INDIAN LAW REPORTS - Kerala High Court
INDIAN LAW REPORTS - Kerala High Court
INDIAN LAW REPORTS - Kerala High Court
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Accused should be heard on the question of sentence before the<br />
trial court passes fresh sentence in accordance with law.<br />
Ishaque,K.P. v. RaveendranThampan I.L.R. 2010 (2) <strong>Kerala</strong> .. 416<br />
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974)—Section<br />
386(e)— Clause (e) of Section 386 does not confer any jurisdiction<br />
on criminal courts to pass orders not contemplated under clauses<br />
(a) to (d)—Clause (e) only clothes the criminal appellate court to<br />
pass such consequential or incidental orders in the interest of<br />
justice, after passing orders of the type contemplated under clauses<br />
(a) to (d).<br />
Ishaque, K. P. v. RaveendranThampan I.L.R. 2010 (2) <strong>Kerala</strong> .. 416<br />
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974)—Sections 397<br />
and 401— Revisional jurisdiction must be understood and<br />
interpreted in the widest possible manner, so as to ensure that<br />
injustice is avoided and justice prevails— Wherever<br />
injustice/impropriety results from the procedure adopted by the<br />
subordinate courts, the revisional court can intervene to invoke its<br />
revisional powers to ensure that justice is done.<br />
Ishaque, K. P. v. Raveendran Thampan I.L.R. 2010 (2) <strong>Kerala</strong> .. 416<br />
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974)—Section 438—<br />
The necessary facts, not borne out by the FIR, remand report and case<br />
diary, on the basis of which the petitioner in a Bail Application desires<br />
the court to grant relief, should be stated by him in the application.<br />
Dr. K. A. Koshy v. State of <strong>Kerala</strong> I.L.R. 2010 (2) <strong>Kerala</strong> .. 481<br />
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974)—Section 438—<br />
Application for anticipatory bail is maintainable even in cases where<br />
the accused are sought to be arrested in execution of a non-bailable<br />
warrant issued by the <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
Dr. K. A. Koshy v. State of <strong>Kerala</strong> I.L.R. 2010 (2) <strong>Kerala</strong> .. 481<br />
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974)—Section 438—<br />
Application for anticipatory bail with respect to an offence alleged to<br />
have been committed in Punjab—<strong>Kerala</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>Court</strong> has jurisdiction<br />
to entertain the bail application and grant appropriate relief.<br />
Dr. K. A. Koshy v. State of <strong>Kerala</strong> I.L.R. 2010 (2) <strong>Kerala</strong> .. 481<br />
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974)—Section 397(2)—<br />
The bar of revision under Section 397(2) is only in relation to any<br />
interlocutory order passed in an appeal, inquiry, trial or other<br />
proceeding pending before an inferior criminal court—An order<br />
granting bail during crime stage would not attract the bar under<br />
Section 397(2).<br />
Prasad Jacob v. State of <strong>Kerala</strong> I.L.R. 2010 (2) <strong>Kerala</strong> .. 633
Change language