8.3)<br />
0 (0)<br />
6 (50)<br />
6 (50)<br />
11 (91.7)<br />
9 (75)<br />
7 (58.3)<br />
3 (25)<br />
4 (<strong>33</strong>.3)<br />
5 (41.7)<br />
3 (25)<br />
Leflunomide Therapy<br />
Detailed information about the four patients receiving<br />
leflunomide therapy is summarized in Table 4. Of the four<br />
patients, three had acute myeloid leukemia and one had highrisk<br />
myelodysplastic syndrome. All patients had acute GVHD<br />
before development <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC. After leflunomide treatment,<br />
two (50%) patients achieved CR and two (50%) achieved PR.<br />
One CR patient and one PR patient had a negative PCR for<br />
BKV, but BKV in urine still remained detectable in one patient<br />
achieving CR. The median duration from the start <strong>of</strong> leflunomide<br />
therapy to response was 13 days (minimum-maximum: 8-17).<br />
The dose <strong>of</strong> leflunomide was not reduced for any patients. All<br />
patients tolerated the leflunomide treatment well, with three<br />
patients having mild gastrointestinal symptoms, including<br />
anorexia and abdominal bloating. No significant adverse effects,<br />
such as hepatotoxicity, skin reactions, diarrhea, bone marrow<br />
suppression, or pneumonia, were observed during leflunomide<br />
treatment. There was no recurrence <strong>of</strong> hematuria in the two<br />
patients achieving CR after discontinuation <strong>of</strong> leflunomide<br />
therapy. Of the patients achieving PR, one died <strong>of</strong> leukemia<br />
relapse 16.3 months after Allo-SCT. The remaining three patients<br />
are still alive without hematuria.<br />
226
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
Park YH, et al: BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
Table 2. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> BK virus-hemorrhagic cystitis and treatment outcomes.<br />
Characteristics<br />
Onset, days after Allo-SCT, median (minimum-maximum) 21 (7-97)<br />
Duration, days, median (minimum-maximum) 22 (6-107)<br />
Platelet count at the onset <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC (x10 9 /L), median (minimum-maximum) 64 (17-260)<br />
Platelet unit transfusions, median (minimum-maximum) 10 (0-48)<br />
RBC unit transfusions, median (minimum-maximum) 0 (0-10)<br />
Serum creatinine at the onset <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC (mg/dL), median (minimum-maximum) 1.15 (0.52-2.57)<br />
Severity, n (%)<br />
I/II<br />
III/IV<br />
Concomitant CMV antigenemia, n (%) 9 (50)<br />
Treatment, n (%)<br />
Intravenous hyperhydration<br />
Quinolone antibiotics (cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin or lev<strong>of</strong>loxacin)<br />
Blood transfusion (RBC or platelet)<br />
Insertion <strong>of</strong> urinary catheter<br />
Cystoscopy<br />
Continuous bladder irrigation with water<br />
Leflunomide<br />
Outcome after initial therapy, n (%)<br />
Complete response<br />
Partial response<br />
No response<br />
Survival, n (%)<br />
Alive<br />
Dead<br />
Relapse/refractory disease<br />
GVHD<br />
BKV-HC related renal failure<br />
BKV-HC: BK virus hemorrhagic cystitis, Allo-SCT: allogeneic stem cell transplantation, RBC: red blood cell, CMV: cytomegalovirus, GVHD: graft-versus-host disease.<br />
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis for development <strong>of</strong> BK virus hemorrhagic cystitis.<br />
5 (27.8)/6 (<strong>33</strong>.3)<br />
5 (27.8)/2 (11.1)<br />
18 (100)<br />
9 (50.0)<br />
12 (66.7)<br />
5 (27.8)<br />
1 (5.6)<br />
2 (11.1)<br />
4 (22.2)<br />
9 (50.0)<br />
4 (22.2)<br />
5 (27.8)<br />
11 (61.1)<br />
7 (38.9)<br />
4 (22.2)<br />
2 (11.1)<br />
1 (5.6)<br />
Characteristics Univariate Multivariate<br />
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value<br />
Sex<br />
Male 1.46 (0.98-6.<strong>33</strong>) 0.097 - -<br />
Age at transplant 2.11 (1.22-5.38) 0.241 - -<br />
HLA match<br />
Mismatched donor 2.23 (1.41-3.56) 0.034 - -<br />
Conditioning regimen intensity<br />
Myeloablative conditioning 2.01 (1.10-3.88) 0.092 - -<br />
Conditioning agents<br />
Cyclophosphamide-containing regimen 1.98 (0.89-5.31) 0.366 - -<br />
GVHD prophylaxis<br />
T-cell depletion 0.75 (0.43-1.24) 0.082 - -<br />
Acute GVHD<br />
Grades II-IV 3.52 (1.68-7.83)
Park YH, et al: BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
Table 4. Clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients receiving leflunomide therapy.<br />
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4<br />
Age (years)/Sex 40/M 49/M 50/F 52/M<br />
Diagnosis AML AML MDS AML<br />
Donor type MSD MSD MUD MSD<br />
Conditioning Bu/Flu Bu/Flu Bu/Flu Bu/Cy<br />
GVHD prophylaxis CsA/MTX CsA/MTX CsA/MTX CsA/MTX<br />
T-cell depletion No No Yes No<br />
Onset <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC (days) 24 21 19 23<br />
Severity <strong>of</strong> HC Grade III Grade III Grade III Grade III<br />
Acute GVHD Grade II (skin) Grade II (skin, liver) Grade I (skin) Grade II (skin)<br />
Chronic GVHD Extensive Extensive Extensive Limited<br />
CMV antigenemia No Yes No No<br />
Response after therapy CR PR PR CR<br />
PCR positivity for BKV after therapy Positive Negative Positive Negative<br />
Adverse effects Nausea (mild) Nausea (mild) Abdominal bloating None<br />
Duration to response (days) 8 14 12 17<br />
Outcome Alive Dead (due to leukemia Alive<br />
Alive<br />
relapse)<br />
M: Male, F: female, AML: acute myeloid leukemia, MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome, MSD: matched sibling donor, MUD: matched unrelated donor, Bu: busulfan, Flu: fludarabine, Cy:<br />
cyclophosphamide, CsA: cyclosporine, MTX: methotrexate, Allo-SCT: allogeneic stem cell transplantation, BKV-HC: BK virus hemorrhagic cystitis, GVHD: graft-versus-host disease,<br />
CMV: cytomegalovirus, CR: complete response, PR: partial response, PCR: polymerase chain reaction.<br />
Discussion<br />
Our results, with an overall incidence <strong>of</strong> HC following Allo-SCT<br />
<strong>of</strong> 43.5%, are consistent with other studies’ findings, which<br />
reported frequencies <strong>of</strong> HC following SCT ranging from 5% to<br />
68% [3,4,5,6,7]. BKV was identified in 60.0% <strong>of</strong> cases (18 <strong>of</strong><br />
30 patients) by a qualitative PCR-based assay. A study <strong>of</strong> 22<br />
Allo-SCT patients who experienced HC showed that the most<br />
frequent virus detected was BKV, with an incidence <strong>of</strong> 54.5%<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients, followed by JC virus and CMV [24]. In a study <strong>of</strong><br />
102 children who underwent Allo-SCT for malignancies and<br />
nonmalignant diseases, HC occurred in 26 patients (25.5%), and<br />
among them, BKV was identified in 21 (80.8%) patients [25].<br />
These findings demonstrated that HC is a frequent complication<br />
after Allo-SCT and BKV is mainly responsible for HC in Allo-SCT<br />
recipients.<br />
Hemorrhagic cystitis after SCT frequently caused prolongation<br />
<strong>of</strong> hospitalization and occasionally death [10,24,26]. Gilis et<br />
al. demonstrated that the median duration <strong>of</strong> hospitalization<br />
for Allo-SCT was significantly longer for patients developing<br />
BKV-HC compared with those without BKV-HC (50 vs. 40 days,<br />
p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
Park YH, et al: BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients, respectively [21]. In a pilot study with five pediatric<br />
patients with severe BKV-HC after Allo-SCT, significantly<br />
shorter duration <strong>of</strong> BKV-HC (p
Park YH, et al: BK Virus-Hemorrhagic Cystitis<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:223-230<br />
20. Wu KH, Weng T, Wu HP, Peng CT, Sheu JN, Chao YH. Effective treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
severe BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis with leflunomide in children<br />
after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a pilot study. Pediatr Infect<br />
Dis J 2014;<strong>33</strong>:1193-1195.<br />
21. Chen XC, Liu T, Li JJ, He C, Meng WT, Huang R. Efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong><br />
leflunomide for the treatment <strong>of</strong> BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis<br />
in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Acta<br />
Haematol 2013;130:52-56.<br />
22. Przepiorka D, Anderlini P, Saliba R, Cleary K, Mehra R, Khouri I, Huh YO,<br />
Giralt S, Braunschweig I, van Besien K, Champlin R. Chronic graft-versushost<br />
disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Blood<br />
2001;98:1695-1700.<br />
23. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J,<br />
Thomas ED. 1994 Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone<br />
Marrow Transplant 1995;15:825-828.<br />
24. Kim SY, Lee JW, Lee KM, Cho BS, Eom KS, Kim YJ, Lee S, Min CK, Kim HJ,<br />
Cho SG, Kim DW, Min WS, Kim CC. Viruria in adult hemorrhagic cystitis<br />
patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and<br />
implication <strong>of</strong> antiviral treatment. Korean J Hematol 2007;42:114-121.<br />
25. Gorczynska E, Turkiewicz D, Rybka K, Toporski J, Kalwak K, Dyla A, Szczyra<br />
Z, Chybicka A. Incidence, clinical outcome, and management <strong>of</strong> virusinduced<br />
hemorrhagic cystitis in children and adolescents after allogeneic<br />
hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant<br />
2005;11:797-804.<br />
26. Gilis L, Morisset S, Billaud G, Ducastelle-Lepretre S, Labussiere-Wallet H,<br />
Nicolini FE, Barraco F, Detrait M, Thomas X, Tedone N, Sobh M, Chidiac<br />
C, Ferry T, Salles G, Michallet M, Ader F; Lyon BK Virus Study Group. High<br />
burden <strong>of</strong> BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis in patients undergoing<br />
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow<br />
Transplant 2014;49:664-670.<br />
27. Vats A, Shapiro R, Singh Randhawa P, Scantlebury V, Tuzuner A, Saxena<br />
M, Moritz ML, Beattie TJ, Gonwa T, Green MD, Ellis D. Quantitative viral<br />
load monitoring and cid<strong>of</strong>ovir therapy for the management <strong>of</strong> BK<br />
virus-associated nephropathy in children and adults. Transplantation<br />
2003;75:105-112.<br />
28. Kadambi PV, Josephson MA, Williams J, Corey L, Jerome KR, Meehan SM,<br />
Limaye AP. Treatment <strong>of</strong> refractory BK virus-associated nephropathy with<br />
cid<strong>of</strong>ovir. Am J Transplant 2003;3:186-191.<br />
29. Thamboo TP, Jeffery KJ, Friend PJ, Turner GD, Roberts IS. Urine cytology<br />
screening for polyoma virus infection following renal transplantation: the<br />
Oxford experience. J Clin Pathol 2007;60:927-930.<br />
30. Gonzalez-Fraile MI, Canizo C, Caballero D, Hernandez R, Vazquez L, Lopez<br />
C, Izarra A, Arroyo JL, de la Loma A, Otero MJ, San Miquel JF. Cid<strong>of</strong>ovir<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> human polyomavirus-associated acute haemorrhagic cystitis.<br />
Transpl Infect Dis 200;3:44-46.<br />
31. Held TK, Biel SS, Nitsache A, Kurth A, Chen S, Gelderblom HR, Sieqert W.<br />
Treatment <strong>of</strong> BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis and simultaneous CMV<br />
reactivation with cid<strong>of</strong>ovir. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;26:347-350.<br />
32. Hatakeyama N, Suzuki N, Kudoh T, Hori T, Mizue N, Tsutsumi H. Successful<br />
cid<strong>of</strong>ovir treatment <strong>of</strong> adenovirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis and<br />
renal dysfunction after allogenic bone marrow transplant. Pediatr Infect<br />
Dis J 2003;22:928-929.<br />
<strong>33</strong>. Leung AY, Suen CK, Lie AK, Liang RH, Yuen KY, Kwong YL. Quantification<br />
<strong>of</strong> polyoma BK viruria in hemorrhagic cystitis complicating bone marrow<br />
transplantation. Blood 2001;98:1971-1978.<br />
230
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0079<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:231-235<br />
A Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy <strong>of</strong> Three Hepatitis B<br />
Vaccine Induction Regimens in Adult Patients with Hematological<br />
Malignancies<br />
Erişkin Hematolojik Maligniteli Hastalarda Üç Tip Hepatit B Aşılama Rejimini Karşılaştıran<br />
Randomize Bir Çalışma<br />
Zübeyde Nur Özkurt, Elif Suyanı, Rauf Haznedar, Münci Yağcı<br />
Gazi University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: Non-responsiveness to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines is<br />
not rare in hemato-oncological patients due to disease-associated or<br />
treatment-induced immune suppression. Although different strategies<br />
have been employed to improve the response rates, to date there is<br />
not an approved schedule for HBV immunization in patients with<br />
hematological malignancies. We designed a prospective randomized<br />
study to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> 3 different induction regimens for<br />
HBV vaccination.<br />
Materials and Methods: In the standard-dose (SD) group, total<br />
vaccine dose delivered was 40 µg and patients were vaccinated with<br />
20 µg at weeks 0 and 4. In the high-dose dose-intensive (HDDI) group,<br />
total vaccine dose delivered was 80 µg and patients were vaccinated<br />
with 40 µg at weeks 0 and 4. In the high-dose time-intensive (HDTI)<br />
group, total vaccine dose delivered was 80 µg and patients were<br />
vaccinated with 20 µg at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6.<br />
Results: In a cohort <strong>of</strong> 114 patients, 38.6% responded to HBV<br />
vaccination. The response rate in the SD arm, HDDI arm, and HDTI arm<br />
was 26.2%, 29.7%, and 44.4%, respectively (p>0.05). Age was the only<br />
variable identified as having a negative impact on response.<br />
Conclusion: Short <strong>of</strong> achieving statistical significance, a higher<br />
response rate was observed in the HDTI arm. Therefore, this study<br />
supports a high-dose, time-intensive HBV vaccine induction regimen<br />
in patients with hematological malignancies who are not on<br />
chemotherapy.<br />
Keywords: Hepatitis B, Vaccine, Hematological malignancies<br />
Amaç: Hematolojik maliniteli hastalarda hastalık veya tedavi ilişkili<br />
immün baskılanma yüzünden Hepatit B virüsü (HBV) aşısı yanıtsızlığı<br />
nadir değildir. Aşı yanıtını düzeltecek yöntemler denenmiş olsa da<br />
hematolojik maligniteli hastalarda kabul görmüş bir protokol henüz<br />
mevcut değildir.<br />
Öz<br />
Öz<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Üç farklı HBV aşılama rejimini karşılaştıran<br />
ileriye dönük ve randomize bir çalışma tasarlandı. Standart doz (SD)<br />
grubuna toplam 40 µg olmak üzere 0. ve 4. haftada 20 µg HBV aşısı<br />
yapıldı. Yüksek doz-doz yoğun (YDDY) gruba toplam 80 µg HBV aşısını<br />
0. ve 4. haftada 40 µg uygulandı. Yüksek doz-sık uygulama (YDSU)<br />
grubuna toplam 80 µg HBV aşısı 0., 2., 4. ve 6. haftalarda 20 µg yapıldı.<br />
Bulgular: Yüz on dört hastayı içeren bu çalışmada HBV aşısına yanıt<br />
%38,6 bulundu. Yanıt oranı SD, YDDY ve YDSU kolu için yanıt sırası ile<br />
%26,2, %29,7 ve %44,7 bulundu (p>0,05). Aşı yanıtı üzerine olumsuz<br />
etkili tek değişkenin yaş olduğu saptandı.<br />
Sonuç: İstatistiksel anlamı olmasa da YDSU kolunda HBV aşı yanıtı<br />
oransal olarak daha yüksek bulundu. Bu çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlar<br />
hematolojik maligniteli hastalarda yüksek doz ve daha sık uygulanan<br />
HBV aşılama rejiminin daha etkin olduğunu düşündürmektedir.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Hepatit B, Aşılama, Hematolojik malignite<br />
Introduction<br />
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the most common chronic viral<br />
infection in the world, can have serious clinical complications<br />
ranging from fulminant hepatitis to cirrhosis and hepatocellular<br />
carcinoma [1]. Vaccination is most effective in preventing HBV<br />
infection and complications. The complete vaccine series induce<br />
protective antibody levels in more than 95% <strong>of</strong> infants, children,<br />
and young adults. Protection has been estimated to last at least 20<br />
years and is possibly lifelong [2]. It is generally held that patients<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Zübeyde Nur ÖZKURT, M.D.,<br />
Gazi University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 312 202 63 17<br />
E-mail : zubeydenurozkurt@yahoo.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: February 10, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: September 28, 2015<br />
231
Özkurt ZN, et al: A Step Further for Improving Hepatitis B Vaccine Response<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:231-235<br />
with hematological malignancies are immunosuppressed, either<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong> the underlying hematological malignancy or due<br />
to treatment with chemotherapy. Immunosuppressive diseases<br />
like hematological malignancies are a risk factor for nonresponsiveness<br />
to HBV vaccination. Despite low response rates,<br />
it is recommended that HBV-naive patients with hematological<br />
malignancies be immunized against HBV [3].<br />
Although a rapid and effective strategy for HBV immunization<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients with hematological malignancies is highly desirable,<br />
to date there is not an approved schedule for these patients.<br />
Different strategies have been employed to improve the response<br />
rates in immunologically compromised patients, including HIVinfected<br />
adult patients, and in patients with chronic kidney<br />
disease [4,5,6]. We designed a prospective randomized study<br />
to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> 3 different induction regimens for<br />
HBV immunization in patients with hematological malignancies.<br />
In this study we aim to compare the results <strong>of</strong> the 3 different<br />
induction regimens for HBV vaccine at week 8. The basis <strong>of</strong> this<br />
deviation <strong>of</strong> omitting the consolidation dose at month 6, the<br />
current standard <strong>of</strong> care for routine HBV vaccination, was to<br />
decrease the drop-out rate due to stem cell transplantation,<br />
progression, relapse, death, frequent infections, and the effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> infection, antibiotics, and intravenous immunoglobulin on<br />
vaccination, and to allow more patients to be recruited into the<br />
study.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Patients with hematological malignancies followed by the<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> at Gazi University in Turkey between<br />
January 2008 and December 2013 were included in the study.<br />
Inclusion criteria were:<br />
a. Age >18 years<br />
b. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2,<br />
c. Negative serology for HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs,<br />
d. Negative serology for hepatitis C and HIV,<br />
e. Chemotherapy-naive patients,<br />
