27.02.2013 Views

Dreaming in Books - uncopy

Dreaming in Books - uncopy

Dreaming in Books - uncopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bibliographic Subjects / 5<br />

dollars a year is spent hous<strong>in</strong>g and mak<strong>in</strong>g books available to the public. 22<br />

In the face of such numbers, to say that the book is dead seems absurd. At<br />

the same time that books cont<strong>in</strong>ue to enjoy an enormously broad public<br />

appeal, they have also reta<strong>in</strong>ed an important ritualistic private function.<br />

Whether for birthdays, schooldays, holidays, or tenure, we still count time<br />

with books. We are, <strong>in</strong> this sense, still very much a bibliographic “culture.” In<br />

writ<strong>in</strong>g a history of the bibliographic imag<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the romantic age, I am<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g the communicative foundations upon which<br />

our contemporary culture is based and to which my own book is <strong>in</strong>tegrally<br />

related. In self- refl exive terms, it is the attempt to ask why we cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />

feel such urgency, whether personally or <strong>in</strong>stitutionally, to write books.<br />

But this book is not just concerned with the emergence dur<strong>in</strong>g the romantic<br />

period of a set of values that cont<strong>in</strong>ue to surround how we use and<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k about books today. It also attempts to recover very different imag<strong>in</strong>aries<br />

of how books worked and what books did <strong>in</strong> the past. It not only<br />

engages narratives of the book’s end but also those of the book’s “rise” or<br />

“com<strong>in</strong>g” as well. Despite much of the triumphalism and universalism that<br />

surrounds rise- of- the- book narratives—that all bibliographic cultures and<br />

ages are the same—one of the aims of this book is to follow the work of<br />

recent book historians such as Robert Darnton, Adrian Johns, Stephan Füssel,<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>hart Wittmann, and Roger Chartier to help us see how the pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

book was a far more richly imag<strong>in</strong>ed and far more diversely used media<br />

object than we have traditionally assumed. Our understand<strong>in</strong>g of the book<br />

has undergone a tremendous narrow<strong>in</strong>g over time that this book hopes to<br />

correct. As media historian Jonathan Sterne has written, “To study technologies<br />

<strong>in</strong> any mean<strong>in</strong>gful sense requires a rich sense of their connection<br />

with human practice, habitat, and habit. It requires attention to the fi elds of<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed cultural, social, and physical activity—what other authors have<br />

called networks or assemblages—from which technologies emerge and of<br />

which they are part.” 23<br />

While books had by the turn of the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century been a constant<br />

of Western cultural life for over 1,500 years, 24 what was new around 1800<br />

was the imm<strong>in</strong>ent sense of too- muchness that surrounded the pr<strong>in</strong>ted book.<br />

It was precisely this notion of the surplus of books that lent the book its<br />

cosmological identity <strong>in</strong> the romantic age—that it was both everywhere and<br />

could conta<strong>in</strong> everyth<strong>in</strong>g—and simultaneously made a unifi ed response to<br />

such a problem <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly diffi cult. 25 The book, like the society it helped<br />

refl ect back to itself, was <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly marked by a key element of heterogeneity,<br />

as different book formats and literary genres were mobilized to<br />

regulate the grow<strong>in</strong>g problem of bibliographic surplus. If we can <strong>in</strong>deed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!