02.03.2013 Views

POSITIVE OPERATORS

POSITIVE OPERATORS

POSITIVE OPERATORS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.1. Basic Properties of Positive Operators 3<br />

consists of equivalence classes rather than functions.) It is easy to see that<br />

under the ordering f ≤ g whenever f(x) ≤ g(x) holds for µ-almost all x ∈ X,<br />

each Lp(µ) is a Riesz space.<br />

There are several useful identities that are true in a Riesz space some of<br />

which are included in the next few results.<br />

Theorem 1.3. If x, y and z are elements in a Riesz space, then:<br />

(1) x ∨ y = − (−x) ∧ (−y) <br />

and x ∧ y = − (−x) ∨ (−y) (2) x + y = x ∧ y + x ∨ y.<br />

.<br />

(3) x +(y∨ z) =(x + y) ∨ (x + z) and x +(y∧ z) =(x + y) ∧ (x + z).<br />

(4) α(x∨y) =(αx)∨(αy) and α(x∧y) =(αx)∧(αy) for all α ≥ 0.<br />

Proof. (1) From x ≤ x ∨ y and y ≤ x ∨ y we get −(x ∨ y) ≤−x and<br />

−(x ∨ y) ≤−y, andso−(x ∨ y) ≤ (−x) ∧ (−y). On the other hand, if<br />

−x ≥ z and −y ≥ z, then −z ≥ x and −z ≥ y, and hence −z ≥ x ∨ y. Thus,<br />

−(x ∨ y) ≥ z holds and this shows that −(x ∨ y) is the infimum of the set<br />

{−x, −y}. That is, (−x) ∧ (−y) =−(x ∨ y). To get the identity for x ∧ y<br />

replace x by −x and y by −y in the above proven identity.<br />

(2) From x ∧ y ≤ y it follows that y − x ∧ y ≥ 0andsox ≤ x + y − x ∧ y.<br />

Similarly, y ≤ x + y − x ∧ y. Consequently, we have x ∨ y ≤ x + y − x ∧ y<br />

or x ∧ y + x ∨ y ≤ x + y. On the other hand, from y ≤ x ∨ y we see that<br />

x + y − x ∨ y ≤ x, and similarly x + y − x ∨ y ≤ y. Thus,x + y − x ∨ y ≤ x ∧ y<br />

so that x + y ≤ x ∧ y + x ∨ y, and the desired identity follows.<br />

(3) Clearly, x + y ≤ x + y ∨ z and x + z ≤ x + y ∨ z, and therefore<br />

(x + y) ∨ (x + z) ≤ x + y ∨ z. On the other hand, we have y = −x +(x + y) ≤<br />

−x +(x + y) ∨ (x + z), and likewise z ≤−x +(x + y) ∨ (x + z), and so<br />

y ∨ z ≤−x +(x + y) ∨ (x + z). Therefore, x + y ∨ z ≤ (x + y) ∨ (x + z)<br />

also holds, and thus x + y ∨ z =(x + y) ∨ (x + z). The other identity can be<br />

proven in a similar manner.<br />

(4) Fix α>0. Clearly, (αx) ∨ (αy) ≤ α(x ∨ y). If αx ≤ z and αy ≤ z<br />

are both true, then x ≤ 1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

αz and y ≤ αz also are true, and so x ∨ y ≤ αz. This implies α(x ∨ y) ≤ z, and this shows that α(x ∨ y) is the supremum of<br />

the set {αx, αy}. Therefore, (αx) ∨ (αy) =α(x ∨ y). The other identity can<br />

be proven similarly.<br />

The reader can establish in a similar manner the following general versions<br />

of the preceding formulas in (1), (3), and (4). If A is a nonempty<br />

subset of a Riesz space for which sup A exists, then:<br />

(a) The infimum of the set −A := {−a: a ∈ A} exists and<br />

inf(−A) =− sup A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!