f. Patients who achieved remission or stable disease after<br />
chemotherapy,<br />
g. In subjects with a history <strong>of</strong> treatment, a time interval <strong>of</strong><br />
at least 3 months from the last dose <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy and/or<br />
radiotherapy.<br />
Exclusion criteria were:<br />
a. History <strong>of</strong> prior HBV vaccination,<br />
b. Evidence <strong>of</strong> ongoing systemic infection,<br />
c. Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy,<br />
d. History <strong>of</strong> prior stem cell transplantation,<br />
e. History <strong>of</strong> a non-hematological malignancy, except<br />
adequately treated squamous or basal cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the skin<br />
or cervical carcinoma in situ.<br />
Chemotherapy regimens were categorized into 4 groups,<br />
namely alkylating agent-based, purine analog-based, chemo<br />
immunotherapy, and acute leukemia type, in an attempt to<br />
evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> various drugs with different modes<br />
<strong>of</strong> action on vaccine response. Disease status at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
vaccination was evaluated as untreated, in complete remission,<br />
or stable disease.<br />
Before vaccination blood was drawn for complete blood count<br />
and IgG, IgA, and IgM levels. Absolute CD4, CD8, CD3+ CD56 + ,<br />
and CD4+ CD25 + counts were determined by flow cytometry<br />
(Becton Dickinson, FACSCalibur). Anti-HBs levels were planned<br />
to be measured at week 8. Patients who completed the<br />
vaccine schedule and had an anti-HBs serology at week 8 were<br />
considered eligible for response evaluation.<br />
Study Protocol<br />
All patients participating in the study received a recombinant<br />
HBV vaccine (Genhevac B, San<strong>of</strong>i Pasteur) in the deltoid region,<br />
intramuscularly. Patients were randomized (1:1:1 ratio) into 1 <strong>of</strong><br />
the 3 groups below to receive the hepatitis B vaccine. Groups<br />
were named based on the total vaccine dose delivered and<br />
vaccination frequency.<br />
Group 1: Standard dose (SD): Patients were vaccinated with 20<br />
µg at weeks 0 and 4; total vaccine dose was 40 µg.<br />
Group 2: High-dose dose-intensive (HDDI): Patients were<br />
vaccinated with 40 µg at weeks 0 and 4; total vaccine dose was<br />
80 µg.<br />
Group 3: High-dose time-intensive (HDTI): Patients were<br />
vaccinated with 20 µg at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6; total vaccine dose<br />
was 80 µg.<br />
Patients who achieved anti-HBs levels <strong>of</strong> >10 IU/L were defined<br />
as vaccine responders. The primary endpoint was seroprotection<br />
rate at week 8 and the secondary endpoint was comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
antibody levels in 3 different HBV vaccination regimens. The<br />
study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee<br />
<strong>of</strong> Gazi University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine and written informed<br />
consent was obtained from all subjects prior to study entry.<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Statistical evaluation was done with SPSS 15. Data were<br />
described as numbers and percentages or medians and<br />
minimum-maximum, as appropriate. Chi-square test was used<br />
for evaluating categorical values, and Kruskal-Wallis and oneway<br />
ANOVA tests were used for continuous values in patient<br />
groups. All p-values were 2-sided with statistical significance<br />
at 0.05 alpha levels. Logistic regression analysis was used for<br />
multivariate analysis to evaluate the factors affecting the<br />
vaccination response.<br />
232
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:231-235<br />
Özkurt ZN, et al: A Step Further for Improving Hepatitis B Vaccine Response<br />
Results<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 124 patients were randomized during the study<br />
period. Ten patients were excluded from the study due to<br />
cerebrovascular event before the first dose <strong>of</strong> the vaccine (1<br />
patient) or not fulfilling the criteria for response evaluation<br />
after vaccination (9 patients). Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients are<br />
summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Significant differences existed<br />
only in CD4/CD8 ratio between the 3 vaccine groups.<br />
Table 1. Baseline demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
patients.<br />
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 p<br />
Age 54 (22-78) 57 (25-78) 54 (20-80) 0.83<br />
Sex (Male/ 20/22 25/12 17/18 0.25<br />
Female)<br />
Patient (n) 42 37 35<br />
CLL 18 16 16<br />
NHL 8 9 7<br />
HD 7 5 5<br />
0.92<br />
AL 6 4 4<br />
HCL 1 2 2<br />
PCD 2 1 1<br />
Treatment 0.66<br />
No 13 11 13<br />
Yes 29 26 22<br />
Radiotherapy 0.76<br />
No 38 34 <strong>33</strong><br />
Yes 4 3 2<br />
DTV (months) 10.5 (0-144) 11 (0-83) 12.5 (0-89) 0.96<br />
LTTV (months) 6 (3-82) 6 (2-64) 9 (3-89) 0.77<br />
Values are expressed as medians and minimum-maximum where necessary.<br />
CLL: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, NHL: non-Hodgkin lymphoma, HD: Hodgkin’s<br />
disease, AL: acute leukemia, HCL: hairy cell leukemia, PCD: plasma cell disorder, DTV:<br />
time from diagnosis to vaccination, LTTV: time from last treatment to vaccination.<br />
Response Evaluation at Week 8<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the study, 114 patients were eligible for response<br />
evaluation. Overall, 44 <strong>of</strong> 114 patients responded, with a<br />
response rate <strong>of</strong> 38.6% at week 8. On the other hand, 61.4% <strong>of</strong><br />
the patients did not respond to HBV vaccination. The response<br />
rate in the SD arm, HDDI arm, and HDTI arm was 26.2%, 29.7%,<br />
and 44.4%, respectively (Figure 1). The high response rate in the<br />
HDTI arm did not translate to statistical significance, possibly<br />
due to relatively low patient numbers (p>0.05). The median<br />
antibody concentration (MAC) in the SD arm, HDDI arm, and<br />
HDTI arm was 46.6 IU/L (12.4-706), 73.95 IU/L (14.7-779), and<br />
47.4 IU/L (11.6-779), respectively (Figure 2). The differences in<br />
MAC between groups were not statistically significant. Among<br />
the variables evaluated, only age had a negative impact on<br />
response (p
Özkurt ZN, et al: A Step Further for Improving Hepatitis B Vaccine Response<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:231-235<br />
600.0<br />
500.0<br />
400.0<br />
trials in patients with hematological malignancies is very limited<br />
and mostly confined to pediatric patients with acute leukemia<br />
[8,9,10,11]. The data supporting HBV vaccination almost<br />
completely come from general vaccination strategies and no<br />
evidence-based recommendations for the dose, frequency, and<br />
timing <strong>of</strong> HBV vaccination in adult hematological patients are<br />
available.<br />
300.0<br />
200.0<br />
100.0<br />
00.0<br />
1 2 3<br />
The risk <strong>of</strong> HBV transmission, just after the diagnosis or<br />
during the chemotherapy <strong>of</strong> patients, is high due to frequent<br />
transfusions and interventions. Immediate vaccination is highly<br />
desirable; however, disease and chemotherapy may compromise<br />
antibody response. If the vaccination is postponed until<br />
after the chemotherapy, disease and chemotherapy-related<br />
immunosuppression are lessened and probability <strong>of</strong> response<br />
increases, but active protection from HBV during the high-risk<br />
period is missed.<br />
Figure 2. Median antibody concentration response to 3 different<br />
regimens at week 8.<br />
Discussion<br />
In this study, overall response rate, defined as anti-HBs <strong>of</strong><br />
>10 IU/L at week 8, was 38.6%. The response rate in the SD<br />
arm, HDDI arm, and HDTI arm was 26.2%, 29.7%, and 44.4%,<br />
respectively. Short <strong>of</strong> achieving statistical significance, a higher<br />
response rate was observed in the HDTI arm. The MAC in the SD<br />
arm, HDDI arm, and HDTI arm was not statistically significant.<br />
Among the variables evaluated, only age had a negative impact<br />
on response.<br />
HBV reactivation is a common complication in HBsAg-positive<br />
patients undergoing immunosuppressive anticancer therapy.<br />
The clinical consequences <strong>of</strong> HBV reactivation are observed as<br />
asymptomatic liver function disturbances, liver failure, and delay<br />
or premature cessation <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy courses with adverse<br />
prognostic consequences for the hematological disease. It is<br />
strongly recommended that all hemato-oncological patients be<br />
screened for HBV markers and immunization against hepatitis<br />
B be performed in HBV-naive patients when appropriate [3,7].<br />
Conducting HBV vaccination trials in adult patients with<br />
hematological malignancies is troublesome. Heterogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />
both the underlying hematological conditions and chemotherapy<br />
regimens, maintenance therapies, relapse <strong>of</strong> the disease, and<br />
salvage regimens including high-dose chemotherapy with<br />
stem cell support make the situation more complex. Therefore,<br />
recruiting a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> patients for randomized trials<br />
and multivariate analysis requires the active collaboration <strong>of</strong><br />
centers, especially in developing countries.<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> these difficulties, the number <strong>of</strong> HBV vaccination<br />
Accelerated vaccination strategies could be useful for atrisk<br />
groups in terms <strong>of</strong> rapid seroconversion and increasing<br />
adherence. Studies conducted in high-risk healthy adults,<br />
drug users, lung transplantation candidates, and HIV-infected<br />
patients elicited similar or better anti-HBs responses and could<br />
be advantageous for the short term in this population. However,<br />
additional studies on long-term protection and effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
accelerated schedules are necessary [12,13,14,15].<br />
Non-responsiveness to HBV vaccine is not rare in hematooncological<br />
patients due to disease-associated or treatmentinduced<br />
immune suppression. There are a number <strong>of</strong> means to<br />
augment the immune response to HBV immunization in nonresponders,<br />
including adding additional doses, doubling the<br />
vaccine dose, intradermal injection <strong>of</strong> the vaccine, combination<br />
with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-<br />
CSF), and use <strong>of</strong> new, more immunogenic HBV vaccines [16]. We<br />
have identified 2 studies on improving serological response to<br />
HBV vaccine in adult patients with hematological malignancies.<br />
First, Pullukcu et al. carried out a non-randomized study in 42<br />
HBV-naive hematology patients during chemotherapy. Patients<br />
were administered a 20 µg HBV vaccine on days 0, 14, and 28.<br />
Overall, 23.8% <strong>of</strong> the patients responded to this accelerated<br />
schedule during chemotherapy [17].<br />
The second study was a randomized one comparing the efficacy<br />
<strong>of</strong> a single dose <strong>of</strong> 40 µg HBV vaccine with one course <strong>of</strong> 40 µg<br />
HBV vaccine after 5 µg/kg recombinant GM-CSF injection in 94<br />
patients with lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). Although the<br />
seroprotection rate was higher in the GM-CSF + HBV vaccine<br />
group (25.5% vs. 17%), the difference did not reach a significant<br />
level. In multivariate analysis, age was the only predictor <strong>of</strong><br />
achieving a seroprotective response. The authors concluded that<br />
in LPDs, the response to HBV vaccine is impaired and GM-CSF<br />
may enhance the response rate to HBV vaccine [18].<br />
234
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:231-235<br />
Özkurt ZN, et al: A Step Further for Improving Hepatitis B Vaccine Response<br />
The available data are far from allowing definite recommendations.<br />
However, some useful information about the dose, frequency,<br />
and timing <strong>of</strong> the vaccination may be collected for the design <strong>of</strong><br />
future studies in adult patients with hematological disease. First<br />
<strong>of</strong> all, response to standard HBV vaccination is impaired and<br />
doubling the vaccine dose per injection does not increase the<br />
response rate at week 8. On the other hand, frequent antigenic<br />
stimulation seems to induce better immune response than a<br />
standard schedule. Thus, an accelerated vaccination schedule is<br />
feasible in this patient group.<br />
The durability <strong>of</strong> the response, even in stable disease conditions,<br />
is another factor that needs to be taken into consideration. In<br />
our previous study, some <strong>of</strong> the patients lost their seroprotective<br />
anti-HBs responses beginning at the sixth month <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vaccination [18]. Therefore, we suggest that a single booster<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> vaccine should be given to responders at the sixth month<br />
<strong>of</strong> vaccination. Finally, response rate to HBV vaccination during<br />
chemotherapy is low even though a frequent injection scheme<br />
is used [17]. Moreover, anti-HBs response may be lost during a<br />
chemotherapy course [19]. Whether patients who lost anti-HBs<br />
response during chemotherapy need re-vaccination or a single<br />
booster dose <strong>of</strong> vaccine to reinduce antibody production is not<br />
known.<br />
The findings from this study suggest a time-intensive approach,<br />
at 20 µg biweekly <strong>of</strong> 3-4 doses <strong>of</strong> HBV vaccine, for the design <strong>of</strong><br />
future studies <strong>of</strong> adult patients with hematological disease who<br />
are not on chemotherapy.<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approved<br />
by the Local Ethics Committee <strong>of</strong> Gazi University Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine; Informed Consent: Written informed consent was<br />
obtained from all subjects prior to study entry.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Medical Practices: Zübeyde Nur Özkurt, Elif Suyanı, Rauf<br />
Haznedar, Münci Yağcı; Concept: Zübeyde Nur Özkurt, Münci<br />
Yağcı; Design: Münci Yağcı, Zübeyde Nur Özkurt; Data Collection<br />
or Processing: Zübeyde Nur Özkurt, Elif Suyanı, Rauf Haznedar,<br />
Münci Yağcı; Analysis or Interpretation: Zübeyde Nur Özkurt,<br />
Elif Suyanı, Münci Yağcı; Literature Search: Zübeyde Nur Özkurt,<br />
Elif Suyanı, Rauf Haznedar, Münci Yağcı; Writing: Zübeyde Nur<br />
Özkurt, Elif Suyanı, Rauf Haznedar, Münci Yağcı.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Trépo C, Chan HL, Lok A. Hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet 2014;384:2053-<br />
2063.<br />
2. WHO. Hepatitis B. Fact Sheet No. 204. Geneva, WHO, 2014.<br />
3. Lalazar G, Rund D, Shouval D. Screening, prevention and treatment <strong>of</strong> viral<br />
hepatitis B reactivation in patients with haematological malignancies. Br J<br />
Haematol 2007;136:699-712.<br />
4. Rey D, Piroth L, Wendling MJ, Miailhes P, Michel ML, Dufour C, Haour G,<br />
Sogni P, Rohel A, Ajana F, Billaud E, Molina JM, Launay O, Carrat F; ANRS<br />
HB04 B-BOOST study group. Safety and immunogenicity <strong>of</strong> double-dose<br />
versus standard-dose hepatitis B revaccination in non-responding adults<br />
with HIV-1 (ANRS HB04 B-BOOST): a multicentre, open-label, randomised<br />
controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15:1283-1291.<br />
5. Tajiri K, Shimizu Y. Unsolved problems and future perspectives <strong>of</strong> hepatitis<br />
B virus vaccination. World J Gastroenterol 2015:21;7074-7083.<br />
6. McNulty CA, Bowen JK, Williams AJ. Hepatitis B vaccination in predialysis<br />
chronic renal failure patients a comparison <strong>of</strong> two vaccination schedules.<br />
Vaccine 2005;14:4142-4147.<br />
7. Yağci M, Ozkurt ZN, Yeğin ZA, Aki Z, Sucak GT, Haznedar R. Hepatitis B virus<br />
reactivation in HBV-DNA negative and positive patients with hematological<br />
malignancies. <strong>Hematology</strong> 2010;15:240-244.<br />
8. Goyal S, Pai SK, Kelkar R, Advani SH. Hepatitis B vaccination in acute<br />
lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res 1998;22:193-195.<br />
9. Yetgin S, Tunç B, Koç A, Toksoy HB, Ceyhan M, Kanra G. Two booster<br />
dose hepatitis B virus vaccination in patients with leukemia. Leuk Res<br />
2001;25:647-649.<br />
10. Somjee S, Pai S, Parikh P, Banavali S, Kelkar R, Advani S. Passive active<br />
prophylaxis against Hepatitis B in children with acute lymphoblastic<br />
leukemia. Leuk Res 2002;26:989-992.<br />
11. Yetgin S, Tavil B, Aytac S, Kuskonmaz B, Kanra G. Unexpected protection<br />
from infection by two booster hepatitis B virus vaccination in children with<br />
acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res 2007;31:493-496.<br />
12. Jin H, Tan Z, Zhang X, Wang B, Zhao Y, Liu P. Comparison <strong>of</strong> accelerated and<br />
standard hepatitis B vaccination schedules in high-risk healthy adults: a<br />
meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2015;10:e01<strong>33</strong>464.<br />
13. Shah DP, Grimes CZ, Nguyen AT, Lai D, Hwang LY. Long-term effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule in drug users. Am J Public<br />
Health 2015;105:36-43.<br />
14. Galar A, Engelson BA, Kubiak DW, Licona JH, Boukedes S, Goldberg HJ,<br />
Baden LR,Marty FM, Issa NC. Serologic response to hepatitis B vaccination<br />
among lung transplantation candidates. Transplantation 2014;27:676-679.<br />
15. Mena G, Llupià A, García-Basteiro AL, Díez C, León A, García F, Bayas JM.<br />
Assessing the immunological response to hepatitis B vaccination in HIVinfected<br />
patients in clinical practice. Vaccine 2012;30:3703-3709.<br />
16. Chen DS. Hepatitis B vaccination: the key towards elimination and<br />
eradication <strong>of</strong> hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2009;50:805-816.<br />
17. Pullukcu H, Ertem E, Karaca Y, Yamazhan T, Sertoz RY, Altuglu I. Efficacy<br />
<strong>of</strong> accelerated hepatitis B vaccination program in patients being actively<br />
treated for hematologic malignancies. Int J Infect Dis 2008;12:166-170.<br />
18. Yagci M, Acar K, Sucak GT, Yamaç K, Haznedar R. Hepatitis B virus vaccine in<br />
lymphoproliferative disorders: a prospective randomized study evaluating<br />
the efficacy <strong>of</strong> granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor as a<br />
vaccine adjuvant. Eur J Haematol 2007;79:292-296.<br />
19. Yağcı M, Suyanı E, Kızıl Çakar M. The impact <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy on hepatitis B<br />
