22.02.2013 Views

Intentions and Results: A Look Back at the Adoption ... - Urban Institute

Intentions and Results: A Look Back at the Adoption ... - Urban Institute

Intentions and Results: A Look Back at the Adoption ... - Urban Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Eighteen st<strong>at</strong>es provided d<strong>at</strong>a on dissolutions in 1999 <strong>and</strong> 20<br />

provided this d<strong>at</strong>a in 2000. Twenty one st<strong>at</strong>es provided d<strong>at</strong>a on<br />

adopted children who returned to foster care in 1999 <strong>and</strong> 23<br />

provided this d<strong>at</strong>a in 2000.<br />

11 D<strong>at</strong>a are not available for 2002 due to a change in <strong>the</strong> NCANDS<br />

reporting period from a calendar year to a fiscal year in 2003<br />

th<strong>at</strong> resulted in a change in <strong>the</strong> specific<strong>at</strong>ion of this measure.<br />

12 For example, <strong>the</strong> 2000 <strong>and</strong> 2001 Child Welfare Outcomes Report<br />

measured “<strong>the</strong> percentage of re-entries into foster care within<br />

12 months of discharge from a prior foster care episode” <strong>and</strong><br />

noted n<strong>at</strong>ional medians of 10.3 percent <strong>and</strong> 10.0, respectively.<br />

In 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2005, <strong>the</strong> Child Welfare Outcomes Report (2002-<br />

2005) documented “of all children who were discharged from<br />

foster care to reunific<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>the</strong> 12-month period prior to <strong>the</strong><br />

target fiscal year, wh<strong>at</strong> percentage re-entered foster care in less<br />

than 12 months from <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>e of discharge.” They noted a r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

of 15.2 percent in 2004 <strong>and</strong> 14.8 percent in 2005.<br />

References<br />

Barth, Richard P. 1997. “Effects of Age <strong>and</strong> Race on <strong>the</strong> Odds of<br />

<strong>Adoption</strong> versus Remaining in Long-Term Out-of-Home Care.”<br />

Child Welfare League of America LXXVI: 2, 285-308.<br />

Barth, Richard, P. 2005. “Child Welfare <strong>and</strong> Race: Models of<br />

Disproportionality.” in Race M<strong>at</strong>ters in Child Welfare, eds.<br />

Dennette M. Derezotes, John Poertner, <strong>and</strong> Mark F. Testa. Child<br />

Welfare League of America Press, Washington, DC.<br />

Chinball, Susan, Dutch, Nicole M., Jones-Harden, Brenda, Brown,<br />

Annie, Gourdine, Ruby, Smith, Jacqueline, Boone, Anniglo, <strong>and</strong><br />

Shelita Snyder. (2003). Children of color in <strong>the</strong> child welfare<br />

system: Perspectives from <strong>the</strong> child welfare community.<br />

Administr<strong>at</strong>ion for Children <strong>and</strong> Families, U.S. Department of<br />

Health <strong>and</strong> Human Services.<br />

Christian, Steve. (1999). “Child Welfare Project: 1998 St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Legisl<strong>at</strong>ive Responses to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>and</strong> Safe Families Act<br />

of 1997.” N<strong>at</strong>ional Conference of St<strong>at</strong>e Legisl<strong>at</strong>ures.<br />

Courtney, Mark E., Needell, Barbara, <strong>and</strong> Fred H. Wulczyn. 2004.<br />

“Unintended consequences of <strong>the</strong> push for accountability: The<br />

case of n<strong>at</strong>ional child welfare performance st<strong>and</strong>ards.” Child<br />

<strong>and</strong> Youth Services Review 26: 1141-1154.<br />

Curtis, Carla M. <strong>and</strong> Ramona W. Denby. 2004. “Impact of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>and</strong> Safe Families Act (1997) on Families of Color:<br />

Workers Share Their Thoughts.” Families <strong>and</strong> Society 85(1):<br />

71-79.<br />

D’Andrade, Amy <strong>and</strong> Jill D. Berrick. 2006. “When Policy Meets<br />

Practice: The Untested Effects of Permanency Reforms in Child<br />

Welfare.” Journal of Sociology <strong>and</strong> Social Welfare XXXIII: 1,<br />

31-52.<br />

Hansen, Mary E. 2007. “St<strong>at</strong>e-design<strong>at</strong>ed special needs, postadoption<br />

support, <strong>and</strong> st<strong>at</strong>e fiscal stress.” Children <strong>and</strong> Youth<br />

Services Review 29(11): 1411-1425.<br />

Hansen, Mary E. <strong>and</strong> Rita J. Simon. 2004. “Transracial Placements<br />

in <strong>Adoption</strong>s with Public Agency Involvement: Wh<strong>at</strong> Can We<br />

