22.03.2013 Views

Static Dispersing Glazing - Picture Framing Magazine

Static Dispersing Glazing - Picture Framing Magazine

Static Dispersing Glazing - Picture Framing Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Preservation Practices<br />

by Hugh Phibbs<br />

86 PFM _ December 2004<br />

<strong>Static</strong> <strong>Dispersing</strong> <strong>Glazing</strong><br />

<strong>Static</strong> electricity was not a major factor<br />

in picture framing, until acrylic<br />

sheet was introduced as a glazing<br />

material in the last century. Glass does<br />

have potential for holding a static charge,<br />

but is crystalline enough that its potential<br />

is low. Plastics are<br />

more amorphous, less<br />

crystalline, and that<br />

makes them much<br />

better at maintaining<br />

a static charge. When<br />

the surface of a plastic<br />

sheet is brushed with<br />

most anything soft,<br />

electrons will be left<br />

on its surface, creating<br />

the static field. This is<br />

especially true if the<br />

atmospheric conditions<br />

are dry. The static<br />

will attract any<br />

small particle that has<br />

a positive charge. This<br />

includes loose or friable media, flaking<br />

paint, or supports that have degrading<br />

surfaces.<br />

The attraction that a static charge can<br />

exert may extend for several inches; making<br />

it especially problematical for framing,<br />

since the planar nature of a picture frame<br />

makes it difficult to space the glazing far<br />

enough from the framed work to ensure<br />

that the reach of any static charge will not<br />

affect the framed item. Acrylic sheet has<br />

<strong>Static</strong> attracts any small<br />

particle that has a<br />

positive charge.<br />

This includes loose or<br />

friable media, flaking<br />

paint, or supports that<br />

have degrading surfaces.<br />

significant advantages for framing—lightweight,<br />

shatter-resistant, available with<br />

UV filtering components, and thermal<br />

insulation—and it should be a mainstay<br />

in any operation in which valuable items<br />

are framed. How can its static potential<br />

be addressed and<br />

how can the phenomenon<br />

of static<br />

in framing be<br />

understood?<br />

When glass<br />

became more<br />

widely available,<br />

with the advent of<br />

sheets made of<br />

flattened cylinders,<br />

works on paper<br />

were placed<br />

between the glass<br />

and a wooden<br />

backing board.<br />

This combination<br />

ensured the<br />

destruction of many of the items they<br />

enclosed. The wood emitted acids and<br />

peroxides and when sun shone through<br />

the glass, the temperature of the work on<br />

paper rose, before the glass warmed up.<br />

This meant that as moisture left the<br />

paper and the wood, behind it, that<br />

moisture might condense on the still<br />

cool glass.<br />

Tim Padfield, a British conservation<br />

scientist, has reasoned that the black


areas in the framed paper would heat up most rapidly,<br />

since dark materials absorb heat more than light ones<br />

and that such differential heating would result in a pattern<br />

that would show up in the salt that forms from the<br />

sodium that is driven from the glass by water. This pattern<br />

can be seen on glass that has been left on frames for<br />

many years. However, this salt will cling tightly to the<br />

glass and should not pose much of a physical problem<br />

for the framed paper. The static<br />

that built up on the glass would<br />

pose a problem for media such as<br />

pastel and charcoal, but physical<br />

contact and transfer were a<br />

greater threat.<br />

In the past, knowledge of this<br />

problem led to unusual techniques.<br />

For example, framers in<br />

the 19th century were well aware<br />

of the fact that pigment could<br />

transfer from the art design to the<br />

glass. They understood that the<br />

greatest risk came from the possibility<br />

that pigment might be<br />

moved from one part of the<br />

design to another, blurring it.<br />

One solution they had for this<br />

problem was placement of the<br />

pastel directly behind the glass.<br />

To ensure that there was minimal<br />

movement of pigment among parts of the drawing, they<br />

kept the pastel snug to the glass by placing cotton<br />

between the back of the paper and the wooden backing.<br />

Even though this resulted in a certain quantity of the<br />

pigment moving from the design to the glass, it guarded<br />

against loss of clarity in the design.<br />

Modern framing has used deep matting and spacers<br />

to address the contact transfer issue and until recently,<br />

went on the assumption that the static potential of glass<br />

was not a significant problem. That view was altered<br />

when staff at the Tate Gallery in London observed that<br />

the process of taking tape off of glass created a significant<br />

static charge. This meant that the tape that had<br />

been used to prevent shattered glass from coming loose,<br />

if there was breakage during shipment, presented a<br />

problem. In short, to maintain safety, the pastel would<br />

have to be unframed, before the tape could come off of<br />

the glass. Museums have used laminated glass to avoid<br />