antibody titer in patients with hematological malignancies. Turk J Hematol<br />
2015;32:251-256.<br />
235
RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0242<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
Reliability and Validity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0<br />
Cancer Module for 2- to 7-Year-Old and the PedsQL 4.0 Generic<br />
Core Scales for 5- to 7-Year-Old: The Hacettepe University<br />
Experience<br />
Çocuklar için Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği Kanser Modülü Türkçe Versiyonunun 2-7 Yaşları<br />
Arasındaki Çocuklarda ve Genel Skalası’nın 5-7 Yaşları Arasındaki Çocuklarda Geçerlik ve<br />
Güvenilirliği: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Deneyimi<br />
Vesile Yıldız Kabak 1 , Yavuz Yakut 1 , Mualla Çetin 2 , Tülin Düger 1<br />
1Hacettepe University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences, Department <strong>of</strong> Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey<br />
2Hacettepe University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, Division <strong>of</strong> Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong>, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the reliability and<br />
validity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong> version <strong>of</strong> the Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory<br />
(PedsQL) 3.0 Cancer Module for 2- to 7-year-old and the PedsQL 4.0<br />
Generic Core Scales for 5- to 7-year-old in childhood cancer.<br />
Materials and Methods: The PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module and PedsQL<br />
4.0 Generic Core Scales were administered to children with cancer<br />
and their parents at Hacettepe University. Internal consistency was<br />
determined by using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability<br />
was determined by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).<br />
Construct validity was assessed by comparing the results <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL<br />
3.0 Cancer Module with those <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.<br />
Results: Cronbach’s alpha <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module varied<br />
from 0.803 to 0.873 and that <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales<br />
from 0.665 to 0.841. Test-retest ICC values <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer<br />
Module varied from 0.877 to 0.949 and those <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0<br />
Generic Core Scales from 0.681 to 0.824. The correlation <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL<br />
3.0 Cancer Module with subscale scores <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0 Generic<br />
Core Scales showed that there were excellent to fair correlations<br />
between the two scales. The relationship between parent proxy-report<br />
and child self-report <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module had very good<br />
correlation (r=0.694, p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
Yıldız Kabak V, et al: <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL at Hacettepe University<br />
Introduction<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> life (QOL) has been described as a subjective term and<br />
is defined as a person’s sense <strong>of</strong> social, emotional, and physical<br />
well-being and his/her ability to function in ordinary tasks <strong>of</strong><br />
daily living [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, a health-related quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
(HRQOL) instrument should include physical, mental, and social<br />
health dimensions [5,6]. It is increasingly acknowledged as an<br />
important health outcome measure in clinical trials and health<br />
service research and evaluation [7].<br />
Disease-specific HRQOL assessment instruments have been<br />
developed to determine the impact <strong>of</strong> disease and treatment on<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> patients’ life. However, there are a limited number<br />
<strong>of</strong> instruments designed to measure the HRQOL <strong>of</strong> pediatric<br />
patients with cancer [8,9,10].<br />
The Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory (PedsQL), which has both<br />
generic and disease-specific modules as well as patient and<br />
parent versions, is one <strong>of</strong> the very few instruments that is widely<br />
used to assess HRQOL among children and adolescents between<br />
the ages <strong>of</strong> 2 and 18 years [3,11]. It is brief, can be applied in 5-15<br />
min, and can be scored easily [12,13]. Evaluation is conducted<br />
by both children and parents; children aged 5 to 18 years are<br />
asked to evaluate their own HRQOL (child self-report) and the<br />
parents <strong>of</strong> children aged 2 to 18 years are asked to evaluate<br />
their child’s HRQOL (parent proxy-report) [14]. The PedsQL 4.0<br />
Generic Core Scales were specifically designed for application<br />
in both healthy and patient populations. The PedsQL 3.0 Cancer<br />
Module was designed to measure HRQOL dimensions specific to<br />
pediatric cancers [7]. This instrument has already been validated<br />
in English [15], German [16], Chinese [11], Japanese [14], Urdu<br />
[17], and Portuguese [8]. In Turkey, the validity and reliability <strong>of</strong><br />
the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales for 8- to 12-year-old and<br />
13- to 18-year-old children were evaluated, as was the PedsQL<br />
3.0 Cancer Module for 8- to 12-year-old children [18,19,20].<br />
Uneri et al. investigated the reliability and validity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong><br />
translation <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales for 2- to<br />
4-year-old and 5- to 7-year-old <strong>Turkish</strong> children. They found<br />
that the validity <strong>of</strong> the parent proxy-reports for the two age<br />
groups was sufficient, whereas the validity <strong>of</strong> the child selfreport<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 5- to 7-year-old age group was low [12].<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the reliability and<br />
validity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong> version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module<br />
for 2- to 4-year-old and 5- to 7-year olds and the reliability and<br />
validity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Turkish</strong> version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core<br />
Scales for 5- to 7-year-old in childhood cancer.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Patients and Setting<br />
This study was developed in Turkey. We recruited children with<br />
cancer and their parents from Hacettepe University Hospital.<br />
Children between the ages <strong>of</strong> 2 and 7 who were diagnosed<br />
with cancer at least 2 months earlier, who agreed to participate<br />
in the study, and who had good verbal communication were<br />
included. Children with comorbid disease, major developmental<br />
disorders, and neurologic problems were excluded from the<br />
study. The 2- to 4-year-old age group consisted <strong>of</strong> 43 children<br />
and their parents. The 5- to 7-year-old age group consisted <strong>of</strong><br />
31 children and their parents. Informed consent was obtained<br />
from all individual participants included in the study.<br />
Instruments<br />
PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales<br />
The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales were designed by Varni et al.<br />
in 1999 as a HRQOL measurement for children and adolescents<br />
aged between 2 and 18 years [13]. It consists <strong>of</strong> 23 items: physical<br />
functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social<br />
functioning (5 items), and school functioning (5 items). Child<br />
self-reports include 3 age groups: 5-7 years (young children),<br />
8-12 years (children), and 13-18 years (teens). The parent proxyreport,<br />
however, includes 4 age groups: 2-4 (toddlers), 5-7,<br />
8-12, and 13-18. The response scale is a 5-point Likert scale for<br />
all age groups, except for the 5- to 7-year-old’ version. Items<br />
are reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale,<br />
so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL. The response scale<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 5- to 7-year-old version is completed with the help <strong>of</strong><br />
an interviewer and simplified to a 3-point scale (0, 2, and 4<br />
points). The child answers the items with the help <strong>of</strong> a visual<br />
scale (happy, neutral, and sad faces). The PedsQL 4.0 computes<br />
the scale scores as well as the Psychosocial Health Summary<br />
Scores by adding the sum <strong>of</strong> points from the Emotional, Social,<br />
and School Functioning Subscales and dividing them by the<br />
total number <strong>of</strong> items answered [21,22].<br />
PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module<br />
The PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module was developed and tested for<br />
validity and reliability by Varni et al. [3,22,23]. This module<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> 27 items: pain and hurt (2 items), nausea (5 items),<br />
procedural anxiety (3 items), treatment anxiety (3 items), worry<br />
(3 items), cognitive problems (5 items), perceived physical<br />
appearance (3 items), and communication (3 items). The format,<br />
instructions, Likert response options, and scoring method are<br />
similar to those <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales [22]. This<br />
scale comprises two parallel forms for child and for parent.<br />
Higher scores indicate better HRQOL [21].<br />
Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation<br />
This study was conducted in these phases:<br />
1. Translation, validation, and reliability <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0<br />
Cancer Module for 2- to 4-year-old parent proxy-report and<br />
5- to 7-year-old children’s form and parent proxy-report.<br />
237
Yıldız Kabak V, et al: <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL at Hacettepe University<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
2. Translation, validation, and reliability <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 4.0<br />
Generic Core Scales for 5- to 7-year-old children’s form.<br />
In the translation process, we used the guidelines for crosscultural<br />
adaptation and we obtained permission for the <strong>Turkish</strong><br />
version from Varni et al. (Mapi Research Trust) [4,24]. Approval <strong>of</strong><br />
the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee <strong>of</strong> Hacettepe<br />
University (GO 14/455).<br />
The original English instruments (PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale<br />
/5-7 years and PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module/2-4 and 5-7 years)<br />
were translated independently into <strong>Turkish</strong>. Two translations<br />
from English to <strong>Turkish</strong> were done by two different and<br />
independent native <strong>Turkish</strong> translators. The <strong>Turkish</strong> translations<br />
were then compared for inconsistencies. The two translations<br />
were then retranslated, also blindly and independently, into<br />
English by two native English speakers. The <strong>Turkish</strong> version was<br />
then jointly reviewed by a bilingual team, including the four<br />
translators, three physical therapists, and a physician, to assess<br />
the necessity <strong>of</strong> cultural adaptation. The <strong>Turkish</strong> version was<br />
compared with the original English version to detect possible<br />
errors <strong>of</strong> interpretation and nuances that might have been<br />
missed. The final stage <strong>of</strong> the adaptation process was to test<br />
the prefinal version. Ten children were tested in this stage. The<br />
results eliminated the necessity for <strong>Turkish</strong> cultural adaptation.<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Reliability<br />
Two common forms <strong>of</strong> reliability are test-retest reliability and<br />
internal consistency. For test-retest reliability, the forms were<br />
applied in 7-day intervals. We used the intraclass correlation<br />
coefficient (ICC) to evaluate test-retest reliability. The ICC can<br />
vary from 0.00 to 1.00, where values <strong>of</strong> 0.60 to 0.80 are regarded<br />
as evidence <strong>of</strong> good reliability and those above 0.80 indicate<br />
excellent reliability [25,26,27].<br />
The internal consistency <strong>of</strong> a scale relates to its homogeneity.<br />
The coefficient <strong>of</strong> internal consistency is mainly assessed with<br />
Cronbach’s alpha. It is suggested that the value <strong>of</strong> alpha should<br />
be above 0.80 for acceptance as high internal consistency [28].<br />
Validity<br />
In this study, construct validity was assessed by comparing the<br />
responses to the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module to the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Construct validity coefficients (r)<br />
were accepted as follows: 0.81-1.0 as excellent, 0.61-0.80 very<br />
good, 0.41-0.60 good, 0.21-0.40 fair, and 0-0.20 poor. Construct<br />
validity was measured by Pearson’s correlation coefficient [29].<br />
All assessments were repeated 7 days later by the physical<br />
therapist. Means and standard deviations were determined to<br />
describe the demographic data <strong>of</strong> the patients. All statistical<br />
analyses were done with IBM-SPSS 22.0 for Windows. A<br />
probability value <strong>of</strong> p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
Yıldız Kabak V, et al: <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL at Hacettepe University<br />
Table 1. Demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the samples.<br />
2- to 4-year-old (n=43) 5- to 7-year-old (n=31)<br />
n % n %<br />
Sex<br />
Girl 21 51.2 14 45.2<br />
Boy 22 48.8 17 54.8<br />
Current treatment status<br />
On-treatment 8 18.6 3 9.7<br />
Off-treatment 8 18.6 14 45.2<br />
Antibiotic treatment 27 62.8 10 32.3<br />
Respondent parent<br />
Mother 37 86.0 26 83.9<br />
Father 4 9.3 3 9.7<br />
Other 2 4.65 2 6.5<br />
Education level <strong>of</strong> the parent<br />
Illiterate 4 9.3 1 3.2<br />
Primary school 9 20.9 6 19.4<br />
Secondary school 2 4.7 3 9.7<br />
High school 13 30.2 7 22.6<br />
University 15 34.9 12 38.7<br />
Mean SD Mean SD<br />
The age <strong>of</strong> the children (years) 3.24 0.12 6.27 0.77<br />
The age <strong>of</strong> the parents (years) 31.81 0.93 37.0 7.95<br />
Total duration after diagnosis (months) 11.95 1.65 18.60 18.15<br />
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 16.05 0.4 16.54 3.22<br />
SD: Standard deviation.<br />
Table 2. Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory 3.0 Cancer Module and 4.0 Generic Core Scale Scores.<br />
2- to 4-year-old 5- to 7-year-old<br />
Parent Proxy-Report Parent Proxy-Report Child Self-Report<br />
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD<br />
PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module<br />
Pain and hurt 72.49 21.03 75.29 20.27 76.66 25.37<br />
Nausea 72.23 21.75 57.43 29.89 67.24 25.05<br />
Procedural anxiety 38.19 28.52 50.25 29.95 61.36 31.25<br />
Treatment anxiety 59.12 35.39 76.96 32.57 84.30 28.14<br />
Worry 70.26 35.00 80.25 31.97 73.85 24.96<br />
Cognitive problems 71.81 23.08 81.45 21.74 78.83 20.45<br />
Perceived physical appearance 78.83 25.80 68.80 30.07 72.89 28.07<br />
Communication 62.90 38.01 64.67 42.55 77.66 27.64<br />
Total score 64.51 18.27 68.16 22.05 73.<strong>33</strong> 17.85<br />
PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale<br />
Physical functioning 70.98 19.99 68.64 26.86 71.73 20.44<br />
Emotional functioning 60.47 20.23 70.48 23.03 74.63 17.37<br />
Social functioning 84.40 18.89 78.53 23.03 82.82 19.10<br />
School-related problems 67.57 <strong>33</strong>.50 59.90 30.17 66.55 26.23<br />
Total score 70.53 15.22 70.32 18.85 73.73 16.08<br />
SD: Standard deviation, PedsQL: Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory.<br />
239
Yıldız Kabak V, et al: <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL at Hacettepe University<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between total scores and subscale scores <strong>of</strong> the scales.<br />
PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Subscale Scores<br />
PH N PA TA W CP PPA C<br />
Total scores (5-7 years old)<br />
Parent proxy-report 0.5<strong>33</strong>* 0.949** 0.709** 0.768** 0.709** 0.512* 0.864** 0.744**<br />
Child self-report 0.408* 0.829** 0.664** 0.622** 0.701** 0.702** 0.516* 0.816**<br />
Total scores (2-4 years old)<br />
Parent proxy-report 0.393* 0.621** 0.671** 0.744** 0.620** 0.588** 0.746** 0.736**<br />
Child self-report - - - - - - - -<br />
PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale Subscale Scores<br />
PF EF SF SRP<br />
Total scores (5-7 years old)<br />
Parent proxy-report 0.678** 0.761** 0.647** 0.817**<br />
Child self-report 0.908** 0.748** 0.743** 0.526*<br />
*p
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
Yıldız Kabak V, et al: <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL at Hacettepe University<br />
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between subscale scores <strong>of</strong> the 5- to 7-year-old parent proxy-report <strong>of</strong> the Pediatric<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory 3.0 Cancer Module and Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales.<br />
PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module,<br />
5- to 7-year-old<br />
Physical Functioning<br />
Emotional<br />
Functioning<br />
PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale,<br />
5- to 7-year-old<br />
Social Functioning<br />
School-Related<br />
Problems<br />
Pain and hurt 0.455* 0.179 -0.120 0.060 0.296<br />
Nausea 0.227 0.625** 0.399* 0.583* 0.586*<br />
Procedural anxiety 0.197 0.418* 0.357 0.578* 0.460*<br />
Treatment anxiety -0.136 0.739** 0.566* 0.674* 0.468*<br />
Worry -0.005 0.769** 0.578* 0.701* 0.583*<br />
Cognitive problems 0.038 0.649** 0.690** 0.706** 0.503*<br />
Perceived physical appearance 0.103 0.713** 0.536* 0.513* 0.545*<br />
Communication 0.154 0.604** 0.312 0.627* 0.510*<br />
Total score 0.179 0.810** 0.562* 0.795** 0.694**<br />
*p
Yıldız Kabak V, et al: <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL at Hacettepe University Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
significant and good (r=0.540, p=0.002). This lower correlation<br />
and internal consistency <strong>of</strong> the 5- to 7-year-old age group may<br />
be related to school functioning. In Turkey, children <strong>of</strong> this age<br />
do not go to school yet, and children with chronic diseases<br />
