05.03.2013 Views

Photorefractive Solitons (Chapter in Springer book ... - Tripod

Photorefractive Solitons (Chapter in Springer book ... - Tripod

Photorefractive Solitons (Chapter in Springer book ... - Tripod

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40 E. DelRe, M. Segev, D. Christodoulides, B. Crosignani, and G. Salamo<br />

11.4 Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear frequency conversion <strong>in</strong> waveguides <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />

photorefractive solitons<br />

The most promis<strong>in</strong>g application of waveguides <strong>in</strong>duced by photorefractive<br />

solitons is nonl<strong>in</strong>ear frequency conversion. The conversion efficiency <strong>in</strong> χ 2<br />

processes is proportional to the <strong>in</strong>tensity of the pump beam, so it is desirable<br />

to work with very narrow beams. One easy way to achieve that is to<br />

use a focused pump beam. However, <strong>in</strong> a bulk crystal, the more focused a<br />

beam is, the faster it diffracts, and diffraction limits the frequency conversion<br />

efficiency because as the <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g beams diffract, (1) their <strong>in</strong>tensities<br />

decrease, and (2) the phase-match<strong>in</strong>g condition cannot be satisfied across<br />

their entire cross section. Therefore, us<strong>in</strong>g waveguides for frequency conversion<br />

can greatly improve the conversion efficiency. But thus far it has been<br />

difficult to fabricate waveguides from most materials that allow for phase<br />

match<strong>in</strong>g, and two-dimensional waveguides are especially difficult to make.<br />

Now, (2+1)D photorefractive solitons <strong>in</strong>duce 2D waveguides, and almost all<br />

photorefractives are highly efficient <strong>in</strong> χ 2 frequency conversion. In waveguides,<br />

phase-match<strong>in</strong>g should take place among the propagation constants<br />

of the guided modes, and is typically obta<strong>in</strong>ed through birefr<strong>in</strong>gence or periodic<br />

pol<strong>in</strong>g. In a fabricated waveguide, however, the structure is fixed, so<br />

tun<strong>in</strong>g techniques rely on vary<strong>in</strong>g the temperature, or on lateral translation<br />

<strong>in</strong> structures with several periods of pol<strong>in</strong>g parallel to one other. But waveguides<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced by photorefractive solitons offer much flexibility because their<br />

waveguide structure and propagation axis (with respect to the crystall<strong>in</strong>e<br />

axes) can be modified at will and <strong>in</strong> real time. Work<strong>in</strong>g with photorefractive<br />

solitons, one can achieve wavelength tunability while avoid<strong>in</strong>g diffraction by<br />

simply rotat<strong>in</strong>g the crystal and launch<strong>in</strong>g a soliton <strong>in</strong> the new direction. One<br />

can also f<strong>in</strong>e-tune the frequency conversion process by chang<strong>in</strong>g the propagation<br />

constants of the guided modes through vary<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tensity ratio and<br />

external voltage, allow<strong>in</strong>g tun<strong>in</strong>g with no mechanical movements.<br />

The first step <strong>in</strong> the direction of nonl<strong>in</strong>ear frequency conversion <strong>in</strong> waveguides<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced by photorefractive solitons was the demonstration of efficient<br />

second-harmonic generation [168, 169, 170]. The experiment have shown that<br />

the conversion efficiency can be considerably <strong>in</strong>creased [168], and high tunability<br />

can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by rotat<strong>in</strong>g the crystal [169]. However, a much more<br />

important scenario occurs <strong>in</strong> a soliton-based optical parametric oscillator<br />

(OPO). In an OPO, the threshold pump power is dependent on the signal<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> per pass through the crystal. To lower the threshold, one has to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the signal ga<strong>in</strong> per pass. A waveguide that conf<strong>in</strong>es the pump beam<br />

as well as the signal and idler <strong>in</strong> a small area is one very effective way to<br />

achieve this. Consider a Gaussian beam at the pump frequency launched<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a nonl<strong>in</strong>ear crystal and assume that phase match<strong>in</strong>g is satisfied at the<br />

waist, located at the <strong>in</strong>put surface. The threshold pump power is proportional<br />

to [z0 arctan 2 (L/z0)+ln 2 (1 + L 2 /z 2 0)/4] −1 , where z0 is the Rayleigh<br />

(diffraction) length of the beam and L is the crystal length. For a given L,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!