13.07.2015 Aufrufe

Krebsforschung in der Schweiz - SAKK – Swiss Group for Clinical ...

Krebsforschung in der Schweiz - SAKK – Swiss Group for Clinical ...

Krebsforschung in der Schweiz - SAKK – Swiss Group for Clinical ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

KONGRESSBERICHTEFigure 1.Fresco by JosefWannenmacher(1762) atthe St.Gallenabbey,depict<strong>in</strong>g theEcumenicalCouncil of earlyChristianity atNicaea held <strong>in</strong>A.D. 325.ity views not only have become tolerated but they mayserve as prophecies to be confi rmed <strong>in</strong> a future cl<strong>in</strong>icaltrial. Although the metaphorical comparison with religiouscouncils may be somewhat stretched, the consensusstatements issued <strong>in</strong> St.Gallen have atta<strong>in</strong>ed a consi<strong>der</strong>abledegree of authority <strong>for</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational breast cancercommunity. There<strong>for</strong>e, the rea<strong>der</strong> is <strong>in</strong>vited to consi<strong>der</strong>not only the scientifi c and medical issues discussed, but topay particular attention to the word<strong>in</strong>g of the questions(Tables 1-8).As announced by the organiz<strong>in</strong>g committee the «Highlightsof the St.Gallen Meet<strong>in</strong>g 2011» will be publishedthis summer <strong>in</strong> Annals of Oncology. This publication willTable 2. Radiotherapy% % %RT <strong>for</strong> DCIS Yes No Absta<strong>in</strong>Should RT be consi<strong>der</strong>ed standard <strong>for</strong> entirely excised DCIS 67.6 24.3 8.1Can RT be avoided <strong>in</strong> el<strong>der</strong>ly (>70) [Sx = BCT] 58.3 33.3 8.3Can RT be avoided [<strong>in</strong> some] <strong>in</strong> low grade/low risk DCIS 61.7 31.9 6.4RT: Accelerated Whole Breast RTShould accelerated WBRT be consi<strong>der</strong>ed an acceptable option 91.5 4.3 4.3Should standard WBRT be preferred if extensive vascular <strong>in</strong>vasion present 34.8 32.6 32.6RT: Partial Breast Irradiation. In comb<strong>in</strong>ation with BCS, PBRT (<strong>in</strong>traoperative) is acceptableAs the def<strong>in</strong>itive irradiation, without any external beam RT 48.9 35.6 15.6With external beam RT if necessary 60.9 17.4 21.7Instead of external beam boost to tumor bed 61.8 11.8 26.5RT: Should Partial Breast Irradiation be applied <strong>in</strong> selected pts (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>traoperative)In el<strong>der</strong>ly (age >70) 86.7 6.7 6.7In lymphoma survivors after mantle field RT 37.2 25.6 37.2RT after Mastectomy (PMRT)Should PMRT be standard <strong>for</strong> pts with N+ ≥4 87.8 4.9 7.3Should PMRT be recommended to all pts with N+ 1-3 18.2 70.5 11.4Should PMRT be recommended to all pts with at least pT2 12.8 85.1 2.1Only if young [10% of cells or gene ratio >2) 68.1 23.4 8.5Subtypes and choice of therapyChoice of therapy depends on tumour subtype as def<strong>in</strong>ed by multi-gene array analysis 19.5 75.6 4.9For practical purposes tumor subtype can be ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed by non-genetic tests <strong>for</strong> ER, PgR, Her2 and Ki67 82.9 12.2 4.9Choice of cytotoxic therapy should be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by tumour subtype 74.4 18.6 7.0Multi-gene signatures[May] Oncotype DX be used to predict chemotherapy response <strong>in</strong> an endocr<strong>in</strong>e-responsive cohort? 84.4 11.1 4.4[May] Mammapr<strong>in</strong>t be used to predict chemotherapy responsiveness 29.8 63.8 6.4[Words <strong>in</strong> brackets refer to changes <strong>in</strong> word<strong>in</strong>g made dur<strong>in</strong>g the consensus conference, e.g. from «should» to «may»]<strong>Schweiz</strong>er Krebsbullet<strong>in</strong> • Nr. 2/2011 179

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!