quit school. Therefore, most <strong>of</strong> the children in this group had<br />
difficulties understanding school functioning questions and<br />
some parents mentioned that their children were too young to<br />
understand some <strong>of</strong> the questions. Only 16 parents and children<br />
answered the school functioning questions, which might be due<br />
to misunderstanding some questions (for example, forgetting<br />
things). This indicated that not only are some modifications to<br />
the school functioning questions for children aged 5-7 years<br />
necessary, but also that the parent-proxy report and child selfreport<br />
should be applied together in this age group.<br />
The PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Scales internal consistency<br />
reliabilities generally exceeded the recommended minimum<br />
alpha coefficient standard <strong>of</strong> 0.70 for group comparison for<br />
child self-report for ages 8-18 years and parent proxy-report<br />
for ages 2-18 years. For self-report at ages 5-7 years, only the<br />
procedural anxiety and treatment anxiety scales met the 0.70<br />
standard and for most scales values were in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.80<br />
to 0.90 [4].<br />
In our study, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0<br />
Cancer Module for 2- to 7-year-old was from 0.803 to 0.73<br />
for the parent-proxy reports and the child self-reports (high).<br />
Test-retest ICC values were 0.877 to 0.949 (excellent) and the<br />
correlations between total score and subscale scores for 5- to<br />
7-year-old were higher than those for 2- to 4-year-old. The<br />
<strong>Turkish</strong> version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module in children<br />
aged 2-7 years can be applied for the <strong>Turkish</strong> population.<br />
The intercorrelations between the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module<br />
and PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales parent proxy-reports were<br />
in the range <strong>of</strong> moderate to high, except for ‘worry’ and ‘schoolrelated<br />
problems’ in 2- to 4-year-old, and except for ‘pain and<br />
hurt’ and ‘physical functioning’ in 5- to 7-year-old. In Turkey,<br />
many children between 2 and 4 years old do not go to school<br />
or kindergarten. Therefore, not all parents answered schooling<br />
questions. At these ages, on the other hand, children do not<br />
know about their disease and its treatment. In 5- to 7-yearold,<br />
subscales and their questions <strong>of</strong> the cancer module do not<br />
correlate with physical situations. According to the results <strong>of</strong><br />
5- to 7-year-old, while parents correlated physical dysfunctions<br />
with ‘pain and hurt’, children correlated them with ‘nausea’. In<br />
this self-report, ‘procedural anxiety’ and ‘perceived physical<br />
appearance’ do not correlate with Generic Core Scale subscales,<br />
and the ‘social functioning subscale’ <strong>of</strong> the Generic Core Scale<br />
does not correlate with Cancer Module subscales. These low<br />
correlations in subscales might be due to the small number <strong>of</strong><br />
items that compose the subscales, the low level <strong>of</strong> schooling in<br />
these ages, or the absence <strong>of</strong> physical function subscales in the<br />
cancer module. Total scale score may be suitable as a summary<br />
score for the primary analysis <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL Inventory in clinical<br />
trials and other group comparisons.<br />
Parent-child agreement about QOL is controversial in the<br />
literature [30]. Some studies reported high agreement, whereas<br />
others reported low agreement [31,32,<strong>33</strong>]. In our study, there was<br />
an excellent correlation between the parent-proxy report and<br />
child self-report for 5- to 7-year-old with the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer<br />
Module. Although patient self-report is considered the standard<br />
for measuring perceived HRQOL, it is the parent’s perception <strong>of</strong><br />
the child’s HRQOL that may influence healthcare utilization [34].<br />
In clinical practice, there may be circumstances in which the child<br />
is too young to understand the questions, or too ill and unwilling<br />
to complete an instrument. Therefore, in cases in which pediatric<br />
patients are not able to provide self-reports, reliable and valid<br />
parent proxy-report instruments are needed [35].<br />
In conclusion, our results indicated that the <strong>Turkish</strong> versions <strong>of</strong><br />
the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales for 5- to 7-year-old and<br />
the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module for 2- to 7-year-old are easy<br />
to understand, reliable, and valid instruments in the <strong>Turkish</strong>speaking<br />
population. These instruments may be utilized as<br />
outcome measures in pediatric cancer clinical trials, research,<br />
and clinical practice for HRQOL outcome assessment. However,<br />
we suggest that the parent proxy-report and child self-report<br />
should be used together for 5- to 7-year-old. Further studies<br />
should focus on testing the responsiveness and reliability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PedsQL in patients who continue or finish treatments and in<br />
long-term follow-up measurements.<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: The approval <strong>of</strong> the Ethic Committee<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Hacettepe University was obtained about this study (GO<br />
14/455); Informed Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Concept: Tülin Düger; Design: Mualla Çetin; Data Collection or<br />
Processing: Vesile Yıldız Kabak; Analysis or Interpretation: Yavuz<br />
Yakut, Vesile Yıldız Kabak; Literature Search: Vesile Yıldız Kabak;<br />
Writing: Tülin Düger.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Fallowfield L. What Is Quality <strong>of</strong> Life? What Is ……….? Series. London, UK,<br />
Hayward Medical Communication, 2009.<br />
2. World Health Organization. Basic Documents, Forty-Seventh Edition.<br />
Geneva, Switzerland, WHO, 2009.<br />
3. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scale in healthy<br />
and patient populations. Med Care 2001;39:800-812.<br />
242
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:236-243<br />
Yıldız Kabak V, et al: <strong>Turkish</strong> Version <strong>of</strong> the PedsQL at Hacettepe University<br />
4. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Katz ER, Meeske K, Dickinson P. The PedsQL in<br />
pediatric cancer: reliability and validity <strong>of</strong> the Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life<br />
Inventory Generic Core Scales, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and Cancer<br />
Module. Cancer 2002;94:2090-2106.<br />
5. Pal DK. Quality <strong>of</strong> life assessment in children: a review <strong>of</strong> conceptual<br />
and methodological issues in multidimensional health status measures. J<br />
Epidemiol Community Health 1996;50:391-396.<br />
6. Vance YH, Morse RC, Jenney ME, Eiser C. <strong>Issue</strong>s in measuring quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
in childhood cancer: measures, proxies, and parental mental health. J Child<br />
Psychol Psychiatry 2001;42:661-667.<br />
7. Ji Y, Chen S, Li K, Xiao N, Yang X, Zheng S, Xiado X. Measuring health-related<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life in children living in mainland China: feasibility, reliability and<br />
validity <strong>of</strong> the Chinese Mandarin version <strong>of</strong> PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales<br />
and 3.0 Cancer Module. Health QualLife Outcomes 2011;9:103.<br />
8. Scarpelli AC, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, Varni JW, Allison PJ.<br />
Measurement properties <strong>of</strong> the Brazilian version <strong>of</strong> the Pediatric Quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> Life Inventory (PedsQL) cancer module scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes<br />
2008;6:7.<br />
9. Eiser C, Havermans T, Craft A, Kernahan J. Development <strong>of</strong> a measure to<br />
assess the perceived illness experience after treatment for cancer. Arch Dis<br />
Child 1995;72:302-307.<br />
10. Fenny D, Furlong W, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Resenbaum P, Weitzman S. A<br />
comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status <strong>of</strong><br />
survivors <strong>of</strong> childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:923-928.<br />
11. Lau JT, Yu XN, Chu Y, Shing MM, Wong EM, Leung TF, Li CK, Fok TF, Mak WW.<br />
Validation <strong>of</strong> the Chinese version <strong>of</strong> the Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory<br />
(PedsQL) Cancer Module. J Pediatr Psychol 2010;35:99-109.<br />
12. Uneri OS, Agaoglu B, Coskun A, Memik NC. Validity and reliability <strong>of</strong><br />
Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory for 2-to 4-year-old and 5-to 7-year-old<br />
<strong>Turkish</strong> children. Qual Life Res 2008;17:307-315.<br />
13. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: the measurement model for the<br />
Pediatric quality <strong>of</strong> life inventory. Med Care 1999;37:126-139.<br />
14. Tsuji N, Kakee N, Ishida Y, Asami K, Tabuchi K, Nakadate H, Iwai T, Maeda<br />
M, Okamura J, Kazama T, Terao Y, Ohyama W, Yuza Y, Kaneko T, Manabe<br />
A, Kobayashi K, Kamibeppu K, Matsushima E. Validation <strong>of</strong> the Japanese<br />
version <strong>of</strong> the Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory (PedsQL) Cancer Module.<br />
Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:22.<br />
15. Parsons SK, Brown AP. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> childhood cancer<br />
survivors: a methodological conundrum. Med Ped Oncol 1998;(Suppl 1):46-<br />
53.<br />
16. Felder-Puig R, Frey E, Proksch K, Varni JW, Gadner H, Topf R. Validation <strong>of</strong><br />
the German version <strong>of</strong> the Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory (PedsQL) in<br />
childhood cancer patients <strong>of</strong>f treatment and children with epilepsy. Qual<br />
Life Res 2004;13:223-234.<br />
17. Chaudhry Z, Siddiqui S. Health related quality <strong>of</strong> life assessment in Pakistani<br />
paediatric cancer patients using PedsQL 4.0 generic core scale and PedsQL<br />
3.0 cancer module. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012;10:52.<br />
18. Memik NÇ, Ağaoğlu B, Coşkun A, Üneri ÖŞ, Karakata I. Çocuklar için Yaşam<br />
Kalitesi Ölçeği’nin 8-13 yaş ergen formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliliği. Turk<br />
Psikiyatri Derg 2007;18:353-363.<br />
19. Memik NÇ, Ağaoğlu B, Coşkun A, Karakay I. Çocuklar için Yaşam Kalitesi<br />
Ölçeği’nin 8-12 yaş çocuk formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Turk J Child<br />
Adolesc Ment Health 2008;15:87-98.<br />
20. Tanir MK, Kuguoglu S. <strong>Turkish</strong> validity and reliability <strong>of</strong> a pediatric quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> life cancer module for children aged 8-13 and parents. Asian Pac J<br />
Cancer Prev 2011;12:125-130.<br />
21. Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Impaired health related quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> 10 disease clusters and <strong>33</strong> disease categories/severities utilizing the<br />
PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:43.<br />
22. Varni JW, Katz ER, Seid M, Quiggins DJ, Freidman-Bender A, Castro CM.<br />
The Pediatric Cancer Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Inventory (PCQL). I. Instrument<br />
development, descriptive statistics, and cross-informant variance. J Behav<br />
Med 1998;21:179-204.<br />
23. Varni JW, Katz ER, Seid M, Quiggins DJ, Freidman-Bender A, Castro CM. The<br />
pediatric cancer quality <strong>of</strong> life inventory-32 (PCQL-32): I. Reliability and<br />
validity. Cancer 1998;82:1184-1196.<br />
24. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process <strong>of</strong><br />
cross-cultural adaptation <strong>of</strong> self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-3191.<br />
25. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.<br />
Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428.<br />
26. PortneyLG, WatkinsMP. Foundations <strong>of</strong> Clinical Research: Application to<br />
Practice. Norwalk, CT,USA, Appleton&Lange, 1993.<br />
27. De Jong Z, van der Heijde D, McKenna SP, Whalley D. The reliability and<br />
construct validity <strong>of</strong> the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality <strong>of</strong><br />
life instrument. Br J Rheumatol 1997;36:878-883.<br />
28. BellamyN. Musculoskeletal Clinical Metrology. Boston, MA, USA, Kluwer<br />
Academic, 1993.<br />
29. Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable<br />
instrument to measure the magnitude <strong>of</strong> clinical change in spinal<br />
conditions. Spine 2001;26:78-8.<br />
30. Eiser C, Morse R. Quality <strong>of</strong>-life measures in chronic disease <strong>of</strong> childhood.<br />
Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1-157.<br />
31. Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Parent proxy-report <strong>of</strong> their children’s<br />
health-related quality <strong>of</strong> life: an analysis <strong>of</strong> 13,878 parents’ reliability and<br />
validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.<br />
Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:2.<br />
32. Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. How young can children reliably and<br />
validly self-report their health-related quality <strong>of</strong> life?: An analysis <strong>of</strong> 8,591<br />
children across age subgroups with the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.<br />
Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:1.<br />
<strong>33</strong>. Cremeens J, Eiser C, Blades M. Factors influencing agreement between<br />
child self-report and parent proxy reports on the Pediatric Quality <strong>of</strong> Life<br />
Inventory (PedsQL) generic core scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:58.<br />
34. Varni JW, Setoguchi Y. Screening for behavioural and emotional problems in<br />
children and adolescents with congenital or acquired limb deficiencies. Am<br />
J Dis Child 1992;146:103-107.<br />
35. Tomlinson D, Hinds PS, Bartels U, Hendershot E, Sung L. Parent report <strong>of</strong><br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life for pediatric patients with cancer with no realistic change <strong>of</strong><br />
cure. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:639-645.<br />
243
BRIEF REPORT<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0368<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:244-247<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> Four-Year Rectal Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci<br />
Surveillance in a Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong>-Oncology Ward: From<br />
Colonization to Infection<br />
Bir Pediatrik Hematoloji-Onkoloji Ünitesinde Vankomisine Dirençli Enterokok Kolonizasyon<br />
ve Enfeksiyonu: Dört Yıllık Sürveyans Sonuçları<br />
Hacer Aktürk 1 , Murat Sütçü 1 , Ayper Somer 1 , Serap Karaman 2 , Manolya Acar 1 , Ayşegül Ünüvar 2 , Sema Anak 2 , Zeynep Karakaş 2 , Aslı<br />
Özdemir 3 , Kutay Sarsar 4 , Derya Aydın 4 , Nuran Salman 1<br />
1İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Pediatric Infectious Diseases, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
2İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong> and Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
3İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Infection Control Committee, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
4İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical Microbiology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Objective: To investigate the clinical impact <strong>of</strong> vancomycinresistant<br />
enterococci (VRE) colonization in patients with hematologic<br />
malignancies and associated risk factors.<br />
Materials and Methods: Patients colonized and infected with VRE<br />
were identified from an institutional surveillance database between<br />
January 2010 and December 2013. A retrospective case-control<br />
study was performed to identify the risk factors associated with<br />
development <strong>of</strong> VRE infection in VRE-colonized patients.<br />
Results: Fecal VRE colonization was documented in 72 <strong>of</strong> 229<br />
children (31.4%). Seven VRE-colonized patients developed subsequent<br />
systemic VRE infection (9.7%). Types <strong>of</strong> VRE infections included<br />
bacteremia (n=5), urinary tract infection (n=1), and meningitis (n=1).<br />
Enterococcus faecium was isolated in all VRE infections. Multivariate<br />
analysis revealed severe neutropenia and previous bacteremia with<br />
another pathogen as independent risk factors for VRE infection<br />
development in colonized patients [odds ratio (OR): 35.4, confidence<br />
interval (CI): 1.7-72.3, p=0.02 and OR: 20.6, CI: 1.3-48.6, p=0.03,<br />
respectively]. No deaths attributable to VRE occurred.<br />
Conclusion: VRE colonization has important consequences in<br />
pediatric cancer patients.<br />
Keywords: Colonization, Infection, Pediatric malignancy, Vancomycinresistant<br />
enterococci<br />
Öz<br />
Amaç: Hematolojik malignitesi olan pediatrik hastalarda vankomisine<br />
dirençli enterokok (VDE) kolonizasyonunun Öz<br />
klinik öneminin<br />
araştırılması ve eşlik eden risk faktörlerinin değerlendirilmesi<br />
amaçlanmıştır.<br />
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2010-Aralık 2013 tarihleri arasında yapılan<br />
VDE sürveyans kayıtlarından faydalanılarak VRE ile kolonize ve/veya<br />
enfekte olmuş hastalar belirlenmiştir. VDE ile kolonize hastalarda VRE<br />
enfeksiyonu gelişimi ile ilişkili risk faktörlerini belirlemek amacıyla<br />
retrospektif olgu-kontrol çalışması yapılmıştır.<br />
Bulgular: Çalışma süresince yatırılan 229 hastanın 72’sinde (%31,4)<br />
rektal VRE kolonizasyonu saptanmıştır. VRE kolonize hastaların<br />
yedisinde (%9,7) kolonizasyon sonrası sistemik VRE enfeksiyonu<br />
gelişmiştir. Beş hastada bakteriyemi (n=5), bir hastada idrar yolu<br />
enfeksiyonu (n=1) ve bir hastada menenjit (n=1) gözlenmiştir.<br />
Tüm enfeksiyonlarda ilgili klinik örneklerde Enterococcus faecium<br />
üretilmiştir. Multivaryant analiz sonucunda, ciddi nötropeni ve başka<br />
bir patojene bağlı bakteriyemi öyküsü VDE kolonize hastalarda VDE<br />
enfeksiyonu gelişimi için risk faktörleri olarak bulunmuştur [odds<br />
ratio (OR): 35,4; güven aralığı (GA): 1,7-72,3; p=0,02 ve OR: 20,6;<br />
GA: 1,3-48,6; p=0,03; sırasıyla]. VDE enfeksiyonuna bağlı mortalite<br />
saptanmamıştır.<br />
Sonuç: Pediatrik kanser hastalarında VDE kolonizasyonunun önemli<br />
