20.02.2013 Views

Download File

Download File

Download File

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE MILL REPORT<br />

Making The Cut<br />

by Andy Stewart<br />

There’s an almost limitless<br />

supply of music foisted on the world<br />

on a daily basis. To cut through that<br />

undergrowth –<br />

assuming of course you want to cut<br />

through – you need to make<br />

a viable product, not<br />

just wear the right<br />

clothes or play<br />

the right<br />

instrument.<br />

Here at The Mill<br />

I’m currently<br />

mixing several<br />

things<br />

at once:<br />

instrumentals<br />

of songs<br />

by Paul<br />

Kelly from<br />

his new<br />

album,<br />

Spring and<br />

Fall, which<br />

I mixed here<br />

a couple of<br />

months ago<br />

(great album – go<br />

buy it); Brighter<br />

Later’s debut album,<br />

entitled The Wolves (not<br />

sure why they’ve called it<br />

that), which sounds amazing;<br />

and a new single by a Victorian band<br />

that I first mixed 15 years ago… “We’re a<br />

lot tighter now,” was the claim of one of its band members.<br />

“We’d love you to mix the single.”<br />

“Sure,” I said. “No worries at all.”<br />

They’re good guys, the singer has a booming voice… I was<br />

intrigued. I thought they’d broken up years ago. Then I<br />

listened to the multitrack…<br />

I thought I was hearing one of the band’s first recordings.<br />

‘Tighter’? Um, well no, not really. ‘Looser’ would probably<br />

be a more accurate descriptor... ‘as a goose’ even. It will be a<br />

challenge, but hey, I like challenges and I’m sure it will sound<br />

cool by the time we’re finished with it.<br />

Elastic Audio here we come.<br />

But it’s got me thinking…<br />

OBJECTIVE OPINION – AN OXYMORON?<br />

At the risk of sounding like I’m down on these guys – and<br />

I’m not (no really, I’m not) – my immediate impression of<br />

the single was that it really could have done with some professional<br />

help; an outside perspective on things like performance<br />

and arrangement at the very least.<br />

Now I know the arguments for and against working with a<br />

producer all too well, but in the end it often boils down to<br />

this: if you can’t even bake a loaf of bread by<br />

yourself, how the hell do you expect to<br />

be able to make a decent album?<br />

I like a crusty sourdough loaf,<br />

sure, but that doesn’t mean<br />

I know anything about<br />

baking it. Music is a<br />

subjective realm<br />

of course – most<br />

creative processes<br />

are – and<br />

not everyone<br />

agrees that<br />

bands should<br />

employ a<br />

producer.<br />

But I hate<br />

the ‘subjective’<br />

cop-out,<br />

especially<br />

when it comes<br />

from artists<br />

desperately in<br />

need of an outside<br />

perspective.<br />

Why, if everything<br />

is so damn subjective,<br />

do I consistently have<br />

the same reaction over and<br />

over to music that’s produced<br />

with little or no help from an<br />

objective third-party? I mean there<br />

are thousands of different musical aesthetics<br />

and styles out there based on imperfect, heartfelt takes and<br />

wonky overdubs. Why shouldn’t this song feel comfortable<br />

in those surrounds? What was it about this single that<br />

set my mind rolling downhill about unstable foundations,<br />

ill-conceived arrangements and unrealised potential?<br />

SORRY, I MEANT THAT<br />

In short, it’s all about intention (he says trying to mortar<br />

the first objective brick in the wall while no one’s looking)?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!