Cover - Viva Lewes
Cover - Viva Lewes
Cover - Viva Lewes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bully Art & Beware About<br />
What’s on in <strong>Lewes</strong>’ Galleries this month (cont)<br />
Our cover artist Peter Messer<br />
will joining 40 or so others in an<br />
Bullying exciting is exhibition a form of in organisational the Star violence and, if<br />
not Gallery dealt with (Castle properly, Ditch a signifi Lane) cant source of workrelated<br />
which runs stress from which October reportedly 30th affects one in six<br />
people to November in the UK. 17th. It can take Curator many different forms,<br />
from Hayley actual Mills physical has close violence links with and threats of violence<br />
- India, to name and calling, she devised sarcasm the and show teasing.<br />
having fallen in love with Indian<br />
In miniature addition art. to the She cost decided to individuals’ to health and<br />
well invite being a number the economic of artists cost she is has likewise substantial:<br />
bullying contact with, costs employers from Sussex 80 and million working days<br />
and from up London to £2 billion as well in lost as revenue select every year.<br />
graduates from the University<br />
Employers of Brighton, would to produce be wise to original take this issue<br />
seriously, art works particularly for the show, in light which of is a recent case which<br />
has entitled arguably ‘Stardust’. made The it easier only for limits<br />
employees she gave them who was have that been the bullied works at work to claim<br />
compensation.<br />
had to be slightly smaller than<br />
A4 size. As well as Peter Messer,<br />
The artists case such confi as Marguerite rmed that employers Horner, are strictly liable<br />
for Hamish workplace Black, bullying Harold Mockford, and harassment even if they<br />
are Tom not Walker, themselves Julian Bell, directly Caroline responsible for it. This<br />
ruling Trant, Charles is of great Williams, signifi cance Richard and may open the<br />
fl Sorrell oodgates and to increased Charles bullying Gilvan and harassment<br />
claims. Cartwright (pictured right) will<br />
be represented. From the 25th<br />
The the gallery case concerned will also William be holding Majrowski, an NHS<br />
employee, its annual who Star brought Crafts Christmas a claim under the Protection<br />
from Show Harassment showing work Act 1997 ranging against his employer<br />
for from bullying pottery he suffered to jewellery at work via at the hands of his<br />
line metal manager. works and Majrowski trugs. (A claimed trug that he had been<br />
harassed is a medieval by his gardening line manager basket for about 18 months.<br />
His particular line manager to Sussex). was suspended and, after an internal<br />
investigation, was found to have subjected Majrowski<br />
to <strong>Lewes</strong>’ homophobic latest gallery harassment. space, Four<br />
Square Fine Arts (Mount Place)<br />
Signifi has been cantly, set up the by Act art does consultant not defi ne harassment,<br />
leaving Sonia it Crivello, open to the who courts has to vast decide the extent of its<br />
application. experience in The selling Act was at originally art fairs intended to target<br />
stalkers and has but a number has already of nationally been used against animal<br />
rights renowned activists artists and on tabloid her newspaper books campaigns.<br />
Until who she now, is victims going of to bullying, exhibit like in others who suffer<br />
stress at work, have had to prove that the employer<br />
was negligent in failing to prevent the bullying taking<br />
LEGAL ADVICE FROM WYNNE BAXTER ART<br />
WWW.VIVALEWES.COM<br />
place. The use of this legislation avoids the need to<br />
prove that the victim of the bullying behaviour has<br />
consequently developed a psychiatric illness, that the<br />
employer should have foreseen what happened and<br />
allows also has a much longer time limit for bringing<br />
claims.<br />
The claim was originally struck out because it was<br />
thought that the 1997 Act had not been designed to<br />
create another level of liability in employment law.<br />
However, this decision was subsequently overturned<br />
and the House of Lords, the UK’s supreme court,<br />
decided that the Act does cover the behaviour of<br />
employees at work and the employer can be held<br />
strictly liable even when it has not caused or failed<br />
to prevent harassment of its employees.<br />
the bright new No gallery doubt, space. this fashions decision will into have delicate-looking<br />
far-reaching<br />
She will also use implications the space for for people pots: who the clay are bullied is peppered at work with and<br />
community projects. it is now First more up, important silica which than sparkles ever for in employers, the light.<br />
an exhibition of three in consultation different with Manja employment Scott is an award-winning<br />
law specialists,<br />
artists, ‘Contrasting to ensure Elements’ that they printer properly who makes implement primitivist internal lino<br />
until the 11th November, policies to which combat cuts bullying which and recall harassment her many in years the<br />
features a ceramicist, workplace. an artist, in Africa; Sally McGill paints<br />
V<br />
and a painter. Ceramicist Sotis landscapes with a difference: they<br />
Fillipides fell in love If you with think this that you are have viewed been from affected above, by workplace abstract-<br />
country after discovering bullying a and type would looking like to and know in whether pastel shades you have of<br />
of clay in Stoke which a claim is usually or if you turquoise are an employer and blue. and V would like<br />
used for stone sculpture, advice on but implementing he anti-bullying policies please<br />
contact Zoe Lagadec or Jo Williams at Wynne<br />
Baxter on 01273 775533.<br />
49 11