klinik sonuçları olduğu gözlenmiştir.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Kolonizasyon, Enfeksiyon, Pediatrik malignite,<br />
Vankomisine dirençli enterokok<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Serap KARAMAN, M.D.,<br />
İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong> and Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 212 414 20 00<br />
E-mail : drkaramans@yahoo.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: November 04, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: February 29, 2016<br />
244
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:244-247<br />
Aktürk H, et al: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Infections in Pediatric Malignancies<br />
Introduction<br />
Children with cancer are at high risk <strong>of</strong> developing systemic<br />
infections by the microorganisms that colonize their own<br />
intestinal system [1,2]. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE)<br />
are health care-associated opportunistic pathogens. Limited data<br />
exist on the incidence <strong>of</strong> subsequent VRE infection development<br />
among VRE-colonized pediatric cancer patients and associated<br />
risk factors, which were investigated in this study.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
All patients admitted to the pediatric hematology/oncology<br />
ward were sampled within 48-72 h after admission and weekly<br />
thereafter as part <strong>of</strong> institutional rectal VRE surveillance. An<br />
infection control nurse assigned by the Hospital Infection<br />
Control Committee (HICC) prospectively tracked the results <strong>of</strong><br />
rectal surveillance and all health care-associated infections<br />
occurring in the hematology/oncology ward. VRE-colonized<br />
and VRE-infected patients were identified from the HICC<br />
surveillance database retrospectively. Detailed clinical and<br />
laboratory features <strong>of</strong> these patients were collected from their<br />
medical records. The overall rate <strong>of</strong> VRE colonization and the<br />
subsequent infection occurrence throughout the study period<br />
were determined. To identify the risk factors associated with<br />
VRE infection occurrence in a colonized patient, a retrospective<br />
case-control study was performed. Patients were defined as VREcolonized<br />
(VRE-C) when the culture <strong>of</strong> the rectal swab yielded<br />
VRE in the absence <strong>of</strong> any clinical specimens positive for VRE<br />
[3]. Systemic VRE infection (VRE-I) was defined as isolation <strong>of</strong><br />
VRE from a clinical specimen together with signs and symptoms<br />
<strong>of</strong> infection. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 21.0<br />
for Windows. Parameters were compared between groups with<br />
the chi-square test, Fisher exact test, or Mann-Whitney U test.<br />
Variables with a p-value <strong>of</strong> ≤0.1 in univariate analysis were fitted<br />
to perform logistic regression analysis to identify independent<br />
risk factors associated with VRE infection occurrence.<br />
Results<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 229 children were admitted to the hematology/<br />
oncology ward. Fecal VRE-C was documented in 72 <strong>of</strong> these<br />
patients (31.4%). Excluding eight patients who were transferred<br />
from the pediatric intensive care unit, 89% <strong>of</strong> the patients were<br />
colonized during their stay in the hematology/oncology ward.<br />
Species determination could be performed in 32 VRE-colonized<br />
patients: Enterococcus faecium was isolated in 28 patients,<br />
Enterococcus gallinarum in 2 patients, and nontypeable<br />
Enterococcus in 2 patients.<br />
VRE-I was detected in 7 patients, all <strong>of</strong> whom were previously<br />
colonized with VRE. The overall rate <strong>of</strong> VRE-I developing in<br />
patients with VRE-C was 9.7%. VRE bacteremia was detected<br />
in five patients (6.9%). Other VRE infections were urinary<br />
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> vancomycin-resistant enterococci-colonized patients who developed<br />
systemic vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection and those who did not.<br />
VRE-Colonized Patients<br />
Who Did Not Develop VRE<br />
Infection<br />
(n=65)<br />
VRE-Colonized Patients Who<br />
Developed VRE Infection<br />
(n=7)<br />
Age, months; mean ± SD 77.7±6.1 45.2±12.9 0.16<br />
Sex, n (%)<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Underlying malignancy, n (%)<br />
ALL<br />
AML<br />
Solid tumor<br />
Duration <strong>of</strong> time between admission and determination <strong>of</strong> VRE<br />
colonization, days; mean ± SD<br />
38 (58.5)<br />
27 (41.5)<br />
<strong>33</strong> (50.8)<br />
15 (23.1)<br />
17 (26.2)<br />
2 (28.6)<br />
5 (71.4)<br />
2 (28.6)<br />
3 (42.9)<br />
2 (28.6)<br />
p<br />
0.13<br />
0.67<br />
27.8±3.9 25.5±7.5 0.85<br />
Severe neutropenia (
Aktürk H, et al: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Infections in Pediatric Malignancies<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:244-247<br />
tract infection in one patient and meningitis in one patient.<br />
Enterococcus faecium was isolated in all patients with VRE-I. The<br />
mean duration <strong>of</strong> time from identification <strong>of</strong> VRE colonization<br />
to development <strong>of</strong> a VRE infection was 32.4±8.6 days (median:<br />
25 days, range: 10-73 days).<br />
Univariate analysis <strong>of</strong> demographic and clinical variables<br />
associated with development <strong>of</strong> VRE-I among patients with<br />
VRE-C is presented in Table 1. Duration <strong>of</strong> neutropenia was<br />
significantly longer in patients with VRE-I than in patients with<br />
VRE-C (12.8±1.4 days vs. 38.5±7.3 days; p=0.016). Similarly,<br />
total parenteral nutritional support was found to be received<br />
for a longer time by patients with VRE-I (9.37±0.8 days vs.<br />
15.<strong>33</strong>±5.5 days; p=0.04). Antimicrobials used among patients<br />
are shown in Table 2. Four out <strong>of</strong> seven patients were receiving<br />
a glycopeptide antibiotic when a systemic VRE infection was<br />
diagnosed. Multivariate analysis revealed severe neutropenia<br />
and history <strong>of</strong> previous bacteremia with another pathogen as<br />
independent risk factors for development <strong>of</strong> VRE infection in a<br />
VRE-colonized patient with cancer (Table 3).<br />
All VRE infections were treated with linezolid. No VREattributable<br />
deaths occurred during systemic VRE infections.<br />
However, crude mortality was higher in patients who suffered<br />
from VRE infection than those who did not (2/7 (28.6%) vs. 4/65<br />
(6.2%), respectively; p=0.04).<br />
Discussion<br />
Overall, 31.4% <strong>of</strong> patients admitted to our hematology/oncology<br />
ward were colonized with VRE. Colonization rates in other studies<br />
ranged from 4.7% to 38% [4,5,6,7]. Systemic VRE infections<br />
develop mostly in VRE-colonized patients [8,9], although some<br />
contrary cases may exist rarely [5,10]. In this study, about 1 in<br />
10 VRE-colonized patients developed subsequent systemic VRE<br />
infection (9.7%). Studies evaluating cancer patients reported a<br />
range <strong>of</strong> 13% to 61% rate <strong>of</strong> progression <strong>of</strong> VRE colonization to<br />
VRE bacteremia [6,10,11,12,13].<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> univariate analysis revealed some risk factors<br />
associated with VRE-I development. One <strong>of</strong> them was severe<br />
neutropenia (
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:244-247<br />
Aktürk H, et al: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Infections in Pediatric Malignancies<br />
Table 3. Multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong> risk factors for<br />
development <strong>of</strong> vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection<br />
in patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci.<br />
Variables p OR (95% CI)<br />
Severe neutropenia (
BRIEF REPORT<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0259<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:248-250<br />
Radiation-Induced Tumor Lysis Syndrome in Chronic Lymphocytic<br />
Leukemia<br />
Kronik Lenfositik Lösemide Radyasyon İlişkili Tümör Lizis Sendromu<br />
Ali Alkan 1 , Tuğçe Kütük 2 , Ebru Karcı 1 , Arzu Yaşar 1 , Ayşe Hiçsönmez 2 , Güngör Utkan 1<br />
1Ankara University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey<br />
2Ankara University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is an important oncological emergency that<br />
is usually observed with hematological malignancies and rarely with<br />
solid tumors. It can be induced either by therapy or spontaneously.<br />
Radiotherapy-induced TLS has been rarely reported in the literature.<br />
Here we present a patient with a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> metastatic prostate<br />
cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia complicated with TLS<br />
during palliative radiotherapy.<br />
Keywords: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Radiation, Tumor lysis<br />
syndrome<br />
Öz<br />
Tümör lizis sendromu (TLS) sıklıkla hematolojik malignitelerde<br />
görülen, nadiren solid tümörlerde karşımıza çıkabilen bir onkolojik<br />
acildir. Tedavi ilişkili olabileceği gibi spontan olarak da ortaya çıkabilir.<br />
Radyasyon ilişkili TLS literatürde nadiren bildirilmiştir. Burada, kronik<br />
lenfositik lösemi ve prostat kanseri tanısıyla izlenen hastada palyatif<br />
radyoterapi ile indüklenen TLS olgusu sunulmaktadır.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Kronik lenfositik lösemi, Radyasyon, Tümör lizis<br />
sendromu<br />
Öz<br />
Introduction<br />
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is one <strong>of</strong> the important<br />
oncological emergencies in oncology practice, especially in<br />
lymphoproliferative malignancies. Aggressive solid tumors with<br />
shorter doubling time can be complicated with TLS. Although it is<br />
generally triggered by cytotoxic therapy, it can also be observed<br />
spontaneously in cases <strong>of</strong> bulky tumors. Radiation as a cause <strong>of</strong><br />
TLS has been rarely reported in the literature [1,2,3]. Here we<br />
present a patient with 2 primary malignancies experiencing TLS<br />
during palliative radiotherapy.<br />
Case Presentation<br />
A 69-year-old male patient, without any comorbidities, presented<br />
with fullness in the left axilla. The initial examination showed<br />
lymphocytosis and lymphadenopathies in the bilateral axillary<br />
and inguinal region. There was neither hepatosplenomegaly<br />
nor pathological lymph nodes in the abdominal and thoracic<br />
cavity. Lymphocytosis and basket cells were seen in the blood<br />
smear. Excisional biopsy from the left axilla showed infiltration<br />
by CD5-positive cells. Immunohistochemistry was consistent<br />
with a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)<br />
infiltration. The bone marrow biopsies supported the diagnosis<br />
with hypercellularity and diffuse interstitial infiltration <strong>of</strong> small<br />
atypical lymphoid cells. The patient had been followed with a<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> CLL for 2 years. Due to initial stage 1 disease, the<br />
patient had been periodically followed without medical therapy.<br />
In a routine outpatient visit, the clinically asymptomatic<br />
patient was evaluated with lymph node excisional biopsy due<br />
to progression <strong>of</strong> the pathological lymph nodes in order to<br />
exclude Richter’s transformation. In addition, bone marrow<br />
sampling was performed. Pathology revealed small atypical<br />
lymphoid cells consistent with an ongoing lymphoproliferative<br />
disease and infiltration <strong>of</strong> an adenocarcinoma as a second<br />
primary malignancy. Further immunohistochemical staining<br />
was inconclusive for the origin <strong>of</strong> the tumor. The age <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patient, osteoblastic metastatic lesions detected in a bone scan,<br />
and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level <strong>of</strong> 1712 ng/mL led us<br />
to order a work-up for prostate cancer. Transrectal prostate<br />
biopsy showed prostate adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score<br />
<strong>of</strong> 10. The patient was treated with goserelin (10.8 mg SC,<br />
every 12 weeks) and bicalutamide (50 mg daily). The analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> bone scans before hormonal therapy showed metastatic<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Ali ALKAN, M.D.,<br />
Ankara University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 312 595 73 21<br />
E-mail : alkanali@yahoo.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: July 02, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: March 23, 2016<br />
248
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:248-250<br />
Alkan A, et al: Radiation-Induced Tumor Lysis Syndrome<br />
lesions in the bilateral scapula, thoracic vertebral column, pelvis,<br />
bilateral humerus, and femur. For skeletal metastatic disease,<br />
zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenous, every 4 weeks) was started<br />
and palliative radiotherapy was planned for painful metastatic<br />
lesions in the thoracic vertebrae. Radiotherapy to T 3-6 and the<br />
right scapula with a total <strong>of</strong> 30 Gy divided into 10 fractions<br />
was planned. Pathological lymph nodes associated with CLL,<br />
ranging between 1 and 3 cm in diameter in the bilateral<br />
inguinal areas, axilla, neck, and hilum, were noted for followup.<br />
On day 7 <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy the patient complained about mild<br />
nausea, progressive malaise, and perioral numbness. Physical<br />
examination was normal except for pathological lymph nodes<br />
with minimal regression and paleness. The largest lymph node<br />
in the right axilla had regressed from 3 to 2 cm and the other<br />
pathological nodes were stable. The hilar fullness in chest<br />
X-ray was stable. The only medications used were drugs for<br />
prostate cancer (bicalutamide and goserelin), lansoprazole for<br />
dyspepsia, and dexamethasone (8 mg), which was planned with<br />
the radiotherapy. The laboratory evaluation revealed acute<br />
renal failure complicated with TLS (Table 1). The PSA value was<br />
stable. The patient was hospitalized and aggressively hydrated<br />
with 0.9% NaCl at 500 mL/h in the first 6 h <strong>of</strong> follow-up with<br />
monitorization <strong>of</strong> hourly urine output. In the initial evaluation,<br />
due to hypocalcemia (5.2 mg/dL) with neuromuscular symptoms<br />
and prolonged QT interval <strong>of</strong> 0.50 s, the patient was treated with<br />
calcium gluconate replacement under cardiac monitorization.<br />
Laboratory results were checked at 4-h intervals. Until we could<br />
use rasburicase, allopurinol was the initial specific therapy for<br />
TLS. The dosage was titrated according to glomerular filtration<br />
rate and a 0.2 mg/kg single dose <strong>of</strong> rasburicase could be added<br />
to therapy on day 3 <strong>of</strong> hospitalization. The patient’s symptoms<br />
and renal dysfunction progressively improved (Table 1). The<br />
patient was free <strong>of</strong> any findings <strong>of</strong> infection or septicemia. The<br />
leukocytosis was linked to the dexamethasone therapy, which<br />
Figure 1. Digitally reconstructed radiograph <strong>of</strong> the scapula field<br />
including axillary lymph nodes, supraclavicular lymph nodes, and<br />
the upper mediastinal lymph node area.<br />
was planned during radiotherapy for anti-edema prophylaxis.<br />
After stopping the drug, leukocytosis improved. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the dose-volume histogram showed that during palliative<br />
radiotherapy to the thoracal vertebrae, mediastinal, axillary,<br />
and supraclavicular lymph nodes were also affected with<br />
maximums <strong>of</strong> 24.8 Gy (mean: 19.8), 34.2 Gy (mean: 20), and<br />
28.1 Gy (mean: 19.1), respectively. A digitally reconstructed<br />
radiograph <strong>of</strong> the scapula field included axillary lymph nodes,<br />
supraclavicular lymph nodes, and the upper mediastinal lymph<br />
node area (Figure 1). After improvement <strong>of</strong> TLS, reanalysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the patient for progression <strong>of</strong> CLL showed minimal regression<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pathological mediastinal and axillary lymph nodes. There<br />
was no progression in other lymph nodes or new organomegaly.<br />
With stable clinical findings <strong>of</strong> CLL and history <strong>of</strong> lymph node<br />
resection three months ago without any aggressive form <strong>of</strong><br />
lymphoproliferative disease or Richter transformation, rebiopsy<br />
was not planned. After six months <strong>of</strong> follow-up the patient was<br />
stable for CLL and the PSA level progressively decreased.<br />
Discussion and Review <strong>of</strong> the Literature<br />
TLS is an oncological emergency that results from massive<br />
tumor lysis due to therapy or spontaneous bursting <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />
cells. The release <strong>of</strong> intracellular electrolytes into circulation<br />
causes an electrolyte imbalance and, as a result, acute renal<br />
failure. Intracellular nucleic acid catabolism and as a result<br />
Table 1. The laboratory parameters before and after<br />
radiotherapy and after treatment.<br />
Laboratory<br />
Parameters<br />
Before<br />
Radiotherapy<br />
Day 6 <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiotherapy<br />
Leukocytes (x10 9 /L) 219 867 424<br />
Hemoglobin (g/L) 129 98 82<br />
Platelets (x10 9 /L) 177 298 113<br />
After<br />
Therapy<br />
BUN (mmol/L) 11.07 27.85 9.12<br />
Creatinine (µmol/L) 102.5 624.1 159.1<br />
Sodium (mmol/L) 140 132 143<br />
Potassium (mmol/L) 3.7 6.1 3.7<br />
Calcium (mmol/L) 4.4 2.1 3.2<br />
Phosphorus (mmol/L) 1.36 2.<strong>33</strong> 1.26<br />
Albumin (g/L) 34 28 26<br />
Corrected calcium 4.6 2.5 3.8<br />
(mmol/L)<br />
Uric acid (µmol/L) 398.5 868.4 249.8<br />
ALT (U/L, reference: 17 27 25<br />
7-40)<br />
AST (U/L, reference: 28 27 20<br />
5-40)<br />
LDH (U/L, reference: 320 732 443<br />
210-425)<br />
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, BUN: blood urea<br />
nitrogen, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.<br />
249
Alkan A, et al: Radiation-Induced Tumor Lysis Syndrome<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:248-250<br />
hyperuricemia further contribute to renal dysfunction. The<br />
clinical presentation may range from nonspecific malaise and<br />
nausea to sudden cardiac death. TLS is diagnosed by both<br />
