23.02.2013 Views

Working Paper on Astrological Physiognomy: History and Sources

Working Paper on Astrological Physiognomy: History and Sources

Working Paper on Astrological Physiognomy: History and Sources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Working</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Paper</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Astrological</strong> <strong>Physiognomy</strong>: <strong>History</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sources</strong><br />

A sec<strong>on</strong>d model for making age-based adjustments to physical appearance is based <strong>on</strong><br />

dynamic changes to the Ascendant measured by the Directing through the Bounds procedure<br />

(e.g., “circumambulati<strong>on</strong>s”). One example is US President Theodore Roosevelt whose physique<br />

underwent a dramatic transformati<strong>on</strong> from a thin <strong>and</strong> gangly ‘Gemini’ physique to a full-bodied<br />

‘Cancer’ physique when the directed Ascendant moved from Gemini to Cancer. 14<br />

At left, Theodore Roosevelt, directed Ascendant = 28GE08’00” <strong>on</strong> 11 th birthday.<br />

At right, Theodore Roosevelt, directed Ascendant = 6LE32’35” 37 th birthday.<br />

Notice the prominent lower jaw <strong>and</strong> the fullness of the face in adulthood compared to youth.<br />

Variability in physical appearance over a lifetime also appears dependent <strong>on</strong> the modality of<br />

the Ascendant sign (e.g., placement in cardinal, fixed, or mutable signs). Just as authors make<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> between modality <strong>and</strong> manners, there is no reas<strong>on</strong> why the same c<strong>on</strong>cept cannot<br />

be applied to physical appearance. 15 Modality of the Ascendant sign appears to impart the range<br />

of variability as a first order c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>. My own findings suggest fixed rising signs are very<br />

resilient to change; cardinal rising signs change somewhat, <strong>and</strong> mutable rising signs are subject<br />

to the greatest modificati<strong>on</strong>s of physical appearance. If so, then Ascendant sign modality should<br />

be c<strong>on</strong>sidered prior to either temperament or dynamic Ascendant models when making agebased<br />

adjustments to physiognomy judgments.<br />

14 A Rectificati<strong>on</strong> Manual: The American Presidency, Regulus Astrology LLC, third editi<strong>on</strong>, 2009, p. 129.<br />

15 See for instance M<strong>on</strong>tulmo’s discussi<strong>on</strong> of manners: “But if any of the aforesaid significators should be in fixed<br />

signs, the native will c<strong>on</strong>stant in purpose, firm in his own opini<strong>on</strong>s, sincere, not false.” M<strong>on</strong>tulmo c<strong>on</strong>nects the<br />

fixed modality of sign placements for significators of manners with a fixed/c<strong>on</strong>stant mental style. Ant<strong>on</strong>ius de<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tulmo, On the Judgment of Nativities, Part 2, trans R. H<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> ed. R Schmidt, Project Hindsight, Latin Track,<br />

Vol XII, Berkeley Springs, Wv.: Golden Hind Press, 1995, p. 47.<br />

©Regulus Astrology LLC, 2010. All Rights Reserved.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!