Ultrasonic Shot Peening - MTU Aero Engines
Ultrasonic Shot Peening - MTU Aero Engines
Ultrasonic Shot Peening - MTU Aero Engines
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
R-18114 0901A00907<br />
Figure 13:<br />
unpeened<br />
Paper_ICSP11.doc<br />
Figure 14: USP<br />
surface failure<br />
R-18288 0904A00636<br />
Figure 15: USP<br />
subsurface failure<br />
R-18288 0904A00646<br />
Figure 16: conv. shot<br />
peened<br />
R-18244 0903A02651<br />
HCF Fatigue Life – Comparison of glass peening and ultrasonic shot peening<br />
<strong>Shot</strong> peening of Ti64 gives similar HCF life for Figure 17. HCF Test results Ti64.<br />
conventional glass peening and <strong>Ultrasonic</strong><br />
RT; 600MPa, R=0<br />
shot peening. In case of <strong>Ultrasonic</strong> shot<br />
<strong>Ultrasonic</strong> shot peened 0,27N<br />
peening with a high Almen intensity value, the<br />
<strong>Ultrasonic</strong> shot peened 0,18N<br />
conventional glass peened 0.27N<br />
scatter can be reduced.<br />
conventional glass peened 0,18N<br />
Compared to the unpeened surface condition,<br />
unpeened<br />
all tested peening processes and Almen<br />
intensities show an increase of the HCF life<br />
about one magnitude.<br />
SEM investigations indicate surface failures<br />
for the unpeened condition and subsurface<br />
failures for all peened specimens (Figure 18,<br />
19, 20).<br />
R-16691 0608A02861<br />
Figure 18:<br />
unpeened<br />
peening parameter<br />
Figure 19: conv.<br />
glass peened<br />
R-16383-16385 0603A02279<br />
<strong>Shot</strong> peening of Ti6246 also leads to similar<br />
resulting HCF life for conventional glass<br />
peening and <strong>Ultrasonic</strong> shot peening.<br />
Compared to the unpeened surface condition<br />
specimens peened with the higher Almen<br />
intensity show a slightly improved HCF life<br />
whereas peening with low Almen intensity<br />
leads to HCF life which is more or less<br />
comparable to unpeened surfaces (Figure<br />
21).<br />
SEM investigations indicate surface failures<br />
for the unpeened condition and subsurface<br />
failures for all peened specimens (Figure 22,<br />
23, 24).<br />
peening parameter<br />
1,E+04 1,E+05 1,E+06 1,E+07<br />
cycles<br />
Figure 20: <strong>Ultrasonic</strong><br />
shot peened<br />
R-16525 0605A02960<br />
Figure 21. HCF Test results Ti6246.<br />
<strong>Ultrasonic</strong> shot peened 0.27N<br />
<strong>Ultrasonic</strong> shot peened 0.18N<br />
conventionell glass 0.27N<br />
conventionall glass 0.18N<br />
unpeened<br />
RT, 800MPa, R=0<br />
1,E+05 1,E+06 1,E+07<br />
cycles to failure