23.03.2013 Views

MODERN GREECE: A History since 1821 - Amazon Web Services

MODERN GREECE: A History since 1821 - Amazon Web Services

MODERN GREECE: A History since 1821 - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

154 RETURN TO DEMOCRACY (1974–2009)<br />

were elected in 1936 came largely from the urban centers, territories<br />

unified with Greece after 1912, and refugee communities after 1922.<br />

In the parliament of 1964, the territorial representation of the two major<br />

parties was more uniform, with deputies from urban centers, the “new”<br />

territories, and the refugee communities evenly distributed between<br />

right and center. Lawyers were again numerically dominant, with<br />

workers and farmers conspicuously absent on both sides of the House.<br />

Of the 107 right-wing coalition representatives elected in 1964, as many<br />

as 20 percent had begun their political careers in the Liberal camp,<br />

while only two of Conservative origin joined the ranks of the Center<br />

Union. In 1974, the center supplied New Democracy and the Panhellenic<br />

Socialist Movement (PASOK) with several of its former adherents.<br />

EDIK’s (the Union of Democratic Center) claim, therefore, that the<br />

Liberal camp was constantly renewing the ranks of other major parties<br />

was not without foundation. The outcome of the referendum to decide<br />

the future of the monarchy in Greece was perhaps more in keeping with<br />

the public mood for change. Although Karamanlis maintained a neutral<br />

stance vis-à-vis the issue in question, his silence was widely interpreted<br />

as a condemnation of the institution, which had destabilized Greek<br />

politics on several crucial occasions. The referendum of December 1974,<br />

which was the sixth to be held on the issue of the Crown in the twentieth<br />

century (1920, 1924, 1935, 1946, 1973), sealed the fate of the monarchy<br />

with 69 percent of the votes cast against the institution.<br />

The drafting of a new constitution incorporating changes that had<br />

emerged <strong>since</strong> the return to democracy, as well as the reformist visions<br />

of the prime minister, began in earnest after the referendum. With more<br />

than a two-thirds majority, Karamanlis introduced a draft constitution<br />

for discussion in Parliament at the end of December 1974 that provided<br />

for a strong presidential executive after the Gaullist model and was<br />

heavily criticized by those who were against any curtailment of the<br />

powers of Parliament.<br />

The constitution of 1975 replaced that of 1952 (which had been put<br />

into temporary force in the summer of 1974) and was the outcome of a<br />

compromise between Karamanlis’s bid for a presidential regime and<br />

those who upheld the prerogatives of Parliament. Among other changes<br />

it set out the legal framework of church–state relations. It removed the<br />

requirement that the president be Orthodox and swear to protect the<br />

Orthodox creed. The clause forbidding proselytism was moved from<br />

Article 3 to Article 13 on human rights “prohibiting proselytism against

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!