20.03.2013 Views

Anne Hutchinson and the Puritan Attitude toward Women Author(s ...

Anne Hutchinson and the Puritan Attitude toward Women Author(s ...

Anne Hutchinson and the Puritan Attitude toward Women Author(s ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"<strong>the</strong> more grievous, in that she being a Woman of<br />

singular Prudence for <strong>the</strong> Management of Affairs,<br />

had taken off from her husb<strong>and</strong> all Secular Cares<br />

so that he wholly devoted himself to his Study, <strong>and</strong><br />

to Sacred Imployments." The Reverend Samuel Whiting's<br />

wife similarly "by her discretion freed her husb<strong>and</strong><br />

from all secular vocations." The people who, as a<br />

result, were burdened with Secular Cares <strong>and</strong>, con-<br />

versely, denied Sacred Imployment <strong>toward</strong> sanctifica-<br />

tion <strong>and</strong> justification, were <strong>the</strong> ministers' wives.<br />

Winthrop said of <strong>Anne</strong> <strong>Hutchinson</strong> that if she "had<br />

attended her household affairs, <strong>and</strong> such things as<br />

belong to women, <strong>and</strong> not gone out of her way <strong>and</strong><br />

calling to meddle in such things as are proper for<br />

men, she had kept her wits, <strong>and</strong> might have improved<br />

<strong>the</strong>m usefully <strong>and</strong> honorably in <strong>the</strong> place that God<br />

had set her." Those "proper things" evidently could<br />

be seen placing <strong>the</strong> ministers nearer to God, which<br />

was precisely <strong>the</strong> position <strong>Hutchinson</strong> denied <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

William <strong>Hutchinson</strong> was perverse in his devotion to<br />

Secular Cares <strong>and</strong> consequent freeing of his wife,<br />

<strong>Anne</strong>, for Sacred Imployments. He has been character-<br />

ized as "lacking in...dynamic <strong>and</strong> positive qualities,"<br />

<strong>the</strong> historians assuming <strong>the</strong> same sexual values as<br />

Winthrop. William <strong>Hutchinson</strong> was open <strong>and</strong> "strong"<br />

enough to accept his wife's intellectual qualities.<br />

<strong>Anne</strong> <strong>and</strong> William <strong>Hutchinson</strong> arrived in Boston in<br />

1634, <strong>and</strong> soon <strong>the</strong>ir home became a center for religious<br />

debate, <strong>the</strong> participants deadly serious in seeking a<br />

direct relationship with God. Included among <strong>the</strong>m<br />

was Sir Henry Vane, whose short governorship (1636-<br />

1637) interrupted Winthrop's. <strong>Anne</strong> <strong>Hutchinson</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

her followers accused all of <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts Bay<br />

ministers, except for John Cotton <strong>and</strong> John Wheelright,<br />

of preaching a "covenant of works," works being ways<br />

whereby men could <strong>the</strong>mselves earn salvation. Hutch-<br />

inson substituted a "covenant of grace," <strong>the</strong> simple<br />

--<strong>and</strong> arbitrary--bestowal of election by God without<br />

<strong>the</strong> recipient's effort, <strong>and</strong> beyond <strong>the</strong> imprimatur<br />

of <strong>the</strong> ministers. She drew large support in Boston,<br />

where Winthrop's smaller party was isolated. But<br />

Winthrop skillfully orchestrated his actions with<br />

those of <strong>the</strong> more conservative forces outside Boston.<br />

In early 1637 Wheelwright was convicted of contempt<br />

<strong>and</strong> sedition; <strong>the</strong>n Winthrop was re-elected Governor<br />

over Vane, who left for Engl<strong>and</strong>; <strong>and</strong> John Cotton<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!