laboratory and clinical findings. Laboratory TLS is defined as<br />
the imbalance <strong>of</strong> two or more electrolytes (hypocalcemia,<br />
hyperuricemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperkalemia), whereas<br />
clinical TLS is defined as laboratory TLS plus one clinical finding<br />
(increased creatinine, arrhythmia/sudden death, seizure)<br />
[4,5,6,7].<br />
In the literature, radiation has been rarely reported as a cause<br />
<strong>of</strong> TLS. Most reported cases are associated with hematological<br />
pathologies and splenic radiation is the most <strong>of</strong>ten related<br />
scenario [8]. Total body irradiation before allogeneic stem cell<br />
transplantation has been related to TLS [9]. TLS as a complication<br />
<strong>of</strong> radiation in solid tumors has been rarely reported. Palliation<br />
<strong>of</strong> bone metastasis from malignant melanoma [10] and<br />
prostate carcinoma [3] has been discussed. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients were good and there were no mortalities as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
complications.<br />
After the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a second primary tumor, palliative<br />
radiotherapy was indicated due to bone pain refractory to<br />
analgesia. The radiotherapy plan for the right scapula and<br />
thoracal vertebrae involved the right axilla and mediastinum<br />
incidentally, where pathological lymph nodes had been<br />
documented. The regression <strong>of</strong> axillary pathological lymph<br />
nodes and stable PSA values after radiotherapy led us to a link<br />
between TLS and the radiated pathological lymph nodes. CLL<br />
with a leukocyte value <strong>of</strong>
BRIEF REPORT<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.04<strong>33</strong><br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:251-253<br />
A Case <strong>of</strong> Superwarfarin Poisoning Due to Repetitive Occupational<br />
Dermal Rodenticide Exposure in a Worker<br />
Tekrarlayan Mesleksel Deri Maruziyetine Bağlı Süpervarfarin Zehirlenmesi Gelişen Bir İşçi Olgusu<br />
Zehra Narlı Özdemir, Uğur Şahin, Mustafa Merter, Mehmet Gündüz, Berna Ateşağaoğlu, Meral Beksaç<br />
Ankara University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Abstract<br />
Superwarfarin poisoning is usually due to chronic occult small-dose<br />
exposures and can easily be misdiagnosed and may lead to serious<br />
complications. The diagnosis can be confirmed by a concordant<br />
history and analyses <strong>of</strong> blood and urine specimens with the liquid<br />
chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)<br />
technique. Several months <strong>of</strong> continuous treatment with high doses<br />
<strong>of</strong> daily oral vitamin K, as well as other supportive measures, are<br />
warranted, especially when repeated laboratory measurements to help<br />
predict the treatment period are not available. In this paper, a case<br />
<strong>of</strong> superwarfarin poisoning due to chronic repetitive occupational<br />
dermal exposure to commercial rodenticides is presented.<br />
Keywords: Superwarfarin, Acquired coagulopathies, Vitamin K<br />
Öz<br />
Süpervarfarin zehirlenmesi genellikle, fark edilmeyen küçük dozlarda<br />
kronik maruziyete bağlı olarak gelişir ve kolaylıkla yanlış tanı<br />
konarak ciddi komplikasyonlara yol açabilir. Tanı, uyumlu bir hikaye<br />
varlığında kan ve idrar örneklerinin sıvı kromatografisi ve tandem<br />
kitle spektrometresi (LC-MS/MS) tekniği ile analiz edilmesi yoluyla<br />
doğrulanabilir. Özellikle de, tedavi süresine karar verilebilmesi için<br />
tekrarlanan laboratuvar ölçümlerinin yapılmasının mümkün olmadığı<br />
durumlarda, aylar boyunca yüksek dozda günlük oral K vitamini<br />
verilmesi gereklidir. Bu yazıda, ticari rodentisitlerle tekrarlayan<br />
mesleksel deri maruziyetine bağlı Özolarak süpervarfarin zehirlenmesi<br />
gelişen bir olgu sunulmaktadır.<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Süpervarfarin, Kazanılmış koagülopatiler, K<br />
vitamini<br />
Introduction<br />
A 40-year-old man without any prior disease was referred to<br />
our outpatient clinics with a one-month history <strong>of</strong> recurrent<br />
epistaxis, ecchymoses, and hemarthroses. Administration <strong>of</strong><br />
fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in the emergency room corrected<br />
the markedly abnormal international normalized ratio (INR),<br />
prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin<br />
time (aPTT) temporarily. His past medical and family histories<br />
were unremarkable. There were no bleeding episodes following<br />
surgery or trauma.<br />
Laboratory analyses repeatedly revealed a sustained deficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> vitamin K-dependent clotting factors with the following<br />
results: factor II, 26.9%; factor VII, 0.1%; factor IX, 13.3%; factor<br />
X, 23.5%; factor V, 82%; factor VIII, 131%; INR, 4.04; PT, 48.5<br />
s; aPTT, 48.3 s; D-dimer, 21 ng/mL; fibrinogen, 5.01 g/L. PT and<br />
aPTT normalized in the dilution assay, excluding any acquired<br />
inhibitors. He had a hypochromic microcytic anemia concordant<br />
with chronic blood loss. The platelet count was 164x10 9 /L. The<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> schistocytes in the peripheral blood smear excluded<br />
disseminated intravascular coagulation. Liver function tests and<br />
hepatobiliary ultrasound were normal. Endoscopic examinations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the gastrointestinal tract revealed normal mucosa.<br />
After excluding all other possible causes, intoxication with<br />
superwarfarin remained the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> exclusion. Blood and<br />
urine specimens were analyzed at the biochemistry laboratory<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Forensic Medicine Institute in Ankara and revealed a high<br />
blood level <strong>of</strong> superwarfarin, 32 ng/dL, and a positive urine test.<br />
Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/<br />
MS), which allows for the identification, characterization, and<br />
quantification <strong>of</strong> chemical compounds in a specimen based on<br />
their molecular masses and fragmentation patterns [1], was used<br />
in analyses. However, various special methods do exist for the<br />
simultaneous analysis <strong>of</strong> multiple hydroxycoumarin rodenticides<br />
in a specimen [2]. Our laboratory could quantify the blood level<br />
<strong>of</strong> superwarfarin, but could give only a qualitative result for<br />
the urine specimens. We were not able to identify the specific<br />
superwarfarin compound in the blood samples, as this requires<br />
some special techniques and expertise.<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Zehra NARLI ÖZDEMİR, M.D.,<br />
Ankara University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 312 595 70 99<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: December 16, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: March 07, 2016<br />
251
Narlı Özdemir Z, et al: A Case <strong>of</strong> Superwarfarin Poisoning Due to Repetitive Occupational Dermal Rodenticide Exposure in a Worker<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:251-253<br />
Thereafter, the patient, who had been working in a car-washing<br />
facility, admitted that he was exposed to various brands <strong>of</strong><br />
commercial rodenticides in this facility and did not take the<br />
necessary precautions (i.e. gloves and masks) while handling and<br />
scattering the rodenticidal pellets and pastes, in contrast to his<br />
coworkers, none <strong>of</strong> whom had similar symptoms. As previously<br />
reported, long-term repetitive exposure to rodenticides via direct<br />
skin contact was the probable route <strong>of</strong> systemic absorption in<br />
this case [3].<br />
Superwarfarins are lipid-soluble long-acting coumarin<br />
derivatives available since the 1970s as strong rodenticides and<br />
they cause prolonged anticoagulation both in rats and human<br />
[4]. The second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides including<br />
brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difenacoum, difethialone, and<br />
flocoumafen have longer elimination half-lives and greater<br />
accumulation and persistence due to a greater affinity to binding<br />
sites in the liver [5]. Among these compounds, brodifacoum has<br />
been reported to have the longest plasma and liver elimination<br />
half-lives, which are 91.7 days and 307.4 days, respectively [5].<br />
The common commercial rodenticidal formulations marketed in<br />
Turkey are in pellet and paste forms and contain 0.005% (w/w)<br />
brodifacoum, 0.005% (w/w) difenacoum, or 0.0025% (w/w)<br />
difethialone. Given the extremely dilute concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
these compounds in the commercial formulations, only a huge<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> a single-dose exposure may cause important side<br />
effects. In concordance, fatalities from a single-dose exposure<br />
are reported to be very rare [2]. However, regarding the long<br />
elimination half-lives and lipid solubility <strong>of</strong> these compounds,<br />
repetitive exposures to small doses <strong>of</strong> these formulations may<br />
result in chronic poisoning.<br />
Our patient had intermittent episodes <strong>of</strong> bleeding together<br />
with prolonged PT approximately every 3-4 weeks after the<br />
outpatient clinic visit during a 6-month period. In every visit he<br />
was prescribed FFP and 10 mg <strong>of</strong> parenteral phytomenadione,<br />
and he continued taking oral phytomenadione <strong>of</strong> 10 mg daily<br />
for 7-10 days. At the end <strong>of</strong> six months his coagulation tests<br />
normalized and bleeding episodes disappeared.<br />
The half-life <strong>of</strong> superwarfarin can be estimated by repeated<br />
measurements <strong>of</strong> blood levels in order to predict the treatment<br />
period [6]. In our case, the Forensic Medicine Institute laboratory<br />
was the only available place able to perform these kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
analyses in the area. However, as it is subject to governmental<br />
regulations, we could not get permission for repeated<br />
measurements. Due to the presence <strong>of</strong> chronic exposure to<br />
more than one product and failure to identify the specific<br />
superwarfarin molecule with laboratory tests, it was hard to<br />
predict the outcome in our case. However, considering the long<br />
wash-out period <strong>of</strong> our case, we can speculate that the patient<br />
might have had more exposure to a product containing the<br />
superwarfarin with the longest half-life, which is brodifacoum.<br />
As we could not diagnose the patient earlier, he was given<br />
vitamin K supplementation at lower doses and shorter periods<br />
than recommended. Supplemental vitamin K doses <strong>of</strong> up to 100<br />
mg daily for 12 months have been reported [7]. Our patient was<br />
a nonobese male, weighing 72 kg and 175 cm in height. In obese<br />
patients, considering the lipid solubility <strong>of</strong> these compounds,<br />
longer periods and higher doses may be required.<br />
Superwarfarin poisoning due to accidental, occupational, and<br />
criminal exposures has been reported and should be suspected<br />
when an acquired bleeding disorder due to persistent deficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> vitamin K-dependent clotting factors and a lack <strong>of</strong> sustained<br />
response to treatment with conventional doses <strong>of</strong> vitamin K<br />
are present [8]. Rodent infestation and food contamination<br />
are important sources <strong>of</strong> superwarfarin poisoning in poor<br />
socioeconomic settings. Long-term vitamin K supplementation<br />
is the recommended treatment [6]. Intravenous administration<br />
<strong>of</strong> vitamin K is <strong>of</strong>ten necessary initially. However, the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
anaphylactic reactions should be considered [9].<br />
This paper aims to refresh awareness about this clinical<br />
scenario that can easily be misdiagnosed and may lead to<br />
serious complications. Chronic occult small-dose exposures<br />
might be overlooked and should be meticulously investigated.<br />
The diagnosis can be confirmed by a concordant history and<br />
analyses <strong>of</strong> blood and urine specimens with the LC-MS/MS<br />
technique in the absence <strong>of</strong> warfarin therapy. Several months<br />
<strong>of</strong> continuous treatment with high doses <strong>of</strong> daily oral vitamin K,<br />
as well as other supportive measures, are warranted, especially<br />
when repeated laboratory measurements to help predict the<br />
treatment period are not available.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We are grateful for the exchange <strong>of</strong> experience provided by Dr.<br />
Reyhan Diz Küçükkaya during the diagnostic stages <strong>of</strong> this case.<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: Not applicable; Informed Consent:<br />
It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Medical Practices: Zehra Narlı Özdemir, Mustafa Merter,<br />
Mehmet Gündüz, Meral Beksaç; Concept: Zehra Narlı Özdemir,<br />
Uğur Şahin, Meral Beksaç; Analysis or Interpretation: Zehra<br />
Narlı Özdemir, Uğur Şahin, Mustafa Merter, Mehmet Gündüz,<br />
Berna Ateşağaoğlu, Meral Beksaç; Literature Search: Zehra Narlı<br />
Özdemir, Uğur Şahin, Mustafa Merter, Mehmet Gündüz, Berna<br />
Ateşağaoğlu, Meral Beksaç; Writing: Zehra Narlı Özdemir, Uğur<br />
Şahin, Mustafa Merter, Mehmet Gündüz, Berna Ateşağaoğlu,<br />
Meral Beksaç.<br />
252
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:251-253<br />
Narlı Özdemir Z, et al: A Case <strong>of</strong> Superwarfarin Poisoning Due to Repetitive Occupational Dermal Rodenticide Exposure in a Worker<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Vogeser M, Parh<strong>of</strong>er KG. Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry<br />
(LC-MS/MS)-technique and applications in endocrinology. Exp Clin<br />
Endocrinol Diabetes 2007;115:559-570.<br />
2. Schaff JE, Montgomery MA. An HPLC-HR-MS-MS method for identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> anticoagulant rodenticides in blood. J Anal Toxicol 2013;37:321-325.<br />
3. Voitsekhovskii VV, Pivnik AV, Bitiutskaia LG, Protsko TT. Acquired hemorrhagic<br />
coagulopathy due to contact with the rodenticide brodifacoum in the<br />
Nutcracker bait. Ter Arkh 2012;84:66-71.<br />
4. Altay S, Cakmak HA, Boz GC, Koca S, Velibey Y. Prolonged coagulopathy<br />
related to coumarin rodenticide in a young patient: superwarfarin<br />
poisoning. Cardiovasc J Afr 2012;23:9-11.<br />
5. Vandenbroucke V, Bousquet-Melou A, De Backer P, Croubels S.<br />
Pharmacokinetics <strong>of</strong> eight anticoagulant rodenticides in mice after single<br />
oral administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2008;31:437-445.<br />
6. Boettcher S, Wacker A, Moerike K, Kopp HG, Jaschonek K, Grobosch T,<br />
Kanz L, Salih HR. Acquired coagulopathy caused by intoxication with the<br />
superwarfarin-type anticoagulant rodenticide flocoumafen. Eur J Haematol<br />
2011;86:173-175.<br />
7. Weitzel JN, Sadowski JA, Furie BC, Moroose R, Kim H, Mount ME, Murphy<br />
MJ, Furie B. Surreptitious ingestion <strong>of</strong> a long-acting vitamin K antagonist/<br />
rodenticide, brodifacoum: clinical and metabolic studies <strong>of</strong> three cases.<br />
Blood 1990;76:2555-2559.<br />
8. Poovalingam V, Kenoyer DG, Mahomed R, Rapiti N, Bassa F, Govender P.<br />
Superwarfarin poisoning-a report <strong>of</strong> 4 cases. S Afr Med J 2002;92:874-876.<br />
9. Spahr JE, Maul JS, Rodgers GM. Superwarfarin poisoning: a report <strong>of</strong> two<br />
cases and review <strong>of</strong> the literature. Am J Hematol 2007;82:656-660.<br />
253
LETTERS TO EDITOR<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:254-258<br />
A Primary Bone Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Ocular<br />
Adnexal Involvement<br />
Oküler Adneks Tutulumu Olan Kemiğin Primer Diffüz Büyük B Hücreli Lenfoması<br />
Rafet Eren 1 , Ceyda Aslan 1 , Cihan Gündoğan 2 , Osman Yokuş 1 , Mehmet Hilmi Doğu 1 , Elif Suyanı 1<br />
1İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
2İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Nuclear Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
To the Editor,<br />
Primary bone lymphomas (PBLs) [1,2] and ocular adnexal (OA)<br />
lymphomas [3,4] are rare types <strong>of</strong> extranodal lymphomas.<br />
Coexistence <strong>of</strong> these two rare entities without lymph node<br />
infiltration has not been reported previously.<br />
A 55-year-old man presented with left hip pain without a<br />
history <strong>of</strong> trauma. His medical history and physical examination<br />
did not reveal any remarkable findings. The X-ray radiographs<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pelvis and left hip showed multiple lytic lesions. Body<br />
18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed<br />
tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) demonstrated multiple osteolytic<br />
bone lesions in the left zygomatic bone, vertebral column,<br />
bilateral iliac bones, left caput femoris, and trochanter major<br />
<strong>of</strong> the femur with increased 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax: 31)<br />
(Figure 1a). Tru-Cut biopsy <strong>of</strong> the caput femoris showed<br />
atypical lymphoid cells that were pancreatin (-), s-100 (-),<br />
CD138 (+), CD30 (-), CD20 (+), CD3 (-), CD5 (-), CD10 (-), bcl-<br />
6 (+), and MUM-1 (+), consistent with diffuse large B-cell<br />
lymphoma. Laboratory data were as follows: erythrocyte<br />
sedimentation rate, 37 mm/h; lactate dehydrogenase level, 405<br />
U/L; hemoglobin, 12 g/dL; white blood cell count, 6.74x109/L;<br />
platelet count, 250x109/L; normal liver and renal function tests.<br />
Bone marrow aspirate and core biopsy were normal. A rituximab,<br />
cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine, vincristine, and prednisolone<br />
(R-CHOP) regimen was planned. However, prior to the first<br />
chemotherapy day, the patient was admitted with swelling<br />
<strong>of</strong> the eyelids, exophthalmos, proptosis, and vision loss in his<br />
left eye that developed progressively over 3 days. Magnetic<br />
resonance imaging (MRI), which was performed two months<br />
after the initial 18F-FDG PET/CT, showed an orbital mass with<br />
diameters <strong>of</strong> 36x21x38 mm eroding the superior wall <strong>of</strong> the<br />
orbita and adjacent s<strong>of</strong>t tissue (Figure 1b). After the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> orbital involvement, investigations for central nervous system<br />
(CNS) involvement were negative. Chemotherapy treatment was<br />
