Oak Ridge National Laboratory Institutional Plan: FY 1982-1987

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Institutional Plan FY 1982-FY 1987 Fig. 5. The Director of Energy Research is the largest single sup porter ofORNL programs. Fig. 6. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is the largest sponsor of the Laboratory's non-DOE work. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NUCLEAR ENERGY DEFENSE PROGRAMS 6% CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY 6% FOSSIL ENERGY 3% DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 18% ■•;::•::•:;• OTHER DOE TOTAL 2294 DIRECT FTEs (f DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 7% NUCLEAR REGULATOR^ COMMISSION ORNL-OWG 81-21146 8% OTHER NON-DOE 15% ORNL-DWG. 81-21147 NONFEDERAL AGENCIES 5% OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES 8% I ■
continue to be extremely important to DOE in many ways. Recently, it has been invaluable in augmenting declining DOE support in our life sciences program. Several decisions in the past few years have transferred program responsibilities from DOE to EPA. Thus, in 1978, the responsibility for certain ORNL programs (funded at $1.3 million) was transferred from the former Assistant Secretary for the Environment (ASEV) to EPA as part of a larger ($14 million) program shift. In FY 1980, EPA transfer monies to ORNL were $2.4 million. In addi tion, more than $2 million have been made available to ORNL annually as part of a Federal Interagency Pass-Through Program, for which EPA has manage ment responsibility. Generally, these sponsors have proved to be stable, reliable sources of funding. The work undertaken for other non-DOE sponsors comple ments DOE programs and consequently offers signifi cant benefit to DOE as well as institutional and pro grammatic flexibility to the Laboratory as a whole. Of course, each such program must be approved directly by DOE as being an appropriate activity for the Laboratory to undertake. Overall, planning projections for non-DOE-sponsored work show research remain PERCENTAGE OF LABORATORY 20 OPERATING FUNDS FISCAL YEAR Laboratory Trends and Future Development 9 ing near 20% of direct manpower over the entire planning period. Subcontracting and Procurement One of the two major extramural expenditures is sub contracting; the other is procurement. As Fig. 7 shows, a very substantial growth in extramural expenditure has occurred since DOE authorized the Laboratory to increase subcontracting in 1974. Some future decrease in extramural expenditures is pro jected as a result of expected declines in several pro grammatic areas. Lead Missions Over the last several years, the Oak Ridge Operations (ORO) and ORNL have been given major technical management roles in a number of DOE programs. These lead missions (Table 1) utilize ORNL's special technical and managerial skills in execution of these important program areas. ORNL-OWG 81 21148 . *6r. 7. Percentages of Labora tory operating funds used for subcon tracting and procurement. The numerical values given above the bars indicate the percentage of total expenditure that was, or is projected to be, provided to minority or disad- vantaged contractors.
Page 1 and 2: OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY UNION
Page 3 and 4: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Insti
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS Director's Overvi
Page 7: DIRECTOR'S OVERVIEW
Page 10 and 11: Director's Overview • to look con
Page 13 and 14: LABORATORY TRENDS AND FUTURE DEVELO
Page 15 and 16: A specialized collection of equipme
Page 17: fossil, and conservation) and a str
Page 21: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES
Page 24 and 25: 14 Oak Ridge National Laboratory In
Page 30 and 31: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Insti
Page 51 and 52: PERSONNEL RESOURCES ORNL, one of th
Page 53: SITE AND FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT
Page 67 and 68: APPENDIX RESOURCE PROJECTIONS Note:
Page 69 and 70:
AT05 Applied Plasma Physics Interna
Page 71 and 72:
HB Life Sciences Res Internal opera
Page 73 and 74:
KC03 Chemical Sciences Internal ope
Page 75 and 76:
AE Advanced Nuclear Systems Interna
Page 77 and 78:
FY : L981 BA BO AG Conventional Rea
Page 79 and 80:
Assistant Secretarial Office Nuclea
Page 81 and 82:
AA85 Surface Coal Gasification Inte
Page 83 and 84:
CHOS Program Management Internal op
Page 85 and 86:
FY 1981 BA BO AMIS Hydrothermal Ind
Page 87 and 88:
EC02 Appliance Standards Internal o
Page 90:
PY BA 1981 BO EG05 Energy Conversio
Page 93 and 94:
FY 1981 BA BO Assistant Secretarial
Page 95 and 96:
m a *> o 0)0 0 01 *> Of u c u MB<
Page 97 and 98:
py 1981 BA BO LA01 Technical Inform
Page 100 and 101:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inter
Page 104:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Insti
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
104 Oak Ridge National Laboratory I
Page 116:
706 Oak Ridge Nalional Laboratory I
Page 119 and 120:
Program-related projects FY 1981 an
Page 122:
Cooling Water Facilities Restoratio
Page 126 and 127:
116 Oak Ridge National Laboratory I
Page 128:
Acknowledgments The Program Plannin
show all

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Institutional Plan: FY 1982-1987

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?