23.03.2013 Views

Muc Mhara Ireland's Smallest Whale - Marine Institute Open Access ...

Muc Mhara Ireland's Smallest Whale - Marine Institute Open Access ...

Muc Mhara Ireland's Smallest Whale - Marine Institute Open Access ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pinger spacing<br />

Next BIM set out to establish what number of pingers would be required on fishing gear. European<br />

legislation required pingers to be deployed at a maximum spacing of 200m, but the maximum<br />

effective spacing had yet to be determined and the sound characteristics of specific pinger models<br />

suggested that the spacing could be higher. The advantages of using less pingers include reductions<br />

in pollution from lost or damaged pingers, noise pollution and associated potential porpoise habitat<br />

limitation, and of course cost and handling for fishermen. Further trials on fishing vessels were<br />

carried out and by-catch rates in nets with pingers deployed at 200m, 600m and in control hauls<br />

with no pingers attached were compared. Aquamark 100 pingers supplied by Aquatech in the UK<br />

were deployed according to these categories on individual strings or stations of gear approximately<br />

4 km in length and careful watch was maintained when hauling gear to check for porpoise by-catch.<br />

As by-catch rates were low, the data were supplemented with control hauls from the pinger<br />

assessment trials during 2005 in order to take advantage of incidences of porpoise by-catch and to<br />

boost the power of analyses.<br />

Spacing results<br />

A total of 152 hauls/stations measuring 637km were carried out over 13 trips to sea for a total bycatch<br />

of 7 porpoises. No porpoises were caught in 27 stations with 600m spacing or in 22 stations<br />

with 200m so these groups were obviously not statistically different. A total of 7 porpoises were<br />

caught in 103 control stations but this group was not statistically different from either of the groups<br />

with pingers (Two sided Fishers exact chi squared test: P = 0.27). So although it appears that<br />

pingers do work at higher spacings, due to relatively low levels of porpoise by-catch it was not<br />

possible to scientifically prove this in Irish waters. A similar trial was carried in 2006 by the Danish<br />

<strong>Institute</strong> for Fisheries Research (DIFRES), in the Danish North Sea hake fishery where higher<br />

porpoise by-catch rates produced clear and conclusive results. A 100% reduction in porpoise bycatch<br />

rates was observed in nets with 455m spacing and a 78% reduction in by-catch in nets with<br />

585m spacing with no significant difference between pinger spacing groups (Larsen and Krog<br />

2007). Based on the research carried out by BIM and DIFRES the Irish government issued a<br />

derogation in June 2007 permitting an increase in the maximum spacing from 200m to 500m.<br />

Figure 2. Position of 152 hauls used in pinger spacing analysis. Porpoise by-catch points are<br />

represented by clear squares.<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Proceedings of the 2 nd IWDG International <strong>Whale</strong> Conference: <strong>Muc</strong> <strong>Mhara</strong> - Ireland’s smallest whale<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!