24.02.2013 Views

March / April 2007 - Sacramento County Bar Association

March / April 2007 - Sacramento County Bar Association

March / April 2007 - Sacramento County Bar Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Retirement<br />

Preparing For Life<br />

After Law<br />

By Kim-An Hernandez and Dennis C. Huie<br />

Asthe<br />

baby boom generation enters the sexagenarian<br />

era, so too burgeons a retirement revolution.<br />

In the decade to come more than 75 million Americans will<br />

pack up their offices and cash in their 401ks. Statistics suggest<br />

that as many as 40,000 lawyers will enter retirement annually.<br />

Here, we discuss some simple yet important issues every retiring<br />

attorney should think about before taking the final plunge.<br />

Your “degree” of retirement. The State <strong>Bar</strong> offers attorneys<br />

three retirement options: (1) resignation; (2) inactive status; or<br />

(3) continued active membership. Retirees eager to exit the<br />

practice of law and relieve themselves of annual dues and<br />

MCLE credits will find resignation a good fit. The retiree can<br />

stay involved in other ways such as acting as a marketing consultant.<br />

Increasingly, firms are employing their former partners<br />

with valuable client contacts in this capacity.<br />

Alternatively, inactive membership may be needed if an attorney<br />

hopes to stay more involved in a non-counsel capacity as,<br />

for example, a referee, hearing officer, court commissioner,<br />

temporary judge, arbitrator or mediator.<br />

Concern about future claims? The retiring attorney may<br />

find solace in Labor Code § 2802 and/or Corporations Code<br />

§ 317 (corporate employees). Both statutes require indemnification<br />

for conduct occurring within the course and scope of<br />

employment or arising out of corporate acts. However, these<br />

statutes are not risk-free. For example, there is no express<br />

coverage for former employees under Labor Code § 2802,<br />

though courts have assumed the statute applies to former<br />

employees. In addition, a retiree may be forced to pay for<br />

defense costs unless and until he or she succeeds in defending<br />

the claim. As a safety net, especially for non-employee<br />

attorneys (i.e., partners), professional liability insurance<br />

should be considered. Because professional liability insurance<br />

plans are typically written on a “claims made” basis, covering<br />

only claims made during the policy period, retiring<br />

attorneys should consider purchasing extended liability tail<br />

insurance to protect them come retirement.<br />

What to do with your practice? Retirees must also decide<br />

how best to dispose of their existing practice. One option is to<br />

sell the practice under Professional Conduct Rule 2-300. Where<br />

the sale contemplates the transfer of responsibility for work not<br />

yet completed or client files, the attorney must provide clients<br />

with 90 day written notice of the transfer and of their right to<br />

retain other counsel and collect their files. Note that Rule 2-300<br />

is not intended to authorize the piecemeal sale of a practice.<br />

Transfer of individual client matters, where permitted, is governed<br />

separately by Rule 2-200.<br />

How do you handle client files? File retention following<br />

a transfer of interest or dissolution is a subject of much<br />

debate among California ethics authorities. Financial and/or<br />

practical considerations may make extended retention difficult.<br />

Retention practices are further complicated by documents<br />

such as wills, testaments, contracts and deeds which<br />

are separately protected and may be indestructible even under<br />

sound policy. Consulting with an ethics lawyer before<br />

destroying documents is key.<br />

Kim-An Hernandez, a graduate of Vanderbilt University Law School,<br />

represents management in labor and employment litigation throughout<br />

California and is an associate with the Employment Law Department<br />

of Hanna, Brophy, MacLean, McAleer & Jensen, LLP.<br />

Dennis Huie, a graduate of University of Pacific, McGeorge School of<br />

Law, represents management in labor and employment litigation<br />

throughout California and supervises the Employment Law Department<br />

for Hanna, Brophy, MacLean, McAleer & Jensen, LLP.<br />

■ MARCH/APRIL <strong>2007</strong> SACRAMENTO LAWYER<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!