20.03.2013 Views

Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project ...

Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project ...

Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Fennoscandian</strong> <strong>Lesser</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong> <strong>Goose</strong> <strong>conservation</strong> <strong>project</strong> – Annual report 1999<br />

Morozov: Surveys for <strong>Lesser</strong> <strong>White</strong>-<strong>fronted</strong> <strong>Goose</strong> in the Bolshezemelskaya Tundra, European Russia, in 1999<br />

Photo 2. Landscape view of the Polar Ural area. © Vladimir Morozov, 1999<br />

36<br />

– study breeding biology, productivity, habitat preferences and<br />

moult patterns;<br />

– collect feathers and blood samples for genetic analyses.<br />

2. Study areas<br />

The study was carried out in the eastern part of Bolshezemelskaya<br />

Tundra and the Polar Ural mountains, where LWfG were observed<br />

in the period 1984–93 (Morozov 1988, 1995). The study area is<br />

located in the southern tundra subzone within 67º30’–68º30’ N,<br />

60º00’–70º00’ E. It encompasses the basins of Bolshaya Rogovaya<br />

River and foothills of the Polar Ural. Co-ordinates of the Bolshaya<br />

Rogovaya River basin are 67º25’–67º36’ N, 62º01’–62º30’ E, and<br />

for Polar Ural areas: 67º02’–67º28’, N, 63º55’–65º10’ E.<br />

The landscape of the lowland tundras of Bolshaya Rogovaya<br />

River basin is hilly, and watersheds are usually flat and considerably<br />

swampy (Photo 1). Profusely meandering rivers occupy deep valleys<br />

and sometimes form steep slopes. Rivers flow usually slowly, and<br />

sandy or muddy banks prevail. In the watersheds there is a great<br />

number of lakes of different origin.<br />

The landscape of the Polar Ural is typically mountainous (Photo<br />

2). Watersheds in foothills are drier than those of lowland tundras.<br />

There are practically no lakes and areas dominated by mires are<br />

scarce. Rivers are of mountain character with rapid flow, stony<br />

bottoms and banks composed of rocks. Some river valleys form<br />

narrow canyons. The vegetation in the lowland tundra is similar to<br />

the vegetation in the mountains. Shrub tundras and dense bushes<br />

prevail everywhere within the study area. In these types of tundras,<br />

dwarf birch (Betula nana) and willows (Salix lanata, S. glauca, S.<br />

phylicifolia and S. lapponum) dominate. The shrubs reach 50-60 cm<br />

in height, and dense bushes of more than 2 m high grow along river<br />

and stream valleys. On the flood-plains there are small sedge and<br />

grassy meadows.<br />

3. Weather conditions<br />

In general 1999 was characterised by cold and wet weather. The<br />

spring came late, and in early June 80% of the area was covered by<br />

snow. Regularly the temperature fell below 0ºC. It was snowing<br />

practically every day, and frost at night occurred daily. By mid June,<br />

about 50% of the area was covered by snow. Due to a very cold<br />

winter, many rivers were frozen to the bottom. Drifting of ice<br />

observed 7–15 June, occurred only in large rivers, in small ones the<br />

water flowed on top of the melting ice. The lakes became ice-free<br />

after 5 July.<br />

The summer was cool, cloudy and rainy. From 1 July to 20 August<br />

only 20 days were without precipitation. Strong rain showers in<br />

August caused short time floods in the mountains and foothills. In<br />

total the breeding conditions were not favourable. Bean Geese started<br />

to breed late, the broods had few goslings and the percentage of<br />

non-breeding birds was relatively high. Apparently LWfG did not<br />

breed in one of the investigated areas because of the unfavourable<br />

weather conditions.<br />

4. Methods<br />

Transportation. Since the distance between the two study areas was<br />

more than 150 km, we rented a caterpillar truck, by which our team<br />

moved from Vorkuta to both study areas. During the spring flooding<br />

we used motorboat. In summer, when rivers became shallow, a rubber<br />

boat was used to drive along the large rivers (Usa and Bolshaya<br />

Rogovaya rivers). In the foothills of the Polar Ural we went by foot.<br />

Counts. We counted geese in order to reveal present distribution<br />

and numbers of LWfG within the study area. In the Usa and Bolshaya<br />

Rogovaya River valleys, the geese were counted by using motorboat<br />

in spring and rubber boat in summer. One field worker went by boat<br />

along the stream while two others moved by foot along each river<br />

bank. Watersheds and small streams were surveyed by walking.<br />

Attention was paid to traces of geese (footprints, feathers, excrements,<br />

grazing sites). The total length of the boat censuses was 320 km,<br />

and for counts by foot 440 km. The surveyed area in the Bolshaya<br />

Rogovaya River basin totalled 400 km2 , and the one in Polar Ural<br />

950 km2 . The surveyed area of the foothills of Polar Ural was 450

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!