Amir Saad Thesis final revision 03x - IUPUI

32
The largest maximum marginal gap seen was in Group FR (82 µm) followed
by group MR (77 µm) and group CP (37 µm). The largest minimum marginal gap
seen was in group FR (9 µm) followed by group CP (5 µm) and group MR (4 µm).
Groups CP had a significantly smaller pre-loading marginal gap than groups
FR (p = 0.0265) and MR (p = 0.0273), while both groups FR and MR did not have a
significantly different pre-loading marginal gap (p = 0.86).
FATIGUE LOADING – FACIAL MARGINAL
GAP AFTER TESTING (Table V)
Group MR had the largest (40.1 µm) facial marginal gap mean followed by
group CP (30 µm) and group FR (23 µm). Group MR had the highest (38.7 µm) facial
marginal gap standard deviation followed by group FR (22.2 µm) and group CP (10.1
µm). The standard error was highest in group MR (14.6 µm) followed by group FR
(7.0 µm) and group CP (4.1 µm).
The largest maximum marginal gap seen was in Group MR (121 µm) followed
by group FR (83 µm) and group CP (36 µm). The largest minimum marginal gap seen
was in group CP (10 µm) followed by group FR (6 µm) and group MR (5 µm).
FATIGUE LOADING – FACIAL MARGINAL GAP CHANGE (Table V)
Group CP had the highest (16.3 µm) facial marginal gap mean followed by
group MR (9.7 µm) and group FR (-3.5 µm). Group MR had the highest (16.2 µm)
standard deviation followed by group CP (16.1 µm) and group FR (6.8 µm). The
standard error was highest in group CP (6.6 µm) followed by group MR (6.1 µm) and
group FR (2.2 µm).
Group MR had the highest (44 µm) maximum facial marginal gap change
followed by group CP (31 µm) and group FR (8 µm). Group MR had the highest (-18