Indian Film Culture - 16.cdr - federation of film societies of india
Indian Film Culture - 16.cdr - federation of film societies of india
Indian Film Culture - 16.cdr - federation of film societies of india
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In Devi we meet Soumitra Chatterjee again, by<br />
now already an embodiment <strong>of</strong> Bengali youth <strong>of</strong><br />
a certain period and type both <strong>of</strong> which are<br />
distinctly derived from Tagore. Already in Devi<br />
the weakness <strong>of</strong> character has become apparent:<br />
he is thinker more than a man <strong>of</strong> action, a bit <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Hamlet. He has read Mill and Bentham and<br />
disapproves <strong>of</strong> his father's superstitious visions,<br />
but he is not strong enough to withstand the<br />
pressures <strong>of</strong> tradition or repudiate what he<br />
considers to be the evils <strong>of</strong> ignorance. In his<br />
political thinking Tagore eschewed both the<br />
violence <strong>of</strong> the terrorist and the shrewdly<br />
practical non-violence <strong>of</strong> Gandhi; but he<br />
provided inspiration towards the general ideals<br />
<strong>of</strong> patriotism which is not narrow, individualism<br />
which is not intolerant. Ray's heroes also<br />
represent a noble philosophical outlook, but are<br />
not men <strong>of</strong> action on the plane <strong>of</strong> reality.<br />
By the time <strong>of</strong> Charulata, Soumitra Chatterjee<br />
has evolved further from his earlier, Tagorean<br />
base. The Mill and Bentham reading character<br />
(inspired by Ram Mohan Roy, a 19th century<br />
social reformer <strong>of</strong>ten described as the 'father <strong>of</strong><br />
modern India') now belongs to the older<br />
generation, and is embodied in the bearded,<br />
princenez-sporting Bhupati with his affluent<br />
idealism. Amal (Chatterjee) himself stands<br />
between the pure Tagore and what is to come<br />
after. But he too is devoid <strong>of</strong> cynicism, on the<br />
9<br />
Charulata<br />
whole unselfconscious, and capable <strong>of</strong> moral<br />
action, in going away when he realizes that he is<br />
about to betray his brother. Of what is to come<br />
after, we see rather more in Kapurush: the<br />
'Ravindrik' (Tagorean) generation has finally<br />
revealed his failure in the weak- minded slightly<br />
parasitic intellectual ( a <strong>film</strong> writer), who is no<br />
longer made a coward by his conscious but by<br />
sheer lack <strong>of</strong> courage.<br />
In the series <strong>of</strong> <strong>film</strong>s – the trilogy, Devi, Samapti,<br />
Charulata and Kapurush – the Ray hero has<br />
emerged in a straight line from the Tagore mould<br />
<strong>of</strong> protected innocence into the contemporary<br />
world, only to find himself inadequate to<br />
contend with it. The type <strong>of</strong> hero represented by<br />
Soumitra chatterjee in various Ray <strong>film</strong>s is no<br />
longer noble in his motives and irresolute in his<br />
actions: In Kapurush he is weak without being<br />
noble. But this is an end which is surely not<br />
untypical <strong>of</strong> the romantic Bengali youth brought<br />
up under the Tagore umbrella. They have<br />
become cynical under the disillusionment in<br />
Independent India. Their past idealism has<br />
become a drag on them and has made them<br />
unable to cope with a society where, whether we<br />
like it or not, the law <strong>of</strong> the jungle has acquired<br />
some currency. But even the evolution never<br />
takes him to its furthest limits, limits which<br />
Tagore himself had explored.<br />
June 2012<br />
Abhijan<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>