ESE633 ESE/633 ESE 633 Week 3 Discussion 2/DQ 2 When to Collaborate and When to Co-Teach -[LATEST]

ESE633 ESE/633 ESE 633 Week 3 Discussion 2/DQ 2
When to Collaborate and When to Co-Teach -[LATEST]
Download here
ESE633 ESE/633 ESE 633 Week 3 Discussion 2/DQ 2 When to Collaborate and When to Co-Teach -[LATEST] When
to Collaborate and When to Co-Teach?- This discussion is your opportunity to demonstrate mastery of the objectives;
analyze the value of co-teaching as an inclusion model of instructional delivery; analyze the value of collaborative
consultation as an inclusion model of instructional delivery; and analyze the range of placements and services offered to
students who have a disability. The discussion represents your mastery of the Course Learning Outcomes 1 & 4 and
Program Learning Outcome 8 and reinforces your competency with the MAED Program Learning Outcome 7. Hallahan,
Kauffman, and Pullen (2012) define collaborative consultation as when "...the special education teacher or psychologist
acts as an expert who provides advice to the general education teacher," (p. 37). The key to the success of this model is
?collaboration? of the general education teacher?s content knowledge and the special educator?s curriculum delivery
expertise. The special educator?s role is to provide strategies to the general educator, outside of class time, on
curriculum accommodations, meeting and documenting the IEP goals, and review student progress for those who have
an identified disability (Why Co-Teaching and Collaborative Consultation, 2008). The special educator and general
educator must acknowledge their individual and team value in providing an equal contribution in the student?s
education, recognize personal areas of strength and weakness, and share an open line of communication and honesty
(Facilitating Collaborative Consultation, 2009). Additional explanations for the purpose and roles involved in the
Collaborative Consultation model visit Inclusion in the Secondary Classroom (Collaborative Consultation, n.d.). Initial
Post: Either choose the prompt to explain the difference between the collaborative consultation model and the
co-teaching model, or the prompt to weigh the pros and cons of each teaching model. a. Explain how the collaborative
consultation model is different than the co-teaching model of inclusive education including its strengths and weakness in
providing equal education to all students within the general education classroom. Be sure to cite at least two outside
sources not included in this week?s required or recommended reading. Your goal is to remain unbiased while presenting
the facts to your peers. b. Compare and contrast the pros and the cons of collaborative consultation model with the
co-teaching model of inclusive education making sure to cite at least two outside sources not included in this week?s
required or recommended reading. Your goal is to remain unbiased while presenting the facts to your peers. Guided
Response: Post replies to at least two peers before the close date of this discussion. In your replies, consider asking
questions of peers about their responses to encourage further conversation. Though two replies is the basic expectation,
for deeper engagement and learning, you are encouraged to provide responses to any comments or questions others
have given to you (including the instructor) before the last day of the discussion; this will further the conversation while
also giving you opportunities to demonstrate your content expertise, critical thinking, and real world experiences with this
topic.
Page 1/{nb}