RALPH WALDO EMERSON AND THE EVER-EVOLVING ART OF ...
RALPH WALDO EMERSON AND THE EVER-EVOLVING ART OF ...
RALPH WALDO EMERSON AND THE EVER-EVOLVING ART OF ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Every ship is a romantic object except that we sail in. Embark, and the romance<br />
quits our vessel, and hangs on every other sail in the horizon…Men seem to have<br />
learned of the horizon the perpetual retreating and reference. ‘Yonder uplands are<br />
rich pastrage, and my neighbor has fertile meadow, but my field,’ says the<br />
querulous farmer, ‘only holds the world together.’ I quote another man’s saying;<br />
unluckily, that other withdraws himself in the same way, and quotes me.<br />
(Emerson EXP 199)<br />
We have become accustomed to deferring to someone else’s language—and, therefore,<br />
their experiences—rather than affirming our own, as this alien vocabulary has a strange,<br />
seductive appeal to it by virtue of its being another’s. Simply residing in a quotation is<br />
only a “retreat and a reference”, and this is problematic because seeking shelter in<br />
another’s lexicon without examining its foundation elides the understanding that that very<br />
shelter is itself only a part of an infinite whole and one person’s “truth”. Earlier, in “Self-<br />
Reliance”, Emerson warns against these conclusions, declaring that, generally speaking,<br />
“Our reading is mendicant and sycophantic” (Emerson SR 129), but that this should not<br />
keep us from affirming that “If you are true, but not in the same truth with me, cleave to<br />
your companions; I will seek my own” (Emerson SR 131). Yet, in “Experience”,<br />
Emerson expresses the inability to “seek his own” truth for fear of not having a sufficient<br />
vocabulary, and it is clear his conception of language has evolved beyond the transparent<br />
model in “History” and the sublime multiplicity in “The Poet”.<br />
Indeed, Emerson’s language in “Experience” is constantly pushing against its<br />
denotative restrictions in an attempt to encapsulate the visceral feeling of loss and<br />
51