25.02.2013 Views

Corporate social responsability and loyalty in services sector - Esic

Corporate social responsability and loyalty in services sector - Esic

Corporate social responsability and loyalty in services sector - Esic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210 11<br />

Figure 2. Model of <strong>loyalty</strong><br />

[210]<br />

Ethical-Legal Social<br />

0.91<br />

0.81<br />

corporate <strong>social</strong> <strong>responsability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>loyalty</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>services</strong> <strong>sector</strong><br />

Technique Q.<br />

0.81<br />

0.64<br />

Functional Q. Perceived Q.<br />

0.77<br />

Commercial<br />

Responsibility<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> Social<br />

Responsibility Loyalty<br />

0.65<br />

Global Image<br />

0.37<br />

0.74<br />

Switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

costs<br />

Social <strong>and</strong> commercial responsibilities are regarded as direct determ<strong>in</strong>ants<br />

of the overall evaluation of the company, <strong>and</strong> therefore, as hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

direct <strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>loyalty</strong>. With respect to this, it is proven that commercial<br />

responsibility is the ma<strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ant of image (hypothesis 4 is not<br />

refuted), while <strong>social</strong>ly responsible behaviour has no significant effect.<br />

Although <strong>in</strong> experimental studies the relationship did appear to be significant,<br />

it seems that when tak<strong>in</strong>g direct knowledge <strong>and</strong> evaluation measures<br />

the output varies. This result leads us to reject hypothesis 5. Thus, users let<br />

themselves be guided by their direct experiences with the service when<br />

called upon to evaluate a company, while <strong>social</strong> responsibility plays a secondary<br />

role. Perhaps this is due, as Mohr <strong>and</strong> Webb (2005) prove, to<br />

image be<strong>in</strong>g more affected by receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation about negative practices<br />

than about positive ones, i.e., consumers react very negatively to<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation over irresponsible practice, while they are less sensitive to positive<br />

messages (Sen <strong>and</strong> Battacharya, 2001).<br />

0.40<br />

0.16<br />

Hypothesis supported<br />

Hypothesis not supported<br />

january · april 2011 · esic market

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!