Learn from <strong>the</strong> AFCARS D<strong>at</strong>a?” <strong>Adoption</strong> Quarterly 8(2): 45-56.<br />

FRAMEWORK PAPER: THE ADOPTION AND SAFE FAMILIES ACT (ASFA) �PAGE 33<br />

Hill, Robert B. 2006. Syn<strong>the</strong>sis of Research on Disproportionality in<br />

Child Welfare: An Upd<strong>at</strong>e. Casey Family Programs.<br />

Jantz, Amy, Geen, Rob, Bess, Roseana, Andrews, Cynthia, <strong>and</strong><br />

Victoria Russell. 2002. The Continuing Evolution of St<strong>at</strong>e Kinship<br />

Care Policies. Washington, DC: The <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>. Assessing<br />

<strong>the</strong> New Federalism Discussion Paper.<br />

Main, Regan, Macomber, Jennifer E. <strong>and</strong> Rob Geen. 2006. “Trends<br />

in Service Receipt: Children in Kinship Care Gaining Ground.”<br />

Washington, DC: The <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>. New Federalism: N<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

Survey of America’s Families Brief B-68.<br />

McDonald, Tom, Press, Alan, Billings, Peggy, <strong>and</strong> Terry Moore. 2007.<br />

“Partitioning <strong>the</strong> <strong>Adoption</strong> Process to Better Predict<br />

Permanency.” Child Welfare League of America 86: 3, 5-32.<br />

Leos-Urbel, Jacob, Bess, Roseana, <strong>and</strong> Rob Geen. 2002. “The<br />

Evolution of Federal <strong>and</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e Policies for Assessing <strong>and</strong><br />

Supporting Kinship Caregivers.” Children <strong>and</strong> Youth Services<br />

Review 24: 1, 37-52.<br />

Mitchell, Lorelei B., Barth, Richard P., Green, Rebecca, Wall, Ariana,<br />

Biemer, Paul, Berrick, Jill D., Webb, Mary B., <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

Survey of Child <strong>and</strong> Adolescent Well-Being Research Group.<br />

2005. “Child Welfare Reform in <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es: Findings from<br />

a Local Agency Survey.” Child Welfare League of America<br />

LXXXIV: 1, 5-24.<br />

Olen, Helaine. 2008. “Dodging ASFA’s Hammer.” Child Welfare<br />

W<strong>at</strong>ch 15: 14-17.<br />

Rockhill, Anna, Green, Beth L., <strong>and</strong> Carrie Furrer. 2007. “Is <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>and</strong> Safe Families Act Influencing Child Welfare<br />

Outcomes for Families with Substance Abuse Issues?” Child<br />

Maltre<strong>at</strong>ment 12: 1, 7-19.<br />

Sen<strong>at</strong>or DeWine (OH). “<strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>and</strong> Safe Families Act of 1997.”<br />

Congressional Record 143 (November 13, 1997) p. S12669.<br />

Sen<strong>at</strong>or Rockefeller (WV). “<strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>and</strong> Safe Families Act of<br />

1997.” Congressional Record 143 (November 13, 1997)<br />

p. S12671.<br />

Smith, Barbara E., Elstein, Sharon G., <strong>and</strong> Eva J. Klain. 2005.<br />

“Parental Substance Abuse, Child Protection <strong>and</strong> ASFA:<br />

Implic<strong>at</strong>ion for Policy Makers <strong>and</strong> Practitioners.” Substance Abuse<br />

Policy Research Program ID #048783, American Bar Associ<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Smith, Susan L., Howard, Jeanne A., Garnier, Phillip C., <strong>and</strong> Scott D.<br />

Ryan. 2006. “Where Are We Now?: A Post-ASFA Examin<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

<strong>Adoption</strong> Disruption.” <strong>Adoption</strong> Quarterly 9(4): 19-44.<br />

U.S. Congress. 1997. “<strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>and</strong> Safe Families Act of 1997”<br />

Pub. L. no. 105-89. 105th Cong., 1st sess.<br />

U.S. Department of Health <strong>and</strong> Human Services, Administr<strong>at</strong>ion for<br />

Children, Youth <strong>and</strong> Families. 1998. Child Welfare Outcomes<br />

1998: Annual Report. Washington, DC.<br />

——. 1999. Child Welfare Outcomes 1999: Annual Report.<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

——. 2000a. Child Maltre<strong>at</strong>ment 1998. Washington, DC.<br />

——. 2000b. Child Welfare Final Rule. Vol. 65, No. 16.<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

——. 2000c. Child Welfare Outcomes 2000: Annual Report.<br />

Washington, DC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!