02.03.2013 Views

'Tit-bits from Temperley' - Durham Bird Club

'Tit-bits from Temperley' - Durham Bird Club

'Tit-bits from Temperley' - Durham Bird Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Siskin<br />

Tit-<strong>bits</strong> <strong>from</strong> Temperley<br />

The <strong>Bird</strong>s of <strong>Durham</strong> Heritage Project<br />

‘Bringing the wildlife of the past, to the people of tomorrow’<br />

Temperley said that it was noted, “in winter in varying<br />

numbers, it has bred” and it was often associated with<br />

redpoll. The first reference to the species in the County<br />

was <strong>from</strong> the „Allan document‟ of 1791, when it was<br />

referred to as a winter visitor, though not known to breed.<br />

By the first half of the twentieth century, Temperley said, “a<br />

pair or two, occasionally remains to breed.” In ‘A History’,<br />

George Temperley documented that, Hancock (1874)<br />

reported that a nest had been „taken‟ on 7 th May 1848 near<br />

Brancepeth, it contained four eggs.<br />

Hornemann’s (Arctic) Redpoll<br />

George Temperley called this a very rare vagrant. A bird was „taken‟ on sea banks at<br />

Whitburn on 24 April 1855 with a „clod of earth‟. It had been observed for a few days<br />

before this. This was the first spring record of the species for Britain.<br />

Twite<br />

In Temperley‟s time this was an “irregular winter<br />

visitor in small numbers”. He thought that „a few<br />

pairs may still breed on western moors‟ but there<br />

were, then, no recent records. Hancock (1874)<br />

said it was not an uncommon breeder on heather<br />

moorlands in both <strong>Durham</strong> and Northumberland.<br />

Pine Grosbeak<br />

The first British record of this species was once collected at Bill Quay (in modern<br />

Gateshead) „sometime before 1835‟. It was a female-type bird, of a yellowish colour,<br />

possibly a first winter male.<br />

Crossbill<br />

Temperley said that the first reference to the species in <strong>Durham</strong> was <strong>from</strong> Hogg<br />

(1827), who recorded that a „hen bird‟ was taken sometime „before 1810‟ in a garden<br />

at Norton on Teesside. Some years later, on 14 July 1810 a male and a female were<br />

shot in a garden at the same place. Hutchinson, 1840 said, “flocks…not infrequently<br />

met with <strong>from</strong> July to September”. In July, 1828 it was said to be abundant in<br />

woodlands near Lanchester, birds were met there until the following March; a female<br />

killed there 23 rd April and three pairs said to be there on 25 th April. A family party,<br />

including young birds thought to be bred in that area were noted around this time, but<br />

no definite proof of breeding in the County was obtained until 27 years later. Thomas<br />

Grundy found the first nest in <strong>Durham</strong> on<br />

24 February 1856, at Coalburns near<br />

Greenside, in what is now west<br />

Gateshead. On 1 st March, this<br />

contained three eggs. On July 14 th<br />

1856, the same Thomas Grundy found a<br />

pair nesting at High Marley Hill.<br />

Two-barred Crossbill<br />

The first record for <strong>Durham</strong> was of a party of five at Forest Lodge, Wolsingham <strong>from</strong><br />

10 th to 28 th January 1943. They were often in the company of common crossbill,<br />

which were there throughout the winter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!