05.03.2013 Views

Photorefractive Solitons (Chapter in Springer book ... - Tripod

Photorefractive Solitons (Chapter in Springer book ... - Tripod

Photorefractive Solitons (Chapter in Springer book ... - Tripod

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 E. DelRe, M. Segev, D. Christodoulides, B. Crosignani, and G. Salamo<br />

component. It carries and conserves angular momentum, although its constituents<br />

exchange angular momentum as they propagate. The soliton turns<br />

out to be generically robust, so much that even dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>elastic collisions<br />

with other composite solitons, the collision products are predicted to be also<br />

composite rotat<strong>in</strong>g propeller solitons [115].<br />

The relatively ease with which vector and composite solitons are generated<br />

<strong>in</strong> photorefractives, by employ<strong>in</strong>g the mutual <strong>in</strong>coherence technique,<br />

has also led to a series of experimental efforts demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractioncollisions<br />

between vector solitons. It turns out that temporal optical vector<br />

solitons, and non-optical vector solitons are very difficult to generate, hence<br />

the collision experiments with optical spatial vector soliton were truly pioneer<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

For example, it has been predicted, more than two decades ago, that<br />

collisions between Manakov-like vector solitons give rise to a symmetric exchange<br />

of energy between the soliton constituents. This elegant phenomenon<br />

was observed only recently, with photorefractive vector (Manakov-like) solitons<br />

[116, 117]. The energy-exchanges between the soliton components (which<br />

have noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with photorefractive two-wave-mix<strong>in</strong>g) have direct implications<br />

<strong>in</strong> a new form of reversible comput<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> which a ”state” is coded<br />

as the ratio between the soliton components [118]. In this scheme, computation<br />

is performed through the energy-exchange <strong>in</strong>teractions (<strong>in</strong> which the<br />

”states” change) dur<strong>in</strong>g collisions between vector solitons. The experiments<br />

have shown that <strong>in</strong>deed, not only such symmetric energy exchanges do occur,<br />

but also <strong>in</strong>formation can be transferred through a series of cascaded collisions<br />

between vector solitons [116, 117].<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, photorefractives were also the means for experimental studies<br />

of <strong>in</strong>teraction-collisions between multi-mode solitons, <strong>in</strong> which shape transformations<br />

were observed [119]. These were the first ever experiments with<br />

collisions of multi-mode solitons.<br />

The general ideas beh<strong>in</strong>d multi-component vector solitons proved <strong>in</strong>valuable<br />

for later developments and <strong>in</strong> particular to the area of <strong>in</strong>coherent solitons<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />

10 Incoherent solitons: self-trapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

weakly-correlated wavepackets<br />

Until 1996, the commonly held belief was that all soliton structures should be<br />

<strong>in</strong>herently coherent entities. In that year however, an experiment carried out<br />

at Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton demonstrated beyond doubt that self-trapp<strong>in</strong>g of a partially<br />

spatially-<strong>in</strong>coherent light beam [42] is <strong>in</strong> fact possible, if the nonl<strong>in</strong>earity<br />

has a non-<strong>in</strong>stantaneous temporal response. In that experiment, the optical<br />

beam was quasi-monochromatic, but partially spatially-<strong>in</strong>coherent and the<br />

nonl<strong>in</strong>ear medium was photorefractive, with a response much slower than<br />

the characteristic time of the phase fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>coherent beam. The<br />

resultant self-trapped beam is now commonly referred to as an ”<strong>in</strong>coherent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!