both breakage and taping issues. Such glass has been<br />

88 PFM _ December 2004<br />

An anti-reflective,<br />

static dispersing acrylic<br />

can be cut with hand<br />

tools or a wall cutter.<br />

Cutting the material<br />

with a saw may cause<br />

some of the brittle<br />

surface coatings to chip.<br />

expensive and hard to work with, since few have had the<br />

ability to cut it to size.<br />

A simple solution to both problems comes from<br />

shatter-resistant acrylic sheet that has a static dispersing<br />

coating of metallic material on its surface. Both glass<br />

and acrylic can be coated with different materials, for<br />

different purposes. Alternating layers of silicates and<br />

titanium dioxide can be used to change the phase of<br />

reflected light as it leaves the glazing.<br />

This makes the reflected light opposite<br />

in phase to the incoming light<br />

and thus, the reflection is cancelled.<br />

This produces the anti-reflective<br />

coatings that are so useful for glazing<br />

dark items.<br />

There are two processes for<br />

applying such coatings. The sheets<br />

can be dipped in a bath and the<br />

material can be baked onto the surface.<br />

Such coatings can also be<br />

applied with an ionic sputter coater.<br />

The first process can only be done<br />

with glass, while the second process<br />

can be done with either glass or<br />

acrylic sheet. To keep the acrylic<br />

from warping at the elevated temperatures<br />

inside the sputter coater, the<br />

use of acrylic that has abrasion resistant<br />

coating on it has been shown to<br />

work well. If another coating of a metallic compound<br />

such as indium-tin oxide is added, these metal oxides<br />

disperse any static that the sheet may encounter, rendering<br />

it static free.<br />

<strong>Static</strong> dispersing acrylic can be found in sizes up to<br />

48"x96" and thicknesses as great as 1 /4". It is used in<br />

clean rooms, where critical scientific and technical tasks<br />

are carried out. (This product can be found in the<br />

online catalog of McMaster Carr.) Another, even more<br />

useful form of static dispersing acrylic comes 41"x71"<br />

and as thick as 3 /16"; it has the advantage of anti-reflectivity<br />

and it is available with UV filtration. This material<br />

was developed for use in flat screen electronic devices,<br />

where the potential for static is quite high and the<br />

client’s investment warrants the use of premium materials.<br />

This latter material is available from Tru Vue, under<br />

the name Optium. Both the non-UV filtering and UVfiltering<br />

sheets of Optium are available in 1 /8" and 3 /16"<br />

thicknesses; the thinner of the two can serve the needs


of framers well, since most of the material they handle<br />

will be kept upright and will not encounter the potential<br />

problem of sagging acrylic that flat storage can entail. In<br />

museums, where UV filtration is handled by filtering<br />

glazing in the building and the use of lighting sources<br />

that emit virtually no UV, workers can use the thicker<br />

and more stable 3 /16" variety, to avoid flexing of the<br />

acrylic during flat storage.<br />

This anti-reflective, static dispersing acrylic can be<br />

cut with hand tools or a wall cutter, while cutting it<br />

with a saw may cause some of the brittle surface coatings<br />

to chip. It can be cleaned with alcohol and water and<br />

since it has no static it is the easiest glazing one can find<br />

to fit.<br />

The potential of anti-reflective, static dispersing<br />

acrylic for high end preservation is profound since it<br />

combines several sought after attributes. Its anti-reflective<br />

property will enable its usage for materials, which<br />

owners or curators might otherwise be hesitant to glaze.<br />

Its static dispersing potential makes it safe for use with<br />

unfixed pastel and other difficult to store media. These<br />

media can now be safely kept in frames, whether on the<br />

90 PFM _ December 2004<br />

wall or on the darkened shelf. Its shatter-resistant<br />

strength means that it can serve as glazing for works<br />

that must be shipped.<br />

The complexities of making this anti-reflective,<br />

static dispersing acrylic are likely to prohibit significant<br />

decline in its price, but it is already less than half the<br />

price of low-iron, anti-reflective, laminated glass. As is<br />

the case with heat activated sealing foils, silica gel, and<br />

pollution scavenging materials, preservation framing<br />

benefits from technologies developed for other areas<br />

and we should be continually looking for other such<br />

useful adaptations as technologies evolve. ■<br />

Hugh Phibbs, Preservation Editor, is the coordinator of graphics<br />

conservation services in the Department of Exhibitions and Loans,<br />

Conservation Division, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.<br />

He has taught workshops for the National Conference, the AIC,<br />

PPFA, the conservation programs at Winterthur/University of<br />

Delaware, and the Smithsonian Resident Associates Program. He also<br />

compiled the matting and framing section of “The Book and Paper<br />

Group Outline.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!