- Page 1 and 2: EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE O
- Page 3 and 4: iii DEDICATION
- Page 5 and 6: v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- Page 7: vii Prosthodontics department lab,
- Page 11 and 12: TABLE I TABLE II TABLE III TABLE IV
- Page 13 and 14: 1 INTRODUCTION
- Page 15 and 16: 3 Fiber posts with a more natural c
- Page 17 and 18: HISTORY 5 Root canal treatment date
- Page 19 and 20: 7 Although vital dentin is 3.5-perc
- Page 21 and 22: ROOT LENGTH 9 Root length plays a s
- Page 23 and 24: POSTS 11 The main purpose of a post
- Page 25 and 26: 13 philosophies in treating nonvita
- Page 27 and 28: evaluated various prefabricated pos
- Page 29 and 30: 17 posts 151-153 such as ceramic po
- Page 31 and 32: 19 MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Page 33 and 34: 21 axis of each tooth at a speed of
- Page 35 and 36: will be 21.5 mm. Posts and cores we
- Page 37 and 38: expansion. 165, 166 The lingual thi
- Page 39 and 40: LOAD TO FAILURE 27 For each group,
- Page 41 and 42: 29 RESULTS
- Page 43 and 44: MOMENT OF INERTIA AT FRACTURE SITE
- Page 45 and 46: 33 µm) minimum facial marginal gap
- Page 47 and 48: 35 FATIGUE LOADING - FACIAL AND LIN
- Page 49 and 50: 37 TABLES AND FIGURES
- Page 51 and 52: 39 TABLE II Type of post systems, n
- Page 53 and 54: 41 TABLE IV Moment of inertia (mm 4
- Page 55 and 56: 43 TABLE VI Lingual marginal gap (
- Page 57 and 58: 9.5 mm 2 mm 9 mm 5 mm 1 mm FIGURE 1
- Page 59 and 60:
9.5 mm 2 mm 9 mm 5 mm 1 mm FIGURE 3
- Page 61 and 62:
9.5 mm 2 mm 9 mm 5 mm 1 mm FIGURE 5
- Page 63 and 64:
Direction of force 51 45° Cross he
- Page 65 and 66:
53 Marginal gap opening FIGURE 9. F
- Page 67 and 68:
55 FIGURE 11. Template for teeth re
- Page 69 and 70:
57 FIGURE 13. MTS Bionix 858 Test S
- Page 71 and 72:
59 FIGURE 15. MTS Bionix 858 Test S
- Page 73 and 74:
61 FIGURE 17. Specimen #29 demonstr
- Page 75 and 76:
63 FIGURE 19. Load-to-failure sampl
- Page 77 and 78:
65 DISCUSSION
- Page 79 and 80:
67 post and cores yielded the best
- Page 81 and 82:
TITANIUM POSTS 69 All fractures obs
- Page 83 and 84:
71 types of leakage seen were eithe
- Page 85 and 86:
core technique, because it demonstr
- Page 87 and 88:
75 There was no significant differe
- Page 89 and 90:
1. Ring, ME. Dentistry, an illustra
- Page 91 and 92:
30. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et a
- Page 93 and 94:
57. Chupein TF. Pennsylvania associ
- Page 95 and 96:
83 87. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, He
- Page 97 and 98:
115. Camp LR, Todd MJ. The effect o
- Page 99 and 100:
146. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Baharav H,
- Page 101 and 102:
176. Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke, M, Va
- Page 103 and 104:
91 APPENDIXES
- Page 105 and 106:
93 APPENDIX II Group FR individual
- Page 107 and 108:
95 APPENDIX IV Individual load-to-f
- Page 109 and 110:
97 APPENDIX VI Group FR moment of i
- Page 111 and 112:
99 ABSTRACT
- Page 113 and 114:
101 All teeth were obturated and pr
- Page 115 and 116:
CURRICULUM VITAE