21.03.2013 Views

Enhancing Surgical Care in BC - British Columbia Medical Association

Enhancing Surgical Care in BC - British Columbia Medical Association

Enhancing Surgical Care in BC - British Columbia Medical Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix<br />

Treat the Whole Me<br />

Patient Perspectives on the Perioperative Experience:<br />

A Focus Group Summary Report prepared by Patient Voices Network, Impact<strong>BC</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

At the request of the <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Association</strong>, the Patient Voices Network (PVN) conducted a focus group on Saturday<br />

February 26, 2011, to gather patient <strong>in</strong>put about surgical access and efficiency. Eight patient partners, resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> regions<br />

served by four prov<strong>in</strong>cial health authorities (Fraser Health Authority, Interior Health Authority, Northern Health Authority,<br />

and Vancouver Island Health) were identified by PVN to participate <strong>in</strong> the day-long focus group.<br />

The participants ranged <strong>in</strong> age, gender, cultural background, and personal surgical experience. The group <strong>in</strong>cluded males<br />

and females between the ages of 50 and 75 years, two of whom were from Aborig<strong>in</strong>al communities <strong>in</strong> <strong>BC</strong>. The range of<br />

surgical experiences <strong>in</strong>cluded both elective and emergency surgeries, specifically knee replacement surgeries, open heart<br />

surgery, cataract surgery, gynecological surgery, hernia repair, and lower leg amputation. Many of the participants also<br />

contributed to the discussion from their perspective as a caregiver or family member provid<strong>in</strong>g pre- and postoperative<br />

support to a loved one.<br />

Focus group participants identified six quality-related areas that could improve their perioperative experiences:<br />

1. Communication and <strong>in</strong>formation-shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2. Better plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

3. Patient <strong>in</strong>fluence/control vs. vulnerability<br />

4. Anxiety/fears vs. safety/security<br />

5. Responsibility (most responsible cl<strong>in</strong>ician)<br />

6. Patient feedback<br />

This summary report was shared with the participants, and their comments and recommendations were verified. However,<br />

patient names have been changed to protect the identity of the participants.<br />

Key F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

1. Improve quality of communication and <strong>in</strong>formation-shar<strong>in</strong>g at all stages of the perioperative<br />

process to ensure cont<strong>in</strong>uity of care<br />

Participants shared a number of negative experiences dur<strong>in</strong>g the discussion, and many of them po<strong>in</strong>ted to a lack of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g and breakdowns <strong>in</strong> communication processes among medical staff, and also between the patients or<br />

family members and medical staff.<br />

<strong>Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Surgical</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>BC</strong> – Appendix 38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!