commenced immediately without doing a biopsy because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patient’s vision loss. After 4 cycles <strong>of</strong> R-CHOP chemotherapy,<br />
the patient’s left hip pain, left eye swelling, exophthalmos, and<br />
proptosis resolved completely, but his vision did not improve.<br />
Control 18F-FDG PET/CT showed marked regression <strong>of</strong> bone<br />
lesions with decreased 18 F-FDG uptake (SUVmax: 4.6). Orbital<br />
MRI also showed that the mass had regressed to 14x12 mm<br />
in size. After obtaining this response, 2 cycles <strong>of</strong> R-CHOP,<br />
radiotherapy to the left orbita, and two cycles <strong>of</strong> high-dose<br />
methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis were planned.<br />
Considering the extensive lytic bone lesions and recent<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> the OA tumor, the primary site <strong>of</strong> the disease<br />
must have been the bones in the presented case. Thus, the<br />
diagnosis can be categorized as PBL with OA involvement. An<br />
orbital mass was detected two months after diagnosis by means<br />
<strong>of</strong> MRI, but not by 18F-FDG PET/CT performed at diagnosis. It<br />
would be speculative to claim that such a large mass had arisen<br />
in a two month period. Taking into account that MRI is the gold<br />
standard imaging technique in evaluation <strong>of</strong> OA tumors [3], the<br />
orbital mass, which was probably small at the beginning, could<br />
not have been noticed on 18F-FDG PET/CT. This case emphasizes<br />
that a high suspicion index <strong>of</strong> OA involvement in PBL cases with<br />
any symptoms regarding the eyes and prompt assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients with MRI might prevent undesirable consequences.<br />
Figure 1a. 18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/<br />
computed tomography image <strong>of</strong> the patient at diagnosis.<br />
254
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:254-258<br />
LETTERS TO EDITOR<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Surgical and Medical Practices: Rafet Eren, Elif Suyanı; Concept:<br />
Rafet Eren, Ceyda Aslan, Cihan Gündoğan, Osman Yokuş,<br />
Mehmet Hilmi Doğu, Elif Suyanı; Design: Rafet Eren, Ceyda<br />
Aslan, Cihan Gündoğan, Osman Yokuş, Mehmet Hilmi Doğu,<br />
Elif Suyanı; Data Collection or Processing: Rafet Eren, Ceyda<br />
Aslan, Cihan Gündoğan, Osman Yokuş, Mehmet Hilmi Doğu,<br />
Elif Suyanı; Analysis or Interpretation: Rafet Eren, Ceyda Aslan,<br />
Cihan Gündoğan, Osman Yokuş, Mehmet Hilmi Doğu, Elif Suyanı;<br />
Literature Search: Rafet Eren, Ceyda Aslan, Cihan Gündoğan,<br />
Osman Yokuş, Mehmet Hilmi Doğu, Elif Suyanı; Writing: Rafet<br />
Eren, Ceyda Aslan, Cihan Gündoğan, Osman Yokuş, Mehmet<br />
Hilmi Doğu, Elif Suyanı.<br />
Figure 1b. Magnetic resonance imaging image <strong>of</strong> orbital adnexal<br />
mass.<br />
Keywords: Primary bone lymphoma, Ocular adnexal lymphoma,<br />
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Primer kemik lenfoma, Oküler adneks<br />
lenfoma, Diffüz büyük B hücreli lenfoma<br />
Ethics<br />
Ethics Committee Approval: Not applicable; Informed Consent:<br />
Not applicable.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts <strong>of</strong><br />
interest, including specific financial interests, relationships, and/<br />
or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials included.<br />
References<br />
1. Messina C, Christie D, Zucca E, Gospodarowicz M, Ferreri AJ. Primary and<br />
secondary bone lymphomas. Cancer Treat Rev 2015;41:235-246.<br />
2. Kitsoulis P, Vlychou M, Papoudou-Bai A, Karatzias G, Charchanti A, Agnantis<br />
NJ, Bai M. Primary lymphomas <strong>of</strong> bone. Anticancer Res 2006;26:325-<strong>33</strong>7.<br />
3. Ponzoni M, Govi S, Licata G, Mappa S, Giordano Resti A, Politi LS, Spagnuolo<br />
L, Di Cairano E, Doglioni C, Ferreri AJ. A reappraisal <strong>of</strong> the diagnostic and<br />
therapeutic management <strong>of</strong> uncommon histologies <strong>of</strong> primary ocular<br />
adnexal lymphoma. Oncologist 2013;18:876-884.<br />
4. Woolf DK, Ahmed M, Plowman PN. Primary lymphoma <strong>of</strong> the ocular adnexa<br />
(orbital lymphoma) and primary intraocular lymphoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll<br />
Radiol) 2012;24:<strong>33</strong>9-344.<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Elif SUYANI, M.D.,<br />
İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 212 459 63 04<br />
E-mail : elifsuyani@hotmail.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: December 12, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: March 25, 2016<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0424<br />
Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis Mimicking Intracranial Mass<br />
İntrakranial Kitleyi Taklit Eden Serebral Sinovenöz Tromboz<br />
Derya Özyörük<br />
Ankara Children’s <strong>Hematology</strong> and Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey<br />
To the Editor,<br />
Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis is rare in children [1]. Most<br />
common signs and symptoms are seizure, lethargy, and headache<br />
[1,2,3]. We herein report a case diagnosed as cerebral sinovenous<br />
thrombosis mimicking an intracranial mass and presenting with<br />
increased intracranial pressure symptoms in an adolescent girl.<br />
A 16-year-old girl was admitted to our emergency service with<br />
complaints <strong>of</strong> headache, vomiting, and confusion. Her past<br />
medical history was unremarkable. Physical examination revealed<br />
facial paralysis and motor weakness on the left side. Magnetic<br />
resonance (MR) imaging disclosed a mass (65x42x55 mm) in the<br />
right temporal lobe shifting the midline structure from right<br />
to left (Figure 1). Because <strong>of</strong> herniation findings, surgery was<br />
performed immediately. Histopathologic investigation showed<br />
255
LETTERS TO EDITOR<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:254-258<br />
Figure 1. Cranial magnetic resonance images <strong>of</strong> the patient<br />
demonstrate a heterogeneous parenchymal lesion with increased<br />
T2 signal intensity in the right temporal lobe causing compression<br />
<strong>of</strong> the third lateral ventricle, basal ganglion, and thalamus with<br />
sylvian fissure, sulcal effacement, shifting midline structure, and<br />
significant edema.<br />
hematoma, gliosis, inflammation, and vasculitis. The laboratory<br />
examination revealed iron deficiency anemia (white blood cells:<br />
12x109/L, Hb: 7.2 g/dL, mean corpuscular volume: 49 fL, red cell<br />
distribution width: 20%, platelets: 570x10 9 /L, ferritin: 4.4 ng/mL).<br />
Other hematologic tests and coagulation panels were determined<br />
to be normal. Prothrombotic markers such as protein C, protein<br />
S, antithrombin III, plasminogen, heparin c<strong>of</strong>actor II, factor VIII,<br />
factor XII, lipoprotein (a), fibrinogen, homocysteine, anticardiolipin<br />
IgG, lupus anticoagulant levels, prothrombin 20210G, and factor<br />
V Leiden were normal. Tumor markers were negative. Cranial MR<br />
venography demonstrated stasis and occlusion in the middle distal<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the transverse sinus, sigmoid sinus, and internal jugular<br />
vein. The patient had no signs <strong>of</strong> nephrotic syndrome, infection,<br />
or vasculitis. She was diagnosed with transverse sinus thrombosis<br />
and anticoagulated with low-molecular-weight heparin. Iron<br />
supplementation was administered for six months.<br />
Cases <strong>of</strong> thrombosis presenting with signs <strong>of</strong> intracranial mass are<br />
rarely reported in the literature. Kim et al. [4] reported a 54-yearold<br />
male patient who was operated on for an intracranial tumor;<br />
however, the final diagnosis was thrombus in the aneurysm <strong>of</strong><br />
the middle cerebral artery. In another report, a 20-month-old<br />
girl presented with rapidly progressing hemiparesis on the left<br />
side. Cranial MR revealed an abscess or glial tumor-like lesion<br />
in the right thalamus; however, pathological investigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the stereotactic biopsy specimen did not show any signs <strong>of</strong><br />
malignancy. On day 14 <strong>of</strong> admission, control cranial MR showed<br />
thrombosis in the superior sagittal sinus and transverse sinus [5].<br />
The association <strong>of</strong> iron deficiency anemia with sinus thrombosis<br />
has been reported previously in children [6]. Although secondary<br />
thrombocytosis has been implicated in cerebral venous sinus<br />
thrombosis associated with iron deficiency, two cases with<br />
normal platelet count have also been described [7]. As not<br />
all cases <strong>of</strong> iron-related thrombotic events occur in patients<br />
with concomitant high platelet counts, other pathogenic<br />
mechanisms have been proposed. One <strong>of</strong> these explanations is<br />
that iron deficiency may contribute to a hypercoagulable state<br />
by affecting blood flow patterns within the vessels because <strong>of</strong><br />
reduced deformability and increased viscosity <strong>of</strong> microcytic<br />
red blood cells. Furthermore, anemic hypoxia secondary to<br />
iron deficiency has been suggested to precipitate situations <strong>of</strong><br />
increased metabolic stress, in particularly in vulnerable areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> the brain supplied by end arteries [8]. In our patient, iron<br />
deficiency may also have contributed to the development <strong>of</strong><br />
thrombosis.<br />
In conclusion, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis associated with<br />
increased intracranial pressure symptoms may mimic intracranial<br />
masses in children.<br />
Keywords: Intracranial mass, Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis,<br />
Increased intracranial pressure<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: İntrakranial kitle, Serebral sinovenöz<br />
tromboz, Artmış intrakranial basınç<br />
References<br />
1. Hedlund GL. Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in pediatric practice. Pediatr<br />
Radiol 2013;43:173-188.<br />
2. Suppiej A, Gentilomo C, Saracco P, Sartori S, Agostini M, Bagna R, Bassi B,<br />
Giordano P, Grassi M, Guzzetta A, Lasagni D, Luciani M, Molinari AC, Palmieri<br />
A, Putti MC, Ramenghi LA, Rota LL, Sperlì D, Laverda AM, Simioni P. Stroke<br />
working group <strong>of</strong> the Italian Registry <strong>of</strong> Pediatric Thrombosis. Paediatric<br />
arterial ischaemic stroke and cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. First report<br />
from the Italian Registry <strong>of</strong> Pediatric Thrombosis (R. I. T. I., Registro Italiano<br />
Trombosi Infantili). Thromb Haemost 2015;113:1270-1277.<br />
3. Ichord RN, Benedict SL, Chan AK, Kirkham FJ, Nowak-Göttl U. International<br />
Paediatric Stroke Study Group. Paediatric cerebral sinovenous thrombosis:<br />
findings <strong>of</strong> the International Paediatric Stroke Study. Arch Dis Child<br />
2015;100:174-179.<br />
4. Kim YJ, Jeun SS, Park JH. Thrombosed large middle cerebral artery aneurysm<br />
mimicking an intra-axial brain tumor: case report and review <strong>of</strong> literature.<br />
Brain Tumor Res Treat 2015;3:39-43.<br />
5. Haug V, Linder-Lucht M, Zieger B, Korinthenberg R, Mall V, Mader I.<br />
Unilateral venous thalamic infarction in a child mimicking a thalamic<br />
tumor. J Child Neurol 2009;24:105-109.<br />
6. Sébire G, Tabarki B, Saunders DE, Leroy I, Liesner R, Saint-Martin C, Husson<br />
B, Williams AN, Wade A, Kirkham FJ. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis<br />
in children: risk factors, presentation, diagnosis and outcome. Brain<br />
2005;128:477-489.<br />
7. Kinoshita Y, Taniura S, Shishido H, Nojima T, Kamitani H, Watanebe T.<br />
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis associated with iron deficiency: two case<br />
reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:589-593.<br />
8. Franchini M, Targher G, Montagnana M, Lippi G. Iron and thrombosis. Ann<br />
Hematol 2008;87:167-173.<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Derya ÖZYÖRÜK, M.D.,<br />
Ankara Children’s <strong>Hematology</strong> and Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 505 6<strong>33</strong> 52 74<br />
E-mail : dozyoruk@yahoo.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: January 22, 2016<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: March 21, 2016<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2016.0038<br />
256
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:254-258<br />
LETTERS TO EDITOR<br />
A Rare Cause <strong>of</strong> Unexplained Refractory Iron Deficiency Anemia:<br />
Unicentric Plasma-Cell Type Castleman’s Disease<br />
Tedaviye Dirençli Demir Eksikliği Anemisinin Nadir Bir Nedeni: Unisentrik Plazma Hücreli<br />
Tip Castleman Hastalığı<br />
Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık 1 , İpek Yönal Hindilerden 1 , Fehmi Hindilerden 2 , İbrahim Öner Doğan 3 , Fatih Beşışık 4<br />
¹İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine, Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
2İstanbul Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
3İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
3İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine, Division <strong>of</strong> Gastroenterohepatology, İstanbul, Turkey<br />
To the Editor,<br />
Castleman’s disease (CD) is an uncommon benign<br />
lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by enlargement <strong>of</strong><br />
hyperplastic lymph nodes with abnormal interfollicular vascular<br />
growth [1]. It is clinically categorized as unicentric disease or<br />
multicentric disease. Histopathologic variants <strong>of</strong> CD include<br />
hyaline-vascular type, plasma-cell (PC) type, and mixed form<br />
[2]. CD presents with features ranging from asymptomatic<br />
lymphadenopathy to systemic manifestations such as serious<br />
infections, anemia, and nerve damage [3]. In CD, hepcidin<br />
secretion induced by IL-6 is the main cause <strong>of</strong> anemia [4,5].<br />
Anemia is more common in multicentric CD and is rarely reported<br />
in unicentric CD [3]. Few cases <strong>of</strong> unicentric PC type CD associated<br />
with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) have been reported [6,7,8,9]. To<br />
our knowledge, there is only one previous reported case <strong>of</strong> adult<br />
unicentric PC type CD located in the abdomen and presenting<br />
with IDA [9]. We describe an adult with occult unicentric PC type<br />
CD <strong>of</strong> the abdomen presenting with iron-refractory anemia (IRA)<br />
and achieving dramatic response to curative resection.<br />
A 47-year-old man was referred with a 5-year history <strong>of</strong> IRA.<br />
Blood analysis showed Hb <strong>of</strong> 8 g/dL, mean corpuscular volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> 70 fL, red cell distribution width <strong>of</strong> 17%, and platelet count<br />
<strong>of</strong> 478,000/mm 3 . Biochemical tests were as follows: serum<br />
ferritin, 371 µg/L; transferrin saturation, 8.6%; and erythrocyte<br />
sedimentation rate (ESR), 110 mm/h (reference range: 0-20).<br />
Serum protein electrophoresis revealed polyclonal gammopathy<br />
with gamma globulin <strong>of</strong> 2.16 g/dL. The soluble transferrin<br />
receptor/log10 ferritin index <strong>of</strong> 2.3 indicated the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
combined IDA and anemia <strong>of</strong> inflammation (AI) [10]. Underlying<br />
chronic inflammatory diseases were excluded. Upper and lower<br />
gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluations and bone marrow<br />
examination were normal. Positron emission tomographycomputed<br />
tomography showed a s<strong>of</strong>t tissue mass with diffuse<br />
fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with an SUVmax <strong>of</strong> 11.39 and a<br />
craniocaudal length <strong>of</strong> 8 cm extending from the hepatogastric<br />
ligament and with a maximal diameter <strong>of</strong> 4.4x4.3 cm in the axial<br />
plane at the portal region. He underwent exploratory laparotomy<br />
and the mass was completely excised. Histopathological<br />
examination <strong>of</strong> the mass revealed greater retention <strong>of</strong> the<br />
nodal architecture with increased secondary lymphoid follicles,<br />
vascularization <strong>of</strong> germinal centers, and expansion <strong>of</strong> mantle<br />
zones. The interfollicular region contained sheets <strong>of</strong> CD38-positive<br />
mature-appearing plasma cells and increased postcapillary<br />
venules. Plasma cells expressed polytypic immunoglobulins, light<br />
and heavy chains (Figure 1). These findings were compatible with<br />
a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> PC type CD. Four months after complete resection,<br />
laboratory tests had completely normalized (Hb 14 g/dL, mean<br />
Figure 1. Histopathological examination <strong>of</strong> the resected<br />
specimen. Greater retention <strong>of</strong> the nodal architecture with<br />
increased secondary lymphoid follicles, and vascularization <strong>of</strong><br />
germinal centers (a: 40 x ), germinal centers fed by prominent<br />
vessels; lollipop-like appearance (b: 200 x ). The interfollicular<br />
region contained sheets <strong>of</strong> mature-appearing plasma cells and<br />
increased postcapillary venules (c: 400 x ; d: 200 x ).<br />
257
LETTERS TO EDITOR<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:254-258<br />
corpuscular volume 83 fL, and ESR 10 mm/h). He has been free <strong>of</strong><br />
disease for more than 26 months since the resection.<br />
Previously reported PC type CD patients with abdominal<br />
involvement and IDA aged between 11 and 29 years [6,7,9],<br />
making our patient the oldest reported patient. PC type CD with<br />
abdominal involvement may show an indolent course, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
leading to great delay in diagnosis. We report an unusual case<br />
<strong>of</strong> unicentric PC type CD in which the patient suffered from<br />
systemic manifestations <strong>of</strong> anemia for five years. After surgical<br />
resection, the anemia completely resolved. CD should be included<br />
in the differential diagnosis <strong>of</strong> chronic, unexplained inflammation<br />
associated with combined IDA and AI.<br />
Keywords: Iron deficiency anemia, Unicentric plasma-cell type,<br />
Castleman’s disease<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Demir eksikliği anemisi, Unisentrik plazma<br />
hücreli tip, Castleman hastalığı<br />
Ethics<br />
Informed Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Concept: Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık, İpek Yönal Hindilerden, Fehmi<br />
Hindilerden, İbrahim Öner Doğan, Fatih Beşışık; Design: Sevgi<br />
Kalayoğlu Beşışık, İpek Yönal Hindilerden, Fehmi Hindilerden;<br />
Data Collection or Processing: Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık, İpek<br />
Yönal Hindilerden, Fehmi Hindilerden, İbrahim Öner Doğan,<br />
Fatih Beşışık; Analysis or Interpretation: İpek Yönal Hindilerden;<br />
Literature Search: Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık, İpek Yönal Hindilerden,<br />
Fehmi Hindilerden; Draft the Article: Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık,<br />
İpek Yönal Hindilerden, Fehmi Hindilerden; Revise the Article:<br />
Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık, İbrahim Öner Doğan, Fatih Beşışık;<br />
Writing: Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık, İpek Yönal Hindilerden, Fehmi<br />
Hindilerden, İbrahim Öner Doğan, Fatih Beşışık.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts <strong>of</strong><br />
interest, including specific financial interests, relationships, and/<br />
or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials included.<br />
References<br />
1. Castleman B, Iverson L, Menendez VP. Localized mediastinal lymph node<br />
hyperplasia resembling thymoma. Cancer 1956;9:822-830.<br />
2. Keller AR, Hochholzer L, Castleman B. Hyaline-vascular and plasma-cell types<br />
<strong>of</strong> giant lymph node hyperplasia <strong>of</strong> the mediastinum and other locations.<br />
Cancer 1972;29:670-683.<br />
3. Bjarnason I, Cotes PM, Knowles S, Reid C, Wilkins R, Peters TJ. Giant lymph<br />
node hyperplasia (Castleman’s disease) <strong>of</strong> the mesentery. Observations on the<br />
associated anemia. Gastroenterology 1984;87:216-223.<br />
4. Yoshizaki K, Matsuda T, Nishimoto N, Kuritani T, Taeho L, Aozasa K, Nakahata<br />
T, Kawai H, Tagoh H, Komori T. Pathogenic significance <strong>of</strong> interleukin-6 (IL-6/<br />
BSF-2) in Castleman’s disease. Blood 1989;74:1360-1367.<br />
5. Song SN, Tomosugi N, Kawabata H, Ishikawa T, Nishikawa T, Yoshizaki K.<br />
Down-regulation <strong>of</strong> hepcidin resulting from long-term treatment with an<br />
anti-IL-6 receptor antibody (tocilizumab) improves anemia <strong>of</strong> inflammation<br />
in multicentric Castleman disease. Blood 2010;116:3627-3634.<br />
6. Yin L, Lu XY, Xu F, Li AJ, Wu MC. Unicentric Castleman’s disease presenting with<br />
growth retardation and iron deficiency anemia. Am J Med Sci 2012;343:426-<br />
428.<br />
7. Chandrakasan S, Bakeer N, Mo JQ, Cost C, Quinn CT. Iron-refractory microcytic<br />
anemia as the presenting feature <strong>of</strong> unicentric Castleman disease in children.<br />
J Pediatr 2014;164:928-930.<br />
8. Suh JH, Hong SH, Jeong SC, Park CB, Choi KB, Shin OR, Choi SY. Anemia<br />
resolved by thoracoscopic resection <strong>of</strong> a mediastinal mass: a case report <strong>of</strong><br />
unicentric Castleman’s disease. J Thorac Dis 2015;7:189-193.<br />
9. Vinzio S, Ciarloni L, Schlienger JL, Rohr S, Méchine A, Goichot B. Isolated<br />
microcytic anemia disclosing a unicentric Castleman disease: The<br />
interleukin-6/hepcidin pathway? Eur J Intern Med 2008;19:367-369.<br />
10. Punnonen K, Irjala K, Rajamäki A. Serum transferrin receptor and its ratio to<br />
serum ferritin in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> iron deficiency. Blood 1997;89:1052-1057.<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: İpek YÖNAL HİNDİLERDEN, M.D.,<br />
İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine,<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, İstanbul, Turkey Phone : +90 535 687 59 92<br />
E-mail : ipekyonal@yahoo.com.tr<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: February 28, 2016<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: March 28, 2016<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2016.0083<br />
258
IMAGES IN HEMATOLOGY<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0112<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:259-260<br />
Vaginal Lymphoma: A Possible Cause <strong>of</strong> Genital Hemorrhage<br />
Vajinal Lenfoma: Olası Bir Genital Kanama Nedeni<br />
Erdoğan Nohuz 1 , Sharif Kullab 2 , Albane Ledoux-Pilon 3 , Cécile Moluçon-Chabrot 4 , Maël Albaut 1 , Luisa De Simone 1 , Xavier Durando 2<br />
1General Hospital <strong>of</strong> Thiers, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thiers, France<br />
2Centre Jean Perrin, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Medical Oncology, Clermont-Ferrand, France<br />
3Estaing University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology, Clermont-Ferrand, France<br />
4Estaing University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Clermont-Ferrand, France<br />
Figure 1. A) Grenz zone (arrows): CD20-positive immunoreactivity in neoplastic cells (25 x ). B: Immunohistochemical analysis <strong>of</strong> paraffinembedded<br />
sections <strong>of</strong> the mass lesion showing tumor cells expressing the CD20 molecule (400 x ).<br />
A 59-year-old patient complaining <strong>of</strong> vaginal bleeding and<br />
puruloid discharge was admitted to our gynecology department.<br />
Speculum examination showed a vaginal fungating necrotic<br />
ulcerated mass. There was no palpable lymphadenopathy or<br />
hepato-splenomegaly on physical examination. Transvaginal<br />
ultrasound and abdominopelvic computed tomography<br />
demonstrated a bulky vaginal mass approximately 5x4x3 cm in<br />
diameter involving the bladder and the rectovaginal septum.<br />
With the patient’s approval, a punch biopsy was performed and<br />
failed to establish the diagnosis (small and necrotic samples<br />
that were not representative <strong>of</strong> the lesion).<br />
Histopathological diagnosis was obtained after a second biopsy<br />
performed under general anesthesia. Immunohistochemistry<br />
showed that tumor cells were positive for CD20, CD30, MUM1,<br />
and bcl-6 and were negative for bcl-2, EMA, CD10, and CD30<br />
(Figure 1). The patient was diagnosed with primary vaginal diffuse<br />
large-B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and underwent 8<br />
courses <strong>of</strong> rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine,<br />
prednisone immunochemotherapy. Complete remission was<br />
achieved without any relapse at 18 months’ follow-up.<br />
Primary vaginal NHL represents less than 1% <strong>of</strong> genital<br />
neoplasms [1,2,3]. Early and accurate diagnosis significantly<br />
influences the prognosis [4,5]. It should be considered in<br />
differential diagnosis <strong>of</strong> patients with vaginal bleeding. A deep<br />
biopsy may be required.<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Erdoğan NOHUZ, M.D.<br />
General Hospital <strong>of</strong> Thiers, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thiers, France<br />
E-mail : enohuz@yahoo.fr<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: March 09, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: November 09, 2015<br />
259
Nohuz E, et al: Vaginal Lymphoma<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:259-260<br />
Keywords: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Vaginal B-cell<br />
lymphoma, Postmenopausal bleeding, Vaginal discharge<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Non-Hodgkin lenfoma, Vajinal B-hücreli<br />
lenfoma, Postmenopozal kanama, Vajinal akıntı<br />
Ethics<br />
Informed Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Surgical and Medical Practices: Erdoğan Nohuz, Cécile<br />
Moluçon-Chabrot; Concept: Erdoğan Nohuz, Maël Albaut;<br />
Design: Erdoğan Nohuz, Sharif Kullab; Data Collection or<br />
Processing: Erdoğan Nohuz, Albane Ledoux-Pilon, Luisa De<br />
Simone; Analysis or Interpretation: Erdoğan Nohuz, Xavier<br />
Durando; Literature Search: Erdoğan Nohuz, Sharif Kullab,<br />
Albane Ledoux-Pilon, Cécile Moluçon-Chabrot, Maël Albaut,<br />
Luisa De Simone, Xavier Durando; Writing: Erdoğan Nohuz.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Kosari F, Daneshbod Y, Parwaresch R, Krams M, Wacker HH. Lymphomas <strong>of</strong><br />
the female genital tract: a study <strong>of</strong> 186 cases and review <strong>of</strong> the literature.<br />
Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1512-1520.<br />
2. Ragupathy K, Bappa L. Primary vaginal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Low<br />
Genit Tract Dis 2013;17:326-329.<br />
3. Dane C, Dane B, Kalli E, Erginbaş M, Çetin A. Primary uterine lymphoma.<br />
Turk J Haematol 2004;21:39-43.<br />
4. Nohuz E, Albaut M, Kullab S, Fattouh M, Tamburro S, Dauplat MM,<br />
Benoît C, Durando X. What is your diagnosis? J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc<br />
2014;15:262-263.<br />
5. Ameri M, Memarian A, Behtash N, Karimi Zarchi M. The importance <strong>of</strong><br />
re-examination with deep biopsies in diagnosing cervical malignancies<br />
despite multiple negative pathology reports: A case report. Int J Surg Case<br />
Rep 2015;14:48-49.<br />
260
IMAGES IN HEMATOLOGY<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0143<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:261-262<br />
Endothelial Cells, Ankaferd Hemostat, and Estradiol<br />
Endotel Hücreleri, Ankaferd ve Estradiol<br />
Yasemin Ardıçoğlu1, Nejat Akar1, İbrahim Haznedaroğlu2<br />
1TOBB-ETÜ Hospital, Ankara, Turkey<br />
2Hacettepe University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>, Ankara, Turkey<br />
Figure 1A. A. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells adhered to<br />
each other, within seconds, just after the application <strong>of</strong> Ankaferd<br />
hemostat (5 µL).<br />
Figure 1B. Reversible vital endothelial cell adherence/aggregation<br />
in human umbilical vein endothelial cells 24 h after application <strong>of</strong><br />
Ankaferd hemostat (5 µL).<br />
We previously demonstrated the effects <strong>of</strong> Ankaferd hemostat<br />
(AH) on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in<br />
<strong>Turkish</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> [1]. Endothelial cells adhered to<br />
each other within seconds and critical intracellular transcription<br />
factors were activated just after the application <strong>of</strong> AH (5 µL) to<br />
the HUVECs (Figure 1A). Rapid vital endothelial cell adherence/<br />
aggregation is reversible and could be reversed within 24 h<br />
(Figure 1B).<br />
We further determined that the cellular effects <strong>of</strong> AH on HUVECs<br />
are clinically important in pharmacobiological hemostasis [1,2,3].<br />
Endothelial cells are involved in a range <strong>of</strong> pathophysiological<br />
processes including hemostasis, inflammation, and angiogenesis<br />
[4], all <strong>of</strong> which are directly related to the effects <strong>of</strong> AH [1,2,3].<br />
However, the relevant receptors on the surface <strong>of</strong> HUVECs and<br />
the molecules inside the content <strong>of</strong> AH affecting the endothelial<br />
cells remain unknown. Since HUVECs express estrogen receptor<br />
(ER) beta [4] and rapid HUVEC cellular responses to estrogen<br />
can be mediated by estrogen binding to ER [5], we herein<br />
aimed to investigate the estradiol content <strong>of</strong> AH. Estradiol<br />
concentration is found to be very high in AH (1452.6 pg/mL),<br />
whereas progesterone level is 6.06 ng/mL. Those results suggest<br />
novel hypotheses that shall be tested in future investigations<br />
regarding the interrelationships <strong>of</strong> vascular endothelial cells,<br />
hemostasis, and estradiol inside AH.<br />
Keywords: Endothelium, Ankaferd, Estradiol<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Endotel, Ankaferd, Estradiol<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Concept: İbrahim Haznedaroğlu, Nejat Akar; Design: Yasemin<br />
Ardıçoğlu, Nejat Akar, İbrahim Haznedaroğlu; Data Collection<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: İbrahim HAZNEDAROĞLU, M.D.,<br />
Hacettepe University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong>,<br />
Ankara, Turkey<br />
E-mail : haznedar@yahoo.com, ichaznedaroglu@gmail.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: April 02, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: May 12, 2015<br />
261
Ardıçoğlu Y, et al: Endothelial Cells, Ankaferd Hemostat, and Estradiol<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:261-262<br />
or Processing: Yasemin Ardıçoğlu, Nejat Akar, İbrahim<br />
Haznedaroğlu; Analysis or Interpretation: Yasemin Ardıçoğlu,<br />
Nejat Akar, İbrahim Haznedaroğlu; Literature Search: Yasemin<br />
Ardıçoğlu, Nejat Akar, İbrahim Haznedaroğlu; Writing: Yasemin<br />
Ardıçoğlu, Nejat Akar, İbrahim Haznedaroğlu.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Yılmaz E, Güleç Ş, Torun D, Haznedaroğlu İC, Akar N. The effects <strong>of</strong><br />
Ankaferd® Blood Stopper on transcription factors in HUVEC and the<br />
erythrocyte protein pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Turk J Hematol 2011;28:276-285.<br />
2. Karabiyik A, Güleç S, Yilmaz E, Haznedaroglu I, Akar N. Reversible proteaseactivated<br />
receptor 1 downregulation mediated by Ankaferd Blood Stopper<br />
inducible with lipopolysaccharides inside the human umbilical vein<br />
endothelial cells. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011;17:165-170.<br />
3. Karabıyık A, Yılmaz E, Güleç S, Haznedaroğlu I, Akar N. The Dual Diverse<br />
Dynamic Reversible Effects <strong>of</strong> Ankaferd Blood Stopper on EPCR and PAI-1<br />
Inside Vascular Endothelial Cells with and without LPS Challenge. Turk J<br />
Hematol 2012;29:361-366.<br />
4. Toth B, Saadat G, Geller A, Scholz C, Schulze S, Friese K, Jeschke U. Human<br />
umbilical vascular endothelial cells express estrogen receptor beta (ERβ)<br />
and progesterone receptor A (PR-A), but not ERα and PR-B. Histochem Cell<br />
Biol 2008;130:399-405.<br />
5. Russell KS, Haynes MP, Sinha D, Clerisme E, Bender JR. Human vascular<br />
endothelial cells contain membrane binding sites for estradiol, which<br />
mediate rapid intracellular signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:5930-<br />
5935.<br />
262
IMAGES IN HEMATOLOGY<br />
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2015.0384<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:263-264<br />
An Unusual Congenital Anomaly in Fanconi Aplastic Anemia:<br />
Congenital Lobar Emphysema<br />
Fanconi Aplastik Anemisinde Nadir Bir Konjenital Anomali: Konjenital Lober Amfizem<br />
Ali Fettah 1 , Gökçe Pınar Reis 1 , Soner Sertan Kara 2 , Tekin Aksu 3 , Afak Durur Karakaya 4 , Mahmut Subaşı 5 , Atilla Çayır 6<br />
1Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong>, Erzurum, Turkey<br />
2Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital Clinic <strong>of</strong> Pediatric Infectious Disease, Erzurum, Turkey<br />
3Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong>, Ankara, Turkey<br />
4Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Erzurum, Turkey<br />
5Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Thoracic Surgery, Erzurum, Turkey<br />
6Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Endocrinology, Erzurum, Turkey<br />
Figure 1. Posterior anterior lung radiography imaging <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patient.<br />
Figure 2. Computerized tomography imaging <strong>of</strong> the patient.<br />
A 7-year-old girl who presented with epistaxis was examined<br />
due to pancytopenia. Her medical history revealed that she had<br />
respiratory distress in the neonatal period. She was born to a<br />
second-degree consanguineous marriage. Physical examination<br />
revealed short stature, microcephaly, microphthalmia, and hypo/<br />
hyperpigmented lesions on the trunk and extremities. She did<br />
not have tachypnea, but she had decreased breathing sounds in<br />
the left lung. A laboratory work-up revealed hemoglobin <strong>of</strong> 5.4<br />
g/dL, mean corpuscular volume <strong>of</strong> 103/fL, leukocyte count <strong>of</strong><br />
2.7x109/L, and thrombocyte count <strong>of</strong> 11x10 9 /L. A chromosomal<br />
breakage test with diepoxybutane was compatible with Fanconi<br />
anemia (FA). Posteroanterior chest X-ray showed hyperinflation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the left lung (Figure 1). Chest computed tomography revealed<br />
emphysematous changes in the upper part <strong>of</strong> the left lung,<br />
compatible with congenital lobar emphysema (Figure 2).<br />
FA is a rare autosomal recessive disorder and presents with<br />
numerous organ abnormalities, progressive cytopenia, and<br />
susceptibility to several malignancies [1,2]. Although absent lung<br />
lobes and abnormal pulmonary drainage have been reported<br />
[3], congenital lobar emphysema has not been presented as an<br />
accompanying pathology with FA. It is striking that the patient<br />
had no prominent respiratory symptoms since the newborn<br />
period. Congenital lobar emphysema’s association with FA has<br />
not been reported previously and it could be in coexistence or<br />
have an association with FA.<br />
Address for Correspondence/Yazışma Adresi: Ali FETTAH, M.D.,<br />
Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Pediatric <strong>Hematology</strong>, Erzurum, Turkey<br />
Phone : +90 505 675 05 86<br />
E-mail : alifettah@gmail.com<br />
Received/Geliş tarihi: November 09, 2015<br />
Accepted/Kabul tarihi: February 08, 2016<br />
263
Fettah A, et al: Congenital Lobar Emphysema in Fanconi Anemia<br />
Turk J Hematol 2016;<strong>33</strong>:263-264<br />
Keywords: Fanconi, Anemia, Congenital lobar emphysema<br />
Anahtar Sözcükler: Fanconi, Anemi, Konjenital lober amfizem<br />
Ethics<br />
Informed Consent: It was taken.<br />
Authorship Contributions<br />
Surgical and Medical Practices: Tekin Aksu, Afak Durur Karakaya,<br />
Mahmut Subaşı, Atilla Çayır; Concept: Ali Fettah, Gökçe Pınar<br />
Reis; Design: Ali Fettah, Gökçe Pınar Reis; Data Collection or<br />
Processing: Ali Fettah, Gökçe Pınar Reis, Soner Sertan Kara,<br />
Tekin Aksu, Afak Durur Karakaya, Mahmut Subaşı, Atilla Çayır;<br />
Analysis or Interpretation: Ali Fettah, Gökçe Pınar Reis, Soner<br />
Sertan Kara; Literature Search: Ali Fettah, Gökçe Pınar Reis,<br />
Soner Sertan Kara; Writing: Ali Fettah, Soner Sertan Kara.<br />
Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest: The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have no conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest, including specific financial interests, relationships,<br />
and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials<br />
included.<br />
References<br />
1. Unal S, Ozbek N, Kara A, Alikaşifoğlu M, Gümrük F. Five Fanconi anemia<br />
patients with unusual organ pathologies. Am J Hematol 2004;77:50-54.<br />
2. Auerbach AD. Fanconi anemia and its diagnosis. Mutat Res 2009;668:4-10.<br />
3. Bessler M, Mason PJ, Daniel CL, Wilson DB. Inheritedbone marrow failure<br />
syndromes. In: Nathan DG, Oski FA (eds). <strong>Hematology</strong> <strong>of</strong> Infancy and<br />
Childhood. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2015.<br />
264